EGFR mutations and HER2/3 protein expression and clinical outcome in Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib

A narrative review of advances in treatment and survival prognosis of HER2-positive malignant lung cancers

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), as a receptor tyrosine kinase of EGF receptor family, whose mutation is often associated with even if less frequency but poor prognosis and shorter survival in pulmonary malignant tumor. HER2 status include mutation, overexpression, amplification and also some rare genotypes, detected by next generation sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and also fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Different genotypes represent different therapeutic targets and indicate different clinical prognosis concluded by previous studies. Unfortunately, no standard guidelines for first-line treatment are widely recognized, and current therapeutic schedules include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Especially for patients with advanced metastasis, chemotherapy is based as a systemic therapy using studies of breast cancer or EGFR-positive lung adenocarcinoma as a template. Studies already explored treatment including EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as gefitinib and afatinib, and also trastuzumab and its conjugation like HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). Also, he researches explored combination therapy with chemotherapy and TKIs or monoclonal antibodies. This review describes commonly used therapies for HER2-positive/HER2-overexpression patients and general relationship between genotypes of HER2, drug selection and final prognosis in order to provide suggestions for future diagnosis and treatment.

Neuropeptide bombesin receptor activation stimulates growth of lung cancer cells through HER3 with a MAPK-dependent mechanism

Despite recent advances in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), prognosis still remains poor and new therapeutic approaches are needed. Studies demonstrate the importance of the EGFR/HER-receptor family in NSCLC growth, as well as that of other tumors. Recently, HER3 is receiving increased attention because of its role in drug resistance and aggressive growth. Activation of overexpressed G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) can also initiate growth by transactivating EGFR/HER-family members. GPCR transactivation of EGFR has been extensively studied, but little is known of its ability to transactivate other EGFR/HER-members, especially HER3. To address this, we studied the ability of bombesin receptor (BnR) activation to transactivate all EGFR/HER-family members and their principal downstream signaling cascades, the PI3K/Akt- and MAPK/ERK-pathways, in human NSCLC cell-lines. In all three cell-lines studied, which possessed EGFR, HER2 and HER3, Bn rapidly transactivated EGFR, HER2 and HER3, as well as Akt and ERK. Immunoprecipitation studies revealed Bn-induced formation of both HER3/EGFR- and HER3/HER2-heterodimers. Specific EGFR/HER3 antibodies or siRNA-knockdown of EGFR and HER3, demonstrated Bn-stimulated activation of EGFR/HER members is initially through HER3, not EGFR. In addition, specific inhibition of HER3, HER2 or MAPK, abolished Bn-stimulated cell-growth, while neither EGFR nor Akt inhibition had an effect. These results show HER3 transactivation mediates all growth effects of BnR activation through MAPK. These results raise the possibility that targeting HER3 alone or with GPCR activation and its signal cascades, may be a novel therapeutic approach in NSCLC. This is especially relevant with the recent development of HER3-blocking antibodies.

Prognostic value of localization of epidermal growth factor receptor in lung adenocarcinoma

Background

The nuclear translocation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been considered to play a role in carcinogenesis. However, the relevance of differentially located EGFR proteins in lung cancer remains unclear.

Methods

We examined 161 patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma to detect EGFR expression in lung cancer cells using immunohistochemistry and determined the correlations of EGFR expression with clinical characteristics, EGFR mutations, and survival time. Moreover, we graded complete membranous staining with strong intensity as high membranous EGFR (mEGFR) expression, and nuclear EGFR staining with strong intensity as high nuclear (nEGFR) expression.

