Modulation of oncogenic transformation by the human adenovirus E1A C-terminal region

Structural Determinants within the Adenovirus Early Region 1A Protein Spacer Region Necessary for Tumorigenesis

It has long been established that group A human adenoviruses (HAdV-A12, -A18, and -A31) can cause tumors in newborn rodents, with tumorigenicity related to the presence of a unique spacer region located between conserved regions 2 and 3 within the HAdV-A12 early region 1A (E1A) protein. Group B adenoviruses are weakly oncogenic, whereas most of the remaining human adenoviruses are nononcogenic. In an attempt to understand better the relationship between the structure of the AdE1A spacer region and oncogenicity of HAdVs, the structures of synthetic peptides identical or very similar to the adenovirus 12 E1A spacer region were determined and found to be α-helical using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. This contrasts significantly with some previous suggestions that this region is unstructured. Using available predictive algorithms, the structures of spacer regions from other E1As were also examined, and the extent of the predicted α-helix was found to correlate reasonably well with the tumorigenicity of the respective virus. We suggest that this may represent an as-yet-unknown binding site for a partner protein required for tumorigenesis.IMPORTANCE This research analyzed small peptides equivalent to a region within the human adenovirus early region 1A protein that confers, in part, tumor-inducing properties to various degrees on several viral strains in rats and mice. The oncogenic spacer region is α-helical, which contrasts with previous suggestions that this region is unstructured. The helix is characterized by a stretch of amino acids rich in alanine residues that are organized into a hydrophobic, or "water-hating," surface that is considered to form a major site of interaction with cellular protein targets that mediate tumor formation. The extent of α-helix in E1A from other adenovirus species can be correlated to a limited degree to the tumorigenicity of that virus. Some serotypes show significant differences in predicted structural propensity, suggesting that the amino acid type and physicochemical properties are also of importance.

Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses reveal new insights into the regulation of immune pathways during adenovirus type 2 infection

Background

Human adenovirus (Ad) infection leads to the changes of host cell gene expression and biosynthetic processes. Transcriptomics in adenovirus type 2 (Ad2)-infected lung fibroblasts (IMR-90) cells has previously been studied using RNA sequencing. However, this study included only two time points (12 and 24 hpi) using constrained 76 bp long sequencing reads. Therefore, a more detailed study of transcription at different phases of infection using an up-graded sequencing technique is recalled. Furthermore, the correlation between transcription and protein expression needs to be addressed.

Results

In total, 3556 unique cellular genes were identified as differentially expressed at the transcriptional level with more than 2-fold changes in Ad2-infected cells as compared to non-infected cells by using paired-end sequencing. Based on the kinetics of the gene expression changes at different times after infection, these RNAs fell into 20 clusters. Among them, cellular genes involved in immune response were highly up-regulated in the early phase before becoming down-regulated in the late phase. Comparison of differentially expressed genes at transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels revealed low correlation. Particularly genes involved in cellular immune pathways showed a negative correlation. Here, we highlight the genes which expose inconsistent expression profiles with an emphasis on key factors in cellular immune pathways including NFκB, JAK/STAT, caspases and MAVS. Different from their transcriptional profiles with up- and down-regulation in the early and late phase, respectively, these proteins were up-regulated in the early phase and were sustained in the late phase. A surprising finding was that the target genes of the sustained activators failed to show response.

Conclusion

There were features common to genes which play important roles in cellular immune pathways. Their expression was stimulated at both RNA and protein levels during the early phase. In the late phase however, their transcription was suppressed while protein levels remained stable. These results indicate that Ad2 and the host cell use different strategies to regulate cellular immune pathways. A control mechanism at the post-translational level must thus exist which is under the control of Ad2.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12866-018-1375-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Determination of the transforming activities of adenovirus oncogenes

The last 50 years of molecular biological investigations into human adenoviruses (Ads) have contributed enormously to our understanding of the basic principles of normal and malignant cell growth. Much of this knowledge stems from analyses of the Ad productive infection cycle in permissive host cells. Also, initial observations concerning the transforming potential of human Ads subsequently revealed decisive insights into the molecular mechanisms of the origins of cancer and established Ads as a model system for explaining virus-mediated transformation processes. Today it is well established that cell transformation by human Ads is a multistep process involving several gene products encoded in early transcription units 1A (E1A) and 1B (E1B). Moreover, a large body of evidence now indicates that alternative or additional mechanisms are engaged in Ad-mediated oncogenic transformation involving gene products encoded in early region 4 (E4) as well as epigenetic changes resulting from viral DNA integration. In particular, studies on the transforming potential of several E4 gene products have now revealed new pathways that point to novel general mechanisms of virus-mediated oncogenesis. In this chapter we describe in vitro and in vivo assays to determine the transforming and oncogenic activities of the E1A, E1B, and E4 oncoproteins in primary baby rat kidney cells, human amniotic fluid cells and athymic nude mice.

