Direct coronary stenting: effect on coronary blood flow, immediate and late clinical results

Impact of the rs73598374 polymorphism of the adenosine deaminase gene on platelet reactivity and long-term outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor

BACKGROUND

The positive interaction of ticagrelor with the metabolism of adenosine has been claimed for the large antithrombotic and antiischemic benefits of this antiplatelet agent in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Adenosine catabolism is regulated by the activity of the adenosine deaminase enzyme (ADA), for which several polymorphisms have been identified. Therefore, the aim of our study was to explore the impact of the rs73598374 polymorphism of ADA gene on platelet reactivity in ACS patients treated with ticagrelor.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients receiving ASA and ticagrelor after an ACS and coronary intervention. Platelet reactivity was evaluated by impedance aggregometry at 30-90 days post-discharge. The genetic analysis was carried out by PCR and RFLP. Clinical endpoints were mortality, cardiovascular death, recurrent myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization at the maximum available follow-up.

RESULTS

Our population is represented by 464 patients, of whom 33.4% were A-heterozygotes and 6 homozygotes. A-allele carriers showed a greater prevalence of renal failure (p = 0.02) and a lower rate of previous coronary artery bypass graft (p = 0.03) and statin treatment (p = 0.02). No differences in the mean values of platelet reactivity or HRPR on ticagrelor were found according to the ADA genotype (11.3%vs13.9%, p = 0.45; adjusted OR[95% CI] = 1.17[0.64-2.14], p = 0.61). At follow up, patients carrying the A-allele showed a non-significantly lower incidence of ACS and repeated unplanned revascularization, although with no effect on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study the rs73598374 polymorphism of the ADA gene did not affect platelet reactivity or the long-term prognosis in patients with ACS receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and ticagrelor.

Microcatheter-Facilitated Primary Angioplasty in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Direct stenting is the best method for achieving reperfusion in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We hypothesized that the use of a microcatheter (MC) during PPCI when Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow ≤ 1 after wire crossing would allow visualization of the downstream artery with an optimal TIMI 3 flow at the end of the procedure.

METHODS

In this pilot study, PPCI patients with TIMI flow ≤ 1 after wire crossing formed the MC group (n = 60); the MC was positioned in the distal part of the culprit artery and a small amount of contrast was injected through it to determine stent size and length to treat the culprit lesion. The MC group was compared with previous consecutive patients treated using standard PPCI (n = 94; similar characteristics except for the rate of previous percutaneous coronary intervention).

RESULTS

In the MC group, downstream arteries were visualized in 98% of cases and direct stenting was achieved in 72% vs 31% (P < 0.0001). Final TIMI 3 flow was similar in both groups (97%). There was less manual thrombectomy (20% vs 63%; P < 0.001) and bailout glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (6.7% vs 29.8%; P < 0.002). The incidence of major adverse events (death, shock, severe arrhythmia) and left ventricular ejection fraction were similar. The peak cardiac enzymes level was significantly lower in the MC group.

CONCLUSIONS

The MC strategy appears feasible and safe. It could allow exploring new strategies on the basis of more systematic direct stenting and prepared reperfusion by injecting drugs through the MC before reperfusion.

Deflated Balloon-Facilitated Direct Stenting in Primary Angioplasty (The DBDS Technique): A Pilot Study

Background

Several studies and meta-analyses have shown that direct stenting (DS) may improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). But in most cases, the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow remains ≤ 1 after wire placement. We used deflated balloon to facilitate DS in patients with totally occluded culprit arteries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and outcomes of this novel technique in patients with STEMI in real-world clinical practice.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational, single-center pilot study. From September 2016 to June 2018, 454 patients were enrolled in the study. DS was performed when the culprit vessel was visualized with at least TIMI flow grade 1. Patients with complete occlusion of the vessel after wire placement were subjected to deflated balloon-facilitated DS technique (DBDS technique) and DS was done wherever possible.

Results

DS was done in 74% (n = 336) of the patients and 26% (n = 118) patients received stenting after pre-dilatation (PD). DBDS technique to facilitate DS was successful in 68% patients (211/309). Final TIMI 3 flow was achieved more frequently in the DS group as compared to PD group (96.7% versus 92.3%, P = 0.04). The procedural complications were also significantly lower in DS group (0.6% versus 7.6%, P < 0.001). DS group had significantly lower procedure time (33 ± 19 min versus 41 ± 17 min, P < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (6.2 ± 3.4 min versus 7.8 ± 32 min, P < 0.001), required lesser contrast volume (112 ± 16 mL versus 123 ± 18 mL, P < 0.001) and had lower procedural cost (310 ± 45$ versus 402 ± 56$, P < 0.001). ST-segment resolution > 50% after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were significantly higher in the DS group (85.7% versus 71.1%, P < 0.001). At 30 days, the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was significantly lower in the DS group (2.4% versus 9.3%, P = 0.02), mainly driven by lower rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) (0.9% versus 4.2%, P = 0.01).

Conclusion

This cost-effective technique appears to be simple, feasible and safe and is associated with superior clinical outcomes. It helps in maximizing DS and could offer an alternative to PD and aspiration thrombectomy in total occlusion. However, larger studies with longer follow up are required before a wider application of this technique.

Resting Pd/Pa and haemodynamic relevance of coronary stenosis as evaluated by fractional flow reserve

BACKGROUND

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) currently represents the gold standard in the evaluation of the haemodynamic relevance of coronary stenoses. However, both intracoronary and intravenous adenosine may be tolerated poorly by some patients. Therefore, considerable interest had been focused in the last few years on new adenosine-free indexes to define the haemodynamic relevance of coronary stenoses. So far, few data have been reported on resting Pd/Pa and its correlation with FFR as evaluated with high-dose intracoronary adenosine administration, which is the aim of the current study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

FFR was assessed in 120 patients with 137 intermediate lesions during cardiac catheterization by a pressure-recording guidewire (PrimeWire). FFR was calculated as the ratio of the distal coronary pressure to the aortic pressure at hyperaemia. Intracoronary doses of adenosine were administered up to 720 μg as intracoronary boli. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (a) allergy to adenosine; (b) baseline bradycardia (heart rate <50 bpm); (c) hypotension (blood pressure <90 mmHg); and (d) refusal to provide signed informed consent.