Results

The prevalence of high mEGFR and nEGFR expression in lung adenocarcinoma was 42.86 and 39.13%, respectively. After multivariate analyses, high mEGFR expression was associated with a significantly reduced mortality risk in older patients, those with a history of smoking, and those without brain metastasis (hazard ratio[95% confidential interval], HR[95% CI] = 0.55[0.32~ 0.92]; 0.51[0.26~ 0.98] and 0.56[0.33~ 0.94], in overall survival, respectively). An association between high nEGFR expression and early recurrence was observed in patients with metastasis (HR[95% CI] =1.68[1.05~ 2.68], in progression-free survival). Notably, patients with low mEGFR and low nEGFR expression had the lowest survival rate in cases without brain metastasis (p = 0.018) and with a history of smoking (p = 0.062) and total EGFR (any high mEGFR or nEGFR) expression indicated a more favorable response to platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of EGFR mutations (HR[95% CI] =0.33[0.12–0.92]; adjusted HR[95% CI] = 0.36[0.13~ 1.02] with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor).

Conclusions

EGFR proteins at different cellular locations in lung adenocarcinoma might influence the biology of cancer cells and are an independent indicator of more favorable prognosis and treatment response.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12929-018-0451-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for lung squamous carcinomas harboring EGFR mutation: A multicenter study and pooled analysis of published reports

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are common in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) but rare in squamous cell carcinoma (SQC). The efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for SQC with EGFR mutations is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs for these patients. We performed a retrospective matched-pair case-control study from 3 cancer centers, including 44 SQC and 44 ADC patients with EGFR mutation who were treated with EGFR-TKI. Subsequently, we performed a pooled analysis on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs for EGFR-mutant SQC in 115 patients, including 71 patients selected from 25 published reports. In our multicenter study, EGFR-mutant SQC and ADC patients had similar objective response rate (ORR) (43.2% vs. 54.5%, p = 0.290), but SQC patients had lower disease control rate (DCR) (71.3% vs. 100%, p = 0.001), significant shorter median progression free survival (PFS) (5.1 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.000) and median overall survival (OS) (17.2 vs. 23.6 months, p = 0.027). In pooled analysis, the ORR, DCR, PFS and OS of SQC patients were 39.1%, 71.3%, 5.6 months and 15.0 months, respectively. Performance status was the only independent predictor of PFS and erlotinib treatment was associated with a better survival. In conclusion, EGFR-TKI was less effective in EGFR-mutant SQC than in ADC but still has clinical benefit for SQC patients. Further study is need to evaluate the using of EGFR-TKIs in these SQC patients.

Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology

CONTEXT

- In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing.

OBJECTIVE

- To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update.

DESIGN

- The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations.

RESULTS

- Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

- The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes ( ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.

Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology

CONTEXT

In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update.

DESIGN

The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations.

RESULTS

Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes (ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.

Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology

CONTEXT

In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update.

DESIGN

The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations.

RESULTS

Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes (ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.

Somatic mutations in salivary duct carcinoma and potential therapeutic targets

Background

Salivary duct carcinomas (SDCa) are rare highly aggressive malignancies. Most patients die from distant metastatic disease within three years of diagnosis. There are limited therapeutic options for disseminated disease.

Results

11 cases showed androgen receptor expression and 6 cases showed HER2 amplification. 6 Somatic mutations with additional available targeted therapies were identified: EGFR (p.G721A: Gefitinib), PDGFRA (p.H845Y: Imatinib and Crenolanib), PIK3CA (p.H1047R: Everolimus), ERBB2 (p.V842I: Lapatinib), HRAS (p.Q61R: Selumetinib) and KIT (p.T670I: Sorafenib). Furthermore, alterations in PTEN, PIK3CA and HRAS that alter response to androgen deprivation therapy and HER2 inhibition were also seen.

Materials and Methods

Somatic mutation analysis was performed on DNA extracted from 15 archival cases of SDCa using the targeted Illumina TruSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel. Potential targetable genetic alterations were identified using extensive literature and international somatic mutation database (COSMIC, KEGG) search. Immunohistochemistry for androgen receptor and immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization for HER2 were also performed.

Conclusions

SDCa show multiple somatic mutations, some that are amenable to pharmacologic manipulation and others that confer resistance to treatments currently under investigation. These findings emphasize the need to develop testing and treatment strategies for SDCa.

Efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in targeted therapy of lung squamous cell carcinoma patients with EGFR mutation: a pooled analysis

Purpose

This pooled analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in lung squamous cell carcinoma with EGFR mutation.

