1
|
Xu Y, Cai Q, Li J, Guo W, Chen L, Chen M, Lin Y, Wang Y, Cai W, Qiu Y, He P, Liu S, Wang C, Fu F. Frequency of somatic and germline variants of predisposition genes in young Chinese women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2025; 210:635-644. [PMID: 39755988 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07602-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 12/26/2024] [Indexed: 01/07/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Age stratification influences the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of breast cancer. We aimed to understand the effect of age on gene variants in young Chinese women with breast cancer compared with those from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). METHODS Enrolled patients ≤ 40 years old (N = 370) underwent germline or somatic genetic testing using a 32-gene hereditary cancer panel at Fujian Union Hospital. Significant alterations of germline and somatic genes were analyzed. The frequency of somatic variants was compared between enrolled patients and patients from TCGA who were divided into two groups (≤ 40 years and > 40 years). RESULTS Among the enrolled patients (median age 36; range 25-40), 335 underwent germline genetic testing and 174 underwent simultaneous somatic genetic testing. We detected 44 germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 42 (12.5%) patients, where BRCA1/2 was the most common gene (29.8.5%). Family history of first-degree relatives was significantly associated with pathogenic variants (p < 0.001). Somatic Tier I/II mutation frequency was like that of patients ≤ 40 from TCGA (N = 97). More PIK3CA and TP53 mutations in luminal A and basal-like tumors, respectively, were detected in young patients than in patients > 40 from TCGA (N = 975). No significant differences were observed in other breast cancer subtypes. CONCLUSION These results provide a spectrum of genomic alterations in young Chinese women and highlight different frequencies of gene variants in young Asian patients versus Western patients with breast cancer. Further research should explore the biological mechanism to provide more treatment strategies for young Asian women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuchun Xu
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Affiliated Nanping First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Nanping, 353000, Fujian, China
| | - Qindong Cai
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361001, Fujian, China
| | - Wenhui Guo
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
| | - Lili Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
| | - Minyan Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
| | - Yuxiang Lin
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
| | - Yali Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
| | - Weifeng Cai
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
| | - Yibin Qiu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
| | - Peng He
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
| | - Shunyi Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China
| | - Chuan Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China.
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China.
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
| | - Fangmeng Fu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China.
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian , China.
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laas E, Dumas E, Hamy AS, Gaillard T, Gougis P, Reyal F, Husson F, Jannot AS. The influence of treatment intervals on prognosis in young breast cancer patients: Insights from the French National cohort. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2025; 51:109373. [PMID: 39549387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Revised: 10/29/2024] [Accepted: 11/05/2024] [Indexed: 11/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suboptimal treatment delays is known to impact prognosis of patients with cancer but optimal timing in specific subgroups remains poorly studied. This study aimed to analyze treatment delays in young women treated for a breast cancer (BC) on and its impact on their prognosis using French Nationwide Data. METHODS Using the CAREPAT-YBC Cohort based on the French National Healthcare System Database, we analyzed disease-free survival (DFS) in 22,093 young women (18-45 years) who underwent either surgery-chemotherapy-radiotherapy pathway (adjuvant setting, 15,433 patients) or chemotherapy-surgery-radiotherapy pathway (neoadjuvant setting, 6660 patients), according to delays between the different pathways. RESULTS For the adjuvant chemotherapy-radiotherapy interval, the best timing was 17-31 days with increased risk above this delay. For the neoadjuvant setting, the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy-surgery interval was 17-31 days, while ≤15 days (HR 1.44, 95%CI 1.21-1.71) or ≥62 days (HR 2.07, 95%CI 1.36-3.15) showed poorer prognosis. Combining best timing into an "optimal pathway" was associated with respectively a 1.2-fold decreased risk for recurrence or mortality. CONCLUSION Optimizing treatment intervals enhance BC survival in younger age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enora Laas
- Université Paris Cité, HeKA, INRIA Paris, Inserm, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France; Surgery Department, Institut Curie, Universite Paris Cite, Paris, France.
| | - Elise Dumas
- Residual Tumor and Response to Treatment, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France; Department of Mathematics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Anne-Sophie Hamy
- Residual Tumor and Response to Treatment, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France; Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Universite Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Gaillard
- Surgery Department, Institut Curie, Universite Paris Cite, Paris, France
| | - Paul Gougis
- Residual Tumor and Response to Treatment, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France; Oncology and Pharmacology Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Surgery Department, Institut Curie, Universite Paris Cite, Paris, France; Residual Tumor and Response to Treatment, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France
| | - François Husson
- Institut Agro, Univ Rennes, CNRS, IRMAR, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Jannot
- Université Paris Cité, HeKA, INRIA Paris, Inserm, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France; French National Rare Disease Registry (BNDMR), Greater Paris University Hospitals (AP-HP), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al Amri WS, Al Amri AH, Al Abri A, Hughes TA, Al Lawati F. BRCA1/2 mutations and outcomes among Middle Eastern patients with early-onset breast cancer in Oman. Oncologist 2024; 29:e1714-e1722. [PMID: 39187384 PMCID: PMC11630774 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High prevalence of early-onset breast cancer (EOBC) has been reported in Middle Eastern populations. For example, in Oman more than 50% of patients with breast cancer (BC) are under age 45 at diagnosis. Causes for this high incidence are unknown. Germline BRCA gene mutations have been associated with EOBC, however, prevalence of these mutations and how they relate to EOBC in Oman has not been assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical data were collected for patients with BC treated at Royal Hospital, Oman between 2010 and 2022. Germline BRCA1/2 gene mutations were identified using sequencing and MLPA. Correlation and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to test relationships among clinico-pathological features, gene mutations, and outcomes. RESULTS Total of 1336 Middle Eastern patients with BC were included; 611 were aged <45 at diagnosis (45.7%). No significant correlation was found between BRCA1/2 mutation status and EOBC (P = .229), and the majority of EOBC cases had no family history of BC. EOBC tumors did, however, differ in clinicopathological features; EOBCs were significantly larger (P < .0001), of higher grade (P < .0001), and included more HER2-enriched, and triple negative subtypes (P = .018) compared with later onset cases. Accordingly, survival analyses revealed that EOBC had significantly worse disease-free survival (P = .002). BRCA gene variants showed a distinct range of mutations including, in BRCA2, 3 previously unreported mutations and 4 potential founder recurrent mutations. CONCLUSION Our findings showed that germline BRCA1/2 mutations were not over-represented in EOBC cases in Oman, and therefore are unlikely to be responsible for high EOBC rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waleed S Al Amri
- Department of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Royal Hospital, P.C. 111, Muscat, Oman
| | - Ahmed H Al Amri
- National Genetic Centre, Royal Hospital, P.C. 111, Muscat, Oman
| | - Aisha Al Abri
- Department of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Royal Hospital, P.C. 111, Muscat, Oman
| | - Thomas A Hughes
- School of Science, Technology and Health, York St. John University, York YO31 7EX, United Kingdom
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
| | - Fatma Al Lawati
- Department of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Royal Hospital, P.C. 111, Muscat, Oman
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Isiklar AD, Aliyeva L, Yesilyurt A, Soyder A, Basaran G. Frequency of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes among young Turkish breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 202:297-304. [PMID: 37615792 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07074-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE One of the most important risk factors for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer is young age. We aim to report the frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposing genes in young (≤ 40 years old) breast cancer patients who undergone 26-gene inherited cancer panel at our Breast Health Center. METHODS Medical records of breast cancer patients who were referred to genetic counseling based on NCCN criteria and were ≤ 40 years of age are reviewed. The frequency of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants who undergone 26-gene inherited cancer panel was analyzed. RESULTS Among 414 breast cancer patients who were ≤ 40 years of age, 308 undergone 26-gene inherited cancer panel and 108 had next generation sequencing (NGS)-based BRCA 1 and 2 genetic testing. Median age was 35 (22-40), Family history in first degree relatives was present in 14% of patients. Forty-five percent of patients met one of the NCCN criteria for genetic testing, 41% of them met two criteria, and 14% of patients fulfilled ≥ 3 criteria. Seventy pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPV) were found in 65 (21%) patients. PV/LPs in BRCA genes and non-BRCA genes represented 53% and 44% of all PV/LPVs, accounting for 12% and 10% of patients in the study cohort respectively. Two PVs were present in 5 patients and eleven PVs were novel. The most common PVs were in BRCA 1 (n:18), BRCA 2 (n:19), ATM (n:7), CHEK2 (n:7) and TP53 (n:5) genes. Thirty-one percent of the patients with triple-negative tumors and 25% of the patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors had PV/LPVs with panel testing. Family history in first degree relatives (p = 0.029), the number of met NCCN criteria (p = 0.036) and axillary nodal involvement (p = 0.000) were more common in patients with PVs. When combined with patient group (n:106) who had only BRCA1 and 2 gene testing, 16% of Turkish breast cancer patients ≤ 40 years of age had PVs in BRCA genes. CONCLUSION One fifth of Turkish breast cancer patients ≤ 40 years of age had at least one PV/LPV in breast cancer predisposing genes with 26-gene inherited cancer panel. The frequency of PV/LPVs was higher in triple-negative young-onset patients compared to hormone receptor and Her-2 positive subtypes. Our findings regarding to frequency PV/LPVs in BRCA 1/2 and non-BRCA genes in young-onset breast cancer patients are in line with the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aysun Dauti Isiklar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Altunizade District, Yurtcan St. No: 1, Uskudar, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Lamiya Aliyeva
- Department of Medical Genetics, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Halkali Merkez, Turgut Ozal Bulvari No: 16, 34303, Kucukcekmece, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Yesilyurt
- Acibadem Labgen Genetic Diagnosis Center, İçerenköy Kerem Aydınlar Campus, Kayışdağı Cd. No: 32, Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Aykut Soyder
- Department of General Surgery, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Altunizade District, Yurtcan St. No: 1, Uskudar, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gul Basaran
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Altunizade District, Yurtcan St. No: 1, Uskudar, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allen I, Hassan H, Sofianopoulou E, Eccles D, Turnbull C, Tischkowitz M, Pharoah P, Antoniou AC. Risks of second non-breast primaries following breast cancer in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:18. [PMID: 36765408 PMCID: PMC9912682 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01610-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Second primary cancer incidence is rising among breast cancer survivors. We examined the risks of non-breast second primaries, in combination and at specific cancer sites, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, seeking studies published by March 2022. We included studies that reported standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), with associated standard errors, assessing the combined risk of second non-breast primaries following breast cancer. We performed meta-analyses of combined second primary risks, stratifying by age, follow-up duration, and geographic region. We also assessed second primary risks at several specific sites, stratifying by age. The inverse variance method with DerSimonian-Laird estimators was used in all meta-analyses, assuming a random-effects model. Associated biases and study quality were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS One prospective and twenty-seven retrospective cohort studies were identified. SIRs for second non-breast primaries combined ranged from 0.84 to 1.84. The summary SIR estimate was 1.24 (95% CI 1.14-1.36, I2: 99%). This varied by age: the estimate was 1.59 (95% CI 1.36-1.85) when breast cancer was diagnosed before age 50, which was significantly higher than in women first diagnosed at 50 or over (SIR: 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.36, p for difference: < 0.001). SPC risks were also significantly higher when based on Asian, rather than European, registries (Asia-SIR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.29-1.67. Europe-SIR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.28). There were significantly increased risks of second thyroid (SIR: 1.89, 95% CI 1.49-2.38), corpus uteri (SIR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.53-2.23), ovary (SIR: 1.53, 95% CI 1.35-1.73), kidney (SIR: 1.43, 95% CI 1.17-1.73), oesophagus (SIR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.26-1.55), skin (melanoma) (SIR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.52), blood (leukaemia) (SIR: 1.30, 95% CI 1.17-1.45), lung (SIR: 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.51), stomach (SIR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.12-1.36) and bladder (SIR: 1.15, 95% CI 1.05-1.26) primaries. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer survivors are at significantly increased risk of second primaries at many sites. Risks are higher for those diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 and in Asian breast cancer survivors compared to European breast cancer survivors. This study is limited by a lack of data on potentially confounding variables. The conclusions may inform clinical management decisions following breast cancer, although specific clinical recommendations lie outside the scope of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Allen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK.
