Clinical and Biological Correlates of Neurotoxicity Associated with CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

An overview of multiplexed analyses of CAR T-cell therapies: insights and potential

INTRODUCTION

Cancer immunotherapy is a rapidly growing field with exponential advancement in engineered immune cell-based therapies. For instance, an engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) can be introduced in T-cells or other immune cells and adoptively transferred to target and kill cancer cells in hematologic malignancies or solid tumors. The first CAR-T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has been developed against CD19, a B-cell marker expressed on lymphoma and lymphoblastic leukemia. To allow for personalized treatment, proteomics approaches could provide insights into biomarkers for CAR-T therapy efficacy and toxicity.

AREAS COVERED

We researched the most recent technology methods of biomarker evaluation used in the laboratory and clinical setting. Publications of CAR-T biomarkers were then systematically reviewed to provide a narrative of the most validated biomarkers of CAR-T efficacy and toxicity. Examples of biomarkers include CAR-T functionality and phenotype as well as interleukin-6 and other cytokines.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Biomarkers of CAR-T efficacy and toxicity have been identified, but still need to be validated and standardized across institutions. Moreover, few are used in the clinical setting due to limitations in real-time technology. Expansion of biomarker research could provide better understanding of patient response and risk of life-threatening side effects with potential for improved precision medicine.

Rethinking mechanisms of neurotoxicity with BCMA directed therapy

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has become a key target for antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, and other immunotherapies in multiple myeloma. Some of these agents such as belantamab mafodotin and idecabtagene vicleucel have already received regulatory approval in the United States. Although BCMA has generally been considered to be expressed almost exclusively in plasma cells with a low likelihood of on-target off-tumor toxicity, there has been a range of unusual neurotoxicity observed across the spectrum of BCMA immunotherapies. In certain cases, these unusual neurotoxicity presentations have led to patient death or withdrawal of agents from further development. Our review summarizes the literature in this field and highlights the possibility of on-target toxicities due to neural expression of BCMA. We draw attention to the need for further investigation of these toxicities. This risk becomes increasingly important as BCMA targeted therapies are brought to earlier lines of treatment.

CD19/CD22 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Cocktail Therapy following Autologous Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B Cell Lymphomas

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) is the standard of care for chemosensitive relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive B cell lymphoma. Patients with a positive positron emission tomography (PET) scan before ASCT have a poor prognosis, and those who fail to achieve a therapeutic response better than partial remission after salvage treatment are ineligible candidates for ASCT. We conducted this open-label single-arm prospective clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sequential infusion of CD19/22 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells following HDT-ASCT. Eligibility for this study included patients with R/R aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET positivity and patients with stable or progressive disease after salvage chemotherapy. Between November 14, 2016, and August 15, 2019, 42 patients underwent HDT-ASCT followed by CD19/22 CAR T cell infusion. Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in only 2 patients. Twenty-one percent of patients experienced any grade of neurotoxicity, 5% with severe grade 3. All cases of CRS and neurotoxicity were reversible. The overall response rate was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.4% to 97.3%). At a median follow-up of 24.3 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were not reached. The 2-year PFS rate was 83.3 % (95% CI, 68.2% to 91.7%). No patients were found to be CD19- and CD22-negative at the time of progression; 97.1% and 68.6% of patients with ongoing complete remission (CR) had consistently detectable levels of CD19 and CD22 CAR transgene, respectively, at 3 months. The median time to onset of sustained B cell recovery was 8.2 months. The high durable CR rates and favorable safety profiles support the strong potential of the HDT-ASCT plus CD19/CD22 CAR T cell cocktail therapy for the suboptimal group of patients with R/R aggressive B-NHL who are less sensitive or fail salvage chemotherapy. These early data are encouraging and informative for future trials to further test the efficacy and safety of HDT-ASCT plus CAR T cell therapy in a larger population. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: An emergency medicine focused review

INTRODUCTION

Several novel cancer therapies have been recently introduced, each with complications that differ from chemotherapy and radiation.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review discusses complications associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for emergency clinicians.

DISCUSSION

Novel immune-based cancer therapies including CAR T-cell therapy have improved the care of patients with malignancy, primarily lymphoma and leukemia. However, severe complications may arise, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). CRS is associated with excessive cytokine release that results in severe end organ injury. Patients present with fever and a range of symptoms based on the affected organs. Grading is determined by the need for cardiopulmonary intervention, while management focuses on resuscitation, evaluation for other concomitant conditions, and treatment with tocilizumab or steroids. ICANS is also associated with cytokine release, causing patients to present with a variety of neurologic features. A grading system is available for ICANS based on feature severity. Management is supportive with steroids. Other complications of CAR T-cell therapy include infusion reactions, hypogammaglobulinemia, tumor lysis syndrome, cytopenias, cardiac toxicity, and graft-versus-host disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of this novel cancer therapy class and the potential complications can improve the care of these patients in the emergency department setting.

Frontal predominant encephalopathy with early paligraphia as a distinctive signature of CAR T-cell therapy-related neurotoxicity

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an emerging highly effective treatment for refractory haematological malignancies. Unfortunately, its therapeutic benefit may be hampered by treatment-related toxicities, including neurotoxicity. Early aggressive treatment is paramount to prevent neurological sequelae, yet it potentially interferes with the anti-cancer action of CAR T-cells. We describe four CAR T-cells infused patients who presented with reiterative writing behaviours, namely paligraphia, as an early manifestation of neurotoxicity, and eventually developed frontal predominant encephalopathy (one mild, three severe). Paligraphia may represent an early, specific, and easily detectable clinical finding of CAR T-cell therapy-related neurotoxicity, potentially informing its management.

Putting function back in dysfunction: Endothelial diseases and current therapies in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and cellular therapies

Endothelial dysfunction is characterized by altered vascular permeability and prothrombotic, pro-inflammatory phenotypes. Endothelial dysfunction results in end-organ damage and has been associated with diverse disease pathologies. Complications observed after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy for hematologic and neoplastic disorders share overlapping clinical manifestations and there is increasing evidence linking these complications to endothelial dysfunction. Despite advances in supportive care and treatments, end-organ toxicity remains the leading cause of mortality. A new strategy to mitigate endothelial dysfunction could lead to improvement of clinical outcomes for patients. Statins have demonstrated pleiotropic effects of immunomodulatory and endothelial protection by various molecular mechanisms. Recent applications in immune-mediated diseases such as autoimmune disorders, chronic inflammatory conditions, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have shown promising results. In this review, we cover the mechanisms underlying endothelial dysfunction in GVHD and CAR-T cell-related toxicities. We summarize the current knowledge about statins and other agents used as endothelial protectants. We propose further studies using statins for prophylaxis and prevention of end-organ damage related to extensive endothelial dysfunction in HCT and CAR-T.

A Primer on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy: What Does It Mean for Pathologists?