Methods

Advanced stage (IIIB/IV) lung squamous cell carcinoma patients with EGFR mutations treated with EGFR-TKIs were extracted from the publications searched from the databases of EMBASE, Medline (Ovid SP), Web of Science, Cochrane library, PubMed Publisher, ASCO meeting abstract and Google Scholar before August 2016, or identified from the database of Shanghai Chest Hospital from July 2014 to August 2016. Pooled objective response rate, disease control rate and median progression-free survival were accessed directly or by Kaplan-Meier method and combined in different studies by Comprehensive Meta Analysis software via one-group dichotomous or continuous analysis functions.

Results

The combined objective response rate, disease control rate and median progression-free survival were 31.6% (95%CI, 24.1%∼40.2%), 72.0% (95% CI, 63.5%∼79.2%) and 3.08 months (95% CI, 2.31-3.84 months) in lung squamous cell carcinoma patients with EGFR mutation.

Conclusion

The EGFR-TKIs had a modest response for EGFR mutated lung squamous cell carcinoma patients and might be a selective option for those patients.

Impact of HER2 codon 655 polymorphism and expression of HER2 and HER3 in non small cell lung cancer patients

The aim of the study was to assess the expression and significance of HER2 and HER3, and Ile/Val single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of HER2 in lung cancer patients. Thirty seven cases of lung cancer were investigated immunohistochemically for HER2 and HER3 expression. PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was used to analyze the presence of HER-2 SNP at codon 655 in 20 samples. The results were compared with clinical and pathological parameters of investigated patients.We found that 100% of the cases were negative for HER2, 29.7% were with moderate or strong HER3 expression and 70.3% of the tumors-without or with low expression for HER3. Lymph node metastasis were found in 40% of HER3 positive cases (χ(2) = 4.752; p = 0.029). Moderately-differentiated tumors do not express neither of investigated markers (χ(2) = 6.719; p = 0.035). HER2 RFLP-PCR analysis showed genotype AG in five patients (25%) and the rest of 15 cases (75%) had АА (Ile/Ile) genotype. Patients with metastasis had genotype АА (Ile/Ile) in 80% and genotype AG (Ile/Val) in 20% (χ(2) = 2.857; p = 0.091).Our results indicate that SNP in HER2 codon 655 and investigation of HER2 and HER3 expression could be helpful to outline the prognosis for patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Different efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and prognosis in patients with subtypes of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nearly 85 % of lung-cancer-specific epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitive mutations comprise a substitution at position 858 (21L858R) and deletion mutants in exon 19 (19del). The aim of this study was to assess the role of EGFR mutation subtypes in predicting the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) and the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHOD

We systematically searched for eligible articles investigating the association between EGFR mutation subtypes and the efficacy of EGFR TKIs and the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. The summary risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) were calculated using meta-analysis. In addition, we used variance analysis for the progression-free survival data (PFS) and used the rank sum test for the overall survival data.

RESULTS

We identified 22 eligible trials involving 1,082 patients. The objective response rate of the 19del mutation group was significantly higher than the 21L858R mutation group (RR 1.23; 95 % CI 1.12-1.36; P < 0.0001). The PFS (MD 3.55; 95 % CI 0.90-6.20; P = 0.009; MD 2.57; 95 % CI 0.51-4.62; P = 0.01) and overall survival (OS) (MD 10.52; 95 % CI 5.10-15.93; P = 0.0001) of the 19del mutation group were significantly longer than the 21L858R mutation group; the same results were observed in the variance analysis and rank sum test.

CONCLUSION

The 19del mutation may be a more efficient clinical marker for predicting the response of patients with NSCLC to EGFR TKIs. Furthermore, patients with the 19del mutation have both a longer PFS and OS. The 19del mutation is also the prognostic factor for patients with NSCLC.