| | - Hend Hassan
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Eleni Sofianopoulou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Diana Eccles
- Department of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Translational Genetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rao ND, Shirts BH. Using species richness calculations to model the global profile of unsampled pathogenic variants: Examples from BRCA1 and BRCA2. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0278010. [PMID: 36753473 PMCID: PMC9907816 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
There have been many surveys of genetic variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 to identify variant prevalence and catalogue population specific variants, yet none have evaluated the magnitude of unobserved variation. We applied species richness estimation methods from ecology to estimate "variant richness" and determine how many germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants have yet to be identified and the frequency of these missing variants in different populations. We also estimated the prevalence of germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and identified those expected to be most common. Data was obtained from a literature search including studies conducted globally that tested the entirety of BRCA1/2 for pathogenic variation. Across countries, 45% to 88% of variants were estimated to be missing, i.e., present in the population but not observed in study data. Estimated variant frequencies in each country showed a higher proportion of rare variants compared to recurrent variants. The median prevalence estimate of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers was 0.64%. BRCA1 c.68_69del is likely the most recurrent BRCA1/2 variant globally due to its estimated prevalence in India. Modeling variant richness using ecology methods may assist in evaluating clinical targeted assays by providing a picture of what is observed with estimates of what is still unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandana D. Rao
- Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Brian H. Shirts
- Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Allen I, Hassan H, Sofianopoulou E, Eccles D, Turnbull C, Tischkowitz M, Pharoah P, Antoniou AC. Risk of developing a second primary cancer in male breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1660-1669. [PMID: 36115878 PMCID: PMC9596702 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01940-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With increasing survival after cancer diagnoses, second primary cancers (SPCs) are becoming more prevalent. We investigated the incidence and site of non-breast SPC risks following male breast cancer (BC). METHODS PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies reporting standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) for SPCs published by March 2022. Meta-analyses used the generic inverse-variance method, assuming a random-effects model. We evaluated SIRs for overall SPCs, site-specific risks, by age at BC onset, time since BC onset and geographic region. We assessed study quality using routine techniques. RESULTS Eight population-based retrospective cohort studies were identified. SIRs ranged from 1.05 to 2.17. The summary SIR estimate was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.03-1.56, I2: 86%), and there were increased colorectal (SIR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03-1.61), pancreatic (SIR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.05-2.55) and thyroid (SIR: 5.58, 95% CI: 1.04-30.05) SPC risks. When an outlying study was excluded, the summary SIR for men diagnosed with BC before age 50 was 1.50 (95% CI: 1.21-1.85), significantly higher than men diagnosed at older ages (SIR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.98-1.33). CONCLUSIONS Male BC survivors are at elevated risks of developing second primary colorectal, pancreatic and thyroid cancers. The estimates may assist their clinical management and guide decisions on genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Allen
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Hend Hassan
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Eleni Sofianopoulou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Diana Eccles
- Department of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Translational Genetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vasigh M, Eslami B, Elahi A, Kaviani A, Shirkoohi R, Majidzadeh K, Nazarian N, Omranipour R. Evaluation of the indication of BRCA1/2 genetic tests in Iranian women and acceptance rate of risk-reducing surgeries in BRCA mutation carriers. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2022; 10:e1867. [PMID: 35023322 PMCID: PMC8830810 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A higher risk for breast and ovarian cancer has been reported in BRCA carriers and prophylactic surgeries are proposed to reduce this risk. This retrospective cohort study has evaluated the indication of BRCA1/2 genetic tests in Iranian women and the rate of women's acceptance of prophylactic surgeries recommended by the surgeon. METHODS Medical records of 147 high-risk women according to NCCN clinical practice guidelines who referred for BRCA mutations testing were assessed. Individual information, indications for BRCA1/2 genetic testing and their results, physician recommendations, and type of accepted surgery were registered. To evaluate the current status of women an active visit follow-up every six months was conducted. RESULTS The mean age of women was 43.40 ± 10.94 and the median follow-up time was 1.92 years. Genetic test results showed 49(33.3%) women were positive for either BRCA1/2 mutations. Although the occurrence of breast cancer younger than 40 was the most common indication for genetic tests (26.5%), positive breast cancer history in first-degree relatives and two relatives younger than 50 was the most common indications with positive results. The rate of acceptance of prophylactic mastectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was (14.3% and 34.7%) in BRCA mutation carriers. CONCLUSION If the onset of breast cancer at a young age (less than 40) will be the only indication for a BRCA analysis, the rate of a positive result (12.8%) is very low. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the age limit for genetic testing in our country. Prophylactic mastectomy acceptance is very low in BRCA1/2 carriers in our centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahtab Vasigh
- Breast Disease Research Center, Cancer Institute,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bita Eslami
- Breast Disease Research Center, Cancer Institute,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ahmad Elahi
- Department of Surgery, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
| | - Ahmad Kaviani
- Breast Disease Research Center, Cancer Institute,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Surgical Oncology, University de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Reza Shirkoohi
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Keivan Majidzadeh
- Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Newsha Nazarian
- Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ramesh Omranipour
- Breast Disease Research Center, Cancer Institute,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang W, Zhang BL, He JJ, Fan JH, Li J, Zhang B, Yang HJ, Xie XM, Tang ZH, Li H, Li JY, Wang SL, Qiao YL, Huang R, Zhang P. Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment of young women with breast cancer in China: a nationwide multicenter 10-year retrospective study. Gland Surg 2021; 10:175-185. [PMID: 33633974 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is currently the most common female malignancy in China. However, the clinical features and overall prognosis of young women diagnosed with this malignancy remain unclear. This study aimed to describe the clinicopathological characteristics of young patients (≤34 years of age) with breast cancer and explore the current treatment approaches used in China. Methods This was a hospital-based, multicenter, retrospective study of women with breast cancer across seven Chinese hospitals from 1999 to 2008. A total of 295 young (≤34 years of age) patients (research group) and 2,119 women aged 35 to 49 years (control group) were included in the study. Patient epidemiology, pre-operative examinations, clinical pathology, and treatment were analyzed. Results The percentage of young patients with breast cancer in the study group was 7.01%. These young women had a lower body mass index (BMI), a higher level of education, a lower number of previous births, and a lower history of breastfeeding than the control group (P<0.05). Increasingly, pre-operative use of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are being used to diagnose breast cancer in young women in China. In young women with breast cancer, breast cancer not otherwise specified (NOS) was the primary pathology. The carcinoma in young women was more prone to lymph node metastasis, showed less progesterone receptor (PR) expression, and was more advanced than observed in the control group (P<0.05). We found that the number of young breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery in China is increasing. Conclusions Young breast cancer patients display unique clinicopathological features, including tumors of a higher grade than those aged 35 years or older. As breast cancer is more aggressive in younger women, prevention and early diagnosis are critical, and new policies should be developed in line with these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Bai-Lin Zhang
- Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Institute/Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union of Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jian-Jun He
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jin-Hu Fan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Bin Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Hong-Jian Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Ming Xie
- Department of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhong-Hua Tang
- Department of Breast-thyroid Surgery, Xiangya Second Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, the Second People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
| | - Jia-Yuan Li
- Department of Epidemiology, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Shu-Lian Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - You-Lin Qiao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Huang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Pin Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute & Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Uyisenga JP, Segers K, Lumaka AZ, Mugenzi P, Fasquelle C, Boujemila B, Josse C, Mutesa L, Bours V. Screening of germline mutations in young Rwandan patients with breast cancers. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2020; 8:e1500. [PMID: 32959997 PMCID: PMC7667342 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Sub‐Saharan Africa breast cancer is commonly detected at younger age and the profile is more aggressive with a high mortality rate compared to the European countries. It is suggested that African‐specific genetic background plays a key role in this matter. The present study aimed at understanding the role of genetic factors in breast cancer development in young Rwandan. Methods We performed a massive parallel sequencing on Illumina MiSeq NGS system for the screening of 26 genes associated with hereditary breast cancer from 40 patients under 35 years old from two University Teaching Hospitals in Kigali, Rwanda. Sanger sequencing was used to confirm pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations. Results Five patients out of 40 (12.5%) presented with pathogenic mutations including four patients (10%) carrying BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants. One patient showed a missense likely pathogenic TP53 variant. We have also detected additional missense, intronic, and 3’UTR variants of unknown significance in all study participants. Conclusion This preliminary study suggests that the frequency of germline mutations in young Rwandan patients with breast cancer is similar to the observations made in Caucasians. However, further large studies including patients and controls are needed to better understand the impact of genetic factors as well as the environmental risk factors in the development of breast cancer in young Rwandans. Screening of germline mutations in Rwandan young patients with breast cancer. The next generation sequencing detected pathogenic BRCA 1 and 2 mutations in 6 patients. We have also detected additional missense, intronic, and 3’UTR variants of unknown significance in all study participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne P Uyisenga
- Laboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.,Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Karin Segers
- Department of Human Genetics, University Hospital of Liège CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Aimé Z Lumaka
- Laboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Corinne Fasquelle
- Laboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Bouchra Boujemila
- Laboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Claire Josse
- Laboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.,Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Liège CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Leon Mutesa
- Center for Human Genetics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Vincent Bours
- Laboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.,Department of Human Genetics, University Hospital of Liège CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bakkach J, Mansouri M, Derkaoui T, Loudiyi A, El Fahime E, Barakat A, Ghailani Nourouti N, Martinez De Villarreal J, Cortijo Bringas C, Bennani Mechita M. Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations to early onset breast cancer: a series from north of Morocco. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:859. [PMID: 32894085 PMCID: PMC7487731 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07352-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, the contribution of BRCA1/2 mutations in Moroccan early onset breast cancer patients remains unknown. Here we assess these genetic alterations for the first time in a cohort from North of Morocco. METHODS Thirty-three patients diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of ≤40 years were recruited irrespective of breast and/or ovarian cancer family history. Coding regions and intron-exon boundaries of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were sequenced from peripheral blood DNA using Ion Proton (Thermo Fisher Scientific) next generation sequencing platform. RESULTS Overall, five BRCA germline mutations were identified (15.1%). The frequency of mutations among patients with family history of breast cancer was 16.7%. Three mutations were found in BRCA1 (9%) and two within the BRCA2 gene (6%). These are three frameshift mutations (c.798_799del, c.2125_2126insA, c.5116_5119delAATA), one missense (c.116G > A) and one nonsense mutation (c.289G > T). The mutation c.5116_5119delAATA has a founder effect in North Africa. Moreover, one variant of unknown significance was identified in BRCA2 (c.4090A > G). Most BRCA mutations carriers (80%) had no family history of breast cancer. CONCLUSION Our data do not support the hypothesis that BRCA mutations alone explain the higher frequency of breast cancer in Moroccan young women. The young age (≤40 years) for breast cancer diagnosis seems to be strongly predictive of BRCA mutation status in Moroccan patients. These results will help in decision making with regard to genetic counseling and testing in the national scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joaira Bakkach
- Biomedical Genomics and Oncogenetics Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, P.A: 416-Tangier, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Mohamed Mansouri
- Biomedical Genomics and Oncogenetics Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, P.A: 416-Tangier, Tangier, Morocco
- Oncology Clinic Al AMAL of Tangier, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Touria Derkaoui
- Biomedical Genomics and Oncogenetics Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, P.A: 416-Tangier, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Ali Loudiyi
- Oncology Clinic Al AMAL of Tangier, Tangier, Morocco
| | - ElMostafa El Fahime
- Functional Genomic Plateform, Units of Technical Support to Scientific Research, National Center of Scientific and Technical Research, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Amina Barakat
- Biomedical Genomics and Oncogenetics Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, P.A: 416-Tangier, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Naima Ghailani Nourouti
- Biomedical Genomics and Oncogenetics Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, P.A: 416-Tangier, Tangier, Morocco
| | | | | | - Mohcine Bennani Mechita
- Biomedical Genomics and Oncogenetics Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, P.A: 416-Tangier, Tangier, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Cancer is a multi-step process during which cells acquire mutations that eventually lead to uncontrolled cell growth and division and evasion of programmed cell death. The oncogenes such as Ras and c-Myc may be responsible in all three major stages of cancer i.e., early, intermediate, and late. The NF-κB has been shown to control the expression of genes linked with tumor pathways such as chronic inflammation, tumor cell survival, anti-apoptosis, proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis. In the last few decades, various biomarker pathways have been identified that play a critical role in carcinogenesis such as Ras, NF-κB and DNA damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anas Ahmad
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Mohali, India.,Department of Nano-Therapeutics, Institute of Nano Science and Technology (INST), Habitat Centre, Mohali, India
| | - Haseeb Ahsan
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li J, Wen WX, Eklund M, Kvist A, Eriksson M, Christensen HN, Torstensson A, Bajalica‐Lagercrantz S, Dunning AM, Decker B, Allen J, Luccarini C, Pooley K, Simard J, Dorling L, Easton DF, Teo S, Hall P, Borg Å, Grönberg H, Czene K. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in a large, unselected breast cancer cohort. Int J Cancer 2019; 144:1195-1204. [PMID: 30175445 PMCID: PMC6320715 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2-driven tumors may benefit from targeted therapy. It is not clear whether current BRCA screening guidelines are effective at identifying these patients. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of inherited BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in a large, clinically representative breast cancer cohort and to estimate the proportion of BRCA1/2 carriers not detected by selectively screening individuals with the highest probability of being carriers according to current clinical guidelines. The study included 5,122 unselected Swedish breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2001 to 2008. Target sequence enrichment (48.48 Fluidigm Access Arrays) and sequencing were performed (Illumina Hi-Seq 2,500 instrument, v4 chemistry). Differences in patient and tumor characteristics of BRCA1/2 carriers who were already identified as part of clinical BRCA1/2 testing routines and additional BRCA1/2 carriers found by sequencing the entire study population were compared using logistic regression models. Ninety-two of 5,099 patients with valid variant calls were identified as BRCA1/2 carriers by screening all study participants (1.8%). Only 416 study participants (8.2%) were screened as part of clinical practice, but this identified 35 out of 92 carriers (38.0%). Clinically identified carriers were younger, less likely postmenopausal and more likely to be associated with familiar ovarian cancer compared to the additional carriers identified by screening all patients. More BRCA2 (34/42, 81.0%) than BRCA1 carriers (23/50, 46%) were missed by clinical screening. In conclusion, BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence in unselected breast cancer patients was 1.8%. Six in ten BRCA carriers were not detected by selective clinical screening of individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingmei Li
- Human GeneticsGenome Institute of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Department of SurgeryYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Wei Xiong Wen
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Sime Darby Medical CentreSubang JayaSelangorMalaysia
| | - Martin Eklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Anders Kvist
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical SciencesLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | | | | | | | - Alison M. Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Brennan Decker
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaMD
- Department of PathologyBrigham and Women's HospitalBostonMA
| | - Jamie Allen
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Craig Luccarini
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Karen Pooley
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec‐Université Laval Research CenterCanada Research Chair in Oncogenetics, Université LavalQuebec CityCanada
| | - Leila Dorling
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic EpidemiologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Soo‐Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Sime Darby Medical CentreSubang JayaSelangorMalaysia
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Åke Borg
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical SciencesLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Norum J, Grindedal EM, Heramb C, Karsrud I, Ariansen SL, Undlien DE, Schlichting E, Mæhle L. BRCA mutation carrier detection. A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the traditional family history approach and the testing of all patients with breast cancer. ESMO Open 2018; 3:e000328. [PMID: 29682331 PMCID: PMC5905828 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Identification of BRCA mutation carriers among patients with breast cancer (BC) involves costs and gains. Testing has been performed according to international guidelines, focusing on family history (FH) of breast and/or ovarian cancer. An alternative is testing all patients with BC employing sequencing of the BRCA genes and Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification (MLPA). Patients and methods A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, employing data from Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål (OUH-U) and a decision tree, was done. The societal and the healthcare perspectives were focused and a lifetime perspective employed. The comparators were the traditional FH approach used as standard of care at OUH-U in 2013 and the intervention (testing all patients with BC) performed in 2014 and 2015 at the same hospital. During the latter period, 535 patients with BC were offered BRCA testing with sequencing and MLPA. National 2014 data on mortality rates and costs were implemented, a 3% discount rate used and the costing year was 2015. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated in euros (€) per life-year gained (LYG). Results The net healthcare cost (healthcare perspective) was €40 503/LYG. Including all resource use (societal perspective), the cost was €5669/LYG. The univariate sensitivity analysis documented the unit cost of the BRCA test and the number of LYGs the prominent parameters affecting the result. Diagnostic BRCA testing of all patients with BC was superior to the FH approach and cost-effective within the frequently used thresholds (healthcare perspective) in Norway (€60 000–€80 000/LYG).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Norum
- Department of Surgery, Finnmark Hospital, Hammerfest, Norway
| | | | - Cecilie Heramb
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inga Karsrud
- Section for Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sarah Louise Ariansen
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dag Erik Undlien
- Section for Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ellen Schlichting
- Section for Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lovise Mæhle
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bakkach J, Mansouri M, Derkaoui T, Loudiyi A, Fihri M, Hassani S, Barakat A, Ghailani Nourouti N, Bennani Mechita M. Clinicopathologic and prognostic features of breast cancer in young women: a series from North of Morocco. BMC Womens Health 2017; 17:106. [PMID: 29121898 PMCID: PMC5680801 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-017-0456-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Literature data reported a higher frequency of breast cancer in young women (BCYW) in developing countries. BCYW is associated with delayed diagnosis, aggressive biology and poor prognosis. However, our knowledge of biological profile, treatment received and outcome of young patients is still limited in Morocco. We propose to analyze clinicopathologic, therapeutic and prognostic features of BCYW among a series of patients native and/or inhabitant of North of Morocco. METHODS We carried out a retro-prospective study of 331 infiltrating breast cancer cases registered between January 2010 and December 2015. Details of tumor pathology, treatment and outcome were collected. Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS A total of 82 patients were diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of 40 or younger (24.8%). Median age was 36 years. More than one quarter (26%) of patients had family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Advanced stages accounted for 34.2% of cases. Median tumor diameter was 2.8 cm. Intermediate and high-grade tumors represented 47.6% and 40.2%, respectively. Nodal involvement was present in 58.5% and lymphovascular invasion was found in 47.7% of the patients. About two thirds (66.2%) of tumors were hormone receptor positive, 29.2% over-expressed HER2 receptor and 23% were triple negative. Patients underwent breast conserving surgery in 38.2% of cases, 61.7% were offered adjuvant chemotherapy and 84.6% received hormone therapy. Five-year DFS and OS were respectively 88.9% and 75.6%. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 2.8% of cases and 8.3% of patients developed distant metastases. CONCLUSION Our findings are in accordance with previous studies that have shown a higher frequency of breast cancer among Moroccan young women. In line with literature data, clinicopathologic profile seems to be aggressive and prognosis is pejorative in our series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joaira Bakkach
