KRAS mutation-induced upregulation of PD-L1 mediates immune escape in human lung adenocarcinoma

Drugging the Undruggable and beyond: Emerging precision oncology approaches to target acquired resistance to KRAS G12C and KRAS G12D inhibitors

Development of mutant specific KRAS inhibitors validated KRAS as a 'druggable' target. However, excellent initial efficacy was eventually overshadowed by failure to exhibit sustained clinical response, primarily due to acquired resistance. Some targeted therapies like SOS1, SHP2, and MEK inhibitors, in combination with mutant KRAS G12C inhibitors (G12Ci), are currently under clinical investigation with evidences of improving efficacy. However, a deep understanding of the underlying molecular pathways behind the acquired resistance is still at a nascent stage. Recent preclinical studies have uncovered a role of novel proteins and pathways responsible for resistance and their inhibition demonstrated a robust anticancer efficacy in combination. Plethora of combination therapy approaches are now being proposed with emergence of AXL, ULK1, Tissue factor, farnesyltransferase, etc. as targets to counter G12Ci resistance. This review summarizes in a comprehensive manner, some of the novel combination modalities to overcome G12Ci resistance, based on current understanding and with great potential to hit clinical success. Along with G12C, KRAS G12D (G12D) was also considered a formidable foe, until the discovery of selective inhibitors. However, eventual clinical resistance can eclipse the early success and requires an in-depth understanding of resistance mechanisms. Evidences of G12Ci resistance can be exploited as probable combination strategies to tackle ensuing resistance to G12D inhibitors (G12Di), and can translate in superior clinical efficacy. Early preclinical studies of G12Di in combination with ERBB, SOS1, AKT and immune-checkpoints inhibitors indicate encouraging response. This review further describes some of the early affirmations on combination strategies with G12Di. We postulate to go beyond 'Drugging the Undruggable' with advanced combination approaches mitigating G12C and G12D inhibitor resistance.

Oncogenic Signalling Pathways in Cancer Immunotherapy: Leader or Follower in This Delicate Dance?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become a mainstay of treatment in many solid organ malignancies. Alongside this has been the rapid development in the identification and targeting of oncogenic drivers. The presence of alterations in oncogenic drivers not only predicts response to target therapy but can modulate the immune microenvironment and influence response to immunotherapy. Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with targeted agents is an attractive therapeutic option but overlapping toxicity profiles may limit the clinical use of some combinations. In addition, there is growing evidence of shared resistance mechanisms that alter the response to immunotherapy when it is used after targeted therapy. Understanding this complex interaction between oncogenic drivers, targeted therapy and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors is vital for selecting the right treatment, at the right time for the right patient. In this review, we summarise the preclinical and clinical evidence of the influence of four common oncogenic alterations on immune checkpoint inhibitor response, combination therapies, and the presence of shared resistance mechanisms. We highlight the common resistance mechanisms and the need for more randomised trials investigating both combination and sequential therapy.

Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases as drug targets

Cyclic nucleotides are synthesized by adenylyl and/or guanylyl cyclase, and downstream of this synthesis, the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase families (PDEs) specifically hydrolyze cyclic nucleotides. PDEs control cyclic adenosine-3',5'monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine-3',5'-monophosphate (cGMP) intracellular levels by mediating their quick return to the basal steady state levels. This often takes place in subcellular nanodomains. Thus, PDEs govern short-term protein phosphorylation, long-term protein expression, and even epigenetic mechanisms by modulating cyclic nucleotide levels. Consequently, their involvement in both health and disease is extensively investigated. PDE inhibition has emerged as a promising clinical intervention method, with ongoing developments aiming to enhance its efficacy and applicability. In this comprehensive review, we extensively look into the intricate landscape of PDEs biochemistry, exploring their diverse roles in various tissues. Furthermore, we outline the underlying mechanisms of PDEs in different pathophysiological conditions. Additionally, we review the application of PDE inhibition in related diseases, shedding light on current advancements and future prospects for clinical intervention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Regulating PDEs is a critical checkpoint for numerous (patho)physiological conditions. However, despite the development of several PDE inhibitors aimed at controlling overactivated PDEs, their applicability in clinical settings poses challenges. In this context, our focus is on pharmacodynamics and the structure activity of PDEs, aiming to illustrate how selectivity and efficacy can be optimized. Additionally, this review points to current preclinical and clinical evidence that depicts various optimization efforts and indications.

Current status of KRAS G12C inhibitors in NSCLC and the potential for combination with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy: a systematic review

In recent years, precision medicine for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has made significant strides, particularly with advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. Targeted 7therapies and Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapies have emerged as vital treatment options, yet KRAS mutations, especially KRAS G12C, have been historically difficult to address. Due to the unique activation mechanism of KRAS G12C has led to the development of specific inhibitors, such as AMG 510 and MRTX849, which show promising therapeutic potential. However, results from the CodeBreaK 200 Phase III trial indicated that AMG 510 did not significantly improve overall survival compared to docetaxel. Resistance after prolonged use of KRAS G12C inhibitors continues to pose a challenge, prompting interest in new drugs and combination strategies. KRAS mutations can impair tumor-infiltrating T cell function and create an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, making the combination of KRAS G12C inhibitors with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies particularly appealing. Preliminary data suggest these combinations may enhance both survival and quality of life, though safety concerns remain a barrier. Ongoing research is crucial to refine treatment regimens and identify suitable patient populations. This review focuses on the development of KRAS G12C inhibitors in monotherapy and combination therapies for NSCLC, discussing major clinical trials and future research directions.

Genomics guiding personalized first-line immunotherapy response in lung and bladder tumors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer treatment, particularly in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, identifying reliable predictive biomarkers for ICI response remains a significant challenge. In this study, we analyzed real-world cohorts of advanced NSCLC and MIBC patients treated with ICI as first-line therapy.

METHODS

Tumor samples underwent Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) to identify specific somatic variants and assess tumor mutational burden (TMB). Additionally, mutational signature extraction and pathway enrichment analyses were performed to uncover the underlying mechanisms of ICI response. We also characterized HLA-I haplotypes and investigated LINE-1 retrotransposition.

RESULTS

Distinct mutation patterns were identified in patients who responded to treatment, suggesting potential biomarkers for predicting ICI effectiveness. In NSCLC, tumor mutational burden (TMB) did not differ significantly between responders and non-responders, while in MIBC, higher TMB was linked to better responses. Specific mutational signatures and HLA haplotypes were associated with ICI response in both cancers. Pathway analysis showed that NSCLC responders had active inflammatory and immune pathways, while pathways enriched in non-responders related to FGFR3 and neural crest differentiation, associated to resistance mechanisms. In MIBC, responders had alterations in DNA repair, leading to more neoantigens and a stronger ICI response. Importantly, for the first time, we found that LINE-1 activation was positively linked to ICI response, especially in MIBC.

CONCLUSION

These findings reveal promising biomarkers and mechanistic insights, offering a new perspective on predicting ICI response and opening up exciting possibilities for more personalized immunotherapy strategies in NSCLC and MIBC.

