1
|
Norton BY, Liu J, Lewis SA, Magee H, Kruer TN, Dinh R, Bakhtiari S, Nordlie SH, Shetty S, Heim J, Nishiyama Y, Arango J, Johnson D, Seabrooke L, Shub M, Rosenberg R, Shusterman M, Wisniewski S, Cooper B, Rothwell E, Fahey MC, Shrader MW, Lennon N, Oleszek J, Pierce W, Fleming H, Belthur M, Tinto J, Noritz G, Glader L, Steffan K, Walker W, Grenard D, Aravamuthan B, Bjornson K, Joseph M, Gross P, Kruer MC. Development and validation of a stakeholder-driven, self-contained electronic informed consent platform for trio-based genomic research studies. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.05.01.24306461. [PMID: 39040210 PMCID: PMC11261908 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.01.24306461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Increasingly long and complex informed consents have yielded studies demonstrating comparatively low participant comprehension and satisfaction with traditional face-to-face approaches. In parallel, interest in electronic consents for clinical and research genomics has steadily increased, yet limited data are available for trio-based genomic discovery studies. We describe the design, development, implementation, and validation of an electronic iConsent application for trio-based genomic research deployed to support genomic studies of cerebral palsy. iConsent development incorporated stakeholder perspectives including researchers, patient advocates, institutional review board members, and genomic data-sharing considerations. The iConsent platform integrated principles derived from prior electronic consenting research and elements of multimedia learning theory. Participant comprehension was assessed in an interactive teachback format. The iConsent application achieved nine of ten proposed desiderata for effective patient-focused electronic consenting for genomic research. Overall, participants demonstrated high comprehension and retention of key human subjects' considerations. Enrollees reported high levels of satisfaction with the iConsent, and we found that participant comprehension, iConsent clarity, privacy protections, and study goal explanations were associated with overall satisfaction. Although opportunities exist to optimize iConsent, we show that such an approach is feasible, can satisfy multiple stakeholder requirements, and can realize high participant satisfaction and comprehension while increasing study reach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Y Norton
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Departments of Child Health, Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Neurology and Program in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - James Liu
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Departments of Child Health, Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Neurology and Program in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sara A Lewis
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Departments of Child Health, Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Neurology and Program in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Helen Magee
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Departments of Child Health, Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Neurology and Program in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Tyler N Kruer
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Departments of Child Health, Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Neurology and Program in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Rachael Dinh
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Departments of Child Health, Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Neurology and Program in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Somayeh Bakhtiari
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Departments of Child Health, Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Neurology and Program in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sandra H. Nordlie
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Departments of Child Health, Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Neurology and Program in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sheetal Shetty
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Departments of Child Health, Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Neurology and Program in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Programs in Behavioral Health, Biomedical Informatics, Molecular & Cellular Biology, and Neuroscience, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Jennifer Heim
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Departments of Child Health, Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Neurology and Program in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Yumi Nishiyama
- Programs in Behavioral Health, Biomedical Informatics, Molecular & Cellular Biology, and Neuroscience, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Jorge Arango
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | - Darcy Johnson
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | - Lee Seabrooke
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | - Mitchell Shub
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | - Robert Rosenberg
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | | | - Stephen Wisniewski
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Blair Cooper
- Cerebral Palsy Research Network, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Erin Rothwell
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Michael C Fahey
- Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - M. Wade Shrader
- Department of Orthopaedics, AI DuPont Children’s Hospital, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Nancy Lennon
- Department of Orthopaedics, AI DuPont Children’s Hospital, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Joyce Oleszek
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Colorado Children’s Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Wendy Pierce
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Colorado Children’s Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Hannah Fleming
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Colorado Children’s Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Mohan Belthur
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | - Jennifer Tinto
- Division of Complex Care, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s, Colombus, OH, USA
| | - Garey Noritz
- Division of Complex Care, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s, Colombus, OH, USA
| | - Laurie Glader
- Division of Complex Care, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s, Colombus, OH, USA
| | - Kelsey Steffan
- Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - William Walker
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Developmental Medicine, Seattle Children’s, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Deborah Grenard
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Developmental Medicine, Seattle Children’s, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Kristie Bjornson
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Developmental Medicine, Seattle Children’s, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Malin Joseph
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | - Paul Gross
- Cerebral Palsy Research Network, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Michael C Kruer
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s, Phoenix, AZ USA
- Departments of Child Health, Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Neurology and Program in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Programs in Behavioral Health, Biomedical Informatics, Molecular & Cellular Biology, and Neuroscience, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zemsi A, Nekame LJG, Mohammed N, Batchilly ES, Dabira E, Sillah SO, Sey G, Williams DH, Dondeh BL, Cerami C, Clarke E, D'Alessandro U. Practical Guidelines for Standardised Resolution of Important Protocol Deviations in Clinical Trials Conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2024; 58:395-403. [PMID: 38285370 PMCID: PMC11043146 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-023-00604-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
A clinical trial is any research on human subjects that involves an investigational medicinal product or device. Investigational medicinal products include unlicensed drugs or drugs used outside the product license (e.g. for a new indication) (ICH-GCP). As per the internationally accepted ICH-GCP guidelines, clinical trials should be conducted strictly per the approved protocol. However, during the lifecycle of a trial, protocol deviations may occur. Under ICH efficacy guidelines, protocol deviations are divided into non-important (minor) or important (major), and the latter can jeopardise the participant's rights, safety or the quality of data generated by the study. Existing guidelines on protocol deviation management do not detail or standardise actions to be taken for participants, investigational products, data or samples as part of a holistic management of important protocol deviations. Herein, we propose guidelines to address the current literature gap and promote the standardisation of actions to address important protocol deviations in clinical trials. The advised actions should complement the existing local institutional review board and national regulatory authority requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armel Zemsi
- MRCG at LSHTM, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, P.O. Box 273, Banjul, The Gambia.
| | | | - Nuredin Mohammed
- MRCG at LSHTM, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, P.O. Box 273, Banjul, The Gambia
| | | | - Edgard Dabira
- MRCG at LSHTM, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, P.O. Box 273, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Sheikh Omar Sillah
- MRCG at LSHTM, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, P.O. Box 273, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Gibbi Sey
- MRCG at LSHTM, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, P.O. Box 273, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Daisy H Williams
- MRCG at LSHTM, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, P.O. Box 273, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Bai-Lamin Dondeh
- MRCG at LSHTM, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, P.O. Box 273, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Carla Cerami
- MRCG at LSHTM, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, P.O. Box 273, Banjul, The Gambia
| | - Ed Clarke
- MRCG at LSHTM, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, P.O. Box 273, Banjul, The Gambia
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barber VS, Calvert C, Appelbe D, Sprange K, Nollett C, Tanner S, Richards DB. Current usage of explainer animations in trials: a survey of the UKCRC registered clinical trial units in the UK. Trials 2024; 25:224. [PMID: 38549126 PMCID: PMC10976673 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08060-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Explainer animations are a means to communicate aspects of clinical trials to participants in a more engaging and accessible way. Delivered well these have the potential to enhance recruitment and retention. The range of media technology used to deliver this material is expanding rapidly but is highly fragmented. Usage of explainer animations across the UK is unknown, the aim of this research was to determine current usage across the 52 registered UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) to understand the current landscape and any barriers that could be preventing wider uptake of this functionality. METHODS A survey link was emailed to all UKCRC CTU Directors and Trial Management Leads to ascertain current usage of explainer animations within their CTU. The survey ran between 01 February 2023 and 07 March 2023. RESULTS Responses were received from 35 CTUs-representing a response rate of 67%. 24 CTUs (69%) reported that they had created/used at least one explainer animation within their unit, although the usage, cost, length and production activities varied among the units. CONCLUSIONS The survey showed that a high proportion of the UKCRC CTUs have used explainer animations to provide information to participants about clinical studies. For those not using the technology yet, the most common reasons cited were a lack of expertise, lack of resources and costs to produce them. One of the desired outcomes of this project is the creation of a free-to-use library of animations to encourage wider uptake and avoid duplication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki S Barber
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit (OCTRU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Clare Calvert
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit (OCTRU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Duncan Appelbe
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit (OCTRU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kirsty Sprange
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Claire Nollett
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Samantha Tanner
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit (OCTRU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Duncan B Richards
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit (OCTRU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haas MA, Madelli EO, Brown R, Prictor M, Boughtwood T. Evaluation of CTRL: a web application for dynamic consent and engagement with individuals involved in a cardiovascular genetic disorders cohort. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:61-68. [PMID: 37709947 PMCID: PMC10772119 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01454-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
There has been keen interest in whether dynamic consent should be used in health research but few real-world studies have evaluated its use. Australian Genomics piloted and evaluated CTRL ('control'), a digital consent tool incorporating granular, dynamic decision-making and communication for genomic research. Individuals from a Cardiovascular Genetic Disorders Flagship were invited in person (prospective cohort) or by email (retrospective cohort) to register for CTRL after initial study recruitment. Demographics, consent choices, experience surveys and website analytics were analysed using descriptive statistics. Ninety-one individuals registered to CTRL (15.5% of the prospective cohort and 11.8% of the retrospective cohort). Significantly more males than females registered when invited retrospectively, but there was no difference in age, gender, or education level between those who did and did not use CTRL. Variation in individual consent choices about secondary data use and return of results supports the desirability of providing granular consent options. Robust conclusions were not drawn from satisfaction, trust, decision regret and knowledge outcome measures: differences between CTRL and non-CTRL cohorts did not emerge. Analytics indicate CTRL is acceptable, although underutilised. This is one of the first studies evaluating uptake and decision making using online consent tools and will inform refinement of future designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matilda A Haas
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| | - Evanthia O Madelli
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Rosie Brown
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Megan Prictor
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Tiffany Boughtwood
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sawant S, Madathil KC, Molloseau M, Obeid J. Overcoming recruitment hurdles in clinical trials: An investigation of remote consenting modalities and their impact on workload, workflow, and usability. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2024; 114:104135. [PMID: 37713927 PMCID: PMC10843021 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
Travel constraints can hinder the recruitment of eligible research participants in clinical trials, causing research timeline extensions, added costs, underpowered results, and early termination. Remote consenting can help solve these issues by allowing researchers and potential participants to connect remotely. This controlled experimental study investigates the effect of remote consenting on workload, workflow, usability, and barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Using a mixed experimental design, simulated consenting sessions were conducted with three different modalities (remote paper consent, eConsent, and teleconsent) with 23 researchers and 93 research participants. Each session involved a single researcher who experienced all three modalities, while three different research participants were assigned to each modality individually. Research participants and researchers completed surveys measuring workload and usability. Remote consenting allows researchers and participants to connect at their preferred location and time, and teleconsenting was found to be the preferred modality by the researchers, primarily due to its ability to exchange visual cues. However, challenges such as training requirements and technology dependence need to be addressed for widespread implementation. Future research should aim to eliminate these barriers and improve remote consenting modalities to facilitate clinical research participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarvesh Sawant
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Clemson University, USA
| | | | - Maria Molloseau
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Clemson University, USA
| | - Jihad Obeid
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoonakker JD, Adeline-Duflot F, Orcel V, Grudzinski ML, Cognet M, Renard V. Use of visual aids in general practice consultations: A questionnaire-based survey. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100159. [PMID: 37384162 PMCID: PMC10294083 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Visual aids (VAs) seem effective to improve doctor-patient communication. The objective was to describe how VAs are used in consultation and what French general practitioners (GPs) expect of them. Methods Cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire among French GPs in 2019. Descriptive and multinominal logistic regression analyses were performed. Results Of the 376 respondents, 70% used VAs at least weekly and 34% daily; 94% considered VAs useful/very useful; 77% felt they did not use VAs enough. Sketches were the most used VAs and considered the most useful. Younger age was significantly associated with a higher rate of use of simple digital images. VAs were mainly used to describe anatomy and facilitate patient comprehension. Main reasons for not using VAs more often were time spent searching, lack of habit and poor quality of available VAs. Many GPs requested a database of good quality VAs. Conclusions GPs use VAs regularly in consultations but would like to use them more often. Informing GPs of the usefulness of VAs, training them to draw adapted sketches and creating a good quality databank are some possible strategies to increase the use of VAs. Innovation This study described in detail the use of VAs as tool for doctor-patient communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Denis Hoonakker
