Flunisolide HFA vs flunisolide CFC: pharmacokinetic comparison in healthy volunteers

Are synthetic glucocorticoids in the aquatic environment a risk to fish?

The glucocorticosteroid, or glucocorticoid (GC), system is largely conserved across vertebrates and plays a central role in numerous vital physiological processes including bone development, immunomodulation, and modification of glucose metabolism and the induction of stress-related behaviours. As a result of their wide-ranging actions, synthetic GCs are widely prescribed for numerous human and veterinary therapeutic purposes and consequently have been detected extensively within the aquatic environment. Synthetic GCs designed for humans are pharmacologically active in non-mammalian vertebrates, including fish, however they are generally detected in surface waters at low (ng/L) concentrations. In this review, we assess the potential environmental risk of synthetic GCs to fish by comparing available experimental data and effect levels in fish with those in mammals. We found the majority of compounds were predicted to have insignificant risk to fish, however some compounds were predicted to be of moderate and high risk to fish, although the dataset of compounds used for this analysis was small. Given the common mode of action and high level of inter-species target conservation exhibited amongst the GCs, we also give due consideration to the potential for mixture effects, which may be particularly significant when considering the potential for environmental impact from this class of pharmaceuticals. Finally, we also provide recommendations for further research to more fully understand the potential environmental impact of this relatively understudied group of commonly prescribed human and veterinary drugs.

Flunisolide for the treatment of asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are recommended for treatment of persistent asthma. Several ICSs are available and delivered by a variety of devices. After the banning of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), a formulation of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-flunisolide marketed with an in-built spacer has been developed, complying with the request of efficacy and safety for children and adults. It delivers an aerosol with mass median aerodynamic diameter smaller than that of the CFC-formulation (1.2 vs 3.8 m). The extrafine aerosol and the add-on spacer are peculiarities of HFA-flunisolide with respect to the traditional ICSs, assuring larger lung deposition, lower oro-pharyngeal dose and targeting small airways. HFA-flunisolide with the spacer is effective at one-third the dose of CFC-flunisolide delivered without spacer. HFA-flunisolide may be considered an effective alternative to currently available ICSs for asthma management of adult and pediatric patients 6 years of age and older.

A pharmacokinetic simulation tool for inhaled corticosteroids

The pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of inhaled drugs is more complicated than that of other forms of administration. In particular, the effects of certain physiological (mucociliary clearance and differences in membrane properties in central and peripheral (C/P) areas of the lung), formulation (as it relates to drug deposition and particle dissolution rate), and patient-related factors (lung function; effects on C/P deposition ratio) affect the systemic PKs of inhaled drugs. The objectives of this project were (1) to describe a compartmental model that adequately describes the fate of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) after administration while incorporating variability between and within subjects and (2) based upon the model, to provide a freely available tool for simulation of PK trials after ICS administration. This compartment model allows for mucociliary removal of undissolved particles from the lung, distinguishes between central and peripheral regions of the lung, and models drug entering the systemic circulation via the lung and the gastrointestinal tract. The PK simulation tool is provided as an extension package to the statistical software R ('ICSpkTS'). It allows simulation of PK trials for hypothetical ICS and of four commercially available ICS (budesonide, flunisolide, fluticasone propionate, and triamcinolone acetonide) in a parallel study design. Simulated PK data and parameters agreed well with literature data for all four ICS. The ICSpkTS package is especially suitable to explore the effect of changes in model parameters on PK behavior and can be easily adjusted for other inhaled drugs.

Inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma: pharmacologic determinants of safety and efficacy and other clinical considerations

The role of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the treatment of childhood asthma has been well established. An ideal corticosteroid should demonstrate high pulmonary deposition and residency time, in addition to a low systemic bioavailability and rapid systemic clearance. The lung depositions of the ICS have been compared, with beclomethasone (beclometasone)-hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) and ciclesonide showing the highest lung deposition. Lung deposition is influenced by not only the inhalation device and type of propellant (HFA or chlorofluorocarbon), but also by whether the aerosol is a solution or suspension, and the particle size of the respirable fraction. Pulmonary residency time increases when budesonide and des-ciclesonide undergo reversible fatty acid esterification. The bioavailability of the drug depends on the oral bioavailable fraction and the amount absorbed directly from the pulmonary vasculature. The clearance rate of des-ciclesonide is very high (228 L/h), increasing its safety profile by utilizing extra-hepatic clearance mechanisms. Both des-ciclesonide and mometasone have a high protein binding fraction (98-99%). The volume of distribution (Vd) is proportional to the lipophilicity of the drug, with the Vd of fluticasone being 332L compared with 183L for budesonide. Increasing the Vd will also increase the elimination half-life of a drug. The pharmacodynamics of ICS depend on both the receptor binding affinity and the dose-response curve. Among the ICS, fluticasone and mometasone have the highest receptor binding affinity (1800 and 2200, respectively), followed by budesonide at 935 (relative to dexamethasone = 100). Compared with other nonsteroid asthma medications (long-acting beta-agonists, theophylline, and montelukast) ICS have proven superiority in improving lung function, symptom-free days, and inflammatory markers. One study suggests that early intervention with ICS reduces the loss in lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) over 3 years. Whether airway remodeling is reduced or prevented in the long term is unknown. Potential adverse drug effects of ICS include adrenal and growth suppression. While in low-to-medium doses ICS have shown little suppression of the adrenal pituitary axis, in high doses the potential for significant adrenal suppression and adrenal crisis exists. Several longitudinal studies evaluating the effect of ICS on growth have shown a small decrement in growth velocity (approximate 1-2 cm) during the first year of treatment. However, when investigators followed children treated with budesonide for up to 10 years, no change in target adult height was noted. In conclusion, the development of optimal delivery devices for young children, as well as optimizing favorable pharmacokinetic properties of ICS should be priorities for future childhood asthma management.

