Rate of Statin Prescription in Younger Patients With Severe Dyslipidemia

Gender disparities in utilization of statins for low density lipoprotein management across the spectrum of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Insights from the houston methodist cardiovascular disease learning health system registry

Introduction

Lower statin utilization is reported among women compared to men, however large-scale studies evaluating gender disparities in LDL-C management in individuals with ASCVD and its subtypes remain limited, particularly across age and racial/ethnic subgroups. In this study, we address this knowledge gap using data from a large US healthcare system.

Methods

All adult patients with established ASCVD in the Houston Methodist Learning Health System Registry during 2016-2022 were included. Statin use and dose were extracted from the database. The association between gender and statin utilization was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analyses in patients with ASCVD overall, across ASCVD subtypes, and by age, racial/ethnic subgroups, and socioeconomic risk factors.

Results

A total of 97,819 patients with prevalent ASCVD were included. Women with ASCVD had lower utilization of any statin (64.3% vs 72.6 %; p < 0.001) and high-intensity statin (29.8% vs 42.5 % p < 0.001) compared with men. In fully adjusted models, women had 40 % lower odds of any (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:0.58, 95 % CI 0.57-0.60) and high-intensity statin use (aOR:0.59, 0.57-0.61) relative to men. Women were also less likely to have guideline-recommended LDL-C < 70 mg/dL (30.2% vs 42.7 %; p < 0.01). These differences persisted across age, racial/ethnic and socioeconomic subgroups.

Conclusion

Significant gender disparities exist in contemporary lipid management among patients with ASCVD, with women being less likely to receive any and high-intensity statin and achieving guideline defined LDL-C goal compared with men across age and racial/ethnic subgroups. These disparities underscore the need to further understand potential socioeconomic drivers of the observed lower statin uptake in women.

Trends of Lipid Concentrations, Awareness, Evaluation, and Treatment in Severe Dyslipidemia in US Adults

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the contemporary trends of lipid concentrations, cholesterol evaluation, hypercholesterolemia awareness, and statin use among individuals with severe dyslipidemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] level ≥190 mg/dL) between 2011 and 2020.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This serial cross-sectional analysis included nonpregnant adults ≥20 years of age from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2011 and 2020. Age-adjusted weighted trends of LDL-C, triglycerides, cholesterol evaluation in the past 5 years, hypercholesterolemia awareness, and documented statin use among individuals with severe dyslipidemia were estimated.

RESULTS

Among 24,722 participants included, the prevalence of severe dyslipidemia was 5.4% (SE: 0.2%) which was stable across the study period (Ptrend=.78). Among individuals with severe dyslipidemia (mean age: 55.3 [SE: 0.7] years; 52.2% females; 68.8% non-Hispanic White), LDL-C (224.3 [SE: 4.2] mg/dL in 2011-2012 to 224.2 [SE: 4.6] mg/dL in 2017-2020; Ptrend =.83), and triglyceride (123.3 [SE: 1.1] mg/dL in 2011-2012 to 101.8 [SE: 1.1] mg/dL in 2017-2020; Ptrend=.13), levels remained stable from 2011 to 2020. The rates of cholesterol evaluation in the past 5 years (72.0% [SE: 5.7%] in 2011-2012 to 78.0% [SE: 4.8%] in 2017-2020; Ptrend=.91), hypercholesterolemia awareness (48.1% [SE: 5.5%] in 2011-2012 to 51.9% [SE: 5.8%] in 2017- 2020; Ptrend=.77), and documented statin use (34.7% [SE: 4.5%] in 2011-2012 to 33.4% [SE: 4.0%] in 2017-2020; Ptrend=.28) remained stagnant in individuals with severe dyslipidemia between 2011 and 2020.

CONCLUSION

Among individuals with severe dyslipidemia, cholesterol evaluation and hypercholesterolemia awareness rates were stable at ∼75% and ∼50% in the past decade. Only ∼34% of individuals with severe dyslipidemia took statins between 2011 and 2020, which likely contributed to the stable LDL-C levels noted across the study period. Further investigations into the determinants of statin use and adherence to statins are needed.

Association Between Premature Menopause and Cardiovascular Diseases and All-Cause Mortality in Korean Women

BACKGROUND

Mortality from cardiovascular diseases in Asian populations is considerable. Menopause is a risk-enhancing factor for cardiovascular disease, but it is unclear whether menopause is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality in Asian women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1 159 405 postmenopausal women, who had participated in the health examinations of the Korean National Health Insurance Service in 2009, were analyzed, and their reproductive histories were taken. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model assessed the hazard ratios (HRs) of myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality, according to the history of premature menopause and age at menopause. After an average 10-year follow-up, there were 31 606, 45 052, and 77 680 new cases of MI, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality, respectively. The women with premature menopause exhibited increased risks of MI (HR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.31-1.50]), ischemic stroke (HR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.31]), and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.14-1.24]) when compared with women with menopause aged ≥50 years. The highest risk was evident with menopause between the ages of 30 and 34 years (HR for MI, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.30-1.78]; HR for ischemic stroke, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.12-1.48]; HR for all-cause mortality, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.20-1.47]) when compared with women with menopause aged ≥50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Earlier age at menopause was associated with increased risks for MI, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality. Future guidelines and risk assessment tools should consider menopause as an independent risk factor of cardiovascular disease in Korean women.

Disparities in statin prescription among patients with severe hypercholesterolemia in an integrated healthcare system

Background

Severe hypercholesterolemia (SH), defined as a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level ≥ 190 mg/dl, is associated with an increased risk for premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Despite guideline recommendations, many patients with severe hypercholesterolemia remain untreated. We conducted an observational analysis of a large pool of SH patients, exploring demographic and social factors contributing to disparities in the prescription of statin and other lipid-lowering therapies.

Methods

We included all adults (age 18 or older) in the University Hospitals Health Care System, with an LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dl on a lipid profile drawn between January 2, 2014, and March 15, 2022. Variables were compared across relevant categories of age, gender, race and ethnicity, medical history, prescription medication status, insurance type, and provider referral type. We used the Fischer exact test and Pearson Chi-square (χ 2) for variable comparisons.

Results

A total of 7,942 patients were included in the study. The median age was 57 [IQR 48-66] years with 64% female, and 17% Black patients. Only 58% of the total cohort was prescribed statin therapy. Higher age was independently associated with a higher likelihood of receiving a statin, with an odds ratio of 1.25 (95% CI [1.21 - 1.30] per 10 years, p<0.001). Additional factors that were associated with higher rates of statin prescription in patients with SH were Black race (OR 1.90, 95% CI [1.65 - 2.17], p<0.001), smoking (OR 2.42, 95% CI [2.17 -2.70], p<0.001), and presence of diabetes (OR 3.88, 95% CI [3.27 - 4.60], p<0.001). Similar trends were also seen with other lipid-lowering therapies such as ezetimibe and fibrates.

Conclusions

In our Northeast Ohio healthcare system, less than two-thirds of patients with severe hypercholesterolemia are prescribed a statin. Statin prescription rates were highly dependent on age and the presence of additional ASCVD risk factors.

Utilization of statins in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the practice in a lower middle income South Asian country

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes. Statin reduces CVD risk. The ACC/AHA 2018 guideline on dyslipidemia recommends all patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus to be given moderate-intensity statin. We aimed to determine the prescription practices of statins among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from February to April 2021. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus between 40 and 75 years were recruited from the University Medical Clinic and Endocrine Clinic at Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Sri Lanka.

Results

Four hundred seventy-one patients were enrolled with a mean age of 59.05 (± 9.139) years. The mean duration of diabetes was 10.97 (± 9.57) years. Four hundred forty-one (93.6%) patients were on statin and 30 (6.4%) patients were not on statin therapy. Those not on statins were not prescribed statins.

Conclusions

There were 163 (34.61%) patients who required high intensity. Though only 3 (1.73%) were on high-strength statin, the rest were on moderate (152, 93.25%), low (4, 2.45%), and none (4, 2.45%). Among patients with prior history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and the high-risk category according to the 10-year ASCVD risk estimation (155, 32.91%), only 17 (10.97%) have achieved optimal LDL therapeutic targets (55mg/dL). A large proportion of the study population received statin therapy for primary and secondary prophylaxis. However, the majority were on suboptimal doses of statin and have not achieved therapeutic targets with regard to LDL-C levels. The findings highlight the importance of improving statin therapy and optimizing lipid management according to evidence-based guideline recommendations.

A comparative analysis of premature heart disease- and cancer-related mortality in women in the USA, 1999-2018

AIMS

To compare premature heart disease- and cancer-related deaths in women in the USA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed the US national database of death certificates of women aged <65 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database between 1999 and 2018. We measured annual percentage changes (APCs) in age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) and years of potential life lost per 100 000 persons due to heart disease and cancer. Overall, cancer was a more prevalent cause of premature death compared with heart disease. Between 1999 and 2018, the AAMRs decreased for both cancer (61.9/100 000 to 45.6/100 000) and heart disease (29.2/100 000 to 22.6/100 000). However, while APC in AAMR for cancer declined consistently over time, after an initial decline, APC in AAMR for heart disease increased between 2010 and 2018 [0.53 95% confidence interval (0.18-0.89)], with a significant rise in Midwest, medium/small metros, and rural areas after 2008. Compared with cancer, APC in AAMR for heart disease increased in women aged 25-34 years [2.24 (0.30-4.22); 2013-18) and 55-64 years [0.46 (0.13-0.80); 2009-13], as well as Non-Hispanic (NH) Whites [APC, 0.79 (0.46-1.13); 2009-18] and NH American Indian/Alaskan Native [2.71 (0.59-4.87); 2011-2018]. Consequently, the mortality gap between cancer and heart disease has narrowed from an AAMR of 32.7/100 000 to 23.0/100 000.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality gap between cancer and heart disease is decreasing among women <65 years. Intensive cardiovascular health interventions are required focusing on vulnerable young demographic subgroups and underserved regional areas to meet the American Heart Association's Impact Goal and Million Hearts Initiative.

Lower-Intensity Statins Contributing to Gaps in Care for Patients With Primary Severe Hypercholesterolemia

Background Although severe hypercholesterolemia confers a 5-fold increased long-term risk for coronary artery disease, treatment guidelines may not be fully implemented, leading to underdiagnosis and suboptimal treatment. To further understand the clinical features and gaps in treatment approaches, we analyzed electronic medical record data from a midwestern US multidisciplinary healthcare system, between 2009 and 2020. Methods and Results We retrospectively assessed the prevalence, clinical presentation, and treatment characteristics of individuals currently treated with statin therapy having a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) value that is either (1) an actual maximum electronic medical record-documented LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL (group 1, n=7542) or (2) an estimated pretreatment LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL (group 2, n=7710). Comorbidities and prescribed lipid-lowering therapies were assessed. Statistical analyses identified differences among individuals within and between groups. Of records analyzed (n=266 282), 7% met the definition for primary severe hypercholesterolemia. Group 1 had more comorbidities than group 2. More individuals in both groups were treated by primary care providers (49.8%-53.0%, 32.6%-36.4%) than by specialty providers (4.1%-5.5%, 2.1%-3.3%). High-intensity lipid-lowering therapy was prescribed less frequently for group 2 than for group 1, but moderate-intensity statins were prescribed more frequently for group 2 (65%) than for group 1 (52%). Conclusions Two percent of patients in our study population being treated with low- or moderate-intensity statins have an estimated LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL (indicating severe hypercholesterolemia), but receive less aggressive treatment than patients with a maximum measured LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL.

