1
|
Scime NV, Metcalfe A, Nettel-Aguirre A, Tough SC, Chaput KH. Association of postpartum medication practices with early breastfeeding cessation among mothers with chronic conditions: A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2023; 102:420-429. [PMID: 36707933 PMCID: PMC10008275 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Use of medications is a common concern for breastfeeding women, particularly when they are strongly needed or unavoidable to manage maternal chronic conditions. Yet the influence of medication usage patterns on breastfeeding duration in mothers with chronic conditions is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine whether postpartum medication practices were associated with shorter breastfeeding duration or earlier than planned breastfeeding cessation among mothers with chronic conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed 346 mothers with chronic conditions enrolled in a prospective, community-based pregnancy cohort study (Alberta, Canada) who initiated breastfeeding after birth. Data were collected through self-report questionnaires spanning late pregnancy to 6 months postpartum. Based on reported use of preexisting medications while breastfeeding, women were classified as continuing medications (reference group), discontinuing one or more medications, or those who did not use preexisting medications. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the association of medication practices and overall breastfeeding duration in weeks. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association of medication practices and earlier than planned breastfeeding cessation. Multivariable models adjusted for demographic and health-related factors. RESULTS Overall, 30.6% of women with chronic conditions stopped breastfeeding in the first 6 months, almost all of whom did so earlier than planned. In multivariable models, medication discontinuation was significantly associated with shorter breastfeeding duration (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.70) and earlier than planned breastfeeding cessation (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.85, 95% CI 1.01-3.42), whereas medication non-use was not associated with differences in breastfeeding outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Women with chronic conditions who discontinued preexisting medications while breastfeeding had significantly shorter breastfeeding duration and were less likely to meet their breastfeeding goals in the first 6 months postpartum compared to women who continued preexisting medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie V Scime
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amy Metcalfe
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alberto Nettel-Aguirre
- Center For Health and Social Analytics, National Institute for Applied Statistical Research, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Suzanne C Tough
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kathleen H Chaput
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Denz R, Klaaßen-Mielke R, Timmesfeld N. A comparison of different methods to adjust survival curves for confounders. Stat Med 2023; 42:1461-1479. [PMID: 36748630 DOI: 10.1002/sim.9681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Treatment specific survival curves are an important tool to illustrate the treatment effect in studies with time-to-event outcomes. In non-randomized studies, unadjusted estimates can lead to biased depictions due to confounding. Multiple methods to adjust survival curves for confounders exist. However, it is currently unclear which method is the most appropriate in which situation. Our goal is to compare forms of inverse probability of treatment weighting, the G-Formula, propensity score matching, empirical likelihood estimation and augmented estimators as well as their pseudo-values based counterparts in different scenarios with a focus on their bias and goodness-of-fit. We provide a short review of all methods and illustrate their usage by contrasting the survival of smokers and non-smokers, using data from the German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle-Brachial-Index. Subsequently, we compare the methods using a Monte-Carlo simulation. We consider scenarios in which correctly or incorrectly specified models for describing the treatment assignment and the time-to-event outcome are used with varying sample sizes. The bias and goodness-of-fit is determined by taking the entire survival curve into account. When used properly, all methods showed no systematic bias in medium to large samples. Cox regression based methods, however, showed systematic bias in small samples. The goodness-of-fit varied greatly between different methods and scenarios. Methods utilizing an outcome model were more efficient than other techniques, while augmented estimators using an additional treatment assignment model were unbiased when either model was correct with a goodness-of-fit comparable to other methods. These "doubly-robust" methods have important advantages in every considered scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Denz
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany
| | - Renate Klaaßen-Mielke
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany
| | - Nina Timmesfeld
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prognostic Factors and Primary Healing on Root Perforation Repaired with MTA: A 14-year Longitudinal Study. J Endod 2022; 48:1092-1099. [PMID: 35714727 DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Few data are available on the long-term efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in treating root canal perforations. This prospective cohort study builds on a previously reported trial to determine the outcome for teeth with root perforations treated with orthograde MTA after longer follow-up and identify potential prognostic factors. METHODS A prospective cohort study was performed, enrolling (1999-2009) patients with a single dental perforation treated with MTA. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative information was evaluated, and the outcomes were dichotomized as healed or nonhealing. Patients were followed up yearly until 2018 for a maximum of 17 years after treatment, with controls carried out until 14 years. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated using standardized follow-up protocols. RESULTS Of the 124 entrolled patients (median age = 36.5 years, 53.2% male), 115 were healed at the first (n = 110, 89%) or second (n = 5, 4%) annual posttreatment checkup, while 9 subjects (7%, 4 females, 18-65 years old) did not heal. Characteristics significantly associated with nonhealing were gender, positive probing, size, and perforation site. Perforations recurred in 48 teeth during the follow-up with the estimated probability of reversal at 5, 10, and 14 years of 6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-10%), 30% (95% CI, 20%-38%), and 62% (95% CI, 46%-73%), respectively. Positive probing had a higher reversal risk (hazard ratio = 3.3, P ≤ .001), and perforations >3 mm were more likely to have a reversal (hazard ratio = 4.1, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The risk of reversal for healed MTA-treated root canal perforations, initially relatively low, vastly increases over time.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hu ZH, Wang HL, Gale RP, Zhang MJ. A SAS macro for estimating direct adjusted survival functions for time-to-event data with or without left truncation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2022; 57:6-10. [PMID: 34413470 PMCID: PMC9396933 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01435-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
There are several statistical programmes to compute direct adjusted survival estimates from results of the Cox proportional hazards model. However, when used to analyze observational databases with large sample sizes or highly stratified treatment groups such as in registry-related datasets, these programmes are inefficient or unable to generate confidence bands and simultaneous p values. Also, these programmes do not consider potential left-truncation in retrospectively collected data. To address these deficiencies we developed a new SAS macro %adjsurvlt() able to produce direct adjusted survival estimates based on a stratified Cox model. The macro has improved computational performance and is able to handle left-truncated and right-censored time-to-event data. Several mechanisms were implemented to improve computational efficiency including choosing matrix operations over do-loops and reducing dimensions of co-variate matrices. Compared to the latest SAS macro, %adjsurvlt() used < 0.1% computational time to process a dataset with 100 treatment cohorts and a sample size of 20,000 and showed similar computational efficiency when analyzing left-truncated and right-censored data. We illustrate use of %adjsurvlt() to compare retrospectively collected survival data of 2 transplant cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Huan Hu
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Hai-Lin Wang
- Everest Clinical Research Services, Inc., Little Falls, NJ, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adjusted Survival Curves Improve Understanding of Multivariable Cox Model Results. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36:3367-3371. [PMID: 34565525 PMCID: PMC8476943 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Kaplan-Meier survival curves are the most common methods for unadjusted group comparison of outcomes in orthopedic research. However, they may be misleading due to an imbalance of confounders between patient groups. The Cox model is frequently used to adjust for confounders, but graphical display of adjusted survival curves is not commonly utilized. We describe the circumstances when adjusted survival curves are useful in orthopedic research, describe and use 2 different methods to obtain adjusted curves, and illustrate how they can improve understanding of the multivariable Cox model results. We further provide practical strategies for identifying the need for and performing adjusted survival curves. Please visit the followinghttps://youtu.be/ys0hy2CiMCAfor a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mikkelsen AP, Greiber IK, Scheller NM, Lidegaard Ø. Association of Labor Epidural Analgesia With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children. JAMA 2021; 326:1170-1177. [PMID: 34581738 PMCID: PMC8479581 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.12655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE A recent cohort study found that epidural analgesia during labor was associated with an increased risk of autism in offspring. OBJECTIVE To investigate if labor epidural increases the risk of autism in offspring. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This nationwide retrospective cohort study identified all live-born children in Denmark between January 2006 and December 2013. Follow-up commenced at children's first birthday and ended in December 2017. Among 485 093 live-born children, 5915 were excluded because of occurrences during the first year of life including death, emigration, misregistration of birth, diagnosis of disease inherently linked to autism, or diagnosis of autism. EXPOSURES Administration of epidural analgesia during labor, as identified by procedure code. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome of interest was incident diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder based on International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision codes in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register or National Patient Register. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression, adjusted for covariates describing maternal comorbidity, sociodemographic factors, lifestyle, pregnancy, psychiatric illness, psychotropic medication, medical-seeking behavior, and family history of autism. A secondary analysis used a within-mother design including only children of mothers with both exposure and nonexposure to labor epidural analgesia in different deliveries. RESULTS The cohort included 479 178 children (233 405 girls [48.7%]; median maternal age at delivery, 30.9 [IQR, 27.6-34.2] years); of these, 92 900 (19.4%) were exposed to epidural analgesia during labor. Median follow-up was 7.0 years (IQR, 4.9-9.0 years), and by the end of follow-up, 6428 children (1.3%) had been diagnosed with autism. Exposed children had an autism diagnosis incidence rate of 23.1 per 10 000 person-years compared with 18.5 per 10 000 person-years in the unexposed group (crude hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.21-1.37]; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.98-1.11]). A secondary within-mother analysis including 59 154 children (12.3%) estimated an autism diagnosis incidence rate of 20.8 per 10 000 person-years in the exposed group and 17.1 per 10 000 person-years in the unexposed group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.90-1.21]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this nationwide cohort study of Danish children, maternal exposure to epidural analgesia during labor was not significantly associated with autism spectrum disorder in offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Pretzmann Mikkelsen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Iben Katinka Greiber
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nikolai Madrid Scheller
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Queen Ingrid’s Hospital, Nuuk, Greenland
| | - Øjvind Lidegaard
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yuan C, Morales-Oyarvide V, Khalaf N, Perez K, Tabung FK, Ho GYF, Kooperberg C, Shadyab AH, Qi L, Kraft P, Sesso HD, Giovannucci EL, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Ng K, Fuchs CS, Wolpin BM, Babic A. Prediagnostic Inflammation and Pancreatic Cancer Survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1186-1193. [PMID: 33739411 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic inflammation may promote initiation and progression of pancreatic cancer, but no studies have examined the association between inflammation in the period before diagnosis and pancreatic cancer survival. METHODS We prospectively examined the association of prediagnostic plasma levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α receptor 2 with survival among 492 participants from 5 large US prospective cohort studies who developed pancreatic cancer. Using an empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) score, we evaluated whether long-term proinflammatory diets were associated with survival among 1153 patients from 2 of the 5 cohorts. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios for death with adjustment for potential confounders. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Higher prediagnostic levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α receptor 2 were individually associated with reduced survival (Ptrend = .03, .01, and .04, respectively). Compared with patients with a combined inflammatory biomarker score of 0 (all 3 marker levels below medians), those with a score of 3 (all 3 marker levels above medians) had a hazard ratio for death of 1.57 (95% confidence interval = 1.16 to 2.12; Ptrend = .003), corresponding to median overall survival times of 8 vs 5 months. Patients consuming the most proinflammatory diets (EDIP quartile 4) in the prediagnostic period had a hazard ratio for death of 1.34 (95% confidence interval = 1.13 to 1.59; Ptrend = .01), compared with those consuming the least proinflammatory diets (EDIP quartile 1). CONCLUSION Prediagnostic levels of inflammatory biomarkers and long-term proinflammatory diets were inversely associated with pancreatic cancer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vicente Morales-Oyarvide
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Natalia Khalaf
- Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kimberly Perez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fred K Tabung
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.,The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center-Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gloria Y F Ho
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Epidemiology and Prevention, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, USA
| | - Charles Kooperberg
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Aladdin H Shadyab
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lihong Qi
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Howard D Sesso
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Preventive Medicine and Division of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edward L Giovannucci
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - JoAnn E Manson
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Preventive Medicine and Division of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meir J Stampfer
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ana Babic
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park SH, Han K, Park SY. Mistakes to Avoid for Accurate and Transparent Reporting of Survival Analysis in Imaging Research. Korean J Radiol 2021; 22:1587-1593. [PMID: 34431251 PMCID: PMC8484160 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Seong Ho Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Kyunghwa Han
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seo Young Park
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Korea National Open University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Coronary Revascularization in the Past Two Decades in Japan (From the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registries Cohort-1, -2, and -3). Am J Cardiol 2021; 153:20-29. [PMID: 34238444 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of coronary artery disease has substantially changed over the past two decades. However, it is unknown whether and how much these changes have contributed to the improvement of long-term outcomes after coronary revascularization. We assessed trends in the demographics, practice patterns and long-term outcomes in 24,951 patients who underwent their first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 20,106), or isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n = 4,845) using the data in a series of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registries (Cohort-1 [2000 to 2002]: n = 7,435, Cohort-2 [2005 to 2007]: n = 8,435, and Cohort-3 [2011 to 2013]: n = 9,081). From Cohort-1 to Cohort-3, the patients got progressively older across subsequent cohorts (67.0 ± 10.0, 68.4 ± 9.9, and 69.8 ± 10.2 years, ptrend < 0.001). There was increased use of PCI over CABG (73.5%, 81.9%, and 85.2%, ptrend < 0.001) and increased prevalence of evidence-based medications use over time. The cumulative 3-year incidence of all-cause death was similar across the 3 cohorts (9.0%, 9.0%, and 9.3%, p = 0.74), while cardiovascular death decreased over time (5.7%, 5.1%, and 4.8%, p = 0.03). The adjusted risk for all-cause death and for cardiovascular death progressively decreased from Cohort-1 to Cohort-2 (HR:0.89, 95%CI:0.80 to 0.99, p = 0.03, and HR:0.80, 95%CI:0.70 to 0.92, p = 0.002, respectively), and from Cohort-2 to Cohort-3 (HR:0.86, 95%CI:0.78 to 0.95, p = 0.004, and HR:0.77, 95%CI:0.67-0.89, p < 0.001, respectively). The risks for stroke and repeated coronary revascularization also improved over time. In conclusions, we found a progressive and substantial reduction of adjusted risk for all-cause death, cardiovascular death, stroke, and repeated coronary revascularization over the past two decades in Japan.
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang J, Huang X, Sun S, Wang K, Qu Y, Chen X, Wu R, Zhang Y, Liu Q, Zhang J, Luo J, Xiao J, Gao L, Xu G, Hu C, Li YX, Yi J. Stage-dependent conditional survival and failure hazard of non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiation therapy: Clinical implications for treatment strategies and surveillance. Cancer Med 2021; 10:3613-3621. [PMID: 33960136 PMCID: PMC8178506 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Conditional survival (CS) and failure hazard estimations can provide important dynamic prognostic information for clinical decision‐making and surveillance counseling. The current study aimed to investigate the CS and dynamic failure hazard in non‐metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods Conditional overall survival (COS) and progression‐free survival (CPFS) estimates adjusted for age and gender against each AJCC 8th stage were calculated. Multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models were fitted in the entire population at baseline and subsequently separate MCR models were fitted in patients who have maintained event‐free time of 1 to 10 years to generate respective hazard ratio (HR). Annual hazard rates of death and progression over 10 years for each stage were also estimated. Results A total of 1993 patients were eligible for analysis. The estimated 5‐year OS and PFS for entire cohort were 79.0% and 70.7% at initial diagnosis. After 5 years of event‐free follow‐up, additional 5‐year COS and CPFS increased to 85.9% and 85.5%, respectively. Stage I/II maintained dramatically favorable CS and low hazard (< 5%) of death and progression over time. Relative to stage I/II, stage III manifested non‐significantly higher failure hazard for the first 3 years of survivorship and approached to similar level of stage I/II afterwards. Stage IVA presented most impressive improvement in terms of both COS (∆=9.8%) and CPFS (∆ = 16.8%) whereas still drastically inferior to that of stage I‐III across all conditional time points. After 4 years of follow‐up, progression hazard of stage IVA became relatively steady of approximate 6%. Conclusions Survival prospect of non‐metastatic NPC improves over years with distinct dynamic patterns across stages, providing important implications for personalized decision‐making in terms of both clinical management and surveillance counseling. Stage‐dependent and hazard‐adapted clinical management and surveillance are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingbo Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaodong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shiran Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Runye Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qingfeng Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianghu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jingwei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Li Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Guozhen Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Hu
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ye-Xiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junlin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sun N, Chen Y, Fan Y, Chang J, Gao X, Zhao Y, Sun H, Wang Z, Gu X, Tian J, Wu B. Plasma irisin levels are associated with hemodynamic and clinical outcome in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients. Intern Emerg Med 2021; 16:625-632. [PMID: 32797373 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02467-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Irisin has been considered to reflect oxidative stress. This study aimed to show whether plasma irisin levels are correlated with hemodynamic dysfunction and predict the clinical outcome of patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH). A total of 68 adult IPAH patients were prospectively recruited in the present study. Plasma irisin levels were measured by the ELISA method in enrolled IPAH patients. Baseline clinical characteristics, and hemodynamic and clinical outcome were compared according to different plasma irisin levels. IPAH patients were divided into high irisin group (irisin ≥ 7.3 μg/ml) and low irisin group (irisin < 7.3 μg/ml) according to median values of irisin levels. Total plasma cholesterol levels (P = 0.027) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (P = 0.042) were higher in high irisin group and were positively correlated with plasma irisin levels. IPAH patients in low irisin group had a significantly higher mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP, P = 0.047), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP, P = 0.022), systolic right-ventricular pressure (sRVP, P = 0.007), mean right atrial pressure (mRAP, P = 0.043), and systolic right atrial pressure (sRAP, P = 0.020). mRAP, sRAP, and diastolic right atrial pressure (dRAP) were negatively correlated with plasma irisin levels. Low irisin group predicts adverse hemodynamic status and poor free of event survival rate (P = 0.030, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis indicates plasma irisin levels to be an independent predictor of prognosis in IPAH patients after adjusting for related covariates (HR 0.786; 95% CI 0.584, 0.957; P = 0.038). Plasma irisin levels may serve as a novel biomarker in IPAH patients for hemodynamic severity assessment and clinical outcome evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Sun
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China
- Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yiqiang Chen
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Youli Fan
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China
| | - Jiaxue Chang
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China
| | - Xuan Gao
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China
| | - Yingzi Zhao
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China
| | - Hongru Sun
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China
- Department of Epidemiology, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Zhuozhong Wang
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China
- Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xia Gu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China
- Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
- Department of Cardiology, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Jinwei Tian
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China.
- Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
| | - Bingxiang Wu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150086, China.
- Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guideline-concordant treatment predicts survival: a National Cancer Database validation study of novel composite locoregional and systemic treatment scores among women with early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2021; 28:698-709. [PMID: 33398775 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-020-01206-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this large nationwide study was to validate two novel composite treatment scores that address guideline-concordant locoregional and systemic breast cancer care. We examined the relationship between these two scores and their association with survival. METHODS Women with Stage I-III unilateral breast cancer were identified within the National Cancer Database. For each woman, a locoregional and a systemic treatment score (0, 1, 2) was assigned based on receipt of guideline-concordant care. Multivariable Cox regression models evaluated the association between the scores and survival. RESULTS 623,756 women were treated at 1,221 different American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) facilities. Overall, 86% had a locoregional treatment score of 2 (most guideline-concordant), 75% had a systemic treatment score of 2, and 72% had both scores of 2. Median follow-up was 4.5 years. Compared to women with a locoregional treatment score of 2, those with a score of 1 or 0 had a 1.7-fold and 2.0-fold adjusted greater risk of death. Compared to women with a systemic treatment score of 2, those with a score of 1 or 0 had a 1.5-fold and 2.1-fold adjusted greater risk of death. Risk-adjusted 5-year overall survival was 91.6% when both scores were 2 compared to 73.4% when both scores were 0. CONCLUSIONS In this large national study of CoC facilities, two composite scores capturing guideline-concordant breast cancer care had independent and combined robust effects on survival. These clinically constructed novel scores are promising tools for health services research and quality-of-care studies.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kawaguchi Y, Newhook TE, Tran Cao HS, Tzeng CWD, Chun YS, Aloia TA, Dasari A, Kopetz S, Vauthey JN. Alteration of FBXW7 is Associated with Worse Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:186-194. [PMID: 33205306 PMCID: PMC10095595 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04866-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLMs), the prognostic role of somatic gene alterations is increasingly recognized. F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 7 (FBXW7) is a tumor suppressor gene found in approximately 10% of patients with colorectal cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the association of FBXW7 with overall survival after CLM resection. METHODS Patients who underwent initial CLM resection during 2001-2016 and had genetic sequencing data were studied. Risk factors for overall survival (OS) were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models using backward elimination. RESULTS Of 2045 patients who underwent CLM resection during the study period, 476 were included. The majority (90.5%) underwent prehepatectomy chemotherapy. A total of 27 patients (5.7%) had FBXW7 alteration, along with 240 (50.4%) RAS, 337 (70.8%) TP53, 51 (10.7%) SMAD4, and 27 (5.7%) BRAF. Cox proportional hazards model analyses including 5 somatic gene alteration status and 12 clinicopathologic factors revealed FBXW7(hazard ratio [HR] 1.99, P = 0.015), BRAF (HR 2.47, P = 0.023), RAS (HR 2.42, P < 0.001), TP53 (HR 2.00, P < 0.001), and SMAD4 alterations (HR 1.90, P = 0.004) as significantly associated with OS, together with three clinicopathologic factors, prehepatectomy chemotherapy > 6 cycles (HR 1.51, P = 0.021), number of CLM (HR 1.05, P = 0.007), and largest liver metastasis diameter (HR 1.07, P = 0.023). The covariate-adjusted 5-year OS was significantly lower in patients with FBXW7 alteration than in patients with FBXW7 wild-type (40.4% vs.59.4%, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS FBXW7 alterations are associated with worse survival after CLM resection. The information on multiple somatic gene alterations is imperative for risk stratification and patient selection for CLM resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Arvind Dasari
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hannan EL, Zhong Y, Cozzens K, Adams DH, Girardi L, Chikwe J, Wechsler A, Sundt TM, Smith CR, Gold JP, Lahey SJ, Jordan D. Revascularization for Isolated Proximal Left Anterior Descending Artery Disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 112:555-562. [PMID: 33144114 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most studies of patients with isolated proximal left anterior descending (PLAD) coronary artery disease do not include all 3 procedural options: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, or minimally invasive CABG. METHODS New York's cardiac registries were used to identify patients who underwent revascularization for isolated PLAD disease between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2016, in New York State. After exclusions, 14,327 patients, of whom 13,115 received PCI, 1001 of whom underwent CABG surgery, and 211 of whom underwent minimally invasive CABG were monitored through the end of 2017 to compare outcomes. Registry data were matched to vital statistics data to obtain deaths occurring after discharge and matched to claims data to obtain subsequent admissions for myocardial infarction and stroke. RESULTS There were no significant differences in mortality or in mortality/myocardial infarction/stroke after 7 years (with median follow-up times in excess of 4 years) among the 3 procedures after adjusting for differences in patient risk factors. However, conventional CABG surgery was associated with a lower subsequent revascularization rate than PCI (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.58) and minimally invasive CABG surgery (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.66). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with isolated PLAD disease undergoing any of 3 revascularization options (PCI, conventional CABG surgery, or minimally invasive CABG surgery), conventional CABG surgery was associated with lower subsequent revascularization rates, but there were no differences in mortality or mortality/myocardial infarction/stroke rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Hannan
- School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York.
| | - Ye Zhong
- School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York
| | - Kimberly Cozzens
- School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York
| | - David H Adams
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Leonard Girardi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Joanna Chikwe
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Andrew Wechsler
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Thoralf M Sundt
- Cardiac Surgical Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Craig R Smith
- Department of Surgery, Columbia-Presbyterian Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey P Gold
- Department of Administration, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Stephen J Lahey
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut
| | - Desmond Jordan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia-Presbyterian Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hoshino T, Uchiyama S, Wong LKS, Kitagawa K, Charles H, Labreuche J, Lavallée PC, Albers GW, Caplan LR, Donnan GA, Ferro JM, Hennerici MG, Molina C, Rothwell PM, Steg PG, Touboul PJ, Vicaut É, Amarenco P. Five-Year Prognosis After TIA or Minor Ischemic Stroke in Asian and Non-Asian Populations. Neurology 2020; 96:e54-e66. [PMID: 33046613 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000010995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine long-term vascular outcomes of Asian patients who experienced TIA or minor ischemic stroke and to compare the outcomes of Asian patients with those of non-Asian patients, in the context of modern guideline-based prevention strategies. METHODS This is a subanalysis of the TIAregistry.org project, in which 3,847 patients (882 from Asian and 2,965 from non-Asian countries) with a recent TIA or minor ischemic stroke were assessed and treated by specialists at 42 dedicated units from 14 countries and followed for 5 years. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal acute coronary syndrome. RESULTS No differences were observed in the 5-year risk of the primary outcome (14.0% vs 11.7%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.37; p = 0.41) and stroke (10.7% vs 8.5%; HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.90-1.51; p = 0.24) between Asian and non-Asian patients. Asian participants were at higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (1.8% vs 0.8%; HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.09-4.57; p = 0.029). Multivariable analysis showed that the presence of multiple acute infarctions on initial brain imaging was an independent predictor of primary outcome and modified Rankin Scale score of >1 in both Asian (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.11-3.29; p = 0.020) and non-Asian (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02-1.90; p = 0.037) patients. CONCLUSION The long-term risk of vascular events in Asian patients was as low as that in non-Asian patients, while Asian participants had a 2.2-fold higher intracranial hemorrhage risk. Multiple acute infarctions were independently associated with future disability in both groups. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class I evidence that among people who experienced TIA or minor stroke, Asian patients have a similar 5-year risk of cardiovascular death, stroke, and acute coronary syndrome as non-Asian patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takao Hoshino
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Shinichiro Uchiyama
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Lawrence K S Wong
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Kazuo Kitagawa
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Hugo Charles
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Julien Labreuche
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Philippa C Lavallée
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Gregory W Albers
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Louis R Caplan
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Geoffrey A Donnan
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - José M Ferro
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Michael G Hennerici
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Carlos Molina
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Peter M Rothwell
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - P Gabriel Steg
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Jean Touboul
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Éric Vicaut
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Amarenco
- From the Department of Neurology and Stroke Center (T.H., H.C., J.L., P.C.L., P.-J.T., P.A.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP and INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France; Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels (S.U.), Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics (L.K.S.W.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital; Department of Neurology (T.H., K.K.), Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan; Université Lille (J.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Équipe d'Accueil 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, Lille, France; Stanford Stroke Center (G.W.A.), Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, CA; Cerebrovascular Disease Service (L.R.C.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Melbourne Brain Centre (G.A.D.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurosciences (J.M.F.), Service of Neurology, Hospital Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Neurology (M.G.H.), Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology (C.M.), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Stroke Prevention Research Unit (P.M.R.), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, UK; Department of Cardiology (P.G.S.), Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College (P.G.S.), Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biostatistics (É.V.), Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sun N, Fan Y, Chang J, Chen Y, Gao X, Sun H, Wang Z, Gu X, Tian J, Zhao Y, Yu B, Tian J, Wu B. Plasma irisin level associated with hemodynamic parameters and predict clinical outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Respir Med 2020; 171:106072. [PMID: 32658835 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of the present study is to investigate the correlation of plasma irisin level and hemodynamic parameters in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) and to estimate clinical outcome prediction value of plasma irisin level. METHODS We prospectively recruited 86 adult patients with APE in the present study. All recruited patients conduct measurement of plasma irisin levels using ELISA kits. Baseline clinical characteristics, hemodynamic parameters and prognostic conditions were evaluated according to different plasma irisin levels. RESULTS According to median values of irisin levels, APE patients were divided into high irisin group (irisin≥6.9 μg/ml) and low irisin group (irisin<6.9 μg/ml). Plasma NT-proBNP (P = 0.044), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP, P = 0.013), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP, P = 0.001), mean right ventricular pressure (mRVP, P = 0.021) and systolic right ventricular pressure (sPVP, P = 0.003) were higher in low irisin group compared with high irisin group. Hemodynamic parameters of mPAP, sPAP, mRVP and sRVP were negatively correlated with plasma irisin levels. Kaplan- Meier survival analysis showed that APE patients with lower plasma irisin levels had significantly higher clinical worsening event rate (P = 0.026) and could be the independent predictor of prognosis in multivariate analysis (P = 0.035). CONCLUSION Plasma irisin level was negatively correlated with hemodynamic parameters in patients with APE. Low irisin group patients had significantly higher clinical worsening event rate and could be the independent predictor of clinical outcome in multivariate analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Sun
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Youli Fan
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Jiaxue Chang
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yiqiang Chen
- Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xuan Gao
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Hongru Sun
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; Department of Epidemiology, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Zhuozhong Wang
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xia Gu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; Department of Cardiology, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Jiangtian Tian
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yingzi Zhao
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Bo Yu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Jinwei Tian
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
| | - Bingxiang Wu
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shin H, Taghavifar S, Salehi S, Joyce P, Gholamrezanezhad A. Current comments on contrast media administration in patients with renal insufficiency. Clin Imaging 2020; 69:37-44. [PMID: 32652456 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.06.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Contrast media administration has been associated with complications such as nephropathy, cardiovascular morbidity, and neurovascular events, particularly in patients with renal insufficiency. This association has been questioned in recent studies. This review was performed to summarize the most current evidence on contrast induced nephropathy (CIN), contributing factors, and considerations in patients with renal insufficiency. The risk of CIN was over-estimated by the previous studies, due to a lack of control groups or presence of non-randomized control groups, which led to a selection bias. However, the thresholds associated with an increased risk of CIN are controversial and require risk-benefit analysis on an individual basis. Regarding the administration of contrast media (CM) in the emergency setting, the majority of studies suggested that CM exposure does not meaningfully increase the risk of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients (including trauma patients). Several strategies have been suggested to reduce the risk of CIN, including volume expansion to increase renal blood flow, sodium bicarbonate or N-acetylcysteine administration, and use of low-osmolal contrast media in end-stage renal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heeseop Shin
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Sana Salehi
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Peter Joyce
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ali Gholamrezanezhad
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Batteson R, Hart R, Hemstock M, Gooden K, Kotapati S, Roze S, Lee D, Amadi A. Modelling Survival of Patients Treated with Adjuvant Nivolumab Who Have Melanoma with Lymph Node Involvement or Metastatic Disease After Complete Resection. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2020; 4:343-351. [PMID: 31587138 PMCID: PMC7248152 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-00181-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nivolumab demonstrated significant recurrence-free survival (RFS) gains versus ipilimumab in the CheckMate-238 trial, whereas the CA184-029 trial showed superior RFS gains for ipilimumab versus placebo. No head-to-head trial data were available to compare the efficacy of nivolumab to that of observation, so indirect treatment comparisons were required. Additionally, overall survival (OS) data were not available from CheckMate-238, and the clinical pathway for melanoma has changed significantly over the last decade. Four modelling options were developed using different methods and evidence sources to estimate OS and the impact of nivolumab on predicted life-years in the adjuvant setting; however, this article focuses on two primary methods. METHODS RFS for nivolumab and observation were informed by a patient-level data meta-regression. The first model was a partitioned survival model, where the parametric OS curve for observation was derived from CA184-029 and nivolumab OS was based on a surrogacy relationship between RFS and OS specific to adjuvant melanoma. The other option used a state-transition model to estimate post-recurrence survival using different data sources. RESULTS The modelling options estimated different OS for both nivolumab and observation but demonstrated at least a 32% increase in life-years gained for nivolumab versus observation. CONCLUSION This analysis demonstrated the difficulties in modelling within the adjuvant setting. Each model produced different survival projections, showing the need to explore different techniques to address the extent of uncertainty. This also highlighted the importance of understanding the impact of RFS in the long term in a setting where the aim of treatment is to remain disease free.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rose Hart
- BresMed, Steel City House, West Street, Sheffield, S1 2GQ, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Dawn Lee
- BresMed, Steel City House, West Street, Sheffield, S1 2GQ, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Saunders NR, Chiu M, Lebenbaum M, Chen S, Kurdyak P, Guttmann A, Vigod S. Suicide and Self-Harm in Recent Immigrants in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Study. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2019; 64:777-788. [PMID: 31234643 PMCID: PMC6882076 DOI: 10.1177/0706743719856851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the rates of suicide and self-harm among recent immigrants and to determine which immigrant-specific risk factors are associated with these outcomes. METHODS Population-based cohort study using linked health administrative data sets (2003 to 2017) in Ontario, Canada which included adults ≥18 years, living in Ontario (N = 9,055,079). The main exposure was immigrant status (long-term resident vs. recent immigrant). Immigrant-specific exposures included visa class and country of origin. Outcome measures were death by suicide or emergency department visit for self-harm. Cox proportional hazards estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS We included 590,289 recent immigrants and 8,464,790 long-term residents. Suicide rates were lower among immigrants (n = 130 suicides, 3.3/100,000) than long-term residents (n = 6,354 suicides, 11.8/100,000) with aHR 0.3, 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.3. Male-female ratios in suicide rates were attenuated in immigrants. Refugees had 2.1 (95% CI, 1.3 to 3.6; rate 6.1/100,000) and 2.8 (95% CI, 2.5 to 3.2) times the likelihood of suicide and self-harm, respectively, compared with nonrefugee immigrants. Self-harm rate was lower among immigrants (n = 2,256 events, 4.4/10,000) than long-term residents (n = 68,039 events, 9.7/10,000 person-years; aHR 0.3; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.3). Unlike long-term residents, where low income was associated with high suicide rates, income was not associated with suicide among immigrants and there was an attenuated income gradient for self-harm. Country of origin-specific analyses showed wide ranges in suicide rates (1.4 to 9.9/100,000) and self-harm (1.8 to 14.9/10,000). CONCLUSION Recent immigrants have lower rates of suicide and self-harm and different sociodemographic predictors compared with long-term residents. Analysis of contextual factors including immigrant class, origin, and destination should be considered for all immigrant suicide risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Ruth Saunders
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,These authors contributed equally, acting as co-first authors
| | - Maria Chiu
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,These authors contributed equally, acting as co-first authors
| | - Michael Lebenbaum
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Paul Kurdyak
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Astrid Guttmann
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simone Vigod
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hamada T, Yuan C, Bao Y, Zhang M, Khalaf N, Babic A, Morales-Oyarvide V, Cochrane BB, Gaziano JM, Giovannucci EL, Kraft P, Manson JE, Ng K, Nowak JA, Rohan TE, Sesso HD, Stampfer MJ, Amundadottir LT, Fuchs CS, De Vivo I, Ogino S, Wolpin BM. Prediagnostic Leukocyte Telomere Length and Pancreatic Cancer Survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28:1868-1875. [PMID: 31427306 PMCID: PMC6825575 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-0577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leukocyte telomere length has been associated with risk of subsequent pancreatic cancer. Few prospective studies have evaluated the association of prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length with pancreatic cancer survival. METHODS We prospectively examined the association of prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length with overall survival (OS) time among 423 participants diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1984 and 2008 within the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Nurses' Health Study, Physicians' Health Study, and Women's Health Initiative. We measured prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length in banked blood samples using quantitative PCR. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate HRs for OS with adjustment for potential confounders. We also evaluated 10 SNPs at the telomerase reverse transcriptase locus. RESULTS Shorter prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length was associated with reduced OS among patients with pancreatic cancer (P trend = 0.04). The multivariable-adjusted HR for OS comparing the lowest with highest quintiles of leukocyte telomere length was 1.39 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.93), corresponding to a 3-month difference in median OS time. In an analysis excluding cases with blood collected within 2 years of cancer diagnosis, the association was moderately stronger (HR, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.21; comparing the lowest with highest quintiles; P trend = 0.01). No prognostic association or effect modification for the prognostic association of prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length was noted in relation to the studied SNPs. CONCLUSIONS Prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length was associated with pancreatic cancer survival. IMPACT Prediagnostic leukocyte telomere length can be a prognostic biomarker in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Chen Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ying Bao
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mingfeng Zhang
- Laboratory of Translational Genomics, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Natalia Khalaf
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ana Babic
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vicente Morales-Oyarvide
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - J Michael Gaziano
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
| | - Edward L Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - JoAnn E Manson
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan A Nowak
- Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thomas E Rohan
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Howard D Sesso
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meir J Stampfer
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laufey T Amundadottir
- Laboratory of Translational Genomics, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Immaculata De Vivo
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nursing Home Length of Stay in 3 Canadian Health Regions: Temporal Trends, Jurisdictional Differences, and Associated Factors. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2019; 20:1121-1128. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
22
|
Cui K, Lyu S, Song X, Liu H, Yuan F, Xu F, Zhang M, Wang W, Zhang M, Zhang D, Tian J. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease. Am J Cardiol 2019; 124:334-342. [PMID: 31174834 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.04.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The relative benefit of staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus culprit-only PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease remains disputable. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the long-term outcomes of staged complete revascularization and culprit-only PCI in this population. A total of 1,205 patients were treated with staged PCI (n = 576) or culprit-only PCI (n = 629) from January 2006 to December 2015 in our center. After propensity-score matching, 415 pairs of patients were identified, and postmatching absolute standardized differences were <10% for all covariates. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or unplanned revascularization. The mean follow-up duration was 5 years. Overall, staged complete revascularization was associated with lower risks of MACCE, MI, unplanned revascularization, and a composite of cardiac death, MI or stroke compared with culprit-only PCI in both overall population and propensity-matched cohorts. In Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the strategy of staged PCI was consistently a significant predictor of lower incidences of MACCE, MI, unplanned revascularization and a composite of cardiac death, MI, or stroke. However, there was no difference in the risks of MACCE, MI and unplanned revascularization between the 2 approaches for diabetic patients. In conclusion, among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI, an approach of staged complete revascularization is superior to culprit-only PCI at 5-year follow-up. Nevertheless, the advantage of staged PCI is attenuated in diabetic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kongyong Cui
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Shuzheng Lyu
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China.
| | - Xiantao Song
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Yuan
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Xu
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Min Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Mingduo Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Dongfeng Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Jinfan Tian
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Morris SAL, Zhu P, Rao M, Martir M, Zhu JJ, Hsu S, Ballester LY, Day AL, Tandon N, Kim DH, Shepard S, Blanco A, Esquenazi Y. Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Combination with Bevacizumab for Recurrent Glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 2019; 127:e523-e533. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
24
|
Kawaguchi Y, Kopetz S, Newhook TE, De Bellis M, Chun YS, Tzeng CWD, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN. Mutation Status of RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 is Superior to Mutation Status of RAS Alone for Predicting Prognosis after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:5843-5851. [PMID: 31221662 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Somatic gene mutations have been increasingly recognized to impact prognosis following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). We aimed to determine the impact of combinations of somatic mutations on survival in patients undergoing CLM resection. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We identified patients who underwent initial CLM resection during 2007-2017 and had genetic sequencing data available. Risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were determined using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Of 1460 patients who underwent CLM resection during the study period, 507 met the inclusion criteria. Multigene testing revealed mutation rates greater than 10% for TP53 (mutated in 70.8% of patients), APC (53.5%), RAS (50.7%), PIK3CA (15.8%), and SMAD4 (11.0%). BRAF was mutated in 2.0% of patients. BRAF, RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 mutations were significantly associated with OS, and RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 mutations were significantly associated with RFS. Coexisting mutations in RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 were associated with significantly worse OS and RFS than coexisting mutations in any 2 of these genes and mutations in 1 or none of these genes. Coexisting mutations in 2 genes conferred significantly worse OS and RFS than single mutation or no mutations. OS and RFS did not differ significantly between patients with RAS mutation and wild-type TP53 and SMAD4 and patients with wild-type RAS (P = 0.858 and 0.729, respectively). CONCLUSIONS RAS mutation status alone is not sufficient for precisely predicting prognosis after CLM resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Charytan DM, Sabatine MS, Pedersen TR, Im K, Park JG, Pineda AL, Wasserman SM, Deedwania P, Olsson AG, Sever PS, Keech AC, Giugliano RP. Efficacy and Safety of Evolocumab in Chronic Kidney Disease in the FOURIER Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73:2961-2970. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 03/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
26
|
Agca R, Hopman LHGA, Laan KJC, van Halm VP, Peters MJL, Smulders YM, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Stehouwer CDA, Voskuyl AE, Boers M, Lems WF, Nurmohamed MT. Cardiovascular Event Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared with Type 2 Diabetes: A 15-year Longitudinal Study. J Rheumatol 2019; 47:316-324. [PMID: 31092721 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) risk is increased in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, longterm followup studies investigating this risk are scarce. METHODS The CARRÉ (CARdiovascular research and RhEumatoid arthritis) study is a prospective cohort study investigating CVD and its risk factors in 353 patients with longstanding RA. CV endpoints were assessed at baseline and 3, 10, and 15 years after the start of the study and are compared to a reference cohort (n = 2540), including a large number of patients with type 2 diabetes (DM). RESULTS Ninety-five patients with RA developed a CV event over 2973 person-years, resulting in an incidence rate of 3.20 per 100 person-years. Two hundred fifty-seven CV events were reported in the reference cohort during 18,874 person-years, resulting in an incidence rate of 1.36 per 100 person-years. Age- and sex-adjusted HR for CV events were increased for RA (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.57-2.72, p < 0.01) and DM (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.22, p = 0.04) compared to the nondiabetic participants. HR was still increased in RA (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.32-2.50, p < 0.01) after additional adjustment for CV risk factors. Patients with both RA and DM or insulin resistance had the highest HR for developing CVD (2.21, 95% CI 1.01-4.80, p = 0.046 and 2.67, 95% CI 1.30-5.46, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION The incidence rate of CV events in established RA was more than double that of the general population. Patients with RA have an even higher risk of CVD than patients with DM. This risk remained after adjustment for traditional CV risk factors, suggesting that systemic inflammation is an independent contributor to CV risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabia Agca
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands. .,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam.
| | - Luuk H G A Hopman
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| | - Koen J C Laan
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| | - Vokko P van Halm
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| | - Mike J L Peters
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| | - Yvo M Smulders
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| | - Jacqueline M Dekker
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| | - Giel Nijpels
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| | - Coen D A Stehouwer
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| | - Alexandre E Voskuyl
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| | - Maarten Boers
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| | - Willem F Lems
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| | - Michael T Nurmohamed
- From the Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade; Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Department of Cardiology, and Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of General Practice, and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine, and the Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,R. Agca, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; L.H. Hopman, PhD student, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology; K.J. Laan, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam; V.P. van Halm, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, and Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Department of Cardiology; M.J. Peters, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; Y.M. Smulders, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine; J.M. Dekker, Prof. Dr., Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; G. Nijpels, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of General Practice, and Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; C.D. Stehouwer, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, and Maastricht University Medical Center, CARIM; A.E. Voskuyl, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M. Boers, MD, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; W.F. Lems, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; M.T. Nurmohamed, MD, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology in Reade, and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Braga JR, Austin PC, Ross HJ, Tu JV, Lee DS. Importance of Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease in the Prognosis of Patients With Heart Failure. JACC-HEART FAILURE 2019; 7:493-501. [PMID: 31078476 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to examine the prognostic significance of nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with heart failure (HF), as a distinct category apart from those with normal coronary arteries. BACKGROUND Individuals with HF are often dichotomized into ischemic versus nonischemic categories according to the underlying etiology. This binary classification creates a heterogeneous group, combining individuals with nonobstructive CAD with those with normal coronary arteries under the nonischemic label. METHODS A cohort of individuals with HF and reduced ejection fraction undergoing invasive coronary angiography was examined and linked to administrative databases for outcomes evaluation. Patients were divided into those with normal coronary arteries, nonobstructive disease, and obstructive disease. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or HF hospitalization. RESULTS Of 12,814 individuals, 2,656 (20.7%) had normal coronary arteries, 2,254 (17.6%) had nonobstructive CAD, and 7,904 (61.7%) had obstructive CAD. The risk of the primary outcome was increased in the nonobstructive group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 1.32; p = 0.01) relative to those with normal coronary arteries. Nonobstructive CAD was associated with an increased hazard of cardiovascular death (HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.27 to 2.62; p = 0.001) and death of any cause (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.33; p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in the rate of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS Among HF patients with reduced ejection fraction, the presence of nonobstructive CAD was independently associated with an increased hazard of the primary composite outcome and death of any cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juarez R Braga
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter C Austin
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Canada
| | - Heather J Ross
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jack V Tu
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Canada; Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Douglas S Lee
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Majer IM, Castaigne JG, Palmer S, DeCosta L, Campioni M. Modeling Covariate-Adjusted Survival for Economic Evaluations in Oncology. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2019; 37:727-737. [PMID: 30610657 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0759-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In economic evaluations in oncology, adjusted survival should be generated if imbalances in prognostic/predictive factors across treatment arms are present. To date, no formal guidance has been developed regarding how such adjustments should be made. We compared various covariate-adjusted survival modeling approaches, as applied to the ENDEAVOR trial in multiple myeloma that assessed carfilzomib plus dexamethasone (Cd) versus bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Vd). METHODS Overall survival (OS) data and baseline characteristics were used for a subgroup (bortezomib-naïve/one prior therapy). Four adjusted survival modeling approaches were compared: propensity score weighting followed by fitting a Weibull model to the two arms of the balanced data (weighted data approach); fitting a multiple Weibull regression model including prognostic/predictive covariates to the two arms to predict survival using the mean value of each covariate and using the average of patient-specific survival predictions; and applying an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) derived from a Cox proportional hazard model to the baseline risk estimated for Vd. RESULTS The mean OS estimated by the weighted data approach was 6.85 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.62-10.70) for Cd, 4.68 years (95% CI 3.46-6.74) for Vd, and 2.17 years (95% CI 0.18-5.06) for the difference. Although other approaches estimated similar differences, using the mean value of covariates appeared to yield skewed survival estimates (mean OS was 7.65 years for Cd and 5.40 years for Vd), using the average of individual predictions had limited external validity (implausible long-term OS predictions with > 10% of the Vd population alive after 30 years), and using the adjusted HR approach overestimated uncertainty (difference in mean OS was 2.03, 95% CI - 0.17 to 6.19). CONCLUSIONS Adjusted survival modeling based on weighted or matched data approaches provides a flexible and robust method to correct for covariate imbalances in economic evaluations. The conclusions of our study may be generalizable to other settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01568866 (ENDEAVOR trial).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Istvan M Majer
- Global Health Economics, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Suurstoffi 22, 6343, Rotkreuz, Zug, Switzerland.
| | | | - Stephen Palmer
- University of York, Centre for Health Economics, York, UK
| | - Lucy DeCosta
- Amgen Ltd., Global Biostatistical Science, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Marco Campioni
- Global Health Economics, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Suurstoffi 22, 6343, Rotkreuz, Zug, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z, Smith CR, Lahey SJ, Gold JP, Jordan D, Sundt TM, Girardi L, Ashraf MH, Chikwe J. Mitral valve repair versus replacement for patients with preserved left ventricular function without heart failure symptoms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 157:1432-1439.e2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
30
|
Kosnik MB, Reif DM, Lobdell DT, Astell-Burt T, Feng X, Hader JD, Hoppin JA. Associations between access to healthcare, environmental quality, and end-stage renal disease survival time: Proportional-hazards models of over 1,000,000 people over 14 years. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0214094. [PMID: 30897121 PMCID: PMC6428249 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the US increased by 74% from 2000 to 2013. To investigate the role of the broader environment on ESRD survival time, we evaluated average distance to the nearest hospital by county (as a surrogate for access to healthcare) and the Environmental Quality Index (EQI), an aggregate measure of ambient environmental quality composed of five domains (air, water, land, built, and sociodemographic), at the county level across the US. Associations between average hospital distance, EQI, and survival time for 1,092,281 people diagnosed with ESRD between 2000 and 2013 (age 18+, without changes in county residence) from the US Renal Data System were evaluated using proportional-hazards models adjusting for gender, race, age at first ESRD service date, BMI, alcohol and tobacco use, and rurality. The models compared the average distance to the nearest hospital (<10, 10-20, >20 miles) and overall EQI percentiles [0-5), [5-20), [20-40), [40-60), [60-80), [80-95), and [95-100], where lower percentiles are interpreted as better EQI. In the full, non-stratified model with both distance and EQI, there was increased survival for patients over 20 miles from a hospital compared to those under 10 miles from a hospital (hazard ratio = 1.14, 95% confidence interval = 1.12-1.15) and no consistent direction of association across EQI strata. In the full model stratified by average hospital distance, under 10 miles from a hospital had increased survival in the worst EQI strata (median survival 3.0 vs. 3.5 years for best vs. worst EQI, respectively), however for people over 20 miles from a hospital, median survival was higher in the best (4.2 years) vs worst (3.4 years) EQI. This association held across different rural/urban categories and age groups. These results demonstrate the importance of considering multiple factors when studying ESRD survival and future efforts should consider additional components of the broader environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa B. Kosnik
- Toxicology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
- Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - David M. Reif
- Toxicology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
- Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
- Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Danelle T. Lobdell
- National Health and Environmental Effects Research Lab, U.S. EPA, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Thomas Astell-Burt
- Population Wellbeing and Environment Research Lab, School of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Public Health, Peking Union Medical College and The Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoqi Feng
- Population Wellbeing and Environment Research Lab, School of Health and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Jane A. Hoppin
- Toxicology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
- Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Long-term outcomes of in-hospital staged revascularization versus culprit-only intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. Coron Artery Dis 2019; 30:188-195. [PMID: 30724818 DOI: 10.1097/mca.0000000000000701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term relative benefit of culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and staged PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease remains disputable. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of culprit-only PCI and in-hospital staged complete revascularization in real-world patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 452 patients were treated with in-hospital staged complete revascularization (n=133) or culprit-only PCI (n=319) between May 2012 and December 2015 in our center. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and unplanned revascularization. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 3.2 years. Overall, treatment with in-hospital staged complete revascularization can reduce the incidence of the primary end point of MACCE in both the overall population [hazard ratio (HR): 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.29-0.82] and the propensity-matched cohorts (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27-0.97). After correction of the possible confounders, staged PCI remained associated with decreased risk of MACCE (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.33-0.96). Besides, the strategy of staged PCI tended to be associated with lower risk of a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stroke than culprit-only PCI in multivariable-adjusted analysis (HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.09-1.01). CONCLUSION In patients with STEMI and multivessel disease undergoing primary PCI, an approach of in-hospital staged complete revascularization was associated with a better 3-year composite outcome compared with culprit-only PCI.
Collapse
|
32
|
Tejwani SG, Prentice HA, Wyatt RWB, Maletis GB. Femoral Tunnel Drilling Method: Risk of Reoperation and Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46:3378-3384. [PMID: 30419174 DOI: 10.1177/0363546518805086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be created by the transtibial (TT) or tibial-independent (TI) methods. An anatomically located femoral tunnel can be more consistently achieved by TI methods, which include the anteromedial portal and lateral (outside-in, retrodrill) techniques. Nonanatomic graft placement in ACLR can result in postoperative instability and meniscal or chondral injury. An anatomically located graft is subjected to higher postoperative physiologic forces than one placed nonanatomically. PURPOSE To examine isolated primary ACLR and determine the risk of aseptic revision and reoperation based on femoral tunnel drilling method. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS The ACLR registry of an integrated US health care system was used to identify primary isolated unilateral ACLRs from 2009 to 2014. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate risk for aseptic revision for graft failure and aseptic reoperation for meniscal or chondral injury according to femoral tunnel drilling method: TI versus TT. Models included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race, graft type, and femoral fixation type as covariates. RESULTS The cohort included 19,059 patients with primary ACLR. The mean age was 28.9 years (SD, 11.5), 6991 patients (36.8%) were younger than 22 years, 11,795 patients (61.9%) were male, 7648 patients (40.1%) had a BMI less than 25 kg/m2, 8913 patients (46.8%) were white, and 7357 patients (38.6%) received an allograft. Median follow-up was 2.30 years (interquartile range, 1.08-3.77). TI techniques were used for 12,342 (64.8%) of the ACLRs, and the TT method was used for 6717 (35.2%). Use of TI techniques increased from 33.6% of all ACLRs in 2009 to 83.4% in 2014. After adjustment for covariates, the TI group had a higher risk for aseptic revision than the TT group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.04-1.56), and this risk was 1.41 times higher in patients younger than 22 years specifically. The 5-year cumulative reoperation probability was lower in the TI group (4.50%; 95% CI, 3.78%-5.36%) compared with the TT group (5.06%; 95% CI, 4.31-5.94%). After adjustment for the covariates, no difference in risk for aseptic reoperation was observed (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.85-1.39). CONCLUSION In the largest known study of its type examining femoral tunnel drilling method for primary ACLR, after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, race, graft type, and femoral fixation, TI techniques were found to carry higher risk of aseptic revision compared with the TT method, while no difference was observed in risk for aseptic reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir G Tejwani
- Department of Orthopaedics, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Fontana, California, USA
| | - Heather A Prentice
- Surgical Outcomes and Analysis, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Ronald W B Wyatt
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Permanente Medical Group, Walnut Creek, California, USA
| | - Gregory B Maletis
- Department of Orthopaedics, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Baldwin Park, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hoshino T, Sissani L, Labreuche J, Bousser MG, Chamorro A, Fisher M, Ford I, Fox KM, Hennerici MG, Mattle HP, Rothwell PM, Gabriel Steg P, Vicaut E, Amarenco P. Non-cardioembolic stroke/transient ischaemic attack in Asians and non-Asians: A post-hoc analysis of the PERFORM study. Eur Stroke J 2018; 4:65-74. [PMID: 31165096 DOI: 10.1177/2396987318797245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We aimed to compare the characteristics and vascular outcomes between Asian and non-Asian patients with non-cardioembolic stroke/transient ischaemic attack receiving antiplatelet monotherapy and to identify population-specific predictors for recurrent events. Patients and methods We conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from the PERFORM study, in which 19,100 patients (mean age, 67.2 years; male, 63%; 2178 Asian and 16,922 non-Asian patients) with non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack were randomised to aspirin or terutroban and followed for two years. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and cardiovascular death). Results There was no difference in major adverse cardiovascular events risk between Asian and non-Asian populations (11.1% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.39). However, Asian patients were at significantly higher risk of intracranial haemorrhage (2.4% vs. 1.3%; hazard ratio (HR) 1.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-2.60; p < 0.001) and major bleeding (5.4% vs. 4.1%; HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.04-1.61; p = 0.02). Stroke risk was significantly higher in Asian than in non-Asian populations among patients with lacunar stroke (7.4% vs. 4.5%; p = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, diastolic blood pressure (HR per 5 mm Hg 1.08; 95% CI 1.01-1.16; p = 0.03) and diabetes (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.22-1.52; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events for Asian and non-Asian patients, respectively.Conclusion: Compared with non-Asian patients, Asian patients had significantly higher risk of haemorrhagic events when given antiplatelet monotherapy for secondary prevention after non-cardioembolic stroke/transient ischaemic attack. Lacunar stroke and elevated diastolic blood pressure were more associated with recurrence risk in Asian patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takao Hoshino
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Hôpital Bichat, APHP and Université Paris-Diderot-Sorbonne, Paris, France.,INSERM Laboratory for Vascular Translational Sciences 1148 and Département Hospitalo-Universitaire FIRE, Paris, France.,Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Leila Sissani
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Hôpital Bichat, APHP and Université Paris-Diderot-Sorbonne, Paris, France.,INSERM Laboratory for Vascular Translational Sciences 1148 and Département Hospitalo-Universitaire FIRE, Paris, France
| | - Julien Labreuche
- INSERM Laboratory for Vascular Translational Sciences 1148 and Département Hospitalo-Universitaire FIRE, Paris, France.,Université de Lille, CHU Lille, EA 2694 - Santé publique : épidémiologie et qualité des soins, Lille, France
| | | | - Angel Chamorro
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc Fisher
- Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, MA, USA
| | - Ian Ford
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kim M Fox
- NHLI Imperial College, ICMS, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Heinrich P Mattle
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universität Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter M Rothwell
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Philippe Gabriel Steg
- INSERM Laboratory for Vascular Translational Sciences 1148 and Département Hospitalo-Universitaire FIRE, Paris, France.,NHLI Imperial College, ICMS, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France
| | - Eric Vicaut
- Department of Biostatistics, Hôpital Fernand Widal, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Amarenco
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Hôpital Bichat, APHP and Université Paris-Diderot-Sorbonne, Paris, France.,INSERM Laboratory for Vascular Translational Sciences 1148 and Département Hospitalo-Universitaire FIRE, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hamada T, Khalaf N, Yuan C, Morales-Oyarvide V, Babic A, Nowak JA, Qian ZR, Ng K, Rubinson DA, Kraft P, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ, Fuchs CS, Ogino S, Wolpin BM. Prediagnosis Use of Statins Associates With Increased Survival Times of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16:1300-1306.e3. [PMID: 29474971 PMCID: PMC6056316 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Statin medications, most commonly prescribed to reduce lipid levels and prevent cardiovascular disease, may be associated with longer survival times of patients with cancer. However, the association of statins with outcomes of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is not clear. METHODS We analyzed the association of statin use before a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with survival times of 648 participants in the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study who were diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2000 through 2013. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for overall mortality using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for potential confounders. We assessed the temporal association between prediagnosis statin use and cancer survival by 2-year lag periods to account for a possible latency period between statin use and cancer survival. RESULTS Regular statin use before diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was associated with modestly prolonged survival compared with nonregular use (adjusted HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97; P = .02). A 1-month longer median survival was observed in regular statin users compared with nonregular users. Regular statin use within the 2 years prior to cancer diagnosis was most strongly associated with longer survival. We observed no statistically significant effect modification by smoking status, body mass index, diabetes, or cancer stage (all Pinteraction > .53). Regular statin use before diagnosis was similarly associated with survival in the Nurses' Health Study (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63-1.15). CONCLUSIONS Regular statin use before diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was associated with modest increases in survival times in 2 large prospective cohort studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Natalia Khalaf
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chen Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vicente Morales-Oyarvide
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ana Babic
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan A Nowak
- Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Zhi Rong Qian
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas A Rubinson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Edward L Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meir J Stampfer
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fornili M, Boracchi P, Ambrogi F, Biganzoli E. Modeling the covariates effects on the hazard function by piecewise exponential artificial neural networks: an application to a controlled clinical trial on renal carcinoma. BMC Bioinformatics 2018; 19:186. [PMID: 30066658 PMCID: PMC6069688 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2179-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In exploring the time course of a disease to support or generate biological hypotheses, the shape of the hazard function provides relevant information. For long follow-ups the shape of hazard function may be complex, with the presence of multiple peaks. In this paper we present the use of a neural network extension of the piecewise exponential model to study the shape of the hazard function in time in dependence of covariates. The technique is applied to a dataset of 247 renal cell carcinoma patients from a randomized clinical trial. Results An interaction effect of treatment with number of metastatic lymph nodes but not with pathologic T-stage is highlighted. Conclusions Piecewise Exponential Artificial Neural Networks demonstrate a clinically useful and flexible tool in assessing interaction or time-dependent effects of the prognostic factors on the hazard function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Fornili
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Patrizia Boracchi
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Ambrogi
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Elia Biganzoli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.,Unit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Valmasoni M, Pierobon ES, Zanchettin G, Briscolini D, Moletta L, Ruol A, Salvador R, Merigliano S. Cervical Esophageal Cancer Treatment Strategies: A Cohort Study Appraising the Debated Role of Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2747-2755. [PMID: 29987601 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6648-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have examined optimal treatment specifically for cervical esophageal carcinoma. This study evaluated the outcome of three common treatment strategies with a focus on the debated role of surgery. METHODS All patients with cervical esophageal cancer treated at a single center were identified and their outcomes analyzed in terms of morbidity, mortality, and recurrence according to the treatment they received, i.e. surgery alone, definitive platinum-based chemoradiation (CRT), or CRT followed by surgery. RESULTS The study population included 148 patients with cervical esophageal cancer from a prospective database of 3445 patients. Primary surgery was the treatment of choice for 56 (37.83%) patients, definitive CRT was the treatment of choice for 52 (35.13%) patients, and CRT followed by surgery was the treatment of choice for 40 (27.02%) patients. CRT-treated patients obtained 36.96% complete clinical response, with overall morbidity and mortality rates of 36.95 and 2.17%, respectively. Surgical complete resection was achieved in 71.88% of surgically treated cases, with morbidity and mortality rates of 52.17 and 6.25%, respectively. No significant survival difference existed among the three treatments, but patients who underwent surgery alone had a significantly lower stage of disease (p = 0.031). Compared with patients with complete response after CRT, surgery did not confer any significant survival benefit, and overall 5-year survival was lower than definitive CRT alone. In contrast, surgery improved survival significantly in patients with non-complete response after definitive CRT (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS Definitive platinum-based CRT should be the treatment of choice for cervical esophageal cancer. Surgery has a role for patients with non-complete response as it adds significant survival benefit, with acceptable morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Valmasoni
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Center for Esophageal Disease, University of Padova, Padua, Italy. .,University Hospital, Padua, Italy.
| | - Elisa Sefora Pierobon
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Center for Esophageal Disease, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Gianpietro Zanchettin
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Center for Esophageal Disease, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Dario Briscolini
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Center for Esophageal Disease, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Lucia Moletta
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Center for Esophageal Disease, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.,University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Alberto Ruol
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Center for Esophageal Disease, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Renato Salvador
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Center for Esophageal Disease, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.,University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Stefano Merigliano
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Center for Esophageal Disease, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.,University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Weng CH, Tien CP, Li CI, L'Heureux A, Liu CS, Lin CH, Lin CC, Lai SW, Lai MM, Lin WY. Mid-upper arm circumference, calf circumference and mortality in Chinese long-term care facility residents: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020485. [PMID: 29743327 PMCID: PMC5942455 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), calf circumference (CC) and all-cause mortality in a Chinese population. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Eight long-term care facilities in central Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS A total of 329 residents age 60 years and older (median 79.0 years, range 60-101; 139 men, 190 women) were enrolled. METHODS Anthropometrics and metabolic parameters were measured at the time of enrolment to the study. Mean MUAC and CC were 24.2±3.4 cm and 27.5±4.3 cm, respectively. Mortality data were obtained from the Department of Health in Taiwan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE To identify the association between all-cause mortality and MUAC or CC. RESULTS There were 255 deaths during the 7-year follow-up period. After adjusting for age, sex, cigarette smoking, betel nut chewing, alcohol use, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale score, serum albumin level, hypertension and diabetes mellitus, subjects in the highest tertile of MUAC (27.8±2.2 cm) and CC (32.1±2.6 cm) had a significantly lower mortality rate than did subjects in the lowest tertile (MUAC 20.6±1.7 cm; CC 22.8±1.9 cm). The adjusted HR for all-cause mortality in the highest versus lowest MUAC tertile was 0.64 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.90). The adjusted HR for all-cause mortality in the highest versus lowest CC tertile was 0.51 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.74). CONCLUSIONS MUAC and CC are negative predictors for all-cause mortality in older Chinese adults living in long-term care facilities. Participants with higher MUAC and CC had lower all-cause mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chien-Hsiang Weng
- Department of Family Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- NH Dartmouth Family Medicine Residency, Concord Hospital, Concord, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, Providence Community Health Centers, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Chia-Ping Tien
- Department of Family Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Ing Li
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Abby L'Heureux
- Department of Family Medicine, Rural Medical Partners, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA
| | - Chiu-Shong Liu
- Department of Family Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Social Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hsueh Lin
- Department of Family Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Chieh Lin
- Department of Family Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Social Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Wei Lai
- Department of Family Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-May Lai
- Department of Family Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yuan Lin
- Department of Family Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Social Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fiedler AG, Bhambhani V, Laikhter E, Picard MH, Wasfy MM, Tolis G, Melnitchouk S, Sundt TM, Wasfy JH. Aortic valve replacement associated with survival in severe regurgitation and low ejection fraction. HEART (BRITISH CARDIAC SOCIETY) 2018; 104:835-840. [PMID: 29092919 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Revised: 09/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although guidelines support aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF <35%) is thought to confer high surgical risk. We sought to determine if a survival benefit exists with AVR compared with medical management in this high-risk, relatively rare population. METHODS A large institutional echocardiography database was queried to identify patients with severe AR and LVEF <35%. Manual chart review was performed. Due to small sample size and population heterogeneity, corrected group prognosis method was applied, which calculates the adjusted survival curve for each individual using fitted Cox proportional hazard model. Average survival adjusted for comorbidities and age was then calculated using the weighted average of the individual survival curves. RESULTS Initially, 2 54 614 echocardiograms were considered, representing 1 45 785 unique patients, of which 40 patients met inclusion criteria. Of those, 18 (45.0%) underwent AVR and 22 (55.0%) were managed medically. Absolute mortality was 27.8% in the AVR group and 91.2% in the medical management group. After multivariate adjustment, end-stage renal disease (HR=17.633, p=0.0335) and peripheral arterial disease (HR=6.050, p=0.0180) were associated with higher mortality. AVR was associated with lower mortality (HR=0.143, p=0.0490). Mean follow-up time of the study cohort was 6.58 years, and mean survival for patients undergoing AVR was 6.31 years. CONCLUSIONS Even after adjustment for clinical characteristics and patient age, AVR is associated with higher survival for patients with low LVEF and severe AR. Although treatment selection bias cannot be completely eliminated by this analysis, these results provide some evidence that surgery may be associated with prolonged survival in this high-risk patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy G Fiedler
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vijeta Bhambhani
- Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Laikhter
- Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael H Picard
- Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meagan M Wasfy
- Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - George Tolis
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Serguei Melnitchouk
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thoralf M Sundt
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jason H Wasfy
- Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Circulating Levels of Inflammatory Proteins and Survival in Patients with Gallbladder Cancer. Sci Rep 2018; 8:5671. [PMID: 29618736 PMCID: PMC5884817 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23848-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Although inflammation is central to gallbladder cancer (GBC) development and proliferation, no study has systematically investigated circulating inflammatory proteins and patient survival. We aimed to examine whether the circulating levels of inflammatory proteins is associated with all-cause mortality among such patients. We recruited 134 patients with newly diagnosed with GBC from 1997 to 2001 in a population-based study in Shanghai and an independent set of 35 patients from 2012 to 2013 in Chile. Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for covariates were used to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs) for death by serum levels of 49 inflammatory proteins (quartiles). Of 49 evaluable proteins, eight were significantly associated with overall survival. Seven were associated with a poorer survival, while the highest levels of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) were associated with an increase in survival (HR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.14, 0.47). No substantial difference in the magnitude of the association was observed between early- and late-stages of GBC. Of seven proteins, five were validated in the patients from Chile. Reducing inflammation and targeting pathways associated with increased survival might improve GBC outcomes. The potential for using a TRAIL-related anticancer drug for GBC treatment merits further investigation.
Collapse
|
40
|
Zhu P, Du XL, Lu G, Zhu JJ. Survival benefit of glioblastoma patients after FDA approval of temozolomide concomitant with radiation and bevacizumab: A population-based study. Oncotarget 2018; 8:44015-44031. [PMID: 28467795 PMCID: PMC5546458 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Few population-based analyses have investigated survival change in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients treated with concomitant radiotherapy-temozolomide (RT-TMZ) and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) and then bevacizumab (BEV) after Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, respectively. We aimed to explore the effects on survival with RT-TMZ, adjuvant TMZ and BEV in general GBM population based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) databases. A total of 28933 GBM patients from SEER (N = 24578) and TCR (N = 4355) between January 2000 and December 2013 were included. Patients were grouped into three calendar periods based on date of diagnosis: pre-RT-TMZ and pre-BEV (1/2000-2/2005, P1), post-RT-TMZ and pre-BEV (3/2005-4/2009, P2), and post-RT-TMZ and post-BEV (5/2009-12/2013, P3). The association between calendar period of diagnosis and survival was analyzed in SEER and TCR, separately, by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. We found a significant increase in median overall survival (OS) across the three periods in both populations. In multivariate models, the risk of death was significantly reduced during P2 and further decreased in P3, which remained unchanged after stratification. Comparison and validation analysis were performed in the combined dataset, and consistent results were observed. We conclude that the OS of GBM patients in a "real-world" setting has been steadily improved from January 2000 to December 2013, which likely resulted from the administrations of TMZ concomitant with RT and adjuvant TMZ for newly diagnosed GBM and then BEV for recurrent GBM after respective FDA approval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Zhu
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), McGovern Medical School, and Memorial Hermann at Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Xianglin L Du
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Guangrong Lu
- The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), McGovern Medical School, and Memorial Hermann at Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jay-Jiguang Zhu
- The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), McGovern Medical School, and Memorial Hermann at Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Calkins KL, Canan CE, Moore RD, Lesko CR, Lau B. An application of restricted mean survival time in a competing risks setting: comparing time to ART initiation by injection drug use. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018. [PMID: 29523081 PMCID: PMC5845164 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0484-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Restricted mean survival time (RMST) is an underutilized estimand in time-to-event analyses. Herein, we highlight its strengths by comparing time to (1) all-cause mortality and (2) initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-infected persons who inject drugs (PWID) and persons who do not inject drugs. Methods RMST to death was determined by integrating the Kaplan-Meier survival curve to 5 years of follow-up. To account for the competing risks of death and loss-to-clinic when estimating time to ART, we calculated RMST to ART initiation by estimating the area between the survival curve for ART initiation and the cumulative incidence curve for death or loss-to-clinic. We standardized all curves using inverse probability of exposure weights. Results We followed 3044 HIV-positive, ART-naive persons from enrollment into the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort from 1996 to 2014. PWID had a − 0.19 year (95% confidence interval (CI): − 0.29, − 0.10) difference in survival over 5 years of follow-up compared to persons who did not inject drugs. There was no difference between the two groups in time not on ART while alive and in clinic (RMST difference = 0.08, 95% CI: -0.10, 0.36). Conclusions PWID have similar expected time to ART initiation after properly accounting for their greater risk of death and loss-to-clinic. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0484-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keri L Calkins
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| | - Chelsea E Canan
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Richard D Moore
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.,School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Catherine R Lesko
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Bryan Lau
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.,School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Impact of hospital volume on racial disparities and outcomes for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 149:329-336. [PMID: 29506862 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Little is known about the influence of hospital procedural volume on racial disparities for uterine cancer. We examined whether the magnitude of the survival differential between black and white women varied based on hospital procedural volume for endometrial cancer. METHODS We utilized the National Cancer Data Base to examine women with endometrial cancer from 1998 to 2012. Annualized hospital procedural volume was calculated and hospitals grouped into volume-based quartiles. Multivariable models were developed to examine differences in two and five-year survival between black and white women across the hospital volume categories. Patients were classified as early or advanced stage and as type I (low grade, endometrioid) or type II (high grade endometrioid, other histologies) cancers. RESULTS We identified 243,422 (75.0%) white and 27,764 (8.6%) black women treated at 1059 hospitals. Regardless of hospital volume, black women had decreased survival. For each tumor class, the absolute difference in adjusted two-year survival between black and white women decreased with increasing hospital volume. For example, for women with early-stage, type I tumors, the adjusted two-year survival differential between blacks and whites was -1.4% (95%CI, -2.4 to -0.5%) at low volume centers and decreased to -0.5% (95%CI, -0.9 to 0%) at high-volume hospitals (P<0.0001). For advanced stage, type I tumors, the adjusted survival differential decreased from -12.4% (95%CI, -24.0 to -0.9%) to 1.2% (95%CI, -2.9 to 5.3%) at high volume hospitals (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION Black race is an independent predictor of mortality. The impact of race on mortality is mitigated, albeit not eliminated, by increasing hospital volume.
Collapse
|
43
|
Chiu M, Rahman F, Vigod S, Lau C, Cairney J, Kurdyak P. Mortality in single fathers compared with single mothers and partnered parents: a population-based cohort study. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 3:e115-e123. [DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30003-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Revised: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
44
|
Büyükkaramikli NC, de Groot S, Fayter D, Wolff R, Armstrong N, Stirk L, Worthy G, Albuquerque de Almeida F, Kleijnen J, Al MJ. Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone for Treating Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated with Lenalidomide and Bortezomib: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of an NICE Single Technology Appraisal. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2018; 36:145-159. [PMID: 29086363 PMCID: PMC5805808 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0581-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), as part of the institute's single technology appraisal (STA) process, invited the manufacturer of pomalidomide (POM; Imnovid®, Celgene) to submit evidence regarding the clinical and cost effectiveness of the drug in combination with dexamethasone (POM + LoDEX) for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after at least two regimens including lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BOR). Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd (KSR) and Erasmus University Rotterdam were commissioned as the Evidence Review Group (ERG) for this submission. The ERG reviewed the evidence submitted by the manufacturer, validated the manufacturer's decision analytic model, and conducted exploratory analyses in order to assess the robustness and validity of the presented clinical and cost-effectiveness results. This paper describes the company submission, the ERG assessment, and NICE's subsequent decisions. The company conducted a systematic review to identify studies comparing POM with comparators outlined in the NICE scope: panobinostat with bortezomib and dexamethasone (PANO + BOR + DEX), bendamustine with thalidomide and dexamethasone (BTD) and conventional chemotherapy (CC). The main clinical effectiveness evidence was obtained from MM-003, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing POM + LoDEX with high-dose dexamethasone (HiDEX; used as a proxy for CC). Additional data from other studies were also used as nonrandomized observational data sources for the indirect treatment comparison of POM + LoDEX with BTD and PANO + BOR + DEX. Covariate or treatment switching adjustment methods were used for each comparison. The model developed in Microsoft® Excel 2010 using a semi-Markov partitioned survival structure, submitted in the original submission to NICE for TA338, was adapted for the present assessment of the cost effectiveness of POM + LoDEX. Updated evidence from the clinical-effectiveness part was used for the survival modelling of progression-free survival and overall survival. For POM + LoDEX, the patient access scheme (PAS) discount was applied to the POM price. Three separate comparisons were conducted for each comparator, each comparison using a different dataset and adjustment methods. The ERG identified and corrected some errors, and the corrected incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for POM + LoDEX versus each comparator were presented: approximately £45,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained versus BTD, savings of approximately £143,000 per QALY lost versus PANO + BOR + DEX, and approximately £49,000 per QALY gained versus CC. The ERG also conducted full incremental analyses, which revealed that CC, POM + LoDEX and PANO + BOR + DEX were on the cost-effectiveness frontier. The committee's decision on the technology under analysis deemed that POM + LoDEX should be recommended as an option for treating multiple myeloma in adults at third or subsequent relapse of treatments including both LEN and BOR, contingent on the company providing POM with the discount agreed in the PAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasuh C Büyükkaramikli
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Saskia de Groot
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Lisa Stirk
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | | | - Fernando Albuquerque de Almeida
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- Department of Family Medicine, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maiwenn J Al
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Scurti V, Di Ienno S, Fanizza C, Belfiglio M, D'ettorre A, Romero M, Tognoni G. Hospital Discharge Database as a Tool to Monitor Incidence, Survival and Burden of Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 98:19-26. [DOI: 10.1177/030089161209800102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Aims and Background Cancer in young patients (15–39 years) is unique for the distribution of types, therapeutic options and clinical evolution. Administrative databases represent well-documented tools in epidemiology, and in oncology they are very important in those realities without cancer registries. Our study aimed to analyze the occurrence, outcomes and burden of cancer in young patients through the analysis of hospital discharge records. Methods Hospital discharge databases and civil registries were analyzed through record linkage technique. Annual incidence rate (AIR), standardized incidence rate (SR), overall survival, hospitalization rate, and mean number of hospitalizations were evaluated. Results Among 2,330,459 young adults, 1846 new cancer patients had been hospitalized in the analyzed period. The SR was 69.3/100,000/year: 1051, 56.9%, were females (AIR 91.0 and SR 76.0) and 795, 43.1%, were males (AIR 67.6 and SR 62.5). Hematological disease was more frequent in males than females (25.5% vs 14.7%, P <0.0001), whereas solid tumors were more frequent among females (85.3% vs 74.5, P <0.0001). The distribution by diagnostic group showed that among females breast cancer was the most frequent (n = 272, SR 17.2), whereas among males genitourinary tract cancer (n = 245, SR 19.2), especially testicular cancer (n = 187, SR 15.1), was the most frequent. Metastatic disease at diagnosis was already present in 198 patients with a solid cancer (13.3%), whereas 213 (11.5%) developed metastasis in the following years. At 12 months from the diagnosis, 87 of 1488 patients with solid cancers and 35 of 358 patients with hematologic disease failed: overall survival was 94% and 90%, respectively. Patients with a new diagnosis of cancer had produced 6663 hospitalizations, 4640 (69.6%) of which were due to solid tumors, 3992 (59.9%) produced by patients over 29 years old, and 3606 (54.1%) by females. The percentage of day hospital admissions increased proportionally with patient age: 25.7% of all hospitalizations among older adolescents (15–20 years) and 32.9% among young adults of 34–39 years. Conclusions Administrative data have clear advantages in terms of availability and large numbers. Comparison of our results with the literature showed that a health care delivery database can provide useful information for clinical-epidemiologic evaluations in oncology as well as for the analysis of health services utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Scurti
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, S. Maria Imbaro (CH), Italy
| | - Sabrina Di Ienno
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, S. Maria Imbaro (CH), Italy
| | - Caterina Fanizza
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, S. Maria Imbaro (CH), Italy
| | - Maurizio Belfiglio
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, S. Maria Imbaro (CH), Italy
| | - Antonio D'ettorre
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, S. Maria Imbaro (CH), Italy
| | - Marilena Romero
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, S. Maria Imbaro (CH), Italy
| | - Gianni Tognoni
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, S. Maria Imbaro (CH), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chiu M, Gatov E, Zaheer J, Lebenbaum M, Fu L, Newman A, Kurdyak P. Postdischarge service utilisation and outcomes among Chinese and South Asian psychiatric inpatients in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020156. [PMID: 29331978 PMCID: PMC5781058 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to examine the short-term and long-term impacts of psychiatric hospitalisations among patients of Chinese and South Asian origin. DESIGN Retrospective population-based cohort study using linked health administrative data. SETTING We examined all adult psychiatric inpatients discharged between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2014 in Ontario, Canada, who were classified as Chinese, South Asian and all other ethnicities (ie, 'general population') using a validated algorithm. We identified 2552 Chinese, 2439 South Asian and 127 142 general population patients. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES We examined psychiatric severity measures at admission and discharge and performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine 30-day, 180-day and 365-day postdischarge service utilisation and outcomes, comparing each of the ethnic groups with the reference population, after adjustment for age, sex, income, education, marital status, immigration status, community size and discharge diagnosis. RESULTS Despite presenting to hospital with greater illness severity, Asian psychiatric inpatients had shorter lengths of hospital stay and greater absolute improvements in mental health and functional status at discharge compared with other inpatients. After hospitalisation, Chinese patients were more likely to visit psychiatrists and South Asian patients were more likely to seek mental healthcare from general practitioners. They were also less likely to have a psychiatric readmission or die 1 year following hospitalisation (adjusted ORChinese=0.87; 95% CI 0.79 to 0.97; adjusted ORSouth Asian=0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.91). Findings were consistent across genders, psychiatric diagnoses and immigrant groups. CONCLUSION Once hospitalised, patients of Chinese and South Asian origin fared as well as or better than general population patients at discharge and following discharge, and had a positive trajectory of psychiatric service utilisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Chiu
- Mental Health and Addictions Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- University of Toronto, Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Canada
| | - Evgenia Gatov
- Mental Health and Addictions Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| | - Juveria Zaheer
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Lebenbaum
- Mental Health and Addictions Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| | - Longdi Fu
- Mental Health and Addictions Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alice Newman
- Mental Health and Addictions Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul Kurdyak
- Mental Health and Addictions Program, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Yu AYX, Malo S, Svenson LW, Wilton SB, Hill MD. Temporal Trends in the Use and Comparative Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Agents Versus Warfarin for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Canadian Population-Based Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6:JAHA.117.007129. [PMID: 29080863 PMCID: PMC5721787 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.117.007129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to determine the population risk of stroke and death in incident AF, stratified by anticoagulation status and type, and the temporal trends of oral anticoagulation practice in the post-DOAC approval period. METHODS AND RESULTS We conducted a population-based cohort study of incident nonvalvular AF cases using administrative health data in Alberta, Canada. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling with anticoagulation status as a time-varying exposure and adjusted for age (continuous), sex, congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, and chronic kidney disease. Primary outcome was the composite of stroke and death. Among 34 965 patients with incident AF (56.0% male, median age 73 years), relative to warfarin, DOAC use was associated with decreased risk of all stroke and death (hazard ratio: 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.97) and decreased hemorrhagic stroke (hazard ratio: 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.91]) but a similar risk of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio: 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.34]). During this time period, DOAC use increased rapidly, surpassing warfarin, but the total oral anticoagulation use in the population remained stable, even in the subgroup with the highest thromboembolic risk. CONCLUSIONS In a real-world population-based study of patients with incident AF, anticoagulation with DOACs was associated with decreased risk of stroke and death compared with warfarin. Despite a rapid uptake of DOACs in clinical practice, the total proportion of AF patients on anticoagulation has remained stable, even in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Y X Yu
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence W Svenson
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Health, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hoshino T, Uchiyama S, Wong LK, Sissani L, Albers GW, Bornstein NM, Caplan LR, Donnan GA, Ferro JM, Hennerici MG, Labreuche J, Lavallée PC, Molina C, Rothwell PM, Steg PG, Touboul PJ, Vicaut É, Amarenco P. Differences in Characteristics and Outcomes Between Asian and Non-Asian Patients in the TIAregistry.org. Stroke 2017; 48:1779-1787. [DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.016874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Revised: 04/19/2017] [Accepted: 05/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Purpose—
This study provides the contemporary causes and prognosis of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke in Asians and the direct comparisons with non-Asians.
Methods—
The TIAregistry.org enrolled 4789 patients (1149 Asians and 3640 non-Asians) with a TIA or minor ischemic stroke within 7 days of onset. Every participating facility had systems dedicated to urgent intervention of TIA/stroke patients by specialists. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal acute coronary syndrome.
Results—
Approximately 80% of patients were evaluated within 24 hours of symptom onset. At 1 year, there were no differences in the rates of composite cardiovascular events (6.8% versus 6.0%;
P
=0.38) and stroke (6.0% versus 4.8%;
P
=0.11) between Asians and non-Asians. Asians had a lower risk of cerebrovascular disease (stroke or TIA) than non-Asians (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.63–0.98;
P
=0.03); the difference was primarily driven by a lower rate of TIA in Asians (4.2% versus 8.3%;
P
<0.001). Moderately severe bleeding was more frequent in Asians (0.8% versus 0.3%;
P
=0.02). In multivariable analysis, multiple acute infarcts (
P
=0.005) and alcohol consumption (
P
=0.02) were independent predictors of stroke recurrence in Asians, whereas intracranial stenosis (
P
<0.001), ABCD
2
score (
P
<0.001), atrial fibrillation (
P
=0.008), extracranial stenosis (
P
=0.03), and previous stroke or TIA (
P
=0.03) were independent predictors in non-Asians.
Conclusions—
The short-term stroke risk after a TIA or minor stroke was lower than expected when urgent evidence-based care was delivered, irrespective of race/ethnicity or region. However, the predictors of stroke were different for Asians and non-Asians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takao Hoshino
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Shinichiro Uchiyama
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Lawrence K.S. Wong
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Leila Sissani
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Gregory W. Albers
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Natan M. Bornstein
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Louis R. Caplan
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Geoffrey A. Donnan
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - José M. Ferro
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Michael G. Hennerici
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Julien Labreuche
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Philippa C. Lavallée
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Carlos Molina
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Peter M. Rothwell
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Philippe Gabriel Steg
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Pierre-Jean Touboul
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Éric Vicaut
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| | - Pierre Amarenco
- From the APHP, Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, INSERM LVTS-U1148, DHU FIRE, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne-Paris Cité, France (T.H., L.S., P.C.L., P-J.T., P.A.); Clinical Research Center for Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Center for Brain and Cerebral Vessels, Sanno Hospital and Sanno Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (S.U.); Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital (L.K.S.W.); Stanford
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
van Gils L, Clavel MA, Vollema EM, Hahn RT, Spitzer E, Delgado V, Nazif T, De Jaegere PP, Geleijnse ML, Ben-Yehuda O, Bax JJ, Leon MB, Pibarot P, Van Mieghem NM. Prognostic Implications of Moderate Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69:2383-2392. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2016] [Revised: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
50
|
Yuan C, Morales-Oyarvide V, Babic A, Clish CB, Kraft P, Bao Y, Qian ZR, Rubinson DA, Ng K, Giovannucci EL, Ogino S, Stampfer MJ, Gaziano JM, Sesso HD, Cochrane BB, Manson JE, Fuchs CS, Wolpin BM. Cigarette Smoking and Pancreatic Cancer Survival. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:1822-1828. [PMID: 28358654 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.71.2026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Cigarette smoking is associated with increased incidence of pancreatic cancer. However, few studies have prospectively evaluated the association of smoking with patient survival. Patients and Methods We analyzed survival by smoking status among 1,037 patients from two large US prospective cohort studies diagnosed from 1986 to 2013. Among 485 patients from four prospective US cohorts, we also evaluated survival by prediagnostic circulating levels of cotinine, a metabolite of nicotine that is proportional to tobacco smoke exposure. On the basis of prediagnosis cotinine levels, we classified patients as nonsmokers (< 3.1 ng/mL), light smokers (3.1-20.9 ng/mL), or heavy smokers (≥ 21.0 ng/mL). We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for death by using Cox proportional hazards models, with adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes status, diagnosis year, and cancer stage. Results The multivariable-adjusted HR for death was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.69) comparing current smokers with never smokers ( P = .003). A statistically significant negative trend in survival was observed for increasing pack-years of smoking ( Ptrend = .008), with HR for death of 1.49 (95% CI, 1.05 to 2.10) for > 60 pack-years of smoking versus never smoking. Survival among former smokers was similar to that for never smokers, regardless of time since quitting. Heavy smokers defined by prediagnostic circulating cotinine levels had a multivariable-adjusted HR for death of 1.76 (95% CI, 1.23 to 2.51) compared with nonsmokers. Among patients with circulating cotinine levels measured within 5 years before diagnosis, heavy smokers had a multivariable-adjusted HR for death of 2.47 (95% CI, 1.24 to 4.92) compared with nonsmokers. Conclusion Cigarette smoking was associated with a reduction in survival among patients with pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Yuan
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Vicente Morales-Oyarvide
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Ana Babic
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Clary B Clish
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Ying Bao
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Zhi Rong Qian
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Douglas A Rubinson
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Edward L Giovannucci
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Meir J Stampfer
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - John Michael Gaziano
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Howard D Sesso
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Barbara B Cochrane
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - JoAnn E Manson
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Chen Yuan, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Ana Babic, Zhi Rong Qian, Douglas A. Rubinson, Kimmie Ng, Shuji Ogino, Charles S. Fuchs, and Brian M. Wolpin, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Chen Yuan, Peter Kraft, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, Howard D. Sesso, and JoAnn E. Manson, Harvard School of Public Health; Ying Bao, Edward L. Giovannucci, Shuji Ogino, Meir J. Stampfer, John Michael Gaziano, Howard D. Sesso, JoAnn E. Manson, and Charles S. Fuchs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; John Michael Gaziano, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston; Clary B. Clish, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; and Barbara B. Cochrane, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|