Resistance to somatostatin analogs in acromegaly: an evolving concept?

IGF-I levels during standard Lanreotide dose predicts biochemical outcome of high-frequency regimen in acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs) are the cornerstone of acromegaly treatment. Additional benefits were shown using high dose (HD) or high frequency (HF), relatively short-term regimens. Although several predictors of response to standard dose (SD)-fg-SRLs were reported, outcome biomarkers for HF administration are not yet available. Here, we aimed to identify predictors of response to long-term HF-fg-SRLs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 102 patients, treated with Lanreotide. Patients not controlled at 12 months of SD-Lanreotide (120 mg/28 days) were switched to HF-Lanreotide (120 mg/21 days) for additional 12 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were controlled at 6 months of SD-Lanreotide (27.4%); 35 patients were controlled at 12 months of treatment (34.3%). Out of 67 patients treated with HF- Lanreotide, 18 (26.9%) were controlled at 6 months of treatment and remained controlled until 12 months. Both during SD and HF-Lanreotide administrations, IGF-I levels were reduced during the first six months of treatment (p < 0.001), without further significant reduction between 6 and 12 months of therapy. Response at 12 months of SD-Lanreotide was predicted by IGF-I reached at six months of SD-Lanreotide (p = 0.024). Response at 12 months of HF-Lanreotide treatment was predicted by IGF-I levels reached at six months of SD-Lanreotide treatment (p = 0.04) and six months of HF-Lanreotide treatment (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated that initial IGF-I levels during SD-Lanreotide predicted the biochemical outcome after 12 months of HF-Lanreotide. Patients in whom HF-Lanreotide did not normalize IGF-I after 6 months of treatment remained uncontrolled 12 months after starting this regimen.

Insights from an Italian Delphi panel: exploring resistance to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands and guiding second-line medical therapies in acromegaly management

PURPOSE

First-line medical therapy for acromegaly management includes first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fgSRLs), but resistance limits their use. Despite international guidelines, the choice of second-line therapy is debated.

METHODS

We aim to discuss resistance to fgSRLs, identify second-line therapy determinants and assess glycemia's impact to provide valuable insights for acromegaly management in clinical practice. A group of Italian endocrinologists expert in the pituitary field participated in a two-round Delphi panel between July and September 2023. The Delphi questionnaire encompassed a total of 75 statements categorized into three sections: resistance to fgSRLs therapy and predictors of response; determinants for the selection of second-line therapy; the role of glycemia in the therapeutic management. The statements were rated on a 6-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine (79%) statements reached a consensus. IGF-1 levels resulted central for evaluating resistance to fgSRLs, that should be defined considering also symptomatic clinical response, degree of tumor shrinkage and complications, using clinician- and patient-reported outcome tools available. Factors to be evaluated for the choice of second-line medical therapy are hyperglycemia-that should be managed as in non-acromegalic patients-tumor remnant, resistant headache and compliance. Costs do not represent a main determinant in the choice of second-line medical treatment.

CONCLUSION

The experts agreed on a holistic management approach to acromegaly. It is therefore necessary to choose currently available highly effective second-line medical treatment (pegvisomant and pasireotide) based on the characteristics of the patients.

Novel approach to bone comorbidity in resistant acromegaly

Active acromegaly may lead to irreversible complications. Among them, acromegaly osteopathy and fragility (vertebral and hip) fractures have emerged as frequent and precocious events in the natural history of the disease, being correlated with longer disease duration and higher growth hormone (GH) levels, accounting for patients' reported poor quality of life, physical performance and other life-impacting complications. Differently from primary osteoporosis, bone mineral density is not a reliable tool to predict fracture risk in this clinical setting, as patients with active disease frequently have normal or slightly reduced bone mass; whereas bone quality is particularly compromised, as determined by low trabecular bone score (TBS) in patients with active disease as compared to healthy controls or patients with cured/controlled disease. The evidence of impaired bone microstructure has been profoundly investigated with different computed tomography (CT) techniques, reporting low trabecular number and thickness as well as wide but more porous cortical bone, providing an explanation for such a high prevalence of vertebral fractures (up to 40-50% in selected cohorts). Since data on bone-active drugs are scanty, disease control remains a cornerstone to prevent fractures. Nonetheless, some potential protective effects may derive from vitamin D supplementation and pasireotide therapies, independently from disease status. Aim of this manuscript is to review the current and emerging evidence on skeletal fragility in patients with active and resistant acromegaly.

Standards of care for medical management of acromegaly in pituitary tumor centers of excellence (PTCOE)

PURPOSE

A series of consensus guidelines on medical treatment of acromegaly have been produced in the last two decades. However, little information is available on their application in clinical practice. Furthermore, international standards of acromegaly care have not been published. The aim of our study was to report current standards of care for medical therapy of acromegaly, using results collected through an audit performed to validate criteria for definition of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE).

METHODS

Details of medical treatment approaches to acromegaly were voluntarily provided by nine renowned international centers that participated in this audit. For the period 2018-2020, we assessed overall number of acromegaly patients under medical treatment, distribution of patients on different treatment modalities, overall biochemical control rate with medical therapy, and specific control rates for different medical treatment options.

RESULTS

Median number of total patients and median number of new patients with acromegaly managed annually in the endocrinology units of the centers were 206 and 16.3, respectively. Median percentage of acromegaly patients on medical treatment was 48.9%. Among the patients on medical treatment, first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) monotherapy was used with a median rate of 48.7%, followed by combination therapies with a median rate of 29.3%. Cabergoline monotherapy was used in 6.9% of patients. Pegvisomant monotherapy was used in 7 centers and pasireotide monotherapy in 5 centers, with median rates of 7.9% and 6.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Current standards of care in PTCOEs include use of first-generation SRLs as the first medical option in about 50% of patients, as recommended by consensus guidelines. However, some patients are kept on this treatment despite inadequate control suggesting that cost-effectiveness, availability, patient preference, side effects, and therapeutic inertia may play a possible role also in PTCOE. Moreover, at odds with consensus guidelines, other monotherapies for acromegaly appear to have a marginal role as compared to combination therapies as extrapolated from PTCOE practice data. Presence of uncontrolled patients in each treatment category suggest that further optimization of medical therapy, as well as use of other therapeutic tools such as radiosurgery may be needed.

Clinical Pharmacology of Oral Octreotide Capsules for the Treatment of Acromegaly

The primary goal of acromegaly treatment is to normalize biochemical parameters as it significantly reduces the risks of complications and comorbidities associated with the disease. First-line medical treatment is commonly represented by injectable somatostatin analogues (SRLs) after surgery. In June 2020, with the integration of Transient Permeation Enhancer® technology, oral octreotide capsules (OOCs) received regulatory approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for long-term maintenance treatment in patients with acromegaly who have responded to and tolerated treatment with octreotide or lanreotide. We reviewed the clinical pharmacological data on the development and clinical use of OOCs. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on OOCs showed a dose-dependent increase in octreotide levels and remarkable suppression of growth hormone secretion. The efficacy and safety of OOCs were investigated in four clinical trials conducted on patients with complete or partially controlled acromegaly. The trials resulted in the maintenance of biochemical control after switching from injectable SRLs to OOCs, with a comparable side-effect profile. Moreover, the acromegaly symptoms improved in patients on OOC. The data showed a patient preference to continue in the OOC arm for the extension phase of the trials. From the clinical pharmacological perspective, oral formulation of octreotide has the advantage of efficacy and safety with respect to injectable octreotide.

