Romosozumab Improves Bone Mass and Strength While Maintaining Bone Quality in Ovariectomized Cynomolgus Monkeys

Reconstruction of Remodeling units reveals positive effects after 2 and 12 months of Romosozumab treatment

Romosozumab treatment results in a transient early increase in bone formation and sustained decrease in bone resorption. Histomorphometric analyses revealed that the primary bone-forming effect of romosozumab is transient early stimulation of modeling-based bone formation on cancellous and endocortical surfaces; preclinical studies have demonstrated that romosozumab may affect changes in the remodeling unit resulting in positive bone balance. To further investigate the effects of romosozumab on bone balance, month 12 (M12) and M2 (to analyze early effects) unpaired bone biopsies from the FRAME clinical trial were analyzed using remodeling site reconstruction to assess whether positive changes in bone balance on cancellous/endocortical surfaces may contribute to the progressive improvement in bone mass/structure and reduced fracture risk in osteoporotic women at high fracture risk. At M12, bone balance was higher with romosozumab vs placebo on cancellous (+6.1 μm vs +1.5 μm; p = 0.012) and endocortical (+5.2 μm vs -1.7 μm; p = 0.02) surfaces; higher bone balance was due to lower final erosion depth (40.7 μm vs 43.7 μm; p = 0.05) on cancellous surfaces and higher completed wall thickness (50.8 μm vs 47.5 μm; p = 0.037) on endocortical surfaces. At M2, final erosion depth was lower on the endocortical surfaces (42.7 μm vs 50.7 μm; p = 0.021) and slightly lower on the cancellous surfaces (38.5 μm vs 44.6 μm; p = 0.11) with romosozumab vs placebo. Sector analysis of early endocortical formative sites revealed higher osteoid thickness (29.9 μm vs 19.2 μm; p = 0.005) and mineralized wall thickness (18.3 μm vs 11.9 μm; p = 0.004) with romosozumab vs placebo. These evolving bone packets may reflect early stimulation of bone formation that contributes to the increase in completed wall thickness at M12. These data suggest that romosozumab induces a positive bone balance due to its effects on bone resorption and formation at the level of the remodeling unit, contributing to the positive effects on bone mass, structure, and fracture risk.

Eldecalcitol Induces Minimodeling-Based Bone Formation and Inhibits Sclerostin Synthesis Preferentially in the Epiphyses Rather than the Metaphyses of the Long Bones in Rats

This study aimed to examine minimodeling-based bone formation between the epiphyses and metaphyses of the long bones of eldecalcitol (ELD)-administered ovariectomized rats. Sixteen-week-old female rats were divided into four groups: sham-operated rats receiving vehicle (Sham group), ovariectomized (OVX) rats receiving vehicle (Vehicle group), or ELDs (30 or 90 ng/kg BW, respectively; ELD30 and ELD90 groups). ELD administration increased bone volume and trabecular thickness, reducing the number of osteoclasts in both the epiphyses and metaphyses of OVX rats. The Sham and Vehicle groups exhibited mainly remodeling-based bone formation in both regions. The epiphyses of the ELD groups showed a significantly higher frequency of minimodeling-based bone formation than remodeling-based bone formation. In contrast, the metaphyses exhibited significantly more minimodeling-based bone formation in the ELD90 group compared with the ELD30 group. However, there was no significant difference between minimodeling-based bone formation and remodeling-based bone formation in the ELD90 group. While the minimodeling-induced new bone contained few sclerostin-immunoreactive osteocytes, the underlying pre-existing bone harbored many. The percentage of sclerostin-positive osteocytes was significantly reduced in the minimodeling-induced bone in the epiphyses but not in the metaphyses of the ELD groups. Thus, it seems likely that ELD could induce minimodeling-based bone formation in the epiphyses rather than in the metaphyses, and that ELD-driven minimodeling may be associated with the inhibition of sclerostin synthesis.

Inhibition of both sclerostin and DKK1 results in novel skull findings in the rat and non-human primate that is not observed with inhibition of sclerostin alone

Sclerostin is an extracellular inhibitor of canonical Wnt signaling that inhibits bone formation and stimulates bone resorption. Anti-sclerostin antibodies (Scl-Ab) have been developed as bone-building agents. DKK1, another extracellular inhibitor of the pathway, is upregulated in osteocytes in response to sclerostin inhibition. To further enhance bone-forming effects, a bispecific antibody inhibiting both sclerostin and DKK1 was created (AMG 147). In nonclinical safety studies, AMG 147 resulted in novel skull findings. In the rat, there was increased thickness of skull bones of neural crest origin due to increased subperiosteal compact lamellar and intramembranous woven bone. Externally, subperiosteal fibroblastic/osteoblastic stromal cell proliferation with woven bone and hemorrhage was also observed. Scl-Ab alone resulted in increased skull thickness in the rat, like AMG 147, but without the stromal cell proliferation/woven bone formation. In contrast to embryonic flat bone development, intramembranous bone formed similar to plexiform bone. In the monkey, AMG 147 resulted in macroscopic skull thickening due to a diffuse increase in appositional lamellar bone and increased intramembranous bone on both periosteal surfaces of all skull bones. These data demonstrate that dual inhibition of sclerostin and DDK1 results in unique effects on the skull not observed with sclerostin inhibition alone.

Τhe story of sclerostin inhibition: the past, the present, and the future

Sclerostin inhibits osteoblast activity by hampering activation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway and simultaneously stimulates osteoclastogenesis through upregulation of the receptor activator of NFκB ligand (RANKL). Thus, antibodies against sclerostin (Scl-Abs), besides promoting bone formation, suppress bone resorption and dissociate bone formation from resorption. This dual action results in remarkable increases of bone mineral density which are of a greater magnitude compared to the other antiosteoporotic treatments and are accompanied by decreases of fracture risk at all skeletal sites. The anabolic effect subsides after the first few months of treatment and a predominantly antiresorptive effect remains after this period, limiting its use to 12 months. Furthermore, these effects are largely reversible upon discontinuation; therefore, subsequent treatment with antiresorptives is indicated to maintain or further increase the bone gains achieved. Romosozumab is currently the only Scl-Ab approved for the treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis. Indications for use in other populations, such as males, premenopausal women, and patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, are pending. Additionally, the efficacy of Scl-Abs in other bone diseases, such as osteogenesis imperfecta, hypophosphatasia, X-linked hypophosphatemia, and bone loss associated with malignancies, is under thorough investigation. Cardiovascular safety concerns currently exclude patients at high cardiovascular risk from this treatment.

Dual Inhibition of the Wnt Inhibitors DKK1 and Sclerostin Promotes Fracture Healing and Increases the Density and Strength of Uninjured Bone: An Experimental Study in Nonhuman Primates

BACKGROUND

Fracture repair involves the reactivation of developmental signaling cascades, including Wnt signaling that stimulates bone formation and bone regeneration. Rodent data indicate that dual inhibition of the Wnt signaling antagonists sclerostin and Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) increases callus bone volume and strength while increasing bone mass systemically.

METHODS

We evaluated the effects of 16 weeks of subcutaneously administered carrier solution (vehicle, VEH), anti-sclerostin antibody (Scl-Ab), anti-DKK1 antibody (DKK1-Ab), or Scl-Ab plus DKK1-Ab combination therapy (COMBO) on ulnar osteotomy healing in nonhuman primates (cynomolgus monkeys; 20 to 22 per group).

RESULTS

Scl-Ab and COMBO therapy increased systemic markers of bone formation versus VEH, with COMBO leading to synergistic increases versus Scl-Ab or DKK1-Ab monotherapies. The COMBO and Scl-Ab groups showed reduced serum markers of bone resorption versus VEH. The COMBO and DKK1-Ab groups exhibited greater callus bone mineral density (BMD), torsional stiffness, and torsional rigidity versus VEH. Lumbar vertebrae from the Scl-Ab and COMBO groups showed greater BMD and bone formation rate versus VEH, and the femoral mid-diaphysis of the Scl-Ab and COMBO groups showed greater periosteal and endocortical bone formation rates versus VEH.

CONCLUSIONS

DKK1-Ab increased BMD and strength at the ulnar osteotomy site, Scl-Ab increased bone formation and BMD at uninjured skeletal sites, and Scl-Ab plus DKK1-Ab combination therapy induced all of these effects, in some cases to a greater degree versus 1 or both monotherapies. These results in nonhuman primates suggest that DKK1 preferentially regulates bone healing while sclerostin preferentially regulates systemic bone mass.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Combination therapy with antibodies against sclerostin and DKK1 may offer a promising therapeutic strategy for both fracture treatment and fracture prevention.

