Use of dopamine in acute renal failure: a meta-analysis

Prophylactic fenoldopam for renal protection in sepsis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial

OBJECTIVE

Acute renal failure is common in septic patients. Fenoldopam, a dopamine-1 receptor agonist, increases renal blood flow and may, therefore, reduce the risk of acute renal failure in such patients. Accordingly, we sought to determine the safety and efficacy of fenoldopam for the prevention of acute renal failure in septic patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Three multidisciplinary intensive care units at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Three hundred septic patients with baseline serum creatinine concentrations <150 micromol/L.

INTERVENTIONS

We randomized patients to a continuous infusion of either fenoldopam (n = 150) at 0.09 microg x kg x min or placebo (n = 150) while in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of acute renal failure, defined as a serum creatinine concentration increase to >150 micromol/L, during study drug infusion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The incidence of acute renal failure was significantly lower in the fenoldopam group compared with the control group (29 vs. 51 patients; p = .006). The odds ratio of developing acute renal failure for patients treated with fenoldopam was estimated to be 0.47 (p = .005). The difference in the incidence of severe acute renal failure (creatinine >300 mumol/L), however, failed to achieve statistical significance (10 vs. 21; p = .056). The length of intensive care unit stay in surviving patients was significantly lower in the fenoldopam group compared with the control group (10.64 +/- 9.3 vs. 13.4 +/- 14.0; p < .001). There were no complications of fenoldopam infusion. A direct effect of treatment on the probability of death, beyond its effect on acute renal failure, was not significant (odds ratio = 0.68, p = .1).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, low-dose fenoldopam resulted in a smaller increase in serum creatinine in septic patients. The clinical significance of this finding is uncertain. A large multiple-center trial is now needed to confirm these findings.

Acute renal failure in pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

To provide an evidence-based, up-to-date review of the literature regarding the assessment and management of acute renal failure that may affect women during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

DESIGN

A review of the current literature was performed.

RESULTS

Acute renal failure is a rare complication of pregnancy but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Management requires knowledge of the renal physiologic changes occurring in pregnancy and the relevant diagnoses, both pregnancy-specific and those that may coincidentally occur with pregnancy. In addition, fetal effects must be taken into consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

Ideal care for women with acute renal failure in pregnancy or postpartum requires a multidisciplinary approach that may include maternal-fetal medicine, critical care medicine, nephrology, and neonatology specialists.

The case against renal dose dopamine in the pediatric intensive care unit

The use of dopamine for the treatment of renal insufficiency has become a controversial issue. Dopamine exerts its effects on the kidneys through activity on the catecholamine receptors and by its diuretic and natriuretic properties. Utilization of renal dose dopamine to increase renal blood flow has been considered beneficial for preservation of renal function for over 30 years. The hypothesis proposed was that increasing urine volume must indicate improving renal function, particularly in oliguric patients. However, recent clinical trials in adult and pediatric patients have not only failed to demonstrate any benefit, but have also suggested that this therapy may actually have detrimental effects. This article reviews basic pharmacology and physiologic effects and the potential adverse effects of "renal dose dopamine." It also examines the results of clinical trials, in both pediatric and adult patients, that evaluated its usefulness for the treatment of renal insufficiency.

"Renal dose" dopamine is associated with the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

"Renal dose" dopamine (rDA; 1-3 microg/kg per min) is administered to patients after cardiac surgery to preserve or improve renal function. Many of these patients develop new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (pAF) that could be related to rDA administration. The objective of this investigation was to determine whether there was an association between rDA and new-onset pAF in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG).

SETTING

Research hospital.

SUBJECTS

The study population consisted of 1,731 patients undergoing CABG.

INTERVENTIONS

CABG with and without rDA.

DESIGN

After approval by the institutional review board, a retrospective study using the Cardiothoracic Anesthesia Patient Registry was undertaken to determine the association between rDA and pAF in patients undergoing CABG. Patients with a documented history of atrial fibrillation, those who required inotrope use during or after surgery, and those having valve surgery were excluded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One-thousand seven-hundred thirty-one patients undergoing CABG during the period of January 1, 2000, through June 30, 2002, were the study population; of these, 15.0% (260/1,731) developed pAF. The incidence of pAF was 23.3 % (41/176) among patients who received rDA and 14.1% (219/1,555) among those who did not receive rDA. In the multivariable logistic regression model, patient age, gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, and rDA were associated with pAF (p < .01). Receipt of rDA increased the odds of developing pAF by 74%, independent of the effect of other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal-dose dopamine is associated with a 1.74 odds ratio of pAF developing after CABG.

