1
|
Takahara Y, Kashiwagi Y, Tokuda T, Yoshimoto J, Sakai Y, Yamashita A, Yoshioka T, Takahashi H, Mizuta H, Kasai K, Kunimitsu A, Okada N, Itai E, Shinzato H, Yokoyama S, Masuda Y, Mitsuyama Y, Okada G, Okamoto Y, Itahashi T, Ohta H, Hashimoto RI, Harada K, Yamagata H, Matsubara T, Matsuo K, Tanaka SC, Imamizu H, Ogawa K, Momosaki S, Kawato M, Yamashita O. Comprehensive evaluation of pipelines for classification of psychiatric disorders using multi-site resting-state fMRI datasets. Neural Netw 2025; 187:107335. [PMID: 40068496 DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2024] [Revised: 02/17/2025] [Accepted: 02/27/2025] [Indexed: 04/29/2025]
Abstract
Objective classification biomarkers that are developed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data are expected to contribute to more effective treatment for psychiatric disorders. Unfortunately, no widely accepted biomarkers are available at present, partially because of the large variety of analysis pipelines for their development. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated analysis pipelines using a large-scale, multi-site fMRI dataset for major depressive disorder (MDD). We explored combinations of options in four sub-processes of the analysis pipelines: six types of brain parcellation, four types of functional connectivity (FC) estimations, three types of site-difference harmonization, and five types of machine-learning methods. A total of 360 different MDD classification biomarkers were constructed using the SRPBS dataset acquired with unified protocols (713 participants from four sites) as the discovery dataset, and datasets from other projects acquired with heterogeneous protocols (449 participants from four sites) were used for independent validation. We repeated the procedure after swapping the roles of the two datasets to identify superior pipelines, regardless of the discovery dataset. The classification results of the top 10 biomarkers showed high similarity, and weight similarity was observed between eight of the biomarkers, except for two that used both data-driven parcellation and FC computation. We applied the top 10 pipelines to the datasets of other psychiatric disorders (autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia), and eight of the biomarkers exhibited sufficient classification performance for both disorders. Our results will be useful for establishing a standardized pipeline for classification biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Takahara
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan; Laboratory for Drug Discovery and Disease Research, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
| | - Yuto Kashiwagi
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan; Laboratory for Drug Discovery and Development, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoki Tokuda
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Junichiro Yoshimoto
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Biomedical Data Science, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan; International Center for Brain Science, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuki Sakai
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan; XNef, Inc., Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ayumu Yamashita
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan; Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshinori Yoshioka
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan; XNef, Inc., Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hidehiko Takahashi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan; Center for Brain Integration Research, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan
| | - Hiroto Mizuta
- Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan
| | - Kiyoto Kasai
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN) at The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; UTokyo Institute for Diversity and Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Kunimitsu
- Department of Radiology, International University of Health and Welfare, Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohiro Okada
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN) at The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eri Itai
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hotaka Shinzato
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yokoyama
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Masuda
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yuki Mitsuyama
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Go Okada
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Okamoto
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takashi Itahashi
- Medical Institute of Developmental Disabilities Research, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruhisa Ohta
- Medical Institute of Developmental Disabilities Research, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryu-Ichiro Hashimoto
- Medical Institute of Developmental Disabilities Research, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Language Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Harada
- Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Yamagata
- Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Toshio Matsubara
- Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Saori C Tanaka
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan; Division of Information Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Imamizu
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichi Ogawa
- Laboratory for Drug Discovery and Disease Research, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan
| | - Sotaro Momosaki
- Laboratory for Drug Discovery and Disease Research, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan
| | - Mitsuo Kawato
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan; XNef, Inc., Kyoto, Japan
| | - Okito Yamashita
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan; RIKEN, Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karakuzu A, Blostein N, Caron AV, Boré A, Rheault F, Descoteaux M, Stikov N. Rethinking MRI as a measurement device through modular and portable pipelines. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2025:10.1007/s10334-025-01245-3. [PMID: 40274699 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-025-01245-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2025] [Accepted: 03/11/2025] [Indexed: 04/26/2025]
Abstract
The premise of MRI as a reliable measurement device is limited by proprietary barriers and inconsistent implementations, which prevent the establishment of measurement uncertainties. As a result, biomedical studies that rely on these methods are plagued by systematic variance, undermining the perceived promise of quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) and hindering their clinical translation. This review explores the added value of open-source measurement pipelines in minimizing variability sources that would otherwise remain unknown. First, we introduce a tiered benchmarking framework (from black-box to glass-box) that exposes how opacity at different workflow stages propagates measurement uncertainty. Second, we provide a concise glossary to promote consistent terminology for strategies that enhance reproducibility before acquisition or enable valid post-hoc pooling of QIBs. Building on this foundation, we present two illustrative measurement workflows that decouple workflow logic from the orchestration of computational processes in an MRI measurement pipeline, rooted in the core principles of modularity and portability. Designed as accessible entry points for implementation, these examples serve as practical guides, helping users adapt the frameworks to their specific needs and facilitating collaboration. Through critical evaluation of existing approaches, we discuss how standardized workflows can help identify outstanding challenges in translating glass-box frameworks into clinical scanner environments. Ultimately, achieving this goal will require coordinated efforts from QIB developers, regulators, industry partners, and clinicians alike.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agah Karakuzu
- NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nadia Blostein
- School of Medicine, University Collage Cork, Cork, Ireland.
| | - Alex Valcourt Caron
- Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Laboratory (SCIL), Computer Science Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Arnaud Boré
- Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Laboratory (SCIL), Computer Science Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - François Rheault
- Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Laboratory (SCIL), Computer Science Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Maxime Descoteaux
- Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Laboratory (SCIL), Computer Science Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Nikola Stikov
- NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Center for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia
- NYUAD Research Institute, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Warrington S, Torchi A, Mougin O, Campbell J, Ntata A, Craig M, Assimopoulos S, Alfaro-Almagro F, Miller KL, Jenkinson M, Morgan PS, Sotiropoulos SN. A multi-site, multi-modal travelling-heads resource for brain MRI harmonisation. Sci Data 2025; 12:609. [PMID: 40216796 PMCID: PMC11992253 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-04822-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2025] [Indexed: 04/14/2025] Open
Abstract
Despite its great potential for studying the living brain, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be often limited by nuisance non-biological factors, such as hardware/software differences between scanners, which can interfere with biological variability. This lack of standardisation or harmonisation between scanners hinders reproducibility and quantifiability of MRI. Towards addressing this challenge, we present one of the most comprehensive MRI harmonisation resources, based on a travelling heads paradigm; healthy volunteers scanned repeatedly across different scanners. The Oxford-Nottingham Harmonisation (ON-Harmony) resource offers data from 20 participants each scanned on six different 3 T MRI scanners from three major vendors (GE/Philips/Siemens) across five imaging sites. Each scanning session includes five imaging modalities (T1w/T2w/dMRI/rfMRI/SWI) with protocols aligned to the UK Biobank, while for about half of the participants five within-scanner repeats are additionally acquired. The 165 multi-modal scanning sessions allow mapping of different pools of variability (biological, between-scanner, within-scanner) for hundreds of MRI-derived measures. We describe the breadth of information contained in the publicly-available data and showcase their reuse potential for evaluating efficacy of harmonisation approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Warrington
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andrea Torchi
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Olivier Mougin
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jon Campbell
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Asante Ntata
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK
| | - Martin Craig
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Stephania Assimopoulos
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Fidel Alfaro-Almagro
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karla L Miller
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Australian Institute for Machine Learning (AIML), School of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Paul S Morgan
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Nottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Stamatios N Sotiropoulos
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
- Nottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luo AC, Meisler SL, Sydnor VJ, Alexander-Bloch A, Bagautdinova J, Barch DM, Bassett DS, Davatzikos C, Franco AR, Goldsmith J, Gur RE, Gur RC, Hu F, Jaskir M, Kiar G, Keller AS, Larsen B, Mackey AP, Milham MP, Roalf DR, Shafiei G, Shinohara RT, Somerville LH, Weinstein SM, Yeatman JD, Cieslak M, Rokem A, Satterthwaite TD. Two Axes of White Matter Development. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2025:2025.03.19.644049. [PMID: 40166142 PMCID: PMC11957034 DOI: 10.1101/2025.03.19.644049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2025]
Abstract
Despite decades of neuroimaging research, how white matter develops along the length of major tracts in humans remains unknown. Here, we identify fundamental patterns of white matter maturation by examining developmental variation along major, long-range cortico-cortical tracts in youth ages 5-23 years using diffusion MRI from three large-scale, cross-sectional datasets (total N = 2,710). Across datasets, we delineate two replicable axes of human white matter development. First, we find a deep-to-superficial axis, in which superficial tract regions near the cortical surface exhibit greater age-related change than deep tract regions. Second, we demonstrate that the development of superficial tract regions aligns with the cortical hierarchy defined by the sensorimotor-association axis, with tract ends adjacent to sensorimotor cortices maturing earlier than those adjacent to association cortices. These results reveal developmental variation along tracts that conventional tract-average analyses have previously obscured, challenging the implicit assumption that white matter tracts mature uniformly along their length. Such developmental variation along tracts may have functional implications, including mitigating ephaptic coupling in densely packed deep tract regions and tuning neural synchrony through hierarchical development in superficial tract regions - ultimately refining neural transmission in youth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey C. Luo
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven L. Meisler
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Valerie J. Sydnor
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aaron Alexander-Bloch
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joëlle Bagautdinova
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Deanna M. Barch
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Dani S. Bassett
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Alexandre R. Franco
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA
- Strategic Data Initiatives, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeff Goldsmith
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Raquel E. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ruben C. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fengling Hu
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, , Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marc Jaskir
- Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Gregory Kiar
- Center for Data Analytics, Innovation, and Rigor, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arielle S. Keller
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Bart Larsen
- Department of Pediatrics, Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Allyson P. Mackey
- Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael P. Milham
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA
- Center for Data Analytics, Innovation, and Rigor, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - David R. Roalf
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Golia Shafiei
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Russell T. Shinohara
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, , Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Leah H. Somerville
- Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Sarah M. Weinstein
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jason D. Yeatman
- Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Division of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford,California, USA
| | - Matthew Cieslak
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ariel Rokem
- Department of Psychology and eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Theodore D. Satterthwaite
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou C, Zhou J, Lv Y, Batuer M, Huang J, Zhong J, Zhong H, Qin G. The impact of the novel CovBat harmonization method on enhancing radiomics feature stability and machine learning model performance: A multi-center, multi-device study. Eur J Radiol 2025; 184:111956. [PMID: 39908939 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2024] [Revised: 12/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2025] [Indexed: 02/07/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to assess whether the novel CovBat harmonization method can further reduce radiomics feature variability from different imaging devices in multi-center studies and improve machine learning model performance compared to the ComBat method. MATERIALS Non-contrast abdominal CT scans of 1,000 healthy subjects from three medical institutions (from four manufacturers and eight different models) were retrospectively included: Hospital A (n = 513), Hospital B (n = 338), and Hospital C (n = 149). 93 radiomics features were extracted from liver and spleen tissues using PyRadiomics. Performing a binary classification task of liver and spleen tissues on the pooled data from the three institutions: (1) Unharmonized, (2) ComBat, and (3) CovBat. Models were built separately for each radiomics feature classes (First-order, GLCM, GLRLM, GLSZM, NGTD, GLDM), as well as a combined model integrating all feature classes. The Kruskal-Wallis test and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to assess the variability of radiomics features among the groups. Multiple linear regression models were used to analyze the sources of variation. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate model performance. RESULTS After ComBat and CovBat harmonization, the number of consistent features increased by 68.82 % and 73.12 %, respectively, and the feature variability due to hardware differences decreased from 12.32-25.38 % to 1.89-2.01 % with ComBat and 1.19-1.88 % with CovBat. The AUC of the machine learning models improved significantly: Combined (Unharmonized: 0.93, ComBat: 0.99, CovBat: 1.00), First-order (0.93, 0.98, 0.98), GLCM (0.81, 0.93, 0.98), GLRLM (0.78, 0.96, 0.98), NGTDM (0.75, 0.96, 0.98), GLSZM (0.78, 0.93, 0.97), and GLDM (0.83, 0.94, 0.97). DeLong's test showed that the results before and after harmonization were statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION CovBat further reduced radiomics feature variability caused by different CT scanners and significantly improved the performance of machine learning models, although the degree of improvement varied across different feature categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuanghui Zhou
- Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China; School of Medical and Information Engineering, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China
| | - Jianwei Zhou
- Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Yijun Lv
- School of Medical and Information Engineering, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China
| | - Maidina Batuer
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Jinghan Huang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China
| | - Junyuan Zhong
- Medical Imaging Department of Ganzhou People's Hospital, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China
| | - Haijian Zhong
- School of Medical and Information Engineering, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China.
| | - Genggeng Qin
- Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shafiei G, Esper NB, Hoffmann MS, Ai L, Chen AA, Cluce J, Covitz S, Giavasis S, Lane C, Mehta K, Moore TM, Salo T, Tapera TM, Calkins ME, Colcombe S, Davatzikos C, Gur RE, Gur RC, Pan PM, Jackowski AP, Rokem A, Rohde LA, Shinohara RT, Tottenham N, Zuo XN, Cieslak M, Franco AR, Kiar G, Salum GA, Milham MP, Satterthwaite TD. Reproducible Brain Charts: An open data resource for mapping brain development and its associations with mental health. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2025:2025.02.24.639850. [PMID: 40060681 PMCID: PMC11888297 DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.24.639850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2025]
Abstract
Major mental disorders are increasingly understood as disorders of brain development. Large and heterogeneous samples are required to define generalizable links between brain development and psychopathology. To this end, we introduce the Reproducible Brain Charts (RBC), an open data resource that integrates data from 5 large studies of brain development in youth from three continents (N=6,346; 45% Female). Confirmatory bifactor models were used to create harmonized psychiatric phenotypes that capture major dimensions of psychopathology. Following rigorous quality assurance, neuroimaging data were carefully curated and processed using consistent pipelines in a reproducible manner with DataLad, the Configurable Pipeline for the Analysis of Connectomes (C-PAC), and FreeSurfer. Initial analyses of RBC data emphasize the benefit of careful quality assurance and data harmonization in delineating developmental effects and associations with psychopathology. Critically, all RBC data - including harmonized psychiatric phenotypes, unprocessed images, and fully processed imaging derivatives - are openly shared without a data use agreement via the International Neuroimaging Data-sharing Initiative. Together, RBC facilitates large-scale, reproducible, and generalizable research in developmental and psychiatric neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Shafiei
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - N B Esper
- Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - M S Hoffmann
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, Brazil
- Graduate Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- National Institute of Developmental Psychiatry & National Center for Innovation and Research in Mental Health, Brazil
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - L Ai
- Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - A A Chen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - J Cluce
- Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - S Covitz
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - C Lane
- Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - K Mehta
- Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - T M Moore
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - T Salo
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - T M Tapera
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M E Calkins
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - S Colcombe
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - C Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - R E Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - R C Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - P M Pan
- Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A P Jackowski
- Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A Rokem
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - L A Rohde
- Graduate Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - R T Shinohara
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - N Tottenham
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - X N Zuo
- Developmental Population Neuroscience Research Center, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - M Cieslak
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - A R Franco
- Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - G Kiar
- Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - G A Salum
- Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
- Graduate Program in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- National Institute of Developmental Psychiatry & National Center for Innovation and Research in Mental Health, Brazil
- ADHD Outpatient Program & Developmental Psychiatry Program, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Medical Council UNIFAJ & UNIMAX, Brazil
| | - M P Milham
- Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY, USA
| | - T D Satterthwaite
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute (LiBI) of Penn Medicine and CHOP, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Priya S, Reutzel A, Ferreira Dalla Pria OA, Goetz S, Pham HT, Alatoum A, Aher PY, Narayanasamy S, Nagpal P, Carter KD. Addressing Inter-reconstruction variability in multi-energy myocardial CT Radiomics: The Benefits of combat harmonization. Eur J Radiol 2025; 183:111891. [PMID: 39708706 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Revised: 10/18/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 12/23/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To investigate the effect of ComBat harmonization on the stability of myocardial radiomic features derived from multi-energy CT reconstructions. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on 205 patients who underwent dual-energy chest CTA at a single center. The data was reconstructed into multiple spectral reconstructions (mixed energy simulating standard 120 Kv acquisition and monoenergetic images ranging from 40 to 190 keV in increments of 10). The left ventricle myocardium was segmented using semiautomated software (Syngo.Via FRONTIER, version 5.0.2; Siemens). Radiomic features were extracted from multiple spectral reconstructions (batches). The consistency of these radiomics features across different batches was evaluated with and without ComBat harmonization using Cohen's d and Principal component analysis (PCA). Both parametric and nonparametric ComBat methods were considered. RESULTS Without any ComBat technique, 43.40% of features remained consistent across all multienergy reconstructions. Applying ComBat harmonization increased this consistency to 98.37% with parametric empirical bayes (EB) ComBat and EB M-ComBat, and to 91.52% and 92.33% with nonparametric EB ComBat and nonparametric EB M-ComBat, respectively. PCA without ComBat revealed noticeable differences in the first two principal components between batches, indicating a batch effect or unstable radiomic features. Following ComBat harmonization, the principal components showed more consistency between batches, demonstrating radiomics feature stability between batches. CONCLUSION ComBat harmonization enhanced the consistency of radiomic features from multi-energy CT data. Integrating ComBat harmonization may lead to more reproducible results in multienergy CT radiomics studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarv Priya
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa, USA.
| | - Abigail Reutzel
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa, USA
| | | | - Sawyer Goetz
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa, USA
| | - Hanh Td Pham
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Aiah Alatoum
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa, USA
| | - Pritish Y Aher
- Department of Radiology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | | | - Prashant Nagpal
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Knute D Carter
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sasabayashi D, Tsugawa S, Nakajima S, Takahashi T, Takayanagi Y, Koike S, Katagiri N, Katsura M, Furuichi A, Mizukami Y, Nishiyama S, Kobayashi H, Yuasa Y, Tsujino N, Sakuma A, Ohmuro N, Sato Y, Tomimoto K, Okada N, Tada M, Suga M, Maikusa N, Plitman E, Wannan CMJ, Zalesky A, Chakravarty M, Noguchi K, Yamasue H, Matsumoto K, Nemoto T, Tomita H, Mizuno M, Kasai K, Suzuki M. Increased structural covariance of cortical measures in individuals with an at-risk mental state. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2025; 136:111197. [PMID: 39579961 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Revised: 11/01/2024] [Accepted: 11/15/2024] [Indexed: 11/25/2024]
Abstract
An anomalous pattern of structural covariance has been reported in schizophrenia, which has been suggested to represent connectome changes during brain maturation and neuroprogressive processes. It remains unclear whether similar differences exist in a clinical high-risk state for psychosis, and if they are associated with a prodromal phenotype and/or later psychosis onset. This multicenter magnetic resonance imaging study cross-sectionally examined structural covariance in a large at-risk mental state (ARMS) sample with different outcomes. The whole-brain structural covariance of four cortical measures (thickness, area, volume, and gyrification) was assessed in 155 individuals with ARMS, who were subclassified into 26 (16.8 %) with a later psychosis onset (ARMS-P), 44 with persistent subthreshold psychotic symptoms, and 53 with the remission of psychotic symptoms (ARMS-R) during the clinical follow-up, and 191 healthy controls. The relationships of changes in structural covariance with clinical symptoms and cognitive impairments were also investigated in the ARMS subsample. Structural covariance was significantly higher in widespread cortical regions in the ARMS group than in the controls, with each cortical measure having a different pattern in affected cortical regions. The higher structural covariance of the cortical area was partly related to severe suspiciousness-persecutory ideation. Structural covariance was significantly higher, mainly in fronto-parietal gyrification, in the ARMS-P group than in the ARMS-R group. The present results suggest that changes in structural covariance result in psychosis vulnerability and the excessive structural covariance of brain gyrification in ARMS subjects may contribute to their later clinical course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daiki Sasabayashi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Toyama Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan; Research Center for Idling Brain Science, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
| | - Sakiko Tsugawa
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinano-machi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Nakajima
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinano-machi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan; Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada
| | - Tsutomu Takahashi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Toyama Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan; Research Center for Idling Brain Science, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
| | - Yoichiro Takayanagi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Toyama Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan; Arisawabashi Hospital, 5-5 Hane-Shin, Toyama city, Toyama 939-2704, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Koike
- The University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity and Adaptation of Human Mind, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan; Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences, Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan; International Research Center for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Katagiri
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Toho University School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan
| | - Masahiro Katsura
- Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; Canal Kotodai General Mental Clinic, 2-4-8 Honcho, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-0014, Japan
| | - Atsushi Furuichi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Toyama Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan; Research Center for Idling Brain Science, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
| | - Yuko Mizukami
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Toyama Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
| | - Shimako Nishiyama
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Toyama Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan; Center for Health Care and Human Sciences, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama 930-8555, Japan
| | - Haruko Kobayashi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Toyama Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan; Research Center for Idling Brain Science, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
| | - Yusuke Yuasa
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Toyama Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan; Research Center for Idling Brain Science, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
| | - Naohisa Tsujino
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Toho University School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, 3-6-1 Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-8765, Japan
| | - Atsushi Sakuma
- Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Ohmuro
- Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; Osaki Citizen Hospital, 3-8-1 Honami, Osaki, Miyagi 989-6183, Japan
| | - Yutaro Sato
- Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan
| | - Kazuho Tomimoto
- Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan
| | - Naohiro Okada
- International Research Center for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Mariko Tada
- International Research Center for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Motomu Suga
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; Graduate School of Clinical Psychology, Teikyo Heisei University, 2-51-4 Higashi Ikebukuro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo 170-8445, Japan
| | - Norihide Maikusa
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences, Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
| | - Eric Plitman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada
| | - Cassandra M J Wannan
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; Orygen, Parkville, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | - Andrew Zalesky
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Mallar Chakravarty
- Cerebral Imaging Center, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, 6875 LaSalle Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec H4H 1R3, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, 1033 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1, Canada; Biological and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1Y6, Canada
| | - Kyo Noguchi
- Department of Radiology, University of Toyama Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama City, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
| | - Hidenori Yamasue
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan
| | - Kazunori Matsumoto
- Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; Kokoro no Clinic OASIS, 17-27 Futsukamachi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-0802, Japan
| | - Takahiro Nemoto
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Toho University School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Tomita
- Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8574, Japan; Department of Disaster Psychiatry, International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8572, Japan
| | - Masafumi Mizuno
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Toho University School of Medicine, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan; Tokyo Metropolitan Matsuzawa Hospital, 2-1-1 Kamikitazawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-0057, Japan
| | - Kiyoto Kasai
- International Research Center for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Michio Suzuki
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Toyama Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan; Research Center for Idling Brain Science, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama city, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
An L, Zhang C, Wulan N, Zhang S, Chen P, Ji F, Ng KK, Chen C, Zhou JH, Yeo BTT. DeepResBat: Deep residual batch harmonization accounting for covariate distribution differences. Med Image Anal 2025; 99:103354. [PMID: 39368279 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2024.103354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 10/07/2024]
Abstract
Pooling MRI data from multiple datasets requires harmonization to reduce undesired inter-site variabilities, while preserving effects of biological variables (or covariates). The popular harmonization approach ComBat uses a mixed effect regression framework that explicitly accounts for covariate distribution differences across datasets. There is also significant interest in developing harmonization approaches based on deep neural networks (DNNs), such as conditional variational autoencoder (cVAE). However, current DNN approaches do not explicitly account for covariate distribution differences across datasets. Here, we provide mathematical results, suggesting that not accounting for covariates can lead to suboptimal harmonization. We propose two DNN-based covariate-aware harmonization approaches: covariate VAE (coVAE) and DeepResBat. The coVAE approach is a natural extension of cVAE by concatenating covariates and site information with site- and covariate-invariant latent representations. DeepResBat adopts a residual framework inspired by ComBat. DeepResBat first removes the effects of covariates with nonlinear regression trees, followed by eliminating site differences with cVAE. Finally, covariate effects are added back to the harmonized residuals. Using three datasets from three continents with a total of 2787 participants and 10,085 anatomical T1 scans, we find that DeepResBat and coVAE outperformed ComBat, CovBat and cVAE in terms of removing dataset differences, while enhancing biological effects of interest. However, coVAE hallucinates spurious associations between anatomical MRI and covariates even when no association exists. Future studies proposing DNN-based harmonization approaches should be aware of this false positive pitfall. Overall, our results suggest that DeepResBat is an effective deep learning alternative to ComBat. Code for DeepResBat can be found here: https://github.com/ThomasYeoLab/CBIG/tree/master/stable_projects/harmonization/An2024_DeepResBat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijun An
- Centre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational MR Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medicine, Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Human Potential Translational Research Programme & Institute for Digital Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chen Zhang
- Centre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational MR Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medicine, Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Human Potential Translational Research Programme & Institute for Digital Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Naren Wulan
- Centre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational MR Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medicine, Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Human Potential Translational Research Programme & Institute for Digital Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shaoshi Zhang
- Centre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational MR Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medicine, Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Human Potential Translational Research Programme & Institute for Digital Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pansheng Chen
- Centre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational MR Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medicine, Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Human Potential Translational Research Programme & Institute for Digital Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Fang Ji
- Centre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational MR Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kwun Kei Ng
- Centre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational MR Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christopher Chen
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Juan Helen Zhou
- Centre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational MR Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Integrative Sciences and Engineering Programme (ISEP), National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - B T Thomas Yeo
- Centre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational MR Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medicine, Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Human Potential Translational Research Programme & Institute for Digital Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Integrative Sciences and Engineering Programme (ISEP), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yoon H, Schwedt TJ, Chong CD, Olatunde O, Wu T. Healthy core: Harmonizing brain MRI for supporting multicenter migraine classification studies. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0288300. [PMID: 39739610 PMCID: PMC11687649 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/02/2025] Open
Abstract
Multicenter and multi-scanner imaging studies may be necessary to ensure sufficiently large sample sizes for developing accurate predictive models. However, multicenter studies, incorporating varying research participant characteristics, MRI scanners, and imaging acquisition protocols, may introduce confounding factors, potentially hindering the creation of generalizable machine learning models. Models developed using one dataset may not readily apply to another, emphasizing the importance of classification model generalizability in multi-scanner and multicenter studies for producing reproducible results. This study focuses on enhancing generalizability in classifying individual migraine patients and healthy controls using brain MRI data through a data harmonization strategy. We propose identifying a 'healthy core'-a group of homogeneous healthy controls with similar characteristics-from multicenter studies. The Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) in Geodesic Flow Kernel (GFK) space is employed to compare two datasets, capturing data variabilities and facilitating the identification of this 'healthy core'. Homogeneous healthy controls play a vital role in mitigating unwanted heterogeneity, enabling the development of highly accurate classification models with improved performance on new datasets. Extensive experimental results underscore the benefits of leveraging a 'healthy core'. We utilized two datasets: one comprising 120 individuals (66 with migraine and 54 healthy controls), and another comprising 76 individuals (34 with migraine and 42 healthy controls). Notably, a homogeneous dataset derived from a cohort of healthy controls yielded a significant 25% accuracy improvement for both episodic and chronic migraineurs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunsoo Yoon
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Todd J. Schwedt
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- ASU-Mayo Center for Innovative Imaging, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Catherine D. Chong
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
- ASU-Mayo Center for Innovative Imaging, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Oyekanmi Olatunde
- Department of Systems Science and Industrial Engineering, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, United States of America
| | - Teresa Wu
- ASU-Mayo Center for Innovative Imaging, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
- School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tassi E, Bianchi AM, Calesella F, Vai B, Bellani M, Nenadić I, Piras F, Benedetti F, Brambilla P, Maggioni E. Assessment of ComBat Harmonization Performance on Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements. Hum Brain Mapp 2024; 45:e70085. [PMID: 39704541 PMCID: PMC11660414 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 11/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Data aggregation across multiple research centers is gaining importance in the context of MRI research, driving diverse high-dimensional datasets to form large-scale heterogeneous sample, increasing statistical power and relevance of machine learning and deep learning algorithm. Site-related effects have been demonstrated to introduce bias in MRI features and confound subsequent analyses. Although Combating Batch (ComBat) technique has been recently reported to successfully harmonize multi-scale neuroimaging features, its performance assessments are still limited and largely based on qualitative visualizations and statistical analyses. In this study, we stand out by using a robust cross-validation approach to assess ComBat performances applied on volume- and surface-based measures acquired across three sites. A machine learning approach based on Multi-Class Gaussian Process Classifier was applied to predict imaging site based on raw and harmonized brain features, providing quantitative insights into ComBat effectiveness, and verifying the association between biological covariates and harmonized brain features. Our findings showed differences in terms of ComBat performances across measures of regional brain morphology, demonstrating tissue specific site effect modeling. ComBat adjustment of site effects also varied across regional level of each specific volume-based and surface-based measures. ComBat effectively eliminates unwanted data site-related variability, by maintaining or even enhancing data association with biological factors. Of note, ComBat has demonstrated flexibility and robustness of application on unseen independent gray matter volume data from the same sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Tassi
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental HealthFondazione IRCS Cà Granda Ospedale PoliclinicoMilanoItaly
- Department of Electronics, Information and BioengineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly
| | - Anna Maria Bianchi
- Department of Electronics, Information and BioengineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly
| | - Federico Calesella
- Unit of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanoItaly
- University Vita‐Salute San RaffaeleMilanoItaly
| | - Benedetta Vai
- Unit of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanoItaly
- University Vita‐Salute San RaffaeleMilanoItaly
| | - Marcella Bellani
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement SciencesUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
| | - Igor Nenadić
- Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyPhilipps‐University Marburg/Marburg University HospitalMarburgGermany
| | | | - Francesco Benedetti
- Unit of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology, Division of NeuroscienceIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanoItaly
- University Vita‐Salute San RaffaeleMilanoItaly
| | - Paolo Brambilla
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental HealthFondazione IRCS Cà Granda Ospedale PoliclinicoMilanoItaly
- Department of Pathophysiology and TransplantationUniversity of MilanMilanoItaly
| | - Eleonora Maggioni
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental HealthFondazione IRCS Cà Granda Ospedale PoliclinicoMilanoItaly
- Department of Electronics, Information and BioengineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tu JC, Millar PR, Strain JF, Eck A, Adeyemo B, Snyder AZ, Daniels A, Karch C, Huey ED, McDade E, Day GS, Yakushev I, Hassenstab J, Morris J, Llibre-Guerra JJ, Ibanez L, Jucker M, Mendez PC, Perrin RJ, Benzinger TLS, Jack CR, Betzel R, Ances BM, Eggebrecht AT, Gordon BA, Wheelock MD. Increasing hub disruption parallels dementia severity in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease. Netw Neurosci 2024; 8:1265-1290. [PMID: 39735502 PMCID: PMC11674321 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 12/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Hub regions in the brain, recognized for their roles in ensuring efficient information transfer, are vulnerable to pathological alterations in neurodegenerative conditions, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Computational simulations and animal experiments have hinted at the theory of activity-dependent degeneration as the cause of this hub vulnerability. However, two critical issues remain unresolved. First, past research has not clearly distinguished between two scenarios: hub regions facing a higher risk of connectivity disruption (targeted attack) and all regions having an equal risk (random attack). Second, human studies offering support for activity-dependent explanations remain scarce. We refined the hub disruption index to demonstrate a hub disruption pattern in functional connectivity in autosomal dominant AD that aligned with targeted attacks. This hub disruption is detectable even in preclinical stages, 12 years before the expected symptom onset and is amplified alongside symptomatic progression. Moreover, hub disruption was primarily tied to regional differences in global connectivity and sequentially followed changes observed in amyloid-beta positron emission tomography cortical markers, consistent with the activity-dependent degeneration explanation. Taken together, our findings deepen the understanding of brain network organization in neurodegenerative diseases and could be instrumental in refining diagnostic and targeted therapeutic strategies for AD in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxin Cindy Tu
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Peter R. Millar
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jeremy F. Strain
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Andrew Eck
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Babatunde Adeyemo
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Abraham Z. Snyder
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alisha Daniels
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Celeste Karch
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Edward D. Huey
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Eric McDade
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gregory S. Day
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Igor Yakushev
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jason Hassenstab
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - John Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Laura Ibanez
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- NeuroGenomics and Informatics Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mathias Jucker
- Department of Cellular Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Richard J. Perrin
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Richard Betzel
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Beau M. Ances
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Adam T. Eggebrecht
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Brian A. Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Muriah D. Wheelock
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Canada KL, Riggins T, Ghetti S, Ofen N, Daugherty AM. A data integration method for new advances in development cognitive neuroscience. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2024; 70:101475. [PMID: 39549555 PMCID: PMC11609474 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2024] [Revised: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 11/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Combining existing datasets to investigate key questions in developmental cognitive neuroscience brings exciting opportunities and unique challenges. However, many data pooling methods require identical or harmonized methodologies that are often not feasible. We propose Integrative Data Analysis (IDA) as a promising framework to advance developmental cognitive neuroscience with secondary data analysis. IDA serves to test hypotheses by combining data of the same construct from commensurate (but not identical) measures. To overcome idiosyncrasies of neuroimaging data, IDA explicitly evaluates if measures across studies assess the same construct. Moreover, IDA allows investigators to examine meaningful individual variability by de-confounding source-specific differences. To demonstrate IDA's potential, we explain foundational concepts, outline necessary steps, and apply IDA to volumetric measures of hippocampal subfields from 443 4- to 17-year-olds across three independent studies. We identified commensurate measures of Cornu Ammonis (CA) 1, dentate gyrus (DG)/CA3, and Subiculum (Sub). Model testing supported use of IDA to create IDA factor scores. We found age-related differences in DG/CA3, not but CA1 and Sub volume in the integrated dataset. By successfully demonstrating IDA, our hope is that future innovations come from the combination of existing neuroimaging data to create representative integrated samples when testing critical developmental questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey L Canada
- Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
| | - Tracy Riggins
- Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Simona Ghetti
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA; Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Noa Ofen
- Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA; Center for Vital Longevity, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Psychology, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA
| | - Ana M Daugherty
- Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA; Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Saqib M, Horovitz SG. Harmonization for Parkinson's Disease Multi-Dataset T1 MRI Morphometry Classification. NEUROSCI 2024; 5:600-613. [PMID: 39728674 DOI: 10.3390/neurosci5040042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Revised: 10/28/2024] [Accepted: 10/31/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Classification of disease and healthy volunteer cohorts provides a useful clinical alternative to traditional group statistics due to individualized, personalized predictions. Classifiers for neurodegenerative disease can be trained on structural MRI morphometry, but require large multi-scanner datasets, introducing confounding batch effects. We test ComBat, a common harmonization model, in an example application to classify subjects with Parkinson's disease from healthy volunteers and identify common pitfalls, including data leakage. We used a multi-dataset cohort of 372 subjects (216 with Parkinson's disease, 156 healthy volunteers) from 11 identified scanners. We extracted both FreeSurfer and the determinant of Jacobian morphometry to compare single-scanner and multi-scanner classification pipelines. We confirm the presence of batch effects by running single scanner classifiers which could achieve wildly divergent AUCs on scanner-specific datasets (mean:0.651 ± 0.144). Multi-scanner classifiers that considered neurobiological batch effects between sites could easily achieve a test AUC of 0.902, though pipelines that prevented data leakage could only achieve a test AUC of 0.550. We conclude that batch effects remain a major issue for classification problems, such that even impressive single-scanner classifiers are unlikely to generalize to multiple scanners, and that solving for batch effects in a classifier problem must avoid circularity and reporting overly optimistic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Saqib
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Strokes, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Silvina G Horovitz
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Strokes, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vásquez-Venegas C, Wu C, Sundar S, Prôa R, Beloy FJ, Medina JR, McNichol M, Parvataneni K, Kurtzman N, Mirshawka F, Aguirre-Jerez M, Ebner DK, Celi LA. Detecting and Mitigating the Clever Hans Effect in Medical Imaging: A Scoping Review. JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE 2024:10.1007/s10278-024-01335-z. [PMID: 39643820 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01335-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2024] [Revised: 11/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/06/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024]
Abstract
The Clever Hans effect occurs when machine learning models rely on spurious correlations instead of clinically relevant features and poses significant challenges to the development of reliable artificial intelligence (AI) systems in medical imaging. This scoping review provides an overview of methods for identifying and addressing the Clever Hans effect in medical imaging AI algorithms. A total of 173 papers published between 2010 and 2024 were reviewed, and 37 articles were selected for detailed analysis, with classification into two categories: detection and mitigation approaches. Detection methods include model-centric, data-centric, and uncertainty and bias-based approaches, while mitigation strategies encompass data manipulation techniques, feature disentanglement and suppression, and domain knowledge-driven approaches. Despite the progress in detecting and mitigating the Clever Hans effect, the majority of current machine learning studies in medical imaging do not report or test for shortcut learning, highlighting the need for more rigorous validation and transparency in AI research. Future research should focus on creating standardized benchmarks, developing automated detection tools, and exploring the integration of detection and mitigation strategies to comprehensively address shortcut learning. Establishing community-driven best practices and leveraging interdisciplinary collaboration will be crucial for ensuring more reliable, generalizable, and equitable AI systems in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constanza Vásquez-Venegas
- Scientific Image Analysis Lab, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, 8380453, RM, Chile.
- Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, 4030000, Biobio, Chile.
| | - Chenwei Wu
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48105, MI, USA
| | - Saketh Sundar
- Harvard College, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Renata Prôa
- Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Megan McNichol
- Division of Knowledge Services, Department of Information Services, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Krishnaveni Parvataneni
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Felipe Mirshawka
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Daniel K Ebner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Leo Anthony Celi
- Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fan S, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zang Y. Revisiting Resting-State Functional Connectivity of the Amygdala and Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Adolescents and Adults With Depression. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2024:S2451-9022(24)00341-0. [PMID: 39566882 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 11/08/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 11/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescent depression is a growing public health concern, and neuroimaging offers a promising approach to its pathology. We focused on the functional connectivity of the amygdala and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC), which is theoretically important in major depressive disorder (MDD), but empirical evidence has remained inconsistent. This discrepancy is likely due to the limited statistical power of small sample sizes. METHODS We rigorously examined sgACC-amygdala connectivity in adolescents and adults with depression using data from the Healthy Brain Network (n = 321; 170 female), the ABCD (Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development) Study (n = 141; 56 female), the Boston Adolescent Neuroimaging of Depression and Anxiety study (n = 108; 75 female), and the REST-meta-MDD project (n = 1436; 880 female). Linear mixed models, Bayesian factor analyses, and meta-analysis were used to assess connectivity. RESULTS Our analyses revealed that sgACC-amygdala connectivity in adolescents with MDD was comparable to that in healthy control individuals, whereas adults with recurrent MDD exhibited reduced connectivity. Resampling analysis demonstrated that small sample sizes (i.e., n < 30 MDD cases) tend to inflate effects, potentially leading to misinterpretations. CONCLUSIONS These findings clarify the state of sgACC-amygdala connectivity in MDD and underscore the importance of refining neurocognitive models separately for adolescents and adults. The study also highlights the necessity for large-scale replication studies to ensure robust and reliable findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shijia Fan
- School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuxi Wang
- School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yin Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
| | - Yinyin Zang
- School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Antoniades M, Srinivasan D, Wen J, Erus G, Abdulkadir A, Mamourian E, Melhem R, Hwang G, Cui Y, Govindarajan ST, Chen AA, Zhou Z, Yang Z, Chen J, Pomponio R, Sotardi S, An Y, Bilgel M, LaMontagne P, Singh A, Benzinger T, Beason-Held L, Marcus DS, Yaffe K, Launer L, Morris JC, Tosun D, Ferrucci L, Bryan RN, Resnick SM, Habes M, Wolk D, Fan Y, Nasrallah IM, Shou H, Davatzikos C. Relationship between MRI brain-age heterogeneity, cognition, genetics and Alzheimer's disease neuropathology. EBioMedicine 2024; 109:105399. [PMID: 39437659 PMCID: PMC11536027 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain ageing is highly heterogeneous, as it is driven by a variety of normal and neuropathological processes. These processes may differentially affect structural and functional brain ageing across individuals, with more pronounced ageing (older brain age) during midlife being indicative of later development of dementia. Here, we examined whether brain-ageing heterogeneity in unimpaired older adults related to neurodegeneration, different cognitive trajectories, genetic and amyloid-beta (Aβ) profiles, and to predicted progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS Functional and structural brain age measures were obtained for resting-state functional MRI and structural MRI, respectively, in 3460 cognitively normal individuals across an age range spanning 42-85 years. Participants were categorised into four groups based on the difference between their chronological and predicted age in each modality: advanced age in both (n = 291), resilient in both (n = 260) or advanced in one/resilient in the other (n = 163/153). With the resilient group as the reference, brain-age groups were compared across neuroimaging features of neuropathology (white matter hyperintensity volume, neuronal loss measured with Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging, AD-specific atrophy patterns measured with the Spatial Patterns of Abnormality for Recognition of Early Alzheimer's Disease index, amyloid burden using amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), progression to mild cognitive impairment and baseline and longitudinal cognitive measures (trail making task, mini mental state examination, digit symbol substitution task). FINDINGS Individuals with advanced structural and functional brain-ages had more features indicative of neurodegeneration and they had poor cognition. Individuals with a resilient brain-age in both modalities had a genetic variant that has been shown to be associated with age of onset of AD. Mixed brain-age was associated with selective cognitive deficits. INTERPRETATION The advanced group displayed evidence of increased atrophy across all neuroimaging features that was not found in either of the mixed groups. This is in line with biomarkers of preclinical AD and cerebrovascular disease. These findings suggest that the variation in structural and functional brain ageing across individuals reflects the degree of underlying neuropathological processes and may indicate the propensity to develop dementia in later life. FUNDING The National Institute on Aging, the National Institutes of Health, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Antoniades
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Dhivya Srinivasan
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Junhao Wen
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Laboratory of AI and Biomedical Science (LABS), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Guray Erus
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ahmed Abdulkadir
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Research in Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Elizabeth Mamourian
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Randa Melhem
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gyujoon Hwang
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Yuhan Cui
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sindhuja Tirumalai Govindarajan
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew A Chen
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Zhen Zhou
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Zhijian Yang
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jiong Chen
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Raymond Pomponio
- Department of Biostatistics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Susan Sotardi
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yang An
- Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Murat Bilgel
- Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pamela LaMontagne
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ashish Singh
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tammie Benzinger
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lori Beason-Held
- Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel S Marcus
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Lenore Launer
- Neuroepidemiology Section, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John C Morris
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Duygu Tosun
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Luigi Ferrucci
- National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
| | - R Nick Bryan
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Susan M Resnick
- Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mohamad Habes
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Neuroimage Analytics Laboratory (NAL) and the Biggs Institute Neuroimaging Core (BINC), Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - David Wolk
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yong Fan
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ilya M Nasrallah
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Haochang Shou
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- AI(2)D, Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, and Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jaramillo-Jimenez A, Tovar-Rios DA, Mantilla-Ramos YJ, Ochoa-Gomez JF, Bonanni L, Brønnick K. ComBat models for harmonization of resting-state EEG features in multisite studies. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 167:241-253. [PMID: 39369552 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pooling multisite resting-state electroencephalography (rsEEG) datasets may introduce bias due to batch effects (i.e., cross-site differences in the rsEEG related to scanner/sample characteristics). The Combining Batches (ComBat) models, introduced for microarray expression and adapted for neuroimaging, can control for batch effects while preserving the variability of biological covariates. We aim to evaluate four ComBat harmonization methods in a pooled sample from five independent rsEEG datasets of young and old adults. METHODS RsEEG signals (n = 374) were automatically preprocessed. Oscillatory and aperiodic rsEEG features were extracted in sensor space. Features were harmonized using neuroCombat (standard ComBat used in neuroimaging), neuroHarmonize (variant with nonlinear adjustment of covariates), OPNested-GMM (variant based on Gaussian Mixture Models to fit bimodal feature distributions), and HarmonizR (variant based on resampling to handle missing feature values). Relationships between rsEEG features and age were explored before and after harmonizing batch effects. RESULTS Batch effects were identified in rsEEG features. All ComBat methods reduced batch effects and features' dispersion; HarmonizR and OPNested-GMM ComBat achieved the greatest performance. Harmonized Beta power, individual Alpha peak frequency, Aperiodic exponent, and offset in posterior electrodes showed significant relations with age. All ComBat models maintained the direction of observed relationships while increasing the effect size. CONCLUSIONS ComBat models, particularly HarmonizeR and OPNested-GMM ComBat, effectively control for batch effects in rsEEG spectral features. SIGNIFICANCE This workflow can be used in multisite studies to harmonize batch effects in sensor-space rsEEG spectral features while preserving biological associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Jaramillo-Jimenez
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway; Grupo de Neurociencias de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia; Grupo Neuropsicología y Conducta, Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia; Semillero de Investigación NeuroCo, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
| | - Diego A Tovar-Rios
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Doctoral School Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Grupo de Investigación en Estadística Aplicada - INFERIR, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia; Prevención y Control de la Enfermedad Crónica - PRECEC, Universidad del Valle, Colombia.
| | - Yorguin-Jose Mantilla-Ramos
- Grupo Neuropsicología y Conducta, Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia; Semillero de Investigación NeuroCo, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia; Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience Laboratory (CoCo Lab), University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
| | - John-Fredy Ochoa-Gomez
- Grupo de Neurociencias de Antioquia, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia; Grupo Neuropsicología y Conducta, Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombia.
| | - Laura Bonanni
- Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Kolbjørn Brønnick
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine (SESAM), Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tanaka SC, Kasai K, Okamoto Y, Koike S, Hayashi T, Yamashita A, Yamashita O, Johnstone T, Pestilli F, Doya K, Okada G, Shinzato H, Itai E, Takahara Y, Takamiya A, Nakamura M, Itahashi T, Aoki R, Koizumi Y, Shimizu M, Miyata J, Son S, Aki M, Okada N, Morita S, Sawamoto N, Abe M, Oi Y, Sajima K, Kamagata K, Hirose M, Aoshima Y, Hamatani S, Nohara N, Funaba M, Noda T, Inoue K, Hirano J, Mimura M, Takahashi H, Hattori N, Sekiguchi A, Kawato M, Hanakawa T. The status of MRI databases across the world focused on psychiatric and neurological disorders. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2024; 78:563-579. [PMID: 39162256 PMCID: PMC11804910 DOI: 10.1111/pcn.13717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
Neuroimaging databases for neuro-psychiatric disorders enable researchers to implement data-driven research approaches by providing access to rich data that can be used to study disease, build and validate machine learning models, and even redefine disease spectra. The importance of sharing large, multi-center, multi-disorder databases has gradually been recognized in order to truly translate brain imaging knowledge into real-world clinical practice. Here, we review MRI databases that share data globally to serve multiple psychiatric or neurological disorders. We found 42 datasets consisting of 23,293 samples from patients with psychiatry and neurological disorders and healthy controls; 1245 samples from mood disorders (major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder), 2015 samples from developmental disorders (autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder), 675 samples from schizophrenia, 1194 samples from Parkinson's disease, 5865 samples from dementia (including Alzheimer's disease), We recognize that large, multi-center databases should include governance processes that allow data to be shared across national boundaries. Addressing technical and regulatory issues of existing databases can lead to better design and implementation and improve data access for the research community. The current trend toward the development of shareable MRI databases will contribute to a better understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis and assessment, and development of early interventions for neuropsychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saori C. Tanaka
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory GroupAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institutes InternationalKyotoJapan
- Division of Information ScienceNara Institute of Science and TechnologyNaraJapan
| | - Kiyoto Kasai
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
- The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI‐IRCN)The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS)TokyoJapan
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM)TokyoJapan
- Center for Brain Imaging in Health and Diseases (CBHD)The University of Tokyo HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Yasumasa Okamoto
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health ScienceHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Shinsuke Koike
- The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI‐IRCN)The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS)TokyoJapan
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM)TokyoJapan
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences, Graduate School of Art and SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Takuya Hayashi
- Laboratory for Brain Connectomics ImagingRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics ResearchHyogoJapan
- Department of Brain ConnectomicsKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Ayumu Yamashita
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory GroupAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institutes InternationalKyotoJapan
- Graduate School of Information Science and TechnologyThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Okito Yamashita
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory GroupAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institutes InternationalKyotoJapan
- Center for Advanced Intelligence ProjectRIKENTokyoJapan
| | - Tom Johnstone
- School of Health SciencesSwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Franco Pestilli
- Department of Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Center for Perceptual Systems, Center for Learning and MemoryThe University of Texas at AustinAustinTexasUSA
| | - Kenji Doya
- Neural Computation UnitOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate UniversityOkinawaJapan
| | - Go Okada
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health ScienceHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Hotaka Shinzato
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health ScienceHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of MedicineUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan
| | - Eri Itai
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health ScienceHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Yuji Takahara
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory GroupAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institutes InternationalKyotoJapan
- Biomarker R&D departmentSHIONOGI & CO., LtdOsakaJapan
| | - Akihiro Takamiya
- Department of NeuropsychiatryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
- Hills Joint Research Laboratory for Future Preventive Medicine and WellnessKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
- Neuropsychiatry, Department of NeurosciencesLeuven Brain Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Geriatric PsychiatryUniversity Psychiatric Center KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Motoaki Nakamura
- Medical Institute of Developmental Disabilities ResearchShowa UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Takashi Itahashi
- Medical Institute of Developmental Disabilities ResearchShowa UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Ryuta Aoki
- Medical Institute of Developmental Disabilities ResearchShowa UniversityTokyoJapan
- Graduate School of HumanitiesTokyo Metropolitan UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Yukiaki Koizumi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
- Department of PsychiatryHaryugaoka HospitalFukushimaJapan
| | - Masaaki Shimizu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Jun Miyata
- Department of PsychiatryAichi Medical UniversityAichiJapan
- Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Shuraku Son
- Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Morio Aki
- Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Naohiro Okada
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
- The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI‐IRCN)The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS)TokyoJapan
| | - Susumu Morita
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Nobukatsu Sawamoto
- Department of Human Health SciencesKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Mitsunari Abe
- Integrative Brain Imaging CenterNational Center of Neurology and PsychiatryTokyoJapan
| | - Yuki Oi
- Department of Neurology, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Kazuaki Sajima
- Integrative Brain Imaging CenterNational Center of Neurology and PsychiatryTokyoJapan
| | - Koji Kamagata
- Department of RadiologyJuntendo University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Masakazu Hirose
- Department of Integrated Neuroanatomy and NeuroimagingKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Yohei Aoshima
- Integrative Brain Imaging CenterNational Center of Neurology and PsychiatryTokyoJapan
| | - Sayo Hamatani
- Research Center for Child Mental DevelopmentChiba UniversityChibaJapan
- Research Center for Child Mental DevelopmentUniversity of FukuiFukuiJapan
| | - Nobuhiro Nohara
- Department of Stress Sciences and Psychosomatic Medicine, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Misako Funaba
- Department of Behavioral Medicine, National Institute of Mental HealthNational Center of Neurology and PsychiatryTokyoJapan
- Student Counseling CenterMeiji Gakuin UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Tomomi Noda
- Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| | - Kana Inoue
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory GroupAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institutes InternationalKyotoJapan
| | - Jinichi Hirano
- Department of NeuropsychiatryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Masaru Mimura
- Department of NeuropsychiatryKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Hidehiko Takahashi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
- Center for Brain Integration ResearchTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Nobutaka Hattori
- Department of NeurologyJuntendo University Graduate School of MedicineTokyoJapan
- Neurodegenerative Disorders Collaborative LaboratoryRIKEN Center for Brain ScienceSaitamaJapan
| | - Atsushi Sekiguchi
- Department of Behavioral Medicine, National Institute of Mental HealthNational Center of Neurology and PsychiatryTokyoJapan
| | - Mitsuo Kawato
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory GroupAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institutes InternationalKyotoJapan
| | - Takashi Hanakawa
- Integrative Brain Imaging CenterNational Center of Neurology and PsychiatryTokyoJapan
- Department of Integrated Neuroanatomy and NeuroimagingKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Patel J, Schöttner M, Tarun A, Tourbier S, Alemán-Gómez Y, Hagmann P, Bolton TAW. Modeling the impact of MRI acquisition bias on structural connectomes: Harmonizing structural connectomes. Netw Neurosci 2024; 8:623-652. [PMID: 39355442 PMCID: PMC11340995 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
One way to increase the statistical power and generalizability of neuroimaging studies is to collect data at multiple sites or merge multiple cohorts. However, this usually comes with site-related biases due to the heterogeneity of scanners and acquisition parameters, negatively impacting sensitivity. Brain structural connectomes are not an exception: Being derived from T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images, structural connectivity is impacted by differences in imaging protocol. Beyond minimizing acquisition parameter differences, removing bias with postprocessing is essential. In this work we create, from the exhaustive Human Connectome Project Young Adult dataset, a resampled dataset of different b-values and spatial resolutions, modeling a cohort scanned across multiple sites. After demonstrating the statistical impact of acquisition parameters on connectivity, we propose a linear regression with explicit modeling of b-value and spatial resolution, and validate its performance on separate datasets. We show that b-value and spatial resolution affect connectivity in different ways and that acquisition bias can be reduced using a linear regression informed by the acquisition parameters while retaining interindividual differences and hence boosting fingerprinting performance. We also demonstrate the generative potential of our model, and its generalization capability in an independent dataset reflective of typical acquisition practices in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jagruti Patel
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mikkel Schöttner
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Anjali Tarun
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sebastien Tourbier
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Yasser Alemán-Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Patric Hagmann
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas A W Bolton
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV-UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shafiei G, Keller AS, Bertolero M, Shanmugan S, Bassett DS, Chen AA, Covitz S, Houghton A, Luo A, Mehta K, Salo T, Shinohara RT, Fair D, Hallquist MN, Satterthwaite TD. Generalizable Links Between Borderline Personality Traits and Functional Connectivity. Biol Psychiatry 2024; 96:486-494. [PMID: 38460580 PMCID: PMC11338739 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.02.1016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Symptoms of borderline personality disorder (BPD) often manifest during adolescence, but the underlying relationship between these debilitating symptoms and the development of functional brain networks is not well understood. Here, we aimed to investigate how multivariate patterns of functional connectivity are associated with borderline personality traits in large samples of young adults and adolescents. METHODS We used functional magnetic resonance imaging data from young adults and adolescents from the HCP-YA (Human Connectome Project Young Adult) (n = 870, ages 22-37 years, 457 female) and the HCP-D (Human Connectome Project Development) (n = 223, ages 16-21 years, 121 female). A previously validated BPD proxy score was derived from the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. A ridge regression model with cross-validation and nested hyperparameter tuning was trained and tested in HCP-YA to predict BPD scores in unseen data from regional functional connectivity. The trained model was further tested on data from HCP-D without further tuning. Finally, we tested how the connectivity patterns associated with BPD aligned with age-related changes in connectivity. RESULTS Multivariate functional connectivity patterns significantly predicted out-of-sample BPD scores in unseen data in young adults (HCP-YA ppermuted = .001) and older adolescents (HCP-D ppermuted = .001). Regional predictive capacity was heterogeneous; the most predictive regions were found in functional systems relevant for emotion regulation and executive function, including the ventral attention network. Finally, regional functional connectivity patterns that predicted BPD scores aligned with those associated with development in youth. CONCLUSIONS Individual differences in functional connectivity in developmentally sensitive regions are associated with borderline personality traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Golia Shafiei
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute of Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Arielle S Keller
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute of Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Maxwell Bertolero
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute of Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sheila Shanmugan
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute of Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Dani S Bassett
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Physics & Astronomy, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico
| | - Andrew A Chen
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sydney Covitz
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute of Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Audrey Houghton
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Audrey Luo
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute of Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kahini Mehta
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute of Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Taylor Salo
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute of Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Damien Fair
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Institute of Child Development, College of Education and Human Development, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Michael N Hallquist
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lifespan Brain Institute of Perelman School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang X, Fu S, Yoo K, Wang X, Gan L, Zou T, Gao Q, Han H, Yang Z, Hu X, Chen H, Liu D, Li R. Individualized Structural Perturbations on Normative Brain Connectome Restrict Deep Brain Stimulation Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord 2024; 39:1352-1363. [PMID: 38894532 DOI: 10.1002/mds.29874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) respond to deep brain stimulation (DBS) variably. However, how brain substrates restrict DBS outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE In this article, we aim to identify prognostic brain signatures for explaining the response variability. METHODS We retrospectively investigated a cohort of patients with PD (n = 141) between 2017 and 2022, and defined DBS outcomes as the improvement ratio of clinical motor scores. We used a deviation index to quantify individual perturbations on a reference structural covariance network acquired with preoperative T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. The neurobiological perturbations of patients were represented as z scored indices based on the chronological perturbations measured on a group of normal aging adults. RESULTS After applying stringent statistical tests (z > 2.5) and correcting for false discoveries (P < 0.01), we found that accelerated deviations mainly affected the prefrontal cortex, motor strip, limbic system, and cerebellum in PD. Particularly, a negative network within the accelerated deviations, expressed as "more preoperative deviations, less postoperative improvements," could predict DBS outcomes (mean absolute error = 0.09, R2 = 0.15). Moreover, a fusion of personal brain predictors and medical responses significantly improved traditional evaluations of DBS outcomes. Notably, the most important brain predictor, a pathway connecting the cognitive unit (prefrontal cortex) and motor control unit (cerebellum and motor strip), partially mediates DBS outcomes with the age at surgery. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that individual structural perturbations on the cognitive motor control circuit are critical for modulating DBS outcomes. Interventions toward the circuit have the potential for additional clinical improvements. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuyang Wang
- Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Shiyu Fu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Kwangsun Yoo
- Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Data Science Research Institute, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Xiaoyue Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Lin Gan
- Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Ting Zou
- Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Qing Gao
- School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Honghao Han
- Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenzhe Yang
- Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaofei Hu
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
| | - Huafu Chen
- Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| | - Dingyang Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Rong Li
- Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
- MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hu F, Lucas A, Chen AA, Coleman K, Horng H, Ng RWS, Tustison NJ, Davis KA, Shou H, Li M, Shinohara RT. DeepComBat: A statistically motivated, hyperparameter-robust, deep learning approach to harmonization of neuroimaging data. Hum Brain Mapp 2024; 45:e26708. [PMID: 39056477 PMCID: PMC11273293 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Neuroimaging data acquired using multiple scanners or protocols are increasingly available. However, such data exhibit technical artifacts across batches which introduce confounding and decrease reproducibility. This is especially true when multi-batch data are analyzed using complex downstream models which are more likely to pick up on and implicitly incorporate batch-related information. Previously proposed image harmonization methods have sought to remove these batch effects; however, batch effects remain detectable in the data after applying these methods. We present DeepComBat, a deep learning harmonization method based on a conditional variational autoencoder and the ComBat method. DeepComBat combines the strengths of statistical and deep learning methods in order to account for the multivariate relationships between features while simultaneously relaxing strong assumptions made by previous deep learning harmonization methods. As a result, DeepComBat can perform multivariate harmonization while preserving data structure and avoiding the introduction of synthetic artifacts. We apply this method to cortical thickness measurements from a cognitive-aging cohort and show DeepComBat qualitatively and quantitatively outperforms existing methods in removing batch effects while preserving biological heterogeneity. Additionally, DeepComBat provides a new perspective for statistically motivated deep learning harmonization methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengling Hu
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and InformaticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Alfredo Lucas
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, Department of EngineeringUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Andrew A. Chen
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and InformaticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Kyle Coleman
- Statistical Center for Single‐Cell and Spatial GenomicsPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Hannah Horng
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and InformaticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Raymond W. S. Ng
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Nicholas J. Tustison
- Department of Radiology and Medical ImagingUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleVirginiaUSA
| | - Kathryn A. Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, Department of EngineeringUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of NeurologyPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Haochang Shou
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and InformaticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA)Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Mingyao Li
- Statistical Center for Single‐Cell and Spatial GenomicsPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Russell T. Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and InformaticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA)Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yu Y, Cui H, Haas SS, New F, Sanford N, Yu K, Zhan D, Yang G, Gao J, Wei D, Qiu J, Banaj N, Boomsma DI, Breier A, Brodaty H, Buckner RL, Buitelaar JK, Cannon DM, Caseras X, Clark VP, Conrod PJ, Crivello F, Crone EA, Dannlowski U, Davey CG, de Haan L, de Zubicaray GI, Di Giorgio A, Fisch L, Fisher SE, Franke B, Glahn DC, Grotegerd D, Gruber O, Gur RE, Gur RC, Hahn T, Harrison BJ, Hatton S, Hickie IB, Hulshoff Pol HE, Jamieson AJ, Jernigan TL, Jiang J, Kalnin AJ, Kang S, Kochan NA, Kraus A, Lagopoulos J, Lazaro L, McDonald BC, McDonald C, McMahon KL, Mwangi B, Piras F, Rodriguez‐Cruces R, Royer J, Sachdev PS, Satterthwaite TD, Saykin AJ, Schumann G, Sevaggi P, Smoller JW, Soares JC, Spalletta G, Tamnes CK, Trollor JN, Van't Ent D, Vecchio D, Walter H, Wang Y, Weber B, Wen W, Wierenga LM, Williams SCR, Wu M, Zunta‐Soares GB, Bernhardt B, Thompson P, Frangou S, Ge R. Brain-age prediction: Systematic evaluation of site effects, and sample age range and size. Hum Brain Mapp 2024; 45:e26768. [PMID: 38949537 PMCID: PMC11215839 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Structural neuroimaging data have been used to compute an estimate of the biological age of the brain (brain-age) which has been associated with other biologically and behaviorally meaningful measures of brain development and aging. The ongoing research interest in brain-age has highlighted the need for robust and publicly available brain-age models pre-trained on data from large samples of healthy individuals. To address this need we have previously released a developmental brain-age model. Here we expand this work to develop, empirically validate, and disseminate a pre-trained brain-age model to cover most of the human lifespan. To achieve this, we selected the best-performing model after systematically examining the impact of seven site harmonization strategies, age range, and sample size on brain-age prediction in a discovery sample of brain morphometric measures from 35,683 healthy individuals (age range: 5-90 years; 53.59% female). The pre-trained models were tested for cross-dataset generalizability in an independent sample comprising 2101 healthy individuals (age range: 8-80 years; 55.35% female) and for longitudinal consistency in a further sample comprising 377 healthy individuals (age range: 9-25 years; 49.87% female). This empirical examination yielded the following findings: (1) the accuracy of age prediction from morphometry data was higher when no site harmonization was applied; (2) dividing the discovery sample into two age-bins (5-40 and 40-90 years) provided a better balance between model accuracy and explained age variance than other alternatives; (3) model accuracy for brain-age prediction plateaued at a sample size exceeding 1600 participants. These findings have been incorporated into CentileBrain (https://centilebrain.org/#/brainAGE2), an open-science, web-based platform for individualized neuroimaging metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuetong Yu
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Hao‐Qi Cui
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Shalaila S. Haas
- Department of PsychiatryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Faye New
- Department of PsychiatryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Nicole Sanford
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Kevin Yu
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Denghuang Zhan
- School of Population and Public HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Guoyuan Yang
- Advanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Sciences, School of Medical Technology, School of Life ScienceBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
| | - Jia‐Hong Gao
- Center for MRI ResearchPeking UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Dongtao Wei
- School of PsychologySouthwest UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Jiang Qiu
- School of PsychologySouthwest UniversityChongqingChina
| | - Nerisa Banaj
- Laboratory of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Clinical and Behavioral NeurologyIRCCS Santa Lucia FoundationRomeItaly
| | - Dorret I. Boomsma
- Department of Biological PsychologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Alan Breier
- Department of PsychiatryIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Randy L. Buckner
- Department of Psychology, Center for Brain ScienceHarvard UniversityBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jan K. Buitelaar
- Department of Cognitive NeuroscienceDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Dara M. Cannon
- Centre for Neuroimaging & Cognitive Genomics (NICOG), Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Galway Neuroscience CentreCollege of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, University of GalwayGalwayIreland
| | - Xavier Caseras
- Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical NeurosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Vincent P. Clark
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, Department of PsychologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueNew MexicoUSA
| | - Patricia J. Conrod
- Department of Psychiatry and AddictionUniversité de Montréal, CHU Ste JustineMontrealQuebecCanada
| | - Fabrice Crivello
- Institut des Maladies NeurodégénérativesUniversité de BordeauxBordeauxFrance
| | - Eveline A. Crone
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social SciencesLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Social and Behavioral SciencesErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Udo Dannlowski
- Institute for Translational PsychiatryUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | | | - Lieuwe de Haan
- Department of PsychiatryAmsterdam UMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Greig I. de Zubicaray
- Faculty of Health, School of Psychology & CounsellingQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | | | - Lukas Fisch
- Institute for Translational PsychiatryUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | - Simon E. Fisher
- Language and Genetics DepartmentMax Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsNijmegenThe Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Barbara Franke
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive NeuroscienceRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
- Department of Human GeneticsRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - David C. Glahn
- Department of Psychiatry, Tommy Fuss Center for Neuropsychiatric Disease Research, Boston Children's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Dominik Grotegerd
- Institute for Translational PsychiatryUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | - Oliver Gruber
- Section for Experimental Psychopathology and Neuroimaging, Department of General PsychiatryHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
| | - Raquel E. Gur
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Ruben C. Gur
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Tim Hahn
- Institute for Translational PsychiatryUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | - Ben J. Harrison
- Department of PsychiatryThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Sean Hatton
- Brain and Mind CentreThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Ian B. Hickie
- Brain and Mind CentreThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Hilleke E. Hulshoff Pol
- Department of PsychiatryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of PsychologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Alec J. Jamieson
- Department of PsychiatryThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Terry L. Jernigan
- Center for Human Development, Departments of Cognitive Science, Psychiatry, and RadiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Jiyang Jiang
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Andrew J. Kalnin
- Department of RadiologyThe Ohio State University College of MedicineColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Sim Kang
- West Region, Institute of Mental HealthSingaporeSingapore
| | - Nicole A. Kochan
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Anna Kraus
- Institute for Translational PsychiatryUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
| | - Jim Lagopoulos
- Brain and Mind CentreThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Luisa Lazaro
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and PsychologyHospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Brenna C. McDonald
- Department of Radiology and Imaging SciencesIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Colm McDonald
- Centre for Neuroimaging & Cognitive Genomics (NICOG), Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Galway Neuroscience CentreCollege of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, University of GalwayGalwayIreland
| | - Katie L. McMahon
- School of Clinical Sciences, Centre for Biomedical TechnologiesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Benson Mwangi
- Louis A. Faillace, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesThe University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Fabrizio Piras
- Laboratory of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Clinical and Behavioral NeurologyIRCCS Santa Lucia FoundationRomeItaly
| | | | - Jessica Royer
- McConnell Brain Imaging CentreMcGill UniversityMontrealQuebecCanada
| | - Perminder S. Sachdev
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Andrew J. Saykin
- Department of Radiology and Imaging SciencesIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Gunter Schumann
- Department of PsychiatryCCM, Charite Universitaetsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
- Centre for Population Neuroscience and Stratified Medicine (PONS), ISTBIFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Pierluigi Sevaggi
- Department of Translational Biomedicine and NeuroscienceUniversity of Bari Aldo MoroBariItaly
| | - Jordan W. Smoller
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Center for Genomic MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Center for Precision PsychiatryMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jair C. Soares
- Louis A. Faillace, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesThe University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Gianfranco Spalletta
- Laboratory of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Clinical and Behavioral NeurologyIRCCS Santa Lucia FoundationRomeItaly
| | - Christian K. Tamnes
- PROMENTA Research Center, Department of PsychologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Julian N. Trollor
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Developmental Disability Neuropsychiatry, School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Dennis Van't Ent
- Department of Biological PsychologyVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Daniela Vecchio
- Laboratory of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Clinical and Behavioral NeurologyIRCCS Santa Lucia FoundationRomeItaly
| | - Henrik Walter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin BerlinCorporate Member of FU Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of RadiologyMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeWisconsinUSA
| | - Bernd Weber
- Institute for Experimental Epileptology and Cognition ResearchUniversity of Bonn and University Hospital BonnBonnGermany
| | - Wei Wen
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lara M. Wierenga
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social SciencesLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Steven C. R. Williams
- Department of NeuroimagingInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Mon‐Ju Wu
- Louis A. Faillace, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesThe University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Giovana B. Zunta‐Soares
- Louis A. Faillace, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesThe University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Boris Bernhardt
- McConnell Brain Imaging CentreMcGill UniversityMontrealQuebecCanada
| | - Paul Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaMarina del ReyCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sophia Frangou
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- Department of PsychiatryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Ruiyang Ge
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Horng H, Scott C, Winham S, Jensen M, Pantalone L, Mankowski W, Kerlikowske K, Vachon CM, Kontos D, Shinohara RT. Multivariate testing and effect size measures for batch effect evaluation in radiomic features. Sci Rep 2024; 14:13923. [PMID: 38886407 PMCID: PMC11183083 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64208-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
While precision medicine applications of radiomics analysis are promising, differences in image acquisition can cause "batch effects" that reduce reproducibility and affect downstream predictive analyses. Harmonization methods such as ComBat have been developed to correct these effects, but evaluation methods for quantifying batch effects are inconsistent. In this study, we propose the use of the multivariate statistical test PERMANOVA and the Robust Effect Size Index (RESI) to better quantify and characterize batch effects in radiomics data. We evaluate these methods in both simulated and real radiomics features extracted from full-field digital mammography (FFDM) data. PERMANOVA demonstrated higher power than standard univariate statistical testing, and RESI was able to interpretably quantify the effect size of site at extremely large sample sizes. These methods show promise as more powerful and interpretable methods for the detection and quantification of batch effects in radiomics studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Horng
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analysis (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Penn Statistics in Imaging Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Lauren Pantalone
- Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analysis (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Walter Mankowski
- Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analysis (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | | | | | - Despina Kontos
- Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analysis (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Center for Innovation in Imaging Biomarkers and Integrated Diagnostics (CIMBID), Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analysis (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Penn Statistics in Imaging Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhang R, Chen L, Oliver LD, Voineskos AN, Park JY. SAN: Mitigating spatial covariance heterogeneity in cortical thickness data collected from multiple scanners or sites. Hum Brain Mapp 2024; 45:e26692. [PMID: 38712767 PMCID: PMC11075170 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
In neuroimaging studies, combining data collected from multiple study sites or scanners is becoming common to increase the reproducibility of scientific discoveries. At the same time, unwanted variations arise by using different scanners (inter-scanner biases), which need to be corrected before downstream analyses to facilitate replicable research and prevent spurious findings. While statistical harmonization methods such as ComBat have become popular in mitigating inter-scanner biases in neuroimaging, recent methodological advances have shown that harmonizing heterogeneous covariances results in higher data quality. In vertex-level cortical thickness data, heterogeneity in spatial autocorrelation is a critical factor that affects covariance heterogeneity. Our work proposes a new statistical harmonization method called spatial autocorrelation normalization (SAN) that preserves homogeneous covariance vertex-level cortical thickness data across different scanners. We use an explicit Gaussian process to characterize scanner-invariant and scanner-specific variations to reconstruct spatially homogeneous data across scanners. SAN is computationally feasible, and it easily allows the integration of existing harmonization methods. We demonstrate the utility of the proposed method using cortical thickness data from the Social Processes Initiative in the Neurobiology of the Schizophrenia(s) (SPINS) study. SAN is publicly available as an R package.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongqian Zhang
- Department of Statistical SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Linxi Chen
- Department of Statistical SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | | | - Aristotle N. Voineskos
- Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Jun Young Park
- Department of Statistical SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Feng Y, Chandio BQ, Villalon-Reina JE, Thomopoulos SI, Nir TM, Benavidez S, Laltoo E, Chattopadhyay T, Joshi H, Venkatasubramanian G, John JP, Jahanshad N, Reid RI, Jack CR, Weiner MW, Thompson PM. Microstructural Mapping of Neural Pathways in Alzheimer's Disease using Macrostructure-Informed Normative Tractometry. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.04.25.591183. [PMID: 38712293 PMCID: PMC11071453 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.25.591183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Diffusion MRI is sensitive to the microstructural properties of brain tissues, and shows great promise in detecting the effects of degenerative diseases. However, many approaches analyze single measures averaged over regions of interest, without considering the underlying fiber geometry. Methods Here, we propose a novel Macrostructure-Informed Normative Tractometry (MINT) framework, to investigate how white matter microstructure and macrostructure are jointly altered in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. We compare MINT-derived metrics with univariate metrics from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), to examine how fiber geometry may impact interpretation of microstructure. Results In two multi-site cohorts from North America and India, we find consistent patterns of microstructural and macrostructural anomalies implicated in MCI and dementia; we also rank diffusion metrics' sensitivity to dementia. Discussion We show that MINT, by jointly modeling tract shape and microstructure, has potential to disentangle and better interpret the effects of degenerative disease on the brain's neural pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixue Feng
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Bramsh Q. Chandio
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Julio E. Villalon-Reina
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Sophia I. Thomopoulos
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Talia M. Nir
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Sebastian Benavidez
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Emily Laltoo
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Tamoghna Chattopadhyay
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Himanshu Joshi
- Multimodal Brain Image Analysis Laboratory National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Ganesan Venkatasubramanian
- Translational Psychiatry Laboratory, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - John P. John
- Multimodal Brain Image Analysis Laboratory National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Neda Jahanshad
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | - Robert I. Reid
- Department of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Clifford R. Jack
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Michael W. Weiner
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Paul M. Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Luo AC, Sydnor VJ, Pines A, Larsen B, Alexander-Bloch AF, Cieslak M, Covitz S, Chen AA, Esper NB, Feczko E, Franco AR, Gur RE, Gur RC, Houghton A, Hu F, Keller AS, Kiar G, Mehta K, Salum GA, Tapera T, Xu T, Zhao C, Salo T, Fair DA, Shinohara RT, Milham MP, Satterthwaite TD. Functional connectivity development along the sensorimotor-association axis enhances the cortical hierarchy. Nat Commun 2024; 15:3511. [PMID: 38664387 PMCID: PMC11045762 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47748-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Human cortical maturation has been posited to be organized along the sensorimotor-association axis, a hierarchical axis of brain organization that spans from unimodal sensorimotor cortices to transmodal association cortices. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that the development of functional connectivity during childhood through adolescence conforms to the cortical hierarchy defined by the sensorimotor-association axis. We tested this pre-registered hypothesis in four large-scale, independent datasets (total n = 3355; ages 5-23 years): the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (n = 1207), Nathan Kline Institute-Rockland Sample (n = 397), Human Connectome Project: Development (n = 625), and Healthy Brain Network (n = 1126). Across datasets, the development of functional connectivity systematically varied along the sensorimotor-association axis. Connectivity in sensorimotor regions increased, whereas connectivity in association cortices declined, refining and reinforcing the cortical hierarchy. These consistent and generalizable results establish that the sensorimotor-association axis of cortical organization encodes the dominant pattern of functional connectivity development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey C Luo
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Valerie J Sydnor
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Adam Pines
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Bart Larsen
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Aaron F Alexander-Bloch
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Matthew Cieslak
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Sydney Covitz
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Andrew A Chen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | | | - Eric Feczko
- Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Alexandre R Franco
- Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, 10962, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Ruben C Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Audrey Houghton
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Fengling Hu
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Arielle S Keller
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Gregory Kiar
- Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Kahini Mehta
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Giovanni A Salum
- Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Section on Negative Affect and Social Processes, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Tinashe Tapera
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Ting Xu
- Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Chenying Zhao
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Taylor Salo
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Damien A Fair
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
- Institute of Child Development, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Michael P Milham
- Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, 10962, USA
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Souza R, Winder A, Stanley EAM, Vigneshwaran V, Camacho M, Camicioli R, Monchi O, Wilms M, Forkert ND. Identifying Biases in a Multicenter MRI Database for Parkinson's Disease Classification: Is the Disease Classifier a Secret Site Classifier? IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2024; 28:2047-2054. [PMID: 38198251 DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2024.3352513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Sharing multicenter imaging datasets can be advantageous to increase data diversity and size but may lead to spurious correlations between site-related biological and non-biological image features and target labels, which machine learning (ML) models may exploit as shortcuts. To date, studies analyzing how and if deep learning models may use such effects as a shortcut are scarce. Thus, the aim of this work was to investigate if site-related effects are encoded in the feature space of an established deep learning model designed for Parkinson's disease (PD) classification based on T1-weighted MRI datasets. Therefore, all layers of the PD classifier were frozen, except for the last layer of the network, which was replaced by a linear layer that was exclusively re-trained to predict three potential bias types (biological sex, scanner type, and originating site). Our findings based on a large database consisting of 1880 MRI scans collected across 41 centers show that the feature space of the established PD model (74% accuracy) can be used to classify sex (75% accuracy), scanner type (79% accuracy), and site location (71% accuracy) with high accuracies despite this information never being explicitly provided to the PD model during original training. Overall, the results of this study suggest that trained image-based classifiers may use unwanted shortcuts that are not meaningful for the actual clinical task at hand. This finding may explain why many image-based deep learning models do not perform well when applied to data from centers not contributing to the training set.
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang R, Chen L, Oliver LD, Voineskos AN, Park JY. SAN: mitigating spatial covariance heterogeneity in cortical thickness data collected from multiple scanners or sites. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.12.04.569619. [PMID: 38105933 PMCID: PMC10723364 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.04.569619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
In neuroimaging studies, combining data collected from multiple study sites or scanners is becoming common to increase the reproducibility of scientific discoveries. At the same time, unwanted variations arise by using different scanners (inter-scanner biases), which need to be corrected before downstream analyses to facilitate replicable research and prevent spurious findings. While statistical harmonization methods such as ComBat have become popular in mitigating inter-scanner biases in neuroimaging, recent methodological advances have shown that harmonizing heterogeneous covariances results in higher data quality. In vertex-level cortical thickness data, heterogeneity in spatial autocorrelation is a critical factor that affects covariance heterogeneity. Our work proposes a new statistical harmonization method called SAN (Spatial Autocorrelation Normalization) that preserves homogeneous covariance vertex-level cortical thickness data across different scanners. We use an explicit Gaussian process to characterize scanner-invariant and scanner-specific variations to reconstruct spatially homogeneous data across scanners. SAN is computationally feasible, and it easily allows the integration of existing harmonization methods. We demonstrate the utility of the proposed method using cortical thickness data from the Social Processes Initiative in the Neurobiology of the Schizophrenia(s) (SPINS) study. SAN is publicly available as an R package.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongqian Zhang
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Linxi Chen
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Aristotle N. Voineskos
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jun Young Park
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tsugawa S, Honda S, Noda Y, Wannan C, Zalesky A, Tarumi R, Iwata Y, Ogyu K, Plitman E, Ueno F, Mimura M, Uchida H, Chakravarty M, Graff-Guerrero A, Nakajima S. Associations Between Structural Covariance Network and Antipsychotic Treatment Response in Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2024; 50:382-392. [PMID: 37978044 PMCID: PMC10919786 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbad160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS Schizophrenia is associated with widespread cortical thinning and abnormality in the structural covariance network, which may reflect connectome alterations due to treatment effect or disease progression. Notably, patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) have stronger and more widespread cortical thinning, but it remains unclear whether structural covariance is associated with treatment response in schizophrenia. STUDY DESIGN We organized a multicenter magnetic resonance imaging study to assess structural covariance in a large population of TRS and non-TRS, who had been resistant and responsive to non-clozapine antipsychotics, respectively. Whole-brain structural covariance for cortical thickness was assessed in 102 patients with TRS, 77 patients with non-TRS, and 79 healthy controls (HC). Network-based statistics were used to examine the difference in structural covariance networks among the 3 groups. Moreover, the relationship between altered individual differentiated structural covariance and clinico-demographics was also explored. STUDY RESULTS Patients with non-TRS exhibited greater structural covariance compared with HC, mainly in the fronto-temporal and fronto-occipital regions, while there were no significant differences in structural covariance between TRS and non-TRS or HC. Higher individual differentiated structural covariance was associated with lower general scores of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale in the non-TRS group, but not in the TRS group. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that reconfiguration of brain networks via coordinated cortical thinning is related to treatment response in schizophrenia. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to confirm if greater structural covariance could serve as a marker for treatment response in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakiko Tsugawa
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiori Honda
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Noda
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Cassandra Wannan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrew Zalesky
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Melbourne School of Engineering, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ryosuke Tarumi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Komagino Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Iwata
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Kamiyu Ogyu
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, National Hospital Organization Shimofusa Psychiatric Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Eric Plitman
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Fumihiko Ueno
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Masaru Mimura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Uchida
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mallar Chakravarty
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Computational Brain Anatomy Laboratory, Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sone D, Young A, Shinagawa S, Tsugawa S, Iwata Y, Tarumi R, Ogyu K, Honda S, Ochi R, Matsushita K, Ueno F, Hondo N, Koreki A, Torres-Carmona E, Mar W, Chan N, Koizumi T, Kato H, Kusudo K, de Luca V, Gerretsen P, Remington G, Onaya M, Noda Y, Uchida H, Mimura M, Shigeta M, Graff-Guerrero A, Nakajima S. Disease Progression Patterns of Brain Morphology in Schizophrenia: More Progressed Stages in Treatment Resistance. Schizophr Bull 2024; 50:393-402. [PMID: 38007605 PMCID: PMC10919766 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbad164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS Given the heterogeneity and possible disease progression in schizophrenia, identifying the neurobiological subtypes and progression patterns in each patient may lead to novel biomarkers. Here, we adopted data-driven machine-learning techniques to identify the progression patterns of brain morphological changes in schizophrenia and investigate the association with treatment resistance. STUDY DESIGN In this cross-sectional multicenter study, we included 177 patients with schizophrenia, characterized by treatment response or resistance, with 3D T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Cortical thickness and subcortical volumes calculated by FreeSurfer were converted into z scores using 73 healthy controls data. The Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) algorithm was used for unsupervised machine-learning analysis. STUDY RESULTS SuStaIn identified 3 different subtypes: (1) subcortical volume reduction (SC) type (73 patients), in which volume reduction of subcortical structures occurs first and moderate cortical thinning follows, (2) globus pallidus hypertrophy and cortical thinning (GP-CX) type (42 patients), in which globus pallidus hypertrophy initially occurs followed by progressive cortical thinning, and (3) cortical thinning (pure CX) type (39 patients), in which thinning of the insular and lateral temporal lobe cortices primarily happens. The remaining 23 patients were assigned to baseline stage of progression (no change). SuStaIn also found 84 stages of progression, and treatment-resistant schizophrenia showed significantly more progressed stages than treatment-responsive cases (P = .001). The GP-CX type presented earlier stages than the pure CX type (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS The brain morphological progressions in schizophrenia can be classified into 3 subtypes, and treatment resistance was associated with more progressed stages, which may suggest a novel biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daichi Sone
- Department of Psychiatry, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alexandra Young
- Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Sakiko Tsugawa
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Iwata
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Tarumi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kamiyu Ogyu
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiori Honda
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Ochi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Karin Matsushita
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Ueno
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Hondo
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Koreki
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Wanna Mar
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nathan Chan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Teruki Koizumi
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Kato
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Kusudo
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Vincenzo de Luca
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Philip Gerretsen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gary Remington
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mitsumoto Onaya
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Noda
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Uchida
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaru Mimura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Shigeta
- Department of Psychiatry, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Shinichiro Nakajima
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yu X, Yang Q, Tang Y, Gao R, Bao S, Cai LY, Lee HH, Huo Y, Moore AZ, Ferrucci L, Landman BA. Deep conditional generative model for longitudinal single-slice abdominal computed tomography harmonization. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2024; 11:024008. [PMID: 38571764 PMCID: PMC10987005 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.11.2.024008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Two-dimensional single-slice abdominal computed tomography (CT) provides a detailed tissue map with high resolution allowing quantitative characterization of relationships between health conditions and aging. However, longitudinal analysis of body composition changes using these scans is difficult due to positional variation between slices acquired in different years, which leads to different organs/tissues being captured. Approach To address this issue, we propose C-SliceGen, which takes an arbitrary axial slice in the abdominal region as a condition and generates a pre-defined vertebral level slice by estimating structural changes in the latent space. Results Our experiments on 2608 volumetric CT data from two in-house datasets and 50 subjects from the 2015 Multi-Atlas Abdomen Labeling Challenge Beyond the Cranial Vault (BTCV) dataset demonstrate that our model can generate high-quality images that are realistic and similar. We further evaluate our method's capability to harmonize longitudinal positional variation on 1033 subjects from the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging dataset, which contains longitudinal single abdominal slices, and confirmed that our method can harmonize the slice positional variance in terms of visceral fat area. Conclusion This approach provides a promising direction for mapping slices from different vertebral levels to a target slice and reducing positional variance for single-slice longitudinal analysis. The source code is available at: https://github.com/MASILab/C-SliceGen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Yu
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Qi Yang
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Yucheng Tang
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Riqiang Gao
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Shunxing Bao
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Leon Y. Cai
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Ho Hin Lee
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Yuankai Huo
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | | | - Luigi Ferrucci
- National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Bennett A. Landman
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zhu AH, Nir TM, Javid S, Villalon-Reina JE, Rodrigue AL, Strike LT, de Zubicaray GI, McMahon KL, Wright MJ, Medland SE, Blangero J, Glahn DC, Kochunov P, Håberg AK, Thompson PM, Jahanshad N. Lifespan reference curves for harmonizing multi-site regional brain white matter metrics from diffusion MRI. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.02.22.581646. [PMID: 38463962 PMCID: PMC10925090 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.22.581646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
Age-related white matter (WM) microstructure maturation and decline occur throughout the human lifespan, complementing the process of gray matter development and degeneration. Here, we create normative lifespan reference curves for global and regional WM microstructure by harmonizing diffusion MRI (dMRI)-derived data from ten public datasets (N = 40,898 subjects; age: 3-95 years; 47.6% male). We tested three harmonization methods on regional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) based fractional anisotropy (FA), a metric of WM microstructure, extracted using the ENIGMA-DTI pipeline. ComBat-GAM harmonization provided multi-study trajectories most consistent with known WM maturation peaks. Lifespan FA reference curves were validated with test-retest data and used to assess the effect of the ApoE4 risk factor for dementia in WM across the lifespan. We found significant associations between ApoE4 and FA in WM regions associated with neurodegenerative disease even in healthy individuals across the lifespan, with regional age-by-genotype interactions. Our lifespan reference curves and tools to harmonize new dMRI data to the curves are publicly available as eHarmonize (https://github.com/ahzhu/eharmonize).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa H Zhu
- Imaging Genetics Center, USC Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Marina del Rey, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, USC Viterbi School of Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Talia M Nir
- Imaging Genetics Center, USC Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Marina del Rey, CA, USA
| | - Shayan Javid
- Imaging Genetics Center, USC Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Marina del Rey, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, USC Viterbi School of Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Julio E Villalon-Reina
- Imaging Genetics Center, USC Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Marina del Rey, CA, USA
| | - Amanda L Rodrigue
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lachlan T Strike
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Katie L McMahon
- Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Margaret J Wright
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sarah E Medland
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Psychology, `, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - John Blangero
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, TX, USA
- South Texas Diabetes and Obesity Institute, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, TX, USA
| | - David C Glahn
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Peter Kochunov
- Faillace Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Asta K Håberg
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Department of MiDtT National Research Center, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Paul M Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, USC Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Marina del Rey, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, USC Viterbi School of Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Neda Jahanshad
- Imaging Genetics Center, USC Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Marina del Rey, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, USC Viterbi School of Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Marzi C, Giannelli M, Barucci A, Tessa C, Mascalchi M, Diciotti S. Efficacy of MRI data harmonization in the age of machine learning: a multicenter study across 36 datasets. Sci Data 2024; 11:115. [PMID: 38263181 PMCID: PMC10805868 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02421-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Pooling publicly-available MRI data from multiple sites allows to assemble extensive groups of subjects, increase statistical power, and promote data reuse with machine learning techniques. The harmonization of multicenter data is necessary to reduce the confounding effect associated with non-biological sources of variability in the data. However, when applied to the entire dataset before machine learning, the harmonization leads to data leakage, because information outside the training set may affect model building, and potentially falsely overestimate performance. We propose a 1) measurement of the efficacy of data harmonization; 2) harmonizer transformer, i.e., an implementation of the ComBat harmonization allowing its encapsulation among the preprocessing steps of a machine learning pipeline, avoiding data leakage by design. We tested these tools using brain T1-weighted MRI data from 1740 healthy subjects acquired at 36 sites. After harmonization, the site effect was removed or reduced, and we showed the data leakage effect in predicting individual age from MRI data, highlighting that introducing the harmonizer transformer into a machine learning pipeline allows for avoiding data leakage by design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Marzi
- Department of Statistics, Computer Science and Applications "Giuseppe Parenti", University of Florence, 50134, Florence, Italy
- "Nello Carrara" Institute of Applied Physics (IFAC), National Research Council (CNR), 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Giannelli
- Unit of Medical Physics, Pisa University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana", 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrea Barucci
- "Nello Carrara" Institute of Applied Physics (IFAC), National Research Council (CNR), 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlo Tessa
- Radiology Unit Apuane e Lunigiana, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, 54100, Massa, Italy
| | - Mario Mascalchi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, 50139, Florence, Italy
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Governance, Institute for Study, Prevention and netwoRk in Oncology (ISPRO), 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Diciotti
- Department of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi" - DEI, University of Bologna, 47522, Cesena, Italy.
- Alma Mater Research Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, University of Bologna, 40121, Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rieck J, Wrobel J, Porras AR, McRae K, Gowin JL. Neural signatures of emotion regulation. Sci Rep 2024; 14:1775. [PMID: 38245590 PMCID: PMC10799868 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52203-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Emotional experience is central to a fulfilling life. Although exposure to negative experiences is inevitable, an individual's emotion regulation response may buffer against psychopathology. Identification of neural activation patterns associated with emotion regulation via an fMRI task is a promising and non-invasive means of furthering our understanding of the how the brain engages with negative experiences. Prior work has applied multivariate pattern analysis to identify signatures of response to negative emotion-inducing images; we adapt these techniques to establish novel neural signatures associated with conscious efforts to modulate emotional response. We model voxel-level activation via LASSO principal components regression and linear discriminant analysis to predict if a subject was engaged in emotion regulation and to identify brain regions which define this emotion regulation signature. We train our models using 82 participants and evaluate them on a holdout sample of 40 participants, demonstrating an accuracy up to 82.5% across three classes. Our results suggest that emotion regulation produces a unique signature that is differentiable from passive viewing of negative and neutral imagery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared Rieck
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Julia Wrobel
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Antonio R Porras
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Surgery, and Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Pediatric Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Deparment of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kateri McRae
- Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Joshua L Gowin
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rosario MA, Kern KL, Mumtaz S, Storer TW, Schon K. Cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with cortical thickness of medial temporal brain areas associated with spatial cognition in young but not older adults. Eur J Neurosci 2024; 59:82-100. [PMID: 38056827 PMCID: PMC10979765 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Cardiorespiratory fitness has a potent effect on neurocognitive health, especially regarding the hippocampal memory system. However, less is known about the impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on medial temporal lobe extrahippocampal neocortical regions. Specifically, it is unclear how cardiorespiratory fitness modulates these brain regions in young adulthood and if these regions are differentially related to cardiorespiratory fitness in young versus older adults. The primary goal of this study was to investigate if cardiorespiratory fitness predicted medial temporal lobe cortical thickness which, with the hippocampus, are critical for spatial learning and memory. Additionally, given the established role of these cortices in spatial navigation, we sought to determine if cardiorespiratory fitness and medial temporal lobe cortical thickness would predict greater subjective sense of direction in both young and older adults. Cross-sectional data from 56 young adults (20-35 years) and 44 older adults (55-85 years) were included. FreeSurfer 6.0 was used to automatically segment participants' 3T T1-weighted images. Using hierarchical multiple regression analyses, we confirmed significant associations between greater cardiorespiratory fitness and greater left entorhinal, left parahippocampal, and left perirhinal cortical thickness in young, but not older, adults. Left parahippocampal cortical thickness interacted with age group to differentially predict subjective sense of direction in young and older adults. Young adults displayed a positive, and older adults a negative, correlation between left parahippocampal cortical thickness and sense of direction. Our findings extend previous work on the association between cardiorespiratory fitness and hippocampal subfield structure in young adults to left medial temporal lobe neocortical regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A. Rosario
- Graduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn L. Kern
- Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shiraz Mumtaz
- Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas W. Storer
- Men’s Health, Aging, and Metabolism Unit, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karin Schon
- Graduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Boston University Aram V. Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Park S, Thomson P, Kiar G, Castellanos FX, Milham MP, Bernhardt B, Di Martino A. Delineating a Pathway for the Discovery of Functional Connectome Biomarkers of Autism. ADVANCES IN NEUROBIOLOGY 2024; 40:511-544. [PMID: 39562456 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2024]
Abstract
The promise of individually tailored care for autism has driven efforts to establish biomarkers. This chapter appraises the state of precision-medicine research focused on biomarkers based on the functional brain connectome. This work is grounded on abundant evidence supporting the brain dysconnection model of autism and the advantages of resting-state functional MRI (R-fMRI) for studying the brain in vivo. After considering biomarker requirements of consistency and clinical relevance, we provide a scoping review of R-fMRI studies of individual prediction in autism. In the past 10 years, responding to the availability of open data through the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange, machine learning studies have surged. Nearly all have focused on diagnostic label classification. These efforts have shown that autism prediction is feasible using functional connectome markers, with accuracy reported well above chance. In parallel, emerging approaches more directly addressing autism heterogeneity are paving the way for much-needed biomarkers of longitudinal outcome and treatment response. We conclude with key challenges to be addressed by the next generation of studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinwon Park
- Child Mind Institute, Autism Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Gregory Kiar
- Child Mind Institute, Center for Data Analytics, Innovation, and Rigor, New York, NY, USA
| | - F Xavier Castellanos
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA
| | - Michael P Milham
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA
- Child Mind Institute, Center for the Developing Brain, New York, NY, USA
| | - Boris Bernhardt
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ottino-González J, Cupertino RB, Cao Z, Hahn S, Pancholi D, Albaugh MD, Brumback T, Baker FC, Brown SA, Clark DB, de Zambotti M, Goldston DB, Luna B, Nagel BJ, Nooner KB, Pohl KM, Tapert SF, Thompson WK, Jernigan TL, Conrod P, Mackey S, Garavan H. Brain structural covariance network features are robust markers of early heavy alcohol use. Addiction 2024; 119:113-124. [PMID: 37724052 PMCID: PMC10872365 DOI: 10.1111/add.16330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Recently, we demonstrated that a distinct pattern of structural covariance networks (SCN) from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived measurements of brain cortical thickness characterized young adults with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and predicted current and future problematic drinking in adolescents relative to controls. Here, we establish the robustness and value of SCN for identifying heavy alcohol users in three additional independent studies. DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies using data from the Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition and Genetics (PING) study (n = 400, age range = 14-22 years), the National Consortium on Alcohol and Neurodevelopment in Adolescence (NCANDA) (n = 272, age range = 17-22 years) and the Human Connectome Project (HCP) (n = 375, age range = 22-37 years). CASES Cases were defined based on heavy alcohol use patterns or former alcohol use disorder (AUD) diagnoses: 50, 68 and 61 cases were identified. Controls had none or low alcohol use or absence of AUD: 350, 204 and 314 controls were selected. MEASUREMENTS Graph theory metrics of segregation and integration were used to summarize SCN. FINDINGS Mirroring our prior findings, and across the three data sets, cases had a lower clustering coefficient [area under the curve (AUC) = -0.029, P = 0.002], lower modularity (AUC = -0.14, P = 0.004), lower average shortest path length (AUC = -0.078, P = 0.017) and higher global efficiency (AUC = 0.007, P = 0.010). Local efficiency differences were marginal (AUC = -0.017, P = 0.052). That is, cases exhibited lower network segregation and higher integration, suggesting that adjacent nodes (i.e. brain regions) were less similar in thickness whereas spatially distant nodes were more similar. CONCLUSION Structural covariance network (SCN) differences in the brain appear to constitute an early marker of heavy alcohol use in three new data sets and, more generally, demonstrate the utility of SCN-derived metrics to detect brain-related psychopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonatan Ottino-González
- Division of Endocrinology, The Saban Research Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Renata B. Cupertino
- Department of Genetics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Zhipeng Cao
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Sage Hahn
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Devarshi Pancholi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Matthew D. Albaugh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Ty Brumback
- Department of Psychological Science, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY, USA
| | - Fiona C. Baker
- Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Sandra A. Brown
- Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Duncan B. Clark
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - David B. Goldston
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Beatriz Luna
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Bonnie J. Nagel
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kate B. Nooner
- Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA
| | - Kilian M. Pohl
- Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Susan F. Tapert
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Wesley K. Thompson
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Terry L. Jernigan
- Center for Human Development, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Patricia Conrod
- Department of Psychiatry, Université de Montreal, CHU Ste Justine Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Scott Mackey
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Hugh Garavan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ge R, Ching CRK, Bassett AS, Kushan L, Antshel KM, van Amelsvoort T, Bakker G, Butcher NJ, Campbell LE, Chow EWC, Craig M, Crossley NA, Cunningham A, Daly E, Doherty JL, Durdle CA, Emanuel BS, Fiksinski A, Forsyth JK, Fremont W, Goodrich‐Hunsaker NJ, Gudbrandsen M, Gur RE, Jalbrzikowski M, Kates WR, Lin A, Linden DEJ, McCabe KL, McDonald‐McGinn D, Moss H, Murphy DG, Murphy KC, Owen MJ, Villalon‐Reina JE, Repetto GM, Roalf DR, Ruparel K, Schmitt JE, Schuite‐Koops S, Angkustsiri K, Sun D, Vajdi A, van den Bree M, Vorstman J, Thompson PM, Vila‐Rodriguez F, Bearden CE. Source-based morphometry reveals structural brain pattern abnormalities in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Hum Brain Mapp 2024; 45:e26553. [PMID: 38224541 PMCID: PMC10785196 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is the most frequently occurring microdeletion in humans. It is associated with a significant impact on brain structure, including prominent reductions in gray matter volume (GMV), and neuropsychiatric manifestations, including cognitive impairment and psychosis. It is unclear whether GMV alterations in 22q11DS occur according to distinct structural patterns. Then, 783 participants (470 with 22q11DS: 51% females, mean age [SD] 18.2 [9.2]; and 313 typically developing [TD] controls: 46% females, mean age 18.0 [8.6]) from 13 datasets were included in the present study. We segmented structural T1-weighted brain MRI scans and extracted GMV images, which were then utilized in a novel source-based morphometry (SBM) pipeline (SS-Detect) to generate structural brain patterns (SBPs) that capture co-varying GMV. We investigated the impact of the 22q11.2 deletion, deletion size, intelligence quotient, and psychosis on the SBPs. Seventeen GMV-SBPs were derived, which provided spatial patterns of GMV covariance associated with a quantitative metric (i.e., loading score) for analysis. Patterns of topographically widespread differences in GMV covariance, including the cerebellum, discriminated individuals with 22q11DS from healthy controls. The spatial extents of the SBPs that revealed disparities between individuals with 22q11DS and controls were consistent with the findings of the univariate voxel-based morphometry analysis. Larger deletion size was associated with significantly lower GMV in frontal and occipital SBPs; however, history of psychosis did not show a strong relationship with these covariance patterns. 22q11DS is associated with distinct structural abnormalities captured by topographical GMV covariance patterns that include the cerebellum. Findings indicate that structural anomalies in 22q11DS manifest in a nonrandom manner and in distinct covarying anatomical patterns, rather than a diffuse global process. These SBP abnormalities converge with previously reported cortical surface area abnormalities, suggesting disturbances of early neurodevelopment as the most likely underlying mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiyang Ge
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | | | - Anne S. Bassett
- Clinical Genetics Research ProgramCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoOntarioCanada
- The Dalglish Family 22q Clinic, Department of Psychiatry and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research InstituteCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Leila Kushan
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human BehaviorUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | - Geor Bakker
- Department of Psychiatry and NeuropsychologyMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtNetherlands
| | - Nancy J. Butcher
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Child Health Evaluative SciencesThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoOntarioCanada
| | | | - Eva W. C. Chow
- Clinical Genetics Research ProgramCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Michael Craig
- Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment and Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, King's College LondonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
- National Autism UnitBethlem Royal HospitalBeckenhamUK
| | - Nicolas A. Crossley
- Department of PsychiatryPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileSantiagoChile
| | - Adam Cunningham
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical NeurosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Eileen Daly
- Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment and Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, King's College LondonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
| | - Joanne L. Doherty
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical NeurosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of PsychologyCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Courtney A. Durdle
- Department of PediatricsUC Davis MIND InstituteDavisCaliforniaUSA
- Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesUC Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraCaliforniaUSA
| | - Beverly S. Emanuel
- Division of Human GeneticsThe Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Ania Fiksinski
- Department of Psychology and Department of Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's HospitalUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Division of Mental Health, MHeNSMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtNetherlands
| | - Jennifer K. Forsyth
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human BehaviorUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Wanda Fremont
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences State University of New YorkUpstate Medical University SyracuseNew YorkUSA
| | - Naomi J. Goodrich‐Hunsaker
- Department of PediatricsUC Davis MIND InstituteDavisCaliforniaUSA
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Maria Gudbrandsen
- Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment and Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, King's College LondonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
- Centre for Research in Psychological Wellbeing (CREW), School of PsychologyUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUK
| | - Raquel E. Gur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Maria Jalbrzikowski
- Department of PsychiatryHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesBoston Children's HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Wendy R. Kates
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences State University of New YorkUpstate Medical University SyracuseNew YorkUSA
| | - Amy Lin
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human BehaviorUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Graduate Interdepartmental Program in NeuroscienceUCLA School of MedicineLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - David E. J. Linden
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical NeurosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Kathryn L. McCabe
- School of PsychologyUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
- Department of PediatricsUC Davis MIND InstituteDavisCaliforniaUSA
| | - Donna McDonald‐McGinn
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- 22q and You Center, Clinical Genetics Center, and Division of Human GeneticsThe Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Human Biology and Medical GeneticsSapienza UniversityRomeItaly
| | - Hayley Moss
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical NeurosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Declan G. Murphy
- Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment and Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, King's College LondonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
- Behavioural Genetics Clinic, Adult Autism Service, Behavioural and Developmental Psychiatry Clinical Academic GroupSouth London and Maudsley Foundation NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Kieran C. Murphy
- Department of PsychiatryRoyal College of Surgeons in IrelandDublinIreland
| | - Michael J. Owen
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical NeurosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | | | - Gabriela M. Repetto
- Centro de Genetica y Genomica, Facultad de MedicinaClinica Alemana Universidad del DesarrolloSantiagoChile
| | - David R. Roalf
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Kosha Ruparel
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - J. Eric Schmitt
- Department of Radiology and PsychiatryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Sanne Schuite‐Koops
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity Medical Center Groningen, Rijksuniversiteit GroningenGroningenNetherlands
| | | | - Daqiang Sun
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human BehaviorUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ariana Vajdi
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human BehaviorUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine PasadenaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Marianne van den Bree
- MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical NeurosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Jacob Vorstman
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
- Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, Research Institute, and Department of PsychiatryThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Paul M. Thompson
- Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Radiology, Engineering, Pediatrics and OphthalmologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Fidel Vila‐Rodriguez
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- School of Biomedical Engineering University of British Columbia VancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Carrie E. Bearden
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human BehaviorUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Tu JC, Millar PR, Strain JF, Eck A, Adeyemo B, Daniels A, Karch C, Huey ED, McDade E, Day GS, Yakushev I, Hassenstab J, Morris J, Llibre-Guerra JJ, Ibanez L, Jucker M, Mendez PC, Bateman RJ, Perrin RJ, Benzinger T, Jack CR, Betzel R, Ances BM, Eggebrecht AT, Gordon BA, Wheelock MD. Increasing hub disruption parallels dementia severity in autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.10.29.564633. [PMID: 37961586 PMCID: PMC10634945 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.29.564633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Hub regions in the brain, recognized for their roles in ensuring efficient information transfer, are vulnerable to pathological alterations in neurodegenerative conditions, including Alzheimer Disease (AD). Given their essential role in neural communication, disruptions to these hubs have profound implications for overall brain network integrity and functionality. Hub disruption, or targeted impairment of functional connectivity at the hubs, is recognized in AD patients. Computational models paired with evidence from animal experiments hint at a mechanistic explanation, suggesting that these hubs may be preferentially targeted in neurodegeneration, due to their high neuronal activity levels-a phenomenon termed "activity-dependent degeneration". Yet, two critical issues were unresolved. First, past research hasn't definitively shown whether hub regions face a higher likelihood of impairment (targeted attack) compared to other regions or if impairment likelihood is uniformly distributed (random attack). Second, human studies offering support for activity-dependent explanations remain scarce. We applied a refined hub disruption index to determine the presence of targeted attacks in AD. Furthermore, we explored potential evidence for activity-dependent degeneration by evaluating if hub vulnerability is better explained by global connectivity or connectivity variations across functional systems, as well as comparing its timing relative to amyloid beta deposition in the brain. Our unique cohort of participants with autosomal dominant Alzheimer Disease (ADAD) allowed us to probe into the preclinical stages of AD to determine the hub disruption timeline in relation to expected symptom emergence. Our findings reveal a hub disruption pattern in ADAD aligned with targeted attacks, detectable even in pre-clinical stages. Notably, the disruption's severity amplified alongside symptomatic progression. Moreover, since excessive local neuronal activity has been shown to increase amyloid deposition and high connectivity regions show high level of neuronal activity, our observation that hub disruption was primarily tied to regional differences in global connectivity and sequentially followed changes observed in Aβ PET cortical markers is consistent with the activity-dependent degeneration model. Intriguingly, these disruptions were discernible 8 years before the expected age of symptom onset. Taken together, our findings not only align with the targeted attack on hubs model but also suggest that activity-dependent degeneration might be the cause of hub vulnerability. This deepened understanding could be instrumental in refining diagnostic techniques and developing targeted therapeutic strategies for AD in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxin Cindy Tu
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Peter R Millar
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Jeremy F Strain
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Andrew Eck
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Babatunde Adeyemo
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Alisha Daniels
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Celeste Karch
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Edward D Huey
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912
| | - Eric McDade
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Gregory S Day
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA, 32224
| | - Igor Yakushev
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 81675
| | - Jason Hassenstab
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - John Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Jorge J Llibre-Guerra
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Laura Ibanez
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
- NeuroGenomics and Informatics Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Mathias Jucker
- Department of Cellular Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 72076
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany, 72076
| | | | - Randell J Bateman
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Richard J Perrin
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Tammie Benzinger
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Clifford R Jack
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA 55905
| | - Richard Betzel
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN USA, 47405
| | - Beau M Ances
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Adam T Eggebrecht
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Brian A Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| | - Muriah D Wheelock
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA, 63108
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shafiei G, Keller AS, Bertolero M, Shanmugan S, Bassett DS, Chen AA, Covitz S, Houghton A, Luo A, Mehta K, Salo T, Shinohara RT, Fair D, Hallquist MN, Satterthwaite TD. Generalizable links between symptoms of borderline personality disorder and functional connectivity. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.08.03.551534. [PMID: 37662311 PMCID: PMC10473667 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.03.551534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Background | Symptoms of borderline personality disorder (BPD) often manifest in adolescence, yet the underlying relationship between these debilitating symptoms and the development of functional brain networks is not well understood. Here we aimed to investigate how multivariate patterns of functional connectivity are associated with symptoms of BPD in a large sample of young adults and adolescents. Methods | We used high-quality functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data from young adults from the Human Connectome Project: Young Adults (HCP-YA; N = 870, ages 22-37 years, 457 female) and youth from the Human Connectome Project: Development (HCP-D; N = 223, age range 16-21 years, 121 female). A previously validated BPD proxy score was derived from the NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). A ridge regression model with 10-fold cross-validation and nested hyperparameter tuning was trained and tested in HCP-YA to predict BPD scores in unseen data from regional functional connectivity, while controlling for in-scanner motion, age, and sex. The trained model was further tested on data from HCP-D without further tuning. Finally, we tested how the connectivity patterns associated with BPD aligned with age-related changes in connectivity. Results | Multivariate functional connectivity patterns significantly predicted out-of-sample BPD proxy scores in unseen data in both young adults (HCP-YA; pperm = 0.001) and older adolescents (HCP-D; pperm = 0.001). Predictive capacity of regions was heterogeneous; the most predictive regions were found in functional systems relevant for emotion regulation and executive function, including the ventral attention network. Finally, regional functional connectivity patterns that predicted BPD proxy scores aligned with those associated with development in youth. Conclusion | Individual differences in functional connectivity in developmentally-sensitive regions are associated with the symptoms of BPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Golia Shafiei
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Arielle S. Keller
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Maxwell Bertolero
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Sheila Shanmugan
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Dani S. Bassett
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Department of Physics & Astronomy, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501
| | - Andrew A. Chen
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics,Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Sydney Covitz
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Audrey Houghton
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA
| | - Audrey Luo
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Kahini Mehta
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Taylor Salo
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Russell T. Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics,Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Damien Fair
- Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA
- Institute of Child Development, College of Education and Human Development, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA
| | - Michael N. Hallquist
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Theodore D. Satterthwaite
- Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhang R, Oliver LD, Voineskos AN, Park JY. RELIEF: A structured multivariate approach for removal of latent inter-scanner effects. IMAGING NEUROSCIENCE (CAMBRIDGE, MASS.) 2023; 1:1-16. [PMID: 37719839 PMCID: PMC10503485 DOI: 10.1162/imag_a_00011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Combining data collected from multiple study sites is becoming common and is advantageous to researchers to increase the generalizability and replicability of scientific discoveries. However, at the same time, unwanted inter-scanner biases are commonly observed across neuroimaging data collected from multiple study sites or scanners, rendering difficulties in integrating such data to obtain reliable findings. While several methods for handling such unwanted variations have been proposed, most of them use univariate approaches that could be too simple to capture all sources of scanner-specific variations. To address these challenges, we propose a novel multivariate harmonization method called RELIEF (REmoval of Latent Inter-scanner Effects through Factorization) for estimating and removing both explicit and latent scanner effects. Our method is the first approach to introduce the simultaneous dimension reduction and factorization of interlinked matrices to a data harmonization context, which provides a new direction in methodological research for correcting inter-scanner biases. Analyzing diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data from the Social Processes Initiative in Neurobiology of the Schizophrenia (SPINS) study and conducting extensive simulation studies, we show that RELIEF outperforms existing harmonization methods in mitigating inter-scanner biases and retaining biological associations of interest to increase statistical power. RELIEF is publicly available as an R package.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongqian Zhang
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Aristotle N. Voineskos
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jun Young Park
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Xie Y, Sun J, Man W, Zhang Z, Zhang N. Personalized estimates of brain cortical structural variability in individuals with Autism spectrum disorder: the predictor of brain age and neurobiology relevance. Mol Autism 2023; 14:27. [PMID: 37507798 PMCID: PMC10375633 DOI: 10.1186/s13229-023-00558-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heritable condition related to brain development that affects a person's perception and socialization with others. Here, we examined variability in the brain morphology in ASD children and adolescent individuals at the level of brain cortical structural profiles and the level of each brain regional measure. METHODS We selected brain structural MRI data in 600 ASDs and 729 normal controls (NCs) from Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE). The personalized estimate of similarity between gray matter volume (GMV) profiles of an individual to that of others in the same group was assessed by using the person-based similarity index (PBSI). Regional contributions to PBSI score were utilized for brain age gap estimation (BrainAGE) prediction model establishment, including support vector regression (SVR), relevance vector regression (RVR), and Gaussian process regression (GPR). The association between BrainAGE prediction in ASD and clinical performance was investigated. We further explored the related inter-regional profiles of gene expression from the Allen Human Brain Atlas with variability differences in the brain morphology between groups. RESULTS The PBSI score of GMV was negatively related to age regardless of the sample group, and the PBSI score was significantly lower in ASDs than in NCs. The regional contributions to the PBSI score of 126 brain regions in ASDs showed significant differences compared to NCs. RVR model achieved the best performance for predicting brain age. Higher inter-individual brain morphology variability was related to increased brain age, specific to communication symptoms. A total of 430 genes belonging to various pathways were identified as associated with brain cortical morphometric variation. The pathways, including short-term memory, regulation of system process, and regulation of nervous system process, were dominated mainly by gene sets for manno midbrain neurotypes. LIMITATIONS There is a sample mismatch between the gene expression data and brain imaging data from ABIDE. A larger sample size can contribute to the model training of BrainAGE and the validation of the results. CONCLUSIONS ASD has personalized heterogeneity brain morphology. The brain age gap estimation and transcription-neuroimaging associations derived from this trait are replenished in an additional direction to boost the understanding of the ASD brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingying Xie
- Department of Radiology and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154, Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, China
| | - Jie Sun
- Department of Radiology and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154, Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, China
| | - Weiqi Man
- Department of Radiology and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154, Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, China
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, China
| | - Zhang Zhang
- Department of Radiology and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154, Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, China.
| | - Ningnannan Zhang
- Department of Radiology and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154, Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, China.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hu F, Chen AA, Horng H, Bashyam V, Davatzikos C, Alexander-Bloch A, Li M, Shou H, Satterthwaite TD, Yu M, Shinohara RT. Image harmonization: A review of statistical and deep learning methods for removing batch effects and evaluation metrics for effective harmonization. Neuroimage 2023; 274:120125. [PMID: 37084926 PMCID: PMC10257347 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography from multiple batches (e.g. sites, scanners, datasets, etc.) are increasingly used alongside complex downstream analyses to obtain new insights into the human brain. However, significant confounding due to batch-related technical variation, called batch effects, is present in this data; direct application of downstream analyses to the data may lead to biased results. Image harmonization methods seek to remove these batch effects and enable increased generalizability and reproducibility of downstream results. In this review, we describe and categorize current approaches in statistical and deep learning harmonization methods. We also describe current evaluation metrics used to assess harmonization methods and provide a standardized framework to evaluate newly-proposed methods for effective harmonization and preservation of biological information. Finally, we provide recommendations to end-users to advocate for more effective use of current methods and to methodologists to direct future efforts and accelerate development of the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengling Hu
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
| | - Andrew A Chen
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Hannah Horng
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Vishnu Bashyam
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine, United States
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine, United States
| | - Aaron Alexander-Bloch
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Penn-CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, United States; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States
| | - Mingyao Li
- Statistical Center for Single-Cell and Spatial Genomics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Haochang Shou
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine, United States
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Penn-CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, United States; The Penn Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Meichen Yu
- Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine, United States
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gallo S, El-Gazzar A, Zhutovsky P, Thomas RM, Javaheripour N, Li M, Bartova L, Bathula D, Dannlowski U, Davey C, Frodl T, Gotlib I, Grimm S, Grotegerd D, Hahn T, Hamilton PJ, Harrison BJ, Jansen A, Kircher T, Meyer B, Nenadić I, Olbrich S, Paul E, Pezawas L, Sacchet MD, Sämann P, Wagner G, Walter H, Walter M, van Wingen G. Functional connectivity signatures of major depressive disorder: machine learning analysis of two multicenter neuroimaging studies. Mol Psychiatry 2023; 28:3013-3022. [PMID: 36792654 PMCID: PMC10615764 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-01977-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
The promise of machine learning has fueled the hope for developing diagnostic tools for psychiatry. Initial studies showed high accuracy for the identification of major depressive disorder (MDD) with resting-state connectivity, but progress has been hampered by the absence of large datasets. Here we used regular machine learning and advanced deep learning algorithms to differentiate patients with MDD from healthy controls and identify neurophysiological signatures of depression in two of the largest resting-state datasets for MDD. We obtained resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from the REST-meta-MDD (N = 2338) and PsyMRI (N = 1039) consortia. Classification of functional connectivity matrices was done using support vector machines (SVM) and graph convolutional neural networks (GCN), and performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. Features were visualized using GCN-Explainer, an ablation study and univariate t-testing. The results showed a mean classification accuracy of 61% for MDD versus controls. Mean accuracy for classifying (non-)medicated subgroups was 62%. Sex classification accuracy was substantially better across datasets (73-81%). Visualization of the results showed that classifications were driven by stronger thalamic connections in both datasets, while nearly all other connections were weaker with small univariate effect sizes. These results suggest that whole brain resting-state connectivity is a reliable though poor biomarker for MDD, presumably due to disease heterogeneity as further supported by the higher accuracy for sex classification using the same methods. Deep learning revealed thalamic hyperconnectivity as a prominent neurophysiological signature of depression in both multicenter studies, which may guide the development of biomarkers in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selene Gallo
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ahmed El-Gazzar
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Paul Zhutovsky
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rajat M Thomas
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nooshin Javaheripour
- Department Of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Meng Li
- Department Of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Lucie Bartova
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Udo Dannlowski
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Christopher Davey
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Thomas Frodl
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- German center for mental health, CIRC, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ian Gotlib
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Simone Grimm
- Department of Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dominik Grotegerd
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Tim Hahn
- Institute for Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Paul J Hamilton
- Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ben J Harrison
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andreas Jansen
- Department Of Psychiatry, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kircher
- Department Of Psychiatry, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Igor Nenadić
- Department Of Psychiatry, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Olbrich
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Elisabeth Paul
- Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Lukas Pezawas
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthew D Sacchet
- Center for Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA
| | | | - Gerd Wagner
- Department Of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Henrik Walter
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Walter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- German center for mental health, CIRC, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Guido van Wingen
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chen Q, Chen F, Zhu Y, Long C, Lu J, Zhang X, Nedelska Z, Hort J, Chen J, Ma G, Zhang B. Reconfiguration of brain network dynamics underlying spatial deficits in subjective cognitive decline. Neurobiol Aging 2023; 127:82-93. [PMID: 37116409 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Brain dynamics and the associations with spatial navigation in individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) remain unknown. In this study, a hidden Markov model (HMM) was inferred from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data in a cohort of 80 SCD and 77 normal control (NC) participants. By HMM, 12 states with distinct brain activity were identified. The SCD group showed increased fractional occupancy in the states with less activated ventral default mode, posterior salience, and visuospatial networks, while decreased fractional occupancy in the state with general network activation. The SCD group also showed decreased probabilities of transition into and out of the state with general network activation, suggesting an inability to dynamically upregulate and downregulate brain network activity. Significant correlations between brain dynamics and spatial navigation were observed. The combined features of spatial navigation and brain dynamics showed an area under the curve of 0.854 in distinguishing between SCD and NC. The findings may provide exploratory evidence of the reconfiguration of brain network dynamics underlying spatial deficits in SCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Chen
- Department of Radiology, Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Institute of Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Futao Chen
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China; Institute of Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yajing Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Institute of Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Cong Long
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China; Institute of Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiaming Lu
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China; Institute of Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China; Institute of Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zuzana Nedelska
- Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia
| | - Jakub Hort
- Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia
| | - Jun Chen
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Guolin Ma
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bing Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China; Institute of Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Medical Imaging Center, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Nanjing, China; Institute of Brain Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yoon H, Schwedt TJ, Chong CD, Olatunde O, Wu T. Harmonizing Healthy Cohorts to Support Multicenter Studies on Migraine Classification using Brain MRI Data. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.06.26.23291909. [PMID: 37425905 PMCID: PMC10327280 DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.26.23291909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Multicenter and multi-scanner imaging studies might be needed to provide sample sizes large enough for developing accurate predictive models. However, multicenter studies, which likely include confounding factors due to subtle differences in research participant characteristics, MRI scanners, and imaging acquisition protocols, might not yield generalizable machine learning models, that is, models developed using one dataset may not be applicable to a different dataset. The generalizability of classification models is key for multi-scanner and multicenter studies, and for providing reproducible results. This study developed a data harmonization strategy to identify healthy controls with similar (homogenous) characteristics from multicenter studies to validate the generalization of machine-learning techniques for classifying individual migraine patients and healthy controls using brain MRI data. The Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) was used to compare the two datasets represented in Geodesic Flow Kernel (GFK) space, capturing the data variabilities for identifying a "healthy core". A set of homogeneous healthy controls can assist in overcoming some of the unwanted heterogeneity and allow for the development of classification models that have high accuracy when applied to new datasets. Extensive experimental results show the utilization of a healthy core. One dataset consists of 120 individuals (66 with migraine and 54 healthy controls) and another dataset consists of 76 (34 with migraine and 42 healthy controls) individuals. A homogeneous dataset derived from a cohort of healthy controls improves the performance of classification models by about 25% accuracy improvements for both episodic and chronic migraineurs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunsoo Yoon
- Yonsei University; Department of Industrial Engineering
| | - Todd J. Schwedt
- Mayo Clinic; Department of Neurology
- ASU-Mayo Center for Innovative Imaging
| | - Catherine D. Chong
- Mayo Clinic; Department of Neurology
- ASU-Mayo Center for Innovative Imaging
| | - Oyekanmi Olatunde
- Binghamton University; Department of Systems Science and Industrial Engineering
| | - Teresa Wu
- ASU-Mayo Center for Innovative Imaging
- Arizona State University; School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hu F, Lucas A, Chen AA, Coleman K, Horng H, Ng RW, Tustison NJ, Davis KA, Shou H, Li M, Shinohara RT. DeepComBat: A Statistically Motivated, Hyperparameter-Robust, Deep Learning Approach to Harmonization of Neuroimaging Data. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.04.24.537396. [PMID: 37163042 PMCID: PMC10168207 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.24.537396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Neuroimaging data from multiple batches (i.e. acquisition sites, scanner manufacturer, datasets, etc.) are increasingly necessary to gain new insights into the human brain. However, multi-batch data, as well as extracted radiomic features, exhibit pronounced technical artifacts across batches. These batch effects introduce confounding into the data and can obscure biological effects of interest, decreasing the generalizability and reproducibility of findings. This is especially true when multi-batch data is used alongside complex downstream analysis models, such as machine learning methods. Image harmonization methods seeking to remove these batch effects are important for mitigating these issues; however, significant multivariate batch effects remain in the data following harmonization by current state-of-the-art statistical and deep learning methods. We present DeepCombat, a deep learning harmonization method based on a conditional variational autoencoder architecture and the ComBat harmonization model. DeepCombat learns and removes subject-level batch effects by accounting for the multivariate relationships between features. Additionally, DeepComBat relaxes a number of strong assumptions commonly made by previous deep learning harmonization methods and is empirically robust across a wide range of hyperparameter choices. We apply this method to neuroimaging data from a large cognitive-aging cohort and find that DeepCombat outperforms existing methods, as assessed by a battery of machine learning methods, in removing scanner effects from cortical thickness measurements while preserving biological heterogeneity. Additionally, DeepComBat provides a new perspective for statistically-motivated deep learning harmonization methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengling Hu
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Alfredo Lucas
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, Department of Engineering, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew A. Chen
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Kyle Coleman
- Statistical Center for Single-Cell and Spatial Genomics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Hannah Horng
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Kathryn A. Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, Department of Engineering, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Haochang Shou
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Mingyao Li
- Statistical Center for Single-Cell and Spatial Genomics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Russell T. Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Endeavor (PennSIVE), Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Perelman School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wang YW, Chen X, Yan CG. Comprehensive evaluation of harmonization on functional brain imaging for multisite data-fusion. Neuroimage 2023; 274:120089. [PMID: 37086875 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
To embrace big-data neuroimaging, harmonizing the site effect in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMRI) data fusion is a fundamental challenge. A comprehensive evaluation of potentially effective harmonization strategies, particularly with specifically collected data, has been scarce, especially for R-fMRI metrics. Here, we comprehensively assess harmonization strategies from multiple perspectives, including tests on residual site effect, individual identification, test-retest reliability, and replicability of group-level statistical results, on widely used R-fMRI metrics across various datasets, including data obtained from participants with repetitive measures at different scanners. For individual identifiability (i.e., whether the same subject could be identified across R-fMRI data scanned across different sites), we found that, while most methods decreased site effects, the Subsampling Maximum-mean-distance based distribution shift correction Algorithm (SMA) and parametric unadjusted CovBat outperformed linear regression models, linear mixed models, ComBat series and invariant conditional variational auto-encoder in clustering accuracy. Test-retest reliability was better for SMA and parametric adjusted CovBat than unadjusted ComBat series and parametric unadjusted CovBat in the number of overlapped voxels. At the same time, SMA was superior to the latter in replicability in terms of the Dice coefficient and the scale of brain areas showing sex differences reproducibly observed across datasets. Furthermore, SMA better detected reproducible sex differences of ALFF under the site-sex confounded situation. Moreover, we designed experiments to identify the best target site features to optimize SMA identifiability, test-retest reliability, and stability. We noted both sample size and distribution of the target site matter and introduced a heuristic formula for selecting the target site. In addition to providing practical guidelines, this work can inform continuing improvements and innovations in harmonizing methodologies for big R-fMRI data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Wei Wang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; International Big-Data Center for Depression Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Xiao Chen
- CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; International Big-Data Center for Depression Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Chao-Gan Yan
- CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; International Big-Data Center for Depression Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China..
| |
Collapse
|