Comparison of estrogen receptor determinations by a biochemical ligand-binding assay and immunohistochemical staining with monoclonal antibody ER1D5 in females with lymph node positive breast carcinoma entered on two prospective clinical trials

Estrogen- and estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated cisplatin chemoresistance in cancer

Cisplatin is a platinum-based chemotherapeutic drug used in the standard treatment of various solid cancers including testicular, bladder, head and neck, cervical and ovarian cancer. Although successful clinical responses are observed in patients following initial cisplatin treatment, resistance to cisplatin ultimately develops in most patients, leading to therapeutic failure. Multiple molecular mechanisms contributing to cisplatin resistance in cancer cells have been identified to date. In this review, we discuss the effect of estrogen, estrogen receptors (ERs) and estrogen-related receptors (ERRs) on cisplatin resistance in various cancer types. We highlight that estrogen treatment or increased expression of ERs or ERRs are generally associated with higher cisplatin resistance in cancer in vitro, mostly due to decreased caspase activity, increased anti-apoptotic protein levels such as BCL-2, higher drug efflux and higher levels of antioxidant enzymes. Targeted inhibition of ERs or estrogen production in combination with cisplatin treatment thus can be a useful strategy to overcome chemoresistance in certain cancer types. Estrogen levels and ER status can also be considered to identify cancer patients with a high potential of therapy response against cisplatin. A better mechanistic understanding of the involvement of estrogen, ERs and ERRs in the development of cisplatin resistance is needed to improve the management of cancer treatment.

Nanobodies derived from Camelids represent versatile biomolecules for biomedical applications

Nanobodies are antigen binding variable domains of heavy-chain antibodies without light-chains, and these biomolecules occur naturally in the serum of Camelidae species. Nanobodies have a compact structure and low molecular weight when compared with antibodies, and are the smallest active antigen-binding fragments. Because of their remarkable stability and manipulable characteristics, nanobodies have been incorporated into biomaterials and used as molecular recognition and tracing agents, drug delivery systems, molecular imaging tools and disease therapeutics. This review summarizes recent progress in this field focusing on nanobodies as versatile biomolecules for biomedical applications.

Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers of Endocrine Responsiveness for Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

The estrogen-dependent nature of breast cancer is the fundamental basis for endocrine therapy. The presence of estrogen receptor (ER), the therapeutic target of endocrine therapy, is a prerequisite for this therapeutic approach. However, estrogen-independent growth often exists de novo at diagnosis or develops during the course of endocrine therapy. Therefore ER alone is insufficient in predicting endocrine therapy efficacy. Several RNA-based multigene assays are now available in clinical practice to assess distant recurrence risk, with majority of these assays evaluated in patients treated with 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. While MammaPrint and Oncotype Dx are most predictive of recurrence risk within the first 5 years of diagnosis, Prosigna, Breast Cancer Index (BCI), and EndoPredict Clin have also demonstrated utility in predicting late recurrence. In addition, PAM50, or Prosigna, provides further biological insights by classifying breast cancers into intrinsic molecular subtypes. Additional strategies are under investigation in prospective clinical trials to differentiate endocrine sensitive and resistant tumors and include on-treatment Ki-67 and Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index (PEPI) score in the setting of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. These biomarkers have become important tools in clinical practice for the identification of low risk patients for whom chemotherapy could be avoided. However, there is much work ahead toward the development of a molecular classification that informs the biology and novel therapeutic targets in high-risk disease as chemotherapy has only modest benefit in this population. The recognition of somatic mutations and their relationship to endocrine therapy responsiveness opens important opportunities toward this goal.

Oncotype DX RT-qPCR assay for ER and PR correlation with IHC: a study of 3 different clones

BACKGROUND

Accurate determination of hormonal receptors (HR) status is crucial in therapeutic planning for women with breast cancer. Since the introduction of Oncotype DX, discordance with immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis has emerged to pose a clinical dilemma for the treating oncologist. The purpose of the study was to determine the accuracy of Oncotype DX RT-qPCR assay compared with IHC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive breast carcinoma cases (n=114) that had Oncotype DX scoring for HR from 2009 to 2011 were included in the study. All cases were stained with Dako antibodies and scored using image analysis. Thereafter, cases with low RT-qPCR scores were stained with antibody clones from Ventana and Leica.

RESULTS

Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) tested by RT-qPCR were positive in 109 of 114 (97.3%) and in 85 (74.6%) samples, respectively. The Spearman correlation was 65% for ER and 91% for PR. For ER, the recommended H-score, percentage score, and the Allred score cutoffs had high concordance rate with RT-qPCR. These cutoffs were inaccurate to determine PR status, with false results seen in 14 (12.3%), 12 (10.5%), and 17 (14.9%) cases, respectively. Although the established cutoff for ER detected by RT-qPCR of 6.5 had high accuracy, PR cutoff of 5.5 was inaccurate. The best cutoffs to correlate with different scoring systems were 3.8, 4.9, and 3.5, respectively. In the low HR expression group, marked variability was detected using different antibody clones.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that although there was minimal difference in ER status between these 2 assays, PR had considerable discordance.

