1
|
Baykara N. Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Mortality in Pregnant/Puerperal Women with COVID-19 Admitted to ICU in Turkey: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study from a Middle-Income Country. J Intensive Care Med 2024; 39:577-594. [PMID: 38320979 DOI: 10.1177/08850666231222838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronaviruses have been the cause of 3 major outbreaks during the last 2 decades. Information on coronavirus diseases in pregnant women is limited, and even less is known about seriously ill pregnant women. Data are also lacking regarding the real burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in pregnant women from low/middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and clinical course of COVID-19 in pregnant/puerperal women admitted to ICUs in Turkey. METHODS This was a national, multicenter, retrospective study. The study population comprised all SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant/puerperal women admitted to participating ICUs between 1 March 2020 and 1 January 2022. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, illness severity, therapies, extrapulmonary organ injuries, non-COVID-19 infections, and maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes were recorded. LASSO logistic regression and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictive variables in terms of ICU mortality. RESULTS A total of 597 patients (341 pregnant women, 255 puerperal women) from 59 ICUs in 44 hospitals were included and of these patients, 87.1% were unvaccinated. The primary reason for ICU admission was acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in 522 (87.4%), acute hypoxemic respiratory failure plus shock in 14 (2.3%), ischemic cerebrovascular accident (CVA) in 5 (0.8%), preeclampsia/eclampsia/HELLP syndrome in 6 (1.0%), and post-caesarean follow-up in 36 (6.0%). Nonsurvivors were sicker than survivors upon ICU admission, with higher APACHE II (p < 0.001) and SOFA scores (p < 0.001). A total of 181 (30.3%) women died and 280 (46.6%) had received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Myocardial injury, the highest SOFA score during ICU stay, LDH levels on admission, the highest levels of AST during ICU stay, average daily dose of corticosteroids, IMV, prophylactic dose anticoagulation (compared with therapeutic dose anticoagulation), PaO2/FiO2 ratio <100, pulmonary embolism, and shock were identified as predictors of mortality. Rates of premature birth (46.4%), cesarean section (53.7%), fetal distress (15.3%), stillbirth (6.5%), and low birth weight (19.4%) were high. Rates of neonatal death (8%) and respiratory distress syndrome (21%) were also high among live-born infants. CONCLUSIONS Severe/critical COVID-19 infection during the pregnancy/puerperal period was associated with high maternal mortality and fetal/neonatal complication rates in Turkey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Baykara
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, School of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Malone S, Walsh S, Butters Z, Seiler A, Unterscheider J. COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the effect of strong public health messaging in an Australian cohort. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2024. [PMID: 38777380 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy predisposes women and their offspring to adverse health outcomes, while internationally reported rates of vaccination uptake remain low. Our study objective was to quantify the uptake of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women, and to assess their attitudes toward vaccination in pregnancy with both quantitative and qualitative analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a prospective, cross-sectional survey at Australia's largest quaternary level maternity centre. A total of 351 pregnant women, at 6-42 weeks gestation receiving antenatal care at our hospital, completed an online voluntary, anonymous, 17 question survey. This was conducted during a five-week period in November to December 2021. The main outcome measures were demographic data, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination status, knowledge and attitudes surrounding COVID-19 disease and vaccination in pregnancy. RESULTS High rates of COVID-19 vaccination were observed in this pregnant population. Of the 351 respondents, 82% had received at least one dose of the COVID 19-vaccination. This increased compared to estimates of 15% in June 2021 which were obtained from the hospital's electronic health record. CONCLUSIONS Our survey demonstrates that a strong public health campaign with clear messaging regarding the beneficial effects of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy can lead to high vaccination uptake rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Malone
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Siobhan Walsh
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zoe Butters
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ashleigh Seiler
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julia Unterscheider
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Magee LA, Brown JR, Bowyer V, Horgan G, Boulding H, Khalil A, Cheetham NJ, Harvey NR, Mistry HD, Sudre C, Silverio SA, von Dadelszen P, Duncan EL. Courage in Decision Making: A Mixed-Methods Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in Women of Reproductive Age in the U.K. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:440. [PMID: 38675822 PMCID: PMC11055058 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12040440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccination rates are lower in women of reproductive age (WRA), including pregnant/postpartum women, despite their poorer COVID-19-related outcomes. We evaluated the vaccination experiences of 3568 U.K. WRA, including 1983 women (55.6%) experiencing a pandemic pregnancy, recruited through the ZOE COVID Symptom Study app. Two staggered online questionnaires (Oct-Dec 2021: 3453 responders; Aug-Sept 2022: 2129 responders) assessed reproductive status, COVID-19 status, vaccination, and attitudes for/against vaccination. Descriptive analyses included vaccination type(s), timing relative to age-based eligibility and reproductive status, vaccination delay (first vaccination >28 days from eligibility), and rationale, with content analysis of free-text comments. Most responders (3392/3453, 98.2%) were vaccinated by Dec 2021, motivated by altruism, vaccination supportiveness in general, low risk, and COVID-19 concerns. Few declined vaccination (by Sept/2022: 20/2129, 1.0%), citing risks (pregnancy-specific and longer-term), pre-existing immunity, and personal/philosophical reasons. Few women delayed vaccination, although pregnant/postpartum women (vs. other WRA) received vaccination later (median 3 vs. 0 days after eligibility, p < 0.0001). Despite high uptake, concerns included adverse effects, misinformation (including from healthcare providers), ever-changing government advice, and complex decision making. In summary, most women in this large WRA cohort were promptly vaccinated, including pregnant/post-partum women. Altruism and community benefit superseded personal benefit as reasons for vaccination. Nevertheless, responders experienced angst and received vaccine-related misinformation and discouragement. These findings should inform vaccination strategies in WRA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A. Magee
- School of Life Course & Population Science, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; (G.H.); (H.D.M.); (S.A.S.); (P.v.D.)
| | - Julia R. Brown
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (J.R.B.); (V.B.); (N.J.C.); (E.L.D.)
| | - Vicky Bowyer
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (J.R.B.); (V.B.); (N.J.C.); (E.L.D.)
| | - Gillian Horgan
- School of Life Course & Population Science, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; (G.H.); (H.D.M.); (S.A.S.); (P.v.D.)
| | - Harriet Boulding
- The Policy Institute, King’s College London, London WC2B 6LE, UK;
| | - Asma Khalil
- Department of Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine, St. George’s University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK;
| | - Nathan J. Cheetham
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (J.R.B.); (V.B.); (N.J.C.); (E.L.D.)
| | - Nicholas R. Harvey
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (J.R.B.); (V.B.); (N.J.C.); (E.L.D.)
| | | | | | - Hiten D. Mistry
- School of Life Course & Population Science, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; (G.H.); (H.D.M.); (S.A.S.); (P.v.D.)
| | - Carole Sudre
- Centre for Medical Image Computer, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK;
| | - Sergio A. Silverio
- School of Life Course & Population Science, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; (G.H.); (H.D.M.); (S.A.S.); (P.v.D.)
- School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5AH, UK
| | - Peter von Dadelszen
- School of Life Course & Population Science, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; (G.H.); (H.D.M.); (S.A.S.); (P.v.D.)
| | - Emma L. Duncan
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, London SE1 7EH, UK; (J.R.B.); (V.B.); (N.J.C.); (E.L.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Álvarez Aldeán J, José Álvarez García F, de la Calle Fernández-Miranda M, Figueras Falcón T, Iofrío de Arce A, López Rojano M, Rivero Calle I, Suy Franch A. Vaccination in pregnancy. Consensus document of the CAV-AEP and the SEGO. An Pediatr (Barc) 2024; 100:268-274. [PMID: 38565447 DOI: 10.1016/j.anpede.2024.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
During pregnancy, physiological changes in the immune response make pregnant women more susceptible to serious infection, increasing the risk for the mother as well as the foetus, newborn and infant. All women should be correctly and fully vaccinated as they enter their reproductive years, especially against diseases such as tetanus, hepatitis B, measles, rubella and varicella. In addition to the recommended vaccines, in risk situations, inactivated vaccines could be administered to women who were not correctly vaccinated before, while attenuated vaccines are contraindicated. Despite the fact that vaccination during pregnancy is a very important preventive measure and the existing recommendations from public health authorities, scientific societies and health professionals, the vaccination coverage could clearly be improved, especially against influenza and SARS-CoV-2, so any health professional involved in the care of pregnant women should proactively recommend these vaccines. The Spanish Association of Pediatrics (AEP), through its Advisory Committee on Vaccines, and the Spanish Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (SEGO) recommend vaccination against the following diseases during pregnancy: against influenza and COVID-19, in any trimester of pregnancy and during the postpartum period (up to 6 months post birth) in women not vaccinated during pregnancy; against pertussis, with the Tdap vaccine, between weeks 27 and 36 of gestation (in the CAV-AEP recommendations, preferably between weeks 27 and 28); and against RSV, with RSVPreF, between weeks 24 and 36 of gestation, preferably between weeks 32 and 36.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Álvarez Aldeán
- Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Costa del Sol, Asociación Española de Pediatría (CAV-AEP), Marbella, Málaga, Spain
| | - Francisco José Álvarez García
- Centro de Salud de Llanera, Asturias Departamento de Medicina. Universidad de Oviedo. Asociación Española de Pediatría (CAV-AEP), Oviedo, Spain.
