Randomised trial of interferon alpha-2a as adjuvant therapy in resected primary melanoma thicker than 1.5 mm without clinically detectable node metastases. French Cooperative Group on Melanoma

Modelling the cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node mapping and adjuvant interferon treatment for stage II melanoma

Clinical studies have demonstrated that high dose adjuvant interferon therapy improves disease-free and overall survival among high risk (stage IIb and III) melanoma patients. Sentinel lymph node mapping (SLM) has been shown to accurately detect micrometastasis and may be used to identify higher risk stage II patients, who might benefit most from adjuvant interferon therapy. We modelled the cost-effectiveness of first testing with SLM and then treating with adjuvant interferon (IFN) therapy for stage II melanoma. We used a decision analytical model to compare four strategies for stage II patients after surgical excision of their melanoma: (1) treat all with low dose IFN; (2) test first with SLM and then treat only those with positive micrometastasis with high dose IFN; (3) test first with SLM and treat positives with high dose IFN and negatives with low dose IFN (test and treat appropriately); and (4) surgery only. Treatment, toxicity, follow-up and relapse costs were included over a 5 year time period. The primary outcome was cost per quality-adjusted relapse-free life year saved. Our analysis shows that, compared with the current surgery-only strategy, all three treatment strategies provide incremental benefits. The test and treat appropriately strategy is the most effective, with an incremental improvement of 0.64 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). The cost-effectiveness of test and treat some with high dose IFN compared with the surgery-only strategy is $18,700/QALY. The test and treat appropriately strategy is also cost-effective compared with test and treat some at $31,100/QALY. In conclusion appropriate dosing of IFN therapy based on the results of SLM is a cost-effective strategy for stage II melanoma patients.

[Interferons and malignant melanoma]

BACKGROUND

Alpha interferon is currently used in the treatment of malignant melanoma mainly as adjuvant therapy at the first stage of the illness (primary tumor) and at the second stage (lymph node invasion).

CURRENT POSITION AND MAIN POINTS

At metastatic stage, interferon alpha has no adverse indication when used alone. However, studies are on going to assess its potential synergistic effect combined with chemotherapy and its interest for maintaining clinical response. Beta and gamma interferon have no adverse indication in the treaTment of malignant melanoma.

PERSPECTIVE

Although its action has been mainly demonstrated on relapse free survival, and the impact on quality of life remains important, additional new studies will be required to confirm its interest as adjuvant therapy for melanoma. In addition, the future use of pegylated interferon which would permit a reduction in the number of injections is of a significant interest.

Tyrosinase mRNA in blood of patients with melanoma treated with adjuvant interferon

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical significance of the detection of circulating melanoma cells in patients treated with adjuvant interferon and to determine their potential value as a marker of interferon response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 616 peripheral-blood samples from 120 melanoma patients with stage IIA (n = 33), IIB (n = 22), III (n = 50), or IV (surgically resected) (n = 15) disease receiving adjuvant interferon alfa-2b therapy. Tyrosinase mRNA was assayed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as a marker of circulating melanoma cells before the start of interferon and every 2 to 3 months thereafter.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 32.3 months (range, 7.1 to 77.5 months), 47 patients (39.8%) relapsed and 31 (26%) died. During adjuvant interferon treatment, 76 patients (64%) had undetected circulating melanoma cells and 44 patients (36%) had a positive RT-PCR result in at least one sample. Actuarial 5-year disease-free survival was 62% in patients with persistently negative RT-PCR during interferon treatment and 38% for patients with positive RT-PCR during interferon (P =.02). Actuarial 5-year overall survival was 75% and 50%, respectively (P =.03).

CONCLUSION

Patients with melanoma and tyrosinase mRNA detected in the blood during adjuvant interferon therapy had a worse prognosis compared with patients with undetected tyrosinase mRNA during treatment. Further investigation into the detection of circulating melanoma cells as a surrogate marker of response to adjuvant interferon therapy is warranted.

Adjuvant therapy of malignant melanoma

High risk surgically resected melanoma is associated with a less than 50% 5-year survival. Adjuvant therapy is an appropriate treatment modality in this setting, and is more likely to be effective as the tumour burden here is small. Clinical observations of spontaneous tumour regressions and a highly variable rate of disease progression suggest a role of the immune system in the natural history of melanoma. Biological agents have therefore been the subjects of numerous adjuvant studies. Early, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), levamisole, Corynebacterium parvum, chemotherapy, isolated limb perfusion (ILP), radiotherapy, transfer factor (TF), megestrol acetate and vitamin A yielded largely negative results. Current trials focus on vaccines and the interferons. To date the latter is the only therapy to have shown a significant benefit in the prospective randomised controlled phase III setting. This report represents a systematic review of studies in adjuvant therapy in melanoma. Data from ongoing studies is awaited before a role for adjuvant agents in high risk melanoma is confirmed.

Mechanisms and management of toxicities associated with high-dose interferon alfa-2b therapy

PURPOSE

The toxicity associated with adjuvant high-dose interferon-alfa-2b therapy (HDI) for high-risk melanoma can lead to premature discontinuation. It is important to understand the expected adverse events and their underlying mechanisms and to anticipate and aggressively manage toxicity during treatment in order to ensure that patients receive the maximum therapeutic benefit.

METHODS

The toxicity profile of HDI was reviewed by examining data from the United States cooperative group trials. Available published data related to the potential mechanisms responsible for the observed adverse events are discussed, and comprehensive recommendations for managing side effects are presented.

RESULTS

The HDI regimen is associated with acute constitutional symptoms, chronic fatigue, myelosuppression, elevated liver enzyme levels, and neurologic symptoms. The majority of patients tolerate 1 year of therapy with an understanding of the anticipated toxicities in conjunction with appropriate dose modifications and supportive care. Ongoing monitoring for liver dysfunction and hematologic toxicity is critical to ensure safety. Many of the toxicities associated with interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) seem to be the result of endogenous cytokines and their effects on the neuroendocrine system. Recent data have also demonstrated that IFN-alpha suppresses the activity of specific CYP450 isoenzymes and that this correlates with discrete toxicities. Pharmacologic interventions are under study for fatigue and depression. An increased understanding of the mechanisms of IFN-alpha-associated toxicity will lead to more rational and effective supportive care and improved quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Continued research in this area should lead to improvements in the safety and tolerability of adjuvant therapy for melanoma.