Dopamine “Renal Dose” Versus Fenoldopam Mesylate to Prevent Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Renal Transplantation

Low dose of dopamine is commonly used after kidney transplantation as a reno-protective agent, although its benefits are controversial. Dopamine may increase renal blood flow, decrease resistive index (RI), and induce urine output in normal kidneys. Many authors hypothesized that the vasculature of a denervated renal transplant may not respond to dopamine in the same fashion as healthy native kidneys, which led us to find other drugs to attenuate the ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. Fenoldopam is a selective dopamine1 (DA1) receptor agonist, most of the activity of which resides in the R-enantiomer, which also shows weaker alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist activities. Fenoldopam produces a vasidilatory effect in vascular beds that are rich in vascular DA1 receptors, producing increased renal blood flow at doses that do not affect blood pressure. In addition to its renal vasodilator activity, fenoldopam is natriuretic, possibly resulting from a direct effect of DA1 receptors on the proximal convoluted tubule. In animals with spontaneous or drug-induced renal failure, fenoldopam improves renal function. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible effects of fenoldopan mesylate in recent kidney transplants. Creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, urine output, and renal vascular resistive index (IR) were measured using Doppler ultrasound. Two groups of patients with no statistical differences in demographic data were treated with dopamine or fenoldopan, showing no significant difference but a trend favoring the fenoldopan group.

Renoprotective Action of Fenoldopam in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Background— Acute renal failure is a serious complication of cardiac surgery causing high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of fenoldopam, a specific agonist of the dopamine-1 receptor, in patients at high risk of perioperative renal dysfunction.

Methods and Results— A prospective single-center, randomized, double-blind trial was performed after local ethical committee approval and after written consent was obtained from 80 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients received either fenoldopam at 0.05 μg/kg per minute or dopamine at 2.5 μg/kg per minute after the induction of anesthesia for a 24-hour period. All these patients were at high risk of perioperative renal dysfunction as indicated by Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Program score >10. Primary end point was defined as 25% creatinine increase from baseline levels after cardiac surgery. The 2 groups (fenoldopam versus dopamine) were homogeneous cohorts, and no difference in outcome was observed. Acute renal failure was similar: 17 of 40 (42.5%) in the fenoldopam group and 16 of 40 (40%) in the dopamine group ( P =0.9). Peak postoperative serum creatinine level, intensive care unit and hospital stay, and mortality were also similar in the 2 groups.

Conclusions— Despite an increasing number of reports of renal protective properties from fenoldopam, we observed no difference in the clinical outcome compared with dopamine in a high-risk population undergoing cardiac surgery.

Physiologic Impact of Low-Dose Dopamine on Renal Function in the Early Post Renal Transplant Period

BACKGROUND

Low-dose dopamine (LDD) (< or =5.0 microg/kg/min) is often used in the early postrenal transplant period for its perceived improvements in renal function parameters. However, there is little published evidence to support its use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of LDD on the physiologic parameters of the transplanted kidney.

METHODS

With local ethics approval, 20 consecutive adult patients (age range, 27-74 years), who underwent cadaveric renal transplantation with cyclosporine immunosuppression, were randomized into two study groups, each with 10 patients. The study period was over 9 hrs on the first postoperative day. This 9-hr block was divided into three 3-hr periods. Patient group 1 received a dopamine infusion over the second 3-hr period only, and patient group 2 received a dopamine infusion over both the first and third 3-hr periods. During these periods, urine flow rate (UFR), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), creatinine clearance (CC), and total urinary sodium excretion rate (tUNa) were measured.

RESULTS

In both groups, there were significant (P<0.05, Wilcoxon rank sum test) increases in ERPF, UFR, CC, and tUNa during LDD infusion periods compared with periods of no LDD infusion. No changes in heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure were seen with LDD administration.

CONCLUSIONS

LDD significantly increases ERPF, UFR, CC, and tUNa in the transplanted allograft kidney treated with cyclosporine immunosuppression in the early posttransplant period.

Evidence-based renal protection in cardiac surgery

Acute renal dysfunction is a common serious complication of cardiac surgery. Although a diversity of mechanisms exist by which the kidney can be damaged during cardiac surgery, atheroembolism, ischemia-reperfusion, and inflammation are believed to be primary contributors to perioperative renal insult. In addition, the high metabolic demands of active tubular reabsorption and the oxygen diffusion shunt characteristic of renal circulation make the kidney particularly vulnerable to ischemic injury. Remote effects of acute renal injury likely contribute to the strong association of this condition with other major postoperative morbidities and mortality and justify the search for renoprotective agents, even when dialysis is never required. Nonpharmacologic preventive strategies include procedure planning that is based on risk stratification, avoidance of nephrotoxins, and meticulous perioperative clinical care, including optimizing intravascular volume and attention to modifiable risk factors such as minimizing hemodilution. Although numerous pharmacologic interventions to prevent or treat acute renal injury have shown promise in animal models, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials that have looked at measures of significant adverse outcomes such as death and dialysis have not confirmed a benefit.

Prevention of Acute Renal Failure

Acute renal failure (ARF) complicates the clinical course of many critically ill patients and significantly adds to their morbidity and mortality. Efforts to develop techniques to prevent ARF or to facilitate its resolution largely have been unsuccessful. Aggressive hydration, minimizing nephrotoxins, and maintenance of "adequate" mean arterial pressure remain the main nonpharmacologic strategies to prevent ARF in the ICU. Increasing insight into mechanisms that lead to ARF prompted investigators to evaluate the role of novel therapeutic agents in the prevention of ARF. Recent data suggest that N-acetylcysteine may reduce the incidence of ARF secondary to radio-contrast agents.

