Comparative Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Effect modification of dosing strategy (AUC or trough) on AKI associated with vancomycin in combination with piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime and meropenem

Piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), cefepime (FEP), or meropenem (MEM) and vancomycin (VAN) are commonly used in combination for sepsis. Studies have shown an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) with TZP and VAN compared to FEP or MEM. VAN guidelines recommend area under the curve (AUC) monitoring over trough (Tr) to minimize the risk of AKI. We investigated the association of AKI and MAKE-30 with the two VAN monitoring strategies when used in combination with TZP or FEP/MEM. Adult patients between 2015 and 2019 with VAN > 72 hours were included. Patients with AKI prior to or within 48 hours of VAN or baseline CrCl of ≤30 mL/min were excluded. Four cohorts were defined: FEP/MEM/Tr, FEP/MEM/AUC, TZP/Tr, and TZP/AUC. A Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used to model AKI as a function of the incidence rate of at-risk days, testing monitoring strategy as a treatment effect modification. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model MAKE-30. Overall incidence of AKI was 18.6%; FEP/MEM/Tr = 115 (14.6%), FEP/MEM/AUC = 52 (14.9%), TZP/Tr = 189 (26%), and TZP/AUC = 96 (17.1%) (P < 0.001). Both drug group [(TZP; P = 0.0085)] and monitoring strategy [(Tr; P = 0.0007)] were highly associated with the development of AKI; however, the effect was not modified with interaction term [(TZP*Tr); 0.085)]. The odds of developing MAKE-30 were not different between any group and FEP/MEM/AUC. The effect of VAN/TZP on the development of AKI was not modified by the VAN monitoring strategy (AUC vs trough). MAKE-30 outcomes were not different among the four cohorts.

Association between piperacillin/tazobactam use and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Piperacillin/tazobactam is one of the most common antibiotics prescribed in the ICU and the combination of piperacillin/tazobactam with vancomycin has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. However, data on the risk of AKI with piperacillin/tazobactam, despite vancomycin co-exposure, are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association of piperacillin/tazobactam with AKI and renal replacement therapy (RRT) among adult ICU patients.

METHODS

We analysed data from patients included in two open access databases (MIMIC-IV and eICU). Critically ill patients who received piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime (a cephalosporin with similar broad-spectrum activity to piperacillin/tazobactam) during their first ICU stay were eligible for the study. Marginal structural Cox models, accounting for time-fixed covariates and time-dependent covariates were performed. The primary outcomes were AKI and need of RRT.

RESULTS

A total of 20 107 patients were included, with 11 213 in the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 8894 in the cefepime group. Exposure to piperacillin/tazobactam was associated with AKI (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.51-2.07; P < 0.001) and with need of RRT (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.08-1.57; P = 0.005). Tests for interaction were not statistically significant for occurrence of AKI and RRT in the subgroup of patients exposed to vancomycin or not (P = 0.26 and P = 0.6, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients, exposure to piperacillin/tazobactam was associated with increased risk of AKI and with increased risk of RRT, regardless of combination therapy with vancomycin.

Understanding vancomycin nephrotoxicity augmented by β-lactams: a synthesis of endosymbiosis, proximal renal tubule mitochondrial metabolism, and β-lactam chemistry

The recent understanding that hydrophobic β-lactams have greater affinity for organic anion transporter-3 (OAT-3) of the proximal renal tubule could provide valuable insights for anticipating β-lactams that may exacerbate vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity. Vancomycin alone provides oxidative stress on the highly metabolic proximal tubular cells. Hydrophobic β-lactams (eg, piperacillin and anti-staphylococcal β-lactams) could have greater OAT-3 mediated uptake into proximal tubular cells than hydrophilic β-lactams (eg, most cephalosporins and carbapenems), thereby causing greater mitochondrial stress on these susceptible cells. It remains to be seen whether concomitant drugs that inhibit OAT-3 mediated cellular uptake of β-lactams into proximal tubular cells or provide antioxidant effects might mitigate β-lactam augmented vancomycin nephrotoxicity. Furthermore, the serum creatinine rise seen with vancomycin and hydrophobic β-lactams might represent competition for creatinine-secreting transporters (of which OAT-3 is one), thus, indicating creatinine retention rather than renal injury. In the meantime, clinicians are advised to utilise less nephrotoxic combinations in both empirical and directed antibiotic selection settings until further research is conducted.

Nut Cracked? Does the ACORN Trial End the Debate Surrounding Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam Combination Therapy and Increased Risk for Acute Kidney Injury?

Observational data published over the past decade have suggested that concomitant receipt of piperacillin-tazobactam with vancomycin significantly increases the risk for vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury. Importantly, however, there is significant controversy surrounding this association, and debate continues about the veracity of the risk. Given this ongoing debate, the recently published "Cefepime vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults Hospitalized With Acute Infection: The ACORN Randomized Clinical Trial" is of tremendous interest to the infectious diseases community. In ACORN, the authors conclude that there was no association between receipt of cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam and the primary outcome of acute kidney injury or death by day 14, despite the fact that >75% of the population received concomitant vancomycin. In this perspective, we provide a brief history on the controversy, provide a critical analysis of the ACORN findings, and ultimately discuss how these data help inform the ongoing debate.

Acute kidney injury associated with piperacillin-tazobactam versus other antibiotics combined with vancomycin in critically ill patients: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Evidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) induced by piperacillin-tazobactam (Piptazo) versus other broad-spectrum antibiotics (BSA) combined with vancomycin has been established in the literature. However, there is limited evidence regarding these combinations among critically ill patients. This study assessed the risk of nephrotoxicity of Piptazo versus other BSA as an add-on to vancomycin among patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

We have reviewed patients' charts retrospectively to investigate AKI incidence among ICU patients receiving Piptazo versus other BSA as an add-on to vancomycin. Furthermore, we have assessed the duration of AKI and ICU stay, as well as the association between patients' criteria and risk of AKI using logistic regression analyses.

Results

A total of 79 patients were included, 50 patients received the Piptazo combination while 29 patients received other BSA combinations. Almost 52 % of the patients in the Piptazo group developed AKI while only 37.9 % of those in the BSA group did, yet the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.22). On the other hand, the risk of AKI was highly associated with vancomycin trough concentration above 20 mcg/mL, nephrotoxic medications, and African descent (OR 7.1, 95 %CI 1.96-25.84, OR 3.94, 95 %CI 1.27-12.2, OR 3.53, 95 %CI 1.1-11.27, respectively).

Conclusion

Although the difference in AKI risk was not statistically significant between Piptazo versus BSA groups, the elevated trough concentration of vancomycin and the concomitant use of nephrotoxic medications, were found to increase the risk of AKI, independently of the combined antibiotics used.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam Versus Anti-Pseudomonal Cephalosporins and Renal and Neurologic Outcomes in Critically Ill Adults: A Secondary Analysis of the SMART Trial

Background: Prior studies suggest associations between receipt of piperacillin-tazobactam and development of acute kidney injury and receipt of anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins and neurotoxicity. We compared clinically-relevant renal and neurologic outcomes in critically ill patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam versus anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Isotonic Solutions and Major Adverse Renal Events Trial examining patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam or an anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin within 24 h of intensive care unit admission. We performed multivariable analysis using a proportional odds model to examine the association between the first antibiotic received and the outcomes of Major Adverse Kidney Events within 30 days (MAKE30) and days alive and free of delirium and coma to day 28. Results: 3199 were included in the study; 2375 (74%) receiving piperacillin-tazobactam and 824 (26%) receiving anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin. After adjustment for prespecified confounders, initial receipt of piperacillin-tazobactam, compared to anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins, was not associated with higher incidence of MAKE30 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.83-1.27; P = .80) but was associated with a greater number of days alive and free of delirium and coma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00-1.38; P = .04). In a sensitivity analysis adjusting for baseline receipt of medications which may impact neuro function, this finding was not significant. Conclusion: Among critically ill adults, receipt of piperacillin-tazobactam was not associated with an increased incidence of death, renal replacement therapy, or persistent renal dysfunction or a greater number of days alive and free of delirium and coma. Randomized trials are needed to inform the choice of antibiotics for empiric treatment infection in critically ill adults.

