Intra-arterial iodine 131-labeled lipiodol as adjuvant therapy after curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 2 clinical study

Operational nuclear research reactors in the Asia-Pacific with potential for medical radionuclide production

Personalised cancer treatment is of growing importance and can be achieved via targeted radionuclide therapy. Radionuclides with theranostic properties are proving to be clinically effective and are widely used because diagnostic imaging and therapy can be accomplished using a single formulation that avoids additional procedures and unnecessary radiation burden to the patient. For diagnostic imaging, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) is used to obtain functional information noninvasively by detecting the gamma (γ) rays emitted from the radionuclide. For therapeutics, high linear energy transfer (LET) radiations such as alpha (α), beta (β - ) or Auger electrons are used to kill cancerous cells in close proximity, whereas sparing the normal tissues surrounding the malignant tumour cells. One of the most important factors that lead to the sustainable development of nuclear medicine is the availability of functional radiopharmaceuticals. Nuclear research reactors play a vital role in the production of medical radionuclides for incorporation into clinical radiopharmaceuticals. The disruption of medical radionuclide supplies in recent years has highlighted the importance of ongoing research reactor operation. This article reviews the current status of operational nuclear research reactors in the Asia-Pacific region that have the potential for medical radionuclide production. It also discusses the different types of nuclear research reactors, their operating power, and the effects of thermal neutron flux in producing desirable radionuclides with high specific activity for clinical applications.

An Overview of Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Partial hepatectomy, one of a few curative therapeutic modalities, is plagued by high recurrence rate of up to 70% at 5 years. Throughout the past 3 decades, many clinical trials have attempted to improve HCC recurrence rate following partial hepatectomy using adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment modalities such as antiviral therapy, brachytherapy, systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization, and radiotherapy. The goal of this review is to discuss the clinical trials pertaining to resectable HCC including surgical technique considerations, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant treatment modalities.

Advances in postoperative adjuvant therapy for primary liver cancer

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly heterogeneous, invasive, and conventional chemotherapy-insensitive tumor with unique biological characteristics. The main methods for the radical treatment of HCC are surgical resection or liver transplantation. However, recurrence rates are as high as 50% and 70% at 3 and 5 years after liver resection, respectively, and even in Milan-eligible recipients, the recurrence rate is approximately 20% at 5 years after liver transplantation. Therefore, reducing the postoperative recurrence rate is key to improving the overall outcome of liver cancer. This review discusses the risk factors for recurrence in patients with HCC radical surgical resection and adjuvant treatment options that may reduce the risk of recurrence and improve overall survival, including local adjuvant therapy (e.g., transcatheter arterial chemoembolization), adjuvant systemic therapy (e.g., molecular targeted agents and immunotherapy), and other adjuvant therapies (e.g., antiviral and herbal therapy). Finally, potential research directions that may change the paradigm of adjuvant therapy for HCC are analyzed.

Adjuvant treatment strategy after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatic resection represents the first-line treatment for patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the 5-year recurrence rates of HCC after surgery have been reported to range from 50% to 70%. In this review, we evaluated the available evidence for the efficiency of adjuvant treatments to prevent HCC recurrence after curative liver resection. Antiviral therapy has potential advantages in terms of reducing the recurrence rate and improving the overall survival (OS) and/or disease-free survival of patients with hepatitis-related HCC. Postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization can significantly reduce the intrahepatic recurrence rate and improve OS, especially for patients with a high risk of recurrence. The efficacy of molecular targeted drugs as an adjuvant therapy deserves further study. Adjuvant adoptive immunotherapy can significantly improve the clinical prognosis in the early stage. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies evaluating adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors are ongoing, and the results are highly expected. Adjuvant hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy might be beneficial in patients with vascular invasion. Huaier granule, a traditional Chinese medicine, has been proved to be effective in prolonging the recurrence-free survival and reducing extrahepatic recurrence. The efficiency of other adjuvant treatments needs to be further confirmed by large RCT studies.

History and development of radioembolization: an old idea with modern applications

The current review documents the major hallmarks in the history and development of radioembolization, the origins of which date back to the late 1940s. Radioembolization was initially abandoned because of the increased incidence of adverse effects and lack of commercial interest; however, it regained avid interest in clinical trials and has achieved established clinical utility in the last 15 years. This review focuses on the main stations of the evolution of radioembolization, namely, initial animal and human experimental studies, production of Y-microspheres, development of current therapeutic agents (resin and glass spheres and labeled Lipiodol), prediction and prevention of inadvertent, extrahepatic shunt side effects, initial prospective studies, and large randomized trials till final approval from the relevant official bodies. The historical knowledge of the initial concepts of the method and the limitations encountered may pave the way toward further evolution and possible new applications.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver malignancy worldwide and a major cause of cancer-related mortality for which liver resection is an important curative-intent treatment option. However, many patients present with advanced disease and with underlying chronic liver disease and/or cirrhosis, limiting the proportion of patients who are surgical candidates. In addition, the development of recurrent or de novo cancers following surgical resection is common. These issues have led investigators to evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies aimed at improving resectability rates and decreasing recurrence rates. While high-level evidence to guide treatment decision making is lacking, recent advances in locoregional and systemic therapies, including antiviral treatment and immunotherapy, raise the prospect of novel approaches that may improve the outcomes of patients with HCC. In this review, we evaluate the evidence for various neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies and discuss opportunities for future clinical and translational research.

Adjuvant I-131 Lipiodol After Resection or Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High rates of recurrence have been observed after curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The main aim of this study was to establish the influence of adjuvant transarterial radioembolization-based I-131 lipiodol on survival and recurrence.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2010, 38 patients were treated with adjuvant I-131 lipiodol therapy, at a dosage of 2220 MBq, within 4 months after surgery. This treated cohort was compared to a control cohort consisting of 42 consecutive patients operated prior to the time the I-131 lipiodol treatment became available.

RESULTS

Recurrence-free survival in the control and in the I-131 lipiodol cohort was 12.6 and 18.7 months, respectively (HR = 1.871, p = 0.025). At 2 and 5 years, the cumulative incidence of a first recurrence or death was, respectively, 50 % and 61 % in the treated cohort versus 69 % and 74 % in the control cohort. Median overall survival was 55 and 29 months, respectively (p = 0.051). Among patients with a recurrence at 2 years, more patients had already experienced such recurrence at 1 year in the control cohort (70 % vs 33 %, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant I-131 lipiodol improves disease-free survival in patients with HCC.

