A longitudinal study of oral ulcerative mucositis in bone marrow transplant recipients

Neutropenic ulcers in oncology: terminology, diagnosis, and management

Neutropenic ulcerations are characterized by mucosal ulcerations which occur in the presence of neutropenia, suggesting a direct link between neutropenia and mucosal ulceration. An oral ulcer can be labeled as "neutropenic" only if the patients have primary (typically congenital) or secondary neutropenia, and neutropenia is the sole causative factor. Oral mucosal ulcers observed in patients undergoing oncologic therapy may also be termed as "neutropenic ulcers", but the pathogenesis of these oral ulcers more likely involves mucosal events related to trauma, microbial factors, and direct cytotoxicity. In cancer patients, the early appearance of oral ulcers is often attributed to oral mucositis which is a condition primarily caused by the direct mucosal cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapy. Oral ulcers that develop later during or after active cancer therapy may result from intraoral trauma and typically manifest on non-keratinized areas of the oral mucosa which are more susceptible to mucosal damage. In patients undergoing chemotherapy, factors such as disturbances in mucosal barrier function as well as bone marrow suppression lead to reduced neutrophil count and function, and can contribute to the development of oral ulcers. While the etiology of oral ulcers in cancer therapy receiving patients can vary, it is important to emphasize that the host's response plays a crucial role in the progression and repair process of these lesions. This narrative review presents the etiopathogenesis, clinical presentation, and potential management approaches for oral ulcerations in neutropenic patients, with a particular focus on clarifying the usage of the term "neutropenic ulcer" since this term lacks diagnostic specificity and can be misleading in clinical practice regarding the underlying causes and treatment strategies.

Phase I-II Trial of Early Azacitidine after Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The hypomethylating agent azacitidine (AZA) has been shown to be effective in preclinical and clinical studies for the prevention of acute GVHD (aGVHD). We sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AZA when given on days 1 to 5 of a 28-day cycle for 4 cycles, starting on day +7 after allo-HCT, as well as its impact on aGVHD and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), relapse, and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing matched unrelated donor allo-HCT. This study was a single-arm, single-center, open-label phase I-II study with a total of 15 and 38 patients enrolled in the phase I and II portions of the trial, respectively. A standard 3+3 study design was used in phase I, and all patients in phase II received AZA at the MTD determined in phase I. The MTD of AZA starting at day +7 post-transplantation was 45 mg/m2. Phase II of the study was halted after enrolling 38 of the planned 46 patients following an interim analysis that suggested futility. Overall, AZA at 45 mg/m2 exhibited a side effect profile consistent with prior reports and had a minimal impact on engraftment. The cumulative incidence of clinically significant aGVHD by day +180 was 39.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22% to 53.7%). The incidence of all-grade cGVHD was 61.4% (95% CI, 40.3% to 75%). At 1 year, OS was 73.7% (95% CI, 60.9% to 89.1%), and the disease relapse rate was 11.4% (95% CI, .2% to 21.3%). Our results suggest that early post-allo-HCT AZA has limited efficacy in preventing aGVHD and cGVHD but could have a beneficial effect in preventing disease relapse.

Temporal variation in oral microbiome composition of patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation with keratinocyte growth factor

INTRODUCTION

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is a well-established treatment for lymphoma. Unintended effects of this therapy include oral mucositis (OM) and gastrointestinal toxicities, resulting in poor clinical outcomes. The gut microbiome has been previously linked to transplant toxicities among allogeneic recipients, but little is known about the effects of AHCT on the oral microbiome.

METHODS

Seven patients with non-Hodgkin or Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing AHCT with palifermin (keratinocyte growth factor) were included. Buccal swab samples were collected at baseline and 14- and 28-days post-treatment. Oral microbial communities were characterized with 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Temporal trends in community composition, alpha diversity, and beta diversity were investigated.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in the relative abundance of the genera Gemella and Actinomyces were observed from baseline. No significant temporal differences in alpha diversity were observed. Significant changes in beta diversity were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Results of this pilot study suggest treatment with AHCT and palifermin affects the oral microbiome, resulting in temporal shifts in oral microbial community composition. Future studies are warranted to confirm these trends and further investigate the effects of AHCT on the oral microbiome and how these shifts may affect health outcomes.

Salivary inflammatory mediators as biomarkers for oral mucositis and oral mucosal dryness in cancer patients: A pilot study

Oral mucositis (OM) is a common side effect in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and radiotherapy; however, no salivary mediator is known to be associated with OM. We aimed to determine candidate salivary inflammatory mediators potentially associated with OM in patients with cancer. To this end, we compared the relationships between OM grade, oral mucosal dryness, and inflammatory mediators (Interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), prostaglandin E2, and vascular endothelial growth factor) in patients with cancer and in healthy volunteers (HV). We collected saliva samples from 18 patients with cancer according to the following schedule: 1) within 14 days of treatment initiation, 2) within 3 days of OM occurrence, 3) when OM was improved or got worsened, and 4) within 7 days after chemotherapy completion. The oral care support team determined the OM grade at each sample collection point based on CTCAE version 5.0. Salivary inflammatory mediator concentrations were detected using cytometric bead array or enzyme-linked immunoassay. We compared oral mucosal dryness in pre- and post-index patients with cancer to that in HV (n = 33) using an oral moisture-checking device. Fourteen of eighteen patients experienced OM (four, grade 3 OM; four, grade 2 OM; six, grade 1 OM). IL-6, IL-10, and TNF salivary concentrations were significantly increased in the post-index group compared to those in the pre-index group (p = 0.0002, p = 0.0364, and p = 0.0160, respectively). Additionally, salivary IL-6, IL-10, and TNF levels were significantly higher in the post-index group than in the HV group (p < 0.0001, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). Significant positive correlations were observed between OM grade and salivary IL-6, IL-10, and TNF levels (p = 0.0004, r = 0.4939; p = 0.0171, r = 0.3394; and p = 0007, r = 0.4662, respectively). Oral mucosal dryness was significantly higher in the HV than in the pre- and post-index groups (p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that salivary IL-6, IL-10, and TNF levels may be used as biomarkers for OM occurrence and grade in patients with cancer. Furthermore, monitoring oral mucosal dryness and managing oral hygiene before cancer treatment is essential.