Rational engineering of glycosaminoglycan-based Dickkopf-1 scavengers to improve bone regeneration

The WNT signaling pathway is a central regulator of bone development and regeneration. Functional alterations of WNT ligands and inhibitors are associated with a variety of bone diseases that affect bone fragility and result in a high medical and socioeconomic burden. Hence, this cellular pathway has emerged as a novel target for bone-protective therapies, e.g. in osteoporosis. Here, we investigated glycosaminoglycan (GAG) recognition by Dickkopf-1 (DKK1), a potent endogenous WNT inhibitor, and the underlying functional implications in order to develop WNT signaling regulators. In a multidisciplinary approach we applied in silico structure-based de novo design strategies and molecular dynamics simulations combined with synthetic chemistry and surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy to Rationally Engineer oligomeric Glycosaminoglycan derivatives (_REGAG) with improved neutralizing properties for DKK1. In vitro and in vivo assays show that the GAG modification to obtain _REGAG translated into increased WNT pathway activity and improved bone regeneration in a mouse calvaria defect model with critical size bone lesions. Importantly, the developed _REGAG outperformed polymeric high-sulfated hyaluronan (sHA3) in enhancing bone healing up to 50% due to their improved DKK1 binding properties. Thus, rationally engineered GAG variants may represent an innovative strategy to develop novel therapeutic approaches for regenerative medicine.

Role of Wnt signaling and sclerostin in bone and as therapeutic targets in skeletal disorders

Wnt signaling and its bone tissue-specific inhibitor sclerostin are key regulators of bone homeostasis. The therapeutic potential of anti-sclerostin antibodies (Scl-Abs), for bone mass recovery and fragility fracture prevention in low bone mass phenotypes, has been supported by animal studies. The Scl-Ab romosozumab is currently used for osteoporosis treatment.

INTRODUCTION

Wnt signaling is a key regulator of skeletal development and homeostasis; germinal mutations affecting genes encoding components, inhibitors, and enhancers of the Wnt pathways were shown to be responsible for the development of rare congenital metabolic bone disorders. Sclerostin is a bone tissue-specific inhibitor of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, secreted by osteocytes, negatively regulating osteogenic differentiation and bone formation, and promoting osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption.

PURPOSE AND METHODS

Here, we reviewed current knowledge on the role of sclerostin and Wnt pathways in bone metabolism and skeletal disorders, and on the state of the art of therapy with sclerostin-neutralizing antibodies in low-bone-mass diseases.

RESULTS

Various in vivo studies on animal models of human low-bone-mass diseases showed that targeting sclerostin to recover bone mass, restore bone strength, and prevent fragility fracture was safe and effective in osteoporosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, and osteoporosis pseudoglioma. Currently, only treatment with romosozumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-sclerostin antibody, has been approved in human clinical practice for the treatment of osteoporosis, showing a valuable capability to increase BMD at various skeletal sites and reduce the occurrence of new vertebral, non-vertebral, and hip fragility fractures in treated male and female osteoporotic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Preclinical studies demonstrated safety and efficacy of therapy with anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibodies in the preservation/restoration of bone mass and prevention of fragility fractures in low-bone-mass clinical phenotypes, other than osteoporosis, to be validated by clinical studies for their approved translation into prevalent clinical practice.

Therapeutic approaches to activate the canonical Wnt pathway for bone regeneration

Activation of the canonical Wingless-related integration site (Wnt) pathway has been shown to increase bone formation and therefore has therapeutic potential for use in orthopedic conditions. However, attempts at developing an effective strategy to achieve Wnt activation has been met with several challenges. The inherent hydrophobicity of Wnt ligands makes isolating and purifying the protein difficult. To circumvent these challenges, many have sought to target extracellular inhibitors of the Wnt pathway, such as Wnt signaling pathway inhibitors Sclerostin and Dickkopf-1, or to use small molecules, ions and proteins to increase target Wnt genes. Here, we review systemic and localized bioactive approaches to enhance bone formation or improve bone repair through antibody-based therapeutics, synthetic Wnt surrogates and scaffold doping to target canonical Wnt. We conclude with a brief review of emerging technologies, such as mRNA therapy and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats technology, which serve as promising approaches for future clinical translation.

Bone fragility: conceptual framework, therapeutic implications, and COVID-19-related issues

Bone fragility is the susceptibility to fracture even for common loads because of structural, architectural, or material alterations of bone tissue that result in poor bone strength. In osteoporosis, quantitative and qualitative changes in density, geometry, and micro-architecture modify the internal stress state predisposing to fragility fractures. Bone fragility substantially depends on the structural behavior related to the size and shape of the bone characterized by different responses in the load–deformation curve and on the material behavior that reflects the intrinsic material properties of the bone itself, such as yield and fatigue. From a clinical perspective, the measurement of bone density by DXA remains the gold standard for defining the risk of fragility fracture in all population groups. However, non-quantitative parameters, such as macro-architecture, geometry, tissue material properties, and microcracks accumulation can modify the bone’s mechanical strength. This review provides an overview of the role of different contributors to bone fragility and how these factors might be influenced by the use of anti-osteoporotic drugs and by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Where is bone science taking us?

Bone science has over the last decades unraveled many important pathways in bone and mineral metabolism and the interplay between genetic factors and the environment. Some of these discoveries have led to the development of pharmacological treatments of osteoporosis and rare bone diseases. Other scientific avenues have uncovered a role for the gut microbiome in regulating bone mass, which have led to investigations on the possible therapeutic role of probiotics in the prevention of osteoporosis. Huge advances have been made in identifying the genes that cause rare bone diseases, which in some cases have led to therapeutic interventions. Advances have also been made in understanding the genetic basis of the more common polygenic bone diseases, including osteoporosis and Paget's disease of bone (PDB). Polygenic profiles are used for establishing genetic risk scores aiming at early diagnosis and intervention, but also in Mendelian randomization (MR) studies to investigate both desired and undesired effects of targets for drug design.

Phillyrin Prevents Ovariectomy-Induced Osteolysis by Inhibiting Osteoclast Differentiation

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a metabolic disease caused by an imbalance between osteoclasts and osteoblasts. At present, the drug strategy for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis has some limitations and is unable to satisfy the demands of patients. Phillyrin (Phil) is an herbal extract from Forsythiae Fructus, with an inhibitory effect on osteolysis. In this study, we described the role of Phil in ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis and its effect on osteoclast differentiation in vitro. Eighteen female C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into three groups: sham group (sham surgery and injection with 0.9% normal saline), ovariectomized group (ovariectomy and injection with 0.9% normal saline), and Phil group (ovariectomy and injecting Phil with 100 mg/kg for 2 days). Mice were sacrificed after 6-week Phil administration and femurs were harvested for microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) and histomorphology analyses. In vitro, we used different concentrations of Phil to study its effect on osteoclastogenesis. The results showed that the BV/TV, Tb.Th, and Tb.N in trabecular bone were increased in the Phil group compared with the OVX group, and the trabecular bone mass was remarkably decreased in the OVX group compared with the sham group. The number of osteoclasts was increased in the OVX group compared to the sham group, and the number and area of osteoclasts were decreased in the Phil group compared to the control group. Compared with the OVX group, the number and area of osteoclasts were reduced in the Phil group. In conclusion, Phil could inhibit the formation of osteoclasts, promote the growth of bone trabecular, and relieve osteoporosis caused by ovariectomy, with a certain clinical adoption value.

The effect of osteoporosis treatment on bone mass

Over the last two decades there have been significant developments in the pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis. The therapeutic arsenal has expanded with monoclonal antibodies which have been developed based on discoveries of the molecular mechanisms underlying bone resorption and bone formation. Denosumab, the antibody binding RANKL, inhibits bone resorption, and romosozumab, the antibody binding sclerostin, inhibits bone resorption and stimulates bone formation as well. Both antibodies have shown potent anti-fracture efficacy in randomized clinical trials and this review will discuss the preclinical and clinical studies focusing on the effects on bone mass. After discontinuation of these antibodies, bone mineral density quickly returns to baseline and in the case of denosumab, discontinuation can not only induce rebound bone loss, but also the occurrence of vertebral fractures. Therefore, sequential antiresorptive therapy to maintain bone mass gains and anti-fracture efficacy is of utmost importance and will also be discussed in this review.

