Role of Deficient DNA Mismatch Repair Status in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer Treated With FOLFOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pooled Analysis From 2 Randomized Clinical Trials

The effects of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancer with mismatch repair-deficient: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

For high-risk stageIImismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colon cancers, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy remains debatable. The principal aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of high-risk factors and the effect of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy among dMMR stageIIcolon cancers.

METHODS

Patients with stage II dMMR colon cancers diagnosed between June 2011 and May 2018 were enrolled in the study. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, and follow-up data were retrospectively collected. The high-risk group was defined as having one of the following factors: pT4 disease, fewer than twelve lymph nodes harvested (< 12 LNs), poorly differentiated histology, perineural invasion (PNI), lymphatic vascular invasion (LVI), or elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The low-risk group did not have any risk factors above. Factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) were included in univariate and multivariate Cox analyses.

RESULTS

We collected a total of 262 consecutive patients with stage II dMMR colon cancer. 179 patients (68.3%) have at least one high-risk factor. With a median follow-up of 50.1 months, the low-risk group was associated with a tended to have a better 3-year DFS than the high-risk group (96.4% vs 89.4%; P = 0.056). Both elevated preoperative CEA (HR 2.93; 95% CI 1.26-6.82; P = 0.013) and pT4 disease (HR 2.58; 95% CI 1.06-6.25; P = 0.037) were independent risk factors of recurrence. Then, the 3-year DFS was 92.6% for the surgery alone group and 88.1% for the adjuvant chemotherapy group (HR 1.64; 95% CI 0.67-4.02; P = 0.280). Furthermore, no survival benefit from oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was observed in the high-risk group and in the subgroups with pT4 disease or < 12 LNs.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggests that not all high-risk factors have a similar impact on stage II dMMR colon cancers. Elevated preoperative CEA and pT4 tumor stage are associated with increased recurrence risk. However, oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy shows no survival benefits in stage II dMMR colon cancers, either with or without high-risk factors.

CAF-derived exosomal lncRNA FAL1 promotes chemoresistance to oxaliplatin by regulating autophagy in colorectal cancer

Oxaliplatin is a widely applied anti-cancer drug in clinics for colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. Nonetheless, the treatment efficacy is always limited by the acquisition of chemoresistance in cancer cells. The deregulation of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) FAL1 has been implicated in the tumorigenesis and progression of different malignancies. Nevertheless, the possible contribution of lnc-FAL1 in drug resistance development of CRC has not been investigated. Here, we reported the overexpression of lnc-FAL1 in CRC samples, and elevated lnc-FAL1 levels seemed to be associated with the poor survival in CRC patients. We further demonstrated that lnc-FAL1 promoted oxaliplatin chemoresistance in both cell and animal model. Additionally, lnc-FAL1 was mainly derived from exosomes secreted by cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and lnc-FAL1-containing exosomes or lnc-FAL1 overexpression significantly inhibited oxaliplatin-induced autophagy in CRC cells. Mechanistically, lnc-FAL1 acted as a scaffold for the interaction between Beclin1 and TRIM3 to promote TRIM3-dependent Beclin1 polyubiquitination and degradation, thereby suppressing oxaliplatin-induced autophagic cell death. In summary, these data imply a molecular mechanism through which CAF-derived exosomal lnc-FAL1 contributes to the acquisition of oxaliplatin resistance in CRC.

A liquid biopsy signature of circulating extracellular vesicles-derived RNAs predicts response to first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most threatening tumors in the world, and chemotherapy remains dominant in the treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients. The purpose of this study was to develop a biomarker panel to predict the response of the first line chemotherapy in mCRC patients.

METHODS

Totally 190 mCRC patients treated with FOLFOX or XEOLX chemotherapy in 3 different institutions were included. We extracted the plasma extracellular vesicle (EV) RNA, performed RNA sequencing, constructed a model and generated a signature through shrinking the number of variables by the random forest algorithm and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm in the training cohort (n = 80). We validated it in an internal validation cohort (n = 62) and a prospective external validation cohort (n = 48).

RESULTS

We established a signature consisted of 22 EV RNAs which could identify responders, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values was 0.986, 0.821, and 0.816 in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohort respectively. The signature could also identify the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Besides, we constructed a 7-gene signature which could predict tumor response to first-line oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy and simultaneously resistance to second-line irinotecan-containing chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The study was first to develop a signature of EV-derived RNAs to predict the response of the first line chemotherapy in mCRC with high accuracy using a non-invasive approach, indicating that the signature could help to select the optimal regimen for mCRC patients.

Chemokine- and chemokine receptor-based signature predicts immunotherapy response in female colorectal adenocarcinoma patients

The clinical significance and comprehensive characteristics of chemokines and chemokine receptors in female patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma have not ever been reported. Our study explored the expression profiles of chemokines and chemokine receptors and constructed a chemokine- and chemokine receptor-based signature in female patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma. Four independent cohorts containing 1335 patients were enrolled in our study. Univariate Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analyses were performed to construct the signature. CIBERSORT was used to evaluate the landscape of immune cell infiltration. Thirty-two pairs of tissue specimens of female advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and two CRC cell lines were used to validate the signature in vitro. Quantitative real-time PCR and western blotting were performed to validate the mRNA and protein expression levels of signature genes. EdU and colony formation assays were performed to examine proliferative ability. Transwell and wound healing assays were used to evaluate cell invasion and migration capacity. During the signature construction and validation process, we found that the signature was more applicable to female patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma. Hence, the subsequent study mainly focused on the particular subgroup. Enrichment analyses revealed that the signature was closely related to immunity. The landscape of immune cell infiltration presented that the signature was significantly associated with T cells CD8 and neutrophils. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) confirmed that the high-risk group was chiefly enriched in the tumor-promoting related pathways and biological processes, whereas the low-risk group was mainly enriched in anti-tumor immune response pathways and biological processes. The signature was closely correlated with CTLA4, PDL1, PDL2, TMB, MSI, and TIDE, indicating that our signature could serve as a robust biomarker for immunotherapy and chemotherapy response. ROC curves verified that our signature had more robust prognostic power than all immune checkpoints and immunotherapy-related biomarkers. Finally, we used 32 pairs of tissue specimens and 2 CRC cell lines to validate our signature in vitro. We first provided a robust prognostic chemokine- and chemokine receptor-based signature, which could serve as a novel biomarker for immunotherapy and chemotherapy response to guide individualized treatment for female patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma.

[Novel Treatment Concepts in Patients with Colorectal Carcinomas and High Microsatellite Instability]

Approximately 15% of patients with colorectal cancer show high microsatellite instability (MSI-high) in their tumour tissue. For one third of these patients, there is a hereditary cause for this finding - that leads to the diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome. In combination with clinical findings such as the Amsterdam or the revised Bethesda criteria, MSI-high status has been used as a tool in identifying patients at risk. Today, MSI-status has gained much more importance, due to its impact on treatment decisions. Patients with UICC II cancers should not receive adjuvant treatment. For patients with distant metastases and MSI-high status, immune checkpoint inhibitors can be given as first line therapy - with tremendous success. Novel data show a deep response for immune checkpoint antibodies in patients with locally advanced colon as well as rectal cancer in a neoadjuvant setting. Especially for patients with MSI-high rectal cancer, there might be a novel therapeutic regimen utilising immune checkpoint inhibitors without neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and even without surgery. This could lead to a relevant reduction in morbidity in this patient cohort. In conclusion, universal MSI-testing is essential for identifying patients at risk for Lynch syndrome and for optimal decision making in treatment planning.

