Effect of moderate or severe hepatic impairment on clarithromycin pharmacokinetics

Uncovering the impact of COVID-19-mediated bidirectional dysregulation of cytochrome P450 3A4 on systemic and pulmonary drug concentrations using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling

Several clinical studies have shown that COVID-19 increases the systemic concentration of drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. However, it is unclear how COVID-19-mediated bidirectional dysregulation of hepatic and pulmonary cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 affects drug concentrations, especially in the lung tissue, which is most affected by the disease. Herein, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was used to demonstrate the differences in systemic and pulmonary concentrations of 4 respiratory infectious disease drugs when CYP3A4 is concurrently downregulated in the liver and upregulated in the lung based on existing clinical data on COVID-19-CYP3A4 interactions at varying severity levels including outpatients, non-intensive care unit (ICU), and ICU patients. The study showed that hepatic metabolism is the primary determinant of both systemic and pulmonary drug concentrations despite the concurrent bidirectional dysregulation of liver and lung CYP3A4. ICU patients had the most systemic and pulmonary drug exposure, with a percentage increase in the area under the concentration-time curve in the plasma compartment of approximately 44%, 56%, 114%, and 196% for clarithromycin, nirmatrelvir, dexamethasone, and itraconazole, respectively, relative to the healthy group. Within the ICU cohort, clarithromycin exhibited its highest exposure in lung tissue mass with a fold change of 1189, whereas nirmatrelvir and dexamethasone showed their highest exposure in the plasma compartment, with fold changes of about 126 and 5, respectively, compared with the maximum therapeutic concentrations for their target pathogens. Itraconazole was significantly underexposed in the lung fluid compartment, potentially explaining its limited efficacy for the treatment of COVID-19. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing dosing regimens in at risk ICU patients to enhance both efficacy and safety profiles. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study investigated whether COVID-19-mediated concurrent hepatic downregulation and pulmonary upregulation of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 leads to differences in the systemic and pulmonary concentrations of 4 respiratory medicines. The study demonstrated that intercompartmental differences in drug concentrations were driven by only hepatic CYP3A4 expression. This work suggests that ICU patients with significant COVID-19-CYP3A4 interactions may be at risk of clinically relevant COVID-19-drug interactions, highlighting the need for optimizing dosing regimens in this patient group to improve safety and efficacy.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Solithromycin in Subjects with Hepatic Impairment

Solithromycin, a new macrolide and the first fluoroketolide, is in late-stage clinical development and, like older macrolides, is primarily metabolized and excreted through liver-dependent mechanisms. This study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of solithromycin in patients with chronic liver disease. This open-label, multiple-dose study in subjects with hepatic impairment and in healthy control subjects (matched for age, weight, and sex) enrolled 8 Child-Pugh class A (mild), 8 class B (moderate), and 8 class C (severe) patients and 9 healthy controls. Subjects (n = 33) received one 800-mg dose on day 1 followed by once-daily doses of 400 mg on days 2 through 5. The most commonly reported adverse events were mild diarrhea and mild headache, and no significant differences were noted between hepatically impaired subjects and healthy controls. The pharmacokinetics of plasma solithromycin in subjects with mild and moderate impairment was similar to that in control subjects. In subjects with severe impairment, total exposure to solithromycin at steady state (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC0-tau]) was decreased compared to that in control subjects, which may have been related to the higher body mass index of individuals in this group. No greater accumulation was noted in any hepatically impaired cohort on day 5 compared to that in control subjects. No decrease in dosage is therefore needed when administering solithromycin to patients with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment. Solithromycin was well tolerated in this patient population, and no significant differences in safety, compared to healthy controls, were noted.

Relevance of Liver Failure for Anti-Infective Agents: From Pharmacokinetic Alterations to Dosage Adjustments

The liver is a complex organ with great ability to influence drug pharmacokinetics. Due to its wide array of function, its impairment has the potential to affect bioavailability, enterohepatic circulation, drug distribution, metabolism, clearance, and biliary elimination. These alterations differ widely depending on the cause of the liver failure, if it is acute or chronic in nature, the extent of impairment, and comorbid conditions. In addition, effects on liver functions do not occur in a proportional or predictable manner for escalating degrees of liver impairment. The ability of hepatic alterations to influence PK is also dependent on drug characteristics, such as administration route, chemical properties, protein binding, and extraction ratio, among others. This complexity makes it difficult to predict what these effects have on drugs. Unlike certain classes of agents, efficacy of anti-infectives is most often dependent on fulfilling pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets, such as C_max/MIC, AUC/MIC, T_>MIC, IC₅₀/EC₅₀, or T>EC₉₅. Loss of efficacy, or conversely, increased risk of toxicity may occur in certain circumstances of liver injury. Although important to consider these potential alterations and their effects on specific anti-infectives, many lack data to constitute specific dosing adjustments, making it important to monitor patients for effectiveness and toxicities of therapy.

