Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Evaluation Tools in Adults with Solid Malignancies Outside the Head and Neck and Upper GI Tract: A Systematic Review

Clinical Implementation of DIGEST as an Evidence-Based Practice Tool for Videofluoroscopy in Oncology: A Six-Year Single Institution Implementation Evaluation

Clinical implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) tools is a healthcare priority. The Dynamic Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) is an EBP tool developed in 2016 for videofluoroscopy in head and neck (H&N) oncology with clinical implementation as a goal. We sought to examine: (1) feasibility of clinical implementation of DIGEST in a national comprehensive cancer center, and (2) fidelity of DIGEST adoption in real-world practice. A retrospective implementation evaluation was conducted in accordance with the STARI framework. Electronic health record (EHR) databases were queried for all consecutive modified barium swallow (MBS) studies conducted at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2016 to 2021. Implementation outcomes included: feasibility as measured by DIGEST reporting in EHR (as a marker of clinical use) and fidelity as measured by accuracy of DIGEST reporting relative to the decision-tree logic (penetration-aspiration scale [PAS], residue, and Safety [S] and Efficiency [E] grades). Contextual factors examined included year, setting, cancer type, MBS indication, and provider. 13,055 MBS were conducted by 29 providers in 7,842 unique patients across the lifespan in diverse oncology populations (69% M; age 1-96 years; 58% H&N cancer; 10% inpatient, 90% outpatient). DIGEST was reported in 12,137/13,088 exams over the 6-year implementation period representing 93% (95% CI: 93-94%) adoption in all exams and 99% (95% CI: 98-99%) of exams excluding the total laryngectomy population (n = 730). DIGEST reporting varied modestly by year, cancer type, and setting/provider (> 91% in all subgroups, p < 0.001). Accuracy of DIGEST reporting was high for overall DIGEST (incorrect SE profile 1.6%, 200/12,137), DIGEST-safety (incorrect PAS 0.4% 51/12,137) and DIGEST-efficiency (incorrect residue 1.2%, 148/12,137). Clinical implementation of DIGEST was feasible with high fidelity in a busy oncology practice across a large number of providers. Adoption of the tool across the lifespan in diverse cancer diagnoses may motivate validation beyond H&N oncology.

A Case of Suspected Metastatic Lung Cancer With Delayed Neurologic Presentation

This case report details the clinical journey of an 81-year-old male presenting with significant weight loss, seizures, dysphagia, and rapidly progressive right-sided hearing loss. Initially, he experienced a tonic-clonic seizure, prompting an extensive diagnostic workup. Imaging studies, including CT and MRI, revealed multifocal cortical lesions, initially misinterpreted as cavernous hemangiomas. Subsequent evaluations confirmed the presence of a malignant mass in the right lung with extensive pulmonary metastasis. The diagnosis of metastatic lung cancer was established, leading to a multidisciplinary approach focused on palliative care due to the patient's poor prognosis and the complexity of his symptoms. This case underscores the importance of recognizing neurological manifestations in patients with underlying malignancies and the need for integrated care in such complex scenarios.

Swallowing disorders and mortality in adults with advanced cancer outside the head and neck and upper gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although oncological palliative care is increasingly being offered by multidisciplinary teams, there is still a lack of data about some symptoms handled by these teams, such as dysphagia, in patients with advanced cancer outside swallow regions. This study aimed to estimate the occurrence of dysphagia in prognosis studies of adults with advanced cancer outside the head, neck, and upper gastrointestinal tract, and to determine if there is an association with mortality.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies that evaluated dysphagia and mortality was conducted (PROSPERO: CRD42021257172).

DATA SOURCES

BVS, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus. Data between 2011 and 2023 were selected.

RESULTS

Among the 608 articles screened, only 14 were included, which covered different types of cancer, primarily Lung, and Genitourinary, Skin, Hematological, and Central Nervous System as well. Dysphagia demonstrated a variable frequency, and almost half of the studies found a percentage of dysphagia above 60%, appearing most as a symptom that affects health-related quality of life and prove to be a toxicity of treatment. The association between dysphagia and mortality was only evaluated in three articles that studied advanced lung cancer, in which, after controlling for covariates, swallowing disorders were associated with worse survival, with prevalences of dysphagia and hazard ratios of 78.5% (1.12 [1.04-1.20]), 4% (1.34 [1.28-1.35]), and 3% (1.40 [1.07-1.81]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of dysphagia in advanced cancer outside the head, neck, and upper GI tract is common, and there seems to be an association with significantly decreased survival in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Incidence of dysphagia requiring medical attention in various types of cancers: A nationwide population-based cohort study

PURPOSE

Most previous reports on dysphagia in cancer have focused on specific cancer types, particularly head and neck cancer. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidence of dysphagia in patients with various cancers using a nationwide database in South Korea.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Service database. Claim codes were used for the selection criteria and operational definitions. The total population data from 2010 to 2015 were extracted. The crude incidence of dysphagia was calculated per 1,000 person-years. The multivariate adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the effects of different cancers on the incidence of dysphagia.

