Remimazolam besilate, a benzodiazepine, has been approved for general anesthesia!!

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of remimazolam and midazolam for general anesthesia in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients are a vulnerable group with high perioperative risks. Thus, reducing the duration of anesthesia is important. Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine sedative commonly used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia given its rapid induction and rapid recovery. Most reports have focused on nonelderly patients.

AIM

To compare the time to loss of consciousness, length of PACU stay and incidence of adverse events in patients older than 65 years who received remimazolam for general anesthesia with those of patients who received midazolam.

METHODS

This study was conducted at a university hospital between February 2022 and March 2023. We included 100 patients aged 65 years or older who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into 2 groups, namely, the midazolam group and the remimazolam group, with 50 patients in each group. The primary outcome was the time to loss of consciousness. The secondary outcomes included the time to extubation and length of PACU stay. We also recorded the percentage of flumazenil used and incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Clinical data from 96 patients who were scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia were included in the final analysis, with 46 patients in the remimazolam group and 50 patients in the midazolam group. The time to loss of consciousness was 304 (222, 330) s in the remimazolam group and 95 (67, 25) s in the midazolam group, and the difference was significant (p = 0.000). The time to extubation was 24.93 ± 11.617 min in the remimazolam group and 34.88 ± 19.740 min in the midazolam group, revealing a significant difference (p = 0.003). The length of PACU stay was 55 (48, 64) min in the remimazolam group and 65 (55, 85) min in the midazolam group, and the difference was significant (p = 0.001). The percentage of flumazenil used was 6% in the remimazolam group and 20% in the midazolam group, and the difference was significant (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

General anesthesia with remimazolam has been shown to be effective and safe for surgery in elderly patients. The time to extubation was significantly shorter, length of PACU stay was shorter, and percentage of flumazenil used was lower in the remimazolam group than in the midazolam group.

Comparison between single bolus dose administration and continuous infusion of remimazolam for general anesthesia induction in non-cardiac surgery: a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine anesthetic recommended for continuous infusion during anesthesia induction. However, the safety and efficacy of single bolus dose administration remain under investigation. This study compared continuous infusion with single bolus dose administration and assessed the safety of a single bolus dose administration.

METHODS

The participants were randomly assigned into three groups based on the method of remimazolam administration the day before surgery: (1) continuous infusion group (continuous infusion at 12 mg/kg/h), (2) single bolus dose administration of 0.1 group (single administration of 0.1 mg/kg), or (3) single bolus dose administration of 0.2 group (single administration of 0.2 mg/kg). The time between drug administration and loss of consciousness was determined, and hemodynamic monitoring was performed.

RESULTS

67 patients (continuous infusion group (n = 22), single bolus dose administration of 0.1 group (n = 22), and single bolus dose administration of 0.2 group (n = 23)) were included in the study. The different times to loss of consciousness were 88.2 ± 16.2 s, 59.5 ± 31.5 s, and 42.6 ± 11.4 s in the continuous infusion group, single bolus dose administration of 0.1 group, and single bolus dose administration of 0.2 group, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of adverse events between the groups. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose remimazolam is a safe method for anesthesia induction, resulting in shorter time to loss of consciousness compared with continuous infusion, while maintaining a similar incidence of adverse events.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCTs061230049, registered on 17/08/2023.

Comparison of remimazolam and sevoflurane for general anesthesia during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

Safe perioperative management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is crucial. Remimazolam is a newly developed short-acting benzodiazepine. We hypothesized that combining remimazolam and flumazenil would reduce emergence time compared with sevoflurane in patients undergoing general anesthesia for TAVI.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized, parallel-design, open-label, single-centre clinical trial between June 2022 and August 2023 at Kagoshima University Hospital. We allocated patients randomly to either the remimazolam/flumazenil group or the sevoflurane group. Patients in the remimazolam group received iv remimazolam whereas patients in the sevoflurane group received sevoflurane for general anesthesia maintenance. Patients in both groups received a remifentanil infusion throughout the TAVI procedure (0.2 μg·kg-1·min-1 iv). Remimazolam and sevoflurane were adjusted to maintain a Bispectral Index™ (Covidien/Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) of 40-60. In the remimazolam group, flumazenil (0.2 mg iv) was administered immediately after remimazolam discontinuation. The primary outcome was time to extubation. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative variables (hemodynamic variables and vasopressor dose), rate of intra- and postoperative complications, and recovery of muscle strength.

RESULTS

Overall, 60 patients were enrolled, and data from 56 were included. The median [interquartile range] time to extubation was significantly shorter in the remimazolam group than in the sevoflurane group (6.5 [5.1-8.1] min vs 14.2 [10.9-15.9] min; difference in medians, -6.9 min; 95% confidence interval, -8.7 to -5.0; P < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were observed in the perfusion index (P = 0.03) and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (P = 0.03) between the groups. No significant differences between the two groups were seen in other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with sevoflurane, a combination of remimazolam and flumazenil significantly reduced the time to extubation in patients undergoing general anesthesia for TAVI. Therefore, remimazolam may be a suitable choice for general anesthesia in patients undergoing TAVI.

STUDY REGISTRATION

UMIN.ac.jp ( UMIN000047892 ); first posted 30 May 2022.

Recovery of sedation and psychomotor and equilibrium functions following remimazolam anesthesia with or without flumazenil: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

Background

Prompt awakening and sufficient recovery of psychomotor and equilibrium functions are important for day surgery. Flumazenil accelerates recovery of consciousness after remimazolam anesthesia, but its effects on psychomotor and equilibrium functions are not well known. The purpose of this study was to determine whether flumazenil improves time to recovery, psychomotor, and equilibrium functions in subjects undergoing remimazolam anesthesia.

Methods

The design was a single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-64 years scheduled for oral surgery under remimazolam anesthesia, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II. The predictor variable was the use of a reversal agent (flumazenil group) versus placebo (non-flumazenil group). The primary outcome variable was recovery from sedation measured using the Modified Observer's Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale for wakefulness. Secondary outcome variables were psychomotor function measured using the Trieger Dot Test (number of dots missed [NDM], maximum distance of dots missed [MDDM]), and the digit symbol substitution test (DSST), as well as equilibrium function measured using the timed up and go test (TUG), and gravimetric area and speed. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test, Student's t-test, two-way ANOVA, and Bonferroni correction. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Sixty-eight subjects were included (male: 33, female: 35). The mean time from extubation to an MOAA/S score of 5 (minutes) was 6.5 (1.5-10.5) in the flumazenil group and 13.5 (6.8-19.3) in the non-flumazenil group (P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the recovery of psychomotor and balance functions between the two groups. However, the following measurements were significantly increased compared to baseline: NDM (P < 0.001) and DSST (P < 0.001) at 30 minutes, MDDM (P < 0.001), TUG (P < 0.001), and gravimetric speed (P < 0.001) at 60 minutes, and gravimetric area (P = 0.03) at 90 minutes.

Conclusion

Administration of flumazenil after remimazolam anesthesia resulted in faster recovery of consciousness, but it did not affect the recovery of psychomotor and equilibrium functions. The time until patients were safe to return home was 120 minutes. Flumazenil did not improve the time until it was safe for patients to return home.

Effects of different doses of remimazolam on the quality of sedation and cardiac function in elderly patients: a double-blind randomised controlled study

Background

We intended to observe the effects of different doses of remimazolam besylate via intravenous induction on the quality of sedation and cardiac function in elderly patients.

Methods

A total of 135 ASA I-III patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected. They were divided into three groups and they were randomized. Low dose group (Group L): Remimazolam besylate 0.2 mg/kg; middle dose group (Group M): Remimazolam besylate 0.3 mg/kg; High dose group (Group H): Remimazolam besylate 0.4 mg/kg. There were 45 patients in each group. The blood pressure, heart rate, BIS values, cardiac function before induction (T0), after induction (T1) and after intubation (T2), as well as the length of loss of consciousness, duration of sedation, and extubation and adverse events were recorded.