Dissection of the C-terminal region of E1A redefines the roles of CtBP and other cellular targets in oncogenic transformation

Human adenovirus E1A makes extensive connections with the cellular protein interaction network. By doing so, E1A can manipulate many cellular programs, including cell cycle progression. Through these reprogramming events, E1A functions as a growth-promoting oncogene and has been used extensively to investigate mechanisms contributing to oncogenesis. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how the C-terminal region of E1A contributes to oncogenic transformation. Although this region is required for transformation in cooperation with E1B, it paradoxically suppresses transformation in cooperation with activated Ras. Previous analysis has suggested that the interaction of E1A with CtBP plays a pivotal role in both activities. However, some C-terminal mutants of E1A retain CtBP binding and yet exhibit defects in transformation, suggesting that other targets of this region are also necessary. To explore the roles of these additional factors, we performed an extensive mutational analysis of the C terminus of E1A. We identified key residues that are specifically required for binding all known targets of the C terminus of E1A. We further tested each mutant for the ability to both localize to the nucleus and transform primary rat cells in cooperation with E1B-55K or Ras. Interaction of E1A with importin α3/Qip1, dual-specificity tyrosine-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A), HAN11, and CtBP influenced transformation with E1B-55K. Interestingly, the interaction of E1A with DYRK1A and HAN11 appeared to play a role in suppression of transformation by activated Ras whereas interaction with CtBP was not necessary. This unexpected result suggests a need for revision of current models and provides new insight into transformation by the C terminus of E1A.

High-throughput sequencing of microRNAs in adenovirus type 3 infected human laryngeal epithelial cells

Adenovirus infection can cause various illnesses depending on the infecting serotype, such as gastroenteritis, conjunctivitis, cystitis, and rash illness, but the infection mechanism is still unknown. MicroRNAs (miRNA) have been reported to play essential roles in cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and pathogenesis of human diseases including viral infections. We analyzed the miRNA expression profiles from adenovirus type 3 (AD3) infected Human laryngeal epithelial (Hep2) cells using a SOLiD deep sequencing. 492 precursor miRNAs were identified in the AD3 infected Hep2 cells, and 540 precursor miRNAs were identified in the control. A total of 44 miRNAs demonstrated high expression and 36 miRNAs showed lower expression in the AD3 infected cells than control. The biogenesis of miRNAs has been analyzed, and some of the SOLiD results were confirmed by Quantitative PCR analysis. The present studies may provide a useful clue for the biological function research into AD3 infection.

Adenovirus E1A inhibits SCF(Fbw7) ubiquitin ligase

The SCF(Fbw7) ubiquitin ligase complex plays important roles in cell growth, survival, and differentiation via the ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated regulation of protein stability. Fbw7 (also known as Fbxw7, Sel-10, hCdc4, or hAgo), a substrate recognition subunit of SCF(Fbw7) ubiquitin ligase, facilitates the degradation of several proto-oncogene products by the proteasome. Given that mutations in Fbw7 are found in various types of human cancers, Fbw7 is considered to be a potent tumor suppressor. In the present study, we show that E1A, an oncogene product derived from adenovirus, interferes with the activity of the SCF(Fbw7) ubiquitin ligase. E1A interacted with SCF(Fbw7) and attenuated the ubiquitylation of its target proteins in vivo. Furthermore, using in vitro purified SCF(Fbw7) component proteins, we found that E1A directly bound to Roc1/Rbx1 and CUL1 and that E1A inhibited the ubiquitin ligase activity of the Roc1/Rbx1-CUL1 complex but not that of another RING-type ubiquitin ligase, Mdm2. Ectopically expressed E1A interacted with cellular endogenous Roc1/Rbx1 and CUL1 and decelerated the degradation of several protooncogene products that were degraded by SCF(Fbw7) ubiquitin ligase. Moreover, after wild-type adenovirus infection, adenovirus-derived E1A interacted with endogenous Roc1/Rbx1 and decelerated degradation of the endogenous target protein of SCF(Fbw7). These observations demonstrated that E1A perturbs protein turnover regulated by SCF(Fbw7) through the inhibition of SCF(Fbw7) ubiquitin ligase. Our findings may help to explain the mechanism whereby adenovirus infection induces unregulated proliferation.

