Treatment-related mortality with bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Pharmacogenetic and clinical risk factors for bevacizumab-related gastrointestinal hemorrhage in prostate cancer patients treated on CALGB 90401 (Alliance)

The objective of this study was to discover clinical and pharmacogenetic factors associated with bevacizumab-related gastrointestinal hemorrhage in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance) 90401. Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer received docetaxel and prednisone ± bevacizumab. Patients were genotyped using Illumina HumanHap610-Quad and assessed using cause-specific risk for association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. In 1008 patients, grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred in 9.5% and 3.8% of bevacizumab (n = 503) and placebo (n = 505) treated patients, respectively. Bevacizumab (P < 0.001) and age (P = 0.002) were associated with gastrointestinal hemorrhage. In 616 genetically estimated Europeans (n = 314 bevacizumab and n = 302 placebo treated patients), grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurred in 9.6% and 2.0% of patients, respectively. One SNP (rs1478947; HR 6.26; 95% CI 3.19-12.28; P = 9.40 × 10-8) surpassed Bonferroni-corrected significance. Grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal hemorrhage rate was 33.3% and 6.2% in bevacizumab-treated patients with the AA/AG and GG genotypes, versus 2.9% and 1.9% in the placebo arm, respectively. Prospective validation of these findings and functional analyses are needed to better understand the genetic contribution to treatment-related gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

A Phase 1b Study of Ivonescimab, a Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Bispecific Antibody, as First- or Second-Line Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Immunotherapy-Naive NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

This study (HARMONi-5) aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ivonescimab (a bispecific antibody against programmed cell death protein 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor) as first- or second-line monotherapy in patients with advanced immunotherapy-naive NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible patients received intravenous ivonescimab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W), 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W), 20 mg/kg Q3W, or 30 mg/kg Q3W. The primary end points were safety and objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

RESULTS

At data cutoff (October 5, 2022), 108 patients were enrolled and received ivonescimab. Programmed death ligand-1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was greater than or equal to 1% in 74 patients (68.5%), including 35 (32.4%) with TPS greater than or equal to 50%. The median follow-up was 10.4 months (range: 8.4-10.9 mo). For all patients, ORR and disease control rate were 39.8% and 86.1%, respectively. ORR by TPS was 14.7%, 51.4%, and 57.1% in patients with TPS less than 1%, greater than or equal to 1%, and greater than or equal to 50%, respectively. In the 67 programmed death ligand-1-positive patients receiving first-line ivonescimab, the ORR was 33.3%, 52.6%, 60.0%, and 75.0% at the doses of 10 mg/kg Q3W, 20 mg/kg Q2W, 20 mg/kg Q3W, and 30 mg/kg Q3W, respectively. Grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 24 patients (22.2%). TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in one patient (0.9%). TRAEs leading to death occurred in three patients (2.8%) with squamous NSCLC. The occurrence of grade greater than or equal to 3 TRAEs and grade greater than or equal to 3 bleeding events in squamous versus nonsquamous NSCLC patients was 25.5% versus 18.9% and 0.0% versus 1.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ivonescimab monotherapy was well tolerated and found to have a promising efficacy in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier: NCT04900363.

Effectiveness of bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefit of bevacizumab under the comprehensive treatment strategy and its advantages over other drugs, so as to provide reference for the formulation of clinical plans.

METHODS

As of October 1, 2022, the randomized controlled clinical trials of bevacizumab in combination with metastatic colorectal cancer published in PubMed, Cochrane Library and Medline databases were searched. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the short-term disease control effect and long-term survival of the treatment strategy.

RESULTS

21 RCTs (6665 patients; 3356 patients in the experimental group and 3309 patients in the control group; average age, 55-75 years) were treated with bevacizumab as the experimental group for metastatic colorectal cancer. BEV has stronger anti-tumor activity than the single treatment scheme (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.11-1.52). And Benefits of the BEV group were 0.73 (0.55, 0.96), 1.26 (0.71, 2.24), 1.63 (0.92, 2.87) and 0.07 (0.02, 0.25) compared with CET, VAN, CED and PAN respectively. The disease control of BEV combined therapy was better (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.04-1.78). The same as compared with cediranib (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.06-3.55). However, the long-term prognosis of BEV, including the overall survival (HRs = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.84-1.15) and progression-free survival (HRs = 1.05,95% CI: 0.97-1.13) were not prolonged. The survival benefits of cetuximab and panitumumab were not reflected.

CONCLUSION

The addition of BEV can enhance the anti-tumor ability and disease control, while cetuximab and panitumumab may have stronger ability. However, it did not effectively improve the survival of patients. A more reasonable and effective treatment plan needs more clinical experimental support.

Administration of Bevacizumab and the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease Development in Taiwan Residents: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a significant role as a pro-angiogenic and pro-permeability factor within the kidney. Bevacizumab is a pharmaceutical monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody that inhibits the growth of new blood vessels, which blocks blood supply and thereby restricts tumor growth. Thus, we conducted a nationwide study to explore the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) development in Taiwan residents after bevacizumab therapy. We drew data from the extensive National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), which encompasses data from >99% of Taiwan's population from 1995 onwards. Individuals who received bevacizumab between 2012-2018 were identified as the bevacizumab cohort, with the index date set at the first usage. We randomly selected dates within the study period for the control group to serve as index dates. We excluded patients with a history of CKD prior to the index date or those <20 years old. In both cohorts, patients' propensity scores matched in a 1:1 ratio based on sex, age, index year, income, urbanization level, comorbidities, and medications. We found patients treated with bevacizumab had a significantly higher risk of contracting CKD than patients without bevacizumab (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.35, 95% confidence interval = 1.35-1.73). The risk of CKD was 1.35-fold higher in participants with bevacizumab treatment than those in the control group. These findings suggest that close monitoring of CKD development after bevacizumab administration is needed.

Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment in Breast Cancer: Prognostic and Predictive Significance and Therapeutic Opportunities

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent tumors among women. Its prognosis and treatment outcomes depend on factors related to tumor cell biology. However, recent studies have revealed the critical role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in the development, progression, and treatment response of breast cancer. In this review, we explore the different components of the TME and their relevance as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer. In addition, techniques for assessing the tumor microenvironment, such as immunohistochemistry or gene expression profiling, and their clinical utility in therapeutic decision-making are examined. Finally, therapeutic strategies targeting the TME are reviewed, highlighting their potential clinical benefits. Overall, this review emphasizes the importance of the TME in breast cancer and its potential as a clinical tool for better patient stratification and the design of personalized therapies.

Egyptian Society of Liver Cancer Recommendation Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Globally, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most common cause of death from cancer. The prevalence of this pathology, which has been on the rise in the last 30 years, has been predicted to continue increasing. HCC is the most common cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in Egypt and is also the most common cancer in males. Chronic liver diseases, including chronic hepatitis C, which is a primary health concern in Egypt, are considered major risk factors for HCC. However, HCC surveillance is recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and liver cirrhosis; those above 40 with HBV but without cirrhosis; individuals with hepatitis D co-infection or a family history of HCC; and Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients exhibiting significant fibrosis or cirrhosis. Several international guidelines aid physicians in the management of HCC. However, the availability and cost of diagnostic modalities and treatment options vary from one country to another. Therefore, the current guidelines aim to standardize the management of HCC in Egypt. The recommendations presented in this report represent the current management strategy at HCC treatment centers in Egypt. Recommendations were developed by an expert panel consisting of hepatologists, oncologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, pathologists, and radiologists working under the umbrella of the Egyptian Society of Liver Cancer. The recommendations, which are based on the currently available local diagnostic aids and treatments in the country, include recommendations for future prospects.