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Health, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
- Multidisciplinary Health Centre of Pays de Nemours, Nemours, France
| | | | - Véronique Orcel
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Health, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Marie-Louise Grudzinski
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Health, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Mathilde Cognet
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Health, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
- University Multidisciplinary Health Centre of Sucy-en-Brie, Sucy-en-Brie, France
| | - Vincent Renard
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Health, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kamisato A, Hong H, Okubo S. Public Awareness of Medical Research Terminology in Japan, and the Accuracy of Physicians' Predictions regarding that Awareness. Asian Bioeth Rev 2023; 15:397-416. [PMID: 37808447 PMCID: PMC10555973 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-023-00247-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the ethical principles of medical research involving human subjects is obtaining proper informed consent (IC). However, if the participants' actual awareness of medical research terminology is lower than the researchers' prediction of that awareness, it may cause difficulty obtaining proper IC. Therefore, this study aims to clarify the presence of "perception gaps" and then discuss IC-related issues and measures based on the insights obtained. We conducted two online surveys: a "public survey" to understand the Japanese public's awareness of 11 medical research terms and a "physicians' survey" to investigate physicians' predictions regarding public awareness. In the "public survey," for each term, respondents were instructed to select their situation from "understand," "have heard," or "have never heard." In the "physicians' survey," respondents were asked to estimate the proportions of the general public who would "have understood," "have heard," or "have never heard" by using an 11-step scale. We analyzed separately in two age groups to understand the age-related difference. We received 1002 valid responses for the "public survey" and 275 for the "physicians' survey." Of the public respondents, more than 80% had never heard of terms such as interventional study, prospective clinical study, cohort study, Phase I clinical trial, or double-blind study. Concurrently, physicians overestimated general public awareness of the terms placebo, cohort study, double-blind study, and randomized clinical trial (in the group of people under 60). The results revealed the perception gap between the general public and physicians which raise serious concerns about obtaining proper IC from clinical research participants. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41649-023-00247-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayako Kamisato
- The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hyunsoo Hong
- The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Suguru Okubo
- Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan
- BMS Yokohama Inc., Yokohama, Kanagawa Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lawrence DS, Ssali A, Jarvis JN, Seeley J. Clinical research for life-threatening illnesses requiring emergency hospitalisation: a critical interpretive synthesis of qualitative data related to the experience of participants and their caregivers. Trials 2023; 24:149. [PMID: 36849961 PMCID: PMC9972707 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07183-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research into life-threatening illnesses which require emergency hospitalisation is essential. This group of patients is unique in that they are experiencing an unfolding emergency when they are approached, enrolled, and followed up in a research study. We aimed to synthesise qualitative data from trial participants and surrogate decision-makers to deepen our understanding and inform the design and conduct of future clinical trials for life-threatening illnesses. METHODS We conducted a critical interpretive synthesis of qualitative data from trial participants and surrogate decision-makers related to the experience of participating in a clinical research study when suffering from a life-threatening illness. A scoping review informed a systematic review of published data. We searched research databases and reviewed papers for inclusion. Primary data and interpretations of data were extracted from each paper. Data were analysed using reciprocal translational analysis, refutational synthesis, and lines of argument synthesis to develop a synthetic construct. RESULTS Twenty-two papers were included. Most individuals had no previous knowledge or experience with clinical research. Individuals making decisions were directly experiencing or witness to an unfolding emergency which came with a myriad of physical and psychological symptoms. It was difficult to differentiate clinical research and routine care, and understanding of core concepts around research, particularly randomisation and equipoise, was limited. We found that this led to an underestimation of risk, an overestimation of benefit, and an expectation of being allocated to the intervention arm. The decision-making process was heavily influenced by trust in the research team. Individuals suggested that abbreviated information, presented in different ways and continuously throughout the research process, would have increased knowledge and satisfaction with the research process. CONCLUSION Individuals suffering from a life-threatening illness who are being invited to participate in clinical research need to be managed in a way that adapts to the severity of their illness and there is a need to tailor research processes, including informed consent, accordingly. We provide suggestions for further research and implementation work around research participation for individuals suffering from a life-threatening illness. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020207296.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Lawrence
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
- Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.
| | - Agnes Ssali
- Social Aspects of Health Across the Life-Course Programme, MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Joseph N Jarvis
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK
- Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana
| | - Janet Seeley
- Social Aspects of Health Across the Life-Course Programme, MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wolters-Zwolle M, de Jongh MM, van Elst MW, Meijer RP, Vervoort SC. Patients' experiences with an audio-visual intervention, the use of a tailored explanimation video in patients with bladder cancer. PEC INNOVATION 2022; 1:100042. [PMID: 37213743 PMCID: PMC10194105 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Objective This qualitative study explored the experiences of patients with bladder cancer with a tailored 'explanimation' video (EV) as a supportive information tool used before and during treatment. Methods Using a qualitative approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 12 patients with bladder cancer and thematically analysed. Results Participants advised future use of the EV, noting it is user friendly and has a fitting difficulty level and clarifying animations. However, some mentioned practical information on 'life after treatment' was lacking, and some emphasized the importance of choosing the right moment of delivery. Patients' experiences were described in four major themes: taking own responsibility, providing opportunity for postponed information supply, easing decision-making processes and gaining a sense of calm. Conclusion Findings indicate the EV supported patients with bladder cancer in the process of being informed and in decision-making. Future use of the EV in the treatment of patients with bladder cancer is recommended. Innovation The use of audiovisual information in patient education is innovative. Tailored audiovisual information in shape of the EV is a step forward in streamlining information processes, meeting individual preferences and highlighting the most important general information for patients with bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjon Wolters-Zwolle
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Clinical Health Sciences, Nursing Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle M.E. de Jongh
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Clinical Health Sciences, Nursing Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten W. van Elst
- Department of Urological Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P. Meijer
- Department of Urological Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sigrid C.J.M. Vervoort
- Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baggio S, Gétaz L, Giraudier L, Tirode L, Urrutxi M, Carboni S, Britan A, Price RL, Wolff H, Heller P. Comparison of Audiovisual and Paper-Based Materials for 1-Time Informed Consent for Research in Prison: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2235888. [PMID: 36219446 PMCID: PMC9554696 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.35888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Few studies are available on informed consent (IC) among detained persons, even with ethics being a critical aspect of prison research. In IC research, audiovisual material seems to improve understanding and satisfaction compared with conventional paper-based material, but findings remain unclear. OBJECTIVE To compare audiovisual and paper-based materials for 1-time general IC for research in prisons. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional randomized clinical trial was conducted in 2 corrections facilities in Switzerland (an adult prison and a juvenile detention center). The study was conducted from December 14, 2019, to December 2, 2020, in the adult prison and from January 15, 2020, to September 9, 2021, in the juvenile detention center. In the adult prison, study participation was offered to detained persons visiting the medical unit (response rate, 84.7%). In the juvenile detention center, all newly incarcerated adolescents were invited to participate (response rate, 98.0%). INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to receive paper-based conventional material or to watch a 4-minute video. Materials included the same legal information, as required by the Swiss Federal Act on Research Involving Human Beings. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was acceptance to sign the IC form. Secondary outcomes included understanding, evaluation, and time to read or watch the IC material. RESULTS The study included 190 adults (mean [SD] age, 35.0 [11.8] years; 190 [100%] male) and 100 adolescents (mean [SD] age, 16.0 [1.1] years; 83 [83.0%] male). In the adult prison, no significant differences were found between groups in acceptance to sign the IC form (77 [81.1%] for paper-based material and 81 [85.3%] for audiovisual material; P = .39) and to evaluate it (mean [SD] correct responses, 5.09 [1.13] for paper-based material and 5.01 [1.07] for audiovisual material; P = .81). Understanding was significantly higher in the audiovisual material group (mean [SD] correct responses, 5.09 [1.84]) compared with the paper-based material group (mean [SD] correct responses, 4.61 [1.70]; P = .04). In the juvenile detention center, individuals in the audiovisual material group were more likely to sign the IC form (44 [89.8%]) than the paper-based material group (35 [68.6%], P = .006). No significant difference was found between groups for understanding and evaluation. Adults took a mean (SD) of 5 (2) minutes to read the paper material, and adolescents took 7 (3) minutes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Given the small benefit of audiovisual material, these findings suggest that giving detained adults and prison health care staff a choice regarding IC material is best. For adolescents, audiovisual material should be provided. Future studies should focus on increasing understanding of the IC process. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05505058.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphanie Baggio
- Division of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospitals & University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Gétaz
- Division of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospitals & University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Lilian Tirode
- Division of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospitals & University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marta Urrutxi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sonia Carboni
- Clinical Research Center, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aurore Britan
- Clinical Research Center, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Hans Wolff
- Division of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospitals & University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Heller
- Division of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospitals & University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gathier CS, van der Jagt M, van den Bergh WM, Dankbaar JW, Rinkel GJE, Slooter AJC. Slow recruitment in the HIMALAIA study: lessons for future clinical trials in patients with delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage based on feasibility data. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:193. [PMID: 36042527 PMCID: PMC9426269 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01155-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Our randomized clinical trial on induced hypertension in patients with delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) was halted prematurely due to unexpected slow recruitment rates. This raised new questions regarding recruitment feasibility. As our trial can therefore be seen as a feasibility trial, we assessed the reasons for the slow recruitment, aiming to facilitate the design of future randomized trials in aSAH patients with DCI or other critically ill patient categories. Methods Efficiency of recruitment and factors influencing recruitment were evaluated, based on the patient flow in the two centers that admitted most patients during the study period. We collected numbers of patients who were screened for eligibility, provided informed consent, and developed DCI and who eventually were randomized. Results Of the 862 aSAH patients admitted in the two centers during the course of the trial, 479 (56%) were eligible for trial participation of whom 404 (84%) were asked for informed consent. Of these, 188 (47%) provided informed consent, of whom 50 (27%) developed DCI. Of these 50 patients, 12 (24%) could not be randomized due to a logistic problem or a contraindication for induced hypertension emerging at the time of randomization, and four (8%) were missed for randomization. Eventually, 34 patients were randomized and received intervention or control treatment. Conclusions Enrolling patients in a randomized trial on a treatment strategy for DCI proved unfeasible: only 1 out of 25 admitted and 1 out of 14 eligible patients could eventually be randomized. These rates, caused by a large proportion of ineligible patients, a small proportion of patients providing informed consent, and a large proportion of patients with contraindications for treatment, can be used to make sample size calculations for future randomized trials in DCI or otherwise critically ill patients. Facilitating informed consent through improved provision of information on risks, possible benefits, and study procedures may result in improved enrolment. Trial registration The original trial was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01613235), date of registration 07-06-2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine S Gathier
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Mathieu van der Jagt
- Department of Intensive Care Adults and Erasmus MC Stroke Center, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Walter M van den Bergh
- Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem Dankbaar
- Department of Radiology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gabriel J E Rinkel
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen J C Slooter
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stoffel ST, Law JH, Kerrison R, Brewer HR, Flanagan JM, Hirst Y. Testing the Effectiveness of an Animated Decision Aid to Improve Recruitment of Control Participants in a Case-Control Study: Web-Based Experiment. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e40015. [PMID: 36018628 PMCID: PMC9463615 DOI: 10.2196/40015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participation in case-control studies is crucial in epidemiological research. The self-sampling bias, low response rate, and poor recruitment of population representative controls are often reported as limitations of case-control studies with limited strategies to improve participation. With greater use of web-based methods in health research, there is a further need to understand the effectiveness of different tools to enhance informed decision-making and willingness to take part in research. OBJECTIVE This study tests whether the inclusion of an animated decision aid in the recruitment page of a study website can increase participants' intentions to volunteer as controls. METHODS A total of 1425 women were included in a web-based experiment and randomized to one of two experimental conditions: one in which they were exposed to a simulated website that included the animation (animation; n=693, 48.6%), and one in which they were exposed to the simulated website without the animation (control; n=732, 51.4%). The simulated website was adapted from a real website for a case-control study, which invites people to consider taking part in a study that investigates differences in purchasing behaviors between women with and without ovarian cancer and share their loyalty card data collected through 2 high street retailers with the researchers. After exposure to the experimental manipulation, participants were asked to state (1) their intention to take part in the case-control study, (2) whether they would be willing to share their loyalty card for research, and (3) their willingness to be redirected to the real website after completing the survey. Data were assessed using ordinal and binary logistic regression, reported in percentages (%), adjusted odds ratio (AOR), and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Including the animation in the simulated website did not increase intentions to participate in the study (AOR 1.09; 95% CI 0.88-1.35) or willingness to visit the real study website after the survey (control 50.5% vs animation 52.6%, AOR 1.08; 95% CI 0.85-1.37). The animation, however, increased the participants' intentions to share the data from their loyalty cards for research in general (control 17.9% vs animation 26%; AOR 1.64; 95% CI 1.23-2.18). CONCLUSIONS While the results of this study indicate that the animated decision aid did not lead to greater intention to take part in our web-based case-control study, they show that they can be effective in increasing people's willingness to share sensitive data for health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro T Stoffel