Results

At T1 and T2, systolic and diastolic blood pressure in Group M were lower than those in Group L, but higher than those in Group H, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). At T1 and T2, the BIS value in Group M was lower than that in Group L, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in BIS values between Group M and Group H; At T1 and T2, the cardiac output and stroke volume in Group M were higher than those in Group H, while the systemic vascular resistance in Group M was lower than that in Group H, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05); The incidences of bucking when moving and hiccup in Group L were higher than those in Group M and Group H, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The number of vasoactive drugs used in Group H was higher than that in Group L and Group M, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

General anesthesia induction with remimazolam besylate at 0.3 mg/kg in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy showed good quality of sedation, could achieve rapid intubation, with minimal effect on cardiac function and generally favorable safety profile.

Remimazolam in Cardiac Anesthesia: Analysis of Recent Data

Interest in remimazolam has surged in recent years, thanks to its advantageous pharmacologic profile. This ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine is noted for its rapid onset and termination of action, organ-independent elimination, availability of a reversal agent, and excellent hemodynamic stability. Although the use of remimazolam has been explored in various anesthesia settings and procedures, data on its application in cardiovascular anesthesia and catheterization laboratory procedures remain limited. This review evaluates the latest literature to assess remimazolam's role in cardiovascular anesthesia across different settings and procedures. The analysis shows that remimazolam offers anesthesia without significant hemodynamic instability and a reduced need for vasopressors, with an incidence of perioperative adverse events comparable to that of other agents. These findings are relevant for both the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in catheterization laboratory procedures and general anesthesia in elective cardiac surgery. Although further research is needed to fully understand remimazolam's role in cardiovascular anesthesia, its favorable hemodynamic and safety profile suggests that it is a promising option for cardiac anesthesiologists in both the catheterization laboratory and the operating room.

The sedation efficacy of different doses of remimazolam in elderly patients with regional nerve block anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine sedative that is indicated for induction and maintenance during general anaesthesia. Remimazolam is also used for sedation in outpatient surgery; however, most reports have focused on nonelderly patients, whereas only a few studies have reported the use of remimazolam for elderly patients when receiving regional nerve block anaesthesia.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different doses of remimazolam in elderly patients when specifically related to regional nerve block anaesthesia.

METHODS

This study was conducted at a university hospital between February 2022 and March 2023. We included 80 patients aged 65 years or older under regional nerve block anaesthesia. After the effects of anaesthesia were determined, patients were intravenously administered different doses of the test drug, i.e. 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, or 6 mg, which were named the R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the loss of consciousness time. The secondary outcomes included the maintenance time and the number of assisted ventilators needed. The exceptional response of patients in terms of loss of consciousness maintenance time, the mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), SpO2, and modified observers assessment of alertness/sedation (MOAA/S) scores were recorded at baseline (T0), 3 min after the injection of the test drug (T1), 6 min after the injection of the test drug (T2), 9 min after the injection of the test drug (T3), 12 min after the injection of the test drug (T4), 15 min after the injection of the test drug (T5), 18 min after the injection of the test drug (T6), 21 min after the injection of the test drug (T7), and 24 min after the injection of the test drug (T8).

RESULTS

We included 80 patients according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 16 patients in each group. There were no significant differences in sex, age, and BMI amongst the 5 groups. The loss of consciousness time was significantly greater in the R2 group than in the R3, R4, and R5 groups (p < 0.001), and the loss of consciousness maintenance time was significantly greater in the R5 group than in the R3 group (p < 0.05). The MAP was significantly lower in the R2 and R5 groups than in the R1 group at T4 (p = 0.004) and significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1 group at T5 (p = 0.007). The HR was significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R3 group at T3 (p = 0.004) and T4 (p = 0.007). The RR was significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R4 group at T4 (p = 0.049) and significantly greater in the R4 group than in the R2 group at T5 (p = 0.024) and T6 (p = 0.020). The RR was significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1, R3 and R4 groups at T7 (p = 0.001). The RR was significantly greater in the R1 group than in the R2 and R5 groups at T8 (p = 0.001). The RR was significantly greater in the R4 group than in the R2 group at T8 (p = 0.001). SpO2 was significantly lower in the R3 group than in the R1 group at T3 (p = 0.003) and significantly lower in the R3 group than in the R1 and R5 groups at T4 (p = 0.002), T5 (p = 0.001), T6 (p = 0.000), and T7 (p = 0.000). The MOAA/S scores were significantly lower in the R4 and R5 groups than in the R1 and R2 groups at T1 (p = 0.000), significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1 and R3 groups at T2 (p = 0.004), and significantly lower in the R5 group than in the R1 group at T3 (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that doses of 5-5.5 mg remimazolam are more suitable for sedation in elderly patients, and the loss of consciousness time and depth of sedation differed according to the remimazolam dosage. Doses of 5-5.5 mg remimazolam were associated with adequate levels of sedation in elderly patients and with a decreased risk of complications, whilst haemodynamic fluctuations occurred approximately 12-15 min after the administration of remimazolam.

Remimazolam anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines are used in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) because of their mild hemodynamic depressant effects. A novel short-acting benzodiazepine, remimazolam, is expected to be suitable for these patients. We examined the characteristics of remimazolam anesthesia in pediatric patients with CHD undergoing cardiac catheterization.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for CHD. The primary outcome was the remimazolam dose for loss of consciousness. Secondary outcomes included the mean maintenance remimazolam dose, recovery time from anesthesia, predicted remimazolam concentration at emergence, decrease in blood pressure and heart rate, vasopressor administration during anesthesia, electroencephalogram index (bispectral index: BIS or patient state index: PSI), and life-threatening adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients, aged 2 months to 16 years, were included. Thirty-three patients received a median [interquartile] midazolam dose of 0.10 [0.10-0.10] mg.kg-1 in the pre-anesthesia room. The remimazolam dose for loss of consciousness was 0.34 [0.26-0.45] mg.kg-1. The mean maintenance dose was 1.0 [0.8-1.4] mg.kg-1.h-1. The recovery time was 15 [12-17] min. The predicted remimazolam concentration at emergence was 0.4-1.2 µg.ml-1 in 3-6-year-old patients. Blood pressure and heart rate decreased by 30% in 15 and 6 patients, respectively. Vasopressors were administered as a bolus in 8 patients. The BIS or PSI did not fall ≤ 60 or ≤ 50, respectively, in 51% of patients before tracheal intubation. No life-threatening adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam is a good alternative anesthetic agent for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for CHD.

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate in anesthesia for short otolaryngology surgery

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam tosilate represents the novel ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine drug. This work focused on exploring whether remimazolam tosilate was effective and safe in anesthesia for short otolaryngology surgery in adults, and optimize its medication regimen, thus providing a theoretical basis for its widespread clinical application.

METHODS

The present unicentric, double-blind, randomized controlled study enrolled altogether 85 otolaryngology surgery patients aged 18-60 years, and they were divided as remimazolam (RM, 42 cases) or midazolam (MD, 43 cases) group. Efficacy outcomes included successful sedation time, sedation effect (Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score), bispectral index values (BIS), and postoperative recovery. The safety outcomes were patient vital signs at each time point (before induction (T0), 2 min and 5 min after trial drug treatment (T1 and T2 separately), during successful intubation (T3), at the end of surgery (T4), during extubation (T5), and at the time of exiting the room (T6)), any adverse reactions (AEs) during perioperative period, and patient satisfaction with anesthesia experience.

RESULTS

Demographics were not significantly different in both groups (P > 0.05). RM group had significantly decreased successful sedation time relative to MD group (P < 0.05), while increased successful sedation rate (100%) relative to MD group (90.70%, P = 0.116). RM group showed decreased MOAA/S score and BIS value compared with MD group at T1 and T2 (P < 0.05). The spontaneous respiration recovery time and extubation time were not significantly different in both groups (P > 0.05), but RM group exhibited decreased discharge time compared with MD group (P < 0.05). Compared with MD group, the RM group had lower blood pressure (BP) at T3 (P < 0.05); whereas higher heart rate (HR) and respiration rate (RR) at T1 and T2 (P < 0.05). Difference in AEs was not of statistical significance. Finally, RM group exhibited the increased satisfaction of anesthesia experience compared with MD group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam tosilate is effective on anesthesia for short otolaryngology surgery. Remimazolam shows the rapid onset, stable circulation, fast postoperative recovery, no increase in perioperative AEs, and high satisfaction with anesthesia experience compared with midazolam.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.chictr.org.cn/ (ChiCTR2200067123) on 27/12/2022. This study was consistent with CONSORT guidelines.