Multiple Rare Primary Malignancies: A Mixed Squamous Neuroendocrine Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix, Metastasized Carcinosarcoma and Extramammary Vulvar Paget's Disease Case Report

The occurrence of more than one primary malignant tumor in a single patient is rare. Multiple primary malignancies can pose difficulties in differential diagnosis between primary tumors and metastasis. Here, we present a case report with multiple primary malignancies. The patient is a 45-year-old female who was diagnosed with cervical mixed squamous neuroendocrine adenocarcinoma, metastasized carcinosarcoma and extramammary vulvar Paget's disease. The patient was first diagnosed with a microinvasive squamous cervical carcinoma in situ. After a few months, the amputation of a small residual tumor and histological evaluation revealed an IA1-stage poorly differentiated (G3) mixed squamous and neuroendocrine cervical adenocarcinoma. After two years, the disease had progressed and biopsies from altered sites were taken. Histological diagnosis from an ulcerated vulvar region revealed extramammary vulvar Paget's disease. A biopsy from vagina polyp revealed an earlier diagnosed mixed squamous and neuroendocrine cervical adenocarcinoma. However, histological diagnosis from an inguinal lymph node biopsy was unexpected and revealed carcinosarcoma. It indicated either the development of another primary malignancy, or an unusual spread of metastasis. Clinical presentation as well as diagnostic and treatment challenges are discussed in this case report. This case report shows that multiple primary malignancy cases are difficult to manage both for clinicians and the patient because the therapeutic options can become limited. This complex case was managed by a multidisciplinary team.

The safety risk of information overload and bureaucracy in oncology clinical trial conduct

Performance of clinical trials has led to major therapeutic developments and substantial improvements in the field of medical oncology. To ensure patient's safety, regulatory aspects for proper clinical trial conduct have been increased over the past two decades but seem to cause information overload and ineffective bureaucracy, possibly even impacting patient safety. To put this in perspective, after the implementation of Directive 2001/20/EC in the European Union, a 90 per cent increase in trial launching time, a 25 per cent decrease in patient participation and a 98 per cent rise in administrative trial costs were reported. The time to initiate a clinical trial has increased from a few months to several years in the past three decades. Moreover, there is a serious risk that information overload with relatively unimportant data endangers the decision-making processes and distracts from essential patient safety information. It is now a critical moment in time to improve efficient clinical trial conduct for our future patients diagnosed with cancer. We are convinced that a reduction of the administrative regulations, information overload, and simplification of the procedures for trial conductance may improve patient safety. In this Current Perspective, we give insight in the current regulatory aspects of clinical research, evaluate the practical consequences of these regulations, and propose specific improvements for optimal clinical trial conduct.

The Association of Intravitreal Injections of Different Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor with Systemic Outcomes in Diabetic Patients

This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the systemic effects of three commonly available anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injections in patients with diabetes, using data taken from a multi-institutional database in Taiwan. Patient data were sourced from the multi-institutional Chang Gung Research Database. Participants were divided into groups based on treatment with bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept. Baseline characteristics were matched among the groups by the inverse probability of treatment weighting. The incidence rate of outcome events was calculated as the number of events divided by 100 person-years of follow-up. The cumulative incidence function was used to estimate the incidence rate of the outcome events among groups. The incidence of ischemic stroke was higher in the ranibizumab group than the bevacizumab and aflibercept groups (1.65, 0.92, and 0.61 per 100 person-years, respectively). The incidence of major adverse lower-limb events was higher in the bevacizumab group (2.95), followed by ranibizumab (2.00) and aflibercept (0.74). Major bleeding was relatively higher in bevacizumab (12.1) compared to ranibizumab (4.3) and aflibercept (3.8). All-cause death was higher for both bevacizumab (3.26) and aflibercept (2.61) when compared to ranibizumab (0.55), and all-cause admission was found to be highest with bevacizumab (58.6), followed by aflibercept (30.2), and ranibizumab (27.6). The bevacizumab group demonstrated a greater decrease in glycated hemoglobin compared to the baseline level (-0.33%). However, a few differences in the clinical condition between the groups were still observed after matching. In conclusion, this study suggests that different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents may be associated with various and differing systemic adverse events. The differences might also be attributed to differences in patient characteristics and clinical status.

A Case of Pneumothorax Required Surgical Treatment as a Complication of Paclitaxel with Bevacizumab Treatment

A 63-year-old woman had a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy, and adjuvant endocrine therapy for 5 years before being diagnosed with recurrent lesions involving the right anterior chest wall, multiple lymph nodes, and pulmonary metastases. The patient was subsequently initiated on a paclitaxel and bevacizumab regimen. During this treatment, the patient complained of palpitations and malaise. Chest radiography revealed a left pneumothorax. Despite attempts at conservative treatment, the pneumothorax did not improve and a thoracoscopic approach was required. One of the metastatic tumors in the left lower lobe appeared to rupture, and this area was estimated to be the cause of air leak. The tumor was covered with a tissue seal sheet, and the patient's condition improved with no recurrence of pneumothorax. This case highlights the importance of early conversion to surgical treatment when conservative treatment for pneumothorax is unresponsive due to the potential side effects of bevacizumab. The findings of this case report may be of interest to oncologists, pulmonologists, and other healthcare professionals involved in the care of patients with breast cancer and pulmonary metastases who are undergoing bevacizumab chemotherapy.

Survival Outcomes after Elective or Emergency Surgery for Synchronous Stage IV Colorectal Cancer

Patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) who have not undergone primary tumor resection (PTR) are at risk of sudden medical emergencies. Despite the ongoing controversy over the necessity and timing of PTR in patients with stage IV CRC, studies comparing the survival outcomes of elective and emergency surgery in this population are scarce. This is a retrospective study conducted at a single institute. The patients were divided into two groups: the elective surgery (ELS) group (n = 46) and the emergency surgery (EMS) group (n = 26). The primary outcome was 2-year overall survival (OS). During a median follow-up period of 27.0 months, the 2-year OS was significantly better in the ELS group (80% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in the 2-year relapse-free survival and 30-day postoperative complication rates. Planning and performing elective surgery could help increase the survival rate of patients with synchronous stage IV CRC, especially those that undergo simultaneous or staged metastasectomy.

Efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab biosimilar or original drug to platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

The role of bevacizumab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been supported by a large number of data. However, whether bevacizumab biosimilars have the same efficacy and safety as the original drug is still controversial. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate whether bevacizumab biosimilars have the same clinical efficacy and safety as the original drug in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Methods

Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP) and the ClinicalTrail.gov website were extensively searched using relevant search criteria. We included phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy and safety of marketed biosimilars and Avastin in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the RoB 2 assessment scale, and the RevMan 5.4 statistical software was used for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 6360 patients were included in 11 RCTs. There was no statistical difference between the experimental group and the control group in terms of effectiveness [objective response rate (at week 18), disease control rate (at week 18), median duration of response, median progression-free survival, median overall survival (OS), and OS after 12 months]. In terms of safety [treatment-emergent adverse events (grade ⩾3) and treatment-related adverse events (grade ⩾3)], there was also no significant difference between biosimilars and Avastin.

Conclusions

The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilars in the treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC are highly similar to those of the original drug combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin, respectively.

