Pharmacological properties of nebivolol in man

A Novel function of Nebivolol: Stimulation of Adipose-derived Stem Cell Proliferation and Inhibition of Differentiation

Tissue engineering is limited by the time of culture expansion of cells needed for scaffold seeding. Thus, a simple means of accelerated stem cell proliferation could represent a significant advance. Here, Nebivolol was investigated for its effect on the replicative capacity of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs). This study indicates that the number of ASCs with Nebivolol treatment showed a significant population increase of 51.5% compared to untreated cells (p<0.01). Cell cycle analysis showed a significant decrease in the percentage of ASCs in G1 phase with Nebivolol treatment compared to untreated cells (p<0.01), suggesting that Nebivolol shortens the G1 phase of ASCs, resulting in a faster proliferative rate. Furthermore, our results showed that Nebivolol significantly increased colony-forming units of ASCs (p<0.01). Despite increasing ASC proliferative potential, we showed that Nebivolol has an inhibitory effect on adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation potential as indicated by significantly reduced expression of CCAAT Enhancer Binding Protein alpha (P<0.01) and lipoprotein lipase (P<0.01) and inhibited activity of alkaline phosphatase (P<0.01), respectively. Taken together, these results showed that Nebivolol accelerated ASC proliferation through shortening G1 phase, while inhibiting both adipogenic and osteogenic potentials of ASCs. These data identify a novel and simple approach to accelerate stem cell expansion in vitro before cell differentiation.

A pharmacokinetic drug interaction study between nebivolol and paroxetine in healthy volunteers

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Nebivolol is a highly selective beta-blocker with additional vasodilator properties, widely used in the clinical practice for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. Paroxetine is a second-generation antidepressant and a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, the same isoenzyme involved in the metabolism of nebivolol. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of multiple-dose paroxetine intake on the pharmacokinetics of nebivolol in healthy volunteers and its potential consequences upon nebivolol pharmacodynamics.

METHODS

The study included 23 healthy subjects and was designed as an open-label, single-centre, non-randomized, two-period clinical trial. During period 1 (reference), each volunteer received a single dose of 5 mg nebivolol, whereas during period 2 (test), each volunteer received a single dose of 5 mg nebivolol and 20 mg paroxetine, after a pretreatment regimen with paroxetine (20-40 mg/day for 6 days). The pharmacokinetic parameters of nebivolol and its active metabolite were analysed by non-compartmental modelling. The pharmacodynamic parameters (blood pressure and heart rate) were assessed at rest, after each nebivolol intake.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Pretreatment with paroxetine increased the mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax ) for unchanged nebivolol (1·78 ± 1·17 vs. 4·24 ± 1·67 ng/mL) and for its active metabolite (0·58 ± 0·21 vs. 0·79 ± 0·24 ng/mL) compared to nebivolol alone. The time (tmax ) to reach Cmax was 1·37 ± 0·88 (h) and 3·11 ± 1·76 (h) for the parent compound and its active metabolite after nebivolol administered alone and 3·96 ± 1·76 (h), respectively, 7·33 ± 7·84 (h) after pretreatment with paroxetine. Also, the total areas under the curve (AUC0-∞ ) were significantly increased from 17·26 ± 43·06 to 106·20 ± 65·56 h ng/mL for nebivolol unchanged and 13·03 ± 11·29 to 74·56 ± 88·77 h ng/mL for its hydroxylated metabolite, before and after paroxetine intake. All the pharmacokinetic parameters presented statistically significant differences when paroxetine was administered with nebivolol. Nonetheless, statistical analysis did not show a significant difference between the vital signs measured during the two periods.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

After pretreatment with paroxetine, the exposure to nebivolol was increased by 6·1-fold for the parent drug and 5·7-fold for the hydroxylated active metabolite. Paroxetine influenced nebivolol pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers, but it did not have a significant effect on nebivolol pharmacodynamic parameters measured at rest, although the clinical relevance of this drug interaction needs further investigation.

No evidence of nitrate tolerance caused by nebivolol

BACKGROUND

Continuous long-term treatment with nitrates may cause nitrate tolerance. Nebivolol is a highly selective beta1-adrenergic antagonist with additional nitric oxide (NO)-mediated vasodilatory effects. However, there have been no investigations into whether or not the long-term administration of nebivolol might cause nitrate tolerance.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in 16 healthy men. Subjects received 5 mg nebivolol or placebo once daily for 8 days in random order divided by a drug-free interval of 2 weeks. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography 3 h after oral intake of the first and last doses of nebivolol and placebo, respectively. FBF was measured again following the intravenous administration of 4 μg nitroglycerin/kg body weight/min for 5 min.

RESULTS

Following 8 days of continuous intake of placebo, nitroglycerin increased FBF by 54% (p < 0.05), whereas nitroglycerin increased FBF by 96% (p < 0.01) following 8 days of continuous intake of nebivolol, and the increase after 8 days of nebivolol was significantly (p < 0.05) more pronounced than after 8 days of placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate no evidence of nitrate tolerance caused by long-term administration of nebivolol. On the contrary, long-term intake of nebivolol increases rather than decreases the NO-mediated vasodilating effects.

Nebivolol: an endothelium-friendly selective β1-adrenoceptor blocker

Nebivolol is a highly selective β1-adrenoceptor blocker, which also stimulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase and scavenges reactive oxygen species (ROS). These characteristics endow nebivolol, compared with conventional β-blockers, with a favorable hemodynamic profile for the treatment of hypertension, chronic heart failure, and possibly other cardiovascular diseases. Nebivolol is a racemic mixture of d- and l-isomers. Its β1-antagonistic properties reside primarily with d-nebivolol although both isomers are capable of increasing the release of NO from the endothelium after binding to β2- or β3-adrenergic receptors. The latter action results in vasodilatation and reduced vascular resistance. Nebivolol also scavenges ROS in a receptor-independent manner by direct interaction with free radicals. By scavenging ROS nebivolol not only reduces oxidant stress but also augments NO bioavailability. The endothelial nitric oxide synthase -stimulating and ROS scavenging effects of nebivolol act synergistically to provide cardiovascular protection in addition to its β1-antagonistic action.

