Safety of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids: lessons for the new millennium

Outcome of pregnancy in a randomized controlled study of patients with asthma exposed to budesonide

BACKGROUND

Budesonide is the only inhaled corticosteroid to be given a category B pregnancy rating by the US Food and Drug Administration, based on observational data from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. However, data from large randomized controlled trials are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy outcomes among patients with recent-onset mild-to-moderate persistent asthma receiving low-dose budesonide vs placebo.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 7241 patients aged 5 to 66 years with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma for less than 2 years and no previous regular corticosteroid therapy received once-daily budesonide or placebo via dry powder inhaler in addition to their usual asthma medication for 3 years. This trial was followed by a 2-year open-label treatment period. The daily dose of budesonide was 400 microg for adults. The study included 2473 females aged 15 to 50 years at randomization. Pregnancy was not an exclusion criterion (except for U.S. patients).

RESULTS

Of 319 pregnancies reported, 313 were analyzed. Healthy children were delivered in 81% and 77% of all pregnancies in the budesonide and placebo groups, respectively. Of the 196 pregnancies reported by participants taking budesonide, 38 (19%) had adverse outcomes: 23 (12%) had miscarriages, 3 (2%) had congenital malformations, and 12 (6%) had other outcomes. Of the 117 pregnancies reported in the placebo group, 27 (23%) had adverse outcomes: 11 (9%) had miscarriages, 4 (3%) had congenital malformations, and 12 (10%) had other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with low-dose inhaled budesonide in females with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma does not seem to affect the outcome of pregnancy.

Effects of glucocorticoids on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in children and adults

Inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids are widely used as effective, first-line treatments for asthma and allergic rhinitis. Despite a good safety profile of these formulations, there is increasing concern about their propensity to produce systemic adverse effects. Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is one of the most important potential complications. This article reviews the effects of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in adults and children.

Comparative pharmacology, bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of inhaled glucocorticosteroids

A comparison of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of inhaled corticosteroids is necessary for their assessment. A good knowledge of these two aspects allows the optimization of efficacy and safety.The currently available inhaled corticosteroids already show some of the desired PK/PD parameters. The local adverse effects are decreased as soon as the inhaled corticosteroid is administered as an inactive prodrug or shows a bet-ter lung deposition. HFA-MDI beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and ciclesonide are two agents that illustrate this. Low oral bioavailability, rapid systemic clearance, and high plasma protein binding can minimize systemic adverse effects. Mometasone furoate, ciclesonide, and fluticasone propionate possess those characteristics. The pulmonary efficacy is maximized by high lung deposition and long pulmonary residence times. This effect can be achieved by slow dissolution in the lungs, as is the case for fluticasone propionate or lipid conjugation and has been shown for budesonide and ciclesonide. Furthermore, the lung deposition depends on the inhalation device, the particle size, and the inhalation technique. Therefore,improvement in the design of MDIs, DPIs, and nebulizers, and the development of more effective drug particles will lead to an optimized pulmonary targeting. Much progress has been made in the treatment of asthma. The available inhaled corticosteroids show a high safety profile and a good pulmonary selectivity. Development of newer compounds showed that improvement is possible as the result of a complete understanding of the PK/PD concepts. However,the introduction of further improved formulations with a better efficacy/safety profile will be difficult and protracted because the existing drugs are already highly efficient.

Safety of inhaled corticosteroids: room for improvement

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the standard of care in asthma and are widely used in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. High-dose regimens and long-term use of ICS in predisposed individuals may be associated with a variety of side effects, similar to those observed with systemic corticosteroid therapy. Side effects associated with long-term ICS use include reduction in growth velocity, cataracts, glaucoma, osteoporosis, and fractures. Fear of unwanted complications may be of concern in all patients using ICS, particularly in age- and gender-specific populations that are more prone to develop side effects or to reduce treatment adherence because of physical, behavioral, or psychological problems. In addition to concerns about ICS safety, dosing regimens that are difficult to follow may further reduce a patient's ability to comply with treatment. Ciclesonide, a new-generation ICS with unique pharmacokinetic properties, was developed to provide effective anti-inflammatory control for asthma with once-daily administration to improve patient adherence and a high safety profile to reduce the occurrence of local and systemic side effects.

Inhaled corticosteroid rapidly improved pulmonary sarcoidosis

We report two cases in whom inhaled corticosteroid rapidly improved pulmonary sarcoidosis. In the first case, fluticasone at 400 microg/day was initiated, because dry cough and small nodular shadows on chest X-ray persisted for six months. But her cough and the nodular shadows were persisted, therefore the treatment was replaced with budesonide at 800 microg/day. Two months later, her dry cough subsided and pulmonary shadows improved. Serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) level was decreased and pulmonary function improved. In the second case, bumethasone was already administered at a local clinic. Budesonide at 400 microg/day was combined with oral steroid, because pulmonary shadows continued for eight years. Also two months later, the serum ACE level was decreased and the pulmonary shadows slightly improved. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy for two to three months is tolerable, and may be a useful treatment option in some patients with sarcoidosis.

Ciclesonide, a novel inhaled steroid, does not affect hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) reduce local airway inflammation, which is an underlying cause of asthma symptoms. However, potential systemic side effects associated with ICS use are a major concern for asthmatic patients.

METHODS

Adult patients (n = 60; > or = 18 years of age) with moderate-to-severe asthma were randomized to receive 4 weeks of treatment with ciclesonide (CIC), 320 microg bid (CIC 640), CIC, 640 microg bid (CIC 1280), fluticasone propionate (FP), 440 microg bid (FP 880), FP 880 microg bid (FP 1760), or placebo (PBO) [all doses expressed as ex-actuator; comparable to ex-valve doses of 800 and 1,600 microg/d for CIC and 1,000 and 2,000 microg/d for FP, respectively].

RESULTS

After 29 days of treatment, CIC 640, CIC 1280, and FP 880 had no significant effect on the mean serum cortisol area under the curve for 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24h). FP 1760 produced a statistically significant suppression in mean serum cortisol AUC0-24h compared to PBO (p = 0.0009; 95% confidence interval [CI] -117.5 [corrected] to -32.1). Results obtained with cosyntropin stimulation revealed no statistically significant differences among the groups. The CIC 640 group demonstrated a significant increase compared to the PBO group in 24-h urinary cortisol levels from baseline at week 4 (p = 0.0224; 95% CI, 0.0023 to 0.0283), while the other treatment groups revealed no change in this parameter. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in all groups, and all adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with moderate and high doses of CIC does not result in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis suppression as compared with PBO.