Chemobrain, Olfactory and Lifestyle Assessment in Onco-Geriatrics: Sex-Mediated Differences between Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy

A possible link between chemotherapy and cognitive impairment has been identified. In the literature, this condition is usually called chemobrain and can mostly affect some memory domain but can lead also to other cognitive impairments. Olfaction, which is known to be linked with cognitive domain and the nociception system, can also be affected by chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the main cognitive and olfactory abilities and the functional and nutritional state of a cohort of chemotherapy and immunotherapy onco-geriatric patients and control geriatrics subjects. Cognitive, olfactory, geriatric and nutritional assessments were performed through the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Sniffin' Sticks Screening 12, G8 test and a questionnaire on the adherence of the Mediterranean diet, respectively. Our findings show a gender effect on the MMSE. Overall results indicate more pronounced impairments both at the cognitive and frailty level regardless of the type of therapy. On the other hand, the Sniffin' Sticks performances highlight a significant decrease in olfactory perception ability of subjects following immunotherapy. Significant correlations between olfactory performance and MMSE and G8 scores were also found, as well as between MMSE and G8 measures.

Pneumothorax as a Complication of Bevacizumab-Containing Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review of Case Reports

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody that binds to and makes all of the VEGF isoforms inactive, and thus prevents angiogenesis, development, and the spread of the tumor. The most reported side effects after administering bevacizumab include bleeding, high blood pressure, heart failure, proteinuria, thrombosis, and gastrointestinal perforation. Pneumothorax has rarely been reported as a complication of bevacizumab, but with an unclear mechanism. This article aims to explore the occurrence of pneumothorax as a side effect after using bevacizumab through a systematic review of current case reports published on the topic. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Directory of Open Access through the utilization of appropriate keywords, and case reports were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our results encompass five case reports that were further evaluated for demographic, clinical, and treatment parameters. This systematic review concludes that pneumothorax can occur after bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy although this side effect is relatively rare. Awareness regarding this possible side effect can assist clinicians during their practice in considering pneumothorax as a possible differential diagnosis when encountering patients presenting with pulmonary symptoms after starting bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy; hence, timely diagnosis and treatment can save a life.

Arteriovenous thrombotic events in a patient with advanced lung cancer following bevacizumab plus chemotherapy: A case report

BACKGROUND

In driver gene-negative non-small cell lung cancer patients who relapse following radical resection, combination chemotherapy using bevacizumab and platinum-based dual drugs is known to increase both progression-free and overall survival. Treatment initially includes bevacizumab, and if patients are able to tolerate it, bevacizumab can continue to be utilized until disease progression. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal neutralizing antibody that acts against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Various anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, can increase the risk of arterial thromboembolism. Current data indicate that VEGF-targeted treatment does not significantly increase the risk of venous thromboembolism events, except for bevacizumab.

CASE SUMMARY

A 55-year-old man underwent radical resection for cancer of the right lung. Six months following surgery, multiple metastases were observed in his left lung. Subsequently, six cycles of bevacizumab combined with pemetrexed/carboplatin chemotherapy was given. Efficacy evaluation continued to be partial relief according to RECIST 1.1 standards, and no noticeable adverse reactions were noted. After three cycles of maintenance therapy using a combination of bevacizumab and pemetrexed, the patient developed dizziness and dyspnea. The patient was diagnosed with acute cerebral infarction and pulmonary embolism following head magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography (CT) angiography, and chest enhanced CT. Although the patient received low-molecular-weight heparin anticoagulation and other treatment, the patient eventually died of respiratory failure 1 mo later. This case report may offer some insight into fatal arteriovenous embolism, which has not been previously reported.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy may also increase the risk of arteriovenous thromboembolism. Accordingly, patients who receive angiogenesis inhibitor therapy should be carefully selected. Furthermore, close monitoring and timely intervention are necessary in order to reduce the risk of such toxicities.

Predictive value of chromosome 18q11.2-q12.1 loss for benefit from bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer; a post-hoc analysis of the randomized phase III-trial AGITG-MAX

The VEGF‐A monoclonal antibody bevacizumab is currently recommended for first‐line treatment of all metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Cost‐benefit ratio and side‐effects however necessitate patient selection. A large retrospective yet nonrandomized study showed that patients with loss of chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 in the tumor and treated with bevacizumab have 3 months improved median progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit compared to patients without this loss and/or treatment modality. Implementation for loss of chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 as a marker in clinical practice mandates evidence in a randomized controlled trial for bevacizumab. Of the trials with randomization of chemotherapy vs chemotherapy with bevacizumab, the AGITG‐MAX trial was the only one with tumor materials available. Chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 copy number status was measured for 256 AGITG‐MAX trial patients and correlated with PFS according to a predefined analysis plan with marker‐treatment interaction as the primary end‐point. Chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 losses were detected in 71% of patients (181/256) characteristic for mCRC. Consistent with the nonrandomized study, significant PFS benefit of bevacizumab was observed in patients with chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 loss (P = .009), and not in patients without 18q loss (P = .67). Although significance for marker‐treatment interaction was not reached (P_interaction = .28), hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of this randomized cohort (HR_interaction = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.39‐1.32) shows striking overlap with the nonrandomized study cohorts (HR_interaction = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.32‐0.8) supported by a nonsignificant Cochrane χ² test (P = .11) for heterogeneity. We conclude that post hoc analysis of the AGITG‐MAX RCT provides supportive evidence for chromosome 18q11.2‐q12.1 as a predictive marker for bevacizumab in mCRC patients.

Apoplastic Production of Recombinant AntiVEGF Protein Using Plant-Virus Transient Expression Vector

Targeting of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) using AntiVEGF can be a promising approach for angiogenesis inhibition and cancer therapy. In this study, we direct AntiVEGF recombinant protein accumulation to cucurbit plant apoplast using a suitable signal (Pr1b) sequence. After assembling the target gene construct and cloning into the expression vector, we infected the plants with the resulting pZYMV-AntiVEGF viral vector. Transcription of the target gene was confirmed with RT-PCR assays. The apoplast-targeted AntiVEGF recombinant protein was detected in infected plants by Dot-blot, western blot, and ELISA analysis. AntiVEGF protein accumulation in the apoplast resulted in levels of 1.2% of TSP (Total Soluble Protein) that demonstrated a two-order increase compared to the cytoplasm-targeted protein. After purification of AntiVEGF protein using aqueous two-phase system (ATPS), purified protein was analyzed with MTT assay. Our results reveal that production of biologically active and correctly processed apoplast-targeted AntiVEGF recombinant protein is possible in plant apoplast. The low level of cytoplasm-targeted AntiVEGF recombinant protein might result from the degradation of improperly folded protein.

Targeting Angiogenesis in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Opportunities in the Immunotherapy Era

Simple Summary

Therapies for squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) have been rapidly evolving, initially with the inclusion of immunotherapy, but more recently with the consideration of anti-angiogenic therapies. Recent preclinical and clinical data reveal a strong correlation between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the progression of SCCHN, with nearly 90% of these malignancies expressing VEGF. Our review article not only elaborates on the utility of anti-VEGF therapies on SCCHN but also its interaction with the immune environment. Furthermore, we detailed the current data on immunotherapies targeting SCCHN and how this could be coupled with anti-angiogenics therapies.

Abstract

Despite the lack of approved anti-angiogenic therapies in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), preclinical and more recent clinical evidence support the role of targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in this disease. Targeting VEGF has gained even greater interest following the recent evidence supporting the role of immunotherapy in the management of advanced SCCHN. Preclinical evidence strongly suggests that VEGF plays a role in promoting the growth and progression of SCCHN, and clinical evidence exists as to the value of combining this strategy with immunotherapeutic agents. Close to 90% of SCCHNs express VEGF, which has been correlated with a worse clinical prognosis and an increased resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. As immunotherapy is currently at the forefront of the management of advanced SCCHN, revisiting the rationale for targeting angiogenesis in this disease has become an even more attractive proposition.