RESULTS

High doses of intracoronary adenosine were well tolerated, with no major side effects. Increasing doses up to 720 μg progressively decreased FFR values and increased the percentage of patients showing an FFR less than 0.80. Resting Pd/Pa showed good accuracy in the identification of patients with significant FFR values (<0.80) [area under the curve=0.9 (0.84-0.96), P<0.0001]. Using receiver-operating characteristic curves, we identified a threshold less than 0.93 as the best accurate cut-off value in the prediction of a positive FFR value. A value up to 0.88 was associated with a 100% positive predictive value, whereas a value of at least 0.95 was associated with a 95% negative predictive value.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that in intermediate lesions, resting Pd/Pa was related linearly to FFR. We identified 0.93 as the best cut-off value in the prediction of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis as evaluated by FFR. However, cut-off values of 0.88 and 0.95 could provide the maximal predictive positive and negative values, suggesting the additional use of FFR only in patients with resting values within this range.

Does direct stenting with drug-eluting stents improve outcome? A meta-analysis of 10,900 patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to summarize the outcomes of patients undergoing direct stenting (DS) with drug-eluting stents (DES) compared to those who underwent balloon predilatation.

BACKGROUND

DS has been associated with improved outcomes in the bare-metal stent era. Although DS with DES implantation has been increasingly adopted in clinical practice, its safety and effectiveness remain controversial.

METHODS

The search criteria identified 546 studies in the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases from 2001 to July 2014. From these, seven studies totaling 10,900 patients were selected. Summarized estimates [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals] were obtained using a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization. The secondary outcomes included a composite of death and MI and the rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR).

RESULTS

Overall, 4101 (38%) and 6799 (62%) patients underwent DS with DES and balloon pre-dilatation, respectively. DS with DES reduced the likelihood of MACE (OR: 0.81 [0.71-0.93]). Additionally, DS with DES was associated with reduced rates of death/MI (OR: 0.76 [0.62-0.92]), and TLR (OR: 0.66 [0.44-0.98]).

CONCLUSIONS

DS with DES is safe and may be associated with better outcomes in selected patients. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Everolimus eluting stent vs first generation drug-eluting stent in primary angioplasty: A pooled patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Several concerns have emerged about the higher risk of very late stent thrombosis (ST) with first generation drug-eluting stent (DES) especially among STEMI patients. Newer generation DES has demonstrated to reduce ST at mid-term follow-up. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to perform an individual patient's data meta-analysis of trials comparing 1st generation DES vs. 2nd generation DES (everolimus-eluting stent, EES) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI.

METHODS

We performed a formal search of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL) and scientific session presentations from January 2010 to June 2016. We included all completed randomized trials comparing 1st vs. EES for patient presenting with STEMI.

RESULTS

Individual patients data were obtained from 3 trials, including a total of 1581 patients (686 or 43.4% randomized to 1st generation DES and 895 or 56.4% randomized to EES). At long-term follow-up (1584±588days), EES did not significantly reduce mortality (7.8.% vs 11.7%, HR [95%CI]=0.77 [0.52, 1.13], p=0.18, p_{heterogeneity}=0.93), cardiac mortality (6.2% vs 7.6%, HR [95%CI]=0.90 [0.56, 1.44], p=0.65, p_{heterogeneity}=0.85), and reinfarction (8.1% versus 11.2%, respectively; HR [95%CI]=0.74 [0.51, 1.07], p=0.11, p_{heterogeneity}=0.52). However, EES significantly reduced the occurrence of ST (3.4% versus 6.1% respectively, HR [95%CI]=0.56 [0.32, 0.97], p=0.04, p_{heterogeneity}=0.42) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (14.2% versus 20.1%; HR [95%CI]=0.63 [0.42, 0.96], p=0.03, p_{heterogeneity}=0.55). Landmark analysis showed more consistent benefits in ST with EES within 1year, whereas benefits in TVR were mostly observed later than 1year.

CONCLUSIONS

The present pooled patient-level meta-analysis demonstrates that among STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, EES as compared to 1st generation DES is associated with a significant reduction in ST and TVR at long-term follow-up.

Risk and Benefits of Triple Therapy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation Requiring Oral Anticoagulation: A Meta-Analysis of 16 Studies

BACKGROUND

Patients with coronary artery disease who undergo stent implantation and have concomitant indication for long-term oral anticoagulation represent a considerable proportion of the overall population. To date there is still no consensus about the optimal antithrombotic strategy to choose in this kind of patients, due to the difficult balance between an increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the risk and benefits of triple antithrombotic therapy versus dual antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation, requiring long-term oral anticoagulation.

METHODS

We performed formal searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and major international scientific session abstracts from January 1990 to September 2015 regarding the use of triple antithrombotic therapy (TT) versus dual therapy (DT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary stent implantation that required chronic oral anticoagulation. Data regarding study design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, number of patients, and selected endpoints was extracted by 2 investigators. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

Sixteen trials with a total of 21716 patients undergoing coronary stent implantation with indication to long term oral anticoagulation, were finally included. A total of 6950 received TT, whereas 14766 received DT alone. The follow-up period ranged from 180 to 730 days. Data regarding mortality were available in 21658 patients (99.7 %). All cause mortality was observed in 10.4 % patients in TT versus 16.3 % in DT (OR [95 % CI] =0.73 [0.66-0.80], p <0.001; p _het <0.001). In addition, TT was associated with a reduced incidence of MI (6.4 versus 9.8 %, OR [95 % CI] = 0.74 [0.65-0.84], p < 0.001; p_het < 0.001) and ischemic stroke (1.8 versus 3.9 %, OR [95 % CI] = 0.55 [0.45-0.68], p < 0.001; p _het  = 0.07). As expected, TT was associated with a significant increase in major bleeding events (10.8 versus 8.5 %, OR [95 % CI] = 1.38 [1.25-1.53], p < 0.001; p _het  = 0.02). By meta regression analysis we found that benefits in mortality with TT were inversely related with the risk of bleedings (beta [95 % CI] = 2.25 (1.55; 2.95), p < 0.00001). The benefits with TT regarding overall mortality, recurrent MI and ischemic stroke were also confirmed in a pre-specified analysis versus DAPT or oral anticoagulation in association with a single antiplatelet agent.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that among patients undergoing coronary stent implantation, requiring chronic OAC, the use of a TT is associated with a significant reduction in overall mortality, recurrent MI and ischemic stroke. As expected, we found a higher incidence of bleedings in patients treated with triple therapy. The benefits in mortality were lost in patients at high-risk for bleedings.

