Atorvastatin. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of hyperlipidaemias

Atorvastatin reduces the ability of clopidogrel to inhibit platelet aggregation: a new drug-drug interaction

BACKGROUND

We observed that the prodrug clopidogrel was less effective in inhibiting platelet aggregation with coadministration of atorvastatin during point-of-care platelet function testing. Because atorvastatin is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, we hypothesized that clopidogrel might be activated by CYP3A4.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Platelet aggregation was measured in 44 patients undergoing coronary artery stent implantation treated with clopidogrel or clopidogrel plus pravastatin or atorvastatin, and in 27 volunteers treated with clopidogrel and either erythromycin or troleandomycin, CYP3A4 inhibitors, or rifampin, a CYP3A4 inducer. Atorvastatin, but not pravastatin, attenuated the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel in a dose-dependent manner. Percent platelet aggregation was 34+/-23, 58+/-15 (P=0.027), 74+/-10 (P=0.002), and 89+/-7 (P=0.001) in the presence of clopidogrel and 0, 10, 20, and 40 mg of atorvastatin, respectively. Erythromycin attenuated platelet aggregation inhibition (55+/-12 versus 42+/-12% platelet aggregation; P=0.002), as did troleandomycin (78+/-18 versus 45+/-18% platelet aggregation; P<0.0003), whereas rifampin enhanced platelet aggregation inhibition (33+/-18 versus 56+/-20% platelet aggregation, P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CYP3A4 activates clopidogrel. Atorvastatin, another CYP3A4 substrate, competitively inhibits this activation. Use of a statin not metabolized by CYP3A4 and point-of-care platelet function testing may be warranted in patients treated with clopidogrel.

Is alternate daily dose of atorvastatin effective in treating patients with hyperlipidemia? The Alternate Day Versus Daily Dosing of Atorvastatin Study (ADDAS)

BACKGROUND

The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of alternate-day dosing of atorvastatin compared with the standard once-daily dose based on mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction from baseline at 6 and 12 weeks of treatment.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled design, 35 eligible patients who met the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel II (ATP II) guidelines for drug therapy, depending on their risk factors, were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg of atorvastatin as an initial dose every day or every other day. Patients were assessed at 6 and 12 weeks as to whether they met the LDL-C goal, and the dose was doubled if the goal was not reached.

RESULTS

LDL-C decreased by 27% and 38%, in the every-other-day (n = 15) and every-day (n = 15) groups, respectively, at 6 weeks. At 12 weeks, the LDL-C was reduced by 35% and 38% in the every-other-day and every-day groups, respectively (P =.49). The mean dose was 18 mg (9 mg/d) in the alternate-day group (n = 14) and 12 mg/d in the every-day group (n = 12) at the end of the 12 weeks (P =.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although higher doses of atorvastatin were used on alternate days, these results suggest that the alternate-day administration of atorvastatin can produce a reduction in LDL-C comparable to that of daily administration in patients with hypercholesterolemia, and yet provide some cost savings.

Pharmacodynamic interaction between the new selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe and simvastatin

AIMS

The primary aims of these two single-centre, randomized, evaluator-blind, placebo/positive-controlled, parallel-group studies were to evaluate the potential for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe 0.25, 1, or 10 mg and simvastatin 10 mg (Study 1), and a pharmacodynamic interaction between ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 20 mg (Study 2). Evaluation of the tolerance of the coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin was a secondary objective.

METHODS

Eighty-two healthy men with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >or=130 mg dl-1 received study drug once daily in the morning for 14 days. In Study 1 (n=58), five groups of 11-12 subjects received simvastatin 10 mg alone, or with ezetimibe 0.25, 1, or 10 mg or placebo. In Study 2 (n=24), three groups of eight subjects received simvastatin 20 mg alone, ezetimibe 10 mg alone, or the combination. Blood samples were collected to measure serum lipids in both studies. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and its beta-hydroxy metabolite were evaluated in Study 1 only.

RESULTS

In both studies, reported side-effects were generally mild, nonspecific, and similar among treatment groups. In Study 1, there were no indications of pharmacokinetic interactions between simvastatin and ezetimibe. All active treatments caused statistically significant (P<0.01) decreases in LDL-C concentration vs placebo from baseline to day 14. The coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin caused a dose-dependent reduction in LDL-C and total cholesterol, with no apparent effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) or triglycerides. The coadministration of ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 10 mg or 20 mg caused a statistically (P<0.01) greater percentage reduction (mean -17%, 95% CI -27.7, -6.2, and -18%, -28.4, -7.4, respectively) in LDL-C than simvastatin alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The coadministration of ezetimibe at doses up to 10 mg with simvastatin 10 or 20 mg daily was well tolerated and caused a significant additive reduction in LDL-C compared with simvastatin alone. Additional clinical studies to assess the efficacy and safety of coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin are warranted.

Effect of atorvastatin on plasma apoE metabolism in patients with combined hyperlipidemia

Atorvastatin, a synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor used for the treatment of hyperlipidemia and the prevention of coronary artery disease, significantly lowers plasma cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. It also reduces total plasma triglyceride and apoE concentrations. In view of the direct involvement of apoE in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, we have investigated the effect of atorvastatin treatment (40 mg/day) on in vivo rates of plasma apoE production and catabolism in six patients with combined hyperlipidemia using a primed constant infusion of deuterated leucine. Atorvastatin treatment resulted in a significant decrease (i.e., 30-37%) in levels of total triglyceride, cholesterol, LDL-C, and apoB in all six patients. Total plasma apoE concentration was reduced from 7.4 +/- 0.9 to 4.3 +/- 0.2 mg/dl (-38 +/- 8%, P < 0.05), predominantly due to a decrease in VLDL apoE (3.4 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.2 mg/dl; -42 +/- 11%) and IDL/LDL apoE (1.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 0.8 +/- 0.1 mg/dl; -57 +/- 6%). Total plasma lipoprotein apoE transport (i.e., production) was significantly reduced from 4.67 +/- 0.39 to 3.04 +/- 0.51 mg/kg/day (-34 +/- 10%, P < 0.05) and VLDL apoE transport was reduced from 3.82 +/- 0.67 to 2.26 +/- 0.42 mg/kg/day (-36 +/- 10%, P = 0.057). Plasma and VLDL apoE residence times and HDL apoE kinetic parameters were not significantly affected by drug treatment. Percentage decreases in VLDL apoE concentration and VLDL apoE production were significantly correlated with drug-induced reductions in VLDL triglyceride concentration (r = 0.99, P < 0.001; r = 0.88, P < 0.05, respectively, n = 6). Our results demonstrate that atorvastatin causes a pronounced decrease in total plasma and VLDL apoE concentrations and a significant decrease in plasma and VLDL apoE rates of production in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.

Pharmacology of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), including rosuvastatin and pitavastatin

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world, with hypercholesterolemia as the major risk factor. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors represent the most efficient drugsfor the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. They lower plasma cholesterol due to the inhibition of endogenous cholesterol synthesis in the liverand subsequent increased expression of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors, resulting in an up-regulated catabolic rate for plasma LDL. The beneficial effect of statins on the incidence of CHD was clearly demonstrated in several large-scale clinical trials. Currently, five statins (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin) are available, and two novel compounds (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin) are undergoing clinical investigation. To point out potential mechanisms leading to increased toxicity and to compare the novel statins with the established ones, this article summarizes their pharmacological data since the prevalence of adverse events can be explained at least in part by their pharmacokinetic differences.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug interactions with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors

The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are effective in both the primary and secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease. As a group, these drugs are well tolerated apart from two uncommon but potentially serious adverse effects: elevation of liver enzymes and skeletal muscle abnormalities, which range from benign myalgias to life-threatening rhabdomyolysis. Adverse effects with statins are frequently associated with drug interactions because of their long-term use in older patients who are likely to be exposed to polypharmacy. The recent withdrawal of cerivastatin as a result of deaths from rhabdomyolysis illustrates the clinical importance of such interactions. Drug interactions involving the statins may have either a pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic basis, or both. As these drugs are highly extracted by the liver, displacement interactions are of limited importance. The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system plays an important part in the metabolism of the statins, leading to clinically relevant interactions with other agents, particularly cyclosporin, erythromycin, itraconazole, ketoconazole and HIV protease inhibitors, that are also metabolised by this enzyme system. An additional complicating feature is that individual statins are metabolised to differing degrees, in some cases producing active metabolites. The CYP3A family metabolises lovastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin and cerivastatin, whereas CYP2C9 metabolises fluvastatin. Cerivastatin is also metabolised by CYP2C8. Pravastatin is not significantly metabolised by the CYP system. In addition, the statins are substrates for P-glycoprotein, a drug transporter present in the small intestine that may influence their oral bioavailability. In clinical practice, the risk of a serious interaction causing myopathy is enhanced when statin metabolism is markedly inhibited. Thus, rhabdomyolysis has occurred following the coadministration of cyclosporin, a potent CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitor, and lovastatin. Itraconazole has been shown to increase exposure to simvastatin and its active metabolite by at least 10-fold. Pharmacodynamically, there is an increased risk of myopathy when statins are coprescribed with fibrates or nicotinic acid. This occurs relatively infrequently, but is particularly associated with the combination of cerivastatin and gemfibrozil. Statins may also alter the concentrations of other drugs, such as warfarin or digoxin, leading to alterations in effect or a requirement for clinical monitoring. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of the statins should allow the avoidance of the majority of drug interactions. If concurrent therapy with known inhibitors of statin metabolism is necessary, the patient should be monitored for signs and symptoms of myopathy or rhabdomyolysis and the statin should be discontinued if necessary.

Rosuvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, upregulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase and protects from ischemic stroke in mice

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are cholesterol-lowering drugs and reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. In this study we investigated whether rosuvastatin, a new, potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, upregulates endothelial nitric oxide (NO) expression and activity and protects from cerebral ischaemia in mice. Endothelial cells in culture and 129/SV mice were chronically treated with rosuvastatin. The expression and activity of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) was determined by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Western blotting and arginine-citrulline assays. Cerebral ischaemia was induced by occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAo) for 2 h and infarct size was determined after 22 h of reperfusion. Treatment of endothelial cells with rosuvastatin concentration- and time-dependently upregulated eNOS mRNA and protein expression. In aortas of 129/SV wild-type mice, treatment with 0.2, 2, and 20 mg kg(-1) rosuvastatin subcutaneously (s.c.) for 10 days significantly upregulated eNOS mRNA by 50, 142, and 205%, respectively. NOS activity was significantly increased by 75, 145, and 320%, respectively. Stroke volume after 2-h MCAo was reduced by 27, 56, and 50% (for 0.2, 2 and 20 mg kg(-1), respectively). Serum cholesterol and triglygeride levels were not significantly lowered by the treatment. The novel HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor rosuvastatin dose-dependently upregulates eNOS expression and activity and protects from cerebral ischaemia in mice. The effects are independent of changes in cholesterol levels and are equivalent or even superior to the protective effects by simvastatin and atorvastatin in this animal model.

High doses of atorvastatin and simvastatin induce key enzymes involved in VLDL production

Treatments with high doses of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors may induce the expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP)-target genes, causing different effects from those attributed to the reduction of hepatic cholesterol content. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of high doses of statins on the key enzymes involved in VLDL production in normolipidemic rats. To examine whether the effects caused by statin treatment are a consequence of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition, we tested the effect of atorvastatin on these enzymes in mevalonate-fed rats. Atorvastatin and simvastatin enhanced not only HMG-CoA reductase but also the expression of the SREBP-2 gene itself. As a result of the overexpression of SREBP-2 caused by the statin treatment, genes regulated basically by SREBP-1, as FA synthase and acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase, were also induced and their mRNA levels increased. DAG acyltransferase and microsomal TG transfer protein mRNA levels as well as phosphatidate phosphohydrolase activity were increased by both statins. Simvastatin raised liver cholesterol content, ACAT mRNA levels, and CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase activity, whereas it reduced liver DAG and phospholipid content. Mevalonate feeding reversed all changes induced by the atorvastatin treatment. These results show that treatment with high doses of statins induces key enzymes controlling rat liver lipid synthesis and VLDL assembly, probably as a result of SREBP-2 overexpression. Despite the induction of the key enzymes involved in VLDL production, both statins markedly reduced plasma TG levels, suggesting that different mechanisms may be involved in the hypotriglyceridemic effect of statins at high or low doses.

How well tolerated are lipid-lowering drugs?

It has been clearly established that lipid-lowering treatments [such as 3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutamyl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ('statins') or fibrates] can reduce cardiovascular events, and with one of the statins even total mortality, in high-risk populations. Intervention studies have not included the very old, but it is generally assumed that this patient group would benefit from these treatments to an extent similar to younger patients. Worries about the associations seen in observational studies between low cholesterol levels and cancer, cerebral haemorrhage or mood and behaviour change have been largely overcome by findings from the latest large drug intervention trials, which do not show any increase in these conditions with statin or fibrate treatments. The common adverse effects associated with these drugs are relatively mild and often transient in nature. Potentially more serious adverse effects, which are more clearly related to drug treatment and are probably dose-dependent, include elevations in hepatic transaminase levels and myopathy; however, these effects are uncommon and generally resolve rapidly when treatment is stopped. The risk of myopathy with fibrate treatment is increased in patients with renal impairment, and the risk of myopathy with statin treatment increases with co-administration of drugs that inhibit statin metabolism or transport. Other adverse effects are related to specific drugs, for example, clofibrate is associated with an increased risk of gallstones. Studies in elderly patients have not shown an increased risk of adverse effects with lipid-lowering drugs compared with younger patients, but in clinical practice there may be some increased risk, particularly with regards to drug interactions. Therefore, lipid-lowering drugs should be administered with extra caution to elderly patients.

Atorvastatin: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and use in dyslipidaemia

Atorvastatin is a synthetic hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor. In dosages of 10 to 80 mg/day, atorvastatin reduces levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, triglyceride and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol in patients with a wide variety of dyslipidaemias. In large long-term trials in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. atorvastatin produced greater reductions in total cholesterol. LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels than other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. In patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), atorvastatin was more efficacious than lovastatin, pravastatin. fluvastatin and simvastatin in achieving target LDL-cholesterol levels and, in high doses, produced very low LDL-cholesterol levels. Aggressive reduction of serum LDL-cholesterol to 1.9 mmol/L with atorvastatin 80 mg/day for 16 weeks in patients with acute coronary syndromes significantly reduced the incidence of the combined primary end-point events and the secondary end-point of recurrent ischaemic events requiring rehospitalisation in the large. well-designed MIRACL trial. In the AVERT trial, aggressive lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg/ day for 18 months was at least as effective as coronary angioplasty and usual care in reducing the incidence of ischaemic events in low-risk patients with stable CHD. Long-term studies are currently investigating the effects of atorvastatin on serious cardiac events and mortality in patients with CHD. Pharmacoeconomic studies have shown lipid-lowering with atorvastatin to be cost effective in patients with CHD, men with at least one risk factor for CHD and women with multiple risk factors for CHD. In available studies atorvastatin was more cost effective than most other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in achieving target LDL-cholesterol levels. Atorvastatin is well tolerated and adverse events are usually mild and transient. The tolerability profile of atorvastatin is similar to that of other available HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and to placebo. Elevations of liver transaminases and creatine phosphokinase are infrequent. There have been rare case reports of rhabdomyolysis occurring with concomitant use of atorvastatin and other drugs.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin is an appropriate first-line lipid-lowering therapy in numerous groups of patients at low to high risk of CHD. Additionally it has a definite role in treating patients requiring greater decreases in LDL-cholesterol levels. Long-term studies are under way to determine whether achieving very low LDL-cholesterol levels with atorvastatin is likely to show additional benefits on morbidity and mortality in patients with CHD.