Risk and Incidence of Infection with Bevacizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A previous meta-analysis suggested that use of bevacizumab is associated with an increased risk of infection in cancer patients. With the continuous accumulation of evidence in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we performed a focused meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials to quantify the relative risk and incidence of infectious complications in those individuals treated with bevacizumab.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Eligible studies were prospective randomized clinical trials of NSCLC patients treated with bevacizumab with toxicity data on infectious complications. Relative risk (RR), overall incidence rates, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed or random effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 4,545 patients from 14 prospective RCTs (randomized controlled trials) were included for the meta-analysis. Treatment with bevacizumab was not associated with an increased risk of all grade (RR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.84 - 1.49) or high grade (RR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.86 - 1.41) infections, respectively. The summary incidences of all-grade and high-grade infection in patients receiving bevacizumab in the treatment group were 16.4% (95% CI: 15.7 - 17.2%) and 4.3% (95% CI: 3.0 - 6.1%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of bevacizumab is not associated with a significantly higher risk of infections in NSCLC patients. These data provide reassurance regarding the risk of incidence of infection in patients with NSCLC receiving bevacizumab.

Impact of angiogenesis inhibitor eligibility on the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) are currently the primary treatment option for patients with EGFR‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the effect of EGFR‐TKIs are eventually weakened due to resistance, and there is also a differential efficacy based on EGFR mutation subtypes. The combination of angiogenesis inhibitor (AI) with EGFR‐TKI has shown better efficacy than EGFR‐TKI monotherapy, regardless of the mutation subtypes. Nevertheless, the effect of AI eligibility on overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) remains to be elucidated. Thus, we assessed this impact on patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation.

Methods

In this study, the data for 450 patients with EGFR‐mutant NSCLC, who were treated with EGFR‐TKI monotherapy, were retrospectively analyzed for AI eligibility. The patients were categorized into AI‐eligible (AI fit) and ineligible groups (AI unfit).

Results

The median PFS of the AI fit group was 12.9 months, compared to 9.6 months in the unfit group (p = 0.007), and OS was also significantly longer in the AI fit group (median OS = 33.0 months) compared to that in the unfit group (18.5 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that AI ineligibility was associated with shorter PFS and poor prognosis. Also, in the AI fit group, there was no significant difference in the PFS between EGFR L858R mutation and EGFR exon 19 deletion (median PFS = 11.5 months vs. 13.8 months; p = 0.17).

Conclusions

From our study, AI eligibility resulted in longer OS and PFS, and also had different effects on patients with EGFR L858R and exon 19 deletion. Since this selection bias may have affected previous clinical trial data on the efficacy of AI combination therapy, their results should be carefully considered henceforth.

The Safety and Effectiveness of Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

Bevacizumab was currently available for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSqNSCLC) patients and has been studied in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for treatment of these patients. This meta-analysis summarizes the most up-to-date evidences regarding the effects and adverse reactions of bevacizumab in the treatment of NSqNSCLC patients.

Methods

The authors searched for RCTs from electronic database including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Experimental arm was defined as the bevacizumab-containing group and the control arm as the bevacizumab-free group. Data of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse reactions were synthetically extracted. A protocol for this meta-analysis has been registered on PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero).

Results

Ten RCTs that involved a total of 3134 patients were included. The experimental group was associated with significant superior ORR (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.14, P < 0.001), OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99, P < 0.001), and prolonged PFS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.74, P < 0.001) compared to the control. No significant difference was observed regarding DCR (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.30, P = 0.08). The experimental group showed higher rate of hypertension (RR 6.91, 95% CI 4.62 to 10.35, P < 0.00001) and hemorrhagic events (RR 3.07, 95% CI 1.78 to 5.30, P < 0.0001) than the control group. The experimental group showed lower rate of anemia (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.96, P = 0.02) than the control group. No significant difference was observed regarding treatment-related adverse event grade 3-5 (TRAE3-5) (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.53, P = 0.06), thrombocytopenia (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.33, P = 0.29), and neutropenia (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.40, P = 0.36).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed that bevacizumab could increase ORR, OS, and prolonged PFS for treatment of NSqNSCLC patients. However, no significant improvement in DCR was observed and bevacizumab could increase the rate of hypertension and hemorrhagic events. Bevacizumab was an acceptable option for NSqNSCLC patients. This trial is registered with PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021226790.

MicroRNA‑10b modulates cisplatin tolerance by targeting p53 directly in lung cancer cells

MicroRNA (miRNA or miR)‑10b is an oncogenic miRNA associated with metastasis that is present in various types of tumor, including lung cancer. However, whether miR‑10b is involved in different malignant characteristics, such as drug resistance or stemness, remains unclear. Therefore, the present study investigated whether miR‑10b is an upstream regulator of p53. Ectopic expression of miR‑10b‑agomir decreased the expression of p53 and its downstream effectors, such as Bax and p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis. Two non‑canonical sites, including 1,580‑1,587 and 2,029‑2,035, located in p53 3'‑untranslated region (UTR) were affected by the presence of miR‑10b. In functional assays, upregulation of the p53 signaling pathway following cisplatin treatment was associated with decreased levels of miR‑10b and upregulation of the luciferase activity of wild‑type, but not 1,584, 2,032‑dual‑mutant, p53 3'‑UTR. The ectopic expression of miR‑10b‑agomir attenuated the stability of p53 3'‑UTR and the expression of p53 and its downstream effectors induced by cisplatin. By contrast, the knockdown of miR‑10b induced the stability of p53 3'‑UTR and increased levels of p53 and the sensitivity of A549 cells to cisplatin treatment. Similar results were also observed for Beas 2B cells. In the clinical investigation, p53 exhibited two distinct associations (cocurrent and countercurrent) with miR‑10b in patients with lung cancer. Patients with lung cancer with low p53 and high miR‑10b levels exhibited the poorest prognosis, while those with high p53 and low miR‑10b exhibited the most favorable prognosis. These findings indicate a novel pathway in which cisplatin induces the levels of p53 by increasing mRNA stability via miR‑10b, indicating a novel oncogenic role of miR‑10b in promoting the malignant characteristics of non‑small cell lung carcinoma.

Clinical Factors Affecting Bevacizumab Efficacy With and Without Conventional Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colon Cancer

PURPOSE

Bevacizumab (BZ) combined with first line chemotherapy (CC) has shown good clinical outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Overall survival (OS) and/or progression free survival in mCRC patients receiving BZ with or without 5FU-based CC is thought to be affected by clinical and morphological factor(s).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed retrospective medical records of all consecutive mCRC patients treated with BZ with or without CC at tertiary care center between 2003 and 2009 out of which149 patients (m = 77, f = 72) were eligible.

RESULTS

Our study population had a mean age at diagnosis of 63.5 years (SD = 11) with median follow-up period of 19.4 months. On initial radiological evaluation following BZ therapy, 56 patients (m = 31, f = 25) had complete or partial response categorized as "early responders." Remaining patients (m = 46, f = 47) who were either stable or showed progressive disease were categorized as "non-responders." Fifty percent among early responders and 60% among non-responders [relative risk (RR) 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-1.06)] demonstrated disease progression on follow up. There was a slightly better OS among early responders compared to non-responders (median 21.5 months days versus 16.8 months, P = 0.07). Cox regression analysis suggested male sex (RR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.43-0.98), hematochezia (RR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.4-0.98), resectable primary tumor (RR 0.42, 95% CI, 0.24-0.72) and resectable metastatic mass (RR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.14-0.74) were found to be associated with longer OS. Abdominal pain (RR 1.76, 95% CI, 1.1-2.8), accompanying diabetes (RR 1.76, 95% CI, 1.09-2.85), and unexplained weight loss (RR 2.73, 95% CI, 1.73-4.29) were associated with poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Better OS among mCRC patients with resectable primary and metastatic tumors was seen. This is the first study to demonstrate slightly better outcome in males and negative influence of diabetes on outcome in mCRC treated with BZ.

