Clinical pharmacology of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist

Pharmacokinetic and clinical profile of a novel formulation of bosentan in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension: the FUTURE-1 study

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

* Exposure to bosentan was lower in paediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients treated with the marketed adult formulation at a dose of about 2 mg kg(-1) when compared with adult PAH patients. * In healthy adult subjects, bosentan pharmacokinetics are less than dose-proportional at doses of >or=500 mg.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

* The pharmacokinetics of a new paediatric bosentan formulation were characterized in paediatric PAH patients. * The level of exposure to bosentan as observed in adult PAH patients cannot be reached in paediatric patients with b.i.d. dosing. * In paediatric PAH patients, nondose-proportional pharmacokinetics of bosentan occur at lower doses when compared with healthy adult subjects.

AIM

To show equivalent bosentan exposure in paediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) when compared with a cohort of historical controls of adult PAH patients using a newly developed paediatric formulation.

METHODS

Thirty-six paediatric PAH patients were enrolled in this multicentre, prospective, open-label, noncontrolled study and treated for 4 weeks with bosentan 2 mg kg(-1) b.i.d. and then for 8 weeks with 4 mg kg(-1) b.i.d. Blood samples were taken for pharmacokinetic purposes. Exploratory efficacy measurements included World Health Organization (WHO) functional class and parent's and clinician's Global Clinical Impression scales.

RESULTS

Comparing children with a historical group of adults, the geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was 0.54 (0.37, 0.78), i.e. children had lower exposure to bosentan than adults. Bosentan concentrations following doses of 2 and 4 mg kg(-1) were similar. Improvements in WHO functional class and the Global Clinical Impression scales occurred mainly in bosentan-naive patients, whereas the rare worsenings occurred in patients already on bosentan prior to study initiation. The paediatric formulation was well accepted and bosentan well tolerated in this study. No cases of elevated liver enzymes or anaemia were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to bosentan, as shown comparing the results from this study with those from a study in adults, was different in paediatric and adult PAH patients. Since FUTURE-1 and past studies suggest a favourable benefit-risk profile for bosentan at 2 mg kg(-1) b.i.d., this dose is recommended for children with PAH. The new paediatric formulation was well tolerated.

Bosentan: a review of its use in the management of digital ulcers associated with systemic sclerosis

Bosentan (Tracleer) is an orally administered dual endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor antagonist approved in the EU for reducing the number of new digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis and ongoing digital ulcer disease. Oral bosentan therapy was beneficial and generally well tolerated in patients with digital ulcers associated with systemic sclerosis. In well designed, placebo-controlled trials, bosentan treatment significantly reduced the number of new ulcers, but had no effect on ulcer healing, in patients with digital ulcers. Adverse events associated with bosentan were consistent with those seen during treatment for other indications, with major concerns being the potential for teratogenicity and hepatotoxicity, for which regular liver function monitoring is recommended. Overall, considering the large unmet need for therapeutic options in patients with digital ulcers, bosentan extends the treatment options available to patients with systemic sclerosis-associated digital ulcers.

Bosentan for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary diseases: emerging evidence

Endothelin-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor and mitogen that is primarily synthesized and released from vascular endothelial cells. Bosentan is a dual endothelin-receptor antagonist that initially received approval for treatment of WHO group I pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) for patients in functional classes III and IV. Analysis of a study conducted in functional class II patients (Endothelin Antagonist Trial in Mildly Symptomatic PAH Patients [EARLY] trial) suggest its efficacy for these less symptomatic patients. In addition, bosentan has demonstrated efficacy in patients with congenital heart disease and Eisenmengers syndrome with right to left shunting and in HIV-related PAH. Studies of bosentan in inoperable or residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension suggest possible efficacy. Bosentan appears promising in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who do not have pulmonary hypertension. Combinations of bosentan with other PAH therapies such as iloprost and sildenafil may have incremental benefit over monotherapy.

Safety and tolerability of bosentan in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Endothelin receptor antagonism has emerged as an important therapeutic approach in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Bench to bedside scientific research has clearly shown that endothelin-1 (ET-1) is over-expressed in several forms of pulmonary vascular disease and plays an important pathogenetic role in the development and progression of PAH. Oral endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been shown to improve exercise capacity, functional status, pulmonary hemodynamics, and delay the time to clinical worsening in several randomized placebo-controlled trials. Bosentan, the first oral ERA, was approved in 2001 and since that time it has established a strong record of safety and efficacy in PAH. More recently, two additional ERAs, ambrisentan and sitaxsentan, have been approved for use. The objective of this review is to evaluate the available evidence supporting the efficacy, pharmacology, safety and tolerability, and patient-focused perspectives for bosentan, the first approved ERA for PAH. Ongoing and forthcoming randomized trials are also highlighted including the application of bosentan in combination with other PAH therapies.

