Late protocol liver biopsies in the liver allograft: a neglected investigation?

Protocol liver biopsy predicts graft survival after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The use of protocol liver biopsy to monitor liver allograft status remains controversial. There is limited data from modern transplantation populations that includes protocol biopsies to evaluate its value in predicting clinical outcomes.

METHODS

All protocol liver biopsies were identified from 875 patients who underwent liver transplantation at Helsinki University Hospital between 2000 and 2019. Each histologic component was analyzed for its ability to predict long-term outcomes, especially graft survival. We determined the frequency of significant biopsy findings based on the Banff working group definition. Liver function tests (LFTs) and clinical markers were evaluated for their ability to predict significant biopsy findings.

RESULTS

In total, 867 protocol liver biopsies were analyzed. Significant findings were identified in 20.1% of the biopsies. In the first protocol biopsy, steatohepatitis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.504, p = .03) and moderate or severe congestion (HR 3.338, p = .04) predicted graft loss. The presence of cholangitis (HR 2.563, p = .04), necrosis (HR 7.635, p < .001), mild congestion (HR 4.291, p = .009), and significant biopsy finding (HR 2.540, p = .02) predicted inferior death-censored graft survival. While the degree of elevation of LFTs was positively associated with significant biopsy findings, the discrimination was poor (AUC .572-.622). Combined LFTs and clinical risk factors remained suboptimal for discriminating significant biopsy findings (AUC .696).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the use of protocol liver biopsies after liver transplantation since they frequently revealed changes associated with long-term outcomes, even when LFTs were normal.

Hepatic granulomas following liver transplantation: A retrospective survey, and analysis of possible microbiological etiology

BACKGROUND

Liver granulomas have always been a diagnostic challenge for pathologists. They have been described in up to 15% of liver biopsies and can also be seen in liver allograft biopsy specimens, but there is a paucity of information regarding the prevalence and associated etiologic factors of granulomas in liver transplanted patients. The aim of this study is to shed light on the etiology of liver granulomas.

METHODS

Liver biopsies from liver transplanted patients, in the period from 01.01.2011 - 01.05.2017, were examined. We registered the histo-morphological characteristics and clinicopathological data of all biopsies and performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect possible pathogens (bacteria, fungi, and parasites) in the biopsies containing granulomas.

RESULTS

We reviewed a total of 400 liver biopsies from 217 liver transplant patients. Of these, 131 liver biopsies (32.8%) from 98 patients (45.2%) revealed granulomas. Most were epithelioid granulomas located parenchymal and were detected in 115 (87.7%) biopsies. We also identified 10 cases (7.6%) with both lobular and portal granulomas and six biopsies (4.5%) with portal granulomas alone. In 54 biopsies (41.2%), granulomas were found in biopsies with acute cellular rejection (ACR). Fifty (51%) patients with granulomas underwent liver transplantation for autoimmune-related end-stage liver disease (AILD). The granulomas were found most frequently in the first six months after transplantation, where patients also more often were biopsied. NGS analysis did not reveal any potential infectious agent, and no significant differences were observed in the microbiological diversity (microbiome) between clinical- and granuloma characteristics concerning bacteria, fungi, and parasites.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that granulomas are frequently seen in liver allograft biopsy specimens, and most often localized in the parenchyma, occurring in the first post-transplant period in patients with AILD, and often seen simultaneously with episodes of ACR. Neither a specific microbiological etiological agent nor a consistent microbiome was detected in any case.

Liver transplantation immunology: Immunosuppression, rejection, and immunomodulation

Outcomes after liver transplantation have continuously improved over the past decades, but long-term survival rates are still lower than in the general population. The liver has distinct immunological functions linked to its unique anatomical configuration and to its harbouring of a large number of cells with fundamental immunological roles. The transplanted liver can modulate the immunological system of the recipient to promote tolerance, thus offering the potential for less aggressive immunosuppression. The selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs should be individualised to optimally control alloreactivity while mitigating toxicities. Routine laboratory tests are not accurate enough to make a confident diagnosis of allograft rejection. Although several promising biomarkers are being investigated, none of them is sufficiently validated for routine use; hence, liver biopsy remains necessary to guide clinical decisions. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors due to the unquestionable oncological benefits they provide for many patients with advanced-stage tumours. It is expected that their use will also increase in liver transplant recipients and that this might affect the incidence of allograft rejection. Currently, the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients is limited and cases of severe allograft rejection have been reported. In this review, we discuss the clinical relevance of alloimmune disease, the role of minimisation/withdrawal of immunosuppression, and provide practical guidance for using checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients.

Regular protocol liver biopsy is useful to adjust immunosuppressant dose after adult liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Adjusting immunosuppression to minimal levels post-adult liver transplantation (LT) is critical; however, graft rejection has been reported in LT recipients with normal liver function evaluated by liver biopsy (LBx). Continual protocol liver biopsy (PLB) is performed regularly in LT recipients with normal liver function in some centers; however, its usefulness remains inadequately evaluated. This study aimed to assess retrospectively the usefulness of late PLB after adult LT.

METHODS

LBx evaluations of LT recipients with normal liver function and hepatitis B and C virus seronegativity were defined as PLB. The cases requiring immunosuppressive therapy for rejection findings based on Banff criteria were extracted from the PLBs, and pathological data collected before and after immunosuppressive dosage adjustment (based on modified histological activity index [HAI] score) were compared.

RESULTS

Among 548 LBx cases, 213 LBx in 110 recipients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for PLB. Immunosuppressive therapy after PLB was intensified in 14 LBx (6.6%) recipients (12.7%); of these, nine had late-onset acute rejection, three had isolated perivenular inflammation, one had plasma cell-rich rejection, and one had early chronic rejection. Follow-up LBx after immunosuppressive dose adjustment showed improvement in the modified HAI score grading in 10 of 14 cases (71.4%). No clinical background and blood examination data, including those from the post-LT period, immunosuppressant trough level, or examination for de novo DSA, predicted rejection in PLB. Complications of PLB were found in only three cases.

CONCLUSION

PLB is useful in the management of seemingly stable LT recipients, to discover subclinical rejection and allow for appropriate immunosuppressant dose adjustment.

Long-term liver allograft fibrosis: A review with emphasis on idiopathic post-transplant hepatitis and chronic antibody mediated rejection

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving surgical procedure and the current standard of care for most patients with end stage liver disease. With improvements in organ preservation techniques, perioperative care, and immunosuppression, there is better patient and graft survival following LT, and assessment of the liver allograft in long-term survivors is becoming increasingly important. Recurrent or de novo viral or autoimmune injury remains the most common causes of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis following liver transplantation in adults. However, no obvious cause can be identified in many adults with controlled recurrent disease and the majority of pediatric LT recipients, as they have been transplanted for non-recurrent liver diseases. Serial surveillance liver biopsies post LT have been evaluated in several adult and pediatric centers to identify long-term pathological changes. Pathological findings are frequently present in liver biopsies obtained after a year post LT. The significance of these findings is uncertain as many of these are seen in protocol liver biopsies from patients with clinically good allograft function and normal liver chemistry parameters. This narrative review summaries the factors predisposing to long-term liver allograft fibrosis, highlighting the putative role of idiopathic post-LT hepatitis and chronic antibody mediated rejection in its pathogenesis.