Cardiovascular Adverse Events With Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

IMPORTANCE

Systemic safety of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) is a matter of debate and regular updates are necessary.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate systemic adverse events (SAEs) associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs compared with non-anti-VEGF treatments in patients with ocular diseases.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to July 7, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials conducted in adults with retinal diseases who received intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Studies and treatment characteristics and outcome data were extracted and analyzed, and study quality was evaluated.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Main outcomes were major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and total mortality. Secondary outcomes included nonocular hemorrhage, components of MACEs, other cardiovascular outcomes, serious SAEs, and all SAEs.

RESULTS

A total of 74 randomized clinical trials were analyzed: 32 trials (43%) included 14 190 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), 24 (32%) included 5424 patients with diabetic retinopathy (diabetic macular edema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy), 17 trials (23%) included 3757 patients with retinal vein occlusion, and 1 trial (1%) included 122 patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization. Anti-VEGF drug administration did not increase MACEs compared with control agents (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% CI, 0.85-1.58) or total mortality (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.82-1.96). There was an interaction (subgroup difference, P = .04) in mortality risk depending on the underlying disease with an increase (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.03-3.16; P = .04) in the risk of death in patients with diabetic retinopathy; however, no increase was observed in patients with AMD or retinal vein occlusion. Administration of anti-VEGF drugs increased the risk of nonocular hemorrhage (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.01-2.10), mainly in patients with AMD.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Intravitreal anti-VEGF was not associated with an increase in MACEs in the trials examined herein. Increased mortality in patients with diabetes and nonocular hemorrhages, especially in those with AMD, could represent a safety signal, but the evidence was not strong. However, continued surveillance of SAEs remains warranted.

High ELF4 expression in human cancers is associated with worse disease outcomes and increased resistance to anticancer drugs

The malignant phenotype of tumour cells is fuelled by changes in the expression of various transcription factors, including some of the well-studied proteins such as p53 and Myc. Despite significant progress made, little is known about several other transcription factors, including ELF4, and how they help shape the oncogenic processes in cancer cells. To this end, we performed a bioinformatics analysis to facilitate a detailed understanding of how the expression variations of ELF4 in human cancers are related to disease outcomes and the cancer cell drug responses. Here, using ELF4 mRNA expression data of 9,350 samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas pan-cancer project, we identify two groups of patient's tumours: those that expressed high ELF4 transcripts and those that expressed low ELF4 transcripts across 32 different human cancers. We uncover that patients segregated into these two groups are associated with different clinical outcomes. Further, we find that tumours that express high ELF4 mRNA levels tend to be of a higher-grade, afflict a significantly older patient population and have a significantly higher mutation burden. By analysing dose-response profiles to 397 anti-cancer drugs of 612 well-characterised human cancer cell lines, we discover that cell lines that expressed high ELF4 mRNA transcript are significantly less responsive to 129 anti-cancer drugs, and only significantly more response to three drugs: dasatinib, WH-4-023, and Ponatinib, all of which remarkably target the proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SRC and tyrosine-protein kinase ABL1. Collectively our analyses have shown that, across the 32 different human cancers, the patients afflicted with tumours that overexpress ELF4 tended to have a more aggressive disease that is also is more likely more refractory to most anti-cancer drugs, a finding upon which we could devise novel categorisation of patient tumours, treatment, and prognostic strategies.

Colon Cancer, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Colon Cancer focuses on systemic therapy options for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), because important updates have recently been made to this section. These updates include recommendations for first-line use of checkpoint inhibitors for mCRC, that is deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high, recommendations related to the use of biosimilars, and expanded recommendations for biomarker testing. The systemic therapy recommendations now include targeted therapy options for patients with mCRC that is HER2-amplified, or BRAF V600E mutation-positive. Treatment and management of nonmetastatic or resectable/ablatable metastatic disease are discussed in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer available at NCCN.org. Additional topics covered in the complete version include risk assessment, staging, pathology, posttreatment surveillance, and survivorship.

Bilateral adrenal haematoma complicated by adrenal insufficiency in a patient treated with bevacizumab

Bevacizumab (bev) significantly improves outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the addition of bev to concurrent chemotherapy significantly increased the risk of haemorrhage. We describe the case of a patient with mCRC who presented with acute diffuse abdominal pain following four cycles of bev-containing systemic chemotherapy. A CT revealed the appearance of bilateral adrenal enlargement suggestive of acute adrenal haematoma. Blood test results showed a dramatic decrease in cortisol level and highly elevated Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) level suggesting an adrenal insufficiency. After differential diagnosis, we hypothesised that bev may have contributed to the development of a bilateral adrenal haematoma complicated by adrenal insufficiency. Bev was immediately withdrawn and the patient was subsequently treated with hydrocortisone substitution with favourable outcome. This case highlights for the first time the possibility of adrenal bleeding with bev-containing chemotherapy.

Does the presence of an intact primary increase the risk of nonelective colorectal surgery in patients treated with bevacizumab?

AIM

In patients with incurable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), resection of the primary tumour is debated; however, patients with intact primaries may be at a higher risk of complications requiring surgery when receiving treatment with bevacizumab. Our aim was to estimate the risk of nonelective colorectal surgery in patients undergoing bevacizumab therapy for mCRC and evaluate the association between intact primary tumours and risk of nonelective surgery.

METHOD

We designed a population-based, retrospective cohort study using administrative and cancer registry data in Ontario, Canada. We included patients with mCRC who received bevacizumab from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2014. The primary outcome was nonelective colorectal surgery after initiation of bevacizumab. We determined the cumulative incidence of nonelective colorectal surgery among patients with previously resected and unresected primaries, accounting for the competing risk of death. We explored the relationship between previous resection of the primary and need for nonelective surgery using a cause-specific hazards model, controlling for patient, tumour and treatment factors.

RESULTS

We identified 1840 (32.7%) patients with intact primaries and 3784 (67.3%) patients with prior resection. The cumulative incidence of nonelective surgery 1 year after initiating bevacizumab for all patients was 3.9% (95% CI 3.4-4.5%). One-year cumulative incidence was higher in those with intact primaries than in those with resected primaries (6.1% vs 2.9%, P < 0.0001). After adjustment, an intact primary remained strongly associated with nonelective colorectal surgery (hazard ratio = 2.89, 95% CI 2.32-3.61; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab is associated with a low but meaningful risk for serious gastrointestinal complications, necessitating vigilance, particularly among patients with an intact primary tumour.