Romosozumab for the treatment of osteoporosis in women: Efficacy, safety, and cardiovascular risk

Increased understanding of the Wnt signaling pathway has led to the development of romosozumab, one of the most potent osteoanabolic agents to date for osteoporosis treatment. Romosozumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits sclerostin, a natural inhibitor of the Wnt signaling pathway. Romosozumab, by inhibiting sclerostin activates the Wnt signaling pathway, leading to increased bone formation and decreased bone resorption. The pivotal ARCH and FRAME studies established romosozumab’s fracture reduction efficacy. Romosozumab was superior to alendronate in fracture reduction and bone mineral density gain in the ARCH study. Romosozumab treatment should be followed sequentially with a potent antiresorptive agent. The antifracture efficacy gained from romosozumab is maintained or improved after transitioning to an antiresorptive agent. As one of the most potent osteoanabolic agents, the introduction of romosozumab has significantly increased our ability to treat osteoporosis. Studies have provided important information on using romosozumab with other osteoporosis medications to optimize osteoporosis treatment. Romosozumab used before antiresorptive medications is associated with more significant bone mineral density increases than when an antiresorptive agent is used before romosozumab. Romosozumab is recommended for osteoporosis treatment in patients at very high risk for fracture with low cardiovascular risk. Romosozumab is generally well tolerated, with 4%–5% of patients having injection site reactions. The ARCH trial showed a higher risk of cardiovascular events in patients receiving romosozumab. Romosozumab carries a black box warning that romosozumab should not be initiated in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke in the preceding year. However, the information on romosozumab and increased cardiovascular risk is conflicting. The risk of cardiovascular disease with romosozumab is unclear. While romosozumab has demonstrated significant osteoanabolic effect and antifracture efficacy and will benefit high fracture risk patients, further studies are needed to investigate the cardiovascular safety of romosozumab.

Physiological and Pharmacological Roles of PTH and PTHrP in Bone Using Their Shared Receptor, PTH1R

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and the paracrine factor, PTH-related protein (PTHrP), have preserved in evolution sufficient identities in their amino-terminal domains to share equivalent actions upon a common G protein-coupled receptor, PTH1R, that predominantly uses the cyclic adenosine monophosphate-protein kinase A signaling pathway. Such a relationship between a hormone and local factor poses questions about how their common receptor mediates pharmacological and physiological actions of the two. Mouse genetic studies show that PTHrP is essential for endochondral bone lengthening in the fetus and is essential for bone remodeling. In contrast, the main postnatal function of PTH is hormonal control of calcium homeostasis, with no evidence that PTHrP contributes. Pharmacologically, amino-terminal PTH and PTHrP peptides (teriparatide and abaloparatide) promote bone formation when administered by intermittent (daily) injection. This anabolic effect is remodeling-based with a lesser contribution from modeling. The apparent lesser potency of PTHrP than PTH peptides as skeletal anabolic agents could be explained by lesser bioavailability to PTH1R. By contrast, prolongation of PTH1R stimulation by excessive dosing or infusion, converts the response to a predominantly resorptive one by stimulating osteoclast formation. Physiologically, locally generated PTHrP is better equipped than the circulating hormone to regulate bone remodeling, which occurs asynchronously at widely distributed sites throughout the skeleton where it is needed to replace old or damaged bone. While it remains possible that PTH, circulating within a narrow concentration range, could contribute in some way to remodeling and modeling, its main physiological role is in regulating calcium homeostasis.

Assessment of Cardiovascular Safety of Anti-Osteoporosis Drugs

The incidence of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease increases with age, and there are potentially shared mechanistic associations between the two conditions. It is therefore highly relevant to understand the cardiovascular implications of osteoporosis medications. These are presented in this narrative review. Calcium supplementation could theoretically cause atheroma formation via calcium deposition, and in one study was found to be associated with myocardial infarction, but this has not been replicated. Vitamin D supplementation has been extensively investigated for cardiac benefit, but no consistent effect has been found. Despite findings in the early 21st century that menopausal hormone therapy was associated with coronary artery disease and venous thromboembolism (VTE), this therapy is now thought to be potentially safe (from a cardiac perspective) if started within the first 10 years of the menopause. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are associated with increased risk of VTE and may be related to fatal strokes (a subset of total strokes). Bisphosphonates could theoretically provide protection against atheroma. However, data from randomised trials and observational studies have neither robustly supported this nor consistently demonstrated the potential association with atrial fibrillation. Denosumab does not appear to be associated with cardiovascular disease and, although parathyroid hormone analogues are associated with palpitations and dizziness, no association with a defined cardiovascular pathology has been demonstrated. Finally, romosozumab has been shown to have a possible cardiovascular signal, and therefore post-market surveillance of this therapy will be vital.

Cardiovascular Safety and Sclerostin Inhibition

Sclerostin, which is primarily produced by the osteocytes, inhibits the canonical Wnt pathway and thereby the osteoblasts and stimulates RANKL release by the osteocytes and thereby osteoclast recruitment. Inhibition of sclerostin therefore causes stimulation of bone formation and inhibition of resorption. In clinical trials, romosozumab, an antibody against sclerostin, increases bone mineral density and reduces the risk of fractures compared with placebo and alendronate. The cardiovascular safety of romosozumab was adjudicated in 2 large clinical osteoporosis trials in postmenopausal women. Compared with placebo, the incidence of cardiovascular events was similar in the 2 treatment groups. Compared with alendronate, the incidence of serious cardiovascular events was higher in women treated with romosozumab. The incidence of serious cardiovascular adverse events was low and post hoc analyses should therefore be interpreted with caution; however, the relative risk seemed unaffected by preexisting cardiovascular disease or risk factors. Sclerostin is expressed in the vasculature, predominantly in vascular smooth muscle cells in the media. However, preclinical and genetic studies have not demonstrated any increased cardiovascular risk with continuously low sclerostin levels or inhibition of sclerostin. Furthermore, no potential mechanisms for such an effect have been identified. In conclusion, while there is no preclinical or genetic evidence of a harmful effect of sclerostin inhibition on cardiovascular safety, the evidence from the large clinical trials in postmenopausal women is conflicting. Romosozumab should therefore be used for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture after careful consideration of the cardiovascular risk and the balance between benefits and risks.

Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis

Recent evidence confirms the superiority of osteoanabolic therapy compared to anti-remodeling drugs for rapid improvement in bone density and fracture risk reduction, providing strong justification for the use of these anabolic agents as the initial therapy in high-risk patients, to be followed by anti-remodeling therapy. This review will highlight the results of recent studies and define the current status of osteoanabolic therapy for osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis Treatment with Anti-Sclerostin Antibodies-Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Application

Osteoporosis is characterized by reduced bone mass and disruption of bone architecture, resulting in increased risk of fragility fractures and significant long-term disability. Although both anti-resorptive treatments and osteoanabolic drugs, such as parathyroid hormone analogues, are effective in fracture prevention, limitations exist due to lack of compliance or contraindications to these drugs. Thus, there is a need for novel potent therapies, especially for patients at high fracture risk. Romosozumab is a monoclonal antibody against sclerostin with a dual mode of action. It enhances bone formation and simultaneously suppresses bone resorption, resulting in a large anabolic window. In this opinion-based narrative review, we highlight the role of sclerostin as a critical regulator of bone mass and present human diseases of sclerostin deficiency as well as preclinical models of genetically modified sclerostin expression, which led to the development of anti-sclerostin antibodies. We review clinical studies of romosozumab in terms of bone mass accrual and anti-fracture activity in the setting of postmenopausal and male osteoporosis, present sequential treatment regimens, and discuss its safety profile and possible limitations in its use. Moreover, an outlook comprising future translational applications of anti-sclerostin antibodies in diseases other than osteoporosis is given, highlighting the clinical significance and future scopes of Wnt signaling in these settings.

'Educated' Osteoblasts Reduce Osteoclastogenesis in a Bone-Tumor Mimetic Microenvironment

Breast cancer (BC) metastases to bone disrupt the balance between osteoblasts and osteoclasts, leading to excessive bone resorption. We identified a novel subpopulation of osteoblasts with tumor-inhibitory properties, called educated osteoblasts (EOs). Here we sought to examine the effect of EOs on osteoclastogenesis during tumor progression. We hypothesized that EOs affect osteoclast development in the bone-tumor niche, leading to suppressed pre-osteoclast fusion and bone resorption. Conditioned media (CM) was analyzed for protein expression of osteoclast factors receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-β ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) via ELISA. EOs were co-cultured with pre-osteoclasts on a bone mimetic matrix to assess osteoclast resorption. Pre-osteoclasts were tri-cultured with EOs plus metastatic BC cells and assessed for tartrate-resistance acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive, multinucleated (≥3 nuclei), mature osteoclasts. Tumor-bearing murine tibias were stained for TRAP to determine osteoclast number in-vivo. EO CM expressed reduced amounts of soluble TNFα and OPG compared to naïve osteoblast CM. Osteoclasts formed in the presence of EOs were smaller and less in number. Upon co-culture on a mimetic bone matrix, a 50% reduction in the number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts formed in the presence of EOs was observed. The tibia of mice inoculated with BC cells had less osteoclasts per bone surface in bones with increased numbers of EO cells. These data suggest EOs reduce osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption. The data imply EOs provide a protective effect against bone resorption in bone metastatic BC.