Clinical Value of Surveillance Biopsies in Pediatric Liver Transplantation

Although pediatric liver transplantation (LT) results in excellent long-term outcomes, a high incidence of early acute cellular rejection and late graft fibrosis persists. Routine measurement of allograft enzymes may not reliably detect rejection episodes, identify candidates for immunosuppression minimization, or indicate allograft fibrosis. Surveillance biopsies (SBs) can provide valuable information in this regard, but their role in pediatric LT is not fully established. A retrospective cohort of 236 pediatric LT recipients from a high-volume center was studied to characterize the risks and benefits of SB versus for-cause biopsies (FCBs). The study population was 47.1% male and 54.7% Hispanic, and 31% received living donor grafts. Our data suggest that patients in the SB group had better transplant outcomes (rejection-free, graft, and patient survival) compared with patients who had FCBs or who never underwent biopsy. Among 817 biopsies obtained from 236 patients, 150 (18.4%) were SBs. Only 6 patients had a biopsy-related complication, and none were observed in the SB subset. Graft biochemical blood tests did not accurately predict rejection severity on biopsy, with aspartate aminotransferase area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.66, alanine aminotransferase AUROC 0.65 (very poor predictions), and gamma-glutamyltransferase AUROC 0.58 (no prediction). SBs identified subclinical rejection in 18.6% of biopsies, whereas 63.3% of SBs had evidence of fibrosis. SBs prompted changes in immunosuppression including dose reduction. Our experience suggests that SB in pediatric LT is safe, offers valuable information about subclinical rejection episodes, and can guide management of immunosuppression, including minimization. Improved outcomes with SB were likely multifactorial, potentially relating to a more favorable early posttransplant course and possible effect of management optimization through SB. Further multicenter studies are needed to examine the role of SBs on long-term outcomes in pediatric LT.

Outcome and safety of a surveillance biopsy guided personalized immunosuppression program after liver transplantation

Graft survival beyond year 1 has not changed after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) over the last decades. Likewise, OLT causes comorbidities such as infection, renal impairment and cancer. We evaluated our single-center real-world individualized immunosuppression program after OLT, based on 211 baseline surveillance biopsies (svLbx) without any procedural complications. Patients were classified as low, intermediate and high rejection risk based on graft injury in svLbx and anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies. While 32% of patients had minimal histological inflammation, 57% showed histological inflammation and 23% advanced fibrosis (>F2), which was not predicted by lab parameters. IS was modified in 79% of patients after svLbx. After immunosuppression reduction in 69 patients, only 5 patients showed ALT elevations and three of these patients had a biopsy-proven acute rejection, two of them related to lethal comorbidities. The rate of liver enzyme elevation including rejection was not significantly increased compared to a svLbx control cohort prior to the initiation of our structured program. Immunosuppression reduction led to significantly better kidney function compared to this control cohort. In conclusion, a biopsy guided personalized immunosuppression protocol after OLT can identify patients requiring lower immunosuppression or patients with graft injury in which IS should not be further reduced.

Value of posttransplant protocol biopsies in 2 biliary autoimmune liver diseases: A step toward personalized immunosuppressive treatment

The value of protocol liver graft biopsies with good liver function was evaluated in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) or primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).A total of 250 protocol liver biopsy reports from 182 PSC and PBC patients were compared. Overall histopathological findings and those leading to changes in immunosuppression therapy were retrospectively analyzed.The mean time to first protocol biopsy after transplantation was 5.5 (±4.5) years for PSC patients and 9.3 (±6.6) years for PBC patients. More than 1 abnormal histopathological parameter was found in 43% and 62% of PSC and PBC patients, respectively. However, the histology was interpreted as normal by the pathologist in 78% of PSC and 60% of PBC patients. Immunosuppression therapy was reduced in 10% and increased in 6% patients due to protocol biopsy findings. Biopsies leading to increased immunosuppression therapy had more portal (P = .004), endothelial (P = .008), interphase (P = .021), and lobular (P = .000) inflammation.Mild histopathological findings were frequently found in the protocol biopsies despite the normal biochemistry. PBC patients had more histological abnormalities than those transplanted due to PSC; however, PBC patients had longer follow-up times. Immunosuppression therapy could be safely increased or decreased according to protocol biopsy findings after multidisciplinary meeting discussions.

Protocol liver biopsies in stable long-term pediatric liver transplant recipients: risk or benefit?

BACKGROUND

Follow-up after pediatric liver transplantation (LTX) is challenging and needs to be refined to extend graft survival as well as general functional health and patients´ quality of life. Strategies towards individual immunosuppressive therapy seem to play a key role. Our aim was to evaluate protocol liver biopsies (PLB) as a tool in personalized follow up after pediatric LTX.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our retrospective analysis evaluates 92 PLB in clinically asymptomatic pediatric patients after LTX between 2009 and 2019. Histological findings were characterized using the Desmet scoring system. In addition to PLB, other follow-up tools like laboratory parameters, ultrasound imaging and transient elastography were evaluated. Risk factors for development of fibrosis or inflammation were analyzed.

RESULTS

PLB revealed a high prevalence of graft fibrosis (67.4%) and graft inflammation (47.8%). Graft inflammation was significantly (P = 0.0353*) more frequent within the first 5 years after transplantation compared to later time points. Besides conventional ultrasound, the measurement of liver stiffness using transient elastography correlate with stage of fibrosis (r = 0.567, P = <0.0001***). Presence of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies in blood correlates with grade of inflammation in PLB (r = 0.6040, P = 0.0018 **). None of the patients who underwent PLB suffered from intervention-related complications. Histopathological results had an impact on clinical decision making in one-third of all patients after PLB.

CONCLUSION

PLB are a safe and useful tool to detect silent immune-mediated allograft injuries in the context of normal liver parameters.

Donor HLA Class 1 Evolutionary Divergence Is a Major Predictor of Liver Allograft Rejection : A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The HLA evolutionary divergence (HED), a continuous metric quantifying the peptidic differences between 2 homologous HLA alleles, reflects the breadth of the immunopeptidome presented to T lymphocytes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the potential effect of donor or recipient HED on liver transplant rejection.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Liver transplant units.

PATIENTS

1154 adults and 113 children who had a liver transplant between 2004 and 2018.

MEASUREMENTS

Liver biopsies were done 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after the transplant and in case of liver dysfunction. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) were measured in children at the time of biopsy. The HED was calculated using the physicochemical Grantham distance for class I (HLA-A or HLA-B) and class II (HLA-DRB1 or HLA-DQB1) alleles. The influence of HED on the incidence of liver lesions was analyzed through the inverse probability weighting approach based on covariate balancing, generalized propensity scores.

RESULTS

In adults, class I HED of the donor was associated with acute rejection (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.16]), chronic rejection (HR, 1.20 [CI, 1.10 to 1.31]), and ductopenia of 50% or more (HR, 1.33 [CI, 1.09 to 1.62]) but not with other histologic lesions. In children, class I HED of the donor was also associated with acute rejection (HR, 1.16 [CI, 1.03 to 1.30]) independent of the presence of DSAs. There was no effect of either donor class II HED or recipient class I or class II HED on the incidence of liver lesions in adults and children.