Review of macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin), ketolids (telithromycin) and glycylcyclines (tigecycline)

The advanced macrolides, azithromycin and clarithromycin, and the ketolide, telithromycin, are structural analogs of erythromycin. They have several distinct advantages when compared with erythromycin, including enhanced spectrum of activity, more favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, once-daily administration, and improved tolerability. Clarithromycin and azithromycin are used extensively for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, and Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease. Telithromycin is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Severe hepatotoxicity has been reported with the use of telithromycin.

Macrolides, ketolides, and glycylcyclines: azithromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin, tigecycline

The advanced macrolides, azithromycin and clarithromycin, and the ketolide, telithromycin, are structural analogs of erythromycin. They have several distinct advantages when compared with erythromycin, including enhanced spectrum of activity, more favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, once-daily administration, and improved tolerability. Clarithromycin and azithromycin are used extensively for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, and Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease. Telithromycin is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Severe hepatotoxicity has been reported with the use of telithromycin.

Modeling the autoinhibition of clarithromycin metabolism during repeated oral administration

Clarithromycin decreases CYP3A4 activity and thus gradually inhibits its own metabolism as well as that of coadministered drugs. The aim of this study was to obtain an understanding of the time course of these changes. The plasma concentration-time profiles of clarithromycin and its active metabolite, 14(R)-hydroxy-clarithromycin, in 12 young healthy volunteers after oral administration of a clarithromycin suspension (500 mg twice a day [b.i.d.] for seven doses) were modeled by population pharmacokinetic analysis in the NONMEM program. The nonlinearity of clarithromycin metabolism was considered during model development, and the metabolite disposition kinetics were assumed to be linear. The absorption kinetics of clarithromycin were best described by a Weibull function model. The pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin and its 14(R)-hydroxyl metabolite were adequately described by a one-compartment model each for clarithromycin and its metabolite as well as an inhibition compartment that reflects the autoinhibition of clarithromycin metabolism. Up to 90% of the apparent total clarithromycin clearance (60 liters/h) was susceptible to reversible autoinhibition, depending on the concentration in the inhibition compartment. The proposed semimechanistic population pharmacokinetic model successfully described the autoinhibition of clarithromycin metabolism and may be used to adjust the doses of other drugs that are metabolized by CYP3A4 and that are coadministered with clarithromycin. Simulations showed that for the standard dose of 500 mg b.i.d., no further increase in the level of exposure occurs after approximately 48 h of treatment. For a 1,000-mg b.i.d. dose, the achievement of steady state is expected to take several days and to achieve a 3.6-fold higher level of clarithromycin exposure than the 500-mg b.i.d. dose. This evaluation provides a rationale for safer and more effective therapy with clarithromycin.

Prediction of oral clearance fromin vitrometabolic data using recombinant CYPs: Comparison among well-stirred, parallel-tube, distributed and dispersion models

Intrinsic clearances (CLint-HLM-total) for the metabolism of NE-100, metoprolol, clarithromycin (CAM), lornoxicam and tenoxicam were predicted from in vitro data with recombinant cytochorme P450s (CYPs) using relative activity factor (RAF) and then compared with CLint-HLM observed in human liver microsomes (HLM). The predicted CLint-HLM-total correlated well with the observed CLint-HLM in HLM. When oral clearances (CLoral) of low-clearance drugs such as metoprolol, CAM, lornoxicam and tenoxicam were predicted from the in vitro data using four physiological models (well-stirred, parallel tube, distributed and dispersion models), the predicted CLoral corresponded well with the observed CLoralin vivo and were similar among the four models. For a high-clearance drug, the predicted CLoral of NE-100 in extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers (EMs) was substantially different between individual models, although the predicted CLoral in a poor metabolizer of CYP2D6 (PMs) was similar. The CLoral ratio of NE-100 between the EMs and the PMs predicted from the dispersion model, which leads to a reliable prediction for the high-clearance drug, was 48.4, but the ratio decreased depending on the increase of the NE-100 plasma concentration. The results suggest that the CLoral decrease in the EMs is caused by saturation of NE-100 metabolism mediated by CYP2D6 and is based on increases in plasma NE-100 concentrations dependent on the dose of NE-100. The study suggests that the RAF and the in vitro-in vivo scaling approaches are useful for predicting CLoral from in vitro data with recombinant CYPs without using HLM and hepatocytes.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Aspects of Antibiotic Use in High-Risk Populations