CONTEXT.—

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) technology has shown great promise in both clinical and preclinical models in mediating potent and specific antitumor activity. With the advent of US Food and Drug Administration-approved CAR-T therapies for B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, CAR-T therapy is poised to become part of mainstream clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE.—

To educate pathologists on CAR-T and chimeric antigen receptor-derived cellular therapy, provide a better understanding of their role in this process, explain important regulatory aspects of CAR-T therapy, and advocate for pathologist involvement in the delivery and monitoring of chimeric antigen receptor-based treatments. Much of the focus of this article addresses US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies; however, more general issues and future perspectives are considered for therapies in development.

DESIGN.—

A CAR-T workgroup, facilitated by the College of American Pathologists Personalized Health Care Committee and consisting of pathologists of various backgrounds, was convened to develop a summary guidance paper for the College of American Pathologists Council on Scientific Affairs.

RESULTS.—

The workgroup identified gaps in pathologists' knowledge of CAR-T therapy, including uncertainty in the role of the clinical laboratory in supporting CAR-T therapy. The workgroup considered these issues and summarized the findings to assist pathologists to become stakeholders in CAR-T therapy administration.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This manuscript serves to both educate pathologists on CAR-T therapy and serve as a point of initial discussions in areas of CAR-T science, clinical therapy, and regulatory issues as CAR-T therapies continue to be introduced into clinical practice.

Cellular immunotherapy for hematological malignancy: recent progress and future perspectives

Advancements in the field of cellular immunotherapy have accelerated in recent years and have changed the treatment landscape for a variety of hematologic malignancies. Cellular immunotherapy strategies exploit the patient's immune system to kill cancer cells. The successful use of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells in treating B-cell malignancies is the paradigm of this revolution, and numerous ongoing studies are investigating and extending this approach to other malignancies. However, resistance to CAR-T-cell therapy and non-durable efficacy have prevented CAR-T-cells from becoming the ultimate therapy. Because natural killer (NK) cells play an essential role in antitumor immunity, adoptively transferred allogeneic NK and CAR-modified NK cell therapy has been attempted in certain disease subgroups. Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the oldest form of cellular immunotherapy and the only curative option for hematologic malignancies. Historically, the breadth of application of allo-HSCT has been limited by a lack of identical sibling donors (ISDs). However, great strides have recently been made in the success of haploidentical allografts worldwide, which enable everyone to have a donor. Haploidentical donors can achieve comparable outcomes to those of ISDs and even better outcomes in certain circumstances because of a stronger graft vs. tumor effect. Currently, novel strategies such as CAR-T or NK-based immunotherapy can be applied as a complement to allo-HSCT for curative effects, particularly in refractory cases. Here, we introduce the developments in cellular immunotherapy in hematology.

Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR T) in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chimeric antigen receptors T (CAR-T) cell therapy of cancer is a rapidly evolving field. It has been shown to be remarkably effective in cases of hematological malignancies, and its approval by the FDA has significantly increased the enthusiasm for wide clinical usage and development of novel CAR-T therapies. However, it has also challenged physicians and investigators to recognize and deal with treatment-associated toxicities. A total of 2592 patients were included from 84 eligible studies that were systematically searched and reviewed from the databases of PubMed, de, the American Society of Hematology and the Cochrane Library. The meta-analysis and subgroup analysis by a Bayesian logistic regression model were used to evaluate the incidences of therapy-related toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological symptoms (NS), and the differences between different targets and cancer types were analyzed. The pooled all-grade CRS rate and grade ≥ 3 CRS rate was 77% and 29%, respectively, with a significantly higher incidence in the hematologic malignancies (all-grade: 81%; grade ≥ 3: 29%) than in solid tumors (all-grade: 37%; grade ≥ 3: 19%). The pooled estimate NS rate from the individual studies were 40% for all-grade and 28% for grade ≥ 3. It was also higher in the hematologic subgroup than in the solid tumors group. The subgroup analysis by cancer type showed that higher incidences of grade ≥ 3 CRS were observed in anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy for ALL and NHL, anti-BCMA CAR-T for MM, and anti-CEA CAR-T for solid tumors, which were between 24-36%, while higher incidences of grade ≥ 3 NS were mainly observed in CD19-ALL/NHL (23-37%) and BCMA-MM (12%). Importantly, subgroup analysis on anti-CD19 CAR-T studies showed that young patients (vs. adult patients), allologous T cell origin (vs. autologous origin), gamma retrovirus vector, and higher doses of CAR-T cells were associated with high-grade CRS. On the other hand, the patients with NHL (vs ALL), administered with higher dose of CAR-T, and adult patients (vs. young patients) had an increased incidence of grade ≥ 3 NS events. This study offers a comprehensive summary of treatment-related toxicity and will guide future clinical trials and therapeutic designs investigating CAR T cell therapy.

CAR T cells: Building on the CD19 paradigm

Spearheaded by the therapeutic use of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) targeting CD19, synthetic immunology has entered the clinical arena. CARs are recombinant receptors for antigen that engage cell surface molecules through the variable region of an antibody and signal through arrayed T-cell activating and costimulatory domains. CARs allow redirection of T-cell cytotoxicity against any antigen of choice, independent of MHC expression. Patient T cells engineered to express CARs specific for CD19 have yielded remarkable outcomes in subjects with relapsed/refractory B- cell malignancies, setting off unprecedented interest in T-cell engineering and cell-based cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we present the challenges to extend the use of CAR T cells to solid tumors and other pathologies. We further highlight progress in CAR design, cell manufacturing, and genome editing, which in aggregate hold the promise of generating safer and more effective genetically instructed immunity. Novel engineered cell types, including innate T-cell types, natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived immune cells, are on the horizon, as are applications of CAR T cells to treat autoimmunity, severe infections, and senescence-associated pathologies.

Real-World Experiences of CAR T-Cell Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma: How Similar Are They to the Prospective Studies?

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has emerged as a revolutionary treatment option for highly aggressive B cell malignancies. Clinical trials of CD19 CAR T cells for the management of relapsed and/or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have shown markedly improved survival and response rates. The goal of this review is to evaluate whether the results from these clinical trials are reflective of real-world practices through the analysis of published literature of the commercially available CAR T cell products. We have found that despite the significantly different patient characteristics, the adverse events and response rates of real-world patients were similar to those of the clinical trials. Of interest, several groups excluded from the clinical trials, such as patients with HIV infection, chronic viral hepatitis, and secondary CNS (central nervous system) lymphoma, had case reports of promising outcomes.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: Updates in Glioblastoma Treatment

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are the most common and among the deadliest brain tumors in adults. Current mainstay treatments are insufficient to treat this tumor, and therefore, more effective therapies are desperately needed. Immunotherapy, which takes advantage of the body's natural defense mechanism, is an exciting emerging field in neuro-oncology. Adoptive cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells provides a treatment strategy based on using patients' own selected and genetically engineered cells that target tumor-associated antigens. These cells are harvested from patients, modified to target specific proteins expressed by the tumor, and re-introduced into the patient with the goal of destroying tumor cells. Here, we review the history of CAR T-cell therapy, and describe the characteristics of various generations of CAR T therapies, and the challenges inherent to treatment of GBM. Finally, we describe recent and current CAR T clinical trials designed to combat GBM.