In Silico Identification of Putative Allosteric Pockets and Inhibitors for the KRASG13D-SOS1 Complex in Cancer Therapy

RAS mutations occur in about 30% of human cancers, leading to enhanced RAS signaling and tumor growth. KRAS is the most commonly mutated oncogene in human tumors, especially lung, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers. Direct targeting of KRAS is difficult due to its highly conserved sequence; but, its complex with the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Son of Sevenless (SOS) 1 promises an attractive target for inhibiting RAS-mediated signaling. Here, we first revealed putative allosteric binding sites of the SOS1, KRASG12C-SOS1 complex, and the ternary KRASG13D-SOS1 complex structures using two network-based models, the essential site scanning analysis and the residue interaction network model. The results enabled us to identify two new putative allosteric pockets for the ternary KRASG13D-SOS1 complex. These were then screened together with the known ligand binding site against the natural compounds in the InterBioScreen (IBS) database using the Glide software package developed by Schrödinger, Inc. The docking poses of seven hit compounds were assessed using 400 ns long molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with two independent replicas using Desmond, coupled with thermal MM-GBSA calculations for the estimation of the binding free energy values. The structural skeleton of the seven proposed compounds consists of different functional groups and heterocyclic rings that possess anti-cancer activity and exhibit persistent interactions with key residues in binding pockets throughout the MD simulations. STOCK1N-09823 was determined as the most promising hit that promoted the disruption of the interactions R73 (chain A)/N879 and R73 (chain A)/Y884, which are key for SOS1-mediated KRAS activation.

Immunotherapy in advanced, KRAS G12C-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: current strategies and future directions

Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutations are present in up to 25% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). KRAS G12C is the most common type of mutation, representing approximately half of the cases in KRAS-mutant NSCLC. Mutations in KRAS activate the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway, leading to increased cell proliferation and survival. Recent advances in drug development have led to the approval of KRAS G12C inhibitors sotorasib and adagrasib. This review explores the emerging therapeutic strategies in KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC, including dual checkpoint blockade and combinations with checkpoint inhibitors, with a focus on the setting of advanced disease.

Development and Evaluation of Indole-Based Phospholipase D Inhibitors for Lung Cancer Immunotherapy

This study explored novel immunomodulatory approaches for cancer treatment, with a specific focus on lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. We synthesized indole-based phospholipase D (PLD) inhibitors with various substituents to improve anticancer efficacy. Through structure-activity relationship studies, the key compound was identified that significantly inhibiting PLD, suppressing cell growth, viability, and migration in vitro, while inducing apoptosis of lung cancer cells. In silico docking studies confirmed its binding to the PLD1 active site, highlighting the role of specific residues in inhibiting PLD1 activity. The inhibitor modulated oncogenic pathways and immune evasion in lung cancer cells, showing potential for immunotherapy. In vivo experiments in a mouse model showed tumor reduction and immune response alteration. Combining these inhibitors with gemcitabine, an anticancer drug, synergistically enhanced inhibition of lung cancer cell apoptosis and proliferation. This research offers new insights into PLD inhibitor as potential cancer therapeutics.

Molecular Underpinnings of Brain Metastases

Brain metastases are the most commonly diagnosed type of central nervous system tumor, yet the mechanisms of their occurrence are still widely unknown. Lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the most common etiologies, but renal and colorectal cancers have also been described as metastasizing to the brain. Regardless of their origin, there are common mechanisms for progression to all types of brain metastases, such as the creation of a suitable tumor microenvironment in the brain, priming of tumor cells, adaptations to survive spreading in lymphatic and blood vessels, and development of mechanisms to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. However, there are complex genetic and molecular interactions that are specific to every type of primary tumor, making the understanding of the metastatic progression of tumors to the brain a challenging field of study. In this review, we aim to summarize current knowledge on the pathophysiology of brain metastases, from specific genetic characteristics of commonly metastatic tumors to the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in progression to the central nervous system. We also briefly discuss current challenges in targeted therapies for brain metastases and how there is still a gap in knowledge that needs to be overcome to improve patient outcomes.

Enhancing T cell cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma with bispecific αPD-L1 × αCD3 T cell engager-armed T cells and low-dose bortezomib therapy

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy characterized by frequent relapse due to acquired treatment resistance, underscoring the need for innovative therapies, particularly for relapsed cases. This study explores the effects of low-dose bortezomib (BTZ) on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in MM cell lines and its potential to enhance T cell-mediated anti-tumor responses. Utilizing this PD-L1 upregulation, we employed bispecific αPD-L1 × αCD3 T cell engager-armed T cells (BATs) to block PD-L1 signaling and activate T cells. Flow cytometry confirmed that BATs selectively bound CD3 on T cells and PD-L1 on cancer cells, inducing T cell activation and proliferation without directly affecting cancer cell viability. BATs' cytotoxic activity was evaluated in MM cell lines with or without BTZ-induced PD-L1 expression. While KMS-12-PE cells showed no significant response, BATs significantly increased cell death in L363 cells, with further enhancement by BTZ. In RPMI-8226 cells, BATs demonstrated robust cytotoxicity, further amplified by BTZ. These results suggest that BATs, particularly in combination with BTZ, represent a promising strategy for treating MM, including bortezomib-resistant cases.

KRAS Mutations in Cancer: Understanding Signaling Pathways to Immune Regulation and the Potential of Immunotherapy

The Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) mutation is one of the most prevailing mutations in various tumors and is difficult to cure. Long-term proliferation in carcinogenesis is primarily initiated by oncogenic KRAS-downstream signaling. Recent research suggests that it also activates the autocrine effect and interplays the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we discuss the emerging research, including KRAS mutations to immune evasion in TME, which induce immunological modulation that promotes tumor development. This review gives an overview of the existing knowledge of the underlying connection between KRAS mutations and tumor immune modulation. It also addresses the mechanisms to reduce the effect of oncogenes on the immune system and recent advances in clinical trials for immunotherapy in KRAS-mutated cancers.

Immunomodulatory role of oncogenic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer: a review of implications for immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking targetable oncogenic alterations. However, their efficacy in individuals with such genomic alterations remains heterogeneous and poorly understood. In detail, certain oncogenic alterations in TP53, EGFR (uncommon mutations), KRAS (G12C), BRAF (non-V600E), MET (amplifications), FGFR1 and FGFR4, actively modify MAPK, PI3K, and STING signaling, thus remodeling tumoral immune phenotype and are associated with high TMB counts, enriched T lymphocyte tumor infiltration, and high expression of antigen-presenting molecules, supporting their consideration as part of the eligibility criteria for ICIs treatment. Nonetheless, other oncogenic alterations are associated with an immunosuppressive TME, low TMB counts, and downregulation of targetable immune checkpoints, in which novel therapeutic approaches are currently being tested to overcome their intrinsic resistance. In this context, this review discusses the fundamental mechanisms by which frequent driver alterations affect ICIs efficacy in patients with NSCLC, and outlines their prognostic relevance in the era of immunotherapy.

Advancements in gene therapies targeting mutant KRAS in cancers

Mutations in the KRAS gene are well-known tumourigenic drivers of colorectal, pancreatic and lung cancers. Mechanistically, these mutations promote uncontrolled cell proliferation and alter the tumour microenvironment during early carcinoma stages. Given their critical carcinogenic functions, significant progress has been made in developing KRAS inhibitors for cancer treatment. However, clinical applications of these KRAS inhibitor compounds are limited to specific cancer types which carry the relevant KRAS mutations. Additionally, clinical findings have shown that these compounds can induce moderate to serious side effects. Therefore, new approaches have emerged focusing on the development of universal therapeutics capable of targeting a wider range of KRAS mutations, minimising toxicity and enhancing the therapeutic efficacy. This review aims to examine these therapeutic strategies in the context of cancer treatment. It firstly provides an overview of fundamental KRAS biology within the cell signalling landscape and how KRAS mutations are associated with cancer pathogenesis. Subsequently, it introduces the development of current KRAS inhibitors which target certain KRAS mutants in different types of cancer. It then explores the potential of gene therapy approaches, including siRNA, miRNA and CRISPR methodologies. Furthermore, it discusses the use of lipid-based nanocarriers to deliver gene cargos for targeting KRAS gene mutants. Finally, it provides the insights into the future prospects for combatting KRAS mutation-associated cancers.

Combined KRAS Inhibition and Immune Therapy Generates Durable Complete Responses in an Autochthonous PDAC Model

SIGNIFICANCE

Clinically available KRAS* inhibitors and IO agents alleviated the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in PDAC. Profound tumor regression and prolonged survival in an autochthonous PDAC model provide a compelling rationale for combining KRAS* inhibition with IO agents targeting multiple arms of the immunity cycle to combat PDAC.

Targeting KRAS: from metabolic regulation to cancer treatment

The Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) protein plays a key pathogenic role in oncogenesis, cancer progression, and metastasis. Numerous studies have explored the role of metabolic alterations in KRAS-driven cancers, providing a scientific rationale for targeting metabolism in cancer treatment. The development of KRAS-specific inhibitors has also garnered considerable attention, partly due to the challenge of acquired treatment resistance. Here, we review the metabolic reprogramming of glucose, glutamine, and lipids regulated by oncogenic KRAS, with an emphasis on recent insights into the relationship between changes in metabolic mechanisms driven by KRAS mutant and related advances in targeted therapy. We also focus on advances in KRAS inhibitor discovery and related treatment strategies in colorectal, pancreatic, and non-small cell lung cancer, including current clinical trials. Therefore, this review provides an overview of the current understanding of metabolic mechanisms associated with KRAS mutation and related therapeutic strategies, aiming to facilitate the understanding of current challenges in KRAS-driven cancer and to support the investigation of therapeutic strategies.

The Potential Treatment Options and Combination Strategies of KRAS-Mutated Lung Cancer

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations are found in up to 30% of all cases, with the most prevalent mutations occurring in codons 12 and 13. The development of KRAS-targeted drugs like sotorasib and adagrasib has generated significant excitement in the clinical arena, offering new therapeutic options. Their potential for combination with other treatments broadens the scope for clinical exploration. Acquired resistance to KRAS exon 2 p.G12C inhibitors is a significant challenge, with several reported mechanisms. In this scenario, combination therapy strategies that include targeting Src Homology Region 2 Domain-Containing Phosphatase-2 (SHP2), Son of Sevenless Homolog 1 (SOS1), or downstream effectors of KRAS exon 2 p.G12C are showing promise in overcoming such resistance. However, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this context still requires comprehensive evaluation. The response to anti-Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Ligand (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) drugs in NSCLC may be significantly influenced by co-occurring mutations, underscoring the need for a personalized approach to treatment based on the specific genetic profile of each tumor.

Fingerprint Profiling of Glycans on Extracellular Vesicles via Lectin-Induced Aggregation Strategy for Precise Cancer Diagnostics

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) harbor abundant glycans that mediate various functions, such as intercellular communication and disease advancement, which play significant roles in disease progression. However, the presence of EV heterogeneity in body fluids and the complex nature of the glycan structures have posed challenges for the detection of EV glycans. In this study, we provide a streamlined method integrated, membrane-specific separation with lectin-induced aggregation strategy (MESSAGE), for multiplexed profiling of EV glycans. By leveraging a rationally designed lectin-induced aggregation strategy, the expression of EV glycans is converted to size-based signals. With the assistance learning machine algorithms, the MESSAGE strategy with high sensitivity, specificity, and simplicity can be used for early cancer diagnosis and classification, as well as monitoring cancer metastasis via 20 μL plasma sample within 2 h. Furthermore, our platform holds promise for advancing the field of EV-based liquid biopsy for clinical applications, opening new possibilities for the profiling of EV glycan signatures in various disease states.

Oncogenic KRAS drives immunosuppression of colorectal cancer by impairing DDX60-mediated dsRNA accumulation and viral mimicry

The interferon (IFN) response is vital for the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy. Our previous research showed that KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral) mutation impairs the IFN response in colorectal cancer (CRC), with an unclear mechanism. Here, we demonstrate that KRAS accelerates double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) degradation, impairing dsRNA sensing and IFN response by down-regulating DExD/H-box helicase 6 (DDX60). DDX60 was identified as a KRAS target here and could bind to dsRNAs to protect against RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC)-mediated degradation. Overexpressing DDX60 induced dsRNA accumulation, reactivated IFN signaling, and increased CRC sensitivity to ICI therapy. Mechanistically, KRAS engaged the AKT (also known as protein kinase B)-GSK3β (glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta) pathway to suppress STAT3 phosphorylation, thereby inhibiting STAT3-driven DDX60 transcription. Our findings reveal a role for KRAS in dsRNA homeostasis, suggesting potential strategies to convert "cold" tumors to "hot" and to overcome ICI resistance in CRC with KRAS mutations.

Sustained Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Combination with Nab-Paclitaxel in Metastatic Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Harboring the KRAS-G12V Mutation: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Cisplatin-based standardized therapy has been established for metastatic testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs). However, the patient prognosis is considerably less favorable if the disease recurs following failure of first-line therapies. There is a need for novel treatment options for patients with recurrent or metastatic TGCTs, notably for those that are not sensitive to first-line chemotherapy. With the development of next-generation sequencing technologies, an increasing number of gene mutations has been identified in TGCTs. Previously published research studies have established a link between KRAS mutations and chemotherapy resistance, and have demonstrated that KRAS mutations are associated with inflammatory tumor microenvironment and tumor immunogenicity, leading to an improved response to inhibition of programmed death (PD-1) protein expression. Previous studies have reported that the tumor immune microenvironment of TGCT influences therapeutic efficacy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 65-year-old metastatic patient with TGCT and a KRAS-12 valine-for-glycine gene mutation was described. This patient initially underwent inguinal orchiectomy and received two prior chemotherapeutic regimens. Following the rapid progression of the disease, the patient was treated with anti-PD-1 therapy and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy, and his condition was successfully controlled by this combination treatment.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first successful case of KRAS-mutation patient with TGCT who achieved partially and sustained disease remission by combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy. This case provides an excellent example for personalized treatment of metastatic TGCTs.

