Accuracy of endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing for oropharyngeal dysphagia

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Mandarin Version of the 10-Item Eating Assessment Tool in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to culturally adapt and validate the Chinese Mandarin version of the 10-Item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10-CM) for Chinese community-dwelling older adults.

METHOD

A total of 346 Chinese community-dwelling older adults participated in this study, with 47 individuals included in the second testing phase. Reliability was assessed through internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Validity analysis covered several aspects: instrument validity, convergent validity, concurrent validity, content validity, and discriminant validity. Instrument validity was assessed by comparing EAT-10-CM scores between participants with and without oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). Convergent validity was evaluated by comparing the EAT-10-CM with the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI). Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing the EAT-10-CM with the Penetration-Aspiration Scale. Content validity was examined using the content validity index, based on the input of 10 expert reviewers. Discriminant validity was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal cutoff value.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha for the total scale and individual items was > 0.9, indicating excellent internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Pearson's correlation analysis, which showed a strong correlation (r > .7), demonstrating good stability over time. Significant differences in EAT-10-CM scores were observed between participants with OD and healthy individuals, supporting the instrument's ability to differentiate between these groups. The EAT-10-CM showed significant correlations with the DHI and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (p < .001). The content validity index was 0.95 for the scale and ≥ 0.8 for each item. ROC analysis determined an optimal cutoff value of 3.00, with corresponding sensitivity and specificity values of 0.865 and 0.940, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The EAT-10-CM is a culturally adapted and validated instrument specifically for Chinese older adults with good reliability and validity. The optimal cutoff value of 3.00 provides a useful threshold for clinical assessment.

Comparison of filter-based and software-based image enhancement systems for endoscopic swallowing diagnostics: a head-to-head study

PURPOSE

Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is a gold standard for diagnosing swallowing disorders. This study investigates two image enhancement technologies usable in FEES-hardware filtering (Narrow Band Imaging, NBI®) and software filtering (Professional Image Enhancement Technology, PIET®)-to assess their effectiveness in improving the visibility of food dyes.

METHODS

This Head-to-head study compared NBI® and PIET® by creating 190 videos showcasing food dyes diluted from 1:10 to 1:100,000, tested in the oral cavities of four volunteers. Four raters evaluated the maximum visible dilution for both systems across all colors. Sixteen snippets representing eight colors (red, yellow, blue, green, purple, orange, black, and white) at a 1:10 dilution were analyzed by 14 raters, including two with no prior FEES experience, all blinded to the filtering method.

RESULTS

The study used a point system to assess subjective image quality, color intensity, and contrast to the mucosa. Both systems produced similar hues for yellow and red and their secondary colors. PIET was preferred for red and purple, while NBI was favored for yellow, green, and orange. For blue, black, and white (all showing no intensification), PIET was nearly unanimously chosen. Raters agreed 100% on the maximum visible dilution, showing no significant difference between systems; both enhanced visibility tenfold.

CONCLUSIONS

Both image enhancement systems improved the visibility of specific food dyes effectively. Each method has distinct advantages. The choice between them depends on personal preference and available systems.

Age-defying swallowing

Swallowing disorders, which are generally underdiagnosed, affect the elderly, leading to a decreased quality of life and complications, including aspiration pneumonia and death. Understanding the neurophysiology of swallowing and the causes of its dysfunction is a fundamental tool for the prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment of dysphagia. New technologies open a wide range of possibilities for the implementation of new care protocols for this disorder.

Evaluation of swallowing function during the perioperative period using fiberoptic endoscopy in a patient with myasthenia gravis: a case report

BACKGROUND

General anesthesia causes postoperative dysphagia, and myasthenia gravis also impairs swallowing function. Thus, managing general anesthesia in patients with myasthenia gravis requires special attention to swallowing function. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has the potential to provide precise perioperative assessment and management of swallowing in these patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 35-year-old woman with myasthenia gravis was scheduled for laparoscopic ileocolic resection. FEES was performed before anesthesia, after extubation, and on postoperative day 1. General anesthesia was performed with endotracheal intubation, and extubation was performed uneventfully. Post-extubation FEES revealed salivary pooling, decreased glottal closure reflex, and redness of right arytenoid, likely caused by the endotracheal intubation and nasogastric tube. However, FEES performed on postoperative day 1 showed improvement of these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

FEES effectively identified transient swallowing impairments related to intubation and confirmed the absence of dysphagia specific to myasthenia gravis, thereby contributing to safe perioperative care.

Screening and early detection of post-extubation oropharyngeal dysphagia: a best practice implementation project

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing intubation and mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit risk developing post-extubation oropharyngeal dysphagia (PED). PED can lead to aspiration complications, aspiration pneumonia, and prolonged hospitalization, as well as increased repeat intubation and in-hospital morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

This evidence implementation project aimed to promote evidence-based screening and early detection of PED in an adult intensive care unit in a secondary public hospital in Brazil.

METHOD

The project followed the seven-phase JBI Evidence Implementation Framework to promote changes at the study site. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) approach were also used. The project was developed considering the main barriers to best practices, which were identified through a baseline audit. An educational program was designed to address the identified barriers. Two follow-up audits were then conducted to assess the changes in compliance with the evidence-based practices.

RESULTS

The baseline audit showed deficits in current practices. The first follow-up audit indicated improved compliance with best practices, with five of the seven audit criteria showing 100% compliance. The second follow-up audit indicated that compliance remained at 100% for those five criteria and increased for the other two after an additional intervention to address poor results in nursing care documentation.

CONCLUSION

The first follow-up audit showed good adherence to the educational program for the screening and detection of PED by nurses. The second follow-up audit, in line with the new strategies, showed improvement in nursing documentation.

SPANISH ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A241.

Navigating Nutrition Complexity in Critical Care: A Focus on Swallowing Function and Rehabilitation

During the past decade, there has been an increased research focus on the prevalence, nature, and impact of newly acquired critical illness dysphagia. Disordered function can impact the safety and efficiency across all stages of the swallow mechanism, with detrimental impacts on patients' body systems, function, and participation. Accurate assessment of swallow function is key to informed diagnosis and enhances intervention planning. We discuss the current evidence base around dysphagia pathophysiology with a detailed discussion considering the modes of ventilation commonly received in intensive care units. Assessment and management across critical illness are evaluated and future research efforts are presented.

The Influence of Perspective on Perception: Assessing Residue Across Planes of Videofluoroscopy

OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine whether perception of pharyngeal residue severity differs by view plane on videofluoroscopy. (2) To explore whether the Bolus Clearance Ratio (BCR) can be reliably applied in the anterior-posterior (AP) plane. (3) To investigate the relationship between perception of residue severity and BCR measures across view planes.

METHODS

Images of the same bolus condition in lateral and AP were rated using a simple 5-point ordinal descriptive scale (none, trace, mild, moderate, severe) by 225 speech-language pathologists via electronic survey. BCR measures were obtained for the same set of images from four trained raters. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and cumulative mixed modeling were used to compare ratings by plane. BCR reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Perceptual ratings were compared with BCR measures using Spearman correlations.

RESULT

(1) Perception of residue severity was not consistent across plane in 9/10 image pairs (p < 0.05), with a significant fixed effect of plane on severity rating (β = 0.41; z = 7.27; p < 0.001). The directionality of differences varied by case. (2) Inter-rater reliability for BCR measures was good across lateral (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.82) and AP (ICC = 0.87) planes, with superior intra-rater reliability in AP (lateral ICC = 0.85; AP ICC = 0.98). (3) There was a strong positive correlation between perceptual ratings and BCR measures in both planes.

CONCLUSIONS

Perception of pharyngeal residue severity differs between lateral and AP planes with inconsistent directionality raising important questions about the clinical implications of single plane studies. The BCR shows good-excellent reliability and strong correlation with perception across planes, offering a promising method for cross-plane quantification.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3, diagnostic study with a gold standard Laryngoscope, 135:1352-1358, 2025.

Predictors of Pneumonia in Patients With Penetration-Aspirations Detected on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing

Aspiration pneumonia is a serious condition resulting from swallowing dysfunction. However, predicting high risk patients remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors for pneumonia in oropharyngeal dysphagia patients exhibiting episodes of penetration or aspiration during fiberoptic endoscopic swallowing evaluation (FEES). A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who visited a dysphagia clinic between 2016 and 2022, and demonstrated at least one episode of penetration or aspiration during the FEES (Penetration Aspiration Scale [PAS] score ≥ 3). Data collected included demographics, comorbidities and FEES findings. Outcomes included mortality, hospital admissions to treat pneumonia events, and incidents of pneumonia managed by primary care providers or outpatient medical facilities. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, t-tests, logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Among 73 patients (mean follow-up: 3.87 ± 1.5 years), 33 (45.2%) exhibited penetration, and 40 (54.8%) aspiration. Pneumonia developed in 41 patients (56%), with 33 (45%) hospitalized. A total of 28 patients (38.4%) died during follow-up. A history of prior pneumonia (OR: 1.374, p = 0.02) and Murray Secretion Scale score (OR: 1.121, p = 0.022) were associated with subsequent pneumonia events. Reduced laryngeal sensation showed a near-significant trend toward association with pneumonia-related hospitalizations in the penetration group (58.3% vs. 19%, P = 0.052). No significant association was found between PAS and pneumonia or mortality. Prior pneumonia and secretions accumulation during FEES significantly predict pneumonia in patients presenting with penetration-aspiration during FEES. Reduced laryngeal sensation showed a nearly-significant trend toward pneumonia-related hospitalizations.