Emerging drugs for renal failure

Renal failure involves a significant impairment of the essential functions of the kidney, which can be either acute with sudden and rapid onset (acute renal failure [ARF]) or chronic with gradual onset (chronic renal failure [CRF]). ARF, if detected early, may be halted or reversed, whereas CRF is generally irreversible. Without treatment or intervention, both forms of renal failure lead to end stage renal failure (ESRF) or end stage renal disease (ESRD), requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the form of dialysis or renal transplantation for survival. However, provision of RRT requires expert teams working in specialised units, making therapy of patients with renal failure expensive; furthermore, RRT is complex, with its own complications. Although pharmacological interventions have shown promise in experimental models, these have not been as successful in the clinical setting (e.g., administration of atrial natriuretic peptide, low-dose dopamine). At present, drugs are administered during CRF to either reduce one of the many risk factors of CRF (e.g., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, statins) or to deal with the consequences of CRF (e.g., erythropoietin, calcitriol). Recent evidence suggests that some of these interventions may provide further direct beneficial effects via reduction of renal inflammation. Although these interventions have greatly improved the prospects for patients suffering ESRF, the development of novel drugs and therapies with which to reduce the consequences of renal failure and ESRD remain topics of great interest. This article reviews the therapies available for the prevention and management of renal failure in adults and describes, in detail, emerging drugs and novel interventions that may soon become available for the treatment or prevention of ESRF.

Renal protection strategies in the perioperative period

The development of acute renal failure (ARF) in the perioperative period continues to be a vexing condition associated with high morbidity and mortality rates which have been unchanged for several decades. In this article I briefly review recent research categorizing pathogenesis of ARF and mechanisms of recovery. Once ARF is established, its maintenance phase is dependent on several mechanisms that interact with cellular integrity. The main focus of the article is on assessing clinical and experimental interventions to prevent ARF. Unfortunately, existing pharmacological and other interventions show a rather limited efficacy in preventing ARF.

Cadaveric donors

The diagnosis of brain death describes the final catastrophic state of a person for whom, except for ventilators and pharmacology, death would surely have already intervened. Although we think of death as an ending, if the patient becomes an organ donor it is also a beginning. For, at the moment we lose one patient, we potentially gain others in the fortunate recipients of viable grafts.

Fenoldopam Prophylaxis of Postoperative Acute Renal Failure in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients

BACKGROUND

Acute renal failure requiring replacement therapy occurs in 1% to 2% of patients who have undergone cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and is associated with a very high mortality rate. The aim of this study was to determine if prophylactic treatment with fenoldopam mesylate of patients at high risk of postoperative acute renal failure reduced the incidence of this event.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, prospective, cohort study in which 108 patients at high risk of postoperative acute renal failure and undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were treated with fenoldopam mesylate (0.08 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) starting at the induction of anesthesia and throughout at least the next 24 hours. A homogeneous control group of 108 patients was created using a propensity-score analysis.

RESULTS

Fenoldopam prophylaxis was significantly associated with a reduction in acute renal failure incidence (from 22% to 11%, p = 0.028), a less pronounced creatinine clearance decrease (p = 0.05), and a lower mortality rate (6.5% versus 15.7%, p = 0.03) by the univariate analysis, but these results were not confirmed by a multivariable analysis. Within the subgroup of patients who suffered a postoperative low output syndrome, fenoldopam prophylaxis was an independent protective factor for postoperative renal failure (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.7; p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limitations of a nonrandomized prospective trial, our results support the hypothesis that fenoldopam may reduce the risk of acute renal failure in patients in whom endogenous and exogenous cathecolamines action may induce a renal vascular constrictive condition.

Inotropes and vasopressors in adults and foals

Successful treatment with inotropes and vasopressors depends on an understanding of the interplay of flow, pressure, and resistance in the cardiovascular system and an appreciation of the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to inadequate tissue perfusion. Any treatment strategy is necessarily a compromise between the requirements of different vascular beds.Furthermore. the underlying hemodynamic derangements can change rapidly. Therefore. inotropes and vasopressors should be titrated to measures of improved hemodynamic status, and the treatments should be frequently reviewed.

Renal, but not systemic, hemodynamic effects of dopamine are influenced by the severity of congestive heart failure

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the short-term systemic and renal hemodynamic response to dopamine is influenced by clinical severity of congestive heart failure.

DESIGN

Effects of increasing doses of dopamine were assessed in patients consecutively admitted for acutely decompensated congestive heart failure.

SETTING

Intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

We enrolled 16 congestive heart failure patients stratified by clinical severity (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III, n = 8; NYHA class IV, n = 8) and two additional NYHA class III patients as controls.