Single-cell analysis unveils activation of mast cells in colorectal cancer microenvironment

The role of mast cells (MCs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear, and a comprehensive single-cell study on CRC MCs has not been conducted. This study used a multi-omics approach, integrating single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and bulk tissue sequencing data to investigate the heterogeneity and impact of MCs in CRC. Five MC signature genes (TPSAB1, TPSB2, CPA3, HPGDS, and MS4A2) were identified, and their average expression was used as a marker of MCs. The MC density was found to be lower in CRC compared to normal tissue, but MCs in CRC demonstrated distinct activation features. Activated MCs were defined by high expression of receptors and MC mediators, while resting MCs had low expression. Most genes, including the five MC signature genes, were expressed at higher levels in activated MCs. The MC signature was linked to a better prognosis in both CRC and pan-cancer patient cohorts. Elevated KITLG expression was observed in fibroblasts and endothelial cells in CRC samples compared to normal tissue, and co-localization of MCs with these cell types was revealed by spatial transcriptome analysis. In conclusion, this study finds decreased MC density in CRC compared to normal tissue, but highlights a shift in MC phenotype from CMA1high resting cells to activated TPSAB1high, CPA3high, and KIThigh cells. The elevated KITLG expression in the tumor microenvironment's fibroblasts and endothelial cells may activate MCs through the KITLG-KIT axis, potentially suppressing tumor progression.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment for cancer: A paradigm shift in the treatment of resectable gastrointestinal cancer 3)A paradigm shift in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed cell death-1, programmed cell death ligand-1, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibodies, have been notably effective in various types of cancers. Mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability-high tumors have been established as striking biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. These biomarkers show a higher mutational burden, have cancer-associated neoantigens, and dense immune cell infiltration, which generates a robust immune response. For metastatic colorectal cancer, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, with or without ipilimumab, are recommended for chemotherapy-refractory patients, and pembrolizumab is recommended for chemotherapy-naive patients with mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability-high tumors. Conversely, patients with mismatch repair-proficient and microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer showed no clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. Currently, combination therapy with anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibodies or a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with molecular targeting agents or radiotherapy have been investigated to modulate immune cells and enhance therapeutic efficacy in mismatch repair-proficient and microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been developed for neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. In this review, we summarize the existing clinical data and discuss future perspectives with a focus on immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatments for colorectal cancer.

Time to recurrence and its relation to survival after recurrence in patients resected for stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

It is intuitively thought that early relapse is associated with poor survival after recurrence (SAR) in resected colon cancer (CC) patients, but this has never been formally studied.

METHODS

We pooled data from stage III patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy in two phase III trials, to analyse time to recurrence (TTR) and its relationship with SAR. TTR and SAR were also studied according to molecular status (mismatch repair (MMR), RAS, and BRAFV600E). Early relapsing patients were defined as patients having a TTR event within 12 months after starting adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

4548 stage III CC patients were included in the present analysis. Deficient MMR (dMMR) CC patients experienced fewer recurrences than proficient (p)MMR CC patients (18.8% versus 27.6%) but had a significantly shorter median TTR (mTTR; 0.74 versus 1.40 years, p < 0.0001). In pMMR patients, BRAF and RAS mutations were also associated with earlier mTTR as compared to double wild-type (WT) patients (0.99 versus 1.38 versus 1.54 years, respectively, p < 0.0001). Early recurrence occurred in 397 patients and was associated with a median SAR (2.2 versus 3.3 years, p = 0.0007). However, this association was mainly due to pMMR/RAS and BRAFV600E mutated tumours and was not confirmed in dMMR and pMMR/double WT subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In resected stage III CC treated with standard oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy, TTR varies between dMMR, pMMR/RAS, or BRAFV600E mutated and pMMR/double WT tumours. In addition, early relapse is associated with poor survival, mainly due to patients resected for a pMMR/RAS or BRAFV600E mutated tumour.

DNA damage repair molecular subtype derived immune signature applicable for the prognosis and immunotherapy response prediction in colon cancer

Background

The DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway is one of the pathways of tumor pathogenesis, but its relationship with the immunophenotype has not been clarified in colon cancer (CC).

Methods

We identified the differentially expressed immune-related genes (DEIRGs) between two DDR molecular subtypes, namely, C1 and C2, and used univariate Cox analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalized Cox regression analysis to construct the risk score in the training cohort [n=1,009, a combination of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and GSE39582]. Regarding the median risk score as the unified cutoff to classify the patients into high- and low-risk groups. Two independent cohorts (GSE17538, n=232; GSE38832, n=122) were used for external validation of the prognostic value of the risk score. The IMvigor210 cohort (n=348) was used to test the predictive value of the risk score for immunotherapy response. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were performed to discover the underlying mechanism. Immune cell infiltration was quantified by the single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) algorithm.

Results

The high-risk group showed significantly reduced overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) compared to the low-risk group, and the two groups differed significantly in lymphatic invasion, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM stage, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, etc. The enrichment levels of pathways related to colorectal cancer, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), angiogenesis, hypoxia, P53, TGF-β, KRAS signaling, etc., were upregulated in the high-risk group, but DDR-related pathways were defective in the high-risk group. The immunophenotypes of the high-risk group tended to be desert and excluded, and the risk score of patients who responded to immunotherapy was significantly lower than that of patients who did not respond to immunotherapy. The higher the infiltration levels of gamma delta T cells (γδ T cells), immature dendritic cells, and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, the more significant adverse impact on the prognosis of CC patients was exhibited and an obviously positive correlation with the risk score was showed.

Conclusions

An immune gene risk score associated with the DDR molecular subtype was built and verified herein; that is applicable to the prognosis and immunotherapy response prediction in CC.

Radiologic T staging of colon cancer: renewed interest for clinical practice

Radiologic imaging, especially MRI, has long been the mainstay for rectal cancer staging and patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection. In contrast, colonoscopy and CT have been the standard for colon cancer diagnosis and metastasis staging with T and N staging often performed at the time of surgical resection. With recent clinical trials exploring the expansion of the use of neoadjuvant therapy beyond the anorectum to the remainder of the colon, the current and future state of colon cancer treatment is evolving with a renewed interest in evaluating the role radiology may play in the primary T staging of colon cancer. The performance of CT, CT colonography, MRI, and FDG PET-CT for colon cancer staging will be reviewed. N staging will also be briefly discussed. It is expected that accurate radiologic T staging will significantly impact future clinical decisions regarding the neoadjuvant versus surgical management of colon cancer.

A narrative review of prognostic indices in the evaluation of gastrointestinal cancers

Background and Objective

Accurate cancer prognostication allows for conscious decision-making. There is a need for precise indices, along with predictive biomarkers, which aid cancer prognostication. We sought to conduct an overview of the current state of prognostic indices and biomarkers in the evaluation of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, specifically esophageal, colon and rectal.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive review of articles in the PubMed database between September 2001 and February 2022. Only articles written in English were included. We reviewed retrospective analyses and prospective observational studies.

Key Content and Findings

Nomograms are well-described tools that provide estimates of specific cancer-related events, such as overall survival (OS). They are also useful in unroofing specific patient-related variables, which may be associated with cancer survival. Certain prognostic indices have been tested against each other with the goal of discerning superiority. Finally, specific biomarkers have emerged as promising prognostic indicators.

Conclusions

Nomograms play a significant role in the prognostication of GI cancer. The identification of specific biomarkers in cancer prognostication is evolving. As we embark on the era of precision medicine, further investigation of reliable prognostic indices and biomarkers is needed.

Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for colorectal cancer: Current status and future prospects

Immunotherapy, particularly programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors, has made revolutionary progress in the treatment strategies for various types of cancer. Regarding colorectal cancer (CRC), the current clinical application of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is primarily categorized based on mutation patterns, including deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) or non-high microsatellite instability (non-MSI-H). PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have demonstrated good efficacy against dMMR/MSI-H CRC by increasing T-cell infiltration into tumor tissues. However, the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for pMMR/non-MSI-H CRC remains uncertain. Due to the lower prevalence of dMMR/MSI-H in CRC, recent clinical trials have reported combined applications of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with other anti-tumor treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy to achieve better therapeutic outcomes. Neoadjuvant therapy, primarily consisting of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, not only downstages the tumor but also provides benefits from local control, thus improving clinical symptoms and quality of life. Integrating immunotherapy into neoadjuvant therapy may alter the treatment approach for potentially resectable or certain metastatic CRC cases. In this article, we focus on the development of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and discuss its future prospects for the treatment of CRC.

