Subcellular distribution of actively partitioning F plasmid during the cell division cycle in E. coli

Dynamic cellular location of bacterial plasmids

Recent studies have shown that plasmids are organized inside bacterial cells in a remarkably complex way. Plasmids containing active partitioning systems are tethered to specific regions of the cell, and the number and position of plasmid molecules within the cell are coordinated with the bacterial host cell cycle and growth rate. Plasmids belonging to different incompatibility groups are also tethered to different sites within the cell, and segregate at different times relative to one another and to the bacterial cell cycle. Recent studies suggest that many of these observations regarding subcellular plasmid dynamics formulated for Escherichia coli plasmids may be broadly conserved.

The P1 plasmid in action: time-lapse photomicroscopy reveals some unexpected aspects of plasmid partition

The prophage of bacteriophage P1 is a low copy number plasmid in Escherichia coli and is segregated to daughter cells by an active partition system. The dynamics of the partition process have now been successfully followed by time-lapse photomicroscopy. The process appears to be fundamentally different from that previously inferred from statistical analysis of fixed cells. A focus containing several plasmid copies is captured at the cell center. Immediately before cell division, the copies eject bi-directionally along the long axis of the cell. Cell division traps one or more plasmid copies in each daughter cell. These copies are free to move, associate, and disassociate. Later, they are captured to the new cell center to re-start the cycle. Studies with mutants suggest that the ability to segregate accurately at a very late stage in the cell cycle is dependent on a novel ability of the plasmid to control cell division. Should segregation be delayed, cell division is also delayed until segregation is successfully completed.

The P1 plasmid is segregated to daughter cells by a 'capture and ejection' mechanism coordinated with Escherichia coli cell division

The fate of the P1 plasmid of Escherichia coli was followed by time-lapse photomicroscopy. A GFP-ParB fusion marked the plasmid during partition (segregation) to daughter cells at slow growth rate. The process differs from that previously inferred from statistical analysis of fixed cells. A focus of plasmid copies is captured at the cell centre. Immediately before cell division, the copies eject bidirectionally along the long axis of the cell. Cell division traps one or more plasmid copies in each daughter. They are not directed to a prescribed position but are free to move, associate and disassociate. Later, they are captured to the new cell centre to restart the cycle. A null P1 par mutant associates to form a focus, but it is neither captured nor ejected. A dominant negative ParB protein forms a plasmid focus that attaches to the cell centre but never ejects. It remains captive at the centre and blocks host cell division. The cells elongate. Eventually the intact focus is pushed to one side and the cells divide simultaneously in several places at the same time. This suggests that the wild-type plasmid imposes a regulatory node on the host cell cycle, preventing cell division until its own segregation is completed.

Amplification of Hot DNA segments in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, a replication fork blocking event at a DNA replication terminus (Ter) enhances homologous recombination at the nearby sister chromosomal region, converting the region into a recombination hotspot, Hot, site. Using a RNaseH negative (rnhA-) mutant, we identified eight kinds of Hot DNAs (HotA-H). Among these, enhanced recombination of three kinds of Hot DNAs (HotA-C) was dependent on fork blocking events at Ter sites. In the present study, we examined whether HotA DNAs are amplified when circular DNA (HotA plus a drug-resistance DNA) is inserted into the homologous region on the chromosome of a rnhA- mutant. The resulting HotA DNA transformants were analysed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, fluorescence in situ hybridization and DNA microarray technique. The following results were obtained: (i) HotA DNA is amplified by about 40-fold on average; (ii) whereas 90% of the cells contain about 6-10 copies of HotA DNA, the remaining 10% of cells have as many as several hundred HotA copies; and (iii) amplification is detected in all other Hot DNAs, among which HotB and HotG DNAs are amplified to the same level as HotA. Furthermore, HotL DNA, which is activated by blocking the clockwise oriC-starting replication fork at the artificially inserted TerL site in the fork-blocked strain with a rnhA+ background, is also amplified, but is not amplified in the non-blocked strain. From these data, we propose a model that can explain production of three distinct forms of Hot DNA molecules by the following three recombination pathways: (i) unequal intersister recombination; (ii) intrasister recombination, followed by rolling-circle replication; and (iii) intrasister recombination, producing circular DNA molecules.

Two separate DNA sequences within oriC participate in accurate chromosome segregation in Bacillus subtilis

Current views of bacterial chromosome segregation vary in respect of the likely presence or absence of an active segregation mechanism involving a mitotic-like apparatus. Furthermore, little is known about cis-acting elements for chromosome segregation in bacteria. In this report, we show that two separate DNA regions, a 3' coding region of dnaA and the AT-rich sequence between dnaA and dnaN (the initial opening site of duplex DNA during replication), are necessary for efficient segregation of the chromosome in Bacillus subtilis. When a plasmid replicon was integrated into argG, far from oriC, on the chromosome and then the oriC function was disrupted, the oriC-deleted mutant formed anucleate cells at 5% possibly because of defects in chromosome segregation. However, when the two DNA sequences were added near oriN, frequency of anucleate cells decreased to 1%. In these cells, the origin (argG) regions were localized near cell poles, whereas they were randomly distributed in cells without the two DNA sequences. These results suggest that the two DNA sequences in and downstream of the dnaA gene participate in correct positioning of the replication origin region within the cell and that this function is associated with accurate chromosome segregation in B. subtilis.

Prokaryotic DNA segregation by an actin-like filament

The mechanisms responsible for prokaryotic DNA segregation are largely unknown. The partitioning locus (par) encoded by the Escherichia coli plasmid R1 actively segregates its replicon to daughter cells. We show here that the ParM ATPase encoded by par forms dynamic actin-like filaments with properties expected for a force-generating protein. Filament formation depended on the other components encoded by par, ParR and the centromere-like parC region to which ParR binds. Mutants defective in ParM ATPase exhibited hyperfilamentation and did not support plasmid partitioning. ParM polymerization was ATP dependent, and depolymerization of ParM filaments required nucleotide hydrolysis. Our in vivo and in vitro results indicate that ParM polymerization generates the force required for directional movement of plasmids to opposite cell poles and that the ParR-parC complex functions as a nucleation point for ParM polymerization. Hence, we provide evidence for a simple prokaryotic analogue of the eukaryotic mitotic spindle apparatus.

