Three sites of the hepatitis B virus X protein cooperatively interact with cellular proteins

The molecular and pathophysiological implications of hepatitis B X antigen in chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B virus is considered one of the most significant environmental carcinogens in humans. Because the mechanisms of HBV replication and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are partially known, HBV-associated pathogenesis remains a challenge to increase its understanding. Evidence suggests that the regulatory protein hepatitis B virus X (HBx) mediates the establishment and maintenance of the chronic carrier state. HBx is a multifunctional and potentially oncogenic protein that is conserved among mammalian hepadnaviruses; it is produced very early after infection and throughout the chronic phase. HBx exerts its effects by interacting with cellular proteins and activating various signaling pathways. HBx stimulates the transcription of genes that regulate cell growth, apoptosis, and DNA repair. It also interacts with proteasome subunits and affects mitochondrial stability. Moreover, HBx participates in processes that are associated with the progression of chronic liver disease, including angiogenesis and fibrosis. This review discusses the function of HBx in the life cycle of HBV and its contribution to the pathogenesis of HCC.

Evaluation of transcriptional efficiency of hepatitis B virus covalently closed circular DNA by reverse transcription-PCR combined with the restriction enzyme digestion method

Virus persistence in chronic hepatitis B patients is due to the sustaining level of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) within the nuclei of infected hepatocytes. In this study, we used a modified 1.3-fold hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome, with a BclI genetic marker embedded in the redundancy region, to examine the transcriptional activity of cccDNA and the effect of the HBx protein on transcriptional regulation. After harvesting total RNA from transfected cells or stable lines, we specifically identified and monitored the transcripts from cccDNA by using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) combined with the restriction enzyme digestion method. In this approach, we have found that (i) RT-PCR combined with detection of the BclI marker is a highly specific method for distinguishing cccDNA-derived transcripts from the original integrated viral genome, (ii) the transcriptional ability of cccDNA was less efficient than that from the integrated viral genome, and (iii) the transcriptional activity of cccDNA was significantly regulated by the HBx protein, a potential transcription activator. In conclusion, we provided a tool with which to elucidate the transcriptional regulation of cccDNA and clarified the transcriptional regulation mechanism of HBx on cccDNA. The results obtained may be helpful in the development of a clinical intervention for patients with chronic HBV infections.

Interaction of the hepatitis B virus X protein (HBx) with heat shock protein 60 enhances HBx-mediated apoptosis

Understanding the function of the hepatitis B virus X protein (HBx) is fundamental to elucidating the underlying mechanisms of hepatitis and hepatocarcinogenesis caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. We identified heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60) as a novel cellular target of HBx by the combination of affinity purification and mass spectrometry. Physical interaction between HBx and Hsp60 was confirmed by standard immunoprecipitation and immunoblot methods. Analysis of HBx deletion constructs showed that amino acids 88-117 of HBx were responsible for the binding to Hsp60. Confocal laser microscopy demonstrated that HBx and Hsp60 colocalized in mitochondria. Furthermore, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP end labeling (TUNEL) revealed that the introduction of Hsp60 into cells facilitated HBx-induced apoptosis. These findings suggest the importance of the molecular chaperon protein Hsp60 to the function of HBV viral proteins.

Two distinct types of hepatitis B virus core promoter variants in Yemeni blood donors

Genetic variations in the basic core promoter (BCP) region of hepatitis B virus (HBV) occur during the natural history of chronic HBV infection. This study investigates the presence of basic core promoter variations in 28 asymptomatic Yemeni blood donors, correlating variations with HBeAg phenotype and viral load. The core promoter/precore and surface gene region of HBV DNA were amplified using nested PCRs and the PCR products were sequenced either directly or after cloning. HBeAg and viral load were measured when HBV DNA was detectable. Sequencing of 18 surface PCR products indicated that all were of genotype D. Two distinct types of variants were identified in the basic core promoter: substitution only (N = 14) and major deletion (N = 9). The commonest substitutions were located at nucleotide positions 1753, 1762, and 1764; 10/14 (71.4%) were associated with the precore 1896A substitution resulting in the premature stop of the precore reading frame and 6/14 (42.9%) had viral loads above 400 copies/ml. Two forms of deletion variants were found: 8 bp deletion (1763-1770) (N = 2) and a novel 12 (1746-1757) + 8 bp (1763-1770) deletion (N = 7). The deletion sequences were never associated with the precore 1896A substitution and all had viral load below 400 copies/ml with negative HBeAg phenotype. The polymorphism 1773C was found in 9/14 (64.3%) substitution sequences whereas all deletion sequences had 1773T. Two donors had mixed sequences of basic core promoter substitution and major deletions (both 8 bp and 12 + 8 bp). While the deletion variants in these two donors were similar to others found in isolation, the substitutions were of a different pattern. Further studies are required to understand the selection process behind these variants.