[Mechanisms of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions]

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions occur when a drug alters the disposition (absorption, distribution, elimination) of a coadministered agent. Pharmacokinetic interactions may result in the increase or the decrease of plasma drug concentrations. These modifications are variable in intensity but can lead to contraindications of the association. The mechanisms of pharmacokinetic interactions involve drug metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters and orphan nuclear receptors that regulate at the transcriptional level the expression of enzymes and transporters. The increase of drug plasma concentrations is generally related to the inhibition of enzymes and/or drug transport. The decrease of drug concentrations reflects the activation of orphan nuclear receptors by inducers that lead to the increase of the expression of enzymes and drug transporters. Inhibition of drug metabolism or transport is quite immediate (24-48h) while induction is a slower process (7-10 days). Complex situations may be observed with drugs that are both inducers and inhibitors (rifampin, ritonavir). They can cause the decrease and the increase of the exposure of the combined agent depending on the duration of the association.

Polymorphisms of human cytochrome P450 2C9 and the functional relevance

Human cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) accounts for ∼20% of hepatic total CYP content and metabolizes ~15% clinical drugs such as phenytoin, S-warfarin, tolbutamide, losartan, and many nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs). CYP2C9 is highly polymorphic, with at least 33 variants of CYP2C9 (*1B through *34) being identified so far. CYP2C9*2 is frequent among Caucasians with ~1% of the population being homozygous carriers and 22% are heterozygous. The corresponding figures for the CYP2C9*3 allele are 0.4% and 15%, respectively. There are a number of clinical studies addressing the impact of CYP2C9 polymorphisms on the clearance and/or therapeutic response of therapeutic drugs. These studies have highlighted the importance of the CYP2C9*2 and *3 alleles as a determining factor for drug clearance and drug response. The CYP2C9 polymorphisms are relevant for the efficacy and adverse effects of numerous NSAIDs, sulfonylurea antidiabetic drugs and, most critically, oral anticoagulants belonging to the class of vitamin K epoxide reductase inhibitors. Warfarin has served as a practical example of how pharmacogenetics can be utilized to achieve maximum efficacy and minimum toxicity. For many of these drugs, a clear gene-dose and gene-effect relationship has been observed in patients. In this regard, CYP2C9 alleles can be considered as a useful biomarker in monitoring drug response and adverse effects. Genetic testing of CYP2C9 is expected to play a role in predicting drug clearance and conducting individualized pharmacotherapy. However, prospective clinical studies with large samples are warranted to establish gene-dose and gene-effect relationships for CYP2C9 and its substrate drugs.

Identification of the major human hepatic and placental enzymes responsible for the biotransformation of glyburide

One of the factors affecting the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a drug during pregnancy is the activity of hepatic and placental metabolizing enzymes. Recently, we reported on the biotransformation of glyburide by human hepatic and placental microsomes to six metabolites that are structurally identical between the two tissues. Two of the metabolites, 4-trans-(M1) and 3-cis-hydroxycyclohexyl glyburide (M2b), were previously identified in plasma and urine of patients treated with glyburide and are pharmacologically active. The aim of this investigation was to identify the major human hepatic and placental CYP450 isozymes responsible for the formation of each metabolite of glyburide. This was achieved by the use of chemical inhibitors selective for individual CYP isozymes and antibodies raised against them. The identification was confirmed by the kinetic constants for the biotransformation of glyburide by cDNA-expressed enzymes. The data revealed that the major hepatic isozymes responsible for the formation of each metabolite are as follows: CYP3A4 (ethylene-hydroxylated glyburide (M5), 3-trans-(M3) and 2-trans-(M4) cyclohexyl glyburide); CYP2C9 (M1, M2a (4-cis-) and M2b); CYP2C8 (M1 and M2b); and CYP2C19 (M2a). Human placental microsomal CYP19/aromatase was the major isozyme responsible for the biotransformation of glyburide to predominantly M5. The formation of significant amounts of M5 by CYP19 in the placenta could render this metabolite more accessible to the fetal circulation. The multiplicity of enzymes biotransforming glyburide and the metabolites formed underscores the potential for its drug interactions in vivo.

Bosentan in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with the focus on the mildly symptomatic patient

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease with poor survival outcomes. Bosentan is an oral endothelin-1 receptor antagonist (ERA) that has been shown in a large randomized placebo-controlled trial (BREATHE-1) to be effective at improving exercise tolerance in patients with PAH in functional class III and IV. Further studies have been conducted showing: benefit in smaller subgroups of PAH, eg, congenital heart disease, efficacy in combination with other PAH therapies, eg, sildenafil, improved long-term survival compared with historical controls. More recently, controlled trials of new ERAs have included patients with milder symptoms; those in functional class II. Analysis of the functional class II data is often limited by small numbers. These trials have generally shown a similar treatment effect to bosentan, but there are no controlled trials directly comparing these new ERAs. The EARLY trial exclusively enrolled functional class II patients and assessed hemodynamics at 6 months. Though significant, the reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance is merely a surrogate marker for the intended aim of delaying disease progression. Significant adverse effects associated with bosentan include edema, anemia and transaminase elevation. These may preclude a long duration of treatment. Further studies are required to determine optimum treatment strategy in mild disease.