| | - Maria de la Calle Fernández-Miranda
- Sección de Obstetricia, Hospital Universitario la Paz, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Madrid, Spain
| | - Tatiana Figueras Falcón
- Unidad Medicina Materno Fetal, Servicio de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil de Las Palmas, Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Antonio Iofrío de Arce
- Centro de Salud El Ranero, Comité Asesor de Vacunas de la Asociación Española de Pediatría (CAV-AEP), Murcia, Spain
| | - Marta López Rojano
- Servicio de Medicina Maternofetal, BCNatal-Centro de Medicina Maternofetal y Neonatal de Barcelona (Hospital Clínic de Barcelona y Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irene Rivero Calle
- Sección de Pediatría Clínica, Infectológica y Traslacional, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Sociedad Española de Infectología Pediátrica (SEIP), Grupo Genética, Vacunas, Infecciones y Pediatría (GENVIP). Asociación Española de Pediatría (CAV-AEP), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Anna Suy Franch
- Sección de Obstetricia, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pugni L, Crippa BL, Raimondi F, Vento G, Mangili G, Coscia A, Artieri G, Ronchi A, Ventura ML, Lago P, Pietrasanta C, Crimi R, Bonfante G, Perrone S, Boncompagni A, Solinas A, Agosti M, Poggi C, Falcone A, Pagliotta C, Gianotti D, Gottardi G, Paviotti G, Allodi A, Maffei G, Proto A, Travierso A, Salomè S, Costa S, Ferrari S, Peila C, Sinelli M, Fanelli F, Giordano L, Saruggia M, Capasso L, Spada E, Gizzi C, Orfeo L, Mosca F. SARS-CoV-2 perinatal transmission and neonatal outcomes across four different waves of COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide prospective cohort study from the Italian Society of Neonatology. Int J Infect Dis 2024; 140:17-24. [PMID: 38157929 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe how SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of delivery affected maternal and neonatal outcomes across four major waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. METHODS This is a large, prospective, nationwide cohort study collecting maternal and neonatal data in case of maternal peripartum SARS-CoV-2 infection between February 2020 and March 2022. Data were stratified across the four observed pandemic waves. RESULTS Among 5201 COVID-19-positive mothers, the risk of being symptomatic at delivery was significantly higher in the first and third waves (20.8-20.8%) than in the second and fourth (13.2-12.2%). Among their 5284 neonates, the risk of prematurity (gestational age <37 weeks) was significantly higher in the first and third waves (15.6-12.5%). The risk of intrauterine transmission was always very low, while the risk of postnatal transmission during rooming-in was higher and peaked at 4.5% during the fourth wave. A total of 80% of positive neonates were asymptomatic. CONCLUSION The risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes was significantly higher during the first and third waves, dominated by unsequenced variants and the Delta variant, respectively. Postnatal transmission accounted for most neonatal infections and was more frequent during the Omicron period. However, the paucity of symptoms in infected neonates should lead us not to separate the dyad.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenza Pugni
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Raimondi
- Division of Neonatology, University of Naples Federico II, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Vento
- Neonatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Neonatology Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alessandra Coscia
- AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Neonatologia Universitaria, Dipartimento di Scienze della Sanità Pubblica e Pediatriche, Torino, Italy
| | - Giacomo Artieri
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Ronchi
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paola Lago
- NICU, Ospedale Regionale Cà Foncello, Treviso, Italy
| | - Carlo Pietrasanta
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Crimi
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Bonfante
- NICU, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, PO S. Anna, Torino, Italy
| | - Serafina Perrone
- University of Parma, Pietro Barilla University Children's Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Alessandra Boncompagni
- Women's and Children's Health Department, NICU, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Agostina Solinas
- NICU, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Arcispedale S.Anna, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Massimo Agosti
- NICU, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy; Department of Pediatrics, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Chiara Poggi
- Department of Mother and Child Care, NICU, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Genny Gottardi
- NICU, ULSS8 Berica, Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Giulia Paviotti
- Neonatology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Presidio Ospedaliero di Udine - Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
| | | | | | - Alice Proto
- NICU, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Serena Salomè
- Division of Neonatology, University of Naples Federico II, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Naples, Italy
| | - Simonetta Costa
- Neonatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Peila
- AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Neonatologia Universitaria, Dipartimento di Scienze della Sanità Pubblica e Pediatriche, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Federica Fanelli
- Division of Neonatology, University of Naples Federico II, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Naples, Italy
| | - Lucia Giordano
- Neonatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Letizia Capasso
- Division of Neonatology, University of Naples Federico II, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Naples, Italy
| | - Elena Spada
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Gizzi
- Pediatric and Neonatal Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy; NICU, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Orfeo
- NICU, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli, Isola, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Mosca
- NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Delle Chiaie L, Stolpner I, Dettmer MS, Baltz-Ghahremanpour K. Acute placental insufficiency two weeks after an asymptomatic COVID-19 maternal infection: the deleterious effects of the SARS-CoV-2 placentitis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 309:723-726. [PMID: 36912992 PMCID: PMC10009343 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-06991-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Loredana Delle Chiaie
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital/Frauenklinik, Kriegsbergstraße 62, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
| | - Ilona Stolpner
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Stuttgart-Olgahospital/Frauenklinik, Kriegsbergstraße 62, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shamshirsaz AA, Byrne JJ, Ramsey PS, Cahill AG, Turrentine MA. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Pregnant and Postpartum Women With Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143:219-228. [PMID: 37944145 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the maternal survival and live-birth rates in pregnant women with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who are treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES From database inception through August 2023, we explored MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies reporting maternal survival and live-birth rates in pregnant women with critical COVID-19 undergoing ECMO were included. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION Two reviewers separately ascertained studies, obtained data, and evaluated study quality. Summary estimates of maternal survival and live-birth rates were measured, and 95% CIs were calculated. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Nine retrospective case series and 12 retrospective cohort studies were identified with 386 pregnant women with critical COVID-19 who underwent ECMO. Studies evaluated women that were treated from January 2020 to October 2022. Four studies were from the United States; three were from Turkey; two were from France; two were from Israel; and one each was from Columbia, Germany, Italy, Kuwait, Poland, Republic of Srpska, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, a consortium from Belgium, France, Switzerland, and an international registry. The pooled estimate of the maternal survival rate among pregnant patients who were initiated on ECMO was 75.6% (95% CI, 66.0-84.1%, I2 =72%). The pooled estimate of the live-birth rate among pregnant patients who were initiated on ECMO was 83.7% (95% CI, 76.8-89.6%, 153 neonates, I2 =11%). When the case series and cohort studies were examined separately, the results were similar. CONCLUSION Among pregnant women with acute respiratory distress syndrome attributable to critical COVID-19 who were managed with ECMO, maternal survival and live-birth rates were high. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42023442800.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir A Shamshirsaz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, and the Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Turdybekova YG, Kopobayeva IL, Turmukhambetova AA, Kamyshanskiy YK. Multi-organ dysfunction and outcomes in pregnancy associated COVID-19 infection - descriptive review of pathological findings. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:45. [PMID: 38195406 PMCID: PMC10775618 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06240-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) Comparative clinical and morphological characterization of lesions of the vascular and nervous system in cases of maternal death associated with COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN The study included autopsy in 12 cases of maternal death with a positive intravital result for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. For histopathology, tissue samples were taken from the internal organs of each patient. Pieces of organs were fixed and stained according to the standard protocol. The relative number of microvessels with vasculitis and fibers of the peripheral nervous system with infiltration by immune cells was studied. All morphological changes were classified depending on the severity of the damage. RESULTS The average age of patients with a fatal outcome was 35 ± 4.4 years. Time to death after onset of symptoms averaged 16 ± 4.4 days. Dystrophic lesions (necrosis and apoptosis) of the villous and extravillous trophoblast and decidual tissue were observed in the studied placentas. Histopathological signs of mild and severe lesions of the peripheral nervous system in the organs of the gastrointestinal tract were detected in 2 (16.7%) and 10 (83.3%) cases, respectively, in the myocardium in 4 (33.3%) and 8 (66.7%) cases. Histopathological signs of severe damage to the microvascular bed in the organs of the gastrointestinal tract were registered in 9 (75%) cases. CONCLUSION(S) The main clinical feature of this cohort was that death occurred in a long-term period, in most cases with a negative PCR. The histopathological pattern was a non-acute injury with an immune component of the microvascular bed and the autonomic nervous system with predominant damage to the myocardium and intestines. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO THE CLINICAL WORK This study makes it possible to even better study the immunopathological profile in organs and tissues in pregnant women with a fatal outcome when affected by a viral infection, in particular Covid-19. This knowledge can be used when humanity encounters other viral pandemics in the future.