Pilot study to define criteria for Pituitary Tumors Centers of Excellence (PTCOE): results of an audit of leading international centers

PURPOSE

The Pituitary Society established the concept and mostly qualitative parameters for defining uniform criteria for Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOEs) based on expert consensus. Aim of the study was to validate those previously proposed criteria through collection and evaluation of self-reported activity of several internationally-recognized tertiary pituitary centers, thereby transforming the qualitative 2017 definition into a validated quantitative one, which could serve as the basis for future objective PTCOE accreditation.

METHODS

An ad hoc prepared database was distributed to nine Pituitary Centers chosen by the Project Scientific Committee and comprising Centers of worldwide repute, which agreed to provide activity information derived from registries related to the years 2018-2020 and completing the database within 60 days. The database, provided by each center and composed of Excel® spreadsheets with requested specific information on leading and supporting teams, was reviewed by two blinded referees and all 9 candidate centers satisfied the overall PTCOE definition, according to referees' evaluations. To obtain objective numerical criteria, median values for each activity/parameter were considered as the preferred PTCOE definition target, whereas the low limit of the range was selected as the acceptable target for each respective parameter.

RESULTS

Three dedicated pituitary neurosurgeons are preferred, whereas one dedicated surgeon is acceptable. Moreover, 100 surgical procedures per center per year are preferred, while the results indicated that 50 surgeries per year are acceptable. Acute post-surgery complications, including mortality and readmission rates, should preferably be negligible or nonexistent, but acceptable criterion is a rate lower than 10% of patients with complications requiring readmission within 30 days after surgery. Four endocrinologists devoted to pituitary diseases are requested in a PTCOE and the total population of patients followed in a PTCOE should not be less than 850. It appears acceptable that at least one dedicated/expert in pituitary diseases is present in neuroradiology, pathology, and ophthalmology groups, whereas at least two expert radiation oncologists are needed.

CONCLUSION

This is, to our knowledge, the first study to survey and evaluate the activity of a relevant number of high-volume centers in the pituitary field. This effort, internally validated by ad hoc reviewers, allowed for transformation of previously formulated theoretical criteria for the definition of a PTCOE to precise numerical definitions based on real-life evidence. The application of a derived synopsis of criteria could be used by independent bodies for accreditation of pituitary centers as PTCOEs.

Multidisciplinary management of difficult/aggressive growth-hormone pituitary neuro-endocrine tumors

Growth Hormone-secreting adenomas exhibits variable biological behavior and heterogeneous natural history, ranging from small adenomas and mild disease, to invasive and aggressive neoplasms with more severe clinical picture. Patients not cured or controlled after neurosurgical and first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) therapy could require multiple surgical, medical and/or radiation treatments to achieve disease control. To date, no clinical, laboratory, histopathological, or neuroradiological markers are able to define the aggressiveness or predict the disease prognosis in patients with acromegaly. Therefore, the management of these patients requires careful evaluation of laboratory assessments, diagnostic criteria, neuroradiology examinations, and neurosurgical approaches to choose an effective and patient-tailored medical therapy. A multidisciplinary approach is particularly useful in difficult/aggressive acromegaly to schedule multimodal treatment, which includes radiation therapy, chemotherapy with temozolomide and other, recent emerging treatments. Herein, we describe the role of the different members of the multidisciplinary team according to our personal experience; a flow-chart for the therapeutic approach of difficult/aggressive acromegaly patients is proposed.

Modern approach to resistant acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Targets of acromegaly treatment are normalization of biochemical values, removal/reduction/stabilization of the pituitary mass, control of clinical activity and mortality with a multimodal/multidisciplinary approach. Despite significant technological and pharmacological progress, still several patients with acromegaly bear a resistant somatotroph adenoma and active disease may persist for many years with resultant poor clinical outcomes.

AIM

To review briefly definition and pathophysiology of resistance to acromegaly treatment and the options of medical treatment in this context, exploring the role of novel clinical and molecular biomarkers in the personalization of therapy and proposing updates to the currently available guidelines for the treatment of resistant GH-secreting adenomas.

CONCLUSIONS

In the last few years, in parallel with the increased number of medical options available for the therapy of acromegaly, relevant advances occurred in the understanding of the role of novel molecular and clinical biomarkers in predicting the responsiveness to second-line medical treatments, such as Pegvisomant and Pasireotide LAR, and helping clinicians in the personalization of the follow-up and treatment of resistant somatotroph adenomas. The integration of these findings into the existing guidelines may represent a possibly important step forward in the management of "difficult" acromegaly patients.

Resistance of neuroendocrine tumours to somatostatin analogs

INTRODUCTION

A common feature shared by most neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is the expression on their surface of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) that are essential for their pathophysiological regulation, diagnosis, and management. The first-generation synthetic somatostatin analogs (SSAs), octreotide and lanreotide, constitute the cornerstone of treatment for growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas and functioning, progressive functioning, and non-functioning gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP-NETs). SSAs exert their mechanism of action through binding to the SSTRs; however, their therapeutic response is frequently attenuated or diminished by the development of resistance. The phenomenon of resistance is complex implicating the presence of additional epigenetic and genetic mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

We aim to analyze the molecular, genetic, and epigenetic mechanisms of resistance to SSA treatment. We also summarize recent clinical data related to the development of resistance on conventional and non-conventional modes of administration of the first-generation SSAs and the second-generation SSA pasireotide. We explore mechanisms used to counteract the resistance to SSAs using higher doses or more frequent mode of administration of SSAs and/or combination treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

There is considerable heterogeneity in the development of resistance to SSAs that is tumor-specific necessitating the delineation of the underlying pathophysiological processes to further expand their therapeutic applications.

Resistance to Somatostatin Analogs in Italian Acromegaly Patients: The MISS Study

Approximately 60% of acromegaly patients are not adequately controlled by first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to identify the most relevant biomarkers specific for the Italian acromegaly population. Resistant patients were enrolled consecutively based on time of neurosurgery, while responders were collected in a 1:2 ratio. Clinical characteristics and T2-intensity on MRI scans at diagnosis were retrospectively re-evaluated. Histological analyses of CAM5.2 granulation patterns and SSTR2 expression were centrally performed. Sixty-three resistant patients and thirty-three responders were enrolled. A low-grade SSTR2 expression was the most relevant predictor of resistance identified (OR 4.58, p = 0.013), even considering CAM5.2 immunohistochemistry (OR 2.65, p = 0.047). T2-iso/hyperintense pattern on MRI was also associated with a 3.3-fold greater probability of poor response to medical treatment (p = 0.027), as well as a young age at diagnosis (OR 0.96, p = 0.035). In those patients treated only after neurosurgery due to persistent GH-hypersecretion (51, 53.1%) the absence of any appreciable adenomatous remnant on postoperative MRI was associated with a negligible risk of resistance (OR 0.04, p = 0.003). In the Italian acromegaly population, a low-grade SSTR2 expression seems to be the most relevant predictor of resistance to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands, followed by a SG/intermediate cytokeratin pattern and a T2-iso/hyperintense MRI signal.

International Multicenter Validation Study of the SAGIT® Instrument in Acromegaly

CONTEXT

The SAGIT® instrument (SAGIT) has been developed to enable accurate characterization of acromegaly disease activity.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the ability of SAGIT to discriminate acromegaly disease control status.