Dysphagia, nutritional status, and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy: an observational study

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy (RT) is the most common nonsurgical treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) and may or may not be combined with chemotherapy (CT). Dysphagia, characterized by impaired swallowing function, is one of the most common side effects of RT, occurring during and after RT, and may persist long after treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the evolution of dysphagia, nutritional status, and quality of life (QoL) in the periods immediately before and after RT for HNC in individuals who received only RT or combined RT/CT.

METHODS

Prospective longitudinal observational study performed in a hospital of the Brazilian public health system. The individuals were allocated into two groups: RG (n = 20), consisting of patients who received only RT for HNC, and RCG (n = 27), who received RT plus CT. The patients were evaluated before and after RT to identify and classify dysphagia (PARD protocol), anthropometric variables (BMI, triceps skinfold thickness, arm and calf circumferences, and manual dynamometry), and QoL (QLC-30 and H&N-35 questionnaires).

RESULTS

The groups were homogeneous in demographic characteristics and tumor stage. RCG showed a higher proportion of worsening dysphagia severity (p < 0.01) and worsening of anthropometric assessment (p < 0.05). A negative correlation was observed between the initial-final change in dysphagia and the change in BMI for the total sample (rho=-0.379, p < 0.05). QoL worsened in most domains evaluated, but RCG showed additional worsening in the domains of global health and nausea and vomiting (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

RT for HNC leads to the early development of dysphagia, which can adversely affect nutritional status and QoL. Including CT in the RT regimen leads to a more accentuated worsening of the evaluated parameters.

Thickening liquids for pediatric dysphagia: a perspective from clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is a common condition in infants and young children, particularly among those with neurodevelopmental disabilities. The management of pediatric dysphagia requires customized approaches based on individual clinical features. This report describes our experience in managing pediatric dysphagia using a locust bean- and xanthan gum-based thickener (ThickenUp® Junior), which offers stable consistency and preserves the original taste of liquids.

CASE REPORT

Four cases were discussed to highlight the use of the new thickener. Each case illustrates different aspects of dysphagia management, such as improving swallowing safety, enhancing oral control, and maintaining nutritional intake through tailored thickening strategies. Our experience demonstrates the importance of using specialized thickening agents to prevent aspiration pneumonia and, ultimately, improve the well-being of affected children. We also highlighted the importance of individualized treatment plans, which consider each child's unique needs. A comprehensive evaluation by a multidisciplinary team led to an effective treatment strategy tailored to the child's specific condition and challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

The new locust bean- and xanthan gum-based thickener is effective in managing dysphagia and preventing complications in infants and young children. Such agents can improve swallowing safety, enhance oral control, and maintain nutritional intake, ultimately improving the well-being of the affected children.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Focal Vibration Therapy-Novafon as an Assistive Therapeutic Tool for Children With Feeding and Swallowing Disorders

BACKGROUND

Paediatric dysphagia refers to any feeding and/or swallowing problem that affects nutritional or liquid intake safety or adequacy. There is a prominent lack of available evidence-based effective therapeutic tools to facilitate the rehabilitation of feeding and/or swallowing disorders in children.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of focal vibration therapy-Novafon as an assistive therapeutic intervention for children with feeding and swallowing difficulties.

METHODS

The study involved 122 children with dysphagia who were divided into two groups: (1) 61 children who received conventional dysphagia therapy (cCDTh) and (2) 61 children who received conventional dysphagia therapy in combination with Novafon therapy (cCDTh+NTh). All children were evaluated for pre-, mid- and post-dysphagia therapy with the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) and Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool-10 (PEDI-EAT-10) in different Cypriot school and health settings.

RESULTS

PEDI-EAT-10 total scores for both groups observed that the cCDTh+NTh group had a significant decrease in the overall median between pre- and post-dysphagia therapy total score (Median = 3.00) compared to the cTDTh score (Median = 7.00). GUSS total scores between the two groups showed an increase in overall medians but the cCDTh+NTh group (Median of pre-therapy = 16.50, mid-therapy = 19.00 and post-therapy = 20.00) noted a higher increase in medians compared to the cCDTh group (Median of pre-therapy = 15.00, mid-therapy = 16.00 and post-therapy = 17.00).

CONCLUSION

The present study highlights that focal vibration therapy using Novafon may serve as an effective and supportive approach within conventional dysphagia therapy for children. Further research is necessary to enhance the evidence-based literature on the use of Novafon in paediatric dysphagia.

Post-stroke dysphagia: identifying the evidence missing

Dysphagia is a high-profile dysfunction that often occurs after a stroke, with a prevalence of 50%-80%. Post-stroke dysphagia (PSD) often leads to serious complications such as pneumonia and malnutrition, reducing the quality of life and leading to poor prognosis or even death. PSD causes these adverse physical and psychological impairments to patients, which becomes a challenge for both patients and physicians. This review intends to contribute to the international debate on evidence-based options on Stroke Rehabilitation and to better understand the need for further research on PSD and summarizing evidence on some of the most relevant topics and clarifying its clinical practice value for Neurology, stroke rehabilitation experts, rehabilitation and nursing staff, as well as patients. The article identifies and discusses the gaps in knowledge on PSD and elaborates on current evidence concerning the selection of subjects, examination methods, patient data extraction and analysis, classification of stroke lesions, details of dysphagia, significance of results, and neuromodulation of dysphagia, from the perspective of rehabilitation physicians. The review identified a set of 10 points and parameters for the international debate on PSD, namely: stroke onset, cognitive impairment, feeding method, contrast medium, swallowing reflex delay, swallowing evaluation form, division of brainstem, multiple stroke sites, basal ganglia lesions and neuromodulation techniques. The article explores available evidence on factors associated with dysphagia and stroke site. Although there is plenty of evidence exploring the correlation between stroke site and swallowing disorders, the pathophysiological mechanisms between the two are complex, and expert interpretations of the evidence and clinical opinions vary on which swallowing abnormalities occur. The study generates evidence on current evidence-based options on Stroke Rehabilitation and a better understanding of the need for further research on Post-Stroke Dysphagia. Taking a patient-centric approach, the ultimate goal is to generate on how can available evidence influence policy or practice or research or clinical education. The article provides a structured discussion clarifying key points on the relationship between stroke lesions and swallowing dysfunctions and contributes to clarifying the gaps in evidence to further improve the quality of life of the patients suffering from Post-Stroke Dysphagia.

Swallowing disorders in cerebral palsy: a systematic review of oropharyngeal Dysphagia, nutritional impact, and health risks

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a permanent disorder affecting movement and posture due to nonprogressive brain issues, often leading to various sensory, cognitive, and musculoskeletal challenges. Among these complications, oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) is prevalent, impacting up to 85% of children with CP and resulting in significant nutritional deficits. This systematic review aims to explore the prevalence and types of OPD in CP patients, its effects on nutritional status, and its associated health complications, emphasizing the need for thorough assessment and intervention to mitigate risks. The review adheres to PRISMA guidelines, searching five major databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus) without time range restrictions to capture studies addressing swallowing disorders and their impact on nutritional status in CP. This review has been registered on Open OSF (n) 3KUQX. Individuals with CP often experience swallowing impairments, including delayed pharyngeal transit and aspiration. Research indicates that 81.5% of kids with CP suffer from dysphagia, commonly associated with reduced motor skills and general health. Moreover, as a result of these swallowing difficulties, nutritional complications may occur, with elevated levels of gastroesophageal symptoms causing malnutrition and growth delays, which require thorough evaluations and personalized interventions for successful treatment. Tools like the Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study were identified as primary methods for evaluation, but assessment remains limited by methodological inconsistencies. This systematic review underscores the significant health impacts of OPD in children with CP, which affects nutrition and overall well-being. Future research should address the need for standardized evaluation methods and effective interventions to balance nutritional needs with practical mealtime strategies.

Videofluoroscopic swallowing study predicts clinical outcomes in critically Ill children with dysphagia: a retrospective observational study

Background

This retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the features of acute dysphagia observed during videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) in critically ill children and their potential to anticipate clinical outcomes.

Methods

Administrative healthcare data of children aged 1-18 were analyzed. Data were collected from the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a single tertiary medical center in South Korea between March 2019 and December 2022. We reviewed VFSS conducted on patients in the PICU who were referred by clinicians suspecting dysphagia.

Results

A total of 36 children were included in the study; 52.8% exhibited aspiration on VFSS. In this investigation, participants were provided with pureed food, liquids, solids, and a combination of solids and liquids (referred to as mixed) during the examination. Any occurrence of aspiration throughout the examination was deemed as aspiration. All individuals displaying aspiration were found to have silent aspiration. Silent aspiration was associated with a longer length of stay (LOS) in the PICU. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the time from PICU admission to VFSS and intubation duration significantly influenced LOS. Abnormal findings in the VFSS, including aspiration, delayed swallowing reflex, insufficient laryngeal closure, and residue, were statistically significant variables in determining the feeding mode at discharge.

Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of VFSS in assessing swallowing function in critically ill children. It suggests that VFSS findings, such as silent aspiration, can aid in predicting patient outcomes, including LOS and the delay in oral feeding.