Collapse
|
9
|
Carlson J, Simeone RM, Ellington S, Galang R, DeSisto CL, Fleming-Dutra K, Riley L, Meaney-Delman D, Tong VT. Pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron Periods of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Health Outcomes During Delivery Hospitalization. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143:131-138. [PMID: 37917932 PMCID: PMC10949122 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis at delivery and adverse maternal health and pregnancy outcomes during pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron variant predominance, with a focus on the time period of Omicron variant predominance. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional observational study with data from delivery hospitalizations in the Premier Healthcare Database from February 2020 to August 2023. The pre-Delta (February 2020-June 2021), Delta (July 2021-December 2021), and Omicron (January 2022-August 2023) periods of variant predominance were examined. Exposure to COVID-19 was identified by having a diagnostic code for COVID-19 during the delivery hospitalization. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) were calculated to compare the risks of adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes for women with and without COVID-19 diagnoses at the time of delivery for each variant period. RESULTS Among 2,990,973 women with delivery hospitalizations, 1.9% (n=56,618) had COVID-19 diagnoses noted at delivery admission discharge, including 26,053 during the Omicron period. Across all variant time periods, the prevalence of many adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes during the delivery hospitalization was significantly higher for pregnant women with COVID-19 compared with pregnant women without COVID-19. In adjusted models, COVID-19 during the Omicron period was associated with significant increased risks for maternal sepsis (COVID-19: 0.4% vs no COVID-19: 0.1%; aPR 3.32, 95% CI, 2.70-4.08), acute respiratory distress syndrome (0.6% vs 0.1%; aPR 6.19, 95% CI, 5.26-7.29), shock (0.2% vs 0.1%; aPR 2.14, 95% CI, 1.62-2.84), renal failure (0.5% vs 0.2%; aPR 2.08, 95% CI, 1.73-2.49), intensive care unit admission (2.7% vs 1.7%; aPR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.52-1.77), mechanical ventilation (0.3% vs 0.1%; aPR 3.15, 95% CI, 2.52-3.93), in-hospital death (0.03% vs 0.01%; aPR 5.00, 95% CI, 2.30-10.90), stillbirth (0.7% vs 0.6%; aPR 1.17, 95% CI, 1.01-1.36), and preterm delivery (12.3% vs 9.6%; aPR 1.28, 95% CI, 1.24-1.33). CONCLUSION Despite the possibility of some level of immunity due to previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, vaccination, or testing differences, risks of adverse outcomes associated with COVID-19 diagnosis at delivery remained elevated during the Omicron variant time period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Carlson
- Eagle Global Scientific, LLC, and the Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, the Coronavirus and Other Respiratory Viruses Division, the Influenza Division, the Division of Reproductive Health, and the Division of Viral Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nkobetchou M, Leruez-Ville M, Guilleminot T, Roux N, Petrilli G, Guimiot F, Saint-Frison MH, Deryabin I, Ville Y, Faure-Bardon V. SARS-CoV-2 infection as cause of in-utero fetal death: regional multicenter cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62:867-874. [PMID: 37519281 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Placental infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can lead to placental insufficiency and in-utero fetal death (IUFD). The objective of this study was to confirm and quantify the extent to which fetoplacental infection with SARS-CoV-2 is a cause of fetal death. METHODS This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of fetal deaths that underwent postmortem examination between January 2020 and January 2022 in three fetal pathology units in Paris, France. All cases of IUFD and termination of pregnancy (TOP) occurring in 31 maternity hospitals in the Paris region undergo detailed placental pathological examination in these units. Databases were searched for cases of IUFD and TOP. Cases with fetal malformation or cytogenetic abnormality were excluded to avoid bias. We included cases of IUFD with a placental or undetermined cause and cases of TOP in the context of severe intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Placentas were sent to a single virology unit for reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing by a single laboratory technician blinded to the initial postmortem examination report. Our primary endpoint was the proportion of positive placental SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests in the cohort. RESULTS Among 147 722 deliveries occurring over 2 years, 788 postmortem examinations for IUFD and TOP for severe IUGR were recorded, of which 462 (58.6%) were included. A total of 13/462 (2.8%) placentas tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Wild-type virus and alpha and delta variants were identified. All positive cases had histological lesions consistent with placental dysfunction. There was a strong correlation between SARS-CoV-2 placentitis and the presence of chronic intervillositis and/or massive fibrin deposits in the placenta. When both lesion types were present, the specificity and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of placental SARS-CoV-2 infection were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98), respectively. CONCLUSIONS At the height of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the cause of more than half of fetal deaths in the Paris area was determined by postmortem analysis to be of placental or undetermined origin. Of these cases, 2.8% were due to placental SARS-CoV-2 infection with a specific pattern of histological involvement. This study highlights the need for SARS-CoV-2 screening in stillbirth assessment. The impact of vaccination coverage remains to be established. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Nkobetchou
- EA 73-28, Paris Cité University, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
- Maternity Department, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Leruez-Ville
- EA 73-28, Paris Cité University, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
- Virology Department, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - T Guilleminot
- EA 73-28, Paris Cité University, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
- Virology Department, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - N Roux
- Histopathology Department, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - G Petrilli
- Histopathology Department, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - F Guimiot
- Histopathology Department, Robert Debré Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - I Deryabin
- Histopathology Department, Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Y Ville
- EA 73-28, Paris Cité University, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
- Maternity Department, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - V Faure-Bardon
- EA 73-28, Paris Cité University, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
- Maternity Department, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu LL, Lin LH, Lin F, Yang YK, Lin CF, Zhang L, Huang YC, Liao YW, Zeng YQ, Zeng GK, Cao YB, Zhu RZ, Yang LY. The clinical characteristics of COVID-19 omicron variant infection in pregnant women and their neonates. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1229794. [PMID: 37780575 PMCID: PMC10537922 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1229794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of pregnant women infected with the COVID-19 omicron variant and their neonates during the outbreak in Guangdong province, China. Methods The clinical data of pregnant women infected with the COVID-19 omicron variant and their neonates were retrospectively collected from two hospitals in Guangdong province. Information recorded included age of mother, date of birth, sex, weight at birth, mode of delivery, gestational age, feeding mode, Apgar score, signs, medical records, underlying comorbidities and laboratory results. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was tested using an real-time PCR assay. Results Seventy-nine pregnant women infected with COVID-19 omicron variant and their 68 neonates were included in this study. The vast majority (86.1%) of pregnant women was in their third trimester of pregnancy, and only 11 cases (15%) were in the first or second trimester. Of 79 pregnant women, 39 cases were asymptomatic at the time of infection, and 40 mothers presented with mild manifestations of COVID-19. The most common symptoms were fever (92.5%, 37/40) and cough (57.5%, 21/40). All of pregnant women did not receive chest computed tomography (CT) scan or X-ray. No pregnant woman developed severe pneumonia. A total of 68 neonates (3 set of twins) from 65 mothers with COVID-19 were reviewed. Among women who delivered, 34 cases underwent cesarean section, 31 cases underwent vaginal delivery. According to the timing of birth, there were 10 (14.7%) preterm neonates. Two babies were born dead (intrauterine fetal death after 22 weeks of gestation). Of the live babies born (66 cases) from mothers with COVID-19, 9 newborns were lower weight, and one preterm case was born with respiratory distress and intubated, he recovered and developed normally. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing was conducted on 41 neonates daily after birth, with only one neonate testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection on the third day after birth. The infected neonate exhibited typical fever and acute respiratory tract syndrome but ultimately had a good prognosis, recovering after 5 days of treatment. Conclusion Although preliminary data suggests the risk of severe maternal and fetal complications from Omicron variant infection during pregnancy is lower than previous variants and Delta variant. Our study, which was conducted on a limited population sample, indicates that there is a possibility of severe complications, such as stillbirth, occurring in some fetal cases. These findings emphasize the need for continued attention from obstetricians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Li Liu
- Precision Medical Lab Center, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Lv-Hua Lin
- Department of Obstetrics, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Fen Lin
- Precision Medical Lab Center, Chaozhou Central Hospital, Chaozhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yi-Kang Yang
- Precision Medical Lab Center, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
- Institute of Medicine and Nursing, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Chun-Fan Lin
- Department of Neonatology, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Lin Zhang
- Precision Medical Lab Center, Chaozhou Central Hospital, Chaozhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yu-Chan Huang
- Precision Medical Lab Center, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Yu-Wei Liao
- Precision Medical Lab Center, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Yangjiang, People's Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Yan-Qing Zeng
- Precision Medical Lab Center, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Guang-Kuan Zeng
- Precision Medical Lab Center, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Yan-Bin Cao
- Precision Medical Lab Center, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Rui-Zhen Zhu
- Department of Obstetrics, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
| | - Li-Ye Yang
- Precision Medical Lab Center, People’s Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Yangjiang, People's Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
- Yangjiang Branch of Biochip Beijing National Engineering Research Center, People's Hospital of Yangjiang Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Popescu DE, Cerbu S, Rosca I, Lungu N, Trușculescu AA, Belengeanu V, Manea AM, Dima MA, Gorun F, Popa ZL, Crisan DC, Boia M. Comparative Analysis of Hematological and Biochemical Changes in Neonates among Women with and without COVID-19 Infection during Pregnancy. Children (Basel) 2023; 10:1370. [PMID: 37628369 PMCID: PMC10453899 DOI: 10.3390/children10081370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the test results of neonates delivered by COVID-19-positive mothers during pregnancy with those of neonates born to unvaccinated mothers who are COVID-19-free. A cohort study was conducted on 367 pregnant women who gave birth at Premiere Hospital, Timisoara, Romania, between May 2021 and February 2022. Two groups were established: Group 1, with 167 pregnant women infected with COVID-19, and Group 2, with 200 pregnant women who were not affected by COVID-19 during pregnancy. Maternal laboratory examination did not exhibit significant variations except for platelet count. In neonatal blood tests, WBC had a significantly lower median value in the group born to COVID-19-free mothers. Neonatal anemia and leukocytosis showed slightly higher prevalence in Group 1, but the differences were not statistically significant. This study suggests that maternal COVID-19 infection during pregnancy does not have significant associations with most maternal and neonatal characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela-Eugenia Popescu
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology and Neonatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.-E.P.); (N.L.); (A.M.M.); (M.A.D.); (Z.L.P.); (D.C.C.); (M.B.)