Validation of EP1 antibody clone for estrogen receptor immunohistochemistry in breast cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER) tumor's status is critical for breast cancer management. A new rabbit antibody clone, EP1, is now available for ER status determination. The objective was to validate the EP1 antibody clone for its use in breast cancer ER status determination in a clinical setting against the previous standard, SP1. EP1 clone was assessed in 130 consecutive cases, including 50 ER-negative (<1% ER expression), 13 ER-low-positive (1% to 9% ER expression), and 67 ER-positive (≥10% ER expression). Using EP1 versus SP1, positive agreement (sensibility) was 92.5% and negative agreement (specificity) was 100%, leading to an overall agreement of 95.4%. All discordant cases (n=6) were ER-low-positive. SP1 was remeasured in 13 ER-low-positive and in 11 ER-negative cases. Overall agreement between SP1 initial tumor status and reassessment was 70.8% in those negative and low-positive cases. In conclusion, EP1 antibody has been validated for use in breast cancer with a positive agreement ≥90% and a negative agreement ≥95%, as recommended. Also, overall agreement between EP1 and SP1 was as good as between the SP1 initial status and SP1 reassessment.

Systematic review on hormone receptor testing in breast cancer

Assessment of hormone receptors (estrogen and progesterone) helps to direct therapy for women with breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry is most commonly used to assess hormone receptor status and it is essential that these tests are performed accurately and reliably within and across laboratories. The overall purpose of this guideline is to improve the quality and accuracy of hormone receptor testing and its utility as a prognostic and predictive marker for invasive and in situ breast cancer. Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and abstracts from the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium were searched. An environmental scan of the internet and of international guideline developers and key organizations was performed. Preanalytic elements such as the collection, fixation, and storage of samples, and analytic elements such as selection of antibodies and scoring methods that seem to offer the best results for immunohistochemical assessment of hormone receptors are presented. Proficiency testing or quality assurance of immunohistochemistry is described.

Cancer care Ontario guideline recommendations for hormone receptor testing in breast cancer

Hormone receptor testing (oestrogen and progesterone) in breast cancer at the time of primary diagnosis is used to guide treatment decisions. Accurate and standardised testing methods are critical to ensure the proper classification of the patient's hormone receptor status. Recommendations were developed to improve the quality and accuracy of hormone receptor testing based on a systematic review conducted jointly by the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists and Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated to set standards for optimising immunohistochemistry in assessing hormone receptor status, as well as assuring quality and proficiency between and within laboratories. A formal external review was conducted to validate the relevance of these recommendations. It is anticipated that widespread adoption of these guidelines will further improve the accuracy of hormone receptor testing in Canada.

Effect of delayed formalin fixation on estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer: a study of three different clones

We previously reported that delayed formalin fixation (DFF) has a negative effect on immunohistochemical staining of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2. The primary aim of the study was to determine if DFF affected commonly used clones of the ER and PR differentially. The specific clones evaluated were ER clones 1D5, 6F11, and SP1 and PR clones 16, 1E2, and PgR636. Ten breast cancer cases were dissected and fixed at different times (0, 10, and 30 minutes; 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours; and overnight) and were then stained with anti-ER and anti-PR antibodies. The mean Q score for ER started to decline at 2 to 4 hours for clones 1D5 and 6F11 and at 1 hour for SP1. SP1 was superior to 1D5 at the 8-hour mark (P = .03). The Q score for PR started to decline at 1 hour for clones PgR636 and 16 and 4 to 8 hours for 1E2 (P = .03). Based on our findings, it appears that regardless of the antibody clones evaluated, DFF has a negative effect on hormone receptors.

Immunohistochemistry compared to cytosol assays for determination of estrogen receptor and prediction of the long-term effect of adjuvant tamoxifen

The purpose of this study is to compare immunohistochemistry (IHC) and cytosol-based assays for determination of estrogen receptor (ER) and prediction of response to adjuvant tamoxifen treatment in postmenopausal women with early-stage invasive breast cancer. The Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group conducted a randomized trial during 1976 through 1990 comparing adjuvant tamoxifen versus control. The patients were stratified according to tumor size and lymph node status in high-risk and low-risk groups. In this study we evaluated 683 patients with "low risk" breast cancer (size ≤30 mm, lymph node-negative) for whom ER status had been determined by both the cytosol assays and IHC at one pathology laboratory. The median follow-up was 17 years. Six hundred eighty-three patients had tumors with ER determined by both methods, 536 (78.5%) were ER-positive by cytosol assays using the cutoff level at ≥0.05 fmol/μg DNA and 539 patients were ER-positive (79%) by IHC using the cutoff level at ≥10% cell stained. Thirty-nine tumors (5.7%) were ER-positive by cytosol but not by IHC, whereas the opposite pattern was found for 42 cases (6.1%). Only seven tumors had stained cells between 0 and 9% by IHC. The concordance between IHC and cytosol assays was high (88%). The kappa statistic was 0.65, 95% CI 0.58-0.72. Among patients classified as ER-negative no therapeutic benefit from tamoxifen was observed. Among patients with ER-expressing tumors, tamoxifen resulted in significantly better recurrence-free survival irrespective of the method (IHC: HR, 0.53, P < 0.001; cytosol: HR, 0.53, P < 0.001). The effect on overall survival was not statistically significant probably due to the limited sample size. Both IHC and cytosol assay accurately predict long-term response to adjuvant tamoxifen.

Delay to formalin fixation effect on breast biomarkers

Delay to formalin fixation may invalidate hormone receptors and HER2 analyses. Invalid results of tumor markers could significantly alter the type of adjuvant therapy a patient receives and potentially impact outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of progressive delay to formalin fixation on breast cancer biomarkers. Ten palpable invasive breast cancers were resected and underwent immediate gross evaluation. For each case, the procured tumor was divided into eight parts and consecutively fixed after 0, 10, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h; one section was kept in saline and stored overnight at 4 degrees C. Two tissue microarray blocks were constructed. Estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization were carried out. Statistical analyses including non-parametric sign test, exact McNemar's test and Page's L test were used. All 10 cases were invasive ductal carcinomas. Q score > or =6 was identified in five cases for estrogen receptor and four for progesterone receptor. Mean Q score started to decline at the 2 h mark for estrogen receptor and 1 h mark for progesterone receptor. Lowest score was at 8 h mark for estrogen receptor and overnight for progesterone receptor. HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization started to be compromised for interpretation at the 1 h mark and became statistically significant at the 2 h mark (P<0.03). To avoid delay to formalin fixation as a factor negatively affecting on breast biomarkers, we recommend not to delay formalin fixation for more than 1 h and not to store specimens overnight.