Survival and prognostic factors after adjuvant 131iodine-labeled lipiodol for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 106 patients over 20 years

OBJECTIVE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has high recurrence rate after curative treatment. The aim of the present study was to report our experience with adjuvant use of ¹³¹I-lipiodol after curative treatment of HCC in terms of recurrence and survival in a large cohort of patients with a long follow-up.

METHODS

All patients treated with ¹³¹I-lipiodol after curative treatment of HCC in two French centers from 1991 to 2009 were included in a retrospective cohort study.

RESULTS

One hundred and six patients were included. The median (range) follow-up was 6 years (0.3-22). Forty-three patients (41%) had cirrhosis. Recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 2, 5, 10, and 20 years were 73, 57, 40, 30, and 14%, respectively. Cirrhosis was an independent predictive factor of recurrence [RR = 1.18, 95% CI (1.11-3.02), p = 0.019]. Overall, survival rates at 1, 2, 5, 10, and 20 years were 90, 83, 59, 37, and 23%, respectively. Prognostic factors were recurrence [RR = 2.73, 95% CI (1.35-5.54); p = 0.005], age over 60 years (RR = 1.91, 95% CI [1.02-3.61]; p = 0.044), and tumor number over 3 [RR = 3.31, 95% CI (1.25-8.77); p = 0.016].

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the effect of ¹³¹I-lipiodol after curative treatment of HCC could be related to a beneficial impact on risk factors of early tumor recurrence. This could be evaluated in further studies using modern radioembolization methods.

On developing a pragmatic strategy for clinical trials: A case study of hepatocellular carcinoma

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with sufficiently high statistical power are not always feasible for patients when the administration of the treatment is burdensome. Nevertheless, useful information concerning the relative effectiveness of the Test and Standard therapies, may be gleaned from under powered trials, non-randomised comparative studies and/or clinician's beliefs: the latter possibly additionally providing some suggestion of the strength of evidence required in order to adopt the Test therapy into clinical practice. In such circumstances, a Bayesian synthesis may be useful in quantifying the evidence of treatment effectiveness. In this article, we aim to present a Bayesian approach for synthesizing the cumulative evidence of the use of adjuvant hepatic intra-arterial iodine-131-lipiodol (I131L) following curative resection in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We constructed a posterior distribution using the information from two small RCTs, three non-randomised comparative studies, three single arm studies and the views of investigators on the use of I131L. This distribution enables calculation of the probability that the Test therapy is more effective than the Standard by a pre-stipulated amount. If this is very high, then for example, one may conclude the Test may replace the Standard therapy. If it is not, then the Standard would be retained for clinical use. Despite a strong early indication of the effectiveness of I131L, the evolving evidence over a 10-year period became more sceptical of its value. Although highly recommended, difficulties of implementing a Bayesian approach in this context are highlighted.

Comparative survival analysis of adjuvant therapy with iodine-131-labeled lipiodol to hepatic resection of primary hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Adjuvant therapies play an important role in delaying the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with resectable tumor. Among the available options, use of radionuclides is an effective strategy. This meta-analysis aims to examine the evidence pertaining to the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy with intra-arterial iodine-131-labeled lipiodol ((131)I-lipiodol) to hepatic resection of HCC.

METHODS

A literature survey was conducted of multiple electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar using various combinations of the most relevant key terms. The odds ratio-based meta-analysis of recurrence and survival rates was performed with RevMan software (version 5.2) using a random-effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed by χ(2) and I(2) statistics.

RESULTS

When compared with the resection-only group, recurrence rates at 2 and 5 years were significantly lower in patients who received adjuvant therapy with intra-arterial I-lipiodol, with a corresponding odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.45 (0.29-0.70) and 0.52 (0.32-0.85), respectively. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were found to be significantly higher in patients who received adjuvant therapy with (131)I-lipiodol than in patients who were not given any adjuvant therapy. Between-study statistical heterogeneity was moderate.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative adjuvant therapy with intra-arterial (131)I-lipiodol to hepatic resection of HCC significantly improves overall and disease-free survival rates and reduces recurrence rates. However, well-designed randomized trials are needed to arrive at conclusive evidence.

Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of liver transplantation

The aim of management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is to improve the prognosis of the patients by radical resection and preserve remnant liver function. Although liver transplantation is associated with a lower tumor recurrence rate, this benefit is counteracted by long-term complications. Therefore, hepatectomy could be the first choice of treatment in selected patients with HCC. However, the higher frequency of tumor recurrence and the lower rate of resectability after hepatectomy for HCC led to an unsatisfactory prognosis. New strategies are required to improve the long-term outcome of HCC after hepatectomy. In this paper, we introduce some strategies to increase the low rate of resectability and reduce the high rate of tumor recurrence. Some aggressive treatments for tumor recurrence to extend long-term survival are also involved. We believe that hepatectomy combined with other therapies, such as portal vein embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, radioembolization, antiviral treatment, radiofrequency ablation and salvage transplantation, is a promising treatment modality for HCC and may improve survival greatly.

Adjuvant Intraarterial Lipiodol or ¹³¹I-Lipiodol After Curative Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Randomized Trial

The prevention of tumor recurrence after curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unresolved. Postoperative intraarterial injection of (131)I-labeled lipiodol has been proposed as adjuvant treatment. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to evaluate if a single dose of postoperative adjuvant intraarterial (131)I-lipiodol (vs. unlabeled lipiodol) could reduce the rate of intrahepatic recurrence at 2 y.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative treatment for HCC and recovered within 6 wk were randomly assigned to receive a single 2,200-MBq (131)I-lipiodol dose or a single unlabeled lipiodol dose on a 1:1 basis. Recurrence-free and overall survival rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between June 2005 and February 2009, we included 58 patients (median age of 63 y [range, 23-85 y]): 29 received intraarterial (131)I-lipiodol and 29 received lipiodol adjuvant treatment. At 2 y after treatment, the rate of patients with intrahepatic recurrence was 28% in the (131)I-lipiodol group and 56% in the lipiodol group (P = 0.0449). The Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed this result, with a 2-y recurrence-free survival in the (131)I-lipiodol and lipiodol groups of 73% and 45%, respectively (P = 0.0259). The 5-y recurrence-free survival rates in the (131)I-lipiodol and lipiodol groups were 40% and 0%, respectively (P = 0.0184). The overall and specific survivals were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.9378 and P = 0.1339, respectively). (131)I-lipiodol had no severe toxic effects.