METHODS

This multicenter, noninterventional, prospective and retrospective, longitudinal study, conducted at academic and private clinical practice sites, included patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of controlled (n = 109) or non-controlled (n = 105) acromegaly, assessed by clinical global evaluation of disease control (CGE-DC) questionnaire, investigator therapeutic decision, and international guidelines. Control status was not determined at baseline for 13 patients. Since 9 patients were enrolled retrospectively, all presented analyses are based on the prospective population (N = 227). Patients were assessed over a 2-year follow-up period. Classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed to investigate how SAGIT components at baseline (signs/symptoms [S], associated comorbidities [A], growth hormone levels [G], insulin-like growth factor 1 levels [I], tumor features [T]) discriminate between controlled and non-controlled acromegaly.

RESULTS

Baseline mean subscores S, G, I, and T were significantly lower in patients with CGE-DC controlled vs CGE-DC non-controlled acromegaly. SAGIT components I and G for CGE-DC and S, A, G, I, and T for the clinician's therapeutic decision were retained by CART analyses. For international guidelines, only SAGIT component I was retained. The risk for undergoing ≥ 1 treatment change during the study was 3.44 times greater for CGE-DC non-controlled acromegaly relative to CGE-DC controlled acromegaly.

CONCLUSION

The SAGIT instrument is a valid and sensitive tool to comprehensively and accurately assess acromegaly severity.

Pituitary adenoma…nomen omen?

BACKGROUND

In 2017, the International Pituitary Pathology Club proposed to rename pituitary adenoma as pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) but since no consensus on this new terminology was obtained the Pituitary Society decided to host on this topic an international multidisciplinary virtual workshop, Pituitary Neoplasm Nomenclature (PANOMEN), to which several Societies participated with the designation of their representatives in the expert panel. Main conclusion of the meeting was that there was not yet a case for adopting the PitNET nomenclature and main recommendation was that the term adenoma is retained.

AIM

Aim of this Editorial is to comment the outcome of the recently published document of the meeting.

CONCLUSIONS

Ideally, only the combination of pathological, neuroradiological, and clinical data can define the degree of agressiveness/invasion of a pituitary adenoma and effectively guide treament. This may be classically obtained only with a close multisciplinary collaboration into a PTCOE. It is proposed that improved definition of "invasive" and "aggressive" neoplasms may represent the most clinically effective development in the clinico-neuroradiological-pathological denomination and classification of pituitary adenomas.

Glucose metabolism outcomes in acromegaly patients on treatment with pasireotide-LAR or pasireotide-LAR plus Pegvisomant

INTRODUCTION

Disorders of glucose metabolism are a serious acromegaly comorbidity and may be differently impacted by medical treatments of acromegaly. In this retrospective longitudinal multicenter study, we investigated the outcome of glucose metabolism and its predictors in patients treated with Pasireotide LAR (PAS-LAR) alone or in combination with Pegvisomant (PAS-LAR + Peg-V).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Acromegaly patients treated continously with PAS-LAR or PAS-LAR + Peg-V for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

Forty patients (25 females, 15 males) were enrolled. At last visit, 27/40 patients (67.5%) reached biochemical control of acromegaly. Overall, glucose metabolism improved in 3 (all in PAS-LAR + Peg-V; 7.5%), worsened in 26 (65%) and remained unchanged in 11 patients (27.5%). Glucose metabolism worsened in 25 patients (73.5%) treated with PAS-LAR and in a single patient (16.7%) treated with PAS-LAR + Peg-V (p < 0.001). Among patients treated with Pas-LAR alone, GH at baseline was higher in those with worsening of glucose metabolism (p = 0.04) as compared to those with stable glucose status. A significantly higher reduction of HbA1c was observed in patients treated with PAS-LAR + Peg-V, as compared with those treated with PAS-LAR alone (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirmed that glucose metabolism in patients treated with PAS-LAR is often worsened, and may be predicted by entity of baseline GH hypersecretion and by the dose of PAS-LAR. Moreover, our data, although limited by small numbers, may suggest that the combination treatment PAS-LAR + Peg-V can improve glucose homeostasis in selected patients.

Results from ACROCOVID: an international survey on the care of acromegaly during the COVID-19 era

With most global healthcare resources focused on COVID-19, altered resource allocation is disrupting the continuum of care for chronic endocrine conditions, including acromegaly. In order to assess the effects of COVID-19 on care of patients with acromegaly, we conducted an international online survey of endocrinologists. The questionnaire was drafted by a Steering Committee of acromegaly experts and covered both respondent demographics, contact and communication with patients, and patient care. Respondent awareness was generated through social media campaigns and the survey completed online using Google forms. The majority of endocrinologists who responded (N = 84) were based in Europe (67.9%) and were female (58.3%). Slightly more than half of respondents worked in a specialized pituitary center (52.4%) and a large minority cared for more than 50 acromegaly patients (47.6%). Most respondents (85.7%) indicated surgery was their first-line treatment, with only 14.3% indicating medical therapy as a first-choice treatment option. One-third (33.3%) of respondents reported having delayed a planned surgery due to a lack of COVID-19 testing provision and 54.8% due to a lack of surgical provision; 19.1% indicated that a lack of personal protective equipment had reduced their ability to treat patients with acromegaly. Just 21.4% of respondents reported no negative effects from the pandemic on diagnostic practice patterns, and just 19.1% reported no negative effect on patient follow-up practices. Many respondents (55.9%) indicated that remote methods had improved their ability to communicate with their patients and 69.0% indicated that they would continue to use methods of consultation necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our data suggest the COVID-19 pandemic is substantially affecting the care of acromegaly. However, these results also suggest that endocrinologists are embracing aspects of the 'new normal' to create a novel continuum of care better suited to the presumed post-COVID-19 environment. The goal of these changes must be both to improve care while shielding patients from more severe involvement in concomitant acute illnesses such COVID-19.

Effectiveness of Cabergoline Treatment in Patients with Acromegaly Uncontrolled with SSAs: Experience of a Single Tertiary Center

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of cabergoline and the parameters affecting cabergoline response as add-on treatment to somatostatin analaogues (SSA) in patients with acromegaly uncontrolled with SSAs.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

One hundred and twenty-nine acromegalic patients uncontrolled with SSA who had cabergoline added to their treatment were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into the SSAs + cabergoline-responsive (group 1) and non-responsive groups (group 2), and biochemical, pathologic, and radiologic parameters were assessed.

RESULTS

IGF-1 normalization was achieved in 75 of 129 patients (58%) when cabergoline was added to the SSA treatment. Female patients were significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (p=0.006). Group 1 had significantly smaller pre- and post-cabergoline tumor size (p=0.011, p=0.007 respectively), lower levels of IGF-1 in pre-and post-operative period (p=0.040, p=0.001), and lower levels of IGF-1 in pre- and post-cabergoline treatment (p<0.001). Cavernous invasion on sellar magnetic resonance imaging, dural invasion in pathologic examination were not significantly different between the groups. Sellar invasion in pathologic examination was significantly higher in group 1 (p=0.011). No significant difference was found in proliferation indices between two groups. The presence of fibrous bodies was significantly lower in group 1 (p=0.010).

CONCLUSION

Cabergoline can be added to the treatment of acromegalic patients uncontrolled with SSAs due to its ease of use and low economic cost, especially in patients with acromegaly who have small adenomas and no fibrous bodies.

