Curative salvage liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: An intention-to-treat analysis

Upfront multi-bipolar radiofrequency ablation for HCC in transplant-eligible cirrhotic patients with salvage transplantation in case of recurrence

INTRODUCTION

We aim to assess the long-term outcomes of percutaneous multi-bipolar radiofrequency (mbpRFA) as the first treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in transplant-eligible cirrhotic patients, followed by salvage transplantation for intrahepatic distant tumour recurrence or liver failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included transplant-eligible patients with cirrhosis and a first diagnosis of HCC within Milan criteria treated by upfront mbp RFA. Transplantability was defined by age <70 years, social support, absence of significant comorbidities, no active alcohol use and no recent extrahepatic cancer. Baseline variables were correlated with outcomes using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox models.

RESULTS

Among 435 patients with HCC, 172 were considered as transplantable with HCCs >2 cm (53%), uninodular (87%) and AFP >100 ng/mL (13%). Median overall survival was 87 months, with 75% of patients alive at 3 years, 61% at 5 years and 43% at 10 years. Age (p = .003) and MELD>10 (p = .01) were associated with the risk of death. Recurrence occurred in 118 patients within Milan criteria in 81% of cases. Local recurrence was observed in 24.5% of cases at 10 years and distant recurrence rates were observed in 69% at 10 years. After local recurrence, 69% of patients were still alive at 10 years. At the first tumour recurrence, 75 patients (65%) were considered transplantable. Forty-one patients underwent transplantation, mainly for distant intrahepatic tumour recurrence. The overall 5-year survival post-transplantation was 72%, with a tumour recurrence of 2.4%.

CONCLUSION

Upfront multi-bipolar RFA for a first diagnosis of early HCC on cirrhosis coupled with salvage liver transplantation had a favourable intention-to-treat long-term prognosis, allowing for spare grafts.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapies in hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer, specifically hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The development of effective systemic therapies, particularly those involving immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has substantially improved the outcomes of patients with advanced-stage HCC. Approximately 30% of patients are diagnosed with early stage disease and currently receive potentially curative therapies, such as resection, liver transplantation or local ablation, which result in median overall survival durations beyond 60 months. Nonetheless, up to 70% of these patients will have disease recurrence within 5 years of resection or local ablation. To date, the results of randomized clinical trials testing adjuvant therapy in patients with HCC have been negative. This major unmet need has been addressed with the IMbrave 050 trial, demonstrating a recurrence-free survival benefit in patients with a high risk of relapse after resection or local ablation who received adjuvant atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In parallel, studies testing neoadjuvant ICIs alone or in combination in patients with early stage disease have also reported efficacy. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current approaches to manage patients with early stage HCC. We also describe the tumour immune microenvironment and the mechanisms of action of ICIs and cancer vaccines in this setting. Finally, we summarize the available evidence from phase II/III trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches and discuss emerging clinical trials, identification of biomarkers and clinical trial design considerations for future studies.

Downstaging Techniques for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Candidates Awaiting Liver Transplantation

During the last decade, downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma has expanded the pool of patients eligible for liver transplantation. The literature is rife with attempts to elucidate best treatment strategies with novel locoregional and systemic therapies continuing to emerge. Several trials have confirmed the large-scale success of downstaging protocols, with equitable long-term survival and recurrence rates after liver transplant. We review the currently available techniques used for downstaging, including their indications, complications, and efficacies. New frontiers have focused on the potential role of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, although more research is needed to delineate its role in current treatment paradigms.

Multidisciplinary Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 2023: Italian practice Treatment Guidelines of the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF), Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italian Association of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery (AICEP), Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists (AIGO), Italian Association of Radiology and Clinical Oncology (AIRO), Italian Society of Pathological Anatomy and Diagnostic Cytology (SIAPeC-IAP), Italian Society of Surgery (SIC), Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE), Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), Italian Organ Transplant Society (SITO), and Association of Patients with Hepatitis and Liver Disease (EpaC) - Part I - Surgical treatments

Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death. The remarkable improvements in treating HCC achieved in the last years have increased the complexity of HCC management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the multidisciplinary treatment management of HCC, the Italian Scientific Societies involved in the management of this cancer have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the GRADE methodology needed to produce guidelines based on evidence. Here is presented the first part of guidelines, focused on the multidisciplinary tumor board of experts and surgical treatments of HCC.

Predictors of non-transplantable recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with frontline liver resection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence is common in patients treated with liver resection (LR). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the incidence and preoperative predictors of non-transplantable recurrence in patients with single HCC ≤5 cm treated with frontline LR.

METHODS

From the Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) database, 512 patients receiving frontline LR for single HCC ≤5 cm were retrieved. Incidence and predictors of recurrence beyond Milan criteria (MC) and up-to-seven criteria were compared between patients with HCC <4 and ≥4 cm.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 4.2 years, the overall recurrence rate was 55.9%. In the ≥4 cm group, a significantly higher proportion of patients recurred beyond MC at first recurrence (28.9% vs. 14.1%; p < 0.001) and overall (44.4% vs. 25.2%; p < 0.001). Similar results were found considering recurrence beyond up-to-seven criteria. Compared to those with larger tumours, patients with HCC <4 cm had a longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival. HCC size ≥4 cm and high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level at the time of LR were independent predictors of recurrence beyond MC (and up-to-seven criteria). In the subgroup of patients with available histologic information (n = 354), microvascular invasion and microsatellite lesions were identified as additional independent risk factors for non-transplantable recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high recurrence rate, LR for single HCC ≤5 cm offers excellent long-term survival. Non-transplantable recurrence is predicted by HCC size and AFP levels, among pre-operatively available variables. High-risk patients could be considered for frontline LT or listed for transplantation even before recurrence.

Transplant Oncology: An Emerging Discipline of Cancer Treatment

Transplant oncology is an emerging concept of cancer treatment with a promising prospective outcome. The applications of oncology, transplant medicine, and surgery are the core of transplant oncology to improve patients' survival and quality of life. The main concept of transplant oncology is to radically cure cancer by removing the diseased organ and replacing it with a healthy one, aiming to improve the survival outcomes and quality of life of cancer patients. Subsequently, it seeks to expand the treatment options and research for hepatobiliary malignancies, which have seen significantly improved survival outcomes after the implementation of liver transplantation (LT). In the case of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the transplant setting, where the liver is the most common site of metastasis of patients who are considered to have unresectable disease, initial studies have shown improved survival for LT treatment compared to palliative therapy interventions. The indications of LT for hepatobiliary malignancies have been slowly expanded over the years beyond Milan criteria in a stepwise manner. However, the outcome improvements and overall patient survival are limited to the specifics of the setting and systematic intervention options. This review aims to illustrate the representative concepts and history of transplant oncology as an emerging discipline for the management of hepatobiliary malignancies, in addition to other emerging concepts, such as the uses of immunotherapy in a peri-transplant setting as well as the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for surveillance post-transplantation.

Surgical Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Competing-risk Analysis of Tumor-related Death Following Liver Resection and Transplantation Under an Intention-to-treat Perspective

BACKGROUND

Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma could benefit from upfront liver resection (LR) or liver transplantation (LT), but the optimal strategy in terms of tumor-related outcomes is still debated. We compared the oncological outcomes of LR and LT for hepatocellular carcinoma, stratifying the study population into a low-, intermediate-, and high-risk class according to the risk of death at 5-y predicted by a previously developed prognostic model. The impact of tumor pathology on oncological outcomes of low- and intermediate-risk patients undergoing LR was investigated as a secondary outcome.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicentric cohort study involving 2640 patients consecutively treated by LR or LT from 4 tertiary hepatobiliary and transplant centers between 2005 and 2015, focusing on patients amenable to both treatments upfront. Tumor-related survival and overall survival were compared under an intention-to-treat perspective.

RESULTS

We identified 468 LR and 579 LT candidates: 512 LT candidates underwent LT, whereas 68 (11.7%) dropped-out for tumor progression. Ninety-nine high-risk patients were selected from each treatment cohort after propensity score matching. Three and 5-y cumulative incidence of tumor-related death were 29.7% and 39.5% versus 17.2% and 18.3% for LR and LT group ( P = 0.039), respectively. Low-risk and intermediate-risk patients treated by LR and presenting satellite nodules and microvascular invasion had a significantly higher 5-y incidence of tumor-related death (29.2% versus 12.5%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk patients showed significantly better intention-to-treat tumor-related survival after upfront LT rather than LR. Cancer-specific survival of low- and intermediate-risk LR patients was significantly impaired by unfavorable pathology, suggesting the application of ab-initio salvage LT in such scenarios.

Recent advances in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma therapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent form of primary liver cancer, accounting for 75%-85% of cases. Although treatments are given to cure early-stage HCC, up to 50%-70% of individuals may experience a relapse of the illness in the liver after 5 years. Research on the fundamental treatment modalities for recurrent HCC is moving significantly further. The precise selection of individuals for therapy strategies with established survival advantages is crucial to ensuring better outcomes. These strategies aim to minimize substantial morbidity, support good life quality, and enhance survival for patients with recurrent HCC. For individuals with recurring HCC after curative treatment, no approved therapeutic regimen is currently available. A recent study presented novel approaches, like immunotherapy and antiviral medication, to improve the prognosis of patients with recurring HCC with the apparent lack of data to guide the clinical treatment. The data supporting several neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for patients with recurring HCC are outlined in this review. We also discuss the potential for future clinical and translational investigations.

Surgical treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and challenges

Primary liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and was the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide in 2020. It includes hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (representing 75%-85% of cases), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (representing 10%-15% of cases), and other rare types. The survival rate of patients with HCC has risen with improved surgical technology and perioperative management in recent years; however, high tumor recurrence rates continue to limit long-term survival, even after radical surgical resection (exceeding 50% recurrence). For resectable recurrent liver cancer, surgical removal [either salvage liver transplantation (SLT) or repeat hepatic resection] remains the most effective therapy that is potentially curative for recurrent HCC. Thus, here, we introduce surgical treatment for recurrent HCC. Areas Covered: A literature search was performed for recurrent HCC using Medline and PubMed up to August 2022. Expert commentary: In general, long-term survival after the re-resection of recurrent liver cancer is usually beneficial. SLT has equivalent outcomes to primary liver transplantation for unresectable recurrent illness in a selected group of patients; however, SLT is constrained by the supply of liver grafts. SLT seems to be inferior to repeat liver resection when considering operative and postoperative results but has the major advantage of disease-free survival. When considering the similar overall survival rate and the current situation of donor shortages, repeat liver resection remains an important option for recurrent HCC.

Current status and prospect of treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Owing to its heterogeneous and highly aggressive nature, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high recurrence rate, which is a non-negligible problem despite the increasing number of available treatment options. Recent clinical trials have attempted to reduce the recurrence and develop innovative treatment options for patients with recurrent HCC. In the event of liver remnant recurrence, the currently available treatment options include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, tumor ablation, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, stereotactic body radiotherapy, systemic therapies, and combination therapy. In this review, we summarize the strategies to reduce the recurrence of high-risk tumors and aggressive therapies for recurrent HCC. Additionally, we discuss methods to prevent HCC recurrence and prognostic models constructed based on predictors of recurrence to develop an appropriate surveillance program.

Surgical Strategies for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Resection: A Review of Current Evidence

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, and both liver resection and liver transplantation are considered potentially curative options. However, high recurrence rates affect the prognosis depending both on the primary HCC pathology characteristics or on the type and time of the relapse. While great attention has been usually posted on treatment algorithms for the first HCC, treatment algorithms for recurrent HCC (rHCC) are lacking. In these cases, surgery still represents a curative option with both redo hepatectomy and/or salvage liver transplantation, which are considered valid treatments in selected patients. In the current era of personalised medicine with promises of new systemic-targeted immuno-chemotherapies, we wished to perform a narrative review of the literature on the role of surgical strategies for rHCC.

Contrast-enhanced CT findings-based model to predict MVI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Microvascular invasion (MVI) is important in early recurrence and leads to poor overall survival (OS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A number of studies have reported independent risk factors for MVI. In this retrospective study, we designed to develop a preoperative model for predicting the presence of MVI in HCC patients to help surgeons in their surgical decision-making and improve patient management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We developed a predictive model based on a nomogram in a training cohort of 225 HCC patients. We analyzed patients' clinical information, laboratory examinations, and imaging features from contrast-enhanced CT. Mann-Whitney U test and multiple logistic regression analysis were used to confirm independent risk factors and develop the predictive model. Internal and external validation was performed on 75 and 77 HCC patients, respectively. Moreover, the diagnostic performance of our model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, maximum tumor diameter (> 50 mm), tumor margin, direct bilirubin (> 2.7 µmol/L), and AFP (> 360.7 ng/mL) were confirmed as independent risk factors for MVI. In the internal and external validation cohort, the developed nomogram model demonstrated good diagnostic ability for MVI with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.723 and 0.829, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on routine clinical examinations, which may be helpful for clinical decision-making, we have developed a nomogram model that can successfully assess the risk of MVI in HCC patients preoperatively. When predicting HCC patients with a high risk of MVI, the surgeons may perform an anatomical or wide-margin hepatectomy on the patient.

Risk factors and long-term prognosis of beyond-Milan recurrence after hepatectomy for BCLC stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma: A large-scale multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Data on recurrence are important to inform surveillance and improve long-term surgical outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We sought to identify risk factors and long-term prognosis among patients who experienced beyond-Milan recurrence after hepatectomy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hepatectomy for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma were identified from a multi-institutional database. Predictors of beyond-Milan recurrence and risk factors associated with post-recurrence survival among patients with beyond-Milan recurrence were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among 753 patients (median follow-up, 51.8 months), 138 (18.3%) developed beyond-Milan recurrence. Regular surveillance (interval follow-up ≤3 months within 1 year and ≤6 months in subsequent years after surgery) was not carried out for 53 (38.4%) patients who developed beyond-Milan recurrence. On multivariate analysis, increased risk of beyond-Milan recurrence was independently associated with preoperative alpha-fetoprotein level >400 ng/mL, tumor size >5.0 cm, multifocal disease, microvascular invasion, and no/irregular recurrence surveillance. Median post-recurrence survival among patients with beyond-Milan recurrence was only 8.4 months (95% confidence interval: 7.0-9.8 months). Among patients who developed beyond-Milan recurrence, Child-Pugh grade B/C, early recurrence within 1 year after surgery, macrovascular invasion/distant metastasis, and noncurative treatment of recurrence were independent risk factors associated with worse post-recurrence survival.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 1 in 5 patients developed beyond-Milan recurrence after hepatectomy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with beyond-Milan recurrence had a median survival of less than 1 year after diagnosis of the recurrence. Regular surveillance is an important and actionable measure to decrease beyond-Milan recurrence and, in turn, improve long-term survival among patients treated with hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatobiliary Phase Features of Preoperative Gadobenate-Enhanced MR can Predict Early Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Who Underwent Anatomical Hepatectomy

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to establish a model for predicting early recurrence (≤2 years) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after anatomical hepatectomy based on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) imaging characteristics of gadobenate-enhanced MRI.

Methods

A total of 155 patients who underwent anatomical hepatectomy HCC therapy and gadobenate-enhanced MRI were included retrospectively. The patients were divided into the early recurrence-free group (n = 103) and the early recurrence group (n = 52). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independent risk factors related to early recurrence, and four models were established. The preoperative model with/without HBP imaging features (HBP-pre/No HBP-pre model) and the postoperative model with/without HBP imaging features (HBP-post/No HBP-post model). Bootstrap resampling 1,000 times was used to verify the model and displayed by nomograms. The performance of nomograms was evaluated by discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate the differences between models and to select the optimal model.

Results

Shape, arterial peritumoral enhancement, AFP-L3, and peritumoral hypointensity on HBP were identified as independent risk factors. Prothrombin time (PT) and r-glutamyltransferase (GGT) were selected by multivariate Cox regression. These six factors construct the HBP-pre model. Removing peritumoral hypointensity on HBP was the No HBP-pre model. Adding microvascular invasion (MVI) and microscopic capsule factors were the HBP-post and No HBP-post model. The C-index was 0.766, 0.738, 0.770, and 0.742, respectively. The NRI and IDI of the HBP-pre vs. the No HBP-pre model and the HBP-post vs. the No HBP-post model significantly increased 0.258, 0.092, 0.280, and 0.086, respectively. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) had good consistency and clinical utility. However, the NRI and IDI of the No HBP-post vs. the No HBP-pre model and the HBP-post vs. the HBP-pre model did not increase significantly.

Conclusions

Preoperative gadobenate-enhanced MR HBP imaging features significantly improve the model performance while the postoperative pathological factors do not. Therefore, the HBP-pre model is selected as the optimal model. The strong performance of this model may help hepatologists to assess the risk of recurrence in order to guide the selection of treatment options.

The second Mexican consensus on hepatocellular carcinoma. Part II: Treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is more frequently manifesting as one of the main complications of cirrhosis of the liver, its principal risk factor. There have been modifications in its incidence over the past decade, related to an epidemiologic transition in the etiology of cirrhosis, with a decrease in the prevalence of hepatitis C and an increase in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as a cause, as well as the development of HCC in the non-cirrhotic liver due to NAFLD. Genetic markers associated with the disease have been identified, and surveillance and diagnosis have improved. Regarding treatment, surgical techniques, in both resection and transplantation, have advanced and radiologic techniques, at the curative stage of the disease, have enhanced survival in those patients. And finally, there have been radical changes in the systemic approach, with much more optimistic expectations, when compared with the options available a decade ago. Therefore, the Asociación Mexicana de Hepatología decided to carry out the Second Mexican Consensus on Hepatocellular Carcinoma, which is an updated review of the available national and international evidence on the epidemiology, risk factors, surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease, to offer the Mexican physician current information on the different topics regarding hepatocellular carcinoma. In this second part of the document, the topics related to the treatment of HCC are presented.

Models to Predict Development or Recurence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) in Patients with Advanced Hepatic Fibrosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States (U.S.).1 The purpose of this review is to highlight published models that predict development of HCC and estimate risk of HCC recurrence after treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been several models created for both de novo HCC and HCC recurrence, with the more recent models using a combination of age, sex, decompensation, and laboratory values (platelet count, albumin, bilirubin), and liver disease etiology to predict both 5 and 10-year HCC incidence. For chronic hepatitis C, sustained virologic response has been a useful component of understanding HCC risk reduction. BMI and diabetes have been utilized in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) models to predict HCC risk. For HCC recurrence after treatment (for both surgical resection and liver transplant), tumor size and number, vascular invasion, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are all components of HCC recurrence risk models. Although numerous HCC risk prediction models have been established over the last several years, challenges remain including how to best incorporate these models into clinical practice, improve surveillance for NAFLD-HCC development, and determine timing and duration of post-resection recurrence surveillance.

Prognostic Value of International Normalized Ratio-to-Albumin Ratio and Ferritin Level in Chronic Liver Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth among the most common cancers and the fourth among cancer-related causes of death in the world. In the evaluation of liver function in HCC patients, parameters such as albumin-bilirubin, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) to albumin ratio (PTAR) are used among new methods other than Child-Pugh and MELD scores. Biomarkers are widely used in clinical practice in cases such as diagnosing various diseases, evaluating treatment response and predicting prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of serum ferritin and INR/albumin ratio in patients with chronic liver disease who develop HCC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 534 patients who were followed up with the diagnosis of HCC between 2009 and 2020. The patients with HCC etiology were evaluated in 3 groups (chronic hepatitis B group, chronic hepatitis C group, and other group). When comparing serum ferritin level and prothromin time-international normalized ratio to albumin ratio with Child Pugh score (CTP) in chronic liver patients with HCC, liver functional reserve and its role in predicting prognosis were investigated.

RESULTS

The serum ferritin level was 226 ± 334 in the CTP A group, 239 ± 302 in the CTP B group, and 678 ± 966 in the CTP C group, and the p value was 0.001. The PTAR CTP group was 0.35 ± 0.10, the CTP B group was 0.50 ± 0.26, the CTP C group was 1.18 ± 6.01, and the p value was 0.001. Multivariant analysis results showed that ferritin hazard ratio is 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, and p value was 0.09, and PTAR hazard ratio is 1.38, 95% CI 2.37-8.00, and p value was 0.49. The etiological distribution of HCC was determined as HBV (61.6%), HCV (19.9%), and other etiologies (18.5%). Significant values were determined for age, gender, glucose, GGT, T. cholesterol, and tumor diameter parameters according to etiological distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum ferritin level and PTAR score increased in proportion to the severity of liver disease and were associated with poor prognosis. We think that high serum ferritin and PTAR score is a prognostic biomarker in predicting the synthesis function of the liver and mortality in critically ill patients with cirrhosis.

Surveillance and Monitoring of Hepatocellular Carcinoma During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is expected to have a long-lasting impact on the approach to care for patients at risk for and with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to the risks from potential exposure and resource reallocation. The goal of this document is to provide recommendations on HCC surveillance and monitoring, including strategies to limit unnecessary exposure while continuing to provide high-quality care for patients. Publications and guidelines pertaining to the management of HCC during COVID-19 were reviewed for recommendations related to surveillance and monitoring practices, and any available guidance was referenced to support the authors' recommendations when applicable. Existing HCC risk stratification models should be utilized to prioritize imaging resources to those patients at highest risk of incident HCC and recurrence following therapy though surveillance can likely continue as before in settings where COVID-19 prevalence is low and adequate protections are in place. Waitlisted patients who will benefit from urgent LT should be prioritized for surveillance whereas it would be reasonable to extend surveillance interval by a short period in HCC patients with lower risk tumor features and those more than 2 years since their last treatment. For patients eligible for systemic therapy, the treatment regimen should be dictated by the risk of COVID-19 associated with route of administration, monitoring and treatment of adverse events, within the context of relative treatment efficacy.

Role of Locoregional Therapies in Patients With Hepatocellular Cancer Awaiting Liver Transplantation

Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in the world and the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. The United Network for Organ Sharing has its own staging criteria for organ allocation, which is a modification of tumor-node-metastasis staging of American Joint Committee on Cancer. For the purpose of clarity, United Network for Organ Sharing staging will be described as uT1, uT2 (Milan criteria), and uT3 (eligible for downstaging) in this review. For those with unresectable HCC or those with advanced liver disease and HCC but within the Milan criteria, liver transplantation is the treatment of choice. Because of prolonged waiting period on the liver transplant list in many parts of the world for deceased donor liver transplantation, there is a serious risk of dropout from the liver transplant list because of tumor progression. For those patients, locoregional therapies might need to be considered, and moreover, there is circumstantial evidence to suggest that tumor progression after locoregional therapies might be a surrogate marker of unfavorable tumor biology. There is no consensus on the role or type of locoregional therapies in the management of patients with uT1 and uT2 eligible for liver transplant and of those with lesions larger than uT2 but eligible for downstaging protocol (uT3 lesions). In this review, we examine the role of locoregional therapies in these patients stratified by staging and propose treatment options based on the current evidence of tumor progression rates while awaiting liver transplantation and tumor recurrence rates after liver transplantation.

Argentinian clinical practice guideline for surveillance, diagnosis, staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

The A.A.E.E.H has developed this guideline for the best care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Argentina. It was done from May 2018 to March 2020. Specific clinical research questions were systematically searched. The quality of evidence and level of recommendations were organized according to GRADE. HCC surveillance is strongly recommended with abdominal ultrasound (US) every six months in the population at risk for HCC (cirrhosis, hepatitis B or hepatitis C); it is suggested to add alpha-feto protein (AFP) levels in case of inexeperienced sonographers. Imaging diagnosis in patients at risk for HCC has high specificity and tumor biopsy is not mandatory. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer algorithm is strongly recommended for HCC staging and treatment-decision processes. Liver resection is strongly recommended for patients without portal hypertension and preserved liver function. Composite models are suggested for liver transplant selection criteria. Therapies for HCC with robust clinical evidence include transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and first to second line systemic treatment options (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab). Immunotherapy with nivolumab and pembrolizumab has failed to show statistical benefit but the novel combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has recently shown survival benefit over sorafenib in frontline.

Survival according to recurrence patterns after resection for transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma in HBV endemic area: Appraisal of liver transplantation strategy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Since there is a shortage of liver donors, we investigated recurrence patterns and outcomes after liver resection (LR) to determine the feasibility of salvage liver transplantation (SLT).

METHODS

We analyzed 468 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria (MC) who were mainly associated with Hepatitis B virus infection (76.3%) and had undergone curative LR as an initial treatment.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) rates were 86.6% and 67.4% at 5 and 10 years after LR, respectively. During a median follow-up of 59 months, 211 patients experienced recurrences including 175 (37.4%) within MC and 36 (7.7%) beyond MC. Survival was lowest in patients with beyond MC-recurrence followed by within MC- and no-recurrence groups (26.5%, 86.6%, and 94.7% at 5 years, respectively, P<0.001). Independent pathologic predictors of recurrence beyond MC were the presence of satellite nodules, microvascular invasion, and unfavorable gross findings (multinodular confluent and infiltrative) (all, P<0.05). Patients with all three risk factors experienced recurrence with the highest cumulative incidence of mortality. Among 173 patients with recurrence within MC, the cumulative incidence of HCC progression beyond MC despite resection and locoregional treatment (LRT) was 29% and 60% at 5 and 10 years after recurrence, respectively, and their 10-year OS rate was 25.8%.

CONCLUSION

Curative LR achieved a 5-year survival of>85% in patients with transplantable HCC, but early SLT after recurrence within MC is advocated because of poor survival and high risk of progression thereafter. Further, prophylactic LT could be considered for those with high risk of recurrence.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Working Group Report from the ILTS Transplant Oncology Consensus Conference

Liver transplantation (LT) offers excellent long-term outcome for certain patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a push to not simply rely on tumor size and number. Selection criteria should also consider tumor biology (including alpha-fetoprotein), probability of waitlist and post-LT survival (ie, transplant benefit), organ availability, and waitlist composition. These criteria may be expanded for live donor LT (LDLT) compared to deceased donor LT though this should not adversely affect the double equipoise in LDLT, namely ensuring both acceptable recipient outcomes and donor safety. HCC patients with compensated liver disease and minimal tumor burden have low urgency for LT, especially after local-regional therapy with complete response, and do not appear to derive the same benefit from LT as other waitlist candidates. These guidelines were developed to assist in selecting appropriate HCC patients for both deceased donor LT and LDLT.

Potential Anticancer Effect of Celastrol on Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Suppressing CXCR4-related Signal and Impeding Tumor Growth in Vivo

BACKGROUND

Potential agents that can effectively treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are being continuously explored.

METHODS

Celastrol extracted from roots of an ancient Chinese herb, Tripterygium wilfordii (Thunder god vine), has been identified as a potential anti-tumor agent. In this study, the molecular mechanisms underlying the action of celastrol on cell proliferation and chemokine CXCR4-related signal pathway associated with tumor growth were investigated.

RESULTS

The CXCR4 expression was diminished by celastrol treatment in a dose-dependent manner, and its downstream associated pathways, including PI3K and Akt were also downregulated. Celastrol also significantly attenuated proliferation and migration ability of HCC cells, and induced cell apoptosis in vitro. Additionally, significant inhibition of HCC growth was observed in the celastrol-treated group as compared with the control group in vivo as well.

CONCLUSION

Celastrol is capable of attenuating cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis, leading to inhibition of HCC growth through the suppression of CXCR4-related signal pathway.

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells combine with normothermic machine perfusion to improve rat donor liver quality-the important role of hepatic microcirculation in donation after circulatory death

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) can expand the donor pool effectively. A gap remains in outcome between DCD livers and living donor livers, warranting improved DCD liver quality and urgent resolution. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) can regulate immunity, participate in the anti-inflammatory response, and secrete cytokines. We investigated the effect of BMMSCs combined with normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) on DCD liver quality, and the role of microcirculation therein. Rat thoracic aortas were clipped to obtain DCD livers, and a rat NMP system was established. The DCD livers were grouped by preservation method: normal, static cold storage (SCS), NMP (P), and BMMSCs plus NMP (BP); storage time was up to 8 h. Liver function in outflow perfusate was detected by biochemical methods; liver tissue histopathology was observed by hematoxylin–eosin staining; hepatocyte ultrastructure was observed by transmission electron microscopy; hepatocyte apoptosis was detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling; liver microcirculation–related indicators were detected by immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Compared with SCS, P and BP significantly improved liver function and liver histological damage, reduced hepatocyte apoptosis, and repaired hepatocyte mitochondrial damage after 6 h in vitro. BP also significantly inhibited intrahepatic macrophage activation and intercellular adhesion, improved endothelial damage, and significantly improved endothelin 1–nitric oxide balance and microcirculation perfusion. In conclusion, BP can improve DCD liver microcirculation and quality. The mechanism may be the improvement of improve hepatic sinusoidal endothelial injury and microcirculation perfusion by inhibiting macrophage activation and intercellular adhesion.

Radiomic Features at Contrast-enhanced CT Predict Recurrence in Early Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Study

Background Early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the ideal candidate for resection in patients with preserved liver function; however, cancer will recur in half of these patients and no reliable prognostic tool has been established. Purpose To investigate the effectiveness of radiomic features in predicting tumor recurrence after resection of early stage HCC. Materials and Methods In total, 295 patients (median age, 58 years; interquartile range, 50-65 years; 221 men) who underwent contrast material-enhanced CT and curative resection for early stage HCC that met the Milan criteria between February 2009 and December 2016 were retrospectively recruited from three independent institutions. Follow-up consisted of serum α-fetoprotein level, liver function tests, and dynamic imaging examinations every 3 months during the first 2 years and then every 6 months thereafter. In the development cohort of 177 patients from institution 1, recurrence-related radiomic features were computationally extracted from the tumor and its periphery and a radiomics signature was built with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Two models, one integrating preoperative and one integrating pre- and postoperative variables, were created by using multivariable Cox regression analysis. An independent external cohort of 118 patients from institutions 2 and 3 was used to validate the proposed models. Results The preoperative model integrated radiomics signature with serum α-fetoprotein level and tumor number; the postoperative model incorporated microvascular invasion and satellite nodules into the above-mentioned predictors. In both study cohorts, two radiomics-based models provided better predictive performance (concordance index ≥0.77, P < .05 for all), lower prediction error (integrated Brier score ≤0.14), and larger net benefits, as determined by means of decision curve analysis, than rival models without radiomics and widely adopted staging systems. The radiomics-based models gave three risk strata with high, intermediate, or low risk of recurrence and distinct profiles of recurrent tumor number. Conclusion The proposed radiomics models with pre- and postresection features helped predict tumor recurrence for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma-How to Determine Therapeutic Options

Deciding on specific treatment strategies involves not only tumor stage, performance status, and severity of underlying liver disease, but additional factors such as biomarkers, organ availability, and radiographic tumor response to treatment. In this review, we present hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases to highlight how to determine therapeutic options for HCC in specific scenarios, including resection versus liver transplant, choice of initial local regional treatment, tumor downstaging, and systemic therapies for advanced HCC.

Impact of narrow margin and R1 resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on the salvage liver transplantation strategy. An intention-to-treat analysis

BACKGROUND

No studies have investigated whether narrow margin is a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence outside transplantability criteria. The objective was to assess on an intent-to-treat (ITT) basis whether hepatectomy with narrow margin affects the outcomes in patients enrolled in the salvage liver transplantation (LT) strategy.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2016, patients enrolled in the salvage LT strategy were divided into 2 groups: narrow (<10 mm) vs. wide (≥10 mm) margin groups. R1 resection was defined as positive histologic margin involvement. Recurrence rate, transplantability rate of recurrence and ITT overall survival (ITT-OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were studied: 43 patients with narrow margin and 38 with wide margin. The recurrence rates, pattern and delay of recurrence, transplantability following recurrence, and ITT-OS were similar between the two groups. These results were maintained when comparing patients with R1 resection to those with R0 resection.

CONCLUSION

On an ITT basis, hepatectomy with narrow margin or R1 resection did not impair the transplantability of recurrence and survival of patients enrolled in the salvage LT strategy. Narrow margin and even R1 resection following hepatectomy in the setting of salvage LT strategy should not be the basis for altering the strategy.

Advantage of early liver transplantation whenever indicated for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after primary liver resection

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following liver resection (LR) has been considered a promising strategy for improving patient's outcome. The study aimed to analyse patients from primary LR to LT for HCC and to provide additional information for decision-making in therapeutic strategies for patients with HCC.

METHODS

Among 776 LTs, a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone LT for recurrent HCC after primary LR between May 2005 and 2017 February was performed.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, the overall recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 84.8%, 68.2% and 68.2%, and disease-specific overall-survival rates were 95.7%, 74.4% and 66.7% at 1, 3 and 5 years after LT, respectively. Beyond University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) transplantation criteria (p = 0.018, hazard ratio (HR) = 12.70), maximum tumor size ≥ 5 cm at LR (p = 0.012, HR = 7.90) and period between post-LR HCC recurrence and LT ≥ 1 year (p = 0.030, HR = 7.57) were prognostic factors of HCC recurrence after LT. Moreover, HCC recurrence after LT was the solely independent risk factor affecting overall survival of patients.

CONCLUSION

Large tumor size at LR should be taken into cautious tending to HCC recurrence even after salvage LT. Importantly, LT should be considered as soon as possible preferably within 1 year whenever post-LR recurrent HCC meets transplantation criteria.

Salvage living donor liver transplantation for posthepatectomy recurrence: a higher incidence of recurrence but promising strategy for long-term survival

BACKGROUND

The scarcity of deceased donor organ donation has led to increasing utilization of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), which is an optimal treatment for cirrhosis associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study thus aims to analyze prognostic factors and beneficial effects of LDLT for patients with HCC.

METHODS

All patients who underwent LDLT for HCC were included in this study. A multivariate analysis of patients' clinicopathologic parameters was performed to determine prognostic factors. Subsequently, the type of LDLT was further analyzed and compared based on the result of multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 36 (11.9%) of 303 patients were identified as having HCC recurrence after LDLT. Salvage LDLT (sLDLT) defined by liver transplantation for those patients with recurrent HCC after primary liver resection (LR) was identified as the major prognostic factor of HCC recurrence following the transplantation (HR=2.49 [1.12-5.54], p=0.025). The HCC recurrence incidence and recurrence-free survival after LDLT were significantly inferior in the salvage group than the other group. The pre-transplantation factors were further evaluated and resulted in only maximum tumour size ≥5 cm at primary LR(HR=10.79 [2.10-55.43], p=0.004) affecting post-transplantation HCC recurrence in those patients who had been performed sLDLT. However, patients receiving salvage LDLT had 5- and 10-year overall survival of 86.7% and 52.9%, respectively, measured from the time of initial HCC diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Overall, LDLT achieves a satisfactory result with low incidence of HCC recurrence based on certain transplantation criteria. Despite the higher incidence of HCC recurrence after sLDLT, it remains a promising strategy to improve long-term outcomes.

18F-FDG PET/CT predicts microvascular invasion and early recurrence after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in the prediction of MVI and early recurrence following resection.

METHOD

This prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02145013) included 78 consecutive HCC patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before curative-intent resection from 2014 to 2017. Prognostic factors available before surgery for predicting MVI and early recurrence (≤2 years) were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The 18F-FDG PET/CT result was positive in 30 (38%) patients. MVI was present in 33% (26/78) of specimens. Early recurrence occurred in 19% (14/74) of surviving patients. PET/CT positivity was the sole independent predictor of MVI (odds ratio [OR] = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-11.2; p = 0.03), with a specificity and sensitivity for predicting MVI of 73% and 62%, respectively. Analysis of variables available before surgery showed that PET/CT positivity (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.8, 95% CI = 1.6-20.4; p = 0.006) and the male sex (HR = 6.6; 95% CI = 1.8-24.2; p = 0.005) were independent predictors of early recurrence.

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET/CT predicts MVI and early recurrence after surgery for HCC and could be used to select patients for neoadjuvant treatment.

Local Ablation Does Not Worsen Perioperative Outcomes After Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE. Local ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplant has important advantages, such as preventing disease progression, tumor downstaging, and offering a test of time. However, it might render liver transplant more technically demanding. Thus far, its potential effect on liver transplant outcomes is still unknown, and, therefore, the current study was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients who underwent liver transplant for HCC at a single tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2016 were included and retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent liver resection and local ablation before liver transplant were excluded. Patients treated with local ablation before liver transplant were compared with those not treated with local ablation, both before and after propensity score matching. In addition, the local ablation group was compared with patients who underwent primary resection before liver transplant. Posttreatment mortality and morbidity were determined, and overall and disease-free survival rates were calculated. RESULTS. In total, 182 patients were included. Twenty-six patients underwent resection but not local ablation before liver transplant. Of the remaining 156 patients, 66 (42%) underwent local ablation before liver transplant and 90 (58%) did not. Perioperative mortality and morbidity were similar in both groups before and after propensity score matching (8% and 74% in the local ablation group vs 10% and 83% in the non-local ablation group, p = 0.60 and 0.17, respectively). In addition, no significant differences in long-term outcomes were observed between the groups before and after propensity score matching. Also, no differences were observed in outcomes in the local ablation group versus the liver resection group. CONCLUSION. Local ablation before liver transplant does not have a negative effect on outcomes after liver transplant for HCC.

The association of liver function and quality of life of patients with liver cancer

BACKGROUND

Quality of life (QOL) assessments with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, QLQ-HCC18, C30 and HCC18 index scores have been shown to be prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), independent of disease stage and liver function. Liver function parameters (including bilirubin, albumin, international normalized ratio [INR], Child-Pugh class, ALBI grade, MELD, alkaline phosphatase [ALP]-to-platelet ratio, albumin-to-ALP ratio) have also been found to be independent prognostic factors for OS in HCC patients. There has been scanty data on whether QOL and baseline liver function per se are correlated in HCC patients. This study investigates the correlations between baseline QOL data and liver function variables in HCC patients.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2011, 517 patients were enrolled. Baseline QOL was assessed at diagnosis using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18; thereafter C30 and HCC18 index scores were derived. Clinical and laboratory data were collected. For liver function assessment, Child-Pugh class, ALBI grade, MELD, ALP-to-platelet ratio and albumin-to-ALP ratio were derived. Correlation analyses were performed between QOL and liver function data.

RESULTS

Complete QOL data were available in 472 HCC patients. After adjusting for clinical variables, significant correlations were found between QOL (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18) and dichotomized liver function variables (including Child-Pugh class, ALBI grade and the presence of ascites). It was demonstrated that QOL had significant and potentially clinically important correlations with continuous liver function variables (albumin, bilirubin, ALP and albumin-to-ALP ratio), with the highest Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho) exceeding 0.4. HCC18 and C30 index scores were also significantly correlated with these liver function variables. HCC18 index score, which had rho up to 0.37, generally performed better than C30 index score, which had rho up to 0.33.

CONCLUSIONS

In HCC patients, baseline QOL assessment (using EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-HCC18, C30 index-score or HCC18 index-score) is significantly correlated with liver function. Based on the findings of this study, future trials are warranted to assess whether treatment to enhance liver function could improve HCC patients' QOL.

Systematic review of treatment strategy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: Salvage liver transplantation or curative locoregional therapy

AIMS

The aim of our systematic review was to compare the efficacy of salvage liver transplantation (SLT) versus curative locoregional therapy (CLRT) for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Studies comparing the SLT with CLRT for patients with recurrent HCC were selected from database of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. The outcomes including overall survival, disease-free survival, and complications were abstracted. Individual and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval of each outcome was analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven retrospective studies involving 840 patients were included. There is no difference between SLT and CLRT group regarding the1- and 3-year overall survival rates. However, the 5-year overall survival and 1-, 3-, 5-year disease-free survival were significantly higher after SLT than after CLRT (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.09-2.39, P = .02; OR = 4.08, 95% CI 1.95-8.54, P = .0002; OR = 3.63, 95% CI 2.21-5.95, P <.00001; OR = 5.71, 95% CI 2.63-12.42, P <.0001, respectively). But CLRT was associated with fewer complications and shorter hospital-stay compared with SLT. For SLT compared with repeat hepatectomy (RH), the subgroup analysis indicated that SLT group had a significantly higher 3- and 5-years disease-free survival than the RH group (OR = 3.23, 95% CI 1.45-7.20, P = .004; OR = 4.79, 95% CI 1.88-12.25, P = .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of SLT may be superior to that of CLRT in the treatment of recurrent HCC. However, considering the similar overall survival rate and current situation of donor shortage, RH is still an important option for recurrence HCC.

Does meeting the Milan criteria at the time of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection have an impact on prognosis?

BACKGROUND

The survival outcomes of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative resection remain unclear due to lack of clear basis for the selection of treatment option. We investigated overall survival (OS) after intrahepatic recurrence and re-recurrence free survival (rRFS) of the patients with recurrent HCC, and whether Milan criteria (MC) status at resection and recurrence impacts on OS and rRFS.

METHOD

We enrolled 959 patients who experienced recurrence after primary hepatic resection for HCC. We divided the cohort into four groups according to MC at two periods: IN-rIN MC (HCC within MC at the time of resection-recurrence within MC), IN-rOUT MC (HCC within MC at the time of resection-recurrence outside MC), OUT-rIN MC (HCC outside MC at the time of resection-recurrence within MC), and OUT-rOUT MC (HCC outside MC at the time of resection-recurrence outside MC).

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS after recurrence was 81.0%, 55.7%, and 45.8%, respectively, while rRFS was 63.7%, 46.1%, and 42.0%, respectively. The IN-rIN MC group had the best outcomes (5-year OS and rRFS, 54.5% and 45.7%, respectively). The IN-rOUT and OUT-rIN MC groups had better 5-year OS outcomes than the OUT-rOUT MC group (46.5%, 38.6%, and 24.8%, respectively; P < 0.05). However, 5-year rRFS did not differ among the three groups (37.5%, 36.6%, and 31.9%, respectively; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Survival after first recurrence following curative primary resection for HCC was affected by MC at both time of resection and recurrence. Both the IN-rOUT and OUT-rIN MC groups with similar survival outcomes can be saved via curative treatment.

Long-term survival comparison between primary transplant and upfront curative treatment with salvage transplant for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Whether primary liver transplantation (PLT) or upfront curative treatment with salvage liver transplantation (SLT) is a better treatment option for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. This study aims to compare the long-term survival starting from the time of primary treatment between the two approaches for early HCC using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

From 1995 to 2014, 175 patients with early HCC undergoing either PLT (n = 149) or SLT (n = 26) were retrospectively reviewed in a prospectively collected database. Patients' demographic data, tumor characteristics, short-term and long-term outcome were compared between two groups after PSM.

RESULTS

After matching, the baseline characteristics were comparable between mPLT group (n = 45) and mSLT group (n = 25). The tumor recurrence rate after transplant was significantly higher in mSLT group than mPLT group (28% vs. 15.6%). Calculating from the time of primary treatment, the 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival rates were comparable between mPLT group (97.8%, 91.1% and 86.3%) and mSLT group (100%, 95% and 85%). However, the 1, 3, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were significantly better in mPLT group than mSLT group (95.6% vs. 90%, 86.6% vs. 80% and 84.3% vs. 70%). SLT approach and high pre-treatment serum alpha-fetoprotein level (>200 ηg/mL) were poor prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival after transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

PLT may be a better treatment option for early HCC, whereas SLT approach for HCC should be cautiously considered under the circumstance of organ shortage.

Which is the best combination of TACE and Sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treatment? A systematic review and network meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and Sorafenib for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through a systematic review and network meta-analysis and identify the best combination of TACE and Sorafenib. We searched databases for publications prior to May 2018. The prespecified efficacy outcomes were the objective response rate, overall survival rate, and time to progression. adverse effects included dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and general disorders. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and a network meta-analysis regarding two types of outcomes by different chemotherapy agents in TACE (5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, Platinum, mitomycin C, hydroxycamptothecin) were included. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018098541). For efficacy outcomes, subgroups which included 5-fluorouracil and hydroxycamptothecin ranked higher than other chemotherapy agents, while mitomycin C ranked the lowest. For advanced effects, the use of mitomycin C or 5-fluorouracil as the chemotherapy agent ranked higher, while hydroxycamptothecin ranked the lowest. Therefore, we excluded 5-Fu and Mitomycin C in subsequent studies. Additionally, in the evaluation of primary adverse effects by the network meta-analysis, Platinum ranked the highest while hydroxycamptothecin ranked the lowest. Therefore, we excluded Platinum this time. Furthermore, all types of Adriamycin are not same, and some studies included two types of Adriamycin. The network meta-analysis results showed that the TACE (hydroxycamptothecin + pirarubicin) +Sorafenib arm and TACE (hydroxycamptothecin + epirubicin) +Sorafenib arm had significant efficacy differences. In conclusion, for patients with advanced HCC, combination therapy with HCPT plus THP/EPI in TACE and Sorfenib may be used as a first-line treatment.

Preoperative platelet-albumin-bilirubin grades predict the prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection: A retrospective study

Minimal information is available concerning platelet-albumin-bilirubin (PALBI) grades in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following liver resection. This study aimed to investigate the predictive ability of PALBI grades in patients with a Child-Pugh class A score and hepatitis B virus-related (HBV-related) HCC after liver resection.The data of patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent liver resection from 2010 to 2017 at our center were reviewed (n = 785). Cox regression was used to determine factors independently associated with postoperative recurrence and mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to estimate the predictive accuracy of different tools.During the follow-up period, 505 (64.3%) patients experienced recurrence, and 374 (47.6%) patients died. Multivariate analysis revealed that the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (HR = 1.591, 95%CI = 1.414-1.789, P < .001), PALBI grade (HR = 1.326, 95%CI = 1.139-1.544, P < .001), a high AFP level (HR = 1.382, 95%CI = 1.158-1.649, P < .001) and transfusion (HR = 1.364, 95%CI = 1.087-1.712, P = 0.007) were independently associated with recurrence. Additionally, microvascular invasion (HR = 1.674, 95%CI = 1.292-2.169, P < .001), beyond the Milan criteria (HR = 0.477, 95%CI = 0.346-0.657, P < .001), PALBI grade (HR = 1.356, 95%CI = 1.151-1.598, P < .001), a high AFP level (HR = 1.542, 95%CI = 1.252-1.900, P < .001), and transfusion (HR = 1.548, 95%CI = 1.199-1.999, P = 0.001) adversely impacted the overall survival. The AUCs of the PALBI grades for postoperative recurrence and mortality were significantly higher than the albumin-bilirubin grade and Child-Pugh score. The prognostic significance of the PALBI grade for postoperative recurrence and mortality was maintained when stratified by the TNM stage.The preoperative PALBI grade is a surrogate marker for the postoperative prognosis in patients with HBV-related HCC after liver resection.