Natural history and survival of inoperable breast cancer treated with radiotherapy and radiotherapy followed by radical mastectomy

Whole-genome sequencing of phenotypically distinct inflammatory breast cancers reveals similar genomic alterations to non-inflammatory breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has a highly invasive and metastatic phenotype. However, little is known about its genetic drivers. To address this, we report the largest cohort of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of IBC cases.

METHODS

We performed WGS of 20 IBC samples and paired normal blood DNA to identify genomic alterations. For comparison, we used 23 matched non-IBC samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA). We also validated our findings using WGS data from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium. We examined a wide selection of genomic features to search for differences between IBC and conventional breast cancer. These include (i) somatic and germline single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), in both coding and non-coding regions; (ii) the mutational signature and the clonal architecture derived from these SNVs; (iii) copy number and structural variants (CNVs and SVs); and (iv) non-human sequence in the tumors (i.e., exogenous sequences of bacterial origin).

RESULTS

Overall, IBC has similar genomic characteristics to non-IBC, including specific alterations, overall mutational load and signature, and tumor heterogeneity. In particular, we observed similar mutation frequencies between IBC and non-IBC, for each gene and most cancer-related pathways. Moreover, we found no exogenous sequences of infectious agents specific to IBC samples. Even though we could not find any strongly statistically distinguishing genomic features between the two groups, we did find some suggestive differences in IBC: (i) The MAST2 gene was more frequently mutated (20% IBC vs. 0% non-IBC). (ii) The TGF β pathway was more frequently disrupted by germline SNVs (50% vs. 13%). (iii) Different copy number profiles were observed in several genomic regions harboring cancer genes. (iv) Complex SVs were more frequent. (v) The clonal architecture was simpler, suggesting more homogenous tumor-evolutionary lineages.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-genome sequencing of IBC manifests a similar genomic architecture to non-IBC. We found no unique genomic alterations shared in just IBCs; however, subtle genomic differences were observed including germline alterations in TGFβ pathway genes and somatic mutations in the MAST2 kinase that could represent potential therapeutic targets.

Locoregional Management of Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Purpose of Review

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a biologically aggressive subtype with a high risk for rapid local progression and early distant metastasis. We review the updated data for optimal locoregional management of IBC, including areas of active controversy.

Recent Findings

Advancements in tri-modality therapies have improved survival among IBC patients in recent years; however, the risk of locoregional and distant recurrence remains high, particularly in triple-negative IBC. Data to support de-escalation of surgery or radiotherapy is limited, and the recommended treatment approach for non-metastatic IBC remains preoperative systemic therapy (PST), modified radical mastectomy (MRM), and adjuvant radiotherapy in all patients. For patients with de novo metastatic disease, locoregional intervention may be appropriate.

Summary

Optimal locoregional management of IBC remains PST followed by MRM and adjuvant radiotherapy. With increasingly effective systemic therapies, research to identify a subset of patients who may benefit from de-escalation of locoregional therapies is warranted.

Biological subtype, treatment response and outcomes in inflammatory breast cancer using data from the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Although inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is postulated to be a distinct biological entity, practice guidelines and previous data suggest that treatment and outcomes are influenced by standard approximated biological subtype. The aim of this study was validation in a large recent National Cancer Database (NCDB) patient cohort.

METHODS

Patients with non-metastatic IBC treated in 2010-2015 with neoadjuvant systemic therapy and surgery were identified from the NCDB. Approximated biological subtypes were categorized as oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), ER-/HER2- and HER2+. Total pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as ypT0/ypTis, ypN0. χ² tests were used to compare pCR rates, and Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression to analyse overall survival.

RESULTS

Among 4068 patients with IBC (median age 56 years), the approximated biological subtype was ER+/HER2- in 1575 (38·7 per cent), HER2+ in 1323 (32·5 per cent) and ER-/HER2- in 1170 (28·8 per cent). A total of 3351 patients (84·0 per cent) were cN+ at presentation, with no differences across subtypes. Total pCR rates varied significantly by subtype: ER+/HER2- (6·2 per cent), HER2+ (38·8 per cent), ER-/HER2- (19·1 per cent) (P < 0·001), as did breast pCR rates (10·4, 44·5 and 25·2 per cent respectively) and nodal pCR rates (16·9, 56·9 and 33·1 per cent). The 5-year overall survival rate varied significantly across subtypes (ER+/HER2- 64·9 per cent, HER2+ 74·0 per cent, ER-/HER2- 44·0 per cent; P < 0·001) and by pCR within subtypes (all P < 0·001). In multivariable analysis, ER-/HER2- subtype (hazard ratio 2·89 versus HER2+ as reference; P < 0·001) and absence of total pCR (hazard ratio 3·23; P < 0·001) predicted worse survival.

CONCLUSION

Both treatment response and survival in patients with IBC varied with approximated biological subtype, as among other invasive breast cancers. These data support continued tailoring of systemic treatment to approximated biological subtype and highlight the recent improved outcomes in patients with HER2+ disease.

Nomogram for predicting cancer specific survival in inflammatory breast carcinoma: a SEER population-based study

The clinicopathological features of inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC), the effect of therapeutic options on survival outcome and the identification of prognostic factors were investigated in this study. Information on IBC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to determine potential significant prognostic factors of IBC. A nomogram was then constructed to evaluate patient survival based on certain variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that race (p < 0.001), M stage (p < 0.001), surgery (p = 0.010), chemotherapy (CT) (p < 0.001), tumor size (p = 0.010), estrogen receptor (p < 0.001), progesterone receptor (p = 0.04), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (p < 0.001) were all independent risk factors. The concordance index (C-index) of the nomogram was 0.735, which showed good predictive efficiency. Survival analysis indicated that IBC patients without CT had poorer survival than those with CT (p < 0.001). Stratified analyses showed that modified radical mastectomy (MRM) had significant survival advantages over non-MRM in patients with stage IV IBC (p = 0.031). Patients treated with or without CT stratified by stage III and stage IV showed better survival than those without stage III and IV (p < 0.001). Trimodality therapy resulted in better survival than surgery combined with CT or CT alone (p < 0.001). Competing risk analysis also showed the same results. The nomogram was effectively applied to predict the 1, 3 and 5-year survival of IBC. Our nomogram showed relatively good accuracy with a C-index of 0.735 and is a visualized individually predictive tool for prognosis. Treatment strategy greatly affected the survival of patients. Trimodality therapy was the preferable therapeutic strategy for IBC. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Clinical Response to Induction Chemotherapy Predicts Outcome after Combined-Modality Therapy in Inflammatory Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To assess predictors of outcome in a cohort of Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) patients receiving induction chemotherapy followed by local treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 95 non-metastatic IBC patient files.