A Large-Scale Multicenter Retrospective Study on Nephrotoxicity Associated With Empiric Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding acute kidney injury associated with concomitant administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is conflicting, particularly in patients in the ICU.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a difference exist in the association between commonly prescribed empiric antibiotics on ICU admission (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin and cefepime, and vancomycin and meropenem) and acute kidney injury?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the eICU Research Institute, which contains records for ICU stays between 2010 and 2015 across 335 hospitals. Patients were enrolled if they received vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin and cefepime, or vancomycin and meropenem exclusively. Patients initially admitted to the ED were included. Patients with hospital stay duration of < 1 h, receiving dialysis, or with missing data were excluded. Acute kidney injury was defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 2 or 3 based on serum creatinine component. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in the control (vancomycin and meropenem or vancomycin and cefepime) and treatment (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam) groups, and ORs were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to study the effect of longer courses of combination therapy and patients with renal insufficiency on admission.

RESULTS

Thirty-five thousand six hundred fifty-four patients met inclusion criteria (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, n = 27,459; vancomycin and cefepime, n = 6,371; vancomycin and meropenem, n = 1,824). Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury and initiation of dialysis when compared with that of both vancomycin and cefepime (Acute kidney injury: OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.25-1.49]; dialysis: OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.14-1.45]) and vancomycin and meropenem (Acute kidney injury: OR, 1.27 [95%, 1.06-1.52]; dialysis: OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.23-2.00]). The odds of acute kidney injury developing was especially pronounced in patients without renal insufficiency receiving a longer duration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam therapy compared with vancomycin and meropenem therapy.

INTERPRETATION

VPT is associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury than both vancomycin and cefepime and vancomycin and meropenem in patients in the ICU, especially for patients with normal initial kidney function requiring longer durations of therapy. Clinicians should consider vancomycin and meropenem or vancomycin and cefepime to reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity for patients in the ICU.

Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practices of acute kidney injury incidence with co-administration of piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin among healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study

Background

No studies have identified a link between acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence due to the co-administration of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam (VPT) and healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices. We aimed to (1) assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards AKI due to VPT co-administration among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia, and (2) examine the relationship between healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes about AKI due to VPT co-administration and their practices.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted between February 2022 and April 2022. Healthcare providers, including physicians, pharmacists, and nurses, were included in the study population. The correlation coefficient assessed the relationship between knowledge, attitude, and practice. Spearman's rho was used as a test statistic.

Results

Of the invited healthcare providers, 192 responded to the survey. A significant difference in knowledge was found among healthcare providers for two variables: the definition of AKI (p < 0.001) and appropriate management of AKI due to VPT (p = 0.002). Physicians were found to rely less on the most common causative organisms of infection to guide empirical antibiotic therapy (p < 0.001). In addition, physicians were less likely to switch piperacillin/tazobactam to cefepime or meropenem in combination with vancomycin with AKI incidence (p = 0.001). A positive attitude towards the perceived AKI risk with VPT was positively correlated with avoiding using VPT unless no alternatives were available (Rho = 0.336) and taking protective measures when using VPT (Rho = 0.461).

Conclusion

Deviation has been observed in the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of AKI incidence with the co-administration of piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin among healthcare workers. Interventions at the organizational level are recommended to guide best practices.

Comparative renal risk of long-term use of beta-lactams in combination with vancomycin across the continuum of care

Background

Data are controversial regarding nephrotoxicity risk with vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) compared to vancomycin alone or in combination with other beta-lactams (BLs) in acute care use. Furthermore, data are lacking on the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) with long-term use of VPT including outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT).

Methods

This retrospective study included 826 adult patients on an intravenous vancomycin plus BL for ⩾2 weeks, including cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ertapenem, or meropenem, from August 2017 to January 2022. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were conducted to adjust for confounding variables. A secondary analysis based on the propensity score (PS)-matched cohort was performed.

Results

AKI occurred in 14.4% of patients in the VPT group (n = 15/104) compared to 5.5% in the other BL group (n = 40/722) (p < 0.001). Average time to AKI from start of combination therapy was 9.4 (1.7-12.0) days in the VPT group and 10.9 (5-22.7) days in the other BL group (p = 0.20). The median duration of vancomycin and BL in the overall cohort was approximately 1 month. Beyond BL selection, patient characteristics were not associated with AKI other than the receipt of concomitant acyclovir [hazard ratio (HR) 2.48 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-4.65), p = 0.004]. In the PS-matched cohort, AKI occurred in 14.4% of patients in the VPT group (n = 15/104) and 5.3% in the other BL group (n = 11/208) (p = 0.006). Receipt of VPT [HR: 2.55 (1.36-4.78), p = 0.004] and acyclovir [HR: 2.38 (1.19-4.74), p = 0.014) remained significantly associated with AKI in the multivariable model.

Conclusion

Clinicians should exercise caution when using VPT for >2 weeks, including in the OPAT setting, even when no renal dysfunction is observed during the initial week of combination therapy.

Factors associated with occurrence and severity of acute kidney injury in patients with Sepsis - A retrospective database study

PURPOSE

Sepsis remains the most common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) and is associated with a high mortality. This study aims to identify laboratory, clinical and demographic factors that are associated with the different stages of AKI in sepsis.

METHODS

We studied patients >18 years who met Sepsis-3 criteria between July 10, 2009 and September 7, 2019 using ordinal logistic regression to determine the factors associated with different stages of AKI. Sensitivity analyses for development of any stage vs no AKI and, separately, the factors associated with receipt of kidney replacement therapy were also done.

RESULTS

Of 31,228 patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria, 4684 (15%) developed AKI. Of the AKI patients, 53% were KDIGO stage 1, 9% stage 2, and 37% stage 3, with 27% of AKI patients receiving kidney replacement therapy (Stage 3b). Several comorbidities, mechanical ventilation, and pre-sepsis creatinine levels were associated with AKI occurrence and severity. Positive blood culture was associated with a higher risk (OR 1.10 [1.06, 1.15], p < 0.001), while positive respiratory, urine, and wound cultures were associated with lower risks of developing AKI and with lower severity.

CONCLUSION

Presepsis creatinine levels, mechanical ventilation, comorbidities, and positive blood cultures were associated with AKI.

Acute Kidney Injury in a Cohort of Critical Illness Patients Exposed to Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

To determine whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) exposure prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission affects the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) with renal replacement therapy (RRT). An administrative database is used to establish a cohort of patients who were admitted to the ICU. The exposure to NSAIDs that the patients had before admission to the ICU is determined. Demographic variables, comorbidities, AKI diagnoses requiring RRT, and pneumonia during the ICU stay are also measured. Multivariate logistic regression and inverse probability weighting (IPW) are used to calculate risks of exposure to NSAIDs for patients with AKI requiring RRT. In total, 96,235 patients were admitted to the ICU, of which 16,068 (16.7%) were exposed to NSAIDs. The incidence of AKI with RRT was 2.71% for being exposed to NSAIDs versus 2.24% for those not exposed (p < 0.001). For the outcome of AKI, the odds ratio weighted with IPW was 1.28 (95% CI: 1.15−1.43), and for the outcome of pneumonia as a negative control, the odds ratio was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.98−1.17). The impact of prior exposure to NSAIDs over critically ill patients in the development of AKI is calculated as 8 patients per 1000 exposures. The negative control with the same sources of bias did not show an association with NSAID exposure.

Piperacillin–Tazobactam Plus Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Adults: Can Teicoplanin or Other Antipseudomonal Beta-Lactams Be Remedies?