Effects of octreotide on autophagy markers and cell viability markers related to metabolic activity in rat pituitary tumor cells

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to investigate possible direct effects of the somatostatin analog octreotide on autophagy markers and markers of cellular metabolic activity using in vitro cultured rat pituitary tumor cells (GH3 cell line).

METHODS

We measured two markers of the autophagic flux in cell lysates by Western blot and MTT reductive activity, total cellular ATP levels, pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complex activity in cells lysates as markers of cell viability related to metabolic activity.

RESULTS

Octreotide (100 nM) treatment induced autophagy activation (increased LC3-I protein lipidation) and enhanced the autophagic flux (SQSTM1/p62 protein downregulation) in GH3 cells in different incubation media, in detail in Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) as well as in maintenance medium with serum. We did not observe any decrease of redox activity and energy production related to the induction of autophagy by octreotide. On the other hand, short-term treatments with octreotide in HBSS tended to enhance MTT reduction activity and to increase PDH complex enzymatic activity and ATP levels measured in GH3 cell lysates.

CONCLUSIONS

We provided evidence that octreotide can affect autophagy in pituitary tumor cells. The observed effects of octreotide were not related to a decrease of cellular metabolic activity. Finally, the induction of autophagy was either short-lived or overshadowed by other factors in the long term and this limit does not help clarifying their real impact on the pharmacological activity of somatostatin analogs.

Effects of Pegvisomant and Pasireotide LAR on Vertebral Fractures in Acromegaly Resistant to First-generation SRLs

PURPOSE

Osteopathy is an emerging complication of acromegaly. In somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL)-resistant patients, pegvisomant (PegV) and pasireotide LAR (Pasi) are used for acromegaly treatment, but their effect on skeletal health is still not defined.

METHODS

In a longitudinal retrospective international study, we evaluated incidence of radiological vertebral fractures (VFs) in 55 patients with acromegaly resistant to first-generation SRL.

RESULTS

At study entry, prevalent VFs occurred in 23 patients (41.8%). Biochemical acromegaly control was reached in 66.7% of patients on PegV and in 66.7% of patients on Pasi. During the follow-up, incident VFs (iVFs) were detected in 16 patients (29.1%). Occurrence of iVFs was associated with prevalent VFs (P = .002), persistence of active acromegaly (P = .01) and higher value of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) during follow-up (P = .03). Among patients with active disease at last visit, iVFs occurred less frequently in patients on treatment with Pasi (25%) compared to PegV (77.8% P = .04), independently of the IGF-1 values (P = .90). In patients who reached biochemical control, 22.7% on PegV and 12.5% on Pasi had iVFs (P = .40). Among both treatment groups, the presence of pre-existent VFs was the main determinant for iVFs.

CONCLUSION

Our data show for the first time that patients with biochemically active disease treated with Pasi had lower risk of iVFs versus those treated with PegV. It also confirms that the presence of pre-existent VFs was the main determinant for iVFs. Additional studies on larger populations and with longer follow-up are needed to confirm our data and disclose the mechanisms underlying our findings.

How treatments with endocrine and metabolic drugs influence pituitary cell function

A variety of endocrine and metabolic signals regulate pituitary cell function acting through the hypothalamus-pituitary neuroendocrine axes or directly at the pituitary level. The underlying intracellular transduction mechanisms in pituitary cells are still debated. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) functions as a cellular sensor of low energy stores in all mammalian cells and promotes adaptive changes in response to calorie restriction. It is also regarded as a target for therapy of proliferative disorders. Various hormones and drugs can promote tissue-specific activation or inhibition of AMPK by enhancing or inhibiting AMPK phosphorylation, respectively. This review explores the preclinical studies published in the last decade that investigate the role of AMP-activated protein kinase in the intracellular transduction pathways downstream of endocrine and metabolic signals or drugs affecting pituitary cell function, and its role as a target for drug therapy of pituitary proliferative disorders. The effects of the hypoglycemic agent metformin, which is an indirect AMPK activator, are discussed. The multiple effects of metformin on cell metabolism and cell signalling and ultimately on cell function may be either dependent or independent of AMPK. The in vitro effects of metformin may also help highlighting differences in metabolic requirements between pituitary adenomatous cells and normal cells.

Pituitary Diseases and Bone

Neuroendocrinology of bone is a new area of research based on the evidence that pituitary hormones may directly modulate bone remodeling and metabolism. Skeletal fragility associated with high risk of fractures is a common complication of several pituitary diseases such as hypopituitarism, Cushing disease, acromegaly, and hyperprolactinemia. As in other forms of secondary osteoporosis, pituitary diseases generally affect bone quality more than bone quantity, and fractures may occur even in the presence of normal or low-normal bone mineral density as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, making difficult the prediction of fractures in these clinical settings. Treatment of pituitary hormone excess and deficiency generally improves skeletal health, although some patients remain at high risk of fractures, and treatment with bone-active drugs may become mandatory. The aim of this review is to discuss the physiological, pathophysiological, and clinical insights of bone involvement in pituitary diseases.

Effects of metformin on cell growth and AMPK activity in pituitary adenoma cell cultures, focusing on the interaction with adenylyl cyclase activating signals

For a few years we have been investigating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) as a target for drug therapy of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Aim of this study was to investigate the direct effects of metformin, which causes AMPK activation in different cell types, on rat pituitary adenoma cell growth and on related cell signalling pathways. Our results suggest that metformin can exert a growth-inhibitory activity in rat pituitary tumor cells mediated by AMPK activation, although multiple mechanisms are most likely involved. Membrane proteins, including growth factor receptors, are valuable targets of AMPK. The inhibition of the mTOR-p70S6 kinase signalling pathway plays a role in the suppressive effect of metformin on pituitary tumor cell growth. Metformin did not affect the MTT reduction activity in energetic stress conditions. Finally, metformin was still able to induce AMPK activation and to inhibit cell growth in cells treated with forskolin and in transfected cells overexpressing GHRH-receptor and treated with GHRH. Hence, adenylyl cyclase over-activation does not account for the lack of response of some human pituitary tumors to AMPK-activating compounds in vitro.

Effects of pegvisomant and somatostatin receptor ligands on incidence of vertebral fractures in patients with acromegaly

PURPOSE

Acromegalic osteopathy is an emerging complication of acromegaly characterized by increase in bone turnover, deterioration in bone microarchitecture and high risk of vertebral fractures (VFs). Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) and pegvisomant (PegV) are used for treatment of acromegaly and there is evidence that both drugs may exert direct effects on peripheral targets regardless of biochemical control of disease. However, whether or not SRLs and PegV may directly influence skeletal health its is unknown.

METHODS

In this longitudinal study, we evaluated the incidence of radiological VFs in 83 patients (48 females, 35 males; median age 47 years, range 18-80 years) who were treated with SRLs alone (42 cases), PegV alone (6 cases) or in combination with SRLs (35 cases) for median period of 82 months (range 36-126). PegV was given when acromegaly was not controlled by SRLs alone.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, 29 patients (34.9%) developed incident VFs. In patients receiving PegV due to active disease during SRL therapy, incidence of VFs decreased significantly from 43.9 to 26.8% (p = 0.039). When acromegaly was controlled by PegV, the incidence of VFs was slightly but not significantly lower as compared to that observed in patients with biochemical control of disease by SRLs (10.0 vs. 26.7%; p = 0.09). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, incident VFs were independently predicted by pre-existing VFs (odds ratio 61.0; p = 0.009), duration of active acromegaly (odds ratio 1.01; p = 0.05) and mean serum IGF-I during the follow-up (odds ratio 5.26; p = 0.03), regardless of the therapeutic regimen (odds ratio 1.05; p = 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

PegV and SRLs had comparable effects on VF risk in acromegaly. The activity of disease was the main determinant of VFs independently of the drug used to control acromegaly.

High-Dose and High-Frequency Lanreotide Autogel in Acromegaly: A Randomized, Multicenter Study

CONTEXT

Increase in drug frequency or dose is recommended for acromegaly patients with partial response to long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). However, the efficacy and safety data with lanreotide (LAN) Autogel (LAN-ATG) at high dose (HD) or high frequency (HF) are still scanty.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biochemical efficacy and safety of HF and HD LAN-ATG in patients with active acromegaly.

DESIGN

Twenty-four-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Thirty patients with active acromegaly, partial responders to SRLs, were randomized to HF (120 mg/21 days; 15 patients) or HD (180 mg/28 days; 15 patients) LAN-ATG.

OUTCOMES

Normalization of serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and reduction in random growth hormone (GH) values < 1.0 µg/L, reduction in serum IGF-I and GH from baseline, differences in biochemical response between HF and HD LAN-ATG, adverse events.

RESULTS

IGF-I decreased significantly (P = 0.007) during the 24-week treatment, with greater decrease in HD (P = 0.03) vs HF group (P = 0.08). Normalization in IGF-I values occurred in 27.6% of patients (P = 0.016 vs baseline), without a significant difference between HF and HD groups (P = 0.59). The decrease in serum IGF-I significantly correlated with serum LAN values (P = 0.04), and normalization of IGF-I was predicted by baseline IGF-I values (P = 0.02). Serum GH values did not change significantly (P = 0.22). Overall, 19 patients (63.3%) experienced adverse events, all being mild to moderate and transient, without differences between the two therapeutic arms.

CONCLUSION

HF and HD LAN-ATG regimens are effective in normalizing IGF-I values in about one-third of patients with active acromegaly inadequately controlled by long-term conventional SRLs therapy.

Pegvisomant in acromegaly: an update

BACKGROUND

In 2007, we published an opinion document to review the role of pegvisomant (PEG) in the treatment of acromegaly. Since then, new evidence emerged on the biochemical and clinical effects of PEG and on its long-term efficacy and safety.

AIM

We here reviewed the emerging aspects of the use of PEG in clinical practice in the light of the most recent literature.

RESULTS

The clinical use of PEG is still suboptimal, considering that it remains the most powerful tool to control IGF-I in acromegaly allowing to obtain, with a pharmacological treatment, the most important clinical effects in terms of signs and symptoms, quality of life and comorbidities. The number of patients with acromegaly exposed to PEG worldwide has become quite elevated and the prolonged follow-up allows now to deal quite satisfactorily with many clinical issues including major safety issues, such as the concerns about possible tumour (re)growth under PEG. The positive or neutral impact of PEG on glucose metabolism has been highlighted, and the clinical experience, although limited, with sleep apnoea and pregnancy has been reviewed. Finally, the current concept of somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) resistance has been addressed, in order to better define the acromegaly patients to whom the PEG option may be offered.

CONCLUSIONS

PEG increasingly appears to be an effective and safe medical option for many patients not controlled by SRL but its use still needs to be optimized.

New medical therapies of acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare disease associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality. Treatment of acromegaly aims at controlling growth hormone hypersecretion, improving patients' symptoms and comorbidities and normalizing mortality. The therapeutic options for acromegaly include surgery, medical therapies and radiotherapy. However, despite all these treatment options, approximately one-half of patients are not adequately controlled. Progress in molecular research has made possible to develop new therapeutic strategies to improve control of acromegaly. This article will review the new medical approaches to acromegaly which consist in evolution of traditional therapeutic protocols and development of new molecules with different profiles of activity.

Current and future medical treatments for patients with acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a relatively rare condition of growth hormone (GH) excess associated with significant morbidity and, when left untreated, high mortality. Therapy for acromegaly is targeted at decreasing GH and insulin-like growth hormone 1 levels, ameliorating patients' symptoms and decreasing any local compressive effects of the pituitary adenoma. The therapeutic options for acromegaly include surgery, medical therapies (such as dopamine agonists, somatostatin receptor ligands and the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant) and radiotherapy. However, despite all these treatments option, approximately 50% of patients are not adequately controlled.

AREAS COVERED

In this paper, the authors discuss: 1) efficacy and safety of current medical therapy 2) the efficacy and safety of the new multireceptor-targeted somatostatin ligand pasireotide 3) medical treatments currently under clinical investigation (oral octreotide, ITF2984, ATL1103), and 4) preliminary data on the use of new injectable and transdermal/transmucosal formulations of octreotide.

EXPERT OPINION

This expert opinion supports the need for new therapeutic agents and modalities for patients with acromegaly.

ACROSTUDY: the Italian experience

ACROSTUDY is a world-wide non-interventional, post marketing surveillance study performed to monitor the safety and outcomes of pegvisomant (PEG) in clinical practice. We report data from acromegaly patients who have been included in the Italian ACROSTUDY registry. The data of 341 acromegaly patients (171 males) were available for analysis using data freeze (12/9/2012). Patients were enrolled in 25 Italian endocrine centres. Before and during PEG treatment IGF-I, liver enzymes, metabolic parameters, and pituitary MRI were assessed. Before PEG, 54.3% patients had been treated with medical therapy and surgery, 22.9% medical therapy only, and 15.8% medical plus radiation and surgical therapy. 199 adverse events were reported in 98 patients (28.7%). Serious adverse events were documented in 29 patients (8.5%). 71.1% of patients had no significant change in tumor volume. Central MRI reading was performed in 34 patients; in 7 patients, an increase in tumor volume was found. Hormonal efficacy progressively increased since the start of PEG. After 6 years, normal IGF-I levels were found in 70.9% of patients (mean daily dose 18.1 mg). 87.1% of patients were treated with daily PEG although in 8.8% of patients, it was administered 2-6 times per week and in 3.8% with weekly injections. 74.8% received a PEG dose 10-15 mg/daily. PEG is a drug with a favorable safety profile which is efficacious also considering that in Italy it is currently available as third-line therapy.

Aggressive pituitary adenomas--diagnosis and emerging treatments

The WHO categorizes pituitary tumours as typical adenomas, atypical adenomas and pituitary carcinomas, with typical adenomas constituting the major class. However, the WHO classification does not provide an accurate correlation between histopathological findings and clinical behaviour. Tumours lacking typical histological features are classified as atypical, but not all are clinically atypical or exhibit aggressive behaviour. Pituitary carcinomas, by definition, have craniospinal or systemic metastases, although not all display classical cytological features of malignancy. Aggressive pituitary adenomas, defined from a clinical perspective, have earlier and more frequent recurrences and can be resistant to conventional treatments. Specific biomarkers have not yet been identified that can distinguish between clinically aggressive and nonaggressive pituitary adenomas, although the antigen Ki-67 proliferation index might be of value. This Review highlights the need to develop new biomarkers to facilitate the early detection of clinically aggressive pituitary adenomas and discusses emerging markers that hold promise for their identification. Defining aggressiveness is of crucial importance for improving the management of patients by enhancing prognostic predictions and effectiveness of treatment. New drugs, such as temozolomide, have potential use in the management of these patients; anti-VEGF therapy, mTOR and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also potentially useful in managing selected patients.

Improving differential diagnosis of pituitary adenomas

Pituitary adenomas are common tumors arising in adenohypophysial cells or their precursors. For improving control of the disease an early diagnosis is important. Initially considered sporadic tumors, some of them are associated with familial syndromes and their recognition and classification is also required. Morphologically, pituitary adenomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumors with several subtypes and different clinical behavior thus a precise pathological diagnosis is crucial. The simple diagnosis of pituitary adenoma is not satisfactory and the correct classification of histological subtypes may predict aggressiveness in the majority of cases. Although considered not malignant, some of them are clinically aggressive and their recognition remains a challenge. In this paper we present the recent advances in the event of improving early recognition and differential diagnosis of pituitary tumors.

Cabergoline treatment in acromegaly: cons

Many options are available for the treatment of acromegaly, including surgery, radiotherapy, and medical treatment. Cabergoline (CAB), a dopamine agonist with high affinity for dopamine receptor type 2, has been used both in monotherapy and in conjunction with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). Although it is administered orally and has a relatively lower-cost in comparison with SSAs, few studies have demonstrated its usefulness, there is a lack of randomized-controlled trials and other drugs (SSAs and pegvisomant) with more data in the literature are available; these issues are the main drawbacks of adopting CAB for the treatment of acromegaly.

Octreotide for acromegaly treatment: a reappraisal

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a rare disorder characterized by excess secretion of growth hormone (GH) generally caused by a pituitary macroadenoma and associated with reduced life expectancy if the disease is untreated. This article covers the recent available evidences published on octreotide , the first somatostatin analog introduced into clinical practice for the medical treatment of acromegaly.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses i) pharmacology of somatostatin and octreotide; ii) biochemical effects of regular octreotide and long-acting repeatable formulation; iii) tumor shrinkage effects of octreotide in acromegaly; iv) impact of octreotide on acromegalic clinical manifestations and chronic complications; v) safety of octreotide and vi) place of octreotide in the guidelines for acromegaly treatment. Full-text articles in the English language were selected from a PubMed search spanning 1984 - 2013, for keywords including 'octreotide,' 'acromegaly,' 'GH,' 'IGF-I,' and 'tumor shrinkage.' Reference lists in selected papers were also used to broaden the search.

EXPERT OPINION

Octreotide is a mature drug with a consolidated favorable benefit versus risks profile in the treatment of acromegaly.

A consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly complications

In March 2011, the Acromegaly Consensus Group met to revise and update the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly complications. The meeting was sponsored by the Pituitary Society and the European Neuroendocrinology Association and included experts skilled in the management of acromegaly. Complications considered included cardiovascular, endocrine and metabolic, sleep apnea, bone diseases, and mortality. Outcomes in selected, related clinical conditions were also considered, and included pregnancy, familial acromegaly and invasive macroadenomas. The need for a new disease staging model was considered, and design of such a tool was proposed.

The place of medical treatment of acromegaly: current status and perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is characterized by elevated growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels and by progressive somatic disfigurement and systemic manifestations, which lead to a mortality rate higher than the general population. Therefore, diagnosis and properly treatment should be performed as soon as possible.

AREAS COVERED

This article focuses on the state of the art of acromegaly medical treatment. Somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists and GH receptor antagonist were reviewed. Somatostatin analogs, the first-choice pharmacotherapy, can be used as primary or pre-operative treatment or as secondary therapy after failed surgery. Dopamine agonists have been used in patients with slightly elevated hormone levels and/or mixed GH/prolactin adenomas. Pegvisomant is indicated for resistant to somatostatin analogs/dopamine agonists. Combined treatment is also an option for resistant cases. Other non-conventional therapies and perspectives of treatment were also been discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The control of disease activity in acromegaly is of paramount importance. Medical treatment is an important option for cases in which surgery was unsuccessful or not indicated. Despite the achievements in medical treatment, somatotropic tumor aggressiveness and/or resistance to the drugs currently available remain a concern. Therefore, novel therapy targets based on molecular pathogenesis of GH-secreting tumors are currently in development, aiming at fulfilling this important gap.

Effects of AMPK activation and combined treatment with AMPK activators and somatostatin on hormone secretion and cell growth in cultured GH-secreting pituitary tumor cells

We investigated the effects of the AMPK activator AICAR as compared to somatostatin-14 on cell viability and GH secretion in human GH-secreting pituitary adenomas in vitro and in rat GH3 cells. Overnight treatment with AICAR increased phospho-(threonine-172) AMPK levels (activated AMPK) in cultured human adenomas. As to the effects on cell viability, four adenomas out of 15 were responsive to AICAR (0.4mM) and five adenomas were responsive to SS-14 (100 nM). One adenoma was responsive to both somatostatin and AICAR. The effects of cotreatment with SS-14 and AICAR were investigated in eight adenomas. In two adenomas, the effects of AICAR+SS-14 did not exceed the effect of AICAR. In two adenomas which were not responsive to either AICAR or SS-14, the cotreatment was able to reduce cell viability versus control. Two adenomas were not responsive to any treatment. As to the effects on GH secretion, nine adenomas out of 15 were responsive to AICAR. Twelve adenomas were responsive to SS-14. Eight adenomas were responsive to both AICAR and SS-14. Cotreatment exceeded the effect of single treatments in 4 out of 10 adenomas. In GH3 cells, AICAR reduced the activity of p70S6 kinase, which plays an important role in cell growth. SS-14 did not affect significantly AMPK phosphorylation and p70S6K activity but it was able to enhance the inhibitory effect of AICAR on phospho-S6 levels. Moreover, AICAR and SS-14 reduced ERK phosphorylation with a different time course. The combined treatment reduced phospho-ERK levels at any time point.

Meta-analysis on the effects of octreotide on tumor mass in acromegaly

BACKGROUND

The long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide is used either as an adjuvant or primary therapy to lower growth hormone (GH) levels in patients with acromegaly and may also induce pituitary tumor shrinkage.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a meta-analysis to accurately assess the effect of octreotide on pituitary tumor shrinkage.

DATA SOURCES

A computerized Medline and Embase search was undertaken to identify potentially eligible studies.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligibility criteria included treatment with octreotide, availability of numerical metrics on tumor shrinkage and clear definition of a clinically relevant reduction in tumor size. Primary endpoints included the proportion of patients with tumor shrinkage and mean percentage reduction in tumor volume.

DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS

The electronic search identified 2202 articles. Of these, 41 studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria were selected for data extraction and analysis. In total, 1685 patients were included, ranging from 6 to 189 patients per trial. For the analysis of the effect of octreotide on pituitary tumor shrinkage a random effect model was used to account for differences in both effect size and sampling error.

RESULTS

Octreotide was shown to induce tumor shrinkage in 53.0% [95% CI: 45.0%-61.0%] of treated patients. In patients treated with the LAR formulation of octreotide, this increased to 66.0%, [95% CI: 57.0%-74.0%). In the nine studies in which tumor shrinkage was quantified, the overall weighted mean percentage reduction in tumor size was 37.4% [95% CI: 22.4%-52.4%], rising to 50.6% [95% CI: 42.7%-58.4%] with octreotide LAR.

LIMITATIONS

Most trials examined were open-label and had no control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide LAR induces clinically relevant tumor shrinkage in more than half of patients with acromegaly.

Sleep apnea in acromegaly: a review on prevalence, pathogenetic aspects and treatment

Sleep apnea syndrome is a common complication of acromegaly with a negative impact on quality of life and survival. Obstructive sleep apnea is the prevailing form and is characterized by recurrent episodes of apnea and hypopnea owing to the total or partial collapse of the upper airways during sleep. The craniofacial deformations and the hypertrophy of upper airway soft tissue are responsible for its occurrence. Successful treatment of acromegaly can improve the severity of this complication, but can only seldom reverse it, particularly after a long time of active acromegaly. Thus, it is advisable to evaluate patients for sleep apnea syndrome at diagnosis and during treatment, and also when acromegaly is biochemically controlled. In selected cases, continuous positive airway pressure should be implemented to improve patient outcome.

MGMT immunoexpression in growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas and its correlation with Ki-67 labeling index and cytokeratin distribution pattern

Recent publications suggest the utility of temozolomide (TMZ) in the management of aggressive pituitary adenomas and carcinomas, resistant to conventional treatments. The response to TMZ is inversely correlated with tumoral expression of O-6 methylguanine DNA methyl transferase (MGMT). Therefore, we aimed to assess MGMT immunoexpression in pure GH-secreting pituitary adenomas, in an effort to predict the likelihood of response to TMZ, and to correlate MGMT immunoexpression with Ki-67 LI and cytokeratin (CK) distribution pattern. Our material consisted of 36 GH-secreting pituitary adenomas (21 female,15 male, mean age 42.5±10.5), operated at our center between 2003 and 2010. Immunostaining for MGMT, Ki-67, and CK was performed using avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method. Immunoreactivity for MGMT and Ki-67 was evaluated microscopically and recorded as percentages of positive nuclear immunostaining. CK distribution pattern was also evaluated microscopically and assoreted into dot-like and nondot-like pattern subtypes. MGMT immunoexpression scored as 0=none, 1=<10%, 2=<25%, 3=<50%, and 4=>50%. Staining for MGMT was <10% (score 1) in 30 (83.3%), 10-25% (score 2) in 3 (8.3%), 25-50% (score 3) in 2 (5.6%) and >50% (score 4) in 1 (2.8%) of the tumors, respectively. There was no correlation between Ki-67 LI and CK distribution pattern with MGMT immunoreactivity (P>0.05). Data from the current study suggest a large proportion of GH-secreting adenomas, including those with dot-like CK distribution pattern and high Ki-67 LI, demonstrate negative/low MGMT immunoreactivity and could be treated with TMZ, if conventional treatment fails.

[Role of somatostatin receptor ligands in the treatment of acromegaly--literature review]

Acromegaly is a rare disease with typical clinical manifestations. Untreated acromegaly carries a 2-4-fold increase in mortality in long-term outcome. The goal of treatment is double, including biochemical control of the disease (normalization of serum IGF1 levels compared to age and gender matched controls, GH levels below 1 ng/ml after oral glucose load, or random GH below 2.5 ng/ml) and control of the tumor mass. The therapeutic modalities currently available for the treatment of acromegaly are: surgery, medical therapy, radiation therapy and their combinations. The cornerstones of medical therapy in acromegaly are the somatostatin receptor ligands due to their effectiveness in controlling GH excess in 60-70 % of patients and their beneficial effects on tumor volume. Somatostatin analogues have an established role as adjuvant therapy after non-curative surgery, and evidence suggests their use as primary treatment for selected patients. The long-term use of somatostatin receptor ligands is safe and they are well tolerated. Future medical therapy consists of pasireotide, a novel, universal somatostatin receptor agonist, and a new class of drugs named dopastatins. The latter so-called chimeric molecules have strong affinity for somatostatin receptors and dopamine-2 receptors, resulting in a more effective blocking of GH secretion, according to preliminary data. The authors of this paper review the current medical therapy of acromegaly, focusing on the role of somatostatin receptor ligands.

Resistance to somatostatin analogs in acromegaly

Somatostatin analogs (SA) are widely used in acromegaly, either as first-line or adjuvant treatment after surgery. First-line treatment with these drugs is generally used in the patients with macroadenomas or in those with clinical conditions so severe as to prevent unsafe reactions during anesthesia. Generally, the response to SA takes into account both control of GH and IGF-I excess, with consequent improvement of clinical symptoms directly related to GH and IGF-I excess, and tumor shrinkage. This latter effect is more prominent in the patients treated first-line and bearing large macroadenomas, but it is also observed in patients with microadenomas, even with little clinical implication. Predictors of response are patients' gender, age, initial GH and IGF-I levels, and tumor mass, as well as adequate expression of somatostatin receptor types 2 and 5, those with the highest affinity for octreotide and lanreotide. Only sporadic cases of somatostatin receptor gene mutation or impaired signaling pathways have been described in GH-secreting tumors so far. The response to SA also depends on treatment duration and dosage of the drug used, so that a definition of resistance based on short-term treatments using low doses of long-acting SA is limited. Current data suggest that response to these drugs is better analyzed taking together biochemical and tumoral effects because only the absence of both responses might be considered as a poor response or resistance. This latter evidence seems to occur in 25% of treated patients after 12 months of currently available long-acting SA.

Octreotide long-acting release (LAR): a review of its use in the management of acromegaly

Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) [Sandostatin LAR] is a somatostatin analogue with a well established clinical profile in patients with acromegaly. It binds to somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 with high potency to reduce the production and secretion of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I. Octreotide LAR is administered intramuscularly once every 28 days, in contrast to the subcutaneous formulation which requires administration two to three times daily. In several noncomparative trials, octreotide LAR was effective as primary therapy in normalizing GH and IGF-I levels and reducing tumour volume in patients with acromegaly. In addition, no significant difference was seen between octreotide LAR and surgery or lanreotide long-acting (LA) or lanreotide Autogel(R) (ATG) in small, randomized or observational, primary therapy trials. In another small, randomized trial, preoperative octreotide LAR followed by surgery was no more effective than surgery alone in terms of normalizing IGF-I levels, except in patients with macroadenoma. Octreotide LAR has also demonstrated good efficacy as postoperative adjuvant therapy, alone or in combination with pegvisomant, in randomized or noncomparative trials. In patients with different treatment histories (mixed populations), the efficacy of octreotide LAR appears to be generally similar to that of lanreotide ATG and greater than that of lanreotide LA, according to data from switching or crossover studies. Also in mixed populations, the efficacy of octreotide LAR was not significantly different to that of pegvisomant in terms of normalizing IGF-I levels in a randomized trial, and octreotide LAR demonstrated good efficacy in combination with cabergoline in a small, sequential-treatment trial. Octreotide LAR was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with the most commonly occurring adverse events being gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary in nature. Thus, octreotide LAR continues to be a valuable option in the treatment of acromegaly.

Treatment of Cushing disease: overview and recent findings

Endogenous Cushing syndrome is an endocrine disease caused by excessive secretion of adrenocorticotropin hormone in approximately 80% of cases, usually by a pituitary corticotroph adenoma (Cushing disease [CD]). It is a heterogeneous disorder requiring a multidisciplinary and individualized approach to patient management. The goals of treatment of CD include the reversal of clinical features, the normalization of biochemical changes with minimal morbidity, and long-term control without recurrence. Generally, the treatment of choice is the surgical removal of the pituitary tumor by transsphenoidal approach, performed by an experienced surgeon. Considering the high recurrence rate, other treatments should be considered. Second-line treatments include more radical surgery, radiation therapy, medical therapy, and bilateral adrenalectomy. Drug treatment has been targeted at the hypothalamic or pituitary level, at the adrenal gland, and also at the glucocorticoid receptor level. Frequently, medical therapy is performed before surgery to reduce the complications of the procedure, reducing the effects of severe hypercortisolism. Commonly, in patients in whom surgery has failed, medical management is often essential to reduce or normalize the hypercortisolemia, and should be attempted before bilateral adrenalectomy is considered. Medical therapy can be also useful in patients with CD while waiting for pituitary radiotherapy to take effect, which can take up to 10 years or more. So far, results of medical treatment of CD have not been particularly relevant; however, newer tools promise to change this scenario. The aim of this review is to analyze the results and experiences with old and new medical treatments of CD and to reevaluate medical therapies for complications of CD and hypopituitarism in patients with cured CD.

A consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

The Acromegaly Consensus Group met in April 2009 to revisit the guidelines on criteria for cure as defined in 2000.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants included 74 neurosurgeons and endocrinologists with extensive experience of treating acromegaly. EVIDENCE/CONSENSUS PROCESS: Relevant assays, biochemical measures, clinical outcomes, and definition of disease control were discussed, based on the available published evidence, and the strength of consensus statements was rated.

CONCLUSIONS

Criteria to define active acromegaly and disease control were agreed, and several significant changes were made to the 2000 guidelines. Appropriate methods of measuring and achieving disease control were summarized.

Effects of lanreotide SR and Autogel on tumor mass in patients with acromegaly: a systematic review

Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSA) are widely used for the treatment of acromegaly achieving biochemical control of the disease in 50-75% of the patients. One of the goals of the treatment of acromegaly is the control of tumor growth, especially in patients in whom SSAs are used as first-line therapy. Over the recent years, there has been growing evidence that SSAs are able to induce tumor shrinkage in patients with acromegaly. However, most of the data are from patients under treatment with octreotide, either subcutaneously or intramuscularly with long-acting formulation, whereas the data on lanreotide SR or Autogel are very few. Indeed, octreotide and lanreotide, i.e. the two commercially available SSAs, show slight differences in pharmacokinetics and patterns of receptor affinities with potentially different therapeutic effects. We aimed to perform a systematic review of literature data concerning the shrinkage effects of long-acting lanreotide in patients with acromegaly. The analysis was focused on the following issues: differences in shrinkage effects between primary and secondary medical treatment, predictive value of baseline tumor volume and correlation between biochemical control and shrinkage effects. The peer-reviewed medical literature was searched to identify clinical trials studying the effects of lanreotide SR or Autogel on adenoma size in acromegaly. To be included in this analysis, studies had one of the following designs: randomized controlled trial; prospective, nonrandomized trial; retrospective study. Twenty-two studies were found to be eligible for the final analysis, in which tumor size was measured as an end-point for lanreotide treatment. Overall a total of 32.8% of patients experienced a variable degree (from 10 to 77%) of tumor shrinkage during lanreotide SR or Autogel treatment. The analysis showed that tumor shrinkage was more frequent in naïve patients as compared with those previously treated by radiotherapy, surgery or drugs other than lanreotide. The data on the correlation between tumor shrinkage and baseline tumor size were discordant, but when baseline tumor size was specified, more than 80% of patients undergoing shrinkage under lanreotide Autogel had macroadenomas. Finally, with lanreotide Autogel there was no evident correlation between biochemical response and tumor shrinkage. Our systematic review of the literature shows that lanreotide particularly when used as first-line therapy is able to quite frequently induce tumor shrinkage in patients with acromegaly. This finding suggests that this drug may have a role in the primary treatment of acromegaly.

Short- and long-term changes of quality of life in patients with acromegaly: results from a prospective study

Quality of life (QoL) may be affected in acromegalic patients, although the role of disease activity is still unsettled. The aim of the study was to assess the QoL of acromegalic patients with a specific questionnaire (ACROQOL). ACROQOL was evaluated in a prospective study (at baseline, at 6 and 24 months) in 23 active untreated acromegalic patients. Control of acromegaly was defined by normal age-matched serum IGF-I concentrations. Patient groups were defined as controlled or uncontrolled at 6 months and at 24 months: controlled or uncontrolled during the entire study period (ACRO(CC) or ACRO(NC), respectively) or uncontrolled at 6 months and controlled thereafter (ACRO(C)). At 6 months, ACROQOL scores improved globally (from 54.3+/-21 to 65.1+/-19, p=0.04) as did subdomains and were inversely related to IGF-I variation (r=-0.50, p=0.052). At 24 months, ACROQOL improved globally (from 54.3+/-21 to 65.7+/-18.0, p=0.04) and this was also seen in the appearance subdomains; however, no correlation was revealed between variation of serum IGF-I concentrations and changes in ACROQOL total score (r=0.008, p=0.87). ACROQOL scores did not significantly change in ACRO(NC) (p=0.310) and in ACRO(C) (p=0.583), whereas it improved globally (from 42.1+/-22.1 to 58.8+/-16.04, p=0.021) and in psychological subdomains in ACRO(CC); however, it reflected the improvement occurred within the first 6 months of disease control. In conclusion, successful treatment, which normalizes disease activity, improves QoL in acromegaly in the short term. However, the lack of correlation between the ACROQOL score in the long term might suggest that factors other than serum IGF-I participate in the well-being of acromegalic patients; however, due to the small sample size, our results need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Expression of neuropeptide hormone receptors in human adrenal tumors and cell lines: antiproliferative effects of peptide analogues

Peptide analogues targeting various neuropeptide receptors have been used effectively in cancer therapy. A hallmark of adrenocortical tumor formation is the aberrant expression of peptide receptors relating to uncontrolled cell proliferation and hormone overproduction. Our microarray results have also demonstrated a differential expression of neuropeptide hormone receptors in tumor subtypes of human pheochromocytoma. In light of these findings, we performed a comprehensive analysis of relevant receptors in both human adrenomedullary and adrenocortical tumors and tested the antiproliferative effects of peptide analogues targeting these receptors. Specifically, we examined the receptor expression of somatostatin-type-2 receptor, growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor or GHRH receptor splice variant-1 (SV-1) and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) receptor at the mRNA and protein levels in normal human adrenal tissues, adrenocortical and adrenomedullary tumors, and cell lines. Cytotoxic derivatives of somatostatin AN-238 and, to a lesser extent, AN-162, reduced cell numbers of uninduced and NGF-induced adrenomedullary pheochromocytoma cells and adrenocortical cancer cells. Both the splice variant of GHRH receptor SV-1 and the LHRH receptor were also expressed in adrenocortical cancer cell lines but not in the pheochromocytoma cell line. The GHRH receptor antagonist MZ-4-71 and LHRH antagonist Cetrorelix both significantly reduced cell growth in the adrenocortical cancer cell line. In conclusion, the expression of receptors for somatostatin, GHRH, and LHRH in the normal human adrenal and in adrenal tumors, combined with the growth-inhibitory effects of the antitumor peptide analogues, may make possible improved treatment approaches to adrenal tumors.