Influence of nebivolol on anticonvulsant effect of lamotrigine

Objective:

The present study describes the effect of nebivolol (NBV) either alone or in combination with lamotrigine (LTG) using increasing current electroshock seizures (ICES) model in mice.

Materials and Methods:

Male albino mice of Swiss strain each weighing 18-30 g were used. Lamotrigine (Lamitor tablets, Torrent; 1.5 and 3.0 mg/kg) and NBV (Nebicard tablets, Torrent; 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) were suspended in 0.25% of carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) in 0.9% saline and administered orally in volumes of 10 mg/kg. Control animals received an equivalent volume of 0.25% CMC in 0.9% saline suspension. The anticonvulsant effects of the drugs were measured using ICES model whereas cognitive behavior was measured by the spontaneous alternation behavior and grip-strength test. The biochemical estimation was done by measuring the lipid peroxidation and reduced glutathione (GSH).

Results:

Both NBV and LTG produced significantly enhanced seizure threshold (ST), decreased grip strength, inhibited lipid peroxidation, and increased brain GSH levels in acute and chronic dosages likened to control group, whereas there was no significant effect on alternation scores. The combination of NBV with LTG significantly potentiated the ST when compared to LTG.

Conclusion:

Nebivolol showed antiepileptic effects in addition to its reported antihypertensive effect, which could be attributed to action of the two drugs through different mechanisms or due to drug interaction that may be pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic needing elucidation.

Rationale and design of a trial evaluating the effects of losartan vs. nebivolol vs. the association of both on the progression of aortic root dilation in Marfan syndrome with FBN1 gene mutations

BACKGROUND

The major clinical problem of Marfan syndrome (MFS) is the aortic root aneurysm, with risk of dissection when the root diameter approximates 5 cm. In MFS, a key molecule, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), normally bound to the extracellular matrix, is free and activated. In an experimental setting, TGF-beta blockade prevents the aortic root structural damage and dilatation. The angiotensin receptor 1 blockers (sartanics) exert an anti-TGF-beta effect; trials are now ongoing for evaluating the effect of losartan compared with atenolol in MFS. beta-Adrenergic blockers are the drugs most commonly used in MFS. The third-generation beta-adrenergic blocker nebivolol retains the beta-adrenergic blocker effects on heart rate and further exerts antistiffness effects, typically increased in MFS.

METHODS

The open-label phase III study will include 291 patients with MFS and proven FBN1 gene mutations, with aortic root dilation (z-score > or =2.5). The patients will be randomized to nebivolol, losartan and the combination of the two drugs. The primary end point is the comparative evaluation of the effects of losartan, nebivolol and the association of both on the progression of aortic root growth rate. Secondary end points include the pharmacokinetics of the two drugs, comparative evaluation of serum levels of total and active TGF-beta, quantitative assessment of the expression of the mutated gene (FBN1, both 5' and 3'), pharmacogenetic bases of drug responsiveness. The quality of life evaluation in the three groups will be assessed. Statistical evaluation includes an interim analysis at month 24 and conclusive analyses at month 48.

CONCLUSION

The present study will add information about pharmacological therapy in MFS, supporting the new application of angiotensin receptor 1 blockers and finding beta-adrenergic blockers that may give more specific effects. Moreover, the study will further deepen understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms that are active in Marfan syndrome through the pharmacogenomic and transcriptomic mechanisms that may explain MFS phenotype variability.

Investigation of the different adrenoceptor targets of nebivolol enantiomers in rat thoracic aorta

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Nebivolol is a highly selective beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist with beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist properties and is a racemate mixture of D- and L-enantiomers. However, the cellular mechanisms of the effects of each enantiomer are not yet clear and are a matter for debate. The aim of the present experiments was to determine the adrenoceptors involved in the vascular effects of D- and L-enantiomers of nebivolol in rat thoracic aorta.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Responses to nebivolol enantiomers were evaluated in rings of thoracic aorta from male Sprague-Dawley rats.

KEY RESULTS

D-nebivolol (0.1-10 micromol.L(-1)), but not L-nebivolol, significantly shifted to the right the concentration-response curve to phenylephrine, an alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist, in a concentration-dependent manner. For the following experiments, aortic rings were constricted with endothelin 1 and now both enantiomers produced an endothelium-dependent relaxation of the rings involving the nitric oxide pathway. This relaxation was not modified by 1 micromol.L(-1) CGP 20,712A (beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist), but significantly blunted by 7 micromol.L(-1) L-74,8337 (beta(3)-adrenoceptor antagonist). However, only the vasorelaxation induced by D-nebivolol was significantly reduced by 1 micromol.L(-1) ICI 118,551 (beta(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our results suggest that the nebivolol enantiomers act on different targets. D-nebivolol induced vasorelaxation by activating beta(2)- and beta(3)-adrenoceptors and antagonizing alpha(1)-adrenoceptors. L-nebivolol induced vasorelaxation by activating only beta(3)-adrenoceptors in our model. Our results emphasize that nebivolol is a beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist with several important pharmacological differences from other beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists.