Messing Up the Cancer Stem Cell Chemoresistance Mechanisms Supported by Tumor Microenvironment

Despite the recent advances in cancer patient management and in the development of targeted therapies, systemic chemotherapy is currently used as a first-line treatment for many cancer types. After an initial partial response, patients become refractory to standard therapy fostering rapid tumor progression. Compelling evidence highlights that the resistance to chemotherapeutic regimens is a peculiarity of a subpopulation of cancer cells within tumor mass, known as cancer stem cells (CSCs). This cellular compartment is endowed with tumor-initiating and metastasis formation capabilities. CSC chemoresistance is sustained by a plethora of grow factors and cytokines released by neighboring tumor microenvironment (TME), which is mainly composed by adipocytes, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), immune and endothelial cells. TME strengthens CSC refractoriness to standard and targeted therapies by enhancing survival signaling pathways, DNA repair machinery, expression of drug efflux transporters and anti-apoptotic proteins. In the last years many efforts have been made to understand CSC-TME crosstalk and develop therapeutic strategy halting this interplay. Here, we report the combinatorial approaches, which perturb the interaction network between CSCs and the different component of TME.

Cytokine Release Syndrome Associated with T-Cell-Based Therapies for Hematological Malignancies: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment

Cytokines are a broad group of small regulatory proteins with many biological functions involved in regulating the hematopoietic and immune systems. However, in pathological conditions, hyperactivation of the cytokine network constitutes the fundamental event in cytokine release syndrome (CRS). During the last few decades, the development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and T-cell therapies has rapidly evolved, and CRS can be a serious adverse event related to these treatments. CRS is a set of toxic adverse events that can be observed during infection or following the administration of antibodies for therapeutic purposes and, more recently, during T-cell-engaging therapies. CRS is triggered by on-target effects induced by binding of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells or bispecific antibody to its antigen and by subsequent activation of bystander immune and non-immune cells. CRS is associated with high circulating concentrations of several pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukins, interferons, tumor necrosis factors, colony-stimulating factors, and transforming growth factors. Recently, considerable developments have been achieved with regard to preventing and controlling CRS, but it remains an unmet clinical need. This review comprehensively summarizes the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of CRS caused by T-cell-engaging therapies utilized in the treatment of hematological malignancies.

EEG findings in CART T associated neurotoxicity: clinical and radiological correlations

BACKGROUND

While EEG is frequently reported as abnormal after CAR T cell therapy, its clinical significance remains unclear. We aim to systematically describe EEG features in a large single-center cohort and correlate them with clinical and radiological findings.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients undergoing CAR T cell therapy who had continuous EEG. Neurotoxicity grades, detailed neurological symptoms, and brain MRI or FDG-PET were obtained. Correlation between clinical and radiological findings and EEG features was assessed.

RESULTS

In 81 patients with median neurotoxicity grade 3 (IQR 2-3), diffuse EEG background slowing was the most common finding and correlated with neurotoxicity severity (p <0.001). A total of 42 patients had rhythmic or periodic patterns, 16 of them within the ictal-interictal-continuum (IIC), 5 with clinical seizures, and 3 with only electrographic seizures. Focal EEG abnormalities, consisting of lateralized periodic discharges (LPD, n=1), lateralized rhythmic delta activity (LRDA, n=6), or focal slowing (n=19), were found in 22 patients. All patients with LRDA, LPD, and 10/19 patients with focal slowing had focal clinical symptoms concordant with these EEG abnormalities. In addition, these focal EEG changes often correlated with PET hypometabolism or MRI hypoperfusion, in absence of a structural lesion.

CONCLUSION

In adult patients experiencing neurotoxicity after CAR T cell infusion, EEG degree of background disorganization correlated with neurotoxicity severity. IIC patterns and focal EEG abnormalities are frequent and often correlate with focal clinical symptoms and with PET-hypometabolism/MRI-hypoperfusion, without structural lesion. The etiology of these findings remains to be elucidated.

Bayesian modeling of a bivariate toxicity outcome for early phase oncology trials evaluating dose regimens

Most phase I trials in oncology aim to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on the occurrence of dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Evaluating the schedule of administration in addition to the dose may improve drug tolerance. Moreover, for some molecules, a bivariate toxicity endpoint may be more appropriate than a single endpoint. However, standard dose‐finding designs do not account for multiple dose regimens and bivariate toxicity endpoint within the same design. In this context, following a phase I motivating trial, we proposed modeling the first type of DLT, cytokine release syndrome, with the entire dose regimen using pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), whereas the other DLT (DLT_o) was modeled with the cumulative dose. We developed three approaches to model the joint distribution of DLT, defining it as a bivariate binary outcome from the two toxicity types, under various assumptions about the correlation between toxicities: an independent model, a copula model and a conditional model. Our Bayesian approaches were developed to be applied at the end of the dose‐allocation stage of the trial, once all data, including PK/PD measurements, were available. The approaches were evaluated through an extensive simulation study that showed that they can improve the performance of selecting the true MTD‐regimen compared to the recommendation of the dose‐allocation method implemented. Our joint approaches can also predict the DLT probabilities of new dose regimens that were not tested in the study and could be investigated in further stages of the trial.

[Immunomonitoring of patients treated with CAR-T cells for hematological malignancy: Guidelines from the CARTi group and the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

CAR-T cells represent a new anti-tumor immunotherapy which has shown its clinical efficacy in B-cell malignancies. The results of clinical trials carried out in this context have shown that certain immunological characteristics of patients before (at the time of apheresis) and after the administration of the treatment, or of the CAR-T cells themselves, are correlated with the response to the treatment or to its toxicity. However, to date, there are no recommendations on the immunological monitoring of patients treated in real life. The objectives of this workshop were to determine, based on data from the literature and the experience of the centers, the immunological analyses to be carried out in patients treated with CAR-T cells. The recommendations relate to the characterization of the patient's immune cells at the time of apheresis, the characterization of the injected CAR-T cells, as well as the monitoring of the CAR-T cells and other parameters of immune reconstitution in the patient after administration of the treatment. Harmonization of practices will allow clinical-biological correlation studies to be carried out in patients treated in real life with the aim of identifying factors predictive of response and toxicity. Such data could have a major medico-economic impact by making it possible to identify the patients who will optimally benefit from these expensive treatments.

Efficacy and Safety of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Tisagenlecleucel Administration in Lymphoma Patients With Secondary CNS Involvement: A Systematic Review

Background

The efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has already been demonstrated. However, patients with a history of/active secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma were excluded from the licensing trials conducted on two widely used CAR-T cell products, Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) and Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel). Hence, the objective of the present review was to assess whether secondary CNS lymphoma patients would derive a benefit from Axi-cel or Tisa-cel therapy, while maintaining controllable safety.

Method

Two reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library independently in order to identify all records associated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel published prior to February 15, 2021. Studies that included secondary CNS lymphoma patients treated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel and reported or could be inferred efficacy and safety endpoints of secondary CNS lymphoma patients were included. A tool designed specifically to evaluate the risk of bias in case series and reports and the ROBINS-I tool applied for cohort studies were used.