Bleeding events in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Despite limited evidence from clinical studies, anticoagulant drugs such as vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (e.g., warfarin or phenprocoumon) are widely used in the background treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). According to current guidelines, they are generally accepted as efficacious drugs, although their efficacy is neither supported by randomised controlled trials, nor formally approved by regulatory agencies for use in the specific PAH indication. The use of these drugs is not without problems, as a paradoxical situation has to be managed in the treatment of this condition. On one hand, thrombosis is one of the key pathophysiologic features of PAH (besides vasoconstriction, proliferation and inflammation). On the other hand, the incidence of bleeding events is increased in PAH patients. This applies particularly to PAH that is related to connective tissue diseases, congenital heart disease and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. In patients receiving VKA, caution must be observed in particular when concomitantly using prostanoids or sildenafil. Similarly, VKA doses have to be adjusted according to the labelling when using sitaxentan concomitantly. Regular International Normalized Ratio monitoring contributes to the safety of PAH patients on VKA.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in combination with ambrisentan in healthy volunteers

AIMS

Ambrisentan is an oral, propanoic acid-based endothelin receptor antagonist often co-administered with warfarin to patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential for ambrisentan to affect warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

METHODS

In this open-label cross-over study, 22 healthy subjects received a single dose of racemic warfarin 25 mg alone and after 8 days of ambrisentan 10 mg once daily. Assessments included exposure (AUC(0-last)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) for R- and S-warfarin, and International Normalized Ratio maximum observed value (INR(max)) and area under the curve (INR(AUC(0-last))). The effects of warfarin on ambrisentan steady-state pharmacokinetics and the safety of ambrisentan/warfarin co-administration were assessed. Data are presented as geometric mean ratios.

RESULTS

Ambrisentan had no significant effects on the AUC(0-last) of R-warfarin [104.7; 90% confidence interval (CI) 101.7, 107.7) or S-warfarin (101.6; 90% CI 98.4, 105.0). Similarly, ambrisentan had no significant effects on the C(max) of R-warfarin (91.6; 90% CI 86.2, 97.4) or S-warfarin (89.9; 90% CI 84.8, 95.3). Consistent with these observations, little pharmacodynamic change was observed for INR(max) (85.3; 90% CI 82.4, 88.2) or INR(AUC(0-last)) (93.0; 90% CI 90.8, 95.3). In addition, co-administration of warfarin did not alter ambrisentan steady-state pharmacokinetics. Adverse events were infrequent, and there were no bleeding adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple doses of ambrisentan had no clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of warfarin. Therefore, significant dose adjustments of either drug are unlikely to be required with co-administration.

Role of Ambrisentan in the Management of Pulmonary Hypertension

Objective:

To review the role of ambrisentan in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

Data Sources:

Literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1950-June 2008), Iowa Drug Information Service (1966–March 2008), EMBASE (1966-June 2008), bibliographies of pertinent articles, and unpublished data provided by the manufacturer and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Search terms included ambrisentan, endothelin antagonist, pulmonary hypertension, and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Due to limited literature available, additional criteria to limit searches were not used.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Abstracts and original preclinical and clinical research reports available in the English language were Identified for review. All manufacturer-provided data were also evaluated. Literature related to ambrisentan, endothelin antagonists, pulmonary hypertension, and pulmonary arterial hypertension were included. Four clinical trials evaluated the efficacy of ambrisentan in adults with symptomatic PAH.

Data Synthesis:

Ambrisentan is the latest endothelin-receptor antagonist (ERA) to obtain FDA approval for the treatment of PAH. It joins the first FDA-approved ERA, bosentan. Like bosentan, ambrisentan is available orally (with once-daily dosing compared with bosentan's twice-daily dosing) and has been shown to improve exercise capacity and delay clinical worsening. As with bosentan, the most significant safety concerns with ambrisentan relate to potential liver injury and a contraindication in pregnancy. Although ambrisentan has higher affinity for the endothelin type A receptor than for the endothelin type B receptor, specific advantages of this selectivity, in terms of efficacy compared with bosentan, a nonselective agent, have not been demonstrated.

Conclusions:

Ambrisentan has been shown to be an effective ERA in patients with PAH. A significant advantage of ambrisentan is the lack of any clinically important drug interactions with warfarin and sildenafil, which are frequently used by patients being treated for PAH.

Inhibition and induction of human cytochrome P450 enzymes: current status

Variability of drug metabolism, especially that of the most important phase I enzymes or cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, is an important complicating factor in many areas of pharmacology and toxicology, in drug development, preclinical toxicity studies, clinical trials, drug therapy, environmental exposures and risk assessment. These frequently enormous consequences in mind, predictive and pre-emptying measures have been a top priority in both pharmacology and toxicology. This means the development of predictive in vitro approaches. The sound prediction is always based on the firm background of basic research on the phenomena of inhibition and induction and their underlying mechanisms; consequently the description of these aspects is the purpose of this review. We cover both inhibition and induction of CYP enzymes, always keeping in mind the basic mechanisms on which to build predictive and preventive in vitro approaches. Just because validation is an essential part of any in vitro-in vivo extrapolation scenario, we cover also necessary in vivo research and findings in order to provide a proper view to justify in vitro approaches and observations.