RESULTS

People with cancer had a lower income and suffered from a higher risk of comorbidities compared to people without cancer. The risk of dysphagia increased in all types of cancers, particularly in the oral cavity and pharynx (hazard ratio [HR]: 20.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.73-24.06), esophagus (HR: 18.25, 95% CI: 15.66-21.26), larynx (HR: 12.87, 95% CI: 10.33-16.02), and central nervous system (HR: 12.42, 95% CI: 10.33-14.94).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of dysphagia was significantly higher in the cancer group than in the non-cancer group. As the survival of cancer patients is improving with the development of new treatments, more attention should be paid to dysphagia in the management of cancer. Prompt and appropriate multidisciplinary interventions for dysphagia are necessary to improve the recovery and quality of life in cancer patients.

Nutrition impact symptoms: Noteworthy prognostic indicators for lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Nutrition impact symptoms (NIS) in head and neck cancer are well-studied and are found to be heavy contributors of poor outcome. However, the prevalence and role of NIS in other cancer are less addressed. In this study, we investigated the incidence and prognostic role of NIS in patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

NIS, evaluated by patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) in a multicenter real-world prospective study, included loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, mouth ulcer, constipation, diarrhea, dry mouth, taste change, altered smell, dysphagia, early satiety, and pain. The endpoints were the patients' overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). The COX analysis was used to investigate the relationship between NIS and OS. Interaction analysis and mediation analysis were performed to determine the modifiers and mediator.

RESULTS

3634 patients with lung cancer were enrolled in this study, of which 1533 patients had NIS. During the average follow-up of 22.65 months, 1875 deaths occurred. The OS of patients with lung cancer with NIS was lower than that of patients without NIS. NIS (HR, 1.181, 95% CI, 1.073-1.748), loss of appetite (HR, 1.266, 95% CI, 1.137-1.409), vomiting (HR, 1.282, 95% CI, 1.053-1.561), and dysphagia (HR, 1.401, 95% CI, 1.079-1.819) were independent prognostic factors in patients with lung cancer. There were interactions between chemotherapy and primary tumor on NIS . In the relationship between different types of NIS (NIS, loss of appetite, vomiting, dysphagia) and prognosis, the mediating effects of inflammation accounted for 15.76%, 16.49%, 26.32%, and 18.13%, respectively. Meanwhile, these three NIS were closely associated with the occurrence of severe malnutrition and cancer cachexia.

CONCLUSIONS

42% patients with lung cancer experienced different types of NIS. NIS were independent indicators of malnutrition, cancer cachexia and shorter OS, and closely related to QoL. NIS management is of clinical significance.

Dysphagia in Solid Tumors Outside the Head, Neck or Upper GI Tract: Clinical Characteristics

CONTEXT

Dysphagia is common in cancer, but underlying pathophysiology and manifestations within patients are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To examine dysphagia characteristics in those with solid malignancies outside the head, neck and upper gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS

Seventy-three individuals with dysphagia (46 male, 27 female, aged 37-91) were recruited from a parent trial conducted in two acute hospitals and one hospice. Cranial nerve function, Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT), Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) evaluated swallow profile.

RESULTS

Only 9/73 (12%) had documented dysphagia prior to study enrollment. MASA risk ratings found n=61/73 (84%) with dysphagia risk and n=22/73 (30%) with aspiration risk. Food texture modification was required for n=34/73 (47%), fluid texture modification for n=1/73 (1%). Compensatory strategies for food were needed by n=13/73 (18%) and for fluids by n=24/73 (33%). Cranial nerve deficits were present in n=43/73 (59%). Oral health problems were common, with xerostomia in two-thirds. Worse dysphagia on MASA was associated with disease progression, affecting hospice, and palliative care the most. Worse performance status was indicative of poorer MASA raw score (P<0.001, OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5-3.4), greater risk of aspiration (P=0.005, OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.6) and lower FOIS (P=0.004, OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2).

CONCLUSION

Dysphagia management in those with cancer requires robust assessment to uncover clinically important needs like food texture modification and safe swallowing advice. Better assessment tools should be developed for this purpose. Oral health problems should be routinely screened in this population since they exacerbate dysphagia.