Extreme complications related to bevacizumab use in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a case series from a III level referral centre and review of the literature

In patients undergoing debulking surgery for ovarian cancer (OC), bevacizumab-combined chemotherapy has been reported to be associated with an increased incidence of adverse events (AEs). Reports in the literature have noted the overall morbidity of bevacizumab to be between 3.7% and 9%. The aim of this study is to report uncommon and unusual manifestations of morbidity in surgical cases performed at our third level referral centers for gynecologic oncology. Additionally, we review the rare and severe bevacizumab-related complications that have been described in the literature. We defined as "extreme", the particularly rare and/or severe complications up to determining a life-threatening condition or death, which are related to the use of bevacizumab. A case-series of extreme complications registered at our institutions were reported. In addition, a literature search of the PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases was performed for this review. The studies collected included: 8 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 5 prospective observational, 1 prospective phase-IV, 10 prospective phase-II, 2 prospective phase-I, and 20 retrospective studies, as well as 9 case reports. Bevacizumab was administered as primary treatment in adjuvant and neo-adjuvant setting in 16 and 5 studies respectively, as treatment for recurrence in 36 trials, and for secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in 3 studies. The overall population administered with bevacizumab numbered 7,096 women. Extreme complications were observed in 591 patients, with a morbidity rate of the 8.3%. Overall, central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular, gastrointestinal (GI) and primary infectious complications were seen in 22 patients (0.3%), 261 patients (3.7%), 159 patients (2.2%), and 8 patients (0.13%), respectively. Hemorrhagic and wound complications occurred in 18 women (0.25%), and 112 women (1.6%), respectively. Extreme complications related to the use of bevacizumab are rare, and often go unrecognized. The recognition and immediate management of such rare and life-threatening complications in patients treated at third level referral centers could significantly improve patient survival.

Perioperative Chemotherapy for Liver Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer

Simple Summary

Survival outcomes for resectable metastatic colorectal cancer have improved over the past decade. This is due in part to improvements made in imaging technology, locoregional treatment, and systemic treatment. The focus of this review is to summarize and analyze the existing information available on systemic therapy in the setting of colorectal cancer with liver metastases. It is written with structured viewpoints including patient selection, sequencing of treatment, choice of systemic therapy for upfront resectable disease and conversion chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal cancer. Post-treatment surveillance and future research directions are also discussed. This review will help treating physicians make decisions for the treatment of liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

Abstract

The liver is the dominant site of metastasis for patients with colorectal cancer. For those with isolated liver metastases, surgical resection with systemic therapy has led to long-term remission in as high as 80% of patients in well-selected cohorts. This review will focus on how systemic therapy should be integrated with resection of liver metastases; in particular, the use of clinical risk scores based on clinicopathological features that help with patient selection, various approaches to the treatment of micro-metastatic disease (peri-operative versus post-operative chemotherapy), as well as conversion chemotherapy for those with initially upfront unresectable disease will be discussed.

Radiation-Induced Optic Neuropathy: Literature Review

Radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) is a rare disease caused by exposure of the optic nerves to radiation during radiotherapy procedures for head and neck tumours. The purpose of this study was to review and summarise the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentations, pathphysiology characteristics, diagnosis, and management of RION. Its occurrence is associated with cumulative doses of radiation above 50 Gy, presence of multi-morbidities and the presence of concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It manifests with acute, painless, and monocular loss of vision, and these symptoms appear late after the radiation exposure. The diagnosis of the disease occurs by exclusion and, mainly, by the clinical analysis of the case associated with the time of radiation exposure. Treatment does not seem promising and there is not an effective cure. In this review, we mainly focus on compiling existing information on the topic and providing knowledge for early diagnosis and more efficient treatment.

Cardiovascular Toxicity of Targeted Therapies for Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Background

Several targeted therapies for cancer have been associated with cardiovascular toxicity. The evidence for this association has not been synthesized systematically nor has the quality of evidence been considered. We synthesized systematic review evidence of cardiovascular toxicity of individual targeted agents.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for systematic reviews with meta-analyses of cardiovascular outcomes for individual agents published to May 2020. We selected reviews according to prespecified eligibility criteria (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42017080014). We classified evidence of cardiovascular toxicity as sufficient, probable, possible, or indeterminate for specific cardiovascular outcomes based on statistical significance, study quality, and size.

Results

From 113 systematic reviews, we found at least probable systematic review evidence of cardiovascular toxicity for 18 agents, including high- and all-grade hypertension for bevacizumab, ramucirumab, axitinib, cediranib, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib, vandetanib, aflibercept, abiraterone, and enzalutamide, and all-grade hypertension for nintedanib; high- and all-grade arterial thromboembolism (includes cardiac and/or cerebral events) for bevacizumab and abiraterone, high-grade arterial thromboembolism for trastuzumab, and all-grade arterial thromboembolism for sorafenib and tamoxifen; high- and all-grade venous thromboembolism (VTE) for lenalidomide and thalidomide, high-grade VTE for cetuximab and panitumumab, and all-grade VTE for bevacizumab; high- and all-grade left ventricular ejection fraction decline or congestive heart failure for bevacizumab and trastuzumab, and all-grade left ventricular ejection fraction decline/congestive heart failure for pazopanib and sunitinib; and all-grade corrected QT interval prolongation for vandetanib.

Conclusions

Our review provides an accessible summary of the cardiovascular toxicity of targeted therapy to assist clinicians and patients when managing cardiovascular health.

Pharmacogenomics, Pharmacokinetics and Circulating Proteins as Biomarkers for Bevacizumab Treatment Optimization in Patients with Cancer: A Review

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets VEGF-A and inhibits tumor angiogenesis. Bevacizumab is approved for the treatment of various cancer, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), ovarian cancer, lung cancer, and others. Thus, it is widely used in oncology, but contrary to other therapeutic classes, there is still a lack of validating predictive factors for treatment outcomes with these agents. In recent years, the research for factors predictive of anti-VEGF treatments and especially bevacizumab response has been one of the most competitive translational research fields. Herein, we review and present the available literature of the clinical use of biomarkers, pharmacogenomics (PG), and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) approaches that can be used for the optimization of bevacizumab use in the era of precision medicine.

Assessing the risk-benefit profile of ramucirumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab is a widely used cancer drug having gained six regulatory approvals in various advanced solid tumors. Thus, assessing the risk-benefit profile of such a commonly used drug across multiple tumor types is necessary to inform clinical and reimbursement decisions. To objectively assess the risks and benefits of ramucirumab in patients with advanced solid tumors, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and conference abstracts for all RCTs of ramucirumab in patients with advanced solid cancer was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Data on treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs), fatal adverse events (FAEs), primary endpoint, gains in median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) with their hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and quality of life (QOL) were extracted from each RCT. Summary relative risks (RR) with 95% CI for SAEs and FAEs were calculated by pooling data across the RCTs using random-effects model. Treatment benefit was evaluated descriptively in terms of median and HR with 95% CI of OS and PFS gains as well as improvements in QOL. ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS), a validated tool, was used to objectively quantify clinical benefit of ramucirumab in approved settings.

FINDINGS

Ten RCTs met our inclusion criteria. Compared with the control arm, the use of ramucirumab was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing SAE (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.21, incidence 37.5% v 33.5%). The increase in risk of FAE (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.96-2.07, incidence 1.8% v 1.3%) was not statistically significant. Using the ESMO MCBS tool, clinical benefit with ramucirumab was not substantial in any indication, five of six approvals scoring a "negligible benefit" score of 1 or 2. QOL was either not reported (30%) or not improved (70%) in these RCTs.

INTERPRETATION

In this meta-analysis of RCTs, use of ramucirumab in patients with advanced cancer was associated with increased risk of treatment related serious and possibly fatal adverse events but the magnitude of clinical benefit from ramucirumab was mostly negligible with no trial reporting an improvement in QOL. These relative risks and benefits should be considered in clinical and regulatory decision making.

FUNDING

None.

MOMENTUM: A Phase I Trial Investigating 2 Schedules of Capecitabine With Aflibercept in Patients With Gastrointestinal and Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although data from preclinical and clinical studies provide a strong rationale for combining capecitabine with anti-angiogenic agents, clinical development of this fluoropyrimidine in combination with aflibercept has lagged behind other treatments. We conducted a nonrandomized, noncomparative, 2-arm, phase I trial to address this unmet need.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with chemorefractory gastrointestinal and breast cancer were sequentially recruited into a continuous (Arm A, starting dose 1100 mg/m²/day) or intermittent (Arm B, 2 weeks on/1 week off, starting dose 1700 mg/m²/day) capecitabine dosing arm. Aflibercept was administered at a flat dose of 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks in both arms. A classical 3 + 3, dose-escalation design was used. The primary objective was to establish the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and recommended dose for phase II trials.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight eligible patients were recruited of whom 33 were assessable for DLTs (15 in arm A and 18 in arm B). Fourteen had colorectal cancer, 8 gastric cancer, and 11 breast cancer. DLTs included grade 2 hand-foot syndrome, grade 2 anorexia considered unacceptable by the patient, and grade 3 hypertension. The recommended dose for phase II trials for capecitabine was established at 1300 mg/m²/day in Arm A and 2500 mg/m²/day in Arm B with treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurring in 47% and 50% of patients, respectively. Among 26 assessable patients, the objective response rate was 15.4% in Arm A and 7.7% in Arm B.

CONCLUSION

Combining capecitabine with aflibercept is feasible and associated with a manageable safety profile and some anti-tumor activity in patients with chemorefractory gastrointestinal and breast cancer.

Assessment of Predictive Scoring System for 90-Day Mortality Among Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Have Completed Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

IMPORTANCE

There is currently no system to predict 90-day morality among patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after the completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

OBJECTIVE

To validate the accuracy of a predictive scoring system for 90-day mortality among patients with locally advanced HNSCC who have completed CCRT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This prognostic study included 16 029 patients with HNSCC who completed CCRT between January 2006 and December 2015. Data were extracted from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database. A risk scoring system was developed based on significant risk factors and corresponding risk coefficients. Data analysis was conducted from June 2018 to February 2019.

EXPOSURES

Mortality within 90 days of completion of definitive CCRT.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The 90-day mortality rate after completion of CCRT and the accuracy of the scoring system, based on a comparison of mortality rates between training and test data sets.

RESULTS

Among 16 029 patients with locally advanced HNSCC, 1068 (6.66%; 1016 [95.1%] men; mean [SD] age, 55.11 [11.45] years) died before reaching the 90-day threshold, and 14 961 (93.4%; 14 080 [94.1%] men; mean [SD] age, 52.07 [9.99] years) survived. Multivariable analysis revealed that being aged 50 years or older (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.263; 95% CI, 1.104-1.445; P < .001), being aged 70 years or older (aHR, 2.183; 95% CI, 1.801-2.645; P < .001), having pneumonia (aHR, 1.946; 95% CI, 1.636-2.314; P < .001), having sepsis (aHR, 3.005; 95% CI, 2.503-3.607; P < .001), having hemiplegia (aHR, 1.430; 95% CI, 1.085-1.884; P = .01), having moderate or severe renal disease (aHR, 2.054; 95% CI, 1.643-2.568; P < .001), having leukemia (aHR, 4.541; 95% CI, 1.132-8.207; P = .03), and having non-HNSCC metastatic solid cancers (aHR, 1.457; 95% CI, 1.292-1.644; P < .001) were significant risk factors for 90-day mortality. Risk scores were categorized as very low risk (score of 0), low risk (score 1-3), moderate risk (score 4-6), and high risk (score ≥7), with 90-day mortality rates of 3.37%, 5.00% to 10.98%, 16.15% to 29.13%, and 33.93% to 37.50%, respectively. Mortality rates for patients with the same risk score in the training and test data sets were similar (score of 0, 3.27% vs 3.66%; score of 6, 27.42% vs 25.00%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this prognostic study, a 90-day mortality scoring system accurately predicted 90-day mortality among patients with locally advanced HNSCC who completed CCRT.

Multiplicity and the marginal benefits of bevacizumab in malignant solid tumours

Although clinical trials of novel medications have historically been individually interpreted, there is increasing recognition that trials should be considered to be part of a broader clinical trials agenda or portfolio […]

Classification of Strokes in Patients Receiving Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify the differences in the types of strokes seen in patients receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) compared with normal control populations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective consecutive review of all patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2013, for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), or retinal vein occlusion (RVO). A 2-year follow-up period was required for study inclusion. Three age- and sex-matched cohorts were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 2,541 patients were examined. There were 690 patients identified during the study period as receiving an intravitreal injection for AMD, DME, PDR, or RVO. Of these patients, 38 (5.8%) suffered a stroke after starting intravitreal injection therapy. Of these strokes, 27 (71.1%) were ischemic, six (15.8%) were embolic, and five (13.2%) were hemorrhagic. There were no differences in the types of strokes identified among the patients receiving intravitreal injections between the case cohort and the control cohorts (P > .05 for all).

CONCLUSION

The authors' data suggest there is no predilection to the development of ischemic infarcts or hemorrhagic strokes in those patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF compared with control populations. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:e140-e157.].

Overview of Current Immunotherapies Targeting Mutated KRAS Cancers

The occurrence of somatic substitution mutations of the KRAS proto-oncogene is highly prevalent in certain cancer types, which often leads to constant activation of proliferative pathways and subsequent neoplastic transformation. It is often seen as a gateway mutation in carcinogenesis and has been commonly deemed as a predictive biomarker for poor prognosis and relapse when conventional chemotherapeutics are employed. Additionally, its mutational status also renders EGFR targeted therapies ineffective owing to its downstream location. Efforts to discover new approaches targeting this menacing culprit have been ongoing for years without much success, and with incidences of KRAS positive cancer patients being on the rise, researchers are now turning towards immunotherapies as the way forward. In this scoping review, recent immunotherapeutic developments and advances in both preclinical and clinical studies targeting K-ras directly or indirectly via its downstream signal transduction machinery will be discussed. Additionally, some of the challenges and limitations of various K-ras targeting immunotherapeutic approaches such as vaccines, adoptive T cell therapies, and checkpoint inhibitors against KRAS positive cancers will be deliberated.

[Cancer patients in operative intensive care medicine]

Die Prävalenz onkologischer Erkrankungen ist in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten stetig angestiegen. Durch neue Therapieoptionen können immer mehr Patienten mit einem kurativen Therapieansatz behandelt werden. Diese individualisierten und teilweise sehr aggressiven Therapien können jedoch auch zu schweren Nebenwirkungen führen. Diese sollten als wichtige Differenzialdiagnosen zu anderen vitalbedrohlichen Krankheitsbildern auch dem im OP und als Intensivmediziner tätigen Anästhesisten bekannt sein. Krebspatienten werden häufig auf operativen Intensivstationen aufgenommen, um Komplikationen der malignen Grunderkrankung oder auch Nebenwirkungen einer operativen oder konservativen Therapie zu behandeln. Aktuelle Untersuchungen zeigen, dass die maligne Grunderkrankung entgegen bisheriger Annahme keinen wesentlichen Einfluss auf das Intensivüberleben hat. Bei der Aufnahme eines onkologischen Patienten sollte daher die akut vorliegende Organdysfunktion zunächst im Vordergrund stehen. Bei der Therapiezielplanung gilt es, nicht zu übersehen, wann ein kuratives in ein palliatives Konzept übergehen muss. Hierfür müssen neue Aufnahmestrategien und -kriterien entwickelt und evaluiert werden. In diesem Übersichtsartikel werden Diagnosen und Therapien häufiger intensivmedizinischer Krankheitsbilder von onkologischen Patienten sowie Nebenwirkungen moderner onkologischer Therapien dargelegt und Aufnahmestrategien für Patienten mit malignen Erkrankungen vorgestellt.