Pharyngeal Residues Scoring through the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS): Efficacy of Training

The assessment of pharyngeal residues during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is based on visual-perceptual scales that involve clinical subjectivity. Training might be helpful to increase agreement among clinicians. This paper aims to assess the efficacy of training for the assessment of pharyngeal residue in FEES frames and videos through the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS). Twenty-nine clinicians (Phoniatricians, Otorhinolaryngologists, Speech and Language Pathologists) and 47 students in Speech and Language Pathology participated in this study. Fourteen clinicians were randomly allocated to the training group, whilst the remaining 15 served as a control group; all the students participated in the training. Participants scored 30 pairs of videos and frames using the YPRSRS twice, before and after the training for the training groups and at least two weeks apart for the control group. Construct validity, defined as the agreement between each rater and the experts' scores, and inter-rater reliability were compared among the groups and between the first and the second assessments to verify the efficacy of the training. Construct validity significantly improved at the second assessment in the training group for the pyriform sinuses videos (baseline 0.71 ± 0.04, post-training 0.82 ± 0.05, p = .049) and in the students' group for the valleculae (baseline 0.64 ± 0.02, post-training 0.84 ± 0.02, p < .001) and pyriform sinuses videos (baseline 0.55 ± 0.03, post-training 0.77 ± 0.02, p < .05). No significant differences were found in the inter-rater reliability in any group. In conclusion, the training seems to improve participants' agreement with experts in scoring the YPRSRS in FEES videos.

Fiberoptic Endoscopy Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) Findings Associated with High Pneumonia Risk in a Cohort of Patients at Risk of Dysphagia

Aspiration detected in the fiberoptic endoscopy evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has been inconsistently associated with pneumonia, with no evidence of the risk of pneumonia from other alterations in swallowing safety detected in FEES. We conducted a dynamic, ambidirectional cohort study involving 148 subjects at risk of dysphagia in a tertiary university hospital. Our aim was to determine the risk of pneumonia attributed to alterations in swallowing safety detected during FEES. We used multivariate negative binomial regression models to adjust for potential confounders. The incidence density rate (IR) of pneumonia in patients with tracheal aspiration of any consistency was 26.6/100 people-years (RR 7.25; 95% CI: 3.50-14.98; P < 0.001). The IR was 19.7/100 people-years (RR 7.85; 95% CI: 3.34-18.47; P < 0.001) in those with laryngeal penetration of any consistency and 18.1/100 people-years (RR 6.24; 95% CI: 2.58-15.09; P < 0.001) in those with pharyngeal residue of any consistency. When adjusted for aspiration, the association of residue and penetration with pneumonia disappeared, suggesting that their risk of pneumonia is dependent on the presence of aspiration and that only aspiration is independently associated with pneumonia. This increased risk of pneumonia was significant in uni- and multivariate negative binomial regression models. We found an independently increased risk of pneumonia among patients with dysphagia and aspiration detected during FEES. Alterations in the oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing, without aspiration, did not increase the risk of pneumonia.

The Use of Pharyngeal High-Resolution (Impedance) Manometry in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

This scoping review aims to summarize and explore current literature on the usefulness and clinical implications of pharyngeal high-resolution (impedance) manometry (HRM/HRIM) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.

METHOD

Three online databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and additionally Google Scholar) were searched until December 2023. Studies using pharyngeal HRM/HRIM to assess swallowing or voicing in HNC patients, written in any language and published in peer-reviewed journals, were considered eligible. Quality check was performed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies from the Effective Public Healthcare Practice Project. Information about the study population and HRM/HRIM data (equipment, protocol, analysis, and outcomes) were extracted.

RESULTS

Eight papers met the inclusion criteria, six utilizing HRM and two HRIM. The study design consisted of case-series (five) and case-control (three). The quality assessment indicated a weak global rating for seven papers and a moderate rating for one for the remaining study. Findings suggest that HNC patients with dysphagia suffer from reduced pressures in the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter compared to healthy individuals, potentially influenced by tumor characteristics and treatment. Decreased pressures may indicate poor functioning of swallowing musculature and mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharyngeal HRM/HRIM is sparsely used for swallowing assessment in HNC patients. However, wider use seems warranted, as it can offer valuable insights into swallowing biomechanics. This can help quantifying the degree and timing of pressures involved in swallowing (problems) and holds potential for clinical applications, such as earlier diagnosis of radiation-induced therapy or surgery complications. Additionally, it can be beneficial in evaluating therapeutic swallowing strategies.

A survey of dysphagia services practice in China

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia services have only recently been formalised within Chinese health services. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia services practice in China.

AIMS

To provide a profile for the dysphagia practice in China by assessing various facets of dysphagia services.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

This is a survey study carried out from December 2022 to May 2023 online in China. One hundred fifty-nine respondents comprising doctors, nurses or therapists involved in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation completed a questionnaire via Sojump. The questionnaire included dichotomous (e.g., yes/no) and multiple-choice questions related to participants' general information and their provision of dysphagia management services. Results were analysed descriptively and the differences among different levels of hospitals were analysed.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Approximately two-thirds of hospitals (67.9%) started dysphagia services within the last 5 years. A significant difference in the initiation of dysphagia rehabilitation was observed across different hospital levels (χ2  = 32.70;p < 0.001). Routine dysphagia screening was a standard practice in most hospitals (71.7%), with the most frequently employed screening method being the water swallow test (95.6%). Clinical swallowing evaluation emerged as the preferred initial assessment method (80.5%) and the most utilised assessment method (91.8%). Video fluoroscopic swallow study and flexible endoscopic evaluation swallowing were used by 22.7% and 12.6% of respondents. A significant difference was observed in the choice of assessment methods across hospitals of different levels (χ2 = 43.397; p < 0.001). The majority of respondents (53.5%) primarily employed rehabilitation as the main intervention method (76%-100%). Most respondents indicated that they would reevaluate patients after treatment (74.8%) and reported routine follow-up with patients (60.4%).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Despite the relatively recent development of dysphagia management in China, the practice patterns uncovered in this study are broadly consistent with Chinese guidelines and consensus. However, the use of instrumental assessments remains low, resulting in a lack of objective evaluation of patient conditions and outcomes. There is a need for policy and resource support in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation in China.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject Assessment and treatment methods for dysphagia are various across different patients, medical facilities and settings. There has been no comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of dysphagia rehabilitation practice in China. What this study adds to existing knowledge The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China through an online survey. We found that the relatively recent development of dysphagia management in China, but the practice patterns uncovered in this study are broadly consistent with Chinese guidelines and consensus. Variations in practice patterns between hospitals of different levels may be attributed to resource constraints and patient needs. Besides, while rehabilitation exercises are the primary intervention method for dysphagia in China, the assessment largely centres on clinical swallowing evaluation. The use of instrumental assessments remains low, resulting in a lack of objective evaluation of patient conditions and outcomes. What are the clinical implications of this work? The study assessed various facets of dysphagia rehabilitation in China, and the results indicate that the use of instrumental assessments needs to be improved and there is a need for policy and resource support in the field of dysphagia rehabilitation in China.

The pathophysiology of dysphagia post-lung transplant: A systematic review

Purpose

One major consequence of lung transplantation is the development of oropharyngeal dysphagia. This systematic review aims to appraise and synthesize the available evidence of the use of instrumental assessments to outline the characteristics of post-lung transplant dysphagia.

Methods

Following the identification of appropriate search terms for the question, a literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Health and Medical Collection of Proquest Research Library and included records between inception and September 14, 2023. Search strategies included the use of text words and subject headings (e.g., MeSH and Index terms) related to (1) dysphagia or swallowing (swallow*, deglutition disorder*), (2) lung transplant (lung transplant*, post-operative, post-lung), and (3) complications (adverse effects, *complications, treatment outcome).

Results

The literature search strategy yielded a total of 883 studies from the electronic database search, with no additional records identified through other sources. After the removal of duplicates (n = 96), a total of 787 studies were screened through title and abstracts which eliminated 775 studies. Six studies were ultimately included in the systematic review. The selected articles included patients who underwent lung transplantation and all but one study utilized a retrospective design. A lack of transparency regarding instrumental evaluation protocols (videofluoroscopic [VFSS] and Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing [FEES]) including the number and bolus types used during the instrumental evaluations appeared as a theme in the studies included. The Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was systematically utilized to measure dysphagia safety outcome. Handling of the PAS scale was not consistent across studies, however penetration or aspiration ranged from 52.4% up to 100%. Additionally, silent aspiration rates ranged from 14.2% to 61.9%.

Conclusions

This review sought to describe the post-operative swallowing function and its physiological parameters following lung transplantation. We examined the results reported and the methods utilized in obtaining these results in the existing literature. Limited reporting practices for physiological parameters were found, however the airway invasion was reported in all studies with variation in degrees of swallowing safety related deficits, with PAS being the most widely used scale to describe airway invasion depth and response. Future studies exploring dysphagia outcomes post-lung transplant should comment on the altered physiological mechanisms of the swallow to further expand on the physiological deficits observed following transplantation in this group and allow for treatment planning.

Level of evidence

Level 1.

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Proposed Checklist

PURPOSE

Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is not only a well-recognized and ubiquitous tool in dysphagia research but also possesses features that make the assessment vulnerable to shortcomings in transparency and rigor in published literature. Therefore, FEES was considered an important addition to the Framework for RigOr aNd Transparency In REseaRch on Swallowing (FRONTIERS), a multisite collective effort to establish a tool for the critical appraisal of reporting in all forms of dysphagia and swallowing-related research on human subjects.