Core promoter mutations (A(1762)T and G(1764)A) and viral genotype in chronic hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma in Guangxi, China

Hepatitis B viruses (HBV) with core promoter mutations (A(1762)T, G(1764)A) were found in a previous study to be highly prevalent in patients from Guangxi, China with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to determine whether the mutations are prevalent in areas of Guangxi with high and lower incidences of HCC and whether they are associated with other severe sequelae of chronic hepatitis B, including the development of cirrhosis. In addition, the genotypes of the various HBV sequences were determined. Core promoter mutations were significantly more common in HCC patients than asymptomatic carriers from both regions of Guangxi and also were common in patients with cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis. The data also support the hypothesis that genotype C HBV causes more severe liver disease than does genotype B.

In vivo suppression of precore mRNA synthesis is associated with mutations in the hepatitis B virus core promoter

We have examined the in vivo effect of hepatitis B virus (HBV) core promoter mutations on the expression of precore mRNA and pregenomic RNA transcripts in the liver of 24 patients with chronic HBV infection, applying a novel transcript-specific RT-PCR assay. The double A1762T/G1764A mutation in the basic core promoter was detected in 11 cases. This mutation was in all cases associated with absence or low levels of precore mRNA transcripts without significantly affecting the levels of total core promoter-directed transcription in the liver of infected patients. Precore mRNA synthesis was suppressed by the A1762T/G1764A mutation regardless of the presence of the precore stop codon mutation G1896A, suggesting that in addition to downregulating an immunomodulatory protein this double basic core promoter mutation may also confer a replication advantage to the virus. Additional mutations detected in the core promoter may also contribute to the observed changes in precore mRNA levels. Our in vivo study shows therefore that the double A1762T/G1764A mutation is associated with the specific suppression of precore mRNA synthesis directed by the HBV core promoter.

HBV X protein targets HIV Tat-binding protein 1

The HBV X protein (HBx) is implicated in infection and development of hepatocellular carcinoma. HBx has a pleiotropic effect on cells, suggesting multiple targets in the virus-host cell interaction. We employed the cytoplasmic-based two-hybrid screen and identified the HIV Tat-binding protein 1 (Tbp1) as a novel HBx interacting protein. Tbp1 interacts in vivo with HBx both in yeast and in animal cells. This interaction maps to the functionally important ATP-binding motif of Tbp1. Furthermore, HBx and Tbp1 interaction is functionally significant and regulates HBV transcription. Tbp1 homologues, such as Sug1, are known members of the proteasome 19S regulatory cap particle and have also been implicated in transcription coactivation. Remarkably, Tbp1 and Sug1 interact with multiple viral effector proteins including HIV Tat, SV40 large T antigen, and adenovirus E1A, establishing these proteins as important targets of the viral oncogenes.