RESULTS

Complete clinical response (cCR) was obtained in 15 (16%) patients. Median follow up was 13.4 years (IC95%: 10.4-14.6). Loco-regional control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) at 5 years were 85%, 41%, and 55%, respectively; cCR was associated with better DFS and OS in multivariate analyses adjusted for age (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical response to upfront chemotherapy predicts the outcome of patients affected by IBC.

Inflammatory Component: A Worsening Factor in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Treated by Radiotherapy and Systemic Therapy

Locally advanced and inflammatory carcinomas of the breast are two distinct entities with clear differential clinical criteria. We described a particular type of locally advanced breast cancer which, during its evolution, developed inflammatory characteristics limited to a small area of the skin. It, therefore, did not meet the common diagnostic criteria of inflammatory carcinoma. In our series, studied from December 1977 to January 1987, we treated 59 cases of locally advanced breast cancer and 105 cases of locally advanced breast cancer with an inflammatory component. The actuarial overall survival was 53.3 % at 5 years and 38.4 % at 7 years. Differences were observed when the two tumor types were compared. Specifically, locally advanced breast cancer with an inflammatory component had a worse prognosis, poorer survival and poorer disease-free rates than locally advanced breast cancer.

Small Size T4 Breast Cancer. Natural History and Prognosis

The clinical records of 66 patients with a 14 (for skin infiltration or ulceration) breast cancer not larger than 5 cm treated with primary radiotherapy at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan from 1968 through 1977 were reviewed. The tumor measured no more than 3 cm in 19 patients and 3-5 cm in 47 patients. In the first group axillary involvement was lower (32 % vs 55 %) and mean age was older (68 years vs 58). Thirty-four patients were irradiated with orthovoltage and 32 with cobalt, at full doses. In 22 of 66 patients (33.3 %) a Halsted radical mastectomy was carried out after completion of radiotherapy. No medical treatment was planned. The incidence of locoregional and distant metastases was the same in both groups of patients, but that of patients with smaller T4 (up to 3 cm) demonstrated a better prognosis in terms of absolute survival at 5 years (71.3 % vs 34.7 %). T4 breast cancer of 3-5 cm had very poor results quite similar to those of historical large series of T4 carcinomas of any size; therefore they should be treated by the same aggressive combined modality approach adopted for locally advanced breast cancer. On the contrary, small T4, up to 3 cm, in older women could be treated by tumorectomy followed by radiotherapy at full doses; systemic medical therapy (hormonal manipulation or chemotherapy) should be decided according to endocrine receptor investigation and general conditions.

Primary Radiotherapy versus Surgery and Radiotherapy in the Management of Postmenopausal Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

From 1978 through 1984, 103 postmenopausal patients with locally advanced breast cancer (T4 N1-2-3 MO) were treated by definitive radiotherapy (XRT, 35 patients) or mastectomy and postoperative radiotherapy (RM+XRT, 68 patients). A control group of 35 of the 68 RM+XRT patients was selected by matching several prognostic variables with the XRT group. Patients were followed for 4 to 10 years. At 5 years the probabilities of overall survival and relapse-free survival were 49.9% and 33.2% for XRT patients and 49.2% and 42.8% for RM+XRT patients, respectively (with no significant difference). The probability to remain free of local-regional progression at 5 years, with censoring of deaths, was 71.9% in the XRT group and 79.8% in the RM+XRT group. Of the patients treated with definitive radiotherapy, those who received 60 Gy or more to the primary tumor had a significantly better 5-year rate of local control: 88.0 % vs. 68.0 %, p < 0.05. Our results suggest that adequate doses of radiotherapy can provide long-term local-regional control in a large proportion of survivors and can spare mastectomy in most patients, without however achieving substantial improvements in the poor survival results.

Contemporary operative management of T4 breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Guidelines advise modified radical mastectomy following neoadjuvant systemic therapy for T4 breast cancer. We studied the influence of current systemic therapy and tumor subtype on pathologic stage and practice patterns to identify patients for whom less aggressive operative treatment might be considered.

METHODS

We identified 98 clinical T4 M0 cases operated on at our institution from October 2008-July 2015. Patient, tumor, and treatment variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

Clinical T4 substage was 7% T4a, 32% T4b, 3% T4c, and 58% T4d. Tumor biologic subtype was 41% ER+/HER2-, 36% HER2+, and 23% ER-/HER2-. A total of 86 patients (88%) had neoadjuvant systemic therapy; 87% of patients underwent total mastectomy, 9% skin-sparing mastectomy, and 4% breast conservation. Axillary dissection was performed in 74% of patients and sentinel node surgery with (14%) or without (11%) axillary dissection in the remainder; 41/98 (42%) were lymph node negative at operation. The pathologic complete response rate in the breast (31%) and axilla (39%, cN+ cases) correlated with biologic subtype (P < .0001). Overall 5-year, disease-free, and breast cancer-specific survival were 68% and 86%.

CONCLUSION

Alignment with guidelines was substantial for both breast and axillary operation. Favorable breast cancer-specific survival suggests current multidisciplinary treatment has improved outcomes. Careful assessment of pathology and treatment response may identify clinical T4 patients appropriate for breast or axillary conservation.

Influence of patient, physician, and hospital characteristics on the receipt of guideline-concordant care for inflammatory breast cancer

PURPOSE

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer for which treatments vary, so we sought to identify factors that affect the receipt of guideline-concordant care.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with IBC in 2004 were identified from the Breast and Prostate Cancer Data Quality and Patterns of Care Study, containing information from cancer registries in seven states. Variation in guideline-concordant care for IBC, based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, was assessed according to patient, physician, and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 107 IBC patients in the study without distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis, only 25.8% received treatment concordant with guidelines. Predictors of non-concordance included patient age (≥70 years), non-white race, normal body mass index (BMI 18.5-25 kg/m(2)), patients with physicians graduating from medical school >15 years prior, and smaller hospital size (<200 beds). IBC patients survived longer if they received guideline-concordant treatment based on either 2003 (p=0.06) or 2013 (p=0.06) NCCN guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting factors associated with receipt of care that is not guideline-concordant may reduce survival disparities in IBC patients. Prompt referral for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and post-operative radiation therapy is also crucial.