New and emerging systemic therapy options for well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Introduction: Well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with a wide range of clinical behavior. Multiple treatment modalities exist, including novel and emerging systemic options, and an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each is imperative for optimizing the outcomes of patients with GEP-NETs.Areas covered: While surgical resection remains the preferred treatment for localized well-differentiated GEP-NETs, treatment of unresectable disease depends on its extent, location, and distribution as well as underlying aspects of tumor biology. Isolated hepatic metastases can be successfully treated with liver-directed therapies such as hepatic arterial based therapies or ablation. Diffuse metastatic disease often requires systemic treatments such as molecular-targeted therapeutics, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), or traditional chemotherapy. Somatostatin analogs are often the primary treatment option capable of simultaneously inhibiting hormone production and slowing tumor growth.Expert opinion: Recent advances in systemic treatment options for advanced well-differentiated GEP-NETs have emerged due to an improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for tumor development and progression. Future research is needed to determine the optimal indications for and sequencing of these novel therapies.

Metabolic gene alterations impact the clinical aggressiveness and drug responses of 32 human cancers

Malignant cells reconfigure their metabolism to support oncogenic processes such as accelerated growth and proliferation. The mechanisms by which this occurs likely involve alterations to genes that encode metabolic enzymes. Here, using genomics data for 10,528 tumours of 32 different cancer types, we characterise the alterations of genes involved in various metabolic pathways. We find that mutations and copy number variations of metabolic genes are pervasive across all human cancers. Based on the frequencies of metabolic gene alterations, we further find that there are two distinct cancer supertypes that tend to be associated with different clinical outcomes. By utilising the known dose-response profiles of 825 cancer cell lines, we infer that cancers belonging to these supertypes are likely to respond differently to various anticancer drugs. Collectively our analyses define the foundational metabolic features of different cancer supertypes and subtypes upon which discriminatory strategies for treating particular tumours could be constructed.

Thermal Ablation of Metastatic Colon Cancer to the Liver

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is responsible for approximately 10% of cancer-related deaths in the Western world. Liver metastases are frequently seen at the time of diagnosis and throughout the course of the disease. Surgical resection is often considered as it provides long-term survival; however, few patients are candidates for resection. Percutaneous ablative therapies are also used in the management of this patient population. Different thermal ablation (TA) technologies are available including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation (MWA), laser, and cryoablation. There is growing evidence about the role of interventional oncology and image-guided percutaneous ablation in the management of metastatic colorectal liver disease. This article aims to outline the technical considerations, outcomes, and rational of TA in the management of patients with CRC liver metastases, focusing on the emerging role of MWA.

Increased Risk of Hypertension with Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Hypertension is associated with enzalutamide in the treatment of prostate cancer. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to determine the risk of hypertension. Databases including Pubmed and Google scholar were searched to identify randomized clinical trials with enzalutamide. A total of seven studies including 7347 patients were selected. The overall incidences of all-grade and high-grade hypertension were 11.9% (95%% CI: 8.8-16.0%) and 4.9% (95%% CI: 3.5-6.8%) respectively, with a relative risk of 2.82 (95%% CI: 2.34-3.38, p < 0.001) for all-grade and 2.27 (95%% CI: 1.73-2.96, p < 0.001) for high-grade. There was a significant risk of developing hypertension with enzalutamide.

Incidence and Risk of Fatal Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Treated With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeted Agents: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background/Aim: Agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway have dramatically improved the outlook of cancer treatment. Meanwhile, it is well-known that they are associated with increases in the risk of fatal adverse events (FAEs). Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)-targeted drugs have been approved for the treatment of several malignancies. However, little is known regarding the FAEs induced by VEGFR2-targeted agents across different tumor types and treatment regimens. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase database from January 1966 to April 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to calculate the incidence and relative risks (RRs) of FAE. Results: Seventeen RCTs involving 6,982 subjects with solid tumors were included in this study. The overall incidence of FAEs associated with VEGFR2-targeted agents was 1.7% (95% CI: 0.9-2.4%). Compared with controls, the administration of VEGFR2-targeted agents did not increase the risk of FAEs (RR, 1.29; 95% CI: 0.90-1.86). No significant association was found between FAE and VEGFR2-targeted agents in subgroup analyses based on tumor type, treatment strategy, clinical phase, masking method, median treatment duration, and approval status. Additionally, FAEs occurred in the major organ systems dispersedly. Trial sequential analysis revealed that our results are solid and further studies are unlikely to change this. Conclusions: VEGFR2-targeted agents were not associated with an increased risk of FAEs.

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterm Infants With Retinopathy of Prematurity by Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Among extremely preterm infants, we evaluated whether bevacizumab therapy compared with surgery for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is associated with adverse outcomes in early childhood.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on preterm (22-26 + 6/7 weeks' gestational age) infants admitted to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centers who received bevacizumab or surgery exclusively for ROP. The primary outcome was death or severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) at 18 to 26 months' corrected age (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition cognitive or motor composite score <70, Gross Motor Functional Classification Scale level ≥2, bilateral blindness or hearing impairment).

RESULTS

The cohort (N = 405; 214 [53%] boys; median [interquartile range] gestational age: 24.6 [23.9-25.3] weeks) included 181 (45%) infants who received bevacizumab and 224 (55%) who underwent ROP surgery. Infants treated with bevacizumab had a lower median (interquartile range) birth weight (640 [541-709] vs 660 [572.5-750] g; P = .02) and longer durations of conventional ventilation (35 [21-58] vs 33 [18-49] days; P = .04) and supplemental oxygen (112 [94-120] vs 105 [84.5-120] days; P = .01). Death or severe NDI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 2.14) and severe NDI (aOR 1.14; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.70) did not differ between groups. Odds of death (aOR 2.54 [95% CI 1.42 to 4.55]; P = .002), a cognitive score <85 (aOR 1.78 [95% CI 1.09 to 2.91]; P = .02), and a Gross Motor Functional Classification Scale level ≥2 (aOR 1.73 [95% CI 1.04 to 2.88]; P = .04) were significantly higher with bevacizumab therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter cohort of preterm infants, ROP treatment modality was not associated with differences in death or NDI, but the bevacizumab group had higher mortality and poor cognitive outcomes in early childhood. These data reveal the need for a rigorous appraisal of ROP therapy.

A Pilot Study of Liposomal Doxorubicin Combined with Bevacizumab followed by Bevacizumab Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Kaposi Sarcoma

PURPOSE

VEGF-A is important in the pathogenesis of Kaposi sarcoma, and bevacizumab has a response rate of 31%. We explored the combination of bevacizumab with liposomal doxorubicin in patients with Kaposi sarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with Kaposi sarcoma requiring systemic therapy were enrolled in one of two cohorts. Cohort 1 included patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative Kaposi sarcoma or with HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma who would not be expected to respond to antiretroviral therapy (ART) alone (i.e., either stable or progressive Kaposi sarcoma on ART). Cohort 2 included all other patients with HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma. Patients were treated with six cycles of liposomal doxorubicin with bevacizumab every 3 weeks followed by up to 11 cycles of bevacizumab alone.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were enrolled: 10 (two HIV negative) in cohort 1 and six in cohort 2. Fourteen patients had advanced disease (AIDS Clinical Trials Group T1). Overall response rate (complete and partial responses) was 56% [80% confidence interval (CI), 38%-74%] for all patients and were similar in the two cohorts. Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.5 months-not estimable). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events attributed to therapy included hypertension (n = 5), neutropenia (n = 6), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n = 1), and cerebral ischemia (n = 1). There was a significant decrease in VEGF-A levels from baseline to the end of six cycles of combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with bevacizumab has activity in advanced Kaposi sarcoma, but it is unclear whether the combination yields better outcomes than liposomal doxorubicin used alone.