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors and rhabdomyolysis: considerations in the renal failure patient

An intense debate has developed as to the risk-benefit ratio of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) following the withdrawal of cerivastatin. The development of rhabdomyolysis in cerivastatin-treated patients should have surprised few since myotoxicity is an accepted class effect of statins. What has sprung from the cerivastatin experience though is a concern for other members of this class. Such misgivings, although understandable, are ill advised. Without question, differences exist in the risk of rhabdomyolysis occurrence amongst the various statins. In this regard, pravastatin and fluvastatin are least likely to produce rhabdomyolysis, which, in part, relates to the fact they are not metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A4 pathway. When muscle damage occurs with statins it is most often the result of a drug-drug interaction rather than a specific adverse response to statin monotherapy. Such drug-drug interactions increase plasma concentrations of a statin and thereby increase the risk of myotoxicity. A growing consensus exists which supports an expanded use of statins in a range of patient groups including the renal failure patient. Polypharmacy and altered drug metabolism increase the risk of myotoxicity, albeit to an ill-defined degree, in this population. Many factors should enter into the choice of a statin in the multiply medicated renal failure patient.

Evaluation of myopathy risk for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors by urethane infusion method

Purpose of the present study was to evaluate the myopathy risk using a urethane infusion method following oral administration of five kinds of commercial HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A) reductase inhibitors (HCRIs), (pravastatin (PV), simvastatin (SV), cerivastatin (CeV), atorvastatin (AV), and fluvastatin (FV)) alone or with coadministration of bezafibrate (BF). The solubility of HCRIs in various solvents was determined as a criterion of the physicochemical property. The plasma creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level as a marker of myopathy in normal rats was screened under urethane infusion after oral administration of HCRI alone or with BF coadministration. Also, renal tissue specimens were prepared and the myoglobin remaining in the tissue was visualized by the labeled avidin-biotin technique. The plasma CPK level in normal rats under urethane infusion following oral administration of five kinds of HCRI increased as the dose of HCRI increased, and coadministration of BF further increased the CPK level for each drug. The risk of myopathy evaluated from the CPK level was ranked as follows: CeV>FV>AV>SV>PV. Myoglobin deposition was observed in the cast of proximal tubules, cytoplasm of distal tubules and collecting ducts of rat kidney extracted from rats treated with HCRIs under urethane infusion. Histopathological findings showed that the extent of myoglobin deposition increased on coadministration of BF with each drug. The correlation was found for myopathy risk evaluated by CPK level using the urethane infusion method and drug lipophilicity, ie., the water/n-octanol partition coefficient except for the case of SV. Histopathological findings for the kidney following HCRI treatment also reflected the CPK level in rats under urethane infusion.

Statins have biphasic effects on angiogenesis

BACKGROUND

Statins inhibit HMG-CoA reductase to reduce the synthesis of cholesterol and isoprenoids that modulate diverse cell functions. We investigated the effect of the statins cerivastatin and atorvastatin on angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation were enhanced at low concentrations (0.005 to 0.01 micromol/L) but significantly inhibited at high statin concentrations (0.05 to 1 micromol/L). Antiangiogenic effects at high concentrations were associated with decreased endothelial release of vascular endothelial growth factor and increased endothelial apoptosis and were reversed by geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate. In murine models, inflammation-induced angiogenesis was enhanced with low-dose statin therapy (0.5 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)) but significantly inhibited with high concentrations of cerivastatin or atorvastatin (2.5 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)). Despite the fact that high-dose statin treatment was effective at reducing lipid levels in hyperlipidemic apolipoprotein E-deficient mice, it impaired rather than enhanced angiogenesis. Finally, high-dose cerivastatin decreased tumor growth and tumor vascularization in a murine Lewis lung cancer model.

CONCLUSIONS

HMG-CoA reductase inhibition has a biphasic dose-dependent effect on angiogenesis that is lipid independent and associated with alterations in endothelial apoptosis and vascular endothelial growth factor signaling. Statins have proangiogenic effects at low therapeutic concentrations but angiostatic effects at high concentrations that are reversed by geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate. At clinically relevant doses, statins may modulate angiogenesis in humans via effects on geranylated proteins.

Lipoprotein changes with statins

The effects of statins and other lipid drugs are assessed by their ability to affect specific lipid fractions. Although there has been a great deal written abut the statins, most recent papers have focused on the comparative effects of the statins on triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or have been concerned with the nonlipid effects of these drugs. In addition, some recent papers have focused on new parameters that may mediate cardiovascular risk, such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Rhabdomyolysis and statin therapy: relevance to the elderly

A recent debate has emerged as to the risk-benefit ratio of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins). This debate has centered on the withdrawal of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor cerivastatin (Baycol). Its withdrawal was prompted by an unacceptably high rate of rhabdomyolysis associated with its use. The development of rhabdomyolysis in cerivastatin-treated patients surprised few, since myotoxicity is a class effect with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. What has sprung from the cerivastatin experience, though, is the concept of "guilt by association"; thus, other members of this class are now viewed in a similarly negative light. Such misgivings are understandable, but to a degree may be ill-advised, since differences exist in the risk and therefore the rate of rhabdomyolysis occurrence among the various HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. In this regard, pravastatin and fluvastatin are least likely to provoke muscle cell damage, which, at least in part, relates to their not being metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 pathway. When muscle damage does occur with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, it is commonly the result of drug-drug interactions rather than a specific adverse response to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor monotherapy. Such drug-drug interactions inevitably result in higher plasma concentrations of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor and thereby an increased risk of myotoxicity. A growing consensus supports an expanded use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in elderly patients. Polypharmacy and altered drug metabolism both put the elderly patient at increased risk of myotoxicity when drugs in the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor class are administered. Physicians must take many factors into account when selecting a member of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor class, particularly as relates to their use in the multiply medicated elderly patient.

Effect of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and lovastatin on the metabolism of cholesterol and triacylglycerides in HepG2 cells

We evaluated the effects of the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (HMGRI) atorvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin on lipid homeostasis in HepG2 cells. The drugs were almost equally effective in inhibiting cholesterol synthesis and in decreasing cellular cholesterol. Atorvastatin and lovastatin increased low-density lipoprotein receptor mRNA (2.5-fold at 3 x 10(-7) M) and the transcription rate at the promoter of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene (>5-fold at 10(-6) M). The three compounds enhanced the activity of the low-density lipoprotein receptor at a similar magnitude (1.6-2.1- fold at 10(-6) M). Atorvastatin and lovastatin increased the nuclear form of sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP)-2, but not of SREBP-1. Each of the drugs increased triacylglyceride synthesis (50% at 10(-7)-10(-6) M), cellular triacylglyceride content (16% at 10(-6) M), and expression of fatty acid synthase by reporter gene and Northern blot analysis (2-fold and 2.7-fold at 10(-6) M and 3 x 10(-7) M, respectively). All compounds reduced the secretion of apo B (30% at 3 x 10(-7) M). HMGRI decreased the ratio of cholesterol to apo B in newly synthesised apo B containing particles by approximately 50% and increased the ratio of triacylglycerides to apo B by approximately 35%. We conclude that regulatory responses to HMGRI are mediated by SREBP-2 rather than by SREBP-1, that HMGRI oppositely affect the cellular cholesterol and triacylglyceride production, that HMGRI moderately decrease the release of apo B containing particles, but profoundly alter their composition, and that atorvastatin does not significantly differ from other HMGRI in these regards.