METHOD

From the FRONTIERS collective, a team of three clinician researchers completed a review of FEES-related literature to determine all components crucial for generalizable and reproducible reporting of FEES research. These components were developed and refined through an iterative process.

RESULTS

This review culminated in a 26-item series of "yes/no" questions, forming the FEES section of FRONTIERS. These questions are grouped into the following five components: (a) Equipment, (b) Rater(s), (c) Rating Process, (d) Outcome Metrics, and (e) Miscellaneous Factors.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review support that FEES possesses unique characteristics to other aspects of dysphagia research and is consequently a crucial addition to FRONTIERS to ensure that clinical researchers have access to critical appraisal of FEES-related research inquiry.

The discriminant ability of the Eating Assessment tool-10 to detect swallowing efficiency in neurogenic dysphagia

PURPOSE

Neurogenic dysphagia causes complications such as malnutrition, dehydration, and aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, early detection with clinically valid tools is essential. This study aimed to investigate the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) ability to detect swallowing efficiency at three different consistencies in neurogenic dysphagia.

METHODS

One hundred twelve patients with neurogenic dysphagia (74 males and 38 females, mean ± SD age 61.83 ± 9.72 years) were included in the study. A Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) was performed in the clinic following EAT-10 to assess swallowing efficacy at International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) consistencies of 0, 3, and 7. The swallowing efficiency of the patients was assessed using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS). Area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity values were calculated to evaluate the ability of EAT-10 to discriminate between participants with and without residue and between participants with and without moderate-to-severe residue.

RESULTS

The EAT-10 significantly detected participants with and without residues for three IDDSI consistent: for IDDSI 0 residue in the vallecula and pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 14, p < 0.001), for IDDSI 3 residue in the vallecula and pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 13, p < 0.001), for IDDSI 7 residue in the vallecula and pyriform sinus (respectively, cutoff score ≥ 13, cutoff score ≥ 14, p < 0.001). Additionally, the EAT-10 significantly detected those with and without moderate-to-severe residue.

CONCLUSIONS

The EAT-10, frequently used in swallowing clinics, can determine swallowing efficiency in individuals with neurogenic dysphagia. Additionally, it has the power to detect moderate-to-severe pharyngeal residue.

Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer

Dysphagia is a common symptom in patients with head and neck cancer that can significantly impact health outcomes and quality of life. The origin of dysphagia in these patients is often multifactorial, making diagnosis and management especially complex. The evaluating otolaryngologist should be well versed with the patient's neoplasm, comorbidities, and treatment history alongside dysphagia-specific imaging modalities. Management is often dynamic, requiring frequent monitoring, interprofessional collaboration, and a variety of supportive and invasive measures to achieve optimal outcomes.

Neural landscape is associated with functional outcomes in irradiated patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

The incidence of human papilloma virus-mediated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has increased over the past 40 years, particularly among young individuals with a favorable prognosis; however, current therapy often leads to unfortunate side effects, such as dysphagia. Despite the emphasis on dysphagia in previous studies, there is an important research gap in understanding the correlation between neuronal changes and patient-reported and functional outcomes in patients with OPSCC. To address this issue, we examined pathologic tissue samples from patients with OPSCC using multiplex immunofluorescence staining and machine learning to correlate tumor-associated neuronal changes with prospectively collected patient-reported and functional outcomes. We found that tumor enrichment of adrenergic (TH+) and CGRP+ sensory-afferent nerves correlated with poorer swallowing outcomes. Functional electromyography recordings showed correlations between growing (GAP43+) and immature cholinergic (ChAT+DCX+) nerves and denervation patterns in survivors of OPSCC. A murine model of radiation-induced dysphagia further confirmed that immature cholinergic and CGRP+ nerves were correlated with impaired swallowing. Preclinical interventional studies also supported the independent contributions of CGRP+ and cholinergic (ChAT+) nerves to dysphagia in treated mouse models of OPSCC. Our results suggest that CGRP+ and ChAT+ neuronal signaling play distinct roles in tumor- and radiation-induced dysphagia in OPSCC and offer a comprehensive dataset on the neural landscape of OPSCC. These insights may guide early interventions for swallow preservation and the repurposing of neurology-related drugs, such as CGRP blockers, in clinical oncology and survivorship.

The risk factors for silent aspiration: A retrospective case series and literature review

AIM

Evidence shows that 20%-30% of patients who aspirate do so silently. Research to date has not demonstrated clear evidence to indicate which patients are at higher risk of silent aspiration. Our aim was to use univariate logistic regression analysis of retrospective case review to determine potential patterns of silent aspiration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 455 fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) reports. The patients were divided into four groups: G1 - neurological diseases (n = 93), G2 - head and neck surgery (n = 200), G3 - gastroenterological diseases (n = 94) and G4 - other patients (n = 68). Data included the occurrence or absence of saliva penetration or aspiration, of silent fluid/solid food penetration or aspiration, type of penetration or aspiration, occurrence of cranial nerve paresis, radiotherapy and tracheostomy. Univariate logistic regression was used to evaluate independent risk factors of silent aspiration in the study population. Three models with different independent variables were considered.

RESULTS

There is a statistically significant difference in the frequency of occurrence of silent penetration and aspiration within the groups (p < 0.001), with intraglutative being most frequent. Fluid and food penetration and aspiration correlated with saliva penetration and aspiration in all groups (p < 0.001). Cranial nerve paresis (IX and X), radiotherapy and tracheostomy correlate with saliva penetration and aspiration (p = 0.020 for cranial nerve paresis; p = 0.004 for radiotherapy; p < 0.001 for tracheostomy). One hundred and fifteen patients (45.81%) in the subgroup of patients with intraglutative aspiration had cranial nerve paresis (IX, X or IX-X).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who should be prioritised or considered to be at a higher need of instrumental swallowing evaluation are those with IX and X cranial nerve paresis, tracheostomy and those who have had radiotherapy, with saliva swallowing problems, especially after paraganglioma, thyroid and parathyroid glands and middle and posterior fossa tumour surgery.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject Clinical signs of penetration or aspiration include coughing, throat clearing and voice changes, while silent penetration or aspiration patients aspirate without demonstrating any clinical symptoms. The most common consequences of silent aspiration include aspiration pneumonia, recurrent lower respiratory tract infections and respiratory failure. Additionally, malnutrition and dehydration can be indicators of silent aspiration. Patients may unknowingly reduce their oral intake and lose weight. Retrospective studies have shown that 20%-30% of patients aspirate silently (e.g. patients after stroke, acquired brain injury, head and neck cancer treatment, prolonged intubation). Clinical examination of swallowing can miss up to 50% of cases of silent aspiration. What this paper adds to existing knowledge Currently, silent aspiration is often discussed in neurological literature, but its applications to head and neck surgery are limited. In this study, we identify head and neck surgery patients who should be prioritised or considered to be in higher need of instrumental swallowing evaluation due to a higher risk of silent aspiration. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Post-treatment structural changes can result in lower cranial nerve paresis (IX, X, XII) and face injury, in which vagus and glossopharyngeal nerves are injured. After tracheostomy and radiotherapy, patients with problems swallowing saliva need careful clinical examination, particularly cranial nerve examination.

Improving swallowing function with thickening agents in post-stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: a real-world experience

INTRODUCTION

Post-stroke dysphagia (PSD) is a widely prevalent and possibly life-threatening consequence that may lead to aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, dehydration, and higher mortality risk. Recommending thickened fluids (TF) is a longstanding practice in the management of dysphagia. Augmenting liquid viscosity with a xanthan gum-based thickener benefits patients with PSD by aiding in the enhancement of bolus control, facilitating improved coordination in the swallowing mechanism, and lowering the risk of aspiration. Despite the widespread use of TF, limited high-quality evidence supports its benefits in PSD.

CASE REPORT

This manuscript presents the clinical experience with four varied cases of PSD. A comprehensive approach to management with TF decreased the risk of aspiration pneumonia and facilitated effective management of dietary recommendations both during hospitalization and after discharge (all Cases). In addition, TF maintained nutrition and hydration in patients with multiple hospital admissions (Case 2), maintained hydration in those unable to engage in swallow rehabilitation due to complex medical conditions (Cases 2, 3, and 4), and those who needed slow and longer recovery due to long-term risk of silent aspiration (Cases 2, 3, and 4). In one case (Case 4), the use of TF was extended for more than two years post-stroke with no reported incidence of chest infection.

CONCLUSION

In routine clinical practice, a comprehensive management approach with xanthan gum-based TFs reduces the risk of aspiration and aspiration pneumonia in patients with PSD while maintaining nutritional and hydration and improving swallowing function based on formal instrumental assessments. This clinical experience highlights the pivotal role of instrumental assessment, patient education, and informed decision-making to optimize outcomes with TF.

Clinical validation of the nursing outcome "Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase" in patients with laryngeal cancer

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clinically validate the nursing outcome "Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase" (1013).

METHODS

A two-stage study was designed: (1) Chinese translation and cultural adaptation and (2) clinical validation. Internal consistency and interrater reliability tests were performed on 285 patients with laryngeal cancer, and an additional 130 patients were randomly selected from the 285 patients as an independent sample. Criterion-related validity tests were performed using the standardized swallowing assessment (SSA). Nursing outcome sensitivity was detected by scoring two time points.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.951 for the nursing outcome and 0.942-0.965 for each indicator. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values for each indicator ranged from 0.73 to 0.929. The scores of the nursing outcome were negatively correlated with the SSA scores (r = -0.555, p < 0.01). With the exception of two indicators, there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the total scores of the scale and its 11 indicator scores for the two time points. The results indicated that the nursing outcome "Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase" (1013) exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties and high sensitivity to change.