- Department of Neonatology, Premiere Hospital, Regina Maria Health Network, 300645 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Simona Cerbu
- Discipline of Radiology and Medical Imaging, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Ioana Rosca
- Neonatology Department, Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology “Prof. Dr. P.Sirbu”, 060251 Bucharest, Romania;
- Faculty of Midwifery and Nursery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nicoleta Lungu
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology and Neonatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.-E.P.); (N.L.); (A.M.M.); (M.A.D.); (Z.L.P.); (D.C.C.); (M.B.)
- Department of Neonatology, “Louis Țurcanu” Children Emergency Clinical Hospital Timișoara, 300011 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Ana Adriana Trușculescu
- Pulmonology Department, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
- Center for Research and Innovation in Precision Medicine of Respiratory Diseases (CRIPMRD), “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Valerica Belengeanu
- Department of Genetics, Institute of Life Science, Faculty of Medicine, “Vasile Goldiş” Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania;
| | - Aniko Maria Manea
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology and Neonatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.-E.P.); (N.L.); (A.M.M.); (M.A.D.); (Z.L.P.); (D.C.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Mirabela Adina Dima
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology and Neonatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.-E.P.); (N.L.); (A.M.M.); (M.A.D.); (Z.L.P.); (D.C.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Florin Gorun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital Timisoara, 300172 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Zoran Laurentiu Popa
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology and Neonatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.-E.P.); (N.L.); (A.M.M.); (M.A.D.); (Z.L.P.); (D.C.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Doru Ciprian Crisan
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology and Neonatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.-E.P.); (N.L.); (A.M.M.); (M.A.D.); (Z.L.P.); (D.C.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Marioara Boia
- Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology and Neonatology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.-E.P.); (N.L.); (A.M.M.); (M.A.D.); (Z.L.P.); (D.C.C.); (M.B.)
- Department of Neonatology, “Louis Țurcanu” Children Emergency Clinical Hospital Timișoara, 300011 Timisoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
González-Vanegas O, Martinez-Perez O. SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Preeclampsia-How an Infection Can Help Us to Know More about an Obstetric Condition. Viruses 2023; 15:1564. [PMID: 37515250 PMCID: PMC10385171 DOI: 10.3390/v15071564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection have a significantly higher risk of maternal death, ICU admission, preterm delivery, and stillbirth compared to those without infection. Additionally, the risk of preeclampsia (PE) increases in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2, particularly in severe cases. The association between COVID-19 and PE is likely attributed to various mechanisms, including direct effects of the virus on trophoblast function and the arterial wall, exaggerated inflammatory response in pregnant women, local inflammation leading to placental ischemia, SARS-CoV-2-related myocardial injury, cytokine storm, and thrombotic microangiopathy. This paper aims to explore the similarities between PE and SARS-CoV-2 infection, considering COVID-19 as a valuable study model. By examining these parallels, we can enhance our knowledge and comprehension of PE. We wish to emphasize the potential for COVID-19-induced myocardial injury in pregnant women and its connection to the increased maternal mortality rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oscar Martinez-Perez
- Obstetric Departament, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro 2, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Relan P, Motaze NV, Kothari K, Askie L, Le Polain O, Van Kerkhove MD, Diaz J, Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan BK. Severity and outcomes of Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 compared to Delta variant and severity of Omicron sublineages: a systematic review and metanalysis. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8:e012328. [PMID: 37419502 PMCID: PMC10347449 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare severity and clinical outcomes from Omicron as compared with the Delta variant and to compare outcomes between Omicron sublineages. METHODS We searched the WHO COVID-19 Research database for studies that compared clinical outcomes for patients with Omicron variant and the Delta variant, and separately Omicron sublineages BA.1 and BA.2. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates of relative risk (RR) between variants and sublineages. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I2 index. Risk of bias was assessed using the tool developed by the Clinical Advances through Research and Information Translation team. RESULTS Our search identified 1494 studies and 42 met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies were published as preprints. Of the 42 studies, 29 adjusted for vaccination status; 12 had no adjustment; and for 1, the adjustment was unclear. Three of the included studies compared the sublineages of Omicron BA.1 versus BA.2. As compared with Delta, individuals infected with Omicron had 61% lower risk of death (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.46) and 56% lower risk of hospitalisation (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.56). Omicron was similarly associated with lower risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, oxygen therapy, and non-invasive and invasive ventilation. The pooled risk ratio for the outcome of hospitalisation when comparing sublineages BA.1 versus BA.2 was 0.55 (95% 0.23 to 1.30). DISCUSSION Omicron variant was associated with lower risk of hospitalisation, ICU admission, oxygen therapy, ventilation and death as compared with Delta. There was no difference in the risk of hospitalisation between Omicron sublineages BA.1 and BA.2. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022310880.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pryanka Relan
- Health Emergencies Programme, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nkengafac Villyen Motaze
- Health Emergencies Programme, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
- Medicine Usage in South Africa, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| | - Kavita Kothari
- Library and Digital Information Networks, World Health Organization, Kobe, Japan
| | - Lisa Askie
- Methods and Standards Unit, Science Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Le Polain
- Acute Response Coordination Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria D Van Kerkhove
- COVID-19 Health Operations, World Health Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Janet Diaz
- Health Emergencies Programme, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abulseoud OA, Chan B, Rivera-Chiauzzi EY, Egol CJ, Nettey VN, Van Ligten MJ, Griffin TN, Aly M, Sinha S, Schneekloth TD. Psychiatric disorders during pregnancy in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive women: Prevalence and effect on outcome. Psychiatry Res 2023; 326:115313. [PMID: 37336168 PMCID: PMC10273774 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
The effect of psychiatric comorbidity on pregnancy outcome among SARS-CoV-2 positive women with asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic infections remains largely unknown. We reviewed the electronic medical records of all pregnant women who received care at Mayo Health System and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR) from March 2020 through October 2021. Among 789 patients, 34.2% (n = 270) had psychiatric comorbidity. Of those with psychiatric comrobidity, 62.2% (n = 168) had depression prior to pregnancy, and 5.2% (n = 14) reported new-onset depression during pregnancy. Before pregnancy, 65.6% (n = 177) had anxiety, and 4.4% (n = 12) developed anxiety during pregnancy Thirteen percent of SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women (n = 108) received psychotropic medication during pregnancy. In addition, 6.7% (n = 18) and 10.7% (n = 29) of pregnant women with psychiatric comorbidity had documented nicotine, cannabis and/ or illicit substance use during and prior to pregnancy, respectively. We depicted a significantly higher risk for cesarean delivery [35.6% vs. 24.9%) in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women with psychiatric comorbidity. In conclusion, the prevalence rates of depression, anxiety, and prescribed antidepressant medications during pregnancy among asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected women were substantially higher than average, which negatively impacted pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama A Abulseoud
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 58054; Department of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona 58054.