Safety and efficacy of combined use of sildenafil, bosentan, and iloprost before and after liver transplantation in severe portopulmonary hypertension

Portopulmonary hypertension (PPHTN) represents a constrictive pulmonary vasculopathy in patients with portal hypertension. Liver transplantation (LT) may be curative and is usually restricted to patients with mild-to-moderate disease severity characterized by a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP < 35 mm Hg). Patients with severe disease (mPAP > 50 mm Hg) are usually excluded from transplantation. We describe a patient with severe PPHTN, initiated on sequential and ultimately combination therapy of prostacyclin, sildenafil, and bosentan (PSB) pretransplantation and continued for 2 years posttransplantation. Peak mPAP on PSB therapy was dramatically reduced from 70 mm Hg to 32 mm Hg pretransplantation, and continued therapy facilitated a further fall in mPAP to 28 mm Hg posttransplantation. The pulmonary vascular resistance index fell from 604 to 291 dyne second(-1) cm(-5). The perioperative mPAP rose to 100 mm Hg following an episode of sepsis and fell with optimization of PSB therapy. In conclusion, this is the first reported patient with severe PPHTN using this combination of vasodilator therapy as a bridge to LT and then as maintenance in the posttransplantation phase. This regimen may enable LT in similar patients in the future, without long-term consequences.

Inhalation of the ETAreceptor antagonist LU-135252 selectively attenuates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction

Endogenous endothelin (ET)-1 modulates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV). Accordingly, intravenously applied ETAreceptor antagonists reduce HPV, but this is accompanied by systemic vasodilation. We hypothesized that inhalation of an ETAreceptor antagonist might act selectively on the pulmonary vasculature and investigated the effects of aerosolized LU-135252 in an experimental model of HPV. Sixteen piglets (weight: 25 ± 1 kg) were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated at an inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) of 0.3. After 1 h of hypoxia at FiO20.15, animals were randomly assigned either to receive aerosolized LU-135252 as bolus (0.3 mg/kg for 20 min; n = 8, LU group), or to receive aerosolized saline ( n = 8, controls). In all animals, hypoxia significantly increased mean pulmonary arterial pressure (32 ± 1 vs. 23 ± 1 mmHg; P < 0.01; means ± SE) and increased arterial plasma ET-1 (0.52 ± 0.04 vs. 0.37 ± 0.05 fmol/ml; P < 0.01) compared with mild hyperoxia at FiO20.3. Inhalation of LU-135252 induced a significant and sustained decrease in mean pulmonary arterial pressure compared with controls (LU group: 27 ± 1 mmHg; controls: 32 ± 1 mmHg; values at 4 h of hypoxia; P < 0.01). In parallel, mean systemic arterial pressure and cardiac output remained stable and were not significantly different from control values. Consequently, in our experimental model of HPV, the inhaled ETAreceptor antagonist LU-135252 induced selective pulmonary vasodilation without adverse systemic hemodynamic effects.

Inflammatory responses after endothelin B (ETB) receptor activation in human monocytes: new evidence for beneficial anti-inflammatory potency of ETB-receptor antagonism

Endothelin (ET) stimulates potent ETA/ETB receptors important in the pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and fibrosis. Though therapy with ET-receptor antagonists is well established uncertainty exists whether selective ETA or dual ETA/ETB-receptor antagonism is superior in PAH. The objective of this study was to further elucidate the pro-inflammatory effects of ET-1 on ETB receptors in cultured human monocytes (10(5)/20 h) compared with non-specific stimulation with LPS in vitro and to define the antagonizing effects of bosentan, a dual ETA/ETB-receptor antagonist, on inflammatory mediator production. We further hypothesized that ETB-receptor antagonism reduces the requirement of PGE2 to control inflammatory mediator production. Activation of the monocyte ETB subtype by ET (1 ng/ml) concentration-dependently stimulated TNF-alpha (744%) >PGE2 (570%) > IL-1 beta (112%) and had no effect on 5-lipoxygenase metabolism. Compared with ET a different profile of IL-1 beta >TNF-alpha >PGE2 was induced by LPS. ETB-receptor antagonism attenuated ET- and LPS-responses in monocytes, in particular of TNF-alpha and PGE2 to a similar extend (40%) that were only demonstrable following LPS at therapeutic plasma concentrations of bosentan and had no effect on IL-1 beta. Inhibition of ETB receptors in LPS-stimulated monocytes by bosentan was responded with suppression of PGE2 and increased production of leukotrienes indicating strong effects in the cyclooxygenase pathway that is known to control cellular ET transcription. These data suggest an important signaling pathway between ET-induced cytokine production following ETB-receptor activation with no further control of ET transcription by PGE2 required following ETB receptor antagonism. Therefore, in states of inflammation increased ETB-receptor expression and activation mediated by elevated ET concentrations may be an underestimated mechanism, which warrants the application of combined ETA/ETB-receptor antagonists.

Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension: rationale and place in therapy

The last decade has seen significant advances in the understanding and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Three main pathways, involving endothelin, nitric oxide, and prostacyclin, have been identified in its pathogenesis and these have all led to the development of therapies in current use. While the nitric oxide and prostacyclin pathways require augmentation, the endothelin system is overactive in PAH, with increased endothelin synthesis and receptor expression and, therefore, requires blockade. There are two known endothelin receptors. The type A receptor, expressed in pulmonary artery media, mediates vasoconstriction and remodeling, whereas the function of the type B receptor is more complex. Like the type A receptor, the type B receptor mediates vasoconstriction and remodeling effects when expressed on smooth muscle cells and (myo)fibroblasts, yet functions to clear endothelin from the circulation and induce release of endogenous nitric oxide and prostacyclin, when activated in the pulmonary artery endothelium. Consequently, it is not clear from in vitro data whether the optimal strategy is to block only the type A receptor or both receptors. Phase III clinical studies show clear short-term physiologic benefit with both dual and selective endothelin blockade in PAH. Longer-term experience with bosentan, a dual receptor antagonist, has shown improved outcomes compared with historic control data and comparable survival to intravenous prostacyclin therapy. The newer selective blockers, sitaxsentan and ambrisentan, appear to have similar short-term efficacy, but long-term data are as yet either lacking or unpublished. They may be less hepatotoxic than bosentan, although long-term follow-up of patients receiving bosentan has shown this is not a significant problem. On the basis of available evidence, the endothelin receptor antagonists have become first-line therapy for patients with PAH, except in the most severely affected who still require treatment with intravenous prostacyclin. Although their use as part of combination therapy with other agents is widespread, the evidence for this is not as robust, but appropriate investigation is underway.

Mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between steady-state bosentan and sildenafil

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions in healthy volunteers between sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, and bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, both approved for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

METHODS

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study with three treatment arms (sildenafil plus placebo, bosentan plus placebo and sildenafil plus bosentan) was conducted in 55 healthy male volunteers (51 completers). Study duration was 18 days per treatment group. Sildenafil was administered three times daily on Days 1-6 and 11-16 (20 mg initially, increased to 80 mg after 3 days), and bosentan (125 mg) was administered twice daily on Days 7-17.

RESULTS

On Day 16, bosentan decreased the maximum plasma concentration of sildenafil (c)(max)) by 55.4% [90% confidence interval (CI) 40.3-66.6%] and the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve over a dosing interval (AUC(tau)) by 62.6% (90% CI 56.8-67.7%). Sildenafil increased bosentan C(max) by 42.0% (90% CI 15.4-74.8%) and (AUC(tau)) by 49.8% (90% CI 28.7-74.5%). Bosentan and sildenafil in combination were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. All adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy volunteers, there is a mutual pharmacokinetic interaction between bosentan and sildenafil that may influence the dosage of each drug in a combination treatment. The clinical implications of combination therapy with bosentan and sildenafil are as yet unknown, and further trials in patients with PAH are needed.

Current understanding of the role of bosentan in inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension may occur in the context of incomplete lysis of acute pulmonary emboli, resulting in the obstruction of pulmonary blood flow, as well as progressive right ventricular dysfunction and failure. The treatment of choice for this condition is surgical removal of the obstructing material. However, in many patients, surgery is not possible due to either an unfavourable distribution of the disease, the development of a concurrent small vessel pulmonary arteriopathy, or the presence of significant comorbid conditions. There is increasing evidence that the medical therapies that are used in other forms of pulmonary hypertension may also be effective in inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. This article examines the rationale for the use of the oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan in this life-threatening condition.

Bosentan is a substrate of human OATP1B1 and OATP1B3: inhibition of hepatic uptake as the common mechanism of its interactions with cyclosporin A, rifampicin, and sildenafil

The elimination process of the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan (Tracleer) in humans is entirely dependent on metabolism mediated by two cytochrome P450 (P450) enzymes, i.e., CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. Most interactions with concomitantly administered drugs can be rationalized in terms of inhibition of these P450 enzymes. The increased bosentan concentrations observed in the presence of cyclosporin A, rifampicin, or sildenafil, however, are incompatible with this paradigm and prompted the search for alternative mechanisms governing these interactions. In the present article, we identify bosentan and its active plasma metabolite, Ro 48-5033 (4-(2-hydroxy-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-N-[6-(2-hydroxy-ethoxy)-5-(2-methoxy-phenoxy)-[2,2']bipyrimidinyl-4-yl]-benzenesulfonamide), as substrates of the human organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP) OATP1B1 and OATP1B3. Bosentan uptake into Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing these OATP transporters was efficiently inhibited by cyclosporin A and rifampicin with IC(50) values significantly below their effective plasma concentrations in humans. The phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil was also shown to interfere with OATP-mediated transport, however, at concentrations above those achieved in therapeutic use. Therefore, inhibition of bosentan hepatic uptake may represent an alternative/complementary mechanism to rationalize some of the pharmacokinetic interactions seen in therapeutic use. A similar picture has been drawn for drugs like pitavastatin and fexofenadine, drugs that are mainly excreted in unchanged form. Bosentan elimination, in contrast, is entirely dependent on metabolism. Therefore, the described interactions with rifampicin, cyclosporin A, and, to a lesser extent, sildenafil represent evidence that inhibition of hepatic uptake may become the rate-limiting step in the overall elimination process even for drugs whose elimination is entirely dependent on metabolism.