Effect of ciclesonide and fluticasone on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Despite their proven efficacy in the treatment and prevention of asthma exacerbations, current inhaled corticosteroids carry safety concerns, especially adrenal suppression. Ciclesonide (hydrofluoroalkane propellant) is a novel inhaled corticosteroid with few, if any, clinical adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential effects of ciclesonide therapy on the dynamic cortisol response to sequential low- and high-dose cosyntropin stimulation in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week study in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. One hundred sixty-four patients were randomized and treated; 148 patients completed the study. Fluticasone propionate (chlorofluorocarbon propellant) was used as an active comparator. The doses administered were 320 microg of ciclesonide once daily, 320 microg of ciclesonide twice daily, and 440 microg of fluticasone propionate twice daily, all doses ex-actuator.

RESULTS

For both ciclesonide groups, changes in mean low- and high-dose peak serum cortisol levels and in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels corrected for creatinine were small vs baseline and comparable with placebo. For the fluticasone propionate group, significant reductions vs placebo in serum cortisol levels in response to high-dose cosyntropin stimulation and in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels were observed. Oral candidiasis rates were 2.5% for 320-microg/d ciclesonide, 2.4% for 640-microg/d ciclesonide, and 22.0% for 880-microg/d fluticasone propionate.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm the safety of ciclesonide therapy, demonstrating that at doses up to 640 microg/d, the drug does not affect sensitive markers of adrenal function.

Effect of loteprednol etabonate nasal spray suspension on seasonal allergic rhinitis assessed by allergen challenge in an environmental exposure unit

BACKGROUND

Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is a novel soft steroid that was designed to improve the benefit/risk ratio of topical corticosteroid therapy. This study assesses the clinical efficacy and safety of three different doses of LE nasal spray in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR).

METHODS

In this single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial 165 subjects with SAR to grass pollen received daily single doses of either 100, 200, 400 microg LE nasal spray, or placebo for 14 days. The patients underwent three 4-h allergen challenges with grass pollen in an environmental exposure unit at a screening visit (baseline) and on days 7 and 14 of treatment. Standardized nasal symptom scores were obtained every 20 min. Nasal flow, nasal secretions, and FEV(1) were measured every hour during allergen challenges.

RESULTS

After 14 days of treatment, patients who received 400 microg LE had significantly lower total nasal symptom scores compared with those receiving placebo (P = 0.007). LE400 reduced rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, the amount of nasal secretions, and improved nasal flow as compared with placebo (P < 0.05). LE100 and LE200 were not significantly different from placebo. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Loteprednol 400 microg once daily is superior to placebo and the only effective dose tested in improving nasal symptoms and objective parameters in patients with SAR.

Optimizing inhaled corticosteroid therapy in children with chronic asthma

Asthma is the most common chronic illness among children, and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective long-term therapy available for suppressing airway inflammation in persistent asthma. While the primary aim of ICS therapy is good efficacy with minimal side effects, early diagnosis and treatment of asthma can also improve asthma control and normalize lung function, and may prevent irreversible airway injury. Poor patient compliance is a major barrier to treatment. Simplified dosing regimens (e.g., once-daily administration), good inhaler technique, and education of the patient/caregiver should improve patient compliance. Concerns over ICS therapy are often based on the potential for systemic effects associated with oral corticosteroids (e.g., effects on bone mineral density, or growth suppression in children). Since adverse events are associated with high doses of ICS, the dose in all patients should be titrated to the minimum effective dose required to maintain control. Optimal distribution of an ICS in the lungs rather than the systemic compartment is affected by several factors, including the drug's pharmacokinetic profile, inhaler type, inhaler technique, and drug particle size. For young patients unable to use a dry-powder inhaler or pressurized metered-dose inhaler, a nebulizer facilitates drug delivery through passive inhalation; ICS therapy in the form of budesonide inhalation suspension can be given to children with persistent asthma from 12 months of age. In conclusion, selecting a drug with good efficacy and minimal side effects, such as budesonide, together with an easy-to-use delivery system and ongoing patient/caregiver education, is important in optimizing ICS therapy for children with persistent asthma.

Secondary osteoporosis: underlying disease and the risk for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic diseases of many organ systems require long-term (>or=1 year) treatment with glucocorticoids. Owing to the catabolic activity of glucocorticoid therapy, osteoporosis is a potential complication.

OBJECTIVES

This review discusses glucocorticoid-induced bone loss and the factors, including underlying disease, that increase the risk for osteoporosis. Therapeutic options for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) also are reviewed.

METHODS

A review of the English-language literature was conducted using the MEDLINE database and proceedings from scientific meetings. Search terms including glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, bone loss, and fracture were used to refine the search, and preference was given to studies published after 1990.

RESULTS

Long-term glucocorticoid treatment causes bone loss that is most precipitous in the first 6 months. Patients treated with glucocorticoids have additional risk factors for bone loss and osteoporosis that are associated with their primary disease. Chronic diseases can cause changes in bone metabolism, leading to bone loss in addition to that induced by glucocorticoids alone. Bone loss can be minimized through proper nutrition, weight-bearing exercise, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and, where indicated, bisphosphonate treatment. The American College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc Committee on Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis guidelines recommend bisphosphonates for minimizing bone loss and fracture risk in patients at risk for GIO. Risedronate is indicated for the prevention and treatment of GIO, and alendronate is indicated for its treatment. Both risedronate and alendronate increase bone mineral density in patients at risk for GIO. Risedronate significantly reduces the incidence of vertebral fractures after 1 year of treatment (P<0.05). The effectiveness and tolerability of the bisphosphonates have not been established in pregnant women or pediatric patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Men and women initiating long-term glucocorticoid treatment and those with GIO should be concomitantly treated with effective osteoporosis therapy to reduce fracture risk and counseled on preventive lifestyle changes.

Risk-benefit value of inhaled glucocorticoids: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective

Inhaled glucocorticoids induce therapeutic and adverse systemic effects via the same types of receptors. Analysis of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of inhaled glucocorticoids generates a risk-benefit value (RBV). Targeted efficacy with minimal adverse effects helps to quantify an appropriate RBV. High lung deposition/targeting, high receptor binding, longer pulmonary retention, and high lipid conjugation are among the pharmacokinetic parameters to be considered for improved efficacy of the compound. Low or negligible oral bioavailability, small particle size and inactive drug at the oropharynx, high plasma protein binding, rapid metabolism, high clearance, and lower systemic concentrations are associated with low risks for adverse effects. Inhaled glucocorticoid potency is enhanced by solution inhalers, which result in higher pulmonary deposition and minimize local adverse effects. These properties, among others, determine the efficacy and safety of inhaled glucocorticoids. Currently available inhaled glucocorticoids do not provide the complete pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters to optimize RBV, leaving room for improvement in the development of future agents.