Impact of smoking status on EGFR-TKI efficacy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in EGFR mutants: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The strong association between smoking history and the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has been proven in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which explains the favorable response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy in nonsmoking NSCLC patients. However, few studies directly focus on the relationship between EGFR-TKI's efficacy and smoking history in NSCLC EGFR-mutant patients.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for eligible literatures. Data on objective response rates, disease control rates, and progression-free survival (PFS) stratified by smoking status were extracted and synthesized on the basis of a random-effect model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies that involved a total of 1029 EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients after EGFR-TKI treatment were included. In overall, nonsmoking was associated with significant prolonged PFS (HR, 0.73, 0.60 to 0.88; P = .001) compared to ever smokers. However, only marginal improvements without statistical significance in objective response rates (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.46; P = .433) and disease control rate (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.33; P = .740) were observed. Subgroup analyses showed that the benefits of PFS in nonsmokers were predominantly presented in pooled results of studies enrolling patients with active EGFR mutations, studies involving previously treated patients, and retrospective studies. Additionally, we failed to observe any significant benefit from nonsmokers in every subgroup for objective response rates and disease control rate.

CONCLUSION

For advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, nonsmoking is associated with longer PFS than ever smoking after EGFR-TKIs treatment. Smoking history should be considered an essential factor in studies regarding EGFR-targeted agents toward EGFR-mutant patients.

EGFR mutations as a prognostic and predictive marker in non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has entered the age of individual treatment, and increasing point mutations of specific oncogenes and rearrangement of some chromosomes are biomarkers used to predict the therapeutic effect of targeted therapy. At present, there is a consensus among clinicians that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown favorable efficacy in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation, and some relevant research has suggested that the presence of EGFR mutations is a favorable prognostic marker. However, the association of EGFR mutation status with the responsiveness to conventional chemotherapy agents and survival in NSCLC patients is still unclear. This review provides an overview of and assesses the role of EGFR as a prognostic marker for postoperative patients and as a predictive marker for response to cytotoxic chemotherapy. In addition, we review the comparison of response to chemotherapy between EGFR mutations in exon 19 and in exon 21 and the predictive role of p.T790M mutation.

Pooled analysis of clinical outcome for EGFR TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) appear to gain particular benefit from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) if their disease tests positive for EGFR activating mutations. Recently, several large, controlled, phase III studies have been published in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumours. Given the increased patient dataset now available, a comprehensive literature search for EGFR TKIs or chemotherapy in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC was undertaken to update the results of a previously published pooled analysis. Pooling eligible progression-free survival (PFS) data from 27 erlotinib studies (n = 731), 54 gefitinib studies (n = 1802) and 20 chemotherapy studies (n = 984) provided median PFS values for each treatment. The pooled median PFS was: 12.4 months (95% accuracy intervals [AI] 11.6-13.4) for erlotinib-treated patients; 9.4 months (95% AI 9.0-9.8) for gefitinib-treated patients; and 5.6 months (95% AI 5.3-6.0) for chemotherapy. Both erlotinib and gefitinib resulted in significantly longer PFS than chemotherapy (permutation testing; P = 0.000 and P = 0.000, respectively). Data on more recent TKIs (afatinib, dacomitinib and icotinib) were insufficient at this time-point to carry out a pooled PFS analysis on these compounds. The results of this updated pooled analysis suggest a substantial clear PFS benefit of treating patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with erlotinib or gefitinib compared with chemotherapy.

A novel point mutation in exon 20 of EGFR showed sensitivity to erlotinib

Mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are good predictors of response to treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is well established that classic mutations, such as in-frame deletions in exon 19 and the point mutation L858R in exon 21, are associated with high sensitivity to EGFR TKIs. Though mutations in exon 20 are almost correlated with EGFR-TKIs resistance, the awareness that they might confer sensitivity to TKI treatment should be emphasized. Herein, we describe a novel mutation in exon 20 of EGFR in a Chinese male non-smoker, who was diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and characterized by the codon 769 point mutation GTG>GCG, which translates into alanine instead of valine (p.V769A). In this case, the patient showed a good clinical response to erlotinib after paclitaxel/cisplatin first-line and docetaxel second-line chemotherapies. Therefore, we suggest that this rare mutation (p.V769A) may be a sensitive EGFR mutation in NSCLC. The identification of novel EGFR mutations provides new predictive biomarkers for TKI treatment and is essential to the successful use of targeted therapies.