CONCLUSION

After curative treatment of patients with HCC, one 2,200-MBq dose of intraarterial (131)I-lipiodol significantly decreased the rate of intrahepatic recurrence but failed to improve overall or specific survival.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by intra-arterial infusion of radio-emitter compounds: trans-arterial radio-embolisation of HCC

Traditional radiotherapy is only effective in treating hepatocellular cancer (HCC) in doses above 50 Gy, but this is above the recommended liver radiation exposure of about 35 Gy, which is an important limitation making this treatment unsuitable for routine clinical practice. Trans-arterial radio-embolisation (TARE), consists of delivery of compounds linked to radio-emitter particles which end up in hepatic end-arterioles or show affinity for the neoplasm itself, allowing localised delivery of doses beyond 120 Gy. These are well tolerated in patients treated with this type of internal radiation therapy. TARE for HCC is used for palliative treatment of advanced disease which cannot be treated in other ways, or for tumour down-staging before liver transplantation, or as adjuvant therapy for surgically resected HCC. Tumour response after TARE is between 25% and 60% if assessed by using RECIST criteria, and 80% by EASL criteria. In this review we outline the advantages and limitations of radio-emitter therapy including 131-I, 90-Y and 188-Re. We include several observational, and all comparative studies using these compounds. In particular we compare TARE to trans-arterial chemo-embolisation and other intra-arterial techniques.

Meta-analysis of interstitial pneumonia in studies evaluating iodine-131-labeled lipiodol for hepatocellular carcinoma using exact likelihood approach

PURPOSE

Iodine-131-labeled lipiodol is currently licensed for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal thrombosis. It is thought to be well tolerated. Cases of interstitial pneumonia have been reported, but their frequency (≈2%) has not been well estimated. Quantifying adverse drug event frequency requires an appropriate statistical approach because standard methods are biased.

METHODS

To estimate the frequency of interstitial pneumonia in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving iodine-131-labeled lipiodol, we conducted a systematic review of English articles using MEDLINE and EMBASE. All types of articles were considered except case reports. Primary outcome measure was symptomatic interstitial pneumonia based on investigators' judgment. All pooled analyses were based on a random effects meta-analysis model using an exact likelihood approach based on the binomial within-study distribution.

RESULTS

Ten studies, including 142 patients, used low activity per dose, ranging from 0.3 to 1.1 GBq. No respiratory adverse event was noticed in these studies. Eighteen studies, including 542 patients, evaluated higher activity per dose, around 2.2 GBq; 24 cases of interstitial pneumonia were reported in these studies. Estimated frequency of interstitial pneumonia was 1.6% (95%CI, 0.4-6.4%) after one high dose and 4.1% (95%CI, 1.0-16.0%) after two or more high doses.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of interstitial pneumonia appears higher and more precise than previously estimated. The risk appears to be related to the number of injections and the dose level per injection. Generalized linear mixed models using the exact binomial within-study distribution initially described to summarize data on diagnostic evaluation could be relevant for drug-related adverse reaction frequency assessment.

Iodine-131-lipiodol therapy in hepatic tumours

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is worldwide sharply on the rise and patients with advanced disease carry a poor prognosis. HCC is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer associated deaths in the world. Intra-arterially administered (131)I-Lipiodol is selectively retained by hepatocellular carcinomas, and has been used as a vehicle for delivery of therapeutic agents to these tumours. In this review we focus on the therapeutic indications, usefulness and methods of treatment with 131-Iodine Lipiodol. The effectiveness of (131)I-Lipiodol treatment is proven both in the treatment of HCC with portal thrombosis and also as an adjuvant to surgery after the resection of HCCs. It is at least as effective as chemoembolization and is tolerated much better. Severe liver dysfunction represents theoretic contraindication for radioembolization as well as for TACE. In such cases (131)I-Lipiodol is an alternative therapy option especially in tumours smaller than 6cm.

Stereotactic radiation therapy and selective internal radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Recent technological advances allow precise and safe radiation delivery in hepatocellular carcinoma. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a conformal external beam radiation technique that uses a small number of relatively large fractions to deliver potent doses of radiation therapy to extracranial sites. It requires stringent breathing motion control and image guidance. Selective internal radiotherapy or radioembolization refers to the injection of radioisotopes, usually delivered to liver tumors via the hepatic artery. Clinical results for both treatments show that excellent local control is possible with acceptable toxicity. Most appropriate patient populations and when which type of radiation therapy should be best employed in the vast therapeutic armamentarium of hepatocellular carcinoma are still to be clarified.

Adjuvant lipiodol I-131 after curative resection/ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

A total of 329 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma have been treated at our unit since 1990. Following the randomized controlled trial in Hong Kong by Lau et al. in 1999, patients have been offered adjuvant lipiodol I-131. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of adjuvant lipiodol I-131, following potentially curative surgery with resection and/or ablation, on overall and disease-free survival rates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The prospectively updated hepatocellular carcinoma database was analysed retrospectively. A total of 34 patients were identified to have received adjuvant lipiodol I-131 post-curative treatment with surgical resection and/or ablation. Patient demographics, clinical, surgical, pathology, and survival data were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Three patients received ablation alone, 24 resection, and 7 resection and ablation. Of the 34 patients treated, there were 2 possible cases of treatment-related fatality (pneumonitis and liver failure). Potential prognostic factors studied for effect on survival included age, gender, serum AFP concentration, Child-Pugh score, cirrhosis, tumor size, portal vein tumor thrombus, tumor rupture, and vascular and margin involvement. The median follow-up duration was 23.3 months. The overall median survival was 40.1 months, while the overall survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 87.1%, 71.7%, 60.7%, and 49.6%, respectively. Median duration to recurrence was 22.3 months.

CONCLUSION

Administration of adjuvant lipiodol I-131 is associated with good overall survival.