Results

Ten studies involving forty-four patients were included. Of these, seven were case reports or series. The other three reports were cohort studies involving twenty-five patients. Current evidence indicates that secondary CNS lymphoma patients could achieve long-term remission following Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment. Compared with the non-CNS cohort, however, progression-free survival and overall survival tended to be shorter. This was possibly due to the relatively small size of the CNS cohort. The incidence and grades of adverse effects in secondary CNS lymphoma patients resembled those in the non-CNS cohort. No incidences of CAR-T cell-related deaths were reported. Nevertheless, the small sample size introduced a high risk of bias and prevented the identification of specific patients who could benefit more from CAR-T cell therapy.

Conclusion

Secondary CNS lymphoma patients could seem to benefit from both Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment, with controllable risks. Thus, CAR-T cell therapy has potential as a candidate treatment for lymphoma patients with CNS involvement. Further prospective studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are warranted and recommended.

Toxicity of Immunotherapeutic Agents

As the cancer population increases and immunotherapy becomes widely utilized, severe toxicities from these treatments will become more prevalent. In cancer patients, the most common immunotherapies that lead to critical illness are chimeric antigen receptor T cells, monoclonal antibodies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Awareness of their toxicities by the intensive care unit team is of extreme importance. A multidisciplinary approach for diagnosis and treatment is recommended. This article reviews the most common toxicities from immunotherapy and offers a therapy-specific and system-based approach for affected patients.

CAR T-Cell Therapy: An Update for Radiologists

Chimeric antigen receptor-engineer (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising novel immunotherapy that has the potential to revolutionize cancer treatment. With four CAR T-cell therapies receiving FDA approval within the last 5 years, the role of CAR T-cells is anticipated to continue to evolve and expand. However, various aspects of CAR T-cell therapies remain poorly understood, and the therapies are associated with severe side effects [including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS)] that require prompt diagnosis and intervention. In this review, we discuss the role of imaging in diagnosing and monitoring toxicities from CAR T-cell therapies and explore the application of various imaging techniques, including use of PET/CT with novel radiotracers, to predict and assess treatment response and adverse effects. It is important for radiologists to recognize the imaging findings associated with each syndrome, as well as the typical and atypical treatment response patterns associated with CAR T-cell therapy. Given the expected increase in use of CAR T-cells in the near future, radiologists should familiarize themselves with the imaging findings encountered in these novel therapies, to provide comprehensive and up-to-date guidance for clinical management.

Central nervous system injury from novel cancer immunotherapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neurotoxicity from antineoplastic treatment remains a challenge in oncology. Cancer treatment-induced central nervous system (CNS) injury can be therapy-limiting, severely disabling, and even fatal. While emerging cancer immunotherapies have revolutionized oncology during the past decade, their immunomodulatory properties can cause immune-related adverse effects (IRAE) across organ systems, including the nervous system. Central neurologic IRAEs from chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) are challenging complications of such therapies.We aim to provide clinicians with a comprehensive review of the relevant forms of CAR-T and ICPI-associated CNS toxicity, focusing on clinical features of such complications, diagnostic workup, predictive biomarkers, and management considerations in affected patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unique forms of CAR-T and ICPI-related CNS toxicity have been characterized in the recent literature. CAR-T-related neurotoxicity is common and clinically well delineated. ICPI-related CNS toxicity is relatively rare but includes a heterogenous spectrum of severe and diagnostically challenging conditions. While putative risk factors, neurotoxicity biomarkers, imaging correlates and treatment strategies have been put forward, development of tailored diagnostic and management consensus guidelines awaits further clinical investigation.

SUMMARY

As CAR-T and ICPI become more widely adopted, early recognition, documentation, and management of immunotherapy-related CNS toxicity are of paramount importance in the clinical setting.

Novel Use of Extracorporeal Blood Purification for Treatment of Severe, Refractory Neurotoxicity After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy-A Case Report

BACKGROUND:

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR-T) are transforming the treatment of B-cell leukemias and lymphomas. Cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome represent common, potentially life-threatening toxicities from chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy treatment.

CASE SUMMARY:

We present a 53-year-old patient with primary refractory high-grade B-cell lymphoma who developed severe, refractory neurotoxicity following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy but exhibited complete recovery after extracorporeal blood purification with CytoSorb (CytoSorbents, Monmouth Junction, NJ).

Six days after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy infusion, the patient developed cytokine release syndrome grade 3, prompting administration of dexamethasone and tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor. His C-reactive protein levels started to decrease with tocilizumab and dexamethasone treatments. However, his ferritin levels continued to rise, and his interleukin-6 levels were above the upper detection threshold. Thirty-six hours later, the patient showed improved cytokine release syndrome but developed severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome with predominant encephalopathy (grade 3) despite treatment with dexamethasone/methylprednisolone, tocilizumab, and anakinra. We therefore sought a rescue strategy to remove inflammatory mediators. Following emergency use authorization, we initiated extracorporeal blood purification with CytoSorb (CytoSorbents).

Four-day extracorporeal blood purification resulted in complete resolution of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome and greater than 95% reduction in interleukin-6 levels without side effects. The patient was discharged home 10 days later with no signs of neurotoxicity or other secondary end-organ dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our case represents the first reported, successful application of extracorporeal blood purification with CytoSorb (CytoSorbents) to treat severe, refractory neurotoxicity following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

Neurochemical biomarkers to study CNS effects of COVID-19: a narrative review and synthesis

Neurological symptoms are frequently reported in patients suffering from COVID‐19. Common CNS‐related symptoms include anosmia, caused by viral interaction with either neurons or supporting cells in nasal olfactory tissues. Diffuse encephalopathy is the most common sign of CNS dysfunction, which likely results from the CNS consequences of the systemic inflammatory syndrome associated with severe COVID‐19. Additionally, microvascular injuries and thromboembolic events likely contribute to the neurologic impact of acute COVID‐19. These observations are supported by evidence of CNS immune activation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and in autopsy tissue, along with the detection of microvascular injuries in both pathological and neuroimaging studies. The frequent occurrence of thromboembolic events in patients with COVID‐19 has generated different hypotheses, among which viral interaction with perivascular cells is particularly attractive, yet unproven. A distinguishing feature of CSF findings in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is that clinical signs characteristic of neurotropic viral infections (CSF pleocytosis and blood–brain barrier injury) are mild or absent. Moreover, virus detection in CSF is rare and often of uncertain significance. In this review, we provide an overview of the neurological impact that occurs in the acute phase of COVID‐19, and the role of CSF biomarkers in the clinical management and research to better treat and understand the disease. In addition to aiding as diagnostic and prognostic tools during acute infection, the use of comprehensive and well‐characterized CSF and blood biomarkers will be vital in understanding the potential impact on the CNS in the rapidly increasing number of individuals recovering from COVID‐19.

