The Case for Cardiac Xenotransplantation in Neonates: Is Now the Time to Reconsider Xenotransplantation for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome?

Contributions of Europeans to Xenotransplantation Research: 1. Pig Organ Xenotransplantation

Xenotransplantation has a rich history, marked by European pioneers who laid the groundwork for many breakthroughs in the field. Pig organ xenotransplantation offers a solution to the global shortage of deceased human donor organs, whilst allowing the modification of the donor graft itself. The field has continued to garner interest, particularly with the recent advent of simpler and faster genetic-engineering technologies. This review highlights the contributions of European researchers to xenotransplantation, spanning pig kidney, heart, liver, and lung transplantation. Research has focused on (i) identifying and deleting key xenoantigens and modifying the source pig by expression of human "protective" proteins and (ii) testing novel immunosuppressive regimens. These contributions have played key roles in advancing xenotransplantation from the laboratory to early clinical experiments. Europeans have also addressed the potential risks of xenozoonotic infections and the regulatory challenges. The research endeavours of groups in Europe are summarized. Several European researchers moved either permanently or temporarily to US institutions, and their insight and innovations are also highlighted. While we aim to recognize the significant contributions of European physicians and scientists in this article, it is not an exhaustive list of all those who have influenced the field.

Challenges in Paediatric Xenotransplantation: Ethical Components Requiring Distinct Attention in Children and Obligations to Patients and Society

The transplantation of non-human organs into humans, or xenotransplantation (XTx), has recently garnered new attention and is being developed to help address the problem of organ scarcity in transplantation. Ethical issues surrounding XTx have been studied since initial interest arose decades ago and have experienced renewed discussion in the literature. However, the distinct and relevant differences when applied to children has largely been overlooked with few groups attending to the concerns that XTx in children raises. In this paper, we explore ethical challenges to be expected in paediatric XTx, in particular exploring organ sizing concerns, infectious risks, psychological burdens, and issues of moral hazard. We review these domains with the aim of highlighting the implications of pursuing paediatric XTx and the cross-disciplinary approach needed to solve these issues. Children require a unique analysis from a bioethical perspective to best prepare for the issues XTx presents.

Pediatric Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Recommendations for the Ethical Design of Clinical Trials

For children with complex congenital heart problems, cardiac allotransplantation is sometimes the best therapeutic option. However, availability of hearts for pediatric patients is limited, resulting in a long and growing waitlist, and a high mortality rate while waiting. Cardiac xenotransplantation has been proposed as one therapeutic alternative for neonates and infants, either in lieu of allotransplantation or as a bridge until an allograft becomes available. Scientific and clinical developments in xenotransplantation appear likely to permit cardiac xenotransplantation clinical trials in adults in the coming years. The ethical issues around xenotransplantation of the heart and other organs and tissues have recently been examined, but to date, only limited literature is available on the ethical issues that are attendant with pediatric heart xenotransplantation. Here, we summarize the ethical issues, focusing on (1) whether cardiac xenotransplantation should proceed in adults or children first, (2) pediatric recipient selection for initial xenotransplantation trials, (3) special problems regarding informed consent in this context, and (4) related psychosocial and public perception considerations. We conclude with specific recommendations regarding ethically informed design of pediatric heart xenotransplantation trials.

Ethically Advancing Pediatric Cardiac Xenotransplant

This Viewpoint examines how pediatrics should prepare for the prospect of cardiac xenotransplant, including its ethical implications.

The history of cardiac xenotransplantation: early attempts, major advances, and current progress

In light of ongoing shortage of donor organs for transplantation, alternative sources for donor organ sources have been examined to address this supply-demand mismatch. Of these, xenotransplantation, or the transplantation of organs across species, has been considered, with early applications dating back to the 1600s. The purpose of this review is to summarize the early experiences of xenotransplantation, with special focus on heart xenotransplantation. It aims to highlight the important ethical concerns of animal-to-human heart xenotransplantation, identify the key immunological barriers to successful long-term xenograft survival, as well as summarize the progress made in terms of development of pharmacological and genetic engineering strategies to address these barriers. Lastly, we discuss more recent attempts of porcine-to-human heart xenotransplantation, as well as provide some commentary on the current concerns and possible applications for future clinical heart xenotransplantation.