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors upregulate inducible NO synthase expression and activity in vascular smooth muscle cells

Inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase ameliorate atherosclerosis by both cholesterol-dependent and cholesterol-independent mechanisms. We examined whether HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors affect the expression and activity of inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in cultured rat aortic vascular smooth muscle (VSM) cells. Atorvastatin (34 to 68 micromol/L) markedly increased nitrite production, an increase that was essentially abrogated by the NO synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (500 micromol/L). Activity of iNOS, determined by the conversion of L-arginine to L-citrulline, increased 9-fold after atorvastatin treatment. Western blot and semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction revealed that atorvastatin (34 to 68 micromol/L) strongly upregulated iNOS protein and mRNA levels, respectively. These concentrations of atorvastatin did not cause cytotoxicity, as judged by the cell survival rate. Similarly, simvastatin and lovastatin (34 micromol/L) caused robust upregulation of the iNOS protein level. Transfection experiments demonstrated that the -1034- to 88-bp human iNOS promoter was strongly induced by atorvastatin (34 micromol/L). Electromobility and supershift assays using a nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) consensus oligonucleotide and nuclear extracts from VSM cells as well as transfection studies using an NF-kappaB reporter plasmid suggested that the transcriptional activation of the iNOS gene by atorvastatin is not mediated via the NF-kappaB pathway. We conclude that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors potently upregulate iNOS expression and activity in VSM cells, at least in part, by transcriptional mechanisms that do not depend on transcription factor NF-kappaB. These effects might have important implications for the impact of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on atherosclerosis.

Simvastatin and atorvastatin enhance hypotensive effect of diltiazem in rats

Effects of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, simvastatin and atorvastatin, on diltiazem-induced hypotension were examined in anaesthetized rats and compared to that of pravastatin. Vehicle, 2 mg/kg/day simvastatin, 2 mg/kg/day atorvastatin, or 4 mg/kg/day pravastatin was administered orally for 4 days. Diltiazem at 3 mg/kg was given orally 2 hours after the final administration of the inhibitors. Arterial blood pressure was measured via a cannula introduced into the left carotid artery, and heart rate was counted from the pulse pressure. In all groups, diltiazem significantly decreased the mean arterial blood pressure without any changes in heart rate. Pretreatment with simvastatin and atorvastatin significantly enhanced the hypotensive effect of diltiazem, while that with pravastatin did not. Heart rate was not modified by pretreatment with the inhibitors. The results indicate that concomitant use of diltiazem with simvastatin or atorvastatin enhances diltiazem-induced hypotension, probably by competitive inhibition of diltiazem metabolism with simvastatin and atorvastatin metabolisms.

Clinically relevant differences between the statins: implications for therapeutic selection

Although the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, or statins, share a common lipid-lowering effect, there are differences within this class of drugs. The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering efficacy, pharmacokinetic properties, drug-food interactions, and cost can vary widely, thus influencing the selection of a particular statin as a treatment option. The statins that produce the greatest percentage change in LDL cholesterol levels are atorvastatin and simvastatin. Atorvastatin and fluvastatin are least affected by alterations in renal function. Fewer pharmacokinetic drug interactions are likely to occur with pravastatin and fluvastatin, because they are not metabolized through the cytochrome P450 (3A4) system. The most cost-effective statins, based on cost per percentage change in LDL cholesterol levels, are fluvastatin, cerivastatin, and atorvastatin. Awareness of these differences may assist in the selection or substitution of an appropriate statin for a particular patient.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of atorvastatin (10mg) with simvastatin (10mg) at six weeks. ASSET Investigators

The 6-week efficacy and safety of atorvastatin versus simvastatin was determined during a 54-week, open-label, multicenter, parallel-arm, treat-to-target study. In all, 1,424 patients with mixed dyslipidemia (triglyceride 200 to 600 mg/dl [2.26 to 6.77 mmol/L]) were stratified to 1 of 2 groups (diabetes or no diabetes). Patients were then randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg/ day (n = 730) or simvastatin 10 mg/day (n = 694). Efficacy was determined by measuring changes from baseline in lipid parameters including low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B. Compared with simvastatin, atorvastatin produced significantly greater (p < 0.0001) reductions from baseline in LDL cholesterol (37.2% vs 29.6%), total cholesterol (27.6% vs 21.5%), triglycerides (22.1% vs 16.0%), the ratio of LDL cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (41.1% vs 33.7%), and apolipoprotein B (28.3% vs 21.2%), and a comparable increase from baseline in HDL cholesterol (7.4% vs 6.9%). Atorvastatin was also significantly (p < 0.0001) more effective than simvastatin at treating the overall patient population to LDL cholesterol goals (55.6% vs 38.4%). Fewer than 6% of patients in either treatment group experienced drug-attributable adverse events, which were mostly mild to moderate in nature. Diabetic patients treated with either statin had safety characteristics similar to nondiabetics, with atorvastatin exhibiting superior efficacy to simvastatin. In conclusion, atorvastatin, at a dose of 10 mg/day, is more effective than simvastatin 10 mg/day at lowering lipids and reaching LDL cholesterol goals in patients with mixed dyslipidemia. Both statins are well tolerated with safety profiles similar to other members of the statin class.

Efficacy and drug interactions of the new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors cerivastatin and atorvastatin in CsA-treated renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidaemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease in renal transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy and possible drug-drug interactions of the new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) atorvastatin and cerivastatin in cyclosporin A (CsA)-treated renal transplant patients. Subjects and methods. Thirty patients with stable graft function and LDL cholesterol of 130 mg/dl were randomly assigned to active treatment groups (10 mg atorvastatin or 0.2 mg cerivastatin), or a control group. CsA blood trough levels were controlled on a weekly basis and adapted if they changed more than 25% from baseline values (100-150 ng/ml). Lipid levels and routine laboratory parameters before and after a treatment period of 3 months were compared.

RESULTS

In the group treated with cerivastatin no significant changes in CsA blood trough levels occurred (CsA 116+/-21 ng/ml vs 110+/-20 ng/ml). In contrast, in the group treated with atorvastatin, four of 10 patients had a rise in CsA blood trough levels of more than 25% within 7-14 days of starting therapy. In the remaining patients no significant changes in CsA drug levels occurred. After therapy with atorvastatin or cerivastatin, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglycerides were significantly lower compared with baseline conditions. No changes of CsA or lipoprotein levels were present in the control group.

CONCLUSION

In our study population both statins were very effective in lowering elevated LDL cholesterol levels. Cerivastatin did not influence CsA blood trough levels, whereas atorvastatin increased CsA levels in four of 10 patients. Further research in a larger study is necessary in order to confirm these results and to investigate the possible reasons for this drug interaction.

[Atorvastatin (Lipitor): a review of its pharmacological and clinical profile]

Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for the development of coronary heart disease. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have been used as first-line drugs because of both their superior cholesterol lowering effect and reliable safety profile. Since there are many patients whose plasma cholesterol level does not reach the therapeutic target even if reductase inhibitors are available, more effective drugs have been strongly required for a long time. Atorvastatin, one of the most recently introduced statins, produces greater plasma LDL-cholesterol reductions than other statins. This pronounced effect of atorvastatin seems to be due to its long-lasting action, presumably a reflection of longer residence time of atorvastatin and its active metabolites in the liver. Clinical trials of atorvastatin have also demonstrated marked plasma triglyceride reductions. The triglyceride reduction with atorvastatin seems to stem from the following two indirect mechanisms, limiting VLDL secretion from the liver and increase in clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein via induced LDL receptors from plasma. Eleven clinical trials of atorvastatin, which have been developed in Japan, clearly demonstrated its ability to reduce LDL-C levels more strongly and in significantly more patients to LDL-C treatment goals than other reductase inhibitors with similar safety profiles. Therefore, atorvastatin adds a new dimension to the effective management of hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of pravastatin: mechanisms of pharmacokinetic events