- Human Genomic Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Mohamed Mansouri
- Human Genomic Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Tangier, Morocco
- Oncology Clinic AL AMAL of Tangier, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Touria Derkaoui
- Human Genomic Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Ali Loudiyi
- Oncology Clinic AL AMAL of Tangier, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Mohamed Fihri
- Mathematics and Applications Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Samia Hassani
- Human Genomic Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Amina Barakat
- Human Genomic Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Naima Ghailani Nourouti
- Human Genomic Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Tangier, Morocco
| | - Mohcine Bennani Mechita
- Human Genomic Research Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, University Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Tangier, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Márquez-Rodas I, Pollán M, Escudero MJ, Ruiz A, Martín M, Santaballa A, Martínez del Prado P, Batista N, Andrés R, Antón A, Llombart A, Fernandez Aramburu A, Adrover E, González S, Seguí MA, Calvo L, Lizón J, Rodríguez Lescure Á, Ramón y Cajal T, Llort G, Jara C, Carrasco E, López-Tarruella S. Frequency of breast cancer with hereditary risk features in Spain: Analysis from GEICAM "El Álamo III" retrospective study. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0184181. [PMID: 28985233 PMCID: PMC5630120 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the frequency of breast cancer (BC) patients with hereditary risk features in a wide retrospective cohort of patients in Spain. METHODS a retrospective analysis was conducted from 10,638 BC patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2001 in the GEICAM registry "El Álamo III", dividing them into four groups according to modified ESMO and SEOM hereditary cancer risk criteria: Sporadic breast cancer group (R0); Individual risk group (IR); Familial risk group (FR); Individual and familial risk group (IFR) with both individual and familial risk criteria. RESULTS 7,641 patients were evaluable. Of them, 2,252 patients (29.5%) had at least one hereditary risk criteria, being subclassified in: FR 1.105 (14.5%), IR 970 (12.7%), IFR 177 (2.3%). There was a higher frequency of newly diagnosed metastatic patients in the IR group (5.1% vs 3.2%, p = 0.02). In contrast, in RO were lower proportion of big tumors (> T2) (43.8% vs 47.4%, p = 0.023), nodal involvement (43.4% vs 48.1%, p = 0.004) and lower histological grades (20.9% G3 for the R0 vs 29.8%) when compared to patients with any risk criteria. CONCLUSIONS Almost three out of ten BC patients have at least one hereditary risk cancer feature that would warrant further genetic counseling. Patients with hereditary cancer risk seems to be diagnosed with worse prognosis factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iván Márquez-Rodas
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Marina Pollán
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Escudero
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
| | - Amparo Ruiz
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Miguel Martín
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
| | - Ana Santaballa
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Purificación Martínez del Prado
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital de Basurto-Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Norberto Batista
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Raquel Andrés
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Antonio Antón
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Antonio Llombart
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonio Fernandez Aramburu
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Sección de Oncología Médica, Complejo Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain
| | - Encarnación Adrover
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Sección de Oncología Médica, Complejo Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain
| | - Sonia González
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Mútua de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Angel Seguí
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital de Sabadell-Consorcio Sanitario Parc Taulì de Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lourdes Calvo
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - José Lizón
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Sant Joan, Alicante, Spain
| | - Álvaro Rodríguez Lescure
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Teresa Ramón y Cajal
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Llort
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Unitat de Consell Genetic, Institut Oncologic del Valles, Terrasa, Spain
| | - Carlos Jara
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
- Unidad de Oncología, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eva Carrasco
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
| | - Sara López-Tarruella
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
- Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM), San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Paluch-Shimon S, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Abulkhair O, Cardoso MJ, Dent RA, Gelmon K, Gentilini O, Harbeck N, Margulies A, Meirow D, Pruneri G, Senkus E, Spanic T, Sutliff M, Travado L, Peccatori F, Cardoso F. ESO-ESMO 3rd international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY3). Breast 2017; 35:203-217. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 176] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
18
|
Contribution of germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes to tumor etiology in young women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 164:593-601. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4291-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
19
|
Sabour L, Sabour M, Ghorbian S. Clinical Applications of Next-Generation Sequencing in Cancer Diagnosis. Pathol Oncol Res 2017; 23:225-234. [PMID: 27722982 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-016-0124-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
With the advancement and improvement of new sequencing technology, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been applied increasingly in cancer genomics research fields. More recently, NGS has been adopted in clinical oncology to advance personalized treatment of cancer. NGS is utilized to novel diagnostic and rare cancer mutations, detection of translocations, inversions, insertions and deletions, detection of copy number variants, detect familial cancer mutation carriers, provide the molecular rationale for appropriate targeted, therapeutic and prognostic. NGS holds many advantages, such as the ability to fully sequence all types of mutations for a large number of genes (hundreds to thousands) and the sensitivity, speed in a single test at a relatively low cost compared to be other sequencing modalities. Here we described the technology, methods and applications that can be immediately considered and some of the challenges that lie ahead.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Sabour
- Department of Molecular Biology, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran
| | - Maryam Sabour
- Department of Molecular Biology, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran
| | - Saeid Ghorbian
- Department of Molecular Biology, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Danza K, De Summa S, Pinto R, Pilato B, Palumbo O, Carella M, Popescu O, Digennaro M, Lacalamita R, Tommasi S. TGFbeta and miRNA regulation in familial and sporadic breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:50715-50723. [PMID: 28881597 PMCID: PMC5584195 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The term ‘BRCAness’ was introduced to identify sporadic malignant tumors sharing characteristics similar to those germline BRCA-related. Among all mechanisms attributable to BRCA1 expression silencing, a major role has been assigned to microRNAs. MicroRNAs role in familial and sporadic breast cancer has been explored but few data are available about microRNAs involvement in homologous recombination repair control in these breast cancer subgroups. Our aim was to seek microRNAs associated to pathways underlying DNA repair dysfunction in breast cancer according to a family history of the disease. Affymetrix GeneChip microRNA Arrays were used to perform microRNA expression analysis in familial and sporadic breast cancer. Pathway enrichment analysis and microRNA target prediction was carried out using DIANA miRPath v.3 web-based computational tool and miRWalk v.2 database. We analyzed an external gene expression dataset (E-GEOD-49481), including both familial and sporadic breast cancers. For microRNA validation, an independent set of 19 familial and 10 sporadic breast cancers was used. Microarray analysis identified a signature of 28 deregulated miRNAs. For our validation analyses by real time PCR, we focused on miR-92a-1*, miR-1184 and miR-943 because associated to TGF-β signalling pathway, ATM and BRCA1 genes expression. Our results highlighted alterations in miR-92a-1*, miR-1184 and miR-943 expression levels suggesting their involvement in repair of DNA double-strand breaks through TGF-beta pathway control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katia Danza
- IRCCS 'Giovanni Paolo II', Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Simona De Summa
- IRCCS 'Giovanni Paolo II', Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Rosamaria Pinto
- IRCCS 'Giovanni Paolo II', Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Brunella Pilato
- IRCCS 'Giovanni Paolo II', Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Orazio Palumbo
- IRCCS 'Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza', Medical Genetics Unit, San Giovanni Rotondo 71013, Italy
| | - Massimo Carella
- IRCCS 'Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza', Medical Genetics Unit, San Giovanni Rotondo 71013, Italy
| | - Ondina Popescu
- IRCCS 'Giovanni Paolo II', Anatomopathology Unit, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Maria Digennaro
- IRCCS 'Giovanni Paolo II', Experimental Medical Oncology Unit, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Rosanna Lacalamita
- IRCCS 'Giovanni Paolo II', Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Bari 70124, Italy
| | - Stefania Tommasi
- IRCCS 'Giovanni Paolo II', Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Bari 70124, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Triple negative breast cancer: looking for the missing link between biology and treatments. Oncotarget 2016; 6:26560-74. [PMID: 26387133 PMCID: PMC4694936 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Accepted: 08/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The so called “Triple Negative Breast Cancer” (TNBC) represents approximately 15-20% of breast cancers. This acronym simply means that the tumour does not express oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and does not exhibit amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene. Despite this unambiguous definition, TNBCs are an heterogeneous group of tumours with just one common clinical feature: a distinctly aggressive nature with higher rates of relapse and shorter overall survival in the metastatic setting compared with other subtypes of breast cancer. Because of the absence of well-defined molecular targets, cytotoxic chemotherapy is currently the only treatment option for TNBC. In the last decades, the use of more aggressive chemotherapy has produced a clear improvement of the prognosis in women with TNBC, but this approach results in an unacceptable deterioration in the quality of life, also if some support therapies try to relieve patients from distress. In addition, there is the general belief that it is impossible to further improve the prognosis of TNBC patients with chemotherapy alone. In view of that, there is a feverish search for new “clever drugs” able both to rescue chemo-resistant, and to reduce the burden of chemotherapy in chemo-responsive TNBC patients. A major obstacle to identifying actionable targets in TNBC is the vast disease heterogeneity both inter-tumour and intra-tumour and years of study have failed to demonstrate a single unifying alteration that is targetable in TNBC. TNBC is considered the subtype that best benefits from the neoadjuvant model, since the strong correlation between pathological Complete Response and long-term Disease-Free-Survival in these patients. In this review, we discuss the recent discoveries that have furthered our understanding of TNBC, with a focus on the subtyping of TNBC. We also explore the implications of these discoveries for future treatments and highlight the need for a completely different type of clinical trials.