Inhibitory and Inductive Effects of Rifampin on the Pharmacokinetics of Bosentan in Healthy Subjects

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan. Healthy male subjects received bosentan 125 mg b.i.d. for 6.5 days in the presence or absence of rifampin 600 mg once a day. In vitro experiments were performed to investigate the effect of rifampin on the uptake of bosentan into Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the human organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1, -1B3, and -2B1. Following the first concomitant administration, there was a fivefold increase in bosentan trough concentrations. At steady state, concomitant rifampin significantly decreased exposure to bosentan by 58%. Rifampin potently inhibited the uptake of bosentan into cells expressing human OATP1B1 and -1B3. Rifampin decreased the exposure to bosentan consistent with its known cytochrome P450 enzyme-inductive properties. The initial increase in bosentan concentrations can be explained by an inhibitory effect of rifampin on hepatic drug transporters.

Bosentan for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis and digital ulcers

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a devastating multisytemic autoimmune disease associated with widespread vascular damage. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) occurs in a significant proportion of patients and contributes to the morbidity and mortality that occurs in this disease. The recent development of specific therapies for the treatment of PAH mandates the early recognition, appropriate evaluation and judicious management of PAH in patients with SSc. Because endothelin (ET)-1 plays an important role in the development of PAH in SSc, and may also contribute to the vascular damage and fibrosis that occur in multiple organs in patients with the disease, inhibiting the production and activity of ET-1 is an appealing strategy for the treatment of SSc. This article reviews the pathophysiology of SSc and its vascular complications, and critically evaluates the current knowledge regarding the potential role of the ET-1 receptor blocker bosentan in the management of patients with SSc.

Effects of bosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, on bile salt export pump and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2

The bile salt export pump (BSEP/Bsep/ABCB11) and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2/Mrp2/ABCC2) are involved in bile acid-dependent and -independent bile secretion, respectively. It has been reported that bosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, inhibits Bsep, which may lead to cholestatic liver injury due to the intracellular accumulation of bile salts, while increasing bile salt-independent bile flow. Thus, in this study, the effects of bosentan on BSEP/Bsep and MRP2/Mrp2 were evaluated using membrane vesicles derived from Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf) 9 cells, which express these transporters. The adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP)-dependent uptake of (3)H-taurocholic acid into membrane vesicles for BSEP/Bsep was inhibited by bosentan, and its IC(50) values were 76.8 and 101 microM for BSEP and Bsep, respectively. In contrast, bosentan stimulated the MRP2/Mrp2-mediated ATP-dependent vesicular transport of (3)H-estradiol 17beta-glucuronide by shifting the sigmoidal dependence of transport rate on substrate concentration to a more hyperbolic one. Collectively, these results suggest that bosentan inhibits BSEP in humans with a similar potency to rats, and that increased bile salt-independent flow in rats by bosentan is at least partly attributable to the activation of Mrp2.

Elevated warfarin metabolism in warfarin-resistant roof rats (Rattus rattus) in Tokyo

Wild roof rats (Rattus rattus) live in proximity to human habitats, and they may carry numerous pathogens of infectious diseases. Pest control is important for public health, and warfarin is a commonly used rodenticide worldwide. However, continual use of warfarin may cause drug resistance in rodents and lead to failure of their control, especially in urbanized areas. In warfarin-resistant rats, the warfarin level in plasma was significantly lower after oral administration than that in the control warfarin-sensitive rats. Warfarin is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (P450), and hydroxylation of warfarin by P450 isoforms was significantly higher in warfarin-resistant rats (2-fold). Western blot analysis indicated that the level of CYP3A2 expression in warfarin-resistant rats was significantly larger than in warfarin-sensitive rats. The NADPH-P450 reductase activities in resistant rats were 8-fold higher than those in sensitive rats. In vivo, the administration of the P450 potent inhibitor proadifen (SKF-525A) increased the mortality of warfarin in the warfarin-resistant roof rats. We concluded that the mechanism of warfarin resistance in Tokyo roof rats is caused by increased clearance of warfarin.

Endothelin receptor antagonism in pulmonary arterial hypertension--a role for selective ET(A) inhibition?

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) develops from an abnormal interaction between the endothelium and smooth muscle cells in the pulmonary arteries and is characterized by a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance resulting from vascular remodeling, vasoconstriction, and cellular proliferation. A rapidly progressive disease with limited therapeutic options, PAH may progress to right ventricular failure and death. Endothelin (ET-1), a potent vasoconstrictor, has vascular remodeling properties that contribute to the acceleration of the disease. ET-1 predominantly binds to two receptors, endothelin-A (ET(A)) and endothelin-B (ET(B)) receptors. ET(A) receptors are found on smooth muscle cells only and, when activated, induce vasoconstriction and cellular proliferation. ET(B) receptors on smooth muscle cells, when activated, cause vasoconstriction, whereas those on endothelial cells produce vasodilation and clear circulating ET-1. Therefore, a clinically important question arises as to whether selective ET(A) receptor antagonism is superior to nonselective dual-receptor antagonism in the treatment of PAH.