Development of a dry powder inhaler, the Ultrahaler, containing triamcinolone acetonide using in vitro-in vivo relationships

Triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) is safe and effective corticosteroid that is marketed as an MDI (metered dose inhaler) (Azmacort) for the treatment of asthma. A novel dry powder inhaler (DPI), the Ultrahaler, has been developed to deliver Azmacort as another alternative to provide non-CFC formulation for the asthmatic patients. The Ultrahaler is breath actuated and, unlike MDI, does not require coordination of inhalation with the actuation of the device. However, with the Ultrahaler device, like any dry powder inhalation device, the challenge was the on-target and uniform delivery of the drug at the site of action (lungs) with different dose strengths. Due to the complexities of oral inhaled formulations and the topical nature of drug delivery to the lung for efficacy, the reformulation requires careful consideration and support throughout their development, using a combination of in vitro and in vivo studies. This paper describes in vitro studies and two clinical pharmacokinetic studies conducted in a sequence that helped to establish optimum doses for the Ultrahaler. In vitro data were used to guide the initial selection of doses that were then compared in vivo using a pharmacokinetic study with a charcoal block. The in vitro tests included quantifying the target-delivered dose, dose uniformity throughout the life of the device, and the particle size distribution. Particle size distribution was measured using multistage liquid impinger (MSLI) or the Andersen Cascade Impactor (ACI). For in vitro testing, TAA was measured by HPLC methods. Based on the preliminary in vitro data for the respirable fraction, dose strengths with an MDI and the Ultrahaler for the first study were determined. The in vivo assessment consisted of a four-way crossover study following oral inhalation using both MDI (75 and 225 microg/actuation, reference treatment) and comparable respirable doses in the DPI (130 and 360 microg/actuation) devices in healthy volunteers in the presence (lung deposition) and absence (lung and oropharynx deposition) of the charcoal block. Plasma TAA concentrations were determined using a radioimmunoassay (RIA) method. The in vitro data also showed dose proportionality with DPI formulation, and the doses delivered were within 13% of the target doses. A measure of dose uniformity, the relative standard deviation (%RSD) of dose, was less than 15%. Plasma TAA exposure of DPI formulations was compared with that of MDI formulations. Mean ratios (DPI/MDI) of the AUCinf were close to unity for the lower dose strength. However, for the higher dose strength, plasma exposure was higher with the Ultrahaler formulation as compared with the MDI formulation (mean AUCinf DPI/MDI ratios: 1.96). These differences seem to be due to less than proportional increases in the MDI formulation. Based on these results and using the higher dose strength of the MDI as the comparator, the new dose strengths of the Ultrahaler were chosen, ie, 100, 225, and 450 mug/actuation. Plasma TAA concentrations were measured by LC/MS/MS methods. The mean TAA concentrations and AUCinf and Cmax values increased in a dose-proportional manner with an increase in dose for the DPI formulation. The pharmacokinetic parameters showed low variability (10%-33%). Fine particle mass (in vitro testing) and TAA exposure in plasma following DPI administration were compared. Fine particle performance in vitro related well with in vivo pharmacokinetic performance (R=AUCinf-0.9998, Cmax-0.9956). In conclusion, in vitro and in vivo data were in agreement and good control over the target-dose delivery and dose proportionality could be achieved in the early stages of the development of the Ultrahaler device and were critical in guiding and ensuring the success of the reformulation efforts for Azmacort.

Flunisolide HFA

Flunisolide is a synthetic corticosteroid approved for the treatment of persistent asthma and delivered by means of a metered-dose inhaler (MDI). A new formulation of flunisolide, using hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) as a propellant, has been developed to comply with the mandated worldwide phase-out of ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants. Aerosol particle size in the new flunisolide HFA solution is smaller than the flunisolide CFC suspension (1.2 vs 3.8 microm mass median aerodynamic diameter). Aerosol particle size is a key element in determining lung deposition and the regional distribution of inhaled medication within the lung. In addition, the flunisolide HFA MDI has been redesigned to include a built-in spacer. These features have improved distal lung deposition. Flunisolide HFA, at one-third the dosage (170 and 340 microg twice daily), had similar efficacy to flunisolide CFC (500 and 1000 microg twice daily) and significantly greater efficacy than placebo in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Flunisolide HFA was well tolerated in all trials. A long-term study found no suppression of adrenal function and minimal systemic effects were observed both in adults and children.

Propellant-driven metered-dose inhalers for pulmonary drug delivery

The current market for pulmonary drug delivery is at a bottleneck. The therapeutic advantages of inhalation aerosols, and the potential for the lungs as a route for systemically acting drugs, vaccines and gene therapeutic agents, have resulted in a rapid growth of the industry. Alongside this, the environment of inhaler design and formulation has changed markedly in recent years. Environmental concerns over propellants, the commercial success of dry powder inhalers, and the apparent lack of advancement of propellant-driven metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) has led to a less clear future for these devices. This review critically assesses these pressures and also potential opportunities for the pMDI. It is proposed that the future role of pMDIs will be determined by several important forces that can be classified under 'technology development' or 'market climate' categories. Technology development forces will be strengthened by the ability of the industry to have a systematic understanding of mechanisms of spray formation, perform subsequent and continued device and formulation advances, and a focus on all patient groups: particularly paediatric and geriatric populations. The ability to succeed in these areas will be largely determined by the willingness to invest in fundamental research of pMDI technologies.

Flunisolide HFA for the treatment of asthma: an old friend reformulated

The environmental mandate to eliminate the production of ozone-depleting products including chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants has encouraged much needed research into improving modes of delivery of inhaled corticosteroids and enhancing drug deposition. Consequently, flunisolide CFC, an inhaled corticosteroid with a proven track record in the treatment of asthma, has been reformulated using a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) as a propellant and is now awaiting FDA approval. Flunisolide HFA is a solution aerosol, unlike flunisolide CFC which is a suspension aerosol. As a solution aerosol, flunisolide HFA has a smaller mean particle size than flunisolide CFC. In addition, the built-in spacer included in the flunisolide HFA inhaler acts to reduce ex-actuator particle size; the smaller particle size of flunisolide HFA results in an improved deposition profile. Flunisolide HFA has substantially more lung deposition and much less oropharyngeal deposition than flunisolide CFC. Limited information is currently available on the clinical performance of flunisolide HFA. A single dose-response study has been performed in adults and in children comparing multiple doses of flunisolide HFA and flunisolide CFC. These studies indicate that flunisolide HFA is effective in controlling asthma. No unusual safety concerns have been noted, although further studies are needed to determine the long-term systemic effects of flunisolide HFA.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of flunisolide hydrofluoroalkane for the treatment of asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are currently recommended as first-line therapy for the long-term control and management of persistent asthma. Flunisolide hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) is a new formulation of the corticosteroid flunisolide that is delivered by a metered-dose inhaler containing an HFA propellant. HFA replaces the chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant of the previous formulation, producing aerosols of smaller average particle size.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the physical and pharmacologic properties, deposition profile, and potential clinical benefits of flunisolide HFA for the treatment of asthma.

METHODS

Data included in this review were found via MEDLINE (search term, flunisolide HFA).

RESULTS

Flunisolide HFA has a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of 1.2 microm, smaller than the 3.8 microm MMAD of the CFC formulation. Compared with flunisolide CFC, more of each flunisolide HFA dose reaches the lungs and less is deposited in the oropharynx. In addition, scintigraphic studies have found that the extra-fine particle size of flunisolide HFA gives it better access to small airways. In short- and long-term clinical studies, flunisolide HFA has been found to significantly increase pulmonary function relative to placebo. Although not statistically superior to the previous CFC formulation, flunisolide HFA exhibited small improvements in secondary efficacy measures, such as as-needed albuterol use and asthma symptoms, relative to flunisolide CFC. Furthermore, research suggests that the new HFA formulation has a low risk of systemic corticosteroid effects (eg, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression, growth inhibition in children). Also, lower levels of oropharyngeal deposition, such as those seen with flunisolide HFA, are associated with lower incidence of local effects (eg, candidiasis).

CONCLUSION

Flunisolide HFA offers effective asthma control with a high level of tolerability in an extra-fine particle formulation that distributes corticosteroid to all areas of the lung, including small airways.