Expanding heart transplantation in 2022 and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite advances in the technology of mechanical circulatory support, the need for heart transplantation continues to grow. The longevity of heart transplants continues to be superior to mechanical solutions, though the short-term differences are shrinking. In this review, we cover three timely developments and summarize the recent literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

After stagnant rates of heart transplant activity for some years, recently, transplant volume has increased. The developments that have ignited interest have been the use of hepatitis C infected donors, which can now be safely transplanted with the advent of curative oral regimens, and the worldwide use of donors following withdrawal of life support as opposed to traditional brain death donors. In addition, the recent experience of human cardiac xenotransplantation has been very exciting, and though it is not of clinical utility yet, it holds the promise for a virtually unlimited supply of organs at some time in the future.

SUMMARY

Much work remains to be done, but together, all three of these developments are exciting and important to be aware of in the future. Each will contribute to additional donors for human heart transplantation and hopefully will alleviate suffering and death on the waiting list.

The respective relevance of sensitization to alloantigens and xenoantigens in pig organ xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection is a major cause of graft injury and contributes to failure of pig xenografts in nonhuman primates (NHPs). Most 'natural' or elicited antibodies found in humans and NHPs are directed against pig glycan antigens, but antibodies binding to swine leukocyte antigens (SLA) have also been detected. Of clinical importance is (i) whether the presence of high levels of antibodies directed towards human leukocyte antigens (HLA) (i.e., high panel-reactive antibodies) would be detrimental to the outcome of a pig organ xenograft; and (ii) whether, in the event of sensitization to pig antigens, a subsequent allotransplant would be at increased risk of graft failure due to elicited anti-pig antibodies that cross-react with human HLA or other antigens.

SUMMARY

A literature review of pig-to-primate studies indicates that relatively few highly-HLA-sensitized humans have antibodies that cross-react with pigs, predicting that most would not be at increased risk of rejecting an organ xenograft. Furthermore, the existing evidence indicates that sensitization to pig antigens will probably not elicit increased alloantibody titers; if so, 'bridging' with a pig organ could be carried out without increased risk of subsequent antibody-mediated allograft failure.

KEY MESSAGE

These issues have important implications for the design and conduct of clinical xenotransplantation trials.

Will previous palliative surgery for congenital heart disease be detrimental to subsequent pig heart xenotransplantation?

INTRODUCTION

Pig heart xenotransplantation might act as a bridge in infants with complex congenital heart disease (CHD) until a deceased human donor heart becomes available. Infants develop antibodies to wild-type (WT, i.e., genetically-unmodified) pig cells, but rarely to cells in which expression of the 3 known carbohydrate xenoantigens has been deleted by genetic engineering (triple-knockout [TKO] pigs). Our objective was to test sera from children who had undergone palliative surgery for complex CHD (and who potentially might need a pig heart transplant) to determine whether they had serum cytotoxic antibodies against TKO pig cells.

METHODS

Sera were obtained from children with CHD undergoing Glenn or Fontan operation (n = 14) and healthy adults (n = 8, as controls). All of the children had complex CHD and had undergone some form of cardiac surgery. Seven had received human blood transfusions and 3 bovine pericardial patch grafts. IgM and IgG binding to WT and TKO pig red blood cells (RBCs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were measured by flow cytometry, and killing of PBMCs by a complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay.

RESULTS

Almost all children and adults demonstrated relatively high IgM/IgG binding to WT RBCs, but minimal binding to TKO RBCs (p < 0.0001 vs WT), although IgG binding was greater in children than adults (p < 0.01). All sera showed IgM/IgG binding to WT PBMCs, but this was much lower to TKO PBMCs (p < 0.0001 vs WT) and was greater in children than in adults (p < 0.05). Binding to both WT and TKO PBMCs was greater than to RBCs. Mean serum cytotoxicity to WT PBMCs was 90% in both children and adults, whereas to TKO PBMCs it was only 20% and < 5%, respectively. The sera from 6/14 (43%) children were cytotoxic to TKO PBMCs, but no adult sera were cytotoxic.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no children had high levels of antibodies to TKO RBCs, 13/14 demonstrated antibodies to TKO PBMCs, in 6 of these showed mild cytotoxicity. As no adults had cytotoxic antibodies to TKO PBMCs, the higher incidence in children may possibly be associated with their exposure to previous cardiac surgery and biological products. However, the numbers were too small to determine the influence of such past exposures. Before considering pig heart xenotransplantation for children with CHD, testing for antibody binding may be warranted.