CONCLUSIONS

The nursing outcome "Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase" (1013) demonstrated good reliability, validity, and sensitivity in patients with laryngeal cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

The nursing outcome "Swallowing status: pharyngeal phase" (1013) can be used to assess swallowing function in patients with laryngeal cancer and provide guidance for the development of rehabilitation intervention plans and nursing care.

Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in pediatrics: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the state-of-art regarding the use of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in pediatrics, specifically investigating FEES feasibility, safety, diagnostic accuracy, and protocols.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched for original studies on the pediatric population that instrumentally assessed swallowing function using FEES. A hand-search of the references of included studies was performed. Data on the population, feasibility of endoscope insertion and bolus trials, adverse events, sensitivity and specificity, and FEES equipment and protocol were extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed using the checklists of the Johanna Briggs Institute. Selection of the studies, data extraction, and quality appraisal were conducted by two independent researchers.

RESULTS

Eighty-two reports from 81 studies were included. The mean overall quality of the studies was 80 % (17-100 %). The feasibility of endoscope insertion was high (89%-100 %), while the feasibility of bolus trials varied from 40 % to 100 %. Adverse events were excessive crying (8 studies), irritability or agitation (4 studies), transitory oxygen desaturations (3 studies, 1.2-6.7 % of the patients), epistaxis (3 studies, 0.8-3.3 % of the patients), increased heart rate (1 study, 1 patient), vomiting (1 study, 1 patient), hypertonia (1 study), and hypersalivation (1 study). No major complications were reported. Using VFSS as the reference standard, FEES was generally found to be less sensitive (25-94 %) but more specific (75-100 %) for aspiration, whereas the reverse was true for penetration (sensitivity 76-100 %, specificity 44-83 %). FEES protocols were highly heterogeneous with poor reporting.

CONCLUSION

FEES is a safe, accurate, and generally feasible examination in the pediatric population with suspected dysphagia. However, a consensus on the best FEES protocol for clinical practice and research is currently lacking.

Exploring the diagnostic accuracy and applicability of the Gugging Swallowing Screen in children with feeding and/or swallowing disorders

BACKGROUND

The Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) is a bedside dysphagia screening tool that has been designed to determine the risk of aspiration in acute stroke patients. There is no evidence in the literature for the GUSS for the pediatric population. The present study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of GUSS as a screening tool in the Greek language for children with dysphagia.

METHODS

Eighty-Greek-Cypriot children aged 3-12 years who had dysphagia participated in this retrospective study. The translated into Greek GUSS was administered twice (pre- and post-therapy) to each patient throughout 24 sessions of dysphagia therapy.

KEY RESULTS

The GUSS showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.826), good test-retest reliability (rs = 0.767), convergent validity compared to the Greek Pediatric Eating Assessment tool-10 (PEDI-EAT-10) total score (rs = -0.365), and inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.863). A total cutoff points equal to 13.00 was also calculated. Aspiration was identified by the GUSS with low sensitivity and high specificity (PPV 100%, NPV 57%, LR+ NA, LR- 0.79); dysphagia/penetration was identified with high sensitivity and low specificity (PPV 33%, NPV 100%, LR+ 0.102, LR- NA).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The pediatric version of GUSS has been found to be a valuable tool in identifying the risk of aspiration as that of adults. It proved to be used as a good screening guide for selecting and confirming the existence of dysphagia from instrumental assessments. This is the first study of the pediatric version of GUSS, and future studies on this topic are needed.

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for aspiration in patients with acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Aspiration is a frequently observed complication in individuals diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke, leading to potentially severe consequences. However, the availability of predictive tools for assessing aspiration probabilities remains limited. Hence, our study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for accurately predicting aspiration probability in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We analyzed 30 potential risk factors associated with aspiration in 359 adult patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke. Advanced statistical techniques, such as Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Multivariate Logistic regression, were employed to identify independent predictors. Subsequently, we developed a nomogram prediction model based on these predictors, which underwent internal validation through 1000 bootstrap resampling. Two additional cohorts (Cohort A n = 64; Cohort B, n = 105) were included for external validation. The discriminatory power and calibration performance of the nomogram were assessed using rigorous methods, including the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve analyses, and decision curve analyses (DCA).

RESULTS

The nomogram was established based on four variables: sputum suction, brain stem infarction, temporal lobe infarction, and Barthel Index score. The predictive model exhibited satisfactory discriminative ability, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.853 (95 % confidence interval, 0.795-0.910), which remained consistent at 0.852 (95 % confidence interval, 0.794-0.912) during the internal validation. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P = 0.394) and calibration curve demonstrated favorable consistency between the predicted and observed outcomes in the development cohort. The AUC was 0.872 (95 % confidence interval, 0.783-0.962) in validation cohort A and 0.877 (95 % confidence interval, 0.764-0.989) in validation cohort B, demonstrating sustained accuracy. DCA showed a good net clinical benefit of the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram for predicting the probability of aspiration in patients with acute ischemia has been successfully developed and validated.

Pharyngeal Structure and Dysphagia in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders

Pharyngeal muscle changes occur in patients with Parkinson's disease and related disorders (PRD); however, the association between the structural alterations in the pharynx and the symptoms of dysphagia remains unclear. We assessed structural changes and contractile forces by measuring pharyngeal wall thickness and width. We aimed to define the pharyngeal measurements and determine their value as diagnostic tools for dysphagia. The pharyngeal wall thickness (PWT), pharyngeal width at rest (PWR), and shortest pharyngeal width at swallowing (PWS) were measured using lateral neck roentgenograms and videofluoroscopic swallowing study. We compared the PWR and PWT between the PRD and control groups using an independent t-test. The Kendall correlation test was performed on the radiological data of the pharynx (PWT, PWR and PWS), dysphagia scales (Penetration-Aspiration scale [PAS] and Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale [DOSS]), and Hoehn and Yahr scale (HY scale). The PWT was smaller and the PWR greater in the PRD than in the control group (p < 0.05). The dysphagia scales (PAS and DOSS) were correlated with the radiological data (PWT and PWS) and the HY scale (p < 0.05). The HY scale score also correlated with the PWT (p < 0.05). The optimal cutoff points of the PWT and PWR for predicting aspiration were 4.05 and 16.05 mm in the PRD group, respectively. Using the PWT, PWR and PWS, muscle atrophy and contractile strength of the pharynx can be estimated. The combination of the PWT and PWR can be a simple indicator for predicting swallowing disorders at the bedside.

Novel Approach Combining Shallow Learning and Ensemble Learning for the Automated Detection of Swallowing Sounds in a Clinical Database

Cervical auscultation is a simple, noninvasive method for diagnosing dysphagia, although the reliability of the method largely depends on the subjectivity and experience of the evaluator. Recently developed methods for the automatic detection of swallowing sounds facilitate a rough automatic diagnosis of dysphagia, although a reliable method of detection specialized in the peculiar feature patterns of swallowing sounds in actual clinical conditions has not been established. We investigated a novel approach for automatically detecting swallowing sounds by a method wherein basic statistics and dynamic features were extracted based on acoustic features: Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients and Mel Frequency Magnitude Coefficients, and an ensemble learning model combining Support Vector Machine and Multi-Layer Perceptron were applied. The evaluation of the effectiveness of the proposed method, based on a swallowing-sounds database synchronized to a video fluorographic swallowing study compiled from 74 advanced-age patients with dysphagia, demonstrated an outstanding performance. It achieved an F1-micro average of approximately 0.92 and an accuracy of 95.20%. The method, proven effective in the current clinical recording database, suggests a significant advancement in the objectivity of cervical auscultation. However, validating its efficacy in other databases is crucial for confirming its broad applicability and potential impact.

Diagnostic value of water swallow test for dysphagia in patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The diagnostic efficacy of the water swallow test (WST) is relatively robust for patients with neurogenic dysphagia; however, its diagnostic performance in identifying dysphagia among patients with HNC varies across studies. Our study aims to assess the diagnostic value of the WST for detecting dysphagia in patients with HNC. Systematic retrieval of studies on the use of WST for screening dysphagia in patients with HNC from databases up to August 1, 2023. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluate the screening ability of WST for dysphagia. A total of seven articles, encompassing eight study groups, were included, involving the analysis of 691 patients. The meta-analysis results demonstrate that the WST has a combined sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, negative LR, DOR, and AUC for diagnosing dysphagia in patients with HNC of 0.82 (95% CI [0.64, 0.92]), 0.79 (95% CI [0.70, 0.86]), 4.00 (95% CI [2.51, 6.36]), 0.22 (95% CI [0.10, 0.50]), 17.94 (95% CI [5.56, 57.92]), and 0.86 (95% CI [0.83, 0.89]), respectively. Significant heterogeneity was observed among the included studies. Meta-regression analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity of tumor sites and treatment was closely related, while the pooled specificity of treatment and version was closely related. The subgroup analysis showed that the WST's pooled sensitivity for diagnosing dysphagia in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer was 0.40 (95% CI [0.26, 0.56]), with an AUC of 0.50, lower than in other HNC sites. The WST performed better in surgical patients than in those undergoing radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT), with lower sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of 0.49 (95% CI [0.36, 0.61]), 0.66 (95% CI [0.59, 0.72]), and 0.64, respectively, for RT or CRT patients. The modified WST version showed different specificity values of 0.82 (95% CI [0.75, 0.87]), compared to the regular version of 0.68 (95% CI [0.61, 0.74]). Additionally, Deek's test indicated the absence of publication bias in this study (p = 0.32). The WST demonstrates favorable sensitivity and specificity in detecting dysphagia among patients with HNC. However, the diagnostic value may vary depending on factors such as tumor sites, treatment, and the specific version of the WST used.