Adjuvant intra-arterial iodine-131-labeled lipiodol for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial-update on 5-year and 10-year survival

OBJECTIVE

In this prospective randomized trial, we attempted to find out if 1 dose of postoperative adjuvant intra-arterial iodine-131-labeled lipiodol could reduce the rate of local recurrence, and increase disease-free and overall survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study evaluated the long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND

Resection of HCC is potentially curative, but local recurrence is common. However, there is currently no effective adjuvant therapy. Early results after closing the trial (Lau et al. Lancet 1999;353:797-801) showed that 1 dose of intra-arterial I-lipiodol given after curative resection significantly decreased the rate of recurrence, and increased disease-free and overall survival.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative resection for HCC and recovered within 6 weeks were randomly assigned one 1850 MBq dose of I-lipiodol or no further treatment (controls). We compared rates of recurrence, and long-term disease-free and overall survival (the primary endpoints) between the 2 groups by intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

Between April 1992 and August 1997, we recruited 43 patients: 21 were randomized to receive intra-arterial I-lipiodol and 22 to receive no adjuvant treatment. I-lipiodol had no significant toxic effects. During a median follow-up of 66 (range, 3-198) months, there were 10 (47.6%) recurrences among the 21 patients in the adjuvant treatment group, compared with 14 (63.6%) in the control group (P = 0.29). The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival in the treatment and control groups was 61.9% and 31.8%, respectively (P = 0.0397). The actuarial 5-year overall survival in the treatment and control groups was 66.7% and 36.4%, respectively (P = 0.0433). The actuarial 7-year disease-free survival in the treatment and control groups was 52.4% and 31.8%, respectively (P = 0.0224). The actuarial 7-year overall survival in the treatment and control groups was 66.7% and 31.8%, respectively (P = 0.0243). The actuarial 10-year disease-free survival in the treatment and control groups was 47.6% and 27.3%, respectively (P = 0.0892). The actuarial 10-year overall survival in the treatment and control groups was 52.4% and 27.3%, respectively (P = 0.0905).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HCC, adjuvant intra-arterial I-lipiodol after curative liver resection provided survival benefit on the disease-free survival and overall survival, although the difference became statistically insignificant at 8 years after randomization.

Targeted therapy in nuclear medicine—current status and future prospects

In recent years, a number of new developments in targeted therapies using radiolabeled compounds have emerged. New developments and insights in radioiodine treatment of thyroid cancer, treatment of lymphoma and solid tumors with radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), the developments in the application of radiolabeled small receptor-specific molecules such as meta-iodobenzylguanidine and peptides and the position of locoregional treatment in malignant involvement of the liver are reviewed. The introduction of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone and the possibility to enhance iodine uptake with retinoids has changed the radioiodine treatment protocol of patients with thyroid cancer. Introduction of radiolabeled mAbs has provided additional treatment options in patients with malignant lymphoma, while a similar approach proves to be cumbersome in patients with solid tumors. With radiolabeled small molecules that target specific receptors on tumor cells, high radiation doses can be directed to tumors in patients with disseminated disease. Radiolabeled somatostatin derivatives for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors are the role model for this approach. Locoregional treatment with radiopharmaceuticals of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or metastases to the liver may be used in inoperable cases, but may also be of benefit in a neo-adjuvant or adjuvant setting. Significant developments in the application of targeted radionuclide therapy have taken place. New treatment modalities have been introduced in the clinic. The concept of combining therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals with other treatment modalities is more extensively explored.

Survival and recurrence rates after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in noncirrhotic livers

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurring in noncirrhotic livers is rare. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the outcomes and prognostic factors after hepatectomy in this setting.

STUDY DESIGN

Between June 1998 and May 2005, 83 patients underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in noncirrhotic livers at our institution. Preoperative treatment data, intraoperative details, pathologic findings, and information on tumor recurrence, treatment of recurrence, and survival were available for 80 of these patients.

RESULTS

Postresection, the 3- and 5-year-survival rates were 48% and 30%, respectively. After R0 resection (n=66), the calculated 3- and 5-year-survivals were 54% and 39%, compared with 23% and 0%, respectively, after R1/2-resection (p<0.005). After a median followup of 25 months, tumor recurred in 40 of 63 (63%) patients after R0 resection. In univariate analysis, Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stage, vascular invasion, and tumor grading were identified as important findings for recurrence and poor survival after R0 resection. For tumors without vascular invasion, the 3- and 5-year-survivals were 79% and 65%, respectively, which compared favorably with 21% and 7%, respectively, for tumors with vascular invasion (p<0.0001). Similarly, 3- and 5-year-survival rates (95% each) were considerably better for G1 tumors than the corresponding 36% and 22% rates in G2 and 60% and 30% in G3 tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3- and 5-year survivals of 54% and 39%, respectively, after R0 resections suggest that surgery is an option in hepatocellular carcinoma arising in noncirrhotic livers. Longterm results, however, are hampered by high recurrence rates. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer stage, vascular invasion, and tumor grades are predictors of tumor recurrence and diminished survival, and may help to identify candidates for potential adjuvant therapies.

Liver Embolizations in Oncology. A Review. Part II. Arterial Radioembolizations, Portal Venous Embolizations, Experimental Arterial Embolization Procedures

Arterial embolization of the liver may temporarily retard the growth of its primary and secondary tumors which are both mainly nourished arterially. Addition of radioisotopes, mostly (131)I or (90)Y, results in radioembolizations which predominantly act by radiation and less by ischemia. They may therefore be utilized in the absence of portal venous flow when conventional embolization is hazardous. (131)I-oily radioembolization seems to prolong short-term survival in such patients with unresectable hepatocellular cancers, and to improve the prognosis after resection of hepatocellular cancer. The procedure does however not palliate better than "cold" chemoembolization in patients with preserved portal flow, except for having milder side effects. Embolization with (90)Y-coupled microspheres may shrink primary and secondary liver tumors but has so far unproven effects on survival. Embolization of portal venous branches gives compensatory hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver and can increase the volume of the future remnant liver before resection. This diminishes the risk for postoperative liver failure after extensive resection and/or in the presence of chronic liver disease, and permits wider surgical indications. Tumor growth may however be accelerated, and the hypertrophy is inhibited by severe liver parenchymal disease in which situation the method would be most needed. Experimental use of liver arterial embolizations includes combined arterial and portal embolizations, i.e. "chemical hepatectomy," arterial embolizations before external radiotherapy, administration of boron for neutron capture therapy, immunoembolizations, and future gene therapy.

Prevention of intrahepatic recurrence by adjuvant (131)iodine-labeled lipiodol after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV-related cirrhosis

AIM

To evaluate the impact of postoperative injection into the hepatic artery of 131-iodine-labeled lipiodol on disease-free and overall survival rates in patients who underwent liver surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with HCV (hepatitis C virus)-related cirrhosis who underwent liver surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma were treated with adjuvant injection of 131-iodine-labeled lipiodol. They were matched with 20 HCV-positive cirrhotic controls who underwent liver resection alone; patients were paired in terms of age, Child-Pugh class, tumor size, microscopic vascular invasion, tumor histological pattern, presence of satellite nodules and type of surgical resection. Recurrence was defined as the development of a new hypervascularizated nodule in the liver.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the two groups in clinical, biologic and histologic characteristics, except a lower platelet count in the control group. None of the treated patients developed an intrahepatic recurrence until the 15th month from liver resection, whereas recurrences occurred in nine of the 20 patients in the control group (p=0.01). From 18 months onwards, recurrences appeared also in the treated patients, and after 36 months of follow-up both recurrence rate and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrahepatic injection of 131-iodine-labeled lipiodol improves the disease-free survival rate following liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in the short term up to 15 months; this advantage fades, however, away after 36 months.

Radionuclide therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant tumour of the hepatocyte. It is a common malignancy worldwide and causes almost half a million deaths annually. Asia is a high risk area. Although surgery (hepatectomy or liver transplantation) is the main form of curative treatment, the majority of patients are not eligible for surgery due to extent of tumour and dysfunction of liver. Radiopharmaceuticals used for transarterial treatment of HCC were Yttrium-90 microspheres, Iodine-131 lipiodol, Rhenium-188 lipiodol, and Holmium-166 Chitosan complex. Yittrium-90 microspheres are glass or resin microspheres of mean sphere diameter of 20 to 30 micrometre. The activity administered was about 4 GBq. Reported response rate was about 20%, and median survival was 54 weeks. On inoperable tumours, reported objective response of I-131 lipiodol was 40 to 70%, and median survival was six to nine months. It showed efficacy similar to TACE. In adjuvant treatment following curative resection of HCC, reported three year survival was 86% compared with 46% for the control group. The administered activity in both adjuvant and inoperable HCC was about 2 GBq (55 mCi). Rhenium-188 lipiodol is a new radioconjugate, and using it we treated 70 patients with inoperable HCC. This treatment was a part of a multi-centre trial sponsored by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Partial response was obtained in 17% of cases, while 49% had stable disease at three months, and 34% showed disease progression. In terms of survival, 19% survived one year, 60% for six months, and 90% for three months. The mean activity was about 4.6 GBq (124 mCi). This method was safe and free from adverse effects.

Clinical applications of newer radionuclide therapies

When radio-iodine was first used in the treatment of metastasized thyroid carcinoma in 1943, its success in terms of tumour response, quality of life improvement and survival was considered a 'miracle', as in those days metastatic cancer was generally fatal. Inspired by this, many efforts have been made to apply radioisotope therapy to other tumours. Radionuclide therapy uses radioactive isotopes labelled with specific targeting agents that aim to deliver the irradiation of the isotope to the tumour, while sparing normal tissues. Its unique modality allows to systemically target radiosensitive tumours throughout the body. Another important principle is its so-called 'cross-fire' action, whereby, owing to the larger reach of the radiation in relation to the cell diameter, a tumour cell receives lethal hits also from isotopes in the neighbourhood that are not directly associated with this cell. The treatment is therefore less hampered by inhomogeneous distribution and metabolism than for example chemo- or immunotherapy. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine has issued guidelines on so-called 'established' therapies (www.eanm.org), i.e. hyperthyroidism, thyroid carcinoma, refractory synovitis, bone metastases, mIBG therapy, 32P therapy and Lipiodol therapy. Newer therapies include radio-peptide therapy, radio-immunotherapy of lymphoma and microsphere therapy for liver cancer. The aim of a recently held workshop at the ECCO13 conference 2005 and this review is to inform the oncology community about these new developing therapies.

Eradication of hepatocellular carcinoma xenografts by radiolabelled, lipiodol-inducible gene therapy

The promoter region of the early-growth response-1(Egr-1) gene has been shown to be activated by external radiation, thus making a selective tumoricidal effect possible. A previous experiment showed that the Egr-1 promoter can be activated by internal radiation using radioisotopes as well as external radiation. Internal radiation using I-131 lipiodol (I-131-Lip) has been established as one of the most useful therapeutic strategies against hepatoma. We herein linked the Egr-1 promoter to the herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) gene, and investigated its efficacy in hepatoma gene therapy in combination with I-131-Lip. A luciferase assay showed the Egr-1-promoter activity to be markedly increased in hepatoma tissue specimens in an I-131-dose-dependent manner, whereas a less than two-fold increase in this activity was observed in other organs. In addition, the radioactivity derived from I-131 was selectively accumulated in the tumor tissue specimens. To examine the efficacy of EgrTK/ganciclovir (GCV) gene therapy in vivo, subcutaneous hepatoma xenografts in nude mice were transfected using a hemagglutinating virus of Japan (HVJ)-liposome vector. Complete tumor regression was observed in all the EgrTK-transfected tumors following combination treatment with I-131-Lip and GCV 42 days after treatment without any side effects (n=8). In contrast, the tumors continued to grow in all control mice (n=10). Furthermore, the serum alpha-fetoprotein levels decreased in the combination therapy group, while they increased in the controls. In conclusion, these data indicate that Egr-1 promoter-based gene therapy combined with internal radiation has a selective effect on hepatoma tumors while also showing an improved in vivo efficacy. This combination therapy might, therefore, be an effective human hepatoma gene therapy, even in advanced multiple cases.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by means of radiopharmaceuticals