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jing Hui Law
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Kerrison
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah R Brewer
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - James M Flanagan
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yasemin Hirst
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shen FX, Silverman BC, Monette P, Kimble S, Rauch SL, Baker JT. An Ethics Checklist for Digital Health Research in Psychiatry: Viewpoint. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e31146. [PMID: 35138261 PMCID: PMC8867294 DOI: 10.2196/31146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychiatry has long needed a better and more scalable way to capture the dynamics of behavior and its disturbances, quantitatively across multiple data channels, at high temporal resolution in real time. By combining 24/7 data-on location, movement, email and text communications, and social media-with brain scans, genetics, genomics, neuropsychological batteries, and clinical interviews, researchers will have an unprecedented amount of objective, individual-level data. Analyzing these data with ever-evolving artificial intelligence could one day include bringing interventions to patients where they are in the real world in a convenient, efficient, effective, and timely way. Yet, the road to this innovative future is fraught with ethical dilemmas as well as ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI). OBJECTIVE The goal of the Ethics Checklist is to promote careful design and execution of research. It is not meant to mandate particular research designs; indeed, at this early stage and without consensus guidance, there are a range of reasonable choices researchers may make. However, the checklist is meant to make those ethical choices explicit, and to require researchers to give reasons for their decisions related to ELSI issues. The Ethics Checklist is primarily focused on procedural safeguards, such as consulting with experts outside the research group and documenting standard operating procedures for clearly actionable data (eg, expressed suicidality) within written research protocols. METHODS We explored the ELSI of digital health research in psychiatry, with a particular focus on what we label "deep phenotyping" psychiatric research, which combines the potential for virtually boundless data collection and increasingly sophisticated techniques to analyze those data. We convened an interdisciplinary expert stakeholder workshop in May 2020, and this checklist emerges out of that dialogue. RESULTS Consistent with recent ELSI analyses, we find that existing ethical guidance and legal regulations are not sufficient for deep phenotyping research in psychiatry. At present, there are regulatory gaps, inconsistencies across research teams in ethics protocols, and a lack of consensus among institutional review boards on when and how deep phenotyping research should proceed. We thus developed a new instrument, an Ethics Checklist for Digital Health Research in Psychiatry ("the Ethics Checklist"). The Ethics Checklist is composed of 20 key questions, subdivided into 6 interrelated domains: (1) informed consent; (2) equity, diversity, and access; (3) privacy and partnerships; (4) regulation and law; (5) return of results; and (6) duty to warn and duty to report. CONCLUSIONS Deep phenotyping research offers a vision for vastly more effective care for people with, or at risk for, psychiatric disease. The potential perils en route to realizing this vision are significant; however, and researchers must be willing to address the questions in the Ethics Checklist before embarking on each leg of the journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis X Shen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Law School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Benjamin C Silverman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Institute for Technology in Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - Patrick Monette
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Institute for Technology in Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - Sara Kimble
- Institute for Technology in Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - Scott L Rauch
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Institute for Technology in Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - Justin T Baker
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Institute for Technology in Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Young MJ, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Ethical Considerations in Clinical Trials for Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Sci 2022; 12:211. [PMID: 35203974 PMCID: PMC8870384 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
As the clinical trial landscape for patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) expands, consideration of associated ethical challenges and opportunities is of ever-increasing importance. Responsible conduct of research in the vulnerable population of persons with DoC, including those with coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS), minimally conscious state (MCS), covert cortical processing (CCP), and cognitive motor dissociation (CMD), demands proactive deliberation of unique ethical issues that may arise and the adoption of robust protections to safeguard patients, surrogates, and other key stakeholders. Here we identify and critically evaluate four central categories of ethical considerations in clinical trials involving participants with DoC: (1) autonomy, respect for persons and informed consent of individuals with liminal consciousness; (2) balancing unknown benefits and risks, especially considering the epistemological gap between behavior and consciousness that complicates ordinary ascription of subjective states; (3) disclosure to surrogates and clinical teams of investigational results pertaining to consciousness; and (4) justice considerations, including equitable access to clinical trial enrollment across communities and geographies. We outline guiding principles and research opportunities for clinicians, neuroethicists, and researchers engaged in DoC clinical trials to advance ethical study design and deployment in this complex yet crucial area of investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Young
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (B.L.E.)
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (B.L.E.)
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02114, USA
| | - Brian L. Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (B.L.E.)
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bany Hamdan A, Ballourah W, Elghazaly A, Javison S, Alshammary S, Erlandez R, Garatli A, Mohammed H, Alharbi M. The Effect of Video-Assisted Education Prior Intrathecal Chemotherapy on Anxiety and Knowledge Enhancement. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:65-70. [PMID: 32519327 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01787-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Intrathecal chemotherapy procedures are stressful to patients and caregivers, especially the first time. Providing the patient and caregiver with sufficient information to address their concerns before the scheduled procedure is necessary. This study aims to determine whether the use of video instructions could enhance learning outcomes and decrease anxiety levels in patients' caregivers. A prospective trial was conducted in pediatric hematology for 1 year. Thirty-seven respondents were randomly assigned to two groups wherein one group was given conventional educational leaflets and verbal instructions, while the other group received the same information through an educational video presentation before the intrathecal chemotherapy procedure. Knowledge enhancement in the two groups was evaluated using the summative assessment method and measured by a 10-point Likert scale. The validated Arabic version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scale was used to assess anxiety levels. The anxiety level (12.31 ± 8.84) in the video presentation group was significantly higher than that in the conventional group (6.16 ± 5.91). Similarly, the overall Beck scale score revealed that palpitation, frightening, lightheadedness, and hot/cold sweat levels were decreased in the video presentation group. Additionally, a significant difference in knowledge enhancement was noted between the two groups, as knowledge enhancement in the video presentation group (7.61 ± 1.88) was better than that in the conventional group (6.00 ± 1.00). This produced a domino effect on the anxiety level scores of both groups. An educational video presentation before the intrathecal chemotherapy procedure is effective since both visual and auditory senses are involved. This could be considered a good source of an interventional approach before a therapeutic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Walid Ballourah
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Assem Elghazaly
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sherwynn Javison
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sami Alshammary
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Richard Erlandez
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Garatli
- National Neuroscience Institute, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Husain Mohammed
- National Neuroscience Institute, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Musa Alharbi
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
O'Sullivan L, Savinelli S, O'Hare S, Holden S, McHugh C, Mallon P, Doran P. An enhanced participant information leaflet and multimedia intervention to improve the quality of informed consent to a randomised clinical trial enrolling people living with HIV and obesity: a protocol for a Study Within A Trial (SWAT). Trials 2022; 23:50. [PMID: 35039057 PMCID: PMC8762861 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05979-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is the investigator's responsibility to communicate the relevant information about a clinical trial to participants before they provide informed consent to take part. Systematic reviews indicate that participants often have a poor understanding of the concepts which are key to ensuring valid informed consent, such as randomisation and risks/discomforts. Paper-based participant information leaflets and informed consent forms (PIL/ICFs) are becoming longer and are often too complex for many participants. Multimedia interventions and enhanced PIL/ICFs have been trialled in an attempt to improve participants' understanding of various aspects of research studies. However, there is insufficient empirical evidence to determine how effective such interventions are. This protocol describes a study to evaluate whether an enhanced PIL/ICF and website help research participants to understand important information about a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) randomised clinical trial. METHODS This Study Within A Trial (SWAT) is a prospective, multi-centre, randomised, controlled, parallel-group study embedded in a host clinical trial. The host trial (the SWIFT trial; EudraCT: 2019-002314-39) is a prospective, multi-centre, randomised, open-label, controlled trial investigating if semaglutide along with dietary advice assists individuals with HIV and obesity to lose weight, compared to dietary advice alone. For the SWAT, participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either the control (standard PIL/ICF) or the intervention (an enhanced PIL/ICF and a website which includes animations). The enhanced PIL/ICF and website were developed in line with the guidance from organisations which promote plain English and accessible public-facing materials in conjunction with HIV Ireland, a HIV advocacy organisation, and our previous work on consent documents. The primary outcome of the SWAT is the quality of informed consent, assessed by a validated comprehension test-the modified Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test (DICCT). The DICCT will be administered within 48 h of consent to the host trial. The secondary is recall, measured by the modified DICCT questionnaire scores 2 weeks post-consent to the host trial. DISCUSSION The results of this SWAT will add to the methodological evidence base on the use of multimedia to improve the quality of informed consent to randomised clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04174755 . EudraCT 2019-002314-39. SWAT 160, Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT repository (Clarke M, et al., Trials. 16:P209, 2015).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia O'Sullivan
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland. .,Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Stefano Savinelli
- Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.,Centre for Experimental Pathogen Host Research, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | | | - Sinéad Holden
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Ciara McHugh
- Clinical Research Centre, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Patrick Mallon
- Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.,Centre for Experimental Pathogen Host Research, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Peter Doran
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.,Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Toralla O, Lopez Jornet P, Pons-Fuster E. The Effect of an Informative Video upon Anxiety and Stress in Patients Requiring an Oral Biopsy: A Randomized Controlled Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19020783. [PMID: 35055603 PMCID: PMC8775441 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of multimedia tools improves patient understanding of surgical procedures, reduces anxiety and increases satisfaction. The present study evaluates the impact of an audiovisual intervention (video) upon anxiety and stress in patients requiring an oral biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out in patients requiring an oral biopsy. The control group (n = 60) received verbal standard information while the experimental group (n = 60) received information in the form of a video. The following data were recorded: gender, age, educational level and hemodynamic parameters (blood pressure, heart rate and blood oxygen saturation). The following questionnaires were used to assess anxiety and stress before and after the biopsy procedure: Corah's Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS The final study sample consisted of 120 patients, of which 65.8% were women and 34.2% men, with a mean age of 40.5 ± 15.3 years. At the end of the study, the experimental group presented a significantly lower MDAS score than the control group (p = 0.041). The STAI score also showed a significant decrease with respect to the control group at the end of the study (p = 0.012). There were no statistically significant changes in the hemodynamic parameters in either group. CONCLUSIONS The video constituted a useful and easy tool for reducing anxiety among patients requiring an oral biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Toralla
- Departamento Odontologia, Universidad San Carlos de Guatemala, Guatemala 01018, Guatemala;
| | - Pia Lopez Jornet
- Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Murcia, 30008 Murcia, Spain;
- Correspondence:
| | - Eduardo Pons-Fuster
- Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Murcia, 30008 Murcia, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nadkarni A, Wood S, Garg A, Fernandes D, D'Souza E, Bhatia U. Video-augmentation of the informed consent process in mental health research: An exploratory study from India. Asian J Psychiatr 2021; 66:102870. [PMID: 34600401 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Only around 50-75% of individuals fully understand the various aspects of informed consent in research. The aim of our study was to examine whether supplementing the conventional paper-based informed consent process with an audiovisual aid improves participants' understanding of the informed consent process and the information conveyed to them. Participants from two mental health/substance use intervention development studies were recruited for this study through consecutive sampling. They were then administered the traditional paper information and consenting process by itself or in combination with a video depicting the procedures of the study. Subsequently a bespoke questionnaire was administered to assess the participants' understanding of the information conveyed to them about the parent study. The various domains of the questionnaire were compared between those who were administered the two different consenting processes using the chi square test. 27 (58.7%) participants were administered the traditional consenting process and 19 were administered the video-supplemented consenting process. The video-supplemented consenting process was not superior to the traditional paper-based informed consent process on any of the domains examined. In settings with participants having a limited education, and in research involving people with mental health or substance use problems, further research is necessary to identify contextually relevant best practices for the informed consent process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijit Nadkarni
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; Addictions Research Group, Sangath, Porvorim, Goa, India.