Adverse Effects of Total Body Irradiation: A Two-Decade, Single Institution Analysis

Purpose

Several adverse effects have been reported in the literature associated with total body irradiation (TBI). Reports of the adverse effects of TBI have been primarily drawn from single-institution retrospective analyses. We report, to our knowledge, one of the largest cohorts of patients treated with TBI using multiple preparative chemotherapy and radiation regimens.

Methods and Materials

A retrospective chart review was performed for all 705 patients treated with TBI at our institution from 1995 to 2017. Based on availability of TBI records, 622 patients (88%) had sufficient evaluable documentation for analysis. Patients received 1 of 4 conditioning regimens: busulfan-fludarabine, 2 Gy (BUFLU); fludarabine-melphalan, 2 Gy (FLUMEL); cyclophosphamide, 12 Gy fractionated (CY); or etoposide, 12 Gy fractionated (VP16). Individual patients were evaluated for 13 specific recognized adverse effects based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0.

Results

Mucositis (grade 3) was the most common serious adverse effect and occurred most frequently in the group receiving the VP16 12 Gy regimen (40% vs less than 14% in each of the other groups). Serious febrile neutropenia (grade 3-5) was less frequent (24%) among patients receiving CY than among those receiving the other conditioning regimens (more than 38% in each of the other groups). The incidence of serious lung infection was less common (5%) in patients receiving CY than in those receiving VP16 (18%). There was a higher frequency of grade 3-5 diarrhea among those receiving FLUMEL (5%) and VP16 (4%) than in the other groups (<3%) (P = .034). Otherwise, there were no detectable differences in serious toxicity by regimen for the 13 adverse effects reviewed. Only 2 secondary malignancies were reported, and both were in the BUFLU group. Cataract formation occurred in approximately 16% of patients overall, and the rates were similar across regimens. Median time to cataract formation was 1 to 4 years across regimens, with cataracts occurring earlier in the 2-Gy regimens. The overall rate of grade ≥3 pneumonitis was approximately 2% across the entire cohort.

Conclusions

Our nearly 20-year TBI experience showed relatively low rates of radiation-related toxicities. However, cataracts were common with a relatively short onset time.

Leucovorin Rescue After Methotrexate Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Shortens the Duration of Mucositis, Time to Neutrophil Engraftment, and Hospital Length of Stay

Oropharyngeal mucositis (OPM) is common following conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) and results in pain, functional status decline, need for nutritional support, infections, and prolonged length of stay (LOS). Methotrexate (MTX) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis exacerbates OPM and slows hematopoietic engraftment, which may prolong LOS. Previous studies have demonstrated reduced OPM and more rapid engraftment when leucovorin (LCV) is added following MTX GVHD prophylaxis, yet this practice is controversial. The primary objective of this study was to determine if the routine addition of LCV to MTX GVHD prophylaxis impacted the duration of grade 2 to 4 OPM. Secondary objectives included determination of the incidence of grade 2 to 4 and grade 3 to 4 OPM, time to engraftment, ability to receive all four planned MTX doses, use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN), use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), LOS, incidence of acute or chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). This single-center, retrospective cohort study compared alloHCT outcomes for 46 adult patients who received MTX 15 mg/m² day +1; MTX 10 mg/m² days +3, +6, and +11 (15-10-10-10); and LCV following days +3, +6, and +11 MTX compared to historical controls who did not. Patients who received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and matched related donor (MRD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) alloHCT were included. The addition of LCV resulted in significant reductions in the duration of grade 2 to 4 OPM (median, 6 days versus 10.5 days; P = .0004), duration of TPN (7 days versus 16 days; P = .001), PCA use (16% versus 39%; P = .0001), time to neutrophil engraftment (median, 18 versus 20 days; P = .008), and LOS (median, 27.5 versus 31 days; P = .017) compared to historical controls. Patients who received routine LCV had similar incidences of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD (30% versus 28%; relative risk [RR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], .57 to 2.03; P = 1.0), grade 3 or 4 acute GVHD (2% versus 7%; RR, .33; 95% CI, .04 to 3.09; P = .62) and chronic GVHD (37% versus 30%; RR, 1.21; 95% CI, .67 to 2.16; P = .66) compared to historical controls. Graft failure occurred in 2% of patients in each group. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, RFS was similar in the LCV group compared to historical controls (HR, .86; 95% CI, .24 to 1.2; P = .13); however, OS was improved in patients who received LCV (HR, .33; 95% CI, .13 to .83; P = .01). In patients undergoing MAC MRD/MUD alloHCT with four planned doses of MTX GVHD prophylaxis (15-10-10-10), LCV was associated with reduced duration of grade 2 to 4 OPM, faster neutrophil engraftment, reduced utilization of TPN and PCA, and shortened LOS compared to historical controls not receiving routine LCV. These benefits were apparent without an increased risk of acute or chronic GVHD or adverse effect on RFS. LCV improved OS; however, it is unclear if this was due to the intervention or an unmeasured confounder. A randomized, prospective trial of LCV prophylaxis in patients receiving MAC alloHCT and MTX 15-10-10-10 GVHD prophylaxis is warranted to confirm our findings.

Effect of Keratinocyte Growth Factor on Hospital Readmission and Regimen-Related Toxicities after Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma

Regimen-related toxicities with high-dose therapy followed by hematopoietic cell rescue leads to considerable patient distress, morbidity, and high readmission rates. Palifermin is a recombinant keratinocyte growth factor that is Food and Drug Administration-approved to decrease severe oral mucositis (OM) associated with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (ASCT) for hematologic malignancies. We added palifermin as a supportive care measure for patients with lymphoma undergoing ASCT with BEAM conditioning. We compared patients receiving palifermin (n = 35) with historical controls (n = 38) for toxicity and readmission outcomes. The cumulative incidence of OM of any grade was 23% in the palifermin-treated patients and 42% in the control group. Patients receiving palifermin were less likely to be readmitted (57% versus 82%; P = .04), had fewer hospital readmission days (median, 4 days versus 7 days; P < .01), and had fewer total days in the hospital through day +30 after ASCT (median, 12 days versus 15 days; P = .05). Fewer patients in the palifermin group had >20 days in the hospital through day +30 (9% in the palifermin group versus 23% of controls). Adverse events associated with palifermin were mild and transient. The addition of palifermin limits severe regimen-related toxicities and decreases readmissions and duration of hospital stay. This and other measures are needed to identify comprehensive and cost-effective approaches, possibly including palifermin, to prevent severe regimen-related toxicities and decrease health care resource utilization.