Common and rare EGFR and KRAS mutations in a Dutch non-small-cell lung cancer population and their clinical outcome

INTRODUCTION

In randomly assigned studies with EGFR TKI only a minor proportion of patients with NSCLC have genetically profiled biopsies. Guidelines provide evidence to perform EGFR and KRAS mutation analysis in non-squamous NSCLC. We explored tumor biopsy quality offered for mutation testing, different mutations distribution, and outcome with EGFR TKI.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Clinical data from 8 regional hospitals were studied for patient and tumor characteristics, treatment and overall survival. Biopsies sent to the central laboratory were evaluated for DNA quality and subsequently analyzed for mutations in exons 18-21 of EGFR and exon 2 of KRAS by bidirectional sequence analysis.

RESULTS

Tumors from 442 subsequent patients were analyzed. For 74 patients (17%) tumors were unsuitable for mutation analysis. Thirty-eight patients (10.9%) had EGFR mutations with 79% known activating mutations. One hundred eight patients (30%) had functional KRAS mutations. The mutation spectrum was comparable to the Cosmic database. Following treatment in the first or second line with EGFR TKI median overall survival for patients with EGFR (n = 14), KRAS (n = 14) mutations and wild type EGFR/KRAS (n = 31) was not reached, 20 and 9 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

One out of every 6 tumor samples was inadequate for mutation analysis. Patients with EGFR activating mutations treated with EGFR-TKI have the longest survival.

Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology

OBJECTIVE

To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed.

PARTICIPANTS

Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies.

EVIDENCE

Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture published articles from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. EVIDENCE was formally graded for each recommendation.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4).

CONCLUSIONS

The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.

Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology

OBJECTIVE

To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed.

PARTICIPANTS

Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies.

EVIDENCE

Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture articles published published from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. Evidence was formally graded for each recommendation.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4).

CONCLUSIONS

The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.

Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology

OBJECTIVE

To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed.

PARTICIPANTS

Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies.

EVIDENCE

Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture articles published from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. Evidence was formally graded for each recommendation.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4).

CONCLUSIONS

The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.

Uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer and their mechanisms of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity and resistance

Therapy targeted against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has demonstrated dramatic tumor responses and favorable clinical outcomes in a select group of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients whose tumors harbor EGFR activating mutations. The best characterized of the mutations conferring sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are deletions in exon 19 and a point mutation in exon 21 (L858R). Likewise, the most common mutation that confers resistance is the T790M point mutation. However several other mutations have been reported and several have been characterized as regards their role in sensitivity or resistance to EGFR TKIs. Resistance to the EGFR TKIs erlotinib and gefitinib, and the newer irreversible EGFR TKIs is a problem of fundamental importance. Recognition of the presence and significance of specific EGFR mutations is important for appropriate therapeutic implementation of EGFR TKIs and research and development of mutation-specific inhibitors. We summarize the literature and present an overview of the subject of less common EGFR mutations and their clinical significance, with an emphasis on EGFR TKI sensitivity or resistance.

Analysis of HER-3, insulin growth factor-1, nuclear factor-kB and epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number in the prediction of clinical outcome for K-RAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients receiving irinotecan-cetuximab

BACKGROUND

A large proportion of colorectal cancer patients does not benefit from the use of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment although in the absence of a mutation of the K-RAS gene. Preliminary observations suggested that HER-3, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) and EGFR gene copy number (GCN) might identify patients not likely to benefit from anti-EGFR therapy. We tested the interaction between HER-3, IGF-1, NF-kB, EGFR GCN and K-RAS mutational analysis to verify the relative ability of these variables to identify a subgroup of patients more likely to benefit from EGFR-targeted treatment among those harbouring a K-RAS wild-type status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected tumours from 168 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan-cetuximab. K-RAS was assessed with direct sequencing, EGFR amplification was assessed by chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) and HER-3, IGF-1 and NF-kB were assessed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In patients with K-RAS wild-type tumours, the following molecular factors resulted independently associated with response rate: HER-3 [odds ratio (OR)=4.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-13.6, P=0.02], IGF-1 (OR=4.2, 95% CI 2-10.2, P=0.003) and EGFR GCN (OR=4.1, 95% CI 1.9-26.2, P=0.04). These factors also independently correlated with overall survival as follows: HER-3 [hazard ratio (HR)=0.4, 95% CI 0.28-0.85, P=0.008], IGF-1 (HR=0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.76, P<0.0001) and EGFR GCN (HR=0.59, 95% CI 0.22-0.89, P=0.04).