Evolution and Outcomes of Premature Coronary Artery Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to explore the evolution and outcomes of premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) while reviewing strategies for effective screening of those at high risk for developing this disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) affects a population of patients not typically identified as high risk by current risk stratification guidelines or traditional risk calculation tools. Not only does PCAD represent a large proportion of overall cardiovascular disease, it also afflicts a population in which the rate of mortality from cardiovascular disease has plateaued despite an overall declining population-wide cardiovascular mortality rate. There is ample opportunity for behavioral change strategies, screening tools, adapted imaging modalities, and precision pharmacotherapies to be more precisely targeted toward those at highest risk for premature coronary artery disease. Premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) is pervasive and not frequently represented within contemporary risk calculation models. Providers should pursue proactive screening and aggressive risk factor modification and deploy appropriate preventative therapies in caring for younger populations.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Patients With Primary Severe Hypercholesterolemia in a Multidisciplinary Healthcare System

Severe hypercholesterolemia (SH) includes individuals with LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dl, regardless of cause. These individuals have a fivefold increased long-term risk for coronary artery disease. Although systematic SH screening can trigger early treatment, current treatment guidelines may not be fully implemented or followed by patients. To further understand this treatment gap, we used electronic health record data to retrospectively assess SH prevalence, characteristics, and treatment in a midwest US healthcare system, between 2009 and 2020. Comorbidities, tobacco exposure, and prescribed lipid-lowering therapies were assessed. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify differences between individuals with primary SH (LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dl, group 1) and those without primary SH (LDL-C < 190 mg/dl, group 2). Of 265,220 records analyzed, 7.4% met the definition for primary SH. These group 1 cases had more comorbidities than group 2 cases, including premature coronary artery disease (5.8% vs 2.7%). Results showed most individuals in group 1 were treated by primary care providers (43.2% to 45.7%), than by specialty providers (2.5% to 3.3%), and these primary care providers prescribed mainly moderate-intensity statins. Seventy-seven percent of group 1 individuals were treated with a statin, 27% were treated with a high-intensity statin, and 4% were treated with ezetimibe. Fewer young patients (< 40 years) were treated with statins (50% to 58.3%) than older patients (74.0% to 76.3%). Although use of general statins, high-intensity statins, and ezetimibe was higher in individuals with SH than those without SH, treatment remains below guideline recommendations, especially in younger individuals.

The evaluation and management of patients with LDL-C ≥ 190 ​mg/dL in a large health care system

Objectives

Patients with severe hyperlipidemia (low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥190 ​mg/dL) have a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and are more likely to have familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We sought to determine how often health care providers recognize the implications of and adjust therapy for an LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with an LDL-C measurement in the medical record of a large health care system between November 2015 and June 2016. Patients were restricted to those with LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL and without secondary causes of dyslipidemia, with sensitivity analyses for those with LDL-C ≥220 ​mg/dL.

Results

Of 27,963 patients, 227 had LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL. Only 21% were on a statin at the time of LDL-C measurement. More than 90% had a follow-up clinic visit, but 41% had no change in treatment. FH was only included in the differential for 14%. The presence/absence of a family history of dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, and premature CVD were documented in 26%, 29%, and 31%. Only 20.7% and 22.1% had documentation of the presence or absence of tendinous xanthomas or corneal arcus, respectively. Among those without prior specialist care (cardiologist or endocrinologist), only 13% were referred. These measures were only slightly better for those with LDL-C ≥220 ​mg/dL.

Conclusion

In a large health care system, the possibility of FH was rarely acknowledged in those with residual LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL, few were referred to specialists, and therapeutic adjustments were suboptimal. Additional efforts are required to understand barriers to improving the evaluation and management of patients with LDL-C ≥190 ​mg/dL.

Association between frequency of primary care provider visits and evidence-based statin prescribing and statin adherence: Findings from the Veterans Affairs system

BACKGROUND

Statin use remains suboptimal in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We assessed if the frequency of visits with primary care providers (PCPs) is associated with higher use of evidence-based statin prescriptions and adherence among patients with ASCVD.

METHODS

We identified patients with ASCVD aged ≥18 years receiving care in 130 facilities and associated community-based outpatient clinics in the entire Veterans Affairs Health Care System between October 1, 2013 and September 30, 2014. Patients were divided into frequent PCP visitors (annual PCP visits ≥ median number of PCP visits for the entire cohort) and infrequent PCP visitors (annual PCP visits < median number of patient visits). We assessed any- and high-intensity statin prescription as well as statin adherence which was defined by proportion of days covered (PDC).

RESULTS

We included 1,249,061 patients with ASCVD (mean age was 71.9 years; 98.0% male). Median number of annual PCP visits was 3. Approximately 80.1% patients were on statins with 23.8% on high-intensity statins. Mean PDC was 0.715 ± 0.336 with 58.3% patients with PDC ≥0.8. Frequent PCP visitors had higher frequency of statin use (82.2% vs 77.4%), high-intensity statin use (26.4% vs 20.3%), and statin adherence (mean PDC 0.73 vs 0.68; P < .01) compared to infrequent PCP visitors. After adjusting for covariates, frequent PCP visits was associated with greater odds of being on any statin, high intensity statin, and higher statin adherence.

CONCLUSION

Frequent visits with PCPs is associated with a higher likelihood of any statin use, high intensity statin use, and statin adherence. Further research endeavors are needed to understand the reasons behind these associations.

Relation Between Cardiology Follow-Up Visits, Evidence-Based Statin Prescribing, and Statin Adherence (from the Veterans Affairs Health Care System)

Statin use remains suboptimal in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We assessed whether outpatient care with a cardiology provider is associated with evidence-based statin prescription and statin adherence. We identified patients with ASCVD aged ≥18 years receiving primary care in 130 facilities and associated community-based outpatient clinics in the entire Veterans Affairs Health Care System between October 1, 2013 and September 30, 2014. Patients were divided into: (1) patients with at least 1 outpatient cardiology visit and (2) patients with no outpatient cardiology visits in the year before the index primary care visit. We assessed any- and high-intensity statin prescription adjusting for several patient- and facility-level covariates, and statin adherence using proportion of days covered (PDC). We included 1,249,061 patients with ASCVD (mean age: 71.9 years; 98.0% male). After adjusting for covariates, patients who visited a cardiology provider had greater odds of being on a statin (87.4% vs 78.4%; Odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.24 to 1.26), high-intensity statin (34.5% vs 21.2%; OR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.22), and higher statin adherence (mean PDC 0.76 ± 0.29 vs 0.70 ± 0.34, PDC ≥0.8: 62.0% vs 57.3%; OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.11). A dose response relation was seen with a higher number of cardiology visits associated with a higher statin use and statin adherence. In conclusion, compared with outpatient care delivered by primary care providers alone, care delivered by a cardiology provider for patients with ASCVD is associated with a higher likelihood of guideline-based statin use and statin adherence.

Prescribing statins among patients with type 2 diabetes: The clinical gap between the guidelines and practice

BACKGROUND

Statins are recommended for cardiovascular protection for people with diabetes (high-risk groups). This study aimed to evaluate the gap between the guidelines of statin utilization and clinical practice among outpatients with type 2 diabetes regarding the patient's age and gender, to assess if this preventive drug is being satisfactorily utilized or not.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, patients aged <40 or >75 years, pregnant patients, and patients with type 1 diabetes, human immunodeficiency virus, or liver cirrhosis were excluded. Demographics, laboratory parameters, and prevalence of exposure to statin therapy were evaluated. This study was guided by the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines. IBM SPSS software was used for data management.

RESULTS

The study cohort involved 576 patients, with age being 58.3 ± 8.9 years. There were 50.5% of females and 49.5% of males. Overall 81.1% of patients aged 58.8 ± 8.8 years were statin users and 18.9% of patients aged 56.2 ± 9 years were statin nonusers. About 83.2% of females and 78.9% of males were prescribed statins. Statin medications included simvastatin 79.2%, atorvastatin 11.6%, lovastatin 5.8%, rosuvastatin 2.1%, and pravastatin 1.3%. Statin users' and nonusers' adherence was 56.5%, and 41.3% (P = 0.004), respectively. The adherence to medication plan of females and males was 55.7% and 51.6%, respectively (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Patients with diabetes who are at high risk of cardiovascular events, exposure to statin treatment is significantly less than perfect position both in females and males. Nearly one-fifth of the patients with type 2 diabetes are not using statins despite therapeutic necessities.

Effect of Change in Total Cholesterol Levels on Cardiovascular Disease Among Young Adults

BACKGROUND

Although high serum cholesterol in young adults is known to be a predictor for cardiovascular events, there is not enough evidence for the association of cholesterol level change with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to evaluate whether the change in cholesterol is associated with incidence of CVD among young adults.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined 2 682 045 young adults (aged 20-39 years) who had undergone 2 consecutive national health check-ups provided by Korean National Health Insurance Service between 2002 and 2005. Cholesterol levels were classified into low (<180 mg/dL), middle (180-240 mg/dL) and high (≥240 mg/dL). CVD events were defined as ≥2 days hospitalization attributable to CVD for 10 years follow-up. Increased cholesterol levels were significantly associated with elevated ischemic heart disease risk (adjusted hazard ration [aHR]=1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.03-1.42 in low-high group and aHR=1.21; 95% CI=1.15-1.27 in middle-high group) and cerebrovascular disease (CEVD) risk (aHR=1.24; 95% CI=1.05-1.47 in low-high group and aHR=1.09; 95% CI=1.02-1.16 in middle-high group). Decreased cholesterol levels were associated with reduced ischemic heart disease risk (aHR=0.91; 95% CI=0.88-0.95 in middle-low group, aHR=0.65; 95% CI=0.56-0.75 in high-low group and aHR=0.68; 95% CI=0.65-0.73 in high-middle group). Furthermore, lower cerebrovascular disease risk (aHR=0.76; 95% CI=0.62-0.92) was observed in the high-low group compared with patients with sustained high cholesterol.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of our study indicate that increased cholesterol levels were associated with high CVD risk in young adults. Furthermore, young adults with decreased cholesterol levels had reduced risk for CVD.

Prevalence and Predictors of Cholesterol Screening, Awareness, and Statin Treatment Among US Adults With Familial Hypercholesterolemia or Other Forms of Severe Dyslipidemia (1999-2014)

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and other extreme elevations in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; however, recent data suggest that prescription rates for statins remain low in these patients. National rates of screening, awareness, and treatment with statins among individuals with FH or severe dyslipidemia are unknown.

METHODS

Data from the 1999 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used to estimate prevalence rates of self-reported screening, awareness, and statin therapy among US adults (n=42 471 weighted to represent 212 million US adults) with FH (defined using the Dutch Lipid Clinic criteria) and with severe dyslipidemia (defined as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels ≥190 mg/dL). Logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic and clinical correlates of hypercholesterolemia awareness and statin therapy.

RESULTS

The estimated US prevalence of definite/probable FH was 0.47% (standard error, 0.03%) and of severe dyslipidemia was 6.6% (standard error, 0.2%). The frequency of cholesterol screening and awareness was high (>80%) among adults with definite/probable FH or severe dyslipidemia; however, statin use was uniformly low (52.3% [standard error, 8.2%] of adults with definite/probable FH and 37.6% [standard error, 1.2%] of adults with severe dyslipidemia). Only 30.3% of patients with definite/probable FH on statins were taking a high-intensity statin. The prevalence of statin use in adults with severe dyslipidemia increased over time (from 29.4% to 47.7%) but not faster than trends in the general population (from 5.7% to 17.6%). Older age, health insurance status, having a usual source of care, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and having a personal history of early atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were associated with higher statin use.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high prevalence of cholesterol screening and awareness, only ≈50% of adults with FH are on statin therapy, with even fewer prescribed a high-intensity statin; young and uninsured patients are at the highest risk for lack of screening and for undertreatment. This study highlights an imperative to improve the frequency of cholesterol screening and statin prescription rates to better identify and treat this high-risk population. Additional studies are needed to better understand how to close these gaps in screening and treatment.

Trends of Out-of-Hospital Sudden Cardiac Death Among Children and Young Adults

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Previous estimates of sudden cardiac death in children and young adults vary significantly, and population-based studies in the United States are lacking. We sought to estimate the incidence, causes, and mortality trends of sudden cardiac death in children and young adults (1-34 years).

METHODS

Demographic and mortality data based on death certificates for US residents (1-34 years) were obtained (1999-2015). Cases of sudden death and sudden cardiac death were retrieved by using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes.

RESULTS

A total of 1 452 808 subjects aged 1 to 34 years died in the United States, of which 31 492 (2%) were due to sudden cardiac death. The estimated incidence of sudden cardiac death is 1.32 per 100 000 individuals and increased with age from 0.49 (1-10 years) to 2.76 (26-34 years). During the study period, incidence of sudden cardiac death declined from 1.48 to 1.13 per 100 000 (P < .001). Mortality reduction was observed across all racial and ethnic groups with a varying magnitude and was highest in children aged 11 to 18 years. Significant disparities were found, with non-Hispanic African American individuals and individuals aged 26 to 34 years having the highest mortality rates. The majority of young children (1-10 years) died of congenital heart disease (n = 1525, 46%), whereas young adults died most commonly from ischemic heart disease (n = 5075, 29%).

CONCLUSIONS

Out-of-hospital sudden cardiac death rates declined 24% from 1999 to 2015. Disparities in mortality exist across age groups and racial and ethnic groups, with non-Hispanic African American individuals having the highest mortality rates.

Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Review of Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice

Numerous large randomized clinical trials have shown that statin therapy is effective and safe for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) for adults aged 40 to 75 years and support the use of 10-year CVD risk as a means to identify individuals for treatment. Uncertainty exists in those older than 75 years who may be more likely to benefit because of their underlying CVD risk, but also face uncertain harms. Several high-quality mathematical simulation models have shown that statin therapy is cost-effective for primary prevention of atherosclerotic CVD. Despite effectiveness and safety, statins are underutilized for primary prevention.

The prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of dyslipidemia in northeast China: a population-based cross-sectional survey

Background

Dyslipidemia is an important independent modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to explore the current prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of dyslipidemia and its associated influence factors in northeast China.

Methods

In this population-based cross-sectional study, we adopted a multi-stage, stratified sampling method to obtain a representative sample of 4052 permanent residents aged 40 years and over from different urban and rural regions in Dehui City of Jilin Province. All subjects completed a questionnaire and were examined for risk factors. Continuous data were presented as means ± standard deviations (SD) and compared using the Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were presented as proportions and compared using the Rao-Scott-χ² test in different subgroups. The associated influence factors for the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of dyslipidemia were evaluated through multivariate logistic regression.

Results

The prevalence of dyslipidemia was 62.1% overall, with 33.5, 43.9, 0.6, and 8.8% for high total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, respectively. Among those with dyslipidemia, the proportion of subjects who were aware, treated, and controlled was 14.4, 33.9, and 19.9%, respectively. Overweight or obesity (OR = 2.156; 95% CI: 1.863, 2.533), hypertension (OR = 1.643; 95% CI: 1.425, 1.893), or diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.173; 95% CI: 1.661, 2.844) increased the prevalence of dyslipidemia, also these participants were more likely to be aware of their condition, however, this did not increase the likelihood of treatment and control. Living in urban areas and higher education level also increased the awareness of dyslipidemia. Personal history of coronary heart disease was the strongest influence factors associated with better awareness, treatment and control of dyslipidemia. Overweight or obesity (OR = 0.404; 95% CI: 0.235, 0.695) and lack of exercise (OR = 0.423; 95% CI: 0.215, 0.830) were associated with poor control of dyslipidemia.

Conclusion

The prevalence of dyslipidemia among adults aged 40 years and over in northeast China was high, however, the awareness, treatment, and control of dyslipidemia was measured at far from desirable levels. Renewed efforts taking influence factors into account are needed to improve the current unsatisfactory condition.