LIMITATION

The DSAs were measured only in children.

CONCLUSION

Class I HED of the donor predicts acute or chronic rejection of liver transplant. This novel and accessible prognostic marker could orientate donor selection and guide immunosuppression.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale.

Enhancing the Value of Histopathological Assessment of Allograft Biopsy Monitoring

Traditional histopathological allograft biopsy evaluation provides, within hours, diagnoses, prognostic information, and mechanistic insights into disease processes. However, proponents of an array of alternative monitoring platforms, broadly classified as "invasive" or "noninvasive" depending on whether allograft tissue is needed, question the value proposition of tissue histopathology. The authors explore the pros and cons of current analytical methods relative to the value of traditional and illustrate advancements of next-generation histopathological evaluation of tissue biopsies. We describe the continuing value of traditional histopathological tissue assessment and "next-generation pathology (NGP)," broadly defined as staining/labeling techniques coupled with digital imaging and automated image analysis. Noninvasive imaging and fluid (blood and urine) analyses promote low-risk, global organ assessment, and "molecular" data output, respectively; invasive alternatives promote objective, "mechanistic" insights by creating gene lists with variably increased/decreased expression compared with steady state/baseline. Proponents of alternative approaches contrast their preferred methods with traditional histopathology and: (1) fail to cite the main value of traditional and NGP-retention of spatial and inferred temporal context available for innumerable objective analyses and (2) belie an unfamiliarity with the impact of advances in imaging and software-guided analytics on emerging histopathology practices. Illustrative NGP examples demonstrate the value of multidimensional data that preserve tissue-based spatial and temporal contexts. We outline a path forward for clinical NGP implementation where "software-assisted sign-out" will enable pathologists to conduct objective analyses that can be incorporated into their final reports and improve patient care.

The Reliability of Fibro-test in Staging Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients with Recurrent Hepatitis C

Background and Aims: Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for staging of chronic liver disease following orthotopic liver transplantation. Noninvasive assessment of fibrosis with Fibro-test (FT) is well-studied in immunocompetent populations with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of FT in the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in the allografts of liver transplant recipients with evidence of recurrent hepatitis C. Methods: We retrospectively compared liver biopsies and FT performed within a median of 1 month of each other in orthotopic liver transplantation recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. Results: The study population comprised 22 patients, most of them male (19/22), and with median age of 62 years. For all patients, there was at least a one-stage difference in fibrosis as assessed by liver biopsy compared to FT, while for the majority (16/22) there was at least a two-stage difference. The absence of correlation between the two modalities was statistically demonstrated (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.01). In detecting significant fibrosis (a METAVIR stage of F2 and above), an FT cut-off of 0.5 showed moderate sensitivity (77%) and negative predictive value (80%), but suboptimal specificity (61%) and positive predictive value (58%). Conclusions: In post-transplant patients with recurrent hepatitis C, FT appears to be inaccurately assessing the degree of allograft fibrosis, therefore limiting its reliability as a staging tool.

Deletion of donor-reactive T cell clones after human liver transplant

We recently developed a high throughput T cell receptor β chain (TCRβ) sequencing-based approach to identifying and tracking donor-reactive T cells. To address the role of clonal deletion in liver allograft tolerance, we applied this method in samples from a recent randomized study, ITN030ST, in which immunosuppression withdrawal was attempted within 2 years of liver transplantation. We identified donor-reactive T cell clones via TCRβ sequencing following a pre-transplant mixed lymphocyte reaction and tracked these clones in the circulation following transplantation in 3 tolerant and 5 non-tolerant subjects. All subjects showed a downward trend and significant reductions in donor-reactive TCRβ sequences were detected post-transplant in 6 of 8 subjects, including 2 tolerant and 4 non-tolerant recipients. Reductions in donor-reactive TCRβ sequences were greater than those of all other TCRβ sequences, including 3rd party-reactive sequences, in all 8 subjects, demonstrating an impact of the liver allograft after accounting for repertoire turnover. Although limited by patient number and heterogeneity, our results suggest that partial deletion of donor-reactive T cell clones may be a consequence of liver transplantation and does not correlate with success or failure of early immunosuppression withdrawal. These observations underscore the organ- and/or protocol-specific nature of tolerance mechanisms in humans.

Shear-Wave Dispersion Slope from US Shear-Wave Elastography: Detection of Allograft Damage after Liver Transplantation

Background Allograft damage (hepatic parenchymal damage) after liver transplant is associated with the degree of necroinflammation in graft liver. According to a recent animal study, shear-wave dispersion slope obtained at US shear-wave elastography (SWE) is associated with necroinflammatory activity in the liver. Purpose To evaluate the role of shear-wave dispersion slope in detecting allograft damage after liver transplant. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 104 liver transplant recipients underwent percutaneous liver biopsy for allograft evaluation from December 2017 to November 2018. All participants underwent allograft SWE examination just before liver biopsy, and liver stiffness and shear-wave dispersion slope were obtained. Allograft damage was diagnosed by histopathologic analysis. Clinical and imaging factors related to liver stiffness and shear-wave dispersion slope were determined by multivariable linear regression analysis. Diagnostic performance of each variable in detecting allograft damage was evaluated by comparing area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) values. Results There were 104 study participants (35 women); median age was 56 years (interquartile range, 50-62 years). Allograft damage was found in 46 of 104 (44.2%) of participants. The median liver stiffness (8.2 kPa vs 6.3 kPa; P < .01) and shear-wave dispersion slope (14.4 [m/sec]/kHz vs 10.4 [m/sec]/kHz; P < .01) were higher in participants with allograft damage than in those without damage, respectively. Fibrosis stage was the only determinant factor for liver stiffness (coefficient, 1.8 kPa per fibrosis stage; 95% confidence interval: 0.1, 3.5; P = .03), whereas both fibrosis stage (coefficient, 1.4 [m/sec]/kHz per fibrosis stage; 95% confidence interval: 0.3, 2.6; P = .02) and necroinflammatory activity (coefficient, 1.6 [m/sec]/kHz per necroinflammatory activity grade; 95% confidence interval: 0.5, 2.7; P < .01) affected shear-wave dispersion slope. The AUC for shear-wave dispersion slope in detecting allograft damage was 0.86, which was higher than that of liver stiffness (AUC, 0.75; P < .01). Conclusion Shear-wave dispersion slope determined at US shear-wave elastography may help in detecting allograft damage after liver transplant. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Molecular profiling of subclinical inflammatory lesions in long-term surviving adult liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Subclinical inflammatory changes are commonly described in long-term transplant recipients undergoing protocol liver biopsies. The pathogenesis of these lesions remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify the key molecular pathways driving progressive subclinical inflammatory liver allograft damage.

METHODS

All liver recipients followed at Hospital Clínic Barcelona who were >10 years post-transplant were screened for participation in the study. Patients with recurrence of underlying liver disease, biliary or vascular complications, chronic rejection, and abnormal liver function tests were excluded. Sixty-seven patients agreed to participate and underwent blood and serological tests, transient elastography and a liver biopsy. Transcriptome profiling was performed on RNA extracted from 49 out of the 67 biopsies employing a whole genome next generation sequencing platform. Patients were followed for a median of 6.8 years following the index liver biopsy.