Parathyroid Hormone Levels and High-Residual Platelet Reactivity in Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Acetylsalicylic Acid and Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor

BACKGROUND

High-residual-on-treatment platelet reactivity still represents a challenging issue, potentially vanishing the benefits of dual antiplatelet treatment in patients with coronary artery disease. However, very few is known on the determinants of suboptimal response to antiplatelet agents. Recent interests have emerged on the potential prothrombotic effect of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the impact of parathyroid hormone (PTH) on platelet reactivity in patients receiving DAPT after an acute coronary syndrome or PCI.

METHODS

Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30- to 90-days postdischarge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862 AU*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥417 AU*min (for ADP antagonists).

RESULTS

We included 362 patients on DAPT, 125 (34.5%) receiving clopidogrel, and 237 (65.5%) on ticagrelor. Patients were divided according to PTH quartiles values (<45.8; 45.8-60.3; 60.4-88; ≥88.1 pg/mL). Higher PTH was associated with older age (P = 0.001); renal failure (P < 0.001), higher HDL cholesterol (P = 0.006) and creatinine (P < 0.001) and lower 25-OH cholecalciferol (P < 0.001). Suboptimal response to ASA was infrequent (2.8%), and not influenced by the levels of PTH (P = 0.57). ADP-mediated platelet aggregation was significantly increased in patients with higher PTH (P = 0.03), with an absolute increase in the prevalence of HRPR to ADP antagonists for higher PTH (24.7% vs. 40%, P = 0.007 for 4th vs. 1-3rd quartiles, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2.04[1.14-3.64], P = 0.02). By the use of the ROC curve, we identified PTH levels above 96.7 pg/mL as the best predictor of HRPR with ADP antagonists (adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2.52[1.31-4.87], P = 0.006). Higher rate of HRPR was confirmed for PTH >96.7 pg/mL among the subgroup of patients on clopidogrel (51.5 vs. 85.7%, P = 0.001; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 12.5[2.6-60.9], P = 0.002), but not among ticagrelor-treated patients (11.3 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.31; adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.55[0.56-4.6], P = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for coronary artery disease, higher PTH levels are associated with an increased ADP-mediated platelet reactivity and suboptimal response to clopidogrel, especially for values above 96.7 pg/mL, while not influencing the effectiveness of ASA and ticagrelor.

Gender Difference in the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common complication of coronary angiography/percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Identification of high-risk patients and optimal periprocedural management are key points to reduce the incidence of this iatrogenic complication. We evaluated the impact of gender on CIN after coronary angiography/PCI. We enrolled 2851 consecutive patients (730 females and 1851 males) undergoing coronary angiography/PCI. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were collected according to gender. CIN was defined as an absolute ≥0.5mg/dL or a relative ≥25% increase in creatinine level 24 to 48 hours after the procedure. The incidence of CIN was 12.6% and was significantly higher among females (15.6% vs 11.4%, odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.42 [1.11-1.82]; P = .004), but this result was not confirmed at multivariate analysis after correction for all baseline confounders (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.14 [0.81-1.60]; P = 0.45). In conclusion, we showed that female gender is associated with an increased risk of CIN after coronary angiography/PCI. However, this finding was not confirmed after correction for baseline confounders. Therefore, the higher risk profile rather than female gender itself may contribute to the higher occurrence of CIN among women.

Impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing non-urgent percutaneous coronary revascularisation

BACKGROUND

Pro-thrombotic conditions importantly influence myocardial perfusion and procedural results after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has emerged as a predictor of cardiovascular events and of long-term prognosis, especially in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary PCI. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of NLR on periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) in patients undergoing non-urgent PCI.

METHODS

In a consecutive cohort of 1542 patients undergoing PCI, myonecrosis biomarkers were determined at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours post-procedure. Patients were divided into quintiles according to NLR values. Periprocedural myonecrosis was defined as a troponin I increase of 3 times the upper limit of normal or as 50 % of an elevated baseline value, whereas periprocedural MI was defined as a CK-MB increase of 3 times the upper limit of normal or 50 % of baseline.

RESULTS

Higher NLR was related to age, established risk factors and cardiovascular history. NLR was associated with severe coronary artery disease (p = 0.009), tighter stenosis (p < 0.001), coronary calcifications (p = 0.005), intracoronary thrombus or thrombectomy use (p < 0.001), TIMI flow pre- and post-PCI (p < 0.001), and inversely to restenosis (p = 0.04) and use of a drug-eluting stent (p = 0.001). NLR did not influence the occurrence of myonecrosis (p = 0.75; adjusted OR (95 % CI) = 0.99 (0.63-1.54), p = 0.96), but was associated with a higher occurrence of periprocedural MI, even after correction for baseline differences (p = 0.03; adjusted OR (95 % CI) = 1.33 (1.02-2.3), p = 0.02), with NLR ≥ 3 best predicting the risk of periprocedural MI at the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing non-urgent PCI, a higher NLR increases the risk of periprocedural MI, especially for values ≥ 3.

Absolute eosinophils count and the extent of coronary artery disease: a single centre cohort study

Leukocytes have been involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, and recent attention has been raised on eosinophils, that have been claimed for a wide number of cardiovascular pathologies, affecting endocardium, myocardium and vascular walls. However, few data have been reported so far on the relationship between absolute eosinophils count (AEC) and the prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD), that was the aim of present study. Consecutive patients undergoing non-urgent coronary angiography were included. Haematological parameters were measured at admission. Significant CAD was defined as at least 1 vessel stenosis >50 %, while severe CAD as left main and/or trivessel disease, as evaluated by Quantitative Coronary Angiography. Our population is represented by 3,742 patients, divided according to tertiles values of AEC (≤0.1; 0.1-0.2; >0.2 × 10(3)/µl). Higher eosinophils values were significantly associated to male gender, main established cardiovascular risk factors, previous percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularization, antihypertensive and antiplatelet therapy at admission but inversely with acute presentation. Higher AEC was directly related with platelets count (p < 0.001), haemoglobin levels (p = 0.02), white blood cells count (p = 0.02), higher serum creatinine (p < 0.001), triglycerides (p < 0.001) and glycosylated haemoglobin (p < 0.001), while inversely with HDL cholesterol (p < 0.001). AEC was associated with multivessel disease (p = 0.03), chronic occlusions (p = 0.01), in-stent restenosis (p = 0.002), while inversely with the presence of intracoronary thrombus (p < 0.001). A significant relationship was found between AEC and the prevalence of coronary artery disease (p = 0.049), but not for the extent of more severe LM/trivessel CAD (p = 0.31). At multivariate analysis no independent role of eosinophils was found for CAD (adjusted OR [95 % CI] = 1.02 [0.91-1.15], p = 0.70), or severe CAD (adjusted OR [95 % CI] = 0.99 [0.89-1.1], p = 0.9), even when considering separately acute and elective patients. In conclusion, among patients undergoing coronary angiography, higher eosinophils levels are not independently associated with the prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease, but appear confounded by their link with major cardiovascular risk factors.

Advanced age and high-residual platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor

ESSENTIALS: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in elderly patients requires balancing bleedings and thrombosis. Impact of age on high residual on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) on DAPT was studied. A reduced effectiveness of adenosine diphosphate antagonists was observed over 70 years of age. The occurrence of HRPR was increased among elderly patients with both clopidogrel and ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of age on platelet function and the occurrence of high residual on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using acetylsalicilic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

METHODS

Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test values > 862 AU*min (for ASA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test values > 417 AU*min (for ADP antagonists). Elderly patients were defined as those aged ≥ 70 years.

RESULTS

Among 494 patients on DAPT, 224 (45.3%) were ≥ 70 years old. ADP-mediated platelet aggregation increased with decades of age (279.3 ± 148.6 vs. 319.6 ± 171.1 vs. 347.3 ± 190.1 vs. 345.7 ± 169.2), whereas no difference was observed for ASA response. A reduced effectiveness of ADP antagonists was observed among elderly patients; in fact, among the 117 patients displaying HRPR (23.7%), a higher prevalence was observed among patients over 70 years old (30.4% vs. 18.1%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 2.19 [1.29-3.71]). Similar results were obtained among the 266 clopidogrel-treated patients (38.5% vs. 27.9%; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 2.91 [1.46-5.8]) and in the 228 patients receiving ticagrelor (19.1% vs. 8.1%; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 2.55 [1.02-8.59]).

CONCLUSION

In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, advanced age is independently associated with a reduced effectiveness of ADP antagonists and a higher rate of HRPR with both clopidogrel and ticagrelor.

The role of statins in the prevention of contrast induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis of 8 randomized trials

Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common complication of coronary angiography/angioplasty. Prevention is the key to reduce the incidence of CIN and it begins with appropriate pre-procedural management. Statins have been shown to possess pleiotropic effects (anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic properties) and their effects on CIN were assessed in several studies with conflicting results. Aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of short-term statins for the prevention of CIN in patients undergoing coronary angiography/percutaneous interventions. We performed formal searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and major international scientific session abstracts from January 1990 to January 2014 of trials which compares short-term statins versus Placebo for the prevention of CIN in patients undergoing coronary angiography/angioplasty. Data regarding study design, statin dose, inclusion/exclusion criteria, number of patients, and clinical outcome was extracted by 2 investigators. Eight trials were included, with a total of 4734 patients. CIN occurred in 79/2,358 patients (3.3%) treated with statins versus 153/2,376 patients (6.4%) of the placebo group [OR 95% CI 0.50 (0.38-0.66), p < 0.00001; p het = 0.39]. Benefits were both observed with high-dose short-term statins [OR 95% CI 0.44 (0.30-0.65), p < 0.0001; p het = 0.16] and low-dose statins, [OR 95% CI 0.58 (0.39-0.88), p = 0.010; p het = 0.90]. By meta-regression analysis, no significant relationship was observed between benefits from statin therapy and patient's risk profile (p = 0.26), LDL cholesterol (p = 0.4), contrast volume (p = 0.94) or diabetes rate (p = 0.38). This meta-analysis showed that among patients undergoing coronary angiography/percutaneous intervention the use of short-term statins reduces the incidence of CIN, and therefore is highly recommended even in patients with low LDL-cholesterol levels.

Switching from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel in patients undergoing PCI: A meta-analytic overview

Despite the demonstrated benefits of Prasugrel, a new generation thienopyridine, in the prevention of thrombotic complications after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), its use is still precluded to those many patients arriving to the cath lab pre-treated with Clopidogrel. Conclusive data on the strategy of switching from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel are still missing, therefore we aimed to perform a meta-analysis of current studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of switching from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel (PS) as compared to a standard thienopyridine therapy with Clopidogrel or Prasugrel in patients undergoing PCI. Literature archives and main scientific sessions' abstracts were scanned for studies comparing a switching strategy from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel vs. Prasugrel or Clopidogrel. Primary efficacy endpoint was overall mortality. Secondary endpoints were: non-fatal myocardial infarction and definite/probable stent thrombosis. Safety endpoint was the rate of major bleedings according to a per-protocol definition. A total of 12 studies, involving 3956 patients, were included. Among them, 1396 patients (35.3%), received Prasugrel after a Clopidogrel treatment (PS), while 2560 (64.7%) received either Prasugrel or Clopidogrel. The switch from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel was in the majority of the studies periprocedural. The mortality was numerically lower, but not statistically significant, in the PS group as compared with patients who did not switch (1.7% vs. 3.8%, OR [95% CI] = 0.68 [0.40,1.15], p = 0.15, phet = 0.61), without any relationship with patients' risk profile (r = -0.68 [-2.09, 0.73], p = 0.35). Similar results were obtained for secondary efficacy endpoints and at sensitivity analysis in the majority of subgroups evaluated. Moreover, the PS strategy did not increase major bleedings as compared with standard therapy (1.4% vs. 2.5%, OR [95% CI = 0.70 [0.39, 1.25], p = 0.23, phet = 0.6). The present meta-analysis confirms that, among patients undergoing PCI, switching from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel may be safely performed and therefore should be encouraged among patients eligible to Prasugrel.

Glycosylated hemoglobin and the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction in non-diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

Alterations of glucose homeostasis have been reported to occur even in non-diabetic patients, thus increasing the risk of cardiovascular events and worsening the outcome after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Still debated is the role of impaired glucose control in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as hyperglycemia, represents an important pro-thrombotic stimulus, increasing platelet reactivity and potentially procedural complications. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the association between glycosylated hemoglobin and periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) in non-diabetic patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

We included patients without history of diabetes undergoing elective PCI. PMI was defined as creatine kinase-MB increase by 3 times the upper limit normal or by 50% of an elevated baseline value, whereas periprocedural myonecrosis as Troponin I increase by 3× ULN or 50% of baseline.

RESULTS

Our population is represented by 1199 patients, who were divided according to tertile values of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Higher HbA1c was associated with ageing (p<0.001), hypertension (p=0.005), previous myocardial infarction (p=0.009), PCI (p<0.001) or CABG (p=0.001), treatment with diuretics (p<0.001), higher levels of glycemia (p<0.001) and white blood cells (p=0.02), multivessel coronary artery disease (p=0.03), higher rate of instent restenosis (p=0.02). HbA1c did not impact on periprocedural myocardial infarction (p=0.85; adjusted OR [95% CI]=0.91 [0.74-1.12], p=0.38) or myonecrosis (p=0.69; adjusted OR [95% CI]=0.95 [0.80-1.13], p=0.56). Similar results were obtained fasting glycemia for PMI (p=0.82, adjusted OR [95% CI]=0.90 [0.71-1.14], p=0.37) and myonecrosis (p=0.21, adjusted OR [95% CI]=1.02 [0.84-1.24], p=0.84) and confirmed in high-risk subsets of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI, neither glycosylated hemoglobin levels nor fasting glycemia are associated with the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction and necrosis.

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and the Extent of Coronary Artery Disease: Results From a Large Cohort Study

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an inflammatory biomarker, may be of predictive and prognostic value for cardiovascular (CV) events. We evaluated the relationship of NLR with the prevalence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) in consecutive patients undergoing elective or urgent coronary angiography. Our population (n = 3738 patients) was divided into NLR quartiles. Higher NLR was associated with aging and established CV risk factors, previous percutaneous coronary revascularization, acute presentation, and more complex pharmacological therapy. The NLR was related to platelet count, white blood cell count, creatinine, glycemia, uric acid, and C-reactive protein (all P = .001) levels but inversely related to hemoglobin (P < .001), total cholesterol (P = .005), and triglycerides (P < .001) levels. The NLR was associated with multivessel disease (P < .001), anterior descending, right coronary arteries (P < .001) or circumflex branch lesions (P = .01), percentage of stenosis (P < .001), coronary calcification (P < .001), and intracoronary thrombus (P < .001) but inversely with in-stent restenosis (P < .001) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow (P = .04). The NLR was directly related to the prevalence of CAD (P = .001) and severe CAD (P < .001). In patients undergoing coronary angiography, the NLR is independently associated with the prevalence and severity of CAD.

Bivalirudin as compared to unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization: A meta-analysis of 22 randomized trials

Bivalirudin has gained ground against unfractionated heparin (UFH) in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), due to a reported better safety profile. However, whether bivalirudin may provide also advantages in clinical outcome beyond the known benefits in major bleedings, is still a debated matter and was, therefore, the aim of present meta-analysis of randomized trials, evaluating efficacy and safety of bivalirudin as compared with UFH in PCI.

METHODS AND STUDY OUTCOMES

Literature archives (Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane) and main scientific sessions were scanned. Primary endpoint was overall mortality. Secondary endpoints were: 1) mortality within 30-days; 2) overall and within 30-days non fatal myocardial infarction; 3) overall and within 30-days stent thrombosis. Safety endpoints were major bleedings (per protocol definition or TIMI classification). A prespecified analysis was conducted according to clinical presentation (Elective, ACS, STEMI).

RESULTS

A total of 22 randomized clinical were finally included, involving 40156 patients randomized to bivalirudin (52.9%) or to UFH (47.1%). Death occurred in 1100 (2.8%) of patients, with no difference between bivalirudin and UFH (2.7% vs 2.8% OR[95%C]=0.94[0.83,-.06], p=0.32, phet=0.48). The results did not change according to clinical presentation. By meta-regression analysis, the effects on mortality were not related to patients risk profile (r=-0.38(-0.89-0.14), p=0.15) or the reduction in bleeding complications (r=-0.008(-0.86-0.85), p=0.98). A significant increase in short-term stent thrombosis was observed with bivalirudin (OR[95%CI]=1.42 [1.10-1.83], p=0.006). However, Bivalirudin significantly reduced bleedings according to both study protocol definition (OR[95%CI]=0.62[0.56-0.69],p<0.00001; phet=0.0003) or TIMI major criteria (OR[95%CI]=0.65[0.53-0.79],p<0.0001, phet=0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

In present meta-analysis, among patients undergoing PCI, bivalirudin, as compared with UFH, is associated with a significant reduction in major bleeding complications that, however, does not translate into mortality benefits. Furthermore, bivalirudin is associated with higher rate of 30-days stent thrombosis and recurrent MI among STEMI patients.

Effects of HDL-modifiers on cardiovascular outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND AND AIM

High density lipoproteins (HDL) have been addressed as a potential strategy for cardiovascular prevention, with great controversies on pharmacological approaches for HDL-elevation. Our aim was to compare HDL-rising treatment with niacin or CETP-inhibitors with optimal medical therapy in cardiovascular outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Randomized trials were searched. Primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, secondary were: non fatal myocardial infarction; coronary revascularization; cerebrovascular accidents and safety endpoints. As many as 18 randomized trials, for a total of 69,515 patients, were included. HDL-modifiers did not reduce cardiovascular mortality (2.3%vs3.4%; OR [95%CI] = 0.96 [0.87-1.05], p = 0.37, phet = 0.58), with no benefit from niacin/CETP inhibitors according to patients' risk profile (beta [95%CI] = -0.14 [-0.29 to 0.02], p = 0.09) or the amount of HDL increase (beta [95%CI] = 0.014 [-0.008 to 0.04], p = 0.21). Niacin but not CETP-I reduced myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization, but higher rate of SAE occurred with HDL-modifiers (OR [95%CI] = 1.24 [1.18-1.31], p < 0.00001, phet = 0.02), in particular new onset of diabetes with niacin and worsening of hypertension with CETP-inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Niacin and CETP inhibitors do not influence cardiovascular mortality. Significant benefits in MI and coronary revascularization were observed with niacin, despite the higher occurrence of diabetes.

Effect of diabetes mellitus on periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation

BACKGROUND

Diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions are still regarded as a very high risk category because of an increased platelet reactivity and risk of complications, especially in patients with inadequate glycaemic control. However, although its prognostic effect on long-term outcome is well-defined, still unclear is the effect of diabetes on the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions, which was therefore the aim of our study.

METHODS

Myonecrosis biomarkers were dosed at intervals from 6 to 48 h after nonemergent percutaneous coronary interventions. Periprocedural myocardial infarction was defined as creatine kinase-MB increase by three times the upper limit normal or by 50% of an elevated baseline value, whereas periprocedural myonecrosis as troponin I increase by three times the upper limit normal or 50% of baseline.

RESULTS

Of 1311 patients, diabetes mellitus was found in 458 patients (34.9%) and associated with age (p = 0.03), hypertension (p < 0.001), renal failure (p = 0.01), previous MI (p = 0.03), previous coronary revascularization (p < 0.001), higher fasting glycaemia and lower haemoglobin (p < 0.001), more severe coronary disease (p < 0.001), multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions (p = 0.03), coronary calcification (p = 0.003) and in-stent restenosis (p < 0.001) but lower presence of thrombus (p = 0.03). Diabetic patients were receiving significantly more frequent specific pharmacological treatment at admission. Diabetic status did not influence the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction or periprocedural myonecrosis [adjusted OR(95%CI) = 0.90(0.64-1.27), p = 0.57 and adjusted OR(95%CI) = 0.92(0.70-1.21), p = 0.55]. Amongst diabetic patients, we did not observe any effect of chronic glycaemic control on periprocedural myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic status, independent of chronic glycaemic control, is not associated with increased risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction and myonecrosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Pre-diabetes and the risk of contrast induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous intervention

BACKGROUND

Contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is a complication of coronary angiography/percutaneous intervention (PCI). It is known that diabetes is an independent risk factor for CIN, but we have no data regarding the association between CIN and glycemic levels in patients without diabetes. Aim of our study was to evaluate whether high level of glycated-haemoglobin in patients without diabetes is associated with an increased risk of CIN.

METHODS

A total of 1324 patients without diabetes, undergoing elective/urgent coronary angiography/angioplasty were divided according to quartiles of baseline glycated-haemoglobin. CIN was defined as an absolute ≥ 0.5mg/dL or a relative ≥ 25% increase in creatinine level at 24-48 h after the procedure.

RESULTS

Patients with elevated glycated-haemoglobin were older, with hypertension, metabolic syndromes, previous history of AMI, PCI and CABG. They had higher gycaemia, fasting-glycaemia and triglycerides but lower HDL-cholesterol. Patients with higher glycated-haemoglobin were more often on therapy with statins, diuretics and calcium-antagonist at admission, had higher basal, 24 and 48 h creatinine, lower creatinine clearance and lower ejection fraction. They had the highest incidence of PCI and contrast volume-eGFR rate. CIN occurred in 10.6% of patients with a linear association with glycated-haemoglobin (p=0.001). No relationship was found between glycaemia/fasting glycaemia at admission and CIN. The multivariate analysis confirmed the association between elevated glycated haemoglobin (above the median value 5.7%) and the risk of CIN after adjustment for baseline confounding factors (Adjusted OR [95% CI]=1.69 [1.14-2.51], p=0.009). In fact, the results were consistent in major high-risk subgroups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study showing that among patients without diabetes undergoing coronary angiography/PCI elevated glycated-haemoglobin but not glucose levels is independently associated with the risk of CIN.

Elevated Homocysteine and the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common complication in patients with impaired kidney function undergoing coronary angiography/angioplasty. We evaluated whether elevated homocysteine (known to be associated with free radical generation and oxidative stress) increases the risk of CIN. Patients (n = 876) with creatinine clearance <60 mL/min undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were divided into tertiles of homocysteine levels. Contrast-induced nephropathy was defined as ≥0.5 mg/dL or ≥25% creatinine increase 24 to 48 hours post-PCI. A significant relationship was observed between homocysteine levels and the risk of CIN ( P = .033), confirmed after correction for baseline confounding factors, adjusted odds ratio, OR (95% confidence interval, [CI]) = 1.68 (1.09-2.59), P = .019. This association was also significant applying the new definition of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (11.9% in group 1, 10.4% in group 2, and 22.8% in group 3; P < .001), adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.96 (1.3-2.95), P = .001. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings and to define the role of homocysteine in CIN.

Drug-eluting stents in patients with anterior STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty: a substudy of the DESERT cooperation

BACKGROUND

Several concerns have emerged on the higher risk of in-stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, especially in the setting of STEMI patients. Few data have even been reported in high-risk patients, such as those with anterior MI. Therefore this represents the aim of the current study.

METHODS

The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL). We examined all completed randomized trials of DES for STEMI. The following key words were used for study selection: randomized trial, myocardial infarction, reperfusion, primary angioplasty, stenting, DES, sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), Cypher, paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), Taxus. No language restrictions were enforced.

RESULTS

Individual patient's data were obtained from 11 out of 13 trials, including a total of 2,782 patients with anterior MI [1,739 or 62.5% randomized to DES and 1,043 or 37.5% randomized to bare-metal stent (BMS)]. At long-term follow-up, no significant benefit was observed with DES as compared to BMS in terms of mortality [9.8 vs 10.9%, HR (95% CI) = 0.81 (0.61, 1.07), p = 0.13, p heterogeneity = 0.18], reinfarction [8.8 vs 6.4%, respectively; HR (95% CI) = 1.14 (0.80, 1.61), p = 0.47, p heterogeneity = 0.82], and stent thrombosis [5.6 vs 5%, OR (95% CI) = 0.88 (0.59, 1.30), p = 0.51, p heterogeneity = 0.65], whereas DES was associated with a significant reduction in terms of target-vessel revascularization (TVR) [13.7 vs 23.4%; OR (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.46, 0.69), p < 0.0001, p het = 0.81] that was observed at both early (within 1 year) [7 vs 14.7%, HR (95% CI) = 0.56 (0.46, 0.69), p < 0.0001, p het = 0.81] and late (>1 year) follow-up [7.2 vs 9%, HR (95% CI) = 0.67 (0.47, 0.96), p = 0.03, p het = 0.96].

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that among patients with anterior STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty, SES and PES, as compared to BMS, are associated with a significant reduction in TVR at long-term follow-up. No concerns were found with the use of first-generation DES in terms of mortality.

No-Reflow Phenomenon

No-reflow is responsible for 40% of the primary percutaneous coronary intervention without complete myocardial reperfusion despite successful reopening of the infarct-related artery. This review describes the main pathophysiological mechanisms of no-reflow, its clinical manifestation, including the strong association with increased in-hospital mortality, malignant arrhythmias, and cardiac failure as well as the diagnostic methods. The latter ranges from simple angiographic thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade score to more complex angiographic indexes, imaging techniques such as myocardial contrast echo or cardiac magnetic resonance, and surrogate clinical end points such as ST-segment resolution. This review also summarizes the strategies of prevention and treatment of no-reflow, considering the most recent studies results regarding medical therapy and devices.

Multicentre experience with MGuard net protective stent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: safety, feasibility, and impact on myocardial reperfusion

OBJECTIVE

To report, for the first time, angiographic and ECG results as well as in-hospital and 1-month clinical follow-up, after MGuard net protective stent (Inspire-MD, Tel-Aviv, Israel-MGS) implantation in consecutive, not randomized, STEMI patients undergoing primary or rescue PCI.

BACKGROUND

Distal embolization may decrease coronary and myocardial reperfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) setting.

METHODS

One-hundred consecutive patients underwent PCI, with MGS deployment for STEMI, in five different high-volume PCI centres. Sixteen patients presented cardiogenic shock at admission.

RESULTS

All patients underwent successful procedures: mean TIMI flow grade and mean corrected TIMI frame count-cTFC(n)-improved from baseline values to 2.85 +/- 0.40 and to 17.20 +/- 10.51, respectively, with a mean difference in cTFC(n) between baseline and postprocedure of 46.88 +/- 31.86. High-myocardial blush grade (90% MBG 3; 10% MBG 2) was also achieved in all patients. Sixty minutes post-PCI, a high rate (90%) of complete (>or=70%) ST-segment resolution was achieved. At in-hospital follow-up, seven deaths occurred: noteworthy, 5 of 16 patients with cardiogenic shock at admission died. After hospital discharge, no Major Adverse Cardiac Events have been reported up to 30-day follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

MGS might represent a safe and feasible option for PCI in STEMI patients, providing high perfusional and ECG improvement. Further randomized trials comparing this strategy with the conventional one are needed in the near future to assess the impact on clinical practice of this strategy.

The comparison of early and late outcome of direct and conventional stenting of patients with st elevation myocardial infarction

Background: The aim of this study was to compare direct and conventional stenting procedure in the subacute stable phase on short- and long-term results in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Methods: Eighty-eight clinically stable ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients were enrolled into the study. The patients were classified as group I (direct stenting) and group II (conventional stenting — stenting after balloon dilatation). Baseline characteristics of patients were scanned from hospital records. Coronary angiograms before and after the revascularization procedure were evaluated with the quantitative coronary angiogram technique. Patients were followed for 5 years for clinical outcomes. The study population consisted of 58 patients (65%) in group I and 30 patients (35%) in group II. Mean ages were 55.8 ± 10.8 and 57.3 ± 9.8, respectively.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding clinical characteristics (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, family history of cardiovascular disease, smoking and dyslipidemia). The thrombus score was similar in both groups. Diameter stenosis was lower in group I (54.8 ± 12.7 versus 61.4 ± 12.6; p = 0.023) and TFC (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count) was higher in group II (30.7 ± 14.5 versus 40.8 ± 26.7; p = 0.02) before the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Other quantitative angiographic parameters were not different. For all angiographic criteria, the difference between pre- and post-PCI parameters was significantly different in both groups. However, the change in TFC was higher within the group II compared to pre-PCI TFC rates. This difference was statistically significant ( p = 0.002). Procedural success was statistically different between groups (69% in group I, 43% in group II; p50.01). Immediate clinical and angiographic results were similar. At 5-year follow-up the incidence of major adverse cardiac events including death, angina pectoris and myocardial infarction were similar for direct stenting versus conventional angioplasty.

Conclusions: Direct stenting is safe and feasible for the treatment in patients with STEMI at the subacute phase. Immediate clinic, angiographic and late clinical results are similar for direct stenting and conventional stenting following balloon angioplasty. Although conventional stenting improved TFC better than direct stenting, this did not translate to better clinical outcomes.

Use of the TIMI frame count in the assessment of coronary artery blood flow and microvascular function over the past 15 years

Since its introduction, the TIMI frame count method has contributed to the understanding of the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. In this article, the evolution of the TFC method and its applicability in the assessment of various therapeutic modalities are described.

Comparison of direct stenting versus conventional stent implantation on blood flow in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

As compared with balloon angioplasty, stent implantation in treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) reduces abrupt vessel closure, restenosis, and reocclusion rate. However, a few studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of direct stenting compared to conventional stent implantation technique. This study was designed to compare possible advantages of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation on immediate coronary blood flow and short-term clinical benefits in patients with AMI. Fifty patients with AMI who underwent mechanical revascularization were eligible for the study. The patients were randomly assigned to undergo either direct stenting (n = 25) or conventional stent implantation (n = 25). Before and after the procedure thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow and postprocedural corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) of the infarct-related artery were measured. There was no difference in TIMI flow distribution at baseline between the 2 groups. TIMI 3 flow rate significantly increased after procedure in both groups compared to baseline (p < 0.05). Postprocedural cTFC was found significantly lower in the direct stent arm compared to conventional stenting (p < 0.001). Both during and after the procedure the complication rate and procedural time were lower in the direct stenting arm. Direct stenting provides better immediate coronary blood flow and is a safe and feasible method compared with conventional stenting in patients with AMI. Improvement in coronary blood flow measured by the corrected TIMI frame count method may suggests a significant reduction of microvascular injury.

Aspiration thrombectomy and primary percutaneous coronary intervention

How beneficial is the adjunctive use of thrombectomy devices in STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty?

Early results of direct coronary stenting in consecutive patients when multivessel, complex, long lesions, and small vessels are included

BACKGROUND

Direct coronary stenting is the dominant technique for coronary stent implantation, but previous randomized studies have strongly selected lesions to treat. To evaluate whether the results can be generalized to routine clinical practice, all consecutive patients with direct stenting in 15 hospitals were entered into a prospective registry. Single vessels and simple lesions, but also multivessel, complex and long lesions, and small vessels size (< or =2.5 mm) were included. Immediately results as well as clinical events within 30 days after the procedure were evaluated.

METHODS

Between April and November 2002, direct coronary stenting was performed in 452 consecutive patients (559 lesions) at 15 sites. Stents edge-protected by "sleeves" (SOX technology, NIR Stent, Boston Scientific) or with short transitional edge protection (STEP technology, Multilink Stents, Guidant) were selected to minimize vessel injury outside the stent edges during balloon inflation/deployment.

RESULTS

Stents were successfully implanted in 96% of lesions. Lesions were multivessel in 27%, type B2-C in 40%, very angulated in 28%, calcified in 18%, and longer than 20 mm in 10% of patients. Vessels were smaller than < or =2.5 mm in 27% of patients. Direct coronary stenting was unsuccessful in 25 lesions (24 patients) characterized by more unstable angina (p=0.07), more treated lesions (p<0.01), and more distal locations (p=0.001). Dissection occurred in 6% of patients, and one stent embolised. The 30-day follow-up period included 1 death (due to subacute occlusion), 11 (2.4%) acute myocardial infarctions (8 non-Q wave), and one stroke (following carotid surgery).

CONCLUSIONS

Direct coronary stenting yielded excellent results at 30 days although some expanded indications will be included.

Coronary stenting and abciximab in primary angioplasty for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction

Advances in anti-platelet therapy and improvement of stent deployment techniques have improved the safety and efficacy of stenting in the setting of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, in randomized trials, routine coronary stenting does not reduce mortality and re-infarction, compared to balloon angioplasty. Further, the benefits in target vessel revascularization seem to be reduced when applied to unselected patients with STEMI. Direct stenting represents an attractive strategy with potential benefits in terms of myocardial perfusion. Future large randomized trials are needed to evaluate whether this strategy has a significant impact on outcome, and to provide a cost-benefit analysis of the unrestricted use of drug-eluting stents in this high-risk subset of patients. The additional use of abciximab reduces mortality in primary angioplasty. Since the feasibility of long-distance transportation has been shown in several randomized trials, early pharmacological pre-treatment may confer further advantages by early recanalization and shorter ischaemic time, particularly in high-risk patients. Further randomized trials are needed to clarify the potential benefits from early abciximab administration and the potential role of small molecules in primary angioplasty for STEMI.

Current assessments of the adequacy of myocardial perfusion during acute MI

For two decades now, the optimal management of acute coronary syndrome has been the early restoration of complete and sustained flow to the jeopardized infarct area. Advances in thrombolytic therapy and percutaneous coronary interventions have contributed significantly to the re-establishment of epicardial flow. However, a body of evidence now strongly indicates that restoration of epicardial flow alone is not sufficient to optimize clinical outcomes. Rather, it has become evident that reperfusion therapy must also involve restoration of microcirculatory reperfusion. Thus, techniques to assess myocardial perfusion during acute myocardial infarction are becoming increasingly relevant for the assessment of patient prognosis.

Direct stenting compared to conventional stenting in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Disease (DECIDE): a multicenter, open label, randomized, controlled efficacy study

BACKGROUND

Direct stenting (DS) has been shown to be associated with reduced radiation exposure and procedural costs but has a restenosis rate and clinical outcomes similar to conventional stenting (CS) with balloon predilatation. Whether DS confers benefit in diabetic patients, who have been shown to have high restenosis risk after stent implantation, remains unknown.

METHODS

In a multicenter randomized trial, diabetic patients undergoing elective coronary stent implantation for a de novo lesion in a native coronary artery between April 2001 and October 2002 were randomized into DS or CS treatment groups. All patients received NirElite stents (SciMed, Boston Scientific, Maple Grove, Minn). They were scheduled to undergo a 6-month angiographic follow-up with quantitative coronary analysis evaluation. The primary end point was a 6-month binary restenosis rate and the secondary end point involved 6-month all-cause mortality, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization rates.

RESULTS

A total of 128 diabetic patients were randomized into DS or CS treatment groups (n = 64, both groups). The 2 groups were well matched in baseline and lesion characteristics. The procedural success rate was similar (DC vs CS; 98.4% vs 96.9%). Nineteen patients (29.7%) crossed over from DS to CS. Six-month angiographic follow-up showed similar restenosis rates, minimum luminal diameter and late lumen loss. The binary restenosis rate was 43% in DS and 52% in CS groups (P = NS). The 6-month all-cause mortality, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization rates were also similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among diabetic patients undergoing elective coronary stent implantation, DS is safe and feasible. However, it is not associated with reduction in restenosis rate or improvement in clinical outcomes when compared with CS.

Direct stent implantation without predilatation through 5 French guiding catheter following transfemoral coronary angiogram: a feasibility study

Direct stenting (DS) is accepted as reducing procedural cost and duration and 5 Fr guiding catheters as lowering peripheral vascular complications. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of both strategies. We retrospectively studied 150 consecutive patients treated with DS strategy using a 5 Fr femoral approach. A need for 6 Fr devices or balloon predilatation defined 5 Fr DS failure. Procedural success was defined as good angiographic result (residual stenosis < 30% and TIMI flow 3) without ischemic complications. A total of 161 out of 174 lesions were elected as suitable for DS. The success rate of 5 Fr DS was 87.6% (141/161 lesions). The procedural success rate was 92% (138/150 patients). The angiographic success rate was 96.3% (155/161 lesions). Other complications were six non-Q-wave MI and one repeat angioplasty for acute in-stent thrombosis. Only one major peripheral vascular complication occurred. Direct stenting through 5 Fr guiding catheters in selected lesions is safe and effective with a low incidence of peripheral arterial complications.

Effects of percutaneous coronary arterial thrombectomy during acute myocardial infarction on left ventricular remodeling

The benefit of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is limited by the no-reflow phenomenon, resulting in chronic left ventricular (LV) remodeling. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of thrombectomy with the Rescue percutaneous thrombectomy catheter on LV function after AMI. We performed a retrospective study comparing conventional angioplasty with the combination of angioplasty and thrombectomy using the Rescue catheter. The study population was comprised of 109 consecutive patients with AMI who underwent angioplasty and thrombectomy and 86 controls treated with conventional angioplasty. Baseline clinical and lesion characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Postprocedural restoration of normal flow (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3) was more frequent in the thrombectomy group (82% vs 69%, p = 0.03). No differences were observed in cardiac events, including death, reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization (thrombectomy vs controls, 27% vs 33%; p = 0.44) or changes in ejection fraction (p = 0.22) during 6-month follow-up. The incidence of LV remodeling, defined as an increase in LV end-diastolic volume index of >20%, was significantly lower in the thrombectomy group (22% vs 44%; p = 0.01). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that thrombectomy with the Rescue catheter contributed significantly to reduction of both no-reflow and LV remodeling. In the setting of primary angioplasty, adjunctive pretreatment with a rescue catheter reduces the no-reflow phenomenon and protects against LV remodeling.