Pravastatin, one of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) widely used in the management of hypercholesterolaemia, has unique pharmacokinetic characteristics among the members of this class. Many in vivo and in vitro human and animal studies suggest that active transport mechanisms are involved in the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin. The oral bioavailability of pravastatin is low because of incomplete absorption and a first-pass effect. The drug is rapidly absorbed from the upper part of the small intestine, probably via proton-coupled carrier-mediated transport, and then taken up by the liver by a sodium-independent bile acid transporter. About half of the pravastatin that reaches the liver via the portal vein is extracted by the liver, and this hepatic extraction is mainly attributed to biliary excretion which is performed by a primary active transport mechanism. The major metabolites are produced by chemical degradation in the stomach rather than by cytochrome P450-dependent metabolism in the liver. The intact drug and its metabolites are cleared through both hepatic and renal routes, and tubular secretion is a predominant mechanism in renal excretion. The dual routes of pravastatin elimination reduce the need for dosage adjustment if the function of either the liver or kidney is impaired, and also reduce the possibility of drug interactions compared with other statins. which are largely eliminated by metabolism. The lower protein binding than other statins weakens the tendency for displacement of highly protein-bound drugs. Although all statins show a hepatoselective disposition, the mechanism for pravastatin is different from that of the others. There is high uptake of pravastatin by the liver via an active transport mechanism, but not by other tissues because of its hydrophilicity, whereas the disposition characteristics of other statins result from high hepatic extraction because of high lipophilicity. These pharmacokinetic properties of pravastatin may be the result of the drug being given in the pharmacologically active open hydroxy acid form and the fact that its hydrophilicity is markedly higher than that of other statins. The nature of the pravastatin transporters, particularly in humans, remains unknown at present. Further mechanistic studies are required to establish the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of pravastatin and to provide the optimal therapeutic efficacy for various types of patients with hypercholesterolaemia.

Short- and long-term effects of atorvastatin, lovastatin and simvastatin on the cellular metabolism of cholesteryl esters and VLDL secretion in rat hepatocytes

The short- and long-term in vitro effects of the hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin, compared with lovastatin and simvastatin on VLDL secretion, and on the formation and the neutral and acid lysosomal hydrolysis of cholesteryl esters was investigated in rat liver hepatocytes maintained in suspension (2 or 4 h) or cultured in monolayers (24 h). All statins time-dependently reduced [14C]oleate incorporation into cholesteryl esters, but when exogenous cholesterol was added only atorvastatin caused an immediate transient decrease in hepatocyte ACAT activity. Activity of the lysosomal, microsomal and cytosolic CEH isoforms was unaffected by the hepatocyte treatments. Statins reduced free and esterified cholesterol mass in hepatocyte microsomes after 2 h, and this was followed by a modest decline in VLDL cholesteryl esters, whilst secretion of VLDL apoB and triglycerides was unaltered. However, after 24 h of treatment, statins caused generalized 20-40% decreases in the secretion of VLDL apoB, cholesterol and triglycerides, with the reduction in apoB48 secretion being significantly superior to that caused in apoB100. The mean diameter of secreted VLDL was not modified by either duration or drug treatment. Additional studies with subcellular fractions demonstrated that statins have a direct selective effect on the enzymes governing the cholesterol-cholesteryl ester cycle, with the exception of the microsomal CEH. Atorvastatin, lovastatin and simvastatin inhibited ACAT activity in microsomes by 50% at doses of 250, 100 and 50 microM, respectively. The cytosolic CEH elicited a biphasic profile of activity with activations up to 100 microM statin and inhibitions above 250 microM, and the lysosomal CEH was only inhibited by atorvastatin at a dose of 100 microM or more. We conclude that a prolonged, but not a short, limited availability of hepatocyte cholesterol derived from the endogenous synthesis reduces VLDL secretion, and that reactivity of statins at the cellular level are more similar than reactivity at the subcellular level as regards the cholesterol-cholesteryl ester cycle.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin

Cerivastatin sodium, a novel statin, is a synthetic, enantiomerically pure, pyridine derivative that effectively reduces serum cholesterol levels at microgram doses. Cerivastatin is readily and completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with plasma concentrations reaching a peak 2 to 3 hours postadministration followed by a monoexponential decay with an elimination half-life (t1/2beta) of 2 to 3 hours. Cerivastatin pharmacokinetics are linear: maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) are proportional to the dose over the range of 0.05 to 0.8 mg. No accumulation is observed on repeated administration. Cerivastatin interindividual variability is described by coefficients of variation of approximately 30 to 40% for its primary pharmacokinetic parameters AUC, Cmax and t1/2beta. The mean absolute oral bioavailability of cerivastatin is 60% because of presystemic first-pass effects. Its pharmacokinetics are not influenced by concomitant administration of food nor by the time of day at which the dose is given. Age, gender, ethnicity and concurrent disease also have no clinically significant effects. Cerivastatin is highly bound to plasma proteins (>99%). The volume of distribution at steady state of about 0.3 L/kg indicates that the drug penetrates only moderately into tissue; conversely, preclinical studies have shown a high affinity for liver tissue, the target site of action. Cerivastatin is exclusively cleared via metabolism. No unchanged drug is excreted. Cerivastatin is subject to 2 main oxidative biotransformation reactions: demethylation of the benzylic methyl ether moiety leading to the metabolite M-1 [catalysed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 and CYP3A4] and stereoselective hydroxylation of one methyl group of the 6-isopropyl substituent leading to the metabolite M-23 (catalysed by CYP2C8). The product of the combined biotransformation reactions is a secondary minor metabolite, M-24, not detectable in plasma. All 3 metabolites are active inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase with a similar potency to the parent drug. Approximately 70% of the administered dose is excreted as metabolites in the faeces, and 30% in the urine. Metabolism by 2 distinct CYP isoforms renders cerivastatin relatively resistant to interactions arising from inhibition of CYP. If one of the pathways is blocked, cerivastatin can be effectively metabolised by the alternative route. In addition, on the basis of in vitro investigations, there is no evidence for either cerivastatin or its metabolites having any inducing or inhibitory activity on CYP. The apparent lack of any clinically relevant interactions with a variety of drugs commonly used by patients in the target population supports this favourable drug-drug interaction profile.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and myotoxicity

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors specifically inhibit HMG-CoA reductase in the liver, thereby inhibiting the biosynthesis of cholesterol. These drugs significantly reduce plasma cholesterol level and long term treatment reduces morbidity and mortality associated with coronary heart disease. The tolerability of these drugs during long term administration is an important issue. Adverse reactions involving skeletal muscle are not uncommon, and sometimes serious adverse reactions involving skeletal muscle such as myopathy and rhabdomyolysis may occur, requiring discontinuation of the drug. Occasionally, arthralgia, alone or in association with myalgia, has been reported. In this article we review scientific data provided via Medline, adverse drug reaction case reports from the Swedish Drug Information System (SWEDIS) and the World Health Organization's International Drug Information System (INTDIS) database, focusing on HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor-related musculoskeletal system events. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is the main isoenzyme involved in the metabolic transformation of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Individuals with both low hepatic and low gastrointestinal tract levels of CYP3A4 expression may be at in increased risk of myotoxicity due to potentially higher HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor plasma concentrations. The reported incidence of myotoxic reactions in patients treated with this drug class varies from 1 to 7% and varies between different agents. The risk of these serious adverse reactions is dose-dependent and may increase when HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are prescribed concomitantly with drugs that inhibit their metabolism, such as itraconazole, cyclosporin, erythromycin and nefazodone. Electrolyte disturbances, infections, major trauma, hypoxia as well as drugs of abuse may increase the risk of myotoxicity. It is important that the potentially serious adverse reactions are recognised and correctly diagnosed so that the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor may at once be withdrawn to prevent further muscular damage.

Statins: effective antiatherosclerotic therapy

BACKGROUND

Statins are the most effective agents currently available for lowering plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and are the mainstay of therapy for hyperlipidemia. The statins are highly liver-selective, inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, a key enzyme in the synthesis of cholesterol. Several large, controlled clinical trials have confirmed significant reductions in rates of coronary heart disease morbidity and death with long-term statin therapy in patients with mild to severe hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This review article is based on a literature search of more than 60 relevant articles from peer-reviewed journals. Search engines included Medline and Embase. In surveying clinical and angiographic evidence, we found that statins appear to reduce the incidence of coronary events by slowing the progression of atherosclerosis and preventing atheromatous lesion formation. We found that the 6 statins currently marketed-atorvastatin, cerivastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin-differ in their inhibitory action on the HMG-CoA reductase enzyme.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of more potent statins such as atorvastatin and simvastatin affords greater lowering of LDL-C and triglyceride levels, allowing more patients to achieve target goals. The question of how low LDL-C levels should be lowered will be answered by ongoing clinical trials.