Scl-Ab reverts pro-osteoclastogenic signalling and resorption in estrogen deficient osteocytes

Background

Neutralising antibodies to sclerostin (Scl-Ab) have shown significant potential to induce bone formation and decrease bone resorption, increase strength and substantially reduce fracture risk in animal studies and clinical trials. Mechanical loading negatively regulates sclerostin expression, and sclerostin has been shown to induce RANKL synthesis in osteocytes. However, how Scl-Ab governs osteocyte regulation of osteoclast differentiation and function is not fully understood. We have recently discovered that osteoblasts and osteocytes alter osteoclastogenic signalling (RANKL/OPG) during estrogen-deficiency, and that osteoblast-induced osteoclastogenesis and resorption are exacerbated. However, it is not known whether estrogen deficient osteocytes exacerbate osteoclastogenesis. The aims of this study were to (1) establish whether osteocytes induce osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption during estrogen deficiency in vitro (2) investigate whether the sclerostin antibody can revert osteocyte-mediated osteoclastogenesis and resorption by attenuating RANKL/OPG expression.

Results

Using conditioned media and co-culture experiments we found increased osteocyte-induced osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption in estrogen deficient conditions. This is the first study to report that administration of Scl-Ab has the ability to revert osteocyte-mediated osteoclastogenesis and resorption by decreasing RANKL/OPG ratio expression and increasing WISP1 expression in estrogen deficient osteocytes.

Conclusions

This study provides an enhanced understanding of the biological changes underpinning decreases in bone resorption following Scl-Ab treatment observed in vivo by revealing that Scl-Ab can reduce pro-osteoclastogenic cell signalling between osteocytes and osteoclasts.

[Pharmacological characteristics and clinical study results of romosozumab (EVENITY®; genetical recombination), a drug with novel mechanism of action to treat osteoporosis at high risk of fracture]

Romosozumab (EVENITY^®) is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to target sclerostin. Sclerostin is a glycoprotein that is secreted by osteocytes and that inhibits Wnt signaling in osteoblast lineage cells, leading to decreased bone formation by osteoblasts and increased bone resorption by osteoclasts. Romosozumab, by binding and inhibiting sclerostin, increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption. Romosozumab is known to mainly enable increase in modeling-based bone formation. In studies using ovariectomized (OVX) models of rats and cynomolgus monkeys, those administered romosozumab showed dose-dependently increased bone mass and strength. In addition, the bone-forming effect of romosozumab decreased after continued administration. In rats, romosozumab caused almost no focal osteoblast hyperplasia or benign or malignant bone tumors, presumably owing to the time-dependent decrease in the bone-forming effect. Clinical studies demonstrated inhibition of new vertebral fractures at 12 months of treatment, and increased bone mineral density at 6 months of treatment. With a dual effect on bone, increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption, romosozumab is expected to become a new treatment option, and was approved in January 2019 for the indication of "patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture".

Efficacy and safety of Romosozumab in treatment for low bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Osteoporosis is a chronic skeletal disease with an increasing prevalence. Romosozumab, as a monoclonal anti-sclerostin antibody with a dual function, has been produced. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to examine the efficacy of Romosozumab in patients with low bone mineral density. A systematic search was conducted in the most important electronic search engines like Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov at the end of July 2019 to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated the effect of Romosozumab in patients with osteoporosis and/or low bone mineral density. After evaluating the quality of articles with the Cochrane checklist, data related to the outcomes of bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, risk of clinical, vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, and risk of adverse events were extracted. Quality of evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated by I2 and Q statistics. The meta-analysis was performed using CMA v.2.0 software. Of all the 671 initially retrieved articles, seven articles were entered into the meta-analysis after removing duplicates and reviewing papers with inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results of the meta-analysis showed that Romosozumab 210, 140, and 70 mg compared with Alendronate, Teriparatide, and placebo can increase the bone mineral density in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip. The risk of adverse events like adjudicated cardiovascular serious adverse events and adjudicated cardiovascular death was more in Romosozumab 210 mg in comparison with placebo. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Treatment with anti-sclerostin antibodies can be a proper therapeutic option in patients with osteoporosis and low bone mineral density. Based on the results of this meta-analysis, it seems that Romosozumab, with its dual function, has a positive role in the treatment of osteoporosis and low bone mineral density.

The Role of Sclerostin in Bone and Ectopic Calcification

Sclerostin, a 22-kDa glycoprotein that is mainly secreted by the osteocytes, is a soluble inhibitor of canonical Wnt signaling. Therefore, when present at increased concentrations, it leads to an increased bone resorption and decreased bone formation. Serum sclerostin levels are known to be increased in the elderly and in patients with chronic kidney disease. In these patient populations, there is a high incidence of ectopic cardiovascular calcification. These calcifications are strongly associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although data are still controversial, it is likely that there is a link between ectopic calcification and serum sclerostin levels. The main question, however, remains whether sclerostin exerts either a protective or deleterious role in the ectopic calcification process.

Alterations in osteocyte mediated osteoclastogenesis during estrogen deficiency and under ROCK-II inhibition: An in vitro study using a novel postmenopausal multicellular niche model

This study sought to derive an enhanced understanding of the complex intracellular interactions that drive bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis. We applied an in-vitro multicellular niche to recapitulate cell-cell signalling between osteocytes, osteoblasts and osteoclasts to investigate (1) how estrogen-deficient and mechanically loaded osteocytes regulate osteoclastogenesis and (2) whether ROCK-II inhibition affects these mechanobiological responses. We report that mechanically stimulated and estrogen-deficient osteocytes upregulated RANKL/OPG and M-CSF gene expression, when compared to those treated with 10 nM estradiol. Osteoclast precursors (RAW 264.7) cultured within this niche underwent significant reduction in osteoclastogenic gene expression (CTSK), and there was an increasing trend in the area covered by TRAP⁺ osteoclasts (24% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.06). Most interestingly, upon treatment with the ROCK-II inhibitor, RANKL/OPG and M-CSF gene expression by estrogen-deficient osteocytes were downregulated. Yet, this inhibition of the pro-osteoclastogenic factors by osteocytes did not ultimately reduce the differentiation of osteoclast precursors. Indeed, TRAP and CTSK gene expressions in osteoclast precursors were upregulated, and there was an increased trend for osteoclast area (30.4% vs. 24%, p = 0.07), which may have been influenced by static osteoblasts (MC3T3-E1) that were included in the niche. We conclude that ROCK-II inhibition can attenuate bone loss driven by osteocytes during estrogen deficiency.

Safety of Romosozumab in Osteoporotic Men and Postmenopausal Women: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Sclerostin is a protein synthesized mainly by osteocytes whose function is to inhibit bone formation. A recent monoclonal antibody, Romosozumab, is able to block sclerostin. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety of Romosozumab with placebo and alendronate. Five randomized controlled trials that described the safety of Romosozumab in healthy men and postmenopausal women were analyzed. The measures to be compared were the number of adverse events and the number of serious adverse events. Specific results included injection site reaction, arthralgia, nasopharyngitis, and back pain. A total of 11,741 patients were included in this meta-analysis, in three different groups: Romosozumab, alendronate, and placebo. Significant differences were seen between the groups with regard to injection site reaction: 5.88% in the Romosozumab group versus 3.62% in the placebo group (Mantel-Haenszel [M-H] 1.54, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.22-1.96; p < 0.001) and 2.62% in the alendronate group (M-H 1.8, 95% CI 1.32-2.60; p < 0.001). In addition, patients treated with Romosozumab had significantly fewer total adverse events than the alendronate group (M-H 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98; p < 0.05). In conclusion, Romosozumab may have lower adverse effects compared to alendronate and comparable to a placebo, except injection site reactions. Injection site reactions were more with romosozumab compared to alendronate and compared to the placebo as well. Romosozumab appears to have a similar safety profile to bisphosphonates.

Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk

We reviewed the experimental and clinical evidence that hip bone strength estimated by BMD and/or finite element analysis (FEA) reflects the actual strength of the proximal femur and is associated with hip fracture risk and its changes upon treatment.