Nebivolol: a highly selective beta1-adrenergic receptor blocker that causes vasodilation by increasing nitric oxide

Nebivolol (Bystolic) is a cardioselective beta 1 (beta(1))-adrenergic receptor blocker with endothelium-dependent vasodilating properties. The endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by nebivolol is blocked by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and guanylate cyclase. Nebivolol also increases in vitro and in vivo nitric oxide (NO), which is an essential signaling molecule involved in the maintenance of cardiovascular homeostasis. This review summarizes the data involving nebivolol and NO bioavailability. Endothelium-dependent relaxation of blood vessels, which is impaired in hypertensive animals and humans, is reversed by nebivolol treatment. Animals exhibiting endothelial dysfunction also show an improvement in NO-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) signaling and an increase in NO bioavailability when treated with nebivolol. When blood vessel and cultured endothelial cells from hypertensive animals are treated with nebivolol, there is a decrease in superoxide production and an increase in the expression and activity of endothelial NOS (eNOS). As a result of the increased bioavailability of NO, nebivolol also increases in vivo arterial distensibility, glomerular filtration rate, and renal plasma flow. In normotensive volunteers, nebivolol infusion increases the forearm blood flow, an effect that is blocked by inhibitors of NOS and restored by the NOS substrate, L-arginine. In hypertensive patients, chronic treatment with nebivolol improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation induced by acetylcholine and shear stress and reverses endothelium-dependent vasoconstriction. Furthermore, nebivolol displays distinct hemodynamic properties in patients that include improvements in stroke volume and a decrease in peripheral vascular resistance. These studies demonstrate that nebivolol produces endothelium-dependent vasodilation by increasing NO release, decreasing oxidative stress to increase NO bioavailability, or both. The NO-dependent vasodilatory action of nebivolol, coupled with its high beta(1)-adrenergic receptor selectivity, is unique among the clinically available beta-blockers and contributes to its efficacy and improved tolerability (e.g., less fatigue and sexual dysfunction) as an antihypertensive agent.

Impact of beta-blockers on sleep in patients with mild hypertension: a randomized trial between nebivolol and metoprolol

INTRODUCTION

Sleep is an innate and essential part of human life. Various aspects of sleep are negatively affected by beta-blockers. We compared the impact of two beta-blockers, metoprolol succinate (extended release) and nebivolol, on sleep quality in patients with stage 1 hypertension.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. Eligible patients were administered the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire by a blinded interviewer and were randomized to receive metoprolol (starting dose 25 mg) or nebivolol (starting dose 2.5 mg) once daily for 6 weeks. The first dose was administered before patients left the clinic. Visits were scheduled for 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after the initiation of therapy. At the end of the study, patients were readministered the PSQI questionnaire by the same interviewer, as before blinded to treatment allocation.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients in the nebivolol group and 17 patients in the metoprolol group completed the study and were included in the data analysis (mean age of patients, 40.7 years). At study entry, systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, and PSQI scores were similar in the two groups. Over 6 weeks of treatment, systolic and diastolic BP normalized in both groups. Global PSQI score improved significantly in patients in the nebivolol group, whereas it worsened in the metoprolol group. The difference in effect of two beta-blockers was statistically significant (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Nebivolol was associated with improved sleep (as assessed by the PSQI), whereas metoprolol was associated with a worsening of sleep characteristics.

Differential effects of nebivolol and atenolol on transmitral diastolic filling parameters in patients with essential hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Impaired left ventricular (LV) diastolic relaxation, detected by pulsed Doppler echocardiography, is predictive of a higher incidence of major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. An improvement in LV diastolic function is an important goal of treatment. However, treatment of LV diastolic dysfunction remains empirical. The objective of our study was to compare the short-term effects of nebivolol and atenolol on Doppler diastolic filling parameters in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either nebivolol (5 mg/day) or atenolol (50 mg/day) for 1 month. Diastolic filling parameters, with pulsed-wave Doppler transmitral flow velocities, were measured 1 day before and 1 month after treatment.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, both agents significantly decreased heart rate and blood pressure. However, there was no significant difference in pre-and post-treatment values between the nebivolol and atenolol groups. Both drugs significantly improved LV transmitral flow measured by early diastolic flow/atrial contraction signal (E/A) ratio, decreased deceleration time (DT) and isovolumetric contraction time (IVRT), but post-treatment improvement in E/A, DT and IVRT values was more significant with nebivolol compared with atenolol (P=0.05, P=0.05 and P=0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although treatment with nebivolol or atenolol results in improved LV transmitral diastolic function filling parameters (E/A ratio, IVRT and DT), nebivolol has a greater effect compared with atenolol in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Mechanism-based pharmacodynamic modeling of S(-)-atenolol: estimation of in vivo affinity for the beta1-adrenoceptor with an agonist-antagonist interaction model

The aim of this study was the development of an agonist-antagonist interaction model to estimate the in vivo affinity of S(-)-atenolol for the beta(1)-adrenoreceptor. Male Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats were used to characterize the interaction between the model drugs isoprenaline (to induce tachycardia) and S(-)-atenolol. Blood samples were taken to determine plasma pharmacokinetics. Reduction of isoprenaline-induced tachycardia was used as a pharmacodynamic endpoint. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of isoprenaline was first characterized with the operational model of agonism using the literature value for the affinity (K(A)) of isoprenaline (3.2 x 10(-8) M; left atria WKY rats). Resulting estimates for baseline (E(0)), maximal effect (E(max)), and efficacy (tau) were 374 (1.9%), 130 (5.9%), and 247 (33%) beats per minute, respectively. In addition, the interaction between isoprenaline and S(-)-atenolol was characterized using a pharmacodynamic interaction model based on the operational model of agonism that describes the heart rate response based on the affinity of the agonist (K(A)), the affinity of the antagonist (K(B)), the efficacy (tau), the maximal effect (E(max)), the Hill coefficient (n(H)), the concentrations of isoprenaline and atenolol, and the displacement of the endogenous agonist adrenaline. The estimated in vivo affinity (K(B)) of S(-)-atenolol for the beta(1) -receptor was 4.6 x 10(-8) M. The obtained estimate for in vivo affinity of S(-)-atenolol (4.6 x 10(-8) M) is comparable to literature values for the in vitro affinity in functional assays. In conclusion, a meaningful estimate of in vivo affinity for S(-)-atenolol could be obtained using a mechanism-based pharmacodynamic modeling approach.

Efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol compared with other antihypertensive drugs: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Lowering BP to normal levels without quality of life deterioration is the most important means of reducing cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have challenged the position of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) as first-line antihypertensive drugs. Nebivolol is a third-generation, highly selective beta(1)-blocker that causes vasodilation through nitric oxide (NO) release. This meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol compared with other antihypertensive drugs and placebo in patients with hypertension.

METHODS

Twelve randomized controlled studies were included in which nebivolol 5 mg once daily was compared with the recommended clinical doses of other antihypertensive drugs (n = 9), placebo (n = 2), and both (n = 1). The clinical studies were selected after a MEDLINE search up to 2007 using the key words 'nebivolol' and 'hypertension.'

RESULTS

Antihypertensive response rates (the percentage of patients achieving target BP levels or a defined DBP reduction) were higher with nebivolol than with ACE inhibitors (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; p = 0.001) and all antihypertensive drugs combined (OR 1.41; p = 0.001) and similar to beta-blockers, calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) and the angiotensin receptor antagonist (ARA) losartan. Moreover, a higher percentage of patients receiving nebivolol achieved target BP levels compared with patients treated with losartan (OR 1.98; p = 0.004), CCAs (OR 1.44; p = 0.024), and all antihypertensive drugs combined (OR 1.35; p = 0.012). The percentage of patients experiencing adverse events did not differ between nebivolol and placebo; adverse event rates were significantly lower with nebivolol than losartan (OR 0.52; p = 0.016), other beta-blockers (OR 0.56; p = 0.007), nifedipine (OR 0.49; p < 0.001), and all antihypertensive drugs combined (OR 0.59; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Results of previous pharmacokinetic studies suggest that nebivolol 5 mg may not conform completely to the definition of a classic beta-blocker demonstrating additional antihypertensive effect due to endothelial NO release-mediated vasodilation. This meta-analysis showed that nebivolol 5 mg achieved similar or better rates of treatment response and BP normalization than other drug classes and other antihypertensive drugs combined, with similar tolerability to placebo and significantly better tolerability than losartan, CCAs, other beta-blockers, and all antihypertensive drugs combined. Although not definitive, this meta-analysis suggests that nebivolol 5 mg is likely to have advantages over existing antihypertensives and may have a role in the first-line treatment of hypertension.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of S(-)-atenolol in rats: reduction of isoprenaline-induced tachycardia as a continuous pharmacodynamic endpoint

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

For development of mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) models, continuous recording of drug effects is essential. We therefore explored the use of isoprenaline in the continuous measurement of the cardiovascular effects of antagonists of beta-adrenoceptors (beta-blockers). The aim was to validate heart rate as a pharmacodynamic endpoint under continuous isoprenaline-induced tachycardia by means of PK-PD modelling of S(-)-atenolol.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Groups of WKY rats received a 15 min i.v. infusion of 5 mg kg(-1) S(-)-atenolol, with or without i.v. infusion of 5 microg kg(-1) h(-1) isoprenaline. Heart rate was continuously monitored and blood samples were taken.

KEY RESULTS

A three-compartment model best described the pharmacokinetics of S(-)-atenolol. The PK-PD relationship was described by a sigmoid Emax model and an effect compartment was used to resolve the observed hysteresis. In the group without isoprenaline, the variability in heart rate (30 b.p.m.) approximated the maximal effect (Emax=43+/-18 b.p.m.), leaving the parameter estimate of potency (EC50=28+/-27 ng ml(-1)) unreliable. Both precise and reliable parameter estimates were obtained during isoprenaline-induced tachycardia: 517+/-13 b.p.m. (E0), 168+/-15 b.p.m. (Emax), 49+/-14 ng ml(-1) (EC50), 0.042+/-0.012 min(-1) (k(eo)) and 0.95+/-0.34 (n).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Reduction of heart rate during isoprenaline-induced tachycardia is a reliable pharmacodynamic endpoint for beta-blockers in vivo in rats. Consequently this experimental approach will be used to investigate the relationship between drug characteristics and in vivo effects of different beta-blockers.

Comparing Beta-Blocking Effects of Bisoprolol, Carvedilol and Nebivolol

OBJECTIVE

Bisoprolol, carvedilol and nebivolol have been shown to be effective in the treatment of heart failure. However, the beta-blocking effects of these drugs have never been compared directly.

METHODS

Therefore, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial in 16 healthy males. Subjects received 10 mg bisoprolol, 50 mg carvedilol, 10 mg nebivolol and placebo on the first morning followed by 5 mg bisoprolol once daily, 25 mg carvedilol twice daily, 5 mg nebivolol once daily and placebo for 1 week. Heart rate and blood pressure were measured at rest and exercise 3 and 24 h following intake of the first dose, and immediately before and 3 hours following intake of the last dose of each drug. In addition, effects of the drugs on nocturnal melatonin release were determined, and quality of life (QOL) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Heart rate at exercise was decreased at 3 h following intake of the first single dose of each drug by bisoprolol (-24%), carvedilol (-17%) and nebivolol (-15%), and at 24 h following intake of the respective last dose of each drug following 1 week of chronic administration by bisoprolol (-14%), carvedilol (12 h; -15%) and nebivolol (-13%) (p < 0.05 in all cases). Thus, trough-to-peak-ratios at long-term were as follows: Bisoprolol, 58%; carvedilol (12 h), 85%; nebivolol, 91%. Nocturnal melatonin release was decreased by bisoprolol (-44%, p < 0.05) whereas nebivolol and carvedilol had no effect. QOL with carvedilol was slightly but significantly lower than with the other drugs, whereas bisoprolol and nebivolol did not alter QOL.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that peak beta-blocking effects of bisoprolol appear stronger than those of nebivolol and carvedilol. On the other hand, nebivolol exerts the highest trough-to-peak-ratio. However, beta-blocking effects of all the three drugs are similar at trough. Only bisoprolol but neither nebivolol nor carvedilol decreased nocturnal melatonin release, a feature which might cause sleep disturbances. Finally, only carvedilol slightly decreased QOL, whereas nebivolol and bisoprolol did not affect QOL. We conclude that different beta-blockers may exert clinically relevant different effects.