RESULTS

Median time since transplantation to liver biopsy was 13 years (10-22). The most frequently observed histological abnormality was portal inflammation with different degrees of fibrosis, present in 45 biopsies (67%). Two modules of 102 and 425 co-expressed genes were significantly correlated with portal inflammation, interface hepatitis and portal fibrosis. These modules were enriched in molecular pathways known to be associated with T cell mediated rejection. Liver allografts showing the highest expression levels for the two modules recapitulated the transcriptional profile of biopsies with clinically apparent rejection and developed progressive damage over time, as assessed by non-invasive markers of fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of adult liver transplant recipients who survive long-term exhibit subclinical histological abnormalities. The transcriptomic profile of these patients' liver tissue closely resembles that of T cell mediated rejection and may result in progressive allograft damage.

LAY SUMMARY

A large proportion of adult liver transplant recipients who survive for a long time exhibit subclinical histological abnormalities. The expression profile (a measurement of the activity of genes) of liver tissue from a large fraction of these patients closely resembles the profile of T cell mediated rejection. Liver allografts showing the highest expression levels of rejection-related genes developed progressive damage over time.

A cross-sectional analysis of long-term immunosuppressive regimens after liver transplantation at Asan Medical Center: Increased preference for mycophenolate mofetil

Backgrounds/Aims

Long-term immunosuppression regimens after liver transplantation (LT) are rarely reported in detail. We aimed to provide information on actual long-term immunosuppression regimens through this cross-sectional study.

Methods

Our institutional LT database was searched for adult patients who underwent primary LT operation from 2000 to 2016. We identified 3620 live recipients with actual information on immunosuppressive agent use for 1-17 years.

Results

The study cohort was divided into 7 groups according to posttransplantation period. The immunosuppressive agents used at the cross-sectional review period were tacrolimus in 2884 (79.7%), cyclosporine in 445 (12.3%), mycophenolate mofetil in 2007 (55.4%), and everolimus in 138 (3.8%) recipients. There was no marked difference in immunosuppressive agent use according to pretransplantation liver malignancy or type of LT operation. Tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and everolimus were used in 97.4%, 1.8%, 60.9%, and 9.2%, respectively, in the year 2 group; 94.1%, 3.9%, 51.6%, and 8.3%, respectively, in the year 3 group; 87.3%, 8.4%, 68.9%, and 4.8%, respectively, in the year 4-5 group; 78.2%, 12.9%, 64.6%, and 3.0%, respectively, in the year 6-7 group; 76.9%, 10.8%, 58.8%, and 2.4%, respectively, in the year 8-10 group; 66.7%, 22.4%, 43.4%, and 1.5%, respectively, in the year 11-15 group; and 73.8%, 15.4%, 32.9%, and 1.7%, respectively, in the year ≥15 group.

Conclusions

Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil are the primary immunosuppressive agents after LT, and the indications for everolimus have started to increase at our institution. We believe our results will help establish tailored long-term immunosuppression regimens.

Tolerance after liver transplantation: Where are we?

Impeccable management of immunosuppression is required to ensure the best longterm outcomes for liver transplant recipients. This is particularly challenging for children who arguably need 8 decades of graft and patient survival. Too little risks chronic, often subclinical allo-immune injury while too much risks insidious and cumulative toxicities. Historically, immunosuppression minimization or withdrawal has been a strategy to optimize the longevity of liver transplant recipients. The literature is sprinkled with single-center reports of operationally tolerant patients - those with apparently normal liver function and liver tests. However, without biopsy evidence of immunological quiescence, confidence in the phenotypic assignment of tolerance is shaky. More recently, multicenter trials of immunosuppression withdrawal for highly selected, stable, longterm adult and pediatric liver recipients have shown tolerance rates, based on both biochemical and histological assessment, of 40% and 60%, respectively. Extended biochemical and histologic follow-up of children over 8 years, equivalent to 7+ years off of drug, suggests that operational tolerance is robust. Therefore, clearly, immunosuppression can be completely and safety withdrawn from highly-selected subsets of adults and children. However, these trials have also confirmed that clinically ideal recipients - those eligible for immunosuppression withdrawal trial - can harbor significant and worrisome inflammation and/or fibrosis. Although the etiology and prognosis of these findings remain unknown, it is reasonable to surmise that they may reflect an anti-donor immune response that is insufficiently controlled. To achieve the outcomes that we are seeking and that our patients are demanding, we desperately need noninvasive but accurate biomarkers that identify whether immunosuppression is neither too much nor too little but "just right." Until these are available, liver histology remains the gold standard to assess allograft health and guide immunosuppression management. Liver Transplantation 23 1601-1614 2017 AASLD.

Tolerance in clinical liver transplantation

While advances in immunosuppressive therapy have lowered the rate of acute rejection following liver transplantation, the consequence has been an increase in morbidity and mortality related to the lifelong need for maintenance immunosuppression. These complications include an increased risk of malignancy, infection, metabolic disorders, and chronic kidney disease, as well as high health care costs associated with these therapies and the required drug monitoring. Given these issues, most clinicians attempt trial and error dose minimization with variable success rates, and there has been significant interest in full drug withdrawal in select patients through research protocols. These strategies would be more successful if immunomodulatory therapies early after transplantation could be developed and if immune activation biomarkers guiding drug tapering were available to personalize these approaches. This review will review the mechanisms of liver transplant tolerance and potential strategies to achieve immunosuppression withdrawal.

Practical Recommendations for Long-term Management of Modifiable Risks in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: A Guidance Report and Clinical Checklist by the Consensus on Managing Modifiable Risk in Transplantation (COMMIT) Group

Short-term patient and graft outcomes continue to improve after kidney and liver transplantation, with 1-year survival rates over 80%; however, improving longer-term outcomes remains a challenge. Improving the function of grafts and health of recipients would not only enhance quality and length of life, but would also reduce the need for retransplantation, and thus increase the number of organs available for transplant. The clinical transplant community needs to identify and manage those patient modifiable factors, to decrease the risk of graft failure, and improve longer-term outcomes.COMMIT was formed in 2015 and is composed of 20 leading kidney and liver transplant specialists from 9 countries across Europe. The group's remit is to provide expert guidance for the long-term management of kidney and liver transplant patients, with the aim of improving outcomes by minimizing modifiable risks associated with poor graft and patient survival posttransplant.The objective of this supplement is to provide specific, practical recommendations, through the discussion of current evidence and best practice, for the management of modifiable risks in those kidney and liver transplant patients who have survived the first postoperative year. In addition, the provision of a checklist increases the clinical utility and accessibility of these recommendations, by offering a systematic and efficient way to implement screening and monitoring of modifiable risks in the clinical setting.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane-Containing Microbubbles in the Assessment of Liver Allograft Damage: An Exploratory Prospective Study

This prospective study investigated the usefulness of contrast (perfluorobutane-containing microbubbles)-enhanced ultrasound in the non-invasive assessment of liver allograft damage. Forty-one liver recipients underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound followed by a liver biopsy. The hepatic filling rate (time between the arrival of contrast agent in the right hepatic artery and the maximum intensity of hepatic parenchyma) and parenchymal intensity difference before and after instantaneous high-power emission in the Kupffer phase were measured. Patients with allograft damage had higher hepatic filling rates and lower parenchymal intensity differences than those without damage (42.0 ± 16.9 vs. 30.5 ± 7.7 s, p = 0.005; 6.1 ± 7.4 vs. 16.6 ± 16.1 dB, p = 0.047, respectively). In the diagnosis of liver allograft damage, hepatic filling rate and parenchymal intensity difference had sensitivities of 61.5% and 90.9% and specificities of 92.6% and 63.6% using cutoffs of >38.5 s and ≤10.3 dB, respectively. In conclusion, contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be a promising tool in the detection of liver allograft damage.