A pathologist's perspective on emerging genomic tests for breast cancer

Emerging molecular tests for breast cancer indicate how future progress in diagnostic pathology might guide patient care. However, the challenge will be to bring the best results from this exciting research into clinical use as accurate and reliable standardized tests that integrate into the diagnostic work-up.

Re-evaluating adjuvant breast cancer trials: assessing hormone receptor status by immunohistochemical versus extraction assays

BACKGROUND

Tumor levels of steroid hormone receptors, a factor used to select adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer, are currently determined with immunohistochemical assays. These assays have a discordance of 10%-30% with previously used extraction assays. We assessed the concordance and predictive value of hormone receptor status as determined by immunohistochemical and extraction assays on specimens from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VIII and IX. These trials predominantly used extraction assays and compared adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy with endocrine therapy alone among pre- and postmenopausal patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer. Trial conclusions were that combination therapy provided a benefit to pre- and postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors but not to ER-positive postmenopausal patients. ER-positive premenopausal patients required further study.

METHODS

Tumor specimens from 571 premenopausal and 976 postmenopausal patients on which extraction assays had determined ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) levels before randomization from October 1, 1988, through October 1, 1999, were re-evaluated with an immunohistochemical assay in a central pathology laboratory. The endpoint was disease-free survival. Hazard ratios of recurrence or death for treatment comparisons were estimated with Cox proportional hazards regression models, and discriminatory ability was evaluated with the c index. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Concordance of hormone receptor status determined by both assays ranged from 74% (kappa = 0.48) for PgR among postmenopausal patients to 88% (kappa = 0.66) for ER in postmenopausal patients. Hazard ratio estimates were similar for the association between disease-free survival and ER status (among all patients) or PgR status (among postmenopausal patients) as determined by the two methods. However, among premenopausal patients treated with endocrine therapy alone, the discriminatory ability of PgR status as determined by immunohistochemical assay was statistically significantly better (c index = 0.60 versus 0.51; P = .003) than that determined by extraction assay, and so immunohistochemically determined PgR status could predict disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Trial conclusions in which ER status (for all patients) or PgR status (for postmenopausal patients) was determined by immunohistochemical assay supported those determined by extraction assays. However, among premenopausal patients, trial conclusions drawn from PgR status differed--immunohistochemically determined PgR status could predict response to endocrine therapy, unlike that determined by the extraction assay.

Solving the dilemma of the immunohistochemical and other methods used for scoring estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor in patients with invasive breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The authors attempted to resolve the dilemma posed by the lack of unanimity concerning the optimal immunohistochemical (IHC) method for determining and scoring estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR).

METHODS

Sections for IHC were prepared from paraffin embedded tumor samples from 402 patients with lymph node positive breast carcinoma who had biochemical receptor values (obtained with the dextran-coated charcoal [DCC] method) and who were enrolled in a prospective, randomized trial (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-09). IHC receptors were scored independently by two observers according to percent, intensity, and any-or-none algorithms. Results from these evaluations and from two computer-assisted evaluations, DCC, and common pathologic characteristics were analyzed for optimum splits for positive reactions in univariate and multivariate analyses using a tree-structured model. Concordance, sensitivity, and specificity were determined between the DCC method and all other methods.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement and concordance between the DCC method and the other methods and among the methods were high. Univariate analyses revealed that a positive ER score obtained with all methods was related significantly to overall survival (OS) at 5 years and at 10 years. Results related to PR scores and disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival were less consistent. In multivariate analysis, it also was found that all methods for scoring ER predicted a better prognosis for OS in patients with an unfavorable lymph node status at 5 years and 10 years. Patients in a favorable lymph node status group were discriminated further by nuclear grade.

CONCLUSIONS

All IHC methods for scoring ER appeared valid as prognostic indicators of OS in patients with positive lymph nodes. The any-or-none IHC method, by virtue of its simplicity, represents an appropriate choice for practical use.

Progesterone receptor by immunohistochemistry and clinical outcome in breast cancer: a validation study

Progesterone receptor is a surrogate marker of estrogen receptor activity in breast cancer and its utility in helping predict clinical outcome has been established using biochemical assays. However, most laboratories worldwide have switched to immunohistochemistry to assess progesterone receptor, but unfortunately no validated immunohistochemical assay exists for progesterone receptor. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an immunohistochemical assay for progesterone receptor in breast cancer. The assay was based on monoclonal antibody 1294 (DakoCytomation) and slides were scored microscopically using the 'Allred score' on a scale of 0-8. The assay was compared to ligand-binding assay in 1235 breast cancers, and a subset (n=362) that received only hormonal therapy was used to define a cutoff for progesterone receptor-positive. Clinical utility was validated in an independent set of samples (n=423) from a clinical trial randomizing premenopausal breast cancer patients to tamoxifen+oophorectomy vs observation following surgery. A cutoff of >2 (corresponding to >1% positive cells) dichotomized patients with significantly better or worse clinical outcome (P=0.0014). Progesterone receptor by immunohistochemistry provided significantly better results than progesterone receptor by ligand-binding assay in predicting clinical outcome. In the clinical trial, a positive result in univariate analyses was associated with significantly improved disease-free and overall survival both in untreated (hazard ratios/P=0.656/0.060 and 0.479/0.005, respectively) and hormonally treated patients (hazard ratios/P=0.529/0.017 and 0.451/0.007, respectively). Positive progesterone receptor remained significant for improved disease-free and overall survival (hazard ratios/P=0.666/0.038 and 0.549/0.007, respectively) in multivariate analyses including the standard variables of tumor size, nodal status, treatment, histological grade, and HER-2/neu status. Estrogen and progesterone receptors are codependent variables and progesterone receptor was a weaker predictor of response to endocrine therapy than estrogen receptor when both were included in multivariate analysis. This is the first comprehensive study assessing the clinical usefulness of progesterone receptor by immunohistochemistry in archival tissue in breast cancer. Progesterone receptor assessed by immunohistochemistry provides useful information about clinical outcome and it is better than progesterone receptor measured by ligand-binding assay.

