Diagnostic impact of core-needle biopsy on fine-needle aspiration of non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Reliability of lymphoma diagnosis using combined cytologic preparations and core needle biopsy: A single-center analysis

Objectives:

The diagnosis of lymphoma on cytologic preparations and core needle biopsies (CNBs) is often challenging due to limited material that precludes additional ancillary testing for accurate classification. We describe our institutional experience with patients who ultimately received a diagnosis of lymphoma using cytologic preparations and CNB material along with additional ancillary testing.

Material and Methods:

All patients whose cytology material (fluids, cytologic smears, and cell block) and CNB resulted in a diagnosis of lymphoma, atypical lymphoid population, or suspicious for lymphoma were retrieved. Diagnoses of lymphoma followed the established nomenclatures of the World Health Organization (WHO). For all cases, the ancillary test profiles were captured and summarized.

Results:

Of 389 cases identified, 17 (4.4%) were diagnosed as atypical lymphoid cells and 31 (7.9%) were suspicious for lymphoma resulting in an indeterminate rate of 12.3%. The rest of the malignant cases (341; 87.7%) were classified using 2017 WHO lymphoid classification system. Six low-grade and 26 high-grade B-cell lymphomas were not further classified because of limited tissue. B-cell lymphomas were the largest category (73.0%): Primarily diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (21.4%), followed by follicular lymphoma (17.5%) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (10.9%). A total of 140 cases (36.0%) had flow cytometry results, but 30 specimens (21.4%) were insufficient. Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed for 78 cases (20.0%).

Conclusion:

Full classification of lymphomas is possible with combined cytologic preparations and CNB material and it is an attractive first sampling modality in the diagnostic process for this disease group.

Lymph node FNA cytology: Diagnostic performance and clinical implications of proposed diagnostic categories

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread clinical use, lymph node fine-needle aspiration cytology (LN-FNAC) lacks universal acceptance for definitively diagnosing lymphomas. This is likely due to reports of lower diagnostic performance, inconsistent terminology use in cytopathology diagnostic reports, and only limited data on the clinical implications of LN-FNAC diagnoses. Recently, a uniform LN-FNAC cytopathological diagnostic reporting system was proposed (the Sydney System). This study evaluated LN-FNAC diagnostic performance and risks of malignancy associated with the proposed diagnostic categories.

METHODS

LN-FNAC specimens obtained in 2018-2019, with and without concurrent core biopsy, to evaluate for suspected lymphoma were analyzed (n = 349). LN-FNAC diagnoses were compared with final diagnoses obtained via subsequent tissue biopsy and/or clinical assessment.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 57.6 years, and 41% were female. LN-FNAC was the initial diagnostic test in 223 (63.9%), and it was used to evaluate for recurrence in 126 (36.1%). LN-FNAC diagnosed 202 hematological malignancies (57.9%), 23 nonhematological malignancies (6.6%), and 124 reactive processes (35.5%). Subsequent tissue biopsy was performed in 42 (12%). The risks of malignancy per diagnostic category were as follows: inadequate, 58.3%; benign, 6.4%; atypical, 69.2%; suspicious, 96.7%; and malignant, 99.3%. LN-FNAC demonstrated up to 96.3% sensitivity, 91.91% specificity, and 87.35% accuracy. Optimal specimen quality and the use of intradepartmental consultation reduced diagnostic error rates in FNA cases without concurrent core biopsy (P = .029 and P = .0002 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LN-FNAC is accurate and reliable for the diagnosis of lymphoma. Inadequate LN-FNAC samples should be resampled due to a significant associated risk of lymphoma. The diagnostic performance of LN-FNAC may be improved with good specimen quality and reviews by multiple pathologists. Understanding the risks of malignancy associated with LN-FNAC diagnostic categories will help to guide optimal patient management.

Follicular tissue fragments in fine-needle aspiration cytology of lymph nodes: A useful clue in differential diagnosis of follicular lymphoma and reactive follicular hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

In Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of lymph nodes, tissue fragments derived from follicular structures may be observed in specimens. We defined such tissue fragments as follicular tissue fragments (FTF), and investigated differences in cytological findings for FTFs of each histological type.

METHOD

A total of 41 cases with FNAC of lymph nodes were examined. In these cases, the histopathological diagnoses were reactive lymphoid hyperplasia (RLH) (n = 17), follicular lymphoma (FL) (n = 13), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (n = 18), and Burkitt lymphoma (n = 1). Specimens were analyzed for the presence of FTFs, and for tingible-body macrophages (TBMs) and monomorphism of lymphocytes in FTFs. FTFs with a maximum diameter of >500 μm were defined as large-FTFs.

