Malignant Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Clinicopathologic Series of 28 Cases Highlighting Genetic Differences Compared With Conventional, Atypical, and Metastasizing Conventional Tumors

Giant cell tumors of bone are locally aggressive, frequently harbor H3F3A p.G34W mutations, and rarely undergo malignant transformation. The pathogenesis of malignant transformation remains incompletely characterized. Herein, we present 28 malignant giant cell tumors of bone from 14 males and 14 females, aged 16 to 65 (median 39) years. Primary sites included long bones (n=20), pelvis (n=3), vertebrae (n=2), and rarely rib, phalanx, and cuneiform (n=1 each). Sixteen (62%) of 26 tumors with available history represented malignant transformation or recurrence of conventional giant cell tumors of bone, at intervals of 1.3 to 35 (median 7.3) years before malignant transformation. Eight of 15 patients with available treatment history received denosumab before a diagnosis of malignancy. Ten (38%) of 26 tumors with available history likely arose de novo, including 7 with conventional areas and 3 H3F3A -mutant sarcomas lacking conventional giant cell tumor of bone. Of 28 malignant giant cell tumors of bone, 18 (64%) and 10 (36%) harbored osteoblastic and chondroblastic elements, respectively. Among 23 tumors with available genetic testing or surrogate immunohistochemistry, 17 (74%) were p.G34W-mutant, whereas other tumors carried H3F3A p.G34L (n=2), p.G34V (n=2), and p.G34R (n=1) alterations; 1 tumor harbored H3F3B p.K116E and p.R117S in cis. Seven (70%) of 10 malignant giant cell tumors of bone showed complex copy number alterations by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS), and/or karyotype analysis. In contrast, complex chromosomal alterations were lacking in 32 conventional giant cell tumors of bone tested (24 by karyotype, 7 by SNP array, 1 by DNA NGS), 3 atypical giant cell tumors of bone with isolated marked nuclear atypia (2 by karyotype, 1 by SNP array) and 3 metastasizing conventional giant cell tumors of bone (2 by DNA NGS, 1 by karyotype). Clinical follow-up was available for 20 patients (71%), and one additional patient had metastases at presentation. Overall, 14 of 21 patients (67%) developed metastases, and 10 of 20 patients with follow-up (50%) died of disease at 2 months to 9.6 years (median 7 mo). Most patients were treated with chemotherapy; 1 patient (PD-L1 TPS >95%) was treated with pembrolizumab, with complete clinical response of metastatic disease at 2.5 years. In conclusion, malignant giant cell tumors of bone typically arise from long bones, harbor osteosarcomatous and/or chondrosarcomatous differentiation, and show significant risk for distant metastasis and demise. Our data suggest that copy number analysis may be useful in distinguishing malignant giant cell tumors of bone from their conventional, atypical, and metastasizing conventional counterparts.

Molecular pathological insights into tumorigenesis and progression of giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a primary bone tumor that typically exhibits benign histological appearance and clinical behavior in most cases, with local aggressiveness and rare metastasis. It predominantly affects individuals in the young adult age group. It is characterized by the presence of multinucleated osteoclastic giant cells and a stromal population of neoplastic cells. A key hallmark for GCTB pathogenesis is the G34W genetic mutation in the histone H3.3 gene, which is restricted to the population of cancerous stromal cells and is absent in osteoclasts and their progenitor cells. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the pathology of GCTB, including its histopathological characteristics, cytological features, histopathological variants, and their clinical relevance. We also discuss recent insights into genetic alterations in relation to the molecular pathways implicated in GCTB. A summary of the current understanding of GCTB pathology will update the knowledge base to guide the diagnosis and management of this unique bone tumor.

Exploration of the Development and Cell Communication of Aneuploid Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts in Giant Cell Tumour of Bone Using Single-Cell RNA Sequencing

We aimed to explore the development and cell communication of osteoblasts and osteoclasts with aneuploidy variation in giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). We predicted the diploid and aneuploid cells in tissue samples using the CopyKAT package. The Monocle2 package was used to analyse differentiation trajectories of aneuploid cells. We used the CellChat package to observe the signalling pathways and ligand-receptor pairs for the two interaction types, "Cell-Cell Contact" and "Secreted Signalling", respectively. A total of 9,117 cells were obtained including eight cell types. Most aneuploid cells were osteoblasts. As the cell differentiation trajectory matured, we found that aneuploid osteoblasts first increased the inflammatory response activity and then enhanced the ability to activate T cells, whereas osteoclasts gradually enhanced the cellular energy metabolism, cell adhesion, cell proliferation and immune response; the activated biological functions were gradually weakened. The analysis by CellChat indicated that CTLA4 or TIGIT might act as important immune checkpoint genes to attenuate the inhibitory effect of aneuploid osteoclasts on NK/T cells, thereby enhancing the activity of NK/T cells. Our study found that both osteoblasts and osteoclasts might be involved in the development of GCTB, which may provide a new direction for the treatment of GCTB.

The Activation of PDGFRβ on Mononuclear Stromal/Tumor Cells in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone After Denosumab Treatment. An Immunohistochemical Study of Five Cases

Due to the relatively high recurrence rate and the destructive nature of the tumor, the treatment of giant cell tumor is still a challenge. Denosumab appeared to be a promising candidate as a therapeutic drug. However, several studies have reported that tumors can recur during/after treatment with denosumab. Based on activated receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pattern of the stromal/tumor cells, a combination treatment with denosumab and sunitinib has recently been proposed to inhibit recurrences. This prompted us to investigate the PDGFRβ expression of five denosumab treated cases using both primary and recurrent tumors during and after denosumab treatment. In addition, to recognise morphological changes, immunohistochemical analysis of H3F3A and PDGFRβ was also performed. As an effect of denosumab treatment, the permanent absence of giant cells associated with severe to mild fibrosis was the most consistent morphological change, but H3F3A positive stromal/tumor cells were observed in all cases. Furthermore, an increased immunopositivity of PDGFRβ in stromal/tumor cells was evident in all recurrent cases during denosumab treatment. Upon tumor recurrence (after the discontinuation of denosumab treatment) the intensity of PDGFRβ immunostaining in stromal/tumor cells was restored/decreased. Our results confirm (for the first time) the activation of PDGFRβ on mononuclear stromal/tumor cells at protein level as an effect of denosumab treatment, which has so far only been demonstrated by phosphoprotein array analysis (protein lysates). The decreased PDGFRβ activity after the discontinuation of denosumab treatmeant and the increased PDGFRβ activity during denosumab treatment underlines the need for denosumab and sunitinib combination therapy.

Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Multidisciplinary Medical Management Based on Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Real-World Evidence

Simple Summary

The widely accepted local therapy in extremity giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage; patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Abstract

(1) Despite the benign nature of the giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), it shows a local recurrence rate of up to 50% and a chance of malignant transformation. The widely accepted local therapy in extremity GCTB is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the RANKL and associated inhibition of the RANKL pathway, is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. (2) The literature review of patients with GCTB treated with denosumab is performed via PubMed, using suitable keywords from January 2009 to January 2021. (3) Current indications for denosumab use are not definitively clear and unambiguous. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage, and the role of denosumab in preoperative therapy in this patient population remains unclear. (4) However, patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

The H3.3 G34W oncohistone mutation increases K36 methylation by the protein lysine methyltransferase NSD1

The H3.3 G34W mutation has been observed in 90% of the patients affected by giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). It had been shown to reduce the activity of the SETD2 H3K36 protein lysine methyltransferase (PKMT) and lead to genome wide changes in epigenome modifications including a global reduction in DNA methylation. Here, we investigated the effect of the H3.3 G34W mutation on the activity of the H3K36me2 methyltransferase NSD1, because NSD1 is known to play an important role in the differentiation of chondrocytes and osteoblasts. Unexpectedly, we observed that H3.3 G34W has a gain-of-function effect and it stimulates K36 methylation by NSD1 by about 2.3-fold with peptide substrates and 6.3-fold with recombinant nucleosomal substrates. This effect is specific for NSD1, as NSD2 and SETD2 show only a very mild stimulation and even reduced activity on G34W substrates. The potential downstream effects of the G34W induced hyperactivity of NSD1 on DNA methylation, H3K27me3, histone acetylation and splicing are discussed.

Cell Biology of Giant Cell Tumour of Bone: Crosstalk between m/wt Nucleosome H3.3, Telomeres and Osteoclastogenesis

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a rare and intriguing primary bone neoplasm. Worrisome clinical features are its local destructive behaviour, its high tendency to recur after surgical therapy and its ability to create so-called benign lung metastases (lung 'plugs'). GCTB displays a complex and difficult-to-understand cell biological behaviour because of its heterogenous morphology. Recently, a driver mutation in histone H3.3 was found. This mutation is highly conserved in GCTB but can also be detected in glioblastoma. Denosumab was recently introduced as an extra option of medical treatment next to traditional surgical and in rare cases, radiotherapy. Despite these new insights, many 'old' questions about the key features of GCTB remain unanswered, such as the presence of telomeric associations (TAs), the reactivation of hTERT, and its slight genomic instability. This review summarises the recent relevant literature of histone H3.3 in relation to the GCTB-specific G34W mutation and pays specific attention to the G34W mutation in relation to the development of TAs, genomic instability, and the characteristic morphology of GCTB. As pieces of an etiogenetic puzzle, this review tries fitting all these molecular features and the unique H3.3 G34W mutation together in GCTB.

Integration of denosumab therapy in the management of giant cell tumors of bone

A review of the literature indicated denosumab is gaining favorability in the oncology community, particularly with increasing frequency in GCTB. Will denosumab be the breakthrough GCTB treatment? Here, we provide a pertinent case example, a review of the literature regarding the history and basic science behind the use of denosumab for GCTB, highlight the newest insights into the dosing and duration of treatment, and note advancements in the field.

Globally altered epigenetic landscape and delayed osteogenic differentiation in H3.3-G34W-mutant giant cell tumor of bone

The neoplastic stromal cells of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) carry a mutation in H3F3A, leading to a mutant histone variant, H3.3-G34W, as a sole recurrent genetic alteration. We show that in patient-derived stromal cells H3.3-G34W is incorporated into the chromatin and associates with massive epigenetic alterations on the DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility and histone modification level, that can be partially recapitulated in an orthogonal cell line system by the introduction of H3.3-G34W. These epigenetic alterations affect mainly heterochromatic and bivalent regions and provide possible explanations for the genomic instability, as well as the osteolytic phenotype of GCTB. The mutation occurs in differentiating mesenchymal stem cells and associates with an impaired osteogenic differentiation. We propose that the observed epigenetic alterations reflect distinct differentiation stages of H3.3 WT and H3.3 MUT stromal cells and add to H3.3-G34W-associated changes.

The histone variant mutation H3.3-G34W occurs in the majority of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). By profiling patient-derived GCTB tumor cells, the authors show that this mutation associates with epigenetic alterations in heterochromatic and bivalent regions that contribute to an impaired osteogenic differentiation and the osteolytic phenotype of GCTB.

In situ cell cycle analysis in giant cell tumor of bone reveals patients with elevated risk of reduced progression-free survival

OBJECTIVE

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a frequently recurring locally aggressive osteolytic lesion, where pathological osteoclastogenesis and bone destruction are driven by neoplastic stromal cells. Here, we studied if cell cycle fractions within the mononuclear cell compartment of GCTB can predict its progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

154 cases (100 primaries and 54 recurrent) from 139 patients of 40 progression events, was studied using tissue microarrays. Ploidy and in situ cell cycle progression related proteins including Ki67 and those linked with replication licensing (mcm2), G1-phase (cyclin D1, Cdk4), and S-G2-M-phase (cyclin A; Cdk2) fractions; cell cycle control (p21^waf1) and repression (geminin), were tested. The Prentice-Williams-Peterson (PWP) gap-time models with the Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used for PFS analysis.

RESULTS

Cluster analysis showed good correlation between functionally related marker positive cell fractions indicating no major cell cycle arrested cell populations in GCTB. Increasing hazard of progression was statistically associated with the elevated post-G1/S-phase cell fractions. Univariate analysis revealed significant negative association of poly-/aneuploidy (p < 0.0001), and elevated cyclin A (p < 0.001), geminin (p = 0.015), mcm2 (p = 0.016), cyclin D1 (p = 0.022) and Ki67 (B56: p = 0.0543; and Mib1: p = 0.0564 -strong trend) positive cell fractions with PFS. The highest-ranked multivariate interaction model (AIC = 269.5) also included ploidy (HR 5.68, 95%CI: 2.62-12.31, p < 0.0001), mcm2 (p = 0.609), cyclin D1 (HR 1.89, 95%CI: 0.88-4.09, p = 0.105) and cyclin A (p < 0.0001). The first and second best prognostic models without interaction (AIC = 271.6) and the sensitivity analysis (AIC = 265.7) further confirmed the prognostic relevance of combining these markers.

CONCLUSION

Ploidy and elevated replication licensing (mcm2), G1-phase (cyclin D1) and post-G1 phase (cyclin A) marker positive cell fractions, indicating enhanced cell cycle progression, can assist in identifying GCTB patients with increased risk for a reduced PFS.

Characterization of Three Novel H3F3A-mutated Giant Cell Tumor Cell Lines and Targeting of Their Wee1 Pathway

The giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive primary bone tumor that is composed of mononuclear stroma cells, scattered macrophages, and multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells which cause pathologic osteolysis. The stroma cells represent the neoplastic population of the tumor and are characterized by the H3F3A mutation G34W. This point mutation is regarded as the driver mutation of GCTB. We have established three new stable H3F3A mutated GCTB cell lines: U-GCT1, U-GCT2, and U-GCT3M. MK-1775 is a Wee1-kinase inhibitor which has been used for blocking of sarcoma growth. In the cell lines we detected Wee1, Cdk1, Cyclin B1, H3K36me3, and Rrm2 as members of the Wee1 pathway. We analyzed the effect of MK-1775 and gemcitabine, alone and in combination, on the growth of the cell lines. The cell lines showed a significant reduction in cell proliferation when treated with MK-1775 or gemcitabine. The combination of both agents led to a further significant reduction in cell proliferation compared to the single agents. Immunohistochemical analysis of 13 GCTB samples revealed that Wee1 and downstream-relevant members are present in GCTB tissue samples. Overall, our work offers valuable new tools for GCTB studies and presents a description of novel biomarkers and molecular targeting strategies.

Denosumab does not decrease the risk of lung metastases from bone giant cell tumour

PURPOSE

There are conflicting reports on the effect of denosumab on lung metastases in patients with giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone. To address these reports, we performed this study to determine if denosumab prevents lung metastasis and to evaluate univariate and multivariate predictors for lung metastases in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 381 GCT patients with surgery alone and 30 GCT patients with surgery and denosumab administration. The median follow-up was 85.2 months (IQR, 54.2-124.4 months). We evaluated lung metastases and local recurrences, univariate and multivariate predictors for lung metastases, response, and adverse events of denosumab administration.

RESULTS

The occurrence of lung metastases was similar (surgery alone 4.7%, 18 patients; denosumab administration 3.3%, 1 patient); however, the occurrence of local recurrences was significantly higher in the patients with denosumab administration. Denosumab administration was not an important predictor for lung metastases; Campanacci stage and type of surgery were the only univariate predictors for lung metastases, and type of surgery and local recurrence were the only multivariate predictors for lung metastases. Histology showed viable tumour in all tumor specimens of the patients with denosumab administration.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab does not decrease the risk of lung metastases in patients with bone GCT; the only important predictors for lung metastases in these patients are type of surgery and local recurrence. However, because the number of patients with lung metastases was small for a multivariate analysis, the possibility of denosumab's effect could not be completely eliminated.

Giant cell tumour of bone in the denosumab era

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is an intermediate locally aggressive primary bone tumour, occurring mostly at the meta-epiphysis of long bones. Overexpression of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) by mononuclear neoplastic stromal cells promotes recruitment of numerous reactive multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells, causing lacunar bone resorption. Preferential treatment is curettage with local adjuvants such as phenol, alcohol or liquid nitrogen. The remaining cavity may be filled with bone graft or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement; benefits of the latter are a lower risk of recurrence, possibility of direct weight bearing and early radiographic detection of recurrences. Reported recurrence rates are comparable for the different local adjuvants (27-31%). Factors increasing the local recurrence risk include soft tissue extension and anatomically difficult localisations such as the sacrum. When joint salvage is impossible, en-bloc resection and endoprosthetic joint replacement may be performed. Local tumour control on the one hand and maintenance of a functional native joint and quality of life on the other hand are the main pillars of surgical treatment for this disease. Current knowledge and development in the fields of imaging, functional biology and systemic therapy are forcing us into a paradigm shift from a purely surgical approach towards a multidisciplinary approach. Systemic therapy with denosumab (RANKL inhibitor) or zoledronic acid (bisphosphonates) blocks, respectively inhibits, bone resorption by osteoclast-like giant cells. After use of zoledronic acid, stabilisation of local and metastatic disease has been reported, although the level of evidence is low. Denosumab is more extensively studied in two prospective trials, and appears effective for the optimisation of surgical treatment. Denosumab should be considered in the standard multidisciplinary treatment of advanced GCTB (e.g. cortical destruction, soft tissue extension, joint involvement or sacral localisation) to facilitate surgery at a later stage, and thereby aiming at immediate local control. Even though several questions concerning optimal treatment dose, duration and interval and drug safety remain unanswered, denosumab is among the most effective drug therapies in oncology.

Prognosis of local recurrence in giant cell tumour of bone: what can we do?

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is classified as an intermediate tumour with rare metastasis, but is challenged by local recurrence. This review focuses on the role of radiological evaluation in terms of prognosis of local recurrence in GCTB. We hope to highlight the value of radiological evaluation by integrating studies on the impact of surgical treatments and non-surgical factors on local recurrence of GCTB and the current statuses of genetic and molecular prognostic factors of GCTB. Radiological evaluation can provide diverse information on tumours. As a non-invasive method, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is especially valuable for the diagnosis and evaluation of bone tumours due to its heightened sensitivity to soft tissue disease and multiplanar image acquisition. Imaging findings should be integrated with clinical characteristics, pathology and genetic and molecular prognostic factors to direct clinical approach and reduce the local recurrence of GCTB. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a multi-perspective evaluation system by which prognostic factors can be reliably determined. We further advocate more large-scale prospective studies. With the help of radiological evaluation, the clinic treatment of GCTB can be guided and local recurrence might be reduced; additionally, MR imaging can identify local recurrence of GCTB after surgical treatment in the early stage.

Prognostic impact of reduced connexin43 expression and gap junction coupling of neoplastic stromal cells in giant cell tumor of bone

Missense mutations of the GJA1 gene encoding the gap junction channel protein connexin43 (Cx43) cause bone malformations resulting in oculodentodigital dysplasia (ODDD), while GJA1 null and ODDD mutant mice develop osteopenia. In this study we investigated Cx43 expression and channel functions in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), a locally aggressive osteolytic lesion with uncertain progression. Cx43 protein levels assessed by immunohistochemistry were correlated with GCTB cell types, clinico-radiological stages and progression free survival in tissue microarrays of 89 primary and 34 recurrent GCTB cases. Cx43 expression, phosphorylation, subcellular distribution and gap junction coupling was also investigated and compared between cultured neoplastic GCTB stromal cells and bone marow stromal cells or HDFa fibroblasts as a control. In GCTB tissues, most Cx43 was produced by CD163 negative neoplastic stromal cells and less by CD163 positive reactive monocytes/macrophages or by giant cells. Significantly less Cx43 was detected in α-smooth muscle actin positive than α-smooth muscle actin negative stromal cells and in osteoclast-rich tumor nests than in the adjacent reactive stroma. Progressively reduced Cx43 production in GCTB was significantly linked to advanced clinico-radiological stages and worse progression free survival. In neoplastic GCTB stromal cell cultures most Cx43 protein was localized in the paranuclear-Golgi region, while it was concentrated in the cell membranes both in bone marrow stromal cells and HDFa fibroblasts. In Western blots, alkaline phosphatase sensitive bands, linked to serine residues (Ser369, Ser372 or Ser373) detected in control cells, were missing in GCTB stromal cells. Defective cell membrane localization of Cx43 channels was in line with the significantly reduced transfer of the 622 Da fluorescing calcein dye between GCTB stromal cells. Our results show that significant downregulation of Cx43 expression and gap junction coupling in neoplastic stromal cells are associated with the clinical progression and worse prognosis in GCTB.

RANK pathway in giant cell tumor of bone: pathogenesis and therapeutic aspects

Giant cell tumor is a relatively uncommon but painful tumor of bone, which can metastasize to the lungs. The RANK pathway is often reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). This pathway is a key signaling pathway of bone remodeling that plays a critical role in differentiation of precursors into multinucleated osteoclasts, and activation of osteoclasts leading to bone resorption. Dysregulation of RANK ligand (RANKL)-RANK-osteoprotegerin (OPG) signaling cascade induces the imbalance between bone formation and bone resorption, which leads to the changes in bone mass, increases osteoclast-mediated bone destruction, bone metastasis, and the progression of existing skeletal tumors. Recent evidences have shown that targeting the components of RANKL-RANK-OPG signaling pathway is a promising approach in the treatment of GCTB. This review study has focused on the association of RANKL-RANK-OPG pathway in the pathogenesis and progression of GCTB as well as discussed the possible therapeutic strategies by targeting this pathway.

Fibrosarcoma development 15 years after curettage and bone grafting of giant cell tumor of bone

Malignant transformation of conventional giant cell tumor of bone is rare and usually occurs with irradiation. This article describes a case of malignant transformation of a giant cell tumor 15 years after initial curettage and bone graft. A 35-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with a recurrent giant cell tumor of the distal femur. On presentation, the patient reported the insidious onset of a dull aching pain in the distal part of the left thigh 4 months prior to admission. Radiographs revealed a destructive lesion in the left distal femur. Needle biopsy revealed recurrence of giant cell tumor with suspected malignant transformation. The patient underwent en bloc resection of the distal femur with adequately wide margins and reconstruction of the knee joint with a prosthesis. Pathological findings showed malignant transformation of a giant cell tumor to high-grade spindle cell sarcoma. Immunohistochemistry showed diffuse and strong p53 expression. A diagnosis of secondary fibrosarcoma was made after discussion. Unfortunately, the tumor proved to be highly resistant to the chemotherapy, and the patient died of multiple lung metastases 14 months after the diagnosis of malignant transformation. What has to be stressed in this case is that any late recurrence must be approached considering the possibility of a secondary induced primary tumor. Because of the rarity of this disease, the effective therapeutic strategy for fibrosarcoma secondary to giant cell tumor is lacking. In addition, identification of the p53 mutation may help in diagnosing cases of potential malignant transformation of giant cell tumor.

The clinical approach toward giant cell tumor of bone

We provide an overview of imaging, histopathology, genetics, and multidisciplinary treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), an intermediate, locally aggressive but rarely metastasizing tumor. Overexpression of receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) by mononuclear neoplastic stromal cells promotes recruitment of numerous reactive multinucleated giant cells. Conventional radiographs show a typical eccentric lytic lesion, mostly located in the meta-epiphyseal area of long bones. GCTB may also arise in the axial skeleton and very occasionally in the small bones of hands and feet. Magnetic resonance imaging is necessary to evaluate the extent of GCTB within bone and surrounding soft tissues to plan a surgical approach. Curettage with local adjuvants is the preferred treatment. Recurrence rates after curettage with phenol and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA; 8%-27%) or cryosurgery and PMMA (0%-20%) are comparable. Resection is indicated when joint salvage is not feasible (e.g., intra-articular fracture with soft tissue component). Denosumab (RANKL inhibitor) blocks and bisphosphonates inhibit GCTB-derived osteoclast resorption. With bisphosphonates, stabilization of local and metastatic disease has been reported, although level of evidence was low. Denosumab has been studied to a larger extent and seems to be effective in facilitating intralesional surgery after therapy. Denosumab was recently registered for unresectable disease. Moderate-dose radiotherapy (40-55 Gy) is restricted to rare cases in which surgery would lead to unacceptable morbidity and RANKL inhibitors are contraindicated or unavailable.

Giant cell tumor of bone

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES As a result of reading this article, physicians should be able to: 1. Identify at-risk populations for giant cell tumor of bone. 2. Recognize the biology that drives giant cell tumor of bone. 3. Describe modern surgical and adjuvant techniques to effectively treat giant cell tumor of bone. 4. Recognize the complications associated with radiation therapy, poor resection, and adjuvant treatments. Giant cell tumor of bone (GCT) is a benign, locally aggressive bone tumor. Giant cell tumor of bone primarily affects the young adult patient population. The natural history of GCT is progressive bone destruction leading to joint deformity and disability. Surgery is the primary mode of treatment, but GCT has a tendency to recur locally despite a range of adjuvant surgical options. Pulmonary metastasis has been described. However, systemic spread of GCT rarely becomes progressive, leading to death. This review presents the clinicopathologic features of GCT and a historical perspective that highlights the current rationale and controversies regarding the treatment of GCT.

Giant cell tumor of bone: a basic science perspective

Comprehending the pathogenesis of giant cell tumor of bone (GCT) is of critical importance for developing novel targeted treatments for this locally-aggressive primary bone tumor. GCT is characterized by the presence of large multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells distributed amongst mononuclear spindle-like stromal cells and other monocytes. The giant cells are principally responsible for the extensive bone resorption by the tumor. However, the spindle-like stromal cells chiefly direct the pathology of the tumor by recruiting monocytes and promoting their fusion into giant cells. The stromal cells also enhance the resorptive ability of the giant cells. This review encompasses many of the attributes of GCT, including the process of giant cell formation and the mechanisms of bone resorption. The significance of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) in the development of GCT and the importance of proteases, including numerous matrix metalloproteinases, are highlighted. The mesenchymal lineage of the stromal cells and the origin of the hematopoietic monocytes are also discussed. Several aspects of GCT that require further understanding, including the etiology of the tumor, the mechanisms of metastases, and the development of an appropriate animal model, are also considered. By exploring the current status of GCT research, this review accentuates the significant progress made in understanding the biology of the tumor, and discusses important areas for future investigation.

RANKL, denosumab, and giant cell tumor of bone

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is a benign, osteolytic neoplasm of bone. The receptor activator of NF-KB ligand (RANKL) pathway has recently been shown to play a key role in the pathogenesis of GCT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment for refractory, recurrent, or metastatic GCT remains challenging. The recent development of a monoclonal antibody to RANKL, denosumab, offers promise in the management of these patients. A recent phase 2 study suggested denosumab offers disease and symptom control for patients with advanced or refractory disease. In this population, denosumab appears to be well tolerated. There are key questions which remain to be addressed, including patient selection, optimal scheduling, use as an adjuvant, and application to other giant cell-rich disorders.

SUMMARY

Denosumab offers a new treatment option for a subset of patients with previously untreatable GCT. The role of denosumab in curative treatment is the subject of ongoing studies.

Epidermal growth factor receptor signalling contributes to osteoblastic stromal cell proliferation, osteoclastogenesis and disease progression in giant cell tumour of bone

AIMS

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is implicated in bone remodelling. The aim was to determine whether EGFR protein expression contributes to the aggressiveness and recurrence potential of giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), an osteolytic primary bone tumour that can exhibit markedly variable clinical behaviour.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Immunohistochemical analysis on tissue microarrays (TMA) of 231 primary, 97 recurrent, 17 metastatic and 26 malignant GCTBs was performed using TMA analysis software and whole digital slides allowing validated scoring. EGFR expression was restricted to neoplastic stromal cells and was significantly more frequent in recurrent (71 of 92; 77%) than in non-recurrent GCTBs (86 of 162; 53%) (P = 0.002); and in clinicoradiologically aggressive (31 of 43; 72%) than latent (27 of 54; 50%) cases (P = 0.034). Detecting phosphotyrosine epitopes pY1068 and -pY1173 indicated active EGFR signalling, and finding EGFR ligands EGF and transforming growth factor-α restricted to cells of the monocytic lineage suggested paracrine EGFR activation in stromal cells. In functional studies EGF supported proliferation of GCTB stromal cells, and the addition of EGF and macrophage-colony stimulating factor promoted osteoclastogenesis.

CONCLUSION

In GCTB, EGFR signalling in neoplastic stromal cells may contribute to disease progression through promoting stromal cell proliferation and osteoclastogenesis.

Histological and clinical characteristics of malignant giant cell tumor of bone

Malignant giant cell tumors of bone (MGCTB) are rare, and the diagnosis can be difficult due to the occurrence of a variety of malignant tumors containing giant cells. To better understand its clinicopathological features, we have reviewed our experience with 17 cases of MGCTB. Five cases were primary malignant giant cell tumor of bone (PMGCTB), and 12 cases were giant cell tumors of bone initially diagnosed as benign but malignant in a recurrent lesion (secondary MGCTB, SMGCTB). The patients included six women and 11 men (age ranged from 17 to 52 years; mean, 30.5 years). The tumor arose in the femur (six cases), the tibia (seven cases), the humerus (three cases), and the fibula (one case). Microscopically, PMGCTB showed both conventional giant cell tumor and malignant sarcoma features. SMGCTB were initially diagnosed as conventional giant cell tumor of bone, the recurrent lesion showing malignant features. Histologically, the malignant components included osteosarcoma (11 cases), undifferentiated high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma (two cases), and fibrosarcoma (four cases). SMGCTB cases showed strong expression of p53. Follow-up information revealed that four patients died of lung metastasis, two patients are alive with lung metastases, and 11 patients are alive without tumor. MGCTB should be considered as a high-grade sarcoma. It must be distinguished from GCTB and other malignant tumors containing giant cells. p53 might play a role in the malignant transformation of GCTB.

A short-term in vivo model for giant cell tumor of bone

Background

Because of the lack of suitable in vivo models of giant cell tumor of bone (GCT), little is known about its underlying fundamental pro-tumoral events, such as tumor growth, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis. There is no existing cell line that contains all the cell and tissue tumor components of GCT and thus in vitro testing of anti-tumor agents on GCT is not possible. In this study we have characterized a new method of growing a GCT tumor on a chick chorio-allantoic membrane (CAM) for this purpose.

Methods

Fresh tumor tissue was obtained from 10 patients and homogenized. The suspension was grafted onto the CAM at day 10 of development. The growth process was monitored by daily observation and photo documentation using in vivo biomicroscopy. After 6 days, samples were fixed and further analyzed using standard histology (hematoxylin and eosin stains), Ki67 staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Results

The suspension of all 10 patients formed solid tumors when grafted on the CAM. In vivo microscopy and standard histology revealed a rich vascularization of the tumors. The tumors were composed of the typical components of GCT, including (CD51+/CD68+) multinucleated giant cells whichwere generally less numerous and contained fewer nuclei than in the original tumors. Ki67 staining revealed a very low proliferation rate. The FISH demonstrated that the tumors were composed of human cells interspersed with chick-derived capillaries.

Conclusions

A reliable protocol for grafting of human GCT onto the chick chorio-allantoic membrane is established. This is the first in vivo model for giant cell tumors of bone which opens new perspectives to study this disease and to test new therapeutical agents.

A case of secondary malignant giant-cell tumor of bone with p53 mutation after long-term follow-up

A 46-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with a recurrent giant-cell tumor of the distal femur. This was his fourth recurrence, and it had occurred 16 years after his last treatment. The resected recurrent tumor was histologically determined to be a conventional giant-cell tumor. However, a single lung metastatic lesion and local recurrence were noticed 6 months after the resection, both of which were surgically excised. The lung lesion was histologically determined to be an implantation of giant-cell tumor, whereas the local recurrent lesion contained a clearly separated fibrosarcomatous area within the conventional giant-cell tumor. Immunohistochemistry showed diffuse and strong p53 expression in the fibrosarcomatous area. Direct sequencing revealed a p53 mutation in the sarcomatous area and a recessive mutant signal in the conventional area. The lung lesion also contained the same p53 mutation. Identification of the p53 mutation may help in diagnosing potential malignant transformation of giant-cell tumor.

Differential gene expression in classic giant cell tumours of bone: Tenascin C as biological risk factor for local relapses and metastases

AIMS

To identify candidate prognostic biological markers useful in selecting high-risk patients with classic primary giant cell tumours (GCT). GCT specimens with different behaviour associated with an increased risk of local and/or distant relapses were studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Screening mRNA microarray analysis followed by real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry on tissue microarray sections was used to validate the prognostic role of differentially expressed genes on a larger series by statistical analysis tests. Global gene expression profiling identified 109 differentially expressed genes according to prognosis. A correlation was found between mRNA levels and clinical outcome identifying Tenascin C (TNC) as the most significant prognostic biological marker. By means of backward Wald logistic regression, TNC overexpression defined an eightfold increased risk for metastasis and fourfold for local recurrence. At the protein level, TNC immunoreactivity resulted in a significant difference in the disease-free survival probability curves, providing a stratification for GCT patients, useful for predicting relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides important data for the selection of biomarkers with a significant clinical impact and suggests the importance of TNC expression in identifying GCT patients at a higher risk of relapse for closer follow-up and adjuvant medical therapy.

A case of recurrent giant cell tumor of bone with malignant transformation and benign pulmonary metastases

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is a locally destructive tumor that occurs predominantly in long bones of post-pubertal adolescents and young adults, where it occurs in the epiphysis. The majority are treated by aggressive curettage or resection. Vascular invasion outside the boundary of the tumor can be seen. Metastasis, with identical morphology to the primary tumor, occurs in a few percent of cases, usually to the lung. On occasion GCTs of bone undergo frank malignant transformation to undifferentiated sarcomas. Here we report a case of GCT of bone that at the time of recurrence was found to have undergone malignant transformation. Concurrent metastases were found in the lung, but these were non-transformed GCT.

Centrosome abnormalities in giant cell tumour of bone: possible association with chromosomal instability

Giant cell tumour of bone, a benign but potentially aggressive neoplasm, shows an increasing rate of chromosomal aneusomy that correlates with clinical course. Mechanisms that generate chromosomal instability in giant cell tumour of bone are poorly understood. One possible cause of chromosomal instability is an error in mitotic segregation due to numeric and/or functional abnormalities of centrosomes. Centrosome alteration is a common phenomenon in many cancers and has a major role in the development of chromosomal instability in cancer cells. To gain an insight into the possible mechanism for the generation of chromosomal instability in giant cell tumour of bone, we analysed 100 cases, including 57 primary nonrecurrent, 35 recurrent and 8 malignant giant cell tumour of bone cases. gamma-Tubulin immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays of 59 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cases, whereas pericentrin and gamma-tubulin fluorescent immunocytochemistry was carried out on 41 frozen smears. Fluorescent in situ hybridization was performed on 23 cases of pericentrin immunostained smears, allowing the simultaneous analysis of centrosomes and chromosome aberrations. Centrosome amplification was significantly higher in recurrent and malignant giant cell tumour of bones compared with nonrecurrent tumours (P<0.001). A comparison of the percentage of aneusomic cells with a normal centrosome content (4.7%) with that of aneusomic cells with centrosome amplification (6.4%) revealed no significant association between chromosome number alterations and centrosome aberrations (P=0.31). These findings indicate that centrosome alteration and frequency of aneusomy correlate with clinical behaviour; the lack of an association between centrosome amplification and chromosome number alteration suggests that alternative causative mechanisms produce genetic instability in giant cell tumour of bone.