Induction of neuronal and tumor-related genes by adenovirus type 12 E1A

Adenovirus type 12 (Ad12) E1A protein (E1A-12) contains a unique 20-amino-acid spacer region between the second and third conserved regions. Substitution of a single amino acid in the spacer is able to abrogate Ad12 tumorigenesis. To investigate the function of the spacer, microarray analysis was performed on cells transformed by tumorigenic and nontumorigenic Ad12s that differ only by one amino acid in the spacer. Fewer than 0.8% of approximately 8,000 genes in the microarray exhibited differential expression of threefold and higher. Of these, more than half of the known genes with higher expression in the wild-type Ad12-transformed cells have neuronal-specific functions. Some of the other differentially expressed genes are involved in the regulation of the cell cycle, transcription, cell structure, and tumor invasiveness. Northern blot analyses of a subset of the neuronal genes, including Robo1, N-MYC, and alpha-internexin, confirmed their strong expression in multiple Ad12 tumorigenic cell lines. In contrast, these neuronal genes displayed only minor or negligible expression in cells transformed by spacer-mutated Ad12. Significantly, stable introduction of E1A-12 into nontumorigenic Ad5-transformed cells induced neuronal gene expression. We found that the neuron-restrictive silencer factor, which serves as a master repressor of neuronal genes, was inactivated in both Ad12- and Ad5-transformed cells via cytoplasmic retention, though only Ad12-transformed cells exhibited neuronal gene induction. Mutational analyses of the alpha-internexin promoter demonstrated that E1A-12-mediated neuronal gene induction further required the activation of neuronal promoter E-box elements. These results indicate that the spacer is involved in mediating neuronal and tumor-related genes.

Identification of a second CtBP binding site in adenovirus type 5 E1A conserved region 3

C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) binds to adenovirus early region 1A (AdE1A) through a highly conserved PXDLS motif close to the C terminus. We now have demonstrated that CtBP1 also interacts directly with the transcriptional activation domain (conserved region 3 [CR3]) of adenovirus type 5 E1A (Ad5E1A) and requires the integrity of the entire CR3 region for optimal binding. The interaction appears to be at least partially mediated through a sequence ((161)RRNTGDP(167)) very similar to a recently characterized novel CtBP binding motif in ZNF217 as well as other regions of CR3. Using reporter assays, we further demonstrated that CtBP1 represses Ad5E1A CR3-dependent transcriptional activation. Ad5E1A also appears to be recruited to the E-cadherin promoter through its interaction with CtBP. Significantly, Ad5E1A, CtBP1, and ZNF217 form a stable complex which requires CR3 and the PLDLS motif. It has been shown that Ad513SE1A, containing the CR3 region, is able to overcome the transcriptional repressor activity of a ZNF217 polypeptide fragment in a GAL4 reporter assay through recruitment of CtBP1. These results suggest a hitherto-unsuspected complexity in the association of Ad5E1A with CtBP, with the interaction resulting in transcriptional activation by recruitment of CR3-bound factors to CtBP1-containing complexes.

The interaction of adenovirus E1A with p300 family members modulates cellular gene expression to reduce tumorigenicity

The use of adenovirus serotype 2 or 5 (Ad2/5) E1A as therapy for human malignancy requires an understanding of the mechanisms involved in E1A-induced tumor suppression. The prevailing use of E1A in the treatment of human malignancy stresses the non-immunologically mediated, anti-tumorigenic activities of E1A. However, the capacity of E1A to elicit a NK-cell and T-cell anti-tumor immune response and to sensitize tumor cells to lysis by immune effector molecules utilized by NK cells and T cells is also an important component of the anti-tumorigenic activity of E1A. This immune-mediated anti-tumorigenic activity of E1A is not shared by functionally similar viral oncoproteins such as the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E7 oncoprotein and is dependent on the capacity of E1A to interact with transcriptional coadapter, p300. To further define the molecular mechanisms whereby E1A reduces tumorigenicity, we compared total cellular gene expression in H4 cells, a human fibrosarcoma cell line, to gene expression in H4 cells stably expressing E1A, E7, or mutant forms of E1A that do not bind p300. The expression of E1A, but not E7, in H4 cells modulated the expression of cellular genes that may promote apoptosis, enhance immunogenicity and reduce tumor cell metastasis. The difference in the ability of E1A and E7 to modulate the expression of cellular genes that may influence tumorigenicity was largely attributable to distinct interactions of E1A and E7 with p300. Results of this study will be useful in designing novel strategies to augment the anti-tumorigenic activities of E1A.