RESULTS

FTFs were identified in RLH (14/17, 82.4%), FL (13/13, 100%), and DLBCL (3/18, 16.7%). In the RLH subtypes, FTFs were present only in follicular hyperplasia (FH) (14/15, 93.3%) and not in paracortical hyperplasia (0/2). The number of cases with large FTFs among those with FTFs were as follows: RLH (10/14, 71.4%), FL (11/13, 84.6%), and DLBCL (0/3). Similarly, those with TBMs in FTFs were as follows: RLH (13/14, 92.9%), FL (0/13) and DLBCL (2/3, 66.7%). Monomorphism was observed in RLH (1/14, 7.1%) and FL (11/13, 84.6%), but not in DLBCL (0/3).

CONCLUSIONS

Distinction between FL and FH is possible by identifying large-FTFs. In FL, TBMs are absent in FTFs and lymphocytes often show monomorphism. Therefore, recognizing FTFs and observing details inside the FTFs are useful for identification and differential diagnosis of FL and FH in FNAC of lymph nodes.

An approach to small lymph node biopsies: pearls and pitfalls of reporting in the real world

Recent advances in interventional radiology have resulted in the utilization of small lymph node biopsies, including fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) as an initial diagnostic tool in hematopathology. A major challenge to the utilization of FNA and CNB is the limited-to-scant tissue often available. We propose delegation of the task of handling biopsy specimens to the laboratory staff by the biopsy operators, in order to optimize the utilization of the specimen. Furthermore, in order to effectively diagnose hematolymphoid neoplasms a variety of ancillary tests including immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, molecular analysis, florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are necessary. We propose morphological evaluation coupled with careful utilization of ancillary studies along with clinical correlation to approach the correct diagnosis. Our morphological assessment considers the types of proliferating cell population: mainly small cells, sheets of large cells, or scattered large cells among small cells. This is followed by employment of the corresponding immunopanel to assess the differential diagnosis in each of the three categories. We also elaborate on the importance for pathologists to become proficient in understanding the limitations of small tissue biopsies as well as the differences in interpretation, and wording their reports to help clinicians and direct them to further investigate and/or to re-biopsy when necessary.

Rinsing sampling of core needle biopsy for flow cytometric analysis: A favorable method for lymphoma diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Conventional protocols utilize core needle biopsy (CNB) or fine needle aspiration (FNA) to produce cell suspension for flow cytometry (FCM) is a diagnostic challenge for lymphoid malignancies. We aim to develop an alternative CNB rinsing technique (RT) to produce cell suspension for FCM during this mini-invasive procedure of CNB for lymphoma diagnosis.

METHODS

FNA and CNB specimens from the same lesion of 93 patients with suspected lymphoma were collected under the guidance of B-ultrasound simultaneously. The fresh CNB samples were prepared to cell suspension by RT for FCM immunophenotyping analysis (Group CNB-RT). Then, the CNB tissues after performing the RT process and the fresh FNA tissues were processed by conventional tissue cell suspension (TCS) technique to obtain the cell suspensions (Groups of CNB-TCS & FNA-TCS), respectively, as comparison. The diagnostic efficacies, as well as the concordances of the FCM results with reference to the morphologic diagnoses were compared in these three groups.

RESULTS

RT could yield sufficient cells for FCM immunophenotyping analysis, though a lower cell numbers compared to TCS technique. The diagnostic concordance was comparable in group CNB-RT (91.1%) to the group CNB-TCS (88.9%) and group FNA-TCS (88.4%) (p = 0.819). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CNB-RT (91.1%; 100%) was not inferior to that of CNB-TCS (88.9%; 100%) and FNA-TCS (88.4%; 98.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the CNB-RT presented non-inferior diagnostic concordance and efficacy as compared to the TCS technique. CNB-RT has the potential to produce cell suspension for FCM immunophenotyping while preserving tissue for lymphoma diagnosis and research.

Flow cytometric analysis of fine needle aspirates is affected by tumor subtype, but not by anatomic location nor technique

BACKGROUND

Current clinical practices are shifting towards utilizing less invasive biopsy techniques, including fine needle aspiration (FNA) and needle core biopsies. If a patient has a suspected hematologic malignancy, a portion of the FNA sample is typically submitted for flow cytometry (FC) analysis, providing valuable immunophenotypic data.

METHODS

FNA specimens were identified via a pathology database search. All cases were morphologic evaluated and a subset of cases were analyzed by FC.

RESULTS

245 hematologic FNA specimens were identified; 84% of these cases had an adequate number of cells for FC analysis, and an unequivocal morphologic diagnosis (benign or malignant) was rendered in 85%. The percentage of cases with an unequivocal diagnosis was statistically significantly higher in those with associated FC than with those without FC (90% vs 58%). Neither FNA technique nor anatomic site affected the likelihood of obtaining an adequate sample for FC analysis and/or rendering a definitive morphologic or unequivocal FC diagnosis. Likewise, tumor subtype did not affect the likelihood of acquiring enough cells for FC analysis, but occasionally resulted in equivocal FC diagnoses or discordant FNA and FC diagnoses. Aggressive B-cell lymphomas and Hodgkin lymphomas were significantly less likely to be detected by FC as compared to low-grade B-cell lymphomas. Discrepancies between FNA and FC diagnoses occurred in 13% of cases. The majority of discrepancies (78%) included FC false negatives, while only 22% of cases had atypical or positive FC with negative FNA.

CONCLUSIONS

FNA with associated FC is a powerful diagnostic technique; however, lymphoma subtype may affect diagnostic sensitivity by FC, and therefore, discordant FNA and FC results should be interpreted with caution.

Diagnosis of Lymphoma Using Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Core-Needle Biopsy: A Single-Institution Experience

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to study the efficacy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) in the diagnosis of lymphoma in a single institution.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed 635 FNAB/CNB cases performed in our institution to rule out lymphoma during a 4-year period and collected the relevant clinical and pathological information for statistical analysis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

This cohort comprised 275 males and 360 females, with a median age of 57 years. Among the 593 cases with adequate diagnostic materials for lymphoma work-up, 226 were positive for lymphoma, 286 were negative for lymphoma, and 81 were nondiagnostic. Each case had an FNAB, and 191 cases also underwent a CNB. The subclassification rate according to the WHO (2008) was 67% overall, 81% for the FNAB with CNB group, and 40% for the FNAB group. In the FNAB with CNB group, the subclassification rates for cases with and without a history of lymphoma were not significantly different. A definitive diagnosis of lymphoma relied on ancillary studies, but was not affected by location, or the needle gauge of CNB. Follow-up data revealed a high diagnostic accuracy of FNAB with CNB. In conclusion, the use of FNAB and CNB with ancillary studies is effective in providing a definitive diagnosis of lymphoma in our experience at the Northwell Health System.

Diagnosis of Lymphoid Lesions in Limited Samples: A Guide for the General Surgical Pathologist, Cytopathologist, and Cytotechnologist

OBJECTIVES

Advances in interventional techniques allow obtaining samples from most body sites through minimally invasive procedures that yield limited samples. We provide practical guidelines for diagnosis of lymphoid lesions in these samples.

METHODS

Guidelines for selection of biopsy site and triage of the specimen according to results of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), and description of the advantages and limitations of currently available ancillary studies are described, based on the experience of the authors, complemented by a comprehensive review of the literature.

RESULTS

Five diagnostic categories are observed at ROSE: (1) preponderance of small cells, (2) large cells, (3) mixed small and large cells, (4) blast-like cells, and (5) rare large pleomorphic cells. Detailed description of the diagnostic work-up and subsequent classification for each of these groups is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

A definitive diagnosis of lymphoid neoplasms in limited samples is possible in most cases through correlation of morphology, ancillary studies, and clinical scenario.

A Simple and Effective Method for Flow Cytometric Study of Lymphoid Malignancies Using Needle Core Biopsy Specimens

OBJECTIVES

We developed a simple and effective rinsing technique (RT) of needle biopsies to produce cell suspensions for flow cytometry (FCM) and evaluated whether the RT is comparable to the conventional tissue cell suspension (TCS) technique.

METHODS

We retrieved 93 needle core biopsy cases employing the RT for FCM and 25 needle biopsy cases using TCS for FCM.

RESULTS

The diagnostic concordance between the FCM results and the morphologic diagnoses of both groups was compared. The diagnostic concordance was comparable in the RT group (92.6%) to the TCS group (71.4%). Furthermore, the diagnostic concordance in the RT group was associated with number of isolated cells. The diagnostic accuracy increased significantly when the cell number was above 30,000 in the RT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The RT for FCM not only maximizes the tissue utilization, but also is a simple and effective method to obtain cell suspension as compared to traditional cell suspension technique. © 2018 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for diagnosing and grading follicular lymphomas using a multiparameter approach in a cancer center

OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis and grading of follicular lymphomas (FLs) by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) has not been systematically compared with core needle biopsy (CNB). We evaluated the sensitivity of FNAB in diagnosing and grading FLs using a multiparameter approach in a large cancer center.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified CNBs of lymph nodes diagnosed as FL that also had a concurrently acquired FNAB on the same site. The majority of cases had flow cytometric analysis and these results were available for interpretation of both the FNAB and CNB.

RESULTS

Out of 342 patients, CNB diagnoses included 291 (85%) low-grade (LG) FLs, 30 (9%) high-grade (HG) FLs, and 21 (6%) non-graded FLs/other. FNAB diagnoses included 194 (57%) LG FLs, 19 (6%) HG FLs, 93 (27%) non-graded FLs, 9 (3%) large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) of follicle center origin, and 27 (7%) insufficient for diagnosis/other. Review of non-graded FLs showed 45% LG, 35% indeterminate due to polymorphous lymphoid cells with increased numbers of large cells, and 20% scant cellularity. Sensitivity of FNAB for diagnosing FL was 89%, and 66% for LG FL. The latter increased (94%), however, when grading was performed.

CONCLUSION

FNAB is highly sensitive for diagnosing FLs when cellular material for cytomorphology and flow cytometric analysis is obtained, and grading is feasible for most LG FLs. A subset of FLs composed of a polymorphous lymphoid population with increased numbers of large cells may be more difficult to grade, and HG FLs can be difficult to distinguish from CD10-positive diffuse LBCLs.

Systematic review of the effectiveness of fine-needle aspiration and/or core needle biopsy for subclassifying lymphoma

CONTEXT

The World Health Organization system for lymphoma classification relies on histologic findings from excisional biopsies. In contradistinction to expert guidelines, practitioners increasingly rely on fine-needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsies rather than excisional biopsies to diagnose lymphomas.

OBJECTIVE

To determine a rate at which fine-needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsies, combined with flow cytometry and/or genetic techniques, can provide a diagnosis sufficient for optimal medical management of lymphoma.

DATA SOURCES

The English-language literature on fine-needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsies for lymphoma was reviewed to identify studies that provided interpretations of all specimens regardless of whether these were deemed diagnostic.

CONCLUSIONS

Forty-two studies (1989-2012) specified the lymphoma subtypes for each diagnosis or indicated a rate at which the methods failed to provide a diagnosis. The median rate at which fine-needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsies yielded a subtype-specific diagnosis of lymphoma was 74%. Strictly adhering to expert guidelines, which state that follicular lymphoma cannot be graded by these techniques, decreased the diagnostic yield further to 66%. Thus, 25% to 35% of fine-needle aspirates and/or core biopsies of nodes must be followed by an excisional lymph node biopsy to fully classify lymphoma.

Diagnostic impact of color Doppler ultrasound-guided core biopsy on fine-needle aspiration of anterior mediastinal masses

Although lymphoma and thymoma are common etiologies of anterior mediastinal masses (AMMs), smaller percentages and numbers of patients with these diseases have been enrolled in previous ultrasound-guided biopsy studies. To date, there has been no study of color Doppler sonographic features to support the differentiation of AMMs. For this retrospective cohort study, a search of the database of the China Medical University Hospital using the clinical coding "ultrasound-guided biopsy" was conducted for the period December 2003 to February 2013. We selected patients diagnosed with AMMs (not cysts) using radiographic records. This search yielded a list of 80 cases. Real-time ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) was performed in all but 5 patients without a sufficient safety range. In 89% (67/75) of these ultrasound-guided CNB cases, the diagnostic accuracy achieved subclassification. Fine-needle aspiration cytology achieved subclassification in only 10% of cases. On color Doppler sonography, 71% of lymphomas were characterized as "rich vascular with central/crisscross collocations" and 29% as "avascular or localized/scattered peripheral vessels." However, decreased proportions of "rich vascular with central/crisscross collocations" were found in lung cancer (4% [1/23], odds ratio = 0.018, 95% confidence interval: 0.002-0.154, p < 0.001) and thymoma/thymic carcinoma (25% [4/16]; odds ratio = 0.133, 95% confidence interval: 0.035-0.514, p = 0.003) compared with the lymphoma group. We conclude that the vessels in lymphoma AMMs have specific patterns on color Doppler sonography. Ultrasound-guided CNB of AMMs had an accuracy of ≤ 89% in diagnosis and subclassification. Fine-needle aspiration cytology itself cannot aid in the diagnosis. Color Doppler sonographic evaluation of AMMs followed by real-time CNB is a more efficient method.

Cytopathology in the diagnosis of lymphoma

FNA is a simple, safe, and an inexpensive sampling technique that plays an important role in the evaluation of lymphadenopathy. The key to enhancing the accuracy of FNA diagnosis of lymphoma is the multi parameter approach in which the cytomorphologic features are evaluated in correlation with the results of ancillary studies and clinical context. A full understanding of the current lymphoma classification, clinical features associated with each lymphoma subtype and the impact of the diagnosis on patient management is essential in FNA diagnosis of lymphoma. It is also important to recognize the limitations of FNA in the primary diagnosis of some subtypes of lymphoma, and tissue biopsy should be recommended for a definitive diagnosis and subclassification in such cases.

Breast ultrasonography: state of the art

Ultrasonography (US) is an indispensable tool in breast imaging and is complementary to both mammography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast. Advances in US technology allow confident characterization of not only benign cysts but also benign and malignant solid masses. Knowledge and understanding of current and emerging US technology, along with the application of meticulous scanning technique, is imperative for image optimization and diagnosis. The ability to synthesize breast US findings with multiple imaging modalities and clinical information is also necessary to ensure the best patient care. US is routinely used to guide breast biopsies and is also emerging as a supplemental screening tool in women with dense breasts and a negative mammogram. This review provides a summary of current state-of-the-art US technology, including elastography, and applications of US in clinical practice as an adjuvant technique to mammography, MR imaging, and the clinical breast examination. The use of breast US for screening, preoperative staging for breast cancer, and breast intervention will also be discussed.

Diagnosis of B-cell non-hodgkin lymphomas with small-/intermediate-sized cells in cytopathology

Fine needle sampling is a fast, safe, and potentially cost-effective method of obtaining tissue for cytomorphologic assessment aimed at both initial triage and, in some cases, complete diagnosis of patients that present clinically with lymphadenopathy. The cytologic diagnosis of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas composed of small-/intermediate-sized cells, however, has been seen as an area of great difficulty even for experienced observers due to the morphologic overlap between lymphoma and reactive lymphadenopathies as well as between the lymphoma entities themselves. Although ancillary testing has improved diagnostic accuracy, the results from these tests must be interpreted within the morphological and clinical context to avoid misinterpretation. Importantly, the recognition of specific cytologic features is crucial in guiding the appropriate selection of ancillary tests which will either confirm or refute a tentative diagnosis. For these reasons, we here review the cytologic characteristics particular to five common B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas which typically cause the most diagnostic confusion based on cytological assessment alone: marginal zone lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. We summarize the most pertinent cytomorphologic features for each entity as well as for reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, contrast them with each other to facilitate their recognition, and highlight common diagnostic pitfalls.

Fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy of unknown aetiology

The clarification of enlarged lymph nodes is a common issue in clinical routine. By now, open surgery with complete lymph node extirpation, followed by histopathology, is considered as standard. We investigated the value of fine needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) when supporting the conventional morphology by immunotyping. In total, 101 lymph nodes (reactive, n = 19; lymphoma, n = 46; metastatic, n = 36) were examined. CNB specimens were sufficient for unequivocal diagnosis by histopathology in 95 %. The FNA cytology allowed a correct diagnosis in 49 %. When supported by immunocytology, the success rate improved to 72 %. By accepting "suspicious of" as correct diagnosis, the ratio increased to 91 %. Additional use of flow cytometry in 46 samples minimized the "suspicious of" diagnoses and increased the proportion of unequivocal diagnoses in FNA specimens to 87 %. Flow cytometry allowed a correct subtyping in 20 of 21 B cell lymphoma but recognised only one of five Hodgkin lymphoma. All eight reactive samples were correctly diagnosed by flow cytometry. In summary, CNB allows a reliable clarification of an unclear lymphadenopathy. FNA is a powerful first diagnostic approach, especially if cytology is supported by immunocytology. The most substantial contribution of flow cytometry in FNA is the discrimination between reactive lymphadenopathy and B cell lymphoma.

2006 Bethesda International Consensus recommendations on the flow cytometric immunophenotypic analysis of hematolymphoid neoplasia: medical indications

The clinical indications for diagnostic flow cytometry studies are an evolving consensus, as the knowledge of antigenic definition of hematolymphoid malignancies and the prognostic significance of antigen expression evolves. Additionally the standard of care is not routinely communicated to practicing clinicians and diagnostic services, especially as may relate to new technologies. Accordingly there is often uncertainty on the part of clinicians, payers of medical services, diagnostic physicians and scientists as to the appropriate use of diagnostic flow cytometry. In an attempt to communicate contemporary diagnostic utility of immunophenotypic flow cytometry in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with hematolymphoid malignancies, the Clinical Cytometry Society organized a two day meeting of international experts in this area to reach a consensus as to this diagnostic tool. This report summarizes the appropriate use of diagnostic flow cytometry as determined by unanimous approval of these experienced practitioners.

Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness of Core Needle Biopsy in the Evaluation of Suspected Lymphoma: A Study of 101 Cases

Context.—Lymphomas have traditionally been diagnosed on excisional biopsies of lymph nodes in order to evaluate tissue architecture and cytomorphology. Recent lymphoma classification schemes emphasize immunophenotypic, genetic, and molecular aspects in addition to morphology as diagnostic features. Core needle biopsies are increasingly being used to obtain tissue for diagnosis in patients with lymphadenopathy and a clinical suspicion of lymphoma. These procedures are rapid, minimally invasive, well tolerated, and may provide some architectural framework (unlike fine-needle aspirations), as well as material for ancillary studies.

Objective.—To explore the accuracy, utility, and cost-effectiveness of this technique.

Design.—Core needle biopsies of 101 consecutive patients from 2 large community hospitals who were suspected of having primary or recurrent lymphomas were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections of needle cores. Specimens morphologically suspicious for lymphoma were subjected to ancillary studies, including immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and/or molecular studies. Core needle biopsy diagnoses were correlated with subsequent excisional biopsies, if performed.

Results.—Core needle biopsies established a definitive pathologic diagnosis for the vast majority of cases. A diagnosis was considered sufficient to begin treatment for primary and recurrent lymphomas in most cases. Compared with an open biopsy, there is a cost savings of greater than 75%.

Conclusion.—The accuracy of this technique, along with the cost savings and decreased morbidity, suggest that this method may be used safely and reliably as a first-line diagnostic technique.

Value of CT-guided core-needle biopsy in diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphomas using automated biopsy gun

AIM: To evaluate the value of CT-guided core-needle biopsy in diagnosis and classification of malignant lymphomas.

METHODS: From January 1999 to October 2004, CT-guided core-needle biopsies were performed in 80 patients with suspected malignant lymphoma. Biopsies were performed with an 18-20 G biopsy-cut (CR Bard, Inc., Covington, GA, USA) needle driven by a spring-loaded Bard biopsy gun.

RESULTS: A definite diagnosis and accurate histological subtype were obtained in 61 patients with a success rate of 76.25% (61/80). Surgical sampling was performed in 19 patients (23.75%) with non-diagnostic core-needle biopsies. The success rate of CT-guided core-needle biopsy varied with the histopathologic subtypes in our group. The relatively high success rates of core-needle biopsy were noted in diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL, 88.89%) and peripheral T-cell NHL (90%). However, the success rates were relatively low in anaplastic large cell (T/null cell) lymphoma (ALCL, 44.44%) and Hodgkin’s disease (HD, 28.57%) in our group.

CONCLUSION: CT-guided core-needle biopsy is a reliable means of diagnosing and classifying malignant lymphomas, and can be widely applied in the management of patients with suspected malignant lymphoma.

Best Practice No 185. Cytological and molecular diagnosis of lymphoma

With the advances in molecular pathology, the cell as a morphological and functional unit has become essential in the diagnosis of lymphoma. Conventional staining, preparation, and interpretation of cells, as seen in fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), often used as a first line investigation of lymphadenopathy, is being supplemented with an array of immunocytochemical and molecular analyses, aimed not only at a more precise disease definition, but also at recognising factors that can predict prognosis and response to treatment. Accepting the pitfalls of conventional cytomorphology, this review looks at molecular changes characteristic to particular lymphomas and explores the currently available technology for their detection, with particular reference to cytological material. Future protocols for the diagnosis and management of patients with lymphadenopathy should include FNAC as an initial investigation, followed by immunocytochemistry and molecular investigations. Tissue biopsy, the conventional method of diagnosis, may be avoided in selected cases.