Factors Associated with Costs in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Malignancies

Background:

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-Ts) constitute a novel therapeutic strategy for relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. CAR-T therapy has been extensively applied in the clinical setting; however, few systematic studies have evaluated the cost of CAR-T treatment. This study was conducted to evaluate the total cost and cost structure of CAR-T therapy and identify potential risk factors leading to increased costs.

Methods:

We identified the associated risk factors in 89 patients in a phase 1/2 study. The cohort included patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n = 55) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL, n = 34).

Results:

Overall, the treatment of the ALL cohort was costlier than that of the NHL cohort (P < 0.001). Furthermore, in the ALL cohort, it was costlier to treat patients with a high tumor burden (P < 0.001), high cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grade (P < 0.001), and complications of infection after CAR-T cell infusion (CTI) in the whole cohort (P = 0.013) than patients with a low tumor burden, with low CRS grade, and without infection, respectively. CRS grade and length of stay (P ≤ 0.005) were independent risk factors associated with the total cost in both the ALL and NHL cohorts during CAR-T therapy. A high tumor burden, duration of fever, and treatment with tocilizumab were independent risk factors associated with the total cost in the ALL cohort (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

CAR-T treatment should be extended to patients with a low tumor burden or patients in a state of complete remission, and a corticosteroid approach, as opposed to tocilizumab, may reduce costs.

Clinical Predictors of Neurotoxicity After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

Importance

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory hematologic malignant neoplasm causes severe neurologic adverse events ranging from encephalopathy and aphasia to cerebral edema and death. The cause of neurotoxicity is incompletely understood, and its unpredictability is a reason for prolonged hospitalization after CAR T-cell infusion.

Objective

To identify clinical and laboratory parameters predictive of neurotoxicity and to develop a prognostic score associated with its risk.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-center diagnostic/prognostic accuracy study was conducted at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute from April 2015 to February 2020. A consecutive sample of all patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel for relapsed or refractory lymphoma were assessed for inclusion (n = 213). Patients who had previously received CAR T cells or who were treated for mantle cell lymphoma were excluded (n = 9). Patients were followed up for a minimum of 30 days from the date of CAR T-cell infusion.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were measures of performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve) of a diagnostic tool to predict the occurrence of CAR-associated neurotoxicity, as graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria.

Results

Two hundred four patients (127 men [62.2%]; mean [SD] age, 60.0 [12.1] years) were included in the analysis, of which 126 (61.8%) comprised a derivation cohort and 78 (38.2%), an internal validation cohort. Seventy-three patients (57.9%) in the derivation cohort and 45 patients (57.7%) in the validation cohort experienced neurotoxicity. Clinical and laboratory values obtained early in admission were used to develop a multivariable score that can predict the subsequent development of neurotoxicity; when tested on an internal validation cohort, this score had an area under the curve of 74%, an accuracy of 77%, a sensitivity of 82%, and a specificity of 70% (positive:negative likelihood ratio, 2.71:0.26).

Conclusions and Relevance

The score developed in this study may help predict which patients are likely to experience CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity. The score can be used for triaging and resource allocation and may allow a large proportion of patients to be discharged from the hospital early.

CAR-HEMATOTOX: A model for CAR T-cell related hematological toxicity in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma

Hematotoxicity represents a frequent chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell related adverse event and remains poorly understood. In this multicenter analysis, we studied patterns of hematopoietic reconstitution and evaluated potential predictive markers in 258 patients receiving Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) or Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel) for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. We observed profound (ANC<100/µl) and prolonged (≥day 21) neutropenia in 72 and 64% of patients respectively. The median duration of severe neutropenia (ANC<500/µl) was 9 days. We aimed to identify predictive biomarkers of hematotoxicity using the duration of severe neutropenia until day +60 as the primary endpoint. In the training cohort (n=58), we observed a significant correlation with baseline thrombocytopenia (r= -0.43, P=0.001) and hyperferritinemia (r=0.54, P<0.0001) on uni- and multivariate analysis. Incidence and severity of CRS, ICANS and peak cytokine levels were not associated with the primary endpoint. We calculated the CAR-HEMATOTOX model, which included markers associated with hematopoietic reserve (e.g. platelet count, hemoglobin and ANC) and baseline inflammation (e.g. C-reactive-protein, ferritin). This model was validated in two independent cohorts from Europe (n=91) and the USA (n=109), and discriminated patients with severe neutropenia ≥/<14 days (pooled validation: AUC=0.89, Sensitivity 89%, Specificity 68%). A high CAR-HEMATOTOX score resulted in a longer duration of neutropenia (12 vs. 5.5 days, P<0.001), and a higher incidence of severe thrombocytopenia (87% vs. 34%, P<0.001) and anemia (96% vs. 40%, P<0.001). The score implicates pre-CART bone marrow reserve and inflammatory state as key features associated with delayed cytopenia and will be useful for risk-adapted management of hematotoxicity.

Neurological Immunotoxicity from Cancer Treatment

The emergence of immune-based treatments for cancer has led to a growing field dedicated to understanding and managing iatrogenic immunotoxicities that arise from these agents. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can develop as isolated events or as toxicities affecting multiple body systems. In particular, this review details the neurological irAEs from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapies. The recognition and treatment of neurological irAEs has variable success, depending on the severity and nature of the neurological involvement. Understanding the involved mechanisms, predicting those at higher risk for irAEs, and establishing safety parameters for resuming cancer immunotherapies after irAEs are all important fields of ongoing research.

Toci or not toci: innovations in the diagnosis, prevention, and early management of cytokine release syndrome

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) remains a significant toxicity of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy for hematologic malignancies. While established guidelines exist for the management of Grade 2+ CRS with immunosuppressive agents such as tocilizumab or corticosteroids, the management of early-grade CRS (i.e. Grade 1 CRS with isolated fevers) has no such consensus beyond supportive care. In this review, we discuss early-grade CRS with an emphasis on its diagnosis, management, and prevention. Strategies to target early-grade CRS include immunosuppression preemptively (once CRS develops) or prophylactically (before CRS develops) as well as novel small-molecule inhibitors or fractionated CAR-T dosing. In the near future, next-generation CAR-T therapies may be able to target CRS precisely or obviate CRS entirely. If shown to prevent CRS-associated morbidity while maintaining therapeutic anti-neoplastic efficacy, these innovative strategies will enhance the safety of CAR-T therapy while also improving its operationalization and accessibility in the real-world setting.

CAR-T Cell Therapy: Mechanism, Management, and Mitigation of Inflammatory Toxicities

Engineered T cell therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) expressing T cells (CAR-T cells) have great potential to treat many human diseases; however, inflammatory toxicities associated with these therapies present safety risks and can greatly limit its widespread use. This article briefly reviews our current understanding of mechanisms for inflammatory toxicities during CAR T-cell therapy, current strategies for management and mitigation of these risks and highlights key areas of knowledge gap for future research.