Nebivolol: a third-generation beta-adrenergic blocker

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties of a new beta-adrenergic blocker, nebivolol, and review the literature evaluating its efficacy in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1996-May 2006) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-May 2006), using the key word nebivolol. Additional references were selected from the bibliographies of the articles cited. Searches were not limited by language, time, or human subject.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Preclinical studies evaluating the pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties of nebivolol in humans were selected for review. Randomized, controlled, blinded clinical trials assessing the efficacy of nebivolol for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure were also included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Preclinical data have established nebivolol as a third-generation beta-adrenergic blocker, as it possesses vasodilatory properties that contribute to its hemodynamic effects beyond those achieved at beta-adrenergic receptors. Short-term, randomized, controlled clinical trials have shown nebivolol to be as effective as other antihypertensive therapies at lowering blood pressure. One long-term trial showed a significant reduction in death and hospital admissions for cardiovascular causes when nebivolol was compared with placebo in patients with heart failure (31.1% vs 65.3%; HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74 to 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Nebivolol is a novel beta-adrenergic blocker that possesses unique pharmacologic properties, compared with other agents in its class. Nebivolol appears to be as effective as other antihypertensive agents at lowering blood pressure and possesses benefits for patients with heart failure. Additional studies are needed to address the long-term benefits of nebivolol for hypertension, to compare nebivolol with other beta-adrenergic blockers for heart failure, and to investigate the clinical relevance of nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation.

Mixed beta3-adrenoceptor agonist and alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist properties of nebivolol in rat thoracic aorta

Nebivolol, a selective beta-adrenoceptor (beta1-AR) antagonist, induces vasodilatation by an endothelium- and NO-cGMP-dependent pathway. However, the mechanisms involved in the vascular effect of nebivolol have not been established. Thus, we evaluated the role of alpha1 and beta3-ARs in nebivolol-induced vasodilatation. The responses to nebivolol were investigated in vitro in thoracic aortic rings isolated from male Sprague-Dawley rats. Nebivolol (0.1-10 microM) significantly shifted the concentration-response curve to phenylephrine, an alpha1-AR agonist, to the right in a concentration-dependent manner (pA2 = 6.5). Conversely, the concentration-response curve to endothelin 1 (ET1) was unaffected by nebivolol. In ET1-precontracted rings, nebivolol induced a concentration-dependent relaxation, which was unaffected by nadolol (a beta1/beta2-AR antagonist) but was significantly reduced by L-748,337 (a beta3-AR antagonist), endothelium removal or pretreatment with L-NMMA (an NOS inhibitor). Similar results were obtained with a beta3-AR agonist, SR 58611A. It was concluded that, in rat aorta, nebivolol-induced relaxation results from both inhibition of alpha1-ARs and activation of beta3-ARs. In addition, we confirmed that the endothelium and the NO pathway are involved in the vascular effect of nebivolol. The identification of these vascular targets of nebivolol indicate that it has therapeutic potential for the treatment of pathological conditions associated with an elevation of sympathetic tone, such as heart failure and hypertension.

Pharmacological Mechanisms of Clinically Favorable Properties of a Selective β1-Adrenoceptor Antagonist, Nebivolol

Nebivolol is a racemic mixture of d- and l-enantiomers. The drug is characterized by beta(1)-adrenoceptor selectivity and long-acting beta-blockade exerted predominantly by d-enantiomer. Nebivolol is devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and has no relevant membrane stabilizing action. Antiproliferative properties of nebivolol were demonstrated in endothelial and smooth muscle cell cultures. Infusion of nebivolol causes a vasodilation in all vascular beds by endothelial-dependent mechanism involving stimulation of beta(3)-adrenoceptors as well as by endothelial-independent mechanism. Nebivolol possesses not only direct vasodilator properties but also augments the action of endothelium-dependent vasodilators. The antioxidant property of nebivolol can at least in part explain why treatment with this drug enhances eNOS activity and minimizes the reperfusion-induced myocardial injury. The systemic effects of nebivolol in humans have an unusual hemodynamic profile. In contrast to traditional beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, nebivolol reduces preload and afterload due to systemic vasodilation and improves arterial distensibility. At 5 mg daily nebivolol effectively reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure over a 24-h period. During treatment with nebivolol arterial pressure follows the natural circadian rhythm. Trough-to-peak ratio for nebivolol is 0.9. It has been demonstrated in numerous placebo-controlled studies that exercise tolerance is not reduced during nebivolol therapy. By chronic administration to patients with left ventricular dysfunction nebivolol increases myocardial contractility. Nebivolol produced no significant changes in lipid levels, insulin sensitivity or glucose tolerance. These findings make nebivolol a promising therapeutic tool for the treatment of arterial hypertension and chronic heart failure.

Nebivolol: a review

Nebivolol is a vasodilating beta-blocker, which can be distinguished from other beta-blockers by its haemodynamic profile. It combines beta-adrenergic blocking activity with a vasodilating effect mediated by the endothelial L-arginine nitric oxide (NO) pathway. The blood pressure lowering effect of nebivolol is linked to a reduction in peripheral resistance and an increase in stroke volume and preservation of cardiac output. The effects of nebivolol have been compared with other beta-blockers and also with other classes of antihypertensive agents. In general, response rates to treatment are higher and the frequency and severity of adverse events are either comparable or lower with nebivolol. Endothelium-derived NO is important in the regulation of large arterial stiffness, which in turn is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Therefore, antihypertensive drugs, such as nebivolol, that also improve endothelial function and decrease arterial stiffness, may contribute to a reduction in cardiovascular risk.