Modulation of glutathione S-transferase alpha by hepatitis B virus and the chemopreventive drug oltipraz

Persistent infection by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and exposure to chemical carcinogens correlates with the prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma in endemic areas. The precise nature of the interaction between these factors is not known. Glutathione S-transferases (GST) are responsible for the cellular metabolism and detoxification of a variety of cytotoxic and carcinogenic compounds by catalysis of their conjugation with glutathione. Diminished GST activity could enhance cellular sensitivity to chemical carcinogens. We have investigated GST isozyme expression in hepatocellular HepG2 cells and in an HBV-transfected subline. Total GST activity and selenium-independent glutathione peroxidase activity are significantly decreased in HBV transfected cells. On immunoblotting, HBV transfected cells demonstrate a significant decrease in the level of GST Alpha class. Cytotoxicity assays reveal that the HBV transfected cells are more sensitive to a wide range of compounds known to be detoxified by GST Alpha conjugation. Although no significant difference in protein half-life between the two cell lines was found, semi-quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction shows a reduced amount of GST Alpha mRNA in the transfected cells. Because the HBV x protein (HBx) seems to play a role in HBV transfection, we also demonstrated that expression of the HBx gene into HepG2 cells decreased the amount of GST Alpha protein. Transient transfection experiments using both rat and human GST Alpha (rGSTA5 and hGSTA1) promoters in HepG2 cells show a decreased CAT activity upon HBx expression, supporting a transcriptional regulation of both genes by HBx. This effect is independent of HBx interaction with Sp1. Treatment with oltipraz, an inducer of GST Alpha, partially overcomes the effect of HBx on both promoters. Promoter deletion studies indicate that oltipraz works through responsive elements distinct from AP1 or NF-kappaB transcription factors. Thus, HBV infection alters phase II metabolizing enzymes via different mechanisms than those modulated by treatment with oltipraz.

Reduced transcription and progeny virus production of hepatitis B virus containing an 8-bp deletion in basic core promoter

We have demonstrated previously the presence of an 8-bp deletion mutant, spanning from nt. 1768 to nt. 1775 in the basic core promoter region of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with anti-HBe positive asymptomatic phase before developing acute exacerbation after immunosuppressive treatment. The transcription and progeny virus production activities of the mutant were examined by transfection of the recombinant plasmid [pUC Del(2)] containing the head-to-tail dimer DNA of the mutant into HepG2 cells. The amounts of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBe antigens secreted into the culture medium were markedly reduced. Southern blotting of DNAs extracted from the culture medium also showed reduced mutant activity to produce progeny virus. Northern blotting and RNase protection assay of RNAs extracted from transfected cells demonstrated that the transcription of both precore mRNA and pregenome RNA was reduced significantly compared to that of wild-type HBV. The promoter activity examined by transfection of the CAT plasmid containing deletion mutant DNA was much lower than that of wild type. Co-transfection experiments, however, of the CAT plasmid containing wild-type DNA with pUC Del(2) reduced CAT activity induced by wild-type, suggesting that truncated X protein produced by the mutant does not possess a sufficient transactivating activity. Gel shift assay using HepG2 nuclear extract and a probe containing four TA-rich regions in CP and various competitors suggested that the lack of the third TA-rich region was responsible for the transcription reduction of precore mRNA and pregenome RNA. The possible mechanisms are discussed.

Reduced transcription and progeny virus production of hepatitis B virus containing an 8-bp deletion in basic core promoter

We have demonstrated previously the presence of an 8-bp deletion mutant, spanning from nt. 1768 to nt. 1775 in the basic core promoter region of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with anti-HBe positive asymptomatic phase before developing acute exacerbation after immunosuppressive treatment. The transcription and progeny virus production activities of the mutant were examined by transfection of the recombinant plasmid [pUC Del(2)] containing the head-to-tail dimer DNA of the mutant into HepG2 cells. The amounts of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBe antigens secreted into the culture medium were markedly reduced. Southern blotting of DNAs extracted from the culture medium also showed reduced mutant activity to produce progeny virus. Northern blotting and RNase protection assay of RNAs extracted from transfected cells demonstrated that the transcription of both precore mRNA and pregenome RNA was reduced significantly compared to that of wild-type HBV. The promoter activity examined by transfection of the CAT plasmid containing deletion mutant DNA was much lower than that of wild type. Co-transfection experiments, however, of the CAT plasmid containing wild-type DNA with pUC Del(2) reduced CAT activity induced by wild-type, suggesting that truncated X protein produced by the mutant does not possess a sufficient transactivating activity. Gel shift assay using HepG2 nuclear extract and a probe containing four TA-rich regions in CP and various competitors suggested that the lack of the third TA-rich region was responsible for the transcription reduction of precore mRNA and pregenome RNA. The possible mechanisms are discussed.