VEGF-165 serum levels and tyrosinase expression in melanoma patients: correlation with the clinical course

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is known to play a crucial role in the growth and metastatization of solid tumours. In cancer patients, high VEGF serum levels correlate with tumour status and prognosis, but to date few data have been reported concerning VEGF in melanoma patients. In the present study, immunoenzymatic and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) techniques were used to detect VEGF-165 serum levels and the presence of tyrosinase mRNA, respectively, in the peripheral blood of a cohort of 155 melanoma patients at different clinical stages (30 stage I, 40 stage II, 40 stage III and 45 stage IV; AJCC classification). Data were compared with both the extent of the disease and the clinical course. The aim was to assess the relationship between VEGF serum levels, the presence of detectable circulating melanoma cells and melanoma progression. A significant increase in VEGF serum levels was found in melanoma patients, in particular in those with metastatic disease; a higher incidence of relapses was found in stage I-III disease-free patients who showed an increase in VEGF during follow-up. VEGF serum levels were significantly higher in patients with detectable circulating melanoma cells than in those with negative tyrosinase mRNA expression. The finding of both an increase in VEGF and the presence of detectable melanoma cells during follow-up was associated with a relapse rate of 81%. The relapse rate was significantly lower when either of the two parameters were present separately. Multivariate analysis of both overall survival and time-to-progression selected baseline tyrosinase expression in peripheral blood but not VEGF serum levels as an independent prognostic factor.

European approach to adjuvant treatment of intermediate- and high-risk malignant melanoma

Adjuvant therapies for patients with melanoma at high risk of relapse whether local, such as excision margins, elective regional lymph node dissection (ELND), and prophylactic isolated limb perfusion (ILP), or systemic, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, immunochemotherapy, or vaccination therapy, have little or no impact on survival when evaluated in randomized trials. The European approach to the treatment of each stage of malignant melanoma is characterized by thoughtful caution with particular attention being paid to the avoidance of unwarranted mutilation or toxicity because phase 3 studies have failed to demonstrate unequivocal benefits for a more aggressive approach. In Europe, there is no standard adjuvant systemic therapy; high-dose interferon (IFN) is used sporadically in individual patients by some physicians, but there is little enthusiasm for adopting this regimen as the standard of care because of its high toxicity profile and the lack of a clear beneficial impact on long-term survival. Less toxic lower-dose maintenance IFN regimens, antiangiogenic agents, and vaccine therapies are currently being explored.

Cytokine therapy in dermatology

Cytokines have been in the focus of scientific interest for some years now. Analysing their expression permitted a better understanding of the pathogenesis of various diseases, including in dermatology. Moreover, they are now far beyond the stage when they were of interest only to the pathophysiological research sector: some cytokine therapies are already being employed as part of the clinical practice. In fact, several cytokines are used for the treatment of malignant, inflammatory and infectious skin diseases. Their stage of development ranges from advanced, already approved and well established therapies (e.g. IFN-alpha and IL-2 for melanoma) to early explorative trials (e.g. IL-4 and IL-10 for psoriasis). Some of the new approaches currently under investigation will actually lead to registration of new drugs for dermatological treatment and to supplement existing therapeutic options. Beside this, the results of clinical trials with cytokines are significantly contributing to our understanding of the pathophysiology of diseases. They will give a better insight into which mechanisms play a greater or lesser part in their development and may generate momentum for still better targeted pharmacological approaches. Here we would like to give an overview about the current stage of cytokine therapy and the prospects for dermatological indications. The terminology and immunobiology of cytokines are also briefly discussed, since for a sensible interpretation of the relevant findings a basic knowledge of these biologically highly active messenger substances is essential.

Interferon alfa therapy for malignant melanoma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

No standard systemic adjuvant therapy has been proven to increase overall survival in melanoma patients. The effect of interferon alfa (IFNalpha) as a single agent or in combination has been widely explored in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of IFNalpha therapy in malignant melanoma.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing regimens with or without IFNalpha adjuvant therapy in melanoma patients. We assessed the effect of IFNalpha therapy on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), melanoma recurrences, and toxicity. The quality of each trial was systematically evaluated.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IFNalpha therapy in melanoma patients were identified. Eight were published and one was unpublished. Eight trials comprising 3,178 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Quality assessment scores ranged from 22 to 71, with a mean score of 55.4 (95% confidence interval, 53.8 to 57.0). For OS, only one trial reported a statistically significant benefit for IFNalpha, but our analysis did not confirm it. Two trials reported statistically significant benefit in DFS for the patients treated with IFNalpha, but our analysis confirmed it in only one trial. There was a wide clinical heterogeneity between included trials, making meta-analysis inappropriate.

CONCLUSION

In our review, results from included RCTs demonstrated no clear benefit of IFNalpha therapy on OS in melanoma patients. A large RCT is required to answer whether a full regimen of IFNalpha therapy is effective and to identify the subgroups of patients who might benefit from IFNalpha treatment.

European approach to the treatment of malignant melanoma

The European approach to the treatment of each stage of malignant melanoma can be characterized as cautious, avoiding unwarranted mutilation or toxicity, because phase III trials have demonstrated that an aggressive approach in surgical management, adjuvant therapy, and treatment of stage IV disease has met with little success. Phase III trials have demonstrated that wide margins, elective lymph node dissections, and prophylactic isolated limb perfusions bring no survival benefit. Primary melanoma is excised with a margin of 1 cm to maximally 2 cm and primary closure as a rule. There is no standard adjuvant therapy. High-dose interferon treatment is practiced only sporadically in Europe because its high toxicity profile and an unclear long-term impact on survival are not popular. Long-term nontoxic lower-dose interferon regimens and vaccines are currently being explored. Phase III trials have shown that highly toxic polychemotherapy or biochemotherapy has not produced a survival benefit over simple treatment with dacarbazide alone. In Europe biochemotherapy is being abandoned and various less toxic or nontoxic approaches with vaccines and antiangiogenic agents are under study.