Clinical value and safety of liver biopsies in patients transplanted for hepatitis C virus-related end-stage liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is the leading indication for liver transplantation. Differentiation between recurrent graft hepatitis C (RGH-C) and graft rejection (GR) is challenging. Liver biopsy is standard to diagnose both conditions; however, little information is available regarding this procedure in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Liver biopsies (n = 211) from all consecutive patients (n = 138) transplanted for hepatitis C at Hannover Medical School between January 2000 and October 2011 were screened, and a final cohort of 96 patients with 196 biopsies was included. Indications, histopathological findings, and biopsy-related complications were documented. Modifications in the treatment based on the biopsy result and the biochemical outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

Most biopsies (196/211, 93%) were representative. Five patients (2.5%) developed non-fatal biopsy-related complications. Biopsy results were GR (35%), RGH-C (31%), and other diagnoses (34%). GR was independently associated with lower albumin (P = 0.025) and higher bilirubin levels (P = 0.011). Treatment was modified based on the biopsy result in 25% of cases. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and bilirubin levels improved in 41%, 25%, and 31% of cases 4 weeks post biopsy respectively. ALT improvements were more significant in patients with GR than in those with RGH-C.

CONCLUSION

Liver biopsy in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients is safe and representative in >90% of cases. GR is independently associated with lower albumin and higher bilirubin levels.

Expression of alpha smooth muscle actin in living donor liver transplant recipients

Recently, there have been reports from liver biopsies that showed the progression of liver fibrosis in liver transplant patients after the cessation of immunosuppression. Herein, we focused on activated hepatic stellate cells expressing alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) to understand the correlation between immunosuppressant medication and liver fibrosis. The study enrolled two pediatric patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation and ceased immunosuppressant therapy. The number of α-SMA-positive cells in the specimens obtained by liver biopsy from these two patients showed a three-fold increase compared with the number from four transplanted pediatric patients who were continuing immunosuppressant therapy. In addition, the α-SMA-positive area evaluated using the WinRooF image processing software program continued to increase over time in three adult transplanted patients with liver fibrosis, and the α-SMA-positive area was increasing even during the pre-fibrotic stage in these adult cases, according to a retrospective review. Therefore, α-SMA could be a useful marker for the detection of early stage fibrosis.

Protocol liver biopsy is the only examination that can detect mid-term graft fibrosis after pediatric liver transplantation

AIM: To assessed the clinical significance of protocol liver biopsy (PLB) in pediatric liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS: Between July 2008 and August 2012, 89 and 55 PLBs were performed in pediatric patients at two and five years after LT, respectively. We assessed the histopathological findings using the Metavir scoring system, including activity (A) and fibrosis (F), and we identified factors associated with scores of ≥ A1 and ≥ F1. Our results clarified the timing and effectiveness of PLB.

RESULTS: The incidences of scores of ≥ A1 and ≥ F1 were 24.7% and 24.7%, respectively, at two years after LT and 42.3% and 34.5%, respectively, at five years. Independent risk factors in a multivariate analysis of a score of ≥ A1 at two years included ≥ 2 h of cold ischemic time, no acute cellular rejection and an alanine amino transaminase (ALT) level of ≥ 20 IU/L (P = 0.028, P = 0.033 and P = 0.012, respectively); however, no risk factors were identified for a score of ≥ F1. Furthermore, no independent risk factors associated with scores of ≥ A1 and ≥ F1 at five years were identified using multivariate analysis. A ROC curve analysis of ALT at two years for a score of ≥ A1 demonstrated the recommended cutoff value for diagnosing ≥ A1 histology to be 20 IU/L. The incidence of scores of ≥ A2 or ≥ F2 at two years after LT was 3.4% (three cases), and all patients had an absolute score of ≥ A2. In contrast to that observed for PLBs at five years after LT, the incidence of scores of ≥ A2 or ≥ F2 was 20.0% (11 cases), and all patients had an absolute score of ≥ F2. In all cases, the dose of immunosuppressants was increased after the PLB, and all ten patients who underwent a follow-up liver biopsy improved to scores of ≤ A1 or F1.

CONCLUSION: PLB at two years after LT is an unnecessary examination, because the serum ALT level reflects portal inflammation. In addition, immunosuppressive therapy should be modulated to maintain the ALT concentration at a level less than 20 IU/L. PLB at five years is an excellent examination for the detection of early reversible graft fibrosis because no serum markers reflect this finding.

Tailored long-term immunosuppressive regimen for adult liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Backgrounds/Aims

There are few guidelines for tailored immunosuppressive regimens for liver transplantation (LT) recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To establish long-term immunosuppressive regimens suitable for Korean adult LT recipients, we analyzed those that were currently in use at a single high-volume institution.

Methods

This cross-sectional study comprises three parts including review of the immunosuppressive regimens used to manage 2,147 adult LT outpatients, review of LT recipients who were diagnosed of HCC at LT, and review of LT recipients who suffered from HCC recurrence.

Results

In 1,000 adult LT recipients who were living more than 5 years with no adverse events, 916 received a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based therapy (CNI only in 520; CNI with mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] in 396) and 84 were receiving an MMF-based therapy (MMF only in 45; MMF with minimal CNI in 39). Tacrolimus was preferred over cyclosporine for both monotherapy and combination therapy along the passage of posttransplant period. There was no difference in selection of immunosuppressants, target blood concentration, and rate of combination therapy between LT recipients with and without HCC, except for the first 1 year. Sirolimus-based regimens were applied in 21 patients who showed HCC recurrence. Sorafenib was often used after conversion to sirolimus.

Conclusions

Tailored immunosuppressive regimen covering the long-term posttransplant period should be established after consideration of individualized patient profiles including HCC.

Assessment of chronic rejection in liver graft recipients receiving immunosuppression with low-dose calcineurin inhibitors

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Calcineurin inhibitors represent the cornerstone immunosuppressants after liver transplantation despite their side effects. As liver graft is particularly well tolerated, low doses may be proposed. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of chronic rejection in patients with low calcineurin inhibitors regimen and to compare their characteristics with patients under standard doses.

METHODS

All patients with liver transplantation between 1997 and 2004 were divided into two groups. Low-dose patients (n=57) had tacrolimus baseline levels <5ng/ml or cyclosporine levels <50ng/ml at t0 or <100ng/ml at t+2h and were prospectively proposed a liver biopsy, searching for chronic rejection according to Banff criteria. The remaining patients constituted the standard-doses group (n=40).