Pathological complete response in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

There has been recent interest in using pathological complete response (pCR) as a potential surrogate endpoint for long-term outcomes in the neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk, early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

We review the clinical trials that have contributed to our understanding of the association between pCR and long-term outcomes, describe the various definitions of pCR, describe patient populations in which pCR may predict long-term benefit, and discuss the implications of pCR on drug development and accelerated approval for neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

RESULTS

Varying definitions of pCR across clinical trials conducted in heterogeneous patient populations make understanding the association of pCR with long-term outcomes challenging. The US Food and Drug Administration established the Collaborative Trials in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer group to evaluate the potential use of pCR as a regulatory endpoint. The group demonstrated that pCR defined as no residual invasive cancer in the breast and axillary nodes with presence or absence of in situ cancer (ypT0/is ypN0 or ypT0 ypN0) provided a better association with improved outcomes compared to eradication of invasive tumor from the breast alone (ypT0/is).

CONCLUSION

Even though pCR was not validated as a surrogate endpoint for long-term outcomes, the promising data regarding the strong association of pCR with substantially improved outcomes in individual patients with more aggressive subtypes of breast cancer supported the opening of an accelerated approval pathway for patients with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer.

Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally recurrent or advanced inoperable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally recurrent or advanced inoperable breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients treated between 2009 and 2013 were reviewed from a prospectively collected database. All patients had symptomatic recurrent or advanced breast cancer and had been deemed not to be ideal operative candidates. Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy to the primary tumor in the breast or regional lymph nodes, or both, concurrent with either capecitabine, paclitaxel, or cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy. The grade of acute and late toxicity was evaluated, as was response to treatment, overall survival (OS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS).

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients, 9 (45%) presented with primary disease and 11 (55%) had recurrent disease. A total of 11 (55%) patients had evidence of metastatic disease. The overall clinical response rate was 100%, with a clinical complete response (CR) observed in 65% of patients and a clinical partial response (PR) observed in 35% of patients. At a median follow up of 25.3 months, 2-year LRFS was 73% and 2-year OS was 80%. Local control was significantly better in patients with an initial diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.139; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.014-0.935) and in those who had not had previous in-field radiation (HR, 0.011; 95% CI, 0.005-0.512). The only grade ≥ 3 toxicity was acute dermatologic events (30%) and late dermatologic (15%) events.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent CRT with capecitabine, paclitaxel, or cisplatin/etoposide for recurrent or advanced inoperable breast cancer is well tolerated with impressive clinical response rates and durable local control.

Predictors of durable no evidence of disease status in de novo metastatic inflammatory breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and post-mastectomy radiation

INTRODUCTION

Definitive locoregional therapy including surgery and post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) has been offered to select IBC patients with de novo metastatic disease. Herein we examined predictive factors for progression-free survival after comprehensive PMRT radiation +/- locoregional treatment of metastatic sites.

METHODS

Charts of T4d, any N, M1 (de novo) patients who completed PMRT to ≥ 50 Gy from 2006-2011 were reviewed. Patients who received doses <50Gy to the primary site, received radiation at another facility or were treated pre-operatively were excluded. The remaining 36 patients formed the study cohort. Progression-free survival post-PMRT (PFSx) was assessed from the last day of radiation. Median dose to primary fields was 51 Gy. Boost doses ranged from 6-16 Gy.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 54 (range 33-70). Median follow up from primary irradiation completion was 31 months. Sixteen patients were Stage IV NED at last follow-up (IR 37-60 mo). Fifteen patients died of disease. Five patients experienced an in-field recurrence, three of which resulted from local recurrence at the medial edge of the field. Actuarial 5 year locoregional control (LRC) was 86%. Median PFSx was 20 months. All sites of gross disease were treated with radiation in 21/36 patients. Location of metastatic disease had no correlation with PFSx. Estrogen receptor (ER)- patients had shorter 5-yr actuarial PFSx (28% vs. 66%, P = 0.03) and 5 year actuarial OSx (37% vs 71%, P = 0.02). Nine patients (25%) developed a pathological complete response (pCR) after chemotherapy and with a median follow-up of 59 months, 7 remained without evidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the poor prognosis associated with metastatic IBC, our data suggest that select patients may be appropriate candidates for locoregional therapy. Patients who achieve a pCR or those with ER + disease have a favorable PFSx. It remains unclear whether all gross disease needs to be addressed with locoregional therapy to provide benefit.

Inflammatory breast cancer: the disease, the biology, the treatment

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive form of invasive breast cancer accounting for 2.5% of all breast cancer cases. It is characterized by rapid progression, local and distant metastases, younger age of onset, and lower overall survival compared with other breast cancers. Historically, IBC is a lethal disease with less than a 5% survival rate beyond 5 years when treated with surgery or radiation therapy. Because of its rarity, IBC is often misdiagnosed as mastitis or generalized dermatitis. This review examines IBC's unique clinical presentation, pathology, epidemiology, imaging, and biology and details current multidisciplinary management of the disease, which comprises systemic therapy, surgery, and radiation therapy.

Biology and management of inflammatory breast cancer

Inflammatory breast cancer is an aggressive subtype of a locally advanced breast cancer that is thought to account for approximately 1-5% of all newly diagnosed breast cancers diagnosed in the USA. Historically, IBC was considered to be a uniformly fatal disease with less than 5% of patients surviving past 5 years. With the advent of a multidisciplinary approach to management, survival outcomes have improved with 5-year survival rates of over 40% being reported. Research efforts are now focused on trying to better understand the epidemiological and molecular characteristics of this disease to further improve survival. Two genes, Rhoc GTPase and WISP3, have been identified that have been found to be concordantly altered in the majority of inflammatory breast cancer tumors and may serve as potential targets for future therapeutic agents. The purpose of this review is to summarize the latest epidemiological and molecular characteristics of IBC, describe the difficulties encountered in trying to clinically diagnose this entity, highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and present some of the latest data on the management of this disease.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer

Preoperative systemic therapy is the standard of care in locally advanced breast cancer. In this setting, the intent of preoperative systemic therapy is to expand surgical options and to improve survival. Locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer have different biological features, but they share the use of preoperative (primary, neoadjuvant) systemic therapy as the initial treatment of choice. The management of these patients necessitates involvement of a multidisciplinary team from the onset and during therapy. The eradication of invasive cancer from the breast and axillary lymph nodes, pathologic complete response, is a predictor of outcome associated with improved disease-free and overall survival. However, conventional chemotherapy regimens result in pathologic complete response in only a minority of patients. The management of patients with residual invasive disease after preoperative therapy is a common clinical problem for which additional research is necessary. The differential expression of genes and pathways in locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer allows for the exploitation of targeted therapy, and early trials have shown exciting target and tumor effects. Much work remains, and future trials combining targeted and conventional therapies based on molecular subtypes and/or specific targets are needed if we hope to improve survival for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Inflammatory breast cancer

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) represents the most virulent form of breast cancer, characterized by involvement of the skin and rapid progression of the disease. Management involves careful coordination of all multidisciplinary modalities, including imaging, systemic chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has contributed significantly to improvement in overall survival since the first descriptions of this entity and has made the role of locoregional therapy, including surgery and radiation critical to continued improvements in this disease. In this article, we examine the unique epidemiology and pathology of IBC and review the various treatment modalities noting the significance of a multimodality approach and delineating each of the specific components. Moreover, we briefly describe the current research in IBC that will hopefully contribute further to improve systemic therapies.

Pre-operative systemic therapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is common in developing countries and it frequently affects younger women. Patients do very poorly when treated by locoregional therapy alone; therefore, pre-operative systemic therapy (PST) is commonly used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of 64 Saudi patients with LABC treated with PST in a single institution were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, most patients were young (median age 41 years), and had poor clinicopathological characteristics. Following surgery, complete pathologic response (pCR) in the breast was achieved in 13 patients (20%). Of 62 patients with known nodal status, 22 (34%) had negative axillary nodes. Presence of oestrogen receptor (ER) negative tumour was the only dependent variable that predicted pCR in the breast (p = 0.03). At a median follow-up of 42 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 48 months (95% CI, 20-76 months) and the projected five-year overall survival (OS) was 68%. The recently published scoring system (Jeruss et al (2008) J Clin Oncol26 2 246-52), was the only variable that independently influenced PFS, while ER negative tumours and presence of lymphovascular space invasion were the only factors that adversely affected OS.

CONCLUSIONS

despite the use of standard multi-modality approach in the management of patients with LABC, prognosis remains guarded.

Defining the clinical diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an extremely aggressive disease that progresses rapidly and carries a very grim prognosis. It is characterized by erythema, rapid enlargement of the breast, skin ridging, and a characteristic peau d'orange appearance of the skin secondary to dermal lymphatic tumor involvement. Although a palpable tumor may not be present, about 55% to 85% of patients will present with metastases to the axillary or supraclavicular lymph nodes. Diagnosis of IBC is made on the basis of these clinical characteristics, as well as histopathologic verification of carcinoma. Accurate diagnosis is critically important, as multimodal therapy can significantly improve outcomes if instituted early enough.

The role of locoregional therapy in inflammatory breast cancer

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive form of invasive breast cancer. The disease is associated with extensive local disease at the time of initial diagnosis requiring multidisciplinary treatment including neoadjuvant systemic therapy, surgery and comprehensive locoregional therapy. The clinical and pathological response to induction chemotherapy represents an important prognostic factor. IBC is otherwise associated with a high incidence of locoregional recurrence suggesting a critical role also for local modalities, particularly radiotherapy. The use of different schedules of treatment and possible combination approaches are reviewed and discussed.

Trends for inflammatory breast cancer: is survival improving?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the survival of women with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) treated at our institution has improved over the past 30 years. Three-hundred ninety-eight patients with IBC were treated between 1974 and 2005. Patient characteristics and outcomes were tabulated and compared among decades of diagnosis. Survival outcomes were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and compared among groups with the log-rank statistic. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to determine the association between year of diagnosis and survival outcomes after adjustment for patient and disease characteristics and treatments received. The median follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 0.3-23.8 years). There were 238 recurrences and 236 deaths. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) duration was 2.3 years and the median overall survival (OS) time was 4.2 years. In the models for RFS and OS, after adjustment for patient and disease characteristics, increasing year of diagnosis was not associated with a decrease in the risk for recurrence (hazard ratio, [HR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.04) or death (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.01). Our data show that there has not been an important change in the prognosis of patients with IBC in the last 30 years. Clinical trials focusing on the management of this aggressive disease are warranted. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Breast Conservation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Carcinoma of the Breast

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for stage III breast cancer. Gratifying results in these patients prompted this prospective, nonrandomized study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II breast cancer. This study presents our experience with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 127 patients with stage II carcinoma of the breast.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with stages IIA (T > 3.0 cm) and IIB carcinoma were considered for this study and underwent treatment with cyclic chemotherapy until a plateau of response was achieved. Responders underwent breast conservation or mastectomy according to conventional assessment. Chemotherapy was continued in the adjuvant setting. Survival data were compared with historic controls.

RESULTS

Between 1981 and 2001, 127 women between the ages of 22 and 80 years (mean age 52, median age 50), with stage II breast cancer were enrolled, with median followup of 60 months. One hundred twenty-two patients (96.1%) responded to chemotherapy. Of this group, 35 (29.2%) experienced complete pathologic responses or had only microscopic foci of disease after treatment. Sixty-two patients (52.5%) had negative lymph nodes at the time of the operation; 28 of these patients were previously considered N-1 clinically. Seventy-six patients (62%) underwent breast conservation. Overall survivals at 5 years for stage IIA and IIB disease were 94.7% and 88%, respectively. Disease-free survival at 5 years was 85.2% for stage IIA patients and 69.1% for stage IIB patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be effectively applied to patients with stage II disease, and breast conservation becomes feasible in the majority of patients. When compared with historic controls, the current study suggests a statistically significant overall survival advantage (p < 0.007) at 5 years.