INTRODUCTION

The risk of hip fractures increases exponentially with age due to a progressive loss of bone mass, deterioration of bone structure, and increased incidence of falls. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD), measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is the most used surrogate marker of bone strength. However, age-related declines in bone strength exceed those of aBMD, and the majority of fractures occur in those who are not identified as osteoporotic by BMD testing. With hip fracture incidence increasing worldwide, the development of accurate methods to estimate bone strength in vivo would be very useful to predict the risk of hip fracture and to monitor the effects of osteoporosis therapies.

METHODS

We reviewed experimental and clinical evidence regarding the association between aBMD and/orCT-finite element analysis (FEA) estimated femoral strength and hip fracture risk as well as their changes with treatment.

RESULTS

Femoral aBMD and bone strength estimates by CT-FEA explain a large proportion of femoral strength ex vivo and predict hip fracture risk in vivo. Changes in femoral aBMD are strongly associated with anti-fracture efficacy of osteoporosis treatments, though comparable data for FEA are currently not available.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip aBMD and estimated femoral strength are good predictors of fracture risk and could potentially be used as surrogate endpoints for fracture in clinical trials. Further improvements of FEA may be achieved by incorporating trabecular orientations, enhanced cortical modeling, effects of aging on bone tissue ductility, and multiple sideway fall loading conditions.

Antiresorptive and anabolic agents in the prevention and reversal of bone fragility

Bone volume, microstructure and its material composition are maintained by bone remodelling, a cellular activity carried out by bone multicellular units (BMUs). BMUs are focally transient teams of osteoclasts and osteoblasts that respectively resorb a volume of old bone and then deposit an equal volume of new bone at the same location. Around the time of menopause, bone remodelling becomes unbalanced and rapid, and an increased number of BMUs deposit less bone than they resorb, resulting in bone loss, a reduction in bone volume and microstructural deterioration. Cortices become porous and thin, and trabeculae become thin, perforated and disconnected, causing bone fragility. Antiresorptive agents reduce fracture risk by reducing the rate of bone remodelling so that fewer BMUs are available to remodel bone. Bone fragility is not abolished by these drugs because existing microstructural deterioration is not reversed, unsuppressed remodelling continues producing microstructural deterioration and unremodelled bone that becomes more mineralized can become brittle. Anabolic agents reduce fracture risk by stimulating new bone formation, which partly restores bone volume and microstructure. To guide fracture prevention, this Review provides an overview of the structural basis of bone fragility, the mechanisms of remodelling and how anabolic and antiresorptive agents target remodelling defects.

Sclerostin and Its Associations With Bone Metabolism Markers and Sex Hormones in Healthy Community-Dwelling Elderly Individuals and Adolescents

Sclerostin is an important regulator of bone mass involving Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. We aimed to obtain the profile of serum sclerostin level and explore its associations with bone metabolism markers and sex hormones in healthy community-dwelling Chinese elderly individuals and adolescents. A cross-sectional study was performed in three communities in Shanghai. In all, 861 participants, including 574 healthy elderly individuals, and 287 healthy adolescents, were recruited. The levels of serum sclerostin, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), β-CrossLaps of type I collagen containing cross-linked C-telopeptide (β-CTX), parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], estradiol (E₂), testosterone (T), and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were measured in blood samples from all participants. Median sclerostin level was higher in males than in females and in elderly individuals than in adolescents (elderly males: 54.89 pmol/L, elderly females: 39.95 pmol/L, adolescent males: 36.58 pmol/L, adolescent females: 27.06 pmol/L; both P < 0.05). In elderly individuals, serum sclerostin was positively correlated with age (β = 0.176, P < 0.001) and T (β = 0.248, P = 0.001), but negatively associated to P1NP (β = −0.140, P = 0.001). In adolescents, circulating sclerostin was significantly and positively associated with P1NP (β = 0.192, P = 0.003). The directions of the association between sclerostin and P1NP were opposite in Chinese elderly individuals and adolescents, which may reflect that sclerostin plays distinct roles in different functional states of the skeleton. Our findings revealed the rough profile of circulating sclerostin level in general healthy Chinese population and its associations with bone metabolism markers and sex hormones, which may provide a clue to further elucidate the cross action of sclerostin in bone metabolism and sexual development.

Reduced Bone Modeling and Unbalanced Bone Remodeling: Targets for Antiresorptive and Anabolic Therapy

Bone loss during advancing age is the net result of reduced modeling-based bone formation upon the outer (periosteal) envelope and unbalanced remodeling by basic multicellular units (BMUs) upon the three (intracortical, endocortical, and trabecular) components of the inner (endosteal) bone envelope. Each BMU deposits less bone than resorbed, reducing total bone volume and deteriorating the microstructure of the diminished residual bone volume.Antiresorptive agents like bisphosphonates reduce, but do not abolish, the rate of bone remodeling - fewer BMUs remodel, "turn over," the volume of bone. Residual unbalanced remodeling continues to slowly reduce total bone volume and deteriorate bone microstructure. By contrast, denosumab virtually abolishes remodeling so the decrease in bone volume and the deterioration in microstructure cease. The less remodeled matrix remains, leaving more time to complete the slow process of secondary mineralization which reduces the heterogeneity of matrix mineralization and allows it to become glycosylated, changes that may make the smaller and microstructurally deteriorated bone volume more brittle. Neither class of antiresorptive restores bone volume or its microstructure, despite increases in bone mineral density misleadingly suggesting otherwise. Nevertheless, these agents reduce vertebral and hip fractures by 50-60% but only reduce nonvertebral fractures by 20-30%.Restoring bone volume, microstructure, and material composition, "curing" bone fragility, may be partly achieved using anabolic therapy. Teriparatide, and probably abaloparatide, produce mainly remodeling-based bone formation by acting on BMUs existing in their resorption, reversal, or formation phase at the time of treatment and by promoting bone formation in newly initiated BMUs. Romosozumab produces modeling-based bone formation almost exclusively and decreases the surface extent of bone resorption. All three anabolic agents reduce vertebral fracture risk relative to untreated controls; parathyroid hormone 1-34 and romosozumab reduce vertebral fracture risk more greatly than risedronate or alendronate, respectively. Evidence for nonvertebral or hip fracture risk reduction relative to untreated or antiresorptive-treated controls is lacking or inconsistent. Only one study suggests sequential romosozumab followed by alendronate reduces vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fracture risk compared to continuous alendronate alone. Whether combined antiresorptive and anabolic therapy result in superior fracture risk reduction than monotherapy is untested.

Romosozumab: a novel bone anabolic treatment option for osteoporosis?

Research into the drug romosozumab began with the investigation of patients with excess bone formation. The understanding of the wingless-type mouse mammary tumor virus integration site (Wnt) signaling pathway in bone metabolism identified the negative regulator of bone mass sclerostin as a potential target for the treatment of osteoporosis. Preclinical studies confirmed this idea because they showed that sclerostin antibodies have the potential to increase bone formation. Biochemical analyses of clinical studies showed a significant increase in bone formation markers, which then slowly decreased within a year. This was accompanied by a particularly initially pronounced decrease in bone resorption. This dual mechanism of action led to an increase in bone mineral density and a significant reduction in fracture risk. Clinical vertebral fractures decreased by between 28 and 36%, nonvertebral fractures shown in a post hoc analysis by 42%. Romosozumab is administered once a month in the form of two injections. At the puncture site, reactions occur in about 5%. The most significant side effects are cardiovascular. In phase III studies, the number of serious cardiovascular complications was not significantly, albeit numerically, higher than in the control group. In Japan, South Korea, Canada, Australia, and the USA, osteoporosis patients at a high risk of fracture may already be treated with romosozumab (Evenity). Approval in the European Union was granted by 2019-12-12.

Bone mineral density gains with a second 12-month course of romosozumab therapy following placebo or denosumab

Romosozumab is a therapy that stimulates bone formation and reduces bone resorption. In this study of postmenopausal women with low BMD, a second course of romosozumab following a period off treatment or on denosumab increased or maintained BMD, respectively, and was well tolerated, providing insight into treatment sequence options.

INTRODUCTION

In patients with high fracture risk, therapies that stimulate bone formation provide rapid BMD gains; currently available agents, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, are limited to a 2-year lifetime exposure and generally used for a single treatment course. However, for long-term osteoporosis management, a second treatment course may be appropriate. Romosozumab, a therapy with the dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption, reduces fracture risk within 12 months. Here, we report efficacy and safety of a second romosozumab course.

METHODS

In this phase 2, dose-finding study, postmenopausal women with low bone mass (T-score ≤ - 2.0 and ≥ - 3.5) received romosozumab or placebo (month 0-24) followed by placebo or denosumab (month 24-36); participants then received a year of romosozumab (month 36-48).

