Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Ocular hemodynamics in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

To evaluate retinal vascular changes by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 21 patients who were diagnosed with MIS-C and had a history of hospitalization, 20 pediatric outpatients with a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis, and 26 healthy children. All patients underwent a detailed ophthalmologic examination and OCTA. In the MIS-C and pediatric COVID-19 groups, these evaluations were made 6 months after diagnosis. The vascular density values of the superficial, deep, and radial peripapillary capillary plexuses (SCP, DCP, and RPCP, respectively), foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters (area, perimeter, acircularity index, and foveal density), and outer retinal and choriocapillaris flow area values were recorded using OCTA.

RESULTS

No pathology was detected in the ophthalmologic examinations of the three groups with similar age and gender distributions. Although the vascular density values of SCP, DCP, and RPCP were found to be higher in most quadrants in the MIS-C group, there was no statistically significant difference among the three groups ( P > 0.05 for all). FAZ parameters and flow area measurements were similar in all three groups ( P > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate relatively long-term outcomes in patients with MIS-C and pediatric COVID-19 together. This study shows no changes in the SCP and DCP parameters in pediatric age group, which shows that ocular hemodynamic changes may not be reflected on OCTA after 6 months.

Emerging risk factors for heart failure in younger populations: A growing public health concern

Heart failure (HF) is a growing public health concern, with an increasing incidence among younger populations. Traditionally, HF was considered a condition primarily affecting the elderly, but of late, emerging evidence hints at a rapidly rising HF incidence in youth in the past 2 decades. HF in youth has been linked to a complex interaction between emerging risk factors, such as metabolic syndrome, environmental exposures, genetic predispositions, and lifestyle behaviors. This review examines these evolving determinants, including substance abuse, autoimmune diseases, and the long-term cardiovascular effects of coronavirus disease 2019, which disproportionately affect younger individuals. Through a comprehensive analysis, the study highlights the importance of early detection, targeted prevention strategies, and multidisciplinary management approaches to address this alarming trend. Promoting awareness and integrating age-specific interventions could significantly reduce the burden of HF and improve long-term outcomes among younger populations.

CMR Findings in the Long-Term Outcomes After Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MUSIC) Study

BACKGROUND

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children is characterized by high rates of acute cardiovascular involvement with rapid recovery of organ dysfunction. However, information regarding long-term sequelae is lacking. We sought to characterize the systolic function and myocardial tissue properties using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in a multicenter observational cohort of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children patients.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, comprising 32 centers in North America, CMR studies were analyzed by a core laboratory to assess ventricular volumetric data, tissue characterization, and coronary involvement.

RESULTS

A total of 263 CMRs from 255 Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children patients were analyzed. The mean patient age was 11.4±4.4 years. Most studies were performed at 3 months (33%) or 6 months (45%) after hospitalization. Left ventricular dysfunction was present in 17 (6.7%) of the first CMRs and was never worse than mild. Dysfunction was observed in 4/7 (57%) patients at admission, 5/87 (6.9%) patients at 3 months, and 6/129 (4.6%) patients imaged either at 6 months or 1 year post-hospitalization. Late gadolinium enhancement was present in 2 (0.8%) patients, 1 at 3 months and another at 6 months following hospitalization. Coronary artery dilation was present in 13 of the 174 (7.5%) patients. Nine patients met the Lake Louise criteria for myocarditis (3.5%) at the time of CMR.

CONCLUSIONS

In this largest published multiinstitutional longitudinal CMR evaluation of confirmed Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children patients, the prevalence of ventricular dysfunction and myocardial tissue characterization abnormalities on medium-term follow-up was low. However, a small number of patients had mild residual abnormalities at 6 months and 1 year following hospitalization.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05287412.

Abnormal Coronary Vascular Response in Patients with Long COVID Syndrome - a Case-Control Study Using Oxygenation-Sensitive Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

BACKGROUND

Following the world-wide COVID-19 pandemic, many patients reported ongoing severe cardiovascular symptoms after the acute phase. This multisystemic condition has been named long COVID syndrome. Whilst cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the gold standard to diagnose acute myocardial damage, no specific changes have been shown in long COVID patients. However, endothelial dysfunction has been hypothesized to contribute to its pathogenesis. Oxygenation-sensitive CMR during breathing exercise is a simple, non-invasive and accurate test to objectify vascular function, that has not been applied to long COVID patients yet.

METHODS

After receiving approval from the local ethics committee, this prospective observational case-control study enrolled (i) patients reporting symptoms for ≥6 weeks following an acute COVID-19 infection or vaccination, and (ii) healthy volunteers with neither symptoms nor history of cardiovascular disease. Participants completed a questionnaire, point-of-care testing of cardiac biomarkers, a standard non-contrast CMR and an oxygenation-sensitive CMR. Heart rate response and breathing-induced myocardial oxygenation reserve (B-MORE) were assessed during metronome-paced hyperventilation and apnea.

RESULTS

31 patients (17 female; age 39.4 [30.3; 51.6] years) and 27 controls (12 female; age 33.3 [27.3; 46.8]) were included with comparable demographics and cardiovascular risk factors between groups. Laboratory testing and standard CMR did not reveal any pathologies in either of the groups. Indexed left ventricular stroke volume was significantly lower in patients (44.5ml [41.2; 46.6] vs. 55.9ml [49.2; 59.2]; p<0.001), whilst ejection fraction and longitudinal strain of both ventricles were comparable (p>0.05 for all). Vasoactive breathing exercises induced a significant increase in heart rate (+35/min [21; 45]) and B-MORE (9.8% [4.3; 17.2]) in controls. In patients however, heart rate increase was blunted (+15/min [7; 26]; p<0.001) and B-MORE was significantly lower (7.3% [3.4; 10.4], p=0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study is the first to show a blunted hemodynamic and myocardial oxygenation response to vasoactive breathing maneuvers during Oxygenation-sensitive CMR in long COVID patients. This simple, non-invasive test may be the first to objectify complaints of affected patients and indicates evidence for the crucial role of the endothelium in the pathophysiology of long COVID.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Control Measures on Screening and Diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes in British Columbia

INTRODUCTION

In British Columbia (BC), Canada, COVID-19 and associated control measures impacted routine care for patients with diabetes. Some of these measures may have impacted timely screening and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. We assessed the impact of control measures on screening and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in BC.

METHODS

We used data from the BC COVID-19 Cohort, which includes COVID-19 and healthcare administrative data on all residents of BC. We assessed and compared screening (≥40 yrs) and diagnosis (≥18 yrs) of diabetes among the adult population during the pandemic period (1 April 2020-31 December 2022), with 1 January 2016-31 March 2020 used as a historical reference period. We used interrupted time series with generalized additive models to evaluate the impact of policy measures on screening and diagnoses trends.

RESULTS

We observed an initial decline in the mean number of screenings and diagnoses. In the third post-policy phase (January 2022-December 2022), there was a 4.8% (-5.1, 15.4) increase in screenings while after an initial reduction in diabetes diagnoses, we observed a significant increase of 31.6% (17.8, 46.6) in the third post-policy phase. Further stratification by age and sex showed the entire increase in diagnoses trends was driven by younger females with a 56.4% (25.1, 92.9) and 58.7% (38.2, 81.3) increment in diagnoses in the 18-29 and 40-49 age groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial reduced number of screenings and diagnoses followed by the significant upward trend in diabetes diagnoses in the later post-policy phase have important clinical and public health implications. Further research is needed to understand the post-pandemic increase in diabetes among females.

Impaired Cardiovascular Hemodynamics in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Pneumonia

Background: SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection may be associated with impaired cardiac function, especially in severe cases requiring hospitalization. Impedance cardiography (ICG) is a noninvasive method for assessing cardiac function. It could be useful for the early detection of hemodynamic dysfunction, particularly in patients with a severe course of COVID-19. Aim: This study aimed to analyze and compare the hemodynamic profiles of patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2-induced pneumonia to those of a control group. Methods: This prospective, observational, clinical study included 30 hospitalized patients (both men and women, mean age: 48 years) diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVID group). Their data were compared to those of a retrospective control group (CG). The study participants were propensity score-matched based on clinical characteristics, including age, blood pressure (BP), and body mass index (BMI). ICG measurements of hemodynamic profiles were performed using a Niccomo device and included heart rate (HR), stroke volume index (SI), cardiac index (CI), velocity index (VI), acceleration index (ACI), Heather index (HI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), and thoracic fluid content (TFC). Results: Patients with COVID-19 showed significantly higher HR (p < 0.0001) and SVRI (p = 0.0003) and lower values for several cardiac function parameters, including SI (p < 0.0001), VI (p < 0.0001), ACI (p = 0.004), and HI (p < 0.0001). Additionally, 11 patients (37%) in the COVID group had a low SI (<35 mL/m2), compared to only 1 patient (3%) in the control group (p < 0.0001). A statistically significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was also observed (p < 0.0001), although absolute values remained within the normal range. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection negatively affects the cardiovascular system, leading to impaired heart function even in low-risk patients. Impedance cardiography may serve as a simple, noninvasive tool for identifying individuals with cardiac dysfunction following COVID-19 pneumonia.

Assessing the impact of COmorbidities and Sociodemographic factors on Multiorgan Injury following COVID-19: rationale and protocol design of COSMIC, a UK multicentre observational study of COVID-negative controls

INTRODUCTION

SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) has had an enormous health and economic impact globally. Although primarily a respiratory illness, multi-organ involvement is common in COVID-19, with evidence of vascular-mediated damage in the heart, liver, kidneys and brain in a substantial proportion of patients following moderate-to-severe infection. The pathophysiology and long-term clinical implications of multi-organ injury remain to be fully elucidated. Age, gender, ethnicity, frailty and deprivation are key determinants of infection severity, and both morbidity and mortality appear higher in patients with underlying comorbidities such as ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and diabetes. Our aim is to gain mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of multiorgan dysfunction in people with COVID-19 and maximise the impact of national COVID-19 studies with a comparison group of COVID-negative controls.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

COmorbidities and Sociodemographic factors on Multiorgan Injury following COVID-19 (COSMIC) is a prospective, multicentre UK study which will recruit 200 subjects without clinical evidence of prior COVID-19 and perform extensive phenotyping with multiorgan imaging, biobank serum storage, functional assessment and patient reported outcome measures, providing a robust control population to facilitate current work and serve as an invaluable bioresource for future observational studies.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee East Midlands (REC reference 19/EM/0295). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

COSMIC is registered as an extension of C-MORE (Capturing Multi-ORgan Effects of COVID-19) on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04510025).

COVID-19 related complications

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted global healthcare systems, revealed vulnerabilities and prompted a re-evaluation of medical practices. Acute complications from the virus, including cardiovascular and neurological issues, have underscored the necessity for timely medical interventions. Advances in diagnostic methods and personalized therapies have been pivotal in mitigating severe outcomes. Additionally, Long COVID has emerged as a complex challenge, affecting various body systems and leading to respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, psychological, and musculoskeletal problems. This broad spectrum of complications highlights the importance of multidisciplinary management approaches that prioritize therapy, rehabilitation, and patient-centered care. Vulnerable populations such as paediatric patients, pregnant women, and immunocompromised individuals face unique risks and complications, necessitating continuous monitoring and tailored management strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19.

A review of post COVID syndrome pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management in children and young people

Post Covid Syndrome (PCS) is a complex multi-system disorder with a spectrum of presentations. Severity ranges from mild to very severe with variable duration of illness and recovery. This paper discusses the difficulties defining and describing PCS. We review the current understanding of PCS, epidemiology, and predisposing factors. We consider potential mechanisms including viral persistence, clotting dysfunction and immunity. We review presentation and diagnosis and finally consider management strategies including addressing symptom burden, rehabilitation, and novel therapies.

Insights into the epidemiology and clinical aspects of post-COVID-19 conditions in adult

ObjectivesWhile most individuals infected with COVID-19 recover completely within a few weeks, some continue to experience lingering symptoms. This study was conducted to identify and describe the clinical and subclinical manifestations of adult patients from the long-term effects of COVID-19.MethodsThe study analyzed 205 medical records of inpatients (age ≥ 16 years, ≥ 4 weeks post-COVID-19 recovery, and a negative SARS-CoV-2 status at enrollment) at Thong Nhat Hospital, Vietnam, from 6 September 2021 to 26 August 2022, using R language software.ResultsThe majority of patients hospitalized with long COVID-19 symptoms (92.68%) had normal consciousness. The most common symptoms on admission were fatigue (59.02%), dyspnea (52.68%), and cough (42.93%). In total, 80% of patients observed respiratory symptoms, primarily dyspnea, while 42.44% reported neurological symptoms, with sleep disturbance being the most common. Noticeably, 42.93% of patients experienced respiratory failure in the post-COVID-19 period, resembling acute respiratory distress syndrome.DiscussionThese findings provide crucial insights into the epidemiology, clinical, and subclinical aspects of post-COVID-19 conditions, shedding light on the prevalence of common symptoms and the demographic distribution of affected patients. Understanding these manifestations is vital for patient well-being, improved clinical practice, and targeted healthcare planning, potentially leading to better patient care, management, and future interventions.

Factors Associated with Post-COVID Cardiac Conditions and Potential Prognostic Factors: A Systematic Review

Cardiac conditions are a significant category of post-COVID conditions. The objective of this study was to synthesise the evidence on the factors associated with the development of post-COVID cardiac conditions, the frequency of clinical outcomes in affected patients, and the potential prognostic factors. A systematic review was conducted using the databases EBSCOhost, MEDLINE via PubMed, BVS, and Embase, covering studies from 2019 to December 2023. A total of 8343 articles were identified, and seven met the eligibility criteria for data extraction. The protective effect of vaccination stood out among the associated factors, showing a reduced risk of developing post-COVID cardiac conditions. Conversely, COVID-19 reinfections were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes. Regarding the main outcomes in these patients, most recovered, although some cases persisted beyond 200 days of follow-up. The study included in the analysis of prognostic factors reported that the four children who did not recover by the end of the study were between two and five years old and had gastrointestinal symptoms during the illness. The COVID-19 vaccination regimen reduces the risk of developing post-COVID cardiac conditions. Public health policies promoting immunisation should be encouraged to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections and reinfections.

Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination on Cardiac Function and Survival in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

Maintenance hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular complications and mortality following COVID-19 infection due to compromised immune function. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) on cardiac function and survival in this population. Background/Objectives: We aimed to examine whether CoronaVac vaccination affects heart function and survival rates in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Specifically, we assessed changes in heart ultrasound (echocardiographic) measurements, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, and survival outcomes by comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 531 maintenance hemodialysis patients, including 79 who received CoronaVac and 452 who did not. We compared the pre- and post-infection changes in heart function (echocardiographic parameters) and BNP levels between the two groups and assessed their association with the survival rates. Results: The vaccinated patients were younger (60.54  ±  13.51 vs. 65.21  ±  13.76 years, p = 0.006) and had shorter dialysis durations (56.04  ±  51.88 vs. 73.73  ±  64.79 months, p = 0.022). The mortality rate was also significantly lower in the vaccinated group (6.33% vs. 14.38%, p = 0.049). After infection, the unvaccinated patients showed significant declines in heart function and increased B-type natriuretic peptide levels, while the vaccinated patients demonstrated no significant deterioration. Older age, coronary artery disease, inflammation levels, and heart abnormalities were identified as the key risk factors for mortality. Conclusions: CoronaVac was linked to lower mortality and better heart function in maintenance hemodialysis patients. The vaccine may help to reduce infection severity, lower strain on the heart, and improve the overall prognosis.

Distinct Cytokine Patterns Identify Acute and Convalescent Myocardial Involvement After Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Multicohort Biomarker Study

We sought to identify the immunobiologic underpinnings of cardiac involvement as a postacute sequela of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by comparing acute and convalescent populations. For the latter, an integrated analysis of cytokine levels, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity was performed. Unlike acute cardiac injury, which was associated with heightened tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) but not interleukin 18 (IL-18), convalescent myocardial inflammation/edema correlated with IL-18 but not TNF-α. Thus, inflammation is not a monolith in relation to cardiac involvement in the setting of COVID-19. Instead, convalescent cardiac involvement may emerge from mechanisms distinct from acute injury, and appropriately targeted therapies may prevent postacute sequalae of COVID-19.

Genetic and Epigenetic Intersections in COVID-19-Associated Cardiovascular Disease: Emerging Insights and Future Directions

The intersection of COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease (CVD) has emerged as a significant area of research, particularly in understanding the impact of antiplatelet therapies like ticagrelor and clopidogrel. COVID-19 has been associated with acute cardiovascular complications, including myocardial infarction, thrombosis, and heart failure, exacerbated by the virus's ability to trigger widespread inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a critical role in regulating these processes by modulating the gene expressions involved in platelet function, inflammation, and vascular homeostasis. This study explores the potential of miRNAs such as miR-223 and miR-126 as biomarkers for predicting resistance or responsiveness to antiplatelet therapies in COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular disease. Identifying miRNA signatures linked to drug efficacy could optimize treatment strategies for patients at high risk of thrombotic events during COVID-19 infection. Moreover, understanding miRNA-mediated pathways offers new insights into how SARS-CoV-2 exacerbates CVD, particularly through mechanisms like cytokine storms and endothelial damage. The findings of this research could lead to personalized therapeutic approaches, improving patient outcomes and reducing mortality in COVID-19-associated cardiovascular events. With global implications, this study addresses the urgent need for effective management of CVD in the context of COVID-19, focusing on the integration of molecular biomarkers to enhance the precision of antiplatelet therapy.

Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Function in the Third Year After COVID-19 Hospitalization: A Follow-Up Pilot Study in South-East of Romania

Background and Objectives: Cardiac involvement in COVID-19 has been confirmed during the acute stage of the infection. However, the prevalence and spectrum of post-infectious cardiac dysfunction remain incompletely clarified. The objective of our study was to evaluate the frequency of echocardiographic changes 2 years after hospitalization for moderate and severe COVID-19 in patients with no previously known cardiac pathology. Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study analyzing severity markers of COVID-19 infection and echocardiographic parameters assessed ≥2 years after the acute illness, based on recent guideline recommended algorithm for echocardiographic diagnostic of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Results: The study included 50 Caucasian patients, 60% male, 54% aged < 65 years, and 32% with severe forms of the disease. The primary comorbidities were hypertension, obesity, and diabetes. COVID-19 severity correlated with the computed tomography (CT) lung lesion score and a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio >6 but was not associated with post-COVID-19 echocardiographic changes. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was reduced in only 18% of cases, but global longitudinal strain (GLS) impairment was observed in 46% of patients, contributing to the LV systolic subclinical dysfunction in 61%. Impaired LV diastolic disfunction with normal pressure filling was present in 30.61% of cases and with elevated pressure 10.2%. Conclusions: COVID-19 is an independent predictive factor for GLS impairment, which can indicate myocardial contractile dysfunction, even in patients with asymptomatic heart disease. This underscores the importance of regular echocardiographic monitoring for patients recovering from moderate to severe COVID-19.

Cardiac events and procedures following COVID-19 compared with other pneumonias: a national register study

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown an increased risk of cardiac disease following COVID-19, but how it compares to pneumonia of other etiologies is unclear.

AIMS

To determine the incidence and HRs of cardiac disease in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 compared with other viral or bacterial pneumonias.

METHODS

Using nationwide registry data, we estimated the incidence of cardiac events after hospitalisation with COVID-19 (n=2082) in February to November 2020 vs hospitalisation with viral (n=9018) or bacterial (n=29 339) pneumonia in 2018-2019. We defined outcomes using ICD-10 codes for incident myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation/flutter, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, other cardiac disease and total cardiac disease (any heart condition). We used Cox regression and logistic regression for analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with COVID-19 had a mean (SD) age of 60 (18) years, compared with 69 (19) years for viral and 72 (17) years for bacterial pneumonia. Those with COVID-19 were more often male and had fewer comorbidities and fewer prior hospitalisations. Patients with COVID-19 had a lower hazard of new-onset cardiac disease compared with viral (HR 0.79 [95%CI 0.66 to 0.93]) and bacterial pneumonia (HR 0.66 [95%CI 0.57 to 0.78]), adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, hospital admission prior year and respiratory support. Results were similar when including recurrent events.

CONCLUSION

Patients hospitalised with COVID-19 had a lower hazard of new-onset cardiac disease during the first 9 months after hospitalisation compared with patients with other viral or bacterial pneumonias after adjusting for multiple possible confounders. However, there may still be residual confounding from other or unknown factors.

The Burden of Post-Acute Sequelae of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Individuals with Rheumatic Diseases

The long-term impacts of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), are especially pertinent for individuals with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, who are at higher risk of developing COVID-19 infection, complications of acute infection, and possibly PASC. Severity of acute COVID-19 infection, female sex, comorbidities, and immunosuppressive medications impact the risk of PASC in this population. The etiology of PASC remains poorly defined, and the diagnosis is clinical, with symptoms that can overlap with those of rheumatic diseases. A better understanding of the physiologic mechanisms could help to more clearly define PASC and to guide the development of targeted treatments.

Review of Immunologic Manifestations of COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination

We herein summarize currently available and clinically relevant information regarding the human immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, in relation to COVID-19 outcomes with a focus on acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and myocarditis.

Myocardial ischaemia following COVID-19: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

The pathophysiology of myocardial injury following COVID-19 remains uncertain. COVID-HEART was a prospective, multicentre study utilising cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to characterise COVID-related myocardial injury. In this pre-specified analysis, the objectives were to examine (1) the frequency of myocardial ischaemia following COVID-19, and (2) the association between ischaemia and myocardial injury. We studied 59 patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and elevated serum troponin (COVID + /troponin + , age 61 ± 11 years) and 37 control subjects without COVID-19 or elevated troponin and similar by age and cardiovascular comorbidities (COVID -/comorbidity + , 64 ± 10 years). Subjects underwent multi-parametric CMR (comprising assessment of ventricular volumes, stress perfusion, T1/T2 mapping and scar). The primary endpoint was the frequency of inducible myocardial ischaemia. Inducible ischaemia was evident in 11 (19%) COVID + /troponin + patients and in 8 (22%) control subjects (p = 0.72). In COVID + /troponin + patients with ischaemia, epicardial coronary disease pattern ischaemia was present in eight patients and microvascular disease pattern, in three patients. There was no significant difference in the frequency of inducible ischaemia in COVID + /troponin + patients with previous myocardial infarction and/or revascularisation compared to those without (2/12 [17%] vs. 9/47 [19%] respectively, p = 0.84), or in those with and without scar (7/27 [26%] vs. 4/32 [13%] respectively, p = 0.19). Myocardial ischaemia was present in ~ 20% of patients recently hospitalised with COVID-19 and with elevated cardiac troponin, but this was not different to matched comorbid controls. This finding coupled with the lack of an association between ischaemia and myocardial scar suggests that coronary artery abnormalities are unlikely to be the predominant mechanism underlying COVID-19 induced myocardial injury.

Unraveling Cardiovascular Risks and Benefits of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review

The rapid development and deployment of mRNA and non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have played a pivotal role in mitigating the global pandemic. Despite their success in reducing severe disease outcomes, emerging concerns about cardiovascular complications have raised questions regarding their safety. This systematic review critically evaluates the evidence on the cardiovascular effects of COVID-19 vaccines, assessing both their protective and adverse impacts, while considering the challenges posed by the limited availability of randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on these rare adverse events. In adherence to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic review using the Scopus database, incorporating articles published from January 2020 to July 2024. Our search included terms related to COVID-19 vaccines and cardiovascular conditions. We selected relevant studies from case-control studies, cohort studies, and clinical trials, while excluding descriptive analyses, cross-sectional studies, and conference reports. Case reports were also included due to the limited availability of extensive RCT data on the rare cardiovascular adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Of the 6037 articles initially screened, 410 were assessed in detail and 175 studies were ultimately included. The review identified a variety of cardiovascular adverse effects associated with COVID-19 vaccines. mRNA vaccines were primarily linked to myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in younger males, with lower cardiac risks compared to COVID-19 infection. Adenoviral vector vaccines were associated with thrombosis and thrombocytopenia. Inactivated vaccines had fewer severe cardiovascular reports but still presented risks. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy was most commonly observed following mRNA vaccination. Case reports provided valuable additional insights into these rare events, highlighting clinical presentations and potential risk factors not fully captured by larger epidemiological studies. This review reveals a nuanced cardiovascular risk profile for COVID-19 vaccines, with mRNA vaccines linked to rare myocarditis and pericarditis in young males and a higher incidence of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in females. Adenoviral vaccines show a notable association with thrombosis. Despite these risks, the benefits of vaccination in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes outweigh the potential complications, underscoring the importance of continued surveillance, case report documentation, and personalized risk assessment. The inclusion of case reports was critical, as they provided valuable real-world data that complemented the findings from large-scale studies and RCTs.

Review of organ damage from COVID and Long COVID: a disease with a spectrum of pathology

Long COVID, as currently defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other authorities, is a symptomatic condition that has been shown to affect an estimated 10 %-30 % of non-hospitalized patients after one infection. However, COVID-19 can also cause organ damage in individuals without symptoms, who would not fall under the current definition of Long COVID. This organ damage, whether symptomatic or not, can lead to various health impacts such as heart attacks and strokes. Given these observations, it is necessary to either expand the definition of Long COVID to include organ damage or recognize COVID-19-induced organ damage as a distinct condition affecting many symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals after COVID-19 infections. It is important to consider that many known adverse health outcomes, including heart conditions and cancers, can be asymptomatic until harm thresholds are reached. Many more medical conditions can be identified by testing than those that are recognized through reported symptoms. It is therefore important to similarly recognize that while Long COVID symptoms are associated with organ damage, there are many individuals that have organ damage without displaying recognized symptoms and to include this harm in the characterization of COVID-19 and in the monitoring of individuals after COVID-19 infections.

The prolonged health sequelae "of the COVID-19 pandemic" in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Survivors of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often face persistent and significant challenges that affect their physical, mental, and financial wellbeing, which can significantly diminish their overall quality of life. The emergence of new symptoms or the persistence of existing ones after a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnosis has given rise to a complex clinical issue known as "long COVID-19" (LC). This situation has placed additional strain on global healthcare systems, underscoring the urgent need for ongoing clinical management of these patients. While numerous studies have been conducted on the long-term effects of COVID-19, our systematic review, and meta-analysis, is the first of its kind in sub-Saharan Africa, providing a comprehensive understanding of the situation in the region and highlighting the necessity for continuous clinical management.

Objective

This study aimed to systematically synthesize evidence on the persistent sequelae of COVID-19 and their predictors in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods

A thorough search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google/Google Scholar, African online journals, and selected reference lists, from the inception of these databases until January 12, 2024. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using the random-effects restricted maximum-likelihood model. The association between various factors was also analyzed to determine the pooled factors that influence long COVID-19 outcomes.

Results

Our comprehensive analysis of 16 research articles, involving a total of 18,104 participants revealed a pooled prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae at 42.1% (95% CI: 29.9-55.4). The long-term health sequelae identified in this review included persistent pulmonary sequelae (27.5%), sleep disturbance (22.5%), brain fog (27.4%), fatigue (17.4%), anxiety (22.3%), and chest pain (13.2%). We also found a significant association was observed between comorbidities and long COVID-19 sequelae [POR = 4.34 (95% CI: 1.28-14.72)], providing a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing long COVID-19 outcomes.

Conclusion

COVID-19 can have long-lasting effects on various organ systems, even after a person has recovered from the infection. These effects can include brain fog, pulmonary symptoms, sleep disturbances, anxiety, fatigue, and other neurological, psychiatric, respiratory, cardiovascular, and general symptoms. It is crucial for individuals who have recovered from COVID-19 to receive careful follow-up care to assess and reduce any potential organ damage and maintain their quality of life.

Systematic review registration

Clinicaltrial.gov, identifier CRD42024501158.

Comparing myocardial injury patterns and outcomes in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging between COVID-19- and non-COVID-19-related myocarditis

Purpose

Despite the low incidence of COVID myocarditis, its influence on outcomes is substantial. The pivotal role of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in diagnosing myocarditis is considered to be associated with disease prognosis. The primary objective of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of myocardial injury patterns, CMR pathologic features, outcomes, and their correlation with CMR findings in COVID- and non-COVID-related myocarditis.

Material and methods

This historical cohort study involved 124 patients diagnosed with myocarditis (COVID-19 or non-COVID-19), who underwent CMR between 2018 and 2021. The COVID group consisted of 70 individuals with a definite history of COVID-19 infection within 4 weeks, and the non-COVID group comprised 54 individuals who had no prior exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. All patients were monitored for one year to assess the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Additionally, baseline and follow-up echocardiography data were obtained with a minimum 3-month interval.

Results

In comparison between two groups regarding to indices of CMR, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (p < 0.001), right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in non-COVID group, and significant LV and RV systolic dysfunction were meaningfully lower in the COVID group. Extension of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was significantly greater in COVID group. Finally, the incidence of MACE and mean event-free survival did not have significant difference between two groups.

Conclusions

Although CMR findings differed between the 2 groups, there was no significant difference in the risk of MACE or survival during one-year follow-up. Notably, LV and RV dysfunction were more prevalent in the non-COVID group, while extension of LGE was greater in the COVID group.

Longitudinal cardiac imaging for assessment of myocardial injury in non-hospitalised community-dwelling individuals after COVID-19 infection: the Rotterdam Study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the presence of myocardial injury after COVID-19 infection and to evaluate the relation between persistent cardiac symptoms after COVID-19 and myocardial function in participants with known cardiovascular health status before infection.

METHODS

In the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study cohort, echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) were performed among participants who recovered from COVID-19 at home within 2 years prior to inclusion in the current study. Persistent cardiac symptoms comprised only self-reported symptoms of chest pain, dyspnoea or palpitations lasting >4 weeks after COVID-19 infection. We used linear regression and linear mixed models to estimate and test age-adjusted and sex-adjusted mean differences (95% CIs) of (1) post-COVID-19 CMR-derived and echocardiographic-derived parameters among participants with and without persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms and (2) pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 echocardiographic assessments.

RESULTS

92 participants were included, with a mean age of 59±8 years of whom 52% were male. Normal post-COVID-19 CMR-derived left ventricular (LV) function and right ventricular ejection fraction were observed in 92% and 98% of participants, respectively. We observed normal native T1 relaxation times in 100%, normal extracellular volume in 98% and normal T2 relaxation times in 98% of the participants. Comparison of pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 echocardiography revealed a significant but small decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (adjusted mean change -1.37% (95% CI -2.57%, -0.17%)) and global longitudinal strain (1.32% (95% CI 0.50%, 2.15%)). Comparing participants with and without persistent symptoms, there were no significant differences in adjusted CMR-derived ventricular volumes, LV function or presence of myocardial injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost all recovered non-hospitalised COVID-19 participants had normal CMR-derived ventricular volumes and function, without relevant myocardial injury.

From thrombosis to tamponade: unveiling severe pericardial effusion in a misdiagnosis case

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulants increase the risk of cardiac tamponade in patients with pericardial effusion (PE). Therefore, inappropriate administration of them in the presence of PE can lead to a catastrophic outcome. This study presents a patient with a provisional misdiagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

CASE PRESENTATION

An 83-year-old Iranian female was transferred to the emergency department of a tertiary cardiology hospital complaining of neck swelling concomitant with chest pain and dyspnea. The patient had been diagnosed with jugular vein thrombosis in another local center, and since the chief complaint was neck swelling, she underwent Doppler sonography, and the diagnosis was confirmed. Subsequently, the treatment with unfractionated heparin was started. After 5 h, considering the worsening of symptoms with the suspicious diagnosis of COVID-19 based on her symptoms and laboratory data, a chest computed tomography scan was requested, which showed a massive PE. Subsequently, transthoracic echocardiography confirmed the diagnosis. The patient was immediately transferred to the operating room and underwent pericardiotomy. The post-surgery period was uneventful, and she was discharged 5 days later.

CONCLUSION

Patients with viral infections, specifically COVID-19, are at risk of undiagnosed severe pericardial effusions. Venous stasis in the jugular veins due to PE can mimic jugular vein thromboembolism, causing a wrong diagnosis. Since treating thrombosis can exacerbate tamponade to hemodynamic instability and collapse, sufficient investigation before starting anticoagulants is necessary.

CLINICAL KEY MESSAGE

Distinguishing VTE from PE is not always straightforward. Therefore, it is important to ensure physicians have reached an appropriate level of certainty about their diagnosis by performing precise diagnostics before using anticoagulants. Mismanagement with anti-thrombotics can result in catastrophic consequences. Therefore, taking an accurate history, performing a precise physical examination, and using rapid and available diagnostic modalities can avoid delays in definitive management.

Cardiac Function and Functional Capacity in Patients With Long COVID: A Comparison to Propensity-Matched Community Controls

BACKGROUND

Cardiac impairment has been associated with acute COVID-19 since the earliest reports of the pandemic. However, its role in postacute sequelae of COVID-19 ("long COVID") is undefined, and many existing observations about cardiovascular involvement in postacute sequelae of COVID-19 are uncontrolled.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of cardiac dysfunction in patients with long COVID and noninfected controls from the same community and explore their association with functional capacity.

METHODS

Echocardiography was used to assess cardiac structure and function, including the measurement of global longitudinal strain (GLS), in 190 participants with long COVID. All underwent assessment of functional impairment by subjective (Duke Activity Status Index) and objective tests (6-minute walk test). The 190 participants from the long COVID group were matched with those from 979 patients who underwent the same tests in the pre-COVID-19 era, using a propensity score.

RESULTS

The 190 patients with long COVID had similar age and risk factor profiles to those of their matched controls. Left ventricular dimensions and geometry, but not diastolic parameters, were significantly altered in the long COVID group. The long COVID group had subclinical systolic dysfunction (GLS 18.5% ± 2.6% vs 19.3% ± 2.7%, P = .005), and more long COVID patients had abnormal (<16%) GLS (13% vs 8%, P = .035). The association of long COVID with abnormal GLS (odds ratio, 1.49 [1.04, 2.45]) was independent of-and had a similar or greater effect size than-age and risk factors. There was no interaction of long COVID with the association of risk factors with GLS. As expected, the long COVID group had significant subjective (<85% predicted METS; 72% vs 5%, P < .001) and objective functional impairment (29% vs 24%, P = .026), but GLS was only weakly associated with both subjective (r = 0.30, P = .005) and objective (r = 0.21, P = .05) functional impairment. The presence of long COVID was independently associated with subjective (odds ratio = 159.7 [95% CI, 61.6-414.2]) and objective functional impairment (odds ratio = 2.8 [95% CI, 1.5-5.2]).

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired GLS and left ventricular dimensions are the echocardiographic features that are overrepresented in long COVID, and this association is similar to and independent of other risk factors. Impaired GLS is weakly associated with functional impairment.

Pharmacological effect of cepharanthine on SARS-CoV-2-induced disease in a Syrian hamster model

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), remains a global public health threat. Although several effective vaccines and therapeutics have been developed, continuous emergence of new variants necessitates development of drugs with different mechanisms of action. Recent studies indicate that cepharanthine, a chemical derivative purified from Stephania cepharantha, inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro.

METHODS

This study examined the in vivo effects of cepharanthine using a Syrian hamster SARS-CoV-2 infection model. To evaluate the prophylactic and therapeutic effects, cepharanthine was intranasally administered before or after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Effects were assessed by monitoring body weight changes, lung pathology, lung viral load, and inflammatory response in the lungs.

RESULTS

Pre-infection administration of cepharanthine resulted in less weight loss, reduced virus titers, alleviated histopathological severity, and decreased lung inflammation. Furthermore, post-infection administration of cepharanthine also exhibited therapeutic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that both prophylactic and therapeutic administration of cepharanthine reduces the pathogenesis of COVID-19 in a Syrian hamster SARS-CoV-2 infection model. Our findings suggest that cepharanthine is a potential therapeutic agent against COVID-19.

COVID myocarditis: a review of the literature

Myocarditis is a potentially fatal complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. COVID-19 myocarditis appears to have distinct inflammatory characteristics that distinguish it from other viral etiologies. COVID-19 myocarditis can present with symptoms ranging from dyspnea and chest pain to acute heart failure and death. It is critical to detect any cases of myocarditis, especially fulminant myocarditis, which can be characterized by signs of heart failure and arrhythmias. Serial troponins, echocardiography, and electrocardiograms should be performed as part of the initial workup for suspected myocarditis. The second step in detecting myocarditis is cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and endomyocardial biopsy. Treatment for COVID-19 myocarditis is still debatable; however, combining intravenous immunoglobulins and corticosteroids may be effective, especially in cases of fulminant myocarditis. Overall, more research is needed to determine the incidence of COVID-19 myocarditis, and the use of intravenous immunoglobulins and corticosteroids in combination requires large randomized controlled trials to determine efficacy. The purpose of this review is to summarize current evidence on the subject.

Temporal variations in QTc interval during and after COVID-19 infection: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the dynamic changes in QTc interval duration among patients with COVID-19 infection before, during, and after infection, in order to assess the short- and potential long-term impact of COVID-19 on cardiac electrophysiology.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 303 inpatients diagnosed with COVID-19 who visited a tertiary Grade A hospital in China between August 2022 and December 2023. Inclusion criteria required patients to have at least two electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings at three specific time points: before COVID-19 infection, during acute infection, and after recovery (more than one month post-infection).

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 72.8 ± 14.7 years, with a male preponderance (62%, n = 188). A significant prolongation of QTc interval was observed during COVID-19 infection compared to pre-infection levels (438.3 ± 26.7 ms vs. 433.9 ± 26.6 ms, p = 0.025). QTc interval was positively correlated with age both before (r = 0.23, p = 0.001) and during infection (r = 0.19, p = 0.001). In short-term follow-up (≤ 6 months), QTc interval remained unchanged from the infectious period (p > 0.05), whereas it significantly decreased during long-term follow-up (> 6 months; 429.6 ± 32.5 ms vs. 437.5 ± 28.2 ms, p = 0.002). Additionally, P-wave duration significantly decreased from the infectious period to long-term follow-up (99.5 ± 14.8 ms to 96.4 ± 15.2 ms, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 infection demonstrated a significant correlation with prolonged QTc interval, persisting in the short term but gradually returning to normal in the long term. Similarly, P-wave duration shortened over time, suggesting potential cardiac electrophysiological recovery.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Immune Profile and MRI-Detected Cardiac Fibrosis and Edema in Hypertensive and Non-Hypertensive Patients with COVID-19

Cardiac involvement in 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) survivors has been reported frequently. An exacerbated immune response may be the main mechanism of myocardial injury and late cardiac sequelae in this population. Background/Objectives: We investigated the immune profile in hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients with COVID-19 who developed late cardiac fibrosis and edema, as detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: We evaluated associations of cytokine and immune-cell subset levels during hospitalization for COVID-19 with the presence of myocardial interstitial fibrosis [represented by the extracellular volume (ECV)] or edema (represented by the T2), detected by cardiac MRI examination after discharge, in hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients. Results: Patients with hypertension had reduced B-cell percentages, increased natural killer cell percentages, and higher interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-17A, and tumor necrosis factor-β levels compared to patients without hypertension. Larger percentages of human leukocyte antigen DR isotope+ blood cells, reflecting CD8+ T-cell activation, correlated with increased T2 and ECV in hypertensive patients. The HLA-DR mean fluorescence intensity was associated with ECV in non-hypertensive patients. Conclusions: Our findings reveal cytokine and immune-cell dysregulation in both hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients with COVID-19, along with moderate correlations between CD8+ T-cell activation and increased cardiac MRI markers of myocardial interstitial fibrosis and edema. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of immune dysfunction mechanisms involved in myocardial remodeling.

Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Infection Induced by SARS-CoV-2

The pandemic COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which devastated the global economy and healthcare system. The infection caused an unforeseen rise in COVID-19 patients and increased the mortality rate globally. This study gives an overall idea about host-pathogen interaction, immune responses to COVID-19, recovery status of infection, targeted organs and complications associated, and comparison of post-infection immunity in convalescent subjects and non-infected individuals. The emergence of the variants and episodes of COVID-19 infections made the situation worsen. The timely introduction of vaccines and precautionary measures helped control the infection's severity. Later, the population that recovered from COVID-19 grew significantly. However, understanding the impact of healthcare issues resulting after infection is paramount for improving an individual's health status. It is now recognised that COVID-19 infection affects multiple organs and exhibits a broad range of clinical manifestations. So, post COVID-19 infection creates a high risk in individuals with already prevailing health complications. The identification of post-COVID-19-related health issues and their appropriate management is of greater importance to improving patient's quality of life. The persistence, sequelae and other medical complications that normally last from weeks to months after the recovery of the initial infection are involved with COVID-19. A multi-disciplinary approach is necessary for the development of preventive measures, techniques for rehabilitation and strategies for clinical management when it comes to long-term care.

Vascular fibrosis and extracellular matrix remodelling in post-COVID 19 conditions

Causal associations between viral infections and acute myocardial injury are not fully understood, with mechanisms potentially involving direct cardiovascular involvement or systemic inflammation. This review explores plausible mechanisms of vascular fibrosis in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome, focusing on extracellular matrix remodelling. Despite global attention, significant mechanistic or translational breakthroughs in the management of post-viral syndromes remain limited. No effective pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions are currently available for patients experiencing persistent symptoms following COVID-19 infection. The substantial expansion of scientific knowledge resulting from collaborative efforts by medical experts, scientists, and government organisations in undertaking COVID-19 research could inform treatment strategies for other post-viral syndromes and respiratory illnesses. There is a critical need for clinical trials to evaluate potential therapeutic candidates, providing evidence to guide treatment decisions for post-COVID-19 syndromes.

A framework for exclusion of alternative diagnoses in sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous syndrome that arises from a persistent immune response to a triggering antigen(s). There is no "gold standard" test or algorithm for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, making the diagnosis one of exclusion. The presentation of the disease varies substantially between individuals, in both the number of organs involved, and the manifestations seen in individual organs. These qualities dictate that health care providers diagnosing sarcoidosis must consider a wide range of possible alternative diagnoses, from across a range of presentations and medical specialties (infectious, inflammatory, cardiac, neurologic). Current guideline-based diagnosis of sarcoidosis recommends fulfillment of three criteria: 1) compatible clinical presentation and/or imaging 2) demonstration of granulomatous inflammation by biopsy (when possible) and, 3) exclusion of alternative causes, but do not provide guidance on standardized strategies for exclusion of alternative diagnoses. In this review, we provide a summary of the most common differential diagnoses for sarcoidosis involvement of lung, eye, skin, central nervous system, heart, liver, and kidney. We then propose a framework for testing to exclude alternative diagnoses based on pretest probability of sarcoidosis, defined as high (typical findings with sarcoidosis involvement confirmed in another organ), moderate (typical findings in a single organ), or low (atypical/findings suggesting of an alternative diagnosis). This work highlights the need for informed and careful exclusion of alternative diagnoses in sarcoidosis.

The Intestine in Acute and Long COVID: Pathophysiological Insights and Key Lessons

Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), commonly known as Long COVID, represents a significant and complex health challenge with a wide range of symptoms affecting multiple organ systems. This review examines the emerging evidence suggesting a critical role of the gut and gut-brain axis in the pathophysiology of Long COVID. It explores how changes in the gut microbiome, disruption of gut barrier integrity, and the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antigens within the gastrointestinal tract may contribute to the prolonged and varied symptoms seen in Long COVID, including chronic inflammation and neuropsychiatric disturbances. The review also summarizes key insights gained about Long COVID, highlighting its multifactorial nature, which involves immune dysregulation, microvascular damage, and autonomic nervous system dysfunction, with the gut playing a central role in these processes. While progress has been made in understanding these mechanisms, current evidence remains inconclusive. The challenges of establishing causality, standardizing research methodologies, and addressing individual variations in the microbiome are discussed, emphasizing the need for further longitudinal studies and more comprehensive approaches to enhance our understanding of these complex interactions. This review underscores the importance of personalized approaches in developing effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for Long COVID, while also acknowledging the significant gaps in our current understanding. Future research should aim to further unravel the complex interplay between the gut and Long COVID, ultimately improving outcomes for those affected by this condition.

Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 in cancer patients: Two cohorts in UK and Hong Kong

BACKGROUND

Limited research exists on the risks and spectrum of complications in post-acute phase of COVID-19 in cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the post-acute effects of COVID-19 on different types of morbidities among cancer patients across two regions with different healthcare systems and dominant variants of COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cancer patients with COVID-19 from the UK Biobank (UKB, n = 2230; March 16, 2020 to May 31, 2021; pre-Omicron-variants dominant) and electronic medical records in Hong Kong (HK cohort, n = 22,335; April 1, 2020 to October 31, 2022; Omicron-variant dominant) were included. Each COVID-19 case was randomly matched with up to 10 non-COVID-19 cancer patients based on age and sex. Follow-up lasted until 31 August 2021 for UKB and 23 January 2023 for HK. Inverse probability treatment weighting balanced cohort characteristics. Cox regression evaluated the association of COVID-19 with morbidities occurred 30 days post-infection.

RESULTS

Cancer patients with COVID-19 consistently showed significantly higher risk of major cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [UKB: hazard ratio [HR] 1.8 (95% CI 1.3, 2.5); HK: HR 1.4 (95% CI 1.1, 1.8)], CVD death [UKB: HR 4.3 (95% CI 2.9, 6.2); HK: HR 1.7 (95% CI 1.3, 2.4)], and all-cause mortality [UKB: HR 4.7 (95% CI 4.0, 5.5); HK: HR 1.6 (95% CI 1.5, 1.7)] in both cohorts despite the difference in dominant variants. Cancer patients at advanced ages or severely infected had higher all-cause mortality risk. However, associations between COVID-19 and CVDs became insignificant for fully vaccinated patients.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 infection is associated with increased risks of CVDs and mortality in cancer patients. Fully vaccination may reduce the post-acute effects of COVID-19 on CVDs. This information may guide effective pre-emptive measures to reduce COVID-19-related morbidities and mortality in cancer patients.

Evaluation of myocardial work and exercise capacity in patients recovered from the severe form of COVID-19

Background

The impact of COVID-19 goes beyond its acute form and can lead to the persistence of symptoms and the emergence of systemic disorders, defined as long-term COVID.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional study that included patients over 18 years of age who recovered from the severe form of COVID-19 at least 60 days after their discharge. Patients and controls were enrolled to undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using a more sensitive tool, myocardial work, in combination with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).

Results

A total of 52 patients and 31 controls were enrolled. Significant differences were observed in ejection fraction (LVEF; 62 ± 7 vs. 66 ± 6 %; p = 0.007), global longitudinal strain (LVGLS; -18.7 ± 2.6 vs. -20.4 ± 1.4 %; p = 0.001), myocardial wasted work (GWW; 152 ± 81 vs. 101 ± 54 mmHg; p = 0.003), and myocardial work efficiency (GWE; 93 ± 3 vs. 95 ± 2 %; p = 0.002). We found a significant difference in peak VO2 (24.4 ± 5.4 vs. 33.4 ± 8.8 mL/kg/min; p < 0.001), heart rate (160 ± 14 vs. 176 ± 11 bpm; p < 0.001), ventilation (84.6 ± 22.6 vs. 104.9 ± 27.0 L/min; p < 0.001), OUES% (89 ± 16 vs. 102 ± 22 %; p = 0.002), T ½ (120.3 ± 32 vs. 97.6 ± 27 s; p = 0.002) and HRR at 2 min (-36 ± 11 vs. -43 ± 13 bpm; p = 0.010).

Conclusion

Our findings revealed an increased wasted work, with lower myocardial efficiency, significantly reduced aerobic exercise capacity, and abnormal heart rate response during recovery, which may be related to previously described late symptoms. The reduction in functional capacity during physical exercise is partly associated with a decrease in resting myocardial work efficiency. These findings strongly indicate the need to determine whether these manifestations persist in the long term and their impact on cardiovascular health and quality of life in COVID-19 survivors.

Assessment of myocardial injury by SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with COVID-19 infection in a single center after lifting the restrictions in China

PURPOSE

To assess myocardial injury using rest single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in patients with COVID-19 and to evaluate whether myocardial injury detected by rest MPI predict the prognosis of symptoms after 6 months follow-up.

METHODS

Patients suspected of myocarditis between December 2022 and March 2023, after the lifting of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, and between December 2018 and March 2019, prior to the pandemic, were referred to our study. All patients underwent rest MPI. One hundred and sixty four patients with COVID-19 infection after the lifting of pandemic restrictions and 101 patients before the pandemic were included as the study and control groups, respectively. One hundred and fifty three patients of the study group and 83 of the control group presented symptoms when they initially visit to our department. Compare the parameters of myocardial injury detected by rest SPECT MPI between the two groups and then investigate the association between myocardial injury and symptom prognosis in symptomatic patients of both groups.

RESULTS

Total perfusion defect (TPD) (4.2% ± 3.3% vs. 2.3% ± 2.2%, P < 0.001), summed rest score (SRS) (5.3 ± 5.4 vs. 2.7 ± 2.0, P < 0.001), the proportion of patients with TPD > 4% (43.3% vs. 17.8%, P < 0.001), TPD > 10% (6.71% vs 0, P < 0.001), SRS > 4 (40.2% vs 15.8%, P < 0.001), SRS > 10 (12.8% vs 0, P < 0.001), the number of abnormal perfusion segments (3.9 ± 3.1 vs. 2.4 ± 1.7, P < 0.001) were all significantly higher in the study group. All the parameters of rest MPI were not associated with the prognosis of symptoms in symptomatic patients of both groups after 6 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients could be assessed by rest SPECT MPI. The COVID-19 patients could exhibited a higher frequency and greater severity of myocardial injury than uninfected control patients. Myocardial injury assessed by rest MPI did not predict for the prognosis of symptoms in symptomatic patients of both COVID-19 patients and uninfected patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019-related myocardial injury is associated with immune dysregulation in symptomatic patients with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities

AIMS

While acute cardiovascular complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are well described, less is known about longer-term cardiac sequelae. For many individuals with cardiac signs or symptoms arising after COVID-19 infection, the aetiology remains unclear. We examined immune profiles associated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities in patients with unexplained cardiac injury after COVID-19.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-one participants {mean age 47 [standard deviation (SD) 13] years, 71% female} with long COVID-19 (n = 17), raised troponin (n = 2), or unexplained new-onset heart failure (n = 2), who did not have pre-existing heart conditions or recent steroid/immunosuppression treatment, were enrolled a mean 346 (SD 191) days after COVID-19 infection in a prospective observational study. Cardiac MRI and blood sampling for deep immunophenotyping using mass cytometry by time of flight and measurement of proteomic inflammatory markers were performed. Nine of the 21 (43%) participants had MRI abnormalities (MRI(+)), including non-ischaemic patterns of late gadolinium enhancement and/or visually overt myocardial oedema in 8 people. One patient had mildly impaired biventricular function without fibrosis or oedema, and two had severe left ventricular (LV) impairment. MRI(+) individuals had higher blood CCL3, CCL7, FGF-23, and CD4 Th2 cells, and lower CD8 T effector memory (TEM) cells, than MRI(-). Cluster analysis revealed lower expression of inhibitory receptors PD1 and TIM3 in CD8 TEM cells from MRI(+) patients than MRI(-) patients, and functional studies of CD8 T αβ cells showed higher proportions of cytotoxic granzyme B+(GZB+)-secreting cells upon stimulation. CD8 TEM cells and CCL7 were the strongest predictors of MRI abnormalities in a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model (composite area under the curve 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.88-1.0). CCL7 was correlated with diffuse myocardial fibrosis/oedema detected by quantitative T1 mapping (r = 0.47, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

COVID-19-related cardiac injury in symptomatic patients with non-ischaemic myocarditis-like MRI abnormalities is associated with immune dysregulation, including decreased peripheral CD8 TEM cells and increased CCL7, persisting long after the initial infection.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Reveals Cardiac Inflammation and Fibrosis in Symptomatic Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: Findings from the INSPIRE-CMR Multicenter Study

Introduction. Post-coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients may develop cardiac symptoms. We hypothesized that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess the background of post-COVID-19 cardiac symptoms using multi-parametric evaluation. We aimed to conduct an investigation of symptomatic patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome using CMR (INSPIRE-CMR). Methods. INSIPRE-CMR is a retrospective multicenter study including 174 patients from five centers referred for CMR due to cardiac symptoms. CMR was performed using 3.0 T/1.5 T system (24%/76%, respectively). Myocardial inflammation was determined by the updated Lake Louise criteria. Results. Further, 174 patients with median age of 40 years (IQR: 26-54), 72 (41%) were women, and 17 (9.7%) had a history of autoimmune disease, muscular dystrophy, or cancer. In total, 149 (86%) patients were late gadolinium enhanced (LGE)-positive with a non-ischemic pattern, and of those evaluated with the updated Lake Louise criteria, 141/145 (97%) had ≥1 pathologic T1 index. Based on the T2-criterion, 62/173 (36%) patients had ≥1 pathologic T2 index. Collectively, 48/145 (33%) patients had both positive T1- and T2-criterion. A positive T2-criterion or a combination of a positive T1- and T2-criterion were significantly more common amongst patients with severe COVID-19 [45 (31%) vs. 17 (65%), p = 0.001 and 32 (27%) vs. 16 (64%), p < 0.001, respectively]. During the one-year evaluation, available for 65/174 patients, shortness of breath, chest pain, and arrhythmia were identified in 7 (4%), 15 (8.6%), and 43 (24.7%), respectively. CMR evaluation, available in a minority of them, showed mildly reduced LVEF, while nat T1 mapping and EVC remained at levels higher than the normal values of the local MRI units. Conclusions. The majority of post-COVID-19 patients with cardiac symptoms presented non-ischemic LGE and abnormalities in T1 and T2-based indices. Multi-parametric CMR reveals important information on post-COVID-19 patients, supporting its role in short/long-term evaluation.

Absence of cardiac impairment in patients after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 infection: A long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Concerns exist that long-term cardiac alterations occur after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, particularly in patients who were hospitalized in the acute phase or who remain symptomatic. This study investigates potential long-term functional and morphological alterations after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

The authors of this study investigated patients after SARS-CoV-2 infection by using a mobile 1.5T clinical magnetic resonance scanner for cardiac alterations. Cardiac function and dimensions were assessed using a highly efficient cardiac magnetic resonance protocol, which included cine sequences, global longitudinal and circumferential strain assessed by fast-Strain-ENCoded imaging, and T1 and T2 mapping. We assessed symptoms through a questionnaire. Patients were compared with a control group matched for age, gender, body mass index, and body surface area.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 395 (192-408) days. The final population included 183 participants (age 48.4 ± 14.3 years, 48.1% male (88/183)). During the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 27 patients were hospital-admitted. Forty-two patients reported persistent symptoms (shortness of breath, chest pain, palpitations, or leg edema), and 63 reported impaired exercise tolerance. Left ventricular (LV) functional and morphological parameters were within the normal range. T1- and T2-relaxation times were also within the normal range, indicating that the presence of myocardial edema or fibrosis was unlikely. Persistently symptomatic patients showed a slightly reduced indexed LV stroke volume. Functional parameters remained normal in patients who were hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2, persistently symptomatic, or with ongoing impaired exercise tolerance.

CONCLUSION

Irrespective of ongoing symptoms or severity of prior illness, patients who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection demonstrate normal functional and morphological cardiac parameters. Long-term cardiac changes due to SARS-CoV-2 infection appear to be rare.

Diagnostic utility of electrocardiogram for screening of cardiac injury on cardiac magnetic resonance in post-hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The role of ECG in ruling out myocardial complications on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is unclear. We examined the clinical utility of ECG in screening for cardiac abnormalities on CMR among post-hospitalised COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

Post-hospitalised patients (n = 212) and age, sex and comorbidity-matched controls (n = 38) underwent CMR and 12‑lead ECG in a prospective multicenter follow-up study. Participants were screened for routinely reported ECG abnormalities, including arrhythmia, conduction and R wave abnormalities and ST-T changes (excluding repolarisation intervals). Quantitative repolarisation analyses included corrected QT (QTc), corrected QT dispersion (QTc disp), corrected JT (JTc) and corrected T peak-end (cTPe) intervals.

RESULTS

At a median of 5.6 months, patients had a higher burden of ECG abnormalities (72.2% vs controls 42.1%, p = 0.001) and lower LVEF but a comparable cumulative burden of CMR abnormalities than controls. Patients with CMR abnormalities had more ECG abnormalities and longer repolarisation intervals than those with normal CMR and controls (82% vs 69% vs 42%, p < 0.001). Routinely reported ECG abnormalities had poor discriminative ability (area-under-the-receiver-operating curve: AUROC) for abnormal CMR, AUROC 0.56 (95% CI 0.47-0.65), p = 0.185; worse among female than male patients. Adding JTc and QTc disp improved the AUROC to 0.64 (95% CI 0.55-0.74), p = 0.002, the sensitivity of the ECG increased from 81.6% to 98.0%, negative predictive value from 84.7% to 96.3%, negative likelihood ratio from 0.60 to 0.13, and reduced sex-dependence variabilities of ECG diagnostic parameters.

CONCLUSION

Post-hospitalised COVID-19 patients have more ECG abnormalities than controls. Normal ECGs, including normal repolarisation intervals, reliably exclude CMR abnormalities in male and female patients.

Epidemiology of myocarditis following COVID-19 or influenza and use of diagnostic assessments

BACKGROUND

Previous research has suggested a heightened risk of acute myocarditis after COVID-19 infection. However, it is not clear from existing work whether this risk is higher than would be expected after comparable viral respiratory infections. This information is important to guide risk assessments and clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of US administrative health claims was conducted to compare the rates of myocarditis after COVID-19 with that after influenza infection and describe the clinical use of diagnostic assessments.Patients with either incident COVID-19 diagnosis (between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2021) or incident influenza diagnosis (between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018), with at least 12 months of continuous enrolment prior to index date and without a previous diagnosis of myocarditis were included.The primary outcome was clinically diagnosed acute myocarditis recorded after COVID-19 or influenza infection. Results are reported as covariate-adjusted subdistribution HRs from competing risk regression with COVID-19 considered as the exposure of interest and influenza as the reference group. Death was considered a competing risk.

RESULTS

1 120 760 adult COVID-19 patients and 439 278 adult influenza patients were identified, of which 669 (0.06%) adult COVID-19 patients and 91 (0.02%) adult influenza patients received a diagnosis of myocarditis. The myocarditis rate per 1000 person-years was 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.78) for adult COVID-19 patients and 0.24 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.28) for adult influenza populations. In models comprehensively adjusted for demographic and clinical risk factors, COVID-19 diagnosis (compared with influenza diagnosis), cardiac comorbidities, being male and under the age of 30 were independently associated with an increased risk of myocarditis in the year after diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support a distinct link between COVID-19 and myocarditis, which appears greater than after a similar viral respiratory infection. As such, a greater degree of clinical suspicion and investigation according to existing diagnostic pathways is recommended.

Cardiovascular sequelae in symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection survivors

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 infection may lead to myocardial and endothelial damage. The present study sought to characterize the cardiovascular sequel in a large group of consecutive patients admitted for out-patient cardiovascular follow-up after a symptomatic COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

The aims of this study were as follows: to evaluate the presence of post-covid cardiovascular symptoms in an unselected population of outpatients referred to a post-COVID outpatient cardiology clinic and to characterize the long-term abnormalities associated with a more severe COVID-19 infection clinical course. A total of 914 patients were included in this single-center, observational, cross-sectional study, of which 163 were hospitalized and 149 required mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients were analyzed at follow-up according to the care setting during the initial presentation.

RESULTS

The median time to follow-up was 126 days. At that time, only 3.5% of patients reported no persistent dyspnea, chest pain, or fatigue on exertion. In a follow-up echocardiographic assessment, patients who required hospitalization showed slight alterations in the pulmonary acceleration time and the tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient, as well as reduced exercise tolerance during treadmill exercise testing when compared to patients with a benign clinical course. 24-hour Holter EKG monitoring or 24-hour blood pressure monitoring did not identify significant differences between the analyzed subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study reports on an association between COVID-19 severity and the presence of cardiovascular alterations at follow-up. A simple diagnostic protocol, comprising an exercise treadmill test and transthoracic echocardiography is useful in identifying patients who may benefit from regular, structured cardiovascular medical care.

[Mechanisms of prolonged symptoms following acute COVID-19: Some pathophysiological pathways]

INTRODUCTION

Following the Omicron wave in early 2022, an estimated 60-70% of the French population was infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. One out of ten infected subjects could have persistent symptoms three months after infection, representing a public health challenge.

CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE

The persistent symptoms may be secondary to diverse entities with distinct mechanisms. While organic infection sequelae occur mainly after severe COVID-19, some symptoms appear to be essentially psychological in origin; in addition, many subjects present stereotyped symptoms of fluctuating intensity with no identified anatomical or psychic substratum, often in the aftermath of a benign infection. The most frequent complaints are fatigue, pain, dyspnea and difficulty concentrating.

PERSPECTIVES

The hypotheses explored to explain these symptoms include: persistent immune dysfunction, inducted autoimmunity, and microbiome disturbances. Persistent viral antigens may lie at the crossroads of these mechanisms. To date, these different etiological avenues have yet to lead to the development of diagnostic tests or specific therapeutic strategies.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged symptoms after COVID-19 correspond to heterogeneous nosological entities with poorly understood mechanisms.

COVID-19 Infection in Ultramarathon Runners: Findings of the Ultrarunners Longitudinal TRAcking Study

OBJECTIVE

Ultramarathon runners are a unique patient population who have been shown to have a lower rate of severe chronic medical conditions. This study aimed to determine the effect that COVID-19 infection has had on this population and their running behavior.

DESIGN

The Ultrarunners Longitudinal TRAcking (ULTRA) Study is a large longitudinal study of ultramarathon runners. Questions on health status, running behavior, and COVID-19 infection were included in the most recent survey.

SETTING

Community survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Seven hundred thirty-four ultramarathon runners participated in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Personal, exercise, and COVID-19 infection history.

RESULTS

52.7% of study participants reported having been symptomatic from a COVID-19 infection, with 6.7% testing positive multiple times. Participants required a total of 4 days of hospitalization. The most common symptoms included fever (73.6%), fatigue (68.5%), sore throat (68.2%), runny nose (67.7%), and cough (67.4%). Cardiovascular symptoms, which are of particular interest in the running population, included shortness of breath (46.3%), tachycardia (44.7%), chest pain (36.2%), and wheezing (33.3%). A total of 50 subjects (6.8%) reported long COVID (symptoms lasting more than 12 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe COVID-19 infection has been rare in this population of ultramarathon runners, although symptomatic infection that affects running is common. To support the well-being of this group of highly active athletes, clinicians should appreciate that cardiovascular symptoms are common and the long-term significance of these symptoms in runners is unknown.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2 prospective study.

Vitamin D Status and Cardiovascular Disease in College Athletes After SARS-CoV-2 Infection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between vitamin D status and CV disease after COVID-19 in college athletes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

National College Athletic Association Division-I college athletes from a single academic institution.

PATIENTS

A total of 157 athletes (60 female; median age: 20 years) from 9 sports with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), and vitamin D level.

INDEPENDENT VARIABLES

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level (primary); age, sex (regression models).

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Differences in age, sex, race, ethnicity, myocarditis, pericarditis, and CMR metrics by vitamin D status were analyzed. Regression models were used to assess the relationship between vitamin D status and CMR metrics accounting for age and sex.

RESULTS

Low vitamin D (LVD) was found in 33 (21.0%) of athletes, particularly Black males ( P < 0.001). Athletes with LVD had higher biventricular and lower mid-ventricular extracellular volumes, but these differences were not significant when corrected for age and sex. Athletes with LVD had higher left ventricle (LV) mass ( P < 0.001) and LV mass index ( P = 0.001) independent of age and sex. Differences in global circumferential strain were noted but are likely clinically insignificant. Vitamin D status did not associate with myocarditis and pericarditis ( P = 0.544).

CONCLUSIONS

LVD is common in athletes, particularly in Black males. Although athletes with LVD had higher LV mass, cardiac function and tissue characterization did not differ by vitamin D status. Future studies are needed to determine if the differences in LV mass and LV mass index by vitamin D status are clinically significant. This study suggests that vitamin D status does not impact the development of myocarditis or pericarditis after COVID-19 infection.

An immunology model for accelerated coronary atherosclerosis and unexplained sudden death in the COVID-19 era

The immunological basis for cardiac deaths remote from potential triggering viral infection, including SARS-CoV-2 infection, remains enigmatic. Cardiac surface inflammation, including the pericardium, epicardium and superficial myocardium with associated coronary artery vasculitis in infant Kawasaki Disease (KD) and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is well recognised. In this perspective, we review the evidence pointing towards prominent post-viral infection related epicardial inflammation in older subjects, resulting in atherosclerotic plaque destabilisation with seemingly unrelated myocardial infarction that may be temporally distant from the actual infectious triggers. Cardiac surface inflammation in the relatively immune cell rich tissues in the territory though where the coronary arteries traverse is common in the adult post-COVD pneumonic phase and is also well described after vaccination including pre-COVID era vaccinations. Immunologically, the pericardium/epicardium tissue was known to be critical for coronary artery territory atherosclerotic disease prior to the COVID-19 era and may be linked to the involvement of the coronary artery vasa vasorum that physiologically oxygenates the coronary artery walls. We highlight how viral infection or vaccination-associated diffuse epicardial tissue inflammation adjacent to the coronary artery vasa vasorum territory represents a critical unifying concept for seemingly unrelated fatal coronary artery atherosclerotic disease, that could occur soon after or remote from infection or vaccination in adults. Mechanistically, such epicardial inflammation impacting coronary artery vasa vasorum immunity acts as gateways towards the slow destabilisation of pre-existing atherosclerotic plaques, with resultant myocardial infarction and other cardiac pathology. This model offers immunologists and academic cardiologists an immunopathological roadmap between innocuous viral infections or vaccinations and seemingly temporally remote "unrelated" atherosclerotic disease with excess cardiac deaths.

Clinical Significance of Myocardial Injury in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with troponin elevation have a higher prevalence of cardiac abnormalities than control individuals. However, the progression and impact of myocardial injury on COVID-19 survivors remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate myocardial injury in COVID-19 survivors with troponin elevation with baseline and follow-up imaging and to assess medium-term outcomes.

METHODS

This was a prospective, longitudinal cohort study in 25 United Kingdom centers (June 2020 to March 2021). Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with myocardial injury underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scans within 28 days and 6 months postdischarge. Outcomes were tracked for 12 months, with quality of life surveys (EuroQol-5 Dimension and 36-Item Short Form surveys) taken at discharge and 6 months.

RESULTS

Of 342 participants (median age: 61.3 years; 71.1% male) with baseline CMR, 338 had a 12-month follow-up, 235 had a 6-month CMR, and 215 has baseline and follow-up quality of life surveys. Of 338 participants, within 12 months, 1.2% died; 1.8% had new myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, or coronary revascularization; 0.8% had new myopericarditis; and 3.3% had other cardiovascular events requiring hospitalization. At 6 months, there was a minor improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (1.8% ± 1.0%; P < 0.001), stable right ventricular ejection fraction (0.4% ± 0.8%; P = 0.50), no change in myocardial scar pattern or volume (P = 0.26), and no imaging evidence of continued myocardial inflammation. All pericardial effusions (26 of 26) resolved, and most pneumonitis resolved (95 of 101). EuroQol-5 Dimension scores indicated an overall improvement in quality of life (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial injury in severe hospitalized COVID-19 survivors is nonprogressive. Medium-term outcomes show a low incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and improved quality of life. (COVID-19 Effects on the Heart; ISRCTN58667920).

Design and rationale of MYOFLAME-19 randomised controlled trial: MYOcardial protection to reduce post-COVID inFLAMmatory heart disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance Endpoints

BACKGROUND

Cardiac symptoms due to postacute inflammatory cardiac involvement affect a broad segment of previously well people with only mild acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) illness and without overt structural heart disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can identify the underlying subclinical disease process, which is associated with chronic cardiac symptoms. Specific therapy directed at reducing postacute cardiac inflammatory involvement before development of myocardial injury and impairment is missing.

METHODS

Prospective multicenter randomized placebo-controlled study of myocardial protection therapy (combined immunosuppressive/antiremodeling) of low-dose prednisolone and losartan. Consecutive symptomatic individuals with a prior COVID-19 infection, no pre-existing significant comorbidities or structural heart disease, undergo standardized assessments with questionnaires, CMR imaging, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Eligible participants fulfilling the criteria of subclinical post-COVID inflammatory heart involvement on baseline CMR examination are randomized to treatment with either verum or placebo for a total of 16 weeks (W16). Participants and investigators remain blinded to the group allocation throughout the study duration. The primary efficacy endpoint is the absolute change of left ventricular ejection fraction to baseline at W16, measured by CMR, between the verum treatment and placebo group by absolute difference, using unpaired t-test confirmatively at a significance level of 0.05 significance level. Secondary endpoints include assessment of changes of symptoms, CMR parameters, and CPET after W16, and frequency of major adverse cardiac events after 1 year. Safety data will be analyzed for frequency, severity, and types of adverse events (AEs) for all treatment groups. The proportion of AEs related to the contrast agent gadobutrol will also be analyzed. A calculated sample size is a total of 280 participants (accounting for 22 subjects (8%) drop out), randomized in 1:1 fashion to 140 in the verum and 140 placebo groups.

CONCLUSION

Myoflame-19 study will examine the efficacy of a myocardial protection therapy in symptomatic participants with post-COVID inflammatory cardiac involvement determined by CMR. The aim of the intervention is to reduce the symptoms and inflammatory myocardial injury, improve exercise tolerance, and preclude the development of cardiac impairment.

COVID-19: a multi-organ perspective

In this mini review, we explore the complex network of inflammatory reactions incited by SARS-CoV-2 infection, which extends its reach well beyond the respiratory domain to influence various organ systems. Synthesizing existing literature, it elucidates how the hyperinflammation observed in COVID-19 patients affects multiple organ systems leading to physiological impairments that can persist over long after the resolution of infection. By exploring the systemic manifestations of this inflammatory cascade, from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to renal impairment and neurological sequelae, the review highlights the profound interplay between inflammation and organ dysfunction. By synthesizing recent research and clinical observations, this mini review aims to provide an overview of the systemic interactions and complications associated with COVID-19, underscoring the need for an integrated approach to treatment and management. Understanding these systemic effects is crucial for improving patient outcomes and preparing for future public health challenges.