Effects of cerivastatin on human arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in transfilter cocultures

Statins competitively inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase activity reducing mevalonate synthesis. In this study, antiproliferative and antimigratory effects of the new compound cerivastatin were analyzed and compared with classic statins of the first and second generation using mono- and cocultures of human arterial smooth muscle (haSMC) and endothelial (haEC) cells. Effects on the mitotic index and mitochondrial activity of haEC and haSMC monocultures were tested using BrdU enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) tests, respectively. In lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assays, cytotoxicity of statins was studied. Transfilter cocultures were performed for 14 days to evaluate haSMC growth under the stimulatory effect of proliferating haEC, which release growth factors [e.g., platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)]. The hydrophobic statins simvastatin, lovastatin, and atorvastatin significantly inhibited haSMC and haEC growth in monocultures at 0.5-50 microM. However, most potent effects were exerted by cerivastatin in 10- to 30-fold lower doses without any significant cytotoxicity. More important, cerivastatin showed also significant effects on haSMC proliferation and migration in transfilter cocultures at extremely low doses (IC50, 0.04-0.06 microM), even when applied exclusively to the endothelial side and in the presence of low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Addition of mevalonate abolished the effects of cerivastatin completely. Even in the presence of growth-stimulating haEC and LDL, cerivastatin was found to be the most potent inhibitor of haSMC proliferation and migration in doses that also can be reached in human serum after oral drug administration. The results support the concept that statins seems to influence additional cellular mechanisms beyond cholesterol reduction, which might also have a relevance for the prevention of restenosis.

Topical mevalonic acid stimulates de novo cholesterol synthesis and epidermal permeability barrier homeostasis in aged mice

Extracellular lipids of the stratum corneum, which are composed of cholesterol, fatty acid, and ceramides, are essential for the epidermal permeability barrier function. With damage to the barrier, a decreased capacity for epidermal lipid biosynthesis in aged epidermis results in an impaired repair response. Mevalonic acid is an intermediate after the rate-limiting step in cholesterol biosynthesis, which is catalyzed by 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. In the present study, we investigated the effect of topical mevalonic acid on the murine epidermal permeability barrier function, comparing it with that of cholesterol. Topical treatment with acetone caused linear increases in transepidermal water loss, in proportion to the number of treatments more rapidly in aged mice than in young mice. Administration of mevalonic acid on aged murine epidermis enhanced its resistance against damage and the recovery rate of barrier function from acute barrier disruption. In contrast, although cholesterol also had the same effect, it required a much higher amount than mevalonic acid. In young mice, neither mevalonic acid nor cholesterol had any effect on resistance against acetone damage nor the recovery rate from acetone damage. In the skin of mice topically administered with mevalonic acid, stimulation of cholesterol synthesis and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity were both observed, whereas none was seen with stimulation by equimolar cholesterol. These data indicate that a topical application of mevalonic acid enhances barrier recovery in aged mice, which is accompanied by not only acceleration of cholesterol synthesis from mevalonic acid but also stimulation of the whole cholesterol biosynthesis.

Low-density lipoprotein-independent effects of statins

Statins have pleiotropic properties that complement their cholesterol-lowering effects. These properties may partly account for their established benefit in the prevention of coronary artery disease beyond the reduction of LDL-cholesterol levels. The most widely recognized properties are reviewed here. They include: (i) nitric oxide-mediated improvement of endothelial dysfunction and upregulation of endothelin-1 expression; (ii) antioxidant effects; (iii) anti-inflammatory properties; (iv) inhibition of cell proliferation with anticarcinogenic actions in animals; (v) stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques; (vi) anticoagulant effects; and (vii) inhibition of graft rejection after heart and kidney transplantation. As advances are made in our knowledge, new properties are steadily being uncovered. Pleiotropic effects are currently being given consideration when instituting combination therapy for patients at high cardiovascular risk. Some pleiotropic effects are negative, and may account for occasional untoward drug interactions. For many of these new properties, the clinical relevance has not been established. The challenge for the future will be to design and carry out appropriate clinical trials to establish their relative importance in the prevention of coronary artery disease.

Atorvastatin and simvastatin have distinct effects on hydroxy methylglutaryl-CoA reductase activity and mRNA abundance in the guinea pig

The effects of atorvastatin and simvastatin on hydroxy methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase activity and mRNA abundance were studied in guinea pigs randomized to three groups: untreated animals and those treated with 20 mg/kg of atorvastatin or simvastatin. Guinea pigs were fasted for 0, 6, 12, or 18 h in an attempt to remove the drug from their systems. Reductase activity and mRNA levels were analyzed after each time point. Reductase inhibitor treatment resulted in 50-62% lower cholesterol concentrations compared to untreated guinea pigs (P < 0.0001), while plasma triacylglycerol (TAG) concentrations did not differ among groups. Plasma cholesterol and TAG were 50-70% lower after 18 h fasting in the three groups (P < 0.001). In the nonfasting state, simvastatin and atorvastatin treatment did not affect HMG-CoA reductase activity compared with untreated animals. However, after 6 h of fasting, simvastatin-treated guinea pigs had higher HMG-CoA reductase activity than untreated animals (P < 0.01), suggesting that the drug had been removed from the enzyme. In contrast, atorvastatin-treated guinea pigs maintained low enzyme activity even after 18 h of fasting. Further, HMG-CoA reductase mRNA abundance was increased by sevenfold after atorvastatin treatment and by twofold after simvastatin treatment (P < 0.01). These results suggest that simvastatin and atorvastatin have different half-lives, which may affect HMG-CoA reductase mRNA levels. The increase in reductase activity by simvastatin during fasting could be related to an effect of this statin in stabilizing the enzyme. In contrast, atorvastatin, possibly due to its longer half-life, prolonged inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase activity and resulted in a greater increase in mRNA synthesis.

The magnitude of decrease in hepatic very low density lipoprotein apolipoprotein B secretion is determined by the extent of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibition in miniature pigs

It has been postulated that the rate of hepatic very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) apolipoprotein (apo) B secretion is dependent upon the activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. To test this hypothesis in vivo, apoB kinetic studies were carried out in miniature pigs before and after 21 days treatment with high-dose (10 mg/kg/day), atorvastatin (A) or simvastatin (S) (n = 5). Pigs were fed a diet containing fat (34% of calories) and cholesterol (400 mg/day; 0.1%). Statin treatment decreased plasma total cholesterol [31 (A) vs. 20% (S)] and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations [42 (A) vs. 24% (S)]. Significant reductions in plasma total triglyceride (46%) and VLDL triglyceride (50%) concentrations were only observed with (A). Autologous [131I]VLDL, [125I]LDL, and [3H]leucine were injected simultaneously, and apoB kinetic parameters were determined by triple-isotope multicompartmental analysis using SAAM II. Statin treatment decreased the VLDL apoB pool size [49 (A) vs. 24% (S)] and the hepatic VLDL apoB secretion rate [50 (A) vs. 33% (S)], with no change in the fractional catabolic rate (FCR). LDL apoB pool size decreased [39 (A) vs. 26% (S)], due to reductions in both the total LDL apoB production rate [30 (A) vs. 21% (S)] and LDL direct synthesis [32 (A) vs. 23% (S)]. A significant increase in the LDL apoB FCR (15%) was only seen with (A). Neither plasma VLDL nor LDL lipoprotein compositions were significantly altered. Hepatic HMG-CoA reductase was inhibited to a greater extent with (A), when compared with (S), as evidenced by 1) a greater induction in hepatic mRNA abundances for HMG-CoA reductase (105%) and the LDL receptor (40%) (both P < 0.05); and 2) a greater decrease in hepatic free (9%) and esterified cholesterol (25%) (both P < 0.05). We conclude that both (A) and (S) decrease hepatic VLDL apoB secretion, in vivo, but that the magnitude is determined by the extent of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition.