The curability of breast cancer and the treatment of advanced disease

Breast cancer represents a major health problem, with more than 1,000,000 new cases and 370,000 deaths yearly worldwide. In the last decade, in spite of an increasing incidence, breast cancer mortality has been declining in the majority of developed countries. This is the combined result of better education, widespread screening programmes and more efficacious adjuvant treatments. Better knowledge of breast cancer biology now allows the cosmetic, physical and psychological consequences of radical mastectomy to be spared in the majority of breast cancer patients. Use of the sentinel node technique is rapidly expanding and this will further reduce the extent and the consequences of surgery. Several clinico-pathological factors are used to discriminate between patients at low (<10%), average (10-40%) and high risk of relapse. Nodal status, tumour size, tumour grade and age are accepted universally as important factors to define risk categories. Newer factors such as uPA/PAI-1, HERer2-neu, proliferative indices and gene expression profile are promising and will allow better discrimination between patients at different risk. Endocrine manipulation with tamoxifen, ovarian ablation or both is the preferred option in the case of endocrine-responsive tumours. Tamoxifen administered for 5 years is the standard treatment for postmenopausal patients; tamoxifen plus ovarian ablation is more effective than tamoxifen alone for premenopausal women. Recent data demonstrate that, for postmenopausal patients, the aromatase inhibitors are superior to tamoxifen, with a different safety profile. At present, anastrozole can be used in the adjuvant setting in cases of tamoxifen intolerance or toxicity. Chemotherapy is the treatment of choice for steroid receptor-negative tumours. Polychemotherapy is superior to single agents and anthracycline-containing regimens are superior to CMF. Six courses of FEC or FAC or the sequential administration of four doses of anthracycline followed by four of CMF are the recommended regimens. New regimens including the taxanes have produced a further improvement in risk reduction and are reasonable therapeutic options. The taxanes have been approved for adjuvant therapy in the USA, while European approval is pending. Combined endocrine-chemotherapy is the standard adjuvant treatment in high-risk patients with endocrine-responsive tumours. Endocrine manipulation is usually administered after completion of the chemotherapy programme. For HER2-neu overexpressing tumours, several rapidly accruing trials are exploring the potential additive effect of trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the extramembrane portion of the HER2 receptor. Primary chemotherapy is increasingly used in the treatment of locally advanced and operable breast cancer, with increased rates of breast-conserving surgery. A proportion of patients achieve a pathological complete response and these patients have significantly better long-term outcomes. Twenty-five to forty percent of breast cancer patients develop distant metastases. At this stage the disease is incurable; however, treatments can assure a significant prolongation of survival, symptomatic control and maintenance of quality of life. In the case of hormone receptor positivity and in the absence of visceral, life-threatening disease, endocrine manipulation is the treatment of choice. Active treatments include tamoxifen, ovarian ablation, aromatase inhibitors, pure anti-oestrogens and progestins. Aromatase inhibitors are the most active agents, but the choice and the sequence of endocrine therapies are also dictated by prior adjuvant treatment. Chemotherapy has to be preferred in cases of receptor-negative tumours, acquired resistance to hormones and aggressive visceral disease. Combination regimens are usually associated with higher response rates and sometimes survival prolongation, and this approach should be recommended in young patients with good performance status and visceral disease. On the other hand, single agents have a better tolerability profile and should be tand should be the treatment of choice when a careful balance between activity and tolerability is needed. For HER2-neu positive tumours, the combination of trastuzumab and chemotherapy is significantly superior to chemotherapy alone in terms of both response rates and survival. Other useful palliative treatments include bisphosphonates for the control of metastatic bone disease and radiotherapy for painful bone lesions or local relapses.

Phase II study of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and cisplatin for operable and locally advanced breast cancer: analysis of 126 patients

In an earlier study, we have demonstrated a high clinical and pathologic response rate of neoadjuvant paclitaxel (P) and cisplatin (C) for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The current phase II study includes larger number of patients who had longer follow-up. A total of 126 consecutive patients with noninflammatory LABC (T2 >4 cm, T3 or T4, N0-N3, M0) were included in the study. Patients were scheduled to receive three to four cycles of the neoadjuvant PC (paclitaxel 135 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) on day 1) every 21 days. Patients were then subjected to surgery and subsequently received six cycles of FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2), doxorubicin 50 mg m(-2), and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m(-2)) or four cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg m(-2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2)); all drugs were administered intravenously on day 1 with cycles repeated every 21 days. Patients then received radiation therapy, and those with hormone receptor-positive tumours were given adjuvant tamoxifen intended for 5 years. The median age was 41 years. Clinically, 12, 52, and 37% of patients had T2 >4 cm, T3, and T4, respectively. The mean tumour size was 7 cm (95% CI, 7.3-8.5). The clinical nodal status was N0, N1, and N2-N3 in 32, 52, and 17% of patients, respectively. Disease stage at diagnosis was IIA (2%), IIB (32%), IIIA (28%), and IIIB (39%). Clinical assessment of the primary tumour and the axillary nodal status after primary chemotherapy showed that 35 patients (28%) achieved complete response (cCR), while 80 (63%) demonstrated partial response to PC. Of patients with evaluable pathologic data of the primary tumour (123 patients), complete pathologic response (pCR) was achieved in 29 patients (24%), and an additional nine (7%) only had a microinvasive disease. Moreover, 20 of the 122 patients (16%) had no residual disease in the primary tumour or in the axillary nodes. Failure to attain cCR predicted failure to achieve pCR. At a median follow-up of 37.5 months (95% CI, 31.5-43.3), 71% were alive with no recurrence, 16% were alive with evidence of disease, and 13% were dead. Of the 122 patients who had surgery, 36 (29%) developed recurrence including one of the patients who attained pCR. The median overall or disease-free survival has not been reached with a projected 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 85% (+/-4%) and 63% (+/-5%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, clinical response of the primary tumour, pathological response of the primary tumour, and the pathological nodal status were identified as independent prognostic variables for DFS. No variable, however, was identified to prognosticate OS. PC was acceptably safe. Neoadjuvant PC as used in this phase II study in a multidisciplinary strategy was highly effective. Clinical and pathologic responses remain the most important variables that predict outcome.