Collapse
|
22
|
Elrick A, Ashida S, Ivanovich J, Lyons S, Biesecker BB, Goodman MS, Kaphingst KA. Psychosocial and Clinical Factors Associated with Family Communication of Cancer Genetic Test Results among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer at a Young Age. J Genet Couns 2016; 26:173-181. [PMID: 27422778 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9995-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Genetic test results have medical implications beyond the patient that extend to biological family members. We examined psychosocial and clinical factors associated with communication of genetic test results within families. Women (N = 1080) diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger completed an online survey; 920 women that reported prior cancer genetic testing were included in analysis. We examined the proportion of immediate family members to whom they communicated genetic test results, and built multivariable regression models to examine clinical and psychosocial variables associated with the proportion score. Participants were most likely to communicate test results to their mother (83 %) and least likely to their son (45 %). Participants who carried a BRCA mutation (OR = 1.34; 95 % CI = 1.06, 1.70), had higher interest in genomic information (OR = 1.55; 95 % CI = 1.26, 1.91) and lower genetic worry (OR = 0.91; 95 % CI = 0.86, 0.96) communicated genetic test results to a greater proportion of their immediate family members. Participants with a BRCA1/2 mutation shared their genetic test results with more male family members (OR = 1.72; 95 % CI = 1.02, 2.89). Our findings suggest that patients with high worry about genetic risks, low interest in genomic information, or receive a negative genetic test result will likely need additional support to encourage family communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Elrick
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Drive, LNCO, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| | - Sato Ashida
- College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jennifer Ivanovich
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sarah Lyons
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Melody S Goodman
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Drive, LNCO, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Conlon N, Howard J, Catalano J, Gallagher M, Tan LK, Corben AD. Breast Carcinoma in Young Women: No Evidence of Increasing Rates of Metastatic Breast Carcinoma in a Single Tertiary Center Review. Breast J 2016; 22:287-92. [PMID: 26923423 PMCID: PMC5558606 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Breast carcinoma in young women aged less than 40 years attracts a high level of mainstream media coverage, and there is a gap between societal perceptions of the disease as a growing problem and epidemiological trends. Several population studies have reported that the overall incidence of breast carcinoma in young women is stable, while one recent article suggested that the relative proportion of breast carcinoma in young women that is metastatic at diagnosis is growing. We sought to establish whether these trends were apparent at our institution. In this study, the clinical database at a breast carcinoma tertiary center was reviewed in terms of clinicopathologic data on patient age, diagnosis, clinical and pathologic stage, hormone receptor status, and HER-2 overexpression status for the period 2000-2011. Over the study period, young patients represented a decreasing proportion of all breast carcinoma cases (10.8% [2000-2003] to 8.7% [2008-2011]; p < 0.0001) treated at our institution. Young patients were more likely than patients aged 40 years or older to present with metastatic (M1) disease (5.4% versus 4.4%; p = 0.009), to be triple negative (21.6% versus 13%; p < 0.001), or to be HER-2 positive (24.3% versus 14.8%; p < 0.01). Young patients with HER-2-positive cancers were significantly more likely to present with metastatic disease (8.3% versus 4.8%; p = 0.004). This study showed no demonstrable increase in the relative proportion of breast cancer occurring in patients aged <40 years over the 12-year period 2000-2011 and no increase in the proportion of young patients presenting with metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh Conlon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jane Howard
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey Catalano
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Meighan Gallagher
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lee K Tan
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adriana D Corben
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Paluch-Shimon S, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Bar-Meir E, Fallowfield L, Fenlon D, Friedman E, Gelmon K, Gentilini O, Geraghty J, Harbeck N, Higgins S, Loibl S, Moser E, Peccatori F, Raanani H, Kaufman B, Cardoso F. Second international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY2). Breast 2016; 26:87-99. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2015] [Accepted: 12/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
25
|
Manchanda R, Jacobs I. Genetic screening for gynecological cancer: where are we heading? Future Oncol 2016; 12:207-20. [DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The landscape of cancer genetics in gynecological oncology is rapidly changing. The traditional family history-based approach has limitations and misses >50% mutation carriers. This is now being replaced by population-based approaches. The need for changing the clinical paradigm from family history-based to population-based BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in Ashkenazi Jews is supported by data that demonstrate population-based BRCA1/BRCA2 testing does not cause psychological harm and is cost effective. This article covers various genetic testing strategies for gynecological cancers, including population-based approaches, panel and direct-to-consumer testing as well as the need for innovative approaches to genetic counseling. Advances in genetic testing technology and computational analytics have facilitated an integrated systems medicine approach, providing increasing potential for population-based genetic testing, risk stratification, and cancer prevention. Genomic information along-with biological/computational tools will be used to deliver predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory (P4) and precision medicine in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Bartshealth NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK
- Barts Cancer Institute, Charter House Square, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
- GCRC, Women's Cancer, University College London, London, W1T 7DN, UK
| | - Ian Jacobs
- UNSW Australia, Level 1, Chancellery Building, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
- University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
A novel BRCA2 in frame deletion in a Tunisian woman with early onset sporadic breast cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 63:185-9. [PMID: 26320393 DOI: 10.1016/j.patbio.2015.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 07/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is increasing among young women in Tunisia. Germline mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes are associated with a high risk for breast cancer development. However, the true contribution of BRCA1/2 mutation in sporadic breast cancer is not well documented. Our aim is to identify the BRCA2 mutation spectrum in Tunisian young women with breast cancer. METHODS Screening the BRCA2 gene was performed using DHPLC, DNA sequencing and PCR-RFLP. RESULTS We identified, in a woman diagnosed with early onset breast cancer, and without family history, a novel in frame deletion 5456delGTAGCA in the exon 11 of the BRCA2 gene which causes a loss of two residues Ser1743-Ser1744. The absence of this deletion in the patients' parents suggests that it is a de novo variant. Furthermore, we screened 108 sporadic cases, 50 familial cases, and 60 controls for the identified del6bp using PCR-RFLP. None of them carried this deletion suggesting that this variant is not a benign polymorphism and probably rare in our population. With regards to the position of the Ser1743-1744 in the BRCT domain, sequence alignment revealed that the Ser1743 is conserved among several species, which may reflect its importance in the BRCA2 function. A modeling of the wild-type and mutated BRC5-BRC6 domain revealed that the deletion of the 2 Serine residues might affect the structure of this BRCA2 domain. CONCLUSIONS A novel in frame deletion 5456del6bp in BRCA2 gene was identified in an early onset woman with breast cancer and without family history.
Collapse
|
27
|
Manchanda R, Legood R, Burnell M, McGuire A, Raikou M, Loggenberg K, Wardle J, Sanderson S, Gessler S, Side L, Balogun N, Desai R, Kumar A, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Chapman C, Taylor R, Jacobs C, Tomlinson I, Beller U, Menon U, Jacobs I. Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:380. [PMID: 25435542 PMCID: PMC4301704 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Revised: 06/18/2014] [Accepted: 10/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population-based testing for BRCA1/2 mutations detects the high proportion of carriers not identified by cancer family history (FH)-based testing. We compared the cost-effectiveness of population-based BRCA testing with the standard FH-based approach in Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) women. METHODS A decision-analytic model was developed to compare lifetime costs and effects amongst AJ women in the UK of BRCA founder-mutation testing amongst: 1) all women in the population age 30 years or older and 2) just those with a strong FH (≥10% mutation risk). The model assumes that BRCA carriers are offered risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and annual MRI/mammography screening or risk-reducing mastectomy. Model probabilities utilize the Genetic Cancer Prediction through Population Screening trial/published literature to estimate total costs, effects in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), cancer incidence, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and population impact. Costs are reported at 2010 prices. Costs/outcomes were discounted at 3.5%. We used deterministic/probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) to evaluate model uncertainty. RESULTS Compared with FH-based testing, population-screening saved 0.090 more life-years and 0.101 more QALYs resulting in 33 days' gain in life expectancy. Population screening was found to be cost saving with a baseline-discounted ICER of -£2079/QALY. Population-based screening lowered ovarian and breast cancer incidence by 0.34% and 0.62%. Assuming 71% testing uptake, this leads to 276 fewer ovarian and 508 fewer breast cancer cases. Overall, reduction in treatment costs led to a discounted cost savings of £3.7 million. Deterministic sensitivity analysis and 94% of simulations on PSA (threshold £20000) indicated that population screening is cost-effective, compared with current NHS policy. CONCLUSION Population-based screening for BRCA mutations is highly cost-effective compared with an FH-based approach in AJ women age 30 years and older.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Manchanda
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Matthew Burnell
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Alistair McGuire
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Maria Raikou
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Kelly Loggenberg
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Jane Wardle
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Saskia Sanderson
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Sue Gessler
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Lucy Side
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Nyala Balogun
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Rakshit Desai
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ajith Kumar
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Huw Dorkins
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Yvonne Wallis
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Cyril Chapman
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Rohan Taylor
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Uziel Beller
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Usha Menon
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ian Jacobs
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK, (RM); Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, MB, KL, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (RL); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, UK (AM, MR); Behavioural Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); NW Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, Middlesex, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's University of London, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington Oxford, UK (IT); Department Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences & Manchester Academic Health Science Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (IJ).
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Manchanda R, Loggenberg K, Sanderson S, Burnell M, Wardle J, Gessler S, Side L, Balogun N, Desai R, Kumar A, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Chapman C, Taylor R, Jacobs C, Tomlinson I, McGuire A, Beller U, Menon U, Jacobs I. Population testing for cancer predisposing BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in the Ashkenazi-Jewish community: a randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:379. [PMID: 25435541 PMCID: PMC4301703 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Revised: 07/29/2014] [Accepted: 10/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technological advances raise the possibility of systematic population-based genetic testing for cancer-predisposing mutations, but it is uncertain whether benefits outweigh disadvantages. We directly compared the psychological/quality-of-life consequences of such an approach to family history (FH)-based testing. METHODS In a randomized controlled trial of BRCA1/2 gene-mutation testing in the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population, we compared testing all participants in the population screening (PS) arm with testing those fulfilling standard FH-based clinical criteria (FH arm). Following a targeted community campaign, AJ participants older than 18 years were recruited by self-referral after pretest genetic counseling. The effects of BRCA1/2 genetic testing on acceptability, psychological impact, and quality-of-life measures were assessed by random effects regression analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS One thousand, one hundred sixty-eight AJ individuals were counseled, 1042 consented, 1034 were randomly assigned (691 women, 343 men), and 1017 were eligible for analysis. Mean age was 54.3 (SD = 14.66) years. Thirteen BRCA1/2 carriers were identified in the PS arm, nine in the FH arm. Five more carriers were detected among FH-negative FH-arm participants following study completion. There were no statistically significant differences between the FH and PS arms at seven days or three months on measures of anxiety, depression, health anxiety, distress, uncertainty, and quality-of-life. Contrast tests indicated that overall anxiety (P = .0001) and uncertainty (P = .005) associated with genetic testing decreased; positive experience scores increased (P = .0001); quality-of-life and health anxiety did not change with time. Overall, 56% of carriers did not fulfill clinical criteria for genetic testing, and the BRCA1/2 prevalence was 2.45%. CONCLUSION Compared with FH-based testing, population-based genetic testing in Ashkenazi Jews doesn't adversely affect short-term psychological/quality-of-life outcomes and may detect 56% additional BRCA carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Manchanda
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Kelly Loggenberg
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Saskia Sanderson
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Matthew Burnell
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Jane Wardle
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Sue Gessler
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Lucy Side
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Nyala Balogun
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Rakshit Desai
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ajith Kumar
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Huw Dorkins
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Yvonne Wallis
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Cyril Chapman
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Rohan Taylor
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Alistair McGuire
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Uziel Beller
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Usha Menon
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ)
| | - Ian Jacobs
- Affiliation of authors: Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK (RM, KL, MB, SG, LS, NB, RD, UM, IJ); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK (RM); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (SS); Behavioral Sciences Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK (JW); Department of Clinical Genetics, North East Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK (AK); Department of Clinical Genetics, North West Thames Regional Genetics Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK (HD); West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (YW); Department of Clinical Genetics, West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK (CC); South West Thames Molecular Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, St George's Hospital, London, UK (RT); Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK (CJ); London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK (IT); Department of Health Economics, London School of Economics, London, UK (AM); Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel (UB); Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK (IJ).