DISCUSSION

We believe that our data may help further composing the molecular mosaic of EGFR-resistant tumours. The role of HER-3, IGF-1 and CISH EGFR GCN should be prospectively validated in clinical trials investigating anti-EGFR treatment strategies in colorectal cancer patients.

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and their correlation with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and association with the characteristics of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many studies have demonstrated that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is associated with the response to therapy with single agent EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but the extent of the effect is varied. We carried out a meta-analysis to assess the association between EGFR mutation and the efficacy of EGFR-TKI therapy and the independent predictor of EGFR mutation in order to identify who would be likely to benefit from this kind of therapy.

METHODS

All literature relating to EGFR mutation and EGFR-TKI therapy was researched and carefully selected. Related variables were abstracted and the pooled odds ratio calculated after a heterogeneity test with the software, State 10. Publication bias was evaluated at the same time.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included according to the selection criteria. We found a statistically significant higher probability of response in patients with an EGFR mutation versus wild-type (19.33, 95% CI, 13.61-27.46, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the pooled odds ration of susceptibility to EGFR mutation among female patients compared with male patients was 3.01 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.34-3.88 P < 0.0001), adenocarcinoma patients compared with non-adenocarcinoma patients was 5.40 (95% CI, 2.55-11.40 P < 0.0001), and non-smoker patients compared smoker patients was 19.33 (95% CI:,13.61-27.46 P < 0.0001). The publication bias analysis had no statistically significant results.

CONCLUSION

Female, adenocarcinoma and non-smoker are independent predictors for the EGFR mutation. Efficacy of EGFR-TKI therapy favors patients with an EGFR mutation. Without the gene mutational analysis, patients selected for EGFR-TKI therapy should be female non-smokers with adenocarcinoma.

Efficacy of gefitinib for non-adenocarcinoma non-small-cell lung cancer patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: a pooled analysis of published reports

The efficacy of gefitinib for patients with non-adenocarcinoma non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is unclear, because only a small percentage of patients enrolled in the clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of gefitinib for tumors harboring EGFR mutation were non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC. A pooled analysis was conducted to clarify the efficacy of gefitinib for non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations. A systematic search of the PUBMED databases was conducted to identify all clinical reports that contained advanced non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations and treated with gefitinib. The selected patients were advanced non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with gefitinib and described in reports containing the data of the histology, status of EGFR mutations and response to gefitinib. This study selected 33 patients from 15 reports. Twenty-seven and three of the 33 patients were squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma, respectively. One patient each had large-cell carcinoma, pleomorphic carcinoma and spindle cell carcinoma. Twenty-one patients (64%) had sensitive EGFR mutations. The response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 27%, 67-70% and 3.0 months, respectively. These factors were statistically significantly inferior in the non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations to adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR mutations selected from the same published reports (RR: 27%vs 66%, P = 0.000028; DCR: 67-70%vs 92-93%, P = 0.000014; mPFS: 3.0 vs 9.4 months, P = 0.0001, respectively). Gefitinib is less effective in non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations than adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations.

Clinical significance of epidermal growth factor receptors in non-small cell lung cancer and a prognostic role for HER2 gene copy number in female patients

INTRODUCTION

To compare the efficacy of silver in situ hybridization (SISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in detecting HER2 alterations and to investigate the prevalence and prognostic significance of Erb family members in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Stage I to IIIA tumors from 335 patients with NSCLC were immunohistochemically tested for protein expression of all Erb family members. Membranous HER2 expression was compared with its gene copy number by SISH in paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed material. Correlations were made with clinicopathological variables.

RESULTS

Synchronous high immunohistochemical expression of all Erb family members was seen in 8% of tumor samples. There was a significant correlation between the HER2 gene copy number and HER2 protein expression (p = 0.003). High nuclear HER3 expression correlated significantly with high HER2 gene copy numbers (p = 0.015). In univariate analyses, high HER2 gene copy number was a highly significant negative prognostic indicator for disease-specific survival in women (p = 0.005), whereas it did not show prognostic influence in men (p = 0.9). Neither polysomy of chromosome 17 nor the IHC expression of Erb family member proteins as singles or pairs correlated significantly with survival. In the multivariate analysis, high HER2 gene copy number in tumor epithelial cells (p = 0.03) was an independent prognostic factor for disease-specific survival in female patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IHC does not consistently identify patients likely to have a poor prognosis, whereas SISH provides superior prognostic information for female patients with NSCLC. High HER2 gene copy number in tumor epithelial cells is an independent predictor of inferior survival in female patients with primary NSCLC.

The role of HER-3 expression in the prediction of clinical outcome for advanced colorectal cancer patients receiving irinotecan and cetuximab

Preclinical data suggested that, in the presence of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-3-altered activation, colorectal cancer cells may escape anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mediated cell death. HER-3 overexpression may then represent a key factor for resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies in colorectal cancer. The aim of our analysis was to investigate a possible correlation between HER-3 expression and clinical outcome in wild-type K-RAS advanced colorectal cancer patients receiving cetuximab and irinotecan. We retrospectively analyzed immunoreactivity for HER-3 in wild-type K-RAS advanced colorectal cancer patients receiving irinotecan and cetuximab. Eighty-four advanced wild-type K-RAS colorectal cancer patients were available for HER-3 analysis. Forty patients (48%) had a HER-3(-) colorectal tumor, whereas the remaining 44 cases (52%) were deemed HER-3(+). In patients with HER-3(-) and HER-3(+) tumors, we observed a partial response in 17 (42%) and eight (18%) patients respectively; progressive disease occurred in 11 (35%) and 26 (53%) patients with HER-3(-) and HER-3(+) tumors, respectively (p = .003). The median progression-free survival time was 6.3 months in patients with HER-3(-) tumors and 2.8 months for those who had HER-3-overexpressing tumors (p < .0001). The median overall survival time was 13.6 months in patients showing HER-3(-) tumors and 10.5 months for those who had HER-3-expressing tumors (p = .01). HER-3 proved to be a predictive factor for clinical outcome in wild-type K-RAS colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. Combined HER-3 and K-RAS analysis may represent an effective strategy for better selection of responding colorectal cancer patients.

Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a distinct subgroup of NSCLCs that is particularly responsive to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). A weighted pooled analysis of available studies was performed to evaluate clinical outcome in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who were treated with chemotherapy or EGFR TKIs. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were pooled from prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated chemotherapy or single-agent EGFR TKIs (erlotinib or gefitinib) in patients with NSCLC and EGFR mutations. Among the studies identified for inclusion in the analysis, 12 evaluated erlotinib (365 patients), 39 evaluated gefitinib (1069 patients) and 9 evaluated chemotherapy (375 patients). Across all studies, the most common EGFR mutations were deletions in exon 19 and the L858R substitution in exon 21. In the weighted pooled analysis, the overall median PFS was 13.2 months with erlotinib, 9.8 months with gefitinib and 5.9 months with chemotherapy. Using a two-sided permutation, erlotinib and gefitinib produced a longer median PFS versus chemotherapy, both individually (P= 0.000 and P= 0.002, respectively) and as a combined group (EGFR TKI versus chemotherapy, P= 0.000). EGFR TKIs appear to be the most effective treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Ongoing prospective trials comparing the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy and EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant disease should provide further insight into the most appropriate way to treat this specific group of patients.