An update on adjuvant interferon for melanoma

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in the staging and surgical therapy of melanoma, patients with high-risk resected melanoma still have 5-year recurrence rates of 55% to 80% and 5-year survival rates as low as 25% to 70%. Effective adjuvant therapy is needed for this patient population.

METHODS

The authors review the literature regarding the use of interferon for the adjuvant therapy of resected melanoma.

RESULTS

Low-dose adjuvant interferon regimens have not affected overall survival and have had an inconsistent effect on disease-free survival across different stage groupings. High-dose adjuvant interferon improved disease- free and overall survival in the E1684 and Intergroup E1694 trials. High-dose interferon regimens cause significant morbidity, but quality-adjusted years of life are greater with this therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant high-dose interferon should be considered standard therapy for all high-risk melanoma patients expected to be able to tolerate the interferon and treated off protocol. In addition, this regimen should serve as the active control in future trials of alternative adjuvant therapies for these patients.

Randomized clinical trials in melanoma

Efforts to improve the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma have led to 67 prospective randomized clinical trials investigating the use of agents comprising three main areas of therapy: systemic chemotherapy-based regimens, immunotherapy, and vaccine therapy

Prognostic index for cutaneous melanoma: an analysis after follow-up of 2715 patients

In 2715 of 4524 patients with cutaneous melanoma treated surgically between 1968 and 1992 prognostic parameters were analysed for their value in predicting the occurrence of first progression. All of the 2715 patients developed only one invasive cutaneous melanoma during the follow-up period. Data concerning tumour thickness and mitotic index (maximum number of mitoses per square millimetre) of the cutaneous melanomas were determined. Between the characteristics age, tumour thickness, mitotic index, prognostic index (PI), sex, site of tumour, melanoma subtype and Clark level, the value of the mitotic index, as a prognostic parameter independent of tumour thickness, and the combination of mitotic index and tumour thickness were evaluated. The development of the first metastases was documented during a mean follow-up of 7.5 years. The majority of first recurrences occurred at regional lymph nodes and attempts have been made to identify those patients at risk of developing metastatic disease. The most effective parameters proved to be tumour thickness and mitotic index. For both parameters an independent prognostic influence was shown. The prognostic index, defined as the product of tumour thickness and number of mitoses per square millimetre, was re-evaluated and confirmed. A new modified prognostic index, defined as the product of square tumour thickness and mitotic index, proved to be even more useful for defining a subgroup of patients who are at risk of developing metastases and, therefore, might benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Adjuvant interferon-alpha for melanoma revisited: news from old and new studies

Currently the data from 12 randomised phase III trials investigating the role of interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) in patients with stage II-III high-risk melanoma are available. The most prominent differences between these trials concern the dose of IFNalpha, the duration of IFNalpha administration, and the stage of disease. Some of these trials have not yet reached maturity, but despite this the positive results from some immature trials have attracted considerable attention. When only data from mature trials is considered, one may conclude that the use of high-dose IFNalpha does prolong disease-free survival (DFS) but not overall survival (OS). Combined data from low-dose IFNalpha trials does not suggest a benefit in either DFS or OS. A trial with intermediate-dose IFNalpha is still immature. Therefore currently the routine use of IFNalpha cannot be recommended outside the scope of clinical trials.

Biochemotherapy of metastatic malignant melanoma. Predictive value of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes

The therapeutic efficacy of biochemotherapy in metastatic malignant melanoma still carries a low remission rate, but with some durable responses. It would therefore be of considerable importance if patients with a high probability of responding could be identified using predictive tests. The response to interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) correlates with the occurrence of CD4(+) lymphocytes identified by fine-needle aspirates from melanoma metastases (Håkansson et al, 1996). The present investigation studies a possible correlation between tumour-infiltrating CD4(+) lymphocytes in malignant melanoma metastases and the therapeutic effect of biochemotherapy. A total of 25 patients with systemic and 16 with regional metastatic melanoma were analysed before initiation of biochemotherapy (cis-platinum 30 mg/m(2) d.1-3, DTIC 250 mg/m(2) d.1-3 i.v. and IFN-alpha 2 b 10 million IU s.c. 3 days a week, q. 28d.). A monoclonal antibody, anti-CD4, was used to identify tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in fine-needle aspirates before start of treatment. The presence of these lymphocytes was correlated to response, time to progression and overall survival. A statistically significant correlation (P = 0.01) was found between the occurrence of CD4(+) lymphocytes and tumour regression during biochemotherapy in patients with systemic disease. Out of 14 patients with moderate to high numbers of infiltrating CD4(+) lymphocytes, 12 achieved tumour regression. In contrast, among patients with low numbers of these cells in metastatic lesions, 8 out of 11 had progressive disease. We also found a significantly longer time to progression (P < 0.003) and overall survival (P < 0.01) among patients with moderate to high numbers of these cells compared to patients with low numbers of these cells before initiation of biochemotherapy. Furthermore, in patients with regional disease, we found a significantly longer time to progression (P = 0.01) and a trend toward a longer overall survival time (P = 0.09). Based on these results and as previously shown with IFN-alpha therapy alone, there seems to be a need for CD4(+) lymphocytes infiltrating the tumours before the start of biochemotherapy to make the treatment successful. Determination of these cells in fine-needle aspirates seems to be a method to predict responders to biochemotherapy, thus increasing the cost-benefit of this treatment strategy considerably, both in terms of patient adverse reactions and health care costs.