The study of pharmacokinetics includes the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of drugs. The pharmacologic effect that a medication has on the body is known as pharmacodynamics. With antimicrobials, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters become especially important because of the association between host drug concentrations, microorganism eradication, and resistance. This article focuses on the pharmacokinetic changes that can occur with antimicrobials when they are used in patients at high risk of infections and how they influence pharmacodynamic effects. The populations described here include patients with obesity and diabetes mellitus, renal or hepatic failure, chronic lung disease, severe burns, and long-term prosthetic devices and the elderly.

Use of pharmacodynamic principles to optimise dosage regimens for antibacterial agents in the elderly

Throughout most of the world we are witnessing an ever increasing number of aged people as a percentage of the general population. In the coming years, the unique spectrum of infections presented by an elderly population, particularly those in long-term care facilities, will challenge our ability to maintain an effective battery of antibacterials. The pharmacokinetic parameters of most antibacterial agents are altered when assessed in the elderly due in part to non-pathological physiological changes. The inability to clear a drug from the body due to declining lung, kidney/bladder, gastrointestinal and circulatory efficiency can cause accumulation in the body of drugs given in standard dosages. While this may have the potential benefit of achieving therapeutic concentrations at a lower dose, there is also a heightened risk of attaining toxic drug concentrations and an increased chance of unfavourable interactions with other medications. Pharmacodynamic issues in the elderly are related to problems that arise from treating elderly patients who may have a history of previous antibacterial treatment and exposure to resistant organisms from multiple hospitalisations. Furthermore, the elderly often acquire infections in tandem with other common disease states such as diabetes mellitus and heart disease. Thus, it is essential that optimised dosage strategies be designed specifically for this population using pharmacodynamic principles that take into account the unique circumstances of the elderly. Rational and effective dosage and administration strategies based on pharmacodynamic breakpoints and detailed understanding of the pharmacokinetics of antibacterials in the elderly increase the chances of achieving complete eradication of an infection in a timely manner. In addition, this strategy helps prevent selection of drug-resistant bacteria and minimises the toxic effects of antibacterial therapy in the elderly patient.

Evaluation ofin-vitro dissolution andin-vivo absorption for two different film-coated pellets of clarithromycin

The aim of this study was to compare two formulations of film-coated pellets containing clarithromycin after single oral dose study in healthy male volunteers. Two formulations with different coating polymers were prepared: formulation-1 (F-1) was prepared by incorporating three kinds of pH-dependent gradient-release coated pellets into capsules and formulation-2 (F-2) was prepared by coated with an insoluble semiosmotic film. Release profiles of film-coated pellets were evaluated using paddle method under different conditions. Pharmacokinetic profiles of these formulations were obtained in three healthy male volunteers and compared to commercially available immediate release (IR) tablets. The relative bioavailability based on the AUC0-24h was found to be 96.2% and 58.7% for F-1 and F-2 compared with IR, and the Tmax was delayed.

Macrolides and ketolides: azithromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin

The advanced macrolides, azithromycin and clarithromycin, and the ketolide telithromycin are structural analogues of erythromycin. They have several distinct advantages when compared with erythromycin including enhanced spectrum of activity, more favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, once daily administration, and improved tolerability. This article reviews the pharmacokinetics, antimicrobial activity, clinical use, and adverse effects of these antimicrobial agents.