INTERVENTIONS

Measurements were carried out throughout five 20-min experimental periods: baseline, dopamine infusion at 2, 4, and 6 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), and recovery. Controls received a similar amount of saline.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Systemic and renal hemodynamics were determined respectively by right cardiac catheterization and radioisotopes (iodine 131-labeled hippuran and iodine 125-labeled iothalamate clearance). The peak increase in heart rate and cardiac index occurred at a dopamine dose of 4-6 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). The dose-response relation was similar in NYHA classes III and IV. Improvement in effective renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate, peaking at 4 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), was more rapid and marked in NYHA class III than class IV patients, in whom the renal fraction of cardiac output failed to increase. The systemic and renal effects of dopamine were independent of age. No change occurred in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose of dopamine producing an optimal improvement of systemic and renal hemodynamics in congestive heart failure is higher than usually reported. A greater clinical severity of congestive heart failure impairs the renal effects of dopamine, probably through a selective loss in renal vasodilating capacity.

Optimum treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock: evidence in support of the recommendations

Severe sepsis and septic shock are among the most common causes of death in noncoronary intensive care units. The incidence of sepsis has been increasing over the past two decades, and is predicted to continue to rise over the next 20 years. While our understanding of the complex pathophysiologic alterations that occur in severe sepsis and septic shock has increased greatly asa result of recent clinical and preclinical studies, mortality associated with the disorder remains unacceptably high. Despite these new insights, the cornerstone of therapy continues to be early recognition, prompt initiation of effective antibiotic therapy, and source control, and goal-directed hemodynamic, ventilatory,and metabolic support as necessary. To date, attempts to reduce mortality with innovative, predominantly anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies have been extremely disappointing. Observations of improved outcomes with physiologic doses of corticosteroid replacement therapy and activated protein C (drotrecogin alfa[activated]) have provided new adjuvant therapies for severe sepsis and septic shock in selected patients. This article reviews the components of sepsis management and discusses the available evidence in support of these recommendations. In addition, there is a discussion of some promising new strategies.

Increasing Renal Blood Flow

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Many clinicians believe that low-dose dopamine (LDD) [2 micro g/kg/min] increases renal blood flow (RBF) and medium-dose norepinephrine (MD-NE) [0.4 micro g/kg/min] decreases RBF. They also believe that MD-NE might induce mesenteric and/or coronary ischemia. In fact, the effects of these drugs on renal and vital organ blood flow are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 6 h of IV LDD and MD-NE infusion on mammalian renal, coronary, mesenteric, and sagittal blood flow.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, experimental animal study.

SETTING

Animal laboratory of tertiary physiology institute.

SUBJECTS

Seven Merino cross sheep were studied.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

We performed a staged insertion of transit-time flow probes around ascending aorta, sagittal sinus and circumflex coronary, superior mesenteric, and left renal arteries. We then randomized these animal with long-term embedded flow probes to either 6 h of placebo (saline solution) or drugs (MD-NE at 0.4 micro g/kg/min or LDD at 2 micro g/kg/min), and performed continuous measurement of systemic pressures, cardiac output (CO), and flow to vital organs. We also sampled blood and urine for the measurement of lactate, creatinine, and creatinine clearances at preset intervals.

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, LDD did not affect systemic hemodynamics. However, it increased mean RBF by 20% (267.3 +/- 87.6 mL/min vs 222.0 +/- 74.4 mL/min, p = 0.028) without a detectable effect on other vital regional circulations. MD-NE, however, increased mean arterial pressure (101.0 +/- 8.3 mL/min vs 84.2 +/- 5.2 mL/min, p = 0.018) [mean +/- SD] and CO (4.93 +/- 1.45 L/min vs 3.81 +/- 0.57 L/min, p = 0.028). It also increased coronary blood flow (36.0 +/- 15.7 mL/min vs 23.0 +/- 10.7 mL/min, p = 0.018) and RBF (286.5 +/- 79.0 mL/min vs 222.0 +/- 74.4 mL/min, p = 0.018). MD-NE had no detectable effect on mesenteric or sagittal sinus flow. LDD infusion increased urine output, but did not change creatinine clearance. MD-NE infusion increased urine output significantly more than LDD but not creatinine clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LDD (2 micro g/kg/min) and MD-NE (0.4 micro g/kg/min) increased RBF and urine output. However, the effect of MD-NE was more pronounced. LDD did not affect other vital organ flows, but MD-NE increased coronary blood flow without any changes in mesenteric and sagittal sinus blood flow.

Recombinant human atrial natriuretic peptide in ischemic acute renal failure: A randomized placebo-controlled trial*

OBJECTIVE

Acute renal failure is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Need for dialysis is an independent risk factor for early mortality after complicated cardiac surgery. Human atrial natriuretic peptide (h-ANP) is a potent endogenous natriuretic and diuretic substance. Exogenous administration of h-ANP increases glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow in clinical acute renal failure. We have studied the effects of h-ANP on renal outcome in ischemic acute renal failure.

DESIGN

A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Cardiothoracic intensive care units of two tertiary care centers.