Immunohistochemical evaluation of hormone receptors in breast cancer: which scoring system is suitable for highly sensitive procedures?

To evaluate hormone receptors immunohistochemically, standardized staining procedures and scoring systems are required. The authors previously reported that highly sensitive procedures affected basic factors for technical validation. The aim of the present study was to show the characteristics of scoring systems for highly sensitive procedures. To examine how highly sensitive procedures enhance the staining intensity and increase the positive cell population, two different staining methods were compared. To evaluate scoring systems, three systems--cell counting score, modified immunoreactive score, and H score--were compared using the same samples stained by an autostaining system. It was found that the highly sensitive procedure increased the positive cell population, especially in breast cancers with a low enzyme immunoassay (EIA) level of less than 100 fmol/mg, and strengthened the staining intensity. This enhancement led to a correlation in a logarithmic curve rather than a linear correlation by all three scoring systems. The results showed that scoring systems including a factor of staining intensity did not have an absolute advantage because boosted staining intensity by highly sensitive procedure did not reflect EIA value or protein contents accurately. To the authors' knowledge, there is no report discussing the nonlinear correlation between biochemical and immunohistochemical assay by highly sensitive procedures; however, it is important to select a scoring system and threshold based on nonlinear correlation.

Immunohistochemical assessment of oestrogen and progesterone receptors: correlations with the DCC method and clinical outcome in primary breast cancer patients

Two different methods to determine steroid receptors were analysed with respect to their ability to estimate prognosis in primary breast cancer patients. The immunohistochemical assay (IHA) was compared with the dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) method of receptor determination. A random sample of 281 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma was drawn from 841 consecutive patients with primary breast carcinoma treated at Odense University Hospital between 1 January 1980 and 31 December 1990. Receptor determination by the DCC method had been carried out previously in 164 patients for the oestrogen receptor and in 132 patients for the progesterone receptor. The former group was reassessed by IHA with the antibody ER1D5, and the latter with the antibody PgR-ICA. The median follow-up time was 8.3 years (range 2.9-12.9 years). A cutoff of zero was used for the DCC method. Immunohistochemical results were quantified by counting in systematically random sampled fields of vision and values above zero were considered to be positive. Overall agreement of positive and negative cases was 86% for the oestrogen receptor and 83% for the progesterone receptor. Although the study included a limited number of patients, receptor positive cases fared better than negative cases in all situations. Investigation of the prognostic power revealed that classification based on IHA allowed better discrimination of patients than classification based on the DCC method. The reason for this difference might be because distinction between benign and malignant tissue is possible using the IHAmethod. Thus, IHAresults appear to be more clinically relevant.

Comparison of immunohistochemical and biochemical assay of steroid receptors in primary breast cancer--clinical associations and reasons for discrepancies

Estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status was analysed in paraffin-embedded breast cancer material with immunohistochemical (IHC) technique and compared with corresponding analyses in cytosols (CYT). ER showed the same status (positive/negative) with both methods in 88% of the samples (352/402). The concordance was also high for PgR status (81% [321/394]). Besides values near cut-off, heterogeneity in the distribution of receptor positive and negative nuclei within a tumour sample was the main reason for discordances. Histological type, presence of sclerosis, necrosis and non-invasive cells, and technical artefacts seem to be of only limited importance for explaining discordances All patients have been treated with adjuvant tamoxifen for two years. The two subgroups, which were ER(CYT)+/ ER(IHC) + or ER(CYT)-/ER(IHC) +, both had a significantly better progression-free survival (PFS; median follow-up: almost 6 years) than the ER(CYT)-/ER(IHC)- group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively). The remaining group, ER(CYT)+/ER(IHC)-, had an intermediate PFS. For PgR, the associations with PFS were weaker, with significantly better PFS than the PgR(CYT)-/PgR(IHC)- group being found only for the PgR(CYT) +/PgR(IHC)- group (p = 0.03).

Antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer and the role of estrogen receptor signaling