Numerous observational studies and meta-analyses have suggested that combination therapy consisting of piperacillin–tazobactam (TZP) and vancomycin (VAN) augments acute kidney injury (AKI) risk when compared to viable alternatives, such as cefepime–vancomycin (FEP–VAN) and meropenem–VAN. However, the exact pathophysiological mechanisms of this phenomenon are still unclear. One major limitation of the existing studies is the utilization of serum creatinine to quantify AKI since serum creatinine is not a sufficiently sensitive and specific biomarker to truly define the causal relationship between TZP–VAN exposure and nephrotoxicity. Even so, some preventive measures can be taken to reduce the risk of AKI when TZP–VAN is preferred. These measures include limiting the administration of TZP–VAN to 72 h, choosing FEP–VAN in place of TZP–VAN in appropriate cases, monitoring the VAN area under the curve level rather than the VAN trough level, avoiding exposure to other nephrotoxic agents, and minimizing the prescription of TZP–VAN for patients with a high risk of AKI. More data are needed to comment on the beneficial impact of the extended-infusion regimen of TZP on nephrotoxicity. Additionally, TZP and teicoplanin can be reasonable alternatives to TZP–VAN for the purpose of lowering AKI risk. However, the data are scarce to advocate this practice convincingly.

Extended infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam versus intermittent infusion in critically ill egyptian patients: a cost-effectiveness study

Extended infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam over 4 h has been proposed as an alternate mode of administration to the 30-min intermittent infusion to optimize treatment effects in patients with gram-negative bacterial infections. The study aimed to evaluate the extended infusion regimen of piperacillin/tazobactam in standings of efficacy, safety, and cost to the intermittent one in the treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections. A prospective randomized comparative study was performed on 53 patients, 27 in the intermittent infusion group and 26 in the extended infusion group. The primary outcome was the mean number of days to clinical success and the percentage of patients who were clinically cured after treatment. The secondary outcomes included mortality, readmission within 30-days, and cost-effectiveness analysis based on the mean number of days to clinical success. The clinical success rate was comparable in the two groups. Days on extended infusion were significantly lower than intermittent infusion (5.7 vs 8.9 days, respectively, p = 0.0001) as well as days to clinical success (4.6 vs 8.5 days, respectively, p = 0.026). The extended infusion was superior to the intermittent infusion regarding cost-effectiveness ratio ($1835.41 and $1914.09/expected success, respectively). The more cost-effective regimen was the extended infusion. Both regimens had comparable clinical and microbiological outcomes.

Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Treated with Vancomycin and Zosyn or an Alternative: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Zosyn^® (piperacillin-tazobactam; Pfizer Medical, New York, NY), a valuable antibiotic against gram-negative bacteria, combined with vancomycin (Z+V) is known for its high incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU), leading to the frequent use of alternatives for gram-negative coverage (Alt+V). Because there are limited data describing AKI on these alternative antibiotic agents, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine if these regimens were indeed associated with decreased rates of AKI. Patients and Methods: A literature review was performed electronically from its inception to November 1, 2018, screening for relevant literature by title, abstract and full text according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines within the following databases: PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were included if they contained adults who had been admitted to the ICU for treatment and had received a combination of intravenous Z + V or Alt+V as well as had AKI measured during administration of these antibiotic agents. Studies were excluded if they represented pediatric populations, did not receive care in an ICU during their hospital admission, only received monotherapy for antibiotic treatment or received antibiotic treatment for less than 48 hours. Independent extraction was performed by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) methodology for retrospective studies. Random-effects models were used to calculate any differences between rates of AKI after Z + V or Alt + V. Results: Fourteen articles (totaling 30,399 patients) were included. All studies available were retrospective in design. Compared with Alt + V, Z + V was associated with a higher risk ratio of AKI (1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-2.19; p < 0.001). Cefepime (C + V) was the most common alternative to Zosyn, and Z + V was associated with higher rates of kidney injury compared with C + V (1.70; 95% CI, 1.36-2.12; p < 0.00001). However, there was substantial heterogeneity in the data collected as well as high risk of bias. Conclusions: Zosyn plus vancomycin is associated with more risk of AKI compared with Alt+V coverage in ICU adult populations. However, the conclusions were limited by the retrospective nature of the studies, high bias of included articles, and heterogeneity of the included studies.

Survival and recovery modeling of acute kidney injury in critically ill adults

Objectives:

Acute kidney injury is common among the critically ill. However, the incidence, medication use, and outcomes of acute kidney injury have been variably described. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study to examine the risk factors and correlates associated with acute kidney injury in critically ill adults with a particular focus on medication class usage.

Methods:

We reviewed the electronic medical records of all adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit between 1 February and 30 August 2020. Acute kidney injury was defined by the 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines. Data included were demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, laboratory parameters, interventions, and outcomes. The primary outcome was acute kidney injury incidence. A Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression model was used to determine risk factors associated with acute kidney injury. Secondary outcomes including acute kidney injury recovery and intensive care unit mortality were analyzed using a Cox regression model.

Results:

Among 226 admitted patients, 108 (47.8%) experienced acute kidney injury. 37 (34.3%), 39 (36.1%), and 32 patients (29.6%) were classified as acute kidney injury stages I–III, respectively. Among the recovery and mortality cohorts, analgesics/sedatives, anti-infectives, and intravenous fluids were significant (p-value < 0.05). The medication classes IV-fluid electrolytes nutrition (96.7%), gastrointestinal (90.2%), and anti-infectives (81.5%) were associated with an increased odds of developing acute kidney injury, odd ratios: 1.27, 1.71, and 1.70, respectively. Cox regression analyses revealed a significantly increased time-varying mortality risk for acute kidney injury-stage III, hazard ratio: 4.72 (95% confidence interval: 1–22.33). In the recovery cohort, time to acute kidney injury recovery was significantly faster in stage I, hazard ratio: 9.14 (95% confidence interval: 2.14–39.06) cohort when compared to the stage III cohort.

Conclusion:

Evaluation of vital signs, laboratory, and medication use data may be useful to determine acute kidney injury risk stratification. The influence of particular medication classes further impacts the risk of developing acute kidney injury, necessitating the importance of examining pharmacotherapeutic regimens for early recognition of renal impairment and prevention.

Comparative Risk of Acute Kidney Injury Following Concurrent Administration of Vancomycin with Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Meropenem: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

The study aims to comparatively assess the nephrotoxicity of vancomycin when combined with piperacillin-tazobactam (V + PT) or meropenem (V + M) in adult patients hospitalized in general wards or intensive care units. We searched MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for observational studies evaluating incidences of AKI in adult patients receiving V + PT or V + M for at least 48 h in general wards or intensive care units. The primary outcome was AKI events, while the secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), and mortality events. The odds ratio (OR), or mean difference for the hospital length of stay, with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) from the inverse variance weighting random-effects model were estimated for the risk of AKI, RRT, and mortality. Of the 112 studies identified, twelve observational studies were included in this meta-analysis with a total of 14,511 patients. The odds of having AKI were significantly higher in patients receiving V + PT compared with V + M (OR = 2.31; 95%CI 1.69–3.15). There were no differences between V + PT and V + M in the hospital length of stay, RRT, or mortality outcomes. Thus, clinicians should be vigilant while using V + PT, especially in patients who are at high risk of AKI.

The association of high Vancomycin trough concentration with acute kidney injury during combination therapy of Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Vancomycin

Background

Co-administration of Piperacillin/Tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) and Vancomycin (VCM) as an antibiotic therapy for severe infectious diseases increases the risk of nephrotoxicity. We retrospectively investigated the utility of monitoring VCM trough concentration in early stage of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) on this combination therapy.

Methods

We enrolled all infectious disease patients who were managed with concurrent PIPC/TAZ and VCM. The record of dosage and the administration interval of each antibiotic and its clinical parameters, as well as the VCM trough concentrations, blood culture for bacteria, and serum creatinine values, were collected. VCM trough concentration was measured during the initial 48–72 h of VCM administration. Nephrotoxicity was evaluated as the degree of AKI.