Inflammatory breast cancer: results of antracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Twenty-three patients with inflammatory breast cancer treated with a combined modality approach including anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy-surgery-chemotherapy-radiotherapy were reviewed. Twelve patients (52.2%) received FAC (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide) and 11 patients (47.8%) were treated with FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) induction chemotherapy for three cycles every 3 weeks. Surgery was followed by the initial chemotherapy or second-line chemotherapy for an additional six cycles to complete nine cycles and radiotherapy, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) time was 27 months and the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 13 months. Furthermore, patients treated with FAC induction chemotherapy have been found to have longer median OS and DFS periods compared to patients with FEC induction chemotherapy in both univariate and multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the superiority of doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy over epirubicin-containing chemotherapy should be established in larger randomized studies and more effective chemotherapeutic agents such as taxans are required for better survival rates in inflammatory breast cancer patients.

Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide + filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of a standard anthracycline-based regimen to a dose-intensified anthracycline regimen in locally advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Locally advanced breast cancer patients were randomly assigned onto a study comparing cyclophosphamide (C; 75 mg/m(2) orally days 1 to 14), epirubicin (E; 60 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] days 1, 8), and fluorouracil (F; 500 mg/m(2) IV days 1, 8) six cycles every 28 days versus E (120 mg/m(2) IV day 1), C (830 mg/m(2) IV day 1), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim; 5 micro g/kg/d subcutaneously days 2 to 13) six cycles every 14 days. The study was designed to detect a 15% improvement; that is, from 50% to 65% in median progression-free survival (PFS) in favor of the dose-intensified regimen.

RESULTS

A total of 448 patients were enrolled over a period of 3 years. The median dose intensity delivered for C and E reached, respectively, 85% and 87% of that planned in the CEF arm and 96% and 95% of that planned in the EC arm. The dose-intensified arm was slightly more emetogenic and generated more grade 3 to 4 anemia but less febrile neutropenia episodes. After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 277 events have been reported. The median PFS was 34 and 33.7 months for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.68), and the 5-year survival rate was 53% and 51% for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.94).

CONCLUSION

Dose-intensified EC does not provide a measurable therapeutic benefit over CEF as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unselected locally advanced breast cancer patients.

Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a dose-dense primary chemotherapy on pathological response rate (pCR) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with combined modality therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IIIA/IIIB patients received three courses of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) followed by local therapy (total mastectomy or segmental mastectomy with axillary nodes dissection) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with three courses of CEF alternated with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients were randomized to receive ICT and ACT every 3 weeks (arm A, 'standard treatment') or every 2 weeks with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support (arm B, 'dose-dense treatment'). In both arms radiotherapy was administered after the end of chemotherapy (in selected cases) and patients with hormonal receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were randomized (77 arm A and 73 arm B) and demographics were well balanced between the two arms. Compliance to treatment was excellent: 95% and 93% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, completed the treatment program with no modification or delay. Median duration of treatment (ICT+local+ACT) was 183 days (range 0-265) in arm A and 139 days (0-226) in arm B. The average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of chemotherapy was 1.3 with a 30% increase in the dose intensity in arm B in comparison with arm A. No difference in clinical [62%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 49% to 73.2%] and pathological response rates to ICT was observed between the two arms. Median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-96 months); median disease-free survivals were 4.8 years in arm A and 4.5 years in arm B. Median overall survival was 7.8 years in standard therapy: this figure has not yet been reached in the dose-dense treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In LABC a dose-dense regimen, while allowing a 30% increase in the dose intensity of chemotherapy, did not provide significant improvement in pathological response rates. However, accelerated chemotherapy reduced the duration of the combined-modality program (6.1 versus 4.6 months) with no additional toxicities.

Local recurrence of metastatic brain tumor after stereotactic radiosurgery or surgery plus radiation

In this study, we compared the recurrence of metastatic brain tumors after radiosurgery versus after surgery plus radiation, and analyzed the factors associated with the recurrence of brain metastases. Twenty-eight and 35 patients with metastatic brain tumors underwent radiosurgery (52 lesions) and surgery plus radiation (46 lesions), respectively, between 1995 and 2001. The median tumor volume was 1.55 ml (range: 0.02-10.4 ml) in radiosurgery patients and 17.9 ml (range: 0.26-195 ml) in surgery plus radiation patients. The median radiosurgical tumor central and margin doses were 28.9 and 23.8 Gy (range: 20-35 and 25-15 Gy), respectively. The median total dose was 46.7 Gy (range: 30-63 Gy) in the surgery plus radiation group. The recurrence time from surgery plus radiation group (25 months) was significantly longer than that from the radiosurgery group (7.2 months) (p = 0.0199). The factors affecting the recurrence of brain metastases after radiosurgery were size, central dose of radiation and histology (colon vs. others). No factors affected the recurrence of brain metastases after surgery plus radiation. To avoid early recurrences of metastatic brain tumors, surgery plus radiation is the preferable therapeutic modality. The size and histology of brain metastases, and the dose of radiation should be considered for the effective treatment of tumors by radiosurgery.

Biological considerations in locally advanced breast cancer treated with anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy: thymidine labelling index is an independent indicator of clinical outcome

The present retrospective study aims to determine the clinical value of thymidine labelling index (TLI) together with other established clinical and biological factors in 116 locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients treated with anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. TLI was determined in 71 LABC patients with a median of 2.62% (0-23.64%) and a mean of 4.71% +/- 5.54. As a result of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 85 patients (73%) responded to chemotherapy (CT), whereas 31 patients were unresponsive (27%). No relationship has been found between the pretreatment biological variables including TLI, estrogen receptor (ER), progesteron receptor (PgR) status and clinical parameters such as the chemotherapy response rates and axillary lymph node involvement following chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 35 months (18-97 months) and the 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) rates were 71.6% and 52.2%, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with inflammatory breast cancer, high TLI-index (> or = 2.62%), lymph node (LN) positivity or > 3 positive lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and without any response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were found to have worse DFS and OS-rates and high local and systemic recurrence rates. In multivariate analysis, TLI was estimated as the most powerful independent factor affecting the OS in LABC patients among the other established clinical and biological parameters (p = 0.02). These results suggest that TLI is an important independent indicator of clinical outcome in patients with LABC and these patients with high TLI levels require more effective treatment modalities.

Neoadjuvant Moderately High-Dose Chemotherapy with rh-G-CSF in Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma

Aims and Background

The poor results of local treatment for locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC) justify the use of chemotherapy as primary treatment. Retrospective studies have shown a positive correlation between dose and response rate in advanced breast cancer. G-CSF has shown efficacy in achieving optimal dose intensity and ameliorating chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of a moderately high-dose chemotherapy regimen in terms of response rate, disease-free and overall survival and to assess the role of G-CSF in induced neutropenia.