SCOPE

To review clinical trials that studied safety and efficacy of various endothelin receptor antagonists (ETRAs) for the treatment of PAH and address the rationale for the use of either a nonselective or a selective ETRA.

FINDINGS

Nonselective blockade of both ET receptors with the ETRA bosentan has demonstrated benefit in PAH, as have sitaxsentan and ambrisentan, two investigational agents with more selectivity for the ET(A) receptor. Data from placebo-controlled studies and long-term, open-label studies suggest that all ETRAs have similar efficacy, though there is some evidence suggesting that selective ETRAs may have a safer profile.

CONCLUSION

Both selective and nonselective ETRAs have proven to be efficacious in treatment of PAH patients, and selective ETRAs may have a slightly safer profile. However, because PAH is a rare disease and trials have relatively small numbers of patients, it is difficult to quantify the magnitude of the difference between the different agents.

How valid are animal models to evaluate treatments for pulmonary hypertension?

Various animal models of pulmonary hypertension (PH) exist, among which injection of monocrotaline (MCT) and exposure to hypoxia are used most frequently. These animal models have not only been used to characterize the pathophysiology of PH and its sequelae such as right ventricular hypertrophy and failure, but also to test novel therapeutic strategies. This manuscript summarizes the available treatment studies in animal models of PH, and compares the findings to those obtained in patients with PH. The analysis shows that all approaches which have proven successful in patients, most notably prostacyclin and its analogs and endothelin receptor antagonists, are also effective in various animal models. However, the opposite it not always true. Therefore, promising results in animals have to be interpreted carefully until confirmed in clinical studies.

Endothelin receptor antagonists

Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been developed to block the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in a variety of cardiovascular conditions. ET-1 is a powerful vasoconstrictor with mitogenic or co-mitogenic properties, which acts through the stimulation of 2 subtypes of receptors [endothelin receptor subtype A (ETA) and endothelin receptor subtype B (ETB) receptors]. Endogenous ET-1 is involved in a variety of conditions including systemic and pulmonary hypertension (PH), congestive heart failure (CHF), vascular remodeling (restenosis, atherosclerosis), renal failure, cancer, and cerebrovascular disease. The first dual ETA/ETB receptor blocker, bosentan, has already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Trials of endothelin receptor antagonists in heart failure have been completed with mixed results so far. Studies are ongoing on the effects of selective ETA antagonists or dual ETA/ETB antagonists in lung fibrosis, cancer, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. While non-peptidic ET-1 receptor antagonists suitable for oral intake with excellent bioavailability have become available, proven efficacy is limited to pulmonary hypertension, but it is possible that these agents might find a place in the treatment of several cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases in the coming future.

Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with the selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist sitaxsentan

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the optimal dose of the selective endothelin A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist sitaxsentan for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); for observation only, an open-label (OL) bosentan arm was included.

BACKGROUND

Endothelin is a mediator of PAH. In a preliminary PAH study, the selective ET(A) receptor antagonist sitaxsentan improved six-min walk (6MW) distance, World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC), and hemodynamics.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled 18-week study, 247 PAH patients (idiopathic, or associated with connective tissue disease or congenital heart disease) were randomized; 245 patients were treated: placebo (n = 62), sitaxsentan 50 mg (n = 62) or 100 mg (n = 61), or OL (6MW tests, Borg dyspnea scores, and WHO FC assessments third-party blind) bosentan (n = 60). The primary end point was change in 6MW distance from baseline to week 18. Secondary end points included change in WHO FC, time to clinical worsening, and change in Borg dyspnea score.

RESULTS

At week 18, patients treated with sitaxsentan 100 mg had an increased 6MW distance compared with the placebo group (31.4 m, p = 0.03), and an improved WHO FC (p = 0.04). The placebo-subtracted treatment effect for sitaxsentan 50 mg was 24.2 m (p = 0.07) and for OL bosentan, 29.5 m (p = 0.05). The incidence of elevated hepatic transaminases (>3x the upper limit of normal) was 6% for placebo, 5% for sitaxsentan 50 mg, 3% for sitaxsentan 100 mg, and 11% for bosentan.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with the selective ET(A) receptor antagonist sitaxsentan, orally once daily at a dose of 100 mg, improves exercise capacity and WHO FC in PAH patients, with a low incidence of hepatic toxicity.