Assessment of Swallowing Function in Healthy Adults While Using High-Flow Nasal Cannula

OBJECTIVE

Despite widespread use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for respiratory support, the effect of HFNC on swallowing physiology is poorly understood. Flow rates that permit safe swallowing have not been established. We aim to assess if healthy individuals have diminished swallowing function and safety at high flow rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Repeated measures with planned data collection.

SETTING

Outpatient dysphagia clinic.

METHODS

Swallowing function in a cohort of healthy individuals was assessed using Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES). Participants' safety of swallowing was assessed with different textures under randomized rates of HFNC (0, 30, 40, 50, and 60 LPM). Swallowing trials included quantities of thin liquids, mildly-thick liquids, and purees. Trials were scored using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Pearson chi-square tests were used to test for correlation between PAS result, flow rate, and consistency across each quantity of material.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven subjects were enrolled. Forty-one percent were male with mean age of 34 years (11 standard deviation). Ninety-nine percent (267/270), 97% (n = 263/270), and 99% (399/405) of 1 sip swallows, 3 sip swallows, and 5 mL swallows, respectively, were safe. There was no significant correlation between swallow safety and flow rate using Pearson Chi-Square test across all consistencies and across all quantities of materials (P > 0.05). Of note, out of all subtrials, the thin liquid, 3 sips trial at 60 LPM, had the largest percent of unsafe swallows (14%).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest rate of aspiration is not significantly affected by high flow nasal cannula in healthy individuals.

Characterizing the Validity of Using VASES to Derive DIGEST-FEES Grades

INTRODUCTION

Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES) and Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity for Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (DIGEST-FEES) are two complimentary methods for assessing swallowing during FEES. Whereas VASES is intended to facilitate trial-level ratings of pharyngeal residue, penetration, and aspiration, DIGEST-FEES is intended to facilitate protocol-level impairment grades of swallowing safety and efficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of using VASES to derive DIGEST-FEES impairment grades.

METHODS

DIGEST-FEES grades were blindly analyzed from 50 FEES - first using the original DIGEST-FEES grading method (n = 50) and then again using a VASES-derived DIGEST-FEES grading method (n = 50). Weighted Kappa (κw) and absolute agreement (%) were used to assess the relationship between the original DIGEST-FEES grades and VASES-derived DIGEST-FEES grades. Spearman's correlations assessed the relationship between VASES-derived DIGEST-FEES grades with measures of construct validity.

RESULTS

Substantial agreement (κw = 0.76-0.83) was observed between the original and VASES-derived grading methods, with 60-62% of all DIGEST-FEES grades matching exactly, and 92-100% of DIGEST-FEES grades within one grade of each other. Furthermore, the strength of the relationships between VASES-derived DIGEST-FEES grades and measures of construct validity (r = 0.34-0.78) were similar to the strength of the relationships between original DIGEST-FEES grades and the same measures of construct validity (r = 0.34-0.83).

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study demonstrate substantial agreement between original and VASES-derived DIGEST-FEES grades. Using VASES to derive DIGEST-FEES also appears to maintain the same level of construct validity established with the original DIGEST-FEES. Therefore, clinicians and researchers may consider using VASES to increase the transparency and standardization of DIGEST-FEES ratings. Future research should seek to replicate these findings and explore the simultaneous use of VASES and DIGEST-FEES in a greater sampling of raters and across other patient populations.

INTRODUCTION

Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES) and Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity for Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (DIGEST-FEES) are two complimentary methods for assessing swallowing during FEES. Whereas VASES is intended to facilitate trial-level ratings of pharyngeal residue, penetration, and aspiration, DIGEST-FEES is intended to facilitate protocol-level impairment grades of swallowing safety and efficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of using VASES to derive DIGEST-FEES impairment grades.

METHODS

DIGEST-FEES grades were blindly analyzed from 50 FEES - first using the original DIGEST-FEES grading method (n = 50) and then again using a VASES-derived DIGEST-FEES grading method (n = 50). Weighted Kappa (κw) and absolute agreement (%) were used to assess the relationship between the original DIGEST-FEES grades and VASES-derived DIGEST-FEES grades. Spearman's correlations assessed the relationship between VASES-derived DIGEST-FEES grades with measures of construct validity.

RESULTS

Substantial agreement (κw = 0.76-0.83) was observed between the original and VASES-derived grading methods, with 60-62% of all DIGEST-FEES grades matching exactly, and 92-100% of DIGEST-FEES grades within one grade of each other. Furthermore, the strength of the relationships between VASES-derived DIGEST-FEES grades and measures of construct validity (r = 0.34-0.78) were similar to the strength of the relationships between original DIGEST-FEES grades and the same measures of construct validity (r = 0.34-0.83).

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study demonstrate substantial agreement between original and VASES-derived DIGEST-FEES grades. Using VASES to derive DIGEST-FEES also appears to maintain the same level of construct validity established with the original DIGEST-FEES. Therefore, clinicians and researchers may consider using VASES to increase the transparency and standardization of DIGEST-FEES ratings. Future research should seek to replicate these findings and explore the simultaneous use of VASES and DIGEST-FEES in a greater sampling of raters and across other patient populations.

Effectiveness of FEES with artificial intelligence-assisted computer-aided diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

FEES is a standard procedure for diagnosing dysphagia. However, appropriate evaluation of FEES findings is difficult for inexperienced evaluators. Recent progress in deep learning has highlighted the use of artificial intelligence-assisted computer-aided diagnosis (AI-assisted CAD) in medical applications. We investigated the detection accuracy of FEES findings evaluated by inexperienced evaluators with and without the use of CAD.

METHODS

The algorithm for FEES-CAD was developed using 25,630 expert-annotated images. A total of 45 inexperienced evaluators from three groups of people (resident doctors, nurses, and medical students), evaluated 32 FEES videos from 32 patients. To confirm the effectiveness of FEES-CAD, first, 32 FEES videos were evaluated without the use of CAD. Second, one half was evaluated with, and one half without, the use of CAD. The detection accuracy of the FEES findings was investigated, and the evaluation results obtained with CAD were statistically compared with those obtained without CAD.

RESULTS

In the first FEES evaluation, the total detection accuracy was 82.2 %. In the second evaluation, the total detection accuracy with CAD was 84.3 %, and that without CAD was 81.7 %. The detection accuracies by the resident doctors, nurses, and medical students with CAD were 90.1 %, 82.6 %, and 79.4 %, respectively, and those without CAD were 83.7 %, 80.9 % and 80.1 %, respectively. In the resident doctors, the detection accuracy was significantly better when CAD was used for evaluation, compared with the non-CAD evaluations.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated the effectiveness of FEES-CAD in improving the detection accuracy of resident doctors, however, the differences were small.

Risk of Aspiration Increased by Post-swallow Residue in Infant Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of aspiration associated with post-swallow residue subsites in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in bottle-fed infants <1 year of age.

METHODS

This is a retrospective matched-pairs cohort study at an academic tertiary children's hospital. FEES and Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) trials performed within the same infant <5 days apart were paired by matching bolus consistency and bottle flow rate. Positive aspiration was defined by the "or rule" in which aspiration is positive when either FEES or VFSS within a matched pair is positive.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven FEES-VFSS matched pairs from 29 patients (16 males; mean [SD] age, 2.9 [2.8] months) were included. The rate of positive aspiration, as defined by the "or rule", was 59% (51/87). In FEES, post-swallow pyriform sinus residue was present in 16% (14/87) and anterior commissure residue 27% (31/87). Risk of positive aspiration was increased by pyriform sinus residue (odds ratio [OR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-19.3, p < 0.01) and anterior commissure residue in FEES (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-6.1, p = 0.03). In the neonate subgroup, <1 month of age, multivariate-adjusted analysis showed that anterior commissure residue had better diagnostic accuracy for aspiration than in older infants (overall 70% vs. 42%, p < 0.01; sensitivity 60% vs. 10%, p < 0.01), whereas pyriform sinus residue had worse accuracy (overall 41% vs. 70%, p = 0.02; sensitivity 13% vs. 43%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that pyriform sinus and anterior commissure residue during infant FEES were associated with fivefold and twofold increased risk of aspiration, respectively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Using a retrospective matched-pairs cohort, this study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of post-swallow residue in FEES for predicting aspiration. Laryngoscope, 134:1431-1436, 2024.

Management of swallowing disorders in ICU patients - A multinational expert opinion

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, yet it remains underrecognized and often unmanaged despite being associated with life-threatening complications, prolonged ICU stays and hospitalization.

PURPOSE

To propose an expert opinion for the diagnosis and management of dysphagia developed from evidence-based clinical recommendations and practitioner insights.