| | - Sheena Wood
- Addictions Research Group, Sangath, Porvorim, Goa, India
| | - Ankur Garg
- Addictions Research Group, Sangath, Porvorim, Goa, India
| | | | - Ethel D'Souza
- Addictions Research Group, Sangath, Porvorim, Goa, India
| | - Urvita Bhatia
- Addictions Research Group, Sangath, Porvorim, Goa, India; Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang Z, Du A, Li M, Zang S, Liu X, Zhang D, Chen G, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Wang J. Application of a Cloud Video Conference Method for Recruiting Healthy Subjects Into an Early-Phase Clinical Trial During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Public Health 2021; 9:657804. [PMID: 34490177 PMCID: PMC8416603 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.657804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Our objective is to explore the effect of applying cloud video conferencing methods to the informed consent process in an early-phase clinical trial during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: All participants who intended to participate in the trial were informed via a cloud video conference before signing the informed consent forms (ICF). Then, the attitudes of the participants with the cloud video conference and their understanding of the trial were evaluated using a questionnaire when they visited to sign the ICF onsite. Results: A total of 165 subjects participated in the cloud video conference process, and 142 visited the site to sign and date the ICFs at the center during the appointment time. The survey showed that nearly 100% of the subjects evaluated the video-based informed consent process as very good or good and gave correct answers to questions about the trial. Furthermore, 136 (95.8%) subjects believed that the knowledge about the trial derived via the video-based informed consent process was consistent with the onsite reality, and 139 (97.9%) subjects expressed their willingness to participate in an informed consent procedure undertaken through an online video conference. Conclusions: The video-based informed consent process achieved the same effects as an onsite informed consent process. The former saves time and cost of transportation for the subject and exhibits good public acceptance; especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, this process is conducive for reducing the risk of subject infection due to travel and would also help avoid crowding on site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zejuan Wang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Aihua Du
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Min Li
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Siqi Zang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaona Liu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dan Zhang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lina Zhang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yanan Zhang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pal A, Stapleton S, Yap C, Lai-Kwon J, Daly R, Magkos D, Baikady BR, Minchom A, Banerji U, De Bono J, Karikios D, Boyle F, Lopez J. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of enhanced informed consent compared to standard informed consent to improve patient understanding of early phase oncology clinical trials (CONSENT). BMJ Open 2021; 11:e049217. [PMID: 34489282 PMCID: PMC8422487 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early phase cancer clinical trials have become increasingly complicated in terms of patient selection and trial procedures-this is reflected in the increasing length of participant information sheets (PIS). Informed consent for early phase clinical trials has been contentious due to the potential ethical issues associated with performing experimental research on a terminally ill population which has exhausted standard treatment options. Empirical studies have demonstrated significant gaps in patient understanding regarding the nature and intent of these trials. This study aims to test whether enhanced informed consent for patient education can improve patient scores on a validated questionnaire testing clinical trial comprehension. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a randomised controlled trial that will allocate patients who are eligible to participate in one of four investigator-initiated clinical trials at the Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit to either a standard arm or an experimental arm, stratified by age and educational level. The standard arm will involve the full length trial PIS, followed by electronic or paper administration of the Quality of Informed Consent Questionnaire Parts A and B (QuIC-A and QuIC-B). The experimental arm will involve the full length trial PIS, exposure to a two-page study aid and 10 online educational videos, followed by administration of the QuIC-A and QuIC-B. The primary endpoint will be the difference (using a one-sided two-sample t-test) in the QuIC-A score, which measures objective understanding, between the standard and experimental arm. Accrual target is at least 17 patients per arm to detect an 8 point difference (80% power, alpha 0.05). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was granted by the National Health Service Health Research Authority on 15 June 2020-IRAS Project ID 277065, Protocol Number CCR5165, REC Reference 20/EE/0155. Results will be disseminated via publication in a relevant journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04407676; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijit Pal
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, London, UK
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Stapleton
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, London, UK
| | - Christina Yap
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Julia Lai-Kwon
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, London, UK
| | - Robert Daly
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Magkos
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, London, UK
| | - Bindumalini Rao Baikady
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, London, UK
| | - Anna Minchom
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, London, UK
| | - Udai Banerji
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, London, UK
| | - Johann De Bono
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, London, UK
| | - Deme Karikios
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frances Boyle
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Juanita Lopez
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Drug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
O' Sullivan L, Feeney L, Crowley RK, Sukumar P, McAuliffe E, Doran P. An evaluation of the process of informed consent: views from research participants and staff. Trials 2021; 22:544. [PMID: 34407858 PMCID: PMC8371296 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05493-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The process of informed consent for enrolment to a clinical research study can be complex for both participants and research staff. Challenges include respecting the potential participant’s autonomy and information needs while simultaneously providing adequate information to enable an informed decision. Qualitative research with small sample sizes has added to our understanding of these challenges. However, there is value in garnering the perspectives of research participants and staff across larger samples to explore the impact of contextual factors (time spent, the timing of the discussion and the setting), on the informed consent process. Methods Research staff and research participants from Ireland and the UK were invited to complete an anonymous survey by post or online (research participants) and online (research staff). The surveys aimed to quantify the perceptions of research participants and staff regarding some contextual factors about the process of informed consent. The survey, which contained 14 and 16 multiple choice questions for research participants and staff respectively, was analysed using descriptive statistics. Both surveys included one optional, open-ended question, which were analysed thematically. Results Research participants (169) and research staff (115) completed the survey. Research participants were predominantly positive about the informed consent process but highlighted the importance of having sufficient time and the value of providing follow-up once the study concludes, e.g. providing results to participants. Most staff (74.4%) staff reported that they felt very confident or confident facilitating informed consent discussions, but 63% felt information leaflets were too long and/or complicated, 56% were concerned about whether participants had understood complex information and 40% felt that time constraints were a barrier. A dominant theme from the open-ended responses to the staff survey was the importance of adequate time and resources. Conclusions Research participants in this study were overwhelmingly positive about their experience of the informed consent process. However, research staff expressed concern about how much participants have understood and studies of patient comprehension of research study information would seem to confirm these fears. This study highlights the importance of allocating adequate time to informed consent discussions, and research staff could consider using Teach Back techniques. Trial Registration Not applicable Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05493-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia O' Sullivan
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. .,Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Laura Feeney
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Rachel K Crowley
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.,Department of Endocrinology, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Prasanth Sukumar
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Eilish McAuliffe
- University College Dublin Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Peter Doran
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.,Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sacco G, Noublanche F, Blazek F, Hue C, Carballido L, Asfar M, Allain P, Annweiler C. How to deal with the consent of adults with cognitive impairment involved in European geriatric living labs? Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2021; 16:3. [PMID: 34130730 PMCID: PMC8207703 DOI: 10.1186/s13010-021-00101-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living labs are realistic environments designed to create links between technology developers and end-users (i.e. mostly older adults). Research in LLH (Living labs in health) covers a wide range of studies from non-interventional studies to CT (clinical trials) and should involve patients with neurocognitive disorders. However, the ethical issues raised by the design, development, and implementation of research and development projects in LLH have been the subject of only little interest thus far. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to determine a pragmatic, ethical and regulatory correct approach to seek the informed consent of patients with neurocognitive disorders according to the different types of studies carried out in European LLH, with a focus on the French context. METHODS A narrative review of regulatory texts and clinical articles was conducted, and a pragmatic procedure to determine the decision-making capacity of older adults in LLH was proposed. RESULTS Individuals must be adequately informed and freely agree to participate in CT. The capacity to consent should be assessed in CT including cognitively impaired older adults. We propose the following steps: first to assess for delirium using the 4 'A's Test (4AT) or the 3-min Diagnostic interview for Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM), second to search for medical history of major neurocognitive disorder, and third to assess the decision capacity using the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC). CONCLUSIONS Including individuals with neurocognitive disorders in research implies using an efficient and pragmatic strategy to inform participants and obtain their consent. The tool we offer here may be useful in the routine operation of LLH but can also be extended to all CT with this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Sacco
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Center on Autonomy and Longevity, University Hospital, Angers, France.
- Univ Angers, Université de Nantes, LPPL, SFR CONFLUENCES, F-49000, Angers, France.
- Université Côte d'Azur, CoBTek, Nice, France.
| | - Frédéric Noublanche
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Center on Autonomy and Longevity, University Hospital, Angers, France
- Univ Angers, Université de Nantes, LPPL, SFR CONFLUENCES, F-49000, Angers, France
| | | | | | | | - Marine Asfar
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Center on Autonomy and Longevity, University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Philippe Allain
- Univ Angers, Université de Nantes, LPPL, SFR CONFLUENCES, F-49000, Angers, France
| | - Cédric Annweiler
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Center on Autonomy and Longevity, University Hospital, Angers, France.
- Univ Angers, Université de Nantes, LPPL, SFR CONFLUENCES, F-49000, Angers, France.
- Robarts Research Institute, Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Selvaskandan H, Moorthy A. An Ethnic Variation in the Acceptance of Biological Disease-Modifying Therapies: A University Hospital Experience. Cureus 2021; 13:e15270. [PMID: 34194874 PMCID: PMC8234561 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Ethnic variations in the outcomes of rheumatological diseases are well documented. While physiological differences may account for these disparities, attitude to treatment is also likely to be a significant modifiable contributor. We sought to determine if an ethnic variation exists in the uptake of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) among a multi-ethnic cohort when offered in-person through a healthcare system free at the point of access. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients seen in a biologic therapy counselling clinic between December 2016 and April 2017. Clinic letters from consultations were reviewed, and data including ethnicity, language spoken, and decision to accept or reject the therapy were extracted. We chose to measure uptake over adherence, as we believe it is an earlier, more direct marker of attitudes to joint saving medications. Ninety-one cases were included in the analysis. Over 13.2% (12/91) of the cohort declined a biologic treatment when it was offered as the standard of care for joint disease. Non-Caucasian patients accepted treatment less often than Caucasian (White British) patients (OR 0.265, CI 0.73-0.959, p = 0.043), as did those who did not speak English as a first language (OR 0.094, CI 0.18-0.497, p = 0.005). Age, sex, and diagnosis were well matched between those who accepted and declined therapy. We demonstrate a disparity in the uptake of biologic therapies between the White British population and patients from other ethnicities. The reasons for this are likely multifactorial and could be related to socio-economic factors, language barriers, and cultural differences. Addressing this discrepancy is a crucial first step to tackling preventable disparities in the outcomes of rheumatological disease between different ethnicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haresh Selvaskandan
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, GBR
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR
| | - Arumugam Moorthy
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, GBR
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Paramasivan S, Davies P, Richards A, Wade J, Rooshenas L, Mills N, Realpe A, Raj JP, Subramani S, Ives J, Huxtable R, Blazeby JM, Donovan JL. What empirical research has been undertaken on the ethics of clinical research in India? A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e004729. [PMID: 34006518 PMCID: PMC8137180 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The post-2005 rise in clinical trials and clinical research conducted in India was accompanied by frequent reports of unethical practices, leading to a series of regulatory changes. We conducted a systematic scoping review to obtain an overview of empirical research pertaining to the ethics of clinical trials/research in India. METHODS Our search strategy combined terms related to ethics/bioethics, informed consent, clinical trials/research and India, across nine databases, up to November 2019. Peer-reviewed research exploring ethical aspects of clinical trials/research in India with any stakeholder groups was included. We developed an evidence map, undertook a narrative synthesis and identified research gaps. A consultation exercise with stakeholders in India helped contextualise the review and identify additional research priorities. RESULTS Titles/Abstracts of 9699 articles were screened, full text of 282 obtained and 80 were included. Research on the ethics of clinical trials/research covered a wide range of topics, often conducted with little to no funding. Studies predominantly examined what lay (patients/public) and professional participants (eg, healthcare staff/students/faculty) know about topics such as research ethics or understand from the information given to obtain their consent for research participation. Easily accessible groups, namely ethics committee members and healthcare students were frequently researched. Research gaps included developing a better understanding of the recruitment-informed consent process, including the doctor-patient interaction, in multiple contexts and exploring issues of equity and justice in clinical trials/research. CONCLUSION The review demonstrates that while a wide range of topics have been studied in India, the focus is largely on assessing knowledge levels across different population groups. This is a useful starting point, but fundamental questions remain unanswered about informed consent processes and broader issues of inequity that pervade the clinical trials/research landscape. A priority-setting exercise and appropriate funding mechanisms to support researchers in India would help improve the clinical trials/research ecosystem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangeetha Paramasivan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Philippa Davies
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) ConDuCT-II Trials Methodology Hub, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alison Richards
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) ConDuCT-II Trials Methodology Hub, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Julia Wade
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Mills
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Alba Realpe
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Jeffrey Pradeep Raj
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Supriya Subramani
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan Ives
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Huxtable
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Jenny L Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rothwell E, Brassil D, Barton-Baxter M, Brownley KA, Dickert NW, Ford DE, Kraft SA, McCormick JB, Wilfond BS. Informed consent: Old and new challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e105. [PMID: 34192059 PMCID: PMC8193198 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we address how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted informed consent for clinical research through examining experiences within Clinical and Translation Science Award (CTSA) institutions. We begin with a brief overview of informed consent and the challenges that existed prior to COVID-19. Then, we discuss how informed consent processes were modified or changed to address the pandemic, consider what lessons were learned, and present research and policy steps to prepare for future research and public health crises. The experiences and challenges for CTSA institutions offer an important perspective for examining what we have learned about informed consent and determining the next steps for improving the consent process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Rothwell
- Department of Ob/Gyn, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Marietta Barton-Baxter
- University of Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Kimberly A. Brownley
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, NC Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Neal W. Dickert
- Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliancet, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Daniel E. Ford
- Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie A. Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute and Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jennifer B. McCormick
- Department of Humanities, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, and Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine; Institute of Translational Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bardach NS, Lam R, Jasik CB. Assessment of automated clinical trial recruitment and enrolment using patient-facing technology. BMJ Health Care Inform 2021; 28:bmjhci-2019-100076. [PMID: 33504589 PMCID: PMC7843354 DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Interactive patient care systems (IPCS) at the bedside are becoming increasingly common, but evidence is limited as to their potential for innovative clinical trial implementation. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the IPCS could feasibly be used to automate recruitment and enrolment for a clinical trial. Methods In medical-surgical units, we used the IPCS to randomise, recruit and consent eligible subjects. For participants not interacting with IPCS study materials within 48 hours, study staff-initiated recruitment in-person. Eligible study population included all caregivers and any patients >6 years old admitted to medical-surgical units and oncology units September 2015 to January 2016. Outcomes: randomisation assessed using between-group comparisons of patient characteristics; recruitment success assessed by rates of consent; paperless implementation using successful acquisition of electronic signature and email address. We used χ2 analysis to assess success of randomisation and recruitment. Results Randomisation was successful (n=1012 randomised, p>0.05 for all between-group comparisons). For the subset of eligible, randomised patients who were recruited, IPCS-only recruitment (consented: 2.4% of n=213) was less successful than in-person recruitment (61.4% of n=87 eligible recruited, p<0.001). For those consenting (n=61), 96.7% provided an electronic signature and 68.9% provided email addresses. Conclusions Our results suggest that as a tool at the bedside, the IPCS offers key efficiencies for study implementation, including randomisation and collecting e-consent and contact information, but does not offer recruitment efficiencies. Further research could assess the value that interactive technologies bring to recruitment when paired with in-person efforts, potentially focusing on more intensive user-interface testing for recruitment materials. Trial registration number NCT02491190.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi S Bardach
- Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Regina Lam
- School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Carolyn B Jasik
- Research Unit, Omada Health, San Francisco, California, USA.,Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lunger F, Frank F, Peros G, Lunger A, Vuille-Dit-Bille R, Guglielmetti L, Breitenstein S, Grieder F, Ehlers J, Gingert C. Potential benefit in information providing and influence on patient anxiety and satisfaction by means of preoperative explanatory videos in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: study protocol of a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised parallel-group controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e043702. [PMID: 33500291 PMCID: PMC7843340 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of electronic media in informed consent giving has become increasingly important in recent years. Due to the easy access to information via electronical media, patients are primed in a heterogeneous manner concerning expectations and wishes regarding surgical interventions. Inherent to its nature elective interventions are critically questioned as there is time for information gathering and reflection. In this study, we set out to investigate the effect of an educational video as a supporting element in the process of informed consent giving for one the most frequently performed interventions in general surgery, namely inguinal hernia repair. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In a multicentre setup, eligible patients for primary inguinal hernia repair will be randomly assigned to one of three groups. All three groups will have a preoperative informed consent discussion with a physician in which they will eventually sign the informed consent sheet if participation is desired. Eventually, all three groups will get an online link. For two groups, the link will lead to a video with audiovisual information (an inguinal hernia video for the intervention group and a mock video for the control group). The intervention video provides basic principles of endoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair. The second video is similar in length and design and displays general aspects of day surgery in the two study centres. All the three study groups will be provided with a copy of the informed consent form as it is standard by now. The third group's link will lead to the digital version of the informed consent brochure. Primary outcomes will consist of (1) score in a multiple choice test assessing gain of knowledge regarding hernia repair, (2) difference in the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and (3) patient satisfaction questionnaire Individual Clinician Feedback (ICF, Picker Institute, Germany) as assessed 1-2 days after the first consultation. The study design guarantees double blinding, there will be no unblinding at any point. All patients will receive the same, quality and number of medical consultations as well as in the same surgical treatment. (Minor differences in the total extraperitoneal technique of the surgical treatment due to anatomical or pathophysiological differences are independent of the group allocation). Except for the additional videos, there will be no difference in in the information provided and the treatment prior, during or after the hernia repair. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION We plan to publish the study in a peer-reviewed journal. The proposed research project has been reviewed by the Cantonal Ethics Committee (BASEC-No 2020-01548). In accordance with national legal regulations in Switzerland stated by the Human Research Act, the proposed project was declared exempt from approval requirement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04494087; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Lunger
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | | - Georgios Peros
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Lunger
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | | - Laura Guglielmetti
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Breitenstein
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Felix Grieder
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Jan Ehlers
- University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - Christian Gingert
- Department of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
- University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Harle CA, Golembiewski EH, Rahmanian KP, Brumback B, Krieger JL, Goodman KW, Mainous AG, Moseley RE. Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 26:620-629. [PMID: 30938751 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the context of patient broad consent for future research uses of their identifiable health record data, we compare the effectiveness of interactive trust-enhanced e-consent, interactive-only e-consent, and standard e-consent (no interactivity, no trust enhancement). MATERIALS AND METHODS A randomized trial was conducted involving adult participants making a scheduled primary care visit. Participants were randomized into 1 of the 3 e-consent conditions. Primary outcomes were patient-reported satisfaction with and subjective understanding of the e-consent. Secondary outcomes were objective knowledge, perceived voluntariness, trust in medical researchers, consent decision, and time spent using the application. Outcomes were assessed immediately after use of the e-consent and at 1-week follow-up. RESULTS Across all conditions, participants (N = 734) reported moderate-to-high satisfaction with consent (mean 4.3 of 5) and subjective understanding (79.1 of 100). Over 94% agreed to share their health record data. No statistically significant differences in outcomes were observed between conditions. Irrespective of condition, black participants and those with lower education reported lower satisfaction, subjective understanding, knowledge, perceived voluntariness, and trust in medical researchers, as well as spent more time consenting. CONCLUSIONS A large majority of patients were willing to share their identifiable health records for research, and they reported positive consent experiences. However, incorporating optional additional information and messages designed to enhance trust in the research process did not improve consent experiences. To improve poorer consent experiences of racial and ethnic minority participants and those with lower education, other novel consent technologies and processes may be valuable. (An Interactive Patient-Centered Consent for Research Using Medical Records; NCT03063268).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher A Harle
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Regenstrief Institute Center for Biomedical Informatics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Kiarash P Rahmanian
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Babette Brumback
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Janice L Krieger
- Department of Advertising, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kenneth W Goodman
- Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Arch G Mainous
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ray E Moseley
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Skelton E, Drey N, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting. Int J Med Inform 2020; 143:104271. [PMID: 32979650 PMCID: PMC7487205 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic approaches are becoming more widely used to obtain informed consent for research participation. Electronic consent (e-consent) provides an accessible and versatile approach to the consenting process, which can be enhanced with audio-visual and interactive features to improve participant engagement and comprehension of study procedures. Best practice guidance underpinned by ethical principles is required to ensure effective implementation of e-consent for use in research. AIM To identify the key considerations for successful and ethical implementation of e-consent in the recruitment of participants to research projects which are conducted remotely. METHODS Electronic database searches of CINAHL, Medline, Embase, DARE, HTA, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, NHS Evidence, and hand-searches of reference lists were performed. Primary research studies of adult (≥ 18 years old) research participants using e-consent, published in English language, peer-reviewed journals between 2010-2020 were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS Of the initial 665 identified studies, 18 met the inclusion criteria: 6 cohort studies, 5 qualitative studies, 4 randomised control trials, 2 mixed-methods studies and one case-control study. Critical appraisal of included studies using Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tools suggested a low to moderate risk of bias in most studies (n = 15). Key practice recommendations for researchers using e-consent were identified around five primary themes: 1) accessibility and user-friendliness of e-consent, 2) user engagement and comprehension, 3) customisability to participant preferences and demographics, 4) data security and 5) impact on research teams. CONCLUSION E-consenting approaches are generally well received by participants, with most studies reporting user-friendly interfaces and sufficient participant comprehension of consenting documentation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE E-consent may facilitate remotely-conducted research by offering a feasible and robust alternative to face-to-face consenting approaches, however paper-based options should still be offered, based on participant preference. Customising e-consenting platforms may improve accessibility for individuals with specific needs, and increase engagement with study information. Research teams must offer prospective participants opportunities to discuss study information in real-time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Skelton
- Division of Radiography and Midwifery, City, University of London, UK; Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, UK.
| | | | - Mary Rutherford
- Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, UK
| | - Susan Ayers
- Division of Radiography and Midwifery, City, University of London, UK
| | - Christina Malamateniou
- Division of Radiography and Midwifery, City, University of London, UK; Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
De Sutter E, Zaçe D, Boccia S, Di Pietro ML, Geerts D, Borry P, Huys I. Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e19129. [PMID: 33030440 PMCID: PMC7582148 DOI: 10.2196/19129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Informed consent is one of the key elements in biomedical research. The introduction of electronic informed consent can be a way to overcome many challenges related to paper-based informed consent; however, its novel opportunities remain largely unfulfilled due to several barriers. Objective We aimed to provide an overview of the ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface perspectives of multiple stakeholder groups in order to assist responsible implementation of electronic informed consent in biomedical research. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search using Web of Science (Core collection), PubMed, EMBASE, ACM Digital Library, and PsycARTICLES. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used for reporting this work. We included empirical full-text studies focusing on the concept of electronic informed consent in biomedical research covering the ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface domains. Studies written in English and published from January 2010 onward were selected. We explored perspectives of different stakeholder groups, in particular researchers, research participants, health authorities, and ethics committees. We critically appraised literature included in the systematic review using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort and cross-sectional studies, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative studies, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for mixed methods studies, and Jadad tool for randomized controlled trials. Results A total of 40 studies met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the studies were heterogeneous in the type of study design, population, intervention, research context, and the tools used. Most of the studies’ populations were research participants (ie, patients and healthy volunteers). The majority of studies addressed barriers to achieving adequate understanding when using electronic informed consent. Concerns shared by multiple stakeholder groups were related to the security and legal validity of an electronic informed consent platform and usability for specific groups of research participants. Conclusions Electronic informed consent has the potential to improve the informed consent process in biomedical research compared to the current paper-based consent. The ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface perspectives outlined in this review might serve to enhance the future implementation of electronic informed consent. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020158979; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=158979
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien De Sutter
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Drieda Zaçe
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefania Boccia
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.,Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Di Pietro
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - David Geerts
- Meaningful Interactions Lab, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vaswani V, Saxena A, Shah SK, Palacios R, Rid A. Informed consent for controlled human infection studies in low- and middle-income countries: Ethical challenges and proposed solutions. BIOETHICS 2020; 34:809-818. [PMID: 32779233 PMCID: PMC9627191 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In controlled human infection studies (CHIs), participants are deliberately exposed to infectious agents in order to better understand the mechanism of infection or disease and test therapies or vaccines. While most CHIs have been conducted in high-income countries, CHIs have recently been expanding into low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). One potential ethical concern about this expansion is the challenge of obtaining the voluntary informed consent of participants, especially those who may not be literate or have limited education. In some CHIs in LMICs, researchers have attempted to address this potential concern by limiting access to literate or educated populations. In this paper, we argue that this practice is unjustified, as it does not increase the chances of obtaining valid informed consent and therefore unfairly excludes illiterate populations and populations with lower education. Instead, we recommend that investigators improve the informed consent process by drawing on existing data on obtaining informed consent in these populations and interventions aimed at improving their understanding. Based on a literature review, we provide concrete suggestions for how to follow this recommendation and ensure that populations with lower literacy or education are given a fair opportunity to protect their rights and interests in the informed consent process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vina Vaswani
- Centre for Ethics, Yenepoya University, Managlore, India
| | - Abha Saxena
- The INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India
- Institut Éthique Histoire Humanités, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Seema K Shah
- Division of Academic General Pediatrics, Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ricardo Palacios
- Clinical Trials and Pharmacovigilance Center, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Annette Rid
- Department of Bioethics, The Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Betherda, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
O'Sullivan L, Crowley R, McAuliffe É, Doran P. Contributory factors to the evolution of the concept and practice of informed consent in clinical research: A narrative review. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2020; 19:100634. [PMID: 33024880 PMCID: PMC7528065 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Informed consent can be defined as a freely-given decision or agreement following disclosure of relevant information. This review explores how legislation surrounding informed consent has impacted upon clinical research practices, with a focus on clinical trials involving individuals with the capacity to give consent in the non-emergency setting. We also highlight the challenges which remain with the informed consent process, including those which exist in the era of data protection legislation and genetic research. Modern ethicists agree that informed consent encompasses three principal factors: disclosure of information, capacity for decision making, and voluntariness. In the context of clinical research, informed consent is now required by regulatory and ethical frameworks as well as by law, and various guidelines govern the practice of informed consent, including the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. Historically, however, researchers acted paternalistically and included participants in research without their knowledge or consent. Following societal and political revolution, an autonomy model of consent became prevalent, and individuals became free to make individual choices about whether to participate. Despite this, it is also recognized that an individual's community has a role in supporting their decision making, and this may be a strong influence, particularly within some societies. Research scandals and controversies and whistle-blowers which exposed unethical practices in the area of informed consent also contributed to changes in societal attitudes and legislation changed as a result. Medical journals also have an established, although indirect, role in strengthening good practices surrounding informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia O'Sullivan
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
- Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Rachel Crowley
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
- Department of Endocrinology, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Éilish McAuliffe
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Peter Doran
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
- Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Valente PK, Wu Y, Cohen YZ, Caskey M, Meyers K. Behavioral and social science research to support development of educational materials for clinical trials of broadly neutralizing antibodies for HIV treatment and prevention. Clin Trials 2020; 18:17-27. [PMID: 32838558 DOI: 10.1177/1740774520948042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Early integration of behavioral and social sciences research into clinical trials can improve trial conduct and facilitate future implementation of biomedical interventions. We sought to examine participants' experiences in clinical trials with broadly neutralizing antibodies and describe the development of educational materials for use in future broadly neutralizing antibody research. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with trial participants in phase 1 trials evaluating safety and efficacy of broadly neutralizing antibodies for HIV prevention and treatment and key informants (i.e. trial staff involved in broadly neutralizing antibody research). Semi-structured interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Based on findings from the interviews, we developed educational materials addressing concerns and misconceptions identified among trial participants with input from community and research stakeholders. Educational materials were used in subsequent clinical trials with broadly neutralizing antibodies. We evaluated trial staff's experiences with newly developed educational materials in follow-up key informant interviews. RESULTS Although most participants were concerned about long-term harms related to the investigational product upon enrollment, absence of severe side effects in the trial led to an underestimation of risks related to the study during trial participation. Participants showed a poor understanding of what broadly neutralizing antibodies are and the differences between broadly neutralizing antibodies and other HIV prevention and treatment products, such as antiretrovirals. Many trial participants overestimated the possible public health impact of the broadly neutralizing antibody trials in which they were enrolled, associating broadly neutralizing antibody research with the development of vaccine or cure for HIV in the near future. Based on these concerns and misconceptions among trial participants, we developed a frequently asked questions document and adapted an existing educational video about broadly neutralizing antibodies. In follow-up interviews, key informants reported that materials helped address trial participants' concerns and questions related to the trial. Key informants reported using the educational materials not only during informed consent but also throughout trial participation, which contributed to making informed consent an "ongoing" process. CONCLUSION Integration of behavioral research into clinical trials with broadly neutralizing antibodies is key to identify and address key concerns among trial participants. Behavioral and social sciences research promotes communication between trial participants and biomedical researchers, facilitates engagement of participants and trial staff, and strengthens trial conduct. Development of educational materials collaboratively by behavioral and clinical scientists, trial staff, and community stakeholders is feasible and may help to address trial participants' concerns and misconceptions. Future research should evaluate the impact of educational materials in recruitment and retention of trial participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo K Valente
- Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Yumeng Wu
- Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yehuda Z Cohen
- Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.,Translational Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| | - Marina Caskey
- Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kathrine Meyers
- Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Shepherd V. An under-represented and underserved population in trials: methodological, structural, and systemic barriers to the inclusion of adults lacking capacity to consent. Trials 2020; 21:445. [PMID: 32471488 PMCID: PMC7257506 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04406-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing international recognition that populations included in trials should adequately represent the population treated in clinical practice; however, adults who lack the capacity to provide informed consent are frequently excluded from trials. Addressing the under-representation of groups such as those with impaired capacity to consent is essential to develop effective interventions and provide these groups with the opportunity to benefit from evidence-based care. While the spotlight has been on ensuring only appropriate and justifiable exclusion criteria are used in trials, barriers to the inclusion of adults lacking capacity are multifactorial and complex, and addressing their under-representation will require more than merely widening eligibility criteria. This commentary draws on the literature exploring the inclusion of adults lacking the capacity to consent in research and a number of recent studies to describe the methodological, structural, and systemic factors that have been identified. MAIN TEXT A number of potentially modifiable factors contributing to the under-representation of adults lacking the capacity to consent in trials have been identified. In addition to restrictive eligibility criteria, methodological issues include developing appropriate interventions and outcome measures for populations with impaired capacity. Structurally determined factors include the resource-intensive nature of these trials, the requirement for more appropriate research infrastructure, and a lack of interventions to inform and support proxy decision-makers. Systemic factors include the complexities of the legal frameworks, the challenges of ethical review processes, and paternalistic attitudes towards protecting adults with incapacity from the perceived harms of research. CONCLUSIONS Measures needed to address under-representation include greater scrutiny of exclusion criteria by those reviewing study proposals, providing education and training for personnel who design, conduct, and review research, ensuring greater consistency in the reviews undertaken by research ethics committees, and extending processes for advance planning to include prospectively appointing a proxy for research and documenting preferences about research participation. Negative societal and professional attitudes towards the inclusion of adults with impaired capacity in research should also be addressed, and the development of trials that are more person-centred should be encouraged. Further work to conceptualise under-representation in trials for such populations may also be helpful.
Collapse
|
35
|
Ethics (Informed Consent and Conflicts of Interest). Clin Trials 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35488-6_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
36
|
Culliford L, Brierley R, Clout M, Evans R, Maishman R, Phillips D, Tabusa H, Reeves B, Rogers CA. The OMACS-PIL study: a randomised controlled trial within the OMACS observational study. Trials 2019; 20:772. [PMID: 31881927 PMCID: PMC6935214 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3958-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There has been little research to investigate whether the appearance of paper patient information leaflets (PILs) used to describe research studies to potential participants influences their decision to take part. Embedding a study within a trial (SWAT) is an efficient way of answering this type of methodological question. We included a randomised SWAT within a large cohort study, Outcome Monitoring after Cardiac Surgery (OMACS), to address this question. Methods Potential participants for the OMACS study were randomised to receive one of three PILs, which were identical in content but with varying formatting and use of colour: PIL A (enhanced format), PIL B (hybrid format) and PIL C (standard format). Consent to OMACS was the primary outcome. Consent rates using the three different PIL formats were collected and compared. Qualitative feedback on the different formats was obtained from a public and patient involvement (PPI) group. Results For the SWAT, 1517 PILs were sent to potential participants, of whom 640 (42%) consented to take part in OMACS. PIL B had the highest recruitment rate, with 45% of patients consenting to participation; 40% and 41% of patients consented to participation after receiving PILs A and C, respectively. Compared to PIL C, the consent rate was 4% higher with PIL B (45% versus 41%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2% to + 10%, p = 0.16) and 1% lower with PIL A (40% versus 41%, 95% CI − 7% to + 5%, p = 0.72). Conclusions Consent rates were similar for all three PIL formats. PIL B is being used for the remainder of the host study and will be used to inform the design of PILs for other research studies, as it was the preferred format of the PPI group. Trial registration International Clinical Trials Registry, ISRCTN90204321. Registered on 21 January 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Culliford
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit Bristol, Bristol Trials Centre, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Level 7 Queens Building (Zone A), Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK.
| | - Rachel Brierley
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit Bristol, Bristol Trials Centre, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Level 7 Queens Building (Zone A), Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Madeleine Clout
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit Bristol, Bristol Trials Centre, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Level 7 Queens Building (Zone A), Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Rebecca Evans
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit Bristol, Bristol Trials Centre, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Level 7 Queens Building (Zone A), Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Rachel Maishman
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit Bristol, Bristol Trials Centre, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Level 7 Queens Building (Zone A), Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Dawn Phillips
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit Bristol, Bristol Trials Centre, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Level 7 Queens Building (Zone A), Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Hana Tabusa
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit Bristol, Bristol Trials Centre, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Level 7 Queens Building (Zone A), Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Barney Reeves
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit Bristol, Bristol Trials Centre, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Level 7 Queens Building (Zone A), Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Chris A Rogers
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit Bristol, Bristol Trials Centre, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Level 7 Queens Building (Zone A), Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Prictor M, Lewis MA, Newson AJ, Haas M, Baba S, Kim H, Kokado M, Minari J, Molnár-Gábor F, Yamamoto B, Kaye J, Teare HJA. Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2019; 15:175-186. [DOI: 10.1177/1556264619887073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Dynamic consent (DC) is an approach to consent that enables people, through an interactive digital interface, to make granular decisions about their ongoing participation. This approach has been explored within biomedical research, in fields such as biobanking and genomics, where ongoing contact is required with participants. It is posited that DC can enhance decisional autonomy and improve researcher–participant communication. Currently, there is a lack of evidence about the measurable effects of DC-based tools. This article outlines a framework for DC evaluation and reporting. The article draws upon the evidence for enhanced modes of informed consent for research as the basis for a logic model. It outlines how future evaluations of DC should be designed to maximize their quality, replicability, and relevance based on this framework. Finally, the article considers best-practice for reporting studies that assess DC, to enable future research and implementation to build upon the emerging evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Prictor
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Ainsley J. Newson
- Sydney Health Ethics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matilda Haas
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Hannah Kim
- Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Jusaku Minari
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, CiRA, Kyoto University, Japan
| | | | | | - Jane Kaye
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Harriet J. A. Teare
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
McCormack LA, Wylie A, Moultrie R, Furberg RD, Wheeler AC, Treiman K, Bailey DB, Raspa M. Supporting informed clinical trial decisions: Results from a randomized controlled trial evaluating a digital decision support tool for those with intellectual disability. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0223801. [PMID: 31644588 PMCID: PMC6808417 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informed consent requires that individuals understand the nature of the study, risks and benefits of participation. Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) have cognitive and adaptive impairments that may affect their ability to provide informed consent. New treatments and clinical trials for fragile X syndrome, the most commonly known inherited cause of ID, necessitate the development of methods to improve the informed consent process. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of a digital decision support tool with that of standard practice for informed consent and to examine whether the tool can improve decisional capacity for higher functioning individuals. METHODS Participants (N = 89; mean age = 21.2 years) were allocated to the experimental group (consenting information provided via the digital decision support tool), or the comparison group (information provided via standard practice). Participants were assessed on four aspects of decisional capacity (Understanding, Appreciating, Reasoning, and Expressing a choice). We used regression analyses to test the impact of the tool on each outcome, repeating the analyses on the higher functioning subsample. RESULTS No differences existed in any domain of decisional capacity for the sample in full. However, participants in the higher IQ subsample who used the tool scored better on Understanding after adjustment (β = 0.25, p = 0.04), but not on Appreciating or Reasoning. No differences by experimental group existed in the decision to join the hypothetical trial for the full sample or higher functioning subsample. CONCLUSIONS A decision support tool shows promise for individuals with fragile X syndrome with higher cognitive abilities. Future studies should examine the level of cognitive ability needed for sufficient understanding, whether these findings can be translated to other clinical populations, and the impact of the tool in larger trials and on trial retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren A. McCormack
- Public Health Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Amanda Wylie
- Center for Newborn Screening, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Rebecca Moultrie
- Public Health Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Robert D. Furberg
- Health Quality & Analytics, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Anne C. Wheeler
- Center for Newborn Screening, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Katherine Treiman
- Public Health Research Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Donald B. Bailey
- Center for Newborn Screening, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Melissa Raspa
- Center for Newborn Screening, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Effect of Consent and Educational Adjuncts to Consent on Patient Perceptions About Colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2019; 53:e316-e321. [PMID: 30001290 PMCID: PMC6329678 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Informed consent is a vital preprocedural step for endoscopy but there are substantial variations in its delivery. We therefore sought to assess a multifaceted intervention to improve the consent process. METHODS Gastroenterologists at a tertiary center were educated on the recommended components of informed consent. Following this, 3 cohorts of patients undergoing colonoscopy were surveyed before and after consent. In one cohort, the effect of optimized verbal consent alone was assessed. In the second and third groups, the effects of the addition of either a handout or a video describing colonoscopy and its risks were evaluated. The primary outcomes were the changes between preconsent and postconsent survey responses regarding confidence in understanding the procedure's purpose, likelihood of adverse events, and levels of anxiety. RESULTS In total, 240 patients were included with 79 to 81 patients per group. There were no significant differences among the groups' survey responses. Compared with patients receiving verbal consent alone, fewer patients in the handout and video groups increased their perceived risk of adverse events following consent, but this difference did not reach significance (P=0.08). Examining all groups together, anxiety levels changed significantly after consent (P=0.003), with 31% of patients reducing their anxiety level, 8% increasing it, and 62% having no change. CONCLUSIONS The consent process appears to decrease patient anxiety about colonoscopy. When used in conjunction with a high-quality verbal consent, written or video educational adjuncts provided on the day of colonoscopy likely have no effect on patient perceptions.
Collapse
|
40
|
Brubaker L, Jelovsek JE, Lukacz ES, Balgobin S, Ballard A, Weidner AC, Gantz MG, Whitworth R, Mazloomdoost D. Recruitment and retention: A randomized controlled trial of video-enhanced versus standard consent processes within the E-OPTIMAL study. Clin Trials 2019; 16:481-489. [PMID: 31347384 DOI: 10.1177/1740774519865541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS In this study, we compared two research consent techniques: a standardized video plus usual consent and usual consent alone. METHODS Individuals who completed 24-month outcomes (completers) in the Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss study were invited to participate in an extended, longitudinal follow-up study (extended Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss). Potential participants who were (1) able to provide consent and (2) not in long-term care facilities were randomized 1:1 to a standardized video detailing the importance of long-term follow-up studies of pelvic floor disorders followed by the usual institutional consent process versus the usual consent process alone. Randomization, stratified by site, used randomly permuted blocks. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who enrolled in the extended study and completed data collection events 5 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the proportion enrolled in the extended study, completion of follow-up at each study year, completion of data collection points, completion of in-person visits, and completion of quality of life calls. Motivation and barriers to enrollment (study-level and personal-level) and satisfaction with the study consent process were measured by questionnaire prior to recruitment into extended Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss. Groups were compared using an intention-to-treat principle, using unadjusted Student's t-test (continuous) and chi-square or Fisher's exact (categorical) test. A sample size of 340 (170/group) was estimated to detect a 15% difference in enrollment and study completion between groups with p < 0.05. RESULTS Of the 327 Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss completers, 305 were randomized to the consent process study (153 video vs 152 no video). Groups were similar in demographics, surgical treatment, and outcomes. The overall rate of extended study enrollment was high, without significant differences between groups (video 92.8% vs no video 94.1%, p = 0.65). There were no significant differences in the primary outcome (video 79.1% vs no video 75.7%, p = 0.47) or in any secondary outcomes. Being "very satisfied" overall with study information (97.7% vs 88.5%, p = 0.01); "strong agreement" for feeling informed about the study (81.3% vs 70.8%, p = 0.06), understanding the study purpose (83.6% vs 71.0%, p = 0.02), nature and extent (82.8% vs 70.2%, p = 0.02), and potential societal benefits (82.8% vs 67.9%, p = 0.01); and research coordinator/study nurse relationship being "very important" (72.7% vs 63.4%, p = 0.03) were better in the video compared to the no video consent group. CONCLUSION The extended study had high enrollment; most participants completed most study tasks during the 3-year observational extension, regardless of the use of video to augment research consent. The video was associated with a higher proportion of participants reporting improved study understanding and relationship with study personnel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Brubaker
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - J Eric Jelovsek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Emily S Lukacz
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sunil Balgobin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Alicia Ballard
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Alison C Weidner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Donna Mazloomdoost
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jolly K, Sidhu M, Bower P, Madurasinghe V. Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for COPD: a cluster randomised controlled 'study within a trial' (SWAT) of a multimedia information resource. Trials 2019; 20:453. [PMID: 31340853 PMCID: PMC6657092 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3496-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Good quality information is critical for valid informed consent to trials, but current paper-based consent procedures are potentially unwieldy and can be difficult to comprehend, which may deter people from participating. Multimedia resources may be able to provide more accessible and user-friendly information. We aimed to test whether offering access to a multimedia information resource alongside standard, printed patient information impacted on recruitment rates by conducting a pragmatic 'study within a trial' (SWAT) embedding a trial of a multimedia resource within an existing trial. METHODS The PSM COPD study involved people with mild symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recruited from primary care being randomised to a nurse-delivered telephone health coaching intervention, or usual primary care. For the SWAT of recruitment procedures, practices recruiting participants were cluster randomised to use either the standard printed patient information materials or standard printed patient information materials with access to a multimedia information resource. The multimedia resource was developed by patient and public involvement (PPI) contributors and researchers, and included study-specific information (e.g. study purpose, risks), and generic information about trials (e.g. confidentiality, randomisation). We developed a list of components and used animations as well as video clips of patients discussing their experiences of participation, matched to these components. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants randomised. RESULTS Nine point six percent of those receiving standard printed patient information materials and access to the multimedia information resource were recruited, compared to 10.8% in those receiving standard printed materials alone (odds ratio (OR) = 0.844, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.22). We also found no effects on the proportion of people responding to the invitation (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.33) or retention in the trial at 6 (ORs 0.84, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.22) and 12 months after randomisation (ORs 0.80, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.18), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The study suggests no benefits of access to a multimedia information resource alongside patient information materials on recruitment. This may reflect the limited engagement of patients with the multimedia resource. Further uses of multimedia resources will need to explore how content can be explicitly matched to user needs and preferences and methods to encourage engagement to see if effects can be enhanced. More SWATs of multimedia into ongoing trials will provide a more precise estimate of effect, and explore further how effects vary by trial context and recruitment process, intervention, and patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current controlled trials ISRCTN 06710391 . Registered on 21 November 2013. SWAT REGISTRATION SWAT 23: Systematic Techniques for Assisting Recruitment to Trials (MRC START). Registered on 11 January 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Manbinder Sidhu
- Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2RT, UK
| | | | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Vichithranie Madurasinghe
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gillies K, Campbell MK. Development and evaluation of decision aids for people considering taking part in a clinical trial: a conceptual framework. Trials 2019; 20:401. [PMID: 31277693 PMCID: PMC6612082 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3489-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Ethical requirements of informed consent stipulate that patients approached to participate in a clinical trial be provided with written information that must cover key aspects of the trial. For consent to be deemed “informed”, potential participants should be provided with a range of information about the trials (e.g., the trial aims, the anticipated benefits and potential risks of the trial, and their right to withdraw consent at any time). However, it is well documented that simple provision of this information does not ensure that participants make truly informed decisions. Decision aids, tools that have been shown in a treatment and screening context to support better-quality decisions, are emerging as a possible vehicle to support decision making about trial participation. However, information on how they should best be developed and evaluated in a clinical trial context is lacking. Therefore, this article, drawing on theoretical and empirical insights, outlines a framework for the development and evaluation of decision aids for people considering taking part in a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Marion K Campbell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jayasinghe N, Moallem BI, Kakoullis M, Ojie MJ, Sar-Graycar L, Wyka K, Reid MC, Leonard JP. Establishing the Feasibility of a Tablet-Based Consent Process with Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Study. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2019; 59:124-134. [PMID: 29757375 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose of the Study This mixed-methods study explored the feasibility and acceptability of using a tablet-based research consent process with adults aged ≥65 years. Design and Methods In the first phase, focus group participants reported on their perceptions of a tablet-based consent process. In the second phase, older adults were randomized to view either a tablet-based or paper-based consent for a mock clinical trial. Measurements included: time to complete, adverse/unexpected events, user-friendliness, immediate comprehension, and retention at a 1-week delay. Results Focus group participants (N = 15) expressed interest in the novel format, cautioning that peers would need comprehensive orientation to use the technology. In the randomized pilot (N = 20), retention was 100% and all participants completed the protocol without the occurrence of adverse/unexpected events. Although the participants took longer to complete the tablet-based consent than the paper-based version, user-friendliness, immediate comprehension, and retention of the tablet-based consent were similar to the paper-based consent. Discussion and Implications The findings suggest that a tablet-based consent process is feasible to implement with older adults and acceptable to this population, but we would underscore that efforts to optimize design of tablet-based consent forms for older adults are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - B Isabel Moallem
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.,Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Margo Kakoullis
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.,Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Mary-Jane Ojie
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.,Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Katarzyna Wyka
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.,City University of New York, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Synnot AJ, Tong A, Bragge P, Lowe D, Nunn JS, O’Sullivan M, Horvat L, Kay D, Ghersi D, McDonald S, Poole N, Bourke N, Lannin NA, Vadasz D, Oliver S, Carey K, Hill SJ. Selecting, refining and identifying priority Cochrane Reviews in health communication and participation in partnership with consumers and other stakeholders. Health Res Policy Syst 2019; 17:45. [PMID: 31036016 PMCID: PMC6489310 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0444-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Priority-setting partnerships between researchers and stakeholders (meaning consumers, health professionals and health decision-makers) may improve research relevance and value. The Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group (CCCG) publishes systematic reviews in 'health communication and participation', which includes concepts such as shared decision-making, patient-centred care and health literacy. We aimed to select and refine priority topics for systematic reviews in health communication and participation, and use these to identify five priority CCCG Cochrane Reviews. METHODS Twenty-eight participants (14 consumers, 14 health professionals/decision-makers) attended a 1-day workshop in Australia. Using large-group activities and voting, participants discussed, revised and then selected 12 priority topics from a list of 21 previously identified topics. In mixed small groups, participants refined these topics, exploring underlying problems, who they affect and potential solutions. Thematic analysis identified cross-cutting themes, in addition to key populations and potential interventions for future Cochrane Reviews. We mapped these against CCCG's existing review portfolio to identify five priority reviews. RESULTS Priority topics included poor understanding and implementation of patient-centred care by health services, the fact that health information can be a low priority for health professionals, communication and coordination breakdowns in health services, and inadequate consumer involvement in health service design. The four themes underpinning the topics were culture and organisational structures, health professional attitudes and assumptions, inconsistent experiences of care, and lack of shared understanding in the sector. Key populations for future reviews were described in terms of social health characteristics (e.g. people from indigenous or culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, elderly people, and people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage) more than individual health characteristics. Potential interventions included health professional education, interventions to change health service/health professional culture and attitudes, and health service policies and standards. The resulting five priority Cochrane Reviews identified were improving end-of-life care communication, patient/family involvement in patient safety, improving future doctors' communication skills, consumer engagement strategies, and promoting patient-centred care. CONCLUSIONS Stakeholders identified priority topics for systematic reviews associated with structural and cultural challenges underlying health communication and participation, and were concerned that issues of equity be addressed. Priority-setting with stakeholders presents opportunities and challenges for review producers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneliese J. Synnot
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter Bragge
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dianne Lowe
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jack S. Nunn
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Debra Kay
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Davina Ghersi
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Australia
| | - Steve McDonald
- Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Naomi Poole
- Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Natasha A. Lannin
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Allied Health (Occupational Therapy), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Sandy Oliver
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
- University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Karen Carey
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Australia
| | - Sophie J. Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ryan R, Hill S. Supporting implementation of Cochrane methods in complex communication reviews: resources developed and lessons learned for editorial practice and policy. Health Res Policy Syst 2019; 17:32. [PMID: 30922338 PMCID: PMC6437949 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0435-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Every healthcare encounter involves some form of communication and there is growing recognition that effective health communication is central to the delivery of safe, high-quality healthcare. Conversely, poor communication has a range of adverse consequences for those receiving healthcare and the systems delivering care, including elevated patient safety risks. Increasing understanding and documentation of the key role that good communication plays in healthcare design and delivery has meant there is growing demand from policy-makers and other decision-makers for evidence on the effects of health communication interventions - that is, how best to communicate. While systematic reviews of such interventions are fundamental to building this evidence base, such interventions and reviews are often highly complex and pose considerable challenges for authors and editors. In this paper, we describe our experience as a Cochrane editorial group identifying common issues in reviews of communication interventions and developing resources to support authors to better meet these challenges. Our analysis found that issues typically fell into one or more of the following three stages of the review process: understanding and applying systematic review methods (e.g. selecting outcomes for analysis); reporting the review's methods (e.g. describing key decisions made in conducting the review); and interpreting the findings (e.g. incorporating quality of the evidence into findings of the review). We also found that common issues reflected both practical difficulties (such as the typically large size of reviews and disparate measures for outcomes) and conceptual challenges (for instance, the difficulties of identifying comparisons). While extensive advice for Cochrane systematic reviewers exists, this standardised advice does not cover all of the issues emerging for complex communication reviews. In response, we therefore developed a collection of resources, both general and targeted to specific methodological issues. Here, we describe the types of resources developed and the aims of these, the rationale for why we needed to fill specific gaps in existing advice, and reflect on the lessons for future editorial practice, policies and research in relation to the implementation of Cochrane review methods in the area of health communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Ryan
- Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group, Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Victoria, 3086 Australia
| | - Sophie Hill
- Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group, Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Victoria, 3086 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rogers A, Flynn RWV, Mackenzie IS, MacDonald TM. Does the provision of a DVD-based audio-visual presentation improve recruitment in a clinical trial? A randomised trial of DVD trial invitations. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19:24. [PMID: 30700250 PMCID: PMC6354366 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0663-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment to clinical trials can be challenging. Methods that improve the efficiency of trial recruitment are needed to increase successful study completions. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether sending an audio-visual presentation on a digital versatile disc (DVD), along with usual study invitation materials, would improve recruitment to the Febuxostat versus Allopurinol Streamlined Trial (FAST), a clinical trial in patients with established gout. METHODS Potential participants for the FAST study who were identified by searches of GP records in Scottish primary care practices between August 2013 and July 2014 were included in this study. Individuals were randomly allocated to receive either a standard invitation (letter and information leaflet) or a standard invitation and a DVD containing an audio-visual presentation explaining the background and operation of FAST. Data on invitation response rates, screening attendances and randomisations were collected by research nurses. RESULTS One thousand fifty potential participants were invited to take part in FAST during this period. 509 individuals were randomised to receive the DVD presentation and the standard invitation and 541 received a standard invitation only. DVD recipients were less likely to respond to the initial invitation (adjusted OR 0.76, CI 0.58-0.99) and marginally less likely to return a positive response (OR 0.75, CI 0.59-0.96). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in attendance for screening or randomisation. The DVD did not influence the age, gender, or socioeconomic deprivation scores of those responding positively to a letter of invitation. CONCLUSIONS The inclusion of a DVD presentation with FAST study invitations did not make any practical difference to the rate of positive response to invitation. Further innovation and evaluation will be required to improve recruitment to clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION EU Clinical Trials Register. EudraCT Number: 2011-001883-23 . ISRCTN registry. ISRCTN72443278 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Rogers
- Medicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO) and Hypertension Research Centre Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Medicine, University of Dundee Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom.
| | - Robert W V Flynn
- Medicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO) and Hypertension Research Centre Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Medicine, University of Dundee Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Isla S Mackenzie
- Medicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO) and Hypertension Research Centre Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Medicine, University of Dundee Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas M MacDonald
- Medicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO) and Hypertension Research Centre Division of Cardiovascular and Diabetes Medicine, University of Dundee Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
"Tell me what you suggest, and let's do that, doctor": Patient deliberation time during informal decision-making in clinical trials. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0211338. [PMID: 30695047 PMCID: PMC6350979 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Informed consent is an essential part of an ethical clinical trial; to this end, researchers have developed several interventions to promote participants’ full understanding of trials and thereby improve the consent process. However, few empirical studies have examined how patients make the decision of whether to give consent. The objective of this study, therefore, is to analyze patients’ decision-making process when participating in clinical trials. We conduct an internet survey (n = 2,045) and interview data analysis (n = 40) with patients and categorize respondents into three types of participants: active, passive, and non-participation. Our results show that patients often make informal and quick decisions before medical staff provide them with relevant information during the informed consent process. For example, 55.9% of patients received initial information on clinical trials from an online article or web advertising, and 54.5% consulted no one about whether to participate in the clinical trial before making a decision. Only 20.7% of respondents subjectively spent time making the decision whether to participate; 43.0% of patients who said that they “spent time” coming to a decision took four or more days to reach a decision, while 8.3% of people who “did not spend time” making a decision took this among of time. Based on these results, we were able to break patients’ decision-making process into four steps: first contact, informal decision making, relevant information, and formal decision making. Our results show that patients are most likely to make a decision based on the first information they receive on the clinical trial, whatever the source. To this end, having a list of questions for potential participants to ask researchers would be useful in helping better collecting information of clinical trials. In addition, research teams should give patients more than four days to decide between providing them with relevant information and obtaining written consent, even if the patient seems to make a quick decision.
Collapse
|
48
|
Ditai J, Kanyago J, Nambozo MR, Odeke NM, Abeso J, Dusabe-Richards J, Olupot-Olupot P, Carrol ED, Medina-Lara A, Gladstone M, Storr J, Faragher B, Weeks AD. Optimising informed consent for participants in a randomised controlled trial in rural Uganda: a comparative prospective cohort mixed-methods study. Trials 2018; 19:699. [PMID: 30577809 PMCID: PMC6304001 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-3030-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor participant understanding of research information can be a problem in community interventional studies with rural African women, whose levels of illiteracy are high. This study aimed to improve the informed consent process for women living in rural eastern Uganda. We assessed the impact of alternative consent models on participants' understanding of clinical trial information and their contribution to the informed consent process in rural Uganda. METHODS The study applied a parallel mixed-methods design for a prospective comparative cohort, nested within a pilot study on the community distribution of an alcohol-based hand rub to prevent neonatal sepsis (BabyGel pilot trial). Women of at least 34 weeks' pregnancy, suitable for inclusion in the BabyGel pilot trial, were recruited into this study from their homes in 13 villages in Mbale District. As part of the informed consent process, information about the trial was presented using one of three consent methods: standard researcher-read information, a slide show using illustrated text on a flip chart or a video showing the patient information being read as if by a newsreader in either English or the local language. In addition, all women received the patient information sheet in their preferred language. Each information-giving method was used in recruitment for 1 week. Two days after recruitment, women's understanding of the clinical trial was evaluated using the modified Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) tool. They were also shown the other two methods and their preference assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Semi-structured interviews were administered to each participant. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated verbatim, and thematically analysed. RESULTS A total of 30 pregnant women in their homes participated in this study. Their recall of the trial information within the planned 48 h was assessed for the majority (90%, 27/30). For all three consent models, women demonstrated a high understanding of the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the slide-show message (mean 4.7; standard deviation, SD 0.47; range 4-5), video message (mean 4.9; SD 0.33; range 4-5) and standard method (mean 4.5; SD 0.53; range 4-5; all one-way ANOVA, p = 0.190). The slide-show message resulted in the most objective understanding of question items with the highest average QuIC score of 100 points. For women who had been recruited using any of the three models, the slide show was the most popular method, with a mean score for all items of not less than 4.2 (mean 4.8; SD 0.6; range 4-5). Most women (63%, 19/30) preferred the slide-show message, compared with 17% (5/30) and 20% (6/30) for the standard and video messages, respectively. The reasons given included the benefits of having pictures to aid understanding and the logical progression of the information. CONCLUSION Our results from this small study suggest that slide-show messages may be an effective and popular alternative way of presenting trial information to women in rural Uganda, many of whom have little or no literacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN67852437 . Registered on 18 March 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ditai
- Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAfRI), Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Pallisa-Kumi Road Junction, P.o Box 2190, Mbale, Uganda. .,Sanyu Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's' Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK.
| | - J Kanyago
- Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAfRI), Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Pallisa-Kumi Road Junction, P.o Box 2190, Mbale, Uganda
| | - M R Nambozo
- Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAfRI), Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Pallisa-Kumi Road Junction, P.o Box 2190, Mbale, Uganda
| | - N M Odeke
- Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAfRI), Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Pallisa-Kumi Road Junction, P.o Box 2190, Mbale, Uganda
| | - J Abeso
- Sanyu Africa Research Institute (SAfRI), Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Pallisa-Kumi Road Junction, P.o Box 2190, Mbale, Uganda.,Department of Paediatrics, Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Mbale, Uganda
| | - J Dusabe-Richards
- Tropical Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - P Olupot-Olupot
- Busitema University, Faculty of Health Sciences, PO Box 1460, Mbale, Uganda
| | - E D Carrol
- Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, 8 West Derby Street, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK
| | - A Medina-Lara
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - M Gladstone
- Sanyu Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's' Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK.,International Community Paediatrics, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's' Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK
| | | | - B Faragher
- Tropical Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
| | - A D Weeks
- Sanyu Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's' Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cheah PY, Jatupornpimol N, Hanboonkunupakarn B, Khirikoekkong N, Jittamala P, Pukrittayakamee S, Day NPJ, Parker M, Bull S. Challenges arising when seeking broad consent for health research data sharing: a qualitative study of perspectives in Thailand. BMC Med Ethics 2018; 19:86. [PMID: 30404642 PMCID: PMC6223036 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0326-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research funders, regulatory agencies, and journals are increasingly expecting that individual-level data from health research will be shared. Broad consent to such sharing is considered appropriate, feasible and acceptable in low- and middle-income settings, but to date limited empirical research has been conducted to inform the design of such processes. We examined stakeholder perspectives about how best to seek broad consent to sharing data from the Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, which implemented a data sharing policy and broad consent to data sharing in January 2016. METHODS Between February and August 2017 qualitative data were collected at two sites, Bangkok and the Thai-Myanmar border town of Mae Sot. We conducted eighteen semi-structured interviews. We also conducted four focus group discussions with a total of nineteen people. Descriptive and thematic coding informed analysis of aspects of data sharing that are considered most important to inform participants about, and the best ways to explain complex and abstract topics relating to data sharing. RESULTS The findings demonstrated that clinical trial participants prioritise information about the potential benefits and harms of data sharing. Stakeholders made multiple suggestions for clarifying information provided about data sharing on such topics. There was significant variation amongst stakeholders' perspectives about how much information should be provided about data sharing, and it was clear that effective information provision should be responsive to the study, the study population, the individual research participant and the research context. CONCLUSIONS Effectively communicating about data sharing with research participants is challenging in practice, highlighting the importance of robust and effective data sharing governance in this context. Broad consent should incorporate effective and efficient explanations of data sharing to promote informed decision-making, without impeding research participants' understandings of key aspects of the research from which data will be shared. Further work is required to refine both the development of core information about data sharing to be provided to all research participants, and appropriate solutions for context specific-challenges arising when explaining data sharing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phaik Yeong Cheah
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. .,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7FZ, UK. .,The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Nattapat Jatupornpimol
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Borimas Hanboonkunupakarn
- Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Napat Khirikoekkong
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Podjanee Jittamala
- Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sasithon Pukrittayakamee
- Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nicholas P J Day
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7FZ, UK
| | - Michael Parker
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susan Bull
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Greenzang KA, Cronin AM, Kang T, Mack JW. Parent understanding of the risk of future limitations secondary to pediatric cancer treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27020. [PMID: 29603610 PMCID: PMC5980702 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parents and physicians may have different understandings of a child's risk of future limitations due to cancer or cancer treatment. We evaluated alignment between parent- and physician-estimated risk of late effects. METHODS We surveyed 352 parents of children with cancer within 12 weeks of diagnosis, and the children's oncologists, at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. We assessed parent and physician estimations of the child's risk of future limitations in physical abilities, intelligence, or quality of life (QOL) due to cancer treatment. Physician-estimated risk of limitations ≥50% was considered high risk. RESULTS Physicians considered 22% of children at high risk of physical impairments, 9% at high risk for impaired intelligence, and 6% at high risk for impaired QOL. Among high-risk children, 38% of parents recognized this risk in physical abilities, 21% in intelligence, and 5% in QOL. In multivariable analysis, parental understanding of risk, defined as concordant parent and physician estimates, was greater among parents of children at lower risk of future limitations (odds ratio 2.59; 95% confidence interval 1.35-4.96). Regardless of risk, 92% of parents considered it very/extremely important to receive information about potential health implications of cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS Although most parents want information about life after cancer, most parents of children at high risk of future impairment do not recognize this risk. Strategies to improve communication about late effects throughout pediatric cancer treatment should prioritize meeting information needs and improving parent understanding of the risk of impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie A. Greenzang
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Angel M. Cronin
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|