Behavior of sister copies of mini-F plasmid after synchronized plasmid replication in Escherichia coli cells

To clarify whether sister copies of mini-F plasmid are immediately separated from each other after replication, we analyzed the behavior of sister mini-F copies after synchronized replication of mini-F. Sister copies of mini-F were separated immediately or shortly after replication, in contrast to sister oriC copies of the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Bacterial conjugative transfer: visualization of successful mating pairs and plasmid establishment in live Escherichia coli

We used the LacO/GFP-LacI system to label and visualize the IncP beta plasmid R751 fluorescently during conjugative transfer between live donor and recipient bacteria. Comparisons of R751 in conjugative and non-conjugative conditions have allowed us to identify key localizations and movements associated with the initiation of conjugative transfer in the donor and the establishment of R751 in the recipient. A survey of successful mating pairs demonstrates that close physical contact between donor and recipient bacteria is required for DNA transfer and that regions of intimate contact can occur at any location on the donor or recipient cell membrane. The transferred DNA is positioned at the characteristic centre or quarter-cell position after conversion to a double-stranded molecule in the recipient cell. Initial duplication of plasmids often results in an asymmetric distribution of plasmid foci. Symmetric localization (either at centre or at 1/4 and 3/4 cell lengths) occurs only after a significant lag, presumably reflecting the time required to synthesize the plasmid-encoded partitioning proteins.

Compatible bacterial plasmids are targeted to independent cellular locations in Escherichia coli

Targeting of DNA molecules to specific subcellular positions is essential for efficient segregation, but the mechanisms underlying these processes are poorly understood. In Escherichia coli, several plasmids belonging to different incompatibility groups (F, P1 and RK2) localize preferentially near the midcell and quartercell positions. Here we compare the relative positions of these three plasmids using fluorescence in situ hybridization. When plasmids F and P1 were localized simultaneously using differentially labeled probes, the majority of foci (approximately 75%) were well separated from each other. Similar results were found when we compared the subcellular localization of F with RK2, and RK2 with P1: regardless of the number of foci per cell or growth conditions, most of the foci (70-80%) were not in close proximity to one another. We also localized RK2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Vibrio cholerae, and found that plasmid RK2 localization is conserved across bacterial species. Our results suggest that each plasmid has its own unique subcellular address, implying a mechanism for the stable co-existence of plasmids in which subcellular targeting plays a major role.

Functional dissection of the ParB homologue (KorB) from IncP-1 plasmid RK2

Active partitioning of low-copy number plasmids requires two proteins belonging to the ParA and ParB families and a cis-acting site which ParB acts upon. Active separation of clusters of plasmid molecules to the defined locations in the cell before cell division ensures stable inheritance of the plasmids. The central control operon of IncP-1 plasmids codes for regulatory proteins involved in the global transcriptional control of operons for vegetative replication, stable maintenance and conjugative transfer. Two of these proteins, IncC and KorB, also play a role in active partitioning, as the ParA and ParB homologues, respectively. Here we describe mapping the regions in KorB responsible for four of its different functions: dimerisation, DNA binding, repression of transcription and interaction with IncC. For DNA binding, amino acids E151 to T218 are essential, while repression depends not only on DNA binding but, additionally, on the adjacent region amino acids T218 to R255. The C-terminus of KorB is the main dimerisation domain but a secondary oligomerisation region is located centrally in the region from amino acid I174 to T218. Using three different methods (potentiation of transcriptional repression, potentiation of DNA binding and activation in the yeast two-hybrid system) we identify this region as also responsible for interactions with IncC. This IncC-KorB contact differs in location from the ParA-ParB/SopA-SopB interactions in P1/F but is similar to these systems in lying close to a masked oligomerisation determinant.

Characterization of the parB-like yyaA gene of Bacillus subtilis

We have characterized the yyaA gene of Bacillus subtilis, located near the origin of chromosome replication (oriC). Its protein product is similar to the Spo0J protein, which belongs to the ParB family of chromosome- and plasmid-partitioning proteins. Insertional inactivation of the yyaA gene had no apparent effect on chromosome organization and partitioning during vegetative growth or sporulation. Subcellular localization of YyaA by immunofluorescence microscopy indicated that it colocalizes with the nucleoid, and gel retardation studies confirmed that YyaA binds relatively nonspecifically to DNA. Overexpression of yyaA caused a sporulation defect characterized by the formation of multiple septa within the cell. This phenotype indicates that YyaA may have a regulatory role at the onset of sporulation.

The double par locus of virulence factor pB171: DNA segregation is correlated with oscillation of ParA

Prokaryotic plasmids and chromosomes encode partitioning (par) loci that segregate DNA to daughter cells before cell division. Recent database analyses showed that almost all known par loci encode an ATPase and a DNA-binding protein, and one or more cis-acting regions where the proteins act. All par-encoded ATPases belong to one of two protein superfamilies, Walker-type and actin-like ATPases. This property was recently used to divide par loci into Types I and II loci. We show here that the Escherichia coli virulence factor pB171 encodes a double par locus that consists of one Type I and one Type II locus. Separately, each locus stabilized a test-plasmid efficiently. Together, the two loci mediated even more efficient plasmid stabilization. The par loci have a unique genetic organization in that they share a common central region at which the two different DNA-binding proteins probably act. Interestingly, a fusion protein consisting of the Walker-type ParA ATPase and Gfp was functional and oscillated in nucleoid regions on a time scale of minutes. ParA-green fluorescent protein (Gfp) oscillation depended on both ParB and parC but was independent of minCDE. Point mutations in the Walker A box motif simultaneously abolished plasmid stabilization and ParA-Gfp oscillation. These observations raise the possibility that ParA oscillation is prerequisite for active plasmid segregation.