| | - Belinda Chan
- Department of Pediatrics, Neonatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108
| | | | - Claudine J Egol
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 58054
| | - Victor N Nettey
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 58054
| | | | | | - Mohamed Aly
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona 85054
| | - Shirshendu Sinha
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 58054
| | - Terry D Schneekloth
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 58054
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Örtqvist AK, Magnus MC, Dahlqvist E, Söderling J, Johansson K, Sandström A, Håberg SE, Stephansson O. Association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy: prospective, population based cohort study. BMJ Med 2023; 2:e000465. [PMID: 37275554 PMCID: PMC10230329 DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Objective To study the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy. Design Prospective, population based cohort study. Setting All singleton pregnancies after 22 completed gestational weeks registered in the Swedish Pregnancy Register and the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, from 1 March 2020 to 24 May 2022. Participants 312 456 individuals available for analysis (201 770 in Sweden and 110 686 in Norway), with pregnancies that reached 42 completed gestational weeks by the end of follow-up in the pregnancy registries, excluding individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection before pregnancy and those with a diagnosis of pre-existing hypertension or onset of hypertension before 20 gestational weeks. Main outcome measures Newly diagnosed hypertension during pregnancy was defined as a composite outcome of a diagnosis of gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, HELLP (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome, or eclampsia, from gestational week 20 to one week after delivery. The association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and hypertension during pregnancy was investigated with a stratified Cox proportional hazard model, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index, parity, smoking, region of birth, education, income, coexisting medical conditions, previous hypertension during pregnancy, number of healthcare visits during the past year, and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Pre-eclampsia was also analysed as a separate outcome. Results Of 312 456 individuals available for analysis, 8% (n=24 566) had SARS-CoV-2 infection any time during pregnancy, 6% (n=18 051) had a diagnosis of hypertension during pregnancy, and 3% (9899) had pre-eclampsia. SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of hypertension during pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.04) or pre-eclampsia (0.98, 0.87 to 1.10). The results were similar for SARS-CoV-2 infection in all gestational trimesters and in different time periods that corresponded to dominance of different variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Conclusions This population based study did not find any evidence of an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and an increased risk of hypertension during pregnancy or pre-eclampsia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne K. Örtqvist
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Visby Hospital, Visby, Sweden
| | - Maria C. Magnus
- Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elisabeth Dahlqvist
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonas Söderling
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kari Johansson
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women’s Health, Division of Obstetrics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Sandström
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women’s Health, Division of Obstetrics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Siri E. Håberg
- Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olof Stephansson
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women’s Health, Division of Obstetrics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Feng Q, Cui Q, Xiao Z, Liu Z, Fan S. Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 and Variants in Pregnancy. Maternal Fetal Med 2023. [DOI: 10.1097/fm9.0000000000000189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
|
18
|
He J, Wei Z, Leng T, Bao J, Gao X, Chen F. Vaccination options for pregnant women during the Omicron period. J Reprod Immunol 2023; 156:103798. [PMID: 36640675 PMCID: PMC9817340 DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.103798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Omicron exhibits reduced pathogenicity in general population than the previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants. However, the severity of disease and pregnancy outcomes of Omicron infection among pregnant women have not yet been definitively established. Meanwhile, substantial proportions of this population have doubts about the necessity of vaccination given the reports of declining efficacy of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. Herein, we comprehensively discuss the clinical outcomes of infected pregnant women during the Omicron period and summarize the available data on the safety and efficacy profile of COVID-19 vaccination. The results found that the incidence of moderate and severe disease, maternal mortality, pregnancy loss, preterm delivery, stillbirth, preeclampsia/eclampsia, and gestational hypertension during the Omicron period are similar to those during the Pre-Delta period. In view of the effects of mass vaccination and previous natural infection on disease severity, the virulence of Omicron in pregnant women may be comparable to or even higher than that of the Pre-Delta variant. Moreover, the currently approved COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective for pregnant women. Particularly, those who received a second or third dose had significantly less severe disease with little progression to critical illness or death compared with those who were unvaccinated or received only one dose. Therefore, in the case of the rapid spread of Omicron, pregnant women should still strictly follow preventive measures to avoid infection and receive the COVID-19 vaccine in a timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiarui He
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China
| | - Zichun Wei
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China
| | - Taiyang Leng
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China
| | - Jiaqi Bao
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China
| | - Xinyao Gao
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China
| | - Fei Chen
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Favre G, Maisonneuve E, Pomar L, Daire C, Poncelet C, Quibel T, Monod C, Martinez de Tejada B, Schäffer L, Papadia A, Radan AP, Todesco-Bernasconi M, Ville Y, Voekt CA, Eggel-Hort B, Capoccia-Brugger R, Johann S, Grawe C, Defert S, Mottet N, Kahlert CR, Garabedian C, Sentilhes L, Weber B, Leu S, Bassler D, Lepigeon K, Winterfeld U, Panchaud A, Baud D; French and Swiss COVI-PREG group. Maternal and perinatal outcomes following pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants infection among unvaccinated pregnant women in France and Switzerland: a prospective cohort study using the COVI-PREG registry. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2023; 26:100569. [PMID: 36628358 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Background SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women are at higher risk of adverse outcomes, but little evidence is available on how variants impact that risk. We aim to evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes among unvaccinated pregnant women that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, stratified by pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods. Methods This prospective study enrolled women from March 2020 to September 2022. Exposure to the different SARS-CoV-2 variants was defined by their periods of predominance. The primary outcome was severe maternal adverse outcome defined as either intensive care unit admission, acute respiratory distress syndrome, advanced oxygen supplementation, or maternal death. The secondary outcomes were preterm birth and other perinatal outcomes. Findings Overall, 1402, 262, and 391 SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women were enrolled during the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods respectively. Severe maternal adverse outcome was reported in 3.4% (n = 947/1402; 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) 2.5-4.5), 6.5% (n = 7/262; 95%CI 3.8-10.2), and 1.0% (n = 4/391; 95%CI 0.3-2.6) of women during the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods. The risk of severe maternal adverse outcome was higher during the Delta vs pre-Delta period (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) = 1.8; 95%CI 1.1-3.2) and lower during the Omicron vs pre-Delta period (aRR = 0.3; 95%CI, 0.1-0.8). The risks of hospitalization for COVID-19 were 12.6% (n = 176/1402; 95%CI 10.9-14.4), 17.2% (n = 45/262; 95%CI 12.8-22.3), and 12.5% (n = 49/391; 95%CI 9.4-16.2), during the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron period, respectively. Pregnancy complications occurred after SARS-CoV-2 exposure in 30.0% (n = 363/1212; 95%CI 27.4-32.6), 35.2% (n = 83/236; 95%CI 29.1-41.6), and 30.3% (n = 105/347; 95%CI 25.5-35.4) of patients during the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods, respectively. Stillbirths were reported in 0.5% (n = 6/1159; 95%CI 0.2-1.1), 2.8% (n = 6/210; 95%CI 1.0-6.0), and 0.9% (n = 2/213; 95%CI 0.1-3.4) or patients during the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods respectively. Interpretation The Delta period was associated with a higher risk of severe maternal adverse outcome and the Omicron period with a lower risk of severe adverse outcome compared to pre-Delta era. The reported risk of hospitalization was high during the Omicron period and should not be trivialized. Funding Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, Fondation CHUV.
Collapse
|
20
|
Magee LA, Molteni E, Bowyer V, Bone JN, Boulding H, Khalil A, Mistry HD, Poston L, Silverio SA, Wolfe I, Duncan EL, von Dadelszen P. National surveillance data analysis of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in England by women of reproductive age. Nat Commun 2023; 14:956. [PMID: 36813760 PMCID: PMC9947170 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36125-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Women of reproductive age are a group of particular concern with regards to vaccine uptake, related to their unique considerations of menstruation, fertility, and pregnancy. To obtain vaccine uptake data specific to this group, we obtained vaccine surveillance data from the Office for National Statistics, linked with COVID-19 vaccination status from the National Immunisation Management Service, England, from 8 Dec 2020 to 15 Feb 2021; data from 13,128,525 such women at population-level, were clustered by age (18-29, 30-39, and 40-49 years), self-defined ethnicity (19 UK government categories), and index of multiple deprivation (IMD, geographically-defined IMD quintiles). Here we show that among women of reproductive age, older age, White ethnicity and being in the least-deprived index of multiple deprivation are each independently associated with higher vaccine uptake, for first and second doses; however, ethnicity exerts the strongest influence (and IMD the weakest). These findings should inform future vaccination public messaging and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Magee
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Science, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Erika Molteni
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Vicky Bowyer
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course & Population Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jeffrey N Bone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Harriet Boulding
- The Policy Institute at King's, Social Science and Public Policy, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Asma Khalil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Hiten D Mistry
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lucilla Poston
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sergio A Silverio
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ingrid Wolfe
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Emma L Duncan
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course & Population Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Peter von Dadelszen
- Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Science, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yamaguchi T, Makino Y, Mabuchi Y, Okuda K, Hayashi H, Kato N, Fujii T, Hirate H. Severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women and their neonates during the Omicron period compared to the pre-Omicron period: A retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2023; 49:1348-1354. [PMID: 36781158 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
AIM To compare the clinical outcomes among women diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during pregnancy, and their neonates, during the period when the Omicron variant predominated in Japan with those of the pre-Omicron variant period. METHODS We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study between August 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022. The cohort was divided into pre-Omicron group (August 1, 2020 to November 30, 2021) and Omicron group (December 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022). The primary outcome was maternal intensive care unit (ICU) admission during the perinatal period. The secondary outcomes were maternal oxygen administration before and after delivery, preterm birth (PTB), and low birth weight (LBW). RESULTS During the study period, 81 pregnant women were admitted to the hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection (pre-Omicron period, n = 28; Omicron period, n = 53). SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron period was associated with lower risk of maternal ICU admission (adjusted-odds ratio [aOR]: 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-1.23, p = 0.072), oxygen administration via a nasal cannula or mask (aOR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-0.96, p = 0.045), PTB (aOR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04-0.51, p = 0.002), and LBW (aOR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03-0.55, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Among pregnant women, SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron period was associated with reduced risk of maternal ICU admission, requiring supplemental oxygen, PTB, and LBW. This can be attributable to lower virulence of the Omicron variant and higher vaccination coverage during the Omicron period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takumi Yamaguchi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuto Makino