Clinical experience with remimazolam in pediatric anesthesiology: An educational focused review

Remimazolam is a novel ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, which like midazolam, results in sedation, anxiolysis, and amnesia through its agonistic effects on the gamma-amino butyric acid A receptor. As opposed to midazolam, its unique metabolism is via tissue esterases, which results in a rapid elimination with a limited context sensitive half-life and prompt dissipation of its effect when administration is discontinued. Remimazolam received FDA approval for use in adults in 2020. In preliminary and initial clinical trials, its efficacy and safety has been suggested in the adult population, both as a primary agent for procedural sedation or as an adjunct to general anesthesia. There are limited data regarding the use of remimazolam in infants and children and its use in this population remains off label as it does not hold FDA-approval in pediatric-aged patients. This narrative outlines the pharmacologic properties of this unique medication, reviews previous published reports of its role in pediatric-aged patients, and discusses dosing parameters and clinical use in this population.

Comparison of the anesthetic effects of remimazolam tosilate and remimazolam besylate in daytime hysteroscopic surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to observe whether there is a difference in the anesthetic effect of remimazolam tosilate and remimazolam besylate in daytime hysteroscopic surgery, so as to provide reference for clinical application.

METHODS

Fifty patients, aged 18-65 years, ASA I-II, scheduled for hysteroscopy under total intravenous anesthesia were selected. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (n = 25): remimazolam tosilate group (group T) and remimazolam besylate group ( group R). The main observation index was the induction dose of remimazolam; secondary observation indicators were sleep time, anesthesia maintenance time, recovery time, induction maintenance dose of alfentanil, maintenance dose of remimazolam, and incidence of adverse events during anesthesia ( hypertension, hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in anesthesia induction dose, recovery time, sleep time, anesthesia maintenance time, and incidence of adverse events during anesthesia ( body movement, cough, hypertension, hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia) between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the anesthetic effect of remimazolam tosilate and remimazolam besylate in daytime hysteroscopic surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2400081688.

Remimazolam Anesthesia for Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy Mitigates Postoperative Agitation

Postoperative complications, such as immediate postoperative blood pressure elevation, agitation, and delirium, have been associated with modified electroconvulsive therapy (mECT). Remimazolam may reduce postoperative delirium; however, there are no reports of its use in mECT. Herein, we present a case of effective convulsions and calm arousal with remimazolam in a patient with a history of postoperative agitation. The patient was a 45-year-old man who was diagnosed with severe depression and psychotic symptoms and was treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Owing to previous episodes of agitation upon awakening, remimazolam and suxamethonium were administered, and mECT was performed under general anesthesia to ensure effective convulsions and calm awakening. Intraoperative vital signs were normal, with no signs of agitation post-treatment. Remimazolam administration for general anesthesia induction for mECT effectively induced convulsions and suppressed postoperative excitation. However, its effect on convulsions during mECT remains unclear, warranting further investigation.

Comparison of Hemodynamic Effects of Remimazolam and Midazolam During Anesthesia Induction in Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective and Exploratory Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery may experience hemodynamic instability during the induction of general anesthesia, and anesthetic agents with minimal hemodynamic effects should be administered. Midazolam, a classic benzodiazepine anesthetic, is known to have relatively weak circulatory depression during anesthesia induction compared to other sedatives. On the other hand, remimazolam, a newly approved short-acting benzodiazepine anesthetic, is expected to have fewer circulatory depressant effects. However, comparisons between remimazolam and midazolam regarding circulatory depression during anesthesia induction have not been adequately studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the hemodynamic effects of remimazolam and midazolam during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

METHOD

In this single-center retrospective and exploratory study, adults undergoing cardiovascular surgery under general anesthesia were divided into the remimazolam group (R group) and midazolam group (M group). Remimazolam 0.06 mg/kg (R group) or midazolam 0.03 mg/kg (M group) was administered during induction of general anesthesia. Both groups received remifentanil 1 μg/kg/min as analgesia. During anesthesia induction, additional sedatives (remimazolam or midazolam, respectively) were administered as needed to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) below 60. The primary endpoints were the following hemodynamic parameters: mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), and stroke volume variation (SVV). Measurements were taken before the induction of anesthesia, one and three minutes after rocuronium administration, and one, three, five, and 10 minutes after tracheal intubation. Secondary endpoints included the number of patients requiring vasopressors and vasopressor dosage, time to fall asleep, and BIS values. All values are expressed as the median (interquartile range). Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Statistically significant differences were set at p-values <0.05.

RESULTS

Forty patients (20 in each group) were included in the final analysis. The doses of remimazolam and midazolam until sleep onset were 0.058 (0.053, 0.066) mg/kg in the R group and 0.035 (0.03, 0.045) mg/kg in the M group. The MAP at five minutes and 10 minutes after tracheal intubation was significantly higher in the R group than in the M group (p=0.031 and p=0.004, respectively). The HR, CI, SVI, SVRI, and SVV were not significantly different between the two groups at any of the measurement points. The number of patients requiring vasopressors and vasopressor dosage were not statistically significant between the two groups. The time to fall asleep was 124 seconds (90, 142) in the R group and 146 seconds (130, 167) in the M group, with a significant difference (p=0.01). The BIS values during anesthesia induction were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam had fewer hemodynamic effects than midazolam, even with relatively high doses and an earlier sleep onset. In terms of hemodynamic stability, remimazolam may be beneficial during anesthetic induction; however, further research is needed to confirm its efficacy.

[Remimazolam-Update on basic pharmacologic principles and clinical potential]

In recent years the still relatively new short-acting benzodiazepine remimazolam has been approved and clinically implemented in several countries and regions. Remimazolam is also now approved in the EU and the market launch in Germany is expected in the not too distant future. This is therefore a good point in time to summarize the current evidence for various areas of application, including general anesthesia, sedation and intensive care medicine as well as different dosing schemes.

Effectiveness of remimazolam in preventing postoperative delirium in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures

PURPOSE

Elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures are known to be a high-risk group for postoperative delirium (POD). The aim of this study was to determine the association of the benzodiazepine drug remimazolam with POD in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective observational study, we included patients aged 65 years or older who underwent general anesthesia for proximal femoral fractures. We collected data for the incidence of POD within 3 days after surgery. We also obtained data for complications, preoperative blood examinations, maintenance anesthetic and intraoperative vital data. The occurrence of POD in patients who received remimazolam for general anesthesia (remimazolam group) was compared to that in patients who received general anesthesia with other anesthetic agents (other group). We finally conducted a multivariate analysis to assess the independent association of remimazolam with the risk of POD.

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients, including 54 patients who received remimazolam for maintenance anesthesia, were included in this study. The incidence of POD in the patients was 26.1%. The incidence of delirium within 3 days after surgery was significantly lower in the remimazolam group than in the other group (14.8% vs. 29.5%, p  =  0.03). The multivariate analysis showed that the use of remimazolam independently reduced the occurrence of POD (adjusted odds ratio  =  0.42, p  =  0.04).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective observational study showed that the use of remimazolam is independently associated with a reduced incidence of POD. Remimazolam may be considered as an option to reduce POD in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures.

Remimazolam: its clinical pharmacology and evolving role in anesthesia and sedation practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine anesthetic/sedative, designed as a rapidly metabolized carboxylic acid. Since its recent launch, the role of remimazolam in modern anesthesia and sedation practice is still evolving. This review aims to outline the clinical pharmacology and clinical utility of remimazolam to elucidate its potential advantages and limitations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Remimazolam is "short-acting" but not ultra-short-acting compared with propofol based on context-sensitive decrement times. But compared to propofol, the availability of the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, is considered an advantage, particularly in certain emergency situations such as in patients with difficult airways. However, because flumazenil is shorter acting than remimazolam when remimazolam accumulates or is present in a high concentration, the reappearance of remimazolam sedation may occur after the initial reversal of anesthesia/sedation from flumazenil administration. Although it is beneficial that remimazolam causes less respiratory depression and hypotension than propofol, serious respiratory depression and hypotension can still occur. Remimazolam administration causes minimal or no pain on injection. Remimazolam is associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting than inhaled anesthetics, but propofol is clearly superior in this regard. The anesthetic/sedative effects may be prolonged by severe hepatic impairment; remimazolam tolerance can occur in long-term benzodiazepine users.