METHODS

A multinational group of dysphagia and critical care experts conducted a literature review using a modified ACCORD methodology. Based on a fusion of the available evidence and the panel's clinical experience, an expert opinion on best practice management was developed.

RESULTS

The panel recommends adopting clinical algorithms intended to promote standardized, high-quality care that triggers timely systematic dysphagia screening, assessment, and treatment of extubated and tracheostomized patients in the ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the lack of robust scientific evidence, two clinical management algorithms are proposed for use by multidisciplinary teams to improve early systematic detection and effective management of dysphagia in ICU patients. Additionally, emerging therapeutic options such as neurostimulation have the potential to improve the quality of ICU dysphagia care.

Improvement in swallowing safety after injection laryngoplasty in patients with unilateral vocal paralysis complicated with aspiration

BACKGROUND

The benefit of injection laryngoplasty (IL) on voice for unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) is supported increasingly in literatures, yet less is known for swallowing. Also, prevalence of patient-reported dysphagia is substantially higher than instrumental studies. This prospective study focused on swallowing outcomes, with predetermined flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) protocol that simulates daily life situation.

METHODS

Adult patients with UVFP and aspiration receiving IL were recruited. Voice outcome measurements, as well as swallowing outcomes including Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and FEES, which challenged patients with different fluid volumes: 10 mL, 20 mL, and 90 mL cup sipping were evaluated.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were demonstrated in all voice outcomes. Significant changes were also presented inEAT-10 (P < 0.01). Pre-operatively, penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) was 1.5 ± 1.3, 1.9 ± 1.7 and 2.3 ± 1.8 for 10 mL, 20 mL and 90 mL serial sipping, and improved to 1.1 ± 0.3, 1.1 ± 0.4 and 1.4 ± 0.7 post-operatively (P < 0.01). Safe swallowing (PAS ≤ 2) was achieved in all, except for one patient, who presented with a post-injection PAS of 4 (material enters the airway, contacts the vocal folds, and is ejected from the airway) on 90 mL cup sipping, whose pre-injection PAS was 7 (residue in trachea).

CONCLUSION

Maintaining swallowing function suitable for social environment is important. Our results demonstrated the feasibility of the predetermined FEES protocol, and positive effects of IL on both voice and swallowing outcomes.

Validity and reliability of the Group for Learning Useful and Performant Swallowing (GLUPS) tool

INTRODUCTION

To validate the Group for Learning Useful and Performant Swallowing (GLUPS), a clinical tool dedicated to videofluoroscopy swallowing study (VFSS).

METHODS

Forty-five individuals were recruited from January 2022 to March 2023 from the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery of University Hospital Saint-Pierre (Brussels, Belgium). Subjects underwent VFSS, which was rated with GLUPS tool by two blinded otolaryngologists and one speech-therapist. VFSS were rated twice with GLUPS within a 7-day period to assess test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients and twenty-one controls completed the evaluations. The internal consistency (α = 0.745) and the test-retest reliability (rs = 0.941; p = 0.001) were adequate. GLUPS reported a high external validity regarding the significant correlation with the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (rs = 0.551; p = 0.001). Internal validity was adequate, because GLUPS score was significant higher in patients compared to controls (6.21 ± 4.42 versus 2.09 ± 2.00; p = 0.001). Interrater reliability did not report significant differences in the GLUPS sub- and total score among the independent judges. The mean GLUPS score of individuals without any evidence of VFSS abnormalities was 2.09/23 (95% CI  1.23-2.95), which supported that a GLUPS score ≥ 3.0 is suggestive of pathological VFSS.

CONCLUSIONS

GLUPS is a clinical instrument documenting the abnormal findings of oral and pharyngeal phases at the VFSS. GLUPS demonstrated high reliability and excellent criterion-based validity. GLUPS may be used in clinical practice for the swallowing evaluation at the VFSS.

Evaluation of Post-Swallow Residue with Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety in Patients with Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

Objectives: Dysphagia is common in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) and is associated with impairments in both swallowing safety and swallowing efficiency. The goals of this study were to define post-swallow residue patterns in people with IPD and describe pathophysiological endoscopic findings affecting residue accumulation. Methods: This was a prospective single-blinded cross-sectional cohort study of patients with the diagnosis of IPD recruited from a Movement Disorder Clinic. Clinical variables included patient age, cognitive function, and measures of disease severity, and laryngoscopic examinations with a flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) were completed for each patient. Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES) was used to analyze FEES. Post-swallow residue outcomes and non-residue endoscopic outcomes including the Bowing index, Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) score, premature leakage, and build-up phenomenon were evaluated. Multiple regression models were used to evaluate factors affecting the residue at different anatomic levels. Results: Overall 53 patients completed the study. The multiple regression analyses showed a relation between (1) the presence of residue at the level of oropharynx and epiglottis with premature leakage, (2) the presence of residue at the level of the laryngeal vestibule and vocal folds with build-up phenomenon, and (3) the presence of residue at the level of the hypopharynx, laryngeal vestibule, and subglottis with airway invasion. Conclusion: Residue pattern during FEES is associated with specific swallow dysfunctions in IPD. Using residue localization and quantification may be a helpful tool in assessing the impact of targeted swallowing interventions in patients with IPD and dysphagia.

Evaluation of outcome measures for post-operative dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

PURPOSE

The goal is to conduct a review of the current literature to determine and evaluate the current classification metrics available for quantifying post-operative dysphagia.

METHODS

We surveyed the literature for the subjective and objective measures used to classify dysphagia, and further described and analyzed them in the context of post-operative dysphagia (PD) after anterior cervical spine surgery, with a focus on anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). We searched PubMed from the years 2005-2021 using the terms "anterior cervical discectomy and fusion" and "dysphagia or postoperative dysphagia." We included papers that were meta-analyses, systemic reviews, prospective, or retrospective studies. Our selection was further consolidated via abstract and title screening. Ultimately, nineteen articles were included and had full-text reviews.

RESULTS

EAT-10 tool was shown to be more valid and reliable than the commonly used Bazaz grading system. HSS-DDI was found to have a high diagnostic accuracy in stratifying mild, moderate, and severe PD. A shortened 16-item version of the original 44-item SWAL-QOL was found to be statistically and clinically significant. When compared to PROMs, objective tests more accurately diagnose PD.

CONCLUSION

We found that the most valuable subjective tests were the EAT-10 and HSS-DI because they are quick, sensitive, and correlated strongly with the well-established measurements of PD. The MBS and FEES provided accurate measurements of the severity of PD, but they required more time and equipment than the surveys. In some patient populations, such as those with pre-surgical dysphagia, objective testing should always be done.

Consistencies among miscellaneous scales for evaluation of post-stroke dysphagia

PURPOSE

Post-stroke dysphagia (PSD) is the most common type of dysphagia. Stroke patients with sustained dysphagia have poorer outcomes. The severity of PSD is assessed using miscellaneous scales with unknown consistencies. We aim to investigate the consistencies among miscellaneous scales, which could aid in the assessment of PSD.

METHODS

A total of 49 PSD patients were enrolled. Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS), Ohkuma Questionnaire, Eating Assessment Tool-10, and Repetitive Saliva Swallowing Test were performed. FOIS was performed by physicians, and DSS was conducted by both the physicians and nurses; the physicians used either videofluoroscopy (VF) or videoendoscopy (VE) for evaluation; while, the nurses assessed PSD by observation and subjective judgment.

RESULTS

When using VF (VF-DSS and VF-FOIS) as the gold standard for the evaluation, VE-FOIS (κ = 0.625, 95% CI 0.300-0.950, p < 0.001) has a substantial agreement with VF-FOIS, and VE-DSS (κ = 0.381, 95% CI 0.127-0.636, p = 0.007) has a fair agreement with VF-DSS. The weighted kappa of FOIS to DSS in VE (weighted κ = 0.577, 95% CI 0.414-0.740, p < 0.001) is not lower than that in VF (weighted kappa = 0.249, 95% CI 0.136-0.362, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For both DSS and FOIS, only VE has a statistically significant agreement with VF. Though VF has been viewed as the traditional gold standard of dysphagia screening, it has the limitations of being invasive and equipment dependent. For PSD, VE could be considered as a substitution when VF is not available or suitable.

Measuring what matters in healthcare: a practical guide to psychometric principles and instrument development

The provision of quality healthcare relies on scales and measures with robust evidence of their psychometric properties. Using measurement instruments with poor reliability, validity, or feasibility, or those that are not appropriate for the target diagnostic group or construct/dimension under consideration, may be unfavorable for patients, unproductive, and hinder empirical advancement. Resources from the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) group can assist in identifying and developing psychometrically sound measures. The COSMIN initiative is the only international, research-based practice taxonomy and methodological guidelines for measurement in healthcare. This manuscript aims to provide an accessible introduction to theories, principles and practices of psychometrics, instrument properties, and scale development, with applied examples from the COSMIN recommendations. It describes why measurement in healthcare is critical to good practice, explains the concepts of the latent variable and hypothetical construct and their importance in healthcare assessments, explores issues of flawed measurement and briefly explains key theories relevant to psychometrics. The paper also outlines a ten-step process to develop and validate a new measurement instrument, with examples drawn from a recently developed visuoperceptual measure for analysis of disordered swallowing to demonstrate key concepts and provides a guide for understanding properties of and terminology related to measurement instruments. This manuscript serves as a resource for healthcare clinicians, educators, and researchers who seek to develop and validate new measurement instruments or improve the properties of existing ones. It highlights the importance of using psychometrically sound measurement instruments to ensure high-quality healthcare assessments.