Comparative Effects of a Two-Week Treatment with Nebivolol and Nifedipine in Hypertensive Patients Suffering from COPD

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that the antihypertensive agent nebivolol, a beta1-adrenoceptor-blocking agent that modulates the endogenous production of nitric oxide, is preferable to 'conventional' beta1-blockers in hypertensive patients with airway dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES

Since beta1-blockade by nebivolol is larger after repeated dosing than after a single oral intake, we have explored its effect on pulmonary function after a 2-week treatment in hypertensive patients with mild to moderate COPD.

METHODS

A single-blind crossover design was used. Twenty patients with COPD as selected above and with a diastolic blood pressure of 95-110 mm Hg after 1 week of placebo run-in were entered into the two 2-week active treatment periods with either 5 mg nebivolol (n = 10) or 30 mg nifedipine gastrointestinal-transport-system (GITS) (n = 10) taken for a period of 2 weeks. After a further 1-week washout, subjects were crossed-over to receive the other drug for 2 additional weeks. At each visit, changes in spirometric indexes and the interaction with the bronchodilator effect of salbutamol were investigated. Moreover, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) together with heart rate were manually measured in order to evaluate the cardiovascular effects of the different treatments. Throughout the study, patients recorded symptoms.

RESULTS

Similar and significant reductions in systolic and diastolic BP were observed with both treatments. The impact of nifedipine on FEV1 was not significant (p > 0.05), while that of nebivolol was slight. The maximum response to salbutamol was slightly decreased with either nebivolol or nifedipine GITS. Day-to-day airway obstruction control, interpreted from patient recordings of symptom scores and inhaler use, was similar with both treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pilot study suggests that the use of nebivolol in hypertensive patients with stable mild to moderate COPD was safe during a 2-week trial. Evaluation of longer time periods, larger patient numbers with more severe COPD or during exacerbations is warranted.

Beta-blocker treatment of patients with diastolic heart failure and arterial hypertension. A prospective, randomized, comparison of the long-term effects of atenolol vs. nebivolol

We compared the effects of 6 months administration of atenolol or nebivolol on resting and exercise hemodynamic parameters and maximal exercise capacity, in 26 patients with hypertension and left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (ejection fraction >50%, end-diastolic diameter <60 mm and increased pulmonary wedge pressure at rest and/or at peak exercise). Both atenolol and nebivolol administration was associated with a significant decrease in the resting and peak exercise heart rate and blood pressure and in LV mass, with an increase in the E/A ratio. This latter effect was greater with nebivolol. Nebivolol was associated with an increase in the peak VO(2), VO(2) at the anaerobic threshold and with a decrease in the VE/VCO(2) ratio. With regards to the hemodynamic parameters, compared to patients on atenolol, those on nebivolol showed a lower reduction in the cardiac index, a greater increase in the stroke volume index and a decline in the mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary wedge pressure, both at rest and peak exercise. Thus, although the two beta-blockers have a similar antihypertensive action, nebivolol administration was associated with a greater hemodynamic improvement, compared to atenolol.

Long-term treatment with nebivolol improves arterial reactivity and reduces ventricular hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of long-term nebivolol therapy on high blood pressure, impaired endothelial function in aorta, and damage observed in heart and conductance arteries in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). For this purpose, SHR were treated for 9 weeks with nebivolol (8 mg/kg per day). Untreated SHR and Wistar Kyoto rats were used as hypertensive and normotensive controls, respectively. The left ventricle/body weight ratio was used as an index of cardiac hypertrophy, and to evaluate vascular function, responses induced by potassium chloride, noradrenaline, acetylcholine, and sodium nitroprusside were tested on aortic rings. Aortic morphometry and fibrosis were determined in parallel by a quantitative technique. Systolic blood pressure, measured by the tail-cuff method, was lower in treated SHR than in the untreated group (194 +/- 3 versus 150 +/- 4 mm Hg). The cardiac hypertrophy index was significantly reduced by the treatment. In aortic rings, treatment with nebivolol significantly reduced the maximal response to both KCl and NA in SHR. In vessels precontracted with phenylephrine relaxant, activity due to acetylcholine was higher in normotensive rats than in SHR and the treatment significantly improved this response. The effect of sodium nitroprusside on aortic rings was similar in all groups. Medial thickness and collagen content were significantly reduced in comparison with SHR. In conclusion, the chronic antihypertensive effect of nebivolol in SHR was accompanied by an improvement in vascular structure and function and in the cardiac hypertrophy index.

A comparison of the beta1-selectivity of three beta1-selective beta-blockers

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative beta1-selectivity of three beta-blockers (nebivolol, bisoprolol and atenolol), administered orally at normal therapeutic doses, by assessing their impact on the beta2-mediated, haemodynamic and biochemical responses to a terbutaline infusion, which decreases serum potassium and increases serum glucose and insulin.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy volunteers (14 men, 10 women), with no history of respiratory disease, attended on five separate occasions; beta-blockers (nebivolol 5 mg, bisoprolol 10 mg, atenolol 50 and 100 mg) or placebo were supplied in random order. Three baseline blood samples were collected at 65-85 min post-beta-blocker. A 60-min terbutaline infusion was started 90 min after taking the beta-blocker. Blood samples were taken and blood pressure and heart rate recorded at 15 min intervals up to 30-min post-infusion. Blood samples were analysed for serum potassium, glucose and insulin concentrations.

RESULTS

Terbutaline increased heart rate. Pretreatment with nebivolol caused a modest and non-significant reduction in terbutaline-induced tachycardia whilst bisoprolol produced a more marked effect. Atenolol at both 50 and 100 mg doses caused a highly significant reduction in terbutaline-induced tachycardia. All active preparations had a comparable impact on the terbutaline-induced increase in systolic blood pressure, but the drugs had no impact on the changes produced in diastolic blood pressure. After pretreatment with placebo, the terbutaline infusion caused a significant decrease in serum potassium and increases in serum glucose and insulin. Pretreatment with nebivolol had no discernible effect on potassium compared with placebo. In contrast, when compared with either placebo or nebivolol, bisoprolol (P < 0.01) and both doses of atenolol (P < 0.001) significantly attenuated the hypokalaemic effect of terbutaline. Treatment with nebivolol and bisoprolol modestly but significantly reduced the terbutaline-induced increases in glucose (P < 0.05). The blocking effects of both doses of atenolol were highly significant (P < 0.001) when compared with placebo and also significant (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) when compared with nebivolol and bisoprolol. A similar pattern of responses with the different beta-blocker treatments was observed for the effects on insulin concentrations during the terbutaline infusion.

CONCLUSION

The beta1-selectivity of three different beta1-blockers has been demonstrated in healthy volunteers using the blocking of biochemical and haemodynamic responses to a beta2 stimulus. Terbutaline alone caused an increase in heart rate, a rise in systolic blood pressure, a fall in serum potassium and a rise in both serum glucose and insulin. In this study, for both haemodynamic and biochemical responses, atenolol 100 mg had the greatest beta2-blocking effect, nebivolol 5 mg the least. Bisoprolol 10 mg and atenolol 50 mg had intermediate effects; bisoprolol was the more beta1-selective of these two.

Effects of nebivolol and atenolol on small arteries and microcirculatory endothelium-dependent dilation in hypertensive patients undergoing isometric stress

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects on small arteries and on the cutaneous microcirculatory system of nebivolol and atenolol in hypertensive patients.

DESIGN

Twenty hypertensive patients were randomly assigned to receive nebivolol or atenolol in a single-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Piezoelectric plethysmography on the third finger, laser Doppler on the third finger at rest and after iontophoretic administration of acetylcholine, and pressure-heart rate monitoring, were carried out both at rest and during handgrip. The tests were performed 45 min after 5 mg nebivolol or 100 mg atenolol administration, then repeated 2 days later with a placebo and, after a further 2 days, with atenolol or nebivolol again.

RESULTS

Both atenolol and nebivolol reduced diastolic blood pressure values and heart rate, as well the increase of blood pressure and heart rate during handgrip. No change was recorded after placebo. Piezoelectric plethysmography showed a significant increase in the ratio between time to peak and total time (PT/TT), calculated on the sphygmic wave, during handgrip (0.295 0.005 versus 0.231 0.015, P<0.005). After nebivolol, a decrease was recorded in rest conditions (0.185 0.008 versus 0.231 0.015, P<0.005) with no statistically significant increase during handgrip, whereas atenolol showed an increase in the PT/TT ratio at rest, with a sustained response during handgrip. Laser Doppler showed an increased response to acetylcholine only after nebivolol.

CONCLUSIONS

Nebivolol and atenolol significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, favourably modulating response to handgrip. Nebivolol improved small artery distensibility index. Endothelium-dependent cutaneous vasodilation after acetylcholine demonstrated a lack of response with atenolol whereas nebivolol favourably acts on endothelial function.

Nebivolol inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by mechanisms involving nitric oxide but not cyclic GMP

The objective of this study was to elucidate the mechanisms by which nebivolol, a cardio-selective beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist, inhibits rat aortic smooth muscle cell (RASMC) proliferation. Nebivolol was compared with DETA-NO and S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP), two nitric oxide (NO) donor agents, and alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), a known inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC). All four test agents inhibited RASMC proliferation in a concentration-dependent manner, with nebivolol being the most potent (IC(50) = 4.5 microM), whereas atenolol, another relatively selective beta(1)-blocker, was inactive. DFMO, nebivolol, and DETA-NO interfered with cell proliferation in a cell-density-dependent manner, the lower the cell density the greater the inhibition of cell proliferation. The cytostatic effects of nebivolol and DETA-NO were completely independent of cyclic GMP, as neither ODQ (cytosolic guanylyl cyclase inhibitor) nor zaprinast (cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor) affected the antiproliferative action of nebivolol or DETA-NO. The cytostatic effects of nebivolol, SNAP, and DFMO were largely prevented by the addition of excess putrescine, but not ornithine, to cell cultures. Moreover, nebivolol caused a marked reduction in the intracellular levels of putrescine, spermidine, and spermine. Like DFMO, nebivolol and DETA-NO interfered with the G(1)-phase to S-phase cell cycle transition in RASMC. These observations confirm previous findings that DFMO and NO interfere with RASMC proliferation by inhibiting ODC and polyamine production and provide evidence that nebivolol works by the same mechanism.

Effects of nebivolol on human platelet aggregation

It has been documented that beta-adrenergic antagonists can influence platelet aggregation by a mechanism independent of their ability to antagonize beta-adrenoceptors. Nebivolol, a selective beta1-adrenergic receptor antagonist with additional hemodynamic effects, is able to vasodilate human forearm vasculature by acting on the L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway. Constitutive nitric oxide synthase is present also in human platelets, resulting in the formation of nitric oxide, an endogenous inhibitor of platelet aggregation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of nebivolol on platelet aggregation and in particular to determine the involvement of the platelet L-arginine/nitric oxide pathway. Propranolol, a nonselective beta-adrenergic antagonist, and carvedilol, a beta-blocker with vasodilating properties, were compared with nebivolol on platelet activity. Plasma from healthy male subjects was used. Platelet aggregation was achieved with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (3 microM) and collagen (1 microg/ml), using the Born turbidimetric method to measure platelet aggregation. Our results showed that nebivolol, propranolol, and carvedilol all had an inhibitory effect on both ADP- and collagen-induced platelet aggregation. Nebivolol exhibited the greatest inhibition effect on platelet aggregation. The mechanism responsible for the inhibitory effect of nebivolol appeared to involve a nitric oxide-dependent pathway. Indeed, L-arginine augmented the inhibitory effects of nebivolol on platelet aggregation induced by collagen and ADP. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of nebivolol on platelet aggregation was reduced in the presence of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA). In conclusion, we have demonstrated in this study that nebivolol's mechanism of platelet aggregation inhibition differs from that of other beta-adrenergic antagonists by being partially dependent on nitric oxide production.

Integrated effects of the vasodilating beta-blocker nebivolol on exercise performance, energy metabolism, cardiovascular and neurohormonal parameters in physically active patients with arterial hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to investigate the integrated effects of the beta-1-selective blocker with vasodilator properties, nebivolol, on systemic haemodynamics, neurohormones and energy metabolism as well as oxygen uptake and exercise performance in physically active patients with moderate essential hypertension (EH).

DESIGN AND METHODS

Eighteen physically active patients with moderate EH were included: age: 46.9 +/- 2.38 years, weight: 83.9 +/- 2.81 kg, blood pressure (BP): 155.8 +/- 3.90/102.5 +/- 1.86 mm Hg, heart rate: 73.6 +/- 2.98 min(-1). After a 14-day wash-out period a bicycle spiroergometry until exhaustion (WHO) was performed followed by a 45-min submaximal exercise test on the 2.5 mmol/l lactate-level 48 h later. Before, during and directly after exercise testing blood samples were taken. An identical protocol was repeated after a 6-week treatment period with 5 mg nebivolol/day.

RESULTS

Nebivolol treatment resulted in a significant (P < 0.01) decrease in systolic and diastolic BP and heart rate at rest and during maximal and submaximal exercise. Maximal physical work performance, blood lactate and rel. oxygen uptake (rel. VO(2)) before and after nebivolol treatment at rest and during maximal and submaximal exercise remained unaltered. Free fatty acid, free glycerol, plasma catecholamines, beta-endorphines and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) increased before and after treatment during maximal and submaximal exercise but remained unaltered by nebivolol treatment. In contrast, plasma ANP levels at rest were significantly higher in the presence of nebivolol, endothelin-1 levels were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Nebivolol was effective in the control of BP at rest and during exercise in patients with EH. Furthermore, nebivolol did not negatively affect lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and substrate flow. The explanation for the effects on ANP at rest remain elusive. This pharmacodynamic profile of nebivolol is potentially suitable in physically active patients with EH.

Nebivolol inhibits human aortic smooth muscle cell growth: effects on cell cycle regulatory proteins

An enhanced vasoconstriction and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation are involved in pathogenesis of hypertension. Beta3-blockers are effective for treatment of hypertensive patients. Recently the new beta1-receptor blocker nebivolol showed a different hemodynamic profile from those of other classic beta-blockers. In this study we hypothesized that nebivolol may also have different effects on smooth muscle cell proliferation compared with other beta-blockers such as atenolol. Human aortic smooth muscle cells (SMCs) were cultured, and cell growth was determined by increase in cell number. Growth-signaling molecules such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (p42mapk) and S6-kinase (p70S6K) and cell-cycle regulatory proteins (i.e., Cdk2, p27Kip1, and pRb) were analyzed by immunoblotting. In cultured human aortic SMCs, cell number was markedly increased in response to 5% fetal calf serum (FCS) over 6 days (87 +/- 11 x 10(3)/well), which was inhibited by nebivolol (10(-8)-10(-5) M; 25 +/- 2 x 10(3)/well; n = 6; p < 0.05), but not by atenolol. 5% FCS activated p42mapk, S6K, and Cdk2, but downregulated p27Kip1 and hyperphosphorylated pRb. Nebivolol prevented Cdk2 activation without influencing p42mapk, S6K, pRB, and p27Kip1. Thus, the new beta1-blocker nebivolol exhibits antiproliferative effect on human SMC through inactivation of Cdk2. This effect of nebivolol may have advantages over other beta-blockers in treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.

Nebivolol in the management of essential hypertension: a review

Nebivolol is a lipophilic beta1-blocker. It is devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic or membrane stabilising activity but appears to have nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatory effects. Nebivolol is administered as a racemic mixture of equal proportions of d- and l-enantiomers. The drug does not significantly influence glucose or plasma lipid metabolism and appears to have a protective effect on left ventricular function. At the recommended dosage (5 mg once daily) nebivolol reduces resting diastolic blood pressure as effectively as standard therapeutic dosages of atenolol, metoprolol, lisinopril and nifedipine, as shown in comparative trials. Nebivolol reduced blood pressure significantly more than enalapril 10 mg daily in the short but not the long term, although the enalapril dose may not have been optimal. Nebivolol has an additive effect in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. Standing blood pressure and/or mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure is significantly and similarly reduced with nebivolol, atenolol or nifedipine. Nebivolol tended to prevent increases in early morning blood pressure better than nifedipine. Overall response rates to nebivolol therapy (a decrease in sitting/supine diastolic blood pressure to < or = 90 mm Hg or a 10% or > or = 10 mm Hg fall in diastolic blood pressure) ranged from 58 to 81% after 4 to 52 weeks' treatment. In comparative studies, response rates were greater in nebivolol than in enalapril or metoprolol recipients, but not significantly different from those in atenolol or nifedipine recipients. Nebivolol 5 mg once daily is well tolerated in patients with hypertension. Adverse events are infrequent, transient and mild to moderate. Those reported most often include headache, fatigue, paraesthesias and dizziness. Several studies reported no signs of orthostatic hypotension with nebivolol. Comparative trials revealed no significant differences between the frequency and severity of adverse events in patients receiving nebivolol, atenolol, enalapril or placebo; however, the overall incidence of adverse events was greater with nifedipine or metoprolol. Some atenolol or enalapril, but not nebivolol, recipients reported impotence or decreased libido during therapy.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence indicates that nebivolol 5 mg once daily is a well tolerated beta-blocker, which is as effective as once daily atenolol and other classes of antihypertensive agents. It may therefore be recommended as a useful alternative first-line treatment option for the management of patients with mild to moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension.