Effectiveness and Safety of Apatinib Plus Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Five-year survival outcome of laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision for patients with stage II/III gastric cancer without invasion of the squamocolumnar junction

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer patients without invasion of the squamocolumnar junction have a low probability of extragastric mesenteric metastasis, and the survival benefit of conducting D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision is unclear in this group of patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with stage II/III gastric cancer without invasion of the squamocolumnar junction who underwent laparoscopic radical surgery for gastric cancer at the First Hospital of Putian City, Fujian Province, from January 2014 to May 2019. Five-year disease-free survival was the primary outcome, and 5-year overall survival and the recurrence pattern were the secondary outcomes. Morbidity, mortality, and surgery-related outcomes within 30 days of surgery were also analyzed.

RESULTS

This study included 366 patients, 133 in the D2 lymphadenectomy group and 233 in the D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision group. There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival in the D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision group compared with the D2 lymphadenectomy group (P > .05). Regarding recurrence pattern, the D2 lymphadenectomy group had a higher rate of local recurrence (12.3% and 38.3%, P = .001). In subgroup analysis, patients with stage III and T3-4aN1-3 gastric cancer in the D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision group had significantly better 5-year disease-free survival compared with the D2 lymphadenectomy group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastrium excision not only decreased the local recurrence rate of stage II/III gastric cancer without invasion of the squamocolumnar junction, but it also improved the 5-year disease-free survival of patients with stage III and T3-4aN1-3 gastric cancer without invasion of the squamocolumnar junction.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer: a real - world retrospective cohort study

Background

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-angiogenic drugs have demonstrated effectiveness in treating advanced gastric cancer (GC), their role in neoadjuvant or conversion therapy remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with anti-angiogenesis and ICIs in patients with locally advanced GC (LAGC).

Methods

In this cohort study, we reviewed our prospectively maintained GC database and included individuals diagnosed with clinical stage II-III GC who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery between January 2022 and August 2023. The treatment protocol combined ICIs, anti-angiogenic therapy (specifically apatinib), and chemotherapy (S-1 with oxaliplatin). A systematic approach was used to document patients' clinical and pathological characteristics, pathological findings, and survival outcomes, which were subsequently analyzed in detail.

Results

A total of 38 individuals met the study's inclusion criteria, with the majority (32 patients, 84.2%) having clinical stage III GC. All participants underwent surgery, resulting in a notable R0 resection rate of 97.4%. The rates of major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR) were 47.4% and 23.7%, respectively. Post-surgery, 36 patients (92.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 22 months, ten patients experienced disease recurrence, including three who died from tumor relapse. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate stood at 100%, and the disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 94.7%, with median OS and DFS yet to be reached. The neoadjuvant therapy regimen was generally well-tolerated, with no grade 5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) reported. Only one patient experienced a grade 4 TRAE (immune-related hepatitis), while the most common grade 3 TRAEs included thrombocytopenia, elevated aminotransferase levels, and neutropenia.

Conclusions

The combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, and ICIs has proven effective in treating LAGC patients, achieving high pCR rates and favorable survival outcomes while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.

Pathologic Response of Phase III Study: Perioperative Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib and Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (DRAGON IV/CAP 05)

PURPOSE

This multicenter, randomized phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative camrelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) plus low-dose rivoceranib (a VEGFR-2 inhibitor) and S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) (SOXRC), high-dose rivoceranib plus SOX (SOXR), and SOX alone (SOX) for locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with T3-4aN + M0 G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive perioperative treatment with SOXRC, SOXR, or SOX. The primary end points were pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival. The Independent Data Monitoring Committee recommended stopping enrollment in the SOXR group on the basis of the safety data of the first 103 randomly assigned patients in the three groups. The patients were then randomly assigned 1:1 to the SOXRC or SOX groups. This report presents the pCR results obtained per protocol for the first 360 randomly assigned patients who had the opportunity for surgery in the SOXRC and SOX groups.

RESULTS

In the SOXRC and SOX groups, of the 180 patients in each group, 99% and 98% of patients received neoadjuvant therapy, 91% and 94% completed planned neoadjuvant therapy, and 86% and 87% underwent surgery, respectively. The pCR was significantly higher in the SOXRC group at 18.3% (95% CI, 13.0 to 24.8) compared with 5.0% (95% CI, 2.3 to 9.3) in the SOX group (difference of 13.7%; 95% CI, 7.2 to 20.1; odds ratio of 4.5 [95% CI, 2.1 to 9.9]). The one-sided P value was <.0001, crossing the prespecified statistical significance threshold of P = .005. Surgical complications and grade ≥3 neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events were 27% versus 33% and 34% versus 17% for SOXRC and SOX, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The SOXRC regimen significantly improved pCR compared with SOX alone in patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma with a tolerable safety profile.

A literature review of recent advances in gastric cancer treatment: exploring the cross-talk between targeted therapies

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks fourth in global mortality rates and fifth in prevalence, making it one of the most common cancers worldwide. Recent clinical studies have highlighted the potential of immunotherapies as a promising approach to treating GC. This study aims to shed light on the most impactful therapeutic strategies in the context of GC immunotherapy, highlighting both established and emerging approaches.