The role interferon-alpha in malignant melanoma remains to be defined

Interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) is a pleiotropic cytokine with various direct and indirect inflammatory response modulating activities. Some of these activities may have direct or indirect antitumour effects. For such a wide range of biological activities, the dose for optimal biological activity may differ greatly from the maximally tolerated dose as different effects are mediated by different concentrations of IFNalpha. Because of its immunomodulatory effects, it has been extensively studied in melanoma patients. Little antitumour activity has been demonstrated in metastatic stage IV melanoma, with overall response rates of 10-15%, which were not dose-related. Yet, IFNalpha has been widely studied in the adjuvant setting for stage II and III disease. Many trials have been underpowered, have used very heterogeneously mixed patient populations, a wide variety of doses and treatment schedules, and have suffered from early and unplanned analyses. Mature data are still pending in some 3000 patients of the overall approximately 6000 patients that participated in the adjuvant trials. A meta-analysis has demonstrated a similar impact on relapse-free survival across various dose ranges of IFNalpha, but no significant impact on overall survival (OS). In light of the lack of impact on OS and the considerable to serious dose-dependent toxicity of IFNalpha, we do not have a clearly dose- and schedule-defined role for IFNalpha in the adjuvant setting and have no evidence for a benefit of IFNalpha in stage IV melanoma. For the adjuvant setting, the main question: efficacy of very toxic high dose therapy versus efficacy of non-toxic long-term treatment will be answered by the mature data from the large US-Intergroup high-dose and EORTC intermediate-dose and long-term maintenance therapy trials.

Adjuvant therapy of malignant melanoma: is there a choice?

The methodological differences, data interpretation and conclusions of recent studies of adjuvant therapy in high-risk malignant melanoma, are discussed in detail in this communication. Two observations emerge from this analysis:There is as yet no adjuvant treatment that has conclusively been shown to influence overall survival for high-grade primary lesions with or without clinically occult microscopic metastases in regional lymph nodes. With currently available drugs, meaningful benefit is more likely, if adjuvant treatment is administered on development of clinically apparent regional lymph nodes metastases. The paradox of adjuvant therapy being apparently more effective in more advanced stages of the disease is not unique to melanoma and has been observed in other cancers. This paradox can be explained by the notion that currently available treatments will not eradicate the last malignant phenotype. They may, however, anticipate and frustrate the clinical expression of the next episode of disease activity, in a defined period of time.

[Selective sentinel node biopsy in melanoma using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy location and intraoperative detection gamma probe]

BACKGROUND

The experience in detection of sentinel lymph node in melanoma using preoperative scintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe is referred.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 60 patients with stage I-II melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy performed using 99m-Tc-labelled sulphur colloid as radioactive tracer. A preoperative scintigraphy was performed and intraoperative gamma probe was used to localize the sentinel node in all cases. Scintigraphy results, effectiveness of intraoperative detection (technical efficacy), pathological results, and follow-up have been studied.

RESULTS

Preoperative detection was 98.3% and the mean basin detected was 1.17. There were multiple basins especially when melanomas were on the trunk. Technical efficacy was 98.4% and intraoperative detection was more difficult in parotid gland region. HMB-45 immunohistochemical staining was essential in pathological studies, in whom 10% were positives. Lymphadenectomy could be avoided in 90% of the patients. Recurrences were not detected during follow-up and metastases were found only in non biopsied cases. Sentinel node biopsy morbidity was significative lesser than that of lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative scintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe use to localize sentinel node in melanoma have a high efficacy. They can reveal multiple basins and they allow a more selective surgical approach and a minimal dissection.

Synchronous high-risk melanoma and lymphoid neoplasia

Large population-based studies have shown a significant association between melanoma and lymphoid neoplasia, particularly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), that is independent of any treatment received for the initial tumour. This study examines the presentation, diagnosis, treatment and progress of three patients who developed advanced melanoma concurrently with a lymphoid neoplasm (one NHL, two CLLs), in order to illustrate their association, discuss common aetiological factors and examine possible therapeutic options. As it is the melanoma rather than the lymphoid neoplasm that represents the bigger threat to overall survival, initial treatment should be targeted towards this cancer. However, because of the interplay between the diseases and the possible side-effects of the various treatments, the choice of adjuvant therapy requires careful consideration. Immunosuppression associated with chemotherapy may permit a more aggressive course for the melanoma, while locoregional radiotherapy is contraindicated following lymph node dissections. As immunotherapy is of benefit in the treatment of melanoma and has also been recently shown to be effective in the management of lymphoid neoplasia, we instituted interferon-alpha as adjuvant therapy for these patients, thereby utilizing a single agent to treat the dual pathologies. The three patients have now been followed-up for 6 months without evidence of disease recurrence or progression.

Comparison of the two-sided single triangular test to the double triangular test

Comparative clinical trials are designed to determine whether a new treatment has either superior or different efficacy than a standard, that is, if theta represents a measure of treatment difference, to test the null hypothesis H(0): theta = 0 against the alternative hypothesis H(1) of either superior (theta > 0, one-sided) or different (theta not equal 0, two-sided with H(1)(+): theta > 0 and H(-)(1): theta < 0) efficacy. The triangular test (TT), a group sequential method, allows for early stopping of such trials. Its one-sided version (single TT) and two-sided version (double TT) were implemented in the first release of PEST software. The third release of PEST proposed a modification of the single TT, allowing rejection of H(0) in favor of H(-)(1) when very early data show strong inferiority of the new treatment as compared with the standard. Thus, our aim was to compare this modified single TT, referred to as a two-sided test in PEST 3, with the double TT and two-sided single-stage design (SSD). The statistical properties of the SSD and double TT were perfectly similar under all hypotheses. The modified single TT was underpowered as compared to the two others (the probability of falsely accepting H(0) strictly under H(-)(1) was 0.65 instead of 0.05), but the average sample number function was lower than the one of the double TT under all H(-)(1) hypotheses (-56% strictly under H(-)(1)). We conclude that the modified single TT offers a two-sided conclusion with many fewer patients than the double TT, but at the expense of a strong decrease in power under H(-)(1).

Management of high-risk melanoma

Improved treatment options for patients with high-risk melanoma are of great importance for clinicians who participate in the care of these patients. There remains an overall lack of response to existing treatment options, which continues to fuel the efforts of basic scientists and clinicians to pursue other approaches for the treatment of melanoma that is no longer limited to the skin. Continued investigation into the innovative and concurrent use of surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy holds significant promise for improved outcomes in the management of patients with this devastating disease.

