Long-term response after stopping tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative patients - FINITE study

Droplet digital PCR assay as an innovative and promising highly sensitive assay to unveil residual and cryptic HBV replication in peripheral compartment

Droplet digital PCR is an innovative and promising approach for highly sensitive quantification of nucleic acids that is being increasingly used in the field of clinical virology, including the setting of hepatitis B virus (HBV). Here, we comprehensively report a robust and reproducible ddPCR assay for the highly sensitive quantification of serum HBV-DNA. The assay showed a limit of detection of 4 copies/ml (<1IU/ml) by Probit analysis, showed a good linearity (R2 = 0.94) and a high intra- and inter-run reproducibility with differences between the values obtained in the same run or in two independent runs never exceeding 0.14logcopies/mL and 0.21logcopies/mL, respectively. By analysing serum samples from chronically HBV infected patients (mostly under antiviral treatment), ddPCR successfully quantified serum HBV-DNA in 89.8% of patients with detectable serum HBV-DNA < 20 IU/mL [equivalent to <112copies/ml] by classical Real-Time PCR assay, with a median (IQR) of 8(5-14)IU/mL [45(28-78)copies/ml], and in 66.7% of patients with undetectable serum HBV-DNA, with a median (IQR) of 5(4-9)IU/mL [28(20-50)copies/ml]. Similarly, by analysing serum samples from patients with a serological profile compatible with occult HBV infection (anti-HBc+/HBsAg-), ddPCR successfully quantified serum HBV-DNA in 40% of patients with a median (IQR) value of 1(1-2)IU/mL [5(5-11)copies/ml], in line with the extremely limited viral replication typically observed in occult HBV infection. Overall, the availability of assays for the highly sensitive quantification of serum HBV-DNA can provide an added value in optimizing the diagnosis of occult hepatitis B infection, improving the therapeutic management of chronically HBV infected patients, also in the light of innovative drugs (upcoming in clinical practise) aimed at achieving HBV functional cure.

The Human Male Liver Is Predisposed to Inflammation Via Enhanced Myeloid Responses to Inflammatory Triggers

Background & Aim

Men have a higher prevalence of liver disease. Liver myeloid cells can regulate tissue inflammation, which drives progression of liver disease. We hypothesized that sex alters the responsiveness of liver myeloid cells, predisposing men to severe liver inflammation.

Methods

Luminex was done on plasma from Hepatitis B Virus infected patients undergoing nucleoside analogue cessation in 45 male and female patients. We collected immune cells from the sinusoids of uninfected livers of 53 male and female donors. Multiparametric flow cytometry was used to phenotype and characterize immune composition. Isolated monocytes were stimulated with TLR ligands to measure the inflammatory potential and the expression of regulators of TLR signaling.

Results

We confirmed that men experienced more frequent and severe liver damage upon Hepatitis B Virus reactivation, which was associated with inflammatory markers of myeloid activation. No differences were observed in the frequency or phenotype of sinusoidal myeloid cells between male and female livers. However, monocytes from male livers produced more inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in response to TLR stimulation than female monocytes. We investigated negative regulators of TLR signaling and found that TOLLIP was elevated in female liver-derived monocytes

Conclusions

Our data show that enhanced responsiveness of myeloid cells from the male liver predisposes men to inflammation, which was associated with altered expression of negative regulators of TLR signaling.

Prediction of Sustained Response After Nucleo(s)tide Analogue Cessation Using HBsAg and HBcrAg Levels: A Multicenter Study (CREATE)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Predictors of successful nucleo(s)tide analogue (NA) therapy withdrawal remain elusive. We studied the relationship between end-of-treatment levels of hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and outcome after therapy cessation.

METHODS

Patients who discontinued NA therapy in centers in Asia and Europe were enrolled. HBcrAg and HBsAg were measured at treatment cessation, and associations with off-treatment outcomes were explored. The SCALE-B (Surface antigen, Core-related antigen, Age, ALT, and tenofovir for HBV) score was calculated as previously reported. End points included sustained virologic response (VR; hepatitis B virus DNA level <2000 IU/mL), HBsAg loss, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flares (>3× upper limit of normal). Re-treated patients were considered nonresponders.

RESULTS

We analyzed 572 patients, 457 (80%) were Asian and 95 (17%) were hepatitis B e antigen positive at the start of NA therapy. The median treatment duration was 295 weeks. VR was observed in 267 (47%), HBsAg loss was observed in 24 (4.2%), and ALT flare was observed in 92 (16%). VR (67% vs 42%) and HBsAg loss (15% vs 1.5%) was observed more frequently in non-Asian patients when compared to Asian patients (P < .001). Lower HBcrAg levels were associated with higher rates of VR (odds ratio [OR], 0.701; P < .001) and HBsAg loss (OR, 0.476; P < .001), and lower rates of ALT flares (OR, 1.288; P = .005). Similar results were observed with HBsAg (VR: OR, 0.812; P = .011; HBsAg loss: OR, 0.380; P < .001; and ALT flare: OR, 1.833; P < .001). Lower SCALE-B scores were associated with higher rates of VR, HBsAg loss, and lower rates of ALT flares in both Asian and non-Asian patients (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter study, off-treatment outcomes after NA cessation varied with ethnicity. Lower levels of HBcrAg and HBsAg were associated with favorable outcomes. A risk score comprising both factors can be used for risk stratification.

Biomarkers for predicting nucleos(t)ide analogs discontinuation and hepatitis B virus recurrence after drug withdrawal in chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM

To summarize HBV-related biomarkers predicting nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) discontinuation and hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after drug withdrawal in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, providing references for clinical medication, so as to manage CHB patients more scientifically.

METHODS

Related pieces of literature were retrieved in PubMed and the results were sorted out. We then analyzed and summarized these articles.

RESULTS

We found that HBV related biomarkers maybe could predict NAs withdrawal safely and the possibility of relapse after treatment cessation, including hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV DNA, HBV RNA, pregenomic-RNA (pgRNA), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), and models containing several indicators for predicting the effectiveness of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV DNA, HBV RNA, pgRNA, HBcrAg, anti-HBc, as well as the prediction models formed by several biomarkers could predict the safe discontinuation of NAs before HBsAg loss and recurrence.