Incidence and Risk Factors Associated with Infection after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-Ts) constitute a novel therapeutic strategy for relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. With the extensive application of CAR-T therapy in clinical settings, CAR-T-associated toxicities have become increasingly apparent. However, information regarding the associated infections is limited. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of infection during CAR-T therapy and identify the potential risk factors. Especially, we evaluated infections and the associated risk factors in 92 patients. The cohort included patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 58) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 34). Fifteen cases of infection (predominantly bacterial) were observed within 28 days of CAR-T therapy, with an infection density of 0.5 infections for every 100 days-at-risk. Neutropenia before CAR-T therapy (P = .005) and prior infection (P = .046) were independent risk factors associated with infection within 28 days after CAR-T therapy; corticosteroid treatment during cytokine release syndrome (P = .013) was an independent risk factor during days 29-180 after CAR-T infusions. Moreover, the 2-year survival duration was significantly shorter in patients with infections than in those without (126 vs 409 days; P = .006). Our results suggested that effective anti-infection therapies may improve prognosis of patients who have a high infection risk. The risk of bacterial infections during the early stages of CAR-T therapy and the subsequent risk of viral infections thereafter should be considered to provide the appropriate treatment and improve patient prognosis.

The "Magic Bullet" Is Here? Cell-Based Immunotherapies for Hematological Malignancies in the Twilight of the Chemotherapy Era

Despite the introduction of a plethora of different anti-neoplastic approaches including standard chemotherapy, molecularly targeted small-molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and finally hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), there is still a need for novel therapeutic options with the potential to cure hematological malignancies. Although nowadays HSCT already offers a curative effect, its implementation is largely limited by the age and frailty of the patient. Moreover, its efficacy in combating the malignancy with graft-versus-tumor effect frequently coexists with undesirable graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Therefore, it seems that cell-based adoptive immunotherapies may constitute optimal strategies to be successfully incorporated into the standard therapeutic protocols. Thus, modern cell-based immunotherapy may finally represent the long-awaited "magic bullet" against cancer. However, enhancing the safety and efficacy of this treatment regimen still presents many challenges. In this review, we summarize the up-to-date state of the art concerning the use of CAR-T cells and NK-cell-based immunotherapies in hemato-oncology, identify possible obstacles, and delineate further perspectives.

CAR T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma: state of the art and prospects

Chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) are fusion proteins containing an antigen-recognition domain coupled to a T-cell activation domain (eg, CD3ζ [CD247]) and to a costimulatory domain (eg, CD28 or 4-1BB [TNFRSF9, also known as CD137]). The B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA; TNFRSF17) is an attractive target for CAR T-cell therapy because it is only expressed by normal and malignant plasma cells and by a subset of mature B cells. Several trials of anti-BCMA CAR T cells have shown high-quality responses, including minimal residual disease-negativity in patients with multiple myeloma who were heavily pretreated. Phase 3 trials are currently evaluating CAR T-cell therapy versus standard-of-care regimens in patients in earlier stages of the disease. Trials are also ongoing in newly diagnosed patients with high-risk cytogenetic profiles or with residual disease after transplantation. CAR T cells targeting other multiple myeloma antigens, such as CD19, CD38, CD138 (SYND1), and SLAMF7, are also being explored. Toxicities associated with CAR T cells include cytokine-release syndrome, different types of cytopenia, infections, and neurotoxicity. Although some subsets of patients have sustained responses for more than 1 year, most patients eventually relapse, which might be related to the loss of CAR T cells, loss of antigen expression on the tumour cell surface, or to an immunosuppressive microenvironment that impairs the activity of T cells. Efforts to improve the effectiveness of CAR T-cell therapy include optimising CAR design and adapting the manufacturing process to generate cell products enriched for specific subsets of T cells (eg, early memory cells). Other strategies explored in trials include dual-antigen targeting to prevent antigen escape and rational combination therapy to enhance persistence. Several approaches are also being developed to improve the safety of CAR T-cell therapy, such as the incorporation of a suicide gene safety system.

Metabolic flexibility determines human NK cell functional fate in the tumor microenvironment

NK cells are central to anti-tumor immunity and recently showed efficacy for treating hematologic malignancies. However, their dysfunction in the hostile tumor microenvironment remains a pivotal barrier for cancer immunotherapies against solid tumors. Using cancer patient samples and proteomics, we found that human NK cell dysfunction in the tumor microenvironment is due to suppression of glucose metabolism via lipid peroxidation-associated oxidative stress. Activation of the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway restored NK cell metabolism and function and resulted in greater anti-tumor activity in vivo. Strikingly, expanded NK cells reprogrammed with complete metabolic substrate flexibility not only sustained metabolic fitness but paradoxically augmented their tumor killing in the tumor microenvironment and in response to nutrient deprivation. Our results uncover that metabolic flexibility enables a cytotoxic immune cell to exploit the metabolic hostility of tumors for their advantage, addressing a critical hurdle for cancer immunotherapy.

CAR T-Cell Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies: Clinical Role, Toxicity, and Unanswered Questions

At the time of writing, five anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for seven different indications in lymphoid malignancies, including B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. CAR T cells for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, and less common malignancies such as T-cell lymphomas and Hodgkin lymphoma are being tested in early-phase clinical trials worldwide. The purpose of this overview is to describe the current landscape of CAR T cells in hematologic malignancies, outline their outcomes and toxicities, and explain the outstanding questions that remain to be addressed.

Cognitive and behavioral manifestations in SARS-CoV-2 infection: not specific or distinctive features?

Patients with COVID-19 are increasingly reported to suffer from a wide range of neurological complications, affecting both the central and peripheral nervous system. Among central manifestations, cognitive and behavioral symptoms are to date not exhaustively detailed. Furthermore, it is not clear whether these represent a combination of non-specific complications of a severe systemic disease, not differing from those usually seen in patients suffering from heterogenous pathological conditions affecting the central nervous system, or instead, they are a peculiar expression of COVID-19 neurotropism; in other words, if the infection has a coincidental or causal role in such patients. We examined both hypotheses, reporting opposite points of view, with the aim to stimulate discussion and raise awareness of the topic.

Beyond the storm - subacute toxicities and late effects in children receiving CAR T cells

As clinical advances with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are increasingly described and the potential for extending their therapeutic benefit grows, optimizing the implementation of this therapeutic modality is imperative. The recognition and management of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) marked a milestone in this field; however, beyond the understanding gained in treating CRS, a host of additional toxicities and/or potential late effects of CAR T cell therapy warrant further investigation. A multicentre initiative involving experts in paediatric cell therapy, supportive care and/or study of late effects from cancer and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation was convened to facilitate the comprehensive study of extended CAR T cell-mediated toxicities and establish a framework for new systematic investigations of CAR T cell-related adverse events. Together, this group identified six key focus areas: extended monitoring of neurotoxicity and neurocognitive function, psychosocial considerations, infection and immune reconstitution, other end organ toxicities, evaluation of subsequent neoplasms, and strategies to optimize remission durability. Herein, we present the current understanding, gaps in knowledge and future directions of research addressing these CAR T cell-related outcomes. This systematic framework to study extended toxicities and optimization strategies will facilitate the translation of acquired experience and knowledge for optimal application of CAR T cell therapies.

The Potential Role of the Intestinal Micromilieu and Individual Microbes in the Immunobiology of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

Cellular immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells (CARTs) represents a breakthrough in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. CARTs are genetically engineered hybrid receptors that combine antigen-specificity of monoclonal antibodies with T cell function to direct patient-derived T cells to kill malignant cells expressing the target (tumor) antigen. CARTs have been introduced into clinical medicine as CD19-targeted CARTs for refractory and relapsed B cell malignancies. Despite high initial response rates, current CART therapies are limited by a long-term loss of antitumor efficacy, the occurrence of toxicities, and the lack of biomarkers for predicting therapy and toxicity outcomes. In the past decade, the gut microbiome of mammals has been extensively studied and evidence is accumulating that human health, apart from our own genome, largely depends on microbes that are living in and on the human body. The microbiome encompasses more than 1000 bacterial species who collectively encode a metagenome that guides multifaceted, bidirectional host-microbiome interactions, primarily through the action of microbial metabolites. Increasing knowledge has been accumulated on the role of the gut microbiome in T cell-driven anticancer immunotherapy. It has been shown that antibiotics, dietary components and gut microbes reciprocally affect the efficacy and toxicity of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo HCT) as the prototype of T cell-based immunotherapy for hematologic malignancies, and that microbiome diversity metrics can predict clinical outcomes of allo HCTs. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive overview of the principles of CD19-CART immunotherapy and major aspects of the gut microbiome and its modulators that impact antitumor T cell transfer therapies. We will outline i) the extrinsic and intrinsic variables that can contribute to the complex interaction of the gut microbiome and host in CART immunotherapy, including ii) antibiotic administration affecting loss of colonization resistance, expansion of pathobionts and disturbed mucosal and immunological homeostasis, and ii) the role of specific gut commensals and their microbial virulence factors in host immunity and inflammation. Although the role of the gut microbiome in CART immunotherapy has only been marginally explored so far, this review may open a new chapter and views on putative connections and mechanisms.

[Toxicity after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy : Overview and management of early and late onset side effects]

BACKGROUND

The transfusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‑cells has become established as a new treatment option in oncology; however, this is regularly associated with immune-mediated side effects, which can also run a severe course and necessitate a specific treatment and intensive medical treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature review was carried out on CAR T-cell therapy, toxicities and the management of side effects.

RESULTS

The cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) regularly occur shortly after CAR T-cell treatment. The symptoms of CRS can range from mild flu-like symptoms to multiorgan failure. In addition to mild symptoms, such as disorientation and aphasia, ICANS can also lead to convulsive seizures and brain edema. The management of CRS and ICANS is based on the severity according to the grading of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT). Tocilizumab and corticosteroids are recommended for CRS and corticosteroids are used for ICANS. In the further course persisting hypogammaglobulinemia and cytopenia are frequent even months after the initial treatment and promote infections even months after CAR T‑cell therapy.

DISCUSSION

Potentially severe complications regularly occur after CAR T-cell therapy. An interdisciplinary cooperation between intensive care physicians, hematologists, neurologists and specialists in other disciplines is of decisive importance for the optimal care of patients after CAR T‑cell therapy.

CAR T-Cells for CNS Lymphoma: Driving into New Terrain?

Primary CNS lymphomas (PCNSL) represent a group of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas and secondary CNS lymphomas refer to secondary involvement of the neuroaxis by systemic disease. CNS lymphomas are associated with limited prognosis even after aggressive multimodal therapy. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells have proven as a promising therapeutic avenue in hematological B-cell malignancies including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and mantle-cell lymphoma. CARs endow an autologous T-cell population with MHC-unrestricted effectivity against tumor target antigens such as the pan B-cell marker CD19. In PCNSL, compelling and long-lasting anti-tumor effects of such therapy have been shown in murine immunocompromised models. In clinical studies on CAR T-cells for CNS lymphoma, only limited data are available and often include both patients with PCNSL but also patients with secondary CNS lymphoma. Several clinical trials on CAR T-cell therapy for primary and secondary CNS lymphoma are currently ongoing. Extrapolated from the available preliminary data, an overall acceptable safety profile with considerable anti-tumor effects might be expected. Whether these beneficial anti-tumor effects are as long-lasting as in animal models is currently in doubt; and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of the brain may be among the most pivotal factors limiting efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in CNS lymphoma. Based on an increasing understanding of CAR T-cell interactions with the tumor cells as well as the cerebral tissue, modifications of CAR design or the combination of CAR T-cell therapy with other therapeutic approaches may aid to release the full therapeutic efficiency of CAR T-cells. CAR T-cells may therefore emerge as a novel treatment strategy in primary and secondary CNS lymphoma.

Cytokine release syndrome and associated neurotoxicity in cancer immunotherapy

A paradigm shift has recently occurred in the field of cancer therapeutics. Traditional anticancer agents, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and small-molecule drugs targeting specific signalling pathways, have been joined by cellular immunotherapies based on T cell engineering. The rapid adoption of novel, patient-specific cellular therapies builds on scientific developments in tumour immunology, genetic engineering and cell manufacturing, best illustrated by the curative potential of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy targeting CD19-expressing malignancies. However, the clinical benefit observed in many patients may come at a cost. In up to one-third of patients, significant toxicities occur that are directly associated with the induction of powerful immune effector responses. The most frequently observed immune-mediated toxicities are cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. This Review discusses our current understanding of their pathophysiology and clinical features, as well as the development of novel therapeutics for their prevention and/or management.

This Review discusses our current understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies, and how this might be used for the prevention or management of these toxicities.

Clinical and radiologic correlates of neurotoxicity after axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma

Neurotoxicity or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is the second most common acute toxicity after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. However, there are limited data on the clinical and radiologic correlates of ICANS. We conducted a cohort analysis of 100 consecutive patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with standard of care axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). ICANS was graded according to an objective grading system. Neuroimaging studies and electroencephalograms (EEGs) were reviewed by an expert neuroradiologist and neurologist. Of 100 patients included in the study, 68 (68%) developed ICANS of any grade and 41 (41%) had grade ≥3. Median time to ICANS onset was 5 days, and median duration was 6 days. ICANS grade ≥3 was associated with high peak ferritin (P = .03) and C-reactive protein (P = .001) levels and a low peak monocyte count (P = .001) within the 30 days after axi-cel infusion. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 38 patients with ICANS and revealed 4 imaging patterns with features of encephalitis (n = 7), stroke (n = 3), leptomeningeal disease (n = 2), and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (n = 2). Abnormalities noted on EEG included diffuse slowing (n = 49), epileptiform discharges (n = 6), and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (n = 8). Although reversible, grade ≥3 ICANS was associated with significantly shorter progression-free (P = .02) and overall survival (progression being the most common cause of death; P = .001). Our results suggest that imaging and EEG abnormalities are common in patients with ICANS, and high-grade ICANS is associated with worse outcome after CAR T-cell therapy in LBCL patients.

Comparing CAR T-cell toxicity grading systems: application of the ASTCT grading system and implications for management

Various grading systems are currently used for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell-related toxicity, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). We compared the recently proposed American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) grading system to other grading scores in 2 populations of adults: patients (n = 53) with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) treated with 1928z CAR T-cells (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01044069), and patients (n = 49) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with axicabtagene-ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel after US Food and Drug Administration approval. According to ASTCT grading, 82% of patients had CRS, 87% in the B-ALL and 77% in the DLBCL groups (axi-cel: 86%, tisagenlecleucel: 54%), whereas 50% of patients experienced ICANS, 55% in the B-ALL and 45% in the DLBCL groups (axi-cel: 55%, tisagenlecleucel: 15%). All grading systems agreed on CRS and ICANS diagnosis in 99% and 91% of cases, respectively. However, when analyzed grade by grade, only 25% and 54% of patients had the same grade in each system for CRS and ICANS, respectively, as different systems score symptoms differently (upgrading or downgrading their severity), leading to inconsistent final grades. Investigation of possible management implications in DLBCL patients showed that different recommendations on tocilizumab and steroids across current guidelines potentially result in either overtreating or delaying treatment. Moreover, because these guidelines are based on single products and different grading systems, they cannot be universally applied. To avoid discrepancies in assessing and managing toxicities of different products, we propose that unified grading be used across clinical trials and in practice and that paired management guidelines with product-specific indications be developed.

Tumor burden, inflammation, and product attributes determine outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma

ZUMA-1 demonstrated a high rate of durable response and a manageable safety profile with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, in patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma. As previously reported, prespecified clinical covariates for secondary end point analysis were not clearly predictive of efficacy; these included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1), age, disease subtype, disease stage, and International Prognostic Index score. We interrogated covariates included in the statistical analysis plan and an extensive panel of biomarkers according to an expanded translational biomarker plan. Univariable and multivariable analyses indicated that rapid CAR T-cell expansion commensurate with pretreatment tumor burden (influenced by product T-cell fitness), the number of CD8 and CCR7+CD45RA+ T cells infused, and host systemic inflammation, were the most significant determining factors for durable response. Key parameters differentially associated with clinical efficacy and toxicities, with both theoretical and practical implications for optimizing CAR T-cell therapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02348216.

Infusion reactions in natural killer cell immunotherapy: a retrospective review

BACKGROUND AIMS

The use of natural killer (NK) cells as a cellular immunotherapy has increased over the past decade, specifically in patients with hematologic malignancies. NK cells have been used at the authors' institution for over 15 years. Most patients have a reaction to NK cell infusion. The authors retrospectively analyzed the reactions associated with NK cell infusions to characterize the types of reactions and investigate why some patients have higher-grade reactions than others.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of NK cell infusions was performed at the authors' institution under nine clinical protocols from 2008 to 2016. An infusion reaction was defined as any symptom from the time of NK cell infusion up to 4 h after infusion completion. The severity of infusion reactions was graded based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4. Two major endpoints of interest were (i) infusion reaction with any symptom and (ii) grade ≥3 infusion reaction. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between variables of interest and outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained for each variable.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were receiving NK cell infusions at the authors' institution. The most common reported symptom was chills (n = 110, 85%), which were mostly grade 1 and 2, with only half of patients requiring intervention. There were 118 (91%) patients with infusion reactions, and only 36 (28%) were grade 3. There was one life-threatening grade 4 reaction, and no death was reported due to infusion reaction. Among grade ≥3 reactions, cardiovascular reactions (mainly hypertension) were the most common, and less than half of those with hypertension required intervention. NK cell dose was not associated with any of the grade 3 infusion reactions, whereas monocyte dose was associated with headache (grade ≤3, OR, 2.17, 95% CI, 1.19-3.97) and cardiovascular reaction (grade ≥3, OR, 2.13, 95% CI, 1.13-3.99). Cardiovascular reaction (grade ≥3) was also associated with in vitro IL-2 incubation and storage time. Additionally, there was no association between grade ≥3 infusion reactions and overall response rate (OR, 0.75, 95% CI, 0.29-1.95).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients who receive NK cell therapy experience grade 1 or 2 infusion reactions. Some patients experience grade 3 reactions, which are mainly cardiovascular, suggesting that close monitoring within the first 4 h is beneficial. The association of monocytes with NK cell infusion reaction relates to toxicities seen in adoptive T-cell therapy and needs further exploration.

An owner's manual for CD19 "CAR"-T cell therapy in managing pediatric and young adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Despite excellent cure rates in newly diagnosed patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), therapies that improve outcomes for children with relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-ALL are needed. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has demonstrated durable responses and a manageable safety profile in children, adolescents, and young adults less than 26 years old with r/r B-ALL, including patients who have relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplant. This comprehensive review summarizes current data, management practices, and future directions for the treatment of r/r B-ALL in pediatric and young adult patients with CAR-T cell therapy, including patient selection, patient preparation, and CAR-T cell infusion, as well as monitoring and management of short- and long-term safety events, long-term surveillance, and survivorship. Clinical trials registration number: N/A.

Outcomes in patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy who were admitted to intensive care (CARTTAS): an international, multicentre, observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can induce side-effects such as cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), which often require intensive care unit admission. The aim of this study was to describe management of critically ill CAR T-cell recipients in intensive care.

METHODS

This international, multicentre, observational cohort study was done in 21 intensive care units in France, Spain, the USA, the UK, Russia, Canada, Germany, and Austria. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older; had received CAR T-cell therapy in the past 30 days; and had been admitted to intensive care for any reason. Investigators retrospectively included patients admitted between Feb 1, 2018, and Feb 1, 2019, and prospectively included patients admitted between March 1, 2019, and Feb 1, 2020. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, treatment, and outcome data were extracted from medical records. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Factors associated with mortality were identified using a Cox proportional hazard model.

FINDINGS

942 patients received CAR T-cell therapy, of whom 258 (27%) required admission to intensive care and 241 (26%) were included in the analysis. Admission to intensive care was needed within median 4·5 days (IQR 2·0-7·0) of CAR T-cell infusion. 90-day mortality was 22·4% (95% CI 17·1-27·7; 54 deaths). At initial evaluation on admission, isolated cytokine release syndrome was identified in 101 patients (42%), cytokine release syndrome and ICANS in 93 (39%), and isolated ICANS in seven (3%) patients. Grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome within 1 day of admission to intensive care was found in 50 (25%) of 200 patients and grade 3-4 ICANS in 38 (35%) of 108 patients. Bacterial infection developed in 30 (12%) patients. Life-saving treatments were used in 75 (31%) patients within 24 h of admission to intensive care, primarily vasoactive drugs in 65 (27%) patients. Factors independently associated with 90-day mortality by multivariable analysis were frailty (hazard ratio 2·51 [95% CI 1·37-4·57]), bacterial infection (2·12 [1·11-4·08]), and lifesaving therapy within 24 h of admission (1·80 [1·05-3·10]).

INTERPRETATION

Critical care management is an integral part of CAR T-cell therapy and should be standardised. Studies to improve infection prevention and treatment in these high-risk patients are warranted.

FUNDING

Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Réanimation Onco-Hématologique.