PATIENTS

Sixty-one patients with normal preoperative renal function suffering from postcardiac surgical heart failure requiring significant inotropic and vasoactive support.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were randomized to receive a continuous infusion of either recombinant h-ANP (50 ng.kg(-1).min(-1)) or placebo when serum creatinine increased by >50% from baseline. The treatment with h-ANP/placebo continued until serum creatinine decreased below the trigger value for inclusion or the patients fulfilled predefined criteria for dialysis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome variable was dialysis on or before day 21 after the start of treatment. Secondary renal outcome variables were dialysis-free survival at day 21 and creatinine clearance. Twenty-nine patients were assigned h-ANP and 30 placebo. Six (21%) patients in the h-ANP group compared with 14 (47%) in the placebo group needed dialysis before or at day 21 (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.73; p =.009). Eight (28%) patients in the h-ANP group compared with 17 (57%) in the placebo group suffered from the combined end point dialysis or death before or at day 21 (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.82; p =.017). h-ANP improved creatinine clearance in contrast to placebo (p =.040).

CONCLUSIONS

Infusion of h-ANP at a rate of 50 ng.kg(-1).min(-1) enhances renal excretory function, decreases the probability of dialysis, and improves dialysis-free survival in early, ischemic acute renal dysfunction after complicated cardiac surgery.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock

OBJECTIVE

In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and improve outcome in severe sepsis.

DESIGN

The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee.

METHODS

We used a modified Delphi methodology for grading recommendations, built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations were provided to contrast adult and pediatric management.

RESULTS

Key recommendations, listed by category and not by hierarchy, include early goal-directed resuscitation of the septic patient during the first 6 hrs after recognition; appropriate diagnostic studies to ascertain causative organisms before starting antibiotics; early administration of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy; reassessment of antibiotic therapy with microbiology and clinical data to narrow coverage, when appropriate; a usual 7-10 days of antibiotic therapy guided by clinical response; source control with attention to the method that balances risks and benefits; equivalence of crystalloid and colloid resuscitation; aggressive fluid challenge to restore mean circulating filling pressure; vasopressor preference for norepinephrine and dopamine; cautious use of vasopressin pending further studies; avoiding low-dose dopamine administration for renal protection; consideration of dobutamine inotropic therapy in some clinical situations; avoidance of supranormal oxygen delivery as a goal of therapy; stress-dose steroid therapy for septic shock; use of recombinant activated protein C in patients with severe sepsis and high risk for death; with resolution of tissue hypoperfusion and in the absence of coronary artery disease or acute hemorrhage, targeting a hemoglobin of 7-9 g/dL; appropriate use of fresh frozen plasma and platelets; a low tidal volume and limitation of inspiratory plateau pressure strategy for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome; application of a minimal amount of positive end-expiratory pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome; a semirecumbent bed position unless contraindicated; protocols for weaning and sedation/analgesia, using either intermittent bolus sedation or continuous infusion sedation with daily interruptions/lightening; avoidance of neuromuscular blockers, if at all possible; maintenance of blood glucose <150 mg/dL after initial stabilization; equivalence of continuous veno-veno hemofiltration and intermittent hemodialysis; lack of utility of bicarbonate use for pH > or =7.15; use of deep vein thrombosis/stress ulcer prophylaxis; and consideration of limitation of support where appropriate. Pediatric considerations included a more likely need for intubation due to low functional residual capacity; more difficult intravenous access; fluid resuscitation based on weight with 40-60 mL/kg or higher needed; decreased cardiac output and increased systemic vascular resistance as the most common hemodynamic profile; greater use of physical examination therapeutic end points; unsettled issue of high-dose steroids for therapy of septic shock; and greater risk of hypoglycemia with aggressive glucose control.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based recommendations can be made regarding many aspects of the acute management of sepsis and septic shock that are hoped to translate into improved outcomes for the critically ill patient. The impact of these guidelines will be formally tested and guidelines updated annually and even more rapidly as some important new knowledge becomes as available.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock

OBJECTIVE

To develop management guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and improve outcome in severe sepsis.

DESIGN

The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee. The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built upon a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along 5 levels to create recommendation grades from A-E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations were provided to contrast adult and pediatric management.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants included 44 critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations.

RESULTS

A total of 46 recommendations plus pediatric management considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based recommendations can be made regarding many aspects of the acute management of sepsis and septic shock that will hopefully translate into improved outcomes for the critically ill patient. The impact of these guidelines will be formally tested and guidelines updated annually, and even more rapidly when some important new knowledge becomes available.

Acute renal failure in the newborn

Acute renal failure in the newborn is a common problem and is typically classified as prerenal, intrinsic renal disease including vascular insults, and obstructive uropathy. In the newborn, renal failure may have a prenatal onset in congenital diseases such as renal dysplasia with or without obstructive uropathy and in genetic diseases such as autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease. Acute renal failure in the newborn is also commonly acquired in the postnatal period because of hypoxic ischemic injury and toxic insults. Nephrotoxic acute renal failure in newborns is usually associated with aminoglycoside antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications used to close a patent ductus arteriosis. Alterations in renal function occur in approximately 40% of premature newborns who have received indomethacin and such alterations are usually reversible. Renal artery thrombosis and renal vein thrombosis will result in renal failure if bilateral or if either occurs in a solitary kidney. Cortical necrosis is associated with hypoxic/ischemic insults due to perinatal anoxia, placenta abruption and twin-twin or twin-maternal transfusions with resultant activation of the coagulation cascade. As in older children, hospital acquired acute renal failure is newborns is frequently multifactorial in origin. Although the precise incidence and prevalence of acute renal failure in the newborn is unknown, several studies have shown that acute renal failure is common in the neonatal intensive care unit. Recent interesting studies have demonstrated that some newborns may have genetic risks factors for acute renal failure. Once intrinsic renal failure has become established, management of the metabolic complications of acute renal failure continues to involve appropriate management of fluid balance, electrolyte status, acid-base balance, nutrition and the initiation of renal replacement therapy when appropriate. Renal replacement therapy may be provided by peritoneal dialysis, intermittent hemodialysis, or hemofiltration with or without a dialysis circuit. The preferential use of hemofiltration by pediatric nephrologists is increasing while the use of peritoneal dialysis is decreasing except for neonates and small infants. Peritoneal dialysis has been a major modality of therapy for acute renal failure in the neonate when vascular access may be difficult to maintain. In the newborn, the prognosis and recovery from acute renal failure is highly dependent upon the underlying etiology of the acute renal failure. Factors that are associated with mortality include multiorgan failure, hypotension, need for pressors, hemodynamic instability, and need for mechanical ventilation and dialysis. The mortality and morbidity of newborns with acute renal failure is much worse in neonates with multiorgan failure. Newborns who have suffered substantial loss of nephrons as may occur in cortical necrosis are at risk for late development of renal failure after apparent recovery from the initial insult. Similarly, hypoxic/ischemic and nephrotoxic injury to the developing kidney can result is decreased nephron number. Newborns with acute renal failure need life-long monitoring of their renal function, blood pressure, and urinalysis. Typically, the late development of chronic renal failure will first becomes apparent with the development of hypertension, proteinuria, and eventually an elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine.

Cold visceral perfusion improves early survival in patients with acute renal failure after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

INTRODUCTION

Despite advances in organ protection during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair, acute renal failure (ARF) remains a significant clinical problem, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We studied outcome of ARF after TAAA repair in patients who underwent either warm or cold visceral perfusion.

METHOD

Between 1991 and 2001 657 TAAA repairs were performed, of which 359 (55%) had either warm or cold visceral perfusion. Twelve patients with renal failure who had undergone preoperative dialysis were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 347 patients, ARF developed in 81 (23%) after TAAA repair. Forty-four (54%) of the 81 patients with ARF received cold visceral perfusion, and 37 (46%) patients received warm visceral perfusion. ARF was defined as either an increase of 1 mg/dL in serum creatinine (SCr) concentration per day for 2 consecutive days or dialysis requirement. Patient records were reviewed through hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Twenty six (32%) of the 81 patients in whom ARF developed died, 17 of 37 (46%) patients in the warm perfusion group versus 9 of 44 (21%) patients in the cold perfusion group (P <.02). Median onset of ARF was on postoperative day 1 in both groups. Twenty-six of 81 (32%) patients recovered renal function, 10 of 37 (27%) patients in the warm perfusion group versus 16 of 44 (36%) patients in the cold perfusion group. Preoperative SCr concentration was predictive of recovery of renal function (odds ratio, 4.5 per mg/dL increase; P <.03) in patients who received either warm or cold visceral perfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

ARF after TAAA repair remains a significant clinical problem. Recovery of renal function occurred in approximately one third of patients. Preoperative SCr concentration was the only significant determinant of recovered renal function. While cold visceral perfusion did not alter renal recovery, it significantly reduced hospital mortality.

Should We Give Prophylactic “Renal‐Dose” Dopamine After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?

OBJECTIVE

A prospective double-blind randomized study undertaken to assess the effect of postoperative prophylactic "renal-dose" dopamine on post-coronary artery bypass grafting surgery's clinical outcome.

METHODS

Eighty-five consecutive patients undergoing CABG operation were randomized to receive either 3-5 microg/kg/min dopamine (group D, n = 41) or saline as placebo (group P, n = 45) for 48 postoperative hours. Clinical outcome parameters were collected for four postoperative days.

RESULTS

Preoperative and operative parameters were similar in both groups. Four patients from group P and none from group D reached an end-point of the study (oliguria, renal dysfunction) and received dopamine. Two patients from group P and none from group D needed an additional inotropic support. Mean arterial pressure values were similar during the first 24 hours after operation, but left atrial pressure values tended to be higher in group P (10 +/- 4 vs 7 +/- 3 mmH2O, p = 0.18). The mean pH was higher in group D at 8 hours after operation (7.38 +/- 0.2 vs 7.36 +/- 0.3, p = NS), due to higher bicarbonate levels (23 +/- 2 mmol/l vs 21 +/- 2, p = 0.49). The incidence of lung congestion in chest X-rays and CT scans was significantly higher in group P (50% vs 29%, p = 0.073 at 48 hours postoperatively). Room air blood O2 saturation and maximal expiratory volume tended to be higher in group D (at 72 hours after operation- 92 +/- 4 vs 90%+/- 5, p = 0.29 and 646 +/- 276 vs 485 ml +/- 206, p = 0.16, respectively). There was no statistical difference in urine output but the amount of furosemide given to patients in group P was significantly higher (during the first 8 hours 2.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.3 mg +/- 1.6, p = 0.07). Plasma creatinine levels were significantly lower in group D (at 24 hours 0.93 +/- 0.02 vs 1.05 mg/dL +/- 0.02, p = 0.02). Mobilization after surgery was faster in group D.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic dopamine administration after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery improves patient hemodynamic and renal status, reduces the need for additional medical support (inotropes and furosemide) and thus, provides stable postoperative course.

Impact of donor dopamine on immediate graft function after kidney transplantation

Optimizing medical donor management may have a considerable impact on transplantation outcome. This study investigated the effect of donor dopamine on initial graft function in renal allograft recipients, involving 254 consecutive recipients of a cadaver kidney, aged 18-74 years, transplanted between 1990 and 2003. Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine. Patients were grouped according to donor use of dopamine during intensive care. Delayed graft function (DGF), and serial creatinine concentrations were compared between the groups. Dopamine-treated and -untreated donors were very similar regarding hemodynamics and renal function. Delayed graft function occurred in 47/158 treated and 48/96 untreated kidneys (p = 0.001). Donor dopamine was associated with a more rapid decrease of s-creatinine, which became obvious on the first postoperative day. Of patients in the treated and untreated group, respectively, 81.9% and 65.8% reached a s-creatinine level less than 2 mg/dL during the first month (p = 0.005). Donor dopamine remained predictive of a normalized s-creatinine level [HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.22-2.41] after controlling for confounding factors by multivariate Cox regression. Donor dopamine is associated with improvements of initial graft function after kidney transplantation. The beneficial effect of dopamine is achievable without side-effects for the recipients, and correlates with superior long-term graft survival.

Prevention of perioperative acute renal failure: what works?

Perioperative acute renal failure (ARF) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Patients undergoing cardiac, vascular and major abdominal surgery and those with pre-operative renal insufficiency are at increased risk for developing post-operative ARF. The aetiologies of perioperative ARF are multi-factorial. However, pre-renal azotaemia and ischaemic acute tubular necrosis (ATN) are the predominant causes. Preventive strategies involve identifying patients at risk, optimizing intravascular volume as well as renal function with perioperative haemodynamic monitoring, and avoiding nephrotoxins. Various pharmacological agents have been used to optimize renal perfusion and tubular function. Unfortunately, none has been shown to be effective in randomized placebo-controlled trials. In this chapter, we discuss the prophylactic use of fluids, vasoactive drugs, diuretics and other agents, as well as modification of surgical techniques to reduce the incidence of perioperative ARF.

New approaches to the treatment of sepsis

The clinical spectrum of sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock is responsible for a growing number of deaths and excessive health care expenditures. Until recently, despite multiple clinical trials, no intervention provided a beneficial outcome in septic patients. Within the last 2 years, studies that involved drotrecogin alfa (activated), corticosteroid therapy, and early goal-directed therapy showed efficacy in those with severe sepsis and septic shock. These results have provided optimism for reducing sepsis-related mortality.

Is There Still a Place for Dopamine in the Modern Intensive Care Unit?

For many years, dopamine was considered an essential drug in the intensive care unit (ICU) for its cardiovascular effects and, even more, for its supposedly protective effects on renal function and splanchnic mucosal perfusion. There is now ample scientific evidence that low dose dopamine is ineffective for prevention and treatment of acute renal failure and for protection of the gut. Until recently, low-dose dopamine was considered to be relatively free of side effects. However, it is now clear that low-dose dopamine, besides not achieving the preset goal of organ protection, may also be deleterious because it can induce renal failure in normo- and hypovolemic patients. Furthermore, dopamine may cause harm by impairing mucosal blood flow and by aggravating reduced gastric motility. Dopamine also suppresses the secretion and function of anterior pituitary hormones, thereby aggravating catabolism and cellular immune dysfunction and inducing central hypothyroidism. In addition, dopamine blunts the ventilatory drive, increasing the risk of respiratory failure in patients who are being weaned from mechanical ventilation. We conclude that there is no longer a place for low-dose dopamine in the ICU and that, in view of its side effects, its extended use as a vasopressor may also be questioned.

Prevention and nondialytic treatment of acute renal failure

Based on the progress made during the last few years in understanding the pathophysiology of acute renal failure, a plethora of therapeutic drug and nondrug interventions have been developed and tested in animal and human forms of this disease. The first part of this article focuses on the role of volume expansion and vasopressors in the prevention and treatment of acute renal failure in the critically ill. From all prophylactic measures that have been proposed, volume expansion, or at least correction of volume depletion, remains the most efficient and most evidence-based intervention in these patients. Norepinephrine is, out of all the vasopressors, probably the most appropriate to use in cases of hypotension, provided circulating volume is adequate. In hypotensive septic patients, vasopressin has been shown to be useful. Direct renal vasodilating substances, the most popular still being low-dose dopamine, have never been proved to be useful in carefully performed prospective trials. Moreover dopamine especially is associated with a number of side effects and complications. From the agents acting on tubular factors, the diuretic mannitol and loop diuretics are the most prescribed. Only in specific situations such as rhabdomyolysis and kidney transplant surgery has it been shown that mannitol was able to prevent acute renal failure. The loop diuretics are able, after establishing adequate circulating volume, to promote diuresis in some forms of oliguric acute renal failure; however, some recent papers have shown that the administration of loop diuretics may actually be associated with increased mortality and delayed recovery of renal function. The last few years have seen a number of trials with acetylcysteine in the prevention of mainly radiocontrast nephropathy. Although the results are still conflicting, the majority indicates that acetylcysteine, when applied together with adequate volume expansion, may be a useful drug to incorporate in the standard treatment procedures in patients at risk for acute renal failure. Interventions to stimulate the recovery process of the damaged kidney with growth factors, although theoretically sound, have thus far not led to successful results.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dopamine and norepinephrine in critically ill head-injured patients

OBJECTIVE

To explore the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dopamine and norepinephrine.

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled, trial.

SETTING

Neurosciences critical care unit.

PATIENTS

Eight patients with a head injury, requiring dopamine or norepinephrine infusions to support cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP).

INTERVENTION

Patients received in randomised order, either dopamine or norepinephrine to achieve and maintain a CPP of 70 mmHg, and then, following a 30-min period of stable haemodynamics, a CPP of 90 mmHg. Data were then acquired using the second agent. Haemodynamic measurements were made during each period and a blood sample was obtained at the end of each study period for analysis of plasma catecholamine concentrations

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Plasma levels of norepinephrine and dopamine were significantly related to infusion rates but did not have a simple linear relationship to haemodynamic parameters. However, there was a significant quadratic relationship between the infusion rate of dopamine and cardiac index (r2=0.431), and systemic vascular resistance index (r2=0.605), with a breakpoint (at which cardiac index reduced and SVRI increased) at a dopamine plasma level of approximately 50 nM/l (corresponding to an infusion rate of approximately 15 microg.kg(-1).min(-1)).

CONCLUSIONS

Norepinephrine and dopamine have predictable pharmacokinetics; however, those of dopamine do not fit a simple first-order kinetic model. The pharmacodynamic effects of dopamine and norepinephrine show much inter-individual variability and unpredictability. Plasma levels of dopamine appear to relate to variations in adrenergic receptor effects with break points that reflect expectations from infusion-rate related pharmacodynamics.

Monitoring Renal Oxygen Supply in Critically-Ill Patients Using Urinary Oxygen Tension

Critically-ill patients are at risk of developing renal disorders as a consequence of systemic hypoperfusion. Ischemic acute tubular necrosis and resulting acute renal failure are caused by hypotension or therapeutic management. In this study, we tested the change of O(2) availability induced by fenoldopam mesylate using the continuous measurement of urinary oxygen tension (PuO(2)), a relatively noninvasive technique that could provide potentially important real-time data regarding renal oxygenation in intensive care unit patients. Fenoldopam was administered at different doses (0.03, 0.06, and 0.09 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) to 50 stable critically-ill patients. Urine output was collected every hour to assess volume and urinary electrolytes. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, cardiac output, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, arterial oxygen delivery index, and oxygen consumption index were analyzed after fenoldopam dose modifications and at infusion end. PaO(2) and PuO(2) continuous measurements were obtained through two sensors inserted in the radial artery and in the bladder. After a fenoldopam dose increase, PuO(2) significantly increased (P < 0.05), whereas PaO(2) remained unchanged. During the study, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, cardiac output, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, arterial oxygen delivery index, and oxygen consumption remained unchanged. Dose-dependent PuO(2) increases, unrelated to indexes of systemic perfusion and cardiac function, demonstrate that fenoldopam affects the balance between renal oxygen supply and demand in stable critically-ill patients.

IMPLICATIONS

Acute renal failure in critically-ill patients is associated with frequent mortality. Prolonged renal hypoperfusion cannot be detected by current systemic hemodynamic indexes. Using continuous measurement of urinary oxygen tension, which could indirectly provide real-time data regarding renal oxygenation, our study showed that fenoldopam increases the ratio between oxygen supply and demand.

Critical issues in nephrology

Renal and electrolyte problems are common in patients in the ICU. Several advances that occurred in the recent past have been incorporated in the diagnosis and management of these disorders and were reviewed in this article. Unfortunately, many important questions remain unanswered, especially in the area of ARF, where new therapies are anxiously awaited to make the transition from bench to bedside. Better studies are sorely needed to define the best approach to dialysis in patients who have ARF.

Management of Decompensated Heart Failure

Much has been written about the management of chronic heart failure (HF) and there is strong evidence from many controlled, multicenter trials to support a specific strategy for management of compensated HF. There is little evidence and limited guidance for the management of patients during a period of decompensation. The use of diuretics, inodilators, and vasodilators is based primarily on anecdotal observation. This article reviews selected current literature in three areas (diuretics, vasodilators, and inotropes) to examine objective evidence and expert opinion that are available to guide the advanced practitioner who manages the care of patients with decompensated HF.