Acetylation of mouse p53 at lysine 317 negatively regulates p53 apoptotic activities after DNA damage

Posttranslational modifications of p53, including phosphorylation and acetylation, play important roles in regulating p53 stability and activity. Mouse p53 is acetylated at lysine 317 by PCAF and at multiple lysine residues at the extreme carboxyl terminus by CBP/p300 in response to genotoxic and some nongenotoxic stresses. To determine the physiological roles of p53 acetylation at lysine 317, we introduced a Lys317-to-Arg (K317R) missense mutation into the endogenous p53 gene of mice. p53 protein accumulates to normal levels in p53(K317R) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and thymocytes after DNA damage. While p53-dependent gene expression is largely normal in p53(K317R) MEFs after various types of DNA damage, increased p53-dependent apoptosis was observed in p53(K317R) thymocytes, epithelial cells from the small intestine, and cells from the retina after ionizing radiation (IR) as well as in E1A/Ras-expressing MEFs after doxorubicin treatment. Consistent with these findings, p53-dependent expression of several proapoptotic genes was significantly increased in p53(K317R) thymocytes after IR. These findings demonstrate that acetylation at lysine 317 negatively regulates p53 apoptotic activities after DNA damage.

C-terminal binding proteins: Emerging roles in cell survival and tumorigenesis

Within a cell, the levels and activity of multiple pro- and anti-apoptotic molecules act in concert to regulate commitment to apoptosis. Whilst the balance between survival and death can be tipped by the effects of single molecules, cellular apoptosis control pathways very often incorporate key transcription factors that co-ordinately regulate the expression of multiple apoptosis control genes. C-terminal binding proteins (CtBPs), which were originally identified through their binding to the Adenovirus E1A oncoprotein, have been described as such transcriptional regulators of the apoptosis program. Specifically, CtBPs function as transcriptional co-repressors, and have been demonstrated to promote cell survival by suppressing the expression of several pro-apoptotic genes. In this review we summarize the evidence supporting a key role for CtBP proteins in cell survival. We also describe the known mechanisms of transcriptional control by CtBPs, and review the multiplicity of intracellular signaling and transcriptional control pathways with which they are known to be involved. Finally we consider these findings in the context of additional known roles of CtBP molecules, and the potential implications that this combined knowledge may have for our comprehension of diseases of cell survival, notably cancer.

Recent lessons in gene expression, cell cycle control, and cell biology from adenovirus

Adenovirus continues to be an important model system for investigating basic aspects of cell biology. Interactions of several cellular proteins with E1A conserved regions (CR) 1 and 2, and inhibition of apoptosis by E1B proteins are required for oncogenic transformation. CR2 binds RB family members, de-repressing E2F transcription factors, thus activating genes required for cell cycling. E1B-19K is a BCL2 homolog that binds and inactivates proapoptotic BAK and BAX. E1B-55K binds p53, inhibiting its transcriptional activation function. In productively infected cells, E1B-55K and E4orf6 assemble a ubiquitin ligase with cellular proteins Elongins B and C, Cullin 5 and RBX1 that polyubiquitinates p53 and one or more subunits of the MRN complex involved in DNA double-strand break repair, directing them to proteosomal degradation. E1A CR3 activates viral transcription by interacting with the MED23 Mediator subunit, stimulating preinitiation complex assembly on early viral promoters and probably also the rate at which they initiate transcription. The viral E1B-55K/E4orf6 ubiquitin ligase is also required for efficient viral late protein synthesis in many cell types, but the mechanism is not understood. E1A CR1 binds several chromatin-modifying complexes, but how this contributes to stimulation of cellular DNA synthesis and transformation is not clear. E1A CR4 binds the CtBP corepressor, but the mechanism by which this modulates the frequency of transformation remains to be determined. Clearly, adenovirus has much left to teach us about fundamental cellular processes.

The ability of E1A to rescue ras-induced premature senescence and confer transformation relies on inactivation of both p300/CBP and Rb family proteins

In primary cells, oncogenic ras induces a stable growth arrest known as premature senescence. Ras-induced premature senescence is considered as a tumor-suppressing defense response that needs to be bypassed before oncogenic potential ras can be revealed. To gain insights into the mechanism of senescence bypass during oncogenic transformation, we dissected the activities of an adenoviral oncoprotein E1A, which is capable of overcoming ras-induced senescence. Our results have indicated that the senescence bypassing activity resides in the NH2 terminus and requires both Rb-binding and p300/CBP-binding functions of E1A. Although interference with the p16(INK4A)/Rb pathway or inactivation of p300/CBP alone did not lead to senescence bypass, these two types of genetic alterations complemented the Rb-binding defective and the p300/CBP-binding defective mutants of E1A, respectively, to rescue premature senescence. Therefore, genetic alterations disrupting the p16(INK4A)/Rb pathway or the p300/CBP functions both contribute to the bypass of senescence. We further showed that p300/CBP were essential for ras-induced p53 activity, providing a potential mechanism underlying the important role of p300/CBP in senescence. Furthermore, p300/CBP inactivation led to cellular transformation in cooperation with the p300/CBP-binding defective E1A mutants, MDM2 and Ha-RasV12. These results have shown that p300 and CBP are integral components of the pathway that mediates ras-induced senescence. The critical role of p300 and CBP in the senescence response that limits the oncogenic potential of ras has provided a mechanistic basis for the tumor-suppressing function of these proteins.

Human cytomegalovirus pp71: a new viral tool to probe the mechanisms of cell cycle progression and oncogenesis controlled by the retinoblastoma family of tumor suppressors

The DNA tumor virus oncogenes (adenovirus E1A, simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen, and papillomavirus E7) have been instrumental in illuminating the molecules and mechanisms of cell cycle progression and carcinogenesis. However, since these multifunctional proteins target so many important cellular regulators, it is sometimes difficult to establish the functional importance of any individual interaction. Perhaps a herpesvirus protein, newly defined as a cell cycle regulator, can help address these issues. Like the DNA tumor virus proteins, the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) pp71 protein contains a retinoblastoma protein (Rb) binding motif (LxCxD), and stimulates DNA synthesis in quiescent cells. Unlike E1A, T antigen, and E7, pp71 expression does not induce apoptosis, nor does it cooperate to transform primary cells. Determining how pp71 induces cell cycle progression without invoking apoptosis or leading to cellular transformation may help in defining the signals that ultimately lead to these processes.

Macrophages kill human papillomavirus type 16 E6-expressing tumor cells by tumor necrosis factor alpha- and nitric oxide-dependent mechanisms

The expression of adenovirus serotype 2 or 5 (Ad2/5) E1A sensitizes cells to killing by NK cells and activated macrophages, a property that correlates with the ability of E1A to bind the transcriptional coadaptor proteins p300-CBP. The E6 oncoproteins derived from the high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) interact with p300 and can complement mutant forms of E1A that cannot interact with p300 to induce cellular immortalization. Therefore, we determined if HPV type 16 (HPV16) E6 could sensitize cells to killing by macrophages and NK cells. HPV16 E6 expression sensitized human (H4 and C33A) and murine (MCA-102) cell lines to lysis by macrophages but not by NK cells. The lysis of cells that expressed E6 by macrophages was p53 independent but dependent on the production of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) or nitric oxide (NO) by macrophages. Unlike cytolysis assays with macrophages, E6 expression did not significantly sensitize cells to lysis by the direct addition of NO or TNF-alpha. Like E1A, E6 has been reported to sensitize cells to lysis by TNF-alpha by inhibiting the TNF-alpha-induced activation of NF-kappaB. We found that E1A, but not E6, blocked the TNF-alpha-induced activation of NF-kappaB, an activity that correlated with E1A-p300 binding. In summary, Ad5 E1A and HPV16 E6 sensitized cells to lysis by macrophages. Unlike E1A, E6 did not block the ability of TNF-alpha to activate NF-kappaB or sensitize cells to lysis by NK cells, TNF-alpha, or NO. Thus, there appears to be a spectrum of common and unique biological activities that result as a consequence of the interaction of E6 or E1A with p300-CBP.