Antiestrogens include agents such as tamoxifen, toremifene, raloxifene, and fulvestrant. Currently, tamoxifen is the only drug approved for use in breast cancer chemoprevention, and it remains the treatment of choice for most women with hormone receptor positive, invasive breast carcinoma. While antiestrogens have been available since the early 1970s, we still do not fully understand their mechanisms of action and resistance. Essentially, two forms of antiestrogen resistance occur: de novo resistance and acquired resistance. Absence of estrogen receptor (ER) expression is the most common de novo resistance mechanism, whereas a complete loss of ER expression is not common in acquired resistance. Antiestrogen unresponsiveness appears to be the major acquired resistance phenotype, with a switch to an antiestrogen-stimulated growth being a minor phenotype. Since antiestrogens compete with estrogens for binding to ER, clinical response to antiestrogens may be affected by exogenous estrogenic exposures. Such exposures include estrogenic hormone replacement therapies and dietary and environmental exposures that directly or indirectly increase a tumor's estrogenic environment. Whether antiestrogen resistance can be conferred by a switch from predominantly ERalpha to ERbeta expression remains unanswered, but predicting response to antiestrogen therapy requires only measurement of ERalpha expression. The role of altered receptor coactivator or corepressor expression in antiestrogen resistance also is unclear, and understanding their roles may be confounded by their ubiquitous expression and functional redundancy. We have proposed a gene network approach to exploring the mechanistic aspects of antiestrogen resistance. Using transcriptome and proteome analyses, we have begun to identify candidate genes that comprise one component of a larger, putative gene network. These candidate genes include NFkappaB, interferon regulatory factor-1, nucleophosmin, and the X-box binding protein-1. The network also may involve signaling through ras and MAPK, implicating crosstalk with growth factors and cytokines. Ultimately, signaling affects the expression/function of the proliferation and/or apoptotic machineries.

Comparative analysis of the biochemical and immunohistochemical determination of hormone receptors in invasive breast carcinoma influence of the tumor-stroma ratio

Tumor samples obtained from 106 primary breast cancer patients were examined biochemically (DCCA) and immunohistochemically (IHC) for estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) to assess a quantitative relationship between both assays and to study the influence of the tumor-stroma ratio on this quantitative relationship. We used a model of logit transformation of IHC values (% of positive cells) and logarithmic transformation of DCCA values (fmol receptor/mg cytosolic protein). Tumors were subdivided into three categories according to the tumor-stroma ratio (more (t > s), equal amounts (t = s) or less (t < s) tumor than stroma), and the influence of the tumor-stroma ratio was studied using multiple regression analysis. We report a mathematical relationship between the results of the biochemical and immunohistochemical assays for the determination of ER status and PR status in primary breast cancer patients (ER: log DCCA(fmol/mg) = 0.369 logit (IHC(%pos cells)) + 2.328 (r = 0.573; p < 0.0001); PR: log DCCA (fmol/mg) = 0.474 logit (IHC(%pos cells)) + 0, 00 (r = 0.634; p < 0.0001)). In tumors overexpressing ER immunohistochemically (>10% nuclear positivity), median ER-DCCA is significantly higher if the tumor-stroma ratio is greater than 1. As these patients respond to hormonal treatment, depending on the degree of expression of both receptors, this study suggests that the biochemical assay be avoided because this technique is hampered by false-negative or falsely low results due to the loss of morphological information on the tumor-stroma ratio.

The prognostic significance of the semiquantitatively determined estrogen receptor content of breast carcinomas. A clinicopathological study

Response of breast carcinomas to tamoxifen treatment depends, among others, on the estrogen receptor status. The estrogen receptor content was semiquantitatively determined in immunostained sections of stage 1 and 2 cancers of patients who had undergone tumor excision, tamoxifen treatment, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Weighted scores of the estrogen receptor content of the tumors were established by calculating the arithmetic means of the intensity of stained nuclei and the number of positively stained nuclei. Statistically, a cut-off value of > or = 2.1 signified a good prognosis; all patients whose tumors disclosed a weighted score of > or = 2.1 were alive and free of disease at the 10-year postoperative follow-up examination. On the other hand, one third of the patients whose carcinomas had a weighted score of < 2.1 presented with locally recurrent cancer, distant metastases, or both during the follow-up observation period. The statistically significant association between the patients' 10-year event-free survival and carcinomas with a weighted score of > or = 2.1 may serve oncologists in their decision making with respect to hormonal treatment.

Immunohistochemical evaluation of hormone receptor for routine practice of breast cancer: highly sensitive procedures significantly contribute to the correlation with biochemical assays

Immunohistochemical evaluation of hormone receptors for breast cancer has been performed parallel to biochemical assays. Recently, immunohistochemistry has tended to substitute the biochemical method in Japan. To clarify the factors concerned and problems to be resolved, we reviewed our evaluation system for hormone receptors by immunohistochemistry from 1990. A total of 861 breast cancer samples were examined by immunohistochemistry and biochemistry. In 3 main periods, phase 1 (1990-1993), phase 2 (1995-1998), and phase 3 (1999-2001), increasing sensitivity of the immunohistochemical method was provided by commercially available staining systems and shown to range from 83.6% (phase 1) to 92.0% (phase 3). The highly sensitive procedures of the antigen retrieval and peroxidase-conjugated polymer method are main contributing factors. The authors examined how these procedures influenced the distribution of positive cell population; concordance rate, including sensitivity and specificity; cutoff points; and evaluation categories. The correlation between biochemistry and immunohistochemistry was extensively studied in the 1980s and 1990s. In reference to the progress achieved in the United States and United Kingdom to control the current situation in Japan, it should be recognized that recently developed, highly sensitive procedures boost the immunoreactivity, which will affect the basic factors for technical validation.