Expected characteristics of an ideal, all-purpose inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are well established as the mainstay of asthma therapy. A number of ICSs are now available, each with unique pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles and physical characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the key characteristics of an ideal ICS and uses examples of existing agents to indicate the extent to which therapies reach these goals.

RESULTS

Improved therapeutic efficacy in an ICS may be offset by an increase in systemic effects. The ideal characteristics of an ICS include optimal clinical efficacy and no toxicity in combination with a convenient and easy-to-use inhaler device. To achieve this optimal profile, an ICS should have the following: a high affinity for and potency at the glucocorticoid receptor; prolonged retention in the lung; minimal or no oral bioavailability (ie, high first-pass inactivation); and rapid, complete systemic inactivation. The formulation and type of inhaler device are also important considerations: they should provide deposition in the lung in both large and small airways with no absorption effects outside the lung. ICSs should be evaluated for administration with several different delivery devices to ensure ease of use by patients of all ages with different asthma severities. An ICS that can be administered QD is also likely to improve patient adherence by simplifying the treatment regimen.

CONCLUSION

An ideal ICS should have a large therapeutic margin, be used safely and effectively for long periods, be administered QD, be suitable for use in patients of all ages and asthma severities, and offer both control and prevention of asthma symptoms and exacerbations.

Safety and tolerability profiles of intranasal antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis

Intranasal corticosteroids and intranasal antihistamines are efficacious topical therapies in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. This review addresses their relative roles in the management of this disease, focusing on their safety and tolerability profiles. The intranasal route of administration delivers drug directly to the target organ, thereby minimising the potential for the systemic adverse effects that may be evident with oral therapy. Furthermore, the topical route of delivery enables the use of lower doses of medication. Such therapies, predominantly available as aqueous formulations following the ban of chlorofluorocarbon propellants, have minimal local adverse effects. Intranasal application of therapy can induce sneezing in the hyper-reactive nose, and transient local irritation has been described with certain formulations. Intranasal administration of corticosteroids is associated with minor nose bleeding in a small proportion of recipients. This effect has been attributed to the vasoconstrictor activity of the corticosteroid molecules, and is considered to account for the very rare occurrence of nasal septal perforation. Nasal biopsy studies do not show any detrimental structural effects within the nasal mucosa with long-term administration of intranasal corticosteroids. Much attention has focused on the systemic safety of intranasal application. When administered at standard recommended therapeutic dosage, the intranasal antihistamines do not cause significant sedation or impairment of psychomotor function, effects that would be evident when these agents are administered orally at a therapeutically relevant dosage. The systemic bioavailability of intranasal corticosteroids varies from <1% to up to 40-50% and influences the risk of systemic adverse effects. Because the dose delivered topically is small, this is not a major consideration, and extensive studies have not identified significant effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis with continued treatment. A small effect on growth has been reported in one study in children receiving a standard dosage over 1 year, however. This has not been found in prospective studies with the intranasal corticosteroids that have low systemic bioavailability and therefore the judicious choice of intranasal formulation, particularly if there is concurrent corticosteroid inhalation for asthma, is prudent. There is no evidence that such considerations are relevant to shorter-term use, such as in intermittent or seasonal disease. Intranasal therapy, which represents a major mode of drug delivery in allergic rhinitis, thus has a very favourable benefit/risk ratio and is the preferred route of administration for corticosteroids in the treatment of this disease, as well as an important option for antihistaminic therapy, particularly if rapid symptom relief is required.

Safety of the newer inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain a vital part of the management of persistent asthma, but concerns have been raised about their potential adverse effects in children. This review examines the safety data on three new ICS - fluticasone propionate, mometasone, and extrafine beclomethasone in hydrofluoroalkane (HFA-134a) propellant (QVAR The use of tradenames is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement. formulation) in relation to the older corticosteroids. Topical adverse effects such as thrush and dysphonia are rare, but dental erosion is a possibility with powder forms of ICS because of their low pH. Thus, it is important to stress mouth rinsing after administration and maintaining good dental hygiene to minimize this risk. Biochemical adrenal suppression can be readily demonstrated, particularly with high doses of all ICS. The clinical relevance of this was uncertain in the past, but there have now been >50 reported cases of acute adrenal crises in children receiving ICS, most of whom were on fluticasone propionate. In order to minimize the risk of symptomatic adrenal suppression, it is important to back-titrate the ICS dose and alert families of children receiving high-dose ICS of this potential adverse effect. A pediatric endocrine opinion should be sought if adrenal suppression is suspected. The older ICS cause temporary slowing of growth velocity, but the limited data available do not show any significant compromise of final adult height. The effect on growth of fluticasone propionate may not be as great as with the older ICS, but the studies have been short term and only used low doses of fluticasone propionate. There have been case reports of growth suppression in children receiving high doses of fluticasone propionate. The limited studies performed on the effect of ICS on bone mineral density in children did not show any adverse effects, but there may be an increased risk of fractures. Hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone (QVAR) is essentially the same drug as chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone, but with double the lung deposition owing to the smaller particle size. Thus, it could be expected that any adverse effects seen with chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone would be the same with hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone. However, some of the published data, particularly in adults, suggest that hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone may be less systemically active than chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone, even at equipotent doses. As yet, there are no long-term data on mometasone, but initial studies in adults suggest there may be less suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, although further studies are required, particularly in children.ICS will remain a cornerstone in the management of persistent pediatric asthma, provided that the diagnosis of asthma is secure. It is very important to use ICS appropriately and to ensure the lowest possible doses are used to achieve symptom control, thus minimizing the risk of serious adverse effects.