Dysphagia Prevalence and Predictors in Cancers Outside the Head, Neck, and Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

CONTEXT

Dysphagia is usually associated with malignancies of the head, neck, and upper gastrointestinal tract but also occurs in those with tumors outside anatomic swallow regions. It can lead to aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, reduced quality of life, and psychosocial distress. No studies have yet reliably described dysphagia prevalence in those with malignancies outside anatomic swallow regions.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to establish the prevalence and predictors of dysphagia in adults with solid malignancies outside the head, neck, and upper gastrointestinal tract.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, observational study using consecutive sampling was conducted. There were 385 participants (mean age 66 ± 12 years) with 21 different primary cancer sites from two acute hospitals and one hospice. Locoregional disease was present in 33%, metastatic in 67%. Dysphagia was screened by empirical questionnaire and confirmed through swallow evaluation. Demographic and clinical predictors were determined by univariate and multivariate binary regression.

RESULTS

Dysphagia occurred in 19% of those with malignancies outside anatomic swallow regions. Prevalence was 30% in palliative care and 32% in hospice care. Dysphagia was most strongly associated with cough, nausea, and worse performance status. It was also associated with lower quality of life and nutritional difficulties.

CONCLUSION

Dysphagia was common and usually undiagnosed before study participation. It occurred at all disease stages but coincided with functional decline. It may therefore represent a cancer frailty marker. Oncology and palliative care services should routinely screen for this symptom. Timely dysphagia identification and management may improve patient well-being and prevent adverse effects like aspiration pneumonia and weight loss.

The prevalence of patient-reported dysphagia and oral complications in cancer patients

PURPOSE

Research investigating swallowing problems (dysphagia) and complications within the oral cavity in non-head and neck cancer patients is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of patient-reported dysphagia and oral complications in all cancer patients and to examine the relationships between cancer types, oral complications and dysphagia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at a specialist cancer centre in Australia. Data on patient-reported dysphagia and oral complications were collected using the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey (version 2.0) which was completed by participants in one of three settings: inpatients, ambulatory patients receiving chemotherapy, or ambulatory patients receiving radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 239 patients, receiving treatment for 14 cancer types. The proportion of patients who reported dysphagic symptoms were as follows: any dysphagia (54%); dysphagia for liquids (20%); and dysphagia for solids (46%). Significantly more head and neck patients and significantly fewer breast patients reported dysphagia, but there were no differences between other tumour types. Oral symptoms across all cancer types were reported at the following rates: taste changes (62%); xerostomia (56%); voice changes (37%); smell changes (35%); thick mucous (33%); difficulty with teeth/dentures (25%); mouth/throat pain (20%); and trismus (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first time comprehensive data on dysphagia and oral complications across all cancer patients have been collected. We have identified that dysphagic symptoms and oral complications-which have implications for quality of life and function-are common in all cancer patients, not just those with head and neck cancer.

Revisión sistemática para el abordaje de síntomas desagradables gastrointestinales en cuidados paliativos

Introducción: Este artículo de revisión sistemática pretende examinar en detalle la evidencia cientifica para el abordaje desde la enfermería, en el manejo de síntomas desagradables, gastrointestinales tales como: síndrome anorexia caquexia, disfagia, náuseas y vómito enfocado al cuidado paliativo, basados en el referente teórico del modelo revisado del manejo de síntomas de Marylin J. Dodd. Materiales y Métodos: La estrategia que se realizó fue la del sistema PICO, metodológicamente se estableció una pregunta la cual se contesta con la selección de los artículos que se realizó, continuando con la revisión sistemática se aplica la declaración (PRISMA), la investigación de los artículos fue realizada en las bases de datos Medline, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Pubmed, Dialnet, Ebscohost, ProQuest y Elsevier. Dentro de los criterios de inclusión, se tuvo en cuenta principalmente los artículos que fomentan el manejo de los síntomas gastrointestinales en cuidado paliativo. Resultados: A pesar de que se evidencia los avances en conocimiento, se identifica que son insuficientes los estudios en este campo, mostrando la necesidad y la obligación de desarrollar el manejo y control de los síntomas desagradables gastrointestinales, el manejo del síntoma debe ser basado en: la experiencia del síntoma desde la percepción, evaluación y respuesta. Discusión: La evidencia muestra las diferentes maneras de abordar los síntomas desagradables gastrointestinales, con una mirada holística, en constante movimiento, resaltando que se debe intervenir, desde la dimensión espiritual, física y social. Conclusiones: La intención es contribuir con evidencia científica para abordar los síntomas desagradables gastrointestinales.Como citar este artículo: Jaramillo DMG, Muñoz CO, Nuvan ANS, Benavides FPA. Revisión sistemática para el abordaje de síntomas desagradables gastrointestinales en cuidados paliativos. Rev Cuid. 2019; 10(1): e615. http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.v10i1.615