Results

A total of 47 patients fulfilling the criteria were registered, and AKI developed in 10 patients. There was no statistical difference between the AKI and non-AKI groups with regard to age, height, weight, basal creatinine level, body surface area, body mass index, PIPC/TAZ dose, VCM dose, gender, artificial management, and death within around 30 days. The VCM trough level was increased significantly in the AKI group (mean [standard deviation {SD}]: 25.9 [7.8] μg/mL) compared to that in the non-AKI group (mean [SD]: 15.7 [6.9] μg/mL) (p = 0.003). During the clinical course, renal function returned to normal levels in three out of four AKI stage 2 patients, whereas only partial recovery was achieved in all AKI stage 3 patients.

Conclusions

A high VCM trough concentration may have an influence on the occurrence of AKI during combination therapy of PIPC/TAZ and VCM. Careful monitoring of VCM trough concentration will be required to prevent AKI progression.

Overview of Renal Replacement Therapy Use in a General Intensive Care Unit

Objectives. Population-based studies regarding renal replacement therapy (RRT) used in critical care populations are useful to understand the trend and impact of medical care interventions. We describe the use of RRT and associated outcomes (mortality and length of intensive care stay) in a level 1 hospital. Design. A retrospective descriptive observational study. Patients. Critically ill patients admitted to the ICU from 1 January to 31 December 2018. Interventions. Age, gender, ward of admission, primary organ dysfunction at admission, length of hospital stay (LOS), mechanical ventilation, APACHE, SOFA and ISS scores, the use of vasopressors, transfusion, RRT and the number of RRT sessions were extracted. Results. 1703 critically ill patients were divided into two groups: the RRT-group (238 patients) and the non-RRT group (1465 patients). The mean age was 63.58 ± 17.52 (SD) in the final ICU studied patients (64.72 ± 16.64 SD in the RRT-group), 60.5% being male. Patients admitted from general surgery ward needing RRT were 41.4%. The specific scores, the use of vasopressors, transfusions and mortality were higher in the RRT-group. The ICU LOS was superior in the RRT-group, regardless of the primary organ dysfunction. Conclusions. RRT was practiced in 13.9% of patients (especially after age of 61), with mortality being the outcome for 66.8% of the RRT-group patients. All analyzed data were higher in the RRT group, especially for multiple trauma and surgical patients, or patients presenting cardiac or renal dysfunctions at admission. We found significant increased ISS scores in the RRT-group, a significant association between the need of vasopressors or transfusion requirement and RRT use, and an association in the number of RRT sessions and LOS (p < 0.001).

A retrospective cohort study assessing acute kidney injury and renal recovery among septic patients empirically treated with vancomycin piperacillin-tazobactam versus vancomycin cefepime

Vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) is a commonly used antimicrobial regimen for septic patients. VPT is more nephrotoxic than other regimens such as vancomycin plus cefepime (VC) when given over several days. This risk of nephrotoxicity is less clear when VPT is given for initial empiric therapy in sepsis and de-escalated quickly based on evolving clinical information. The objective of this study was to assess nephrotoxicity among septic patients empirically treated with either VPT or VC at initial clinical presentation. We conducted a retrospective study of septic patients who received VPT or VC within 12 h of presentation to the emergency department. The primary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal recovery 72 h after presentation. For the total of 418 patients, 306 received VPT and 112 received VC. Rates of AKI at 72 h were 15.2% for VPT patients and 11.0% for VC patients [p = 0.44]. Among patients with AKI at presentation, 16.3% of VPT patients had AKI at 72 h compared to 8.9% of VC patients [p = 0.19]. Among those without AKI at presentation, 14.2% VPT patients and 16.7% VC patients had AKI at 72 h [p = 0.71]. Renal recovery rates for patients with AKI at presentation were 42.3% for VPT patients versus 40.3% for VC patients [p = 0.78]. In-hospital renal replacement therapy occurred in 6.2% VPT patients and 0.9% VC patients [p = 0.024]. Therefore, initial empiric therapy with VPT in sepsis may not confer increased risk of AKI when de-escalated appropriately.

A Comparison Between Cefepime and Piperacillin-Tazobactam in the Management of Septic Shock

Introduction Septic shock is defined as a dysregulated host response to infection characterized by hemodynamic instability. Concern for the increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) with piperacillin-tazobactam in combination with vancomycin may prompt more use of alternative broad-spectrum antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics, such as cefepime. This study assessed whether cefepime was associated with improved outcomes compared to piperacillin-tazobactam in patients with septic shock. Methods This retrospective cohort study included veterans treated for septic shock between September 1, 2008, and August 31, 2018. This study compared cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam as initial antibiotic management for septic shock. Outcomes included AKI, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), hospital length of stay, intensive care unit mortality, and mortality within 30 days of hospitalization. Results In total, 240 patients were included in this study (120 in each cohort). The proportion of AKI was 60.0% in the piperacillin-tazobactam cohort compared to 58.3% in the cefepime cohort (p = 0.90). Mortality was significantly higher in the cefepime cohort. There were no significant differences in CDI or hospital length of stay. Conclusion The results of this study do not suggest that the use of the antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotic used in the initial management of septic shock is associated with differences in the AKI or CDI. The higher mortality observed with cefepime may warrant further investigation.

Vancomycin with concomitant piperacillin/tazobactam vs. cefepime or meropenem associated acute kidney injury in the critically ill: A multicenter propensity score-matched study

PURPOSE

The risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the AKI incidence associated with concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam compared to either cefepime or meropenem with vancomycin in the ICU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted in adult ICU patients administered vancomycin in combination with either piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, or meropenem were included. Patients developing AKI ≤48 h following combination therapy initiation were excluded. The primary endpoint was to compare the incidence of AKI associated with concomitant antimicrobial therapy. Multivariable Cox regression modeling in predicting AKI was also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 1044 patients were matched. The AKI incidence in vancomycin- piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin-cefepime/meropenem groups were 21.9% and 16.8%, respectively (p = 0.068). Multivariable prediction models showed concomitant vancomycin-piperacillin/tazobactam was an independent risk factor of AKI using serum creatinine only (HR 1.52, 1.10-2.10, p = 0.011) and serum creatinine with urine output-based KDIGO criteria (HR 1.77, 1.18-2.67, p = 0.006). No significant differences between groups were observed for AKI recovery patterns or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam administration in adult ICU patients was independently associated with an increased risk of AKI.

Impact of ascorbic acid in reducing the incidence of vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients: A preliminary randomized controlled trial

Background Antioxidants show nephroprotective effect against vancomycin associated nephrotoxicity (VAN) in animals. This study aimed to assess the ascorbic acid nephro-protective role against VAN clinically.

Methods Forty-one critically ill patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: intervention group (vancomycin IV plus ascorbic acid, n=21) or control group (vancomycin IV only, n=20). Primary outcomes were the incidence of VAN and the absolute change in creatinine parameters, while mortality rate was the secondary outcome. Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (S.cr) by at least 0.5 mg/dL or 50% of baseline for at least two successive measurements. This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03921099), April 2019.

Results Mean absolute S.cr increase was significant when compared between both groups, P-value = 0.036, where S.cr increased by 0.05(0.12) and 0.34(0.55) mg/dL in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Mean absolute Cr.cl decline was significant when compared between both groups, P-value = 0.04, where Cr.cl was decreased by 5.9(17.8) and 22.3(30.4) ml/min in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Incidence of VAN was 1/21(4.7%) versus 5/20(25%) in the intervention and control groups, respectively (RR: 0.19; CI: 0.024–1.49; P-value = 0.093). Mortality was higher in the control group; however, it was not statistically significant, P-value = 0.141.

Conclusion Co-administration of ascorbic acid with vancomycin preserved renal function and reduced the absolute risk of VAN by 20.3%, however, the reduction in VAN incidence didn’t reach statistical significance level. Further large multicenter prospective trials are recommended.