Sister chromosome cohesion of Escherichia coli

We analysed Escherichia coli cells synchronized for initiation of chromosomal DNA replication by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using fluorescent DNA probes corresponding to various chromosomal regions. Sister copies of regions in an approximately oriC-proximal half of the chromosome are cohesive with each other after replication until the late period of chromosome replication. Sister copies of regions relatively close to the terminus are also separated from each other in the same late period of replication. It is important that sister copies in all the tested regions are thus separated from each other nearly all at once in the late period of chromosome replication. These results are consistent with results obtained by FISH in randomly growing cultures. Cohesion of sister copies in an oriC-close region is observed in a dam null mutant lacking DNA adenine methyltransferase the same as in the parental isogenic dam+ strain, indicating that the cohesion is independent of DNA adenine methyltransferase. This further implies that hemimethylated DNA-binding proteins, such as SeqA, are not involved in the cohesion. On the other hand, the cohesion of sister copies of the oriC-close region was not observed in mukB null mutant cells, suggesting that MukB might be involved in the chromosome cohesion.

Role of the ATP-binding site of SopA protein in partition of the F plasmid

SopA belongs to a large family of bacterial partition protein ATPases. It helps stabilize the F plasmid by acting as the primary repressor of transcription of the sopAB operon, preventing the destabilizing effects of Sop protein excess. It is also thought to act directly in the F partition mechanism. We have examined the role of SopA in partition and repression by observing the consequences of replacing an invariant ATP-binding site lysine, K120, by glutamine or arginine. Circular dichroism studies of the purified mutant proteins revealed no major differences from wild-type, but in the presence of ADP or ATP each protein showed a characteristic spectrum which suggested a distinct conformational change. The K120Q mutant retained most of the wild-type ATPase activity while the K120R mutant lost it. In neither case was the residual activity stimulated by SopB, as occurs for wild-type SopA. The strength of sop promoter repression by the mutant SopA proteins alone was comparable to that resulting from SopB-enhancement of wild-type SopA, but SopB enhanced repression by the mutant SopA proteins either slightly (K120R) or not at all (K120Q). Mini-Fs in which the sop operon was controlled by a constitutive promoter were destabilized by the mutations, demonstrating the need for SopA and its ATP-binding site in the partition process. The K120R mini-F was lost at the same rate as a mini-F lacking the sopC centromere, the K120Q mutant was lost faster. SopAK120R at high levels was more effective than SopA(+) in disrupting the partition complex, whereas SopAK120Q did not disrupt it at all. These results suggest that one function of SopA in the partition mechanism is to break the paired plasmid structure to allow F molecules to segregate to daughter cells.

The bacterial ParA-ParB partitioning proteins

A pair of genes designated parA and parB are encoded by many low copy number plasmids and bacterial chromosomes. They work with one or more cis-acting sites termed centromere-like sequences to ensure better than random predivisional partitioning of the DNA molecule that encodes them. The centromere-like sequences nucleate binding of ParB and titrate sufficient protein to create foci, which are easily visible by immuno-fluorescence microscopy. These foci normally follow the plasmid or the chromosomal replication oriC complexes. ParA is a membrane-associated ATPase that is essential for this symmetric movement of the ParB foci. In Bacillus subtilis ParA oscillates from end to end of the cell as does MinD of E. coli, a relative of the ParA family. ParA may facilitate ParB movement along the inner surface of the cytoplasmic membrane to encounter and become tethered to the next replication zone. The ATP-bound form of ParA appears to adopt the conformation needed to drive partition. Hydrolysis to create ParA-ADP or free ParA appears to favour a form that is not located at the pole and binds to DNA rather than the partition complex. Definition of the protein domains needed for interaction with membranes and the conformational changes that occur on interaction with ATP/ADP will provide insights into the partitioning mechanism and possible targets for inhibitors of partitioning.

Bacterial cell division: regulating Z-ring formation

The earliest stage of cell division in bacteria is the formation of a Z ring, composed of a polymer of the FtsZ protein, at the division site. Z rings appear to be synthesized in a bi-directional manner from a nucleation site (NS) located on the inside of the cytoplasmic membrane. It is the utilization of a NS specifically at the site of septum formation that determines where and when division will occur. However, a Z ring can be made to form at positions other than at the division site. How does a cell regulate utilization of a NS at the correct location and at the right time? In rod-shaped bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, two factors involved in this regulation are the Min system and nucleoid occlusion. It is suggested that in B. subtilis, the main role of the Min proteins is to inhibit division at the nucleoid-free cell poles. In E. coli it is currently not clear whether the Min system can direct a Z ring to the division site at mid-cell or whether its main role is to ensure that division inhibition occurs away from mid-cell, a role analogous to that in B. subtilis. While the nucleoid negatively influences Z-ring formation in its vicinity in these rod-shaped organisms, the exact relationship between nucleoid occlusion and the ability to form a mid-cell Z ring is unresolved. Recent evidence suggests that in B. subtilis and Caulobacter crescentus, utilization of the NS at the division site is intimately linked to the progress of a round of chromosome replication and this may form the basis of achieving co-ordination between chromosome replication and cell division.

Multicopy plasmids are clustered and localized in Escherichia coli

We localized the multicopy plasmid RK2 in Escherichia coli and found that the number of fluorescent foci observed in each cell was substantially less than the copy number of the plasmid, suggesting that many copies of RK2 are grouped into a few multiplasmid clusters. In minimal glucose media, the majority of cells had one or two foci, with a single focus localized near midcell, and two foci near the 1/4 and 3/4 cell positions. The number of foci per cell increased with cell length and with growth rate, and decreased upon entering stationary phase, suggesting a coordination of RK2 replication or segregation with the bacterial cell cycle. Time-lapse microscopy demonstrated that partitioning of RK2 foci is achieved by the splitting of a single focus into two or three smaller foci, which are capable of separating with rapid kinetics. A derivative of the high-copy-number plasmid pUC19 containing the lacO array was also localized by tagging with GFP-LacI. Whereas many of the cells contained numerous, randomly diffusing foci, most cells exhibited one or two plasmid clusters located at midcell or the cell quarter positions. Our results suggest a model in which multicopy plasmids are not always randomly diffusing throughout the cell as previously thought, but can be replicated and partitioned in clusters targeted to specific locations.

Dynamic localization of bacterial and plasmid chromosomes

Plasmid-encoded partition genes determine the dynamic localization of plasmid molecules from the mid-cell position to the 1/4 and 3/4 positions. Similarly, bacterial homologs of the plasmid genes participate in controlling the bidirectional migration of the replication origin (oriC) regions during sporulation and vegetative growth in Bacillus subtilis, but not in Escherichia coli. In E. coli, but not B. subtilis, the chromosomal DNA is fully methylated by DNA adenine methyltransferase. The E. coli SeqA protein, which binds preferentially to hemimethylated nascent DNA strands, exists as discrete foci in vivo. A single SeqA focus, which is a SeqA-hemimethylated DNA cluster, splits into two foci that then abruptly migrate bidirectionally to the 1/4 and 3/4 positions during replication. Replicated oriC copies are linked to each other for a substantial period of generation time, before separating from each other and migrating in opposite directions. The MukFEB complex of E. coli and Smc of B. subtilis appear to participate in the reorganization of bacterial sister chromosomes.

DNA segregation in bacteria

Segregation of DNA in bacterial cells is an efficient process that assures that every daughter cell receives a copy of genomic and plasmid DNA. In this review, we focus primarily on observations in recent years, including the visualization of DNA and proteins at the subcellular level, that have begun to define the events that separate DNA molecules. Unlike the process of chromosome segregation in higher cells, segregation of the bacterial chromosome is a continuous process in which chromosomes are separated as they are replicated. Essential to separation is the initial movement of sister origins to opposite ends of the cell. Subsequent replication and controlled condensation of DNA are the driving forces that move sister chromosomes toward their respective origins, which establishes the polarity required for segregation. Final steps in the resolution and separation of sister chromosomes occur at the replication terminus, which is localized at the cell center. In contrast to the chromosome, segregation of low-copy plasmids, such as Escherichia coli F, P1, and R1, is by mechanisms that resemble those used in eukaryotic cells. Each plasmid has a centromere-like site to which plasmid-specified partition proteins bind to promote segregation. Replication of plasmid DNA, which occurs at the cell center, is followed by rapid partition protein-mediated separation of sister plasmids, which become localized at distinct sites on either side of the division plane. The fundamental similarity between chromosome and plasmid segregation-placement of DNA to specific cell sites-implies an underlying cellular architecture to which both DNA and proteins refer.

Partitioning of the Escherichia coli chromosome: superhelicity and condensation

Segregation in Escherichia coli, the process of separating the replicated chromosomes into daughter progeny cells, seems to start long before the duplication of the genome reaches completion. Soon after initiation in mid-cell region, the daughter oriCs rapidly move apart to fixed positions inside the cell (quarter length positions from each pole) and are anchored there by yet unknown mechanism(s). As replication proceeds, the rest of the chromosome is sequentially unwound and then refolded. At termination, the two sister chromosomes are unlinked by decatenation and separated by supercoiling and/or condensation. Muk and Seq proteins are involved in different stages of this replication-cum-partition process and thus can be categorized as important partition proteins along with topoisomerases. E. coli strains, lacking mukB or seqA functions, are defective in segregation and cell division. The nucleoids in these mutant strains exhibit altered condensation and superhelicity as can be demonstrated by sedimentation analysis and by fluorescence microscopy. As the supercoiling of an extrachromosomal element (a plasmid DNA) was also influenced by the mukB and seqA mutations we concluded that the MukB and SeqA proteins are possibly involved in maintaining the general supercoiling activity in the cell. The segregation of E. coli chromosome might therefore be predominantly driven by factors that operate by affecting the superhelicity and condensation of the nucleoid (MukB, SeqA, topoisomerases and additional unknown proteins). A picture thus emerges in which replication and partition are no longer compartmentalized into separable stages with clear gaps (S and M phases in eukaryotes) but are parallel processes that proceed concomitantly through a cell cycle continuum.

Active segregation by the Bacillus subtilis partitioning system in Escherichia coli

Bacterial genes required for proper partitioning consist of two transacting genes that encode proteins and a cis-acting gene that functions like a centromere. Plasmids actively partitioning by means of these genes migrate from midcell to the cell quarters and are tethered to these sites until the cells divide. Previously the partitioning genes were mainly found on plasmids and phages in Escherichia coli. However, progress in genome sequencing reveals that partitioning genes are ubiquitous in many bacterial plasmids and chromosomes. Each homologue of the two transacting genes belongs to a family, ParA or ParB. Moreover, phylogenic analysis of members of the ParA and ParB families indicates that each member falls into a chromosomal group or an extrachromosomal group. It is known that the parAB genes in the chromosomal group are located on relatively conserved chromosomal regions in several bacterial species. This suggests that the parAB genes were transferred from a chromosome to plasmids and phages, so the genes have diverged among bacterial species. To support this possibility, we show that the Bacillus subtilis Soj and Spo0J members of the ParAB families are responsible for the specific localization of plasmids at cell quarters in E. coli and can function as partition proteins. Host factors to tether actively partitioning plasmids at subcellular sites may be conserved in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria so that phages and plasmids with the ParAB partitioning system can be stably inherited in host cells across bacterial species.

The assembly of large BACs by in vivo recombination

We have developed a method for recombining bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) and P1 artificial chromosomes (PACs) containing large genomic DNA fragments into a single vector using the Cre-lox recombination system from bacteriophage P1 in vivo. This overcomes the limitations of in vitro methods for generating large constructs based on restriction digestion, ligation, and transformation of DNA into Escherichia coli cells. We used the method to construct a human artificial chromosome vector of 404 kb encompassing long tracts of alpha satellite DNA, telomeric sequences, and the human hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene. The specificity of Cre recombinase for loxP sites minimizes the possibility of intramolecular rearrangements, unlike previous techniques using general homologous recombination in E. coli, and makes our method compatible with the presence of large arrays of repeated sequences in cloned DNA. This methodology may also be applied to retrofitting PACs or BACs with markers and functional sequences.