Association of hepatitis B virus X protein with mitochondria causes mitochondrial aggregation at the nuclear periphery, leading to cell death

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) X protein activates many viral and cellular genes in trans and functional disruption of the p53 tumor suppressor gene product occurs when X protein is transiently expressed in the cytoplasm of cultured cells. We have carried out investigations to determine the exact location of X protein in X gene transfected cells by using a fluorescent staining technique as well as by biochemical analyses. Aggregation of mitochondrial structures became evident at the periphery of nucleus in the cytoplasm of X transfected cells. X protein was found associated with the aggregated mitochondrial structures. Furthermore, transiently expressed p53 protein co-localized with X protein in X transfected cells. However, the appearance of aggregated mitochondrial structures at the nuclear periphery was independent of the presence of p53 protein in X transfected cells. X protein expression also caused an appearance of TUNEL positive nucleus, cytochrome c release from mitochondrial, the decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential and the membrane blebbing of X transfected cells, which are characteristic of cell death. Our data suggest that X protein causes an abnormal aggregation of mitochondrial structures in the cell, which may be eventually connected with cell death.

The translation initiation factor, hu-Sui1 may be a target of hepatitis B X antigen in hepatocarcinogenesis

The role of hepatitis B virus X antigen in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma was explored by stably transfecting HepG2 cells with an X antigen expression vector, and identifying the differences in gene expression that distinguish X positive from X negative cells by subtractive PCR. One differentially expressed gene, the human homolog of sui1 (hu-sui1), encodes a translation initiation factor whose expression was suppressed by X antigen in HepG2 cells. Hu-Sui1 was also expressed in nontumor liver but not in tumor cells from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Introduction of hu-sui1 into HepG2 cells inhibited cell growth in culture, in soft agar, and partially inhibited tumor formation in nude mice. Hence, the suppression of hu-sui1 by X antigen may result in the abrogation of negative growth regulation and contribute to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Expression of mutated hepatitis B virus X genes in human hepatocellular carcinomas

To explore the role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) X protein in liver carcinogenesis, independently from its role in viral replication, we have analyzed X gene structure and expression in tumorous and non-tumorous tissues obtained from 9 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative, HBV DNA-positive patients. HBV replication was undetectable in tumorous tissues. HBV X gene was truncated at its 3' end in 5 of 9 tumorous tissues and 1 of 8 non-tumorous livers. Sequence analysis performed on uninterrupted X genes from 3 tumors and 3 surrounding non-tumorous tissues showed a high rate of mutations, selectively in the tumorous livers. In 1 of the 3 tumors, a frameshift mutation induced a new stop at codon 129. HBV RNAs were tested by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with surface (S), core (C) and X specific primers. X, but not S and C, RNA expression was found in 6 of 8 tumors and in 6 of 7 non-tumorous tissues. This finding was consistent with immunohistochemical detection of X, but not S and C, antigens in all tumors also expressing X RNA. Our results provide evidence for selective expression of HBV X, but not S and C, RNA and protein in the tumorous and non-tumorous tissue of HBsAg-negative, HBV DNA-positive patients. It also shows that the structure of the X gene is modified (interrupted or highly mutated) in the majority of tumorous livers. Taken together, our findings are consistent with a potential role of mutated X proteins in HBV-related liver oncogenesis.

HBV core promoter mutations prevail in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma from Guangxi, China

The development of primary liver cancer frequently is associated with persistent HBV infection, and tumours may arise in individuals who are anti-HBe positive. However, it is unclear whether viruses with an HBeAg-negative phenotype are associated with tumour development or are selected, during seroconversion, after chromosomal integration of wild-type viral DNA. In order to investigate the temporal evolution of the HBV genome in such individuals, the polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify HBV DNA from tumour tissue and serum of 14 patients from Guangxi, China with hepatocellular carcinoma. Comparison of nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the precore and proximal core region of HBV from the two sites in each patient produced evidence of divergence following integration in the tumour, but in most cases, HBeAg-negativity could not be explained by precore mutations. Sequences from the core promoter region were therefore examined and mutations were found in the majority, which are believed to upregulate transcription of the core (and pregenomic) RNA but to downregulate precore mRNA. To determine whether this finding merely reflected sequence variation among geographical isolates of HBV, the same region of HBV DNA from asymptomatic controls was sequenced and these mutations were found to be rare. We hypothesise that HBV with the core promoter mutations replicates at higher levels than the wild type, with the consequence that more integrations occur into the hepatocyte chromosomes during the early stages of infection. These hepatocytes may expand clonally and be targets for further mutagenic events leading to tumour development.