The evolution and role of macrolides in infectious diseases

Two of the most significant changes in the field of infectious disease management during the last few decades are the emergence of atypical and/or new pathogens that may have devastating consequences and the re-emergence of well-recognised organisms that have acquired antimicrobial resistance through a variety of mechanisms. Erythromycin, the prototype macrolide, was originally marketed approximately five decades ago as a useful alternative agent in the treatment of patients allergic to beta-lactam antibiotics. While clinically useful, its pharmacokinetic and adverse-event profile limited the use of erythromycin to these individuals. Enhancements of the macrolide structure circumvented many of the limitations of erythromycin and resulted in the development of azithromycin and clarithromycin. The clinical uses of clarithromycin and azithromycin are substantially wider than erythromycin due to the wide spectra of activity against the atypical and newer pathogens. In addition, these agents are well-tolerated and have a pharmacokinetic profile that allows once- or twice-daily administration. Studies also indicate that the more common of the two mechanisms of macrolide resistance in the US and Canada imparts only low-level resistance. The multitude of studies substantiating clinical as well as bacteriological success with these two agents indicates that, when used appropriately, they will stand the test of time and continue to be useful antimicrobial agents.

In vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of azithromycin and clarithromycin against Streptococcus pneumoniae based on serum and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

Multidrug-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae are increasingly common worldwide, but the clinical significance of their resistance to the macrolide antibiotics is controversial. Applying pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles can assist in the selection of appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the in vitro activity of penicillin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and clindamycin against clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae and to evaluate the pharmacodynamics of azithromycin and clarithromycin based on serum and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations.

METHODS

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of penicillin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and clindamycin were determined for 307 isolates of S. pneumoniae using broth microdilution. Using serum and ELF concentrations after standard dosing, we calculated the proportion of isolates against which it would be possible to obtain a ratio of azithromycin area under the curve to MIC > or =25 and clarithromycin concentrations that exceeded the MIC for > or =40% of the dosing interval.

RESULTS

Overall, 19.5%, 25.4%, 25.1%, and 7.2% of the 307 pneumococcal isolates were resistant to penicillin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and clindamycin, respectively. However, 71.7% of penicillin-resistant strains were also resistant to azithromycin and clarithromycin. Based on serum concentrations, clarithromycin achieved its pharmacodynamic target in 76.9% of isolates, compared with 59.9% for azithromycin. Based on ELF concentrations, clarithromycin achieved its pharmacodynamic target in 93.5% of isolates, compared with 74.6% for azithromycin. Based on ELF concentrations, clarithromycin achieved its pharmacodynamic target in 86.7% of penicillin-resistant isolates, compared with 28.3% for azithromycin.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of serum and ELF concentrations, clarithromycin achieved pharmacodynamic targets against a greater proportion of S. pneumoniae isolates than did azithromycin. Clinical studies are needed to determine the efficacy of these agents against pneumococci that demonstrate in vitro resistance using current susceptibility breakpoints.

The newer macrolides: azithromycin and clarithromycin

Azithromycin and clarithromycin are two relatively new macrolide antimicrobial agents. Although azithromycin and clarithromycin are structural analogues of erythromycin, they offer distinct advantages in comparison. This article reviews the pharmacokinetics, antimicrobial activity, clinical use, and adverse affects of these antimicrobial agents.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin

Clarithromycin is a macrolide antibacterial that differs in chemical structure from erythromycin by the methylation of the hydroxyl group at position 6 on the lactone ring. The pharmacokinetic advantages that clarithromycin has over erythromycin include increased oral bioavailability (52 to 55%), increased plasma concentrations (mean maximum concentrations ranged from 1.01 to 1.52 mg/L and 2.41 to 2.85 mg/L after multiple 250 and 500 mg doses, respectively), and a longer elimination half-life (3.3 to 4.9 hours) to allow twice daily administration. In addition, clarithromycin has extensive diffusion into saliva, sputum, lung tissue, epithelial lining fluid, alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, tonsils, nasal mucosa and middle ear fluid. Clarithromycin is primarily metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isozymes and has an active metabolite, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin. The reported mean values of total body clearance and renal clearance in adults have ranged from 29.2 to 58.1 L/h and 6.7 to 12.8 L/h, respectively. In patients with severe renal impairment, increased plasma concentrations and a prolonged elimination half-life for clarithromycin and its metabolite have been reported. A dosage adjustment for clarithromycin should be considered in patients with a creatinine clearance < 1.8 L/h. The recommended goal for dosage regimens of clarithromycin is to ensure that the time that unbound drug concentrations in the blood remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration is at least 40 to 60% of the dosage interval. However, the concentrations and in vitro activity of 14-hydroxyclarithromycin must be considered for pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae. In addition, clarithromycin achieves significantly higher drug concentrations in the epithelial lining fluid and alveolar macrophages, the potential sites of extracellular and intracellular respiratory tract pathogens, respectively. Further studies are needed to determine the importance of these concentrations of clarithromycin at the site of infection. Clarithromycin can increase the steady-state concentrations of drugs that are primarily depend upon CYP3A metabolism (e.g., astemidole, cisapride, pimozide, midazolam and triazolam). This can be clinically important for drugs that have a narrow therapeutic index, such as carbamazepine, cyclosporin, digoxin, theophylline and warfarin. Potent inhibitors of CYP3A (e.g., omeprazole and ritonavir) may also alter the metabolism of clarithromycin and its metabolites. Rifampicin (rifampin) and rifabutin are potent enzyme inducers and several small studies have suggested that these agents may significantly decrease serum clarithromycin concentrations. Overall, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that fewer serious drug interactions occur with clarithromycin compared with older macrolides such as erythromycin and troleandomycin.

Pharmacokinetics of dirithromycin in patients with mild or moderate cirrhosis

The pharmacokinetics of dirithromycin were determined over a 72-h period following oral administration of a single 500-mg dose to 8 healthy volunteers and to 16 cirrhotic patients (8 patients with class A cirrhosis and 8 patients with class B cirrhosis according to Pugh's & Child's classification). Drug levels in plasma and urine were determined by microbiological assay. The mean maximum concentrations of drug in serum obtained 3 to 4 h after administration were 0.29 +/- 0.22 mg/liter in volunteers and 0.48 +/- 0.21 and 0.52 +/- 0.38 mg/liter in patients with class A and class B cirrhosis, respectively. The elimination half-life (t1/2beta) was 23.3 +/- 7.6 h in healthy subjects and 35.2 +/- 11.8 h and 39.5 +/- 11.0 h in patients with class A and class B cirrhosis, respectively. The mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and t1/2beta were significantly higher in patients with class A and B cirrhosis than in healthy controls, while total and renal clearances were markedly reduced (P < 0.01). The time to the maximum concentration of drug in serum and the volume of distribution values appeared to be similar in all groups, and the mean recovery in urine at 72 h ranged from 3.7 to 5.7%, without significant differences among groups. These results demonstrate that some dirithromycin kinetic parameters are significantly different in cirrhotic patients in comparison to those in healthy volunteers. However, an increase in the t1/2beta or AUC, which is also observed with other semisynthetic macrolides (e.g., azithromycin), does seem to be not clinically relevant if one takes into account both the high therapeutic indices of these antibiotics and the usually short duration of therapy. Therefore, on the limited basis of single-dose administration, no modifications of dirithromycin dosage seem to be required even for patients with class B liver cirrhosis.

The macrolides: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin

In addition to erythromycin, macrolides now available in the United States include azithromycin and clarithromycin. These two new macrolides are more chemically stable and better tolerated than erythromycin, and they have a broader antimicrobial spectrum than erythromycin against Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), Haemophilus influenzae, nontuberculous mycobacteria, and Chlamydia trachomatis. All three macrolides have excellent activity against the atypical respiratory pathogens (C. pneumoniae and Mycoplasma species) and the Legionella species. Azithromycin and clarithromycin have pharmacokinetics that allow shorter dosing schedules because of prolonged tissue levels. Both azithromycin and clarithromycin are active agents for MAC prophylaxis in patients with late-stage acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), although azithromycin may be the preferable agent because of fewer drug-drug interactions. Clarithromycin is the most active MAC antimicrobial agent and should be part of any drug regimen for treating active MAC disease in patients with or without AIDS. Although both azithromycin and clarithromycin are well tolerated by children, azithromycin has the advantage of shorter treatment regimens and improved tolerance, potentially improving compliance in the treatment of respiratory tract and skin or soft tissue infections. Intravenously administered azithromycin has been approved for treatment of adults with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia or pelvic inflammatory diseases. An area of concern is the increasing macrolide resistance that is being reported with some of the common pathogens, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae, group A streptococci, and H. influenzae. The emergence of macrolide resistance with these common pathogens may limit the clinical usefulness of this class of antimicrobial agents in the future.

Review and comparison of advanced-generation macrolides clarithromycin and dirithromycin

We reviewed English-language clinical studies, abstracts, and review articles identified from MEDLINE searches from January 1966-August 1998, and bibliographies of identified articles to compare advanced-generation macrolides dirithromycin and clarithromycin and their use for respiratory tract infections. Both agents have superior adverse effect profiles compared with erythromycin, the original macrolide. Both have broad antibacterial coverage, but clarithromycin usually has a lower MIC90 to susceptible organisms than dirithromycin; for most isolates this difference is not clinically significant. Clarithromycin has better in vitro coverage of Haemophilus influenzae, but this activity varies with formation of its bioactive metabolite, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin. Neither agent is ideal for H. influenzae eradication. The agents differ markedly in terms of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, metabolism, and cost, and thus with respect to drug interaction profiles and dosages. Dirithromycin's drug interaction profile is markedly better than clarithromycin's. Clarithromycin is dosed twice/day; dirithromycin's pharmacokinetics allow once/day dosing. Dirithromycin is less expensive with regard to both cost/day and cost/treatment regimen. Clarithromycin has been studied and approved for administration to children. In adults with respiratory tract infections who are receiving drugs that would interact with clarithromycin, and in those with renal dysfunction with or without coexisting hepatic dysfunction, dirithromycin appears to be superior in terms of safety and equivalent to clarithromycin in terms of efficacy.

Clarithromycin. A review of its efficacy in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients

Clarithromycin is a broad spectrum macrolide antibacterial agent active in vitro and effective in vivo against the major pathogens responsible for respiratory tract infections in immunocompetent patients. It is highly active in vitro against pathogens causing atypical pneumonia (Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Legionella spp.) and has similar activity to other macrolides against Staphylococcus aureus. Streptococcus pyogenes, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Haemophilus influenzae is susceptible or intermediately susceptible to clarithromycin alone, but activity is enhanced when the parent drug and metabolite are combined in vitro. Absorption of clarithromycin is unaffected by food. More than half of an oral dose is systemically available as the parent drug and the active 14-hydroxy metabolite. Pharmacokinetics are nonlinear, with plasma concentrations increasing in more than proportion to the dosage. First-pass metabolism results in the rapid appearance of the active metabolite 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin in plasma. Clarithromycin and its active metabolite are found in greater concentrations in the tissues and fluids of the respiratory tract than in plasma. Dosage adjustments are required for patients with severe renal failure, but not for elderly patients or those with hepatic impairment. Drug interactions related to the cytochrome P450 system may occur with clarithromycin use. In addition to the standard immediate-release formulation for administration twice daily, a modified-release formulation of clarithromycin is now available for use once daily. In dosages of 500 to 1000 mg/day for 5 to 14 days, clarithromycin was as effective in the treatment of community-acquired upper and lower respiratory tract infections in hospital and community settings as beta-lactam agents (with or without a beta-lactamase inhibitor), cephalosporins and most other macrolides. Clarithromycin was similar in efficacy to azithromycin in comparative studies and is as effective as and better tolerated than erythromycin. Adverse events are primarily gastrointestinal in nature, but result in fewer withdrawals from therapy than are seen with erythromycin. Clarithromycin provides similar clinical and bacteriological efficacy to that seen with beta-lactam agents, cephalosporins and other macrolides. It offers a cost-saving alternative to intravenous erythromycin use in US hospitals and is available in both once-daily and twice-daily formulations. The spectrum of activity of clarithromycin against common and emerging respiratory tract pathogens may make it suitable for use in the community as empirical therapy of respiratory tract infections in both children and adults.

Azithromycin and clarithromycin

Azithromycin and clarithromycin are alternatives to conventional macrolides in the routine treatment of many dermatologic, upper respiratory, and lower respiratory tract infections. In this role as alternative therapy, they are better tolerated, less toxic, and more convenient to take, although at a greater cost to the patient. This dosing convenience is an important consideration for the clinician; as shown by Nelson, patient compliance ranges from 95% with once-daily dosing to 58% with four-times-a-day dosing. Thus, less frequent dosing with both drugs as well as the shorter course of therapy possible with azithromycin may be therapeutically advantageous. In addition to their role as alternatives to conventional macrolide therapy, azithromycin and clarithromycin extend the spectrum of macrolides and offer new therapeutic options for H. influenzae, MAC in AIDS, MOTT, and leprosy. Finally, experimental therapy may extend their use for additional opportunistic infections, such as toxoplasmosis and cryptosporidiosis.