Incompatibility protein IncC and global regulator KorB interact in active partition of promiscuous plasmid RK2

Replication of the broad-host-range, IncPalpha plasmid RK2 requires two plasmid loci: trfA, the replication initiator gene, and oriV, the origin of replication. While these determinants are sufficient for replication in a wide variety of bacteria, they do not confer the stable maintenance of parental RK2 observed in its hosts. The product of the incC gene has been proposed to function in the stable maintenance of RK2 because of its relatedness to the ParA family of ATPases, some of which are known to be involved in the active partition of plasmid and chromosomal DNA. Here we show that IncC has the properties expected of a component of an active partition system. The smaller polypeptide product of incC (IncC2) exhibits a strong, replicon-independent incompatibility phenotype with RK2. This incompatibility phenotype requires the global transcriptional repressor, KorB, and the target for incC-mediated incompatibility is a KorB-binding site (O(B)). We found that KorB and IncC interact in vivo by using the yeast two-hybrid system and in vitro by using partially purified proteins. Elevated expression of the incC and korB genes individually has no obvious effect on Escherichia coli cell growth, but their simultaneous overexpression is toxic, indicating a possible interaction of IncC-KorB complexes with a vital host target. A region of RK2 bearing incC, korB, and multiple KorB-binding sites is able to stabilize an unstable, heterologous plasmid in an incC-dependent manner. Finally, elevated levels of IncC2 cause RK2 to aggregate, indicating a possible role for IncC in plasmid pairing. These findings demonstrate that IncC, KorB, and at least one KorB-binding site are components of an active partition system for the promiscuous plasmid RK2.

Role of the mukB gene in chromosome and plasmid partition in Escherichia coli

The intracellular locations of oriC and oriR1, the replication origins of the chromosome and plasmid R1, respectively, were visualized by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in exponentially growing populations of Escherichia coli. The locations of oriC and oriR1 (from a Par+ R1 plasmid) were unique and different in the wild-type host. In a mukB mutant, the positions were perturbed for both origins. The position of oriR1 from a plasmid with active partition (Par+) in the mukB host was as randomized as that of oriR1 from the Par- plasmid in a wild-type host. However, this mukB-induced randomization did not result in unstable inheritance of the Par+ plasmid, as measured by the conventional segregation assay. This might result from the preferential association of the Par+ plasmid with the bigger, decondensed nucleoid-containing daughters during cell division of MukB- cells, whereas the Par- plasmids were distributed at random and were lost by frequently ending up in anucleate cells.

Plasmid and chromosome partitioning: surprises from phylogeny

Plasmids encode partitioning genes (par) that are required for faithful plasmid segregation at cell division. Initially, par loci were identified on plasmids, but more recently they were also found on bacterial chromosomes. We present here a phylogenetic analysis of par loci from plasmids and chromosomes from prokaryotic organisms. All known plasmid-encoded par loci specify three components: a cis-acting centromere-like site and two trans-acting proteins that form a nucleoprotein complex at the centromere (i.e. the partition complex). The proteins are encoded by two genes in an operon that is autoregulated by the par-encoded proteins. In all cases, the upstream gene encodes an ATPase that is essential for partitioning. Recent cytological analyses indicate that the ATPases function as adaptors between a host-encoded component and the partition complex and thereby tether plasmids and chromosomal origin regions to specific subcellular sites (i.e. the poles or quarter-cell positions). Two types of partitioning ATPases are known: the Walker-type ATPases encoded by the par/sop gene family (type I partitioning loci) and the actin-like ATPase encoded by the par locus of plasmid R1 (type II partitioning locus). A phylogenetic analysis of the large family of Walker type of partitioning ATPases yielded a surprising pattern: most of the plasmid-encoded ATPases clustered into distinct subgroups. Surprisingly, however, the par loci encoding these distinct subgroups have different genetic organizations and thus divide the type I loci into types Ia and Ib. A second surprise was that almost all chromosome-encoded ATPases, including members from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive Bacteria and Archaea, clustered into one distinct subgroup. The phylogenetic tree is consistent with lateral gene transfer between Bacteria and Archaea. Using database mining with the ParM ATPase of plasmid R1, we identified a new par gene family from enteric bacteria. These type II loci, which encode ATPases of the actin type, have a genetic organization similar to that of type Ib loci.

Two types of localization of the DNA-binding proteins within the Escherichia coli nucleoid

BACKGROUND

The genome DNA of Escherichia coli is folded into the nucleosome-like structure, often called a nucleoid, by the binding of several DNA-binding proteins. We previously determined the specificity and affinity of DNA-binding for 12 species of the E. coli DNA-binding protein, and their intracellular concentrations at various growth phases. The intracellular localization of these proteins in E. coli could be predicted from these data, but no attempt has been made thus far to directly observe the intracellular distribution of the DNA-binding proteins.

RESULTS

The intracellular localization in Escherichia coli of 10 species of the nucleoid-associated protein, three components of the transcripton apparatus, and three components of the translation machinery was investigated by indirect immuno-fluorescence microscopy. The DNA-binding proteins could be classified into two groups. The group-I proteins, including the major nucleoid-structural proteins, H-NS, HU, IHF, StpA and Dps, are distributed uniformly within the entire nucleoid. In contrast, the group-II proteins, which are presumed to possess regulatory activities of DNA functions accumulate at specific loci within the nucleoid, forming 2 (SeqA), 3-4 (CbpA and CbpB) and 6-10 (Fis and IciA) immuno-stained dots. Each immuno-stained dot may represent either the association of a hundred to one thousand molecules of each DNA-binding protein at a specific locus of the genome DNA or the assembly of protein-associated DNA segments from different domains of the folded genome. Both the RNA polymerase core enzyme and the sigma70 subunit are mainly associated with the nucleoid, but the anti-sigma70 factor (Rsd) appears to be accumulated at the boundary between the nucleoid and the cytosol in the stationary-phase cells. Here we show that the majority of Hfq is present in cytoplasm together with ribosomal proteins L7/L12 and RMF.

CONCLUSION

The DNA-binding proteins of E. coli could be classified into two groups. One group proteins was distributed uniformly within the nucleoid, but the other group of proteins showed an irregular distribution, forming immuno-stained spots or clumps.

Plasmid and chromosome segregation in prokaryotes

Recent major advances in the understanding of prokaryotic DNA segregation have been achieved by using fluorescence microscopy to visualize the localization of cellular components. Plasmids and bacterial chromosomes are partitioned in a highly dynamic fashion, suggesting the presence of a mitotic-like apparatus in prokaryotes. The identification of chromosomal homologues of the well-characterized plasmid partitioning genes indicates that there could be a general mechanism of bacterial DNA partitioning.