RESULTS

Of 167 participants who entered the month 36-48 period, 35 had been initially randomized to romosozumab 210 mg monthly. In participants who received romosozumab 210 mg monthly followed by placebo, a second romosozumab course (n = 19) increased BMD by amounts similar to their initial treatment (month 0-12) at the lumbar spine (12.4%; 12.0%, respectively) and total hip (6.0%; 5.5%, respectively). Following denosumab, a second romosozumab course (n = 16) increased BMD at the lumbar spine (2.3%) and maintained BMD at the total hip. Safety profiles were similar between first and second romosozumab courses.

CONCLUSIONS

After 12 months off-treatment, a second romosozumab course again led to rapid and large BMD gains. Following denosumab, BMD gains with romosozumab were smaller than with initial treatment. No new safety findings were observed during the second course.

Bone-Forming and Antiresorptive Effects of Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: Bone Histomorphometry and Microcomputed Tomography Analysis After 2 and 12 Months of Treatment

Sclerostin, a protein produced by osteocytes, inhibits bone formation. Administration of sclerostin antibody results in increased bone formation in multiple animal models. Romosozumab, a humanized sclerostin antibody, has a dual effect on bone, transiently increasing serum biochemical markers of bone formation and decreasing serum markers of bone resorption, leading to increased BMD and reduction in fracture risk in humans. We aimed to evaluate the effects of romosozumab on bone tissue. In a subset of 107 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in the multicenter, international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis (FRAME), transiliac bone biopsies were performed either after 2 (n = 34) or 12 (n = 73) months of treatment with 210 mg once monthly of romosozumab or placebo to evaluate histomorphometry and microcomputed tomography-based microarchitectural endpoints. After 2 months, compared with either baseline values assessed after a quadruple fluorochrome labeling or placebo, significant increases (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001) in dynamic parameters of formation (median MS/BS: romosozumab 1.51% and 5.64%; placebo 1.60% and 2.31% at baseline and month 2, respectively) were associated with a significant decrease compared with placebo in parameters of resorption in cancellous (median ES/BS: placebo 3.4%, romosozumab 1.8%; P = 0.022) and endocortical (median ES/BS: placebo 6.3%, romosozumab 1.6%; P = 0.003) bone. At 12 months, cancellous bone formation was significantly lower (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001) in romosozumab versus placebo and the lower values for resorption endpoints seen at month 2 persisted (P < 0.001), signaling a decrease in bone turnover (P = 0.006). No significant change was observed in periosteal and endocortical bone. This resulted in an increase in bone mass and trabecular thickness with improved trabecular connectivity, without significant modification of cortical porosity at month 12. In conclusion, romosozumab produced an early and transient increase in bone formation, but a persistent decrease in bone resorption. Antiresorptive action eventually resulted in decreased bone turnover. This effect resulted in significant increases in bone mass and improved microarchitecture. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Effect of medications on prevention of secondary osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, non-vertebral fracture, and discontinuation due to adverse events: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Bone loss with aging and menopause increases the risk of fragile vertebral fracture, osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). The fracture causes severe pain, impedes respiratory function, lower the quality of life, and increases the risk of new fractures and deaths. Various medications have been prescribed to prevent a secondary fracture, but few study summarized their effects. Therefore, we investigated their effects on preventing subsequent OVCF via meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched for published randomized controlled trials from June 2015 to June 2019. The trials that recruited participants with at least one OVCF were included. We assessed the risk of bias of every study, estimated relative risk ratio of secondary OVCF, non-vertebral fracture, gastrointestinal complaints and discontinuation due to adverse events. Finally, we evaluated the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Forty-one articles were included. Moderate to high quality evidence proved the effectiveness of zoledronate (Relative Risk, RR: 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17-0.69, p = 0.003), alendronate (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.43-0.68; p < 0.0001), risedronate (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.51-0.73; p < 0.0001), etidronate (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.87, p < 0.01), ibandronate (RR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.38-0.71; p < 0.0001), parathyroid hormone (RR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.23-0.41; p < 0.0001), denosumab (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29-0.57; p < 0.0001) and selective estrogen receptor modulators (Raloxifene, RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.44-0.76; p < 0.0001; Bazedoxifene, RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.53-0.82; p = 0.0002) in preventing secondary fractures. Moderate quality evidence proved romosozumab had better effect than alendronate (Romosozumab vs. alendronate, RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49-0.84; p = 0.001) and high quality evidence proved that teriparatide had better effect than risedronate (risedronate vs. teriparatide, RR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.44-2.70; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Zoledronate, alendronate, risedronate, etidronate, ibandronate, parathyroid hormone, denosumab and selective estrogen receptor modulators had significant secondary prevention effects on OVCF. Moderate quality evidence proved romosozumab had better effect than alendronate. High quality evidence proved PTH had better effect than risedronate, but with higher risk of adverse events.

The Bone Extracellular Matrix as an Ideal Milieu for Cancer Cell Metastases

Bone is a preferential site for cancer metastases, including multiple myeloma, prostate, and breast cancers.The composition of bone, especially the extracellular matrix (ECM), make it an attractive site for cancer cell colonization and survival. The bone ECM is composed of living cells embedded within a matrix composed of both organic and inorganic components. Among the organic components, type I collagen provides the tensile strength of bone. Inorganic components, including hydroxyapatite crystals, are an integral component of bone and provide bone with its rigidity. Under normal circumstances, two of the main cell types in bone, the osteoblasts and osteoclasts, help to maintain bone homeostasis and remodeling through cellular communication and response to biophysical signals from the ECM. However, under pathological conditions, including osteoporosis and cancer, bone remodeling is dysregulated. Once in the bone matrix, disseminated tumor cells utilize normal products of bone remodeling, such as collagen type I, to fuel cancer cell proliferation and lesion outgrowth. Models to study the complex interactions between the bone matrix and metastatic cancer cells are limited. Advances in understanding the interactions between the bone ECM and bone metastatic cancer cells are necessary in order to both regulate and prevent metastatic cancer cell growth in bone.

Abaloparatide improves cortical geometry and trabecular microarchitecture and increases vertebral and femoral neck strength in a rat model of male osteoporosis

Androgen deficiency is a leading cause of male osteoporosis, with bone loss driven by an inadequate level of bone formation relative to the extent of bone resorption. Abaloparatide, an osteoanabolic PTH receptor agonist used to treat women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk for fracture, increases bone formation and bone strength in estrogen-deficient animals without increasing bone resorption. This study examined the effects of abaloparatide on bone formation, bone mass, and bone strength in androgen-deficient orchiectomized (ORX) rats, a male osteoporosis model. Four-month-old Sprague-Dawley rats underwent ORX or sham surgery. Eight weeks later, sham-operated rats received vehicle (saline; n = 10) while ORX rats (n = 10/group) received vehicle (Veh) or abaloparatide at 5 or 25 μg/kg (ABL5 or ABL25) by daily s.c. injection for 8 weeks, followed by sacrifice. Dynamic bone histomorphometry indicated that the tibial diaphysis of one or both abaloparatide groups had higher periosteal mineralizing surface, intracortical bone formation rate (BFR), endocortical BFR, and cortical thickness vs Veh controls. Vertebral trabecular BFR was also higher in both abaloparatide groups vs Veh, and the ABL25 group had higher trabecular osteoblast surface without increased osteoclast surface. By micro-CT, the vertebra and distal femur of both abaloparatide-groups had improved trabecular bone volume and micro-architecture, and the femur diaphysis of the ABL25 group had greater cortical thickness with no increase in porosity vs Veh. Biomechanical testing indicated that both abaloparatide-groups had stronger vertebrae and femoral necks vs Veh controls. These findings provide preclinical support for evaluating abaloparatide as an investigational treatment for male osteoporosis.

Weekly teriparatide treatment increases vertebral body strength by improving cortical shell architecture in ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys

Weekly teriparatide treatment is reported to reduce the incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. However, the effect of weekly teriparatide on cortical bone has not been clarified. This study aimed to examine the effects of weekly teriparatide treatment on bone mass, intracortical structure, and remodeling of the lumbar vertebral cortical shell and its relation to mechanical properties in ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys. Female monkeys, aged 9 to 15 years, were divided into four groups: (1) SHAM group, (2) ovariectomized group (OVX group), (3) OVX with 1.2 μg/kg once-weekly teriparatide group (LOW group), (4) OVX with 6.0 μg/kg once-weekly teriparatide group (HIGH group). After 18 months, all animals were double-labeled with calcein, and lumbar vertebrae were analyzed with histomorphometry and compressive mechanical tests. Following ovariectomy, we found reductions in the anterior cortical shell area of the vertebrae and reductions in nearly all of the tested vertebral mechanical properties. Weekly teriparatide significantly preserved the anterior cortical shell area and the energy absorption capacity of the lumbar vertebrae in a dose-dependent manner. Multiple regression analyses indicated that improved mechanical properties were more associated with the increased anterior cortical shell area rather than the cancellous bone volume. The intracortical structure of the Haversian canals was also preserved following teriparatide treatment after ovariectomy. These findings suggest the importance of the cortical shell as a therapeutic target in the treatment of osteoporosis. Weekly teriparatide treatment increases the compressive mechanical strength of the lumbar vertebrae by thickening the anterior cortical shell.