Comparative Prevalence of Acute Kidney Injury in Chinese Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concurrent β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam (VAN + PTZ) provides a broad spectrum of activity against multiple pathogens. However, a major issue in previous research concerned significant nephrotoxicity associated with this drug combination, and most studies have been conducted in American and European countries, with no similar data available from China. Therefore, this study evaluated the nephrotoxic effects of VAN + PTZ in a large-scale Chinese cohort to determine the prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in this population by comparing PTZ and vancomycin monotherapies and the combined use of vancomycin and β-lactam antibiotics.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified adult patients who received vancomycin either as monotherapy or in combination with PTZ or carbapenem (VAN + CAR) for at least 48 hours at Jiangsu Province Hospital from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Patients were also evaluated for the development of AKI, defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome criteria. Duration of vancomycin exposure, steady-state trough vancomycin concentrations, and other risk factors for AKI were assessed. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to validate our results and comparatively evaluate the nephrotoxicity of β-lactam antibiotics in combination with vancomycin.

FINDINGS

In all, 752 patients were included in the present study. The prevalence of AKI was higher in the VAN + PTZ group than in the VAN and VAN + CAR groups (15.2% vs 4.0% and 6.0%, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, VAN + PTZ was still related to AKI (odds ratio [OR] = 4.37; 95% CI, 1.65-11.59; P = 0.003). The network meta-analysis indicated that VAN + PTZ was associated with a significantly higher risk for AKI than was VAN (OR = 3.23; 95% CI, 2.50-4.35), PTZ (OR = 2.86; 95% CI, 1.92-4.12), VAN + cefepime (FEP) (OR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.80-3.19), or VAN + CAR (OR = 2.28; 95% CI, 1.64-3.21). However, there was no significant difference with respect to AKI prevalence among the VAN, PTZ, VAN + FEP, and VAN + CAR groups.

IMPLICATIONS

The prevalence of AKI was higher with VAN + PTZ therapy than with VAN or PTZ monotherapy or with the concurrent use of VAN and FEP or CAR in our study. Clinicians should adequately assess renal function and consider this differential risk for nephrotoxicity when choosing empiric antibiotics in hospitalized patients to minimize the rates of AKI.

Lowered Risk of Nephrotoxicity through Intervention against the Combined Use of Vancomycin and Tazobactam/Piperacillin: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The combined use of vancomycin (VCM) and tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) is a major risk factor for nephrotoxicity. We sought to evaluate interventions against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC. This retrospective cohort study involved patients who considered the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC as a treatment. Patients that had either or both antimicrobials replaced were assigned to the intervention group, whereas those who were continued on combination therapy were assigned to the comparison group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). The survival rate of patients on day 30 was evaluated as the secondary endpoint. The comparison and intervention groups were composed of 65 and 68 patients, respectively, and the incidence rates of AKI were 44.6% and 17.6%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified the intervention as the only independent factor against AKI development, with a hazard ratio of 0.282 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.141 to 0.565). For the incidence of AKI of grade greater than 1, the hazard ratio was 0.114 (95% CI, 0.025 to 0.497). The survival rates on day 30 in the comparison and intervention groups were 92.3% and 91.2%, respectively, with a relative risk of 0.988 (95% CI, 0.892 to 1.094). The trough VCM concentration was not associated with the incidence of AKI in patients receiving the combination therapy. This study demonstrated that intervention against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC can lower the risk of nephrotoxicity. IMPORTANCE The combined use of vancomycin (VCM) and tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) is a major risk factor for nephrotoxicity. We retrospectively evaluated interventions against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC. Patients for whom either or both antimicrobials were replaced were assigned to the intervention group (65 patients), whereas those who were continued on combination therapy were assigned to the comparison group (68 patients). The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). The incidence rates of AKI in the intervention and comparison groups were 44.6% and 17.6%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified intervention as the only independent factor against AKI development, with a hazard ratio of 0.282 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.141 to 0.565). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that intervention against the combined use of VCM and TAZ/PIPC can lower the risk of nephrotoxicity.

Tolerance and microbiological efficacy of cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with vancomycin as empirical antimicrobial therapy of prosthetic joint infection: a propensity-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The use of piperacillin/tazobactam with vancomycin as empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), leading us to propose cefepime as an alternative since 2017 in our reference centre.

OBJECTIVES

To compare microbiological efficacy and tolerance of these two EAT strategies.

METHODS

All adult patients with PJI empirically treated with vancomycin+cefepime (n = 89) were enrolled in a prospective observational study and matched with vancomycin+piperacillin/tazobactam-treated historical controls (n = 89) according to a propensity score including age, baseline renal function and concomitant use of other nephrotoxic agents. The two groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, and non-parametric tests regarding the proportion of efficacious empirical regimen and the incidence of empirical therapy-related adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

Among 146 (82.0%) documented infections, the EAT was considered efficacious in 77 (98.7%) and 65 (98.5%) of the piperacillin/tazobactam- and cefepime-treated patients, respectively (P = 1.000). The rate of AE, particularly AKI, was significantly higher in the vancomycin+piperacillin/tazobactam group [n = 27 (30.3%) for all AE and 23 (25.8%) for AKI] compared with the vancomycin+cefepime [n = 13 (14.6%) and 6 (6.7%)] group (P = 0.019 and <0.001, respectively), leading to premature EAT discontinuation in 20 (22.5%) and 5 (5.6%) patients (P = 0.002). The two groups were not significantly different regarding their comorbidities, and AKI incidence was not related to vancomycin plasma overexposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the susceptibility profile of bacterial isolates from included patients, microbiological efficacy of both strategies was expected to be similar, but vancomycin + cefepime was associated with a significantly lower incidence of AKI.

Attributable nephrotoxicity of vancomycin in critically ill patients: a marginal structural model study

BACKGROUND

Although vancomycin nephrotoxicity is recognizable, critically ill patients have other potential reasons for acute kidney injury (AKI) and determining its attributable nephrotoxic risk in this population can be cumbersome.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the risk of AKI attributable to vancomycin, controlling for baseline and time-dependent confounders.

METHODS

Time-fixed and daily time-varying variables were extracted from a large public database. The exposures analysed were: (i) IV vancomycin; (ii) serum trough level greater than 15 and 20 mg/L; and (iii) concomitant exposure to vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam or other antipseudomonal β-lactams. Censoring and exposure inverse probability of treatment weighting were calculated. Marginal structural models were plotted to evaluate AKI, severe AKI (stage 2/3) and need of renal replacement therapy (RRT).

RESULTS

A total of 26 865 patients were included; 19.7% received vancomycin during ICU stay. After adjusting for fixed and time-variable confounders, vancomycin exposure was associated with AKI (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.09-1.38), but not with severe AKI or need of RRT (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.91-1.23 and HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.74-1.29, respectively). A serum trough level greater than 20 mg/L was associated with AKI (HR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.52-2.30) and severe AKI (HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.31-2.19), but showed no statistically significant association with need of RRT (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.92-2.56). The vancomycin + piperacillin/tazobactam combination was not associated with a greater risk than vancomycin alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The attributable nephrotoxicity of vancomycin in critically ill patients is significantly lower than previously suggested and severe AKI is related to vancomycin only when trough serum levels are greater than 20 mg/L.

Shiga Toxin-Associated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: Specificities of Adult Patients and Implications for Critical Care Management

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS) is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy secondary to an infection by an enterohemorrhagic E. coli. Historically considered a pediatric disease, its presentation has been described as typical, with bloody diarrhea at the forefront. However, in adults, the clinical presentation is more diverse and makes the early diagnosis hazardous. In this review, we review the epidemiology, most important outbreaks, physiopathology, clinical presentation and prognosis of STEC-HUS, focusing on the differential features between pediatric and adult disease. We show that the clinical presentation of STEC-HUS in adults is far from typical and marked by the prevalence of neurological symptoms and a poorer prognosis. Of note, we highlight knowledge gaps and the need for studies dedicated to adult patients. The differences between pediatric and adult patients have implications for the treatment of this disease, which remains a public health threat and lack a specific treatment.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated acute kidney injury: does short-term NSAID use pose a risk in hospitalized patients?