Effect of long-term adjuvant therapy with interferon alpha-2a in patients with regional node metastases from cutaneous melanoma: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Less than half of patients with melanoma that has spread to local draining regional lymph nodes (stage III melanoma) live with no disease for 5 years or longer after surgery. We aimed to see whether interferon alpha-2a increased survival prospects in these patients.

METHODS

444 patients from 23 centres in the WHO Melanoma Programme had complete lymphadenectomy for pathologically proven regional nodal spread of melanoma and were randomly assigned to receive either 3 MU subcutaneously of recombinant interferon alpha-2a three times a week for 3 years, or to observation alone after surgery. Patients were stratified by centre, nodes with macroscopic or microscopic melanoma, number of affected nodes, and nodal metastatic spread. Treatment was continued for 3 years or until first sign of relapse.

FINDINGS

424 patients entered the study. 5-year disease-free survival of those who had surgery plus interferon alpha-2a was 27.5% (95% CI 21.7-33.6); for those who received surgery alone, survival was 28.4% (22.5-34.6) (p=0.50). Neither Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rates, nor multivariate analysis of survival, showed a difference between those who had surgery and interferon alpha-2a (35%, 95% CI 29-42) and those who had surgery alone (37%, 31-44).

INTERPRETATION

Patients with melanoma that has spread to the local draining regional lymph nodes tolerate well 3 MU of interferon alpha-2a given subcutaneously three times a week for 3 years, but this treatment does not improve either disease-free or overall survival.

Detection of melanoma cells in sentinel lymph nodes, bone marrow and peripheral blood by a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: association with Breslow's tumour thickness

BACKGROUND

Tyrosinase reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been shown to be highly sensitive in detecting tumour cells in melanoma patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the detection of minimal residual disease by RT-PCR is improved by concomitant analysis of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) in patients with primary melanoma.

METHODS

Thirty-five SLNs, 41 BM samples and 26 PB specimens from 26 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (tumour thickness > or = 0.75 mm) were examined by nested RT-PCR for tyrosinase and Melan-A. SLNs and BM samples were also analysed by histopathology. RT-PCR findings were related to tumour thickness of the primary melanoma.

RESULTS

Overall, melanoma cells were detected by RT-PCR in 13 of 26 patients (50%). Seven patients had positive RT-PCR results in their SLNs (27%), including all patients (n = 4) with histologically positive SLNs, two patients had positive findings in their BM exclusively detected by RT-PCR (8%) and six patients in PB (23%). The presence of tumour cells detected by RT-PCR in SLNs was not related to the presence of melanoma cells in BM and/or PB. The incidence of RT-PCR-positive SLNs was significantly associated with greater tumour thickness (P = 0.004). Both patients with positive RT-PCR findings in their BM had a large tumour thickness (> or = 2 mm). No association between positive RT-PCR findings in PB and greater tumour thickness was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

RT-PCR-positive SLNs were strongly associated with greater tumour thickness, underlining the prognostic significance of SLN positivity. Similar to certain epithelial malignancies, molecular investigation of the BM might provide complementary prognostic information in the early stages of melanoma. In contrast, no association between positive RT-PCR results in PB and increasing tumour thickness was found, implying that RT-PCR findings in PB are of doubtful clinical relevance in primary melanoma.

High density oligonucleotide array analysis of interferon- alpha2a sensitivity and transcriptional response in melanoma cells

Interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) represents an adjuvant therapy of proven effectiveness in increasing disease-free interval and survival in subgroups of melanoma patients. Since high doses of cytokine are required, the treatment is often accompanied by toxic side effects. Furthermore, naturally occurring insensitivity to IFN-alpha may hamper its therapeutic efficacy. Clinical, molecular or immunological markers enabling the selection of potential responders have not been identified so far. To explore the molecular basis of IFN-alpha responsiveness, we analysed the expression pattern of about 7000 genes in IFN-alpha sensitive and resistant cell lines and we compared the transcription profiles of cells cultured in the presence or absence of the cytokine using high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Melanoma cell lines were screened for their sensitivity to proliferation inhibition and HLA class I induction upon IFN-alpha treatment by standard 3H-thymidine incorporation and flow-cytometry. The study of 4 sensitive and 2 resistant cell lines allowed the identification of 4 genes (RCC1, IFI16, hox2 and h19) preferentially transcribed in sensitive cells and 2 (SHB and PKC-zeta) preferentially expressed in resistant cells. IFN-alpha stimulation resulted in the expression of a panel of 19 known inducible genes in sensitive but not in resistant cells. Moreover a group of 30 novel IFN-alpha inducible genes was identified. These data may provide a useful basis to develop diagnostic tools to select potential IFN-alpha responders eligible for treatment, while avoiding unnecessary toxicity to non-responders. Furthermore, by extending the knowledge of the polymorphic effects of IFN-alpha on gene expression, they offer novel clues to the study of its pleiotropic toxicity.

Early stage (I, II, III) melanoma

Metastatic melanoma beyond the regional nodes (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV) is a highly lethal disease. Few affected individuals survive beyond 5 years despite aggressive treatment. Clearly, effective adjuvant therapies to prevent the development of stage IV disease in at-risk patients are worthwhile and acceptable to patients, even if they are associated with significant toxicities. Improvements in our understanding of the prognosis and staging of melanoma have allowed us to better categorize patients based on their risk of developing metastatic disease, permitting the development of logical strategies using adjuvant therapies with toxicity profiles that are appropriate based on the level of risk for recurrence. Adherence to the standards of care for the surgical management of melanoma patients with high-risk primary disease or regional disease will help optimize the benefit that can be derived from adjuvant therapy. Clinical trials remain critically important as we seek to improve the outcome for melanoma patients, but for high-risk melanoma patients outside the context of clinical trials, adjuvant therapy with high-dose interferon-alfa2b should be considered a standard treatment option.