DnaA, the initiator of Escherichia coli chromosomal replication, is located at the cell membrane

Given the lack of a nucleus in prokaryotic cells, the significance of spatial organization in bacterial chromosome replication is only beginning to be fully appreciated. DnaA protein, the initiator of chromosomal replication in Escherichia coli, is purified as a soluble protein, and in vitro it efficiently initiates replication of minichromosomes in membrane-free DNA synthesis reactions. However, its conversion from a replicatively inactive to an active form in vitro occurs through its association with acidic phospholipids in a lipid bilayer. To determine whether the in situ residence of DnaA protein is cytoplasmic, membrane associated, or both, we examined the cellular location of DnaA using immunogold cryothin-section electron microscopy and immunofluorescence. Both of these methods revealed that DnaA is localized at the cell membrane, further suggesting that initiation of chromosomal replication in E. coli is a membrane-affiliated event.

Bidirectional migration of SeqA-bound hemimethylated DNA clusters and pairing of oriC copies in Escherichia coli

BACKGROUND

We previously found that SeqA protein, which binds preferentially to newly replicated hemimethylated DNA, is localized as discrete fluorescent foci in Escherichia coli cells. A single SeqA focus, localized at midcell, separates into two foci and these foci migrate abruptly in opposite directions.

RESULTS

The present study shows that (i) appearance of SeqA foci depends on continuous DNA replication, suggesting that the SeqA foci represent clusters consisting of SeqA and newly replicated hemimethylated DNA, (ii) in a synchronous round of replication, a single SeqA focus at midcell separates into two foci and these foci abruptly migrate in opposite directions midway through replication from oriC to the terminus, and (iii) oriC is replicated at midcell but replicated oriC copies remain linked with each other at midcell for 40 min after replication at 30 degrees C. Subsequently, the linked oriC copies separate and migrate gradually towards both borders of the nucleoid before cell division.

CONCLUSIONS

A single cluster of SeqA-bound hemimethylated DNA segment separates into two clusters and these clusters migrate abruptly in a bipolar fashion during progress of replication and prior to separation of linked sister oriC copies.

Plasmid R1 is present as clusters in the cells of Escherichia coli

Fluorescence microscopy was used to determine the location(s) of the replication origin of plasmid R1 in exponentially growing cells of Escherichia coli. The number of oriR1 foci per cell was smaller than the number of R1 copies per cell and was found to be the same for a copA mutant of R1 and for the wild-type plasmid. The intensities of individual foci were stronger for the cop mutant than for the wild type. We interpreted these results to imply that the plasmid DNA molecules were localized in small groups/clusters, a result that seems contrary to the earlier observations that plasmid R1 replicates randomly and segregates as a single-copy unit. The implications for the quantitative behavior of plasmid R1 in stability, incompatibility tests, replication, and partition experiments are discussed.

Stoichiometry of P1 plasmid partition complexes

The P1 plasmid prophage is faithfully partitioned by a high affinity nucleoprotein complex assembled at the centromere-like parS site. This partition complex is composed of P1 ParB and Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF), bound specifically to parS. We have investigated the assembly of ParB at parS and its stoichiometry of binding. Measured by gel mobility shift assays, ParB and IHF bind tightly to parS and form a specific complex, called I + B1. We observed that as ParB concentration was increased, a second, larger complex (I + B2) formed, followed by the formation of larger complexes, indicating that additional ParB molecules joined the initial complex. Shift Western blotting experiments indicated that the I + B2 complex contained twice as much ParB as the I + B1 complex. Using mixtures of ParB and a larger polyhistidine-tagged version of ParB (His-ParB) in DNA binding assays, we determined that the initial I + B1 complex contains one dimer of ParB. Therefore, one dimer of ParB binds to its recognition sequences that span an IHF-directed bend in parS. Once this complex forms, a second dimer can join the complex, but this assembly requires much higher ParB concentrations.

Small, stable shuttle vectors based on the minimal pVS1 replicon for use in gram-negative, plant-associated bacteria

The minimal replicon of the Pseudomonas plasmid pVS1 was genetically defined and combined with the Escherichia coli p15A replicon, to provide a series of new, oligocopy cloning vectors (5.3 to 8.3 kb). Recombinant plasmids derived from these vectors were stable in growing and nongrowing cells of root-colonizing P. fluorescens strains incubated under different environmental conditions for more than 1 month.

Plasmid copy-number control and better-than-random segregation genes of pSM19035 share a common regulator

Transcription initiation of the copy-number control and better-than-random segregation genes of the broad-host-range and low-copy-number plasmid pSM19035 are subjected to repression by the autoregulated pSM19035-encoded omega product in Bacillus subtilis cells. The promoters of the copS (Pcop1 and Pcop2), delta (Pdelta), and omega (Pomega) genes have been mapped. These promoters are embedded in a set of either seven copies of a 7-bp direct repeat or in a block consisting of two 7-bp direct repeats and one 7-bp inverted repeat; the blocks are present either two or three times. The cooperative binding of omega protein to the repeats on the Pcop1, Pcop2, Pdelta, and Pomega promoters represses transcription initiation by a mechanism that does not exclude sigma(A)RNAP from the promoters. These results indicate that omega protein regulates plasmid maintenance by controlling the copy number on the one hand and by regulating the amount of proteins required for better-than-random segregation on the other hand.

Dynamic organization of chromosomal DNA in Escherichia coli

We have revealed the subcellular localization of different DNA segments that are located at ∼230-kb intervals on theEscherichia coli chromosome using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The series of chromosome segments is localized within the cell in the same order as the chromosome map. The large chromosome region including oriC shows similar localization patterns, which we call the Ori domain. In addition, the localization pattern of the large segment including dif is characteristic of the replication terminus region. The segment also shows similar localization patterns, which we call the Ter domain. In newborn cells, Ori and Ter domains of the chromosome are differentially localized near opposite cell poles. Subsequently, in the B period, the Ori domain moves toward mid-cell before the initiation of replication, and the Ter domain tends to relocate at mid-cell. An inversion mutant, in which the Ter domain is located close to oriC, shows abnormal subcellular localization of ori and dif segments, resulting in frequent production of anucleate cells. These studies thus suggest that the E. coli chromosome is organized to form a compacted ring structure with the Ori and Ter domains; these domains participate in the cell cycle-dependent localization of the chromosome.

Intracellular localization of P1 ParB protein depends on ParA and parS

The P1 partition system promotes faithful plasmid segregation during the Escherichia coli cell cycle. This system consists of two proteins, ParA and ParB, that act on a plasmid site called parS. By immunofluorescence microscopy, we observed that ParB localizes to discrete foci that are most often located close to the one-quarter and three-quarters positions of cell length. The visualization of ParB foci depended completely on the presence of parS, although their visualization was independent of the chromosomal context of parS (in P1 or the bacterial chromosome). In integration host factor-defective mutants, in which ParB binding to parS is weakened, only a fraction of the total pool of ParB had converged into foci. Taken together, these results indicate that parS recruits a pool of ParB into foci and that the resulting ParB-parS complexes serve as substrates for the segregation reaction. In the absence of ParA, the position of ParB foci in cells is perturbed, indicating that at least one of the roles of ParA is to direct ParB-parS complexes to the proper one-quarter positions from a cell pole. Finally, inhibition of cell division did not inhibit localization of ParB foci in cells, indicating that the positioning signals in the E. coli host that are needed for P1 partition do not depend on early division events.

Optimization of plasmid maintenance in the attenuated live vector vaccine strain Salmonella typhi CVD 908-htrA

The broad objective of the research presented here is to develop a noncatalytic plasmid maintenance system for the stabilization of multicopy expression plasmids encoding foreign antigens in a Salmonella typhi live-vector vaccine strain such as CVD 908-htrA. We have enhanced the maintenance of expression plasmids at two independent levels. First, we removed dependence upon balanced-lethal maintenance systems that involve catalytic enzymes expressed from multicopy plasmids; we accomplished this through incorporation into expression plasmids of a postsegregational killing system based on the noncatalytic hok-sok plasmid addiction system from the antibiotic resistance factor pR1. We also included at least one naturally occurring plasmid partition function in our expression plasmids, which eliminates random segregation of these plasmids, thereby enhancing their inheritance and stability; to accomplish this, we incorporated either the par locus from pSC101, the parA locus from pR1, or both. We monitored the stability of optimized expression plasmids within CVD 908-htrA by quantitating expression of a variant of green fluorescent protein (GFPuv) by using flow cytometry. In this report, we demonstrate the utility of this novel plasmid maintenance system in enhancing the stability of our expression plasmids and go on to show that as the copy number of stabilized plasmids increases, the toxicity of GFPuv synthesis also increases. The implications of these observations for the rational design of immunogenic and protective bacterial live vector vaccines are discussed.

Partition of the linear plasmid N15: interactions of N15 partition functions with the sop locus of the F plasmid

A locus close to one end of the linear N15 prophage closely resembles the sop operon which governs partition of the F plasmid; the promoter region contains similar operator sites, and the two putative gene products have extensive amino acid identity with the SopA and -B proteins of F. Our aim was to ascertain whether the N15 sop homologue functions in partition, to identify the centromere site, and to examine possible interchangeability of function with the F Sop system. When expressed at a moderate level, N15 SopA and -B proteins partly stabilize mini-F which lacks its own sop operon but retains the sopC centromere. The stabilization does not depend on increased copy number. Likewise, an N15 mutant with most of its sop operon deleted is partly stabilized by F Sop proteins and fully stabilized by its own. Four inverted repeat sequences similar to those of sopC were located in N15. They are distant from the sop operon and from each other. Two of these were shown to stabilize a mini-F sop deletion mutant when N15 Sop proteins were provided. Provision of the SopA homologue to plasmids with a sopA deletion resulted in further destabilization of the plasmid. The N15 Sop proteins exert effective, but incomplete, repression at the F sop promoter. We conclude that the N15 sop locus determines stable inheritance of the prophage by using dispersed centromere sites. The SopB-centromere and SopA-operator interactions show partial functional overlap between N15 and F. SopA of each plasmid appears to interact with SopB of the other, but in a way that is detrimental to plasmid maintenance.

Subcellular localization of plasmids containing the oriC region of the Escherichia coli chromosome, with or without the sopABC partitioning system

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis has revealed the subcellular localization of specific chromosomal segments and plasmid molecules during the cell division cycle in Escherichia coli: the replication origin (oriC) segments on the chromosome are localized at nucleoid borders, and actively partitioning mini-F plasmid molecules are localized at the 1/4 and 3/4 positions of the cell. In contrast, mini-F plasmid molecules lacking the sopABC segment are randomly localized in cytoplasmic areas at cell poles. In this study, we analysed the subcellular localization of an oriC plasmid that contains the minimum E. coli chromosomal replication origin and its flanking regions. These oriC plasmid molecules were mainly localized in cytosolic areas at cell poles. On the other hand, oriC plasmid DNA molecules carrying the sopABC segment of F plasmid were localized at cell quarter sites, as were actively partitioning mini-F plasmid DNA molecules. Therefore, we conclude that oriC itself and its flanking regions are not sufficient for positioning the replication origin domain of the E. coli chromosome within the cell.

Dynamic movement of the ParA-like Soj protein of B. subtilis and its dual role in nucleoid organization and developmental regulation

The Spo0J and Soj proteins of B. subtilis belong to a widespread family of bacterial proteins required for accurate segregation of plasmids and chromosomes. Spo0J binds to several sites around the oriC region of the chromosome, which are organized into compact foci that may play a centromere-like role in active chromosome segregation. We now show that Soj has a role in organization or compaction of Spo0J-oriC complexes and possibly other regions of the nucleoid. This activity is accompanied by a dynamic localization pattern in which Soj protein undergoes assembly and disassembly into large nucleoid-associated patches on a timescale of minutes. The dynamic behavior of Soj, like its previously described transcriptional repression activity, is controlled by Spo0J. These interactions may constitute a checkpoint coupling developmental transcription to cell cycle progression.

Effect of growth rate and incC mutation on symmetric plasmid distribution by the IncP-1 partitioning apparatus

The incC and korB genes of IncP-1 plasmid RK2 encode homologues of ubiquitous ParA and ParB partitioning proteins of bacterial plasmids and chromosomes. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that KorB, which binds to 12 widely distributed sites on the genome, is located in symmetrically placed foci in cells containing IncP-1 plasmids. When maintained by the low-copy-number P7 replicon, an RK2 segment including incC, korB and the kla, kle and korC regions encodes an efficient partitioning system that gives a pattern of foci similar to RK2 itself. Symmetrical distribution of KorB foci correlates with segregational stability conferred by either the IncP-1 or P7 partitioning systems; KorB distribution follows plasmid distribution. In the absence of a second partitioning system, incC inactivation resulted in paired or clumped foci that were not symmetrically distributed. At a slow growth rate, position analysis of foci showed a cycle from one central focus to two foci (at one- and three-quarter positions) and back, and at a high growth rate it showed a cycle from two foci to four and back. This pattern fits with the plasmid being coupled to the replication zones in the cell and being moved to successively younger zones by active partitioning, indicating a tight association between replication and partitioning.

Repression at a distance by the global regulator KorB of promiscuous IncP plasmids

KorB protein (358 amino acids) binds to 12 highly conserved sequences on the RK2 genome and co-ordinates the expression of at least five operons encoding genes for stable inheritance and plasmid transfer. KorB represses the trfA, korA and klaA promoters where it binds 4 bp upstream of the -35 region (class I KorB operators, OB). We show here that KorB on its own can also repress the trbA, trbB, kfrA and kleA promoters where OB is between 80 and 189 bp away from the transcription start point (class II operator). A C-terminal deletion of 17 amino acids resulted in the loss of KorB's ability to repress through class II operator but not through class I operator. This deletion reduced multimerization of His6-tailed KorB protein in vitro and greatly reduced binding specificity for fragments containing OB sequences. At the trbBp region, where OB9 lies 189 bp upstream of the transcription start point, mutagenesis of a proposed secondary binding site overlapping the trbBp -35 region had no effect on the ability of KorB to repress trbBp. Nevertheless, gel retardation analysis showed that KorB binding is promoted by sequences upstream and downstream of OB9 and that KorB can form higher order complexes on DNA. However, DNase I footprinting suggested that RNA polymerase may interact directly with KorB bound at OB9 and implied that contacts between these proteins could be responsible for the action of KorB at a distance.

P1 ParA interacts with the P1 partition complex at parS and an ATP-ADP switch controls ParA activities

The partition system of P1 plasmids is composed of two proteins, ParA and ParB, and a cis-acting site parS. parS is wrapped around ParB and Escherichia coli IHF protein in a higher order nucleoprotein complex called the partition complex. ParA is an ATPase that autoregulates the expression of the par operon and has an essential but unknown function in the partition process. In this study we demonstrate a direct interaction between ParA and the P1 partition complex. The interaction was strictly dependent on ParB and ATP. The consequence of this interaction depended on the ParB concentration. At high ParB levels, ParA was recruited to the partition complex via a ParA-ParB interaction, but at low ParB levels, ParA removed or disassembled ParB from the partition complex. ADP could not support these interactions, but could promote the site-specific DNA binding activity of ParA to parOP, the operator of the par operon. Conversely, ATP could not support a stable interaction of ParA with parOP in this assay. Our data suggest that ParA-ADP is the repressor of the par operon, and ParA-ATP, by interacting with the partition complex, plays a direct role in partition. Therefore, one role of adenine nucleotide binding and hydrolysis by ParA is that of a molecular switch controlling entry into two separate pathways in which ParA plays different roles.

DNA segregation: putting chromosomes in their place

Recent studies provide evidence that bacterial chromosomes are replicated by an enzyme factory, the replisome, located at a fixed position at the center of the cell; the fixed replisome could be a major factor in determining chromosome order in the cell, and may provide the force that drives chromosome segregation.

A family of stability determinants in pathogenic bacteria

A novel segregational stability system was identified on plasmid R485, which originates from Morganella morganii. The system is composed of two overlapping genes, stbD and stbE, which potentially encode proteins of 83 and 93 amino acids, respectively. Homologs of the stbDE genes were identified on the enterotoxigenic plasmid P307 from Escherichia coli and on the chromosomes of Vibrio cholerae and Haemophilus influenzae biogroup aegyptius. The former two homologs also promote plasmid stability in E. coli. Furthermore, the stbDE genes share homology with components of the relBEF operon and with the dnaT gene of E. coli. The organization of the stbDE cassette is reminiscent of toxin-antitoxin stability cassettes.

Protein localization during the Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle

New research on bacterial cells has demonstrated that they have a dynamic and complex subcellular organization. Work in Caulobacter crescentus shows that essential and nonessential proteins localize to discrete positions in the cell as a function of cell-cycle progression. The flagellum and chemotaxis receptor are asymmetrically localized to a single pole in the predivisional cell by coordinated proteolysis and transcriptional regulation. Cell type- and compartment-specific localization of the CtrA global transcriptional regulator is essential for proper cell-cycle progression, and subcellular localization of key chromosome partitioning proteins is correlated with proper nucleoid segregation. Given this structural complexity, we are driven to ask how localization is achieved, and to what end.

The partitioning activity of the RK2 central control region requires only incC, korB and KorB-binding site O(B)3 but other KorB-binding sites form destabilizing complexes in the absence of O(B)3

The sector of the genome of broad-host-range IncP plasmid RK2 from kb coordinate 54.0 to 60.0 confers an active partitioning phenotype, increasing the segregational stability of low-copy-number unstable plasmids. This Par region encodes the central control operon (korA, incC, korB, korF and korG) and the associated genes kfrA, upf54.8 and upf54.4. Each ORF in this region was knocked out in turn and it was shown that only incC and korB are needed for the stability phenotype. incC encodes two polypeptides from alternative translational starts. A deletion of the start of the operon showed that only IncC2, the shorter product, is essential for partitioning. Directed mutation or deletion was used to inactivate in turn each of the three KorB-binding sites (O(B)s) which were candidate cis-acting sequences needed for stability. Only inactivation of O(B)3, which lies between upf54.4 and upf54.8, resulted in an increased rate of segregational loss. However, the rate of loss was significantly higher than the rate of loss of the test plasmid carrying none of this RK2 Par region. Either inactivation of korB or deletion of O(B)1 from this O(B)3 mutant resulted in restoration of the loss rate to that expected for the unstable test plasmid alone. Thus KorB can act on O(B)1 to create a complex that either inhibits replication or reduces the effective plasmid copy number, perhaps by promoting pairing between plasmid molecules. This implies that RK2 goes through a cycle of pairing and separation, akin to the mitotic cycle of eukaryotic chromosomes.