Hepatitis B virus pX targets TFIIB in transcription coactivation

pX, the hepatitis B virus (HBV)-encoded regulator, coactivates transcription through an unknown mechanism. pX interacts with several components of the transcription machinery, including certain activators, TFIIB, TFIIH, and the RNA polymerase II (POLII) enzyme. We show that pX localizes in the nucleus and coimmunoprecipitates with TFIIB from nuclear extracts. We used TFIIB mutants inactive in binding either POLII or TATA binding protein to study the role of TFIIB-pX interaction in transcription coactivation. pX was able to bind the former type of TFIIB mutant and not the latter. Neither of these sets of TFIIB mutants supports transcription. Remarkably, the latter TFIIB mutants fully block pX activity, suggesting the role of TFIIB in pX-mediated coactivation. By contrast, in the presence of pX, TFIIB mutants with disrupted POLII binding acquire the wild-type phenotype, both in vivo and in vitro. These results suggest that pX may establish the otherwise inefficient TFIIB mutant-POLII interaction, by acting as a molecular bridge. Collectively, our results demonstrate that TFIIB is the in vivo target of pX.

Activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) down-regulates hepatitis B virus X promoter activity by the competition for the activating protein 1 binding site and the formation of the ATF2-Jun heterodimer

The hepatitis B viral X promoter is known to be positively autoregulated by its own HBx protein, which also interacts with many cellular regulatory proteins. We investigated the effect of activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) on the activity of the X promoter. Cotransfection of the ATF2 expression vector with a X promoter-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase plasmid repressed the X promoter activity in HepG2 cells. HBx activated activating protein 1 (AP-1)-mediated transcription through the hepatitis B virus E element by 35-fold, while its activation activity was inhibited in the presence of ATF2, suggesting that ATF2 inhibited the autoactivation of X promoter by HBx and basal transcription mediated by AP-1. Since the binding sites of AP-1 and ATF2 in the hepatitis B virus E element overlap, the repression of X promoter activity by ATF2 is exerted by the competition for the AP-1 binding site and the formation of the ATF2-Jun heterodimer as in the case of the consensus AP-1 element. However, the small X promoter had a ATF2 binding site and was activated by ATF2. These results suggest that the syntheses of X proteins are differentially regulated by ATF2.

The hepatitis B virus X-associated protein, XAP3, is a protein kinase C-binding protein

The hepatitis B virus X protein induces transcriptional activation of a wide variety of viral and cellular genes. In addition to its ability to interact directly with many nuclear transcription factors, several reports indicate that the X protein stimulates different cytoplasmic kinase signal cascades. Using the yeast two-hybrid screen, we have isolated a clone designated X-associated protein 3 (XAP3) that encodes a human homolog of the rat protein kinase C-binding protein. One of the activation domains of X (amino acids 90-122) is required for binding to XAP3, while the NH2-terminal part of XAP3 is necessary for binding to X. Both X and XAP3 bound specifically to the eta PKC isoenzyme synthesized in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. Overexpression of XAP3 enhanced X transactivation activity. These results support earlier findings that one of the mechanisms of transactivation by X is through involvement with the cellular protein kinase C pathway.

XAP2, a novel hepatitis B virus X-associated protein that inhibits X transactivation

The hepatitis B virus X protein is a promiscuous transcriptional transactivator. Transactivation by the X protein is most likely mediated through binding to different cellular factors. Using the yeast two-hybrid method, we have isolated a clone that encodes a novel X-associated cellular protein: XAP2. X and XAP2 interactions also occur in vitro. Antiserum raised against XAP2 recognizes a cytoplasmic protein with an apparent molecular mass of 36 kDa. The interaction between X and XAP2 requires a small region on X containing amino acids 13-26. From Northern blot analyses, XAP2 is ubiquitously expressed in both liver-derived and non-liver-derived cell lines as well as in normal non-liver tissues. In contrast, XAP2 is expressed in very low level in the normal human liver. In transfection assays, overexpression of XAP2 abolishes transactivation by the X protein. Based on these results, we suggest that XAP2 is an important cellular negative regulator of the X protein, and that X-XAP2 interaction may play a role in HBV pathology.

A revised secondary structure model for the 3'-end of hepatitis B virus pregenomic RNA

The polymerase encoded by human hepatitis B virus, which has reverse transcriptase and RNase H activity, binds to its pregenomic RNA template in a two-step process involving a terminal redundancy. Both first strand and second strand DNA synthesis involve primer translocation and second strand synthesis involves a template jump. Three parts of the genome, including the so-called core promoter, are known to show deletions in strains usually arising after long-standing HBV infection, but also in some patients treated with interferon. A computer-based study of RNA template folding in the core promoter region, accommodating well-known point mutations, has generated a model for the 3' DR1 primer binding site as being part of a superstructure encompassing an already well-established stem-loop. Depending on the identity of nucleotides 1762 and 1764, the DR1 region may assume two alternative secondary structures which stabilize it as a primer binding site to different extents. Remarkably, one of these structures includes a pronounced loop which coincides with at least 12 related deletions seen in HBV DNA from different patients. Thus according to the model, the 5'- and 3'-ends of pregenomic RNA, which share primary sequences but have separate functions, are not structural equivalents. An RNA superstructure near the 3'-end of all HBV transcripts could have far-reaching implications for the modulation of both genome replication and post-transcriptional processing.

Variability in hepatitis B virus DNA: phylogenetic, epidemiological and clinical implications

Hepatitis B virus has the smallest of all known human DNA virus genomes (3.2 kb) and a unique replication strategy with an intermediate reverse transcription step. The naturally occurring genetic variability between different HBV strains provides the basis for phylogenetic analysis. Four main genotypes of HBV have been found, with the possible existence of 1 or 2 more. The different genotypes largely follow a distinctive geographical distribution. Point mutations and nucleotide deletions in the genes (pre-S and S) encoding different forms of the surface protein have been shown to arise both spontaneously and after interferon treatment or vaccination. An immune escape mechanism is believed to be the reason for these mutations. The clinical implications of variations in the HBV X gene have not been widely studied, but these variations may be of importance in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Seroconversion from HBeAg to anti-HBe can be correlated with specific changes in the core promoter, and/or with a translational stop in precore codon 28. In both cases the production of HBeAg protein would be shut off. Mutations in the precore region may have a larger impact at another level, by inhibiting or enhancing viral replication through changes in folding of the transcript.

Disruption of the function of tumor-suppressor gene p53 by the hepatitis B virus X protein and hepatocarcinogenesis

The X gene of the hepatitis B virus codes for a small basic protein and is able to transactivate viral and cellular genes, although the X protein exhibits no DNA-binding activity. The mechanism of transactivation by X protein has been suggested to be via protein-protein interaction(s). We first demonstrated that X protein had amino acid sequences homologous to the functionally essential domain of Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitors and that those sequences were indispensable for the transactivation function. We demonstrated that X protein exhibited an inhibitor activity against hepatic serine proteases, and subsequently found that the protein activated X gene transcription in HepG2 cells and that the X responsive element was localized in the minimal promoter of the X gene. In contrast, the tumor-suppressor gene p53, but not mutant p53, remarkably reduced transcription from the minimal promoter. This p53 repression on the X gene promoter was cancelled by X gene co-expression, probably indicating that the X protein disrupts the p53 tumor suppressor function in the nucleus. All data suggest that X protein leads to transactivation of cellular oncogenes by preventing an interaction between p53 and cellular transcription factor(s) consisting of the basal transcriptional machinery.