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee HB, Han W. Unique features of young age breast cancer and its management. J Breast Cancer 2014; 17:301-7. [PMID: 25548576 PMCID: PMC4278047 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.4.301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2014] [Accepted: 11/05/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Young age breast cancer (YABC) has unique clinical and biological features that are not seen in older patients. Breast tumor biology is more aggressive and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis in younger women. The diagnosis of breast cancer is often delayed, resulting in their initial presentation with more advanced disease. Together, these characteristics lead to a poorer prognosis in younger women than in older women. Young women who receive breast-conserving therapy have a higher rate of local recurrence. Therefore, it is important to secure sufficient resection margins and consider boost radiotherapy to prevent local treatment failure. Based on age alone, patients with YABC should be regarded as high-risk cases, and they should be treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Special considerations regarding psychosocial factors and fertility should be taken into account for young patients. This review discusses the major considerations and principles concerning the management of patients with YABC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Byoel Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonshik Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rich TA, Woodson AH, Litton J, Arun B. Hereditary breast cancer syndromes and genetic testing. J Surg Oncol 2014; 111:66-80. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.23791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2014] [Accepted: 07/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thereasa A. Rich
- Clinical Cancer Genetics Program; Department of Surgical Oncology; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Ashley H. Woodson
- Clinical Cancer Genetics Program; Department of Breast Medical Oncology; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Jennifer Litton
- Clinical Cancer Genetics Program; Department of Breast Medical Oncology; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Banu Arun
- Clinical Cancer Genetics Program; Department of Breast Medical Oncology; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lee M, Czene K, Rebora P, Reilly M. Patterns of changing cancer risks with time since diagnosis of a sibling. Int J Cancer 2014; 136:1948-56. [PMID: 25267314 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2014] [Revised: 09/02/2014] [Accepted: 09/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Family history is a well-known risk factor for many cancers. However, it is important to know if/how the familial risk of cancer changes over time. For each of four major cancers (colorectal, breast, prostate and melanoma), we identified siblings of cancer patients (case siblings) and siblings of matched cancer-free controls sampled from Swedish population-based registers. Effects of age and time since diagnosis on sibling risks were examined using Poisson regression and presented graphically as smoothed hazard ratios (HRs). Screening effects were investigated by comparing hazards before/after the introduction of mammography for breast cancer and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer. Case siblings had higher cancer incidence than control siblings for all cancers at all ages, with overall incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of 2.41 (95% confidence interval 2.14-2.71) for colorectal cancer, 2.37 (2.24-2.52) for breast cancer, 3.69 (3.46-3.93) for prostate cancer and 3.20 (2.72-3.76) for melanoma. Risks were highest in siblings who were young when the first cancer was diagnosed in the family, with siblings aged 30-40 having IRR 9.05 (3.03-27.00) for colorectal cancer and 4.30 (2.87-6.45) for breast cancer. Smoothed HRs remained fairly constant for up to 20 years except for prostate cancer, where the HR decreased steeply during the first few years. After introduction of PSA testing, men had higher incidence of prostate cancer shortly after diagnosis in a brother, but no such screening effect was found for breast cancer. Our findings can help inform the screening and counseling of family members of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myeongjee Lee
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bastos EP, Brentani H, Pasini FS, Silva ART, Torres CH, Puga RD, Olivieri EHR, Piovezani AR, Pereira CADB, Machado-Lima A, Carraro DM, Brentani MM. MicroRNAs discriminate familial from sporadic non-BRCA1/2 breast carcinoma arising in patients ≤35 years. PLoS One 2014; 9:e101656. [PMID: 25006670 PMCID: PMC4090167 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2014] [Accepted: 06/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The influence of genetic factors may contribute to the poor prognosis of breast cancer (BC) at a very young age. However BRCA1/2 mutations could not explain the majority of cases arising in these patients. MicroRNAs (miRs) have been implicated in biological processes associated with BC. Therefore, we investigated differences in miRs expression between tumors from young patients (≤35 years) with sporadic or familial history and non-carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. Thirty-six young Brazilian patients were divided into 2 groups: sporadic (NF-BC) or familial breast cancer (F-BC). Most of the samples were classified as luminal A and B and the frequency of subtypes did not differ between familial or sporadic cases. Using real time qPCR and discriminant function analysis, we identified 9 miRs whose expression levels rather than miR identity can discriminate between both patient groups. Candidate predicted targets were determined by combining results from miRWalk algorithms with mRNA expression profiles (n = 91 differently expressed genes). MiR/mRNA integrated analysis identified 91 candidate genes showing positive or negative correlation to at least 1 of the 9 miRs. Co-expression analysis of these genes with 9 miRs indicated that 49 differentially co-expressed miR-gene interactions changes in F-BC tumors as compared to those of NF-BC tumors. Out of 49, 17 (34.6%) of predicted miR-gene interactions showed an inverse correlation suggesting that miRs act as post-transcriptional regulators, whereas 14 (28.6%) miR-gene pairs tended to be co-expressed in the same direction indicating that the effects exerted by these miRs pointed to a complex level of target regulation. The remaining 18 pairs were not predicted by our criteria suggesting involvement of other regulators. MiR-mRNA co-expression analysis allowed us to identify changes in the miR-mRNA regulation that were able to distinguish tumors from familial and sporadic young BC patients non-carriers of BRCA mutations.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Female
- Genes, BRCA1
- Genes, BRCA2
- Humans
- MicroRNAs/genetics
- MicroRNAs/metabolism
- Transcriptome
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elen Pereira Bastos
- Oncology and Radiology Department, Laboratory of Medical Investigation 24 (LIM 24), University of São Paulo, Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Helena Brentani
- Laboratory of Clinical Pathology – Laboratory of Medical Investigation 23 (LIM 23), Institute and Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fatima Solange Pasini
- Oncology and Radiology Department, Laboratory of Medical Investigation 24 (LIM 24), University of São Paulo, Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Aderbal Ruy T. Silva
- Laboratory of Clinical Pathology – Laboratory of Medical Investigation 23 (LIM 23), Institute and Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Cesar Henrique Torres
- Laboratory of Clinical Pathology – Laboratory of Medical Investigation 23 (LIM 23), Institute and Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Renato David Puga
- Clinical Research Center - Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein- HIAE, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | - Ariane Machado-Lima
- School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Dirce Maria Carraro
- Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biology, Research Center (CIPE), A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Maria Mitzi Brentani
- Oncology and Radiology Department, Laboratory of Medical Investigation 24 (LIM 24), University of São Paulo, Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Double heterozygosity for germline mutations in BRCA1 and p53 in a woman with early onset breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 146:447-50. [PMID: 24916180 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3011-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2014] [Accepted: 05/26/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
To report on a highly unusual case of a 20-year-old woman who presented with multifocal metaplastic breast cancer and was subsequently found to carry deleterious germline mutations in both BRCA1 and p53. Genetic testing was requested on an expedited basis to assist in surgical decision-making and BRCA1/2 and p53 genetic analysis was ordered concurrently. BRCA1/2 and p53 analyses were completed using a combination of direct DNA sequencing and multiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA). The patient was found to carry a deletion of exon 3 of the BRCA1 gene and a splice site mutation at the exon4/intron4 boundary of the p53 gene. To our knowledge, this is the first report of double heterozygosity in BRCA1 and p53. The patient's clinical presentation is highly reminiscent of that predicted by preclinical mouse models. In patients with early onset breast cancer, the possibility of germline mutations in more than one cancer susceptibility gene should be considered. This could have important clinical implications for patients and their at-risk family members.
Collapse
|
34
|
First international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY1). Breast 2014; 23:209-20. [PMID: 24767882 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2014] [Revised: 03/25/2014] [Accepted: 03/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The 1st International Consensus Conference for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY1) took place in November 2012, in Dublin, Ireland organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO). Consensus recommendations for management of breast cancer in young women were developed and areas of research priorities were identified. This manuscript summarizes these international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).
Collapse
|
35
|
Koedijk MS, van der Sangen MJC, Poortmans PMP, van Mierlo-Jansen P, van den Broek WT, Storck BHM, Voogd AC. Effectiveness of routine follow-up in the detection of contralateral breast cancer in young women with early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39:1186-91. [PMID: 24063971 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2013] [Accepted: 08/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of routine follow-up to detect contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in young women. METHODS We used the data of the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry, which covers the southern part of the Netherlands. Between 1988 and 2005, 1451 women aged ≤ 40 years were treated for early-stage breast cancer with breast-conserving treatment or mastectomy. RESULTS Of the 94 patients who developed CBC 17 had an in situ carcinoma. Fifty-seven CBCs (61%) were diagnosed more than 5 years after the primary tumour. Forty-two CBCs (45%) were detected during routine follow-up visits, while 52 (55%) presented between two visits. Of the CBC diagnosed between two visits, only 27 (60%) were visible on mammography. Of the invasive CBCs more than 25% was larger than 2 cm in diameter and in 34% positive axillary lymph nodes were found. CONCLUSIONS These figures indicate that routine follow-up does not guarantee early detection of CBC in young women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Koedijk
- Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Francken AB, Schouten PC, Bleiker EMA, Linn SC, Rutgers EJT. Breast cancer in women at high risk: the role of rapid genetic testing for BRCA1 and -2 mutations and the consequences for treatment strategies. Breast 2013; 22:561-8. [PMID: 23972475 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2013] [Revised: 06/05/2013] [Accepted: 07/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Specific clinical questions rise when patients, who are diagnosed with breast cancer, are at risk of carrying a mutation in BRCA1 and -2 gene due to a strong family history or young age at diagnosis. These questions concern topics such as 1. Timing of genetic counseling and testing, 2. Choices to be made for BRCA1 or -2 mutation carriers in local treatment, contralateral treatment, (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy, and 3. The psychological effects of rapid testing. The knowledge of the genetic status might have several advantages for the patient in treatment planning, such as the choice whether or not to undergo mastectomy and/or prophylactic contralateral mastectomy. The increased risk of developing a second breast cancer in the ipsilateral breast in mutation carriers, is only slightly higher after primary cancer treatment, than in the general population. Prophylactic contralateral mastectomy provides a substantial reduction of contralateral breast cancer, although only a small breast cancer specific survival benefit. Patients should be enrolled in clinical trials to investigate (neo)-adjuvant drug regimens, that based on preclinical and early clinical evidence might be targeting the homologous recombination defect, such as platinum compounds and PARP inhibitors. If rapid testing is performed, the patient can make a well-balanced decision. Although rapid genetic counseling and testing might cause some distress, most women reported this approach to be worthwhile. In this review the literature regarding these topics is evaluated. Answers and suggestions, useful in clinical practice are discussed.