- Department of Preventive Services, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuki Mabuchi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Keito Okuda
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroe Hayashi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Noriko Kato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Fujii
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Hirate
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Villar J, Soto Conti CP, Gunier RB, Ariff S, Craik R, Cavoretto PI, Rauch S, Gandino S, Nieto R, Winsey A, Menis C, Rodriguez GB, Savasi V, Tug N, Deantoni S, Fabre M, Martinez de Tejada B, Rodriguez-Sibaja MJ, Livio S, Napolitano R, Maiz N, Sobrero H, Peterson A, Deruelle P, Giudice C, Teji JS, Casale RA, Salomon LJ, Prefumo F, Cheikh Ismail L, Gravett MG, Vale M, Hernández V, Sentilhes L, Easter SR, Capelli C, Marler E, Cáceres DM, Albornoz Crespo G, Ernawati E, Lipschuetz M, Takahashi K, Vecchiarelli C, Hubka T, Ikenoue S, Tavchioska G, Bako B, Ayede AI, Eskenazi B, Thornton JG, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, Papageorghiou AT. Pregnancy outcomes and vaccine effectiveness during the period of omicron as the variant of concern, INTERCOVID-2022: a multinational, observational study. Lancet 2023; 401:447-457. [PMID: 36669520 PMCID: PMC9910845 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02467-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2021, we showed an increased risk associated with COVID-19 in pregnancy. Since then, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has undergone genetic mutations. We aimed to examine the effects on maternal and perinatal outcomes of COVID-19 during pregnancy, and evaluate vaccine effectiveness, when omicron (B.1.1.529) was the variant of concern. METHODS INTERCOVID-2022 is a large, prospective, observational study, involving 41 hospitals across 18 countries. Each woman with real-time PCR or rapid test, laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in pregnancy was compared with two unmatched women without a COVID-19 diagnosis who were recruited concomitantly and consecutively in pregnancy or at delivery. Mother and neonate dyads were followed until hospital discharge. Primary outcomes were maternal morbidity and mortality index (MMMI), severe neonatal morbidity index (SNMI), and severe perinatal morbidity and mortality index (SPMMI). Vaccine effectiveness was estimated, adjusted by maternal risk profile. FINDINGS We enrolled 4618 pregnant women from Nov 27, 2021 (the day after WHO declared omicron a variant of concern), to June 30, 2022: 1545 (33%) women had a COVID-19 diagnosis (median gestation 36·7 weeks [IQR 29·0-38·9]) and 3073 (67%) women, with similar demographic characteristics, did not have a COVID-19 diagnosis. Overall, women with a diagnosis had an increased risk for MMMI (relative risk [RR] 1·16 [95% CI 1·03-1·31]) and SPMMI (RR 1·21 [95% CI 1·00-1·46]). Women with a diagnosis, compared with those without a diagnosis, also had increased risks of SNMI (RR 1·23 [95% CI 0·88-1·71]), although the lower bounds of the 95% CI crossed unity. Unvaccinated women with a COVID-19 diagnosis had a greater risk of MMMI (RR 1·36 [95% CI 1·12-1·65]). Severe COVID-19 symptoms in the total sample increased the risk of severe maternal complications (RR 2·51 [95% CI 1·84-3·43]), perinatal complications (RR 1·84 [95% CI 1·02-3·34]), and referral, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or death (RR 11·83 [95% CI 6·67-20·97]). Severe COVID-19 symptoms in unvaccinated women increased the risk of MMMI (RR 2·88 [95% CI 2·02-4·12]) and referral, ICU admission, or death (RR 20·82 [95% CI 10·44-41·54]). 2886 (63%) of 4618 total participants had at least a single dose of any vaccine, and 2476 (54%) of 4618 had either complete or booster doses. Vaccine effectiveness (all vaccines combined) for severe complications of COVID-19 for all women with a complete regimen was 48% (95% CI 22-65) and 76% (47-89) after a booster dose. For women with a COVID-19 diagnosis, vaccine effectiveness of all vaccines combined for women with a complete regimen was 74% (95% CI 48-87) and 91% (65-98) after a booster dose. INTERPRETATION COVID-19 in pregnancy, during the first 6 months of omicron as the variant of concern, was associated with increased risk of severe maternal morbidity and mortality, especially among symptomatic and unvaccinated women. Women with complete or boosted vaccine doses had reduced risk for severe symptoms, complications, and death. Vaccination coverage among pregnant women remains a priority. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Villar
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Robert B Gunier
- Center for Environmental Research and Community Health (CERCH), School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Shabina Ariff
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Rachel Craik
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paolo I Cavoretto
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Milan, Italy
| | - Stephen Rauch
- Center for Environmental Research and Community Health (CERCH), School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Serena Gandino
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ricardo Nieto
- Division Neonatología, Hospital Materno Infantil Ramón Sarda, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Adele Winsey
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Camilla Menis
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, NICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriel B Rodriguez
- Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Valeria Savasi
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, L- Sacco Hospital ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Department of Biological and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Niyazi Tug
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sancaktepe Sehit Prof Dr Ilhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Sonia Deantoni
- Neonatal Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marta Fabre
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitario de Aragón (IIS Aragon), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Begoña Martinez de Tejada
- Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Stefania Livio
- Children's Hospital V Buzzi, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaele Napolitano
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK; Fetal Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nerea Maiz
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Helena Sobrero
- Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | - Philippe Deruelle
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Carolina Giudice
- Servicio de Neonatologia, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jagjit S Teji
- Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roberto A Casale
- Maternal and Child Department, Hospital Nacional Profesor Alejandro Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Federico Prefumo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Leila Cheikh Ismail
- Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Michael G Gravett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marynéa Vale
- Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil
| | - Valeria Hernández
- Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Loïc Sentilhes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sarah R Easter
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carola Capelli
- Servicio de Neonatología del Departamento Materno Infantil, Hospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Emily Marler
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Ernawati Ernawati
- Medical Faculty Universitas Airlangga - Dr Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Michal Lipschuetz
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Division- Hadassah Medical Center Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ken Takahashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Teresa Hubka
- Ascension-Resurrection Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Satoru Ikenoue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Babagana Bako
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medical Sciences, Gombe State University, Gombe, Nigeria
| | - Adejumoke I Ayede
- College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Brenda Eskenazi
- Center for Environmental Research and Community Health (CERCH), School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Jim G Thornton
- University of Nottingham Medical School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan; Center for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen H Kennedy
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aris T Papageorghiou
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute, Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shen CJ, Lin YP, Hu SY, Shen CF, Chuang HY, Ker CR, Sun DJ, Yang YH, Cheng CM. Pilot Study for Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine with Seasonal Influenza and Pertussis Vaccines in Pregnant Women. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11. [PMID: 36679964 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11010119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: It is well known that the implementation of routine immunizations to prevent vaccine-preventable diseases has a significant impact on the health and well-being of infants, children, and pregnant women. We aimed to evaluate the influence of influenza, tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine on the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among pregnant women, the priority population recommended for vaccination. Methods: We conducted a prospective study among pregnant women without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in Taiwan. Maternal and umbilical cord blood samples at delivery were analyzed for the percentage of inhibition of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against the original strain, Delta, and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 as well as the total antibody to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. We examined the association between different doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in combination with influenza and Tdap vaccination, and two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with or without influenza and Tdap vaccines via a two-sample t-test. Results of p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results: 98 pregnant women were enrolled in our study, with 32 receiving two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine, 60 receiving three-dose of mRNA-1273, and 6 receiving one-dose of ChAdOx1 and two-dose of mRNA-1273. Twenty-one participants were immunized with SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and Tdap vaccines. Of these 21 individuals, there were no significant NAbs levels in maternal and cord blood samples against the Omicron variant, regardless of doses or type of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. However, antibody responses against the wild-type and Delta variant were significantly lower in all maternal sera in the two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine group. Among 32 women receiving two-dose mRNA-1273, significantly lower levels of NAbs in maternal sera were observed against the Delta variant and total antibody both in maternal sera and cord blood were observed in individuals receiving SARS-CoV-2 and influenza vaccine. Conclusion: This is the pilot study to demonstrate the effects of influenza and the Tdap vaccine on the immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among pregnant women. These results suggest that combination vaccination during pregnancy may result in immunogenic interactions.
Collapse
|
24
|
Seaton CL, Cohen A, Henninger EM, Gendlina I, Hou W, Bernstein PS, Duong TQ. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Perinatal Outcomes Across the Pandemic at an Academic Medical Center in New York City. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:144-51. [PMID: 36302251 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate perinatal complications associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during pregnancy in the four major waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the Bronx, New York. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included all patients who delivered at a single academic medical center between March 1, 2020, and February 13, 2022. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result during pregnancy. Primary outcomes were preterm birth, low birth weight, stillbirth, cesarean delivery, and preeclampsia associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondary analyses examined outcomes by predominant variant at the time of infection. Group differences in categorical variables were tested using χ 2 tests. RESULTS Of the 8,983 patients who delivered, 638 (7.1%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Age, race, ethnicity, and major comorbidities did not differ significantly between the SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative cohorts ( P >.05). Primary outcomes did not differ between the SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative cohorts ( P >.05). There was a marked increase in positive SARS-CoV-2 test results in individuals who gave birth during the Omicron wave (140/449, 31.2%). However, among patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, the preterm birth rate during the Omicron wave (9.9%) was significantly lower than during the original wave (20.3%) and the Alpha (18.4%) wave ( P <.05). Vaccination rates were low before the Omicron wave and rose to 47.2% during the Omicron wave among individuals hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Finally, second-trimester infection was significantly associated with worse perinatal outcomes compared with third-trimester infection ( P <.05). CONCLUSION There was a general trend toward improvement in preterm birth rates across the pandemic among pregnant patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The Omicron variant was more infectious, but the preterm birth rate during the Omicron wave was low compared with that during the original wave and the Alpha wave.