Management and Treatment of Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: Towards Personalized Medicine

The currently available antiviral treatments (Peg-Interferon-α and Nucleos(t)ide Analogues, NA) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) achieve a functional cure (serum HBsAg and HDV-DNA clearance) of HBV infection in a limited number of patients. Nevertheless, the continuous pharmacological suppression of viral replication by NA halts liver disease progression lowering the risk of HCC development and improving the survival. In the near future, to fully exploit the potential of old and new drugs for HBV treatment a personalized approach to the patients will be required according to an accurate definition of their virologic, immunologic and clinical profile.

Clinical Utility of SCALE-B to Predict Hepatitis B Virus Relapse, Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss After Antiviral Cessation in Asian Patients After 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Discontinuation of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients leads to a higher hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss; yet, clinical relapse (CR) may occur. SCALE-B score was developed to predict off-treatment CR; however, validation of SCALE-B beyond a 48-week follow-up is rare. We studied whether SCALE-B and hepatitis B virus ribonucleic acid (HBV RNA) could predict outcomes in CHB patients after a 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 92 Thai CHB patients who stopped antiviral treatment were followed up; baseline characteristics, quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), and HBV RNA were collected at the time of discontinuation, and SCALE-B scores were calculated. Patients were followed up every 12 weeks for 48 weeks, and then, the intervals were upon primary doctors. Follow-up data regarding virological relapse (VR), CR, and HBsAg loss were obtained.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 142 weeks; the cumulative incidences of VR, CR, and HBsAg loss were 65.2, 33.7, and 7.6%, respectively. After 48 weeks, VR and CR plateaued, but HBsAg loss increased from 2.2 to 7.6%. According to the SCALE-B strata, VR, CR, and HBsAg loss were significantly different. The highest stratum (≥ 320) was associated with higher VR, CR, and lesser HBsAg loss when compared to the lowest stratum, with adjusted hazard ratios of 5.0 (95% CIs: 1.8-14.4), 10.44 (95% CIs: 1.4-79.1), and 0.04 (95% CIs: 0.004-0.43), respectively.

CONCLUSION

At a median follow-up of 2.5 years after discontinuing therapy, HBsAg loss in Thai patients was found to increase over time. SCALE-B is a valuable tool for predicting CR, VR, and HBsAg loss; HBV RNA is not significantly associated with long-term outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

[www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [TCTR20180316007].

HBsAg Loss as a Treatment Endpoint for Chronic HBV Infection: HBV Cure

Despite the availability of effective vaccines and antiviral therapy over the past two to three decades, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major global health threat as a leading cause of cirrhosis and liver cancer. Functional HBV cure defined as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss and undetectable serum HBV DNA is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with chronic HBV infection. However, spontaneous loss of HBsAg is rare and occurs in only 1% of all HBsAg-positive individuals annually. Furthermore, the rate of functional cure with currently available antiviral therapy is even lower, <1% patients on treatment per year. Nonetheless, HBsAg loss has become the new target or therapeutic endpoint for antiviral treatment. Recently, there has been much excitement surrounding the development of novel antiviral agents such as small interfering RNA (siRNA), core assembly modulators (CAMs), nucleic acid polymers (NAPs) among others, which may be used in combination with nucleos(t)ide analogs and possibly immunomodulatory therapies to achieve functional cure in a significant proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis B. Novel assays with improved sensitivity for detection of very low levels of HBsAg and to determine the source of HBsAg production will also be required to measure efficacy of newer antiviral treatments for HBV cure. In this narrative review, we will define HBV cure, discuss various sources of HBsAg production, evaluate rates of HBsAg loss with current and future antiviral agents, review clinical factors associated with spontaneous HBsAg loss, and explore clinical implications of functional cure.

[Treatment of parenterally transmittable viral hepatitis]

Die parenteral übertragbaren Hepatitiden B/D und C und deren Komplikationen sind sowohl weltweit als auch in Deutschland ein nicht zu unterschätzendes Problem. Aufgrund der hohen Dunkelziffer, einer weiteren Verbreitung, insbesondere durch Drogenmissbrauch, steigender Prävalenzen im Rahmen der Immigration sowie einer pandemiebedingten verzögerten Diagnostik stellt die Identifizierung der erkrankten und somit potenziell infektiösen Patienten eine große Herausforderung für das Gesundheitswesen dar. Therapeutisch stehen sowohl bei der Hepatitis B als auch der Hepatitis C hochwirksame, praktisch nebenwirkungsfreie Therapiekonzepte mit einer einmal täglichen Tabletteneinnahme zur Verfügung. Für die Hepatitis B handelt es sich in der Mehrzahl der Fälle um eine Dauertherapie zur Suppression der Replikation, während es bei der Hepatitis C innerhalb weniger Wochen zur Viruselimination kommt. Ein neues Therapiekonzept mit Hemmung der Virusaufnahme zur Behandlung der Hepatitis D steht seit September 2020 erstmals zur Verfügung. Für alle Patienten gilt, dass bei einem eingetretenen fortgeschrittenen Leberschaden oder gar einer Leberzirrhose langfristig eine weitere Überwachung insbesondere zum Ausschluss eines Leberzellkarzinoms notwendig ist.

Finite nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B: From an "option" to an "active recommendation"

Nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) including entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and tenofovir alafenamide may suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA profoundly but have no direct action on covalently closed circular DNA, which is a very stable template for HBV production. Therefore, decades of long-term Nuc therapy are required to maintain HBV suppression and to achieve hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients. However, there are concerns including financial burden, adherence, and willingness for indefinite long-term Nuc therapy. Patients lost to follow-up and hence not monitored may risk severe relapse that may deteriorate to hepatic decompensation or even hepatic failure. Cessation of Nuc therapy in HBeAg-negative patients was initially considered in early 2000s. Earlier findings in Asian patients that finite Nuc therapy over 2-3 years is feasible and safe have founded Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of Liver stopping rule since 2008. Subsequent studies have confirmed the feasibility and safety of the strategy of finite Nuc therapy, which has finally been accepted as "an option" by American and European liver associations since 2016. More recent large studies since 2018 have further confirmed the pivotal finding of greatly increased HBsAg loss rate (~5-year 39%) after stopping Nuc therapy. With the high HBsAg loss rate as the main justification, the paradigm shift from indefinite long-term therapy to finite Nuc therapy in HBeAg-negative patients has been changing from an "option" to an "active recommendation" aiming to achieve HBsAg loss. More studies are needed to fine-tuning the strategy, including research for the optimal duration of consolidation therapy, timing to stop, and to start retreatment.