Several techniques have been developed for radionuclide therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Medical literature databases (Pubmed, Medline) were screened for available literature and articles were critically analysed as to their scientific relevance. In a palliative setting, intra-arterial administration of 131I-Lipiodol yields responses in 17-92% of patients. According to a randomised study, 131I-Lipiodol was far better tolerated than classic chemo-embolisation. The additive value of a single 131I-Lipiodol administration following partial liver resection for HCC was evaluated and evidence is available that adjuvant radionuclide treatment reduces the recurrence rate. Data concerning the role of 131I-Lipiodol in bridging patient to liver transplantation are scarce but suggest a potential benefit in terms of reducing the drop-out rate while patients are listed for transplantation. 188Re- and 90Y-labelled conjugates are emerging and initial clinical data are promising. Treatment of HCC with 90Y-labelled microspheres is likely as efficacious as treatment with radiolabelled Lipiodol but pretreatment 99mTc-MAA scintigraphy is required in order to exclude patients with significant lung shunting. Several antibodies targeting antigens expressed on HCC have been radiolabelled, almost exclusively with 131I, and evaluated in a preclinical or clinical setting. The use of radiolabelled Lipiodol and microspheres allows for selective targeting of HCC with limited toxicity. Prospective, randomised controlled trials demonstrating that both treatment modalities may provide a survival benefit in a palliative setting are mandatory. In addition, future research should focus on the complementary role of radionuclide treatment in patients at risk for recurrent disease following partial liver resection or while awaiting liver transplantation.

Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in noncirrhotic liver: analysis of risk factors for survival

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify factors predictive of survival after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in noncirrhotic liver.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty-four patients underwent resection of HCC in noncirrhotic liver between January 1998 and December 2003. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to retrospectively identify factors associated with overall survival and disease-free survival when resection was curative for the primary tumor.

RESULTS

Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 77.8%, 55.0%, and 44.4%, respectively, and 84.0%, 62.0%, and 50.0% when resection was curative for the primary tumor. HCC recurred in 27 patients (39.1%). Recurrence was intrahepatic in 14 patients (51.9%), extrahepatic in 3 patients (11.1%), and both intra- and extrahepatic in the remaining 10 patients (37.0%). In multivariable analysis, three independent factors were associated with poorer overall survival and recurrence-free survival, namely multiple tumors, macroscopic vascular invasion, and nonuse of adjuvant iodine-131-iodized oil.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive operation is an effective treatment for HCC in noncirrhotic patients, whatever the degree of liver fibrosis. Multiple tumors and macroscopic vascular invasion are poor prognostic factors. Postoperative iodine-131-iodized oil injection appears to prevent recurrence and improve overall survival, although this needs to be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.

Indium-111-labelled donor-lymphocyte infusion by way of hepatic artery and radio-frequency ablation against liver metastases of renal and colon carcinoma after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

In patients with metastatic solid cancer, antitumor effects occur after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT). However, this treatment is not as effective in the liver as against pulmonary and lymph-node metastases. To intensify the effect of donor-lymphocyte infusions (DLI) against liver metastases, intra-arterial (IA) cell injection by way of the hepatic artery (HA) can be used.

METHODS

To trace infused cells, three patients with colorectal, three with renal, and one with breast carcinoma were treated with Indium-111 (111-In)-oxinate-labeled lymphocytes. Four patients received the DLI IA, all after radio-frequency ablation (RFA) of liver metastases. Three patients with other metastases received 111-In DLI intravenously (IV). One of them had RFA before SCT.

RESULTS

Localization of the IA 111-In DLI activity on scintigrams homed to the liver. After IA injection, the liver to sternum ratio of radioactivity was higher compared with IV injection. Cells (CD3+, 19+, and 56+) of donor origin in biopsies of liver metastasis in two patients treated with IA injection increased to 80% to 100%. Two of four patients treated using the IA DLI showed stable size and number of liver metastases for 5 and 21 months, respectively. Both are alive 18 and 34 months after SCT. Two of three patients receiving DLI IV are doing well, with a stable metastatic disease or still without metastases 21 and 20 months after cell infusions (26 and 34 months after SCT), respectively. Three patients died because of progressive disease.

CONCLUSION

When infused by way of the HA, 111-In-labeled lymphocytes home to the liver and its metastases. The liver metastasis infiltrating cells of donor origin increased. DLI by way of the HA combined with RFA may be used to treat liver metastases after SCT.

Postoperative adjuvant arterial chemoembolization improves survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with risk factors for residual tumor: A retrospective control study

AIM: To evaluate the effect of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with or without risk factors for the residual tumor.

METHODS: From January 1995 to December 1998, 549 consecutive HCC patients undergoing surgical resection were included in this research. There were 185 patients who underwent surgical resection with adjuvant TACE and 364 patients who underwent surgical resection only. Tumors with a diameter more than 5 cm, multiple nodules, and vascular invasion were defined as risk factors for residual tumor and used for patient stratification. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze survival curve and Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the prognostic significance of adjuvant TACE.

RESULTS: In the patients without any risk factors for the residual tumor, the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 93.48%, 75.85%, 62.39% in the control group and 97.39%, 70.37%, 50.85% in the adjuvant TACE group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the survival between two groups (P = 0.3956). However, in the patients with risk factors for residual tumor, postoperative adjuvant TACE significantly prolonged the patients’ survival. There was a statistically significant difference in survival between two groups (P = 0.0216). The 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 69.95%, 49.86%, 37.40% in the control group and 89.67%, 61.28%, 44.36% in the adjuvant TACE group, respectively. Cox proportional hazard model showed that tumor diameter and cirrhosis, but not the adjuvant TACE, were the significantly independent prognostic factors in the patients without risk factors for residual tumor. However, in the patients with risk factors for residual tumor adjuvant TACE, and also tumor diameter, AFP level, vascular invasion, were the significantly independent factors associated with the decreasing risk for patients’ death from HCC.

CONCLUSION: Postoperative adjuvant TACE can prolong the survival of patients with risk factors for residual tumor, but can not prolong the survival of patients without risk factors for residual tumor.

Transcatheter Arterial Embolization with 188Rhenium-HDD–labeled Iodized Oil in Rabbit VX2 Liver Tumor

PURPOSE

To evaluate the antitumor effect of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) with use of rhenium 188 HDD (4-hexadecyl 2,2,9,9-tetramethyl-4,7-diaza-1,10-decanethiol)-labeled iodized oil and to compare it with that of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with use of an established chemotherapeutic agent and iodized oil in experimentally induced liver tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

VX2 carcinoma was grown in the livers of 57 rabbits. TAE was performed with (188)Re-HDD-labeled iodized oil (Re-Lp group; n = 21), doxorubicin/iodized oil emulsion (Dx-Lp group; n = 21), and iodized oil alone (n = 15). Sequential conjugated planar imaging was performed for dosimetry of the radioisotope in the Re-Lp group (n = 15). Growth ratio and percentage of viable tumor were estimated by computed tomography and histopathologic examination. Hepatic and hematologic toxicities were evaluated by biochemical analysis.