Collapse
|
37
|
Goss PE, Lee BL, Badovinac-Crnjevic T, Strasser-Weippl K, Chavarri-Guerra Y, St Louis J, Villarreal-Garza C, Unger-Saldaña K, Ferreyra M, Debiasi M, Liedke PER, Touya D, Werutsky G, Higgins M, Fan L, Vasconcelos C, Cazap E, Vallejos C, Mohar A, Knaul F, Arreola H, Batura R, Luciani S, Sullivan R, Finkelstein D, Simon S, Barrios C, Kightlinger R, Gelrud A, Bychkovsky V, Lopes G, Stefani S, Blaya M, Souza FH, Santos FS, Kaemmerer A, de Azambuja E, Zorilla AFC, Murillo R, Jeronimo J, Tsu V, Carvalho A, Gil CF, Sternberg C, Dueñas-Gonzalez A, Sgroi D, Cuello M, Fresco R, Reis RM, Masera G, Gabús R, Ribeiro R, Knust R, Ismael G, Rosenblatt E, Roth B, Villa L, Solares AL, Leon MX, Torres-Vigil I, Covarrubias-Gomez A, Hernández A, Bertolino M, Schwartsmann G, Santillana S, Esteva F, Fein L, Mano M, Gomez H, Hurlbert M, Durstine A, Azenha G. Planning cancer control in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14:391-436. [PMID: 23628188 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70048-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 336] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Non-communicable diseases, including cancer, are overtaking infectious disease as the leading health-care threat in middle-income and low-income countries. Latin American and Caribbean countries are struggling to respond to increasing morbidity and death from advanced disease. Health ministries and health-care systems in these countries face many challenges caring for patients with advanced cancer: inadequate funding; inequitable distribution of resources and services; inadequate numbers, training, and distribution of health-care personnel and equipment; lack of adequate care for many populations based on socioeconomic, geographic, ethnic, and other factors; and current systems geared toward the needs of wealthy, urban minorities at a cost to the entire population. This burgeoning cancer problem threatens to cause widespread suffering and economic peril to the countries of Latin America. Prompt and deliberate actions must be taken to avoid this scenario. Increasing efforts towards prevention of cancer and avoidance of advanced, stage IV disease will reduce suffering and mortality and will make overall cancer care more affordable. We hope the findings of our Commission and our recommendations will inspire Latin American stakeholders to redouble their efforts to address this increasing cancer burden and to prevent it from worsening and threatening their societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul E Goss
- Avon International Breast Cancer Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Overberg R, De Man A, Wolterbeek R, Otten W, Zwetsloot-Schonk B. Spontaneously published illness stories on a website for young women with breast cancer: Do writers and themes reflect the wider population? Inform Health Soc Care 2013; 38:54-66. [DOI: 10.3109/17538157.2012.705202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
39
|
Solano AR, Aceto GM, Delettieres D, Veschi S, Neuman MI, Alonso E, Chialina S, Chacón RD, Renato MC, Podestá EJ. BRCA1 And BRCA2 analysis of Argentinean breast/ovarian cancer patients selected for age and family history highlights a role for novel mutations of putative south-American origin. SPRINGERPLUS 2012; 1:20. [PMID: 23961350 PMCID: PMC3725882 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-1-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2012] [Accepted: 08/30/2012] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The spectrum of BRCA1/2 genetic variation in breast-ovarian cancer patients has been scarcely investigated outside Europe and North America, with few reports for South America, where Amerindian founder effects and recent multiracial immigration are predicted to result in high genetic diversity. We describe here the results of BRCA1/BRCA2 germline analysis in an Argentinean series of breast/ovarian cancer patients selected for young age at diagnosis or breast/ovarian cancer family history. METHODS The study series (134 patients) included 37 cases diagnosed within 40 years of age and no family history (any ethnicity, fully-sequenced), and 97 cases with at least 2 affected relatives (any age), of which 57 were non-Ashkenazi (fully-sequenced) and 40 Ashkenazi (tested only for the founder mutations c.66_67delAG and c.5263insC in BRCA1 and c.5946delT in BRCA2). DISCUSSION We found 24 deleterious mutations (BRCA1:16; BRCA2: 8) in 38/134 (28.3%) patients, of which 6/37 (16.2%) within the young age group, 15/57 (26.3%) within the non-Ahkenazi positive for family history; and 17/40 (42.5%) within the Ashkenazi. Seven pathogenetic mutations were novel, five in BRCA1: c.1502_1505delAATT, c.2626_2627delAA c.2686delA, c.2728 C > T, c.3758_3759delCT, two in BRCA2: c.7105insA, c.793 + 1delG. We also detected 72 variants of which 54 previously reported and 17 novel, 33 detected in an individual patient. Four missense variants of unknown clinical significance, identified in 5 patients, are predicted to affect protein function. While global and European variants contributed near 45% of the detected BRCA1/2 variation, the significant fraction of new variants (25/96, 26%) suggests the presence of a South American genetic component. This study, the first conducted in Argentinean patients, highlights a significant impact of novel BRCA1/2 mutations and genetic variants, which may be regarded as putatively South American, and confirms the important role of founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Argentinean Ashkenazi Jews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Rosaria Solano
- Laboratorio HRDC, INBIOMED-CONICET, Departamento de Bioquímica Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155 Piso 5, (C1121ABG) Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Centro de Estudios Médicos e Investigaciones Clínicas, Galván 4102, (C1431FWO) Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gitana Maria Aceto
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, “G. d’Annunzio” University, Via dei Vestini 1, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Dreanina Delettieres
- Centro de Estudios Médicos e Investigaciones Clínicas, Galván 4102, (C1431FWO) Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Serena Veschi
- Unit of General Pathology, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, “G. d’Annunzio” University, and Aging Research Center (CeSI), G. d’Annunzio Universith Foundation, Via Colle dell’Ara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Maria Isabel Neuman
- Laboratorio HRDC, INBIOMED-CONICET, Departamento de Bioquímica Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155 Piso 5, (C1121ABG) Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eduardo Alonso
- Hospital Italiano, Virasoro 1249 (CB1921XAA), Rosario, Santa Fé, Argentina
| | - Sergio Chialina
- Hospital Italiano, Virasoro 1249 (CB1921XAA), Rosario, Santa Fé, Argentina
| | - Reinaldo Daniel Chacón
- Laboratorio HRDC, INBIOMED-CONICET, Departamento de Bioquímica Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155 Piso 5, (C1121ABG) Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mariani-Costantini Renato
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, “G. d’Annunzio” University, Via dei Vestini 1, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Ernesto Jorge Podestá
- Laboratorio HRDC, INBIOMED-CONICET, Departamento de Bioquímica Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155 Piso 5, (C1121ABG) Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
van der Sangen MJC, Scheepers SWM, Poortmans PMP, Luiten EJT, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Voogd AC. Detection of local recurrence following breast-conserving treatment in young women with early breast cancer: optimization of long-term follow-up strategies. Breast 2012; 22:351-6. [PMID: 22989668 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2012] [Revised: 08/20/2012] [Accepted: 08/26/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The detection of a local recurrence (LR) in young women with breast cancer after breast-conserving treatment (BCT) was investigated to compare the impact of different long-term follow-up strategies. Between 1988 and 2005, 937 women aged ≤40 years were treated with BCT for early-stage breast cancer in the southern part of the Netherlands. Up to October 2009, 152 had developed an isolated LR. Information on follow-up visits was available for 124 of them. Fifty-four LRs (44%) were diagnosed within 5 years and 70 (56%) more than 5 years after BCT. Fifty-six LRs (45%) were detected during routine follow-up visits and 68 (55%) presented between two visits. Sixty-six LRs (53%) were diagnosed in patients reporting symptoms. In 31 patients (25%) the LR was found by mammography alone. About a quarter of the LRs was larger than 2 cm in diameter. These results imply that current follow-up strategies for young women with BCT do not guarantee a timely detection of LR.
Collapse
|
41
|
Watts KJ, Meiser B, Mitchell G, Kirk J, Saunders C, Peate M, Duffy J, Kelly PJ, Gleeson M, Barlow-Stewart K, Rahman B, Friedlander M, Tucker K. How should we discuss genetic testing with women newly diagnosed with breast cancer? Design and implementation of a randomized controlled trial of two models of delivering education about treatment-focused genetic testing to younger women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2012; 12:320. [PMID: 22838957 PMCID: PMC3472271 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2012] [Accepted: 07/13/2012] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing offered shortly after a breast cancer diagnosis to inform women's treatment choices - treatment-focused genetic testing 'TFGT' - has entered clinical practice in specialist centers and is likely to be soon commonplace in acute breast cancer management, especially for younger women. Yet the optimal way to deliver information about TFGT to younger women newly diagnosed with breast cancer is not known, particularly for those who were not suspected of having a hereditary breast cancer syndrome prior to their cancer diagnosis. Also, little is known about the behavioral and psychosocial impact or cost effectiveness of educating patients about TFGT. This trial aims to examine the impact and efficiency of two models of educating younger women newly diagnosed with breast cancer about genetic testing in order to provide evidence for a safe and effective future clinical pathway for this service. DESIGN/METHODS In this non-inferiority randomized controlled trial, 140 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer (aged less than 50 years) are being recruited from nine cancer centers in Australia. Eligible women with either a significant family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer or with other high risk features suggestive of a mutation detection rate of > 10% are invited by their surgeon prior to mastectomy or radiotherapy. After completing the first questionnaire, participants are randomized to receive either: (a) an educational pamphlet about genetic testing (intervention) or (b) a genetic counseling appointment at a family cancer center (standard care). Each participant is offered genetic testing for germline BRCA mutations. Decision-related and psychosocial outcomes are assessed over 12 months and include decisional conflict (primary outcome);uptake of bilateral mastectomy and/or risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; cancer-specific- and general distress; family involvement in decision making; and decision regret. A process-oriented retrospective online survey will examine health professionals' attitudes toward TFGT; a health economic analysis will determine the cost effectiveness of the intervention. DISCUSSION This trial will provide crucial information about the impact, efficiency and cost effectiveness of an educational pamphlet designed to inform younger women newly diagnosed with breast cancer about genetic testing. Issues regarding implementation of the trial are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaaren J Watts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Familial Cancer Service, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia
| | - Judy Kirk
- Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
- Westmead Millennium Institute for Medical Research at the University of Sydney, PO Box 412, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Christobel Saunders
- Department of Surgery, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Jessica Duffy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Patrick J Kelly
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Margaret Gleeson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, PO Box 84, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia
| | | | - Belinda Rahman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| | - Michael Friedlander
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Kathy Tucker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the incidence of breast carcinoma and survival in patients younger than 25 years old, and to describe presenting clinical signs and symptoms of breast cancer in this age group. METHODS A population-based descriptive study and case review in Olmsted County, Minnesota, was conducted using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Participants were Olmsted County girls and women younger than 25 years old with histopathologically confirmed breast carcinoma diagnosed between 1935 and 2005. Nonresidents who presented to a medical facility within Olmsted County during this time period were included in some portions of the analysis. Main outcome measures were age-adjusted incidence, 5-year survival, and clinical presentation of breast carcinoma in girls and women younger than 25 years of age. RESULTS With four breast carcinomas observed in Olmsted County residents over 1,201,539 person-years, the annual age-adjusted incidence of breast cancer in this population was 3.2 per million (95% confidence interval, 0.1-6.2). All four cancers occurred in the 20- to 24-year age group (age-specific incidence, 16.2 per million). Eight additional cases of breast carcinoma were identified in nonresidents. Delay in diagnosis was common. All had at least one feature worrisome for an aggressive neoplasm identified in their clinical history, on physical examination or by imaging. CONCLUSION Breast carcinoma in young women is very rare, associated with delayed diagnosis, and usually associated with concerning features requiring biopsy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia S Simmons
- From the Divisions of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology and Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; the Department of Gynaecology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; and the Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic Health System, Austin, Texas