Off-tenofovir hepatitis flares in HBeAg-negative patients occur earlier, more frequent and severe than those off-entecavir therapies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Clinical relapse occurs much earlier and more frequently in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after stopping tenofovir (TDF) therapy than those off-entecavir (ETV). Clinical relapse may subside or progress to hepatitis flare which poses a safety concern. This study compared the incidence, timing and severity of hepatitis flares after stopping TDF and ETV.

METHODS

HBeAg-negative CHB patients who had stopped ETV or TDF were included in the study. Off-therapy hepatitis flare patterns were compared between off-ETV and off-TDF patients before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

The off-therapy hepatitis flares occurred more frequently (2-year: 58% vs 38%, P < .001) and much earlier (12 vs. 38 weeks, P < .001) in TDF group, with higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (after PSM: 536 vs. 419 U/L, P = .020) and two times rate of hepatic decompensation (4.0% vs. 2.1%, P = .322). The cirrhotic status [aHR: 20.531 (2.645-159.365), P = .004] and off-TDF [aHR: 5.530 (1.728-17.694), P = .004] were two independent predictors for hepatic decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis flare occurred more frequently, earlier, and more severe in off-TDF than off-ETV patients. More stringent off-therapy monitoring within 6 months off-TDF is mandatory whereas more attention is needed after 6 months off-ETV.

Off-Therapy Response After Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Withdrawal in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B: An International, Multicenter, Multiethnic Cohort (RETRACT-B Study)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Functional cure, defined based on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, is rare during nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy and guidelines on finite NA therapy have not been well established. We aim to analyze off-therapy outcomes after NA cessation in a large, international, multicenter, multiethnic cohort of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

This cohort study included patients with virally suppressed CHB who were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative and stopped NA therapy. Primary outcome was HBsAg loss after NA cessation, and secondary outcomes included virologic, biochemical, and clinical relapse, alanine aminotransferase flare, retreatment, and liver-related events after NA cessation.

RESULTS

Among 1552 patients with CHB, cumulative probability of HBsAg loss was 3.2% at 12 months and 13.0% at 48 months of follow-up. HBsAg loss was higher among Whites (vs Asians: subdistribution hazard ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-16.8; P < .001) and among patients with HBsAg levels <100 IU/mL at end of therapy (vs ≥100 IU/mL: subdistribution hazard ratio, 22.5; 95% confidence interval, 13.1-38.7; P < .001). At 48 months of follow-up, Whites with HBsAg levels <1000 IU/mL and Asians with HBsAg levels <100 IU/mL at end of therapy had a high predicted probability of HBsAg loss (>30%). Incidence rate of hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma was 0.48 per 1000 person-years and 0.29 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Death occurred in 7/19 decompensated patients and 2/14 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The best candidates for NA withdrawal are virally suppressed, HBeAg- negative, noncirrhotic patients with CHB with low HBsAg levels, particularly Whites with <1000 IU/mL and Asians with <100 IU/mL. However, strict surveillance is recommended to prevent deterioration.

Hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment cessation in non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: A multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Scarce data exist on the effect of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) discontinuation on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHBe-). Therefore, we assessed whether HCC risk is increased in non-cirrhotic CHBe- patients who discontinue compared to those remaining on NAs.

METHODS

This cohort study included 650 consecutive non-cirrhotic Caucasian or Asian patients with CHBe- without a history of HCC who discontinued NAs after a median of 5 or 3 years (cases, n = 325; Caucasians: 143, Asians: 182) or remained on NA therapy beyond 5 or 3 years respectively (controls, n = 325; Caucasians: 223, Asians: 102). Propensity score (PS) 1:1 matching was applied to adjust for patients' origin, age and sex.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 44 months, HCC developed in 7/325 cases and 9/325 controls or 7/245 PS-matched cases and 7/245 PS-matched controls with 5-year cumulative HCC incidence of 5.1% and 4.9% respectively (log-rank, P = .836). No difference in 5-year HCC risk was observed between cases and controls of Caucasian (3.0% vs 4.8%; log-rank, P = .510) or Asian origin (1.3% vs 2.2%; log-rank, P = .873). In both cases and controls, HCC incidence was independently associated with age and PAGE-B score. In cases alone, HCC development after NA discontinuation was associated only with pretreatment platelet counts and PAGE-B score, but not with any type of relapse or HBsAg loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that discontinuation of effective long-term NA therapy in non-cirrhotic CHBe- patients are not associated with increased HCC risk, which is not affected by post-NA relapses and/or HBsAg loss.

Current Trend in Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B

Since active hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication is the key driver of hepatic necroinflammation and disease progression, the treatment aim of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is to suppress HBV replication permanently to prevent hepatic decompensation, liver cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma and prolong survival. Currently, pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN), entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are the first-line drugs of choice. Peg-IFN therapy has been used rarely due to its subcutaneous injection and significant side effect profile. Once daily oral ETV, TDF and TAF can suppress HBV DNA profoundly but have no direct action on cccDNA of the HBV-infected hepatocytes, hence continuing long-term therapy is usually needed to maintain HBV suppression, but the ultimate goal of HBsAg loss was rarely achieved (10 year 2%). In addition, long-term NUC therapy comes with several concerns such as increasing cost, medication adherence and loss-to-follow-up. Studies, mainly from Taiwan, have shown that finite NUCs therapy of two to three years in HBeAg-negative patients is feasible, safe and has a great benefit of much increasing HBsAg loss rate up to 30%/5 year. These have led an emerging paradigm shift to finite NUC therapy in HBeAg-negative patients globally. However, off-NUC relapse with hepatitis B flares may occur and have a risk of decompensation or even life-threatening outcomes. Therefore, proper monitoring, assessment, and retreatment decisions are crucial to ensure safety. Ideally, retreatment should be not too late to ensure safety and also not too early to allow further immune response for further HBsAg decline toward HBsAg loss. Assessment using combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics during hepatitis flare is better than biochemical markers alone to make a right retreatment decision. The strategy of finite NUC therapy has set a benchmark of high HBsAg loss rate to be achieved by the new anti-HBV drugs which are under preclinical or early phase study.