RESULTS

On conjugated planar imaging, radioactivity was concentrated on the tumor (effective half-life, 16.2 hours), and mean radiation dose to the tumor was 147.7 Gy. The mean growth ratios 1, 2, and 3 weeks after TAE and the percentage of viable tumor in the Re-Lp group (-3.4, -7.6, -11.1, and 0.3%) and the Dx-Lp group (-3.2, -5.3, 29.0, and 2.6%) were significantly lower than the respective values in the iodized oil group (45.5, 145.4, 283.0, and 30.1%; P < .001). However, the differences between the values in the Re-Lp group and those in the Dx-Lp group were not significant (P values of .165-0.497 for growth ratios; P = .134 for percentage of viable tumor). There was similar transient hepatotoxicity in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TAE with (188)Re-HDD-labeled iodized oil has potent antitumor effect in VX2 liver tumor that is comparable with that of TACE with an established chemotherapeutic agent.

[Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver]

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients is increasing. Despite advances in imaging and laboratory screening which allow earlier diagnosis, the surgeon is all too often confronted with an HCC of advanced stage or arising in the setting of severe cirrhosis; this severely limits the treatment possibilities. Treatment options are constrained not only by the characteristics of the tumor but also by hepatocellular reserve, severity of portal hypertension, and the general condition of the host. "Curative treatments" envisage the complete eradication of the malignancy; they include liver transplantation, resection, or tumor destruction by radiofrequency or alcohol ablation. They are most effective in the early stages of HCC. Total hepatectomy and transplantation, by far the most complex surgical therapy, also has the best results avoiding the all-too-frequent local recurrence of HCC in the residual liver. Other medical and interventional treatments (chemo-embolization, radiotherapy with lipiodol) can only slow the progress of the HCC. Goals for the future include more precise and directed screening of the population at risk, and better chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic treatments.

Regional chemotherapeutic techniques for liver tumors: current knowledge and future directions

After a rather long period of stagnation, intra-arterial therapeutic approaches for treating liver tumors are currently progressing rapidly. These new modalities will increase the resectability of initially unresectable liver tumors after dramatic responses. At the same time, resectability rates are increasing with the assistance of local ablative physical treatments such as radiofrequency, resulting in an improvement of patients' median survival rates and quality of life.

Preoperative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with intra-arterial injection of 131I-labelled lipiodol

BACKGROUND

Recurrence is common after surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

The efficacy of, and tolerance to, preoperative intra-arterial injection of (131)I-labelled lipiodol was examined in 34 patients with HCC, including 29 with cirrhosis. Twenty-five patients had a single hepatic tumour and the mean(s.d.) tumour size was 5.2(3.7) (range 2-15) cm. The patients received between one and three injections of (131)I-labelled lipiodol (60 mCi per injection) before surgery. Operations included 14 liver transplants, 13 minor hepatectomies, six major hepatectomies and one exploratory laparotomy.

RESULTS

There was one complication after lipiodol injection due to acute ischaemia of the small bowel. Three of 34 patients died within 28 days, two after transplantation and one after resection. An objective tumour response (decrease in tumour size) was observed in 19 of 34 patients, and a complete histological response in eight of 34. There was an objective tumour response or major histological necrosis of lesions in 25 of 34 patients. The 5-year survival rate was 48.4(8.0) per cent, 69.0 per cent after transplantation and 36.0 per cent in patients who underwent resection.

CONCLUSION

This preoperative method appeared to be well tolerated, and provided promising results in terms of macroscopic and microscopic tumour responses.

Safe radiation exposure of medical personnel by using simple methods of radioprotection while administering 131I-lipiodol therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The intra-arterial administration of 131I-lipiodol is a therapeutic approach increasingly used for the treatment of inoperable hepatocellular carcinomas. This technique has even become the reference treatment for hepatocellular carcinomas with portal thrombosis and is the only effective treatment to reduce the risk of recurrence among patients who could benefit from surgical operation. Currently, few data have been published concerning the levels of exposure for personnel carrying out this type of treatment. We undertook a dosimetric study targeted mainly on the exposure of the person performing the injection of 131I-lipiodol to show that this treatment can be carried out with an exposure at the extremities distinctly lower than the regulatory annual threshold by using simple means of radioprotection. The point of puncture was carried out at the level of left femoral artery, the preparation and injection of the therapeutic dose was carried out extemporaneously by the nuclear medicine specialist using a 10 ml syringe (for an injected volume of 4 ml) fitted with an adapted syringe protector. The injection was carried out as rapidly as possible under scopic control while avoiding reflux, with compression carried out by the radiologist. This study comprises 52 intra-arterial injections of 131I-lipiodol (2016+/-92 MBq). For the nuclear medicine specialists, 52 measurements were carried out at the level of the thorax and 41 on the fingers. For the radiologists, 22 measurements were carried out at the level of the thorax and six on their index fingers; nine measurements were carried out at the level of the thorax for the technologist and four at the level of the thorax for the stretcher bearer. For the nuclear medicine specialists, the average dose received at the level of the fingers varies between 140 and 443 microSv (according to the fingers) and the average dose at the thorax is 17 microSv. For the radiologists, the average dose received is 215 microSv at the level of the fingers and 15 microSv at the thorax. These results show that the administration of high therapeutic activities of 131I-lipiodol can be carried out for the exposed personnel with a dose at the level of the fingers much lower than the European regulatory limit of 500 mSv.