RESULTS

Among the low-dose group, 36 patients in the low-dose group were assessed by biopsy. No chronic rejection was found. Fifty-six percent had only calcineurin inhibitors and 8% received other immunosuppressants only. The median time between liver transplantation and biopsy was 90 months (64-157) and between IS regimen decrease and biopsy was 41 months (11-115). Liver tests were normal in 72% of the patients. Low-dose patients had more often hepatitis B (p=0.045), less past acute rejection episodes (p=0.028), and better renal function (p=0.040). Decrease of calcineurin inhibitors failed in 15% of standard-dose patients without impacting the graft function. In the low-dose group, co-prescription of other immunosuppressants facilitated the decrease (p=0.051).

CONCLUSIONS

The minimization, or even cessation, of calcineurin inhibitors may be an achievable goal in the long term for most of the liver graft recipients.

Non-invasive assessment of liver graft fibrosis by transient elastography after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) (FibroScan) is a validated method of quantifying liver fibrosis in non-transplanted patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). It could be useful in follow-up after liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of LSM in evaluating liver fibrosis after LT in patients with and without recurrent HCV.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients (mean age 57.6 ± 9.9 years), 28 (65.1%) HCV-positive patients and 15 (34.9%) HCV-negative patients underwent gold standard liver biopsy and TE 55.8 ± 4.9 months after transplantation. Liver fibrosis was scored on biopsy specimens according to METAVIR (F0-F4). Accuracy of TE and optimal stiffness cut-off values for fibrosis staging were determined by a receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Median stiffness values were significantly different for METAVIR score less than 2 (5.8 kPa) vs. METAVIR score greater to equal to 2 (9.6 kPa) (P<0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.83 for METAVIR score greater to equal to 2 (95%CI: 0.71-0.95). The optimal stiffness cut-off value was 7 kPa for METAVIR scores greater to equal to 2. The results were similar whether the patients had recurrent HCV infection or not.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that transient elastography accurately identifies LT recipients with significant fibrosis, irrespective of HCV status. It is a promising non-invasive tool to assess graft fibrosis progression after LT in patients with HCV recurrence, as well as for screening of late graft fibrosis of other etiologies. Transient elastography could reduce the use of invasive protocol biopsies.

The SPLIT research agenda 2013

This review focuses on active clinical research in pediatric liver transplantation with special emphasis on areas that could benefit from studies utilizing the SPLIT infrastructure and data repository. Ideas were solicited by members of the SPLIT Research Committee and sections were drafted by members of the committee with expertise in those given areas. This review is intended to highlight priorities for clinical research that could successfully be conducted through the SPLIT collaborative and would have significant impact in pediatric liver transplantation.

Meeting report of the International Liver Transplantation Society's 18th annual international congress: Hilton San Francisco Hotel, San Francisco, CA, May 16-19, 2012

From May 16-19, 2012, the International Liver Transplantation Society held its annual congress in San Francisco, CA. More than 1300 registrants attended the meeting, which included a premeeting conference entitled Balancing Risk in Liver Transplantation, focused topic sessions, and a variety of oral and poster presentations. This report is not all-inclusive and focuses on specific research abstracts on key topics in liver transplantation. As always, the new data herein are presented in the context of the published literature to further enhance knowledge in the field.

Evolution of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease recurrence after liver transplantation

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the progressive form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and is the fourth most common indication for liver transplantation. Risk factors for NAFLD can persist and even worsen after liver transplantation. However, the risk and significance of NAFLD recurrence remain unclear. Reported posttransplant NAFLD and NASH recurrence rates vary widely across studies. There is little information detailing the histological evolution of NAFLD recurrence, and the long-term natural history of NAFLD recurrence is unclear. In this review, we summarize the findings of studies on the prevalence of recurrent NAFLD and its risk factors in the posttransplant setting, and we explore reasons for the discrepant reported recurrence rates. On the basis of currently available data, the relatively low rates of advanced fibrosis and NAFLD-associated graft loss and the comparability of the survival rates for these patients and patients undergoing transplantation for other diseases suggest that although NAFLD or NASH can recur, the clinical significance of disease recurrence for graft or patient survival may be small.

Importance of liver biopsy findings in immunosuppression management: biopsy monitoring and working criteria for patients with operational tolerance

Obstacles to morbidity-free long-term survival after liver transplantation (LT) include complications of immunosuppression (IS), recurrence of the original disease and malignancies, and unexplained chronic hepatitis and graft fibrosis. Many programs attempt to minimize chronic exposure to IS by reducing dosages and stopping steroids. A few programs have successfully weaned a highly select group of recipients from all IS without apparent adverse consequences, but long-term follow-up is limited. Patients subjected to adjustments in IS are usually followed by serial liver chemistry tests, which are relatively insensitive methods for detecting allograft damage. Protocol biopsy has largely been abandoned for hepatitis C virus-negative recipients, at least in part because of the inability to integrate routine histopathological findings into a rational clinical management algorithm. Recognizing a need to more precisely categorize and determine the clinical significance of findings in long-term biopsy samples, the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology has reviewed the literature, pooled the experience of its members, and proposed working definitions for biopsy changes that (1) are conducive to lowering IS and are compatible with operational tolerance (OT) and (2) raise concern for closer follow-up and perhaps increased IS during or after IS weaning. The establishment of guidelines should help us to standardize analyses of the effects of various treatments and/or weaning protocols and more rigorously categorize patients who are assumed to show OT. Long-term follow-up using standardized criteria will help us to determine the consequences of lowering IS and to define and determine the incidence and robustness of OT in liver allografts.

Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Autoimmune hepatitis can recur or appear de novo after liver transplantation, and it can result in hepatic fibrosis, graft loss, and re-transplantation. The goals of this review are to describe the prevalence, manifestations, putative pathogenic mechanisms, outcomes, and management of these occurrences. Autoimmune hepatitis recurs in 8-12 % of transplanted patients at 1 year and 36-68 % at 5 years. Recurrence may be asymptomatic and detected only by surveillance liver test abnormalities or protocol liver tissue examination. Autoantibodies that characterized the original disease, hypergammaglobulinemia, increased serum immunoglobulin G level, and histological findings of interface hepatitis, lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, perivenular hepatocyte necrosis, pseudo-rosetting, and acidophil bodies typify recurrence. Premature corticosteroid withdrawal and pre-transplant severity of the original disease are possible risk factors. De novo autoimmune hepatitis occurs in 1-7 % of patients 0.1-9 years after transplantation, especially in children. The appearance of autoantibodies may herald its emergence, and antibodies to glutathione-S-transferase T1 have been predictive of the disease. Recurrent disease may reflect recruitment of residual memory T lymphocytes and host-specific genetic predispositions, whereas de novo disease may reflect an allo-antigenic immune response and molecular mimicries that override self-tolerance. Treatment should be appropriate for autoimmune hepatitis and not based on anti-rejection drugs. Corticosteroid therapy alone or combined with azathioprine is the essential treatment. The substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for azathioprine and switch of the calcineurin inhibitor or its replacement with rapamycin have also been used for refractory disease. Re-transplantation has been necessary in 8-23 %.