Pig heart and lung xenotransplantation: Present status

The recent pig heart transplant in a patient at the University of Maryland Medical Center has stimulated renewed interest in the xenotransplantation of organs from genetically engineered pigs. The barriers to the use of pigs as sources of organs have largely been overcome by 2 approaches - (1) the deletion of expression of the three known pig carbohydrate xenoantigens against which humans have preformed antibodies, and (2) the transgenic introduction of human 'protective' proteins, such as complement-regulatory proteins. These gene modifications, coupled with immunosuppressive therapy based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway, have resulted in survival of baboons with life-supporting pig heart grafts for almost 9 months. The initial clinical success at the University of Maryland reinforces encouraging preclinical results. It suggests that pig hearts are likely to provide an effective bridge to an allotransplant, but their utility for destination therapy remains uncertain. Because of additional complex immunobiological problems, the same approach has been less successful in preclinical lung xenograft transplantation, where survival is still measured in days or weeks. The first formal clinical trials of pig heart transplantation may include patients who do not have access to an allotransplant, those with contraindications for mechanical circulatory support, those in need of retransplantation or with a high level of panel-reactive antibodies. Infants with complex congenital heart disease, should also be considered.

The potential of genetically engineered pig heart transplantation in infants with complex congenital heart disease

Despite advances in surgical and medical techniques, complex congenital heart disease in neonates and infants continues to be associated with significant mortality and morbidity. More than 500 infants in the USA are placed on the cardiac transplantation wait-list annually. However, there remains a critical shortage of deceased human donor organs for transplantation with a median wait-time of 4 months. Hence, infant mortality on the heart transplant wait-list in the USA is higher than for any other solid organ transplant group. Orthotopic transplantation of a pig heart as a bridge to allotransplantation might offer the best prospect of long-term survival of these patients. In recent years, there have been several advances in genetic engineering of pigs to mitigate the vigorous antibody-mediated rejection of a pig heart transplanted into a nonhuman primate. In this review, we briefly highlight (i) the history of clinical heart xenotransplantation, (ii) current advances and techniques of genetically engineering pigs, (iii) the current status of pig orthotopic cardiac graft survival in nonhuman primates, and (iv) progress toward pursuing clinical trials of cardiac xenotransplantation. Ultimately, we argue that pig heart xenotransplantation should initially be used as a bridge to cardiac allotransplantation in neonates and infants.

The Potential Role of Regenerative Medicine on the Future Management of Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome

The development and translation of regenerative medicine approaches for the treatment of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) provides a promising alternative to the current standard of care. We review the strategies that have been pursued to date and those that hold the greatest promise in moving forward. Significant challenges remain. Continued scientific advances and technological breakthroughs will be required if we are to translate this technology to the clinic and move from palliative to curative treatment.

Scientific and psychosocial ethical considerations for initial clinical trials of kidney xenotransplantation

The initial clinical trials of pig solid organ xenotransplantation (XTx) are drawing closer and could begin in the coming years. The first clinical trials may aim to transplant genetically-modified pig kidneys into adult humans. The impetus for beginning these first-in-human trials is the severe lack of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation and the number of patients with end-stage renal disease currently on transplant waitlists, which in the USA approaches 100 000. The majority of patients on the kidney transplant waitlist receive continuous renal replacement therapy. In the United States, for patients on the kidney waitlist, the median wait-time to receive a deceased human donor organ is approximately 4.5 years for patients aged 45-74, with a 5-year mortality (or removal from the waitlist because of deteriorating health) of approximately 40%. XTx has the potential to reduce the kidney waitlist morbidity and mortality while improving quality of life. By focusing on scientific and psychosocial criteria, we present ethical considerations of certain inclusion and exclusion criteria for these first-in-human clinical trials that we suggest have not yet been fully explored.

Pathways to Clinical Cardiac Xenotransplantation

Heart transplantation is the only long-lasting lifesaving option for patients with terminal cardiac failure. The number of available human organs is however far below the actual need, resulting in substantial mortality of patients while waiting for a human heart. Mechanical assist devices are used to support cardiac function but are associated with a high risk of severe complications and poor quality of life for the patients. Consistent success in orthotopic transplantation of genetically modified pig hearts into baboons indicates that cardiac xenotransplantation may become a clinically applicable option for heart failure patients who cannot get a human heart transplant. In this overview, we project potential paths to clinical cardiac xenotransplantation, including the choice of genetically modified source pigs; associated requirements of microbiological, including virological, safety; optimized matching of source pig and recipient; and specific treatments of the donor heart after explantation and of the recipients. Moreover, selection of patients and the regulatory framework will be discussed.

Don't pig(!) the wrong heart!

Cardiac xenotransplantation is believed to have approached clinical application. However, this approach to advanced heart failure is burdened with a multitude of ethical issues. These issues need to be addressed openly and be broadly discussed in public. Only through an honest and transparent approach, it will be possible to engage the lay audience in the evaluation of pig to human transplant.

What Therapeutic Regimen Will Be Optimal for Initial Clinical Trials of Pig Organ Transplantation?

We discuss what therapeutic regimen might be acceptable/successful in the first clinical trial of genetically engineered pig kidney or heart transplantation. As regimens based on a calcineurin inhibitor or CTLA4-Ig have proved unsuccessful, the regimen we administer to baboons is based on induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin, an anti-CD20 mAb (Rituximab), and cobra venom factor, with maintenance therapy based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway (with an anti-CD40 mAb), with rapamycin, and a corticosteroid. An anti-inflammatory agent (etanercept) is administered for the first 2 wk, and adjuvant therapy includes prophylaxis against thrombotic complications, anemia, cytomegalovirus, and pneumocystis. Using this regimen, although antibody-mediated rejection certainly can occur, we have documented no definite evidence of an adaptive immune response to the pig xenograft. This regimen could also form the basis for the first clinical trial, except that cobra venom factor will be replaced by a clinically approved agent, for example, a C1-esterase inhibitor. However, none of the agents that block the CD40/CD154 pathway are yet approved for clinical use, and so this hurdle remains to be overcome. The role of anti-inflammatory agents remains unproven. The major difference between this suggested regimen and those used in allotransplantation is the replacement of a calcineurin inhibitor with a costimulation blockade agent, but this does not appear to increase the complications of the regimen.

The Genetically Engineered Heart as a Bridge to Allotransplantation in Infants Just Around the Corner?

BACKGROUND

Mortality for infants on the heart transplant wait list remains unacceptably high, and available mechanical circulatory support is suboptimal. Our goal is to demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing genetically engineered pig (GEP) heart as a bridge to allotransplantation by transplantation of a GEP heart in a baboon.

METHODS

Four baboons underwent orthotopic cardiac transplantation from GEP donors. All donor pigs had galactosyl-1,3-galactose knocked out. Two donor pigs had human complement regulatory CD55 transgene and the other 2 had human complement regulatory CD46 and thrombomodulin. Induction immunosuppression included thymoglobulin, and Anti-CD20. Maintenance immunosuppression was Rapamycin, AntiCD-40 and methylprednisolone. One donor heart was preserved with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution and the other three with del Nido solution.

RESULTS

All baboons weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass. B217 received a donor heart preserved with UW. Ventricular arrhythmias and depressed cardiac function resulted in early death. All recipients of del Nido preserved hearts easily weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass with minimal inotropic support. B15416 and B1917 survived for 90 days and 241 days respectively. Histopathology in B15416 revealed no significant myocardial rejection but cellular infiltrate around Purkinje fibers. Histopathology in B1917 was consistent with severe rejection. B37367 had uneventful transplant but developed significant respiratory distress with a cardiac arrest.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of B15416 and B1917 demonstrates the feasibility of pursuing additional research to document the ability to bridge an infant to cardiac allotransplant with a GEP heart.