Factors influencing the prognostic role of oestrogen and progesterone receptor levels in breast cancer--results of the analysis of 670 patients with 11 years of follow-up

In the last two decades, the prognostic role of the steroid hormone receptors has been the subject of a myriad of publications. Nevertheless, its relevance after long-term follow-up is still not clear. The confusion about the prognostic value is mainly due to the difficulty in comparing analyses. Despite different study-designs and statistical approaches, oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors are widely accepted as prognostic factors. Data from 670 breast cancer patients with a median follow-up of 11.4 years were analysed retrospectively. ER and PR were measured by the dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) assay. To investigate the time dependence of the prognostic relevance of ER and PR, separate analyses were done for follow-up shorter and longer than 5 years. Special focus was directed at patients < or =50 and >50 years, node-negative women, in particular those without adjuvant therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. In univariate analysis, ER and PR were associated with a significantly longer overall survival at the cut-off levels 10, 20 or 100 fmol/mg protein. The significant survival benefit occurred in the first 5 years of follow-up and remained unchanged in the following period. In the multivariate analyses, only the PR was of significant prognostic value (for PR> or =20 fmol/mg P=0.036, for PR> or =100 P=0.01, Cox analysis). In patients younger than 51 years, only PR was an independent prognosticator at the cut-off level of 100 fmol/mg protein, while in patients >50 years both hormone receptors were not significant. In N0 patients, only the PR reached long-term prognostic independence at a cut-off point of > or =100 fmol/mg (P=0.018). In addition, in the group of node-negative women < or =50 years without adjuvant therapy the PR level reached prognostic significance. The hormone receptor status was a prognostic factor only during the first 5 years of follow-up. Our data suggest that age, lymph node status, length of follow-up and probably the ER/PR assay are important for the evaluation of ER and PR as prognostic variables. In most analyses, PR appeared to be superior to ER in predicting the prognosis of primary breast cancer patients.

Treatment of aggressive fibromatosis: a retrospective study of 72 patients followed for 1-27 years

We evaluated prognostic factors for local recurrence-free survival, including expression of estrogen receptors, after surgical treatment of aggressive fibromatosis in 72 patients (53 women) having primary tumors between 1970 and 1998. Their median age at diagnosis was 31(1 month-77 years) years. 50 patients had extraabdominal and 22 abdominal fibromatosis. Median tumor size was 4 (1-27) cm. 8 patients were treated with an intralesional resection, 32 with marginal, 31 with wide and with radical resection. They were followed for a median of 8 (1-27) years. The overall and local recurrence-free 5-year survival rates were 98% and 73%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified age, compartmentalization and tumor size as prognostic factors for local recurrence-free survival as well as radiotherapy in extraabdominal tumors. In the multivariate analysis, tumor size > 4 cm, extracompartmental location, inadequate margin and age < 32 years were independent negative prognostic factors for local recurrence. None of the tumors expressed estrogen receptors. In conclusion, aggressive fibromatosis as a high local recurrence rate, but a good prognosis, since almost no patients die of their tumor.

Steroid Hormone Receptor Immunohistochemistry in Breast Cancer: Past, Present, and Future

This article reviews the development of steroid hormone receptor detection using the biochemical approach and the disadvantages inherent in these systems. The early history of methods for the in situ detection of receptors is related, culminating in the development of histologic immunoassays using monoclonal antibodies. Correlation of the latter with disease-free and overall survival and with clinical endocrine response are presented together with preliminary findings utilizing a new generation of antireceptor antibodies. Current problems with test scoring and interpretation are detailed with a section devoted to image analysis for assay quantification. Emphasis is placed on the fact that because so many different antibodies and tissue substrates have been employed in the past, these histologic receptor immunoassays cannot yet be considered to be fully validated. It is stressed that different laboratories must employ the same antibodies, substrates, detection systems and methods of scoring, and then correlate findings with measurable clinical end points. Only then can the assays be included in the brief list of approved breast cancer prognostic and predictive markers to eventually replace the routine biochemical methods of steroid receptor detection.

Comparison of enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemical measurements of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer patients

Before replacing enzyme immunoassay of estrogen and progesterone receptors by immunohistochemistry, results of both methods were compared on 437 samples obtained from breast cancer patients (342 primary breast carcinomas, 16 local recurrences, 49 biopsies, and 30 tumor specimens obtained after neoadjuvant treatment). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) results were first assessed semiquantitatively on the basis of the estimated proportion of positive tumor cells, and then quantitatively using the "quick score." Semiquantitative IHC hormone receptors results (positive > or = 10%) correlated well with enzyme immunoassay status (positive >15 fmol/mg protein) in 358 surgical samples (342 primary tumors and 16 recurrences), with overall concordance rates of 89.9% and 82.1%, respectively. Among the 100 discordant cases, a large intraductal carcinoma component was observed in 7 of 36 cases for estrogen receptor (ER) and 15 of 64 for progesterone receptor (PR). Thirty-five discordant cases also were observed near the cut-off values. Hormone receptor levels by enzyme immunoassay correlated strongly with the quantitative IHC "quick score." Whatever the method, hormone receptor status was associated with histologic grade (SBR) and tumor size, whereas age correlated strongly with ER positivity. Similar results were obtained for biopsy specimens and posttreatment samples. This comparison improved the reliability of the IHC technique, which is currently routinely used for ER and PR determination in the authors' institution.

Adjuvant high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate for early breast cancer: 13 years update in a multicentre randomized trial

The authors updated their report on a randomized trial initiated in 1982 comparing, in early breast cancer, high-dose IM Medroxyprogesterone acetate (HD-MPA) adjuvant hormonotherapy during 6 months with no hormonotherapy; node-positive patients also received 6 courses of IV CMF (day 1, day 8; q.4 weeks). 246 node-negative (NN) and 270 node-positive (NP) patients had been followed for a median duration of 13 years. Previous results were confirmed in this analysis on mature data. In NN patients, relapse-free survival (RFS) was improved in the adjuvant hormonotherapy arm, regardless of age while overall survival (OAS) was also increased in younger (less then 50 years) patients. In the whole group of NP patients, no difference was seen regarding RFS or OAS. However, an age-dependant opposite effect was observed: younger patients (< 50) experienced a worse and significant outcome of relapse-free and overall survivals when receiving adjuvant HD-MPA while older patients (> or = 50) enjoyed a significant improvement of their relapse-free survival. For both NN and NP patients, differences in overall survivals observed in older women with a shorter follow-up, were no longer detected.

High sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry for the detection of hormone receptors in breast carcinoma: comparison with biochemical determination in a prospective study of 793 cases

AIMS

The hormone receptor (HR) status of breast cancer is an important prognostic factor and predictive parameter of the response to hormone therapy. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is currently the standard for determination of HR, but immunohistochemistry (IHC) represents a potentially useful alternative. We used IHC to determine HR status in a large prospective study and compared the results to those obtained by EIA. This study was designed to determine which technique should be used in daily practice in our institution which manages a large number of patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor status was evaluated in a prospective series of 793 infiltrating breast cancers by IHC in paraffin-embedded tissue sections, using antibodies 6F11 and 1A6, with a rigorous quality control of the methodology. ER were found to be significantly expressed in 81% of cases after IHC analysis and in 78% of cases by EIA. For PgR, the respective rates of positivity were 65% and 69%. The tumour HR level detected by either technique was significantly correlated with the value of tumour size, histological grade and S-phase fraction. A significant link was observed between the percentage of labelled cells after IHC analysis and the amount of protein detected by EIA. Critical analysis of discordance found that, in the group of invasive lobular carcinomas, the rate of HR positivity was higher with IHC (84%) than with EIA (45%) and that, in the overall population, IHC was more specific than EIA, since cases with nonrelevant positivity related to intraductal normal or neoplastic cells expressing HR could be discarded. The cost of IHC analysis was found to be about one-third of that of EIA.

CONCLUSIONS

IHC is more sensitive, specific and economical than EIA. It should constitute the new standard technique provided that good quality assurance procedures are respected.

Assessing the expression of two genes simultaneously in surgical specimens using polymerase chain reaction

We developed a novel polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method to analyze simultaneously the relative expression of two genes in a single PCR reaction. The method, relational PCR (R-PCR), utilizes special PCR primers that enable a PCR reaction to be converted from a standard uniplex reaction to a multiplex reaction in which all products are dependent on the same reaction components for amplification. We show that the quantitative ability of R-PCR is unaffected by sample nucleic acid input concentration over a range of 25-fold (30 to 750 ng of total RNA) and demonstrate excellent interexperimental reproducibility. We used R-PCR to analyze estrogen receptor gene expression in a series of invasive breast carcinomas, and our results show an excellent correlation between estrogen receptor mRNA expression and protein product accumulation determined by standard immunocytochemistry on paraffin sections.

Early start of adjuvant chemotherapy may improve treatment outcome for premenopausal breast cancer patients with tumors not expressing estrogen receptors. The International Breast Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE

The proper time to commence adjuvant chemotherapy after primary surgery for breast cancer is unknown. An analysis of the International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial V at a median follow-up of 11 years suggested that early initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy might improve outcome for premenopausal, node-positive patients whose tumors did not express any estrogen receptor (ER).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated the relationship between early initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, ER status, and prognosis in 1,788 premenopausal, node-positive patients treated on IBCSG trials I, II, and VI. The disease-free survival for 599 patients (84 with ER-absent tumors) who commenced adjuvant chemotherapy within 20 days (early initiation) was compared with the disease-free survival for 1,189 patients (142 with ER-absent tumors) who started chemotherapy 21 to 86 days after surgery (conventional initiation). The median follow-up was 7.7 years.

RESULTS

Among patients with ER-absent tumors, the 10-year disease-free survival was 60% for the early initiation group compared with 34% for the conventional initiation group (226 patients; hazard ratio [HR], 0. 49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.72; P =.0003). This difference remained statistically significant in a Cox multiple regression analysis controlling for study group, number of positive nodes, tumor size, age, vessel invasion, and institution (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.92; P =.019). Conversely, early initiation of chemotherapy did not significantly improve disease-free survival for patients with tumors expressing ER (1,562 patients; multiple regression HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.10; P =.40).

CONCLUSION

In premenopausal patients with ER-absent tumors, early initiation of systemic chemotherapy after primary surgery might improve outcome. Further confirmatory studies are required before any widespread modification of current clinical practice. In premenopausal patients with tumors expressing some ER, gains from early initiation are unlikely to be clinically significant.

Influence of estrogen receptor variants on the determination of ER status in human breast cancer

Determination of estrogen receptor alpha (ER) status in breast cancer is an important predictive factor for clinical response to endocrine therapy. We have recently shown that discrepancies in ER status determined by immunohistochemical assay (ER-IHA) can occur between amino-terminal (1D5) and carboxyl-terminal (AER-311) targeted ER antibodies and that those tumors which demonstrate discordance are associated with increased expression of truncated ER variant mRNAs. In this study, we have explored this observation to examine if ER variant expression can exert a direct effect on ER-IHA or whether this association is attributable to the characteristics of the antibodies. ER negative cos-1 cells were transfected with expression vectors containing wild type ER (wt-ER) and/or a frequently expressed truncated variant, ER-clone-4 variant. We found that ER-IHA performed with the same N- and C-terminal targeting ER antibodies on cos-1 cells expressing wt-ER alone demonstrated no difference in signals by western blot (P > 0.1). However, co-expression of wt-ER and the truncated ER-clone-4 variant, resulted in discordant IHA results with relatively higher ER-IHA H-scores from N-terminal antibodies (P < 0.03). Furthermore, re-examination of a subset of breast tumors previously studied by ER-IHA showed persistent concordance in 4/5 cases and persistent differences in 3/5 cases with a different pair of ER antibodies. We conclude that the presence of truncated ER variant proteins can interfere with the interpretation of ER status determined by IHA and that this may account for some of the inconsistencies between ER status and response to endocrine therapy.

Immunohistochemical differentiation between primary adenocarcinomas of the ovary and ovarian metastases of colonic and breast origin. Comparison between a statistical and an intuitive approach

AIM

To discriminate between adenocarcinomas that are primary to the ovary and metastatic to the ovary, especially of colonic and breast origin, by immunohistochemistry, using stepwise discriminant analysis or a decision tree.

METHODS

312 routinely processed, formalin fixed tissue specimens were used. The tumours were divided into a learning set (n = 159), composed of primary tumours of ovary, breast, and colon, and a test set, comprising 134 metastases from these sites and an additional 19 primary ovarian carcinomas. The immunohistochemical panel was composed of antibodies against cytokeratin 7 (CK7) and 20 (CK20), CA125, vimentin, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), and the oestrogen receptor (ER). The staining results of the tumours were expressed as the product of the staining intensity and the percentage of positive tumour cells. Analyses were first performed on the learning set and then evaluated on the test set.

RESULTS

Although the immunostaining patterns showed a considerable overlap between the three types of adenocarcinoma, the breast carcinomas were typically positive for GCDFP-15 and often for ER, and negative for vimentin. Ovarian carcinomas were always positive for CK7 and to a lesser extent for CA125. Colonic carcinomas showed prominent positivity for CEA and CK20, while no staining was seen for ER and vimentin. In discriminant analysis, six antibodies (alpha CK7, alpha CK20, alpha CA125, alpha CEA, alpha ER, and alpha GCDFP-15) appeared to be necessary for optimal classification: 89% of the learning set and 82% of the test set were classified correctly. In the decision tree, only four antibodies (alpha CK7, alpha CEA, alpha ER, and alpha GCDFP-15) were used to obtain a correct classification score of 89% for the learning set and 84% for the test set.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a semiquantitative assessment of the immunostaining results by a restricted panel of six antibodies with stepwise discriminant analysis, 80-90% of the adenocarcinomas of colon, breast, and ovary can be correctly classified. Discriminant analysis is computer aided and therefore an easy method and for each case a probability value of the classification result is obtained. The intuitive decision tree method provides a slightly better result, requires only four antibodies, and offers a more practical method for the surgical pathologist.

Correlation between the growth of uterine leiomyomata and estrogen and progesterone receptor content in needle biopsy specimens

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) content in needle biopsy specimens and the growth of uterine leiomyomata after biopsy.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Thirty-one women with uterine leiomyomata and a normal menstrual cycle.

INTERVENTION(S)

Transcervical needle biopsy of uterine leiomyomata.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The relationships between histologic features (smooth muscle content, immunohistochemical expression of ER and PR) and the percent increase over a 12-month observation period in the volume of the largest myoma nodule measured by magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed.

RESULT(S)

Both the density and intensity of immunohistochemical staining of PRs in uterine leiomyoma tissue showed significant positive correlation with leiomyoma growth.

CONCLUSION(S)

The growth of uterine leiomyomata can be determined by histologic and immunohistochemical analysis of needle biopsy specimens from uterine leiomyomata.

Comparison of immunohistochemical and biochemical measurement of steroid receptors in primary breast cancer: evaluation of discordant findings

Tumor samples of 240 patients with primary breast cancer were biochemically and immunohistochemically investigated for estrogen receptors (ER) and, in 130 of the samples, for progesterone-receptors (PgR) in order to examine reasons for discordant findings. The biochemical (DCCA) and immunohistochemical assays (ICA) yielded positivity in 71% for ER, and in 44% for PgR. Concordant ER-DCCA and ER-ICA results were obtained in 84%; two thirds of the discordant ER-findings manifested as DCCA-neg/ICA-pos. Concordance in the case of PgR amounted to 72%, and of the discordances 60% were DCCA-neg/ICA-pos. Significant association with postmenopausal status existed only for ER positivity in ICA (p = 0.01), whereas ER-DCCA, PgR-DCCA and PgR-ICA were all more or less independent of the menopausal status. The frequency of discordances was independent of menopausal status. Discordance for ER-assays increased significantly near the respective cut-off point; this was not unequivocally true for PgR-assays. The correlation of tumor types of sparse cellularity, as well as prominent stroma content ('scirrhous carcinoma') with increased frequency of the constellation DCCA-neg/ICA-pos was of borderline significance for PgR (p = 0.06), but not for ER. The percentage of discordant ER-findings, figuring as DCCA-neg/ICA-pos, was statistically significantly increased in locally advanced breast cancer (p = 0.03). Fibrocystic disease in peritumoral breast tissue had no impact on receptor-assay discordance. In any case, the models derived from theoretical thought, laboratory data and singular observations can only in part explain the discordance in steroid receptor values measured with different methods.

Prognostic significance of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in primary breast cancer

The uPA-mediated pathway of plasminogen activation is central to cancer metastasis. Whether uPA and PAI-1 are related to local recurrence, metastatic spread or both is not clear. We present a retrospective study of 429 primary breast cancer patients with a median follow-up of 5.1 years, in which the levels of uPA and PAI-1 in tumour extracts were analysed by means of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The median values of uPA and PAI-1, which were used as cut-off points, were 4.5 and 11.1 ng mg(-1) protein respectively. The levels of uPA and PAI-1 were correlated with tumour size, degree of anaplasia, steroid receptor status and number of positive nodes. Patients with high content of either uPA or PAI-1 had increased risk of relapse and death. We demonstrated an independent ability of PAI-1 to predict distant metastasis (relative risk 1.7, confidence limits 1.22 and 2.46) and that neither uPA nor PAI-1 provided any information regarding local recurrence.