Hospital management of the patient with dysphagia. Survey and recommendations of SEEN nutrition area

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of dysphagia in hospitalized patients is extraordinarily high and little known. The goal of care should be to assess the efficacy and safety of swallowing, to indicate personalized nutritional therapy. The development of Dysphagia Units, as a multidisciplinary team, facilitates comprehensive care for this type of patient.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A observational, cross-sectional, web-based survey-type study, focused on Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition department heads, was conducted in September-October 2021. The following data were analyzed: size and type of center, existence of a dysphagia unit, dysphagia screening, dietary and nutritional therapy, education and training of professionals and patients, codification, and quality of life evaluation.

RESULTS

65 responses (39% of the total Endocrinology and Nutrition departments). 37% of hospitals have a Dysphagia Unit and 25% are developing it. 75.4% perform screening, with MECV-V in 80.6%, and VED (61.4%) and VFS (54.4%) are performed as main complementary tests. The centers have different models of oral diet, thickeners and nutritional oral supplements adapted to dysphagia. In 40% of the centers, no information is offered on dysphagia, nor on the use of thickeners, dysphagia is coded in 81%, 52.3% have specific nursing protocols and only 8% have scales for quality-of-life evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence and the risk of serious complications require early and multidisciplinary management at the hospital level. The information received by the patient and caregiver about the dietary adaptations they need, is essential to minimize risks and improve quality of life.

Findings of a videofluoroscopic swallowing study in patients with dysphagia

Objective

Swallowing examination is crucial in patients with dysphagia. We aimed to compare qualitative and quantitative videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) results to provide reference for standardizing quantitative parameters.

Materials and methods

In total, 117 patients with dysphagia were included, 38 with Parkinson's disease and 39 and 40 in convalescence following cerebral hemorrhage and infarction. VFSS was both qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed.

Results

A significant difference of Oral transit time was found between the oral motor function grades (p < 0.001), also was swallowing reaction times found between swallowing reaction duration grades (p < 0.001), and soft palate lift duration between the soft palate lift grades (p < 0.001). Superior hyoid bone movement (p < 0.001), anterior hyoid bone movement (p < 0.001), hyoid pause time (p < 0.001), and hyoid movement duration (p = 0.032) had significant differences between the hyoid laryngeal complex movement grades, as did the pharyngeal cavity transit time among the cricopharyngeal muscle opening duration grades (p < 0.001). The laryngeal vestibule closure duration differed among the glottic closure grades (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in upper esophageal sphincter opening diameter (p = 0.682) or duration (p = 0.682) among the cyclopharyngeal muscle opening duration grades. The pharyngeal area at rest did not significantly differ among the different vallecular residue (p = 0.202) and pyriform sinus residue (p = 0.116) grades.

Conclusion

Several quantitative parameters can reflect the swallowing assessment process well. Further optimization of quantitative parameters is recommended.

Usefulness of a newly developed endoscope for the observation of the posterior tracheal wall

Objective

Videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing is an objective swallowing function evaluation method used in dysphagia rehabilitation. However, it is anatomically difficult to detect the entry of foreign substances through the posterior tracheal wall using a conventional endoscope (CE). In this study, we developed an endoscope that can observe the posterior tracheal wall and investigated its reliability and validity in healthy adults.

Methods

Twenty healthy adults were included. The trachea was observed from inside the larynx using a CE and a portable, flexible two-step angulation endoscope (two-AE) with a two-step curved shaft tip. The visibility of the anterior and posterior walls was recorded. The time from the endoscope tip entering the larynx to the posterior tracheal wall was measured. Additionally, discomfort events were assessed after the examination. McNemar's test and a paired t-test were used for statistical analysis. Kappa coefficients and concordance rates were calculated.

Results

The anterior tracheal wall was observed using both endoscopes. The posterior tracheal wall was significantly observed in 18 participants with the two-AE (p < .001), compared to only three of 20 participants with the CE. The time to observation of the posterior tracheal wall for examiners 1 and 2 was 13.3 ± 6.5 and 12.0 ± 6.7 s, respectively, with no difference between groups (p = .400). The kappa coefficients of examiners 1 and 2 and between the examiners were 0.444, 0.643, and 0.643, respectively, with concordance rates of 90%, 95%, and 95%, respectively.

Conclusion

Regardless of the examiner's years of experience, we observed that the two-AE could observe the posterior tracheal wall.

Level of Evidence

Step 5.

[Dysphagia in Parkinsonian Syndromes]

Dysphagia is a clinically relevant problem in Parkinson's disease as well as in atypical Parkinsonian syndromes, such as multiple system atrophy and diseases from the spectrum of 4‑repeat tauopathies, which affect most patients to a varying degree in the course of their disease. This results in relevant restrictions in daily life due to impaired intake of food, fluids, and medication with a subsequent reduction in quality of life. This article not only gives an overview of the pathophysiological causes of dysphagia in the various Parkinson syndromes, but also presents screening, diagnostic and treatment procedures that have been investigated for the different diseases.

Normative Reference Values for FEES and VASES: Preliminary Data From 39 Nondysphagic, Community-Dwelling Adults

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to establish preliminary reference values for the Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES)-a standardized rating methodology used to evaluate swallowing safety and efficiency for flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).

METHOD

FEES were completed in nondysphagic, community-dwelling adults using a standardized protocol of 15 swallowing trials that varied by bolus size, consistency, contrast agent, and swallowing instructions. FEES were blindly analyzed using VASES. Primary outcome measures included bolus location at swallow onset, Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores, and percentage-based residue ratings for six anatomic landmarks. Secondary outcome measures included sip size, bite size, and number of swallows.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine healthy adults completed the study, yielding an analysis of 584 swallows. Swallows were initiated with the bolus in the pharynx for 41.8% of trials. PAS 1 was the most common score, accounting for 75.3% of trials, followed by PAS 3, which accounted for 18.8% of trials. When residue was present (> 0%), the amount was relatively small across all anatomic landmarks, with median residue ratings of 2.0% (oropharynx), 1.5% (hypopharynx), 3.0% (epiglottis), 3.0% (laryngeal vestibule), and 3.5% (vocal folds). Five events of aspiration were observed, which were characterized by subglottic residue ratings of 1%, 3%, 10%, 24%, and 90%. The average sip size of self-selected volume cup sips of water was 19.8 ml, and the average bite size of a 3.0-g saltine cracker was 1.33 g. Moreover, 78% of the trials in this study protocol (except 90-ml trials) were completed in a single swallow.

DISCUSSION

The results from this study provide preliminary norms for VASES that could be used as a reference when assessing functional swallowing outcomes during FEES. While this is an important first step in establishing norms for FEES and VASES, clinicians and researchers should be mindful that the normative reference values from this study are from a relatively small study sample (N = 39), with most people below the age of 60 years (n = 30). Future research should expand on these norms by including a greater number of people across the age continuum and with greater racial, ethnic, and gender diversity.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23504325.

Machine learning predictive model for aspiration screening in hospitalized patients with acute stroke

Dysphagia is a fatal condition after acute stroke. We established machine learning (ML) models for screening aspiration in patients with acute stroke. This retrospective study enrolled patients with acute stroke admitted to a cerebrovascular specialty hospital between January 2016 and June 2022. A videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) confirmed aspiration. We evaluated the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS), an early assessment tool for dysphagia, in all patients and compared its predictive value with ML models. Following ML algorithms were applied: regularized logistic regressions (ridge, lasso, and elastic net), random forest, extreme gradient boosting, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, and naïve Bayes. We finally analyzed data from 3408 patients, and 448 of them had aspiration on VFSS. The GUSS showed an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.79 (0.77-0.81). The ridge regression model was the best model among all ML models, with an AUROC of 0.81 (0.76-0.86), an F1 measure of 0.45. Regularized logistic regression models exhibited higher sensitivity (0.66-0.72) than the GUSS (0.64). Feature importance analyses revealed that the modified Rankin scale was the most important feature of ML performance. The proposed ML prediction models are valid and practical for screening aspiration in patients with acute stroke.

Feasibility study of the Nox-T3 device to detect swallowing and respiration pattern in neurologically impaired patients in the acute phase

Dysphagia is a frequent complication in neurologically impaired patients, which can lead to aspiration pneumonia and thus prolonged hospitalization or even death. It is essential therefore, to detect and assess dysphagia early for best patient care. Fiberoptic endoscopic and Videofluoroscopy evaluation of swallowing are the gold standard exams in swallowing studies but neither are perfectly suitable for patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). In this study, we aimed to find the sensitivity and specificity of the Nox-T3 sleep monitor for detection of swallowing. A combination of submental and peri-laryngeal surface electromyography, nasal cannulas and respiratory inductance plethysmography belts connected to Nox-T 3 allows recording swallowing events and their coordination with breathing, providing time-coordinated patterns of muscular and respiratory activity. We compared Nox-T3 swallowing capture to manual swallowing detection on fourteen DOC patients. The Nox-T3 method identified swallow events with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 99%. In addition, Nox-T3 has qualitative contributions, such as visualization of the swallowing apnea in the respiratory cycle which provide additional information on the swallowing act that is useful to clinicians in the management and rehabilitation of the patient. These results suggest that Nox-T3 could be used for swallowing detection in DOC patients and support its continued clinical use for swallowing disorder investigation.