[Histological lesions in the graft in patients with long-term survival after transplantation. Are protocol biopsies necessary?]

The main lesions found in long-term liver grafts are recurrence of underlying liver disease and the development of de novo diseases or heterogeneous lesions of unknown etiology. In a not insignificant percentage of patients, the results of laboratory tests are normal and these lesions are only detected by liver biopsy. Diagnosis of these lesions is essential since they can affect patient and graft prognosis and may require changes in immunosuppressive therapy or the introduction of new drugs to treat specific diseases. Moreover, some patients with normally functioning liver grafts could benefit from minimization of immunosuppressive therapy. Currently, the performance of protocol biopsies cannot be recommended. However, given the high prevalence of these lesions, grafts should be closely monitored. Transient elastrography could play a role in the selection of patients who might benefit from a liver biopsy.

Transient elastography identifies liver recipients with nonviral graft disease after transplantation: a guide for liver biopsy

Transient elastography (TE) reliably predicts the severity of recurrent hepatitis C virus after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT); however, its accuracy in evaluating nonviral liver graft damage is unknown. Between 2006 and 2009, 69 OLT recipients [37 for hepatitis B virus/hepatitis D virus (recurrence-free), 20 for autoimmune/cholestatic liver disease, 6 for alcoholic liver disease, and 6 for mixed etiologies] underwent protocol/on-demand liver biopsy (LB) and concomitant TE. A histological diagnosis of graft disease was made according to criteria defined by the Banff working group. Sixty-five patients (94%) had reliable TE examinations during a median post-OLT follow-up of 18 months (range = 7-251 months). LB samples (median length = 35 mm) showed graft damage in 28 patients (43%): idiopathic chronic hepatitis (11), steatohepatitis (3), rejection (3), cholangitis (2), and autoimmune/cholestatic recurrence (9). Patients with graft damage had significantly higher serum liver enzyme levels and TE results (median = 7.8 kPa, range = 5.4-27.4 kPa) than the 37 patients without graft damage (median = 5.3 kPa, range = 3.1-7.4 kPa, P < 0.001). By a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, 2 TE cutoffs for the diagnosis of graft damage were identified: 5.3 kPa with 100% sensitivity and 7.4 kPa with 100% specificity. The pretest probability of graft damage was 43%; in patients with TE values ≤5.3 kPa, the posttest probability of graft damage fell to 0%, but in patients with TE results >7.4 kPa, the posttest probability increased to 100%. In conclusion, the dual TE cutoff allows accurate discrimination between the absence and presence of nonviral liver graft damage and improves the clinical management of OLT recipients in terms of the selection of patients most in need of LB.

Primary biliary cirrhosis and liver transplantation

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an immune-mediated chronic progressive inflammatory liver disease, predominantly affecting middle-aged women, characterized by the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs), which can lead to liver failure. Genetic contributions, environmental factors including chemical and infectious xenobiotics, autoimmunity and loss of tolerance have been aggressively investigated in the pathogenesis of PBC, however, the actual impact of these factors is still controversial. Survival of PBC patients has been largely improved with the widespread use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), however, one third of patients still do not respond to the treatment and proceed to liver cirrhosis, requiring liver transplantation as a last resort for cure. The outcome of liver transplantation is excellent with 5- and 10-year survival rates around 80% and 70%, respectively, while along with long survival, the recurrence of the disease has become an important outcome after liver transplantation. Prevalence rates of recurrent PBC rage widely between 1% and 35%, and seem to increase with longer follow-up. Center-specific issues, especially the use of protocol biopsy, affect the variety of incidence, yet, recurrence itself does not affect patient and graft survival at present, and retransplantation due to recurrent disease is extremely rare. With a longer follow-up, recurrent disease could have an impact on patient and graft survival.

Twenty-year protocol liver biopsies: Invasive but useful for the management of liver recipients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Most liver transplant centres have discontinued the practice of protocol liver biopsies (LB), mainly because of the perceived lack of therapeutic benefit. This study aimed to examine the usefulness of 20-year LBs.

METHODS

Ten, 15, and 20-year protocol LBs from 147 patients surviving for >20 years were reviewed. Twenty-year biopsy findings were correlated with clinical data.

RESULTS

Twenty-year-biopsy patients (N=91) and 20-year-non-biopsy patients (N=56) were similar in terms of transplant data, adverse events, and liver function tests (LFTs). Twenty-year LBs revealed a 90% prevalence of abnormalities, among which viral chronic hepatitis (VCH) was the most common (46%). Between 15 and 20 years, hepatic structural abnormalities were the only disorder to increase (p=0.008). An individual progression of abnormalities occurred in 56% of patients. At 20 years, the negative and positive predictive values (PV) of LFTs with respect to histological abnormalities were 95% and 18%, respectively; in VCH, Fibrotest and transient elastography displayed poor discriminative ability for fibrosis (80% and 81% discordance, respectively), but were satisfactory regarding significant fibrosis (negative PV of 77.7% and 80%, respectively). A decrease in immunosuppression was less frequent (14/91 vs. 20/56, p=0.008) while an increase was more common (15/91 vs. 2/56, p=0.017) in 20-year-biopsy patients than in non-biopsy patients. Antiviral therapy was administered in seven of the 20-year biopsy patients, but in none of the non-biopsy patients (p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-year LBs provided important histological information on graft function that was available to a limited degree from LFTs and non-invasive markers. They exerted an impact on immunosuppressive and antiviral therapies.

Digital transplantation pathology: combining whole slide imaging, multiplex staining and automated image analysis

Conventional histopathology is the gold standard for allograft monitoring, but its value proposition is increasingly questioned. "-Omics" analysis of tissues, peripheral blood and fluids and targeted serologic studies provide mechanistic insights into allograft injury not currently provided by conventional histology. Microscopic biopsy analysis, however, provides valuable and unique information: (a) spatial-temporal relationships; (b) rare events/cells; (c) complex structural context; and (d) integration into a "systems" model. Nevertheless, except for immunostaining, no transformative advancements have "modernized" routine microscopy in over 100 years. Pathologists now team with hardware and software engineers to exploit remarkable developments in digital imaging, nanoparticle multiplex staining, and computational image analysis software to bridge the traditional histology-global "-omic" analyses gap. Included are side-by-side comparisons, objective biopsy finding quantification, multiplexing, automated image analysis, and electronic data and resource sharing. Current utilization for teaching, quality assurance, conferencing, consultations, research and clinical trials is evolving toward implementation for low-volume, high-complexity clinical services like transplantation pathology. Cost, complexities of implementation, fluid/evolving standards, and unsettled medical/legal and regulatory issues remain as challenges. Regardless, challenges will be overcome and these technologies will enable transplant pathologists to increase information extraction from tissue specimens and contribute to cross-platform biomarker discovery for improved outcomes.

Recurrent and de novo autoimmune liver diseases

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) each account for approximately 5% of liver transplants per year performed in the United States and Europe. Even though outcomes are excellent, with reported 5-year patient and graft survival exceeding 90% and 80%, 80% and 75%, 72% and 65% for PBC, PSC, and AIH, respectively, the issue of recurrent autoimmune liver disease after orthotopic liver transplantation is increasingly recognized as a cause of graft dysfunction, death, and need for retransplantation. This article reviews diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes of recurrent PBC, PSC, and AIH after liver transplantation.