Association of HSV-1 and Reduced Oral Bacteriota Diversity with Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis in Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Oral mucositis (OM) is a common complication of chemotherapy and remains a significant unmet need. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of oral bacteriota and HSV-1 in OM. Forty-six patients admitted for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were longitudinally evaluated for OM, Candida, HSV-1, and leukocyte count, and buccal mucosal bacterial samples were obtained during their admission period. The bacterial communities collected at the baseline and post-chemotherapy, chosen from the time with the highest severity, were analyzed by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene. Twenty (43.5%) patients developed OM, the severity of which ranged from 1 to 5 according to the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS). Chemotherapy significantly increased the prevalence of HSV-1 detection but not that of Candida. The bacterial communities of patients after conditioning chemotherapy were characterized by aberrant enrichment of minor species and decreased evenness and Shannon diversity. After adjustment for age, gender, and neutropenia, the presence of HSV-1 was associated with the incidence of OM (odds ratio = 3.668, p = 0.004), while the decrease in Shannon diversity was associated with the severity of OM (β = 0.533 ± 0.220, p = 0.015). The control of HSV-1 and restoration of oral bacterial diversity may be a novel option to treat or prevent OM.

Potential Therapeutic Effects of Gut Hormones, Ghrelin and Obestatin in Oral Mucositis

Chemotherapy and/or head and neck radiotherapy are frequently associated with oral mucositis. Oral pain, odynophagia and dysphagia, opioid use, weight loss, dehydration, systemic infection, hospitalization and introduction of a feeding tube should be mentioned as the main determinated effect of oral mucositis. Oral mucositis leads to a decreased quality of life and an increase in treatment costs. Moreover, oral mucositis is a life-threatening disease. In addition to its own direct life-threatening consequences, it can also lead to a reduced survival due to the discontinuation or dose reduction of anti-neoplasm therapy. There are numerous strategies for the prevention or treatment of oral mucositis; however, their effectiveness is limited and does not correspond to expectations. This review is focused on the ghrelin and obestatin as potentially useful candidates for the prevention and treatment of chemo- or/and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis.

Treatment of systemic diseases and oral focal infection

Oral lesions are highly correlated with the occurrence and development of many diseases. In addition, the treatment of systemic diseases may aggravate oral focal infections, affect the life quality of patients, interfere with the treatment of systemic diseases, and even cause systemic infection in serious cases. Treatment strategies for systemic diseases may induce or aggravate oral local lesion infections. In specific, administration of oral antiepileptic drugs and immunosuppressive drugs may induce gingivitis, radiotherapy or chemotherapy for malignant tumors may cause oral mucositis, long-term use of bisphosphonates for inhibition of tumor bone metastasis or prevention of osteoporosis may cause osteonecrosis of the jaw, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may cause oral rejection reactions.

Circulating CD3+CD4+CD161+ Cells Are Associated with Early Complications after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

The aim of this study was to explore if measurement of pretransplant circulating CD161-expressing cells, in addition to clinical risk factors, could predict mucositis and infections in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). To determine if CD161-expressing cells are likely to predict early complications, namely, mucositis (≥grade 3), infections, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation, we prospectively examined CD161-expressing cells (CD3⁺CD4⁺CD161⁺ and CD3⁺CD8⁺CD161⁺) in peripheral blood samples from 108 patients with MM undergoing ASCT. After adjusting for factors identified by univariate analysis that predicted mucositis (≥grade 3), infection before engraftment, and CMV reactivation, multivariate analyses revealed that the low proportion of CD3⁺CD4⁺CD161⁺ cells in peripheral blood was an independent predictor of mucositis (≥grade 3) (P = 0.020), infections before engraftment (P = 0.014), and CMV reactivation (P = 0.010). In addition, we found that female sex and decreased glomerular filtration rate were independent factors for predicting mucositis. Female sex and severe pulmonary comorbidity were independent factors for predicting infection before engraftment. We found that the proportion of circulating CD3⁺CD4⁺CD161⁺ cells is useful for predicting the occurrence of early complications, including mucositis and infections, after ASCT in patients with MM.

Craniomaxillofacial Disorders and Solutions in Humans and Animals

Cross-disciplinary collaborations have initiated translational studies in an effort to harness naturally occurring diseases in companion animals to accelerate the development of new treatment modalities, drugs, and device inventions. These synergistic collaborations can identify clinically relevant models that offer the opportunity to conduct rigorous translational investigations. However, the relationship between craniomaxillofacial diseases in companion animals and humans has been widely overlooked. We report here an innovative and visionary 2-d symposium that was organized to gather professionals working on craniomaxillofacial disorders and solutions in humans and/or animals from multiple disciplines, including veterinary physicians, basic scientists, biomedical engineers, physicians, and dentists. The symposium provided a platform for junior and senior investigators and basic science and clinical researchers to network, collaborate, and develop a new clinical and translational framework for accelerated therapy development.

Burden of oral mucositis in stem cell transplant patients-the patients' perspective

PURPOSE

Purpose of this study was to determine the impact of Oral Mucositis (OM) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and quality of life associated symptoms and functions in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

Prospective, non-interventional single-center observational study at a German tertiary teaching hospital. Inpatient allogenic and autologous stem cell transplant patients ≥18-year-old with high-dose chemotherapy. OM was assessed with the WHO Oral Toxicity Scale, pain according to the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the performance status using the ECOG Score. QOL was captured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-OH15 questionnaires.

RESULTS

Forty-five stem cell transplant patients (20 autologous, 25 allogenic) were enrolled between August 2016 and February 2017. Twenty-six (58%, 95% CI: 42% - 72%) patients developed OM (10 grade I, 4 grade II, 8 grade III, 4 grade IV). OM affected patients suffered more from pain, sore mouth and sensitive mouth. A lower physical functioning (34.5 vs 7.5, p = 0.003) and a lower oral health-related quality of life (24.3 vs 7.7, p = 0.006) was found in patients with OM development. There was found a positive correlation between the grade of OM and the NRS-value (r = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.96, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

OM is associated with health-related quality of life and quality of life associated functions and symptoms. More research should be performed to find ways to prevent OM and to stabilize patients' quality of life during HSCT.

Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges prevent oral mucositis in patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy followed by haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Background

Oral mucositis is a common inflammatory complication in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and radiation followed by haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Lactobacillus brevis CD2 has been proven efficacious in preventing chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck.

Methods

This phase II study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of L. brevis CD2 lozenges in preventing oral mucositis in patients undergoing HSCT. Eligible patients received four to six lozenges of L. brevis CD2 per day, beginning from 4 to 7 days before initiation of chemotherapy and continuing until resolution of mucositis or till day +24.

Results

Of 31 patients enrolled, 7 (22.6%) patients did not develop any mucositis, 6 (19.4%) patients developed grade 1, 12 (38.7%) patients developed grade 2, 4 (12.9%) and 2 (6.5%) patients developed grade 3 and grade 4 mucositis, respectively. Median time to onset and for resolution of mucositis were 6 days and 8 days, respectively. No adverse events were reported with usage of study drug. However, one patient died of Klebsiella sepsis.

Conclusion

Promising results from the study encourage the use of L. brevis CD2 lozenges as a supportive care treatment option; however, a randomised, double-blind, multicentric trial in a larger population is warranted.

Trials registration number

NCT01480011 at https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ (Registered on Nov 04, 2011).

Palifermin: Role in the Prevention of Chemotherapy- and Radiation-Induced Mucositis

Objective:

To assess the efficacy, toxicity, and potential cost benefit of palifermin in the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiation-induced mucositis.

Data Sources:

MEDLINE and PubMed database searches were conducted (1966–May 2006) using the following search terms: palifermin, human keratinocyte growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, mucositis, and stomatitis.

Study Selection And Data Extraction:

All published clinical trials and abstracts examining the use of palifermin, as well as information from the manufacturer, were included.

Data Synthesis:

Severe mucositis resulting from anticancer therapies increases healthcare expenditures and negalively impacts patients' quality-of-life. Radiation therapy to the head and neck, as well as stem cell transplant conditioning regimens, have the highest incidence of severe mucositis. Consequences include prolonged hospitalization, need for parenteral nutrition, increased risk of infection, and severe pain. Palifermin is a recombinant human keratinacyte growth factor indicated in patients with hematologic malignancies who are undergoing stem cell transplant. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial, palifermin significantly reduced the incidence and duration of severe mucositis and days of parenteral nutrition and opioid analgesics in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant. The most common adverse effects of palifermin were rash, pruritus, cough, and taste alterations. Data in patients with solid tumors are limited, and there is a theoretical risk of stimulating tumor growth.

Conclusions:

Treatment with palifermin appears to decrease the severity and duration of severe mucositis following autologous stem cell transplant. Use in these patients appears justified: however, use in non-stem cell transplant patients should bo discouraged until more efficacy and toxicity data are available.

Prevention of Oral Candidiasis After Free Flap Surgery: Role of 3% Sodium Bicarbonate Saline in Oral Care

PURPOSE

Relevant reports about oral candidiasis status and prevention measures after free flap surgery for the oral and maxillofacial region are limited. The present study explored oral candidiasis status after free flap surgery and its prevention through a prospective comparative study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred four patients were randomized to a control group (n = 54) and an experimental group (n = 50). Compared with the control group, the experimental group was provided an additional 3% sodium bicarbonate saline solution for oral care after free flap surgery. The incidence of oral candidiasis was evaluated by objective examination (saliva culture and salivary pH measurement) and subjective evaluation (clinical signs of oral candidiasis) at admission and from postoperative days 1 to 14.

RESULTS

The salivary pH values of the 2 groups were lower than the normal salivary pH, and postoperative salivary pH values were always lower than the active range of oral lysozymes in the control group. The salivary pH values of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group from postoperative days 6 to 14 (P < .05). The incidence of oral candidiasis was 13.0% in the control group, which was higher than that in the experimental group (2.0%; P < .05). In addition, advanced age, use of a free flap for the simultaneous repair of intraoral and paraoral defects, and a combination of 2 antibiotic types were risk factors for oral candidiasis.

CONCLUSION

Oral candidiasis was common in patients after free flap reconstruction surgery, and the use of 3% sodium bicarbonate saline solution for oral care effectively prevented it.

Cutaneous manifestations of nontargeted and targeted chemotherapies

Care of the oncologic patient requires an integral understanding of the adverse reactions of chemotherapy. With the advent of targeted agents and immunomodulating therapies, reactions to these newer treatments are of clinical interest. Cutaneous side effects of chemotherapeutic agents, including toxic erythema and mucositis, are common and may require cessation of treatment if associated with discomfort, superinfection, or negative impact on quality of life. This article reviews the cutaneous adverse reactions and treatment options of both conventional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and newer targeted, multikinase inhibitors and immunomodulating therapies. An understanding of possible cutaneous reactions by all providers involved in the care of the oncologic patient is critical for prompt recognition, allowing for appropriate treatment and referral to dermatologists when necessary.

Noninfectious Generalized Bronchiolitis in the Setting of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Potential Mimic of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To describe a little-known therapy-related small-airway phenomenon presumably caused by mucosal irritation in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective database search at our institution identified 739 hematologic patients who underwent chemotherapy + allo-SCT between September 2004 and March 2014. After infectious pulmonary complications were excluded, 75 patients (female = 24; male = 51; median age = 47 years) with signs of generalized bronchiolitis (GB) on chest high-resolution computed tomography were identified. Computed tomography (CT) was performed proximate to chemotherapy onset; 92% had follow-up CT (mean, 1.9 weeks). The presence of centrilobular nodules, bronchial wall thickening (BWT), tree-in-bud (distributed diffuse vs. focal), ground-glass opacity, airspace opacification, luminal impactions, and air trapping was correlated with occurrence and duration of oral mucositis and therapy characteristics. Intensity of tree-in-bud and centrilobular nodules was graded absent (grade = 0), moderate (grade = 1), or marked (grade = 2).

RESULTS

Overall incidence of GB among allo-SCT patients was 10.14%. GB was diagnosed at the time point of transplantation with a mean duration of CT findings of 4 weeks (±2.7). Tree-in-bud (17% [grade 2] and 83% [grade 1]) and BWT were present in 100% of the patients. Centrilobular nodules diffusely distributed were found in 45.5% of patients (20% [grade 2], 24% [grade 1], and 56% [none]). Air trapping and mosaic pattern were found in 13% and 16% of the patients, respectively. Resolution of GB was spontaneous. GB and its severity correlated with the temporal course and grade of oral mucositis; frequency and degree were not significantly influenced by the chemotherapy regimen. The incidence of GB in high-resolution computed tomography was statistically and significantly higher in patients with oral mucositis (P < 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

GB is frequent during chemotherapy for allo-SCT and is characterized by an even distribution of tree-in-bud, BWT, centrilobular nodules, mild clinical symptoms, and spontaneous resolution.

The efficacy of erythropoietin mouthwash in prevention of oral mucositis in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic SCT: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Oral mucositis (OM) as a complication of high-dose chemotherapy is frequently occurred in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) settings. Erythropoietin (EPO) has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and wound-healing properties and therefore could have an important role in the prevention of OM. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the EPO mouthwash effect on OM incidence and severity in 80 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin disease (HD) or multiple myeloma, undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Patients received either EPO mouthwash (50 IU/ml, 15 ml four times a day) (n = 40) or placebo (n = 40) from the starting day of high-dose chemotherapy until day +14 after transplantation or until the day of discharge from the hospital, whichever occurred first. OM was evaluated daily for 21 days after transplantation or until resolution of OM according to World Health Organization oral toxicity scale. The incidence of OM (grades 1-4) in the EPO mouthwash group and control group was significantly different (27.5% vs 77.5%, p < 0.001). The mean ± SD of two other parameters of OM including maximum intensity OM score (0.60 ± 1.06 vs 1.67 ± 1.27) and average intensity OM score (0.47 ± 0.80 vs 1.28 ± 0.86) was significantly lower in the intervention group (p < 0.001). Moreover, the mean ± SD duration of OM was also significantly shorter among the EPO mouthwash recipients (1.92 ± 3.42 days vs 5.42 ± 3.86 days, P < 0.001). Also, the duration of neutropenic fever was significantly shorter in the intervention group (2.12 ± 2.42 days vs 3.95 ± 4.01 days, p = 0.016). It is concluded that EPO mouthwash can reduce the incidence and duration of OM. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Protective effects of aqueous extract of Solanum nigrum Linn. leaves in rat models of oral mucositis

Oral mucositis is one of the most debilitating side effects in patient undergoing chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Leaves of the plant Solanum nigrum are used in folklore medicine to treat oral ulcers in India. However, no pharmacological investigation has been carried out till date. Aqueous extract of Solanum nigrum leaves (AESN) was prepared and subjected to various phytochemical screening. HPLC analysis of the ethyl acetate fraction was carried out. The aqueous extract (100 and 200 mg/kg) was further evaluated for its protective effect on two rat models: (a) busulfan plus infrared radiation (chemoradiotherapy) induced oral mucositis and (b) methotrexate (chemotherapy) induced oral mucositis. Various parameters including body weight change, food intake, and mortality were measured. AESN showed protective effect in both models of oral mucositis; however, the higher dose was more effective in chemotherapy induced oral mucositis. A reduction in oral mucositis score (P < 0.05) was observed in the treatment groups. Significant (P < 0.05) improvement in food intake was also observed in AESN treated groups. Aqueous extract of Solanum nigrum leaves has protective effect on chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy induced oral mucositis in rats.

Effect of prophylactic low level laser therapy on oral mucositis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Objective was to determine whether prophylactic low level laser therapy (LLLT) reduces the risk of severe mucositis as compared to placebo or no therapy.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until February 2014 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic LLLT with placebo or no therapy in patients with cancer or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). All analyses used random effects models.

RESULTS

Eighteen RCTs (1144 patients) were included. Prophylactic LLLT reduced the overall risk of severe mucositis (risk ratio (RR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20 to 0.67; P = 0.001). LLLT also reduced the following outcomes when compared to placebo/no therapy: severe mucositis at the time of anticipated maximal mucositis (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.59), overall mean grade of mucositis (standardized mean difference -1.49, 95% CI -2.02 to -0.95), duration of severe mucositis (weighted mean difference -5.32, 95% CI -9.45 to -1.19) and incidence of severe pain (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.37).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic LLLT reduced severe mucositis and pain in patients with cancer and HSCT recipients. Future research should identify the optimal characteristics of LLLT and determine feasibility in the clinical setting.

Reduced intensity conditioning and oral care measures prevent oral mucositis and reduces days of hospitalization in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients

PURPOSE

Oral mucositis (OM) is a side effect of intensive chemotherapy and radiation and has been reported to affect 75-100% of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of OM in patients conditioned with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) to reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and to determine the effect of a new oral care protocol.

METHODS

The study involved 171 HSCT recipients, with hematological malignancies transplanted between 2007 and 2011. Median age of the patients was 50 years (range 12-71). Ninety-nine (58%) received RIC and 72 received MAC. Clinical features of OM were recorded from day -3 before to day +25 after HSCT using the World Health Organization (WHO) scoring system and the oral mucositis assessment score (OMAS).

RESULTS

Overall, 87% of the patients developed OM of any severity, which peaked on days 10-11. The mean WHO score was 1.7. In multivariate analysis, the severity of OM was associated with MAC (relative hazard (RH) 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37-1.80, p < 0.001), all donor-recipient gender combinations except female-to-male (RH = 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.4, p = 0.001), and early year of HSCT (RH = 0.84, 95%CI 0.7-0.96, p = 0.013). There was a correlation between long hospitalization and OM (day 15, r = 0.31, p < 0.001). There was a good correlation between the WHO and OMAS scoring systems for OM (r = 0.74, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral mucositis was reduced in patients treated with RIC and in patients treated during recent years, when oral care was intensified. Increased scores of OM prolonged hospitalization.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of palifermin to prevent mucositis among patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Trials have shown benefits of palifermin in reducing the incidence and severity of oral mucositis in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with total body irradiation (TBI)-based conditioning regimens. Similar outcome data are lacking for patients receiving non-TBI-based regimens. We performed a retrospective evaluation on the pharmacoeconomic benefit of palifermin in the setting of non-TBI-based conditioning and autologous HSCT. Between January 2002 and December 2010, 524 patients undergoing autologous HSCT for myeloma (melphalan 200 mg/m²) and lymphoma (high-dose busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide) as preparative regimen were analyzed. Use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was significantly lower in the palifermin-treated groups (myeloma: 13% versus 53%, P < .001; lymphoma: 46% versus 68%, P < .001). Median total transplant charges were significantly higher in the palifermin-treated group, after controlling for inflation (myeloma: $167,820 versus $143,200, P < .001; lymphoma: $168,570 versus $148,590, P < .001). Palifermin treatment was not associated with a difference in days to neutrophil engraftment, length of stay, and overall survival and was associated with an additional cost of $5.5K (myeloma) and $14K (lymphoma) per day of PCA avoided. Future studies are suggested to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of palifermin compared with other symptomatic treatments to reduce transplant toxicity using validated measures for pain and quality of life.

Clinical applications of palifermin: amelioration of oral mucositis and other potential indications

Mucositis is one of the most significant toxicities in cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic treatment. It can have a negative impact on both quality of life and health economics. Severe oral mucositis can contribute to hospitalization, need for narcotic analgesics, total parentral nutrition, suboptimal delivery of anti-neoplastic treatment, and morbidity and mortality. Palifermin, a recombinant derivative of human keratinocyte growth factor, is the first active agent approved by the FDA for the prevention of severe oral mucositis in patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Several studies have also shown significant reduction in the incidence, severity and/or duration of oral mucositis in other high-risk settings such as concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CT/RT) for patients with head and neck cancer, and use of mucotoxic chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin in sarcoma and fluorouracil for the treatment of colorectal cancer. The reduction in mucositis has translated into amelioration of symptoms and improvement in daily functioning as measured by patient-reported outcome in multiple studies. The clinical response to palifermin appears to be related in part to epithelial proliferation and mucosal thickening. Palifermin also has other potential clinical applications including the acceleration of immune reconstitution and inhibition of graft-versus-host disease in patients undergoing HSCT, and mitigation of dysphagia in lung cancer patients treated with concurrent CT/RT. Palifermin is generally well tolerated with mild-to-moderate skin and oral adverse events. Future studies may expand the use of palifermin into other areas that would benefit from its cytoprotective and regenerative effects.

Chemotherapeutic and antiresorptive combination therapy suppressed lymphangiogenesis and induced osteonecrosis of the jaw-like lesions in mice

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a serious adverse event that occurs predominantly in patients on both antiresorptive and antineoplastic therapies. However, how these combination therapies are connected to the high frequency of ONJ in this particular patient population is unclear. This study's aim was to determine a mechanism of ONJ associated with the combination therapy of antiresorptives and chemotherapeutics. Mice received zoledronic acid (ZA) in conjunction with melphalan or dexamethasone. The maxillary first molars were extracted 3 weeks after the initiation of treatment and wound healing assessed at 4 weeks post-extractions using microcomputed tomography and immunohistochemistry. Mice receiving the combination treatment of ZA and melphalan developed ONJ-like lesions, while ONJ-like lesions were not found in mice on ZA or melphalan monotherapy, or the combination treatment of ZA and dexamethasone. ONJ lesions were characterized by a lack of epithelium, exposed necrotic bone, severe inflammatory cell infiltration, and minimal bone formation. Fluorescent immunohistochemistry showed that lymphatic vessel formation was significantly suppressed in ONJ-like lesions with a concomitant decrease in F4/80(+) macrophages expressing vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC). Interestingly, significantly suppressed lymphatics were also found in the draining lymph nodes of mice on the combination treatment of ZA and melphalan. Thus, suppressed lymphangiogenesis was strongly associated with the development of ONJ-like lesions in the current study. Since lymphangiogenesis is critical in the resolution of inflammation during wound healing, inflammation control may serve as a potential strategy to prevent ONJ.

Silver nanoparticles as active ingredient used for alcohol-free mouthwash

We developed an effective and non-irritant mouthwash that is alcohol-free and has a low concentration of silver nanoparticles (SNP) in order to be used for preventing oral cavity infections in immunocompromised oncologic patients. We studied antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles (SNP) in the range of (50-0.024 µg/ml) and 3% of ethanol (30,000 µg/ml) in mouthwash. Antimicrobial effects of two treatments were studied by doing challenge test on microorganisms such as Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans and measuring MIC and MBC (MFC) values of SNP toward mentioned microorganisms. These values of SNP respectively were in the range of (0.78-3.12) and (1.56-12.5 µg/ml). Results showed that SNP in the MIC and the lower concentrations killed all of the used microorganisms. No difference was observed between the antimicrobial effect of ethanol-free mouthwash containing SNP and mouthwash containing SNP and ethanol (30,000 µg/ml). SNP has high antimicrobial effects at low concentrations and it can be a good alternative for ethanol (30,000 µg/ml) because ethanol is also irritating, especially to sensitive or inflamed mucosa.

Effect of Renal Function on the Pharmacokinetics of Palifermin

Palifermin (deltaN23KGF) decreases the incidence, severity, and duration of oral mucositis. The objectives of this open-label study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of single-dose palifermin in subjects with varying degrees of renal function. A single 90-mcg/kg intravenous dose of palifermin was administered to 31 subjects with varying levels of renal function (normal to requiring hemodialysis). Pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted using serum palifermin concentrations. There was considerable overlap in mean palifermin serum clearance among the groups, ranging from 318 to 495 mL/h/kg, indicating that the level of renal function did not affect clearance in humans; thus, no dose adjustment of palifermin is indicated for patients with renal dysfunction.

Recombinant human epidermal growth factor on oral mucositis induced by intensive chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation

Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the most common and debilitating complications in patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rhEGF) oral spray for OM induced by intensive chemotherapy followed by HSCT. Patients were randomly assigned to either the rhEGF group or placebo group. The severity of OM and self-reported quality of life (QOL) were assessed daily. A total of 58 patients were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The incidence of NCI grade ≥ 2 OM was higher in the rhEGF group (78.6% vs. 50%, P = 0.0496). However, the duration of OM in patients with NCI grade ≥ 2 tended to be shorter in the rhEGF group (8.5 days vs. 14.5 days, P = 0.262). The QOL analysis in patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade ≥ 3 OM showed that rhEGF significantly reduced limitations in swallowing (P = 0.039) and drinking (P = 0.042). The duration of hospitalization (P = 0.047), administration of total parenteral nutrition (P = 0.012), and the usage of opioid analgesics (P = 0.018) were significantly shorter in the rhEGF group with WHO grade ≥ 3 OM. Adverse events were mild and similar between the two groups. In conclusion, this analysis showed that rhEGF did not reduce the incidence of NCI grade ≥ 2 OM. However, the patients with WHO grade ≥ 3 OM in the rhEGF group showed better results compared to the placebo group for several secondary endpoints.

Oral bacteria and yeasts in relationship to oral ulcerations in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Oral mucositis is a serious and debilitating side effect of conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Through HSCT, the homeostasis in the oral cavity is disrupted. The contribution of the oral microflora to mucositis remains to be clarified. The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between yeasts, bacteria associated with periodontitis, and oral ulcerations in HSCT recipients.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 49 adult HSCT recipients. Twice weekly, oral ulcerations were scored, and oral rinsing samples were obtained. Samples were evaluated for the total bacterial load; the Gram-negative bacteria: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Parvimonas micra, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola; and the yeasts: Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida kefyr, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida tropicalis using real-time polymerase chain reaction with specific primers and probes. Explanatory variables for oral ulcerations were calculated using the multilevel generalized estimated equations (GEE) technique.

RESULTS

None of the samples was positive for A. actinomycetemcomitans, while F. nucleatum was found most often (66 % of samples). C. albicans was the most isolated yeast (88 % of samples), whereas C. parapsilosis was found in only 8 % of the samples. Multivariate GEE analyses identified P. gingivalis, P. micra, T. denticola, F. nucleatum, C. glabrata, and C. kefyr as significant explanatory variables of oral ulcerations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that P. gingivalis in particular, but also P. micra, T. denticola, F. nucleatum, C. glabrata, and C. kefyr may play a role in ulcerative oral mucositis in patients undergoing HSCT.

Palifermin is efficacious in recipients of TBI-based but not chemotherapy-based allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants

Palifermin, a recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor, is commonly given to prevent mucositis following autologous transplantation. In the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) setting, safety and efficacy data are limited. We conducted a retrospective study in 251 patients undergoing allo-HSCT, 154 of whom received peritransplant palifermin. In all patients, palifermin significantly decreased the mean number of days of total parenteral nutrition (TPN, 13 vs 16 days, P=0.006) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, 6 vs 10 days, P=0.023), as well as the length of initial hospital stay (LOS, 32 vs 37 days, P=0.014). However, the effect of palifermin was only significant in patients who received a TBI- but not BU-based chemotherapy conditioning regimen. In TBI recipients, palifermin decreased the mean number of days of TPN (13 vs 17 days, P<0.001) and PCA (7 vs 12 days, P=0.033), and the length of stay (32 vs 38 days, P=0.001). Palifermin did not affect GVHD, graft failure or relapse. Therefore, in the largest analysis with this patient population to date, we demonstrate that palifermin is safe in allo-HSCT patients, decreases TPN and PCA use and decreases LOS following TBI-based but not chemotherapy-based allo-HSCT.

A pilot randomized controlled trial of an oral care intervention to reduce mucositis severity in stem cell transplant patients

CONTEXT

Oral mucositis remains a significant problem in autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

OBJECTIVES

This pilot trial assessed the effectiveness of oral cryotherapy plus an oral care protocol in reducing oral mucositis severity in ASCT patients.

METHODS

Patients admitted for ASCT were randomly allocated to either the experimental arm (n=23) or usual care (n=23). All participants received information on principles of good oral hygiene and skills training in oral self-care. Patients in the experimental arm had a 60-minute regimen of oral cryotherapy. The primary outcome of oral mucositis severity and secondary outcomes of mucositis-related pain and functional intake of food and fluids were measured at Days -1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Length of hospital stay was determined by counting backward from discharge day to admission. Perception of tolerability and acceptability of the 60-minute cryotherapy and frequency of the oral care regimen also were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were recruited at the study site in six months. The overall mean (SE) of oral mucositis severity for the experimental arm was significantly lower than that for the control group: 0.43 (0.12) vs. 1.14 (0.12); P<0.001, on a 0-4 scale. The overall mean (SE) mucositis-related pain score for the experimental arm also was significantly lower than that for the control group: 0.30 (0.23) vs. 1.64 (0.24); P<0.001, on a 0-10 scale.

CONCLUSION

Oral cryotherapy plus an oral care protocol appears to be beneficial in reducing severity of mucositis compared with an oral care protocol alone.

Management of cancer therapy-induced oral mucositis

The oral mucosa is a common site for collateral damage of cancer therapies, including radiation, cytotoxic medication, and newer targeted therapies. Ulcerative oral mucositis is typically painful and affects oral functions including speech, and oral intake of food and medications, thus impacting the quality of life. Denuded epithelium may also provide access of oral microbial flora to the deeper tissues and the circulation. Prevention of oral mucositis is an ongoing quest currently with relatively few answers. In this chapter, the present authors discuss the evidence and current practice for prophylaxis and management of this treatment side effect in cancer patients.

Mucositis in malignant hematology

Mucosal barrier injury (MBI), also known as mucositis, is the result of the cytotoxic effects of many treatments given for hematological malignancies (HMs) and represents a major source of potentially devastating clinical complications and negative consequences afflicting the patient's management, such as a longer hospitalization, the need of analgesic and total parenteral nutrition use, and increased costs. The available measures for the prevention and treatment of MBI have been substantially limited to the control of pain, infection, bleeding and nutrition. However, in the last decade, a better insight into the complex pathogenesis of MBI has led to the development of novel therapeutic options, such as palifermin, which has been one of the major breakthroughs in the management of this condition, potentially allowing a targeted approach to MBI. Nevertheless, and despite these significant advances, MBI still remains a significant clinical problem in the management of HM and an important burden of sufferance for afflicted patients.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of palifermin for mucosal protection from chemotherapy and radiation

INTRODUCTION

Oral mucositis, one of the major side effects of chemotherapy and irradiation, is still a burden of modern oncology. The keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) palifermin has been approved as a new, targeted therapy for the prevention of severe oral mucositis.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the literature on pharmacokintetics and clinical use of palifermin in patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors for the prevention of chemo- and radiation-induced mucositis by using the PubMed database and additional literature where applicable. The article includes in vitro data, clinical trials as well as case reports regarding dosage, administration schedule, efficacy and adverse events.

EXPERT OPINION

There is sufficient data for a beneficial effect of palifermin prophylaxis for patients with hematological cancers receiving high-dose chemotherapy and total body irradiation as well as patients with head and neck cancer receiving combined irradiation and chemotherapy. In less mucotoxic regimens, dose and schedule of palifermin to achieve protection from mucositis are less well defined. The balance of benefit and unwanted effects has to be evaluated and weighed for individual chemotherapy regimens and patient groups. Further research on the prevention of mucositis should aim to determine the patient's individual risk to develop severe mucositis.

Association of oral mucositis with quality of life and symptom clusters in patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The study aims to determine whether or not oral mucositis (OM) during active chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors is representative of the patient's quality of life (QOL) and the suffering from adverse effects.

METHODS

From October 2007 to September 2008, we prospectively enrolled 344 consecutive patients with solid tumors who initiated a new chemotherapy regimen. OM, other adverse effects, and the QOL were surveyed by face-to-face interviews and patient diaries.

RESULTS

OM developed during 175 of 633 cycles (27.7%). Forty-five percent of the patients experienced OM during two cycles of chemotherapy. The QOL in patients with OM was significantly lower than patients without OM, as evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (70.26 ± 15.36 and 75.09 ± 13.12, respectively; p < 0.001). Specifically, the physical and emotional well-being was lower in patients with OM compared with patients without OM. Moreover, other adverse effects were more frequent in chemotherapy cycles with OM compared with chemotherapy cycles without OM (amount of food intake, activity, nausea, vomiting, fever, myalgias, and sensory neuropathy; p < 0.001, p = 0.008, p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

OM represents poor QOL and is a basic symptom of symptom clusters in patients with solid tumors receiving active chemotherapy.

Incidence and severity of oral mucositis in patients undergoing haematopoietic SCT--results of a multicentre study

Oral mucositis (OM) is a common side effect experienced during haematopoietic SCT (HSCT), and it can have a significant impact on the quality of life of patients. A descriptive nurse-led study was undertaken in 19-member centres of the Italian national transplant group (GITMO) evaluating incidence, severity and duration of OM in patients undergoing HSCT. Data from 1841 patients between 2002 and 2006 was analyzed. Initial medical history and oral cavity assessment was performed. Assessment was repeated on the day of transplant, then daily, using the WHO (World Health Organisation) oral toxicity scale. A total of 71% of the patients evaluated developed mucositis and 21.6% developed severe mucositis. Duration of OM in most cases lasted for 10-14 days and resolved along with marrow reconstitution. Oral mucostitis is a frequent side effect in patients undergoing HSCT. The onset of severe mucositis seems to be related to the conditioning regimen used. This database provides a descriptive overview of the incidence and severity of mucositis and has encouraged participating centres to adopt routine evaluation and measurement of the oral cavity. The assessment tools are still used in some centres, providing a basis for further collaborative research projects.

Prevention and management of antineoplastic therapy induced oral mucositis

With the scientific advancements in the management of malignant diseases, the treatment is expensive and bears high morbidity in term of oral mucositis. It is a debilitating condition and has been researched extensively for its pathogenesis and treatment. Various treatment options include barrier forming, mucosal protectants, mouth rinses, growth factors, lasers and midline-sparing procedures. Some agents are used locally while others are administered systemically. Despite the availability of a wide range of treatment options for mucositis, a cost-effective treatment is yet to be evolved.

[Effectiveness of palifermin in the prevention of oral mucositis in patients with haematological cancers]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of palifermin for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients with haematological cancers.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of cohorts of patients with haematological cancer undergoing cytotoxic therapy causing hematopoietic ablation. The main variable assessed was the duration of the oral mucositis. Secondary variables assessed were incidence of mucositis, febrile or septic neutropenia and the administration of opioids and parenteral nutrition.

RESULTS

We included 36 patients in this study, 11 in the group that received palifermin and 25 in the control group. The duration of oral mucositis was 4.6+/-3.1 days (median: 5 days) in the patients treated with palifermin in comparison with 7.4+/-4.0 days (median: 6 days) in patients treated with conventional prophylactic therapy (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were seen in the incidence of mucositis, febrile or septic neutropenia, opioid administration of the use of parenteral nutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic treatment with palifermin reduces the duration of oral mucosities in patients with haematological cancer. Further studies are necessary with larger samples to be able to assess palifermin and its influence on other variables, such as incidence of mucositis, sepsis, febrile neutropenia, etc.

Implementation of a standardized protocol for prevention and management of oral mucositis in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation

Purpose. Oral mucositis is a serious problem that affects a significant number of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. There are many gaps in management, and evidence-based guidelines do not provide consistent recommendations. The purpose of this pilot study was to develop a mucositis oral care protocol for the prevention and management of mucositis in the HCT patient and to evaluate the clinical impact of its implementation.

Methods. After receipt of Institutional Review Board approval, all patients admitted to the Hematology—Oncology service for high-dose chemotherapy followed by an autologous or allogeneic HCT were eligible for the study. As part of a change in practice, a new mucositis protocol consisting of a specific oral care regimen was instituted for prevention and treatment of mucositis. Assessment of mucositis began upon admission to the hospital and the patient was evaluated using a mucositis grading scale on a daily basis by the physician and nursing staff. The new mucositis protocol was a part of the HCT service admission orders for each patient. The group of patients treated according to the new mucositis protocol were compared with a retrospective control group consisting of patients who had undergone management of oral mucositis under the previous standard of care. The primary endpoints were to evaluate incidence, severity, and duration of oral mucositis. Secondary endpoints included days requiring narcotics; days of parenteral nutrition, febrile neutropenia, antimicrobial therapy, and length of hospital stay.

Results. There were 13 patients enrolled in the control group and 12 patients in the new protocol group. The new protocol resulted in a decreased incidence (100% vs. 75%) and duration (19.2 vs. 8.3 days) of mucositis. Days of maximum grade one and three mucositis were decreased by 56%, and 70%, respectively. Days of maximum grade two mucositis, however increased by 22%. The days of narcotic use were reduced by 19% in the new protocol group (15.8 vs. 12.8 days). All patients in the new protocol group required parenteral nutrition, but days of use were reduced by 41% (17 vs. 10.2 days). The incidence of infection measured by days of febrile neutropenia and antimicrobial therapy were reduced by 35% (10.2 vs. 6.5 days) and 33% (17 vs. 11.4 days). Finally, the overall length of hospital stay was reduced by 7 days (30 vs. 23 days).

Conclusion. Implementation of a standardized oral care protocol for mucositis management resulted in a decreased incidence, duration and severity of mucositis, and also reduced the global negative impact of mucositis. Future studies may further evaluate the global impact by adjusting for confounding factors. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2010) 16: 195—204.