Transporters as a determinant of drug clearance and tissue distribution

Transporters play an important role in the processes of drug absorption, distribution and excretion. In this review, we have focused on the involvement of transporters in drug excretion in the liver and kidney. The rate of transporter-mediated uptake and efflux determines the rate of renal and hepatobiliary elimination. Transporters are thus important as a determinant of the clearance in the body. Even when drugs ultimately undergo metabolism, their elimination rate is sometimes determined by the uptake rate mediated by transporters. Transporters regulate the pharmacological and/or toxicological effect of drugs because they limit their distribution to tissues responsible for their effect and/or toxicity. For example, the liver-specific distribution of some statins via organic anion transporters helps them to produce their high pharmacological effect. On the other hand, as in the case of metformin taken up by organic cation transporter 1, drug distribution to the tissue(s) may enhance its toxicity. As transporter-mediated uptake is a determinant of the drug elimination rate, drug-drug interactions involving the process of transporter-mediated uptake can occur. In this review, we have introduced some examples and described their mechanisms. More recently, some methods to analyze such transporter-mediated transport have been reported. The estimation of the contributions of transporters to the net clearance of a drug makes it possible to predict the net clearance from data involving drug transport in transporter-expressing cells. Double transfected cells, where both uptake and efflux transporters are expressed on the same polarized cells, are also helpful for the analysis of the rate of transporter-mediated transcellular transport.

Bosentan decreases the plasma concentration of sildenafil when coprescribed in pulmonary hypertension

AIMS

To determine whether bosentan decreases the plasma concentration of sildenafil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

METHODS

Ten patients (aged 39-77 years) with pulmonary arterial hypertension in WHO functional class III received bosentan 62.5 mg twice daily for 1 month, then 125 mg twice daily for a second month. Sildenafil 100 mg was given as a single dose before starting bosentan (visit 1) and at the end of each month of bosentan treatment (visits 2 and 3). Sildenafil and its primary metabolite, desmethylsildenafil, were measured in plasma at 0 h and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18 and 24 h using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis was by repeated measures anova, using log transformed data where appropriate.

RESULTS

Treatment with bosentan 62.5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks was associated with a two-fold increase in sildenafil clearance/F and a 50% decrease in the AUC (P < 0.001). Increasing the dose of bosentan to 125 mg twice daily led to a further increase in sildenafil oral clearance and decrease in the AUC (P < 0.001 vs. 62.5 mg bosentan). The ratio of AUC on bosentan treatment relative to that of visit 1 was 0.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36, 0.61] for visit 2 and 0.31 (95% CI 0.23, 0.41) for visit 3 (P < 0.001). Sildenafil C(max) fell from 759 ng ml(-1) on visit 1 to 333 ng ml(-1) on visit 3 (P < 0.01) and there was a significant decrease in the plasma half-life of sildenafil on the higher bosentan dose (P < 0.05). The AUC and plasma half-life of desmethylsildenafil was also decreased by bosentan in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Bosentan significantly decreases the plasma concentration of sildenafil when coadministered to patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Effects of the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan on hemodynamics, symptoms and functional capacity in Japanese patients with severe pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Endothelin (ET)-1 has a pathogenic role in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Recent clinical studies carried out in Western populations showed that blockade of the ET receptors by bosentan improves pulmonary hemodynamics and exercise capacity. In the present study, the efficacy of bosentan was assessed in Japanese patients with PAH.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Because the pharmacokinetics of bosentan and its metabolites are similar in Japanese and Caucasian subjects, the same dose of bosentan, 125 mg twice daily, was administered in the Japanese open-label clinical trial. In 18 patients, mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased from 52.4+/-13.8 to 46.8+/-13.8 mmHg (p=0.003) and cardiac index increased from 2.20+/-0.74 to 2.61 +/-0.72 L.min(-1).m(-2) (p=0.002). The 6-min walking distance increased from 410+/-89.5 to 494+/-86.0 m (p<0.0001). The dyspnea index (Borg scale) decreased from 3.2+/-2.4 to 2.2+/-1.7 (p=0.02). The specific activity scale (SAS) gradually increased throughout the study period from 2.9+/-0.8 to 4.6+/-1.9 METs (p=0.0005). WHO Class improved in 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

Bosentan was well tolerated and improved the hemodynamics, symptoms, exercise capacity, and quality of life of Japanese patients with PAH. Thus, bosentan can be a valuable therapeutic option in Japanese patients.

Influence of mild liver impairment on the pharmacokinetics of tezosentan, a drug excreted unchanged into bile

AIMS

To investigate the effect of mild liver impairment on the pharmacokinetics of tezosentan.

METHODS

Eleven patients with mild liver impairment and eight healthy subjects received an intravenous infusion of 50 mg h-1 tezosentan for 1 h. Plasma and urine concentrations were determined during and following termination of the infusion.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic parameters presented as geometric means [95% confidence interval (CI)] for clearance, volume of distribution and terminal half-life were 30 (22, 40) and 42 (36, 48) l h-1, 28 (19, 42) and 19 (16, 23) l, and 4.5 (2.9, 7.0) and 3.6 (2.9, 4.5) h in liver patients and healthy subjects, respectively. The ratios (liver patients/healthy subjects) of these geometric means (95% CI) were 0.71 (0.47, 1.1), 1.5 (0.87, 2.6), and 1.3 (0.69, 2.3), respectively. A two-compartment model accurately fitted the concentration-time data. In both groups approximately 4% of the dose was excreted unchanged into urine.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was a slight trend towards a decreased clearance, the pharmacokinetics of tezosentan in patients with mild liver impairment were similar to those in healthy subjects. Therefore, no dose adaptation seems to be needed in this patient population.