Rhabdomyolysis associated with concomitant use of atorvastatin and cyclosporine

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of rhabdomyolysis in a cadaveric renal transplant (CRT) patient receiving atorvastatin and cyclosporine.

CASE SUMMARY

A 40-year-old Asian woman with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) presented with bilateral lower-extremity weakness and elevated concentrations of creatine kinase (CK), aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and alkaline phosphatase after two months of concomitant therapy with atorvastatin and cyclosporine. Her other medications were not known to cause rhabdomyolysis; neither was there evidence of an SLE flare. After atorvastatin was discontinued, her CK concentrations declined dramatically and her symptoms resolved.

DISCUSSION

Rhabdomyolysis has been reported in patients treated with other 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors when used in combination with cyclosporine. Atorvastatin, a relatively new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, has not been reported to cause rhabdomyolysis when used concomitantly with cyclosporine. However, its pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties make an interaction with cyclosporine possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to other members of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor class, atorvastatin may interact with cyclosporine and potentially result in rhabdomyolysis. Clinicians should be aware of this possible drug interaction and carefully monitor patients receiving these two drugs concomitantly.

'Fire and forget?' - pharmacological considerations in coronary care

The potential risk of drug-drug interactions is often overlooked during drug therapy selection. Multiple risk factors for drug-drug interactions exist in both the acute and chronic phases of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including concomitant medications and underlying diseases. Some statins have been used for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) in these patients and are not all equivalent in their susceptibility to drug-drug interactions. The lipophilic drugs lovastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, cerivastatin and fluvastatin are metabolized via the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) system in the liver and the gut, making them subject to potential interactions with concomitantly administered drugs that are competing for metabolism via this system. Clinically important interactions with simvastatin or lovastatin and drugs that inhibit the 3A4 isoenzyme (part of the CYP450 system) may result in myopathy and rhabdomyolysis, which can be fatal. However, pravastatin is water-soluble, it does not undergo metabolism via CYP450 to any significant extent (<1%), is excreted essentially unchanged and has not been shown to participate in any clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with CYP450 agents. When selecting drug therapy, knowledge of a drug's route of metabolism is important to predict and prevent life-threatening drug-drug interactions.

Somatic gene therapy for dyslipidemias

Somatic gene transfer is a valuable tool for the in vivo evaluation of lipoprotein metabolism. It has been used to dissect metabolic pathways, to establish structure-function relationships of various gene products, and to evaluate conventional lipid-lowering and novel therapeutic genes for the treatment of lipoprotein disorders. In this article we review some general aspects of somatic gene therapy and the different vehicles used for the delivery of therapeutic genes. We highlight some recent advances in adenoviral vector development that make this vector an attractive system for clinical trials.

Differential effects of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin on Ca2+ release and vascular reactivity

The direct effects of the cholesterol-lowering agents, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors, on vascular smooth muscle responsiveness were examined by incubation of isolated aorta from normocholesterolemic rats with simvastatin, atorvastatin, or pravastatin. The smooth muscle contractions caused by phenylephrine were progressively inhibited with increasing concentrations of simvastatin. Similarly, atorvastatin at the higher concentration caused decreased responses to phenylephrine. In contrast, incubation with pravastatin had no significant effect at all concentrations studied. In Ca2+-free buffer, the transient contraction caused by phenylephrine, which results from intracellular release of Ca2+, also was inhibited by simvastatin and atorvastatin but not by pravastatin. In cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells loaded with fura-2, increases in intracellular free-Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) induced by angiotensin II were markedly inhibited in cells incubated with simvastatin and atorvastatin but not pravastatin. The inhibitory effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin were reversed by mevalonate. These findings demonstrate that inhibition of HMG CoA reductase by using simvastatin and atorvastatin, but not pravastatin, has effects on vascular smooth muscle cell responsiveness that involve alteration of Ca2+ homeostasis through a mevalonate-dependent pathway.

Different effect of simvastatin and atorvastatin on key enzymes involved in VLDL synthesis and catabolism in high fat/cholesterol fed rabbits

The effects of atorvastatin (3 mg kg(-1)) and simvastatin (3 mg kg(-1)) on hepatic enzyme activities involved in very low density lipoprotein metabolism were studied in coconut oil/cholesterol fed rabbits. Plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels increased 19 and 4 fold, respectively, after 7 weeks of feeding. Treatment with statins during the last 4 weeks of feeding abolished the progression of hypercholesterolaemia and reduced plasma triglyceride levels. 3-Hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl Coenzyme A reductase, acylcoenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase, phosphatidate phosphohydrolase and diacylglycerol acyltransferase activities were not affected by drug treatment. Accordingly, hepatic free cholesterol, cholesteryl ester and triglyceride content were not modified. Simvastatin treatment caused an increase (72%) in lipoprotein lipase activity without affecting hepatic lipase activity. Atorvastatin caused a reduction in hepatic phospholipid content and a compensatory increase in CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyl transferase activity. The results presented in this study suggest that, besides the inhibitory effect on 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl Coenzyme A reductase, simvastatin and atorvastatin may have additional effects that contribute to their triglyceride-lowering ability.

Atorvastatin compared with simvastatin in patients with severe LDL hypercholesterolaemia treated by regular LDL apheresis

OBJECTIVES

Atorvastatin is a new potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. We evaluated whether patients with coronary heart disease and severe hypercholesterolaemia showing insufficient LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol reduction despite combined therapy with simvastatin and regular LDL apheresis will benefit from atorvastatin therapy.

SETTING

Tertiary care centre, university hospital.

METHODS

In 21 patients treated by LDL apheresis, concomitant simvastatin therapy (40 mg day-1) was replaced by atorvastatin (40 mg day-1) and increased to 60 and 80 mg day-1 (each for 3 months) if no side-effects were reported and NCEP treatment goals were not reached.

RESULTS

In 20 of 21 patients (95%), atorvastatin resulted in significant reduction of LDL cholesterol compared with simvastatin (by 10%, additional 8% and additional 1%, with 40, 60 and 80 mg day-1, respectively). In four patients, NCEP treatment goals were reached (in three by atorvastatin alone, and in one by atorvastatin and apheresis). Patients with little reduction in LDL cholesterol to 40 mg day-1 atorvastatin benefited most by increasing the dose to 60 mg day-1 (additional 13% reduction), whilst those responding to atorvastatin 40 mg day-1 benefited less (additional 1.9% reduction). During atorvastatin therapy, significantly less plasma had to be treated during apheresis resulting in shorter apheresis time. Eight patients (38%) reported side-effects, resulting in discontinuation of atorvastatin in three (14%) and dose reduction in five patients (24%), whilst no elevation of biochemical markers was observed.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant atorvastatin therapy is superior to simvastatin therapy in patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia treated with regular LDL apheresis, but is associated with a high rate of subjective side-effects.