MAIN BODY

This review examines over 160 clinical studies conducted globally, focusing on the effectiveness of various immunotherapy modalities, including cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed literature was performed using databases such as Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. The selection criteria included peer-reviewed articles published primarily within the last 10 years, with a focus on studies that provided insights into targeted therapies and their mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, and safety profiles. The findings indicate that these immunotherapy strategies can enhance treatment outcomes for GC, aligning with current treatment guidelines. ICIs like pembrolizumab and nivolumab have shown significant survival benefits in specific GC subgroups. Cancer vaccines and CAR-T cell therapies demonstrate potential, while mAbs targeting HER2 and VEGFR pathways enhance outcomes in combination regimens. We discuss the latest advancements and challenges in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for GC. Given the evolving nature of this field, this research emphasizes significant evidence-based therapies and those currently under evaluation rather than providing an exhaustive overview. Challenges include resistance mechanisms, immunosuppressive tumor environments, and inconsistent results from combination therapies. Biomarker-driven approaches and further research into emerging modalities like CAR-T cells and cancer vaccines are critical for optimizing treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunotherapy is reshaping GC management by improving survival and quality of life. Ongoing research and clinical evaluations are crucial for refining personalized and effective therapies.

The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The extensive utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) has achieved significant advancements in the treatment of diverse solid tumors. The present meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) plus PD-1 inhibitors for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).

METHODS

An electronic search of PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify the clinical trials of NCT + PD-1 inhibitor vs. NCT in patients with LAGC. The retrieval period extended from the establishment of the corresponding database until April 2024, and meta-analysis was conducted using Stata (version 15) software. Subsequently, direct comparative analysis was used to compare pooled results of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) with NCT.

RESULTS

After screening, six phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine retrospective studies with 2953 patients were included. In meta-analysis, the NICT group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of pathological complete response (pCR) ( P <0.001) and R0 resection ( P =0.001), and a lower 2-year recurrence rate ( P =0.001) compared to the NCT group. The NICT group, however, exhibited a higher incidence of severe treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) ( P =0.044). Additionally, the NICT and NCT groups exhibited no statistical differences in terms of the number of harvested lymph nodes, the occurrence of total TRAEs and postoperative complications, as well as the duration of postoperative hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PD-1 inhibitor + NCT in LAGC patients enhances the likelihood of achieving radical surgery and improves prognosis, albeit to some extent increasing the risk of severe TRAEs. NICT is anticipated to emerge as the preferred neoadjuvant therapy option for patients diagnosed with LAGC.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin combined with apatinib and camrelizumab as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a protocol for a single-arm phase II trial

Gastric cancer, as the fifth most diagnosed malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death globally, remains a significant health concern. The potential effect of the programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, when used alongside chemotherapy and antiangiogenic agents in neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer, has yet to be explored in the published literature. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen when combined with apatinib and camrelizumab (SOXAC) as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. A single-arm, open-label, single-center phase II clinical trial has been designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the SOXAC regimen as neoadjuvant therapy for patients diagnosed with locally advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma (cT2-3N + M0 or T4NxM0). Eligible patients are to receive 2 cycles of SOXAC and 1 cycle of SOX regimen with camrelizumab (SOXC) as neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical surgery, and 3 cycles of SOXC as postoperative adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint is major pathological remission (MPR), while secondary endpoints include pathological complete response (pCR) rate, R0 resection rate, objective response rate (ORR), operation-related outcomes, and safety. The SOX regimen remains a leading choice for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Eastern countries. Recent studies suggest that combining chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors can enhance the antitumor immune response. This phase II clinical trial seeks to assess the safety and efficacy of the SOXAC regimen as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced resectable gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, while also exploring the correlation between biomarkers and efficacy.Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR): ChiCTR2200062285 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ).

Short term efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib plus S-1 and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Hence, downstaging of the tumor with neoadjuvant therapy is critical for R0 resection and prolongs the overall survival. Data from related studies are lacking, and the literature is scarce. Therefore, a single arm-study was performed on PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib plus S-1 and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LAGC. The findings are expected to serve as a reference for neoadjuvant therapy for LAGC. We assessed 130 LAGC patients using PD-1 inhibitor, apatinib plus S-1, and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 2021 to October 2022. A total of 104 patients received gastric transcatheter chemoembolization (GTC). The primary endpoint was the rate of clinical complete response, pathological complete response, and safety, while the secondary endpoints were the R0 resection rate and objective response rate of the disease and the disease control rate. A total of 130 patients completed the clinical assessment, of which 6 patients (4.6%) achieved clinical complete response, 87 patients (66.9%) achieved partial response, 30 patients (23.0%) achieved stable disease, and 7 patients (5.5%) experienced progressive disease. The overall response rate was 71.5% (93/130), and the disease control rate was 94.5% (123/130). A remarkable downstaging effect was observed in this study. Downstaging of the T stage and N stage was achieved in 71.5% and 80% of the patients, respectively, which translated into a high R0 resection rate. The findings revealed that 125 patients underwent R0 resection, and the R0 resection rate was 96.1%. According to the observed results, 21.6% of the patients achieved pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Gastric transcatheter chemoembolization in the first cycle of neoadjuvant therapy was beneficial for tumor regression (P < .001). All adverse events were relieved and disappeared after symptomatic treatment, and no grade 4 adverse events were noted. PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib plus S-1 and oxaliplatin are safe and effective as neoadjuvant treatment of LAGC. Gastric transcatheter chemoembolization is useful for tumor regression during neoadjuvant therapy.

Clinicopathological Factors and Nomogram Construction for Lymph Node Metastasis in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Background

The research on lymph node metastasis (LNM) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) infiltrating the subserous tissue and serous membrane (T3-4a) is significantly inadequate. This study aims to explore the clinicopathological factors related to LNM in stages T3 and T4a LAGC, while also developing predictive nomograms.

Methods

After systematic searching and rigorous screening, 1995 T3 and 1244 T4a LAGC cases who underwent surgery without neoadjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy were selected. The risk factors associated with LNM were identified using both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Subsequently, the independent variables identified through the multivariate analyses were utilized to construct a nomogram.

Results

The incidence of LNM in T3 and T4a LAGC was 77.1% (1539/1995) and 83.8% (1043/1244), respectively. The following factors were found to be independently associated with LNM in T3 LAGC: preoperative serum albumin <41g/L (P=0.007), gastrointestinal obstruction (P<0.001), tumor location (P=0.040), tumor size >4cm (P=0.002), mixed (P=0.001) and undifferentiated histological types (P=0.002), presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P<0.001) and nerve invasion (P<0.001). Additionally, in T4a LAGC cases, serum albumin < 39g/L (P=0.004), tumor size >6cm (P=0.020), mixed (P<0.001) and undifferentiated histological types (P<0.001), presence of gastrointestinal hemorrhage (P=0.016), neuroendocrine differentiation (P=0.024), and LVI (P<0.001) independently influenced the occurrence of LNM.

Conclusion

This study identified the risk factors associated with LNM in T3-4a LAGC cases and constructed nomograms, thereby providing valuable guidance for formulating and implementing a multidisciplinary perioperative treatment program.

Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Hilar Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Without Greater Curvature Invasion: Five-Year Outcomes From the Fuges-02 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Splenic hilar lymphadenectomy has been recommended for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) involving the greater curvature. However, it is unclear whether laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSPSHL) is associated with a long-term survival benefit for APGC without greater curvature invasion.

Objective

To present the 5-year follow-up data from a randomized clinical trial that compared laparoscopic total gastrectomy (D2 group) with D2 plus LSPSHL (D2 + No. 10 group) among patients with resectable APGC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This is a post hoc secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial that enrolled 536 patients with potentially resectable APGC (cT2-4a, N0 or N+, and M0) without greater curvature invasion from January 5, 2015, to October 10, 2018. All patients were tracked for at least 5 years. The final follow-up was on October 30, 2023.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the D2 + No. 10 or D2 groups.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were measured. Recurrence patterns and causes of death were compared.

Results

A total of 526 patients (392 men [74.5%]; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [9.6] years) were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis, with 263 patients in each group. The 5-year DFS rate was 63.9% (95% CI, 58.1%-69.7%) for the D2 + No. 10 group and 55.1% (95% CI, 49.1%-61.1%) for the D2 group (log-rank P = .04). A statistically significant difference was observed in the 5-year OS between the D2 + No. 10 group and the D2 group (66.2% [95% CI, 60.4%-71.9%] vs 57.4% [95% CI, 51.4%-63.4%]; log-rank P = .03). The No. 10 lymph node exhibited a therapeutic value index (TVI) of 6.5, surpassing that of Nos. 8a (TVI, 3.0), 11 (TVI, 5.8), and 12a (TVI, 0.8). A total of 86 patients in the D2 + No. 10 group (cumulative incidence, 32.7%) and 111 patients in the D2 group (cumulative incidence, 42.2%) experienced recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.95; P = .02). The multivariable competing risk regression model demonstrated that D2 + No. 10 remained an independent protective factor for a lower 5-year cumulative recurrence rate after surgery (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-1.00; P = .05). There was a significant difference in the 5-year cumulative recurrence rate at the No. 10 lymph node area between the 2 groups (D2 + No. 10 group vs D2 group: 0% vs 2.3% [n = 6]; P = .01).

Conclusions

This post hoc secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial found that laparoscopic total gastrectomy with LSPSHL can improve the prognosis and reduce recurrence for APGC without greater curvature invasion. Future multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02333721.

Perioperative chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The study aimed to investigate the prognosis and safety of perioperative chemotherapy (PC) compared with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC).

METHODS

We systematically searched and assessed studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 1st September 2022.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were eligible for the analysis, including 4686 patients in total. Our study found that patients with resectable gastric cancer undergoing PC had favorable prognosis on OS (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69-0.87) and DFS (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.69-0.84) than those who undergoing AC. Addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to AC provided higher R0 resection rate but did not increase the risk of postoperative complication rate and most of the adverse event rates.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that PC shows better OS and DFS in Asians with resectable gastric cancer compared with AC. PC should be preferred because of its favorable prognosis and similar safety.

Fruquintinib plus oxaliplatin combined with S-1 (SOX) as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ): a multicentre, phase II, single-arm, open-label clinical trial (FRUTINEOGA) protocol

INTRODUCTION

Curing locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ) with surgery alone is challenging. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has become the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced GC/GEJ, and SOX is the most common neoadjuvant regimen in China. The generally good tolerability in patients and fruquintinib's low potential for drug-drug interaction suggest that it may be highly suitable for combinations with other antineoplastic therapies. A combination of fruquintinib, S-1 and oxaliplatin can be a promising neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced GC/GEJ. In this phase II study, we aim to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of fruquintinib plus SOX as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced GC/GEJ.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The FRUTINEOGA trial is a prospective, multicentre, phase II, single-arm, open-label clinical trial that will enrol 54 patients. Eligible patients will be registered, enrolled and receive 2-4 cycles of fruquintinib plus SOX, after which surgery will be performed and tumour regression will be evaluated. The primary endpoint is the pathological remission rate, and the secondary endpoints are disease-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, major pathological response rate and R0 resection rate.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Written informed consent will be required from all patients enrolled, and it will be provided by them. The study protocol received approval from the independent ethical review committee of Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Wuming Hospital of Guangxi Medical University and Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou Gongren Hospital (approval number: CS2021(96)). We will submit the finalised paper for publication on completing the analyses. This study will provide valuable insights to clinicians regarding the safety and efficacy of incorporating fruquintinib into SOX as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced GC/GEJ. The findings have the potential to inform future research proposals and may guide the use of fruquintinib in the neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced GC/GEJ.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05122091.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter randomized phase 2 trial

Prospective evidence regarding the combination of programmed cell death (PD)-1 and angiogenesis inhibitors in treating locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is limited. In this multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT04195828), patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (clinical T2-4N + M0) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib combined with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (CA-SAP) or chemotherapy SAP alone (SAP) for 3 cycles. The primary endpoint was the major pathological response (MPR), defined as <10% residual tumor cells in resection specimens. Secondary endpoints included R0 resection rate, radiologic response, safety, overall survival, and progression-free survival. The modified intention-to-treat population was analyzed (CA-SAP [n = 51] versus SAP [n = 53]). The trial has met pre-specified endpoints. CA-SAP was associated with a significantly higher MPR rate (33.3%) than SAP (17.0%, P = 0.044). The CA-SAP group had a significantly higher objective response rate (66.0% versus 43.4%, P = 0.017) and R0 resection rate (94.1% versus 81.1%, P = 0.042) than the SAP group. Nonsurgical grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 17 patients (33.3%) in the CA-SAP group and 14 (26.4%) in the SAP group. Survival results were not reported due to immature data. Camrelizumab and apatinib combined with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant regimen was tolerable and associated with favorable responses for LAGC.

Optimal timing of surgery for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical resection is one of the most preferred treatment options for locally advanced gastric cancer patients. However, the optimal time interval between chemotherapy and surgery is unclear. This review aimed to identify the optimal time interval between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Beginning on November 12, 2022, we searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases, and Embase.com databases for relevant English-language research. Two authors independently screened the studies, assessed their quality, extracted the data, and analyzed the results. The primary goal was to investigate the relationship between the time interval to surgery (TTS) and long-term survival outcomes for patients. This study has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022365196).

RESULTS

After an initial search of 4880 articles, the meta-analysis review ultimately included only five retrospective studies. Ultimately, this meta-analysis included 1171 patients, of which 411 patients had TTS of < 4 weeks, 507 patients had TTS of 4-6 weeks, and 253 patients had TTS of > 6 weeks. In survival analysis, patients with TTS of > 6 weeks had poorer overall survival outcomes than patients with TTS of 4-6 weeks (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.03-1.75, P = 0.03). No significant differences were found in terms of disease-free survival the groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on the current clinical evidence, patients with locally advanced gastric cancer may benefit better with a TTS of 4-6 weeks; however, this option still needs additional study.

Low-dose apatinib in subjects with renal impairment: A pharmacokinetics study

OBJECTIVE

In patients with renal impairment, we studied apatinib and its major metabolites (M1-1, M1-2, M1-6, and M9-2) for pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

Subjects with different renal functions were given a single oral dose of apatinib mesylate tablets of 250 mg. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at 1 hour before dosing,0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after dosing. The pharmacokinetic parameters of apatinib and its major metabolites were calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

RESULTS

Comparing PK parameters of the mild or moderate renal impairment group with the healthy group: the geometric mean ratios of maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax), the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from time 0 to the final quantifiable time (AUC0-t), and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf) were all about one. No significant effect of mild and moderate renal impairment on apatinib pharmacokinetics was observed. Mild and moderate renal impairment was also not observed to have a significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of metabolites M1-1, M1-2, and M1-6. However, mild and moderate renal impairment had a certain increase in exposure to the metabolite M9-2. Considering that M9-2 has no inhibitory effect on protein tyrosine kinase, it has no clinical significance. In addition, the proportion of cumulative excretion of apatinib and its major metabolites was small and almost negligible in all three groups of subjects.

CONCLUSION

Patients with mild and moderate renal impairment do not need to adjust the dose of apatinib when using low dose (250 mg) apatinib.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib and chemotherapy versus apatinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

Programed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, apatinib, and chemotherapy show synergistic antitumor effect in gastric cancer. This study aimed to evaluate this combination as a neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). In this retrospective study, data from 179 LAGC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy with a PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib and chemotherapy (PAC group, n=56), apatinib and chemotherapy (AC group, n=50), or chemotherapy alone (C group, n=73) were analyzed. The PAC group displayed a numerically higher radiologic objective response rate than the AC group (73.2% vs. 60.0%, P=0.149) and significantly higher than the C group (73.2% vs. 35.6%, P<0.001). Tumor resection rates between the PAC and AC groups were not significantly different (100.0% vs. 94.0%, P=0.102) but were higher in the PAC group compared to the C group (100.0% vs. 89.0%, P=0.010). Pathological evaluations revealed comparable R0 resection rates across all groups (P=0.873) and a non-significantly higher pathological complete response rate in the PAC group compared to the AC group (26.8% vs. 17.0%, P=0.236), while significantly higher than the C group (26.8% vs. 7.7%, P=0.005). Moreover, the PAC group exhibited a longer progression-free survival compared to the AC (P=0.036) and C (P<0.001) groups, an extended disease-free survival compared to the C group (P=0.002), and improved overall survival compared to the AC (P=0.028) and C (P=0.002) groups. Adverse events were generally comparable, with the highest incidence of peripheral neuropathy observed in the PAC group (26.8%, P=0.020). PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib and chemotherapy may represent an effective neoadjuvant regimen for LAGC management, necessitating further validation.

Clinical progress of anti-angiogenic targeted therapy and combination therapy for gastric cancer

The incidence of gastric cancer is increasing year by year. Most gastric cancers are already in the advanced stage with poor prognosis when diagnosed, which means the current treatment is not satisfactory. Angiogenesis is an important link in the occurrence and development of tumors, and there are multiple anti-angiogenesis targeted therapies. To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic targeted drugs alone and in combination against gastric cancer, we systematically searched and sorted out relevant literature. In this review, we summarized the efficacy and safety of Ramucirumab, Bevacizumab, Apatinib, Fruquintinib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Pazopanib on gastric cancer when used alone or in combination based on prospective clinical trials reported in the literature, and sorted response biomarkers. We also summarized the challenges faced by anti-angiogenesis therapy for gastric cancer and available solutions. Finally, the characteristics of the current clinical research are summarized and suggestions and prospects are raised. This review will serve as a good reference for the clinical research of anti-angiogenic targeted drugs in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Apatinib combined with SOX regimen for conversion therapy in advanced gastric cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Recently, many studies have shown that the progress of conversion therapy can provide surgical opportunities for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) and bring survival benefits. However, the results of the current study show that the regimen used in conversion therapy is still controversial. Apatinib, as the standard third-line treatment for GC, has an inconclusive status in conversion therapy.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed GC patients admitted to Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from June 2016 to November 2019. All patients were pathologically diagnosed, had unresectable factors, and received SOX regimen with or without apatinib as conversion therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were enrolled in the study. Altogether 33 patients (66%) received conversion surgery and 17 patients (34%) received conversion therapy without surgery. The median progression-free survival (PFS) between surgery group and non-surgery group were 21.0 versus 4.0 months (p < 0.0001), and the median overall survival (OS) were 29.0 versus 14.0 months (p < 0.0001). In conversion surgery group, 16 patients (16/33) were treated with SOX plus apatinib, and the R0 resection rate was 81.3%; 17 patients (17/33) were treated with SOX regimen along, and the R0 resection rate was 41.2% (p = 0.032). The PFS in the SOX combined with apatinib group was significantly longer than that of SOX group (25.5 versus 16 months, p = 0.045), and the median OS were 34.0 versus 23.0 months (p = 0.048). The addition of apatinib did not increase the incidence of serious adverse reactions throughout the preoperative therapy period.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced inoperable gastric cancer could benefit probably from conversion chemotherapy and subsequence conversion surgery. Apatinib-targeted therapy combined with SOX chemotherapy may be a safe and feasible option for conversion therapy.

Assessment of Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Hilar Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Without Invasion Into the Greater Curvature: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

The survival benefit of laparoscopic total gastrectomy combined with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSTG) for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) without invasion into the greater curvature remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term and short-term efficacy of LSTG (D2 + No. 10 group) and conventional laparoscopic total gastrectomy (D2 group) for patients with APGC that has not invaded the greater curvature.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this open-label, prospective randomized clinical trial, a total of 536 patients with clinical stage cT2 to 4a/N0 to 3/M0 APGC without invasion into the greater curvature were enrolled from January 2015 to October 2018. The final follow-up was on October 31, 2021. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to February 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Eligible patients were randomized to the D2 + No. 10 group or the D2 group.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes were 3-year overall survival (OS) and morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Of 526 included patients, 392 (74.5%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 60.6 (9.6) years. A total of 263 patients were included in the D2 + No. 10 group, and 263 were included in the D2 group. The 3-year DFS was 70.3% (95% CI, 64.8-75.8) for the D2 + No. 10 group and 64.3% (95% CI, 58.4-70.2; P = .11) for the D2 group, and the 3-year OS in the D2 + No. 10 group was better than that in the D2 group (75.7% [95% CI, 70.6-80.8] vs 66.5% [95% CI, 60.8-72.2]; P = .02). Multivariate analysis revealed that splenic hilar lymphadenectomy was not an independent protective factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63-1.16) or OS (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59-1.12). Stratification analysis showed that patients with advanced posterior gastric cancer in the D2 + No. 10 group had better 3-year DFS (92.9% vs 39.3%; P < .001) and OS (92.9% vs 42.9%; P < .001) than those in the D2 group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients with advanced posterior gastric cancer could have the survival benefit from No. 10 lymph node dissection (DFS: HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.46; OS: HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.52).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Although LSTG could not significantly improve the 3-year DFS of patients with APGC without invasion into the greater curvature, patients with APGC located posterior gastric wall may benefit from LSTG.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02333721.

Expert Insights on Current Treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical and Molecular Approaches and Bottlenecks to Progress

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary liver tumor that typically occurs in the setting of chronic liver disease/cirrhosis. Treatment modalities for HCC have evolved and given the variety of treatment options, a multi-disciplinary approach requiring input from surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, hepatology, and interventional radiology is necessary. Multiple advances have been made over the last decade regarding treatment of HCC, especially advanced disease. Resection and transplantation remain as cornerstone curative-intent treatment options. For patients who are not candidates for curative-intent therapy, exciting progress has been made in molecular and cellular approaches to systemic therapy for HCC including immunotherapies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Although the prognosis for advanced HCC remains poor, the armamentarium of therapies has increased, and valuable years of life can be gained with these therapies. While the main therapeutic modality for early-stage disease remains resection, multimodal immunotherapy has emerged as first-line treatment for advanced disease. We herein review different clinical and molecular treatment modalities related to the treatment of HCC, as well as provide insights into future directions for HCC treatment. We highlight how research and progress are needed to move into a new era of molecular and cellular treatments.

Low-dose apatinib combined with camrelizumab and the SOX regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (SPACE-neo): a protocol for an open-label, single-arm, clinical trial

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX regimen) has shown promising results in pathological response rate and survival rate in patients with locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (LAGC). We previously carried out the SPACE study to assess efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib combined with camrelizumab and the SOX regimen as a first-line treatment of advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (AGC/GEJC). The preliminary results demonstrated a high objective response rate. However, the SPACE study was conducted in patients with AGC, but the efficacy of LAGC patients is not yet known. The SPACE-neo study is designed to investigate whether this combination could improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (LAGC/GEJC) as neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods

SPACE-neo is a prospective, open-label, single-arm study conducted in China at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital). Thirty-two patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative or HER2-unknown LAGC/GEJC confirmed by histopathology or cytology will be recruited. Included patients shall be clinically staged as M0 and either T3 to T4 or N+ assessed by ultrasound endoscopy and thoracoabdominal-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The patients will receive three cycles of this combined regimen as a neoadjuvant treatment. Each patient will receive screening visits within 2 weeks before the first cycle and planned visits before every cycle of treatment. Key monitoring data include imaging data, pathological findings, and adverse events associated with neoadjuvant and surgical treatment. The primary endpoints are major pathological response (MPR) and safety. MPR is the proportion of patients whose residual tumor cells make up less than 10% of the primary tumor from among the total cohort. Clopper-Pearson method will be used to estimate the 95% confidence interval of MPR and safety data will be reported as descriptive statistical analysis.

Discussion

The SPACE-neo trial aims to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of this regimen in the neoadjuvant treatment of LAGC/GEJC. It is hoped that the study can achieve a higher pathological response rate and longer survival rate.

Trial Registration

ChiCTR.gov.cn: ChiCTR2100049305.

The optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (LAGC) has been recommended in several guidelines. However, there is no global consensus about the optimum of NAC regimens. We aimed to determine the optimal NAC regimen for LAGC.

Methods

A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. The literature search was conducted from inception to June 2022. The odds ratio (OR) value and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for assessment of R0 resection rate and pathological complete response rate (pCR) as primary outcomes. The hazard ratio (HR) value and 95% CI were interpreted for the assessment of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) as second outcomes. The risk ratio (RR) value and 95% CI were used for safety assessment.

Results

Twelve randomized controlled trials were identified with 3846 eligible participants. The network plots for R0 resectability, OS, and DFS constituted closed loops. The regimens of TPF (taxane and platinum plus fluoropyrimidine), ECF (epirubicin and cisplatin plus fluorouracil), and PF (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine) showed a meaningful improvement of R0 resectability, as well as OS and/or DFS, compared with surgery (including surgery-alone and surgery plus postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy). Importantly, among these regimens, TPF regimen showed significant superiority in R0 resection rate (versus ECF regimen), OS (versus ECF regimen), DFS (versus PF and ECF regimens), and pCR (versus PF regimen).

Conclusions

The taxane-based triplet regimen of TPF is likely the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for LAGC patients.

Pathological complete remission of a locally advanced gastric cancer by neoadjuvant therapy "sandwich" regimen as SOXAP+ fluorescence laparoscopic surgery +SOXAP: Case report

Gastric cancer is an extremely burdensome and challenging malignant tumor with a high incidence and a high mortality rate, which seriously results in a thorny prognosis for oncology patients. Surgical treatment combined with postoperative adjuvant therapy are currently the most regular methods for the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), but long-term efficacy is not an ideal outcome. Therefore, herein we report a case of a pathologically confirmed complete remission of LAGC treated by the administration of neoadjuvant therapy combined with fluorescence laparoscopic surgery with more significant long-term survival. With that being mentioned, a 60-year-old man was diagnosed as moderately differentiated gastric antrum adenocarcinoma (T3N1M0). Moreover, after three cycles of SOXAP regimen (Oxaliplatin + S-1+Apatinib + Camrelizumab), and it was found out that the gastric lesion was smaller in size than before, total laparoscopic radical resection of the distal gastric cancer was performed at the time. Furthermore, no tumor cells were seen in gross specimen post operatively, achieving complete remission of the case. In addition, he also underwent three cycles of SOXAP regimen postoperatively. Interestingly and assuredly, he was in good health after an almost 2-year follow up period. These results suggest that this therapeutic regimen is a promising treatment modality for the management of locally advanced gastric cancers.

CT-based radiomic nomogram for preoperative prediction of DNA mismatch repair deficiency in gastric cancer

Background

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency has attracted considerable attention as a predictor of the immunotherapy efficacy of solid tumors, including gastric cancer. We aimed to develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic nomogram for the preoperative prediction of MMR deficiency in gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, 225 and 91 GC patients from two distinct hospital cohorts were included. Cohort 1 was randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 176) and an internal validation cohort (n = 76), whereas cohort 2 was considered an external validation cohort. Based on repeatable radiomic features, a radiomic signature was constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. We employed multivariable logistic regression analysis to build a radiomics-based model based on radiomic features and preoperative clinical characteristics. Furthermore, this prediction model was presented as a radiomic nomogram, which was evaluated in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts.

Results

The radiomic signature composed of 15 robust features showed a significant association with MMR protein status in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts (both P-values &lt;0.001). A radiomic nomogram incorporating a radiomic signature and two clinical characteristics (age and CT-reported N stage) represented good discrimination in the training cohort with an AUC of 0.902 (95% CI: 0.853–0.951), in the internal validation cohort with an AUC of 0.972 (95% CI: 0.945–1.000) and in the external validation cohort with an AUC of 0.891 (95% CI: 0.825–0.958).

Conclusion

The CT-based radiomic nomogram showed good performance for preoperative prediction of MMR protein status in GC. Furthermore, this model was a noninvasive tool to predict MMR protein status and guide neoadjuvant therapy.

Circular RNA-regulated autophagy is involved in cancer progression

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a sort of long, non-coding RNA molecules with a covalently closed continuous ring structure without 5'-3' polarity and poly-A tail. The modulative role of circRNAs in malignant diseases has been elucidated by many studies in recent years via bioinformatics and high-throughput sequencing technologies. Generally, circRNA affects the proliferative, invasive, and migrative capacity of malignant cells via various mechanisms, exhibiting great potential as novel biomarkers in the diagnoses or treatments of malignancies. Meanwhile, autophagy preserves cellular homeostasis, serving as a vital molecular process in tumor progression. Mounting studies have demonstrated that autophagy can not only contribute to cancer cell survival but can also induce autophagic cell death in specific conditions. A growing number of research studies have indicated that there existed abundant associations between circRNAs and autophagy. Herein, we systemically reviewed and discussed recent studies on this topic in different malignancies and concluded that the circRNA–autophagy axis played crucial roles in the proliferation, metastasis, invasion, and drug or radiation resistance of different tumor cells.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib combined with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for locally advanced gastric cancer patients: a multicentered, prospective, cohort study

PURPOSE

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor and apatinib have been utilized in metastatic gastric cancer patients. The current study aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant S-1 plus oxaliplatin combined with PD-1 inhibitor and apatinib (SOXPA) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients.

METHODS

This two-centered, prospective, cohort study analyzed 30 resectable LAGC patients receiving SOXPA as neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Two (6.7%), 18 (60.0%), and 10 (33.3%) patients achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD), separately. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 66.7% and 100.0%, respectively. The R0 resection rate was 93.3%. Beyond that, 6 (20.0%), 18 (60.0%), and 6 (20.0%) patients achieved grade 1, 2, and 3 pathological responses. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 20%. The 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 96.6% and 77.7% respectively; meanwhile, the 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.6% and 90.1%, separately. What's more, better clinical response (P = 0.046); achievement of ORR (P = 0.014), and better pathological response (P = 0.020) were correlated with longer DFS. Besides, ORR achievement was linked with longer OS (P = 0.040). Most adverse events were relatively mild and manageable. Grade 3 adverse events included leukopenia, anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, nausea and vomiting. No grade 4 adverse events were witnessed.

CONCLUSION

SOXPA as neoadjuvant therapy achieves a satisfying clinical response, pathological response, survival profile, and tolerable safety in LAGC patients.

Neoadjuvant apatinib plus tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S‑1)/oxaliplatin chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma

The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib plus tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1) plus oxaliplatin (SOX) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma (LAGC). Therefore, patients with LAGC treated with neoadjuvant apatinib plus SOX chemotherapy (apatinib + SOX group; n=25) or SOX chemotherapy (SOX group; n=35) were enrolled in the present study. Subsequently, the objective response (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR), pathological response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were recorded. The results showed that patients in the apatinib + SOX group exhibited a higher ORR (64.0 vs. 37.1%; P=0.040), but a similar DCR (96.0 vs. 88.6%; P=0.580), compared with those in the SOX group. The pathological response rates in patients with grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 LAGC were 0.0, 20.8, 62.5 and 16.7%, respectively, in the apatinib + SOX group, while in those treated with SOX alone they were 9.1, 39.4, 42.4 and 9.1%, respectively. By contrast, the pathological response was elevated in the apatinib + SOX group compared with the SOX group (P=0.030). During a median follow-up period of 21.0 months (range, 6.4-38.1 months), median DFS and OS were not reached. More specifically, the 1-, 2- and 3-year DFS rates were 91.7, 75.2 and 75.2% in the apatinib + SOX group and 71.8, 59.6 and 44.7% in the SOX group, respectively. In addition, the 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 100.0, 89.6 and 78.4% in the apatinib + SOX group, while those in the SOX group were 90.3, 69.2 and 55.4%, respectively. However, no differences in DFS (P=0.094) or OS (P=0.155) were observed between the two groups. Additionally, the most common adverse events in the SOX group were mild leukopenia (42.9%) and fatigue (34.3%), while those in the apatinib + SOX group were tolerable leukopenia (44.0%) and hypertension (44.0%). In conclusion, the present study suggested that neoadjuvant apatinib plus SOX chemotherapy could be more effective and tolerable compared with SOX chemotherapy alone in patients with LAGC.

Apatinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients: a prospective, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Apatinib, a small molecule targeting VEGFR2, is commonly used for advanced gastric cancer treatment. This prospective cohort study further investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients.

METHODS

Ninety-six locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients were divided into the apatinib plus chemotherapy group (N = 45) and chemotherapy group (N = 51) according to their chosen treatment. Apatinib was administered (375 mg/day), and S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (CapOx) was given as chemotherapy, for 3 cycles with 3 weeks a cycle before surgery.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (62.2% vs. 37.3%, P = 0.015) and pathological response grade (P = 0.011) were better; meanwhile, the tumor-resection rate (95.6% vs. 84.3%, P = 0.143) and pathological complete response rate (23.3% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.080) exhibited increasing trends (without statistical significance) in the apatinib plus chemotherapy group compared with the chemotherapy group. Additionally, the apatinib plus chemotherapy group achieved prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.019) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.047) compared with the chemotherapy group. After adjusted by multivariate Cox's regression analysis, neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy was still superior to chemotherapy regarding DFS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.277, P = 0.014) and OS (HR: 0.316, P = 0.038). Notably, the incidences of adverse events between the two groups were not different (P > 0.050). Moreover, the most common adverse events of neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy were leukopenia (42.2%), fatigue (37.8%), hypertension (37.8%), and anemia (31.1%).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy realizes better clinical response, pathological response, survival profile, and non-inferior safety profile compared to chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma.

Apatinib: A Novel Antiangiogenic Drug in Monotherapy or Combination Immunotherapy for Digestive System Malignancies

Digestive system malignancies are one of the primary causes of cancer-related death. Meanwhile, angiogenesis has been proved to play an important role in the process of cancer neovascularization. Apatinib, a novel targeted antiangiogenic molecule, could generate highly selective competition in the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, involved in tumor progression and metastasis. It has been implied as a promising cancer treatment agent that can prevent tumor cell proliferation meanwhile inhibit tumor angiogenesis. Furthermore, completed clinical trials demonstrated that apatinib could prolong the progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced gastric cancer and primary liver cancer. Recent studies revealed that apatinib had a synergistic effect with immunotherapy as a second-line and third-line treatment regimen for some other cancers. In this review, we summarize the pharmacological properties of apatinib and the latest clinical application in chemotherapy-refractory patients with advanced digestive system cancer. Based on the comparable survival results, the molecular mechanisms of apatinib are prospective to include the antiangiogenic, apoptosis-inducing, and autophagy-inducing properties in the corresponding signaling pathway. Treatment of apatinib monotherapy or combination immunotherapy remains the optimal option for patients with digestive system malignancies in the future.

Studies of the Efficacy of Low-Dose Apatinib Monotherapy as Third-Line Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Apatinib’s Novel Anticancer Effect by Inhibiting Tumor-Derived Exosome Secretion

Simple Summary

We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib monotherapy as a third-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The ORR and DCR were 4.0% (2/50) and 70% (35/50), and the median PFS and OS were 4.7 months and 10.1 months, which demonstrated comparable survival outcomes, significant improvements to the patient’s quality of life, and tolerable adverse reactions. We also disclosed a novel role of apatinib’s anticancer effect, i.e., inhibiting tumor-derived exosome release. Our results indicated that apatinib treatment inhibited exosome secretion through the regulation of MVB biogenesis, transport, and fusion by regulating LAMP2, RAB11, Snap23, and VAMP2. This novel regulatory mechanism provides a new perspective for the antitumor effect of apatinib in CRC treatment.

Abstract

Antiangiogenic therapy is an important treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We carried out a clinical study of low-dose apatinib (250 mg) monotherapy as a third-line treatment in patients with mCRC and assessed its efficacy and safety. It demonstrated that low-dose apatinib had comparable survival outcomes, significantly improved the patient quality of life, and caused tolerable adverse reactions. To further investigate the underlying mechanism of the effects of apatinib in CRC besides angiogenesis, we performed RNA-seq, and our results suggested that apatinib may have other potential antitumor mechanisms in CRC through multiple pathways, including exosomes secretion. In RKO and HCT116 cells, apatinib significantly reduced exosomes secretion by targeting multivesicular body (MVB) transport. Further studies have indicated that apatinib not only promoted the degradation of MVBs via the regulation of LAMP2 but also interfered with MVB transport by inhibiting Rab11 expression. Moreover, apatinib inhibited MVB membrane fusion by reducing SNAP23 and VAMP2 expression. In vivo, apatinib inhibited orthotopic murine colon cancer growth and metastasis and reduced the serum exosomes amount. This novel regulatory mechanism provides a new perspective for the antitumor effect of apatinib beyond angiogenesis inhibition.

Nonsynonymous C1653T Mutation of Hepatitis B Virus X Gene Enhances Malignancy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Adding anti-angiogenics to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for localized gastric cancer is recognized as a promising strategy, but its clinical value remains to be defined.

METHODS

This single-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial included patients with locally advanced (cT3/4aN+M0) adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) who received three cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin (135 mg/m² on day 1), oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1 to 14), and oral apatinib for 21 days (250 mg once daily in the first two cycles, and further increased to 500 mg daily in the third cycle based on whether any adverse event of grade 3 or worse occurred), and an additional cycle of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine, followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response according to RECIST version 1.1.

RESULTS

Between April 28, 2017, and October 23, 2019, 37 patients were screened and 35 participants were included. Of the 32 patients assessable for efficacy and safety, objective responses were achieved in 25 (78.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 60.0% to 90.7%) patients. Thirty-one (96.9%) patients received R0 resection, two (6.3%) patients achieved pathological complete response, and 11 (34.4%) patients achieved pathological response. At the data cutoff date (September 30, 2021), the median event-free survival was 42.6 (95% CI, 16.2 to not reached) months, and the median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were hypertension (9/32, 28.1%), thrombocytopenia (7/32, 21.9%), and neutropenia (5/32, 15.6%). Seven (21.9%) patients developed surgical complications, and the most common one was intra-abdominal abscess (4/32, 12.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The concomitant use of apatinib, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine as neoadjuvant therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable safety profile in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or GEJ, and further phase 3 study is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov ( NCT03229096 ).

Potential Therapeutic Action of Autophagy in Gastric Cancer Managements: Novel Treatment Strategies and Pharmacological Interventions

Gastric cancer (GC), second most leading cause of cancer-associated mortality globally, is the cancer of gastrointestinal tract in which malignant cells form in lining of the stomach, resulting in indigestion, pain, and stomach discomfort. Autophagy is an intracellular system in which misfolded, aggregated, and damaged proteins, as well as organelles, are degraded by the lysosomal pathway, and avoiding abnormal accumulation of huge quantities of harmful cellular constituents. However, the exact molecular mechanism of autophagy-mediated GC management has not been clearly elucidated. Here, we emphasized the role of autophagy in the modulation and development of GC transformation in addition to underlying the molecular mechanisms of autophagy-mediated regulation of GC. Accumulating evidences have revealed that targeting autophagy by small molecule activators or inhibitors has become one of the greatest auspicious approaches for GC managements. Particularly, it has been verified that phytochemicals play an important role in treatment as well as prevention of GC. However, use of combination therapies of autophagy modulators in order to overcome the drug resistance through GC treatment will provide novel opportunities to develop promising GC therapeutic approaches. In addition, investigations of the pathophysiological mechanism of GC with potential challenges are urgently needed, as well as limitations of the modulation of autophagy-mediated therapeutic strategies. Therefore, in this review, we would like to deliver an existing standard molecular treatment strategy focusing on the relationship between chemotherapeutic drugs and autophagy, which will help to improve the current treatments of GC patients.