A Novel Monoclonal Antibody against PD-1 for the Treatment of Viral Oncogene-Induced Tumors or Other Cancer

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) interact to form an immune checkpoint fostering viral infection and viral oncogene-induced tumorigenesis. We generated a novel anti-human PD-1, humanized monoclonal antibody P1801 and investigated its pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic properties. In vitro binding assays revealed that P1801 uniquely binds to human PD-1 and inhibits its interaction with PD-L1/2. It showed a minor effect on the induction of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). P1801 significantly induced the release of IL-2 from activated T-cells but not from nonactivated T-cells. A dose-dependent linear PK profile was observed for the cynomolgus monkeys treated with repeated doses of P1801 at 5 mg/kg to 200 mg/kg once weekly. A four-week repeat-dose toxicity study revealed that P1801 given weekly was safe and well tolerated at doses ranging from 5 to 200 mg/kg/dose. No pathological abnormalities were noted. In humanized PD-1 mice harboring human PD-L1-expressing colon tumor cells, P1801 administered intraperitoneally twice per week at 12 mg/kg significantly inhibited tumor growth and prolonged mouse survival. P1801 displayed unique binding properties different from pembrolizumab and nivolumab. Therefore, it showed distinctive immunological reactions and significant antitumor activities. We are initiating a Phase 1 clinical study to test its combination use with ropeginterferon alfa-2b, which also has antiviral and antitumor activities, for the treatment of cancer.

Correlation between PD-L1 expression status and efficacy of immunotherapy as second-line or later-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the correlation between tumor proportionality scores (TPS) and the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as the second or subsequent line therapies for individuals who received diagnoses of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of a total of 143 patients who received diagnoses of stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and were admitted to our hospital from the beginning of 2019 to the end of September 2022. The follow-up period ended on 01 January 2023. The study used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to assess the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional risk models were used to analyze the factors associated with the PFS and OS of advanced-stage NSCLC patients who received ICIs as the second or subsequent lines.

RESULTS

Patients diagnosed with NSCLC who had a TPS ≥1% and got treatment with ICIs exhibit notably elevated rates of partial response, objective response rate, disease control rate and extended PFS in comparison to NSCLC patients with a TPS of <1% ( P  < 0.05). NSCLC patients with TPS within 1-49% [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.372; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.140-0.993; P  = 0.048] or ≥50% (HR = 0.276; 95% CI, 0.095-0.796; P  = 0.017) were significantly associated with prolonged PFS, which were conducted by multivariate Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Programmed death protein-1 expression status may be predictive markers of the effectiveness of ICIs as the second or subsequent lines of therapies in advanced NSCLC are influenced by TPS.

Immune status and combined immunotherapy progression in Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS)-mutant tumors

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is the most frequently mutated oncogene, occurring in various tumor types. Despite extensive efforts over the past 40 years to develop inhibitors targeting KRAS mutations, resistance to these inhibitors has eventually emerged. A more precise understanding of KRAS mutations and the mechanism of resistance development is essential for creating novel inhibitors that target specifically KRAS mutations and can delay or overcome resistance. Immunotherapy has developed rapidly in recent years, and in-depth dissection of the tumor immune microenvironment has led researchers to shift their focus to patients with KRAS mutations, finding that immune factors play an essential role in KRAS-mutant (KRAS-Mut) tumor therapy and targeted drug resistance. Breakthroughs and transitions from targeted therapy to immunotherapy have provided new hope for treating refractory patients. Here, we reviewed KRAS mutation-targeted treatment strategies and resistance issues, focusing on our in-depth exploration of the specific immune status of patients with KRAS mutations and the impact of body immunity following KRAS inhibition. We aimed to guide innovative approaches combining RAS inhibition with immunotherapy, review advances in preclinical and clinical stages, and discuss challenges and future directions.

CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Knockdown of PD-L1 and KRAS in Lung Cancer Cells

Cancer cells can escape death and surveillance by the host immune system in various ways. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a transmembrane protein that is expressed by most cell types, including cancer cells, and can provide an inhibitory signal to its receptor PD-1, which is expressed on the surface of activated T cells, impairing the immune response. PD-L1/PD-1-mediated immune evasion is observed in several KRAS-mutated cancers. In the current study, we used the CRISPR/Cas9 system to knock down PD-L1 and KRAS in adenocarcinoma lung cells (A549 and H1975). Knockdown of PD-L1 was validated by qPCR and coculture with lymphocytes. The cells were functionally analyzed for cell cycle, migration and apoptosis. In addition, the effects of PD-L1 and KRAS downregulation on chemotherapy sensitivity and expression of inflammatory markers were investigated. Suppression of PD-L1 and KRAS led to a slowdown of the cell cycle in the G0/G1 phase and reduced migration, increased sensitivity to chemotherapy and triggered apoptosis of cancer cells. In addition, the conditioned medium of the modulated cells significantly affected the native cancer cells and reduced their viability and drug resistance. Our study suggests that dual silencing of PD-L1 and KRAS by CRISPR/Cas9 may be a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of lung cancer.

MYC and KRAS cooperation: from historical challenges to therapeutic opportunities in cancer

RAS and MYC rank amongst the most commonly altered oncogenes in cancer, with RAS being the most frequently mutated and MYC the most amplified. The cooperative interplay between RAS and MYC constitutes a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, profoundly influencing tumor development. Together and individually, these two oncogenes regulate most, if not all, hallmarks of cancer, including cell death escape, replicative immortality, tumor-associated angiogenesis, cell invasion and metastasis, metabolic adaptation, and immune evasion. Due to their frequent alteration and role in tumorigenesis, MYC and RAS emerge as highly appealing targets in cancer therapy. However, due to their complex nature, both oncogenes have been long considered "undruggable" and, until recently, no drugs directly targeting them had reached the clinic. This review aims to shed light on their complex partnership, with special attention to their active collaboration in fostering an immunosuppressive milieu and driving immunotherapeutic resistance in cancer. Within this review, we also present an update on the different inhibitors targeting RAS and MYC currently undergoing clinical trials, along with their clinical outcomes and the different combination strategies being explored to overcome drug resistance. This recent clinical development suggests a paradigm shift in the long-standing belief of RAS and MYC "undruggability", hinting at a new era in their therapeutic targeting.

Current perspectives of KRAS in non-small cell lung cancer

NSCLC has a diverse genomic background with mutations in key proto-oncogenic drivers including Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Roughly 40% of adenocarcinoma harbor Kras activating mutations regardless of smoking history. Most KRAS mutations are located at G12, which include G12C (roughly 40%), G12V (roughly 20%), and G12D (roughly 15%). KRAS mutated NSCLC have higher tumor mutational burden and some have increased PD-1 expression, which has resulted in better responses to immunotherapy than other oncogenes. While initial treatment for metastatic NSCLC still relies on chemo-immunotherapy, directly targeting KRAS has proven to be efficacious in treating patients with KRAS mutated metastatic NSCLC. To date, two G12C inhibitors have been FDA-approved, namely sotorasib and adagrasib. In this review, we summarize the different drug combinations used to target KRAS G12c, upcoming G12D inhibitors and novel therapies targeting KRAS.

Prognostic value of KRAS G12C in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression treated with upfront immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

This study aims to evaluate the prognostic role of the KRAS G12C mutation in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1 expression ≥50% who are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of clinical studies fulfilling the following criteria: (1) enrolling patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 tumour expression receiving first-line therapy with anti-PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors; (2) comparing the outcomes of patients with the KRAS G12C mutation to those without this mutation, and (3) reporting overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS). The electronic databases Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Google Scholar, along with reference lists, were systematically searched.