Identification of a novel glucocorticoid receptor mutation in budesonide-resistant human bronchial epithelial cells

We developed a molecular genetic model to investigate glucocorticoid receptor (GR) signaling in human bronchial epithelial cells in response to the therapeutic steroid budesonide. Based on a genetic selection scheme using the human Chago K1 cell line and integrated copies of a glucocorticoid-responsive herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene and a green fluorescent protein gene, we isolated five Chago K1 variants that grew in media containing budesonide and ganciclovir. Three spontaneous budesonide-resistant subclones were found to express low levels of GR, whereas two mutants isolated from ethylmethane sulfonate-treated cultures contained normal levels of GR protein. Analysis of the GR coding sequence in the budesonide-resistant subclone Ch-BdE5 identified a novel Val to Met mutation at amino acid position 575 (GRV575M) which caused an 80% decrease in transcriptional regulatory functions with only a minimal effect on ligand binding activity. Homology modeling of the GR structure in this region of the hormone binding domain and molecular dynamic simulations suggested that the GRV575M mutation would have a decreased affinity for the LXXLL motif of p160 coactivators. To test this prediction, we performed transactivation and glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assays using the p160 coactivator glucocorticoid interacting protein 1 (GRIP1)/transcriptional intermediary factor 2 and found that GRV575M transcriptional activity was not enhanced by GRIP1 in transfected cells nor was it able to bind GRIP1 in vitro. Identification of the novel GRV575M variant in human bronchial epithelial cells using a molecular genetic selection scheme suggests that functional assays performed in relevant cell types could identify subtle defects in GR signaling that contribute to reduced steroid sensitivities in vivo.

Pharmaceutical characteristics that influence the clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the most effective therapy for the management of persistent asthma. The aim of ICS therapy is to achieve a high anti-inflammatory effect in the airways with a concomitant low risk of unwanted local and systemic effects. Direct estimates of clinical efficacy and potency based on studies in humans are difficult to interpret.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the challenges of using alternative estimates of ICS efficacy and potency, including pharmaceutical characteristics.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Articles published from 1990 to 2002 on the potency, efficacy, and tolerability of ICSs were identified using MEDLINE and in-house databases and were then reviewed. Search terms included inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, fluticasone, beclomethasone, mometasone, and potency.

RESULTS

Differences among ICSs can be readily shown using preclinical measures, such as glucocorticoid receptor binding or skin blanching tests. However, pharmaceutical (delivery and pharmacokinetic) differences of ICSs can have a greater impact on clinical efficacy than in vitro potency differences. For example, the unique esterification of budesonide in the airways prolongs its local activity and may contribute positively to its efficacy and therapeutic index. Although comparative clinical trials suggest 6-fold differences in potencies among ICSs, there is currently no evidence to support differences in efficacy when they are administered at equipotent dosages.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater preclinical potency of an ICS does not imply greater clinical efficacy. Pharmacokinetic factors can have a significant impact on relative clinical efficacy.

Inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma: long-term effects on growth and adrenocortical function

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most potent of all the available inhaled treatments, and are effective medications for long-term control of asthma. However, their use in children is limited by the risk of systemic adverse effects. Although results reported in the literature on the adverse effects of ICS are conflicting and often restricted to a small number of cases with a limited follow-up, most of them show an early decrease in growth velocity without significant influence on final adult height. Partial adrenal suppression has also been demonstrated in children treated with ICS for more than 2 months. Only children with mild persistent, moderate, or severe asthma not controlled by non-corticosteroid drugs should be treated with ICS for long periods. The dose of ICS must be individually adjusted to minimize the possible adverse effects on growth, and all children with asthma receiving long-term treatment with ICS must be regularly evaluated for growth impairment, which may necessitate dose reduction or drug replacement.

Triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray and fluticasone propionate are equally effective for relief of nasal symptoms in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVE: We compared 220 µg daily intranasal aqueous triamcinolone acetonide (TAA AQ) with 200 µg daily fluticasone propionate (FP) for relief of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, parallel-group, investigator-blind study included patients with symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis. After a baseline period, TAA AQ or FP was taken for about 21 days. Nasal symptom (discharge, stuffiness, itching, sneezing) severity was recorded twice daily; total nasal symptom score was calculated. Health-related quality of life was assessed by Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire.

RESULTS: Reductions in individual symptoms and total nasal symptom score were statistically significant versus baseline and were equivalent between treatments: −3.15 ± 0.19 with TAA AQ (n = 148) and ∼3.17 ± 0.18 with FP (n = 147) (95% confidence interval for the difference, −0.7391 to 0.3693). Clinically and statistically significant improvements in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores were comparable.

CONCLUSION: TAA AQ and FP were equally efficacious in relieving seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms and improving health-related quality of life.

SIGNIFICANCE: Differences in molecular potency of intranasal steroids do not confer differences in efficacy.

Combination therapy: appropriate for everyone?

The severity of asthma often varies throughout the course of the disease. At times the symptoms and underlying inflammation that are characteristic of asthma can worsen. Thus during an episode of viral-induced asthma or during a seasonal increase in asthma severity, a patient may be directed to increase his or her dosage of asthma controllers (i.e., inhaled corticosteroid) or add a long-acting bronchodilator (or other controller medications such as antileukotrienes) to manage symptoms, as recommended in guidelines published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Similarly, when symptoms are stable, decreasing dosages or discontinuing certain medications may be appropriate. The recent introduction of a combination product, of a long-acting bronchodilator formulated in the same dry powder device with an inhaled corticosteroid raises new challenges for the step care approach to asthma management recommended by the NIH in 1997. Although unquestionably more convenient for the patient, a combination formulation has the potential to decrease the flexibility required to successfully manage asthma over long periods. In addition, controversy exists regarding long-acting beta-agonists alone because their regular use may mask inflammation in the lung and decrease responsiveness to the bronchodilating effects of rescue medications (i.e., short-acting beta-agonists). The purpose of this article is to help physicians make informed therapeutic decisions for their patients with asthma. It focuses on the advantages and potential disadvantages of using combination products, which contain both an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta-agonist in the context of the NIH step care approach. Recent publications outlining the use of other add-on controller medications are also discussed.

Clinical and biological heterogeneity in children with moderate asthma

To evaluate the relationship between inflammatory markers and severity of asthma in children, the amount of interleukin-8 (IL-8) and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) released by peripheral blood mononuclear cells, exhaled nitric oxide (FE NO) levels, p65 nuclear factor-kappaB subunit, and phosphorylated IkBalpha expression by peripheral blood mononuclear cells were assessed in six control subjects, 12 steroid-naives subjects with intermittent asthma, and 17 children with moderate asthma. To investigate their predictive value, biomarker levels were correlated with the number of exacerbations during a 18-month follow-up period. We found that GM-CSF release was higher in moderate and intermittent asthmatics than in control subjects, whereas IL-8 release was higher in moderate than in intermittent asthmatics and control subjects. FE NO levels were similar among study groups. In moderate asthmatics, IL-8, GM-CSF, and FE NO significantly correlated with the exacerbation numbers. Moreover, p65 and phosphorylated IkBalpha levels were greater in moderate than in intermittent asthmatics and control subjects. According to GM-CSF, IL-8, and FE NO levels, two distinct subgroups of moderate asthmatics (low and high producers) were identified. High producers experienced more exacerbations than low producers. This study shows ongoing inflammation associated with biological and clinical heterogeneity in moderate asthmatics despite regular treatment and proposes that large prospective studies confirm the importance of biomarkers to assess inflammation and asthma control in children with asthma.

Are nasal steroids safe?

Nasal steroids have emerged as an integral part of rhinitis management. Most studies have shown no evidence of significant hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression from nasal steroid use, at least based on dynamic testing. Bone mineral density loss, glaucoma, and cataract formation are risks associated with systemic steroids, but reports with nasal steroid use are few. Growth retardation has been seen with some nasal steroids, but not others, based on stadiometric growth studies. Further studies are certainly needed to resolve this issue. Nasal steroids, in general, have an excellent safety record.

Efficacy and safety of budesonide inhalation powder (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) during 52 weeks of treatment in adults and children with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are the agents of choice for treating persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of budesonide inhalation powder (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) in patients with mild to severe persistent asthma.

METHODS

Patients (n=1133) received open-label budesonide (dose range, 100-800 microg b.i.d.) for 52 weeks following 2 weeks to 5 months of treatment in one of four double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Patients, identified before the double-blind studies, included adults (n=249) not receiving corticosteroids, adults (n=384) and children (n=356) previously maintained on inhaled corticosteroids, and adults (n=144) previously maintained on oral corticosteroids.

RESULTS

Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 sec was 68.2% of predicted normal (n=1133) at baseline (mean from two visits before randomization), 74.4% (n=1132) at the end of double-blind treatment, 81.3% (n=971) at week 52, and 80.1% (n=1125) at last observation (including patients who discontinued early). Sixty-four patients maintained on oral corticosteroids before double-blind treatment entered the open-label study off oral corticosteroids, 58 of whom (91%) remained oral corticosteroid-free throughout the study. There was no evidence of basal or cosyntropin-stimulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function suppression, and the most commonly occurring adverse events were respiratory infection, sinusitis, and pharyngitis.

CONCLUSIONS

During this 52-week, open-label study, budesonide maintained the improved pulmonary function and decreased oral corticosteroid use observed during previous double-blind treatment and was well tolerated, supporting its long-term use in adults and children with mild to severe persistent asthma.

Normal pregnancy outcomes in a population-based study including 2,968 pregnant women exposed to budesonide

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy for pregnant women with moderate to severe asthma, although the effects on pregnancy outcome are uncertain. A low compliance with the recommendations might lead to inadequate control of asthma, which has been associated with adverse outcomes both for the mother and the infant.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the reported use of inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort) during pregnancy influences birth outcome.

METHODS

Data were derived from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, which includes 99% of births in Sweden. During 1995 to 1998, 293,948 newborn infants were identified. Pregnancy outcomes were compared for mothers in Sweden reporting asthma medication usage with those reporting no asthma medication usage.

RESULTS

The 2,968 mothers who reported use of inhaled budesonide during early pregnancy gave birth to infants of normal gestational age, birth weight, and length, with no increased rate of stillbirths or multiple births. The rate of caesarean births was higher among mothers who used asthma medication during their pregnancy than among the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of inhaled budesonide in Sweden is not linked with any clinically relevant effects associated with pregnancy outcome.

Systemic bioactivity of intranasal triamcinolone and mometasone in perennial allergic rhinitis

AIMS

To evaluate the systemic bioactivity of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) 220 micro g or mometasone furoate (MF) 200 micro g over 3 weeks in perennial allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients received TA 220 micro g or MF 200 micro g once daily for 3 weeks with a 2 week placebo washout period prior to each randomized treatment. Measurements were made at baseline after each washout and after each randomized treatment, comprising overnight 10-h urinary cortisol corrected for creatinine (OUCC), 08.00 h plasma cortisol and 08.00 h serum osteocalcin.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between baseline values prior to TA or MF, and for any outcome measures comparing randomized treatments to respective baseline values or comparing TA with MF. For OUCC compared with baseline, the geometric mean fold suppression (95% CI) was 1.02 (0.78, 1.33) for TA (2% decrease), 1.07 (0.80, 1.42) for MF (7% decrease), and 1.05 (0.79, 1.39) for TA vs MF (5% decrease).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard doses of TA or MF over 3 weeks showed no differences in systemic bioactivity markers compared with respective baseline values after placebo washout, and there were no differences between TA vs MF.

The effects of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide and intranasal fluticasone propionate on short-term bone growth and HPA axis in children with allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) and fluticasone propionate (FP) aqueous nasal sprays on short-term lower-leg growth velocity and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA-axis function in pediatric subjects.

METHODS

In this controlled, double-blinded (TAA) or single-blinded (FP), four-way crossover trial, 59 subjects (mean age: 7.2 years) were randomized to receive each of four 2-week treatments in random order: TAA nasal spray 110 microg, TAA nasal spray 220 microg, FP nasal spray 200 microg, and placebo, administered by a third party once daily with a 2-week washout period between treatments. Lower-leg growth velocity was measured by knemometry, and HPA-axis function was measured using 12-hour overnight urinary cortisol levels.

RESULTS

Forty-nine subjects completed all four treatments and were included in the analyses. Mean growth velocity (+/- standard error) was 0.46 (+/- 0.06) mm/week for placebo, 0.37 (+/- 0.06) and 0.31 (+/- 0.06) mm/week for TAA nasal spray 110 and 220 microg, respectively, and 0.37 (+/- 0.06) mm/week for FP nasal spray. The treatment effect on mean growth velocity compared with placebo was -19.6% with TAA 110 microg, -32.6% with TAA 220 microg, and -21.7% with FP; none of these effects was considered statistically or clinically significant according to predefined criteria. No significant differences in changes in urine cortisol/creatinine ratios were observed between TAA 110 microg or 220 microg and placebo (4.38, 3.60, and -0.67, respectively, P > or = 0.157). In contrast, the change in mean urine cortisol/creatinine ratio values for FP (-3.59) were significantly lower compared with TAA 220 microg (P = 0.033) and placebo (P = 0.003). Knemometry exhibited less time-dependent variability than overnight urinary cortisol measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither TAA nor FP had a clinically significant effect on lower-leg growth velocity. In contrast to FP, TAA nasal spray did not significantly affect HPA-axis function when used over a 2-week interval.

Survey of adrenal crisis associated with inhaled corticosteroids in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Until recently, only two cases of acute adrenal crisis associated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) had been reported worldwide. We identified four additional cases and sought to survey the frequency of this side effect in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

Questionnaires were sent to all consultant paediatricians and adult endocrinologists registered in a UK medical directory, asking whether they had encountered asthmatic patients with acute adrenal crisis associated with ICS. Those responding positively completed a more detailed questionnaire. Diagnosis was confirmed by symptoms/signs and abnormal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function test results.

RESULTS

From an initial 2912 questionnaires, 33 patients met the diagnostic criteria (28 children, five adults). Twenty-three children had acute hypoglycaemia (13 with decreased levels of consciousness or coma; nine with coma and convulsions; one with coma, convulsions and death); five had insidious onset of symptoms. Four adults had insidious onset of symptoms; one had hypoglycaemia and convulsions. Of the 33 patients treated with 500-2000 micro g/day ICS, 30 (91%) had received fluticasone, one (3%) fluticasone and budesonide, and two (6%) beclomethasone.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of acute adrenal crisis was greater than expected as the majority of these patients were treated with ICS doses supported by British Guidelines on Asthma Management. Despite being the least prescribed and most recently introduced ICS, fluticasone was associated with 94% of the cases. We therefore advise that the licensed dosage of fluticasone for children, 400 micro g/day, should not be exceeded unless the patient is being supervised by a physician with experience in problematic asthma. We would also emphasise that until adrenal function has been assessed patients receiving high dose ICS should not have this therapy abruptly terminated as this could precipitate adrenal crisis.

Intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis

Intranasal corticosteroids are accepted as safe and effective first-line therapy for allergic rhinitis. Several intranasal corticosteroids are available: beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide, flunisolide, fluticasone propionate, mometasone furoate, and triamcinolone acetonide. All are efficacious in treating seasonal allergic rhinitis and as prophylaxis for perennial allergic rhinitis. In general, they relieve nasal congestion and itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing that occur in the early and late phases of allergic response, with studies showing almost complete prevention of late-phase symptoms. The rationale for topical intranasal corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis is that adequate drug concentrations can be achieved at receptor sites in the nasal mucosa. This leads to symptom control and reduces the risk of systemic adverse effects. Adverse reactions usually are limited to the nasal mucosa, such as dryness, burning and stinging, and sneezing, together with headache and epistaxis in 5-10% of patients regardless of formulation or compound. Differences among agents are limited to potency, patient preference, dosing regimens, and delivery, device and vehicle.

Permeability issues in nasal drug delivery

The nasal route is one of the most permeable and highly vascularized site for drug administration ensuring rapid absorption and onset of therapeutic action. It has been potentially explored as an alternative route for drugs with poor bioavailability and for the delivery of biosensitive and high molecular weight (MW) compounds such as proteins, peptides, steroids, vaccines, and so on. This review discusses the major factors affecting the permeability of drugs or biomolecules through the nasal mucosa, including biological, formulation and device-related factors. This information could potentially help to achieve desired plasma concentrations of drugs without compromising or altering the normal physiology of the nasal cavity.

Therapeutic ratio of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon formulations of fluticasone propionate

OBJECTIVES

To compare the therapeutic ratio of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) formulations of fluticasone propionate (FP).

METHODS

We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study comparing 6 weeks of treatment with FP using 500 micro g/d and 1,000 microg/d formulations of CFC and HFA. The primary end points were provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) and overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine excretion.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with mild-to-moderate asthma and geometric mean (SEM) PD20 of 82.3 micro g (19.2 micro g) completed the study. All treatments significantly improved PD20 values and morning peak expiratory flow vs placebo, while 1,000 microg/d was significantly better than 500 microg/d for the CFC formulation of FP (CFC-FP) but not the HFA formulation of FP (HFA-FP). Only 1,000 microg/d of CFC-FP caused significant suppression of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine compared to placebo. There were no differences between formulations at either dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased airway benefit with CFC-FP > 500 microg/d was offset by greater systemic effects. Although HFA-FP had fewer systemic effects than CFC-FP at 1,000 microg/d, there was no benefit to increasing HFA-FP to > 500 microg/d.

Comparative efficacy, safety, and effect on quality of life of triamcinolone acetonide and fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal sprays in patients with fall seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

The topical potency of fluticasone propionate (FP) is known to be four times greater than that of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA). However, the significance of this difference has not been proven in the clinical treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy, safety, and effect on health-related quality of life (HRQL) of FP and TAA aqueous nasal sprays in patients with SAR.

METHODS

Single-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled design. Patients were randomized to 3-week treatment with TAA 220 microg (n = 172) or FP 200 microg (n = 180) as two sprays/nostril once daily AM. Twelve-hour reflective symptom evaluations (nasal discharge, stuffiness, itching; sneezing; ocular itching/tearing/redness) were performed AM/PM, beginning at pretreatment baseline period. Incidences of specific treatment-related side effects were collected in daily questionnaires. HRQL was evaluated at baseline and end-of-treatment with a validated disease-specific, quality-of-life instrument.

RESULTS

TAA and FP produced similar improvement in daily total nasal symptom scores overall (49.4% and 52.7%, respectively; P = 0.332) and at every weekly time point (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between TAA and FP in any individual symptom score at any time point except week 2 (FP provided greater reduction in sneezing, P = 0.046). No significant difference was found between groups in overall occurrence of specific treatment-related side effects. Overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores were similar for TAA and FP at end-of-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differing molecular potencies, FP and TAA demonstrated comparable efficacy in the treatment of SAR, and produced similar occurrences of specific treatment-related side effects and similar improvements in overall patient HRQL.

One-year trial on safety and normal linear growth with flunisolide HFA in children with asthma

Flunisolide hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) has efficacy equivalent to that of flunisolide chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) at one third the dose of the CFC formulation, a reduction from 250 microg/puff for flunisolide CFC to 85 microg/puff for flunisolide HFA. Flunisolide HFA delivers a smaller particle size (1.2 microm) in solution, resulting in improved lung deposition as compared with flunisolide CFC (3.8 microm), which is delivered in suspension. An added built-in spacer has reduced oropharyngeal deposition that may result in fewer adverse events and make it easier to use. The objective of this study was to compare the year-long safety of flunisolide HFA (daily dosage 340 microg) with that of CFC beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) (daily dosage 336 microg) and cromolyn sodium (daily dosage 6,400 microg) in children 4-11 years old with mild-to-moderate asthma. The effects of these drugs on linear growth and growth velocity were also compared. The study was a 1-year open-label, parallel-group trial. Changes in physical examinations (including growth), adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, cosyntropin stimulation tests, mouth and throat cultures for Candida albicans, and laboratory findings were analyzed. Patients 4-5 years old received flunisolide HFA only. In total, 235 children were evaluated (152 receiving flunisolide HFA, 39 BDP, and 44 cromolyn). The incidence of adverse events was comparable among treatment groups; most were mild or moderate and considered unrelated to treatment. Among patients 6-11 years old, mean changes from baseline height at week 52 were 6.2 cm for the flunisolide HFA and cromolyn groups and 5.1 cm for the BDP group. Thus growth in children receiving flunisolide HFA was unaffected by 1 year of treatment. Changes from baseline in other parameters, including response to cosyntropin stimulation, were insignificant and similar among the 3 treatment groups. At the dosages studied, and following 1 year of treatment, flunisolide HFA with its small particle size and built-in spacer is safe and well tolerated in children 4-11 years old. There are no adverse effects associated with hypothalamic pituitary axis (HPA) function of flunisolide HFA, including linear growth in children 6-11 years old when compared with BDP and cromolyn sodium.

Efficacy of budesonide in moderate to severe asthma

BACKGROUND

The worldwide prevalence of asthma is increasing by approximately 50% per decade. Budesonide is one of several inhaled corticosteroids available for the treatment of asthma and has been extensively evaluated in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the published literature on the efficacy of budesonide in the management of adult and pediatric patients with moderate to severe asthma and compares budesonide with other inhaled corticosteroids and nonsteroidal treatment options.

METHODS

All controlled, randomized studies in patients with moderate or severe asthma were considered for inclusion. Relevant studies were identified through a MEDLINE search of the period from 1980 to 2000 using the terms budesonide plus efficacy, with or without the termsfluticasone, mometasone, and beclomethasone. The manufacturer's reference database was used to identify additional publications.

RESULTS

Budesonide is associated with a dose-response effect in adults and children with moderate to severe asthma. The data on budesonide are in line with the current recommendation for a high starting dose of inhaled corticosteroid (800 microg/d), followed by downward titration to the minimal effective dose. Budesonide administered by Turbuhaler (AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, Del) dry-powder inhaler (DPI) was effective at a significantly lower dose than beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) administered by pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) (P = 0.009), whereas its efficacy was similar to that of BDP delivered by hydrofluoroalkane pMDI and that of fluticasone propionate administered by DPI. Inhaled budesonide therapy was shown to be oral corticosteroid sparing in patients with severe asthma, thus reducing the total corticosteroid dose and the risk of systemic side effects. Pulmicort Respules (AstraZeneca), a nebulized formulation, was effective in the treatment of moderate to severe asthma in patients aged > or =12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Once- or twice-daily administration of budesonide delivered via the Turbuhaler and Pulmicort Respules systems has been shown to be well tolerated and efficacious in populations with moderate to severe asthma.

Balancing Safety and Efficacy in Pediatric Asthma Management

In the treatment of childhood asthma, balancing safety and efficacy is key to achieving optimal therapeutic benefit. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), because of their efficacy, remain a cornerstone in managing persistent pediatric asthma, but also are associated with significant adverse effects, including growth suppression. Consequently, careful attention must be given to balancing their safety and efficacy, which should include an understanding of airway patency and systemic absorption (dose, disease severity, propellant and lipophilicity of inhalant), bioavailability (inhalation technique, propellant, delivery devices, and hepatic first-pass metabolism), techniques for using minimum effective doses (dosing time, add-on therapy), and reduction of other exacerbating conditions (allergens, influenza, upper-respiratory diseases). The growth-suppressive effects of ICS may be most evident in children with: 1) mild asthma because the relatively high airway patency may facilitate increased levels of deposition and steroid absorption in more distal airways, and 2) evening dosing that may reduce nocturnal growth hormone activity. A step-down approach targeting a minimum effective dose and once-daily morning dosing is suggested for achieving the most acceptable safety/efficacy balance with ICS. The achievement of regular, safe, and correct ICS use requires significant knowledge and time for both caregiver and patient. Chromones, methylxanthines, long-acting β-agonists, and leukotriene receptor antagonists are currently available alternatives to ICS for the control of persistent childhood asthma. Chromones are safe but, like methylxanthines, are difficult to use and frequently result in compromised effectiveness. Long-acting β-agonists are not recommended as monotherapy for persistent asthma. Several factors that support leukotriene receptor antagonists as a therapeutic option for mild-to-moderate persistent pediatric asthma include established efficacy, good safety profiles, and simple, oral dosing. Physicians must evaluate and compare the balance of safety and efficacy for each agent to determine the appropriate asthma therapy for individual patients.

Decreased morning serum cortisol levels in children with asthma treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate

OBJECTIVE

In an observational long-term study, we followed 62 children (37 males, 25 females; mean age: 11.6 +/- 2.9 years) with moderate-to-severe asthma for 2 years and studied the effects of fluticasone propionate (176-1320 microg/day) on the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

STUDY DESIGN

Morning cortisol levels were monitored after patients had been on fluticasone for a mean of 8.0 +/- 5.2 months. Patients who had abnormal low morning cortisol levels (<5.5 microg/dL) were then switched either to lower fluticasone dosage or to other inhaled steroid formulation. Exact methods based on the binomial distribution were used to construct a 95% confidence interval for the true proportion of abnormal readings among those treated, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test for a significant difference between cortisol levels taken before and after the switch.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (36%) had abnormal morning cortisol levels while on fluticasone. Of the patients on a low dose (176 microg/day), 17% had abnormal values, whereas 43% of patients on a high dose (> or =880 microg/day) were abnormal. Patients with abnormal results (17/22) had their morning cortisol levels repeated 3 months after the switch. Thirteen of these patients (77%) had normal levels. A stratified analysis of the difference in morning cortisol levels before and after the switch showed significant increase in morning cortisol levels in the group receiving 440 microg/day or less of fluticasone (median difference: 5.25; confidence interval: 3.60-8.15), as well as in the group receiving 440 microg/day or more (median difference: 3.85; confidence interval: 1.00-7.60).

CONCLUSION

Inhaled fluticasone, even at conventional doses, may have greater effects on the adrenal function than previously recognized, but the clinical significance of this suppression still remains to be established.

Inhaled mometasone furoate: a review of its use in adults and adolescents with persistent asthma

Mometasone furoate is a corticosteroid with relatively high in vitro potency. Recent randomised, double-blind, multicentre trials have assessed the efficacy of mometasone furoate delivered by dry powder inhaler over 12 weeks in adults and adolescents with mild to severe persistent asthma. Mometasone furoate 200 microg twice daily or 400 microg once daily in the morning or 200 microg once daily in the evening improved lung function, asthma symptom scores and use of rescue medication to a significantly greater extent than placebo in patients who had previously received only short-acting inhaled beta2-adrenoceptor agonists alone as treatment in 3 trials (n = 195 to 306). In studies in 227 to 733 patients with mild to moderate asthma who were receiving ongoing treatment with inhaled corticosteroids prior to enrolment, mometasone furoate 100 to 400 microg twice daily was consistently better at improving the above indicators of asthma than placebo. Mometasone furoate 100 to 200 microg twice daily was as effective as beclomethasone dipropionate 200 microg twice daily or budesonide 400 microg twice daily and mometasone furoate 200 microg twice daily was as effective as fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily. Mometasone furoate 400 or 800 microg twice daily was also consistently more effective than placebo in reducing oral corticosteroid dosages and improving lung function and asthma symptoms in 132 patients with oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. Once daily administration of mometasone furoate 400 microg appears to be as effective at improving indicators of asthma as twice daily administration of 200 microg. Patients receiving mometasone furoate < or =800 microg/day and recipients of placebo experienced a similar overall incidence of adverse events considered to be related to treatment. The most common of these events were oral candidiasis, headache, pharyngitis and dysphonia. Mometasone furoate 100 to 400 microg twice daily, beclomethasone dipropionate 200 microg twice daily, budesonide 400 microg twice daily or fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily were similarly tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Inhaled mometasone furoate is well tolerated, with minimal systemic activity and is equally effective when administered as a divided dose or as a single daily dose. Use of the drug can result in a decrease in requirements for oral corticosteroids in patients with oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma and is as effective as other inhaled corticosteroids currently used in the treatment of mild to moderate persistent asthma. Thus mometasone furoate is suitable for the control of mild to severe persistent asthma in adults or adolescents.

Nonsteroidal selective glucocorticoid modulators: the effect of C-5 alkyl substitution on the transcriptional activation/repression profile of 2,5-dihydro-10-methoxy-2,2,4-trimethyl-1H-[1]benzopyrano[3,4-f]quinolines

The preparation and characterization of a series of selective glucocorticoid receptor modulators are described. The preliminary structure-activity relationship of nonaromatic C-5 substitution on the tetracyclic quinoline core showed a preference for small lipophilic side chains. Proper substitution at this position maintained the transcriptional repression of proinflammatory transcription factors while diminishing the transcriptional activation activity of the ligand/glucocorticoid receptor complex. The optimal compounds described in this study were the allyl analogue 18 and cyclopentyl analogue 32. These candidates showed slightly less potent, highly efficacious E-selectin repression with significantly reduced levels of glucocorticoid response element activation in reporter gene assays vs prednisolone. Allyl analogue 18 was evaluated in vivo. An oral dose of 18 showed an ED(50) = 1.7 mg/kg as compared to 1.2 mg/kg for prednisolone in the Sephadex-induced pulmonary eosinophilia model and an ED(50) = 15 mg/kg vs 4 mg/kg for prednisolone in the carrageenan-induced paw edema model.

Decongestant efficacy of desloratadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis

Recent advances in experimental immunologic approaches to seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) have led to a shift in the concepts of its pathogenesis. The conventional view of SAR as a local response to inhaled allergens has largely given way to a new view of this disorder as a systemic condition with local tissue manifestations. This concept, together with an increasing recognition of specific mediators' distinct roles in driving the early- and late-phase allergic responses, has opened multiple lines of therapeutic attack within the allergic cascade. Potent inhibition of inflammatory mediator release at distinct points in this cascade is conferred by desloratadine. In addition to the familiar range of SAR symptoms amenable to antihistamine therapy, desloratadine uniquely attenuates patient ratings of nasal congestion. This novel, nonsedating histamine H1-receptor antagonist is the only once-daily antiallergic product with a consistent decongestant effect that begins within hours of the first morning dose and is sustained for the entire treatment period.

A risk-benefit assessment of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide in allergic rhinitis

The efficacy of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide in seasonal and allergic rhinitis has been evaluated in clinical trials and has been compared with antihistamines and other intranasal corticosteroids. Intranasal corticosteroids are either as equally effective as or more effective than comparative drugs. Intranasal corticosteroids are particularly useful as they decrease membrane permeability and inhibit both early and late phase reactions to allergens. They minimise the nasal secretory response and reduce the sensitivity of local nasal irritant receptors. A potential benefit of topical application is the flushing action of the nasal mucosa, which may reduce allergens and secretions. In addition to seasonal and perennial rhinitis, intranasal corticosteroids have additional benefits when used to reduce inflammation in the treatment of sinusitis and may help in decreasing secondary rhinovirus infections. Furthermore, suboptimal control of asthma can be avoided by treatment of allergic rhinitis with intranasal corticosteroids. In clinical trials, common adverse effects for triamcinolone acetonide include sneezing, dry, mucosa, nasal irritation, sinus discomfort, throat discomfort, epistaxis and headache. Posterior subcapsular cataract formation has not been seen with triamcinolone acetonide. Recent literature evaluating systemic absorption of intranasal corticosteroids have shown surprising results where significant absorption has occurred with intranasal budesonide and fluticasone propionate. Growth and hypothalamic pituitary axis (HPA) function studies have been reviewed, with some intranasal corticosteroids showing changes with continual use. A retrospective study in children receiving daily triamcinolone acetonide for 12 months showed no effect on height and bodyweight. Triamcinolone acetonide at standard dosages (110 or 220microg once or twice a day) does not appear to suppress adrenal gland function and is effective in relieving most symptoms of allergic rhinitis. The International Consensus Conference Proceedings on Rhinitis now currently recommends the use of intranasal corticosteroids as first line therapy, since they have been found to be well tolerated and effective with minimal adverse effects and, specifically, no cognitive impairment. The recommended maximum dose of aqueous triamcinolone acetonide in adults and children is 220microg once a day. The aerosol form may be recommended in children between 7 and 12 years old, up to 440microg once a day or in divided doses. Duration of allergy treatment is generally for the length of each allergy season. If symptoms are perennial, then a reduction of dosage is made to the lowest effective dose with monitoring every 3 months for risk and benefit assessment. Complications to watch for include bleeding, and possible septal perforation and nasal candidiasis, although these are rare.