Impact of an electronic health record alert in primary care on increasing hepatitis c screening and curative treatment for baby boomers

Clinical decision support and electronic interventions to improve care quality in chronic liver diseases and cirrhosis

Significant quality gaps exist in the management of chronic liver diseases and cirrhosis. Clinical decision support systems-information-driven tools based in and launched from the electronic health record-are attractive and potentially scalable prospective interventions that could help standardize clinical care in hepatology. Yet, clinical decision support systems have had a mixed record in clinical medicine due to issues with interoperability and compatibility with clinical workflows. In this review, we discuss the conceptual origins of clinical decision support systems, existing applications in liver diseases, issues and challenges with implementation, and emerging strategies to improve their integration in hepatology care.

Hepatitis C virus-free endoscope procedures project: An in-hospital elimination approach

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination in the care cascades for patients receiving invasive procedures remains elusive. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HCV-free Endoscope Procedures Project (CEPP) in the effort toward hospital HCV micro-elimination in Taiwan. An electronic medical record (EMR)-based remind system was introduced into gastrointestinal, surgical, urological, and gynecological departments prior to the endoscopy procedures. Anti-HCV tests were actively ordered on their EMR among those patients who have not been tested in the past 5 years. Those patients with anti-HCV+ were recruited into the care cascade for HCV treatment, including HCVRNA testing, direct antivirals (DAAs) delivery, and treatment response assessment. We divided the elimination project into two phases: before (2020 Jan to 2020 Dec, phase A) and during (2021 Jan to 2022 Sep, phase B) the remind system. The screening rate of phase B was 64.2% (1857/2893), which was significantly higher than phase A (18.7%, 899/4812) (p < 0.001). The screening rate of Department of Medicine (DOM) significantly increased from 21.1% of phase A to 89.3% of Phase B (p < 0.001). During phase B, the screening rate of non-DOM was 48.2%, which was significantly higher than 11.8% of Phase A (p < 0.001). During Phase B, 15 (0.8%) out of 1857 screened patients were HCVRNA+. Six HCVRNA+ patients received DAAs treatment, and all achieved viral eradication. The CEPP significantly increased the anti-HCV screening rate for subsequent care cascades, particularly in patients of DOM.

Diagnostic Overshadowing of Chronic Hepatitis C in People With Mental Health Conditions Who Inject Drugs: A Scoping Review

Diagnostic overshadowing refers to a phenomenon whereby people with mental health conditions encounter inadequate or delayed medical attention and misdiagnosis. This occurs when physical symptoms are mistakenly attributed to their mental health condition. This paper presents a scoping review focusing on direct causes and background factors of diagnostic overshadowing in the context of hepatitis C infection in people who inject drugs and have concurrent mental health conditions. Despite significant strides in hepatitis C treatment with direct-acting antiviral drugs, the complex interplay of mental health conditions and physical symptoms necessitates a nuanced approach for accurate diagnosis and effective screening. This review was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology for scoping reviews. The databases searched included Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Global Health, CINAHL and Scopus. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The search strategies identified 1995 records. Overall, 166 studies were excluded. Forty-two (42) studies met the inclusion criteria. Three (n = 3) studies represented direct causes, and 39 (n = 39) with background factors related to diagnostic overshadowing. Studies highlighted six key themes encompassing diagnostic overshadowing, with communication barriers, stigma and knowledge deficiencies being the most prominent. Recognising and addressing diagnostic overshadowing in chronic hepatitis C will lead to increased screening, diagnosis and timely administration of life-saving antiviral therapy, resulting in profound enhancements in well-being and health outcomes. Moreover, this proactive approach will play a pivotal role in advancing the global effort towards eliminating hepatitis C by 2030.

Elimination of HCV Infection: Recent Epidemiological Findings, Barriers, and Strategies for the Coming Years

Hepatitis C is a disease for which in approximately 30 years we have gone from the discovery of the causative agent in 1989, to the introduction of direct-acting antiviral (DAAs) therapies starting from 2011, and to a proposal for its elimination in 2016, with some countries being on track for this goal. Elimination efforts, in the absence of a vaccine, rely on prevention measures and antiviral therapies. However, treatment rates have declined in recent years and are not considered adequate to achieve this goal at a global level. This poses a great epidemiological challenge, as HCV in many countries still causes a significant burden and most infected people are not yet diagnosed. Consequently, efforts are needed at different levels with common purposes: to facilitate access to screening and diagnosis and to improve linkage to care pathways. In this review, we discuss the latest epidemiological findings on HCV infection, the obstacles to its elimination, and strategies that are believed to be useful to overcome these obstacles but are applied unevenly across the world.

Going (Anti)Viral: Improving HIV and HCV Screening and HPV Vaccination in Primary Care

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C (HCV) screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake remain suboptimal. To improve HIV and HCV screening and HPV vaccination, the authors implemented a quality improvement project in three southwestern Pennsylvania family medicine residency practices.

METHODS

From June 1 to November 30, 2021, participating practices used universal screening and vaccination guidelines and chose from multiple strategies at the office (for example, standing orders), provider (for example, multiple forms of provider reminders), and patient (for example, incentives) levels derived from published literature and tailored to local context. Age-eligible patients for each recommendation with at least one in-person office visit during the intervention period were included. To assess the interventions' effect, the authors obtained testing and vaccination data from the electronic health record for the intervention period, contrasted it with identical data from June 1 to November 30, 2020, and used logistic regression controlling for patient age, sex, and race to determine differences in screening and vaccination between intervention and baseline periods.

RESULTS

A total of 14,920 and 15,523 patients were eligible in the baseline and intervention periods, respectively. Following the intervention, HIV lifetime screening but not first-time screening for patients 13-64 years old was significantly higher (78.9% vs. 76.1%, p = 0.004, and 39.6% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.152, respectively, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.38). HCV lifetime screening for patients 18-79 years old was significantly higher postintervention (62.5% vs. 53.5%, p < 0.001, aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.4-1.64). For patients 9-26 years old, no change in HPV initiation was observed, but the percentage of patients who completed their HPV vaccinations in the observed period was significantly higher postintervention (7.0% vs 4.6%, p = 0.006, aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.2). During the postintervention period, the researchers identified 0 new HIV diagnoses and 48 HCV diagnoses (19 eligible for treatment).

CONCLUSION

Family medicine residency office-based multistrategy efforts appear to successfully increase patient uptake of HIV and HCV screenings and maintain HPV vaccination rates.

Impact of an Electronic Health Record-Based Interruptive Alert Among Patients With Headaches Seen in Primary Care: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Headaches, including migraines, are one of the most common causes of disability and account for nearly 20%-30% of referrals from primary care to neurology. In primary care, electronic health record-based alerts offer a mechanism to influence health care provider behaviors, manage neurology referrals, and optimize headache care.

Objective

This project aimed to evaluate the impact of an electronic alert implemented in primary care on patients' overall headache management.

Methods

We conducted a stratified cluster-randomized study across 38 primary care clinic sites between December 2021 to December 2022 at a large integrated health care delivery system in the United States. Clinics were stratified into 6 blocks based on region and patient-to-health care provider ratios and then 1:1 randomized within each block into either the control or intervention. Health care providers practicing at intervention clinics received an interruptive alert in the electronic health record. The primary end point was a change in headache burden, measured using the Headache Impact Test 6 scale, from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in headache frequency and intensity, access to care, and resource use. We analyzed the difference-in-differences between the arms at follow-up at the individual patient level.

Results

We enrolled 203 adult patients with a confirmed headache diagnosis. At baseline, the average Headache Impact Test 6 scores in each arm were not significantly different (intervention: mean 63, SD 6.9; control: mean 61.8, SD 6.6; P=.21). We observed a significant reduction in the headache burden only in the intervention arm at follow-up (3.5 points; P=.009). The reduction in the headache burden was not statistically different between groups (difference-in-differences estimate -1.89, 95% CI -5 to 1.31; P=.25). Similarly, secondary outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Only 11.32% (303/2677) of alerts were acted upon.

Conclusions

The use of an interruptive electronic alert did not significantly improve headache outcomes. Low use of alerts by health care providers prompts future alterations of the alert and exploration of alternative approaches.

Screening for hepatitis C as part of an opioid stewardship quality improvement initiative: Identifying infected patients and analyzing linkage to care

Screening patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) for HCV can potentially decrease morbidity and mortality if HCV-infected individuals are linked to care. We describe a quality improvement initiative focused on patients with OUD, incorporating an electronic health record decision-support tool for HCV screening across multiple health care venues, and examining the linkage to HCV care. Of 5829 patients with OUD, 4631 were tested for HCV (79.4%), (compared to a baseline of 8%) and 1614 (27.7%) tested positive. Two hundred and thirty patients had died at the study onset. Patients tested in the acute care and emergency department settings were more likely to test positive than those in the ambulatory setting (OR = 2.21 and 2.49, p < 0.001). Before patient outreach, 279 (18.2%) HCV-positive patients were linked to care. After patient outreach, 326 (23.0%) total patients were linked to care. Secondary end points included mortality and the number of patients who were HCV-positive who achieved a cure. The mortality rate in patients who were HCV-positive (12.2%) was higher than that in patients who were HCV-negative (7.4%) (OR = 1.72, p < 0.001) or untested patients (6.2%) (OR = 2.10, p<0.001). Of the 326 with successful linkage to care, 113 (34.7%) had a documented cure. An additional 55 (16.9%) patients had a possible cure, defined as direct acting antiviral ordered but no follow-up documented, known treatment in the absence of documented sustained viral response lab draw, or documentation of cure noted in outside medical records but unavailable laboratory results. A strategy utilizing electronic health record decision-support tools for testing patients with OUD for HCV was highly effective; however, linking patients with HCV to care was less successful.

Hepatitis C Cascade of Care in the Direct-Acting Antivirals Era: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemic remains a public health problem worldwide. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to provide evidence of outcomes attained across the HCV care cascade in the era of direct-acting antivirals.

METHODS

Studies from North America, Europe, and Australia (January 2014 through March 2021) reporting on HCV care cascade outcomes (screening to cure) were included. When calculating the proportions of individuals completing each step, the numerator for Steps 1-8 was the number of individuals completing each step; the denominator was the number of individuals completing the previous step for Steps 1-3 and Step 3 for Steps 4-8. In 2022, random effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled proportions with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Sixty-five studies comprising 7,402,185 individuals were identified. Among individuals with positive HCV ribonucleic acid test results, 62% (95% CI=55%, 70%) attended their first care appointment, 41% (95% CI=37%, 45%) initiated treatment, 38% (95% CI=29%, 48%) completed treatment, and 29% (95% CI=25%, 33%) achieved cure. HCV screening rates were 43% (95% CI=22%, 66%) in prisons or jails and 20% (95% CI=11%, 31%) in emergency departments. Linkage to care rates were 62% (95% CI=46%, 75%) for homeless individuals and 26% (95% CI=22%, 31%) for individuals diagnosed in emergency departments. Cure rates were 51% (95% CI=30%, 73%) in individuals with substance use disorder and 17% (95% CI=17%, 17%) in homeless individuals. Cure rates were lowest in the U.S.

DISCUSSION

Despite the availability of effective all-oral direct-acting antiviral therapies, persistent gaps remain across the HCV care cascade, especially among traditionally marginalized populations. Public health interventions targeting identified priority areas (e.g., emergency departments) may improve screening and healthcare retention of vulnerable populations with HCV infection (e.g., substance use disorder populations).

Care for Vulnerable Populations with Chronic Liver Disease: A Safety-Net Perspective

Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) and facilities are the cornerstone of healthcare services for the medically underserved. The burden of chronic liver disease-including end-stage manifestations of cirrhosis and liver cancer-is high and rising among populations living in poverty who primarily seek and receive care in safety-net settings. For many reasons related to social determinants of health, these individuals often present with delayed diagnoses and disease presentations, resulting in higher liver-related mortality. With recent state-based policy changes such as Medicaid expansion that impact access to insurance and critical health services, an overview of the body of literature on SNH care for chronic liver disease is timely and informative for the liver disease community. In this narrative review, we discuss controversies in the definition of a SNH and summarize the known disparities in the cascade of the care and management of common liver-related conditions: (1) steatotic liver disease, (2) liver cancer, (3) chronic viral hepatitis, and (4) cirrhosis and liver transplantation. In addition, we review the specific impact of Medicaid expansion on safety-net systems and liver disease outcomes and highlight effective provider- and system-level interventions. Lastly, we address remaining gaps and challenges to optimizing care for vulnerable populations with chronic liver disease in safety-net settings.

Characteristics associated with receipt of treatment among patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus

Although current guidelines recommend that nearly all patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection receive treatment, a substantial proportion remain untreated. We conducted an administrative claims analysis to provide real-world data on treatment patterns and characteristics of treated versus untreated patients among individuals with HCV in the United States. Adults with an HCV diagnosis from 01 July 2016 through 30 September 2020 and continuous health plan enrolment for 12 months before and ≥1 month after the diagnosis date were identified in the Optum Research Database. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between patient characteristics and the rate of treatment. Of 24,374 patients identified with HCV, only 30% initiated treatment during follow-up. Factors associated with increased rate of treatment included younger age versus age 75+ (hazard ratio [HR] 1.50-1.83 depending on age group), commercial versus Medicare insurance (HR 1.32), and diagnosis by a specialist versus a primary care physician (HR 2.56 and 2.62 for gastroenterology and infectious disease or hepatology, respectively) (p < .01 for all). Several baseline comorbidities were associated with decreased rate of treatment, including psychiatric disorders (HR 0.87), drug use disorders (HR 0.85) and cirrhosis (HR 0.42) (p < .01 for all). These findings highlight existing HCV treatment inequities, particularly among older patients and those with psychiatric disorders, substance use disorders or chronic comorbidities. Targeted efforts to increase treatment uptake in these populations could mitigate a considerable future burden of HCV-related morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs.

Expanded or Risk Factor-Based Annual Screening for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Among Persons With HIV: Which Is the Best Approach?

Introduction. Universal one-time screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) is recommended for all adults. For persons with HIV (PWH), guidelines recommend HCV screening at entry into care and annually in men who have unprotected sex with other men (MSM) and persons who inject drugs (PWID). Public health experts recommend expanded annual screening in all PWH given concerns for undiagnosed new HCV diagnoses when risk factors are not assessed. Electronic medical record (EMR) with clinical decision support using a Best Practice Advisory (BPA) tool can aid HCV risk factor assessment. We conducted a prospective study among three HIV clinics to compare the two screening approaches. Methods. Two clinics implemented the EMR-triggered risk factor-based screening; one clinic used the expanded screening approach. We evaluated BPA uptake and compared HCV testing and positivity rates from August 12, 2019 to March 12, 2020. Results. In the risk factor-based screening clinics, of 1,343 PWH, 239 tests were performed with 139 attributed to the BPA (testing rate 10%). At the expanded screening site, among 434 patients, 237 HCV tests were performed (testing rate 55%). The risk factor-based screening sites were less likely to test for HCV (odds ratio [OR] = 0.0884, p < .01) and identify positive cases (OR = 0.55, p = .025). Conclusions. An EMR-based clinical-decision support tool was successfully implemented for HCV risk factor-based screening resulting in a lower HCV annual screening rate compared with an expanded approach. Although in this group of HIV clinics with limited longitudinal follow-up, no previously undiagnosed HCV cases were detected, additional work is needed to guide the design of the best approach.

Hepatitis C Screening in Post-Baby Boomer Generation Americans: One Size Does Not Fit All

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the impact of access to routine health care, as estimated by health insurance coverage, on hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection prevalence in US adults born after 1965 (post-baby boomer birth cohort [post-BBBC]) and to use the data to formulate strategies to optimize population screening for HCV.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult examinees in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey with available anti-HCV data were divided into era 1 (1999-2008) and era 2 (2009-2016). The prevalence of HCV infection, as defined by detectable serum HCV RNA, was determined in post-BBBC adults. In low prevalence groups, prescreening modalities were considered to increase the pretest probability.

RESULTS

Of 16,966 eligible post-BBBC examinees, 0.5% had HCV infection. In both eras, more than 50% had no insurance. In era 2, HCV prevalence was 0.26% and 0.83% in those with and without insurance, respectively (P<.01). As a prescreening test, low alanine aminotransferase level (<23 U/L in women and 32 U/L in men) would identify 54% of post-BBBC adults with an extremely low (0.02%) HCV prevalence. Based on these data, a tiered approach that tests all uninsured directly for HCV and prescreens the insured with alanine aminotransferase would reduce the number to test by 56.5 million while missing less than 1% infections.

CONCLUSION

For HCV elimination, passive "universal" screening in routine health care settings is insufficient, although the efficiency of screening may be improved with alanine aminotransferase prescreening. Importantly, for individuals with limited access to health care, proactive outreach programs for HCV screening are still needed.

Addressing Barriers to Care in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Promoting Equity and Access

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Chronic viral hepatitis is projected to surpass the composite mortality rates of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), tuberculosis, and malaria by 2040. It can be attributed to several barriers to chronic HBV infection (CHBVI) surveillance that warrant urgent attention. Here, we report a case of a 40-year-old male with CHBVI who developed HCC and underwent partial hepatic resection. However, due to an interruption in insurance and medication regimen, the patient became the victim of healthcare disparity, which led to the progression of HCC and succumbed to widespread metastasis. This case highlights and discusses the healthcare disparity and critical value of continuity of care for patients with HBV infection to promote optimal patient outcomes.

Universal Adult Hepatitis B Screening and Vaccination as the Path to Elimination

This Viewpoint describes new recommendations from the CDC regarding universal screening of adults for hepatitis B virus infection.

Medical malpractice claims in Hepatology: Rates, Reasons, and Results

BACKGROUND

Clinicians are motivated to provide safe, high-quality care to patients with chronic liver disease. This includes the desire to avoid litigation. Data are limited regarding the actual sources of medicolegal risk in chronic liver disease.

METHODS

We conducted a review of a national liability insurer (Candello) with an additional granular analysis of our institution's registry of liability claims. We included closed cases involving chronic liver disease-related encounters between 2012 and 2021. We determined rates of legal claims from a denominator of unique patients with cirrhosis or transplant care seen over the study period.

RESULTS

Local database: We retrieved 39 claims of which 15 involved patients with non-cirrhotic chronic liver disease, 13 involved cirrhosis (0.06% incidence), and 11 involved patients who underwent transplantation (0.6% incidence). Most claims involved periprocedural complications. Others included adverse reactions to prophylactic plasma transfusion, medication-induced HE, and falls/fractures.

NATIONAL DATABASE

We found 94 claims related to liver disease out of 102,575 (0.09%) total claims. Overall, 56% involved diagnosis-related issues (failure/delay in ordering a diagnostic test, failure to appreciate and reconcile a symptom/sign or result, or the misinterpretation of a diagnostic study). Miscommunication between providers and between providers and patients was implicated in 22% of cases. Patient behavior-related factors (nonadherence with scheduled appointments, treatments, or diagnostic testing) factored in 20% of cases. Selection or the management of therapy played a role in 7% of cases. Very rarely were cases associated with technical skill (4%), house staff supervision (3%), or weekend/holiday care (1%). Fifty-one (55%) claims involved HCC.

CONCLUSION

We provide the rates and reasons for medical malpractice claims in hepatology.

Gaps and Disparities in Chronic Hepatitis B Monitoring and Treatment in the United States, 2016-2019

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) carries an increased risk of death from cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recommends patients with CHB receive monitoring of disease activity, including ALT, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg), and liver imaging for patients who experience an increased risk for HCC. HBV antiviral therapy is recommended for patients with active hepatitis and cirrhosis.

METHODS

Monitoring and treatment of adults with new CHB diagnoses were analyzed using Optum Clinformatics Data Mart Database claims data from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019.

RESULTS

Among 5978 patients with new CHB diagnosis, only 56% with cirrhosis and 50% without cirrhosis had claims for≥1 ALT and either HBV DNA or HBeAg test, and among patients recommended for HCC surveillance, 82% with cirrhosis and 57% without cirrhosis had claims for≥1 liver imaging within 12 months of diagnosis. Although antiviral treatment is recommended for patients with cirrhosis, only 29% of patients with cirrhosis had≥1 claim for HBV antiviral therapy within 12 months of CHB diagnosis. Multivariable analysis showed patients who were male, Asian, privately insured, or had cirrhosis were more likely (P<0.05) to receive ALT and either HBV DNA or HBeAg tests and HBV antiviral therapy within 12 months of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Many patients diagnosed with CHB are not receiving the clinical assessment and treatment recommended. A comprehensive initiative is needed to address the patient, provider, and system-related barriers to improve the clinical management of CHB.

Patient Navigation Increases Linkage to Care and Receipt of Direct-acting Antiviral Therapy in Patients with Hepatitis C

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patient navigation interventions can improve health outcomes in underserved, low-income, and racial and ethnic minority groups, who often experience health disparities. We examined the effectiveness of patient navigation to improve linkage to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment receipt in a socioeconomically disadvantaged, racially diverse patient population.

METHODS

We performed a pre-post analysis evaluating the effectiveness of a patient navigation program among baby boomers who tested positive for HCV in a safety-net health system. The usual care group (June 2013 to May 2015) and patient navigation group (January 2016 to December 2017) were balanced using a stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting approach. We used logistic regression analyses to evaluate associations between patient navigation and linkage to care for HCV treatment evaluation, treatment initiation, and sustained virologic response.

RESULTS

Among 1353 patients (62% black, 61% uninsured, 16% homeless), 769 were in the usual care group, and 584 were in the patient navigation group. The patient navigation group had significantly higher odds of linkage to care (odds ratio [OR], 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-4.8) and treatment initiation (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.3-4.2) within 6 months. The patient navigation group continued to have increased linkage to care (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.7-4.3) and treatment initiation (OR 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7-3.0) at 12 months. However, there was no significant difference in sustained virologic response between the groups (86.9% vs 86.1%; P = .78).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient navigation was associated with significantly increased linkage to care and treatment initiation among patients with HCV infection. Patient navigation programs can be used to promote HCV elimination among traditionally difficult-to-reach patient populations.

A Microsimulation Study of the Cost-Effectiveness of Hepatitis C Virus Screening Frequencies in Hemodialysis Centers

BACKGROUND

National guidelines recommend twice-yearly hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. However, studies examining the cost-effectiveness of HCV screening methods or frequencies are lacking.

METHODS

We populated an HCV screening, treatment, and disease microsimulation model with a cohort representative of the US in-center hemodialysis population. Clinical outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2018 guidelines-endorsed HCV screening frequency (every 6 months) were compared with less frequent periodic screening (yearly, every 2 years), screening only at hemodialysis initiation, and no screening. We estimated expected quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) between each screening strategy and the next less expensive alternative strategy, from a health care sector perspective, in 2019 US dollars. For each strategy, we modeled an HCV outbreak occurring in 1% of centers. In sensitivity analyses, we varied mortality, linkage to HCV cure, screening method (ribonucleic acid versus antibody testing), test sensitivity, HCV infection rates, and outbreak frequencies.

RESULTS

Screening only at hemodialysis initiation yielded HCV cure rates of 79%, with an ICER of $82,739 per QALY saved compared with no testing. Compared with screening at hemodialysis entry only, screening every 2 years increased cure rates to 88% and decreased liver-related deaths by 52%, with an ICER of $140,193. Screening every 6 months had an ICER of $934,757; in sensitivity analyses using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY gained, screening every 6 months was never cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

The KDIGO-recommended HCV screening interval (every 6 months) does not seem to be a cost-effective use of health care resources, suggesting that re-evaluation of less-frequent screening strategies should be considered.

Recommendations for the integral diagnosis of chronic viral hepatitis in a single analytical extraction

The Spanish Society of Digestive Pathology (SEPD), the Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH), the Spanish Society of Infections and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and its Viral Hepatitis Study Group (GEHEP), and with the endorsement of the Alliance for the Elimination of Viral Hepatitis in Spain (AEHVE), have agreed on a document to carry out a comprehensive diagnosis of viral hepatitis (B, C and D), from a single blood sample; that is, a comprehensive diagnosis, in the hospital and/or at the point of care of the patient. We propose an algorithm, so that the positive result in a viral hepatitis serology (B, C and D), as well as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), would trigger the analysis of the rest of the virus, including the viral load when necessary, in the same blood draw. In addition, we make two additional recommendations. First, the need to rule out a previous hepatitis A virus (VHA) infection, to proceed with its vaccination in cases where IgG-type studies against this virus are negative and the vaccine is indicated. Second, the determination of the HIV serology. Finally, in case of a positive result for any of the viruses analyzed, there must be an automated alerts and initiate epidemiological monitoring.

Engaging Physicians and Systems to Improve Hepatitis C Virus Testing in Baby Boomers

Approximately three million people in the United States have been exposed to the hepatitis C virus (HCV), with two-thirds of these having chronic HCV infection. Baby boomers (those born 1945-1965) have nearly five times the prevalence of HCV infection compared with other age groups. Despite clinical practice guidelines that recommend HCV testing in baby boomers, the testing rates remain low. We developed and tested a multilevel intervention to increase orders for HCV testing that included integrated clinical decision support within the electronic health record (EHR) and a physician education session to improve HCV physician knowledge in one Florida academic health system. In the year prior to the intervention, test order rates for encounters with baby boomers was 11.9%. During the intervention period (August 2019-July 2020) for providers that viewed a best practice alert (BPA), the ordering increased to 59.2% in Family Medicine and 64.6% in Internal Medicine. The brief physician education intervention improved total HCV knowledge and increased self-efficacy in knowledge of HCV risk factors. These findings suggest that interventions at the system and physician levels hold promise for increasing HCV testing rates. Future studies are needed to evaluate this intervention in additional clinical settings and to test the benefit of adding additional intervention components that are directed at patients.

Efficacy of a Primary Care-Based Mobile Application to Increase Hepatitis C Screening Among Asian Americans: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening remains suboptimal. We assessed the efficacy of a mobile application and provider alert in enhancing HCV screening among Asian Americans.

Methods

A secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized clinical trial was performed during the birth cohort screening era to assess the efficacy of a Hepatitis App (intervention), a multilingual mobile application delivering interactive video education on viral hepatitis and creating a Provider Alert printout, at primary care clinics within 2 healthcare systems in San Francisco from 2015 to 2017. A comparison group received usual care and a similar intervention on nutrition and physical activity. The outcome was electronic health record (EHR) documentation of HCV screening along with patient-provider communication about testing and test ordering.

Results

Four hundred fifty-two participants (mean age 57 years, 36% male, 80% foreign-born) were randomized by provider clusters to the intervention (n = 270) or comparison groups (n = 182). At 3-month follow up, the intervention group was more likely than the comparison group to be aware of HCV (75% vs 59%, P = .006), to discuss HCV testing with their providers (63% vs 13%, P < .001), to have HCV testing ordered (39% vs 10%, P < .001), and to have EHR-verified HCV testing (30% vs 6%, P < .001). Within the intervention group, being born between 1945 and 1965 (odds ratio, 3.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-7.32) was associated with increased HCV testing.

Conclusions

The Hepatitis App delivered in primary care settings was effective in increasing HCV screening in a socioeconomically diverse Asian American cohort. This highlights the importance of mobile technology as a patient-centered strategy to address gaps in HCV care.

Improving the detection of infectious diseases in at-risk migrants with an innovative integrated multi-infection screening digital decision support tool (IS-MiHealth) in primary care: a pilot cluster-randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There are major shortfalls in the identification and screening of at-risk migrant groups. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a new digital tool (IS-MiHealth) integrated into the electronic patient record system of primary care centres in detecting prevalent migrant infections. IS-MiHealth provides targeted recommendations to health professionals for screening multiple infections, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, active tuberculosis (TB), Chagas disease, strongyloidiasis and schistosomiasis, based on patient characteristics (including variables of country of origin, age and sex).

METHODS

A pragmatic pilot cluster-randomized-controlled trial was deployed from March to December 2018. Eight primary care centres in Catalonia, Spain, were randomly allocated 1:1 to use of the digital tool for screening, or to routine care. The primary outcome was the monthly diagnostic yield of all aggregated infections. Intervention and control sites were compared before and after implementation with respect to their monthly diagnostic yield using regression models. This study is registered on international standard randomised controlled trial number (ISRCTN) (ISRCTN14795012).

RESULTS

A total of 15 780 migrants registered across the eight centres had at least one visit during the intervention period (March-December 2018), of which 14 598 (92.51%) fulfilled the criteria to be screened for at least one infection. There were 210 (2.57%) individuals from the intervention group with new diagnoses compared with 113 (1.49%) from the control group [odds ratio: 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63-2.64, P < 0.001]. The intervention centres raised their overall monthly diagnosis rate to 5.80 (95% CI 1.23-10.38, P = 0.013) extra diagnoses compared with the control centres. This monthly increase in diagnosis in intervention centres was also observed if we consider all cases together of HIV, hepatitis B and C, and active TB cases [2.72 (95% CI 0.43-5.00); P = 0.02] and was observed as well for the parasitic infections' group (Chagas disease, strongyloidiasis and schistosomiasis) 2.58 (95% CI 1.60-3.57; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The IS-MiHealth increased screening rate and diagnostic yield for key infections in migrants in a population-based primary care setting. Further testing and development of this new tool is warranted in larger trials and in other countries.

Successful Hepatitis C Birth Cohort Screening and Linkage to Care in a US Community Health System

CONTEXT

Birth cohort ("baby boomer") screening represents a well-validated strategy for the identification of asymptomatic hepatitis C-infected patients. However, successful linkage of newly diagnosed patients to antiviral therapy has been more difficult to accomplish.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results of a systemwide birth cohort screening program in a US community health care system.

DESIGN

We analyzed the data from an ongoing hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening and treatment program that was established at NorthShore University Health System in 2015. Hepatitis C virus screening by primary care providers was prompted through automated Best Practice and Health Maintenance alerts. Patient visits and screening orders were tracked using a customized HCV dashboard. Virologic, demographic, and treatment data were assessed and compared with those of a cohort of patients with previously established HCV infection.

RESULTS

Since program inception, 61 8161 (64.3%) of the entire NorthShore baby boomer population of 96 001 patients have completed HCV antibody testing, and 160 patients (0.26%) were antibody positive. Of 152 antibody-positive patients who underwent HCV RNA testing, 53 (34.2%) were viremic. A total of 39 of 53 patients (73.6%) underwent antiviral therapy and achieved a sustained virologic response. Compared with patients identified through screening, a comparison cohort of patients with previously established HCV had more advanced fibrosis and significantly lower dropout rates. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a decrease in the number of outpatient visits of screening-eligible patients and with a reduction in HCV screening rates.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate the electronic medical records-assisted systemwide implementation of HCV birth cohort screening and successful linkage to antiviral therapy in a community-based US multihospital system.

Hepatitis C Virus Screening: Factors Associated With Test Completion in a Large Academic Health Care System

OBJECTIVES

In 2012, onetime hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening was recommended for all baby boomers (people born during 1945-1965) in the United States, but only 4.0%-12.9% of baby boomers have ever had a screening ordered by a health care provider. This study examined the HCV screening prevalence among adult patients in a large academic health care system and assessed factors associated with the completion of screening when ordered for baby boomers.

METHODS

We defined HCV screening completion as the completion of an HCV antibody test when it was ordered. We used electronic health records to examine HCV screening completion rates among adults (N = 106 630) from August 1, 2015, through July 31, 2020, by birth cohort. Among baby boomers whose health care provider ordered HCV screening, we examined frequency and percentages of HCV screening completion by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. We conducted univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to assess factors associated with HCV screening completion among baby boomers.

RESULTS

During the study period, 73.0% of baby boomers completed HCV screening when it was ordered. HCV completion did not differ by sex or race and ethnicity among baby boomers. Baby boomers with Medicare supplemental health insurance compared with commercial health insurance (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.87) and those seeing only advanced practice professionals compared with specialty care physicians (aOR = 2.24) were more likely to complete HCV screening when it was ordered.

CONCLUSIONS

Noncompletion of HCV screening is one of many barriers along the HCV treatment continuum. Our findings suggest a need for interventions targeting systems, health care providers, and patients to increase HCV screening rates in the United States.

Targeted Electronic Patient Portal Messaging Increases Hepatitis C Virus Screening in Primary Care: a Randomized Study

IMPORTANCE

Electronic health record (EHR) tools such as direct-to-patient messaging and automated lab orders are effective at improving uptake of preventive health measures. It is unknown if patient engagement in primary care impacts efficacy of such messaging.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether more engaged patients, defined as those who have an upcoming visit scheduled, are more likely to respond to a direct-to-patient message with an automated lab order for hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening.

DESIGN

Randomized trial PARTICIPANTS: One thousand six hundred randomly selected Stanford Primary Care patients, 800 with an upcoming visit within 6 months and 800 without, born between 1945 and 1965 who were due for HCV screening. Each group was randomly divided into cohorts of 400 subjects each. Subjects were followed for 1 year.

INTERVENTION

One 400 subject cohort in each group received a direct-to-patient message through the EHR portal with HCV antibody lab order.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

The EHR was queried on a monthly basis for 6 months after the intervention to monitor which subjects completed HCV screening. For any subjects screened positive for HCV, follow-up through the cascade of HCV care was monitored, and if needed, scheduled by the study team.

KEY RESULTS

Of 1600 subjects, 538 (34%) completed HCV screening. In the stratum without an upcoming appointment, 18% in the control group completed screening compared to 26% in intervention group (p<0.01). Similarly, in the stratum with an upcoming appointment, 34% in the control group completed screening compared to 58% in the intervention group (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Direct-to-patient messaging coupled with automated lab orders improved HCV screening rates compared to standard of care, particularly in more engaged patients. Including this intervention in primary care can maximize screening with each visit, which is particularly valuable in times when physical throughput in the healthcare system may be low.

Get2PrEP: An Electronic Medical Record Laboratory Comment Increased Safe Sex Counseling But Not Preexposure Prophylaxis Services at a Large Urban Academic Medical Center in Northern Manhattan

BACKGROUND

HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains underutilized despite its efficacy and potential population impact. Achieving PrEP's full potential depends on providers who are knowledgeable and comfortable prescribing it to individuals at risk of acquiring HIV. Previous educational interventions targeting provider-related uptake barriers have had limited success. We designed and tested an electronic medical record (EMR) interpretative comment to improve the delivery of PrEP.

METHODS

An EMR comment provided information on PrEP eligibility and referral resources to providers delivering positive chlamydia and gonorrhea results. Positive test results for bacterial sexually transmitted infections before intervention (January 1, 2019-August 23, 2019) and after intervention (August 24, 2019-December 31, 2019) were identified. A retrospective chart review was conducted to ascertain provider documentation of PrEP discussions or provision, HIV prevention discussions, and HIV screening. Pretest-posttest analysis was performed to compare the provision of PrEP and HIV prevention services.

RESULTS

We reviewed 856 preintervention encounters spanning 8 months and 461 postencounters spanning 4 months. Patient demographics were comparable. We observed an increase in provider documentation of safe sex and condom counseling (odds ratios [ORs], 1.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.07-1.18] and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.17], respectively), and the absence of any HIV prevention discussion decreased (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.90), but not HIV screening or PrEP documentation.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that an EMR laboratory comment had a modest effect on increasing risk reduction counseling, although not HIV screening or PrEP prescriptions. Future strategies to encourage provider delivery of sexual health services may benefit from more targeted strategies that combine behavioral and information technology approaches.

Reduction in medical emergency team activation among postoperative surgical patients at risk for undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an under-recognized condition that results in morbidity and mortality. Postoperative complications, including medical emergency team activation (META), are disproportionally increased among surgical patients at risk for OSA. A systematic approach is needed to improve provider recognition and treatment, but protocols that demonstrate improvement in META are lacking. As part of a multidisciplinary quality improvement project, DOISNORE50 (DIS), a sleep apnea questionnaire and proactive safety measure, was algorithmically applied to all perioperative patients.

METHODS

Consecutive sleep screening was conducted among perioperative patients. Of the 49,567 surgical navigation center patients, 11,932 had previous diagnosis of OSA. Of the 37,572 (96%) patients screened with DIS, 25,171 (66.9%) were Low Risk (DIS < 4), 9,211 (24.5%) were At Risk (DIS ≥ 4), and 3,190 (8.5%) were High Risk (DIS ≥ 6) for OSA, respectively. High Risk patients received same-day sleep consultation. On the day of surgery, patients with Known OSA, At Risk, and High Risk for OSA received an "OSA Precaution Band." An electronic chart reminder alerted admission providers to order postoperative continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine and sleep consult for patients High Risk for OSA.

RESULTS

Implementation of a comprehensive program was associated with increased sleep consultation, sleep testing, and inpatient CPAP use (P < .001). For every 1,000 surgical patients screened, 30 fewer META, including rapid responses, reintubation, code blues, and code strokes, were observed. However, inpatient sleep consultation and inpatient CPAP use were not independently associated with reduced META. In the subgroup of patients hospitalized longer than 3 days, inpatient CPAP use was independently associated with reduced META.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center, institution-wide, multidisciplinary-approach, quality improvement project, a comprehensive OSA screening process and treatment algorithm with appropriate postoperative inpatient CPAP therapy and inpatient sleep consultations was associated with increased CPAP use and reduced META. Further prospective studies are needed to assess cost, feasibility, and generalizability of these findings.

CITATION

Namen AM, Forest D, Saha AK, et al. Reduction in medical emergency team activation among postoperative surgical patients at risk for undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(8):1953-1965.

Interventions to enhance testing, linkage to care, and treatment initiation for hepatitis C virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the goal set by WHO to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a public health threat, uptake of HCV testing and treatment remains low. To achieve this target, evidence-based interventions are needed to address the barriers to care for people with, or at risk of, HCV infection. We aimed to assess the efficacy of interventions to improve HCV antibody testing, HCV RNA testing, linkage to HCV care, and treatment initiation.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO without language restrictions for reports published between database inception and July 21, 2020, assessing the following primary outcomes: HCV antibody testing; HCV RNA testing; linkage to HCV care; and direct-acting antiviral treatment initiation. We also searched key conference abstracts. We included randomised and non-randomised studies assessing non-pharmaceutical interventions that included a comparator or control group. Studies were excluded if they enrolled only paediatric populations (aged <18 years) or if they conducted the intervention in a different health-care setting to that of the control or comparator. Authors were contacted to clarify study details and to obtain additional population-level data. Data were extracted from the records identified into a pre-piloted and standardised data extraction form and a random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the effects of the interventions on study outcomes. This study is registered in PROSPERO, CRD42020178035.

FINDINGS

Of 15 342 unique records identified, 142 were included, which reported on 148 unique studies (47 randomised controlled trials and 101 non-randomised studies). Medical chart reminders, provider education, and point-of-care antibody testing significantly improved at least three study outcomes compared with a comparator or control. Interventions that simplified HCV testing, including dried blood spot testing, point-of-care antibody testing, reflex RNA testing, and opt-out screening, significantly improved testing outcomes compared with a comparator or control. Enhanced patient and provider support through patient education, provider care coordination, and provider education also significantly improved testing outcomes compared with a comparator or control. Integrated care and patient navigation or care coordination significantly improved linkage to care and the uptake of direct-acting antiviral treatment compared with a comparator or control.

INTERPRETATION

Several interventions to improve HCV care that address several key barriers to HCV care were identified. New models of HCV care must be designed and implemented to address the barriers faced by the population of interest. Further high-quality research, including rigorously designed randomised studies, is still needed in key populations.

FUNDING

None.

The impact of electronic medical record system implementation on HCV screening and continuum of care: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis C (HCV) screening is imperative to meet WHO elimination targets including increased detection and reduced mortality. An electronic medical record (EMR) system can be utilized in health care centers to indicate if a patient should be targeted for HCV screening, thus increasing the number of those offered testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined English language publications reporting on the impact of EMR system utilization on HCV screening and the HCV continuum of care. Relevant papers were identified using multiple search engines to search key terms. Clinical outcomes considered included any or no change in HCV screening rates following EMR system introduction, as well as any or no change in rates of patients progressing along the HCV cascade of care after diagnosis once an EMR system was implemented.

RESULTS

From a search pool of 18 studies, 11 meet inclusion criteria and reported on the selected clinical outcomes. Each outcome assessed indicated that use of an EMR system increased the proportion of patients offered and/or receiving HCV testing. We were unable to conclude if an EMR system had an impact on the number of patients progressing along the HCV cascade of care following a positive test result. Overall, all methods of implementation of an EMR system had the same outcome of increasing screening rates.

CONCLUSIONS

EMR system utilization had a positive impact on increasing HCV screening. However, the clinical effectiveness of utilizing an EMR system to help eliminate transmission and increase HCV treatment cure rates requires further study.

Towards a safe hospital: hepatitis C in-hospital micro-elimination program (HCV-HELP study)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Scarce data are available on in-hospital hepatitis C virus (HCV) micro-elimination strategies. This pilot study was prospectively conducted to assess the outcomes of HCV in-hospital micro-elimination program (HCV-HELP) in a single center in Taiwan.

METHODS

The study included the HCV reflex test for plans A (hospital personnel), B (outpatient surveillance), C (a call-back system for anti-HCV+ patients), and D (surveillance of cancer patients prior to chemotherapy). The primary outcome measurement was that > 80% of eligible patients were enrolled in linkage-to-treat; the secondary outcome measurement was the surveillance efficacy.

RESULTS

We recruited 930, 6072, 2376 and 233 participants into plans A, B, C, and D, respectively, from Oct 2020 to May 2021. The anti-HCV-seropositivity prevalences were 0.22% for plan A, 4.3% for B, and 3.9% for D. Two staff members were identified as HCV-viremic in plan A; these staff members successfully achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). We identified 39, 95 and 2 HCV-viremic patients in plans B, C, and D, respectively. Of these 138 HCV-viremic patients, 135 (97.8%) received direct-acting antiviral therapy, and 134 achieved SVR. Two 4-month phases were stratified to compare efficacies in the liver clinic. In the late phase, the adjusted number of HCV-viremic patients was 4.36/10,000 outpatient visits (90/200,689), which was 3.18-fold higher than that of the early phase (1.37/10,000 outpatient visits [30/212,658], odds ratio 3.18; 95% confidence interval 2.10-4.81, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

HCV micro-elimination is achievable at the hospital level as per the structured HCV-HELP study.

Nurse practitioners as primary care site champions for the screening and treatment of hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND

Primary care providers are often the first point of contact for hepatitis C virus (HCV) care, yet treatment initiation in primary care continues to be low. Nurse practitioners (NPs) are autonomous providers who, in Ontario, currently prescribe HCV therapy; however, methods to engage primary care NPs in HCV care have not occurred.

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of a systematic approach to train and support NPs in HCV testing, care, and treatment.

METHODOLOGY

Nurse practitioners from Canada's largest family health team (FHT) were recruited. Nurse practitioners received six hours of training and develop approaches to screen and treat at FHT sites. Treatment algorithms were given, and the number and types of inquiries from NPs were recorded.

RESULTS

Over 1 year, 9 NPs screened 1,026 patients; 87.4% were screened based on the identification of a risk factor. A mail-out approach for birth cohort screening occurred at a single site, resulting in rapid uptake in screening. Antibody prevalence was 1.66%, with 76.5% RNA positivity. All RNA-positive treatment-eligible individuals were treated by an NP and completed treatment. Thirty-eight consults occurred over 1 year, the majority related to HCV or liver disease staging.

CONCLUSIONS

Formalized initiatives to engage and educate NPs lead to innovative strategies to test for HCV. Nurse practitioners can safely and effectively treat HCV in primary care with minimal support.

IMPLICATIONS

This work could be extrapolated to NPs in other primary care settings. Implementing formalized strategies has the potential to create NP leaders in the treatment and elimination of HCV in Ontario, Canada, and globally.

Micro-Elimination of Hepatitis C among Patients with Kidney Disease by Using Electronic Reminder System-A Hospital-Based Experience

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the use of an electronic reminder system for HCV screening among patients with kidney disease. In this study, we tried to determine whether reminder systems could improve the HCV screening rate in patients with kidney disease.

METHODS

Patients with kidney disease were enrolled from August 2019 to December 2020 to automatically screen and order HCV antibody and RNA testing in outpatient departments.

RESULTS

A total of 19,316 outpatients with kidney disease were included, and the mean age was 66.5 years. The assessment rate of HCV antibody increased from 53.1% prior to the reminder system to 79.8% after the reminder system (p < 0.001), and the assessment rate of HCV RNA increased from 71% to 82.9%. The anti-HCV seropositivity rate decreased from 7.3% at baseline to 2.5% after the implementation of the reminder system (p < 0.001), and the percentage of patients with detectable HCV RNA among those with anti-HCV seropositivity decreased from 69.1% at baseline to 46.8% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility of an electronic reminder system for HCV screening among patients with kidney disease in a hospital-based setting was demonstrated.

Impact of an Electronic Medical Record Best Practice Alert on Expedited Partner Therapy for Chlamydia Infection and Reinfection

Background

Atrius Health implemented a best practice alert (BPA) to encourage clinicians to provide expedited partner therapy (EPT) in October 2014. We assessed (1) the impact of the BPA on EPT provision and chlamydial reinfection and (2) the impact of EPT on testing for chlamydia reinfection and reinfection rates.

Methods

We included patients ≥15 years with ≥1 positive chlamydia test between January 2013 and March 2019. Tests-of-reinfection were defined as chlamydia tests 28–120 days after initial infection, and corresponding positive results were considered evidence of reinfection. We used interrupted time series analyses to identify changes in (1) frequency of EPT, (2) tests-of-reinfection, and (3) reinfections after the BPA was released. Log-binomial regression models, with generalized estimating equation methods, assessed associations between (1) EPT and tests-of-reinfection and (2) EPT and reinfection.

Results

Among 7267 chlamydia infections, EPT was given to 1475 (20%) patients. Expedited partner therapy frequency increased from 15% to 22% of infections between January 2013 and September 2014 (β = 0.003, P = .03). After the BPA was released, EPT frequency declined to 19% of infections by March 2019 (β = −0.004, P = .008). On average, 35% of chlamydia infections received a test-of-reinfection and 7% were reinfected; there were no significant changes in these percentages after BPA implementation. Patients given EPT were more likely to receive tests-of-reinfection (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.16) but without change in reinfections (PR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66–1.17).

Conclusions

Best practice alerts in electronic medical record systems may not be effective at increasing EPT prescribing and decreasing chlamydial reinfection. However, patients given EPT were more likely to receive a test of chlamydia reinfection.

Clinical and economic impact of an alert system in primary care for the detection of patients with chronic hepatitis C

INTRODUCTION

Prevalence of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is higher in patients born between 1955-1975. The aim was to perform an economic evaluation of an age-based electronic health record (EHR) alert in primary care to detect patients with undiagnosed CHC and its treatment in comparison with non-use of the alert system, in Valencian Community, Spain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Decision trees and Markov model were used to evaluate the diagnosis and progression of the disease, respectively. CHC was diagnosed by serology and viral load in seropositive subjects. Epidemiological data and diagnostic costs were extracted from public sources of the Valencian Community. Probabilities, utilities and costs of model states were obtained from the literature. The impact on mortality and hepatic complications avoided by the implementation of the alert were estimated, and efficiency was measured as an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) based on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the costs of both alternatives.

RESULTS

The EHR alert detected 269,548 patients, of whom 1,331 had CHC (vs. 23 patients with non-alert). Over the patients' lifetime, the alert would prevent 93% of decompensated cirrhosis cases, 87% of hepatocellular carcinomas, 90% of liver transplants, and 89% of liver related deaths compared to non-use of the alert system. In addition, it would obtain an additional 3.3 QALY per patient, with an incremental cost of €10,880 and an ICUR of €3,321.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of an age-based EHR alert in primary care to detect patients with CHC reduces hepatic complications and mortality and is an efficient strategy.

HCV testing: Order and completion rates among baby boomers obtaining care from seven health systems in Florida, 2015-2017

Many U.S. residents infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are baby boomers (born 1945-1965), who remain undiagnosed. Past CDC and USPSTF guidelines recommended one-time HCV testing for all baby boomers, with newer guidelines recommending universal screening for all adults. This retrospective cohort study examined electronic medical records for patient visits from 2015 to 2017 within the OneFlorida Data Trust and University of South Florida Health system. We assessed percentages of HCV tests ordered and completed across four age groups (those born before 1945, 1945-1965, 1966-1985, and after 1985). In 2019, we used logistic regression to examine factors associated with HCV test ordering and completion among baby boomers, including age, race, sex, number of primary care visits, HIV status, hepatitis diagnosis, and liver cancer history. All age groups had low rates of HCV test orders. 4.4% of baby boomers had a test ordered in 2015, and 6.7% in 2016. Of those, 94.5% and 89.7% completed testing, respectively. All other races/ethnicities had lower likelihood of testing completion than Whites (Blacks (aOR 0.82, 95%, CI 0.75-0.91); Asians (0.69, 0.52-0.92); Hispanics (0.29, 0.26-0.32)), although test orders were higher for Asians (1.48, 1.37-1.61) and Blacks (1.78, 1.73-1.82). Tests ordered (11.42, 10.94-11.92) and completed (2.25, 1.94-2.60) were more likely among those with hepatitis history. Test orders were more likely for HIV-positive patients (3.68, 3.45-3.93), but completion was less likely (0.67, 0.57-0.78). Interventions are needed to increase testing rates so that HCV infections are treated early, mitigating HCV-related morbidity and mortality, especially related to liver cancer.

A population-based US study of hepatitis C diagnosis rate

BACKGROUND

Underdiagnosis of HCV infection may hinder the obtainment of 2030 elimination goal.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the pre-DAA HCV diagnosis rate to inform future public health effort.

METHODS

Data were obtained from three nationwide databases (Truven Health MarketScan Research Database 2007-2014, US Census Bureau 2012-2016 and NHANES 2007-2014). HCV diagnosis was defined with either one inpatient or two outpatient HCV International Classification of Disease 9 codes, providing the number of patients with diagnosed HCV (Truven). US Census Bureau data were used for age- and sex-standardization. We derived the total (diagnosed and undiagnosed) HCV infection using the NHANES database. To determine the rate and number of undiagnosed HCV, we subtracted diagnosed HCV burden (Truven) from the total HCV burden (NHANES).

RESULTS

Of the 198 073 302 privately insured Americans, 1.49% (2 951 490 persons) had HCV infection. However, only 362 672 (12.29%) persons were diagnosed with HCV, leaving 2 588 818 (87.71%) undiagnosed. About two-third (68.04%) and one-third (33.04%) of diagnosed HCV patients had HCV RNA or genotype tests overall, with even lower rates for the ≥65 age group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the pre-DAA era, only 12% of insured Americans with HCV were diagnosed. While this grim statistic is expected to rise, much more effort is needed to enhance the HCV care cascade.

A Comprehensive Coordinator Supported Hepatitis C Virus Testing and Linkage to Treatment Program at Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States

Since 2020, the US Preventive Services Taskforce has recommended expanding hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening to include ages 18−79, in addition to baby boomers (born 1945−1965) and those at-risk for hepatitis C virus. This retrospective cohort analysis compared patients (18 years and above) tested for HCV through usual care versus a coordinator-supported program (HCV pathway) during 2015−2018 within Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States (KPMAS). In total, 131,176 patients were tested through the HCV pathway and 128,311 through usual care (non-standardized testing). Of those tested, 1.6% (HCV pathway) and 0.5% (usual care) had chronic HCV. Of those with chronic HCV, more patients tested within the HCV pathway completed hepatic transient elastography (82.6% HCV pathway vs. 45.6% usual care; p < 0.001) and a gastroenterology visit (72.2% HCV pathway vs. 46.5% usual care; p < 0.001), and had filled prescriptions for treatment (56.5% HCV pathway vs. 40.3% usual care; p < 0.001). The median time to complete each step was shorter for those tested through the HCV pathway (hepatic transient elastography (26 vs. 118 days), gastroenterology visit (63 vs. 131 days), and prescription fill (222 vs. 326 days)). More patients tested through a coordinator-supported, standardized testing pathway completed the necessary testing steps, in less time, compared to usual care. These findings may inform institutions seeking to create effective population-wide testing programs for HCV and other conditions.

Increasing Hepatitis C Screening in a Federally Qualified Health Center: A Quality Improvement Initiative

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a chronic infection that can lead to severe liver damage if left untreated. With increased availability and affordability of curative treatments, screening for HCV has become an important first step in reducing morbidity and mortality. At a rural federally qualified health center in North Carolina, two quality improvement initiatives-an electronic health record (EHR) prompt and educational flyers-were implemented to improve HCV screening rates. We compared the proportion of eligible patients born from 1945 to 1965 who received HCV screening before, during, and after the initiatives. HCV screening rates were highest during the two initiatives (30% and 39%, respectively). Screening rates fell in the 6-month period after the initiatives' conclusion (12%) but remained higher than at baseline (6%). Although HCV screening can increase with simple interventions, more durable solutions are needed to maintain screening coverage.

Hepatitis C Diagnosis: Simplified Solutions, Predictive Barriers, and Future Promises

The simplification of current hepatitis C diagnostic algorithms and the emergence of digital diagnostic devices will be very crucial to achieving the WHO's set goals of hepatitis C diagnosis (i.e., 90%) by 2030. From the last decade, hepatitis C diagnosis has been revolutionized by the advent and approval of state-of-the-art HCV diagnostic platforms which have been efficiently implemented in high-risk HCV populations in developed nations as well as in some low-to-middle income countries (LMICs) to identify millions of undiagnosed hepatitis C-infected individuals. Point-of-care (POC) rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs; POC-RDTs), RNA reflex testing, hepatitis C self-test assays, and dried blood spot (DBS) sample analysis have been proven their diagnostic worth in real-world clinical experiences both at centralized and decentralized diagnostic settings, in mass hepatitis C screening campaigns, and hard-to-reach aboriginal hepatitis C populations in remote areas. The present review article overviews the significance of current and emerging hepatitis C diagnostic packages to subvert the public health care burden of this 'silent epidemic' worldwide. We also highlight the challenges that remain to be met about the affordability, accessibility, and health system-related barriers to overcome while modulating the hepatitis C care cascade to adopt a 'test and treat' strategy for every hepatitis C-affected individual. We also elaborate some key measures and strategies in terms of policy and progress to be part of hepatitis C care plans to effectively link diagnosis to care cascade for rapid treatment uptake and, consequently, hepatitis C cure.

Strategy for the Micro-Elimination of Hepatitis C among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus-A Hospital-Based Experience

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can induce insulin resistance, and patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher prevalence of HCV infection. Patient outcomes improve after HCV eradication in DM patients. However, HCV micro-elimination targeting this population has not been approached. Little is known about using electronic alert systems for HCV screening among patients with DM in a hospital-based setting. We implemented an electronic reminder system for HCV antibody screening and RNA testing in outpatient departments among patients with DM. The screening rates and treatment rates at different departments before and after system implementation were compared. The results indicated that the total HCV screening rate increased from 49.3% (9505/19,272) to 78.2% (15,073/19,272), and the HCV-RNA testing rate increased from 73.4% to 94.2%. The anti-HCV antibody seropositive rate was 5.7%, and the HCV viremia rate was 62.7% in our patient population. The rate of positive anti-HCV antibodies and HCV viremia increased with patient age. This study demonstrates the feasibility and usefulness of an electronic alert system for HCV screening and treatment among DM patients in a hospital-based setting.

eHealth Technologies for Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Viral Hepatitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Chronic viral hepatitis is a leading cause of worldwide liver-related morbidity and mortality, despite the availability of effective treatments that reduce or prevent complications in most patients. Electronic-health (eHealth) technologies have potential to intervene along the whole cascade of care. We aimed to summarize available literature on eHealth interventions with respect to conventional screening, diagnostic and treatment outcomes in chronic hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV).

METHODS

We systematically reviewed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and international conference abstracts, including studies published from 2009 - 2020. Overall 80 studies were included, covering electronic medical record (EMR) interventions (n=39), telemedicine (n=20), mHealth (n=5), devices (n=4), clinical decision support (n=3), web-based (n=5), social media (n=1) and electronic communication (n=3).

RESULTS

Compared to standard care, EMR alerts increase screening rates in eligible populations including birth cohort screening in HCV, universal HCV screening in Emergency Departments, ethnic groups with high HBV prevalence, and HBV screening prior to immunosuppression. Direct messaging alerts to providers and automated testing may have a greater effect. No significant difference was found in sustained virological response outcomes between telemedicine and face-to-face management for community, rural and prison cohorts in HCV in the direct acting antiviral era of treatment, with higher patient satisfaction in telemedicine groups.

CONCLUSIONS

EMR alerts significantly increase screening rates in eligible cohorts in both chronic HBV and HCV. Telemedicine is equally efficacious to face-to-face care in HCV treatment. Other eHealth technologies show promise; however rigorous studies are lacking.

Randomized Clinical Trial of Inreach With or Without Mailed Outreach to Promote Hepatitis C Screening in a Difficult-to-Reach Patient Population

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment can significantly reduce the risk of liver-related mortality; however, many patients remain unaware of their infection in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of inreach, with and without mailed outreach, to increase HCV screening and follow-up in a large, difficult-to-reach patient population.

METHODS

We conducted a pragmatic randomized clinical trial from August 2018 to May 2019 in a large safety-net health system. Patients born between 1945 and 1965 were randomly assigned (1:1) to inreach with an electronic health record reminder to providers (n = 6,195) or inreach plus mailed HCV screening outreach (n = 6,191) to complete HCV antibody screening. Outreach also included processes to promote HCV RNA testing among those with a positive HCV antibody and linkage to care among those with positive HCV RNA. The primary outcome was completion of HCV antibody testing within 3 months of randomization (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03706742).

RESULTS

We included 12,386 eligible patients (median age 60 years; 46.5% Hispanic, 33.0% Black, and 16.0% White). In intent-to-treat analyses, HCV screening completion was significantly higher among inreach-plus-outreach patients than inreach-alone patients at 3 months (14.6% vs 7.4%, P < 0.001) and 6 months (17.4% vs 9.8%, P < 0.001) after randomization. Among those who completed HCV screening within 6 months, a higher proportion of inreach-plus-outreach patients with positive antibody results completed RNA testing within 3 months than inreach-alone patients (81.1% vs 57.1%, respectively, P = 0.02); however, linkage to care within 3 months of HCV infection confirmation did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (48.1% vs 75.0%, respectively, P = 0.24).

DISCUSSION

Among difficult-to-reach patients, a combination of inreach and mailed outreach significantly increased HCV screening compared with inreach alone. However, HCV screening completion in both arms remained low, highlighting a need for more intensive interventions.

Prescribing direct-acting antivirals to treat hepatitis C virus in a general practice setting in Australia: 'so why not do it'?

BACKGROUND

The recent implementation of a scheme to provide universal access to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medication to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) places Australia in a unique position to reach global HCV elimination goals. To achieve this, increasing the uptake and success of DAA treatment in general practice settings is essential.

AIMS

To explore current enablers and residual barriers to HCV treatment in general practice settings in the post-interferon era from both general practitioner (GP) and patient perspectives.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with 11 GP and 27 patients were conducted to draw out both challenges and facilitators particularly relevant to DAA uptake and treatment journeys.

RESULTS

Key enablers for successful treatment identified by this study included peer-led GP support and skill development, utilisation of electronic reminder systems, trusting relationships with patients and engaging with patients' social and family networks. Barriers related to accessible testing facilities and knowledge and confidence with DAA treatment continue to limit GP-led treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a universal access scheme, barriers to DAA prescription in general practice settings remain. These include access to fibrosis testing and GP confidence in DAA prescription. Strengthening peer-led GP skill development and utilisation of electronic reminder systems may help GP prioritise HCV treatment. Access to fibrosis testing and pathology services with no out-of-pocket costs to patients, particularly in outer-metropolitan areas, should be urgently addressed.

Innovations in Hepatitis C Screening and Treatment

New therapies offer hope for a cure to millions of persons living with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. HCV elimination is a global goal that will be difficult to achieve using the traditional paradigms of diagnosis and care. The current standard has evolved toward universal HCV screening and treatment, to achieve elimination goals. There are several steps between HCV diagnosis and cure with major barriers along the way. Innovative models of care can address barriers to better serve hardly reached populations and scale national efforts in the United States and abroad. Herein, we highlight innovative models of HCV care that aid in our progress toward HCV elimination.

Coordination, Cost, and Changing Epidemiology-Considerations in the Hepatitis C Care Cascade

This editorial reviews two articles in hepatology communications addressing challenges in the hepatitis C care cascade.

Establishing Efficient Systems through Electronic Medical Records to Promote Intra-hospital Referrals of Hepatitis Virus Carriers to Hepatology Specialists: A Multicenter Questionnaire-based Survey of 1,281 Healthcare Professionals

Objective Persistent hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are major causative factors of hepatic cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the development of antiviral treatment has enabled their suppression. Therefore, the early detection and treatment of these infections are important. The objective of this study was to assess the level of awareness among healthcare professionals about hepatitis virus infection and electronic medical records alert system. Methods We surveyed healthcare professionals from 10 institutions with electronic medical records alert systems. All participants attended a lecture about the reactivation risk due to HBV infections, the most recent antiviral treatment for HCV infections, and the electronic medical records alert system. They participated in a questionnaire-based survey about their awareness of these infections, current status of intra-hospital referral, need for intra-hospital referrals before and after the lecture, and reasons for non-referral of patients to specialists. Results Responses were received from 1,281 healthcare professionals. Physicians and pharmacists had a high level of awareness about HBV and HCV. Among physicians, the level of awareness of those in the surgical field and other fields was significantly lower than that of the professionals in the internal medicine field. The awareness of the need to refer patients to hepatologists increased from 84.7-85.4% before to 93.0% after the lecture. The most frequent reasons for not referring patients previously were "I had no knowledge and/or interest" (28.1% of responses) and "All I did was explain the results orally" (24.2%). Conclusion More widespread education of healthcare personnel is important to increase the number of individuals receiving appropriate treatment from specialist physicians.

Hepatitis C virus: Testing rate and attrition at linkage to specialized care, Catalonia, Spain 2011-2016

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening through primary care providers (PCP) might increase linkage to specialized care. This study aimed to calculate HCV testing rate and prevalence of anti-HCV according to socio-demographic factors in primary care in Catalonia, Spain, from 2011 to 2016, and to identify the rate and determinants of attrition at linkage to specialized care. Patient data from 274 primary care centres (3414 PCP) were analysed, including socio-demographic information, morbidity, laboratory tests and treatments (1-Jan-2011 to 31-Dec-2016). Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to examine HCV testing rate, HCV seroprevalence and rate of attrition at linkage to specialized care. In the study period, there were 839 072 people tested for HCV infection and 21 156 with first-time positive anti-HCV test results. Rate of HCV testing was 143.54/10³ pop (95% CI: 143.26-143.83). Women had higher HCV testing rate (158.65/10³ women [95% CI: 158.24-159.07]), compared to men (128.10/10³ men [95% CI: 127.72-128.49]). The highest HCV testing rate was among people aged 25-34 (284.11/10³ pop [CIs: 283.10-285.12]). The anti-HCV seroprevalence was 3.62/10³ pop (CIs: 3.57-3.67). The highest prevalence was found among men (4.20/10³ men [CIs: 4.12-4.27]), people aged 45-54 (7.19/10³ pop [CIs: 7.01-7.37]), people aged 75-84 (7.26/10³ pop [CIs: 6.99-7.53]), Spanish (3.68/10³ [CIs: 3.61-3.75]), European and Northern Americans (5.64/10³ [CIs: 5.33-5.96]) and Asians (9.78/10³ [CIs: 9.21-10.35]). From those who had a positive anti-HCV result, 49.8% (N = 10 528) were not linked to specialized care. Appropriate clinical care pathways and referral systems need to be established to ensure optimal linkage to specialized care for people newly diagnosed with HCV in primary care.