TG-interacting factor 1 (Tgif1)-deficiency attenuates bone remodeling and blunts the anabolic response to parathyroid hormone

Osteoporosis is caused by increased bone resorption and decreased bone formation. Intermittent administration of a fragment of Parathyroid hormone (PTH) activates osteoblast-mediated bone formation and is used in patients with severe osteoporosis. However, the mechanisms by which PTH elicits its anabolic effect are not fully elucidated. Here we show that the absence of the homeodomain protein TG-interacting factor 1 (Tgif1) impairs osteoblast differentiation and activity, leading to a reduced bone formation. Deletion of Tgif1 in osteoblasts and osteocytes decreases bone resorption due to an increased secretion of Semaphorin 3E (Sema3E), an osteoclast-inhibiting factor. Tgif1 is a PTH target gene and PTH treatment failed to increase bone formation and bone mass in Tgif1-deficient mice. Thus, our study identifies Tgif1 as a novel regulator of bone remodeling and an essential component of the PTH anabolic action. These insights contribute to a better understanding of bone metabolism and the anabolic function of PTH.

One Year of Romosozumab Followed by Two Years of Denosumab Maintains Fracture Risk Reductions: Results of the FRAME Extension Study

Romosozumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds and inhibits sclerostin, has the dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. As previously reported in the pivotal FRActure study in postmenopausal woMen with ostEoporosis (FRAME), women with a T-score of ≤ -2.5 at the total hip or femoral neck received subcutaneous placebo or romosozumab once monthly for 12 months, followed by open-label subcutaneous denosumab every 6 months for an additional 12 months. Upon completion of the 24-month primary analysis period, eligible women entered the extension phase and received denosumab for an additional 12 months. Here, we report the final analysis results through 36 months, including efficacy assessments of new vertebral, clinical, and nonvertebral fracture; bone mineral density (BMD); and safety assessments. Of 7180 women enrolled, 5743 (80%) completed the 36-month study (2851 romosozumab-to-denosumab; 2892 placebo-to-denosumab). Through 36 months, fracture risk was reduced in subjects receiving romosozumab versus placebo for 12 months followed by 24 months of denosumab for both groups: new vertebral fracture (relative risk reduction [RRR], 66%; incidence, 1.0% versus 2.8%; p < 0.001), clinical fracture (RRR, 27%; incidence, 4.0% versus 5.5%; p = 0.004), and nonvertebral fracture (RRR, 21%; incidence, 3.9% versus 4.9%; p = 0.039). BMD continued to increase for the 2 years with denosumab treatment in both arms. The substantial difference in BMD achieved through 12 months of romosozumab treatment versus placebo was maintained through the follow-up period when both treatment arms received denosumab. Subject incidence of adverse events, including positively adjudicated serious cardiovascular adverse events, were overall balanced between groups. In conclusion, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 12 months of romosozumab led to persistent fracture reduction benefit and ongoing BMD gains when followed by 24 months of denosumab. The sequence of romosozumab followed by denosumab may be a promising regimen for the treatment of osteoporosis. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Novel actions of sclerostin on bone

The discovery that two rare autosomal recessive high bone mass conditions were caused by the loss of sclerostin expression prompted studies into its role in bone homeostasis. In this article, we aim to bring together the wealth of information relating to sclerostin in bone though discussion of rare human disorders in which sclerostin is reduced or absent, sclerostin manipulation via genetic approaches and treatment with antibodies that neutralise sclerostin in animal models and in human. Together, these findings demonstrate the importance of sclerostin as a regulator of bone homeostasis and provide valuable insights into its biological mechanism of action. We summarise the current state of knowledge in the field, including the current understanding of the direct effects of sclerostin on the canonical WNT signalling pathway and the actions of sclerostin as an inhibitor of bone formation. We review the effects of sclerostin, and its inhibition, on bone at the cellular and tissue level and discuss new findings that suggest that sclerostin may also regulate adipose tissue. Finally, we highlight areas in which future research is expected to yield additional insights into the biology of sclerostin.

Sost Haploinsufficiency Provokes Peracute Lethal Cardiac Tamponade without Rescuing the Osteopenia in a Mouse Model of Excess Glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoid-induced secondary osteoporosis is the most predictable side effect of this anti-inflammatory. One of the main mechanisms by which glucocorticoids achieve such deleterious outcome in bone is by antagonizing Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Sclerostin, encoded by Sost gene, is the main negative regulator of the proformative and antiresorptive role of the Wnt signaling pathway in the skeleton. It was hypothesized that the partial inactivation of sclerostin function by genetic manipulation will rescue the osteopenia induced by high endogenous glucocorticoid levels. Sost-deficient mice were crossed with an established mouse model of excess glucocorticoids, and the effects on bone mass and structure were evaluated. Sost haploinsufficiency did not rescue the low bone mass induced by high glucocorticoids. Intriguingly, the critical manifestation of Sost deficiency combined with glucocorticoid excess was sporadic, sudden, unprovoked, and nonconvulsive death. Detailed histopathologic analysis in a wide range of tissues identified peracute hemopericardium and cardiac tamponade to be the cause. These preclinical studies reveal outcomes with direct relevance to ongoing clinical trials that explore the use of antisclerostin antibodies as a treatment for osteoporosis. They particularly highlight a potential for increased cardiovascular risk and may inform improved stratification of patients who might otherwise benefit from antisclerostin antibody treatment.

Retention of osteocytic micromorphology by sclerostin antibody in a concurrent ovariectomy and functional disuse model

Prolonged mechanical unloading in bedridden patients and concurrent hormonal dysregulation represents the cause of one of the severest forms of osteoporosis, a condition for which there are very few efficacious interventions available to date. Sclerostin, a Wnt antagonist, acts as a negative regulator of bone formation. Sclerostin antibody (Scl-Ab)-mediated blockade of sclerostin can dramatically enhance bone formation and reduce bone resorption. This study was designed to investigate the therapeutic effect of the Scl-Ab on severe bone loss induced by concurrent mechanical unloading and estrogen deficiency in a hindlimb-suspended and ovariectomized rat model, and to study the cellular mechanisms underlying severe osteoporosis and Scl-Ab action. Unloading and ovariectomy resulted in severe loss of trabecular and cortical bone mass and strength; Scl-Ab can significantly counteract the deterioration of bone in unloaded and/or ovariectomized rats, with noticeably increased cortical bone formation. Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed that unloading and ovariectomy lead to multiple morphological and structural abnormalities of osteocytes in cortical bone and the abnormalities were abolished by Scl-Ab administration. This study extends our previous conclusion that Scl-Ab represents a promising therapeutic approach for severe bone loss that occurs after being exposed to estrogen deficiency and prolonged mechanical unloading.

Clinical advantages and disadvantages of anabolic bone therapies targeting the WNT pathway

The WNT signalling pathway is a key regulator of bone metabolism, particularly bone formation, which has helped to define the role of osteocytes - the most abundant bone cells - as orchestrators of bone remodelling. Several molecules involved in the control of the WNT signalling pathway have been identified as potential targets for the development of bone-building therapeutics for patients with osteoporosis. Several of these molecules have been investigated in animal models, but only inhibitors of sclerostin (which is produced by osteocytes) have been investigated in phase III clinical studies. Here, we review the rationale for these developments and the specificity and potential off-target actions of WNT-based therapeutics. We also describe the available preclinical and clinical studies and discuss the benefits and risks of using sclerostin inhibitors for the management of patients with osteoporosis.