Collapse
|
25
|
Piekos SN, Price ND, Hood L, Hadlock JJ. The impact of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination on maternal-fetal outcomes. Reprod Toxicol 2022:S0890-6238(22)00153-8. [PMID: 36283657 DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The rapidly evolving COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an upsurge of scientific productivity to help address the global health crisis. One area of active research is the impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy. Here, we provide an epidemiological overview about what is known about the effects of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination on maternal-fetal outcomes, and identify gaps in knowledge. Pregnant people are at increased risk for severe COVID-19, and maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection increases the risk of negative maternal-fetal outcomes. Despite this elevated risk, there have been high rates of vaccine hesitancy, heightened by the initial lack of safety and efficacy data for COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. In response, retrospective cohort studies were performed to examine the impact of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. Here, we report the vaccine's efficacy during pregnancy and its impact on maternal-fetal outcomes, as well as an overview of initial studies on booster shots in pregnancy. We found that pregnant people are at risk for more severe COVID-19 outcomes, maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with worse birth outcomes, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy remains prevalent in the pregnant population, and COVID-19 vaccination and boosters promote better maternal-fetal outcomes. The results should help reduce vaccine hesitancy by alleviating concerns about the safety and efficacy of administering the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. Overall, this review provides an introduction to COVID-19 during pregnancy. It is expected to help consolidate current knowledge, accelerate research of COVID-19 during pregnancy and inform clinical, policy, and research decisions regarding COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant people.
Collapse
|
26
|
Deng J, Ma Y, Liu Q, Du M, Liu M, Liu J. Association of Infection with Different SARS-CoV-2 Variants during Pregnancy with Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:ijerph192315932. [PMID: 36498007 PMCID: PMC9740636 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192315932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to review the currently available data, and to explore the association of infection with different severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants during pregnancy with maternal and perinatal outcomes in the real world. Observational cohort studies were analyzed that described the maternal and perinatal outcomes of infection with different SARS-CoV-2 variants during pregnancy. Random-effects inverse-variance models were used to evaluate the pooled prevalence (PP) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for maternal and perinatal outcomes. Random effects were used to estimate the pooled odds ratios (OR) and their 95% CI for different outcomes between Delta and pre-Delta periods, and between Omicron and Delta periods. Eighteen studies, involving a total of 133,058 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy (99,567 cases of SARS-CoV-2 wild type or pre-variant infection and 33,494 cases of SARS-CoV-2 variant infections), were included in this meta-analysis. Among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infections, the PPs for required respiratory support, severe or critical illness, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, maternal death, and preterm birth <37 weeks were, respectively, 27.24% (95%CI, 20.51−33.97%), 24.96% (95%CI, 15.96−33.96%), 11.31% (95%CI, 4.00−18.61%), 4.20% (95%CI, 1.43−6.97%), and 33.85% (95%CI, 21.54−46.17%) in the Delta period, which were higher than those in the pre-Delta period, while the corresponding PPs were, respectively, 10.74% (95%CI, 6.05−15.46%), 11.99% (95%CI, 6.23−17.74%), 4.17% (95%CI, 1.53−6.80%), 0.63% (95%CI, 0.05−1.20%), and 18.58% (95%CI, 9.52−27.65%). The PPs for required respiratory support, severe or critical illness, and ICU admission were, respectively, 2.63% (95%CI, 0.98−4.28%), 1.11% (95%CI, 0.29−1.94%), and 1.83% (95%CI, 0.85−2.81%) in the Omicron period, which were lower than those in the pre-Delta and Delta periods. These results suggest that Omicron infections are associated with less severe maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes, though maternal ICU admission, the need for respiratory support, and preterm birth did also occur with Omicron infections. Since Omicron is currently the predominant strain globally, and has the highest rates of transmission, it is still important to remain vigilant in protecting the vulnerable populations of mothers and infants. In particular, obstetricians and gynecologists should not ignore the adverse risks of maternal ICU admission, respiratory support, and preterm births in pregnant patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections, in order to protect the health of mothers and infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Deng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Address No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yirui Ma
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Address No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Qiao Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Address No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Min Du
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Address No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Min Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Address No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Jue Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Address No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Address No. 5, Yiheyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lagousi T, Gkentzi D, Geropeppa M, Tsagkli P, Spoulou V. Protecting the Offspring, the Gift of Maternal Immunization: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:1953. [DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10111953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy is characterized by immunological alterations in pregnant women that permit the growth of a semi-allogenic fetus, resulting in greater susceptibility of childbearing women to infections. Furthermore, due to the immaturity of the immune system of neonates, a protection gap is present in early life, leaving neonates and infants vulnerable to infectious diseases with increased morbidity and mortality. Maternal immunization against influenza, pertussis, and, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 has been implemented in several countries, with beneficial effects on both the mother and the offspring. The main protective mechanism of vaccination during pregnancy is transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies. However, recent evidence has implied that the fetal immune system may be influenced beyond passive immunity. This review sheds light on the current status of the routinely administered vaccinations during pregnancy, focusing on the impact of maternal immunization on the priming of the fetal immune system and suggesting future perspectives for the optimization of vaccination strategies.
Collapse
|
28
|
Mndala L, Monk EJM, Phiri D, Riches J, Makuluni R, Gadama L, Kachale F, Bilesi R, Mbewe M, Likaka A, Chapuma C, Kumwenda M, Maseko B, Ndamala C, Kuyere A, Munthali L, Henrion MYR, Masesa C, Lissauer D. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19 before and after SARS-CoV-2 omicron emergence in maternity facilities in Malawi (MATSurvey): data from a national maternal surveillance platform. Lancet Glob Health 2022; 10:e1623-e1631. [PMID: 36155136 PMCID: PMC9553200 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00359-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes of omicron-associated COVID-19 in pregnancy have not been reported from low-resource settings, and data from sub-Saharan Africa before the emergence of omicron are scarce. Using a national maternal surveillance platform (MATSurvey), we aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19 in Malawi during the omicron wave to the preceding waves of beta and delta. METHODS All pregnant and recently pregnant patients, up to 42 days following delivery, admitted to 33 health-care facilities throughout Malawi with symptomatic, test-proven COVID-19 during the second (beta [B.1.351]: January to April, 2021), third (delta [B.1.617.2]: June to October, 2021), and fourth (omicron [B.1.1.529]: December 2021 to March, 2022) waves were included, with no age restrictions. Demographic and clinical features, maternal outcomes of interest (severe maternal outcome [a composite of maternal near-miss events and maternal deaths] and maternal death), and neonatal outcomes of interest (stillbirth and death during maternal stay in the health-care facility of enrolment) were compared between the fourth wave and the second and third waves using Fisher's exact test. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for maternal outcomes were estimated using mixed-effects logistic regression. FINDINGS Between Jan 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, 437 patients admitted to 28 health-care facilities conducting MATSurvey had symptoms of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in 261 patients; of whom 76 (29%) had a severe maternal outcome and 45 (17%) died. These two outcomes were less common during the fourth wave (omicron dominance) than the second wave (adjusted OR of severe maternal outcome: 3·96 [95% CI 1·22-12·83], p=0·022; adjusted OR of maternal death: 5·65 [1·54-20·69], p=0·0090) and the third wave (adjusted OR: 3·18 [1·03-9·80], p=0·044; adjusted OR: 3·52 [0·98-12·60], p=0·053). Shortness of breath was the only symptom associated with poor maternal outcomes of interest (p<0·0001), and was less frequently reported in the fourth wave (23%) than in the second wave (51%; p=0·0007) or third wave (50%; p=0·0004). The demographic characteristics and medical histories of patients were similar across the three waves. During the second and third waves, 12 (13%) of 92 singleton neonates were stillborn or died during maternal stay in the health-care facility of enrolment, compared with 0 of the 25 born in the fourth wave (p=0·067 vs preceding waves combined). INTERPRETATION Maternal and neonatal outcomes from COVID-19 were less severe during the fourth wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Malawi, during omicron dominance, than during the preceding beta and delta waves. FUNDING Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and the National Institute for Health and Care Research. TRANSLATION For the Chichewa translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard Mndala
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Edward J M Monk
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
| | - Deborah Phiri
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Jennifer Riches
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Regina Makuluni
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Luis Gadama
- Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | | | | | | | - Andrew Likaka
- Malawi Blood Transfusion Services, Blantyre, Malawi; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
| | - Chikondi Chapuma
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Moses Kumwenda
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi; Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Bertha Maseko
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Chifundo Ndamala
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Annie Kuyere
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Laura Munthali
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Marc Y R Henrion
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi; Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Clemens Masesa
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi; Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - David Lissauer