Lynch Syndrome Biopathology and Treatment: The Potential Role of microRNAs in Clinical Practice

Lynch syndrome (LS), also known as Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC), is an autosomal dominant cancer syndrome which causes about 2-3% of cases of colorectal carcinoma. The development of LS is due to the genetic and epigenetic inactivation of genes involved in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system, causing an epiphenomenon known as microsatellite instability (MSI). Despite the fact that the genetics of the vast majority of MSI-positive (MSI+) cancers can be explained, the etiology of this specific subset is still poorly understood. As a possible new mechanism, it has been recently demonstrated that the overexpression of certain microRNAs (miRNAs, miRs), such as miR-155, miR-21, miR-137, can induce MSI or modulate the expression of the genes involved in LS pathogenesis. MiRNAs are small RNA molecules that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by playing a critical role in the modulation of key oncogenic pathways. Increasing evidence of the link between MSI and miRNAs in LS prompted a deeper investigation into the miRNome involved in these diseases. In this regard, in this study, we discuss the emerging role of miRNAs as crucial players in the onset and progression of LS as well as their potential use as disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets in the current view of precision medicine.

Field Synopsis of Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors of Sporadic Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma

BACKGROUND

To systematically appraise and synthesize available epidemiologic evidence on the associations of environmental and genetic factors with the risk of sporadic early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) and early-onset advanced colorectal adenoma (EOCRA).

METHODS

Multiple databases were comprehensively searched to identify eligible observational studies. Genotype data from UK Biobank were incorporated to examine their associations with EOCRC in a nested case-control design. Meta-analyses of environmental risk factors were performed, and the strength of evidence was graded based on predefined criteria. Meta-analyses of genetic associations were conducted using the allelic, recessive, and dominant models, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 61 studies were included, reporting 120 environmental factors and 62 genetic variants. We found 12 risk factors (current overweight, overweight in adolescence, high waist circumference, smoking, alcohol, sugary beverages intake, sedentary behavior, red meat intake, family history of colorectal cancer, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and metabolic syndrome) and three protective factors (vitamin D, folate, and calcium intake) for EOCRC or EOCRA. No significant associations between the examined genetic variants and EOCRC risk were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent data indicate that the changing patterns of traditional colorectal cancer risk factors may explain the rising incidence of EOCRC. However, research on novel risk factors for EOCRC is limited; therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility of EOCRC having different risk factors than late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC).

IMPACT

The potential for the identified risk factors to enhance the identification of at-risk groups for personalized EOCRC screening and prevention and for the prediction of EOCRC risk should be comprehensively addressed by future studies.

MCM5 is an oncogene of colon adenocarcinoma and promotes progression through cell cycle control

Many patients with colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and the molecular mechanism of COAD progression is intricate and controversial. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify more novel prognosis biomarkers for COAD and elucidate the molecular mechanism of this disease. The present study aimed to screen out key genes correlated with COAD prognosis. In this study, a key module was identified and four hub genes (MCM5 (encoding minichromosome maintenance complex component 5), NOLC1 (encoding nucleolar and coiled-body phosphoprotein 1), MYC (encoding MYC proto-oncogene, BHLH transcription factor), and CDK4 (encoding cyclin dependent kinase 4)) were selected that correlated with COAD prognosis, based on the GSE9348 dataset in Gene Expression Omnibus database. Gene ontology enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis indicated that MCM5 correlated with the cell cycle. Furthermore, MCM5 expression was upregulated in tumor tissues of patients with COAD compared with that in adjacent tissues, based on various databases, including The Cancer Genome Atlas, the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium database, and the Human Protein Atlas database. Small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of MCM5 inhibited the cell cycle and migration of colorectal cancer cells in vitro. And western blotting results indicated that factors correlated with cell cycle (CDK2/6, Cyclin D3, P21) were downregulated after knockdown of MCM5 in vitro. Besides, downregulation of MCM5 was demonstrated to inhibit lung metastasis of COAD in nude mice model. In conclusion, MCM5 is an oncogene of COAD that promotes COAD progression via cell cycle control.

Case Report: Chemoimmunotherapy in microsatellite-instability-high advanced goblet cell carcinoma of the colon

Background

Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is a fundamental factor affecting the management treatment outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC). MMR status can be diagnosed by both immunohistochemistry (IHC) polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Since tumors with MMR deficiency are prone to respond to immunotherapy immune checkpoint inhibitors are used to treat such tumors.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old male patient presented to an outside clinic with weight loss and abdominal pain. Radiological investigations detected a mesenteric mass of 10 cm, peritoneal implants, and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The eventual biopsy result from the mesenteric mass was mucinous adenocarcinoma with a goblet cell pattern. Since the IHC result was unclear for deficiency in mismatch repair (dMMR) metastatic CRC (mCRC), the diagnosis was confirmed with PCR. The patient received 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX + bevacizumab followed by FOLFOX combined with pembrolizumab. No adverse effect was reported related to immunotherapy which resulted in radiologic and metabolic regression. The patient underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The final pathology results revealed a pathological complete response and R0 resection. In the 6th month follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis was reported.

Conclusion

Chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination is a promising treatment modality which can also be used for mCRC. This is the index case who received chemotherapy in combination with immunotherapy for mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colon with a goblet cell pattern and had pCR.

Therapeutic landscape and future direction of metastatic colorectal cancer

In the era of targeted therapy based on genomic alterations, the treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been changing. Before systemic treatment initiation, determination of tumour genomic status for KRAS and NRAS, BRAF^V600E mutations, ERBB2, and microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair (MMR) status is recommended. In patients with deficient MMR and BRAF^V600E mCRC, randomized phase III trials have established the efficacy of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy and the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab as second-line or third-line therapy. In addition, new agents have been actively developed in other rare molecular fractions such as ERBB2 alterations and KRAS^G12C mutations. In March 2022, the combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for ERBB2-positive mCRC was approved in Japan, thereby combining real-world evidence from the SCRUM-Japan Registry. As the populations are highly fragmented owing to rare genomic alterations, various strategies in clinical development are expected. Clinical development of a tumour-agnostic approach, such as NTRK fusion and tumour mutational burden, has successfully introduced corresponding drugs to clinical practice. Considering the difficulty of randomized trials owing to cost-benefit and rarity, a promising solution could be real-world evidence utilized as an external control from the molecular-based disease registry.

Tissue microarrey: a potential cost-effective approach for mismatch repair testing in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Deficiencies in Mismatch Repair (MMR) proteins are one of the major pathways in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). MMR status evaluation is recommended in every new CRC patient. However, this is not fully implemented due to high costs. Tissue microarray (TMA) enables allocating tissue cores from few specimens to a single paraffin block. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of TMA MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) compared to whole slide. The secondary objective was to evaluate and validate automatic digital image analysis software in differentiating pathological and normal TMA cores.

METHODS

Pathological cores were defined if at least one MMR protein was unstained. Tumoral and normal tissue of 11 CRC patients with known MMR status was used to obtain 623 TMA cores. The MMR staining of each core was evaluated by a pathologist and compared to the whole slide result. Digital analysis software by 3DHistech Ltd. was used to identify cell nucleus and quantify nuclear staining in 323 tissue cores. To identifying pathological tissue, cores the cohort was divided into a test (N = 146 cores) and validation sets (N = 177 cores). A staining intensity score (SIS) was developed, and its performance compared to the pathologist review of each core and to the whole slide result.

RESULTS

Compared to the whole slide, the pathologist's assessment had 100% sensitivity (n/N = 112/112) and 100% specificity (n/N = 278/278) with 95% lower limit of 97 and 99% respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of SIS was 77%. A cutoff of 55 was obtained from the ROC curve. By implementing the cutoff in the validation dataset, the SIS had sensitivity and specificity of 98.2% [90.1-100%] and 58.5% [49.3-67.4%] respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MMR status of CRC can be evaluated in TMA tissue cores thus potentially reducing MMR testing costs. The SIS can be used as triage indicator during pathologic review.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Institutional ethical approval was granted for the performance of this study (Emek Medical Center Ethics ID: EMC-19-0179).

Development and validation of a new stage-specific nomogram model for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients in different stages of colon cancer: A SEER population-based study and external validation

Background

The effects of laterality of the primary tumor on survival in patients in different stages of colon cancer are contradictory. We still lack a strictly evaluated and validated survival prediction tool, considering the different roles of tumor laterality in different stages.

Methods

A total of 101,277 and 809 colon cancer cases were reviewed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi 'an Jiaotong University database, respectively. We established training sets, internal validation sets and external validation sets. We developed and evaluated stage-specific prediction models and unified prediction models to predict cancer-specific survival and compared the prediction abilities of these models.

Results

Compared with right-sided colon cancers, the risk of cancer-specific death of left-sided colon cancer patients was significantly higher in stage I/II but was markedly lower in stage III patients. We established stage-specific prediction models for stage I/II and stage III separately and established a unified prediction model for all stages. By evaluating and validating the validation sets, we reported high prediction ability and generalizability of the models. Furthermore, the stage-specific prediction models had better predictive power and efficiency than the unified model.

Conclusions

Right-sided colon cancer patients have better cancer-specific survival than left-sided colon cancer patients in stage I/II and worse cancer-specific survival in stage III. Using stage-specific prediction models can further improve the prediction of cancer-specific survival in colon cancer patients and guide clinical decisions.

Comprehensive Review of Biomarkers for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Colon Cancer

Despite the implementation of global screening programs, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. More than 10% of patients with colon cancer are diagnosed as having locally advanced disease with a relatively poor five-year survival rate. Locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) presents surgical challenges to R0 resection. The advantages and disadvantages of preoperative radiotherapy for LACC remain undetermined. Although several reliable novel biomarkers have been proposed for the prediction and prognosis of CRC, few studies have focused solely on the treatment of LACC. This comprehensive review highlights the role of predictive biomarkers for treatment and postoperative oncological outcomes for patients with LACC. Moreover, this review discusses emerging needs and approaches for the discovery of biomarkers that can facilitate the development of new therapeutic targets and surveillance of patients with LACC.

Effects of deficient mismatch repair on the prognosis of patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer during different postoperative periods

Background

We evaluated the prognostic role of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) systems in stage II and stage III colon cancer patients during different postoperative periods. We also assessed whether patients aged ≥75 could benefit from chemotherapy.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted across three medical centers in China. Kaplan–Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce imbalances in the baseline characteristics of the patients. Landmark analysis was performed to evaluate the role of dMMR during different postoperative periods.

Results

The median follow-up time for all patients was 45.0 months (25–75 IQR: 38.0–82.5). There was no significant OS (p = 0.350) or DFS (p = 0.752) benefit associated with dMMR for stage II and III patients during the first postoperative year. However, significant OS (p < 0.001) and DFS (p < 0.001) benefits were observed from the second postoperative year until the end of follow-up. These differences remained after propensity score matching. Moreover, chemotherapy produced no OS (HR = 0.761, 95% CI: 0.43–1.34, p = 0.341) or DFS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.51–1.88, p = 0.961) benefit for patients aged ≥75 years.

Conclusion

The benefits of dMMR in stage III patients were observed from the second postoperative year until the end of follow-up. However, the prognosis of patients with dMMR is not different from that of patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) during the first postoperative year. In addition, elderly patients aged ≥75 years obtained no significant survival benefits from postoperative chemotherapy.

Molecular Pathology of Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common lethal malignant neoplasms worldwide, with limited treatment options for both locally advanced and/or metastatic conditions, resulting in a dismal prognosis. Although the widely used morphological classifications may be helpful for endoscopic or surgical treatment choices, they are still insufficient to guide precise and/or personalized therapy for individual patients. Recent advances in genomic technology and high-throughput analysis may improve the understanding of molecular pathways associated with GC pathogenesis and aid in the classification of GC at the molecular level. Advances in next-generation sequencing have enabled the identification of several genetic alterations through single experiments. Thus, understanding the driver alterations involved in gastric carcinogenesis has become increasingly important because it can aid in the discovery of potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. In this article, we review the molecular classifications of GC, focusing on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification. We further describe the currently available biomarker-targeted therapies and potential biomarker-guided therapies. This review will help clinicians by providing an inclusive understanding of the molecular pathology of GC and may assist in selecting the best treatment approaches for patients with GC.

Current progress and future perspectives of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for colorectal cancer

Immunotherapies, especially the programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors, have revolutionized the therapeutic strategies of various cancers. As for colorectal cancer (CRC), the current clinical application of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are mainly used according to the mutation pattern, which is categorized into deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR), or non-high levels of microsatellite instability (non-MSI-H). PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have been proven to have favorable outcomes against dMMR/MSI-H CRC because of more T-cell infiltration into tumor tissues. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in pMMR/non-MSI-H CRC is still uncertain. Because of the quite-lower proportion of dMMR/MSI-H in CRC, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have been reported to combine with other antitumor treatments including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy for better therapeutic effect in recent clinical trials. Neoadjuvant therapy, mainly including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, not only can reduce clinical stage but also benefit from local control, which can improve clinical symptoms and the quality of life. Adding immunotherapy into neoadjuvant therapy may change the treatment strategy of primary resectable or some metastatic CRC. In this review, we focus on the development of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and discuss the future perspectives in CRC.

Stage-dependent prognostic shift in mismatch repair-deficient tumors: Assessing patient outcomes in stage II and III colon cancer

Introduction

Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is associated with an improved prognosis in colon cancer stage II but poor prognosis in stage IV colon cancer. The clinical significance of dMMR in colon cancer stage III is not established.

Methods

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) from 544 patients with colon cancer stage II and III with clinicopathological and survival data were stained for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, CD3, CD8, and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and programmed death ligand- 1 (PD-L1). Patient outcomes were reviewed.

Results

In stage III colon cancer, dMMR was a marker of poor disease-free survival (DFS) (Kaplan–Meier, mean survival in months: dMMR: 28.76 (95% CI 18.46–39.05) vs. pMMR 40.91 (37.20–44.63), p=0.014, multivariate Cox regression: hazard ratio (HR) 4.17 (95% CI 2.02–8.61), p<0.001). In stage II colon cancer, there was a tendency toward improved DFS for dMMR patients (dMMR: 57.14 (95% CI 54.66–59.62) vs. pMMR 53.54 (95% CI 51.48–55.60), p=0.015, multivariate Cox regression HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.06-1.04), p=0.057). CD3, CD8, and PD-L1 expression was not associated with prognosis of dMMR patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a significant interaction between the MMR phenotype and stage (p=0.001).

Conclusion

dMMR is associated with an improved prognosis in stage II colon cancer but is no longer associated with a favorable prognosis in stage III colon cancer.

Mismatch repair system in colorectal cancer. Frequency, cancer phenotype, and follow-up

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

A frequent task in the study of colorectal carcinomas (CRC) is to identify tumors harboring deficient DNA mismatch repair systems (dMMR), which are associated with microsatellite instability. Given that there is scant information on those tumors in Mexican patients, our aim was to describe their frequency, clinical and pathologic characteristics, and results, which are necessary for future trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of CRC patients, treated and followed at a tertiary care center was performed. The clinical and pathologic variables and the risk of hereditary or familial cancer syndrome were retrieved. The original slides and hMLH1, hPMS2, hMSH2, hMSH6 immunohistochemistry were evaluated. Tumors with an absence of at least one protein were considered dMMR. Differences were contrasted, utilizing non-parametric tests.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-four patients were included, with a median age of 65 years. A total of 134/93% patients presented with sporadic CRC, 8/5.6% had a family history of CRC, and 2/1.4% met the diagnostic criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer, according to the Amsterdam and Bethesda criteria. dMMR tumors were found in 39 patients, distributed among the three groups. They were locally advanced (p<0.001), right-sided, had the mucinous phenotype, and harbored a Crohn's-like lymphoid reaction (all three features, p<0.04). Adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy was administered to 57 (39.6%), concomitant chemoradiotherapy to 24 (16.7%), but 63 (43.8%) patients received no additional treatment to surgery. Five-year follow-up was completed in 131 of the patients and the outcomes alive-with-disease or died-of-disease were more frequently observed in the proficient (pMMR) lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present pre-FOLFOX case series, outcomes were better in dMMR CRC than in proficient lesions.

Clinicopathologic significance of DNA mismatch repair protein status in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The prognostic implications of DNA mismatch repair protein (MMRP) have not been determined in endometrial cancer. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of DNA MMRP deficiency in endometrial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the MMRP status of 206 patients with endometrial carcinomas, using immunohistochemistry, and analyzed their clinicopathologic factors and survival outcomes stratified by MMRP status using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-three cases were deficient for at least one MMRP (20.9%). Loss of MLH1 was the most common (13.1%), followed by MSH6 (7.8%). MMRP deficiency was significantly associated with lympho-vascular space invasion, deep myometrial invasion, and adjuvant treatment (P = 0.032, 0.041, and 0.047, respectively). MMRP-deficient patients had a better overall survival (OS), particularly at advanced cancer stages (III/IV) (100% vs. 73.7%, P = 0.170) or if they had received adjuvant treatment (100% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.087).

CONCLUSION

Although MMRP deficiency was associated with unfavorable prognostic risk factors in endometrial cancer, we found a trend in favor of OS in MMRP-deficient patients. More studies are needed to confirm its prognostic implication.

Microsatellite instability and chemosensitivity in solid tumours

The use of biomarkers that influence a targeted choice in cancer treatments is the future of medical oncology. Within this scenario, in recent years, an important role has been played by knowledge of microsatellite instability (MSI), a molecular fingerprint that identifies defects in the mismatch repair system. This knowledge has changed clinical practice in the adjuvant setting of colon cancer, and its role in the neoadjuvant setting in gastric tumours is becoming increasingly interesting, as well as in endometrial cancers in both early and advanced diseases. Furthermore, it has undoubtedly conditioned the first lines of treatment in the metastatic setting in different types of cancers. The incidence of MSI is different in different cancer types, as well as in early cancers versus metastatic disease. Knowing the incidence of MSI in the various histologies can provide insight into the potential use of this biomarker considering its prognostic value, especially in the early stages, and its predictive role with respect to treatment response. In particular, MSI can guide the choice of chemotherapy treatments in the adjuvant setting of colon and perioperative setting in gastric tumours, which could lead to immunotherapy treatments in these patients in both the early stages of the disease and the metastatic setting where the response to immunotherapy drugs in diseases with MSI is now well established. In this review, we focus on colon, gastric and endometrial cancers, and we briefly discuss other cancer types where MSI could have a potential role in oncological treatment decisions.

Latest evidence on immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer: A 2022 update

The long-term remissions induced by immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in many types of cancers have opened up the possibility of a broader use of immunotherapy in less immunogenic but genetically heterogeneous tumours. Regarding metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), in first-line setting, pembrolizumab has been approved as preferred option and nivolumab, alone or in combination with ipilimumab as alternative option for patients with mismatch-repair-deficient and microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) disease, independently of their eligibility for intensive chemotherapy. In subsequent lines, both these immunotherapeutic regimens (e.g., pembrolizumab and nivolumab+/-ipilimumab) as well as dostarlimab-gxly are currently recommended for patients with dMMR/MSI-H chemo-resistant mCRC who have not previously received an ICI. Beginning from the rationale behind the immune-mediated interplay in the dMMR/MSI-H bowel microenvironment, we provide here an update on the evolution status of all available, approved or not, ICIs in mCRC, describing their efficacy and toxicity profile with an emphasis on the pivotal trials supporting current colorectal indications. For each ICI agent, the results from combinations under investigation, particularly for those being upgraded in clinical phasing, the perspectives but also the limitations of main ongoing trials are thoroughly discussed. In the close future, upcoming data are expected to confirm the clinical benefit of ICIs and to further expand their role in mCRC.

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Colorectal Cancer: The Fundamental Indication and Application on Immunotherapy

The clinical success of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer patients, bringing renewed attention to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) of various cancer types. Immune checkpoint blockade is effective in patients with mismatched repair defects and high microsatellite instability (dMMR-MSI-H) in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), leading the FDA to accelerate the approval of two programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blocking antibodies, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, for treatment of dMMR-MSI-H cancers. In contrast, patients with proficient mismatch repair and low levels of microsatellite stability or microsatellite instability (pMMR-MSI-L/MSS) typically have low tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and have shown unsatisfied responses to the immune checkpoint inhibitor. Different TILs environments reflect different responses to immunotherapy, highlighting the complexity of the underlying tumor-immune interaction. Profiling of TILs fundamental Indication would shed light on the mechanisms of cancer-immune evasion, thus providing opportunities for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize phenotypic diversities of TILs and their connections with prognosis in CRC and provide insights into the subsets-specific nature of TILs with different MSI status. We also discuss current clinical immunotherapy approaches based on TILs as well as promising directions for future expansion, and highlight existing clinical data supporting its use.

Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: current achievements and future perspective

Following dramatic success in many types of advanced solid tumors, interest in immunotherapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly growing. Given the compelling long-term durable remission, two programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-blocking antibodies, pembrolizumab and nivolumab (with or without Ipilimumab), have been approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that is mismatch-repair-deficient and microsatellite instability-high (dMMR-MSI-H). Practice-changing results of several randomized controlled trials to move immunotherapy into the first-line treatment for MSI-H metastasis cancer and earlier stage were reported successively in the past 2 years. Besides, new intriguing advances to expand the efficacy of immunotherapy to mCRC that is mismatch-repair-proficient and low microsatellite instability (pMMR-MSI-L) demonstrated the potential benefits for the vast majority of mCRC cases. Great attention is also paid to the advances in cancer vaccines and adoptive cell therapy (ACT). In this review, we summarize the above progresses, and also highlight the current predictive biomarkers of responsiveness in immunotherapy with broad clinical utility.

Defects in MMR Genes as a Seminal Example of Personalized Medicine: From Diagnosis to Therapy

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is the landmark feature of DNA mismatch repair deficiency, which can be found in 15-20% of all colorectal cancers (CRC). This specific set of tumors has been initially perceived as a niche for geneticists or gastroenterologists focused on inherited predispositions. However, over the years, MSI has established itself as a key biomarker for the diagnosis, then extending to forecasting the disease behavior and prognostication, including the prediction of responsiveness to immunotherapy and eventually to kinase inhibitors, and possibly even to specific biological drugs. Thanks to the contribution of the characterization of MSI tumors, researchers have first acknowledged that a strong lymphocytic reaction is associated with a good prognosis. This understanding supported the prognostic implications in terms of the low metastatic potential of MSI-CRC and has led to modifications in the indications for adjuvant treatment. Furthermore, with the emergence of immunotherapy, this strong biomarker of responsiveness has exemplified the capability of re-activating an effective immune control by removing the brakes of immune evasion. Lately, a subset of MSI-CRC emerged as the ideal target for kinase inhibitors. This therapeutic scenario implies a paradox in which appropriate treatments for advanced disease are effective in a set of tumors that seldom evolve towards metastases.

Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: current achievements and future perspective

Following dramatic success in many types of advanced solid tumors, interest in immunotherapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly growing. Given the compelling long-term durable remission, two programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-blocking antibodies, pembrolizumab and nivolumab (with or without Ipilimumab), have been approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that is mismatch-repair-deficient and microsatellite instability-high (dMMR-MSI-H). Practice-changing results of several randomized controlled trials to move immunotherapy into the first-line treatment for MSI-H metastasis cancer and earlier stage were reported successively in the past 2 years. Besides, new intriguing advances to expand the efficacy of immunotherapy to mCRC that is mismatch-repair-proficient and low microsatellite instability (pMMR-MSI-L) demonstrated the potential benefits for the vast majority of mCRC cases. Great attention is also paid to the advances in cancer vaccines and adoptive cell therapy (ACT). In this review, we summarize the above progresses, and also highlight the current predictive biomarkers of responsiveness in immunotherapy with broad clinical utility.

Interaction between Microsatellite Instability (MSI) and Tumor DNA Methylation in the Pathogenesis of Colorectal Carcinoma

Simple Summary

In colorectal cancer (CRC), mutations may occur in short, repeated DNA sequences, known as microsatellite instability (MSI). Tumor DNA methylation is another molecular change now recognized as an important biomarker in CRC. In a genome-wide scale, for the first time, we explored whether DNA methylation is associated with MSI status in CRC. We analyzed 250 paired samples (tumor and corresponding normal) from 125 CRC patients (m = 72, f = 53) at different stages. We found that many genes were methylated in tumor tissue compared to normal tissue. However, almost four times more genes showed such methylation changes in the tumor if the patient who also had MSI compared to patients without MSI. Our study shows an association of MSI and DNA methylation in CRC. The study also indicates an opportunity for potential use of certain immune checkpoint inhibitors (CTLA4 and HAVCR2 inhibitors) in CRC with MSI.

Abstract

In colorectal cancer (CRC), the role of microsatellite instability (MSI) is well known. In a genome-wide scale, for the first time, we explored whether differential methylation is associated with MSI. We analyzed 250 paired samples from 125 CRC patients (m = 72, f = 53) at different stages. Of them, 101 had left-sided CRC, 30 had MSI, 34 had somatic mutation in KRAS proto-oncogene (KRAS), and 6 had B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) exon 15p.V600E mutation. MSI was more frequent in right-sided tumors (54% vs. 17%, p = 0.003). Among the microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC, a paired comparison revealed 1641 differentially methylated loci (DML) covering 686 genes at FDR 0.001 with delta beta ≥ 20%. Similar analysis in MSI revealed 6209 DML covering 2316 genes. ANOVA model including interaction (Tumor*MSI) revealed 23,322 loci, where the delta beta was different among MSI and MSS patients. Our study shows an association between MSI and tumor DNA methylation in the pathogenesis of CRC. Given the interaction seen in this study, it may be worth considering the MSI status while looking for methylation markers in CRC. The study also indicates an opportunity for potential use of certain immune checkpoint inhibitors (CTLA4 and HAVCR2 inhibitors) in CRC with MSI.

The tumor microenvironment and immune responses in prostate cancer patients

The landscape of cancer treatment has been transformed over the past decade by the success of immune-targeting therapies. However, despite sipuleucel-T being the first-ever approved vaccine for cancer and the first immunotherapy licensed for prostate cancer in 2010, immunotherapy has since seen limited success in the treatment of prostate cancer. The tumour microenvironment of prostate cancer presents particular barriers for immunotherapy. Moreover, prostate cancer is distinguished by being one of only two solid tumours where increased T cell-infiltration correlates with a poorer, rather than improved, outlook. Here, we discuss the specific aspects of the prostate cancer microenvironment that converge to create a challenging microenvironment, including myeloid-derived immune cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts. By exploring the immune microenvironment of defined molecular subgroups of prostate cancer, we propose an immunogenomic subtyping approach to single-agent and combination immune-targeting strategies that could lead to improved outcomes in prostate cancer treatment.

Serum Tumor Markers Combined With Clinicopathological Characteristics for Predicting MMR and KRAS Status in 2279 Chinese Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

Although serum tumor markers (STMs), clinicopathological characteristics and the status of KRAS and MMR play an important role in optimizing the treatment and prognosis of colorectal cancer, their interrelationships remain largely unknown. A retrospective analysis of 2279 patients who tested for KRAS and MMR status, and STM measurements prior to treatment over the past four years was conducted. Of the 784 patients tested for KRAS and 2279 patients tested for MMR status, KRAS mutations and dMMR were identified in 276 patients (35.20%) and 177 patients (7.77%), respectively. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that right colon, well and moderate differentiation and negative CA19-9 were independent predictors for KRAS mutations. The ROC curve yielded an AUC of 0.609 through the combination of these three factors. Age < 65 was an independent predictive factor for dMMR, along with tumor size > 4.6 cm, right colon, poor differentiation, harvested lymph nodes ≥ 22, no lymph node metastasis, no perineural invasion, negative CEA and positive CA72-4. When the nine criteria were used together, the AUC was 0.849. In summary, both STMs and clinicopathological characteristics were found to be significantly associated with the status of KRAS and MMR. The combination of these two factors possessed a strong predictive power for KRAS mutations and dMMR among CRC patients.

SLF1 polymorphism predicts response to oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer

Response to oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy varies among patients with stage II and III colon cancer; however, genetic alterations associated with this response remain incompletely characterized. A three-stage analytical framework, including the discovery, validation, and replication stages, was designed to explore genetic alterations modulating response to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in adjuvant setting among patients with stage II and III colon cancer receiving complete resection of tumor. Except for several somatic mutated genes, such as ARSD and ACE, showing less definitive associations with response to oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, we found stable associations of rs6891545C > A polymorphism in SLF1 gene, a key component of DNA damage response system, with the response across all three stages. Patients with rs6891545 A allele had significantly lower risk of poor responsiveness to oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy at both discovery and validation stages, compared with ones possessing wild homozygous genotype CC (discovery stage: odds ratio, 0; 95% CI, 0-0.48; P = .005; validation stage: odds ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.11-0.99; P = .048). In the replication cohort, rs6891545 A allele was confirmed to be strongly associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.81; P = .007). Notably, the improvement persisted after controlling for sex, age, tumor location, differentiation, and stage (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.80; P = .009). Moreover, in silico analysis unraveled strong impact of rs6891545 A allele on local secondary structure of SLF1 mRNA, possibly leading to low SLF1 protein expression. We conclude that the rs6891545C > A polymorphism may serve as an independent marker of response to oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II and III colon cancer, with improved clinical benefit observed in patients with the A allele possibly attributable to low expression of SLF1 protein resulting in deficient DNA repair capacity.

Controlling for cellular heterogeneity using single-cell deconvolution of gene expression reveals novel markers of colorectal tumors exhibiting microsatellite instability

Approximately 15% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases present with high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Bulk RNA-sequencing approaches have been employed to elucidate transcriptional differences between MSI-H and microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC tumors. These approaches are frequently confounded by the complex cellular heterogeneity of tumors. We performed single-cell deconvolution of bulk RNA-sequencing on The Cancer Genome Atlas colon adenocarcinoma (TCGA-COAD) dataset. Cell composition within each dataset was estimated using CIBERSORTx. Cell composition differences were analyzed using linear regression. Significant differences in abundance were observed for 13 of 19 cell types between MSI-H and MSS/MSI-L tumors in TCGA-COAD. This included a novel finding of increased enteroendocrine (q = 3.71E-06) and reduced colonocyte populations (q = 2.21E-03) in MSI-H versus MSS/MSI-L tumors. We were able to validate some of these differences in an independent biopsy dataset. By incorporating cell composition into our regression model, we identified 3,193 differentially expressed genes (q = 0.05), of which 556 were deemed novel. We subsequently validated many of these genes in an independent dataset of colon cancer cell lines. In summary, we show that some of the challenges associated with cellular heterogeneity can be overcome using single-cell deconvolution, and through our analysis we highlight several novel gene targets for further investigation.

Avelumab versus standard second line treatment chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability: The SAMCO-PRODIGE 54 randomised phase II trial

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have failed in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients except those with dMMR/MSI tumors. However, until very recently we had only non-comparative promising data in this population with anti-programmed cell death 1/ programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD1/PD-L1) antibodies alone or combined with anti- cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) antibodies. This comparative phase II trial (NCT03186326), conducted in more than 100 centers in France, will include dMMR/MSI mCRC patients with progression after a first-line treatment with chemotherapy ± targeted therapies, to evaluate efficacy and safety of the anti-PDL1 Avelumab versus a standard second-line treatment. Main inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 to 75 years, ECOG performance status ≤2, dMMR/MSI mCRC and failure of a standard first-line regimen. Patient will be randomised to receive Avelumab 10 mg/kg versus standard second-line doublet chemotherapy plus a targeted agent according to tumor RAS status. Patients will be followed for 4 years. A gain of 5 months in median PFS is expected in favour of the Avelumab arm (12 vs 7 months; HR=0.58). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity. In addition, circulating tumour DNA and microbiota will be explored to test their potential prognostic and predictive values. The study was opened in March 2018.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with unresectable radically locally advanced colon cancer: a potential improvement to overall survival and decrease to multivisceral resection

Background

The management of unresectable locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) remains controversial, as resection is not feasible. The goal of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with unresectable radically LACC.

Methods

We included patients who were diagnosed at our institution, 2010–2018. The neoadjuvant regimen consisted of radiotherapy and capecitabine/ 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

Results

One hundred patients were identified. The median follow-up time was 32 months. The R0 resection rate, adjusted nonmultivisceral resection rate and bladder preservation rate were 83.0, 43.0 and 83.3%, respectively. The pCR and clinical-downstaging rates were 18, and 81.0%%, respectively. The 3-year PFS and OS rates for all patients were 68.6 and 82.1%, respectively. Seventeen patients developed grade 3–4 myelosuppression, which was the most common adverse event observed after NACRT. Tumor perforation occurred in 3 patients during NACRT. The incidence of grade 3–4 surgery-related complications was 7.0%. Postoperative anastomotic leakage was observed in 3 patients.

Conclusions

NACRT followed by surgery was feasible and safe for selected patients with LACC, and can be used as a conversion treatment to achieve satisfactory downstaging, long-term survival and quality of life, with acceptable toxicities.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07894-6.

The impact of molecular profile on the lymphatic spread pattern in stage III colon cancer

The anatomical spread of lymph node (LN) metastasis is of practical importance in the surgical management of colon cancer (CC). We examined the effect of KRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability (MSI) on LN count and anatomical spread pattern in stage III CC. We determined KRAS, BRAF, and MSI status from stage III CC patients. Biomarker status was correlated with LN count and anatomical spread pattern, which was classified as sequential or skipped. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and correlations were assessed using log-rank and Cox regression analyses. We analyzed 369 stage III CC patients. The proportion of KRAS mutant (mt), BRAF mt, and MSI-high (H) were 44.2% (163/344), 6.8% (25/344), and 6.8% (25/344), respectively. The mean number of metastatic LN was higher in microsatellite-stable (MSS) compared with MSI patients (3.5 vs. 2.7, P = .0406), although no differences were observed in accordance with KRAS or BRAF status. Interestingly, patients with BRAF mt and MSI-H were less likely to harbor skipped metastatic LN (9.3% vs 20% and 4% vs 10.5% compared with BRAF wild-type (wt) and MSS, respectively), but KRAS status did not predict anatomical spread pattern. Patients with KRAS wt and MSI-H showed superior RFS compared with KRAS mt and MSS patients, respectively, whereas BRAF status did not affect RFS. Differences exist in the anatomical pattern of invaded LN in accordance with the molecular status of stage III CC. Patients with MSI-H CC have less invaded and skipped LN, suggesting that a tailored surgical approach is possible.

Integrated Analysis of Expression and Prognostic Values of Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase short-chain in Colorectal Cancer

Background: Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase short-chain (ACADS) is a crucial enzyme in the fatty acid metabolism pathway located in mitochondria. However, the expression level and prognostic value of ACADS in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unclear. Methods: The mRNA and protein expression data of ACADS was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC), and Oncomine. Prognostic values of ACADS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Correlations between ACADS and immune infiltration were estimated using TIMER, CIBERSORT, EPIC, quanTIseq, and xCell. The UALCAN and MEXPRESS databases were utilized for Methylation analysis. The co-expression analysis based on mRNA expression and interaction network of ACADS were performed via several online tools. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis on ACADS co-expressed genes were performed using the Metascape. Results: The expression analysis demonstrated that ACADS was down-regulated in CRC tissues compared with paired normal tissue. Expression of ACADS was found to be significantly associated with clinical cancer stages and the consensus molecular subgroups (CMS) constituent ratio in CRC patients. Besides, lower ACADS expression was found to predict poor prognosis and be significantly associated with common immune checkpoint genes and MMR genes in CRC. ACADS expression levels were positively related to B cells, CD4⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells, M1 macrophages, neutrophils, and Tregs, while negatively correlated with M0 macrophages, M2 macrophages. The methylation level of ACADS in normal tissues was significantly higher than that in tumor tissues, and several methylation sites were identified. The enrichment analysis suggested the co-expressed genes mainly enriched in cell mitochondrial metabolism. Conclusions: The present study provided multilevel evidences for expression of ACADS in CRC and the function of ACADS in prognostic prediction, immune infiltration, and methylation. ACADS might have the potential as the novel biomarker and therapeutic target in CRC patients.

Microsatellite Instability in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer Receiving Fluoropyrimidine With or Without Oxaliplatin: An ACCENT Pooled Analysis of 12 Adjuvant Trials

PURPOSE

In patients with stage III colon cancer (CC) whose tumors demonstrate microsatellite instability (MSI), the efficacy of adjuvant fluoropyrimidine (FP) with or without oxaliplatin has not been clearly demonstrated and the prognostic value of MSI remains uncertain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Individual patient data from the ACCENT database were used to evaluate the effect of FP with or without oxaliplatin on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with MSI stage III CC and the prognostic value of MSI in patients treated with FP plus oxaliplatin, by stratified Cox models adjusted for demographic and clinicopathological factors.

RESULTS

MSI status was available for 5,457 patients (609 MSI, 11.2%; 4848 microsatellite stable [MSS], 88.8%) from 12 randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Oxaliplatin significantly improved OS of MSI patients from the two RCTs testing FP with or without oxaliplatin (n = 185; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.93). Among the 4,250 patients treated with FP plus oxaliplatin (461 MSI and 3789 MSS), MSI was associated with better OS in the N1 group compared with MSS (aHR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.95) but similar survival in the N2 population (aHR = 1.13; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.48; P interaction = .029). The main independent prognosticators of MSI patients treated with FP plus oxaliplatin were T stage (aHR = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.38) and N stage (aHR = 3.57; 95% CI, 2.32 to 5.48). Similar results were observed for DFS in all analyses.

CONCLUSION

Adding oxaliplatin to FP improves OS and DFS in patients with MSI stage III CC. Compared with MSS, MSI patients experienced better outcomes in the N1 group but similar survival in the N2 group.

Novel Genetic and Epigenetic Biomarkers of Prognostic and Predictive Significance in Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer

The therapeutic strategies of stage II/III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after curative surgery remain controversial. In the clinical decision-making process, oncologists need to answer questions such as whether adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary or which therapeutic regimen should be given to each patient. At present, whether adjuvant chemotherapy should be applied is primarily based on histopathological features and clinical risk factors. However, only a fraction of patients can benefit from it. More rigorous stratifying biomarkers are urgently needed to help further distinguishing these populations of patients. Recent progress in next-generation sequencing and high-throughput technologies has greatly promoted biomarker discovery as well as our understanding of the underlying mechanisms in CRC. Novel genetic and epigenetic biomarkers that are associated with prognosis or therapeutic responses have emerged. In this review, we discuss the strategies of biomarker discovery and summarize the status and assess the utility of previously published biomarkers in CRC.

Duration of FOLFOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer With Deficient Mismatch Repair

Background

We evaluated the impact of 3 months of mFOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone in comparison with 6 months of mFOLFOX6 on disease-free survival (DFS) in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colon cancer (CC) patients.

Methods

This retrospective study identified a cohort of patients with high-risk stage II and III dMMR CC who underwent curative surgery between May 2011 and July 2019. DFS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Propensity-score matching was performed to reduce imbalance in baseline characteristics.

Results

A total of 242 dMMR CC patients were identified; 66 patients received 6 months of mFOLFOX6, 87 patients received 3 months of mFOLFOX6, and 89 patients were treated with surgery alone. The 3-year DFS rate was 72.8% in 3-month therapy group and 86.1% in 6-month therapy group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.78 (95CI%, 1.18 to 6.47; P= 0.019). The difference in DFS between surgery alone group and 6-month therapy group was also observed but was nonsignificant (HR= 2.30, 95%CI, 0.99 to 5.38; P=0.054). The benefit of 6-month therapy in DFS compared with 3-month therapy group was pronounced for patients with stage III (HR=2.81, 95%CI, 1.03 to 7.67; P=0.044) but not for high-risk stage II patients. Propensity score matched analysis confirmed a DFS benefit in the 6-month therapy group.

Conclusion

This study suggested that a 6-month duration of mFOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy in dMMR CC patients may be associated with improved DFS compared with 3-month therapy, particularly in patients with stage III. The observational nature of the study implies caution should be taken in the interpretation of these results.

PNN and KCNQ1OT1 Can Predict the Efficacy of Adjuvant Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients

The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the early stages of colorectal cancer (CRC) is still disappointing and the prediction of treatment outcome quite difficult. Recently, through a transcriptomic approach, we evidenced a role of PNN and KCNQ1OT1 gene expression in predicting response to fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III CRC patients. Thus, the aim of this study was to validate in an independent cohort of stages II–III CRC patients our previous findings. PNN and KCNQ1OT1 mRNA expression levels were evaluated in 74 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor and matched normal mucosa samples obtained by stages II–III CRC patients treated with fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. PININ, the protein encoded by PNN, was immunohistochemically evaluated in 15 tumor and corresponding normal mucosa samples, selected on the basis of a low, medium, or high mRNA expression tumor/mucosa ratio. PNN and KCNQ1OT1 mRNA mean expression levels were significantly higher in tumor compared with normal tissues. Patients with high PNN or KCNQ1OT1 tumor mRNA levels according to ROC-based cutoffs showed a shorter disease-free survival (DFS) compared with patients with low tumor mRNA gene expression. Also, patients with tumor mRNA expression values of both genes below the identified cutoffs had a significantly longer DFS compared with patients with the expression of one or both genes above the cutoffs. In a representative large cohort of stages II–III CRC untreated patients retrieved from GEO datasets, no difference in DFS was observed between patients with high and low PNN or KCNQ1OT1 gene expression levels. These data confirm our previous findings and underscore the relevance of PNN and KCNQ1OT1 expression in predicting DFS in early stages of CRC treated with fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. If further validated in a prospective case series, both biomarkers could be used to identify patients who benefit from this treatment and to offer alternative chemotherapy regimens to potential unresponsive patients. In relation to the suggested biological role of PNN and KCNQ1OT1 in CRC, they might also be exploited as potential therapeutic targets.

Immune scores in colorectal cancer: Where are we?

There is growing evidence that the immune system may prevent the occurrence, growth and metastatic diffusion of colorectal cancer (CRC). The role played by the adaptive immune response at the tumour site is critical in the balance between tumour invasion and defence against cancer. Recent data have shown that the evaluation of this immune response may help to define the prognosis and possibly the treatment of localised CRC as well as metastatic CRC. Tumour infiltrates with T cells (CD3+), cytotoxic T cells (CD8+) and memory T cells (CD45RO+) are the immune parameters most consistently and strongly associated with good clinical outcome in CRC. Several scoring systems have been developed, including the Immunoscore®, based on the immunohistochemical determination with a digital image analysis system of the density of CD3+ and CD8+ lymphocytes in the centre and the invasive margin of the tumour. This review will focus on the different immunoscoring systems developed in CRC, their performance, their limitations and their potential for improving patients' care in the future.

Diversity of dose-individualization and therapeutic drug monitoring practices of platinum compounds: a review

Introduction: Platinum-derived drugs are commonly used for the treatment of solid tumors. The differences in chemical structures of these molecules lead to different pharmacological properties, in terms of indication, efficacy, and toxicity. Their pharmacokinetics (PK) differ according to their respective renal elimination and have led to many studies investigating their dose optimization. Area covered: This review attempts to summarize and compare PK and pharmacodynamics of cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin, with an emphasis on differences of dose calculations and opportunities for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in various patient populations. Expert opinion: Although cisplatin and carboplatin can be considered as analogs since they share the same DNA interacting properties, the slower hydrolysis of the latter results in a better safety profile. Carboplatin is the only drug in oncology to be administrated according to a target area under the curve of concentration versus time, considering that its PK variability is almost fully explained by renal function, not by body size. This enables individual dosing based on predicted carboplatin clearance (along with patients renal characteristics) or on actual clearance with TDM, especially in a high-dose protocol.

Survival outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy in deficient mismatch repair stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status remains controversial in patients with stage III colon cancer who are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival outcome of AC in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instable (MSI) stage III CC.

METHODS

Patients with pathological stage III CC between 2010 and 2013 were identified from the National Cancer Database using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (3rd Edition) morphology and topography codes 8140, 8480, and C18.0-18.8. Patients with pathologic stage T3N2, T4N1, or T4N were considered high risk; patients with stage T3N1 were considered low risk. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted, and Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the association between AC and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 9226 patients with pathological stage III CC were identified, of which 2384 (25.8%) were MSI-high (MSI-H) and met the inclusion criteria of the final analysis. MSI-low (MSI-L) patients (n = 6842) were excluded. There was a preponderance of women (55.0% [n = 1311]), and 76.6% (n = 1825) of patients were non-Hispanic white. The median age was 65 years (range, 19-90 years). The primary sites were the cecum (29.7% [n = 707]), ascending colon (26.0% [n = 620]), sigmoid colon (17.2% [n = 410]), and transverse colon (10.8% [n = 257]). The most common tumor grade was moderately differentiated (n = 50.4% [1202]), followed by poorly differentiated (34.1% [n = 813]) and well differentiated (5.1% [n = 121]). High-risk pathologic stage III CC (T4N1, TxN2) constituted 51.0% (n = 1215) of the study population. High-risk stage III was associated with worse OS compared with low-risk stage III on univariate (P < .001) analysis and displayed a similar trend on multivariable analysis, without a statistically significant difference. Multiagent AC was associated with improved OS compared with no treatment on univariate (P < .001) and multivariable (P < .001) analysis. When stratified by risk status, multiagent AC was associated with improved OS compared with no treatment for high-risk (P < .001) and low-risk (P < .001) stage III disease.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better OS in stage III dMMR/MSI-H CC. An enhanced benefit was shown for high-risk stage III disease.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology Clinical Guidelines: Molecular Testing for Colorectal Cancer Treatment, 4th edition

Molecular testing to select the appropriate targeted and standard of care therapies is essential for managing patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The Japanese Society of Medical Oncology previously published clinical guidelines for molecular testing in CRC. In the third edition published in 2018, RAS and BRAF V600E mutations should be tested prior to first‐line chemotherapy to assess the benefit of anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy in patients with unresectable CRC. Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was recommended in patients with curatively resected stage II CRC because deficient mismatch repair is associated with low risk of recurrence. MSI testing was also recommended in patients with CRC suspected to be Lynch syndrome. The main aim of this fourth edition is to reflect recent advances in comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests and liquid biopsy. Here, CGP tests performed on tumor tissues are strongly recommended to assess the benefit of molecular targeted drugs in patients with CRC. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)‐based CGP tests are also proposed. ctDNA testing is recommended to determine the optimal treatment based on the risk of recurrence for curatively resected CRC and evaluate the suitability and monitor the therapeutic effects of anti–EGFR antibodies in patients with unresectable CRC. While both MSI testing and immunohistochemistry are strongly recommended to determine the indication of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with unresectable CRC, next‐generation sequencing‐based tests are weakly recommended because these tests have not been validated in clinical trials.

Prophylactic chemotherapeutic hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion reduces peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer: a retrospective clinical study

Background

Peritoneal metastasis is the most frequent failure in gastric cancer. This study evaluated the role of prophylactic chemotherapeutic hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion (CHIP) in patients after D2 dissection.

Methods

Gastric cancer patients after D2 dissection were enrolled in this study. Patients received either chemotherapy (IV group) or CHIP (CHIP group). Sites of recurrence or metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were evaluated.

Results

Twenty-two patients received CHIP treatment, and 21 patients received chemotherapy alone. The median DFS time was 24.5 and 36.5 months in the IV group and CHIP group (P = 0.044), respectively. The median OS time was 33.1 months in the IV group and not reached in the CHIP group (P = 0.037). We also found that CHIP could reduce the total recurrence/metastasis rate, especially that of peritoneal metastasis. In the subgroup analysis, DFS and OS were both superior in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) patients than in proficient MMR (pMMR) patients.

Conclusion

This hypothesis-generating study indicates that CHIP might be feasible for gastric cancer patients after D2 resection.