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Vaca-Paniagua F, Alvarez-Gomez RM, Fragoso-Ontiveros V, Vidal-Millan S, Herrera LA, Cantú D, Bargallo-Rocha E, Mohar A, López-Camarillo C, Pérez-Plasencia C. Full-exon pyrosequencing screening of BRCA germline mutations in Mexican women with inherited breast and ovarian cancer. PLoS One 2012; 7:e37432. [PMID: 22655046 PMCID: PMC3360054 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2012] [Accepted: 04/19/2012] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary breast cancer comprises 10% of all breast cancers. The most prevalent genes causing this pathology are BRCA1 and BRCA2 (breast cancer early onset 1 and 2), which also predispose to other cancers. Despite the outstanding relevance of genetic screening of BRCA deleterious variants in patients with a history of familial cancer, this practice is not common in Latin American public institutions. In this work we assessed mutations in the entire exonic and splice-site regions of BRCA in 39 patients with breast and ovarian cancer and with familial history of breast cancer or with clinical features suggestive for BRCA mutations by massive parallel pyrosequencing. First we evaluated the method with controls and found 41-485 reads per sequence in BRCA pathogenic mutations. Negative controls did not show deleterious variants, confirming the suitability of the approach. In patients diagnosed with cancer we found 4 novel deleterious mutations (c.2805_2808delAGAT and c.3124_3133delAGCAATATTA in BRCA1; c.2639_2640delTG and c.5114_5117delTAAA in BRCA2). The prevalence of BRCA mutations in these patients was 10.2%. Moreover, we discovered 16 variants with unknown clinical significance (11 in exons and 5 in introns); 4 were predicted as possibly pathogenic by in silico analyses, and 3 have not been described previously. This study illustrates how massive pyrosequencing technology can be applied to screen for BRCA mutations in the whole exonic and splice regions in patients with suspected BRCA-related cancers. This is the first effort to analyse the mutational status of BRCA genes on a Mexican-mestizo population by means of pyrosequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Vaca-Paniagua
- Laboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, México
- Unidad de Genómica y Secuenciación Masiva (UGESEM), Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, México
| | - Rosa María Alvarez-Gomez
- Unidad de Genómica y Secuenciación Masiva (UGESEM), Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, México
| | - Verónica Fragoso-Ontiveros
- Laboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, México
- Unidad de Genómica y Secuenciación Masiva (UGESEM), Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, México
| | | | - Luis Alonso Herrera
- Unidad de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Tlalpan, México
| | - David Cantú
- Departamento de Oncología Médica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, México
| | | | - Alejandro Mohar
- Unidad de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Tlalpan, México
| | | | - Carlos Pérez-Plasencia
- Laboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, México
- Unidad de Genómica y Secuenciación Masiva (UGESEM), Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, México
- Unidad de Biomedicina, FES-IZTACALA, UNAM, Tlalnepantla, México
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rudat V, El-Sweilmeen H, Fadel E, Brune-Erber I, Ahmad Nour A, Bushnag Z, Masri N, Altuwaijri S. Age of 40 years or younger is an independent risk factor for locoregional failure in early breast cancer: a single-institutional analysis in saudi arabia. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2012; 2012:370385. [PMID: 22545048 PMCID: PMC3321571 DOI: 10.1155/2012/370385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2011] [Revised: 01/23/2012] [Accepted: 01/26/2012] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of prognostic factors on the locoregional failure-free survival of early breast cancer patients. Methods. In this single-institutional study, 213 breast cancer patients were retrospectively analysed. Fifty-five of 213 patients were ≤40 years of age at diagnosis. The impact of patient- or treatment-related factors on the locoregional failure-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The simultaneous impact of factors on the locoregional failure-free survival was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results. The median follow-up time of the censored patients was 22 months (mean 28 months, range 3-92 months). On univariate analysis, statistically significant factors for the locoregional failure-free survival were the age (≤40 versus >40 years), T stage (Tis, T0-2 versus T3-4), molecular tumor type (luminal A versus luminal B, Her2neu overexpression, or triple negative), and lymphovascular status (LV0 versus LV1). On multivariate analysis, age and T stage remained statistically significant. Conclusions. Being 40 years or younger has a statistically significant independent adverse impact on the locoregional failure-free survival of patients with early breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Rudat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saad Specialist Hospital, P.O. Box 30353, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hamdan El-Sweilmeen
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Saad Specialist Hospital, P.O. Box 30353, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
| | - Elias Fadel
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Saad Specialist Hospital, P.O. Box 30353, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
| | - Iris Brune-Erber
- Department of Surgery, Saad Specialist Hospital, P.O. Box 30353, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alaa Ahmad Nour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saad Specialist Hospital, P.O. Box 30353, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zinaida Bushnag
- Department of Surgery, Saad Specialist Hospital, P.O. Box 30353, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nidal Masri
- Department of Pathology, Saad Specialist Hospital, P.O. Box 30353, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Altuwaijri
- SAAD Research & Development Center, Saad Specialist Hospital, P.O. Box 30353, Al Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hernan I, Borràs E, de Sousa Dias M, Gamundi MJ, Mañé B, Llort G, Agúndez JAG, Blanca M, Carballo M. Detection of genomic variations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes by long-range PCR and next-generation sequencing. J Mol Diagn 2012; 14:286-93. [PMID: 22426013 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2011] [Revised: 01/10/2012] [Accepted: 01/24/2012] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in sequencing technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), represent an opportunity to perform genetic testing in a clinical scenario. In this study, we developed and tested a method for the detection of mutations in the large BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressor genes, using long-range PCR (LR-PCR) and NGS, in samples from individuals with a personal and/or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Eleven LR-PCR fragments, between 3000 and 15,300 bp, containing all coding exons and flanking splice junctions of BRCA1 and BRCA2, were obtained from DNA samples of five individuals carrying mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2. Libraries for NGS were prepared using an enzymatic (Nextera technology) method. We analyzed five individual samples in parallel by NGS and obtained complete coverage of all LR-PCR fragments, with an average coding sequence depth for each nucleotide of >30 reads, running from ×7 (in exon 22 of BRCA1) to >×150. We detected and confirmed 100% of the mutations that predispose to the risk of cancer, together with other genomic variations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Our approach demonstrates that genomic LR-PCR, together with NGS, using the GS Junior 454 System platform, is an effective method for patient sample analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. In addition, this method could be performed in regular molecular genetics laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imma Hernan
- Molecular Genetics Unit, Hospital of Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
van der Hage JA, Mieog JSD, van de Velde CJH, Putter H, Bartelink H, van de Vijver MJ. Impact of established prognostic factors and molecular subtype in very young breast cancer patients: pooled analysis of four EORTC randomized controlled trials. Breast Cancer Res 2011; 13:R68. [PMID: 21699739 PMCID: PMC3218957 DOI: 10.1186/bcr2908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2010] [Revised: 02/08/2011] [Accepted: 06/24/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Young age at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer is an independent factor of poor prognosis. In many treatment guidelines, the recommendation is to treat young patients with adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of tumor characteristics. However, limited data on prognostic factors are available for young breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of established clinical and pathological prognostic factors in young breast cancer patients. Methods Data from four European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) clinical trials were pooled, resulting in a dataset consisting of 9,938 early breast cancer patients with a median follow-up of 11 years. For 549 patients aged less than 40 years at the time of diagnosis, including 341 node negative patients who did not receive chemotherapy, paraffin tumor blocks were processed for immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Cox proportional hazard analysis was applied to assess the association of clinical and pathological factors with overall and distant metastasis free survival. Results For young patients, tumor size (P = 0.01), nodal status (P = 0.006) and molecular subtype (P = 0.02) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. In the node negative subgroup, only molecular subtype was a prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.02). Young node negative patients bearing luminal A tumors had an overall survival rate of 94% at 10 years' follow-up compared to 72% for patients with basal-type tumors. Conclusions Molecular subtype is a strong independent prognostic factor in breast cancer patients younger than 40 years of age. These data support the use of established prognostic factors as a diagnostic tool to assess disease outcome and to plan systemic treatment strategies in young breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jos A van der Hage
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gadzicki D, Evans DG, Harris H, Julian-Reynier C, Nippert I, Schmidtke J, Tibben A, van Asperen CJ, Schlegelberger B. Genetic testing for familial/hereditary breast cancer-comparison of guidelines and recommendations from the UK, France, the Netherlands and Germany. J Community Genet 2011; 2:53-69. [PMID: 22109790 PMCID: PMC3186026 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-011-0042-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2010] [Accepted: 02/09/2011] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review, the national guidelines and recommendations for genetic testing for familial/hereditary breast cancer from the UK, France, the Netherlands and Germany were evaluated as to the inclusion criteria for genetic testing. In all four countries, access to genetic testing relies basically on the family history of breast and ovarian cancer. Similarities are obvious for most selection criteria. All four guidelines recommend embedding genetic testing within a framework of genetic counselling, and all agree to perform genetic testing first in an affected person. However, there are differences regarding the thresholds based on certain familial constellations, detailed description of selection criteria, the degree of relatedness between affected individuals and the counsellee, the age of diagnosis, the individual history of early onset breast cancer, bilateral breast cancer, the tumour morphology or the access to intensified surveillance. These differences and open questions not covered by the guidelines, e.g. on how to deal with phenocopies, unclassified variants, genetic variants in newly identified breast cancer susceptibility genes or with family constellations not fitting the criteria, are discussed. New evidence is usually slowly integrated into the guidelines. An exchange process towards the harmonization of the guidelines will ensure high quality health care across Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothea Gadzicki
- Institute of Cell and Molecular Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
|
49
|
van der Sangen MJC, van de Wiel FMM, Poortmans PMP, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Roumen RMH, Ernst MF, Tutein Nolthenius-Puylaert MCBJE, Voogd AC. Are breast conservation and mastectomy equally effective in the treatment of young women with early breast cancer? Long-term results of a population-based cohort of 1,451 patients aged ≤ 40 years. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 127:207-15. [PMID: 20703938 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1110-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2010] [Accepted: 07/28/2010] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
To compare the effectiveness of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy, all women aged ≤ 40 years, treated for early-stage breast cancer in the southern part of the Netherlands between 1988 and 2005, were identified. A total of 562 patients underwent mastectomy and 889 patients received BCT. During follow-up, 23 patients treated with mastectomy and 135 patients treated with BCT developed a local relapse without previous or simultaneous evidence of distant disease. The local relapse risk for patients treated with mastectomy was 4.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-6.4) at 5 years and reached a plateau after 6 years at 6.0% (95% CI 3.5-8.5). After BCT, the 5-, 10- and 15-year risks were 8.3% (95% CI 6.3-10.5), 18.4% (95% CI 15.0-21.8) and 28.2% (95% CI 23.0-33.4), respectively (P < 0.0001). Adjuvant systemic therapy following BCT reduced the 15-year local relapse risk from 32.9% (95% CI 26.7-39.1) to 16.1% (95% CI 9.1-23.1), (P = 0.0007). In conclusion, local tumor control in young patients with early-stage breast cancer is worse after BCT than after mastectomy. Adjuvant systemic therapy significantly improves local control following BCT and also for that reason it should be considered for most patients ≤ 40 years. Long-term follow-up is highly recommended for young patients after BCT, because even with systemic treatment an annual risk of local relapse of 1% remains up to 15 years after treatment.
Collapse
|
50
|
Ruddy K, Gelber S, Shin J, Garber J, Rosenberg R, Przypysny M, Partridge A. Genetic testing in young women with breast cancer: results from a Web-based survey. Ann Oncol 2010; 21:741-747. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
|