Quantitation of the acid and lactone forms of atorvastatin and its biotransformation products in human serum by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry

A method for simultaneous quantitation of both the acid and lactone forms of atorvastatin, a new synthetic inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase that is being marketed for the treatment of high serum cholesterol, and both the acid and lactone forms of its two biotransformation products, 2-hydroxyatorvastatin and 4-hydroxyatorvastatin, in human serum (a total of six analytes) by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry was developed and validated. A deuterium labeled analog was used as internal standard for each of the six analytes. Each point of the calibration standard curve, which ranged from 0.5 to 200 ng/mL, contained the six analytes at equal concentrations. Three groups of quality control (QC) samples were used. In the first group, combination QC samples contained all six analytes at equal concentrations. In the second group, acid-only QC samples contained only the acid forms (i.e. three analytes) at equal concentrations. In the third group, lactone-only QC samples contained only the lactone forms (i.e. three analytes) at equal concentrations. After adding the internal standard to 0.5 mL of each standard and the QC sample kept at 4 degrees C, the samples were acidified with sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and then extracted with methyl tert-butyl ether. Detection was by positive ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry using eight selected reaction monitoring channels. The acid compounds were stable in human serum at room temperature but the lactone compounds were unstable as they hydrolyzed rapidly to their respective acid forms. The conversion of the lactone compounds in both QC and post-dose human serum samples was nearly complete after 24 h at room temperature. The lactone compounds in serum could be stabilized by lowering the working temperature to 4 degrees C or lowering the serum pH to 6.0. The acid-only and the lactone-only QC samples showed that, under the sample processing conditions used, the degree of the hydrolysis of the lactone compounds or the lactonization of the acid compounds during the assay procedure was minimal (< 5%). The intra-day C.V., inter-day C.V. and the deviations from the nominal concentrations for all six analytes were within 15%, demonstrating good precision and accuracy. The required lower limit of quantitation (LLQ) of 0.5 ng/mL was achieved for each analyte.

Metabolism and drug interactions of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in transplant patients: are the statins mechanistically similar?

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (EC 1.1.1.88) inhibitors are the most effective drugs to lower cholesterol in transplant patients. However, immunosuppressants and several other drugs used after organ transplantation are cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A, EC 1.14.14.1) substrates. Pharmacokinetic interaction with some of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, specifically lovastatin and simvastatin, leads to an increased incidence of muscle skeletal toxicity in transplant patients. It is our objective to review the role of drug metabolism and drug interactions of lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, and cerivastatin. In the treatment of transplant patients, from a drug interaction perspective, pravastatin, which is not significantly metabolized by CYP enzymes, and fluvastatin, presumably a CYP2C9 substrate, compare favorably with the other statins for which the major metabolic pathways are catalyzed by CYP3A.

Current and future treatment of hyperlipidemia: the role of statins

Hyperlipidemia is recognized as one of the major risk factors for the development of coronary artery disease and progression of atherosclerotic lesions. Dietary therapy together with hypolipidemic drugs are central to the management of hyperlipidemia, which aims to prevent atherosclerotic plaque progression, induce regression, and so decrease the risk of acute coronary events in patients with pre-existing coronary or peripheral vascular disease. In patients at high risk of coronary artery disease but without evidence of atherosclerosis, treatment is designed to prevent the premature development of coronary artery disease, whereas in those with hypertriglyceridemia, treatment aims to prevent the development of hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and pancreatitis. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, are the most potent lipid-lowering agents currently available, and their use in the treatment of hyperlipidemia provides the focus for this review. Particular emphasis is given to cerivastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor that combines potent cholesterol-lowering properties with significant triglyceride-reducing effects. Recently completed primary and secondary intervention trials have shown that the significant reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol achieved with statins result in significant reductions in morbidity and mortality associated with coronary artery disease as well as reductions in the incidence of stroke and total mortality. Such benefits occur early in the course of statin therapy and have led to suggestions that these drugs may possess antiatherogenic effects over and above their capacity to lower atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins. Experimental studies have also shown statin-induced improvements in endothelial function, decreased platelet thrombus formation, improvements in fibrinolytic activity, and reductions in the frequency of transient myocardial ischemia.

Clinical efficacy and safety of cerivastatin: summary of pivotal phase IIb/III studies

Cerivastatin is a new, third-generation 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor ("statin"), which is administered to hypercholesterolemic patients at doses equivalent to 1-3% of the doses of other statins. This report reviews the pivotal Phase IIb/III clinical trials in which the efficacy and safety of cerivastatin was compared with placebo and active comparator statins (lovastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin) after both short- and long-term administration. Overall, the studies showed that at doses of 0.025-0.4 mg/day, cerivastatin produced dose-dependent reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and total cholesterol, which were significantly greater than placebo. The greatest reductions were achieved with 0.4 mg/day cerivastatin. On this dose, >40% of patients achieved reductions in LDL cholesterol >40% and in a further 9% of patients, LDL cholesterol was decreased by >50%. At higher doses, cerivastatin also demonstrated potent triglyceride-lowering effects in a subgroup of patients with raised plasma triglycerides. Reductions in atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins were accompanied by significant increases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, and antiatherogenic lipoprotein A-I. Long-term administration of cerivastatin for periods of up to 2 years was associated with persistent reductions in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B as well as increases in HDL cholesterol similar to those observed after initial administration. Long-term cerivastatin treatment was also well tolerated. There was no significant difference between the incidence of adverse effects with cerivastatin and comparator statins or between cerivastatin and other statins with respect to clinically significant increases in either hepatic enzymes or creatine phosphokinase. In conclusion, these studies indicate that cerivastatin is a safe and effective long-term treatment for patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and also suggest that higher doses should be investigated.

Effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin

BACKGROUND

Itraconazole, a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, increases the risk of skeletal muscle toxicity of some 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors by increasing their serum concentrations. The aim of this study was to characterize the effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor that is metabolized at least in part by CYP3A4.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, two-phase crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers took 200 mg itraconazole or matched placebo orally once daily for 4 days. On day 4, 40 mg atorvastatin was administered orally, and a further dose of 200 mg itraconazole or placebo was taken 24 hours after atorvastatin intake. Serum concentrations of atorvastatin acid, atorvastatin lactone, 2-hydroxyatorvastatin acid and lactone, 4-hydroxyatorvastatin acid and lactone, active and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, itraconazole, and hydroxyitraconazole were measured up to 72 hours.

RESULTS

Itraconazole increased the area under the concentration--time curve from time zero to 72 hours [AUC(0-72)] and the elimination half-life of atorvastatin acid about threefold (p < 0.001), whereas the peak serum concentration was not significantly changed. The AUC(0-72) of atorvastatin lactone was increased about fourfold (p < 0.001), and the peak serum concentration and half-life were increased more than twofold (p < 0.01). Itraconazole decreased the peak serum concentration and AUC(0-72) of 2-hydroxyatorvastatin acid (p < 0.01) and 2-hydroxyatorvastatin lactone (p < 0.01). Itraconazole significantly (p < 0.01) increased the half-life of 2 hydroxyatorvastatin lactone. The AUC(0-72) values of active and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were increased 1.6-fold (p < 0.001) and 1.7-fold (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Itraconazole has a significant interaction with atorvastatin. The mechanism of increased serum concentrations of atorvastatin and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is inhibition of CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of atorvastatin and its metabolites by itraconazole. Concomitant use of itraconazole and other potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 with atorvastatin should be avoided or the dose of atorvastatin should be reduced accordingly.

Effect of hypolipidemic drugs on key enzyme activities related to lipid metabolism in normolipidemic rabbits

The effect of atorvastatin (3 mg kg(-1) day(-1)), simvastatin (3 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) and bezafibrate (100 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) administered for 4 weeks to male New Zealand white rabbits on enzyme activities related to lipid metabolism has been studied. Only the statins reduced plasma cholesterol values, while none of the drugs modified plasma triglyceride or high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol concentrations, nor the activity of enzymes such as hepatic diacylglycerol acyltransferase, lipoprotein lipase or hepatic lipase, directly involved in triglyceride metabolism. Both statins elicited similar increases in the hepatic microsomal 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl Coenzyme A (CoA) reductase activity (147 and 109% induction for simvastatin and atorvastatin, respectively), and none of the drugs assayed modified hepatic acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase activity significantly. Only bezafibrate induced a significant 57% reduction in the activity of hepatic microsomal cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase. Regarding the rate limiting enzyme of phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis, CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyl transferase, atorvastatin and bezafibrate behaved similarly, decreasing the enzyme activity in the liver by 45% and 54%, respectively; simvastatin induced no modification of this activity. The reduction of CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyl transferase activity is not caused by a direct inhibition of the enzyme by bezafibrate and atorvastatin. Further, the inhibitory effect of atorvastatin appears to be unrelated to the inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl CoA reductase elicited in vivo.