Bone Toolbox: Biomarkers, Imaging Tools, Biomechanics, and Histomorphometry

Bone is a unique tissue with turnover, metabolic, and cellular activities that vary through development to aging and with a mineralized matrix in which the current state and the history of a bone coexist. Qualitative histopathology often lacks sensitivity to detect changes in bone formation, mineralization and resorption, which often requires chronic dosing to result in structural changes such as variation in bone mass and geometry. A large panel of modalities can be used to fully analyze the health of the skeleton, including biomarker evaluation in serum or urine, imaging techniques ranging from radiology to computed tomography, biomechanical testing, and undecalcified tissue processing with bone histomorphometry. The use of clinically relevant biomarkers provides an important noninvasive, sensitive, rapid, and real-time tool to monitor bone activity at the whole skeleton level when conducting safety assessments in a preclinical setting. Imaging modalities also allow in vivo longitudinal assessments with a powerful, noninvasive and clinically translatable tools to monitor drug effects. Different imaging modalities are used in the preclinical studies to evaluate the bone tissues: standard radiography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), micro-computed tomography, and high-resolution pQCT. Bone histomorphometry is an important tool that provides sensitive evaluation to detect effects of test articles on bone resorption, formation, mineralization, remodeling rates and growth to address a potential target- or class-related theoretical bone liability. Ultimately, the measurement of bone mechanical properties in pharmaceutical testing is critical to understand the potential effects of that pharmaceutical on bone health and fracture risk. Important considerations are required for including these different techniques in toxicology rodents and nonrodent studies, to actually integrate these into safety assessment.

FRAME Study: The Foundation Effect of Building Bone With 1 Year of Romosozumab Leads to Continued Lower Fracture Risk After Transition to Denosumab

Romosozumab is a bone-forming agent with a dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. In FRActure study in postmenopausal woMen with ostEoporosis (FRAME), postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received romosozumab 210 mg s.c. or placebo once monthly for 12 months, followed by denosumab 60 mg s.c. once every 6 months in both groups for 12 months. One year of romosozumab increased spine and hip BMD by 13% and 7%, respectively, and reduced vertebral and clinical fractures with persistent fracture risk reduction upon transition to denosumab over 24 months. Here, we further characterize the BMD gains with romosozumab by quantifying the percentages of patients who responded at varying magnitudes; report the mean T-score changes from baseline over the 2-year study and contrast these results with the long-term BMD gains seen with denosumab during Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis every 6 Months (FREEDOM) and its Extension studies; and assess fracture incidence rates in year 2, when all patients received denosumab. Among 7180 patients (n = 3591 placebo, n = 3589 romosozumab), most romosozumab-treated patients experienced ≥3% gains in BMD from baseline at month 12 (spine, 96%; hip, 78%) compared with placebo (spine, 22%; hip, 16%). For romosozumab patients, mean absolute T-score increases at the spine and hip were 0.88 and 0.32, respectively, at 12 months (placebo: 0.03 and 0.01) and 1.11 and 0.45 at 24 months (placebo-to-denosumab: 0.38 and 0.17), with the 2-year gains approximating the effect of 7 years of continuous denosumab administration. Patients receiving romosozumab versus placebo in year 1 had significantly fewer vertebral fractures in year 2 (81% relative reduction; p < 0.001), with fewer fractures consistently observed across other fracture categories. The data support the clinical benefit of rebuilding the skeletal foundation with romosozumab before transitioning to antiresorptive therapy. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Sclerostin neutralization unleashes the osteoanabolic effects of Dkk1 inhibition

The WNT pathway has become an attractive target for skeletal therapies. High-bone-mass phenotypes in patients with loss-of-function mutations in the LRP5/6 inhibitor Sost (sclerosteosis), or in its downstream enhancer region (van Buchem disease), highlight the utility of targeting Sost/sclerostin to improve bone properties. Sclerostin-neutralizing antibody is highly osteoanabolic in animal models and in human clinical trials, but antibody-based inhibition of another potent LRP5/6 antagonist, Dkk1, is largely inefficacious for building bone in the unperturbed adult skeleton. Here, we show that conditional deletion of Dkk1 from bone also has negligible effects on bone mass. Dkk1 inhibition increases Sost expression, suggesting a potential compensatory mechanism that might explain why Dkk1 suppression lacks anabolic action. To test this concept, we deleted Sost from osteocytes in, or administered sclerostin neutralizing antibody to, mice with a Dkk1-deficient skeleton. A robust anabolic response to Dkk1 deletion was manifest only when Sost/sclerostin was impaired. Whole-body DXA scans, μCT measurements of the femur and spine, histomorphometric measures of femoral bone formation rates, and biomechanical properties of whole bones confirmed the anabolic potential of Dkk1 inhibition in the absence of sclerostin. Further, combined administration of sclerostin and Dkk1 antibody in WT mice produced a synergistic effect on bone gain that greatly exceeded individual or additive effects of the therapies, confirming the therapeutic potential of inhibiting multiple WNT antagonists for skeletal health. In conclusion, the osteoanabolic effects of Dkk1 inhibition can be realized if sclerostin upregulation is prevented. Anabolic therapies for patients with low bone mass might benefit from a strategy that accounts for the compensatory milieu of WNT inhibitors in bone tissue.

The clinical potential of romosozumab for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

The glycoprotein sclerostin inhibits activation of the canonical Wnt pathway and thereby suppresses bone formation by inhibiting the osteoblasts. Additionally, sclerostin increases bone resorption by stimulating the production of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-β-ligand (RANKL). Romosozumab (ROMO) is a monoclonal antibody against sclerostin. Phase III clinical trials in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis have shown that ROMO increases bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip and reduces the risk of vertebral and clinical fractures in comparison with placebo. In women with severe osteoporosis, ROMO reduces the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral and clinical fractures in comparison with alendronate. ROMO is the first treatment for osteoporosis with dual action, and may become a valuable tool for improving the treatment of osteoporosis. At present, the approval of ROMO by the authorities is awaiting further investigations of a potential increased risk of cardiovascular events associated with ROMO treatment.

Targeting WNT signaling in the treatment of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a widespread chronic disease characterized by low bone density, altered microstructure and bone fragility, leading to low impact fractures in affected individuals. The discovery of a few mutations that cause extremely rare human diseases has identified the WNT signaling pathway as a candidate for therapeutic intervention aimed at increasing bone mass and strength. In particular, inhibition of sclerostin, a WNT antagonist secreted by osteocytes, has proven in clinical trials to be a very efficient osteo-anabolic approach. One year of monthly administration of antibodies to sclerostin rapidly decreases bone resorption and increases bone formation and bone density at all sites, decreasing markedly fracture risk in treated patients. Their effect is however limited in time and cardiovascular adverse events have been reported in one clinical trial.

Targeting Sclerostin in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Focus on Romosozumab and Blosozumab

Most current treatments for osteoporosis inhibit bone resorption and reduce total fracture numbers by about one-quarter. The identification of the osteocytic protein sclerostin as a potent regulator of bone turnover and bone density has led to the development of a new therapeutic class-agents that inhibit sclerostin activity, resulting in increased bone formation and reduced bone resorption. Romosozumab and blosozumab are monoclonal antibodies that bind to sclerostin, reducing its inhibition of Wnt signaling. They have comparable activities in phase I and II studies, doubling formation markers, halving resorption indices, and increasing spine bone density by >10% over 12 months. Only romosozumab has progressed to phase III, where the first study showed a 73% reduction in vertebral fracture risk and a 36% reduction in clinical fractures at 1 year. It was well-tolerated. A further phase III study will conclude in 2017. Romosozumab is a very promising medication in the management of established osteoporosis, but much remains to be done to determine its optimal duration and sequence of administration.

Sclerostin and DKK1 Inhibition Preserves and Augments Alveolar Bone Volume and Architecture in Rats with Alveolar Bone Loss

Alveolar bone is a mechanosensitive tissue that provides structural support for teeth. Alveolar bone loss is common with aging, menopause, tooth loss, and periodontitis and can lead to additional tooth loss, reduced denture fixation, and challenges in placing dental implants. The current studies suggest that sclerostin and DKK1, which are established osteocyte-derived inhibitors of bone formation, contribute to alveolar bone loss associated with estrogen ablation and edentulism in rats. Estrogen-deficient ovariectomized rats showed significant mandibular bone loss that was reversed by systemic administration of sclerostin antibody (SAB) alone and in combination with DKK1 antibody (DAB). Osteocytes in the dentate and edentulous rat maxilla expressed Sost (sclerostin) and Dkk1 (DKK1) mRNA, and molar extraction appeared to acutely increase DKK1 expression. In a chronic rat maxillary molar extraction model, systemic SAB administration augmented the volume and height of atrophic alveolar ridges, effects that were enhanced by coadministering DAB. SAB and SAB+DAB also fully reversed bone loss that developed in the opposing mandible as a result of hypo-occlusion. In both treatment studies, alveolar bone augmentation with SAB or SAB+DAB was accompanied by increased bone mass in the postcranial skeleton. Jaw bone biomechanics showed that intact sclerostin-deficient mice exhibited stronger and denser mandibles as compared with wild-type controls. These studies show that sclerostin inhibition, with and without DKK1 coinhibition, augmented alveolar bone volume and architecture in rats with alveolar bone loss. These noninvasive approaches may have utility for the conservative augmentation of alveolar bone.