Methods

Inclusion criteria were the following: age <65 years, WHO performance status <2, histologically proven breast carcinoma, adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function, stage IIIA or IIIB disease, and no metastatic disease. No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy was allowed. Three cycles of the following chemotherapy were used preoperatively: epirubicin (100 mg/m2 on day 1), cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days) and rh-G-CSF (5 μg/kg/die from day 4 to day 12 every 14 days). After mastectomy or quadrantectomy plus radiotherapy, all patients were treated with 4 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the CMF 1-8 schedule (methotrexate, 40 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2; fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2; all on days 1 and 8, with recycle every 4 weeks).

Results

From May 1992 to June 1996, 57 patients with histologically proven LABC were preoperatively treated. Forty-four patients were premenopausal and 13 postmenopausal; the median age was 45 years (range, 29-64). Thirty-five patients had stage IIIA and 22 patients stage IIIB disease (7 with inflammatory disease). Forty-seven patients underwent radical mastectomy and 10 conservative surgery. A clinical response was noted in 93% (95% confidence interval, 83-98%) of patients (12% complete responses and 81% partial responses); 2 pathological complete remissions (3.5%) were obtained. No toxic deaths were observed. All patients had a follow-up of at least 42 months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 76% (standard error - SE), 6%) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 68% (SE, 6.3%).

Conclusions

The 14-day regimen was well tolerated and effective in LABC patients, although not superior to standard-dose chemotherapy. To improve results the use of new drugs in controlled clinical trials seems warranted.

High complete pathological response in locally advanced breast cancer using paclitaxel and cisplatin

BACKGROUND

In an earlier study, we have demonstrated a high response rate in metastatic breast cancer using paclitaxel (P) and cisplatin (C). A phase II study using the same regimen (PC) has been conducted in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

METHODS

A total of 72 consecutive patients with non-inflammatory LABC (T2 > or = 4 cm, T3 or T4, N0-N2, M0). Patients were scheduled to receive 3-4 cycles of the neoadjuvant PC (paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1) every 21 days. Patients were then subjected to surgery and subsequently received 6 cycles of FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) or 4 cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2). Patients then received radiation therapy, and those with hormone receptor positive tumors were given adjuvant tamoxifen intended for 5 years.

RESULTS

The median age was 39 years (range, 24-78). Clinically, 7%, 58%, and 35% of patients had T2 > or = 4 cm, T3, and T4, respectively. Disease stage at diagnosis was IIB (33%), IIIA (27%), and IIIB (40%). Complete and partial clinical response to PC was demonstrated in 13 (18%), and 52 (72%) patients, respectively. Of those patients with evaluable pathologic response (68 patients), complete pathologic response (pCR) was achieved in 15 (22%) patients. At a median follow-up of 22 (+/- 3.5) months, 58 (81%) were alive with no recurrence, nine (12%) were alive with evidence of disease, and five (7%) were dead. None of the patients achieving pCR has developed any relapse. The median overall survival has not been reached for all 72 patients with a projected 3-year survival (+/- SE) of 90% (+/- 4%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 42.1 (+/- 4.8) months with a projected PFS of 74% +/- 7% at 3-years (for 68 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

PC regimen in LABC produced a high pCR. The contribution of the other added modalities to survival could not be assessed.

Molecular biology of breast cancer metastasis. Inflammatory breast cancer: clinical syndrome and molecular determinants

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive form of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) that effects approximately 5% of women with breast cancer annually in the USA. It is a clinically and pathologically distinct form of LABC that is particularly fast growing, invasive, and angiogenic. Nearly all women have lymph node involvement at the time of diagnosis, and approximately 36% have gross distant metastases. Despite recent advances in multimodality treatments, the prognosis of patients with IBC is poor, with a median disease-free survival of less than 2.5 years. Recent work on the genetic determinants that underlie the IBC phenotype has led to the identification of genes that are involved in the development and progression of this disease. This work has been aided by the establishment of primary human cell lines and animal models. These advances suggest novel targets for future interventions in the diagnosis and treatment of IBC.

The role of radiation therapy for primary breast cancer

Radiation therapy for breast cancer has gone through two revolutions in the last two decades: the routine use of radiation therapy in conjunction with breast-conserving surgery as an equivalent treatment to mastectomy, and the use of radiation therapy following mastectomy in advanced or node-positive disease. Indeed, the perception of postmastectomy radiation has gone full circle: from having no benefit when used for all cases, to being detrimental because of cardiac irradiation, to the present in which the selective use of irradiation in high-risk patients provides both an improvement in local control and an improvement of 8% to 10% in the survival rate. Improvements in radiation technique have reduced complications, in particular late cardiac deaths. The major issues still to be resolved are the targets for postmastectomy irradiation, determining which patients do not need radiation therapy for DCIS and for node-negative disease, and the efficacy of delivering radiation to just the affected quadrant rather than to the whole breast. At present, most patients approach radiation therapy for breast cancer with the knowledge that it has a very high probability of being successful.

Outcomes of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in stage IIIB inflammatory breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), prognostic factors, and treatment-related mortality of women with stage IIIB inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) treated with combined modality therapy (CMT) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem-cell transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1989 and 1997, 47 consecutive patients with stage IIIB IBC were treated with CMT and HDCT and were the subject of this retrospective analysis. Chemotherapy was administered to all patients before and/or after definitive surgery. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 33 and 34 patients, respectively, and 20 patients received both. All patients received HDCT with autologous stem-cell transplantation, and 41 patients received locoregional radiation therapy. Tamoxifen was prescribed to patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cancer.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up from diagnosis was 30 months (range, 6 to 91 months) and from HDCT was 22 months (range, 0.5 to 82 months). At 30 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of DFS and OS from diagnosis were 57.7% and 59.1%, respectively. At 4 years, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of DFS and OS from diagnosis were 51.3% and 51.7%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the only factors associated with better survival were favorable response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P =.04) and receipt of tamoxifen (P =.06); however, the benefit of tamoxifen was only demonstrated in patients with ER-positive breast cancer. At last follow-up, 28 patients (59. 6%) were alive and disease-free. Seventeen patients (36.2%) developed recurrent breast cancer. Seventeen patients died: 15 from disease recurrence and two (4.2%) from treatment-related mortality due to HDCT.