What is the long-term outcome of the liver allograft?

With improved long-term survival following liver transplantation (LT), issues relating to the assessment of the liver allograft in long-term survivors are becoming increasingly relevant. Histological abnormalities are commonly present in late post-transplant biopsies, including protocol biopsies from patients who appear to be well with good graft function. Recurrent disease is the commonest recognised cause of abnormal graft histology, but may be modified by the effects of immunosuppression or interactions with other graft complications, resulting in complex or atypical changes. Other abnormalities seen in late post-transplant biopsies include rejection (which often has different appearances to those seen in the post-transplant period), de novo disease, "idiopathic" post-transplant hepatitis (IPTH) and nodular regenerative hyperplasia. In many cases graft dysfunction has more than one cause and liver biopsy may help to identify the predominant cause of graft damage. Problems exist with the terminology used to describe less well understood patterns of graft injury, but there is emerging evidence to suggest that late rejection, de novo autoimmune hepatitis and IPTH may all be part of an overlapping spectrum of immune-mediated injury occurring in the late post-transplant liver allograft. Careful clinico-pathological correlation is very important and the wording of the biopsy report should take into account therapeutic implications, particularly whether changes in immunosuppression may be indicated. This article will provide an overview of the main histological changes occurring in long-term survivors post-LT, focusing on areas where the assessment of late post-transplant biopsies is most relevant clinically.

Liver transplantation in PBC and PSC: indications and disease recurrence

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) represent major indications for liver transplantation (LT). Despite the steady increase in the incidence and prevalence of PBC, the number of liver transplants for PBC has fallen in recent years, whereas the number of transplants for PSC has remained stable. Indications for LT for PBC and PSC are no different from those of other causes of chronic liver disease, apart from some disease-specific indications. PBC and PSC have more favourable outcomes after LT, compared to viral hepatitis and alcohol-associated liver disease. Numerous studies have clearly demonstrated that PBC and PSC recur after LT. The diagnosis of recurrent disease should be made on agreed criteria. The impact of recurrent disease on survival is unclear. Study of recurrent PBC and PSC may provide a better understanding of the mechanisms of these diseases in the native liver.

Current views on rejection pathology in liver transplantation

Histological assessments continue to play an important role in the diagnosis and management of liver allograft rejection. The changes occurring in acute and chronic rejection are well recognized and liver biopsy remains the 'gold standard' for diagnosing these two conditions. Recent interest has focused on the diagnosis of late cellular rejection, which may have different histological appearances to early acute rejection and instead has features that overlap with so-called 'de novo autoimmune hepatitis' and 'idiopathic post-transplant chronic hepatitis'. There is increasing evidence to suggest that 'central perivenulitis' may be an important manifestation of late rejection, although other causes of centrilobular necro-inflammation need to be considered in the differential diagnosis. There are also important areas of overlap between rejection and recurrent hepatitis C infection and the distinction between these two conditions continues to be a problem in the assessment of liver allograft biopsies. Studies using immunohistochemical staining for C4d as a marker for antibody-mediated damage have found evidence of C4d deposition in liver allograft rejection, but the functional significance of these observations is currently uncertain. This review will focus on these difficult and controversial areas in the pathology of rejection, documenting what is currently known and identifying areas where further clarification is required.

Adding value to liver (and allograft) biopsy evaluation using a combination of multiplex quantum dot immunostaining, high-resolution whole-slide digital imaging, and automated image analysis

Various technologies including nucleic acid, protein, and metabolic array analyses of blood, liver tissue, and bile are emerging as powerful tools in the study of hepatic pathophysiology. The entire lexicon of liver disease, however, has been written using classical hematoxylin-eosin staining and light microscopic examination. The authors' goal is to develop new tools to enhance histopathologic examination of liver tissue that would enrich the information gained from liver biopsy analysis, enable quantitative analysis, and bridge the gap between various "-omics" tools and interpretation of routine liver biopsy results. This article describes the progress achieved during the past 2 years in developing multiplex quantum dot (nanoparticle) staining and combining it with high-resolution whole-slide imaging using a slide scanner equipped with filters to capture 9 distinct fluorescent signals for multiple antigens. The authors first focused on precise characterization of leukocyte subsets, but soon realized that the data generated were beyond the practical limits that could be properly evaluated, analyzed, and interpreted visually by a pathologist. Therefore, the authors collaborated with the open source FARSIGHT image analysis project (http://www.farsight-toolkit.org). FARSIGHT's goal is to develop and disseminate the next-generation toolkit of automated image analysis methods to enable quantification of molecular biomarkers on a cell-by-cell basis from multiparameter images. The resulting data can be used for histocytometric studies of the complex and dynamic tissue microenvironments that are of biomedical interest. The authors envisage that these tools will eventually be incorporated into the routine practice of surgical pathology and precipitate a revolution in the specialty.

T cell-mediated biliary epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in liver allograft rejection

Loss of bile duct epithelium is characteristic of early chronic rejection following liver transplantation. Recent studies have suggested that intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells can transform into myofibroblasts. This study examines the induction and molecular regulation of this transition during allograft rejection. Immortalized human cholangiocytes were stimulated with either transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFbeta1) or a T cell line, and they were examined for morphological, proteomic, and functional features. Posttransplant liver biopsy sections were also examined. Treatment of cholangiocytes with TGFbeta1 or TGFbeta-presenting T cells induced a bipolar morphology, reduced expression of E-cadherin and zona occludens 1 (ZO-1), and increased vimentin, fibronectin, matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), MMP-9, and S100 calcium binding protein A4 (S100A4); treated cells invaded a model basement membrane. Chemokines induced T cell penetration of 3-dimensional, cultured bile duct-like structures and bile ducts in liver biopsy sections. A spatial association was observed between duct-infiltrating T cells and cholangiocyte expression of mesenchymal markers, including S100A4. Inhibition of S100A4 expression in vitro blocked TGFbeta1-mediated loss of E-cadherin and ZO-1 but did not reduce induction of fibronectin, MMP-2, or MMP-9. This study demonstrates the potential for T cells to induce an intrahepatic biliary epithelial-to-mesenchymal cell transition during chronic rejection. Furthermore, S100A4 expression by cholangiocytes was identified as a crucial regulator of this transition.

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis after liver transplantation

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an important clinical outcome after liver transplantation (LT) in selected patients. Prevalence rates for recurrent PBC (rPBC) reported by individual LT programs range between 9% and 35%. The diagnostic hallmark of rPBC is histologic identification of granulomatous changes. Clinical and biochemical features are frequently absent with rPBC and cannot be used alone for diagnostic purposes. Some of the risk factors of rPBC may include recipient factors such as age, gender, HLA status and immunosuppression, as well as donor factors such as age, gender and ischemic time, although controversy exists. Most patients have early stage disease at the time of diagnosis, and there may be a role for therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid. While short- and medium-term outcomes remain favorable, especially if compared to patients transplanted for other indications, continued follow-up may identify reduced long-term graft and patient survival.