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi; University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shoji K, Tsuzuki S, Akiyama T, Matsunaga N, Asai Y, Suzuki S, Iwamoto N, Funaki T, Yamada M, Ozawa N, Yamaguchi K, Miyairi I, Ohmagari N. Comparison of clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in pregnant women between the Delta and Omicron variants of concern predominant periods. J Infect Chemother 2022; 29:33-38. [PMID: 36103949 PMCID: PMC9464469 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Information regarding effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant strains on clinical manifestations and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnant women is limited. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted using the data from the nationwide COVID-19 registry in Japan. We identified pregnant patients with symptomatic COVID-19 hospitalized during the study period. The Delta and Omicron variants of concern (VOC) predominant periods were defined as August 1 to December 31, 2021 and January 1 to May 31, 2022, respectively. Clinical characteristics were compared between the patients in the Delta and Omicron VOC periods. In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for developing moderate-to-severe COVID-19. Results During the study period, 310 symptomatic COVID-19 cases of pregnant women were identified; 111 and 199 patients were hospitalized during the Delta and Omicron VOC periods, respectively. Runny nose and sore throat were more common, and fatigue, dysgeusia, and olfactory dysfunction were less common manifestations observed in the Omicron VOC period. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, onset during the later stage of pregnancy (OR: 2.08 [1.24–3.71]) and onset during the Delta VOC period (OR: 2.25 [1.08–4.90]) were independently associated with moderate-to-severe COVID-19, whereas two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were protective against developing moderate-to-severe COVID-19 (OR: 0.34 [0.13–0.84]). Conclusions Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in pregnant women differed between the Delta and Omicron VOC periods. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was still effective in preventing severe COVID-19 throughout the Delta and Omicron VOC periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kensuke Shoji
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Subspecialties, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Shinya Tsuzuki
- AMR Clinical Reference Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Infectious Diseases, Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Akiyama
- AMR Clinical Reference Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Matsunaga
- AMR Clinical Reference Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Asai
- AMR Clinical Reference Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Infectious Diseases, Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Setsuko Suzuki
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noriko Iwamoto
- AMR Clinical Reference Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Infectious Diseases, Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takanori Funaki
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Subspecialties, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaki Yamada
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Subspecialties, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan; Department for Advanced Medicine for Viral Infections, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Ozawa
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koushi Yamaguchi
- Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Isao Miyairi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Subspecialties, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Norio Ohmagari
- AMR Clinical Reference Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Infectious Diseases, Disease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Buonomo AR, Esposito N, Di Filippo I, Saccone G, Pinchera B, Scotto R, Bifulco G, Gentile I. Safety and efficacy of monoclonal antibodies anti SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2022; 21:1137-1141. [PMID: 36082789 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2122436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND SARS CoV-2 infection in pregnant women has become an urgent medical concern since it has been demonstrated a high rate of severe course of COVID-19, with evidence of increased mortality and peri-partum complications, especially when the infect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Riccardo Buonomo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Infectious Diseases Unit, University "Federico II" - Naples Italy
| | - Nunzia Esposito
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Infectious Diseases Unit, University "Federico II" - Naples Italy
| | - Isabella Di Filippo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Infectious Diseases Unit, University "Federico II" - Naples Italy
| | - Gabriele Saccone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II - Naples Italy
| | - Biagio Pinchera
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Infectious Diseases Unit, University "Federico II" - Naples Italy
| | - Riccardo Scotto
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Infectious Diseases Unit, University "Federico II" - Naples Italy
| | - Giuseppe Bifulco
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Infectious Diseases Unit, University "Federico II" - Naples Italy
| | - Ivan Gentile
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Infectious Diseases Unit, University "Federico II" - Naples Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kabalkin Y, Bentov Y, Gil M, Beharier O, Jaber S, Moav-Zafrir A, Khwies D, Ben-Meir A, Esh Broder E, Walfisch A, Holzer HEG, Hershko Klement A. Mild COVID-19 Was Not Associated with Impaired IVF Outcomes or Early Pregnancy Loss in IVF Patients. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11185265. [PMID: 36142911 PMCID: PMC9505769 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Data collection regarding the effects of COVID-19 on reproduction is ongoing. This study examined the effect of COVID-19 on IVF cycle parameters and early pregnancy outcomes. It included two arms: the first compared non-exposed cycles to post-SARS-CoV-2 IVF cycles. Sperm parameters were also compared. The second, prospective arm compared pregnancy outcomes among IVF patients who contracted COVID-19 during early pregnancy to those who did not. None of the patients were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. The first arm included 60 treatment cycles of women with confirmed COVID-19, compared to 60 non-exposed cycles (either the same patient before exposure or matched non-exposed patients). The outcomes of the treatment cycles did not differ significantly between exposed and non-exposed groups, including number of oocytes, endometrial thickness, fertilization rate and number of top-quality embryos. In 11 cycles, the male partner had also recently recovered: sperm concentration was lower post-exposure: 6.27 million/mL vs. 16.5 pre-exposure (p = 0.008). In 189 patients with IVF-achieved pregnancies, pregnancy loss and hospital admissions did not differ between exposed and non-exposed groups. IVF treatment outcomes and the rate of early pregnancy loss appears to be unaffected by SARS-CoV-2 disease, despite a minor decline in sperm concentration among recent recoverees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yossef Kabalkin
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
| | - Yaakov Bentov
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- The IVF Unit, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel
- Correspondence:
| | - Moran Gil
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- The IVF Unit, Hadassah Ein Kerem-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91220, Israel
| | - Ofer Beharier
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- The IVF Unit, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel
| | - Sireen Jaber
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- The IVF Unit, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel
| | - Arbel Moav-Zafrir
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- The IVF Unit, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel
| | - Dua’ Khwies
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- The IVF Unit, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel
| | - Assaf Ben-Meir
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- The IVF Unit, Hadassah Ein Kerem-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91220, Israel
| | - Efrat Esh Broder
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- The IVF Unit, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel
| | - Asnat Walfisch
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- The IVF Unit, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel
| | - Hananel E. G. Holzer
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- The IVF Unit, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel
| | - Anat Hershko Klement
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- The IVF Unit, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Malik S, Jain D, Bokade CM, Savaskar S, Deshmukh LS, Wade P, Madhura AD, Suryawanshi M, Bandichhode ST, Bodhgire SB, Zala S, Mahale SD, Modi DN, Waghmare R, Surve SV, Gajbhiye RK. Outcomes in neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 during the second wave in India. Eur J Pediatr 2022; 181:3537-3543. [PMID: 35802208 PMCID: PMC9263042 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04546-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED COVID-19 pandemic has affected all age groups globally including pregnant women and their neonates. The aim of the study was to understand outcomes in neonates of mothers with COVID-19 during the first and second waves of COVID-19 pandemic. A retrospective analysis of 2524 neonates born to SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers was conducted during the first wave (n = 1782) and second wave (n = 742) of the COVID-19 pandemic at five study sites of the PregCovid registry in Maharashtra, India. A significant difference was noted in preterm birth, which was higher in the second wave (15.0%, 111/742) compared to the first wave (7.8%, 139/1782) (P < 0.001). The proportion of neonates requiring NICU admission was significantly higher in the second wave (19.0%, 141/742) as compared to that in the first wave (14.8%, 264/1782) (P < 0.05). On comparing regional differences, significantly higher neonatal complications were reported from Mumbai metropolitan region (P < 0.05). During the second wave of COVID-19, birth asphyxia and prematurity were 3.8- and 2.1-fold higher respectively (P < 0.001). Neonatal resuscitation at birth was significantly higher in second wave (3.4%, 25/742 vs 1.8%, 32/1782) (P < 0.05). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in neonates was comparable (4.2% vs 4.6%) with no significant difference between the two waves. CONCLUSION Higher incidence of adverse outcomes in neonates born to SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers in the second wave of COVID-19 as compared to the first wave. TRIAL REGISTRATION PregCovid study is registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2020/05/025423, Registered on 28/05/2020). WHAT IS KNOWN • The second wave of COVID-19 was more lethal to pregnant women than the first wave. Newborns are at risk of developing complications. WHAT IS NEW • Birth asphyxia, prematurity, and neonatal resuscitation at birth were significantly higher in the second wave as compared to those in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushma Malik
- Department of Paediartrics, Topiwala National Medical College & BYL Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra India
| | - Dipty Jain
- Department of Paediartrics, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra India
| | - Chandrakant M. Bokade
- Department of Paediartrics, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra India
| | - Shakira Savaskar
- Department of Paediartrics, Dr Vaishampayan Memorial Government Medical College, Solapur, Maharashtra India
| | - Laxmikant S. Deshmukh
- Department of Paediatrics, Government Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra India
| | - Poonam Wade
- Department of Paediartrics, Topiwala National Medical College & BYL Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra India
| | - Abhishek D. Madhura
- Department of Paediartrics, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra India
| | - Milind Suryawanshi
- Department of Paediartrics, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra India
| | - Sachin T. Bandichhode
- Department of Paediartrics, Dr Vaishampayan Memorial Government Medical College, Solapur, Maharashtra India
| | - Sachin B. Bodhgire
- Department of Paediatrics, Government Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra India
| | - Sarika Zala
- Clinical Research Lab, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Smita D. Mahale
- Emeritus Scientist, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Parel, Mumbai India
| | - Deepak N. Modi
- Molecular and Cellular Biology Laboratory, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Parel, Mumbai India
| | - Rakesh Waghmare
- Medical Education and Drugs Department, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai, India.
| | - Suchitra V. Surve
- Child Health Research Department, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Maharashtra Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Rahul K. Gajbhiye
- Clinical Research Lab, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Parel, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|