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, the early results of treatment with CMT and HDCT compare favorably with other series of patients with stage IIIB IBC treated with CMT alone. These outcomes must be confirmed with longer follow-up and controlled studies.

Locally advanced breast cancer: the outcome of primary polychemotherapy based on infusional 5 fluorouracil

Over a 5-year period, 75 patients with locally advanced breast cancer presenting to the Edinburgh Breast Unit were managed with a policy of infusional primary chemotherapy. For 65 patients, the regimens comprised infusional 5 fluorouracil with anthracycline and/or either cyclophosphamide or cisplatinum (AcF, CAF or ECF) whilst 10 older patients had CMF-inf. The overall activity and tolerability for the regimens was good with a 76% objective response rate including 15% clinical complete responses. Surgery was possible in 64% and pathological complete responses confirmed in 7 (9.3%). Median disease free survival (DFS) is 5.23 years. Factors predicting for DFS or Overall Survival (OS) were assessed in this small group and ER positive patients did better than ER negative although there was surprisingly no negative DFS or OS association with inflammatory disease or advancing age. We found a paradoxical interaction with use of post-chemotherapy tamoxifen which was significantly associated with poorer DFS and OS overall and in the ER negative subgroups.

Beyond palliative mastectomy in inflammatory breast cancer--a reassessment of margin status

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory breast cancer is a locally advanced tumor with an aggressive local and systemic course. Treatment of this disease has been evolving over the last several decades. The aim of this study was to assess whether current therapies, both surgical and chemotherapeutic, are providing better local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). We also attempted to identify clinical and pathologic factors that may be associated with improved OS, disease-free survival (DFS), and LC.

METHODS

A 25-year retrospective review performed at the City of Hope National Medical Center identified 90 patients with the diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer.

RESULTS

Of the 90 patients identified with inflammatory breast cancer, 33 received neoadjuvant therapy (NEO) consisting of chemotherapy followed by surgery with radiation (n = 26) and without radiation (n = 7). Fifty-seven patients received other therapies (nonNEO). Treatments received by the nonNEO group consisted of chemotherapy, radiation, mastectomy, adrenalectomy, and oophorectomy, alone or in combination. The median follow-up was 28.9 months for the NEO group and 17.6 months for the nonNEO group. Borderline significant differences in the OS distributions between the two groups were found (P = .10), with 3- and 5-year OS for the NEO group of 40.0% and 29.9% and for the nonNEO group of 24.7% and 16.5%, respectively. DFS and LC were comparable in the two groups. Lower stage was associated with an improved OS (P < .05). The 5-year OS for stage IIIB was 30.9%, compared to 7.8% for stage IV. In those patients with stage III disease who were treated with mastectomy and rendered free of disease, margin status was identified by univariate analysis to be a prognostic indicator for OS (P < .05). The 3-year OS, DFS, and LC for patients with negative margins were 47.4%, 37.5%, and 60.3%, respectively, compared to 0%, 16.7%, and 31.3% in patients with positive margins.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that in patients with inflammatory breast cancer and nonmetastatic disease, an aggressive surgical approach may be justified with the goal of a negative surgical margin. Achievement of this local control is associated with a better overall outcome for this subset of patients. The ability to obtain negative margins may further identify a group of patients with a less aggressive tumor biology that may be more responsive to other modalities of therapy.

The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to postoperative therapy in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer

The current approach to the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer is sequential chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiation, and consolidation chemotherapy. Although significant tumor response is seen with this regimen, there are few studies that compare this approach to postoperative chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to compare the disease-free and overall survival of patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery to patients treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Ninety-four patients with stage IIB, IIIA, and IIIB breast cancer were treated with a standardized chemotherapy regimen. The first group, 60 patients who were followed prospectively, was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) consisting of vincristine, prednisone, cytoxan, methotrexate, and 5-FU (CVFMP) followed by surgery and consolidation chemotherapy with adriamycin. The second group, 34 patients evaluated retrospectively, had surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy (PCT) with CVFMP followed by adriamycin. Overall median follow-up was 38 months. In the NCT group, 45/60 (75%) patients had a clinical response to induction therapy and the median reduction in tumor size was 50%. The rates of local recurrence, distant recurrence, and death from disease were similar in the two groups. The time to local recurrence was similar for the two groups. However, the median time to distant recurrence was shorter in the NCT group (19 month vs. 31 months, p = NS). Overall median survival among the NCT patients was shorter than for the PCT group (30 vs. 47 months, p = NS). The current study suggests that postoperative therapy is comparable to a neoadjuvant regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer with regard to local recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival.

Primary chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation for patients with stage II larger than 3 cm or locally advanced non-inflammatory breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate possibility of breast-conserving therapy and outcome for patients with locally advanced non-inflammatory breast cancer (LABC) and stage II >3 cm in diameter after primary chemotherapy (CT) followed by external preoperative irradiation (RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1982 and 1990, 147 patients were treated by four courses of induction CT (doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil) followed by preoperative RT (45 Gy to the breast and nodal areas) and a fifth course of CT. Three different loco-regional approaches were proposed depending on tumour characteristics and tumour response. After completion of local therapy, all patients received a sixth course of CT and a maintenance adjuvant CT regimen without anthracycline.

RESULTS

Mastectomy and axillary dissection were performed in 52 patients, and conservative treatment in 95 patients (48 achieved complete remission and received additional radiation boost to initial tumour bed; 47 had a residual mass < or =3 cm in diameter and were treated by wide excision and axillary dissection followed by a boost to the excision site. Ten-year actuarial loco-regional failure rate was 20% after RT alone, 23% after wide excision and RT and 6% after mastectomy (P = 0.85). After multivariate analysis, possibility of breast-conserving therapy was related to initial tumour size. Ten-year overall survival rate was 66%; it was not influenced by local treatment (conservative vs. non-conservative local treatment, P = 0.89). However, local failure significantly decreased overall survival (P < 0.0001). After multivariate analysis, tumour response after induction CT and clinical stage had a significant impact on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data indicate that induction CT followed by preoperative RT may permit the selection of some patients with LABC or stage II >3 cm for conservative treatment. The impact of this treatment modality on long term survival remains to be established.