PURPOSE

While renal risk associated with short-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) has been anecdotally documented, no conclusive evidence is available on the renal safety, especially among hospitalized patients with reduced renal function. This study is to evaluate the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with NSAID use in hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective matched cohort study utilizing electronic health records from two large academic tertiary-care hospitals was conducted. We defined AKI based on changes in SCr according to published AKI criteria. The hospital acquired AKI risk associated with inpatient NSAID use was assessed using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazard regression in pooled cohort as well as two sub cohorts stratified by baseline renal function.

RESULTS

A total of 18,794 admissions were included in the final cohort. Of 9397 admissions exposed to NSAIDs, 7914 and 1483 admissions were in the "without" and "with baseline renal impairment" cohort, with the same number of matching non-exposed admissions in each of the stratified cohort. The AKI incidences were 6 and 22 events per 1000 patient-days in "without" and "with preexisting renal impairment" cohort, respectively. The adjusted analyses suggested that NSAID use increased AKI risk in patients with preexisting renal impairment (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.38 [1.04-1.83]) but not in the patients without preexisting renal impairment (HR: 0.83 [95% CIs: 0.63-1.08]) or in the pooled cohort (HR: 1.01 [95% CIs: 0.83-1.24]).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested that NSAID use is associated with an increased risk of AKI in the hospitalized patients with preexisting renal impairment but the association is not statistically significant in those who have preserved renal function. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these observational findings.

Nephrotoxicity from Vancomycin Combined with Piperacillin-Tazobactam: A Comprehensive Review

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have identified the combination of vancomycin with piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) to be associated with increased nephrotoxicity. Multiple, large cohort studies have found this widely used combination to have a higher risk of nephrotoxicity than other regimens in a variety of populations.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes the epidemiology and clinical features of VPT-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). Potential mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of this phenomenon are also discussed. Key Message: VPT-associated nephrotoxicity is a recently recognized clinical entity. Clinical strategies to minimize the risk of toxicity in this setting include antimicrobial stewardship, monitoring of kidney function, and emerging data supporting the potential role for novel biomarkers in predicting and managing AKI.

Use of matching methods in observational studies with critical patients and renal outcomes. Scoping review

Introduction: The use of matching techniques in observational studies has been increasing and is not always used appropriately. Clinical experiments are not always feasible in critical patients with renal outcomes, and observational studies are an important alternative. Objective: Through a scoping review, determine the available evidence on the use of matching methods in studies involving critically ill patients and assessing renal outcomes. Methods: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were used to identify articles published between 1992 and 2020 up to week 10, which studied different exposures in the critically ill patient with renal outcomes and used propensity matching methods. Results: Most publications are cohort studies 94 (94. 9 %), five studies (5. 1 %) were cross-sectional. The main pharmacological intervention was the use of antibiotics in seven studies (7. 1%) and the main risk factor studied was renal injury prior to ICU admission in 10 studies (10. 1%). The balance between the baseline characteristics assessed by standardized means, in only 28 studies (28. 2%). Most studies 95 (96 %) used logistic regression to calculate the propensity index. Conclusion: Major inconsistencies were observed in the use of methods and in the reporting of findings. A summary is made of the aspects to be considered in the use of the methods and reporting of the findings with the matching by propensity index.

Efficacy and Safety of Cystatin C-Guided Renal Dose Adjustment of Cefepime Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Pneumonia

Cystatin C (CysC) may estimate renal function more accurately than serum creatinine (SCr). The clinical impact of renal dose adjustment of cefepime according to CysC rather than SCr has remained uncertain. We investigated the efficacy and safety of CysC-guided cefepime dosing compared with SCr-guided dosing in hospitalized patients with pneumonia. All adults hospitalized with pneumonia between July 2016 and December 2018 who used cefepime for at least 3 days were enrolled. Mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), cefepime-induced encephalopathy (CIE), and Clostridium difficile infection were compared between the CysC-guided and SCr-guided groups. One hundred and ninety patients were divided into two groups: 129 and 61 received cefepime based on CysC and SCr, respectively. In-hospital mortality did not significantly differ between the groups (12% versus 31%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31-1.77; p = 0.50). CysC-guided cefepime dosing decreased the risk of AKI (13% versus 61%; HR 0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.44; p < 0.001) and CIE (2% versus 11%; HR 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.47; p = 0.003) compared with SCr-guided dosing. There was no significant difference in the risk of Clostridium difficile infection. CysC-guided dosing of cefepime was associated with decreased risk of the cefepime-associated morbidities including AKI and CIE without increasing mortality among the hospitalized patients with pneumonia.

Vancomycin plus piperacillin/tazobactam and acute kidney injury risk: A review of the literature

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Acute kidney injury is a devastating consequence observed with antibiotic therapy. The objective of this review was to summarize available data regarding the rates of acute kidney injury with vancomycin plus piperacillin/tazobactam compared to other beta-lactam combinations.

METHODS

A PubMed search from 2011 to May 2020 was conducted using the following search terms: vancomycin AND piperacillin/tazobactam AND acute kidney injury. Additional references were identified from a review of citations. Articles evaluating exclusively paediatric patients and articles evaluating vancomycin monotherapy as the comparator group were excluded. Case reports and case series were also excluded.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There were 18 studies included. Ten studies adjusted for potential confounders of acute kidney injury. Fourteen retrospective studies, one prospective study and three meta-analyses found the combination of vancomycin/piperacillin/tazobactam to be associated with a higher rate of acute kidney injury than the comparator group(s).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Although there are data to support that the combination of vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam increases the risk of acute kidney, much of the data come from small retrospective studies with variable adjustment for confounders. Furthermore, study heterogeneity on inclusion criteria and evaluation of long-term outcomes should be cautiously interpreted. Finally, additional data suggest that the risk of acute kidney injury seems to be minimized with shorter courses of therapy. Without prospective studies available, antimicrobial stewardship efforts should continue to target reducing broad-spectrum regimens, often limiting the need for long-term vancomycin/piperacillin/tazobactam combination.

Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Among Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Receiving Vancomycin With Either Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Cefepime

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether combination therapy with vancomycin and TZP is associated with a higher incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) compared with vancomycin with cefepime in infants admitted to the NICU.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included infants in the NICU who received vancomycin/cefepime or vancomycin/TZP for at least 48 hours. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI, which was defined by the neonatal modified Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes AKI criteria.

RESULTS

Forty-two infants who received vancomycin with cefepime and 58 infants who received vancomycin with TZP were included in the analysis. The median gestational age at birth, birth weight, and dosing weight were lower in the TZP group, but other baseline characteristics were comparable, including corrected gestational age. Two patients (3%) receiving vancomycin/TZP versus 2 patients (5%) receiving vancomycin/cefepime met criteria for AKI during their antibiotic course (p = 1.00). There were no clinically significant changes in serum creatinine or urine output from baseline to the end of combination antibiotic treatment in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among infants admitted to our NICU, AKI incidence associated with vancomycin and either TZP or cefepime therapy was low and did not differ by antibiotic combination.

Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Among Critically Ill Patients With Brief Empiric Use of Antipseudomonal β-Lactams With Vancomycin

BACKGROUND

Nephrotoxins contribute to 20%-40% of acute kidney injury (AKI) cases in the intensive care unit (ICU). The combination of piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) and vancomycin (VAN) has been identified as nephrotoxic, but existing studies focus on extended durations of therapy rather than the brief empiric courses often used in the ICU. The current study was performed to compare the risk of AKI with a short course of PTZ/VAN to with the risk associated with other antipseudomonal β-lactam/VAN combinations.

METHODS

The study included a retrospective cohort of 3299 ICU patients who received ≥24 but ≤72 hours of an antipseudomonal β-lactam/VAN combination: PTZ/VAN, cefepime (CEF)/VAN, or meropenem (MER)/VAN. The risk of developing stage 2 or 3 AKI was compared between antibiotic groups with multivariable logistic regression adjusted for relevant confounders. We also compared the risk of persistent kidney dysfunction, dialysis dependence, or death at 60 days between groups.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of stage 2 or 3 AKI was 9%. Brief exposure to PTZ/VAN did not confer a greater risk of stage 2 or 3 AKI after adjustment for relevant confounders (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] for PTZ/VAN vs CEF/VAN, 1.11 [.85-1.45]; PTZ/VAN vs MER/VAN, 1.04 [.71-1.42]). No significant differences were noted between groups at 60-day follow-up in the outcomes of persistent kidney dysfunction (P = .08), new dialysis dependence (P = .15), or death (P = .09).