Outcomes of Cessation of Antiviral Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

Data on the efficacy and duration of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) therapies to prevent the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients are scarce and heterogeneous. This study aimed to summarize the clinical and laboratory results of the patients with CHB infection who discontinued oral antiviral therapy.

Methods

A single-centered cohort study was conducted with CHB infection. NUCs were discontinued in patients who were under viral suppression for at least two years with undetectable HBV DNA levels for 18 months. Risk factors for clinical relapse (CR) were evaluated.

Results

A total of 77 patients were recruited. HBeAg status showed that 9.4% of the patients underwent HBeAg seroconversion with NUCs. HBeAg reversion was noted in four (31%) of these patients. Severe hepatitis, which resolved after antiviral therapy was restored, was reported in two out of 77 patients (4%). None of the patients with CR had clinical or biological signs of hepatic decompensation or died during the study period.

Conclusions

We found no benefits of the discontinuation of antiviral therapy after viral suppression in patients with initially severe fibrotic HBV infection. In patients with mild to moderate fibrosis, cessation of antiviral treatment is not associated with adverse outcomes.

Clinical management of chronic hepatitis B: A concise overview

Worldwide, over 250 million people are chronically infected with the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Infected patients have an up to 100-fold increased risk for liver-related complications, including cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Nonetheless, the majority of the infections remains asymptomatic, stressing the importance of HBV screening and linkage to care. Excellent clinical outcomes are seen during nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy, which often is continued indefinitively due to a lack of functional cure. Increasing evidence suggests that NA discontinuation following long-term treatment induced viral suppression in patients without a functional cure may be a favourable option. Reliable biomarkers are, however, urgently needed to select the patients that would benefit from NA withdrawal. In addition, renewed and novel approaches to improve screening and linkage to care are other fundamental factors in the optimisation of the clinical management of chronic hepatitis B.

Prospective Study of Withdrawal of Antiviral Therapy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B after Prolonged Virological Response

Nucleoside analogue (NA) therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is associated with improved clinical outcomes, but usually requires long-term use. Whether treatment can be safely withdrawn and the factors associated with post-withdrawal outcome are not well defined. To assess long-term outcomes after stopping antiviral therapy, patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative CHB who had received antiviral therapy for 4 or more years with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (≤100 IU/mL) were prospectively withdrawn from antiviral therapy and monitored monthly for the initial 6 months and every 3 months thereafter. Those with clinical relapse were retreated according to severity of relapse. Fifteen patients were withdrawn from lamivudine (4), adefovir (5), or a combination of the two (6) after a mean treatment duration of 8.4 years. The mean age was 45 years, 13 were male, and 8 were initially HBeAg-positive before treatment. After a mean follow-up of 6.6 years, outcomes differed by pretreatment HBeAg status. All patients who were HBeAg+ before treatment experienced virological relapse (8 of 8); 6 of 8 experienced clinical relapse; 4 of 8 had ALT flares; 5 of 8 required re-initiation of treatment, one of whom cleared hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg); and 3 of 8 remained off treatment, one of whom cleared HBsAg. In contrast, 4 of 7 patients who were HBeAg-negative before treatment experienced virological relapse, 3 of 7 experienced clinical relapse, and 1 of 7 had an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flare. None restarted treatment, and 4 of 7 cleared HBsAg. Low pre-withdrawal HBsAg level was predictive of HBsAg loss. Conclusion: NA therapy can be safely withdrawn with long-term remission and high rates of HBsAg loss in most HBeAg-negative patients without cirrhosis. Patients who were initially HBeAg+ should not be withdrawn from treatment, because clinical relapse was frequent and often severe.

Highly significant differences in HBsAg kinetics among patients with two types of hepatitis B flare, with and without retreatment

BACKGROUND

Off-therapy hepatitis flare may be detrimental or, conversely, facilitate hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decline. Retreatment decisions are crucial.

METHODS

HBsAg was quantified before and during flares, at peak/retreatment start and at Months 6 and 12 in 336 entecavir/tenofovir-retreated and 105 non-retreated hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients. Increasing HBsAg during ALT flare defined a 'virus-dominating flare' and decreasing HBsAg a 'host-dominating flare'.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-eight retreated patients with a virus-dominating flare showed greater 1 year HBsAg decline (-1.0 versus -0.01 log10 IU/mL; P < 0.0001), more frequent rapid decline (69.8% versus 8.3%; P < 0001) and higher 3 year incidence of HBsAg < 100 IU/mL (32% versus 12%; P = 0.026) than 48 patients with a host-dominating flare, of whom 16 (33.3%) showed 3.8-fold (2 to 52-fold) HBsAg rebound on retreatment (versus 2/288; P < 0.0001). Compared with non-retreated controls, 1 year HBsAg decline was greater (-1.0 versus -0.47 log10 IU/mL; P < 0.0001) and faster (69.8% versus 42.5%; P < 0.0001) in patients with a virus-dominating flare, whereas 1 year HBsAg decline (-0.01 versus -0.16 log10 IU/mL) and 3 year HBsAg loss rate (0% versus 21%; P = 0.009) were lower in patients with a host-dominating flare.

CONCLUSIONS

Entecavir/tenofovir retreatment effectively decreases HBsAg level in patients with a virus-dominating flare but is ineffective/worse in patients with a host-dominating flare. These results support the use of combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics for the decision to retreat patients with a virus-dominating flare and withhold retreatment for patients with a host-dominating flare.

Risks and Benefits of Discontinuation of Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Treatment: A Treatment Concept for Patients With HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B

Systematic discontinuation of long-term treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) is one strategy to increase functional cure rates in patients with chronic hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative hepatitis B. Currently, available study results are heterogeneous; however, long-term hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss rates of up to 20% have been reported in prospective trials. This review proposes criteria that can be used when considering NA discontinuation in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV). Discontinuing NA treatment frequently results in a virologic and biochemical relapse that runs through different phases: the lag phase, reactivation phase, and consolidation phase. The HBV-DNA flares observed during the reactivation phase are often transient and most likely represent a trigger for inducing a long-term immune control by specific CD8+ T cells, and therefore do not need immediate interventions but close follow-up evaluation. Low HBsAg levels at the time of treatment cessation predict a positive long-term response to NA discontinuation associated with a higher likelihood of HBsAg clearance. Other host and viral biomarkers are currently under evaluation that may prove to be helpful to further characterize the population that may benefit most from the finite NA treatment concept. Potential harmful biochemical flares during the reactivation phase need to be identified early and can be effectively terminated by reintroducing NA treatment. Hepatic decompensation represents a risk to patients with cirrhosis undergoing NA discontinuation. Therefore, the finite NA approach should only be considered after excluding advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis and if a close follow-up of the patient and supervision by an experienced physician can be guaranteed. Conclusion: For selected patients, NA discontinuation has become a powerful tool to achieve control over HBeAg-negative HBV infections. Its significant effect represents a challenge to novel treatment approaches, but it may also serve as their enhancer.

Critical Updates on Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in 2021

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global healthcare burden in the form of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer. There is no definite cure for the virus and even though extensive vaccination programs have reduced the burden of liver disease in the future population, treatment options to eradicate the virus from the host are still lacking. In this review, we discuss in detail current updates on the structure and applied biology of the virus in the host, examine updates to current treatment and explore novel and state-of-the-art therapeutics in the pipeline for management of chronic HBV. Furthermore, we also specifically review clinical updates on HBV-related acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). Current treatments for chronic HBV infection have seen important updates in the form of considerations for treating patients in the immune tolerant phase and some clarity on end points for treatment and decisions on finite therapy with nucleos(t)ide inhibitors. Ongoing cutting-edge research on HBV biology has helped us identify novel target areas in the life cycle of the virus for application of new therapeutics. Due to improvements in the area of genomics, the hope for therapeutic vaccines, vector-based treatments and focused management aimed at targeting host integration of the virus and thereby a total cure could become a reality in the near future. Newer clinical prognostic tools have improved our understanding of timing of specific treatment options for the catastrophic syndrome of ACLF secondary to reactivation of HBV. In this review, we discuss in detail pertinent updates regarding virus biology and novel therapeutic targets with special focus on the appraisal of prognostic scores and treatment options in HBV-related ACLF.

The Impact of Nucleos(t)ide Analogs Off-Therapy Among Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Aim: Although most chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients achieve effective virological suppression after receiving long-term nucleos(t)ide analogs (Nucs) therapy, the safety of off-therapy is controversial under the monitor.

Methods: We identified studies through searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 1990 to February 2021. The eligible studies compare the long outcomes between discontinued and continued Nucs treatments groups among CHB patients. This study was conducted to investigate long-term outcomes, including biochemical, serological, and virological outcomes, as well as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development rate between discontinued and maintained Nucs therapy groups among CHB patients.

Results: Five eligible studies covering 1,425 patients were selected for meta-analysis. Our result exhibits that patients with Nucs off-treatment have a higher risk of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flares-up than those who continued Nucs therapy under the monitor (OR = 9.39, 95%CI = 3.87–22.78). Nucs off-therapy patients have a higher virological bound incidence (OR = 617.96, 95%CI = 112.48–3,395.14) and a higher HBV DNA level (OR = 9.39, 95%CI = 3.87–22.78) than those who continued Nucs therapy. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of hyperbilirubinaemia, hepatic decompensation, and HCC development between both two groups. Patients in Nucs off-therapy group demonstrate a higher HBsAg loss rate than those in the continued group (OR = 7.10, 95%CI = 6.68–13.69).

Conclusions: Nucs off-therapy patients may exhibit a higher chance of achieving HBsAg loss than those who continue Nucs therapy. It requires close monitoring after Nucs off-therapy and timely restarting of Nucs therapy when ALT concentrations increase.

Challenges in the discontinuation of chronic hepatitis B antiviral agents

Long-term antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients has been proven to be beneficial in reducing liver-related complications. However, lengthy periods of daily administration of medication have some inevitable drawbacks, including decreased medication adherence, increased cost of treatment, and possible long-term side effects. Currently, discontinuation of antiviral agent has become the strategy of interest to many hepatologists, as it might alleviate the aforementioned drawbacks and increase the probability of achieving functional cure. This review focuses on the current evidence of the outcomes following stopping antiviral treatment and the factors associated with subsequent hepatitis B virus relapse, hepatitis B surface antigen clearance, and unmet needs.

Towards eradication of HBV: Treatment approaches and status of clinical trials

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and its sequelae remain a global health challenge. Current treatments are effective in controlling HBV replication, but complete eradication or 'cure' of HBV remains a rare event and is difficult to assess because of the intrahepatic reservoir of covalently closed circular DNA. Based on the understanding of the HBV life cycle and the deciphering of immune responses to HBV, therapeutic strategies to target HBV eradication are in principle possible. This article reviews current developments in new therapies aimed at HBV cure.

HBeAg-positive patients with HBsAg < 100 IU/mL and negative HBV RNA have lower risk of virological relapse after nucleos(t)ide analogues cessation

BACKGROUND

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) cessation is not widely practiced and remains a controversial, but highly relevant subject in patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). We aimed to explore the related factors for safe NAs cessation.

METHODS

This is a multicenter prospective cohort study. Overall, 139 initially HBV e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients meeting the stopping criteria were included in 12 hospitals in China. Enrolled patients ceased NAs and were followed up every 3 months for 24 months or until clinical relapse (CR).

RESULTS

The 24 month cumulative rates of virological relapse (VR), CR, HBeAg reversion and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) loss were 50.4, 24.5, 11.5 and 9.4%, respectively. Patients with end of treatment (EOT) HBsAg  < 100 IU/mL plus negative HBV RNA had the lowest 24 month cumulative VR rate (5 vs 58%, p < 0.001). EOT HBsAg  ≥ 2 log10 IU/mL [odds ratio (OR) = 6.686, p = 0.006], EOT positive HBV RNA (OR = 3.453, p = 0.008) and EOT hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg)  ≥ 4log U/mL (OR = 3.702, p = 0.002) were found to independently predict the risk of VR. To predict VR, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) value of the EOT HBsAg  < 100 IU/mL plus EOT HBV RNA negative was 0.698 (p < 0.001), which was higher than other parameters alone or combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

NAs cessation is suitable only for a small and selected patients. An EOT HBsAg  < 100 IU/mL and EOT negative HBV RNA identified a patient with low risk of off-treatment VR.

Discontinuation of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients

Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUC) are the first-line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) recommended by most current guidelines. NUC therapy decreases progression of liver disease, reduces the risk of liver-related complications, and improves the quality of life of patients with CHB. Although indefinite or long-term NUC therapy is usually recommended, this strategy raises several concerns, such as side-effects, adherence, costs, and patient willingness to stop therapy. Recent data showed the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of stopping antiviral therapy in carefully selected CHB patients, leading to its incorporation in international guidelines. Patients who discontinue NUC have a higher likelihood of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss compared to patients who continue on therapy. Recommendations pertaining endpoints allowing safety discontinuation of NUC therapy differ among international guidelines. For hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, durable HBeAg seroconversion is considered an acceptable treatment endpoint. For HBeAg-negative patients, some guidelines propose undetectability hepatitis B virus DNA for at least 2 or 3 years, while others consider HBsAg loss as the only acceptable endpoint. CHB patients who stop therapy should remain under strict clinical and laboratorial follow-up protocols to detect and manage relapses in a timely manner. No reliable predictor of relapse has been consistently identified to date, although quantitative HBsAg has been increasingly studied as a reliable biomarker to predict safe NUC discontinuation.

The times they are a-changing - A refined proposal for finite HBV nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy

Although discontinuation of nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) treatment before HBsAg loss is part of all current HBV treatment guidelines for HBeAg-positive patients who achieve HBeAg seroconversion, a treatment endpoint known to be associated with silencing of HBV transcriptional activity and restoration of HBV-specific immune control, whether it is even appropriate to consider NA discontinuation before HBsAg loss in the HBeAg-negative phase remains highly controversial. Despite the growing evidence that a relevant, albeit small, proportion of patients with HBeAg-negative disease can be cured by stopping NA treatment, the fear of discontinuation-associated relapse and the uncertainty of how to predict off-therapy response and monitor patients after discontinuation have generated scepticism and subsequently led to low implementation of this concept in the clinic. In this article, we propose a concept in which NA discontinuation-associated relapse is an integral part of the stop-to-cure approach and ultimately the trigger for achieving HBsAg loss. However, the relapse in this sense becomes functionally effective only if HBV-specific immune reinvigoration and silencing of HBV transcriptional activity have been achieved during the NA treatment period. The probability of functional cure and the severity of post-discontinuation flares depend on the underlying baseline transcriptional activity of HBV when NA therapy was started, as well as the duration of NA treatment, both factors that should be considered as we move towards individualised approaches to HBV cure.

APASL guidance on stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is currently incurable. Long-term treatment with potent and safe nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) can reduce hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis-related complications through profound viral suppression. However, indefinite therapy raises several crucial issues with pros and cons. Because seroclearance of hepatitis B surface (HBsAg) as functional cure is not easily achievable, a finite therapy including sequential 48-week pegylated interferon therapy may provide an opportunity to facilitate HBsAg seroclearance by the rejuvenation of exhausted immune cells. However, the cost of stopping NA is the high incidence of virological relapse and surge of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, which may increase the risk of adverse outcomes (e.g., decompensation, fibrosis progression, HCC, or liver-related mortality). So far, the APASL criteria to stop NA treatment is undetectable HBV DNA levels with normalization of ALT; however, this criterion for cessation of treatment is associated with various incidence rates of virological/clinical relapse and more than 40% of NA-stoppers eventually receive retreatment. A very intensive follow-up strategy and identification of low-risk patients for virological/clinical relapse by different biomarkers are the keys to stop the NA treatment safely. Recent studies suggested that decreasing HBsAg level at the end-of-treatment to < 100-200 IU/mL seems to be a useful marker for deciding when to discontinue NAs therapy. In addition, several viral and host factors have been reviewed for their potential roles in predicting clinical relapse. Finally, the APASL guidance has proposed rules to stop NA and the subsequent follow-up strategy to achieve a better prognosis after stopping NA. In general, for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients who have stopped treatment, these measurements should be done every 1-3 months at the minimum until 12 months.

Changes in the Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Level According to the HBeAg Status and Drug Used in Long-term Nucleos(t)ide Analog-treated Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Backgrounds/Aims

The HBsAg levels have been used to monitor the chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment response to antiviral therapy. On the other hand, it is unclear if the HBsAg quantification levels at each treatment point differ according to the HBeAg status and drug in CHB patients. This study compared the changes in HBsAg in CHB patients according to the HBeAg status and treatment drugs.

Methods

CHB patients with at least 1 year of follow-up treatment with one drug, either entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir (TDF), were enrolled in this study. The mean HBsAg levels were measured annually for up to 6 years. A linear mixed model was used to compare the HBsAg quantification levels during the follow-up period. An independent samples t-test was used to analyze the differences in the HBsAg quantification levels at each treatment time point.

Results

Ninety-seven patients were enrolled in this study; 59 among them were HBeAg-positive. Two patients in the TDF group achieved HBsAg seroconversion. The HBsAg level decreased during the follow-up in the ETV and TDF groups. The HBsAg level was lower in the TDF group than the ETV group during the follow-up. On the other hand, subgroup analysis showed that this trend was the same only in the HBeAg-negative patients, not in the HBeAg-positive patients. In the HBeAg-negative patients, HBsAg level in the TDF group was significantly lower than that in the ETV group at 36, 48, and 72 months. The change in HBsAg level from the baseline increased at a decreasing rate during the follow-up in both groups. Furthermore, the change in the HBsAg level in the TDF group was significantly larger than that of the ETV group at 36 months in the HBeAg-negative patients.

Conclusions

Although TDF might be more efficient than ETV in reducing the HBsAg level in HBeAg-negative patients in a few years, HBsAg seroconversion occurred very rarely. A further large-scale, long-term study will be needed to confirm the antiviral effects on the HBsAg level.

Therapeutic vaccination for treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B infection remains a serious global health threat, contributing to a large number of deaths through liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Current treatment does not eradicate disease, and therefore new treatments are urgently needed. In acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) a strong immune response is necessary to clear the virus, but in chronic infection the immune response is weakened and dysfunctional. Therapeutic vaccination describes the process of inoculating individuals with a non‐infective form of viral antigen with the aim of inducing or boosting existing HBV‐specific immune responses, resulting in sustained control of HBV infection. In this review we outline the rationale for therapeutic vaccination in chronic HBV infection, discuss previous and ongoing trials of novel HBV therapeutic vaccine candidates and outline strategies to improve vaccine efficacy going forward.

Hepatitis B cure: How and when

BACKGROUND

First- and second- generation new treatments are being evaluated to provide a cure for hepatitis B. The life cycle of HBV includes several well- categorized steps that are targets for new treatments. A cure remains a major challenge even if it is measured by HBsAg seroclearance alone. The notion of a functional cure of hepatitis B has been accepted, while a partial functional cure has been more tentatively defined as a decline in HBsAg concentrations to lower levels after finite treatment.

METHODS

More profound suppression of hepatitis B replication through the addition of capsid inhibitors with nucleoside analogues could improve patient prognosis and a sustained treatment response. Several strategies are being evaluated to achieve a cure: (a) deepening inhibition of HBV replication or (b) a reduction in HBsAg presentation for HBsAg seroclearance.

RESULTS

Fortunately, there are signs of important progress in the treatment of hepatitis B including improved on- treatment reductions or seroclearance of HBsAg in phase 2 studies that was not achieved with chain terminators and inhibitors of initiation of DNA synthesis. Progress in immunomodulatory therapy has lagged behind that of antiviral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the multilayered impaired and dysfunctional immune response in hepatitis B is perhaps more likely and feasible after a reduction in host antigen burden. Other potential experimental strategies include CRISPR- Cas9 genome- editing nucleases to specifically target and cleave cccDNA or novel monoclonal antibodies.

Novel Biomarkers of Hepatitis B Virus and Their Use in Chronic Hepatitis B Patient Management

Even though an approved vaccine for hepatitis B virus (HBV) is available and widely used, over 257 million individuals worldwide are living with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who require monitoring of treatment response, viral activity, and disease progression to reduce their risk of HBV-related liver disease. There is currently a lack of predictive markers to guide clinical management and to allow treatment cessation with reduced risk of viral reactivation. Novel HBV biomarkers are in development in an effort to improve the management of people living with CHB, to predict disease outcomes of CHB, and further understand the natural history of HBV. This review focuses on novel HBV biomarkers and their use in the clinical setting, including the description of and methodology for quantification of serum HBV RNA, hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg), including ultrasensitive HBsAg detection, quantitative anti-hepatitis B core antigen (qAHBc), and detection of HBV nucleic acid-related antigen (HBV-NRAg). The utility of these biomarkers in treatment-naïve and treated CHB patients in several clinical situations is further discussed. Novel HBV biomarkers have been observed to provide critical clinical information and show promise for improving patient management and our understanding of the natural history of HBV.

Viral and immune factors associated with successful treatment withdrawal in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Factors associated with a successful outcome upon nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) treatment withdrawal in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients have yet to be clarified. The objective of this study was to analyse the HBV-specific T cell response, in parallel with peripheral and intrahepatic viral parameters, in patients undergoing NA discontinuation.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients without cirrhosis with HBeAg-negative CHB with complete viral suppression (>3 years) were studied prospectively. Intrahepatic HBV-DNA (iHBV-DNA), intrahepatic HBV-RNA (iHBV-RNA), and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) were quantified at baseline. Additionally, serum markers (HBV-DNA, HBsAg, HBV core-related antigen [HBcrAg] and HBV-RNA) and HBV-specific T cell responses were analysed at baseline and longitudinally throughout follow-up.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 34 months, 22/27 patients (82%) remained off-therapy, of whom 8 patients (30% of the total cohort) lost HBsAg. Baseline HBsAg significantly correlated with iHBV-DNA and iHBV-RNA, and these parameters were lower in patients who lost HBsAg. All patients had similar levels of detectable cccDNA regardless of their clinical outcome. Patients achieving functional cure had baseline HBsAg levels ≤1,000 IU/ml. Similarly, an increased frequency of functional HBV-specific CD8+ T cells at baseline was associated with sustained viral control off treatment. These HBV-specific T cell responses persisted, but did not increase, after treatment withdrawal. A similar, but not statistically significant trend, was observed for HBV-specific CD4+ T cell responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased cccDNA transcription and low HBsAg levels are associated with HBsAg loss upon NA discontinuation in patients with HBeAg-negative CHB. The presence of functional HBV-specific T cells at baseline are associated with a successful outcome after treatment withdrawal.

LAY SUMMARY

Nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy can be discontinued in a high proportion of chronic hepatitis B patients without cirrhosis. The strength of HBV-specific immune T cell responses may contribute to successful viral control after antiviral treatment interruption. Our comprehensive study provides in-depth data on virological and immunological factors than can help guide individualised therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Role of serum HBV RNA and hepatitis B surface antigen levels in identifying Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B suitable for entecavir cessation

BACKGROUND

Treatment cessation in chronic HBV infection may be durable in certain patient subgroups before hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance. The role of serum HBV RNA in determining treatment cessation suitability has not been well-investigated.

METHODS

Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) treatment was discontinued in non-cirrhotic patients with chronic HBV with serum HBsAg <200 IU/mL and fulfilling internationally recommended criteria for treatment cessation. Patients were monitored till 48 weeks with baseline and serial measurements of serum HBsAg, HBV RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen. NUCs were resumed when HBV DNA reaches >2000 IU/mL regardless of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels.

RESULTS

114 entecavir-treated patients (median age 58.4 years, median serum HBsAg 54.4 IU/mL) with median treatment duration of 6.7 years were recruited. The 48-week cumulative rate of HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL was 58.1%. End-of-treatment serum HBV RNA and off-treatment serial HBV RNA were both independently associated with HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL (HR 2.959, 95% CI 1.776 to 4.926, p<0.001; HR 2.278, 95% CI 1.151 to 4.525, p=0.018, respectively). Patients with HBV RNA ≥44.6 U/mL had a cumulative 48-week rate of 93.2%, while combining HBV RNA undetectability and HBsAg <10 IU/mL had a cumulative 48-week rate of 9.1%. 24 patients (38.7%) developed off-treatment ALT elevation, highest peak ALT was 1515 U/L. 8 patients (median serum HBsAg 2.6 IU/mL) developed HBsAg seroclearance.

CONCLUSION

Serum HBV RNA measurement is essential for deciding on entecavir cessation in patients with chronic HBV, especially with low HBsAg levels. Patients can be stratified on their risk of off-treatment relapse based on both viral determinants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02738554.

Combining Hepatitis B Virus RNA and Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen: Guidance for Safely Stopping Nucleos(t)ide Analogues in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Safe nucleos(t)ide analogue discontinuation in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is an unmet need. We aimed to investigate whether combining hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) could perform satisfactorily in predicting off-treatment outcomes.

METHODS

The evaluation cohort included 127 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients from a multicenter prospective trial who stopped telbivudine-based therapy after achieving HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA < 50 IU/mL for > 48 weeks. As validation, 59 patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir before discontinuation were analyzed.

RESULTS

At the end of treatment (EOT), HBV RNA and HBcrAg were significant independent predictors of the clinical relapse risk. In the evaluation cohort, no clinical relapse occurred among patients with negative HBV RNA and HBcrAg < 4 log10 U/mL at EOT (low-risk group), whereas 46.8% patients with positive HBV RNA and HBcrAg ≥ 4 log10 U/mL (high-risk group) experienced clinical relapse during 4-year posttreatment follow-up (P < .001); the corresponding incidences in the validation cohort were 0% and 69.4% (P < .001), respectively. More patients in the low-risk group achieved HBsAg loss than the other patients after treatment cessation (16.1% vs 1.3%, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining HBV RNA and HBcrAg performed satisfactorily in predicting clinical relapse and HBsAg loss after treatment cessation in HBeAg-positive patients with CHB.The combination of hepatitis B virus RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen performed satisfactorily in predicting clinical relapse and hepatitis B surface antigen loss after stopping nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment among noncirrhotic hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B and could be used to guide safe discontinuation.

Comparison of viral control between two tenofovir dose reduction regimens (300 mg every 48 hours versus 300 mg every 72 hours) in chronic hepatitis B patients with moderate renal impairment from tenofovir-induced renal dysfunction

Long-term use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) can induce renal dysfunction that requires TDF dose reduction. Previous studies showed that systemic drug use exerts a threefold higher risk of moderate renal impairment. This study aimed to compare viral control between two tenofovir dose reduction regimens in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with moderate renal impairment from TDF-induced renal dysfunction. This noninferiority, randomized controlled study was conducted at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Virologically suppressed CHB patients treated with TDF who had moderate renal impairment were randomly allocated to receive TDF 300 mg either every 48 or 72 hours. Forty-six patients (67.4% male) with a mean age of 62.8 ± 7.8 years were enrolled. Among all patients, 34.8% were HBeAg-positive, and 23.9% had cirrhosis. All included patients completed 12 months of follow-up. No patients had virological breakthrough. After dose reduction, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was improved in both groups, but a higher proportion of patients had an eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m² in the TDF every 72 hours group. Other renal parameters, including serum phosphate, tubular maximal reabsorption for phosphate per GFR, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, urine sugar and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, were not significantly different between groups. Among TDF-treated CHB patients with TDF-induced moderate renal impairment, more aggressive dose reduction in TDF from every 48 hours to every 72 hours did not affect virological breakthrough. A higher proportion of patients in the TDF every 72 hours group had improvement in renal function.

Long-term clinical outcome of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who discontinued nucleos(t)ide analogues

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Discontinuation of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) remains a debatable issue in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to address the outcome of HBeAg-negative CHB patients who discontinued NA therapy.

METHODS

This prospective study included 57 non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative Caucasian CHB patients who discontinued NA therapy after median virological remission of 6 years. All patients had regular blood tests. Virological relapse was defined as HBV DNA > 2000 IU/mL or >20 000 IU/mL and biochemical relapse as ALT > ULN (40 IU/mL) or >2xULN. All patients with retreatment predefined criteria restarted entecavir or tenofovir.

RESULTS

Of the 57 patients, 29 remained without retreatment after median follow-up of 65 months (range: 36-87) following treatment discontinuation. At 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months, cumulative rates of retreatment were 16%, 20%, 32%, 35%, 46% and 50%, while the proportion of patients with HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL and ALT < ULN were 73%, 60%, 52%, 52%, 47% and 37% respectively. All patients had virological and biochemical response after retreatment. No patient developed liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma or death. Cumulative rates of HBsAg loss were 2%, 4%, 7%, 10% and 20% at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. HBsAg levels < 100 IU/mL at the end of NA treatment could predict HBsAg loss (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports that NA therapy can be safely stopped in non-cirrhotic patients with HBeAg-negative CHB. Over a median follow-up of more than 5 years, half of the patients remained without retreatment with a substantial proportion of them achieving functional cure.

Maintained virological suppression and renal function with reduced dose tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in renally impaired chronic hepatitis B patients

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) effectively suppresses viral replication in chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but occasionally leads to renal impairment. We evaluated the prevalence of viral and biochemical breakthrough and renal function kinetics in renally impaired patients with CHB on reduced and on full-dose TDF. This clinic-based longitudinal cohort study included patients receiving full and reduced dose TDF (due to eGFR [Cockcroft-Gault] <60 mL/min/1.73 m² ). Viral and biochemical breakthroughs were assessed 1 month after starting full and reduced TDF dose until the end-of-follow-up. Breakthroughs were studied in full and reduced dose TDF, and renal function (MDRD) longitudinally before and after dose reduction within patients starting on full-dose TDF. Of 750 patients on TDF, 78 (10%) had reduced dose and 672 (90%) full dose. At the time of dose reduction, 36 (46%) patients had chronic kidney disease stage G3B. A viral breakthrough occurred in one cirrhotic dialysis-dependent patient (dosed 300 mg weekly) which resolved without signs of decompensation, and in one patient on full dose which resolved spontaneously. One biochemical breakthrough occurred during dose reduction and resolved naturally without viral breakthrough. The MDRD improved within the first year of dose reduction (+3.0 [2.5] mL/min per year; P < .005) and remained stable thereafter. Fifty-three (79%) patients reached an MDRD >50 mL/min during dose reduction. Low dose TDF maintains renal function and viral suppression in most renally impaired patients with CHB, even in those with advanced liver disease. This useful, yet simple strategy could be particularly viable in resource-constrained settings.