RESULTS

We identified four publications that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 469 patients. Of these, two studies reported hazard ratios (HR) for PFS, resulting in a final pooled patient sample of 163 for the meta-analysis. In patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy, the presence of a KRAS G12C mutation was associated with improved PFS compared to patients with KRAS wild-type tumours, with a pooled hazard ratio of 0.39 and a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 0.25-0.63. Among all patients with KRAS mutations, those harbouring a KRAS G12C mutation had improved PFS compared to patients with any other KRAS mutation (pooled HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have the KRAS G12C mutation and high PD-L1 expression demonstrate favourable PFS with first-line PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy compared to patients with KRASwt or other KRAS mutations and high PD-L1 expression.

Immune checkpoint blockade resistance in lung cancer: emerging mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy works by inhibiting suppressive checkpoints that become upregulated after T cell activation, like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4. While the initial FDA approvals of ICB have revolutionized cancer therapies and fueled a burgeoning immuno-oncology field, more recent clinical development of new agents has been slow. Here, focusing on lung cancer, we review the latest research uncovering tumor cell intrinsic and extrinsic ICB resistance mechanisms as major hurdles to treatment efficacy and clinical progress. These include genomic and non-genomic tumor cell alterations, along with host and microenvironmental factors like the microbiome, metabolite accumulation, and hypoxia. Together, these factors can cooperate to promote immunosuppression and ICB resistance. Opportunities to prevent resistance are constantly evolving in this rapidly expanding field, with the goal of moving toward personalized immunotherapeutic regimens.

Unconventional strategy could be the future: From target to KRAS broad range treatment

The RAS gene family comprises genes that regulate cell growth and differentiation. KRAS, a member of this family, is often mutated in different cancers, resulting in uncontrolled cell growth and tumor development. Recent clinical trial results on KRAS inhibition in NSCLC have defined the presence of a significant proportion of patients resistant to direct G12C inhibition. The presence of co-mutations and the occurrence of secondary resistance phenomena observed in preclinical and clinical settings partly justify these poor results. In addition, all other non-G12C mutations currently remain without specific strategies. Evidence of interactions between KRAS signaling and the TME suggests potential in vitro efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this short paper, we have reviewed the most relevant data from recent conferences, with a focus on KRAS inhibitors resistance mechanisms and interactions with the peri-tumor immune system. Commentary.

Outcome of First-Line Treatment With Pembrolizumab According to KRAS/TP53 Mutational Status for Nonsquamous Programmed Death-Ligand 1-High (≥50%) NSCLC in the German National Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Programmed death-ligand 1 expression currently represents the only validated predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic NSCLC in the clinical routine, but it has limited value in distinguishing responses. Assessment of KRAS and TP53 mutations (mut) as surrogate for an immunosupportive tumor microenvironment (TME) might help to close this gap.

METHODS

A total of 696 consecutive patients with programmed death-ligand 1-high (≥50%), nonsquamous NSCLC, having received molecular testing within the German National Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer between 2017 and 2020, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1 and pembrolizumab as first-line palliative treatment, were included into this retrospective cohort analysis. Treatment efficacy and outcome according to KRAS/TP53 status were correlated with TME composition and gene expression analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas lung adenocarcinoma cohort.

RESULTS

Proportion of KRASmut and TP53mut was 53% (G12C 25%, non-G12C 28%) and 51%, respectively. In KRASmut patients, TP53 comutations increased response rates (G12C: 69.7% versus 46.5% [TP53mut versus wild-type (wt)], p = 0.004; non-G12C: 55.4% versus 39.5%, p = 0.03), progression-free survival (G12C: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, p = 0.009, non-G12C: HR = 0.7, p = 0.047), and overall survival (G12C: HR = 0.72, p = 0.16, non-G12C: HR = 0.56, p = 0.002), whereas no differences were observed in KRASwt patients. After a median follow-up of 41 months, G12C/TP53mut patients experienced the longest progression-free survival and overall survival (33.7 and 65.3 mo), which correlated with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte densities in the TME and up-regulation of interferon gamma target genes. Proinflammatory pathways according to TP53 status (mut versus wt) were less enhanced and not different in non-G12C and KRASwt, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

G12C/TP53 comutations identify a subset of patients with a very favorable long-term survival with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy, mediated by highly active interferon gamma signaling in a proinflammatory TME.

The Relationship Between Gene Mutations and the Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer

Current treatments for gastric cancer (GC) are suboptimal. Potential therapeutic targets for GC were screened using next-generation sequencing. We examined many mutation genes linked to GC, including TP53 (60%), PIK3CA (19%), LRP1B (13%), and ERBB2 (12%), ARID1A (9%), KMT2C (9%), and KRAS (7%). The KMT2C, KRAS, CDK6, and ARID1A wild-type genes were dominant in diffuse-type GC (P < .05), but mutations did not influence prognosis. Patients with APC (6%) and CDH1 (8%) wild-type GC presented with vascular invasion (P < .05). Patients with ATR (2%) wild-type GC were prone to lymph node metastasis (P < .05). Patients with ARID1A (9%) wild-type GC had reduced programmed death ligand 1 expression (<1, P < .05). We found that patients who received chemotherapy had a better prognosis than those who did not (although there was no statistical difference), with platinum-based group having better prognosis and uracil combined with paclitaxel group having worse prognosis.

Immunotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring oncogenic driver alterations other than EGFR: a multicenter real-world analysis

Background

The administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic driver alterations other than epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) aroused a heated discussion. We thus aimed to evaluate ICI treatment in these patients in real-world routine clinical practice.

Methods

A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted for NSCLC patients with at least one gene alteration (KRAS, HER2, BRAF, MET, RET, ALK, ROS1) receiving ICI monotherapy or combination treatment. The data regarding clinicopathologic characteristics, clinical efficacy, and safety were investigated.

Results

A total of 216 patients were included, the median age was 60 years, 72.7% of patients were male, and 46.8% had a smoking history. The molecular alterations involved KRAS (n=95), HER2 (n=42), BRAF (n=22), MET (n=21), RET (n=14), ALK (n=14), and ROS1 (n=8); 56.5% of patients received immunotherapy in the first-line, and the rest 43.5% were treated as a second-line and above. For the entire cohort who received immunotherapy-based regimens in the first-line, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.8 months. For the entire cohort who received immunotherapy-based regimens in the second-line and above, the median PFS was 4.7 months and median OS was 17.1 months. KRAS mutated NSCLC treated with immunotherapy-based regimens in the first-line setting had a median PFS and OS were 7.8 and 26.1 months, respectively. Moreover, the median PFS and OS of immunotherapy-based regimens for KRAS-mutant NSCLC that progressed after chemotherapy were 5.9 and 17.1 months. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level was not consistently associated with response to immunotherapy across different gene alteration subsets. In the KRAS group, PD-L1 positivity [tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1%] was associated with better PFS and OS according to the multivariate Cox analysis. No statistically significant association was found for smoking status, age, or gender with clinical efficacy in any gene group analyses.

Conclusions

KRAS-mutant NSCLC could obtain clinical benefits from ICIs either for treatment-naive patients or those who have experienced progression after chemotherapy, and PD-L1 positive expression (TPS >1%) may be a potential positive predictor. For NSCLC with ALK, RET and ROS1 rearrangement, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, or BRAF V600E mutation, effectiveness of single or combined ICI therapy remains limited, therefore, targeted therapies should be considered prior to immunotherapy regimens. Future studies should address the investigation of better predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response in oncogene-driven NSCLC.

Trametinib sensitizes KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma tumors to PD-1/PD-L1 axis blockade via Id1 downregulation

BACKGROUND

The identification of novel therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance to the MEK inhibitor trametinib in mutant KRAS lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a challenge. This study analyzes the effects of trametinib on Id1 protein, a key factor involved in the KRAS oncogenic pathway, and investigates the role of Id1 in the acquired resistance to trametinib as well as the synergistic anticancer effect of trametinib combined with immunotherapy in KRAS-mutant LUAD.

METHODS

We evaluated the effects of trametinib on KRAS-mutant LUAD by Western blot, RNA-seq and different syngeneic mouse models. Genetic modulation of Id1 expression was performed in KRAS-mutant LUAD cells by lentiviral or retroviral transductions of specific vectors. Cell viability was assessed by cell proliferation and colony formation assays. PD-L1 expression and apoptosis were measured by flow cytometry. The anti-tumor efficacy of the combined treatment with trametinib and PD-1 blockade was investigated in KRAS-mutant LUAD mouse models, and the effects on the tumor immune infiltrate were analyzed by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

We found that trametinib activates the proteasome-ubiquitin system to downregulate Id1 in KRAS-mutant LUAD tumors. Moreover, we found that Id1 plays a major role in the acquired resistance to trametinib treatment in KRAS-mutant LUAD cells. Using two preclinical syngeneic KRAS-mutant LUAD mouse models, we found that trametinib synergizes with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade to hamper lung cancer progression and increase survival. This anti-tumor activity depended on trametinib-mediated Id1 reduction and was associated with a less immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and increased PD-L1 expression on tumor cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that Id1 expression is involved in the resistance to trametinib and in the synergistic effect of trametinib with anti-PD-1 therapy in KRAS-mutant LUAD tumors. These findings suggest a potential therapeutic approach for immunotherapy-refractory KRAS-mutant lung cancers.

Emerging Therapies in Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus (+) Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) is the most frequently found oncogene in human cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For many years, KRAS was considered "undruggable" due to its structure and difficult targeting. However, the discovery of the switch II region in the KRAS-G12C-mutated protein has changed the therapeutic landscape with the design and development of novel direct KRAS-G12C inhibitors. Sotorasib and adagrasib are FDA-approved targeted agents for pre-treated patients with KRAS-G12C-mutated NSCLC. Despite promising results, the efficacy of these novel inhibitors is limited by mechanisms of resistance. Ongoing studies are evaluating combination strategies for overcoming resistance. In this review, we summarize the biology of the KRAS protein and the characteristics of KRAS mutations. We then present current and emerging therapeutic approaches for targeting KRAS mutation subtypes intending to provide individualized treatment for lung cancer harboring this challenging driver mutation.

Association of PD-L1 expression with driver gene mutations and clinicopathological characteristics in non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world study of 10 441 patients

BACKGROUND

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is a well-known predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is limited evidence of the relationship between PD-L1 expression, clinicopathological features, and their association with major driver mutations in NSCLC patients in Latin America.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients from Argentina with advanced NSCLC, and centralized evaluation of PD-L1 expression concurrently with genomic alterations in the driver genes EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, and/or KRAS G12C in FFPE tissue samples.

RESULTS

A total of 10 441 patients with advanced NSCLC were analyzed. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histological subtype (71.1%). PD-L1 expression was categorized as PD-L1 negative (45.1%), PD-L1 positive low-expression 1%-49% (32.3%), and PD-L1 positive high-expression ≥50% (22.6%). Notably, current smokers and males were more likely to have tumors with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% and ≥ 80% expression, respectively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.013). Tumors with non-adenocarcinoma histology had a significantly higher median PD-L1 expression (p < 0.001). Additionally, PD-L1 in distant nodes was more likely ≥50% (OR 1.60 [95% CI: 1.14-2.25, p < 0.01]). In the multivariate analysis, EGFR-positive tumors were more commonly associated with PD-L1 low expression (OR 0.62 [95% CI: 0.51-0.75], p < 0.01), while ALK-positive tumors had a significant risk of being PD-L1 positive (OR 1.81 [95% CI: 1.30-2.52], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression was associated with well-defined clinicopathological and genomic features. These findings provide a comprehensive view of the expression of PD-L1 in patients with advanced NSCLC in a large Latin American cohort.

Immune checkpoints between epithelial-mesenchymal transition and autophagy: A conflicting triangle

Inhibitory immune checkpoint (ICP) molecules are pivotal in inhibiting innate and acquired antitumor immune responses, a mechanism frequently exploited by cancer cells to evade host immunity. These evasion strategies contribute to the complexity of cancer progression and therapeutic resistance. For this reason, ICP molecules have become targets for antitumor drugs, particularly monoclonal antibodies, collectively referred to as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), that counteract such cancer-associated immune suppression and restore antitumor immune responses. Over the last decade, however, it has become clear that tumor cell-associated ICPs can also induce tumor cell-intrinsic effects, in particular epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and macroautophagy (hereafter autophagy). Both of these processes have profound implications for cancer metastasis and drug responsiveness. This article reviews the positive or negative cross-talk that tumor cell-associated ICPs undergo with autophagy and EMT. We discuss that tumor cell-associated ICPs are upregulated in response to the same stimuli that induce EMT. Moreover, ICPs themselves, when overexpressed, become an EMT-inducing stimulus. As regards the cross-talk with autophagy, ICPs have been shown to either stimulate or inhibit autophagy, while autophagy itself can either up- or downregulate the expression of ICPs. This dynamic equilibrium also extends to the autophagy-apoptosis axis, further emphasizing the complexities of cellular responses. Eventually, we delve into the intricate balance between autophagy and apoptosis, elucidating its role in the broader interplay of cellular dynamics influenced by ICPs. In the final part of this article, we speculate about the driving forces underlying the contradictory outcomes of the reciprocal, inhibitory, or stimulatory effects between ICPs, EMT, and autophagy. A conclusive identification of these driving forces may allow to achieve improved antitumor effects when using combinations of ICIs and compounds acting on EMT and/or autophagy. Prospectively, this may translate into increased and/or broadened therapeutic efficacy compared to what is currently achieved with ICI-based clinical protocols.

Exploiting the therapeutic implications of KRAS inhibition on tumor immunity

Over the past decade, RAS oncogenic proteins have transitioned from being deemed undruggable to having two clinically approved drugs, with several more in advanced stages of development. Despite the initial benefit of KRAS-G12C inhibitors for patients with tumors harboring this mutation, the rapid emergence of drug resistance underscores the urgent need to synergize these inhibitors with other therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes. RAS mutant tumor cells can create an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), suggesting an increased susceptibility to immunotherapies following RAS inhibition. This provides a rationale for combining RAS inhibitory drugs with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). However, achieving this synergy in the clinical setting has proven challenging. Here, we explore how understanding the impact of RAS mutant tumor cells on the TME can guide innovative approaches to combining RAS inhibition with immunotherapies, review progress in both pre-clinical and clinical stages, and discuss challenges and future directions.

MicroRNAs as regulators of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy: targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment by harnessing the power of the immune system to eliminate tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) block negative regulatory signals that prevent T cells from attacking cancer cells. Two key ICIs target the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, which includes programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and its receptor programmed death 1 (PD-1). Another ICI targets cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4). While ICIs have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in various malignancies, only a subset of patients respond favorably. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression, play a crucial role in modulating immune checkpoints, including PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4. This review summarizes the latest advancements in immunotherapy, highlighting the therapeutic potential of targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoints and the regulatory role of miRNAs in modulating these pathways. Consequently, understanding the complex interplay between miRNAs and immune checkpoints is essential for developing more effective and personalized immunotherapy strategies for cancer treatment.

New clinical trial design in precision medicine: discovery, development and direction

In the era of precision medicine, it has been increasingly recognized that individuals with a certain disease are complex and different from each other. Due to the underestimation of the significant heterogeneity across participants in traditional "one-size-fits-all" trials, patient-centered trials that could provide optimal therapy customization to individuals with specific biomarkers were developed including the basket, umbrella, and platform trial designs under the master protocol framework. In recent years, the successive FDA approval of indications based on biomarker-guided master protocol designs has demonstrated that these new clinical trials are ushering in tremendous opportunities. Despite the rapid increase in the number of basket, umbrella, and platform trials, the current clinical and research understanding of these new trial designs, as compared with traditional trial designs, remains limited. The majority of the research focuses on methodologies, and there is a lack of in-depth insight concerning the underlying biological logic of these new clinical trial designs. Therefore, we provide this comprehensive review of the discovery and development of basket, umbrella, and platform trials and their underlying logic from the perspective of precision medicine. Meanwhile, we discuss future directions on the potential development of these new clinical design in view of the "Precision Pro", "Dynamic Precision", and "Intelligent Precision". This review would assist trial-related researchers to enhance the innovation and feasibility of clinical trial designs by expounding the underlying logic, which be essential to accelerate the progression of precision medicine.

Response to first-line pembrolizumab in metastatic KRAS-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer

Aims: This retrospective study aims to identify a possible predictive role of KRAS mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer in response to first-line pembrolizumab, either as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy. Methods: Patients received pembrolizumab alone (n = 213) or associated with chemotherapy (n = 81). Results: A mutation in the KRAS gene was detected in 27% of patients. In patients on pembrolizumab alone, median progression-free survival in KRAS-mutated cases was longer than in wild-type cases (11.3 vs 4.4 months; p = 0.019), whereas median overall survival did not reach statistical significance (22.1 vs 12.5 months; p = 0.119). Patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy with KRAS-positive tumors had a similar progression-free survival (9.7 vs 7.3 months; p = 0.435); overall survival data were immature. Conclusion: This study suggests a correlation between KRAS status and response to pembrolizumab.

Targeting KRAS and SHP2 signaling pathways for immunomodulation and improving treatment outcomes in solid tumors

Historically, KRAS has been considered 'undruggable' inspite of being one of the most frequently altered oncogenic proteins in solid tumors, primarily due to the paucity of pharmacologically 'druggable' pockets within the mutant isoforms. However, pioneering developments in drug design capable of targeting the mutant KRAS isoforms especially KRASG12C-mutant cancers, have opened the doors for emergence of combination therapies comprising of a plethora of inhibitors targeting different signaling pathways. SHP2 signaling pathway, primarily known for activation of intracellular signaling pathways such as KRAS has come up as a potential target for such combination therapies as it emerged to be the signaling protein connecting KRAS and the immune signaling pathways and providing the link for understanding the overlapping regions of RAS/ERK/MAPK signaling cascade. Thus, SHP2 inhibitors having potent tumoricidal activity as well as role in immunomodulation have generated keen interest in researchers to explore its potential as combination therapy in KRAS mutant solid tumors. However, the excitement with these combination therapies need to overcome challenges thrown up by drug resistance and enhanced toxicity. In this review, we will discuss KRAS and SHP2 signaling pathways and their roles in immunomodulation and regulation of tumor microenvironment and also analyze the positive effects and drawbacks of the different combination therapies targeted at these signaling pathways along with their present and future potential to treat solid tumors.

From immune checkpoints to therapies: understanding immune checkpoint regulation and the influence of natural products and traditional medicine on immune checkpoint and immunotherapy in lung cancer

Lung cancer is a disease of global concern, and immunotherapy has brought lung cancer therapy to a new era. Besides promising effects in the clinical use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and low response rates are problems unsolved. Natural products and traditional medicine with an immune-modulating nature have the property to influence immune checkpoint expression and can improve immunotherapy's effect with relatively low toxicity. This review summarizes currently approved immunotherapy and the current mechanisms known to regulate immune checkpoint expression in lung cancer. It lists natural products and traditional medicine capable of influencing immune checkpoints or synergizing with immunotherapy in lung cancer, exploring both their effects and underlying mechanisms. Future research on immune checkpoint modulation and immunotherapy combination applying natural products and traditional medicine will be based on a deeper understanding of their mechanisms regulating immune checkpoints. Continued exploration of natural products and traditional medicine holds the potential to enhance the efficacy and reduce the adverse reactions of immunotherapy.

Role of Epiregulin in Lung Tumorigenesis and Therapeutic Resistance

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) signaling regulates multiple cellular processes and plays an essential role in tumorigenesis. Epiregulin (EREG), a member of the EGF family, binds to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and ErbB4, and it stimulates EGFR-related downstream pathways. Increasing evidence indicates that both the aberrant expression and oncogenic function of EREG play pivotal roles in tumor development in many human cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EREG overexpression is induced by activating mutations in the EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF and contributes to the aggressive phenotypes of NSCLC with oncogenic drivers. Recent studies have elucidated the roles of EREG in a tumor microenvironment, including the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, immune evasion, and resistance to anticancer therapy. In this review, we summarized the current understanding of EREG as an oncogene and discussed its oncogenic role in lung tumorigenesis and therapeutic resistance.

Unveiling the role of KRAS in tumor immune microenvironment

Kirsten rats sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS), the first discovered human oncogene, has long been recognized as "undruggable". KRAS mutations frequently occur in multiple human cancers including non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC), colorectal cancer(CRC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC), functioning as a "molecule switch" determining the activation of various oncogenic signaling pathways. Except for its intrinsic pro-tumorigenic role, KRAS alteration also exhibits an unique immune signature characterized by elevated PD-L1 level and high tumor mutational burden(TMB). KRAS mutation shape an immune suppressive microenvironment by impeding effective T cells infiltration and recruiting suppressive immune cells including myeloid-derived suppressor cells(MDSCs), regulatory T cells(Tregs), cancer associated fibroblasts(CAFs). In immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI) era, NSCLC patients with mutated KRAS tend to be more responsive to ICI than patients with intact KRAS. The hallmark for KRAS mutation is the existence of multiple kinds of co-mutations. Different types of co-alterations have distinct tumor microenvironment(TME) signatures and responses to ICI. TP53 co-mutation possess a "hot" TME and achieve higher response to immunotherapy while other loss of function mutation correlated with a "colder" TME and a poor outcome to ICI-based therapy. The groundbreaking discovery of KRAS G12C inhibitors significantly improved outcomes for this KRAS subtype even though efficacy was limited to NSCLC patients. KRAS G12C inhibitors also restore the suppressive TME, creating an opportunity for combinations with ICI. However, an inevitable challenge to KRAS inhibitors is drug resistance. Promising combination strategies such as combination with SHP2 is an approach deserve further exploration because of their immune modulatory effect.

Tumor immunotherapy resistance: Revealing the mechanism of PD-1 / PD-L1-mediated tumor immune escape

Tumor immunotherapy, an innovative anti-cancer therapy, has showcased encouraging outcomes across diverse tumor types. Among these, the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway is a well-known immunological checkpoint, which is significant in the regulation of immune evasion by tumors. Nevertheless, a considerable number of patients develop resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, rendering it ineffective in the long run. This research focuses on exploring the factors of PD-1/PD-L1-mediated resistance in tumor immunotherapy. Initially, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is characterized by its role in facilitating tumor immune evasion, emphasizing its role in autoimmune homeostasis. Next, the primary mechanisms of resistance to PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy are analyzed, including tumor antigen deletion, T cell dysfunction, increased immunosuppressive cells, and alterations in the expression of PD-L1 within tumor cells. The possible ramifications of altered metabolism, microbiota, and DNA methylation on resistance is also described. Finally, possible resolution strategies for dealing with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy resistance are discussed, placing particular emphasis on personalized therapeutic approaches and the exploration of more potent immunotherapy regimens.

A comprehensive integrated gene network construction to explore the essential role of Notch 1 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)

The heterogeneous biological landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is largely attributed to the activation of Notch signalling pathway. Among the Notch family transmembrane proteins, neurogenic locus notch homolog protein1 (NOTCH1) is a putative oncogene in NSCLC which activates the pathway as negative prognostic factor. This study aims to explore integrated network approach in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) especially linked to the notch pathway and its receptors. Our gene set enrichment analysis reveals the key Notch pathway genes are predominantly down regulated in LUAD. There were 675 genes with a total of 6517 functional interactions and 6 densely connected clusters of 38 miRNAs, 84 transcription factors with 156 edges identified through network construction. Here we report five key genes namely NOTCH1, CDH1, ERBB2, GAPDH and COL1A1 significantly enriched in Notch pathway which are further validated through the KM plot, box plots, stage plots and TIMER analysis. In addition, the NOTCH1 receptor is strongly linked to the immune checkpoint inhibitor CD274 (PD-L1) and can be considered as prognostic marker and tumour suppressor gene in LUAD which surely provide the basis for early diagnosis and futuristic immunotherapeutic targets for LUAD.

Drugging the undruggable: Advances in targeting KRAS signaling in solid tumors

Cancer remains the leading cause of global mortality, prompting a paradigm shift in its treatment and outcomes with the advent of targeted therapies. Among the most prevalent mutations in RAS-driven cancers, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations account for approximately 86% of cases worldwide, particularly in lung, pancreatic, and colon cancers, contributing to poor prognosis and reduced overall survival. Despite numerous efforts to understand the biology of KRAS mutants and their pivotal role in cancer development, the lack of well-defined drug-binding pockets has deemed KRAS an "undruggable" therapeutic target, presenting significant challenges for researchers and clinicians alike. Through significant biochemical and technological advances, the last decade has witnessed promising breakthroughs in targeted therapies for KRAS-mutated lung, colon, and pancreatic cancers, marking a critical turning point in the field. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the characteristics of KRAS mutations across various solid tumors, highlighting ongoing cutting-edge research on the immune microenvironment, the development of KRAS-driven mice models, and the recent progress in the exploration of specific KRAS mutant-targeted therapeutic approaches. By comprehensive understanding of the intricacies of KRAS signaling in solid tumors and the latest therapeutic developments, this chapter will shed light on the potential for novel therapeutic strategies to combat KRAS-driven tumors and improve patient outcomes.

Facts and Hopes on RAS Inhibitors and Cancer Immunotherapy

Although the past decade has seen great strides in the development of immunotherapies that reactivate the immune system against tumors, there have also been major advances in the discovery of drugs blocking oncogenic drivers of cancer growth. However, there has been very little progress in combining immunotherapies with drugs that target oncogenic driver pathways. Some of the most important oncogenes in human cancer encode RAS family proteins, although these have proven challenging to target. Recently drugs have been approved that inhibit a specific mutant form of KRAS: G12C. These have improved the treatment of patients with lung cancer harboring this mutation, but development of acquired drug resistance after initial responses has limited the impact on overall survival. Because of the immunosuppressive nature of the signaling network controlled by oncogenic KRAS, targeted KRAS G12C inhibition can indirectly affect antitumor immunity, and does so without compromising the critical role of normal RAS proteins in immune cells. This serves as a rationale for combination with immune checkpoint blockade, which can provide additional combinatorial therapeutic benefit in some preclinical cancer models. However, in clinical trials, combination of KRAS G12C inhibitors with PD-(L)1 blockade has yet to show improved outcome, in part due to treatment toxicities. A greater understanding of how oncogenic KRAS drives immune evasion and how mutant-specific KRAS inhibition impacts the tumor microenvironment can lead to novel approaches to combining RAS inhibition with immunotherapies.

Prognostic value of KRAS mutations, TP53 mutations and PD-L1 expression among lung adenocarcinomas treated with immunotherapy

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between oncogenic alterations and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in lung adenocarcinomas, as well as the prognostic value of KRAS and/or TP53 mutations in patients treated with immunotherapy.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort study of 519 patients with lung adenocarcinomas analysed for mutations and PD-L1 expression. Data were collected from electronic pathology record system, next-generation sequencing system, and clinical databases. Association between mutations and PD-L1 expression was investigated, as well as survival statistics of the 65 patients treated with immunotherapy.

RESULTS

41% of the samples contained a KRAS mutation, predominantly together with mutations in TP53 (41%) or STK11 (10%). Higher expression of PD-L1 was seen among patients with KRAS mutations (p=0.002) and EGFR wild type (p=0.006). For patients treated with immunotherapy, there was no statistically significant difference for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to KRAS mutation status, TP53 mutation status or PD-L1 expression. The HR for concomitant mutations in TP53 and KRAS was 0.78 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.99) for OS and 0.43 (0.21 to 0.88) for PFS. Furthermore, concomitant TP53 and KRAS mutations predicted a better PFS (p=0.015) and OS (p=0.029) compared with no mutations or a single mutation in either TP53 or KRAS.

CONCLUSION

Mutations in TP53 together with KRAS may serve as a potential biomarker for survival benefits with immunotherapy.

First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: how to select and where to go

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy (IO) has established a new milestone in lung cancer treatment. Several registrational studies have approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in different settings, including the metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As well known, responders are just a certain proportion of patients; therefore, their selection by using predictive factors has stood out as a crucial issue to address in tailoring a patient-centered care.

AREAS COVERED

In our review we propose a detailed yet handy cross section on ICIs as first-line treatment in metastatic NSCLC, regarding indications, histological, clinical, and blood-based biomarkers, other than their mechanisms of resistance and new immunological actionable targets. We performed a literature search through PubMed entering keywords complying with crucial features of immunotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

IO represents the backbone of lung cancer treatment. Trials are currently testing novel immune blockade agents assessing combinatorial approaches with standard ICIs, or antibody drug conjugates (ADC), harboring immunological targets. Perfecting patients' selection is an ongoing challenge and a more and more urgent need in order to best predict responders who will consistently benefit from it.