Evidence that sensitization to triple-knockout pig cells will not be detrimental to subsequent allotransplantation

The current evidence is that sensitization to a pig xenograft does not result in the development of antibodies that cross-react with alloantigens, and therefore, sensitization to a pig xenograft would not be detrimental to the outcome of a subsequent allograft. This evidence relates almost entirely to the transplantation of cells or organs from wild-type or α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO) pigs. However, it is not known whether recipients of triple-knockout (TKO) pig grafts who become sensitized to TKO pig antigens develop antibodies that cross-react with alloantigens and thus be detrimental to a subsequent organ allotransplant. We identified a single baboon (B1317) in which no (or minimal) serum anti-TKO pig antibodies could be measured-in our experience unique among baboons. We sensitized it by repeated subcutaneous injections of TKO pig peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in the absence of any immunosuppressive therapy. After TKO pig PBMC injection, there was a transient increase in anti-TKO pig IgM, followed by a sustained increase in IgG binding to TKO cells. In contrast, there was no serum IgM or IgG binding to PBMCs from any of a panel of baboon PBMCs (n = 8). We conclude that sensitization to TKO pig PBMCs in the baboon did not result in the development of antibodies that also bound to baboon cells, suggesting that there would be no detrimental effect of sensitization on a subsequent organ allotransplant.

A perspective on the potential detrimental role of inflammation in pig orthotopic heart xenotransplantation

There is a critical shortage of deceased human donor organs for transplantation. The need is perhaps most acute in neonates and infants with life-threatening congenital heart disease, in whom mechanical support devices are largely unsuccessful. If orthotopic (life-supporting) heart transplantation (OHTx) were consistently successful in the genetically engineered pig-to-nonhuman primate (NHP) model, a clinical trial of bridging with a pig heart in such patients might be justified. However, the results of pig OHTx in NHPs have been mixed and largely poor. We hypothesise that a factor is the detrimental effects of the inflammatory response that is known to develop (a) during any surgical procedure that requires cardiopulmonary bypass, and (b) immediately after an NHP recipient is exposed to a pig xenograft. We suggest that the combination of these two inflammatory responses has a direct detrimental effect on pig heart graft function, but also, and possibly of more importance, on recipient baboon pulmonary function, which further impacts survival of the pig heart graft. In addition, the inflammatory response almost certainly adversely impacts the immune response to the graft. If our hypothesis is correct, the potential steps that could be taken to reduce the inflammatory response or its effects (with varying degrees of efficacy) include (a) white blood cell filtration, (b) complement depletion or inactivation, (c) immunosuppressive therapy, (d) high-dose corticosteroid therapy, (e) cytokine/chemokine-targeted therapy, (f) ultrafiltration or CytoSorb hemoperfusion, (g) reduction in the levels of endogenous catecholamines, (h) triiodothyronine therapy and (i) genetic engineering of the organ-source pig. Prevention of the inflammatory response, or attenuation of its effects, by judicious anti-inflammatory therapy may contribute not only to early survival of the recipient of a genetically engineered pig OHTx, but also to improved long-term pig heart graft survival. This would open the possibility of initiating a clinical trial of genetically engineered pig OHTx as a bridge to allotransplantation.

Attitudes toward xenotransplantation: A survey of parents and pediatric cardiac providers

BACKGROUND

Scientific advancements are occurring in cardiac xenotransplantation (XTx). However, there have been religious and social concerns surrounding this allotransplantation alternative. The purpose of this study was to explore the acceptance of XTx among stakeholders of the congenital heart disease (CHD) community.

METHODS

A Likert-scale anonymous survey was distributed to physicians and nurses who care for children with CHD and parents of children with CHD. Psychosocial and clinical attitudes were compared across all groups to identify differences, and regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with XTx acceptance.

RESULTS

A total of 297 responded to the survey: 134 physicians, 62 nurses, and 101 parents. Potential acceptance of XTx if outcomes were similar to allotransplantation was high overall (75.3%), but different between the groups (physicians 86%; nurses 71%, parents 64%; P < .0001). Regression analysis showed respondents who reported religion would influence medical decision making (OR 0.48; 95%CI 0.24-0.97) and those who would not use a pig heart transplant as a bridge until a human heart became available were less likely to accept XTx (OR 0.09; 95%CI 0.04-0.21). Psychosocial concerns to XTx were minimal but were also associated with XTx acceptance particularly among parents (OR 0.17; 95%CI 0.03-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Potential acceptance of XTx is high, assuming results are similar to allotransplantation. Religious beliefs and attitudes toward the use of XTx as a bridge to allotransplant may present barriers to XTx acceptance. Future research is needed to assess potential attitude differences in light of ethical, psychosocial, and religious objections to XTx.

The immune system in infants: Relevance to xenotransplantation

Despite the improvement in surgical interventions in the treatment of congenital heart disease, many life-threatening lesions (eg, hypoplastic left heart syndrome) ultimately require transplantation. However, there is a great limitation in the availability of deceased human cardiac donors of a suitable size. Hearts from genetically engineered pigs may provide an alternative source. The relatively immature immune system in infants (eg, absence of anti-carbohydrate antibodies, reduced complement activation, reduced innate immune cell activity) should minimize the risk of early antibody-mediated rejection of a pig graft. Additionally, recipient thymectomy, performed almost routinely as a preliminary to orthotopic heart transplantation in this age-group, impairs the T-cell response. Because of the increasing availability of genetically engineered pigs (eg, triple-knockout pigs that do not express any of the three known carbohydrate antigens against which humans have natural antibodies) and the ability to diagnose congenital heart disease during fetal life, cardiac xenotransplantation could be preplanned to be carried out soon after birth. Because of these several advantages, prolonged graft survival and even the induction of tolerance, for example, following donor-specific pig thymus transplantation, are more likely to be achieved in infants than in adults. In this review, we summarize the factors in the infant immune system that would be advantageous in the success of cardiac xenotransplantation in this age-group.

Update and breakthrough in cardiac xenotransplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Considerable advancements have been made in the field of cardiac xenotransplantation in the recent years, achieving prolonged survival of the life-supporting cardiac xenograft and paving the way toward first clinical implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The combination of genetic modifications and novel immunosuppression with costimulation blockade, as well as supporting therapy with antiinflammatory treatment, growth prevention, and adaptation of the heart procurement system to reduce myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury improves the overall cardiac xenograft function and overall survival in nonhuman primates. Through the newly identified xenoantigens and novel gene-editing techniques, further genetic modification of the porcine xenografts should be explored, to ensure clinical safety.

SUMMARY

With continuous progress in all fields of cardiac xenotransplantation, first clinical use in humans seems accomplishable. To ensure the clinical safety and to conform to the ethical regulations, further investigation of the infectious and immunological implications on humans should be explored prior to first clinical use. The first clinical use of cardiac xenotransplantation will be limited to only highly selected patients.

Introduction: The Present Status of Xenotransplantation Research

There is a well-known worldwide shortage of deceased human donor organs for clinical transplantation. The transplantation of organs from genetically engineered pigs may prove an alternative solution. In the past 5 years, there have been sequential advances that have significantly increased pig graft survival in nonhuman primates. This progress has been associated with (1) the availability of increasingly sophisticated genetically engineered pigs; (2) the introduction of novel immunosuppressive agents, particularly those that block the second T-cell signal (costimulation blockade); (3) a better understanding of the inflammatory response to pig xenografts; and (4) increasing experience in the management of nonhuman primates with pig organ or cell grafts. The range of investigations required in experimental studies has increased. The standard immunologic assays are still carried out, but increasingly investigations aimed toward other pathobiologic barriers (e.g., coagulation dysregulation and inflammation) have become more important in determining injury to the graft.Now that prolonged graft survival, extending to months or even years, is increasingly being obtained, the function of the grafts can be more reliably assessed. If the source pigs are bred and housed under biosecure isolation conditions, and weaned early from the sow, most microorganisms can be eradicated from the herd. The potential risk of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) infection remains unknown, but is probably small. Attention is being directed toward the selection of patients for the first clinical trials of xenotransplantation.

WITHDRAWN: Commentary: Unicorns and leprechauns

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.017. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal