Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett's oesophagus in primary care: cohort study

Molecular markers for Barrett's esophagus and its progression to cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is a clinical need for biomarkers that can improve diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification of esophageal lesions. Here we review the current literature and highlight the most important, recent advancements in biomarkers as a supplement to histopathology for management of patients with Barrett's esophagus.

RECENT FINDINGS

A prospective cohort study in Northern Ireland shows that a small panel of biomarkers (low-grade dysplasia, abnormal DNA ploidy and Aspergillus oryzae lectin) can identify patients at high risk for developing high-grade dysplasia or cancer. Recent research in molecular imaging shows promise for molecular probes in endoscopy, using fluorescently labeled peptides or lectins to identify dysplastic areas of Barrett's epithelium. Based on the current literature, p53 immunostaining is starting to be adopted by some centers as an adjunct to histopathology diagnosis for dysplasia.

SUMMARY

The evidence base for the use of biomarkers is increasing and it appears that panels may have superior diagnostic and predictive power over single, candidate biomarkers. Prior to clinical implementation, biomarkers must overcome significant barriers including the need for large-scale prospective validation trials, and the limited ability of clinical laboratories to process and analyze complex biomarker assays.

Optical coherence tomography in Barrett's esophagus

The incidence of Barrett's-related adenocarcinoma of the esophagus continues to increase at an alarming rate. Studies to date show great promise for optical coherence tomography (OCT) in screening, surveillance, and guiding management of Barrett's esophagus. With continued innovation in rapid, accurate scanning systems, such as volumetric laser endomicroscopy or optical frequency domain imaging, advanced OCT seems likely to have an important impact. The next few years are likely to see the initiation of large clinical studies that will define the extent and significance of this impact.

Barrett's esophagus in 2012: updates in pathogenesis, treatment, and surveillance

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only established precursor lesion in the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and it increases the risk of cancer by 11-fold. It is regarded as a complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease. There is an ever-increasing body of knowledge on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of BE and its associated dysplasia. In this review, we summarize the latest advances in BE research and clinical practice in the past 2 years. It is critical to understand the molecular underpinnings of this disorder to comprehend the clinical outcomes of the disease. For clinical gastroenterologists, there is also continuous growth of endoscopic approaches which is daunting, and further improvements in the detection and treatment of BE and early EAC are anticipated. In the future, we may see the increased role of biomarkers, both molecular and imaging, in both diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for BE.

Barrett's esophagus: review of diagnosis and treatment

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is an acquired condition characterized by replacement of stratified squamous epithelium by a cancer predisposing metaplastic columnar epithelium. Endoscopy with systemic biopsy protocols plays a vital role in diagnosis. Technological advancements in dysplasia detection improves outcomes in surveillance and treatment of patients with BE and dysplasia. These advances in endoscopic technology radically changed the treatment for dysplastic BE and early cancer from being surgical to organ-sparing endoscopic therapy. A multimodal treatment approach combining endoscopic resection of visible and/or raised lesions with ablation techniques for flat BE mucosa, followed by long-term surveillance improves the outcomes of BE. Safe and effective endoscopic treatment can be either tissue acquiring as in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection or tissue ablative as with photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy. Debatable issues such as durability of response, recognition and management of sub-squamous BE and optimal management strategy in patients with low-grade dysplasia and non-dysplastic BE need to be studied further. Development of safer wide field resection techniques, which would effectively remove all BE and obviate the need for long-term surveillance, is another research goal. Shared decision making between the patient and physician is important while considering treatment for dysplasia in BE.

Squamous dysplasia--the precursor lesion for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) accounts for 80% of all esophageal cancers worldwide, and esophageal squamous dysplasia (ESD) is the only histopathology that predicts the development of ESCC. The prevalence of ESD parallels rates of invasive ESCC and is typically found in 25% or more of adults above the age of 35 years in populations in north central China, where risk for ESCC is among the highest in the world. Results of chemoprevention and early detection studies to prevent progression of ESD suggest that these approaches, coupled with emerging endoscopic therapies, offer promise for the prevention of esophageal cancer mortality in high-risk populations. Future research on ESD and ESCC should focus on finding additional modifiable risk factors and on identifying biomarkers to incorporate into early detection strategies.

GERD-Barrett-Adenocarcinoma: Do We Have Suitable Prognostic and Predictive Molecular Markers?

Due to unfavorable lifestyle habits (unhealthy diet and tobacco abuse) the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in western countries is increasing. The GERD-Barrett-Adenocarcinoma sequence currently lacks well-defined diagnostic, progressive, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers (i) providing an appropriate screening method identifying the presence of the disease, (ii) estimating the risk of evolving cancer, that is, the progression from Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), (iii) predicting the response to therapy, and (iv) indicating an overall survival—prognosis for EAC patients. Based on histomorphological findings, detailed screening and therapeutic guidelines have been elaborated, although epidemiological studies could not support the postulated increasing progression rates of GERD to BE and EAC. Additionally, proposed predictive and prognostic markers are rather heterogeneous by nature, lack substantial proofs, and currently do not allow stratification of GERD patients for progression, outcome, and therapeutic effectiveness in clinical practice. The aim of this paper is to discuss the current knowledge regarding the GERD-BE-EAC sequence mainly focusing on the disputable and ambiguous status of proposed biomarkers to identify promising and reliable markers in order to provide more detailed insights into pathophysiological mechanisms and thus to improve prognostic and predictive therapeutic approaches.

Screening and risk stratification for Barrett's esophagus: how to limit the clinical impact of the increasing incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma

Barrett's esophagus (BE) and gastroesophageal reflux disease are the strongest risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma. To reduce the clinical impact of this disease, endoscopic screening to detect BE has been proposed and nonendoscopic diagnostic techniques are under investigation. Because screening would result in new diagnoses of BE and additional costs related to endoscopic surveillance, novel tools for risk stratification are also warranted. Dysplasia is the gold standard for risk stratification. Molecular biomarkers may provide a more objective and reproducible estimation of the individual risk, and further prospective studies are required as a prelude to introducing biomarkers into routine clinical practice.

Discovery and validation of Barrett's esophagus microRNA transcriptome by next generation sequencing

Objective

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is transition from squamous to columnar mucosa as a result of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The role of microRNA during this transition has not been systematically studied.

Design

For initial screening, total RNA from 5 GERD and 6 BE patients was size fractionated. RNA <70 nucleotides was subjected to SOLiD 3 library preparation and next generation sequencing (NGS). Bioinformatics analysis was performed using R package “DEseq”. A p value<0.05 adjusted for a false discovery rate of 5% was considered significant. NGS-identified miRNA were validated using qRT-PCR in an independent group of 40 GERD and 27 BE patients. MicroRNA expression of human BE tissues was also compared with three BE cell lines.

Results

NGS detected 19.6 million raw reads per sample. 53.1% of filtered reads mapped to miRBase version 18. NGS analysis followed by qRT-PCR validation found 10 differentially expressed miRNA; several are novel (-708-5p, -944, -224-5p and -3065-5p). Up- or down- regulation predicted by NGS was matched by qRT-PCR in every case. Human BE tissues and BE cell lines showed a high degree of concordance (70–80%) in miRNA expression. Prediction analysis identified targets that mapped to developmental signaling pathways such as TGFβ and Notch and inflammatory pathways such as toll-like receptor signaling and TGFβ. Cluster analysis found similarly regulated (up or down) miRNA to share common targets suggesting coordination between miRNA.

Conclusion

Using highly sensitive next-generation sequencing, we have performed a comprehensive genome wide analysis of microRNA in BE and GERD patients. Differentially expressed miRNA between BE and GERD have been further validated. Expression of miRNA between BE human tissues and BE cell lines are highly correlated. These miRNA should be studied in biological models to further understand BE development.

Management of Barrett's esophageal carcinoma

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the premalignant lesion from which esophageal adenocarcinoma near the esophagogastric junction arises. The management of BE and the treatment of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (BEA) are important clinical issues in Europe and the United States. As the Helicobacter pylori infection rate in Japan is decreasing in the younger population, the incidence of BE and adenocarcinoma arising from BE may start increasing. Thus, we review the current status of BEA and its management. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging is important for diagnosing dysplasia arising from BE. In Japan, adenocarcinoma arising from BE is managed the same way as squamous cell carcinoma in the same location. Strategies to prevent BEA may include medication such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and proton pump inhibitors, and anti-reflux surgery. Understanding the pathophysiology of BE will help to reduce the incidence of BEA.

Diagnosis and treatment of Barrett's oesophagus

INTRODUCTION

Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is a common premalignant condition, which carries a risk of progression to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Recent advances include quantifying the risk of neoplasia progression, novel diagnostic tools and development of new endoscopic techniques to treat early Barrett's cancer.

SOURCES OF DATA

A selective search was performed on recent advances in BO and this was supplemented with guidelines from the American and British Society of Gastroenterology.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

All cases of dysplasia should be confirmed by a second expert histopathologist. Endoscopic therapy is the preferred option for high-grade dysplasia and intra-mucosal (T1a) carcinoma using endomucosal resection (EMR) and/or radiofrequency ablation. EMR also provides accurate staging information and any remaining Barrett segment should be ablated to reduce the risk of metachronous lesions.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The cell of origin for BO is not certain. The merits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic screening and surveillance still remain controversial. The risk of neoplasia progression in low-grade dysplasia is inconsistently reported. The role of chemoprevention remains unclear.

GROWING POINTS

The use of radical endotherapy in early Barrett's neoplasia is promising with some data supporting long-term durability.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

The development of non-endoscopic diagnostic tools and radical endotherapy to treat early cancer strengthens the argument for surveillance and suggests the possibility of screening in the near future. Identification of a biomarker may help to select high-risk patients.

Health benefits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic and nonendoscopic cytosponge screening for Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We developed a model to compare the health benefits and cost effectiveness of screening for Barrett's esophagus by either Cytosponge™ or by conventional endoscopy vs no screening, and to estimate their abilities to reduce mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We used microsimulation modeling of a hypothetical cohort of 50-year-old men in the United Kingdom with histories of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, assuming the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus to be 8%. Participants were invited to undergo screening by endoscopy or Cytosponge (invitation acceptance rates of 23% and 45%, respectively), and outcomes were compared with those from men who underwent no screening. We estimated the number of incident esophageal adenocarcinoma cases prevented and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of the different strategies. Patients found to have high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer received endotherapy. Model inputs included data on disease progression, test accuracy, post-treatment status, and surveillance protocols. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per year. Supplementary and sensitivity analyses comprised esophagectomy management of high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer, screening by ultrathin nasal endoscopy, and different assumptions of uptake of screening invitations for either strategy.

RESULTS

We estimated that compared with no screening, Cytosponge screening followed by treatment of patients with dysplasia or intramucosal cancer costs an additional $240 (95% credible interval, $196-$320) per screening participant and results in a mean gain of 0.015 (95% credible interval, -0.001 to 0.029) QALYs and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $15.7 thousand (K) per QALY. The respective values for endoscopy were $299 ($261-$367), 0.013 (0.003-0.023) QALYs, and $22.2K. Screening by the Cytosponge followed by treatment of patients with dysplasia or intramucosal cancer would reduce the number of cases of incident symptomatic esophageal adenocarcinoma by 19%, compared with 17% for screening by endoscopy, although this greater benefit for Cytosponge depends on more patients accepting screening by Cytosponge compared with screening by endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

In a microsimulation model, screening 50-year-old men with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease by Cytosponge is cost effective and would reduce mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma compared with no screening.

Population-based study reveals new risk-stratification biomarker panel for Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The risk of progression of Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is low and difficult to calculate. Accurate tools to determine risk are needed to optimize surveillance and intervention. We assessed the ability of candidate biomarkers to predict which cases of BE will progress to EAC or high-grade dysplasia and identified those that can be measured in formalin-fixed tissues.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a nested case-control study performed using the population-based Northern Ireland BE Register (1993-2005). Cases who progressed to EAC (n = 89) or high-grade dysplasia ≥ 6 months after diagnosis with BE were matched to controls (nonprogressors, n = 291), for age, sex, and year of BE diagnosis. Established biomarkers (abnormal DNA content, p53, and cyclin A expression) and new biomarkers (levels of sialyl Lewis(a), Lewis(x), and Aspergillus oryzae lectin [AOL] and binding of wheat germ agglutinin) were assessed in paraffin-embedded tissue samples from patients with a first diagnosis of BE. Conditional logistic regression analysis was applied to assess odds of progression for patients with dysplastic and nondysplastic BE, based on biomarker status.

RESULTS

Low-grade dysplasia and all biomarkers tested, other than Lewis(x), were associated with risk of EAC or high-grade dysplasia. In backward selection, a panel comprising low-grade dysplasia, abnormal DNA ploidy, and AOL most accurately identified progressors and nonprogressors. The adjusted odds ratio for progression of patients with BE with low-grade dysplasia was 3.74 (95% confidence interval, 2.43-5.79) for each additional biomarker and the risk increased by 2.99 for each additional factor (95% confidence interval, 1.72-5.20) in patients without dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-grade dysplasia, abnormal DNA ploidy, and AOL can be used to identify patients with BE most likely to develop EAC or high-grade dysplasia.

Surveillance for gastrointestinal malignancies

Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are notorious for frequently progressing to advanced stages even in the absence of serious symptoms, thus leading to delayed diagnoses and dismal prognoses. Secondary prevention of GI malignancies through early detection and treatment of cancer-precursor/premalignant lesions, therefore, is recognized as an effective cancer prevention strategy. In order to efficiently detect these lesions, systemic application of screening tests (surveillance) is needed. However, most of the currently used non-invasive screening tests for GI malignancies (for example, serum markers such as alpha-fetoprotein for hepatocellular carcinoma, and fecal occult blood test, for colon cancer) are only modestly effective necessitating the use of highly invasive endoscopy-based procedures, such as esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy for screening purposes. Even for hepatocellular carcinoma where non-invasive imaging (ultrasonography) has become a standard screening tool, the need for repeated liver biopsies of suspicious liver nodules for histopathological confirmation can’t be avoided. The invasive nature and high-cost associated with these screening tools hinders implementation of GI cancer screening programs. Moreover, only a small fraction of general population is truly predisposed to developing GI malignancies, and indeed needs surveillance. To spare the average-risk individuals from superfluous invasive procedures and achieve an economically viable model of cancer prevention, it’s important to identify cohorts in general population that are at substantially high risk of developing GI malignancies (risk-stratification), and select suitable screening tests for surveillance in these cohorts. We herein provide a brief overview of such high-risk cohorts for different GI malignancies, and the screening strategies that have commonly been employed for surveillance purpose in them.

Management of Barrett's oesophagus and intramucosal oesophageal cancer: a review of recent development

Barrett's oesophagus is the most important and recognizable precursor lesion for oesophageal adenocarcinoma, which is the one of the fastest growing cancers in the Western World. The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma has increased 600% in the United States between 1975 and 2001 and is thought to represent a real increase in burden rather than a result of histologic or anatomical misclassification or overdiagnosis. Thus, the cancer risk in Barrett's oesophagus has to be managed and involves prevention (surveillance endoscopy), treating underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease (medically and or surgically) and endoscopic therapy to remove diseased epithelium in appropriate patient subgroups. In the last decade, new developments in imaging and molecular markers as well as an armamentarium of novel and effective endoscopic eradication therapy has become available to the endoscopist to combat this exponential rise in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Paradoxically, the cancer risk in Barrett's oesophagus gets progressively downgraded which raises fundamental questions about our understanding of the known and unknown risk factors and molecular aberrations that are involved in the Barrett's metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Future research has to be directed at these areas to fine tune our screening and surveillance programs to identify more accurately the high-risk group of progressors to oesophageal adenocarcinoma who would benefit most from endoscopic therapy.

Diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus

Barrett esophagus is characterized by the replacement of squamous mucosa in the esophagus by specialized intestinal metaplasia. Its clinical significance lies in it being the strongest risk factor for and known precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Diagnosis requires endoscopic confirmation of columnar metaplasia in the distal esophagus and histologic confirmation of specialized intestinal metaplasia. Recommendations for the management of subjects diagnosed with Barrett esophagus include periodic endoscopic surveillance to detect the development of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Careful endoscopic evaluation with high-resolution endoscopy and endoscopic resection is recommended in the evaluation of subjects with high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma.

Diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus

Barrett esophagus is characterized by the replacement of squamous mucosa in the esophagus by specialized intestinal metaplasia. Its clinical significance lies in it being the strongest risk factor for and known precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Diagnosis requires endoscopic confirmation of columnar metaplasia in the distal esophagus and histologic confirmation of specialized intestinal metaplasia. Recommendations for the management of subjects diagnosed with Barrett esophagus include periodic endoscopic surveillance to detect the development of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Careful endoscopic evaluation with high-resolution endoscopy and endoscopic resection is recommended in the evaluation of subjects with high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma.

Clinical issues in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: could DNA copy number hold the key?

While not being considered a common cancer, since 1975 oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) has had the fastest-rising incidence of any malignancy in Caucasian Western populations. In the absence of major improvements in treatment since this rise began, the number of deaths has also increased rapidly. In contrast, there have been significant advances in basic science in this period. One such advance is the discovery of DNA copy number aberrations (CNAs), and their potential role in carcinogenesis. The study of CNAs offers the potential to answer fundamental clinical questions in OAC, which in turn may lead to improved diagnosis, staging and treatment. This review outlines current clinical dilemmas in OAC, discusses the role that CNAs have been shown to play to date and highlights potential future applications.

Endoscopic therapies for Barrett's-associated dysplasia: a new paradigm for a new decade

The emergence of endoscopic therapies for Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated dysplasia has significantly altered the management of this complex disease. Over the past decade, there has been a paradigm shift from that of pure surveillance to a more therapeutic approach in eradicating dysplastic BE. This strategy includes less invasive options than esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and early eradication of confirmed low-grade dysplasia. Although multiple modalities exist for endoscopic therapy, endoscopic mucosal resection coupled with radiofrequency ablation appears to be the most effective therapy, with minimal complications. Recent advances in endoscopic eradication therapies for dysplastic BE have fueled excitement for a significant weapon against the rising incidence of esophageal cancer.

Barrett's Esophagus: Emerging Knowledge and Management Strategies

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has increased exponentially in the last 3 decades. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor of EAC. Patients with BE have a greater than 40 folds higher risk of EAC compared with the general population. Recent years have witnessed a revolution in the clinical and molecular research related to BE. However, several aspects of this condition remain controversial. Data regarding the true prevalence of BE have varied widely. Recent studies have suggested a lower incidence of EAC in nondysplastic BE (NDBE) than previously reported. There is paucity of prospective data showing a survival benefit of screening or surveillance for BE. Furthermore, the ever-increasing emphasis on healthcare cost containment has called for reexamination of the screening and surveillance strategies for BE. There is a need for identification of reliable clinical predictors or molecular biomarkers to risk-stratify patients who might benefit the most from screening or surveillance for BE. Finally, new therapies have emerged for the management of dysplastic BE. In this paper, we highlight the key areas of controversy and uncertainty surrounding BE. The paper discusses, in detail, the current literature about the molecular pathogenesis, biomarkers, histopathological diagnosis, and management strategies for BE.

Randomized crossover study comparing efficacy of transnasal endoscopy with that of standard endoscopy to detect Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

Unsedated transnasal endoscopy (TNE) may be safer and less expensive than standard endoscopy (SE) for detecting Barrett's esophagus (BE). Emerging technologies require robust evaluation before routine use.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and acceptability of TNE in diagnosing BE compared with those of SE.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, crossover study.

SETTING

Single, tertiary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

This study enrolled consecutive patients with BE or those referred for diagnostic assessment.

INTERVENTION

All patients underwent TNE followed by SE or the reverse. Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory short-form questionnaires, a visual analogue scale, and a single question addressing preference for endoscopy type were administered.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Diagnostic accuracy and tolerability of TNE were compared with those of SE.

RESULTS

Of 95 patients randomized, 82 completed the study. We correctly diagnosed 48 of 49 BE cases by TNE for endoscopic findings of columnar lined esophagus compared with the criterion standard, SE, giving a sensitivity and specificity of 0.98 and 1.00, respectively. The BE median length was 3 cm (interquartile range [IQR] 1-5 cm) with SE and 3 cm (IQR 2-4 cm) with TNE, giving high correlations between the two modalities (R(2) = 0.97; P < .001). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting intestinal metaplasia by TNE compared with those by SE was 0.91 and 1.00, respectively. The mean (± standard deviation) post-endoscopy Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory short-form score for TNE (30.0 ± 1.10 standard error of the mean [SEM]) was lower than that for SE (30.7 ± 1.29 SEM), (P = .054). The visual analogue scale scores were no different (P = .07). The majority of patients (59%) expressed a preference for TNE.

LIMITATIONS

This is a small study, with limited generalizability, a high prevalence of patients with BE, differential drop-out between the two procedures, and use of sedation.

CONCLUSION

TNE is an accurate and well-tolerated method for diagnosing BE compared with SE. TNE warrants further evaluation as a screening tool for BE.

None-endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma- A Review

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most common cancer and sixth most frequent cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the most common type of EC. ESCC develops by progression from premalignant lesions, which are called esophageal squamous dysplasia (ESD). Prevention is the most effective strategy for controlling this disease. Generally, two methods may be defined for ESCC prevention. The aim of the first preventive method is to prevent the initiation of ESD by avoiding the known risk factors, or primary prevention. Secondary prevention focuses on detection of the disease in its early curable stage, thus preventing its progression into advanced stages. Endoscopy with iodine staining and biopsy is the diagnostic choice for ESD. However it is invasive and expensive, and not accepted by asymptomatic ESD cases. Therefore, it is necessary to find a non-endoscopic screening method. Despite the large number of studies conducted worldwide, no approved method has been developed for ESCC screening. Regarding the multi-factorial nature of ESCC, it is proposed that the use of a combination of various criteria, such as cytological examination, risk factors, genetic alteration, and molecular markers may result in the development of a comprehensive and effective ESCC screening program.

Aberrant vimentin methylation is characteristic of upper gastrointestinal pathologies

BACKGROUND

We have previously established aberrant DNA methylation of vimentin exon-1 (VIM methylation) as a common epigenetic event in colon cancer and as a biomarker for detecting colon neoplasia. We now examine vimentin methylation in neoplasia of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS

Using a quantitative real-time methylation-specific PCR assay, we tested for vimentin methylation in archival specimens of esophageal and gastric neoplasia.

RESULTS

We find that acquisition of aberrant vimentin methylation is highly common in these neoplasms, but largely absent in controls. The highest frequency of vimentin methylation was detected in lesions of the distal esophagus, including 91% of Barrett's esophagus (n = 11), 100% of high-grade dysplasia (HGD, n = 5), and 81% of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC, n = 26) but absent in controls (n = 9). Vimentin methylation similarly was detected in 87% of signet ring (n = 15) and 53% of intestinal type gastric cancers (n = 17). Moreover, in tests of cytology brushings vimentin methylation proved detectable in 100% of Barrett's esophagus cases (n = 7), 100% of HGD cases (n = 4), and 83% of EAC cases (n = 18) but was absent in all controls (n = 5).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings establish aberrant vimentin methylation as a highly common epigenetic alteration in neoplasia of the upper gastrointestinal tract and show that Barrett's esophagus, even without dysplasia, already contains epigenetic alterations characteristic of adenocarcinoma.

IMPACT

These findings suggest vimentin methylation as a biomarker of upper gastrointestinal neoplasia with potential for development as molecular cytology in esophageal screening.

Screening for oesophageal cancer

Oesophageal cancer is a global health problem with high mortality due to the advanced nature of the disease at presentation; therefore, detection at an early stage significantly improves outcome. Oesophageal squamous-cell cancer is preceded by dysplasia and oesophageal adenocarcinoma is preceded by Barrett's oesophagus, which progresses to cancer via intermediate dysplastic stages. Screening to detect these preneoplastic lesions has the potential to substantially reduce mortality and morbidity. However, the risks and benefits of such programmes to individuals and to society need to be carefully weighed. Endoscopic screening is invasive, costly and error prone owing to sampling bias and the subjective diagnosis of dysplasia. Non-endoscopic cell-sampling methods are less invasive and more cost effective than endoscopy, but the sensitivity and specificity of cytological assessment of atypia has been disappointing. The use of biomarkers to analyse samples collected using pan-oesophageal cell-collection devices may improve diagnostic accuracy; however, further work is required to confirm this. The psychological and economic implications of screening as well as the feasibility of implementing such programmes must also be considered.

Incidence and survival of oesophageal and gastric cancer in England between 1998 and 2007, a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Major changes in the incidence of oesophageal and gastric cancers have been reported internationally. This study describes recent trends in incidence and survival of subgroups of oesophageal and gastric cancer in England between 1998 and 2007 and considers the implications for cancer services and policy.

METHODS

Data on 133,804 English patients diagnosed with oesophageal and gastric cancer between 1998 and 2007 were extracted from the National Cancer Data Repository. Using information on anatomical site and tumour morphology, data were divided into six groups; upper and middle oesophagus, lower oesophagus, oesophagus with an unspecified anatomical site, cardia, non-cardia stomach, and stomach with an unspecified anatomical site. Age-standardised incidence rates (per 100,000 European standard population) were calculated for each group by year of diagnosis and by socioeconomic deprivation. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The majority of oesophageal cancers were in the lower third of the oesophagus (58%). Stomach with an unspecified anatomical site was the largest gastric cancer group (53%). The incidence of lower oesophageal cancer increased between 1998 and 2002 and remained stable thereafter. The incidence of cancer of the cardia, non-cardia stomach, and stomach with an unspecified anatomical site declined over the 10 year period. Both lower oesophageal and cardia cancers had a much higher incidence in males compared with females (M:F 4:1). The incidence was also higher in the most deprived quintiles for all six cancer groups. Survival was poor in all sub-groups with 1 year survival ranging from 14.8-40.8% and 5 year survival ranging from 3.7-15.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased focus on prevention and early diagnosis, especially in deprived areas and in males, is required to improve outcomes for these cancers. Improved recording of tumour site, stage and morphology and the evaluation of focused early diagnosis programmes are also needed. The poor long-term survival reinforces the need for early detection and multidisciplinary care.

Endoscopic management of Barrett esophagus

Endoscopy has a vital role in the diagnosis, screening, surveillance and treatment of Barrett esophagus. Over the past few decades, tremendous advances have been made in endoscopic technology, and the management of dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett esophagus has changed radically from being surgical to organ-sparing endoscopic therapy. Proper endoscopic techniques and systematic biopsy protocols improve dysplasia detection, and endoscopic surveillance improves outcomes in patients with Barrett esophagus and dysplasia. Endoscopic treatment can be tissue acquiring (as in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection) or ablative (as with photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy). Treatment is usually multimodal, combining endoscopic resection of visible lesions with one or more mucosal ablation techniques, followed by long-term surveillance. Such treatment is safe and effective. Shared decision-making between the patient and physician is important while considering treatment for dysplasia in Barrett esophagus. Issues such as durability of response, importance of subsquamous Barrett epithelium and the optimal management strategy in patients with low-grade dysplasia and nondysplastic Barrett esophagus need to be studied further. Development of safer wide-field resection techniques, which would effectively remove all Barrett esophagus and obviate the need for long-term surveillance, is needed.

Editorial: should women with heartburn undergo screening upper endoscopy for prevention of cancer?

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a rare disease which is much more common in men than in women. For any given age, women with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms actually have a lower risk of EAC than men without GERD symptoms. The cause of the difference in incidence rates between men and women is unclear and not accounted for by differential distribution of known risk factors. Despite the long-recognized difference in incidence between men and women, neither societal guidelines nor physician practice take into account this difference, leading to illogical use of health-care resources. Given the epidemiology of EAC, the yield of endoscopic screening examinations in those under 50, and in women, regardless of age or GERD symptoms, is exceedingly low, and may approximate the low risk of the endoscopic procedure itself. Recommending organizations should consider the epidemiology of EAC when making screening recommendations.

Barrett's esophagus: A historical perspective, an update on core practicalities and predictions on future evolutions of management

Interpretation of exploding knowledge about Barrett's esophagus is impaired by use of several conflicting definitions. Because any histological type of esophageal columnar metaplasia carries risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma, the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus should no longer require demonstration of intestinal-type metaplasia. Endoscopic recognition and grading of Barrett's esophagus remains a significant source of ambiguity. Reflux disease is a key factor for development of Barrett's esophagus, but other factors must underlie its development, since it occurs in only a minority of reflux disease patients. Neither antireflux surgery nor proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy has major impacts on cancer risk. Within a year, a major trial should indicate whether low-dose aspirin usefully reduces cancer risk. The best referral centers have transformed the accuracy of screening and surveillance for early curable esophageal adenocarcinoma by use of enhanced and novel endoscopic imaging, visually-guided, rather than blind biopsies and by partnership with expert pathologists. General endoscopists now need to upgrade their skills and equipment so that they can rely mainly on visual targeting of biopsies on mucosal areas of concern in their surveillance practice. General pathologists need to greatly improve their interpretation of biopsies. Endoscopic therapy now achieves very high rates of cure of high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma with minimal morbidity and risk. Such results will only be achieved by skilled interventional endoscopists. Esophagectomy should now be mainly restricted to patients whose cancer has extended into and beyond the submucosa. Weighing risks and benefits in the management of Barrett's esophagus is difficult, as is the process of adequately informing patients about their specific cancer risk.