CONCLUSION

Short courses of PTZ/VAN were not associated with a greater risk of short- or 60-day adverse renal outcomes than other empiric broad-spectrum combinations.

Short Versus Extended Duration Vancomycin and Piperacillin/Tazobactam and the Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Noncritically Ill Patients

Background:

Vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) is a commonly used empiric combination of antimicrobials. Recently, studies have demonstrated an increase in acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with combination therapy of VPT. However, the majority of studies required patients to be on VPT for a minimum of 48 to 72 hours to be considered for inclusion and had extended treatment durations longer than most empiric, short course regimens.

Objective:

To assess the incidence of AKI in noncritically ill patients being treated with VPT for short-courses (24 to 60 hours) compared to patients receiving extended-courses (72 hours to 7 days).

Methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study comparing the incidence of AKI in noncritically ill patients receiving VPT for short and extended durations between January 2016 and August 2018. Fishers exact tests were used for differences in nominal data between groups and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for continuous data.

Results:

Of the 2567 screened, 154 patients were included in the short-course group and 106 were included in the extended-course group. The incidence of AKI for patients in the short-course group was 12% (19/154) versus 26% (28/106) in the extended-course group (odds ratio: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.33-4.87; P = .004).

Conclusion:

In noncritically ill patients, a short-course of VPT experienced less AKI compared to an extended-course. Clinicians should continue to practice strict antimicrobial stewardship for VPT therapies expected to continue beyond 72 hours.

Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Combat-Injured Patients Associated With Concomitant Vancomycin and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactam Antibiotic Use

BACKGROUND

Multidrug-resistant infections complicating combat-related trauma necessitate the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Recent literature posits an association between vancomycin (VANC) and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) combination therapy and acute kidney injury (AKI). We examined whether therapy with VPT was associated with an increased risk of AKI compared to VANC and other broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics (VBL) following combat-related injuries.

METHODS

Patients within the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study (TIDOS) who received ≥48 hours concomitant VPT or VBL started within 24 hours of each other were assessed. Exclusion criteria were receipt of renal replacement therapy and baseline creatinine >1.5 mg/dL. Acute kidney injury was defined by meeting any of the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage Renal Disease (RIFLE), AKIN, or VANC consensus guidelines criteria 3 to 7 days after therapy initiation. Variables significantly associated with AKI were used in inverse probability treatment weighting to perform univariate and subsequent logistic regression multivariate modeling to determine significant risk factors for AKI.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients who received VPT and 207 who received VBL were included. Both groups had a median age of 24 years and initial median creatinine of 0.7 mg/dL. The VBL patients were more likely to have sustained blast injuries (P = .001) and received nephrotoxic agents (amphotericin [P = .002] and aminoglycosides [P < .001]). In the VBL group, AKI incidence was 9.7% compared to 13.1% in the VPT group (P = .438). Multivariate analysis identified a relative risk of 1.727 (95% CI: 1.027-2.765) for AKI associated with VPT exposure. Acute kidney injury severity generally met RIFLE Risk criteria and was 1 day in duration. Only 1 patient had persistent renal dysfunction 30 days after therapy completion.

CONCLUSION

In this young and previously healthy, severely ill combat-injured population, VPT was associated with nearly twice the risk of AKI compared to VBL. Nevertheless, AKI was of low severity, short duration, and had high rates of renal recovery.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Receiving Concomitant Vancomycin and Continuous-Infusion Piperacillin/Tazobactam: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

During a recent shortage of small-volume parenteral solutions, some hospitals administered piperacillin/tazobactam via continuous infusion to utilize larger fluid volumes. Although the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) is well documented for patients receiving intermittent or extended-infusion piperacillin/tazobactam with concomitant vancomycin, no literature exists documenting the incidence of AKI in patients receiving continuous-infusion piperacillin/tazobactam.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to examine the incidence and predictors of AKI in patients who received continuous-infusion piperacillin/tazobactam with concomitant intermittent-infusion vancomycin (VPT-CI) at a community hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients who received VPT-CI between December 2017 and March 2018. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were at least 19 years of age and received at least 48 hours of combination therapy. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI. The secondary outcome was an assessment of patient and treatment characteristics to determine predictors of AKI.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were included in the study. The incidence of AKI in patients who received VPT-CI was 31.7%. Based on binary logistic regression analysis, risk factors associated with increased risk of AKI included admission to the intensive care unit and baseline creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The incidence of AKI for VPT-CI found in this study was comparable to that found with intermittent and extended-infusion piperacillin/tazobactam with concomitant vancomycin in prior literature. Additional research should further analyze risk factors for the development of AKI for patients on concomitant vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam therapy.

Acute kidney injury with combination vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam therapy in the ICU: A retrospective cohort study

Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam are commonly used antibiotics. There is increasing evidence to indicate that these therapies in combination predispose patients to acute kidney injury (AKI). However, studies of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with these antibiotics have produced conflicting results. In this single-centre, retrospective cohort study, data was collected on ICU patients prescribed combination vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) for at least 48 h, compared with patients prescribed vancomycin with either cefepime or meropenem (VMC) for the same time period. Primary outcome was incidence of AKI; secondary outcomes included a desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) scale, and association between antibiotic duration and kidney injury. A total of 260 patients were included. AKI was observed in 27% of cases overall. Incidence of AKI was higher with VPT compared with VMC on bivariate (relative risk reduction [RRR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-4.1, P = 0.08) and multivariate (RRR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.9, P = 0.05) analyses. Longer duration of antibiotic therapy was associated with increased rates of AKI independent of which antibiotics were prescribed: RRR 4.9, 95% CI 2.1-11.1, P = <0.001 for 5-6 days compared with <5 days, and RRR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0-5.5, P = 0.05 for >7 days compared with <5 days. This study demonstrated an association between increased risk of nephrotoxicity and combination VPT therapy in ICU patients. The concept remains controversial, with recent suggestions that VPT does not truly cause nephrotoxicity. Given our findings and the weight of previous studies, there is a strong mandate to undertake prospective trials to resolve the issue.

Acute kidney injury following the concurrent administration of antipseudomonal β-lactams and vancomycin: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury is a major complication of vancomycin treatment, especially when it is co-administered with other nephrotoxins.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aims to comparatively assess the nephrotoxicity of antipseudomonal β-lactams when combined with vancomycin.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were systematically searched from inception through 20 August 2019.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies evaluating acute kidney injury risk following the concurrent use of antipseudomonal β-lactams and vancomycin were selected.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult and paediatric patients treated in hospital or intensive care unit.

INTERVENTIONS

Administration of vancomycin combined with any antipseudomonal β-lactam.

METHODS

Acute kidney injury incidence was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included severity, onset, duration, need of renal replacement therapy, length of hospitalization and mortality. Quality of evidence was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis approach.

RESULTS

Forty-seven cohort studies were included, with a total of 56 984 patients. In the adult population, the combination of piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin resulted in significantly higher nephrotoxicity rates than vancomycin monotherapy (odds ratio (OR) 2.05, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.17-3.46) and its concurrent use with meropenem (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.02-3.10) or cefepime (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.13-2.77). In paediatric patients, acute kidney injury was significantly higher with vancomycin plus piperacillin-tazobactam than vancomycin alone (OR 4.18, 95% CI 1.01-17.29) or vancomycin plus cefepime OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.08-11.24). No significant differences were estimated for the secondary outcomes. Credibility of outcomes was judged as moderate, mainly due to imprecision and inter-study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is associated with higher acute kidney injury rates than its parallel use with meropenem or cefepime. Current evidence is exclusively observational and is limited by inter-study heterogeneity. Randomized controlled trials are needed to verify these results and define preventive strategies to minimize nephrotoxicity risk.