Meta-analysis: evaluation of adjuvant therapy after curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

To evaluate adjuvant modalities after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma using a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

In a first step, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was carried out. Sensitivity analyses after inclusion of non-randomized controlled trials were performed. Four therapeutic modalities were evaluated: pre-operative transarterial chemotherapy, post-operative transarterial chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy and a combination of systemic and transarterial chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Only post-operative transarterial chemotherapy improved survival significantly at 2 years [difference, 22.8%; confidence interval (CI), 8.6-36.9%; P = 0.002] and 3 years (difference, 27.6%; CI, 8.2-47.1%; P = 0.005), and decreased the probability of no recurrence at 1 year (difference, 28.8%; CI, 16.7-40.8%; P < 0.001), 2 years (difference, 27.6%; CI, 8.2-47.1%; P = 0.005) and 3 years (difference, 28%; CI, 8.2-47.9%; P = 0.006). In a sensitivity analysis after inclusion of non-randomized controlled trials, post-operative transarterial chemotherapy still improved survival at 1 year (difference, 9.6%; CI, 0.8-18.3%; P = 0.03), 2 years (difference, 13.5%; CI, 0.9-26%, P = 0.04) and 3 years (difference, 18%; CI, 7-28.9%; P < 0.001), and decreased the probability of no recurrence at 1 year (difference, 20.3%; CI, 7.7-33%; P = 0.002), 2 years (difference, 35%; CI, 21.4-46.3%; P < 0.001) and 3 years (difference, 34.5%; CI, 18.7-50.3%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Post-operative transarterial chemotherapy improved survival and decreased the cumulative probability of no recurrence. New randomized controlled trials evaluating this modality are required.

90Y-oxine-ethiodol, a potential radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of liver cancer

Ethiodol (or lipiodol) is selectively retained in hepatocellular carcinoma and is used as a vehicle to deliver radioactive agents following intraarterial hepatic infusion. We prepared the lipophilic complex 90Y-oxine with a radiolabeling efficiency of 97.6+/-1.1%. After extraction into ethiodol, a stability test in serum at 37 degrees C showed that 87.8% of the 90Y remained ethiodol-bound for 7 days. Bremsstrahlung imaging of a rabbit for 48 h confirmed that the homogeneous mixture of radiolabeled 90Y-oxine and ethiodol stayed in the targeted liver lobe. This radiopharmaceutical is thus a potential candidate for the treatment of non-resectable liver cancer.

N/A

N/A

Minimally invasive image-guided therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Minimally invasive therapies are gaining increasing attention as an alternative to standard surgical therapies in the treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. These include therapies administered transcatheterally (arterial embolization, intraarterial chemoinfusion, and combination chemoembolization) and percutaneously (chemical ablation with ethanol or acetic acid, and thermal ablation with radiofrequency, microwave, or laser energies). Benefits over surgical resection include the anticipated reduction in morbidity and mortality, low cost, suitability for real time image guidance, the ability to perform ablative procedures on outpatients, and the potential application in a wider spectrum of patients, including nonsurgical candidates. This review examines reported clinical success, potential complications, current limitations, and future directions of development of chemoembolization, ethanol and acetic acid instillation, and radiofrequency, microwave, and laser thermal ablation.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: review of the randomised clinical trials

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is common worldwide, and its incidence is increasing. Liver resection or transplantation is potentially curative, although subsequent recurrence and death are common. We reviewed randomised trials on the role of adjuvant therapy in resectable HCC. We identified 13 randomised trials with recurrence or survival endpoints reported at 3 years or longer. Three studies involved predominantly systemic adjuvant chemotherapy; four involved predominantly hepatic-artery-based chemotherapy or embolisation; and six used other therapeutic modalities including immunological, radiation, and differentiation agents. A therapeutic benefit in terms of disease-free or overall survival was noted in six trials, five of which involved modalities other than systemic or hepatic-artery chemotherapy or embolisation. We conclude that systemic and hepatic-artery chemotherapy or chemoembolisation have not been shown to improve overall or disease-free survival after resection of HCC, although there has been no definitive trial comparing adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with no treatment. Other adjuvant modalities (mostly tested in small, preliminary settings) may confer benefit after potentially curative resection of HCC.

Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical review from the surgeon's perspective

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the current results of various locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with special reference to the implications for surgeons.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Resection or transplantation is the treatment of choice for HCC, but most patients are not suitable candidates. The past decade has witnessed the development of a variety of locoregional therapies for HCC. Surgeons are faced with the challenge of adopting these therapies in the management of patients with resectable or unresectable HCC.

METHODS

A review of relevant English-language articles was undertaken based on a Medline search from January 1990 to August 2001.

RESULTS

Retrospective studies suggested that transarterial chemoembolization is an effective treatment for inoperable HCC, but its perceived benefit for survival has not been substantiated in randomized trials, presumably because its antitumor effect is offset by its adverse effect on liver function. Nonetheless, it remains a widely used palliative treatment for HCC not amenable to resection or ablative therapies, and it also plays an important role as a treatment of postresection recurrence and as a pretransplant therapy for transplantable HCC. Better patient selection, selective segmental chemoembolization, and treatment repetition tailored to tumor response and patient tolerance may improve its benefit-risk ratio. Transarterial radiotherapy is a less available alternative that produces results similar to those of chemoembolization. Percutaneous ethanol injection has gained wide acceptance as a safe and effective treatment for HCCs 3 cm or smaller. Uncertainty in tumor necrosis limits its potential as a curative treatment, but its repeatability allows treatment of recurrence after ablation or resection of HCC that is crucial to prolongation of survival. Cryotherapy affords a better chance of cure because of predictable necrosis even for HCCs larger than 3 cm, but its use is limited by a high complication rate. There has been recent enthusiasm for heat ablation by microwave, radiofrequency, or laser, which provides predictable necrosis with a low complication rate. Preliminary data indicated that radiofrequency ablation is superior to ethanol injection in the radicality of tumor ablation. The advent of more versatile radiofrequency probes has allowed ablation of HCCs larger than 5 cm. Recent studies have suggested that combined transarterial embolization and heat ablation is a promising strategy for large HCCs. Thus far, no randomized trials comparing various thermoablative therapies have been reported. It is also uncertain whether a percutaneous route, laparoscopy, or open surgery affords the best approach for these therapies. Thermoablative therapies have been combined with resection or used to treat postresection recurrence, and they have also been used as a pretransplant therapy. However, the value of such strategies requires further evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in locoregional therapies have led to a major breakthrough in the management of unresectable HCC, but the exact role of the various modalities needs to be defined by randomized studies. Novel thermoablative techniques provide the surgeon with an exciting opportunity to participate actively in the management of unresectable HCC. Locoregional therapies are also useful adjuncts in the management of patients with resectable or transplantable disease. Hence, surgeons must be equipped with the latest knowledge and techniques of ablative therapy to provide the most appropriate treatment for the wide spectrum of patients with HCC.