Adjuvant interferon alpha 2b in high risk melanoma - the Scottish study

In 1989, the Scottish melanoma group initiated a randomized trial, comparing observation alone with 6 months' therapy with low dose interferon (given subcutaneously 3 MU day-1, twice weekly), for patients with primary melanomas of at least 3 mm Breslow thickness, or with evidence of regional node involvement. The trial was closed in 1993 with only 95 eligible patients randomized. There were no toxic deaths, and no patient failed to complete the treatment for reasons of toxicity. 6 months' treatment with low-dose interferon- resulted in a statistically significant improved disease-free survival for up to 24 months after randomization (P< 0.05). However, at a median follow-up of over 6 years, although there was an apparent improvement in disease-free survival (from 9 to 22 months), and overall survival (from 27 to 39 months), consistent with larger studies powered to detect such differences, these differences were not statistically significant. The data therefore suggest that 6 months of low-dose interferon is active, and confirm the importance of the large randomized studies, such as the UKCCCR AIM-High and EORTC trials, that seek to confirm a possible survival advantage for low or intermediate dose interferon.

Interferon in oncological practice: review of interferon biology, clinical applications, and toxicities

For the past 40 years, various forms of interferon (IFN) have been evaluated as therapy in a number of malignant and non-malignant diseases. With the advent of gene cloning, large quantities of pure IFN became available for clinical study. This paper reviews the biology, pharmacology, and clinical applications of IFN formulations most commonly used in oncology. It then reviews the most common side effects seen in patients treated with IFN, and makes recommendations for the management of IFN-induced toxicity. The major oncological indications for IFN include melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma, follicular lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia, and chronic myelogenous leukemia. Unfortunately, IFN therapy is associated with significant toxicity, which can be divided into constitutional, neuropsychiatric, hematologic, and hepatic effects. These toxicities have a major impact on the patient's quality of life, and on the physician's ability to optimally treat the patient. Careful attention to all aspects of patient care can result in improved tolerability of this difficult but promising therapy.

CONCLUSION

a better understanding of IFN biology, indications, side effect profiles, and toxicity management will aid in optimizing its use in the treatment of patients with cancer.

Dacarbazine and interferon alpha with or without interleukin 2 in metastatic melanoma: a randomized phase III multicentre trial of the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG)

In several phase II-trials encouraging tumour responses rates in advanced metastatic melanoma (stage IV; AJCC-classification) have been reported for the application of biochemotherapy containing interleukin 2. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of therapy with dacarbazine (DTIC) and interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) only to that of therapy with DTIC and IFN-alpha with the addition of interleukin 2 (IL-2) in terms of the overall survival time and rate of objective remissions and to provide an elaborated toxicity profile for both types of therapy. 290 patients were randomized to receive either DTIC (850 mg/m(2)every 28 days) plus IFN-alpha2a/b (3 MIU/m(2), twice on day 1, once daily from days 2 to 5; 5 MIU/m(2)3 times a week from week 2 to 4) with or without IL-2 (4.5 MIU/m(2)for 3 hours i.v. on day 3; 9.0 MIU/m(2) i.v. day 3/4; 4.5 MIU/m(2) s.c. days 4 to 7). The treatment plan required at least 2 treatment cycles (8 weeks of therapy) for every patient. Of 290 randomized patients 281 were eligible for an intention-to-treat analysis. There was no difference in terms of survival time from treatment onset between the two arms (median 11.0 months each). In 273 patients treated according to protocol tumour response was assessable. The response rates did not differ between both arms (P = 0.87) with 18.0% objective responses (9.7% PR; 8.3% CR) for DTIC plus IFN-alpha as compared to 16.1% (8.8% PR; 7.3% CR) for DTIC, IFN-alpha and IL-2. Treatment cessation due to adverse reactions was significantly more common in patients receiving IL-2 (13.9%) than in patients receiving DTIC/IFN-alpha only (5.6%). In conclusion, there was neither a difference in survival time nor in tumour response rates when IL-2, applied according to the combined intravenous and subcutaneous schedule used for this study, was added to DTIC and IFN-alpha. However, toxicity was increased in melanoma patients treated with IL-2. Further phase III trials with continuous infusion and higher dosages must be performed before any final conclusions can be drawn on the potential usefulness of IL-2 in biochemotherapy of advanced melanoma.

Pediatric melanoma: confirming the diagnosis with sentinel node biopsy

Many pediatric melanoma lesions present at a more advanced stage than those in the adult population. Clinical and histological melanoma mimics, including a subset of Spitz nevi, are difficult to discriminate from melanoma. When dealing with a childhood melanoma, the clinician is likely to be faced with a thick lesion, and one in which the actual diagnosis may even be in doubt. There is a paucity of data to guide the physician in his management of melanoma in this age group, particularly with respect to node status and adjuvant therapy. The authors present two cases of pediatric melanoma in which the novel use of sentinel node biopsy helped confirm the diagnosis of melanoma, determined the need for full lymph node dissection, and guided the use of adjuvant interferon therapy.

Adjuvant therapy of malignant melanoma and the role of sentinel node mapping

BACKGROUND

Controversy still exists about standard management of a primary melanoma. Over the last decades randomized phase III trials have addressed questions about the width of margin in relation to the Breslow thickness of the primary lesion, the role of prophylactic isolated limb perfusion, and the role of elective lymph node dissection. Overall these trials have demonstrated that less extensive surgery is as good as more extensive surgery. Wide excision margins, prophylactic isolated limb perfusions, or the elective lymph node dissection did not improve overall survival significantly in any of the phase III trials conducted.

ADJUVANT THERAPY IN HIGH RISK MELANOMA

No standard systemic adjuvant therapy with confirmed impact on overall survival has been identified thus far for clinically node negative stage I-II (TxN0M0) patients after excision of the primary, nor for clinically node positive stage III (TxN1-2M0) patients after lymph node dissection for metastatic regional node involvement. Poor Staging in the Past. One of the main problems associated with the trials assessing systemic adjuvant treatments in management of high risk primary melanoma is the fact that in general patients were poorly staged. About 25%-30% of patients with primaries thicker than 1.5 mm have micro-metastatic disease in the regional lymph nodes and beyond. This population was usually submerged by the other 70%-75% of the patients with excellent prognosis, obscuring the potential benefit of the adjuvant surgical procedure (ELND) or a systemic adjuvant treatment.

SENTINEL LYMPH NODE MAPPING

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping is resolving many of the inadequacies of the past and has completely changed the management of primary melanoma. As a small procedure with low morbidity it identifies that part of the population which has microscopic involvement of regional lymph nodes with greater precision than an elective lymph node dissection. SLN-mapping allows for a detailed histopathologic evaluation involving multiple sections, H&E staining in combination with IHC (immunohistochemical staining) of the node with the highest chance of containing metastatic foci. Moreover in the near future it is most likely that RT-PCR on negative nodes will complete the diagnostic workup as a promising last step in the procedure to determine whether tumor cells are present in the sentinel node. Sentinel lymph node status has been shown recently to be by far the strongest independent prognostic factor of melanoma stage I-II patients. SLN-status is a much stronger prognostic factor than tumor thickness, which looses its prognostic relevance in SLN-positive patients.

CONSEQUENCES FOR DEVELOPMENT AND/OR ALLOCATION OF ADJUVANT THERAPY

Thus we now have a procedure by which the melanoma stage I-II population can be dissected in a group at truly high risk for recurrence and a group with truly low risk of recurrence. The high risk group with a greater than 75% chance for systemic disease can then be selected for trial participation of various systemic adjuvant therapy regimens that may be allowed to be toxic, considering the very high risk for relapse in these patients. The node negative group of patients can be selected for participation in trials evaluating systemic adjuvant treatment of low toxicity considering the low chance for distant metastatic disease.

Evaluation of the use of tyrosinase-specific and melanA/MART-1-specific reverse transcriptase-coupled--polymerase chain reaction to detect melanoma cells in peripheral blood samples from 299 patients with malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND

There is a current need for a reliable prognostic marker for melanoma patients, particularly those with stage 2 and stage 3 disease, so that adjuvant therapies can be directed appropriately.

OBJECTIVES

To establish whether or not the use of tyrosinase-specific or melanA/MART-1-specific reverse transcriptase-coupled-polymerase chain reaction (RT--PCR) of peripheral blood cells detects preclinical disease progression in patients with malignant melanoma.

METHODS

Two hundred and ninety-nine patients with melanoma in clinical stages 1--4 were observed in this study. Samples were obtained sequentially from 153 of these patients at 4-week intervals over a period of up to 2 years and correlated with clinical evidence of disease activity. Tyrosinase and melanA/MART-1 amplicons were analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis and Southern blot hybridization subsequent to a single round of amplification.

RESULTS

We demonstrated a statistically significant increase in tyrosinase RT--PCR positivity with advancing stage of melanoma progression. The percentage tyrosinase positivity in 910 samples tested was: stage 1, 135 samples, 34% positive; stage 2, 196 samples, 51% positive; stage 3, 423 samples, 50% positive; and stage 4, 156 samples, 65% positive. The positivity rate for individual patients tested sequentially was higher if only one positive test was required to label a patient positive, at 42%, 65%, 82% and 81% for patients in stages 1--4, respectively. However, we did not find a clear pattern of conversion from negativity to positivity in patients who progressed during the study from stage 2 to stage 3 or stage 3 to stage 4, and found no clear evidence of increased positivity rates in the 6-week period following melanoma-related surgery in patients with stage 3 and 4 disease. The positivity rate for melanA/MART-1 was lower for both patients and samples, and no melanA/MART-1-positive sample was negative for tyrosinase.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the presence of circulating tyrosinase-positive cells as detected by this method appears to be a discontinuous rather than a continuous phenomenon, even in patients with stage 4 disease. For this reason the assay cannot be recommended as a method of sequentially monitoring individual patients in a clinical setting.

Economic analysis of adjuvant therapy with interferon alpha-2a in stage II malignant melanoma

Using the trial demonstrating that interferonalpha-2a (IFNalpha-2a) is efficacious as adjuvant therapy in stage II melanoma, we evaluate its outcomes and economic consequences. Using rates observed in the 5-year trial and published figures, survival and Q-TWIST (Time Without Symptoms and Toxicity) were extrapolated to a 10-year and lifetime horizon. Cost analysis was performed using the trial's data, published literature and experts' opinions from the perspective of the French Sickness Funds. Patients in the IFNalpha-2a-group have an additional 0.26 years in life-expectancy over a 5-year time period (P=0.046), 0.67 years over a 10-year period and 2.59 years over a lifetime. Cost per life-year-gained was estimated at approximately 14400 after 5 years, 6635 after 10 years and 1716 over a lifetime. Assuming that there is an improvement in disease-free survival only, cost is 26147 per Q-TWIST. Cost-effectiveness of IFNalpha-2a in stage II melanoma compares favourably with estimates for widely used therapies in the oncological field.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon as adjuvant therapy in high-risk melanoma patients in Spain

In the randomised clinical trial E1684, the administration of interferon (IFN) alpha-2b resulted in prolonged disease-free and overall survival in high-risk melanoma patients following surgical resection. However, and considering the cost and toxicity of IFN, the convenience of its widespread use should be evaluated. The aim of this study was to analyse the cost-effectiveness ratio of adjuvant therapy with IFN alpha-2b in melanoma patients versus an untreated control group. A Markov model was used to compare two hypothetical cohorts of 1000 patients aged 50 years, according to the clinical outcome of the E1684 study. The cohort of patients treated with IFN alpha-2b has an increased overall survival of 1.90 years during the patient's lifetime. The incremental discounted cost per life year gained of IFN versus observation is 9015 Euros according to the projection generated by the model. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that changes in the most relevant study end-points do not modify the study outcome. In conclusion, in high-risk melanoma patients following surgical resection, the cost-effectiveness of IFN alpha-2b (at a dose of 20 MU/m2/day, 5 days per week for one month, followed by 10 MU/m2 TIW, up to one complete year of therapy) versus an untreated control group is within the limits established in health economics to determine if adoption of a new treatment is economically justified and is comparable with other interventions in which cost-effectiveness is acceptable to the National Health System.

Intermediate dose recombinant interferon-alpha as second-line treatment for patients with recurrent cutaneous melanoma who were pretreated with low dose interferon

BACKGROUND

Interferon (IFN) is widely considered the most effective agent in the adjuvant therapy of patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM). However, little is known about the effect of IFN on pretreated CM patients who experience disease recurrence. The authors conducted a Phase II study to determine whether intermediate doses of IFN could be beneficial for these patients.

METHODS

A series of 24 consecutive CM patients who had undergone surgery for local, in-transit, or lymph node disease recurrence during adjuvant therapy with low dose IFN (IFNalpha-2b, 3 million units [MU] per day, three times per week) were enrolled for second-line therapy with intermediate dose IFN (IFNalpha-2b, 10 MU per day) for one year.

RESULTS

IFN was discontinued in 7 patients (29.2%) because of toxicity. Several patients complained of impairment in their daily activities. Progression of disease was registered in 17 patients (70. 8%), with a median disease free survival of 5.5 months (95% confidence interval, 3.4-14.2). The median follow-up for the 7 patients who did not experience disease recurrence was 15 months (range, 13-22 months).

CONCLUSIONS

An increased dose of IFN as second-line adjuvant treatment was poorly tolerated and produced negative clinical outcomes in patients with CM. However, these patients probably were unresponsive to IFN regardless of the dosage level. In fact, the first adjuvant IFN treatment was ineffective in all patients. Thus, the key factor in the treatment of CM seems to be patient responsiveness to IFN rather than the total dosage achieved.

The use of interferon alfa as adjuvant therapy for advanced cutaneous melanoma: the need for more evidence

Interferon alfa is rapidly gaining acceptance as the standard of care for patients with advanced but nonmetastatic cutaneous malignant melanoma. The randomized trials of interferons for melanoma are reviewed with attention to any survival benefits demonstrated by these studies. Because none of these studies are placebo controlled, questions regarding the placebo effects interferons may possess are addressed, as is an analogous clinical scenario in which interferons appeared to be beneficial in nonplacebo controlled trials but were shown to be ineffective in placebo-controlled trials. Moreover, given the significant toxicities and financial costs of interferons, the argument is advanced that interferon alfa should not become the standard of care for melanomas until the results of randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the survival advantages of interferon alfa for melanoma become available.

Adjuvant therapy in melanoma

Melanoma is an immunologic tumour as indicated by clinical regression, long dormancy and the presence of class 1 dependent cytotoxic responses against well defined tumour peptides. The poor prognosis and relative chemoresistance of patients with regional nodal or metastatic disease highlights the urgent need for an effective adjuvant therapy. A wide variety of different agents have been assessed including high dose interferon which has been shown to improve overall survival, although results of a subsequent study have not confirmed these findings. Currently, a variety of different biotherapies and biochemotherapy regimes are being assessed in phase II and III studies and sentinel lymph node biopsy now provides an accurate method for staging so that all patients can be stratified into well-designed randomised controlled trials.

Tumour immunotherapy: the adjuvant treatment of the 21st century?

In the course of a century, tumour immunology has revealed a picture of a very complex immune system involving the recognition and eradication of malignancies. Many tumours evade the immune system, and understanding of tumour escape mechanisms is the key to a successful immunotherapy for cancer. A wide array of tumour immunotherapy modalities have been developed, many of which have reached the phase of clinical trials, with some satisfactory results. Based on the available clinical, data and the techniques available for further improvement, we analyse the prospects for the different treatment modalities, and predict an important role for tumour immunotherapy in the near future.

High- and low-dose interferon alfa-2b in high-risk melanoma: first analysis of intergroup trial E1690/S9111/C9190

PURPOSE

Pivotal trial E1684 of adjuvant high-dose interferon alfa-2b (IFNalpha2b) therapy in high-risk melanoma patients demonstrated a significant relapse-free and overall survival (RFS and OS) benefit compared with observation (Obs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized, three-arm, intergroup trial evaluated the efficacy of high-dose IFNalpha2b (HDI) for 1 year and low-dose IFNalpha2b (LDI) for 2 years versus Obs in high-risk (stage IIB and III) melanoma with RFS and OS end points.

RESULTS

A total of 642 patients were enrolled (608 patients eligible), of whom a majority (75%) had nodal metastasis (50% had nodal recurrence). Unlike E1684, E1690 allowed entry of patients with T4 (> 4 mm) deep primary tumors, regardless of nodal dissection, and 25% of the patients entered onto this trial had deep primary tumors (compared with 11% in E1684). At 52 months' median follow-up, HDI demonstrated an RFS benefit exceeding that of LDI compared with Obs. The 5-year estimated RFS rates for the HDI, LDI, and Obs arms were 44%, 40%, and 35%, respectively. The hazards ratio for the intent-to-treat analysis of HDI versus Obs was 1.28 (P(2) =.05); for LDI versus Obs, it was 1.19 (P(2) =.17). By Cox analysis, the impact of HDI on RFS achieved significance (P(2) =.03). The RFS benefit was equivalent for node-negative and node-positive patients. Neither HDI nor LDI has demonstrated an OS benefit compared with Obs at this time. A major improvement in the median OS of patients in the E1690 Obs arm was noted in comparison with E1684 (6 years v 2.8 years). An analysis of salvage therapy for patients who relapsed on E1690 demonstrated that a significantly larger proportion of patients in the Obs arm received IFNalpha-containing salvage therapy compared with the HDI arm; this therapy was unavailable to patients during E1684, and patients with undissected regional nodes were not included in E1684. This study did not specify therapy at recurrence. Analysis of treatments received at recurrence demonstrated significantly more frequent use of IFNalpha2b at relapse from Obs than from HDI, which may have confounded interpretation of the survival benefit of assigned treatments in E1690.

CONCLUSION

The results of the intergroup E1690 trial demonstrate an RFS benefit of IFNalpha2b that is dose-dependent and significant for HDI by Cox multivariable analysis.