Acute Kidney Injury in Pediatric Patients Treated with Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam Versus Vancomycin and Cefotaxime: A Single-center Study

Background

Previous literature showed a higher incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in pediatric patients using vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam compared to cefepime + vancomycin. Our aim was to compare the incidence of developing AKI during the use of vancomycin + cefotaxime with that during the use of vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam in pediatric patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective, matched cohort study that used electronic records from May 1, 2015 through April 30, 2018 for all patients aged less than 16 years who received intravenous (IV) vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam or cefotaxime + vancomycin for at least 72 hours. AKI was defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. Each patient from the vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam group was matched 1:1 with those in the vancomycin + cefotaxime group according to their age, chronic disease, gender, and the number of concomitant nephrotoxic agents. A total of 64 cases were included. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression.

Results

AKI developed in 10 of 32 patients (31.25%) who were using vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam. On the other hand, 13 of 32 patients (40.62%) were using cefotaxime + vancomycin (p = 0.047). Of the 10 patients who were on vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam regimen, 80% developed AKI Stage I. Of the 13 patients who were using cefotaxime + vancomycin, 46% developed AKI Stage II, although no statistical significance was noted in all stages. 

Conclusion

Our study showed that patients treated with cefotaxime and vancomycin showed a higher incidence of AKI than patients treated with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, although the study showed no statistical significance.

Impact of total body weight on rate of acute kidney injury in patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin

PURPOSE

Results of a study to determine whether obesity is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) among patients receiving combination therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin are reported.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients who received combination therapy for at least 48 hours was conducted using data from the University of Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational Science's Enterprise Data Trust. Patients with chronic kidney disease, baseline creatinine clearance of less than 30 mL/min, cystic fibrosis, or missing height or weight information were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 8,125 patients were included in the cohort. Among the variables evaluated, total body weight of 91 kg or more was the variable most predictive of AKI. Patients with a weight of 91 kg or higher were more likely than lower-weight patients to have diabetes (39% versus 21%, p < 0.00001), hypertension (64% versus 47%, p < 0.00001), and heart failure (15% versus 13%, p = 0.007). The median daily vancomcyin dose was lower in patients with a weight of less than 91 kg (2,000 mg versus 3,000 mg, p < 0.00001); however, weight-based doses were lower in patients weighing 91 kg or more (25.5 mg/kg/day versus 27.9 mg/kg/day, p < 0.00001). AKI was more common in patients weighing 91 kg or more (24% versus 18%, p < 0.00001; adjusted odds ratio, 1.46 [95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.66]).

CONCLUSION

Increased total body weight increased the rate of AKI among patients concurrently treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin independent of clinically important confounders, with an important breakpoint occurring at 91 kg.

Acute Kidney Injury in Non-Intensive Care and Intensive Care Patients Treated with Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam

BACKGROUND

We investigated the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and risk factors associated with vancomycin (VAN) and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) combination therapy in non-intensive care unit (ICU) and ICU settings.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, adults who received VAN for ≥48 h during the period from 1 January 2016 through 31 December 2017 were included. The primary endpoint was incidence of AKI.

RESULTS

Data from 593 adults were analyzed. The incidence of AKI was 10.6% overall, 8.0% in the non-TZP group, and 19.8% in the TZP group. In univariate analysis, the odds ratio (OR) for AKI was higher in the TZP group than in the non-TZP group (2.84, 95% CI = 1.64-4.90). In both the non-ICU and ICU settings, the OR for AKI was higher in the TZP group than in the non-TZP group (non-ICU: OR = 3.04, 95% CI = 1.52-6.09; ICU: OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.03-6.08). Furthermore, in propensity score analysis, the OR for AKI was higher in the TZP group than in the non-TZP group (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.52-5.17). In both the non-ICU and ICU settings, the OR for AKI was higher in the TZP group than in the non-TZP group (non-ICU: OR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.17-5.64; ICU: OR = 3.51, 95% CI = 1.05-11.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined use of TZP in patients receiving VAN increased AKI incidence in non-ICU and ICU settings.

Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Antibiotic-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Children

BACKGROUND

There continues to be uncertainty about whether piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) increases the risk of AKI in critically ill pediatric patients. We sought to compare rates of AKI among critically ill children treated with TZP or cefepime, an alternative frequently used in intensive care units, with and without vancomycin.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study assessing the risk of AKI in pediatric intensive care unit patients after exposure to vancomycin, TZP, and cefepime, alone or in combination, within 48 hours of admission. The primary outcome was development of stage 2 or 3 AKI or an increase in AKI stage from 2 to 3 within the 6 days after the 48-hour exposure window. Secondary outcomes included lengths of stay, need for RRT, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of 5686 patients included, 494 (8.7%) developed stage 2 or 3 AKI. The adjusted odds of developing AKI after medication exposure were 1.56 for TZP (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 1.99), 1.13 for cefepime (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.64), and 0.86 for vancomycin (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.07). The adjusted odds of developing AKI for vancomycin plus TZP versus vancomycin plus cefepime was 1.38 (95% CI, 0.85 to 2.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Observational data in critically ill children show that TZP use is associated with increased odds of AKI. A weaker, nonsignificant association between vancomycin plus TZP and AKI compared with vancomycin plus cefepime, creates some uncertainty about the nature of the association between TZP and AKI. However, cefepime is an alternative not associated with AKI.

Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections in Children: a Reappraisal of Vancomycin

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last 50 years, vancomycin has been the agent of choice to treat infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, vancomycin treatment failure is not uncommon, even when MRSA strains are fully susceptible to vancomycin. Treatment with vancomycin requires careful monitoring of drug levels as there is a potential for nephrotoxicity. Resistance to clindamycin is not infrequent, which also limits therapeutic options for treating infections due to MRSA in children. This paper reviews the current data on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy of vancomycin in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Resistance to vancomycin in MRSA (MIC >2 mg/L) is infrequent; there is increasing evidence in the literature that vancomycin maybe ineffective against increasing proportion of isolates with MICs between 1 and 2 mg/L. Recent studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated that strains with high vancomycin MICs are associated with poor outcomes especially in patients with bacteremia and deep tissue infections due to MRSA. This gradual increase in vancomycin MIC has been reported as MIC creep or vancomycin heteroresistance. Patients infected with MRSA isolates that exhibit MIC creep experience poorer clinical outcomes, including delayed treatment response, increased mortality, increase rate of relapse, and extended hospitalization. There are limited data to guide vancomycin dosing in children with MRSA. Although the vancomycin area under the curve AUC₂₄/MIC ratio > 400 has been shown to predict clinical efficacy in adults, this relationship has not been documented very well for treatment outcomes in MRSA infections in children. Use of higher vancomycin dosages in attempts to achieve higher trough concentrations has been associated with increased nephrotoxicity. New recently approved antibiotics including ceftaroline, dalbavancin, and tedizolid offer a number of advantages over vancomycin to treat staphylococcal infections: improved antimicrobial activity, superior pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability, and dosing, including once-daily and weekly regimens, and less need for monitoring drug levels.

An epidemiologic overview of acute kidney injury in intensive care units

SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent event among critically ill patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICU) and represents a global public health problem, being imperative an interdisciplinary approach. OBJECTIV To investigate, through literature review, the AKI epidemiology in ICUs. METHODS: Online research in Medline, Scientific Electronic Library Online, and Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences databases, with analysis of the most relevant 47 studies published between 2010 and 2017. RESULTS Data of the 67,033 patients from more than 300 ICUs from different regions of the world were analyzed. The overall incidence of AKI ranged from 2.5% to 92.2%, and the mortality from 5% to 80%. The length of ICU stay ranged from five to twenty-one days, and the need for renal replacement therapy from 0.8% to 59.2%. AKI patients had substantially higher mortality rates and longer hospital stays than patients without AKI. CONCLUSION AKI incidence presented high variability among the studies. One of the reasons for that were the different criteria used to define the cases. Availability of local resources, renal replacement therapy needs, serum creatinine at ICU admission, volume overload, and sepsis, among others, influence mortality rates in AKI patients.