SUMMARY

Remimazolam may be beneficial to use in procedural sedation and general anesthesia for patients with difficult airways or hemodynamic instability. Further clinical studies with remimazolam are warranted to identify the potential benefits in other settings and patient populations.

Remimazolam anaphylaxis in a patient not allergic to brotizolam: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a recently developed, ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that is used as a general anesthetic. Some cases of remimazolam anaphylaxis have been reported, but its characteristics are not fully understood. We present an interesting case report and review of the literature to better understand remimazolam anaphylaxis.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 75-year-old man scheduled for robot-assisted gastrectomy was administered remimazolam for the induction of general anesthesia. After intubation, low end-expiratory CO2, high airway pressure and concurrent circulatory collapse were observed. Bronchoscopy revealed marked tracheal and bronchial edema, which we diagnosed as anaphylaxis. The patient suffered cardiac arrest after bronchoscopy but recovered immediately with intravenous adrenaline administration and chest compressions. We performed skin prick tests for the drugs used during induction except for remimazolam, considering the high risk of systemic adverse reactions to remimazolam. We diagnosed remimazolam anaphylaxis because the skin prick test results for the other drugs used during anesthesia were negative, and these drugs could have been used without allergic reactions during the subsequent surgery. Furthermore, this patient had experienced severe anaphylactic-like reactions when he underwent cardiac surgery a year earlier, in which midazolam had been used, but it was not thought to be the allergen at that time. Based on these findings, cross-reactivity to remimazolam and midazolam was suspected. However, the patient had previously received another benzodiazepine, brotizolam, to which he was not allergic, suggesting that cross-reactivity of remimazolam may vary among benzodiazepines. In this article, we reviewed the 11 cases of remimazolam anaphylaxis that have been described in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting sedative; however, it can cause life-threatening anaphylaxis. In addition, its cross-reactivity with other benzodiazepines is not fully understood. To increase the safety of this drug, further research and more experience in its use are needed.

Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Total Intravenous Anesthesia between Remimazolam and Propofol for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

This study compared the overall postoperative recovery of patients who underwent total intravenous anesthesia with remimazolam or propofol, using the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15). Seventy-two patients who underwent spine surgery with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) were randomly categorized into the remimazolam group (group R) or propofol group (group P). On the first postoperative day, the QoR-15 scores for groups P and R were 114 and 112, respectively, indicating no significant difference (p = 0.691). Similarly, group-time interaction effects on QoR-15 scores were not significantly different. In the post-anesthesia care unit, the pain intensity at rest was notably higher in group P than in group R (3.0 [0.0] vs. 2.8 [0.5], respectively, p = 0.009). Although the intraoperative consumption of remifentanil was higher in group R (1452.4 µg vs. 2066.8 µg, respectively, p < 0.001), the intraoperative use of vasopressors was lower in group R (1705.6 µg vs. 286.1 µg, respectively, p < 0.001) compared to group P. Group R exhibited significantly lower variability in mean blood pressure over time compared to group P. Remimazolam was viewed as a promising intravenous agent for general anesthesia, showing potential to replace propofol in spine surgery with IONM, considering both recovery quality and intraoperative hemodynamic stability.

Remimazolam attenuates inflammation and kidney fibrosis following folic acid injury

The transition of acute kidney injury (AKI) to chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by intense inflammation and progressive fibrosis. Remimazolam is widely used for procedural sedation in intensive care units, such as AKI patients. Remimazolam has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory and organ-protective properties. However, the role of remimazolam in inflammation and renal fibrosis following AKI remains unclear. Here, we explored the effects of remimazolam on the inflammatory response and kidney fibrogenesis of mice subjected to folic acid (FA) injury. Our results showed that remimazolam treatment alleviated kidney damage and dysfunction. Mice treated with remimazolam presented less collagen deposition in FA-injured kidneys compared with FA controls, which was accompanied by a reduction of extracellular matrix proteins accumulation and fibroblasts activation. Furthermore, remimazolam treatment reduced inflammatory cells infiltration into the kidneys of mice with FA injury and inhibited proinflammatory or profibrotic molecules expression. Finally, remimazolam treatment impaired the activation of bone marrow-derived fibroblasts and blunted the transformation of macrophages to myofibroblasts in FA nephropathy. Additionally, the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist PK-11195 partially reversed the protective effect of remimazolam on the FA-injured kidneys. Overall, remimazolam attenuates the inflammatory response and renal fibrosis development following FA-induced AKI, which may be related to the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor pathway.

Efficacy of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol for total intravenous anaesthesia in urological surgery: A randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative that acts on the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAAR).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacies of remimazolam (RMZ), and propofol (PROP) combined with remifentanil and cisatracurium for total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) in patients undergoing urological surgery.

DESIGN

A prospective, single-blind, randomised, noninferiority clinical trial.

SETTING

Single centre from 1 January 2022 to 30 March 2022.

PATIENTS

A total of 146 adult patients undergoing elective urological surgery.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly allocated in a 1 : 1 ratio to the PROP or RMZ groups. In the PROP group, anaesthesia was induced with propofol at 100 mg min -1 to reach a bispectral index score (BIS) of 40 to 60. After loss of consciousness (LOC), intravenous fentanyl 3 μg kg -1 was administered, followed by cisatracurium 0.3 mg kg -1 . Patients were intubated 3 min after cisatracurium administration. Anaesthesia was maintained with the combination of propofol (plasma concentration: 2.5 to 4 μg ml -1 ) and remifentanil (plasma concentration: 2.5 to 4 ng ml -1 ). In the RMZ group, anaesthesia was induced with remimazolam tosilate starting at 10 mg kg -1  h -1 to reach a BIS of 40 to 60 and maintained between 0.2 and 2 mg kg -1  h -1 . After LOC, fentanyl and cisatracurium were administered and intubation was performed as in the PROP group. Anaesthesia was maintained with a combination of remimazolam (0.2 to 2 mg kg -1  h -1 ) and remifentanil (plasma concentration: 2.5 to 4 ng ml -1 ).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the TIVA success rate. The predefined noninferiority margin considered an absolute difference of 6% in the primary outcome between the groups. The secondary outcomes were vital signs, anaesthesia and surgery characteristics, and adverse events.

RESULTS

All patients completed the trial. The success rates of TIVA with remimazolam and propofol were 100 and 98.6%, respectively. The incidence of hypotension during anaesthesia was lower in the RMZ group (26%) than in the PROP group (46.6%) ( P  = 0.016). The median [IQR] total consumption of ephedrine during anaesthesia was higher in the PROP group 10 [0 to 12.5] mg than in the RMZ group 0 [0 to 10] mg ( P  = 0.0002). The incidence of injection pain was significantly higher in the PROP group (76.7%) than in the RMZ group (0; P  < 0.001). No significant differences in the controllability of the anaesthesia depth, anaesthesia and surgery characteristics, or vital signs were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam demonstrated noninferior efficacy to propofol combined with remifentanil and cisatracurium for TIVA in patients undergoing urological surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2100050923.

CLINICAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100050923, Principal investigator: Xuehai Guan, Date of registration: 8 November 2021, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=133466 ).

Comparison of Remimazolam versus Sevoflurane on the Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial

Purpose

Remimazolam is a newly developed ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine. We compared overall functional recovery, including the postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire scores, between balanced inhalational anesthesia using sevoflurane and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with remimazolam in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Patients and Methods

Seventy-two patients were randomized to the remimazolam (group R) or sevoflurane (group S) group. The primary outcome was the total QoR-15 score on postoperative day (POD) 1. We also assessed the total QoR-15 score on POD2, sub-scores of the QoR-15, perioperative parameters, and postoperative recovery profiles. Group-time interaction effects on the QoR-15 and its sub-scores were analyzed using a linear mixed model.

Results

The total QoR-15 score on POD1 (120.2 in group R vs 114.3 in group S, P=0.189) was not statistically different between the groups. There were no significant group-time interaction effects on total QoR-15 scores. Instead, patients in group R showed significantly better sub-scores in psychological and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) items on POD1, as well as a lower degree of PONV, than those in group S. Among the five dimensions of the QoR-15, a significant group-time interaction effect was observed for psychological support. Group R showed significantly less changeability in blood pressure and heart rate with a lower dose of intraoperatively administered vasopressor than group S.

Conclusion

Considering QoR-15, including PONV reduction, and intraoperative hemodynamic stability, remimazolam can be used as the novel and safe anesthetic agent for maintaining general anesthesia instead of sevoflurane in patients undergoing ACDF.

Remimazolam-Based Anesthesia in Patients with Heart Failure Due to Mitral Regurgitation and Low Left Ventricular Function: A Case Series

Background and Objectives: Remimazolam is a new ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine anesthetic. Remimazolam appears to be useful in patients with severe valvular disease because of its minimal cardiovascular impact. In this retrospective case series study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of remimazolam for maintaining hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction and maintenance. Cases: MitraClip was performed on 18 cases with severe mitral regurgitation with low left ventricular function who presented with heart failure, and remimazolam was administered for general anesthesia with induction (12 mg/kg/h) and maintenance (1 mg/kg/h). The impact of remimazolam on the hemodynamics at anesthetic induction and during anesthetic maintenance was investigated retrospectively using electronic medical records. Blood pressure decreased significantly during anesthetic induction with remimazolam (78.5 [72, 81.25] and 66.1 [62.2, 74.2], median [IQR], p = 0.0001), but only mildly, by about 10 mmHg. There was no significant change in the cardiac index (2.0 [1.8, 2.4] vs. 1.9 [1.8, 2.3], p = 0.57642) or pulse rate (73.5 ± 8.85 vs. 74.7 ± 11.7, mean ± SD, p = 0.0876) during anesthetic induction with remimazolam. All patients underwent MitraClip without major hemodynamic concerns, with no or small increases in inotropes. Conclusions: Remimazolam may be used safely in patients with severe mitral regurgitation and low left ventricular function presenting with heart failure.

Safety and efficacy of remimazolam for general anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Introduction

There is insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of remimazolam in elderly patients. Therefore, this study evaluated the differences in the anesthesia characteristics and perioperative hemodynamic profiles of elderly patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia with remimazolam or propofol.

Methods

Eighty-four patients aged >65 years with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I-III were randomly assigned to Group R (receiving remimazolam, n = 42) or Group P (receiving propofol, n = 42). In Group R, remimazolam was initiated at a rate of 6 mg/kg/h until loss of consciousness (LOC) was achieved and maintained at 1 mg/kg/h subsequently. In Group P, 1.0-1.5 mg/kg of propofol was injected for 1 min and maintained at 100 μg/kg/min subsequently. The maintenance infusion rate was adjusted to maintain an appropriate depth of anesthesia until the end of the surgery. The primary outcome was the time to LOC. The depth of anesthesia scores and hemodynamic profiles were recorded perioperatively.

Results

The time to LOC was significantly longer in Group R (120 s) than in Group P (60 s) (p < 0.001). The time to eye-opening (Group R, 10 min; Group P, 10 min; p = 0.056), the incidence of maintenance of hemodynamic changes within 20% of the peri-anesthetic values, and treatments for hemodynamic instability did not differ significantly between the groups. The depth of anesthesia scores did not differ significantly between the groups; however, the scores were higher in Group R than those in Group P before endotracheal intubation. The hemodynamic parameters did not differ significantly at any time point. The time to extubation was longer in Group R (12 min) than that in Group P (10 min) (p = 0.007). Similarly, the time to discharge from the operating room was significantly longer in Group R (15 min) compared to Group P (12 min) (p = 0.018).

Conclusion

Remimazolam does not exhibit a comparable effect to propofol in terms of anesthesia induction and recovery. However, it demonstrates a similar effect to propofol regarding intraoperative anesthesia depth and hemodynamic profile in elderly patients undergoing remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting after artificial joint replacement surgery: comparison between remimazolam and sevoflurane, a propensity score analysis

PURPOSE

Remimazolam, a newly synthesized ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, has not been previously compared with sevoflurane with regard to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of PONV between remimazolam and sevoflurane among patients undergoing artificial joint replacement surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the electronic medical records of patients who underwent artificial joint replacement surgery at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital from 2020 to 2022, with a focus on comparing the incidence of PONV among those who received sevoflurane versus remimazolam anesthesia. To control for confounding factors, we employed a propensity score-matching technique to pair patients who received sevoflurane anesthesia with those who received remimazolam anesthesia.

RESULTS

The records of 292 patients receiving general anesthesia for artificial joint replacement surgery were collected and categorized into group sevoflurane (n = 241) or group remimazolam (n = 51). Before propensity score matching, age and ASA-PS exhibited significant differences between two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV between them (p = 0.461). After matching, there were 51 patients in each group. However, there is no significant difference in the incidence of PONV between the two matched cohorts (p = 0.243).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that there was no difference in the prevalence of PONV between remimazolam and sevoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing artificial joint replacement surgery.

Monitored Anesthesia Care Under a Combination of Low-Dose Remimazolam Infusion and Flumazenil Antagonism: A Case Report

Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine known for its short-acting properties. The safe use of flumazenil antagonism following remimazolam infusion remains a subject of debate. We present a case of monitored anesthesia care managed to be safe through low-dose remimazolam infusion and flumazenil antagonism. Pharmacokinetic simulations revealed that low-dose remimazolam was practically useful as one of the components of multimodal sedation/analgesia. Subsequent sedation with the readministration of remimazolam after a dose of flumazenil could also be attained.

Remimazolam Compared to Propofol for Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Remifentanil on the Recovery of Psychomotor Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare remimazolam to propofol in psychomotor recovery after total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using the Trieger dot test.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients who were scheduled to undergo endoscopic sinus surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II were randomly allocated to the remimazolam (group R) or propofol group (group P). In group R, all patients received flumazenil postoperatively. After discontinuation of anesthetic agents, the time to eye opening, response to verbal commands, extubation, and discharge from the operation room were measured. Psychomotor recovery was assessed using the Trieger dot test before induction and at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min after anesthesia.

RESULTS

The time to eye opening, response to verbal commands, extubation, and discharge from the operation room were significantly longer in group P compared to group R (group P: 9.8 ± 3.2 min, 11.5 ± 3.4 min, 12.7 ± 3.4 min, 18.1 ± 4.2 min; group R: 6.5 ± 2 min, 7.3 ± 2.6 min, 8.4 ± 2.9 min, 13.2 ± 3.2 min; respectively, p < 0.05). In the Trieger dot test, the number of dots missed was significantly increased in group R compared to group P at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after discharge from the operation room (group R: 20.5 ± 9.3, 16 ± 8.8, 14.9 ± 11.1, 14.3 ± 10.8; group P: 14.6 ± 7.8, 10 ± 7.1, 8.7 ± 7.3, 7.3 ± 5.7; respectively, p < 0.05). The maximum distance of dots missed was significantly increased in group R compared to group P at 30 min after discharge from the operation room (group R: 3.9 ± 2.8; group P: 2.7 ± 1.6; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that remimazolam with flumazenil leads to rapid recovery following anesthesia; however, it may cause delayed psychomotor decline.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (registration number UMIN000044900).

Remimazolam for Pediatric Procedural Sedation: Results of an Institutional Pilot Program

Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative, was first approved in 2020 in Japan as a general anesthetic for adults. However, its utilization in pediatric settings remains unexplored and, to date, is confined to isolated case reports due to a lack of specific pediatric labeling. The primary objective of our study was to evaluate the safety profile of remimazolam when used for procedural sedation in children following dosages established in adult protocols. Additional parameters, including dosage per kg of body weight, duration of the procedure, efficacy (measured as successful completion of the procedure), the necessity for supplemental medications, and changes in physiological parameters, such as the heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), were assessed. Our study encompassed 48 children with an average age of 7.0 years. The objective Tracking and Reporting Outcomes of Procedural Sedation tool indicated no adverse events. In our cohort, propofol and ketamine were used as adjunctive treatments in 8 and 39 patients, respectively, with successful completion of all procedures. Notable hemodynamic variability was observed, with 88.4% of patients experiencing a ≥20% change (increase or decrease) and 62.8% experiencing a ≥30% change in MAP. Additionally, a ≥20% change in HR was observed in 54.3% of patients, and a ≥30% change was observed in 34.8% of patients. Nevertheless, none of the patients required pharmacological intervention to manage these hemodynamic fluctuations. Our findings suggest that remimazolam, when supplemented with propofol or ketamine, could offer a safe and effective pathway for administering procedural sedation in pediatric populations.

Remimazolam's Effects on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Are Similar to Those of Propofol after Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

(1) Background: Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine that prevents postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), is more effective than volatile anesthetics, and was recently approved for use in Japan. (2) Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial study aimed to compare the efficacy of remimazolam and propofol as general anesthetics in terms of the incidence of PONV after laparoscopic gynecological surgery (UMIN000046237). High-risk female patients who underwent general anesthesia with either remimazolam or propofol for the maintenance of anesthesia were enrolled. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV in the two groups (i.e., REM versus PROP) 2 h and 24 h after surgery. The incidence of vomiting without nausea, rescue antiemetic use, and the severity of nausea were also evaluated. (3) Results: No significant differences in PONV were identified between the REM and PROP groups at 2 h or 24 h. Furthermore, no differences were observed in any of the measured parameters, and no adverse events were reported. (4) Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that remimazolam may be as effective as propofol in preventing PONV; however, further investigation is necessary to identify possible differences between these two agents.

Remimazolam Induction in a Patient with Super-Super Obesity and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Case Report

Background: With the rising prevalence of obesity, anesthesiologists are expected to increasingly encounter patients with obesity, which poses challenges for anesthetic management. The use of remimazolam, an intravenous anesthetic agent approved in 2020, may be beneficial in these patients. However, its use in patients with super-super obesity remains underexplored. Case Description: A 55-year-old woman with a body mass index (BMI) of 60.6 kg/m² and moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy under general anesthesia. The transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) technique was used along with the administration of remimazolam at a rate of 6 mg/kg/h based on the total body weight. The patient was sedated within 125 s without any signs of hemodynamic instability, and the surgery was completed successfully. Conclusions: This case study demonstrates the potential effectiveness of remimazolam infusion for inducing general anesthesia in patients with super-super obesity. The infusion rate, derived from the total body weight, yielded an outcome comparable with that observed in individuals without obesity. Further studies with larger cohorts are required to confirm these findings.

Two Cases of Inadequate Response to Remimazolam

We report the inadequate efficacy of remimazolam in two patients undergoing long-term benzodiazepine analog therapy. Remimazolam is a recently developed ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine. It is primarily used as an anesthetic in surgical procedures, as it has minimal effect on cardiac function and antagonists are available. It is expected to become more widely used in the future. On the other hand, similar to other benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine tolerance can also pose a challenge with remimazolam. Herein, we report two cases who were taking long-term oral benzodiazepine analogs. One patient did not fall asleep despite a sufficient dose of remimazolam and required a change to propofol. The other patient required a high dose of remimazolam to fall asleep; however, multiple signs of arousal were noted intraoperatively. Our findings suggest that remimazolam may not be an ideal anesthetic in long-term benzodiazepine analog users. Comprehensive assessment of preoperative medications and careful monitoring of intraoperative sedation levels are necessary. Furthermore, it may be advisable to consider the use of alternative agents such as propofol.

Anesthetic Management Using Remimazolam in a Hemodialysis Patient

Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, is a new intravenous anesthetic used for sedation and general anesthesia. Because remimazolam is primarily metabolized by carboxylesterases in the liver and other tissues including the lung and has metabolites with little or no bioactivity, its anesthetic effect is not significantly influenced by renal dysfunction. Therefore, remimazolam may be considered an appropriate agent for hemodialysis patients and may have added benefits beyond midazolam and propofol. Remimazolam has also been suggested to cause less cardiac depression than propofol. This case report presents an 82-year-old female hemodialysis patient with chronic heart failure who underwent partial glossectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue under general anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil. Hemodynamic control was stable during the anesthetic, which was safely completed without any adverse events and resulted in a rapid, clear emergence without flumazenil. Remimazolam and remifentanil may be appropriate as first-line general anesthetic agents for hemodialysis patients with heart failure.

Remimazolam Anesthesia for Thyroid Surgery

Background

Critical upper airway obstruction, hematoma formation, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy have been reported as postoperative complications of thyroid surgery. Although remimazolam may reduce the risk of these complications, the efficacy of flumazenil with remimazolam has not been reported. We present the successful anesthesia management of thyroid surgery using remimazolam and flumazenil. Case Presentation. A 72-year-old woman was diagnosed with a goiter and scheduled for a partial thyroidectomy under general anesthesia. We used remimazolam for induction and maintenance using a neural integrity monitor, electromyogram, and endotracheal tube under the bispectral index monitor. At the end of the surgery, spontaneous respiration was confirmed after the intravenous administration of sugammadex, and the patient was extubated under mild sedation. In the operating room, we administered flumazenil intravenously to confirm recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and active postoperative hemorrhage. The patient was confirmed to have no recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy under full wakefulness but developed active postoperative hemorrhage with normal blood pressure. The patient required reoperation and was reintubated under intravenous administration of propofol. The anesthesia was maintained using 5% of desflurane, and the patient was extubated without any postoperative problems. The anesthesia was then terminated. The patient had no recall of the procedure.

Conclusion

Maintenance of general anesthesia using remimazolam allowed the use of a neurostimulator with minimal muscle-relaxant effects, and extubation under sedation reduced the risk of abrupt and unexpected changes in blood pressure, body movement, and coughing. Furthermore, after extubation, the patient was rendered fully awake using flumazenil to confirm the presence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and active postoperative hemorrhage. In addition, the patient had no memory of the reoperation, suggesting that the anterograde amnesic effect of remimazolam had a favorable psychological outcome associated with the reoperation. We safely managed thyroid surgery using remimazolam and flumazenil.

Remimazolam Compared to Propofol During Hysteroscopy: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Propofol is the main drug used to induce sedation for endoscopic procedures, and few drugs had shaken its dominant clinical use for a decade until the development of remimazolam. Remimazolam has been demonstrated to perform well in post-marketing studies on sedation for colonoscopy or other procedures requiring short periods of sedation. This study aimed to establish whether remimazolam was effective and safe for inducing sedation for hysteroscopy.

METHODS

One hundred patients who were scheduled to undergo hysteroscopy were randomly assigned to receive induction with remimazolam or propofol. A dose of 0.25 mg/kg remimazolam was administered. Propofol was started at 2-2.5 mg/kg. Before remimazolam or propofol induction, 1 μg/kg fentanyl was infused. Hemodynamic parameters, vital signs, and bispectral index (BIS) values were measured and adverse events recorded to evaluate safety. We comprehensively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the two drugs by the success rate of induction, fluctuation of vital signs, depth of anesthesia, adverse reactions, recovery time, and other indicators.

RESULTS

Information on 83 patients was successfully recorded and carefully documented. The success rate of sedation in the remimazolam group (group R) was 93%, which was lower than for the propofol group (group P) (100%), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of adverse reactions in group R (7.5%) was significantly lower than that in group P (67.4%), and the results were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The fluctuation of vital signs in group P was more severe after induction, especially in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam avoids the injection pain produced by propofol sedation, has a better pre-sedation experience, had the advantage of stable hemodynamics after injection compared to propofol, and a lower respiratory depression rate in the study patients.

An Adequate Infusion Rate of Remimazolam for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adult Patients: A Prospective Up-and-Down Dose-Finding Study

Remimazolam is a recently developed anesthetic agent for general anesthesia and sedation. Currently, the optimal infusion rate for the induction of general anesthesia within two minutes remains unclear. We estimated the 50% and 90% effective doses (ED₅₀ and ED₉₀) of remimazolam required for loss of responsiveness within two minutes in adult patients using the up-and-down method. The starting infusion rate of remimazolam was 0.1 mg/kg/min and was increased or decreased by 0.02 mg/kg/min intervals in the following patient according to the success or failure of the previous patient. Success was defined as a loss of responsiveness within two minutes. Patient enrollment continued until six crossover pairs were observed. The ED₅₀ and ED₉₀ were estimated by centered isotonic regression and the pooled adjacent violators algorithm with bootstrapping, respectively. Twenty patients were included in the analysis. The ED₅₀ and ED₉₀ of remimazolam for loss of responsiveness within two minutes were 0.07 mg/kg/min (90% CI: 0.05, 0.09 mg/kg/min) and 0.10 mg/kg/min (90% CI: 0.10, 0.15 mg/kg/min), respectively. Vital signs were stable with an infusion rate of 0.10 mg/kg/min, and no patients required inotrope/vasopressor. Intravenous infusion of remimazolam at a rate of 0.10 mg/kg/min can be an effective approach to inducing general anesthesia in adult patients.

Remimazolam: A Novel Option for Procedural Sedation in High Risk Patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this drug review was to explore the safety and efficacy of the newly approved benzodiazepine, remimazolam, in order to evaluate its place in therapy.

SUMMARY

Remimazolam has a faster onset of action and recovery time than midazolam when given as single IV doses. Additionally, it has no known CYP450 interactions that would contribute to drug-drug interactions. Patients with severe hepatic impairment may require dose titration as well as the elderly who should be closely monitored. Although remimazolam vials should be protected from light and must be reconstituted immediately before use, the reconstituted vial may be stored for later use at room temperature for up to 8 hours. Remimazolam is more expensive than current options used in practice, as such individual institutional formulary and provider preference will require review to see if its advantages are worth the additional cost and to determine its place in therapy.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam is a novel option when choosing a benzodiazepine for procedural sedation that has pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages when compared to other commonly prescribed sedatives. Remimazolam has proved superior to midazolam when analyzing drug-drug interactions, onset, and time to alertness. Remimazolam also has a shorter elimination half-life and decreased volume of distribution when compared to midazolam.

Change in cerebral circulation during the induction of anesthesia with remimazolam

PURPOSE

Remimazolam is a new ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine with unknown effects on cerebral circulation. We measured total cerebral hemoglobin concentrations, which reflect cerebral blood volume (CBV), and cerebral oxygen saturation, using time-domain near-infrared spectroscopy, which can measure the absolute values of cerebral hemoglobin concentrations. We also measured cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) in the middle cerebral artery using transcranial Doppler as an indicator of cerebral blood flow (CBF). We did so to examine the effect of remimazolam on cerebral circulation in humans, as assessed CBV, CBF, and cerebral oxygen saturation.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study. Fifteen patients without serious complications scheduled for general anesthesia were recruited. We measured total cerebral hemoglobin concentrations, CBFV, and cerebral oxygen saturation throughout the anesthetic induction course with remimazolam.

RESULTS

Total cerebral hemoglobin concentrations did not change during the process (p = 0.51). In contrast, the mean CBFV was reduced by 11% (significant, p = 0.04). The drop in mean blood pressure following the induction of anesthesia was 17%; however, it was within the range of cerebrovascular autoregulation. Moreover, cerebral oxygen saturation increased by 4% (statistically significant, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that anesthetic induction with remimazolam did not alter CBV and reduced CBF in uncomplicated patients.

Effect of Remimazolam on Postoperative Delirium in Older Adult Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background

Postoperative delirium is common in older adult patients and associated with a poor prognosis. The use of benzodiazepine was identified as an independent risk factor for delirium, but there is no randomized controlled trial regarding the relationship between remimazolam, a new ultra-short acting benzodiazepine, and postoperative delirium. We designed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate if remimazolam increases the incidence of postoperative delirium compared with propofol in older adult patients undergoing orthopedic surgery with general anesthesia.

Patients and Methods

We enrolled 320 patients aged more than 60 with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III who underwent orthopedic surgery. Patients were randomized to two groups to receive intraoperative remimazolam or propofol, respectively. Our primary outcome was the incidence of delirium within 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcome was emergence quality including the incidence of emergence agitation, extubation time, and length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay. Adverse events were also recorded.

Results

The incidence of postoperative delirium was 15.6% in the remimazolam group and 12.4% in the propofol group (Risk ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.72 to 2.21; Risk difference, 3.2%; 95% CI, -4.7% to 11.2%; P = 0.42). No significant differences were observed for time of delirium onset, duration of delirium, and delirium subtype between the two groups. Patients in remimazolam group had a lower incidence of hypotension after induction and consumed less vasoactive drugs intraoperatively, but had a longer postoperative extubation time and PACU stay.

Conclusion

General anesthesia with remimazolam was not associated with an increased incidence of postoperative delirium compared with propofol in older adult patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal endoscopy has been associated with difficult experiences and can leave patients with an unpleasant impression. Propofol and midazolam are the most commonly used intravenous anesthetics for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, cardiac and pulmonary adverse events are the primary concerns associated with the use of these sedatives. Remimazolam tosylate is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine drug with a mild inhibitory effect on the respiratory and circulatory systems. These properties qualify remimazolam tosylate to be used as a replacement for propofol or midazolam as a sedative during gastrointestinal endoscopy. This study aims to describe the efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate as a sedative for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled, noninferiority clinical study will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosylate as a sedative during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Participants (n = 1800) will be randomized to receive remimazolam tosylate at 0.15 mg/kg (experimental group 1), remimazolam tosylate at 0.2 mg/kg (experimental group 2), or propofol at 1.5 mg/kg (control group). Procedure success will be assessed and defined as the completion of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without the administration of a rescue sedative agent or more than two top-up doses of the trial drug in any 5-min period after initial administration. Sedation quality will be evaluated using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score. Adverse events will be recorded to evaluate safety.

DISCUSSION

This study will determine the optimal dosage of remimazolam tosylate during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and will describe its efficacy and safety. These findings may contribute to a more comfortable and safer experience for patients compared with that when the conventional sedative propofol is used.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04727034. Registered on February 18, 2021.

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam for procedural sedation during ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block in patients undergoing abdominal tumor surgery: a single-center randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To explore the efficacy and safety of remimazolam for procedural sedation during ultrasound-guided nerve block administration in patients undergoing abdominal tumor surgery, in order to improve and optimize remimazolam use in procedural sedation and clinical anesthesia.

METHODS

The enrolled patients were randomly divided into three groups: 50 patients in the remimazolam group (R group), 50 patients in the dexmedetomidine group (D group), and 50 patients in the midazolam group (M group). Before administering an ultrasound-guided nerve block, all patients received sufentanil AND remimazolam or midazolam or dexmedetomidine. Remimazolam 5 mg was administered intravenously in group R, dexmedetomidine 0.6 µg/kg was administered intravenously in group D, and midazolam 0.025 mg/kg was administered intravenously in group M. Sedation was evaluated by the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation scale.When the Modified Observer's Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score was ≤ 2, block operation was started. If the target sedation level was not reached, rescue sedatives of remimazolam 2.5 mg may be intravenously given in group R, dexmedetomidine 0.4 µg/kg be intravenously given in group D, 0.01 mg/kg midazolam may be intravenously given in Group M. Hemodynamic indicators (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate), pulse oxygen saturation, depth of anesthesia (Narcotrend), MOAA/S,and the incidences of hypoxemia, injection pain, bradycardia and requirement for rescue sedatives were monitored and recorded.

RESULTS

Compared with the control groups (midazolam and dexmedetomidine groups), the Narcotrend index and MOAA/S decreased more in the remimazolam group (P < 0.01). Compared with the control groups, the incidence of hypoxemia and injection pain was slightly higher in the remimazolam group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Compared with the dexmedetomidine group, the incidence of bradycardia was significantly lower in the remimazolam group.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam can be used safely for procedural sedation during ultrasound-guided nerve block administration in patients undergoing abdominal tumor surgery. The sedation effect is better than that with either midazolam or dexmedetomidine, and sedation can be achieved quickly without obvious hemodynamic fluctuations. Remimazolam is associated with better heart rate stability, and slightly higher incidences of hypoxemia and injection pain than are midazolam and dexmedetomidine (no statistically significant difference). The higher incidence of hypoxemia with remimazolam may be related to enhanced sufentanil opioid analgesia, and the mechanism of injection pain with remimazolam must be studied further and clarified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital (Ethical Review 2021, No. 23) and registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn  (ChiCTR2000035388). The pre-registration time of this experiment is 09/08/2020, due to ethical committee of the hospital met irregularly,the ethical approval time is 21/06/2021. The recruitment of patients began after the ethical approval (21/06/2021) and registration update (06/07/2021).The study protocol followed the CONSORT guidelines. The study protocol was performed in the relevant guidelines.

Effect of remimazolam on the incidence of delirium after transcatheter aortic valve implantation under general anesthesia: a retrospective exploratory study

PURPOSE

Delirium after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) should be prevented because it is associated with worse patient outcomes. Perioperative administration of benzodiazepines is a risk factor for postoperative delirium; however, the association between remimazolam, a newer ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine for general anesthesia, and postoperative delirium remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether remimazolam administration during TAVI under general anesthesia affected the incidence of postoperative delirium.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study recruited all adult patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI (TF-TAVI) under general anesthesia between March 2020 and May 2022. Patients were divided into the remimazolam (R) and propofol (P) groups according to the sedative used for anesthesia. In the R group, all patients received flumazenil after surgery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of delirium within 3 days after surgery. Factors associated with delirium after TF-TAVI were examined by multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were included in the final analysis (R group, n = 40; P group, n = 58). The incidence of postoperative delirium was significantly lower in the R group than in the P group (8% vs. 26%, p = 0.032). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that remimazolam (odds ratio 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.80, p = 0.024) was independently associated with the incidence of postoperative delirium, even after adjustment for age, sex, preoperative cognitive function, history of stroke, and TF-TAVI approach.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam may benefit TF-TAVI in terms of postoperative delirium; however, its usefulness must be further evaluated in extensive prospective studies.

Equilibration rate constant, ke0, to determine effect-site concentration for the Masui remimazolam population pharmacokinetic model in general anesthesia patients

Effect-site concentration is widely used to determine drug dosage in anesthesia practice. To obtain effect-site concentration, a pharmacokinetic model with a corresponding equilibration rate constant between plasma and effect-site, ke0, is necessary. Remimazolam, a novel short-acting benzodiazepine, has been approved as anesthetic/sedative. Recently, a remimazolam pharmacokinetic model has been published using a large dataset including wide range of subject characteristics (416 males and 246 females, age 18-93 years, total body weight 34-149 kg, height 133-204 cm, body mass index 14-61 kg m-2, ASA physical status: I-IV, and Asian, White, American African, and 2 other races). This Masui model can be applicable to various patients, but a pharmacodynamic model including ke0 was not developed simultaneously. A previous article has indicated that the time to peak effect of drug after its bolus should be used to determine ke0 for a pharmacokinetic model without simultaneous development of corresponding pharmacodynamic model. The ke0 value can be calculated using numerical analysis but not algebraic solution. We provide the detail method of the numerical analysis and a tool to have ke0 value easily for the Masui remimazolam PK model. Additionally, we provide a multiple regression model to have ke0 value for the PK model.

Remimazolam: An Updated Review of a New Sedative and Anaesthetic

Remimazolam (CNS7056) is a novel benzodiazepine for intravenous sedation; it has an ultra-short duration of action and was recently approved for use in procedural sedation and general anaesthesia. It acts on γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors and is rapidly converted into an inactive metabolite by tissue esterase enzymes. Remimazolam has been successfully used in endoscopic inspection or surgery and general anaesthesia induction and maintenance with fast and predictable onset and recovery times, high procedure success rates, and minor respiratory and hemodynamic fluctuations and without serious drug-related adverse reactions. If needed, the effects of remimazolam can be reversed by flumazenil, which allows prompt termination of sedation. Although remimazolam has great potential for sedation in patients admitted to intensive care units, future studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in patients requiring sedation for a long period, and numerous studies are warranted to explore the optimal dose in different application scenarios. The review aimed to provide an introduction to the process of remimazolam synthesis and its current clinical uses and future clinical developments.

Postoperative Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Induced by Flumazenil Administered for Remimazolam Antagonism

Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine intravenous anesthetic characterized by rapid awakening after anesthesia. However, the method for administering remimazolam in clinical practice remains unclear. Here, we report a case of postoperative heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) after antagonizing remimazolam with flumazenil. An 82-year-old woman was scheduled to undergo lumbar laminectomy for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Preoperative echocardiography revealed normal left ventricular systolic function, left atrial enlargement, and impaired left ventricular diastolic function. General anesthesia was induced with 10 mg/kg/h remimazolam and maintained with 0.8 mg/kg/h remimazolam intraoperatively. Before extubation, a total of 1.0 mg of flumazenil was administered. After extubation, the patient developed pulmonary edema due to HFpEF. When remimazolam is administered in elderly patients with cardiac dysfunction, the maintenance dose should be customized according to the patient’s general condition to minimize the dosage of flumazenil.

Remimazolam Requires Less Vasopressor Support during Induction and Maintenance of General Anesthesia in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center

Introduction

We compared the hemodynamics during general anesthesia with remimazolam and conventional anesthetics in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods

This was a retrospective single-center analysis. We reviewed the records of 42 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a transfemoral artery approach under general anesthesia from January to December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups based on the general anesthetic used for (induction/maintenance) remimazolam/remimazolam (Group R/R), propofol/sevoflurane (Group P/S), and midazolam/propofol (Group M/P). Vasopressor use (ephedrine, phenylephrine, and noradrenaline) was compared among the groups.

Results

The number of patients in each group was 15 (Group R/R), 13 (Group P/S), and 14 (Group M/P), with no significant difference in background characteristics and intraoperative vital signs. For anesthesia induction, doses of ephedrine and phenylephrine used were significantly lower in Group R/R (ephedrine [mg]: Group R/R 2 [0-4] vs. Group P/S 8 [8-12], P < 0.001, Group R/R vs. Group M/P 5 [0-15], P = 0.39; phenylephrine (mg): Group R/R 0 [0-0.08] vs. Group P/S 0.15 [0.10-0.20], P = 0.03, Group M/P 0.21 [0.04-0.40], P = 0.08). For anesthesia maintenance, the noradrenaline dose used was low in the Group R/R (noradrenaline [μg/kg/min]: Group R/R 0.019 [0.015-0.039], Group P/S 0.042 [0.035-0.045], P = 0.02, Group M/P 0.048 [0.040-0.059], P < 0.01).

Conclusion

In patients with severe AS, induction and maintenance of anesthesia with remimazolam resulted in less overall vasopressor use than conventional general anesthetics.

Hypotension after general anesthesia induction using remimazolam in geriatric patients: Protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Introduction

In geriatric patients, hypotension is often reported after general anesthesia induction using propofol. Remimazolam is a novel short-acting sedative. However, the incidence of hypotension after general anesthesia induction using remimazolam in geriatric patients remains unclear. This study aims to compare the incidence of hypotension associated with remimazolam and propofol in patients aged ≥80 years.

Methods

This single-center, double-blind, randomized, two-arm parallel group, standard treatment-controlled, interventional clinical trial will include 90 patients aged ≥80 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia who will be randomized to receive remimazolam or propofol for induction. The primary outcome is the incidence of hypotension after general anesthesia induction, occurring between the start of drug administration and 3 min after intubation. We define hypotension as mean blood pressure <65 mmHg. The primary outcome will be analyzed using the full analysis set. The incidence of hypotension in the two groups will be compared using the Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test. Subgroup analysis of the primary outcome will be performed based on the Charlson comorbidity index, clinical frailty scale, hypertension in the ward, and age. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed using the Fisher’s exact test, Student’s t test, and Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. Logistic regression analysis will be performed to explore the factors associated with the incidence of hypotension after anesthesia induction.

Discussion

Our trial will determine the efficacy of remimazolam in preventing hypotension and provide evidence on the usefulness of remimazolam for ensuring hemodynamic stability during general anesthesia induction in geriatric patients.

Trial registration

The study has been registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000042587), on June 30, 2021.

Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Besylate Combined with Alfentanil in Painless Gastroscopy: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Parallel Controlled Study

Background

The efficacy and adverse reactions of remimazolam besylate (RB) in combination with alfentanil in patients with painless gastroscopy remain unclear.

Objective

The aim of the study is to observe the efficacy and adverse reactions of RB in combination with alfentanil in patients with painless gastroscopy RB.

Methods

All patients were randomly divided into two groups: RB combined with the alfentanil group (research group) and propofol combined with the alfentanil group (control group). After full oxygen inhalation and electrocardiographic monitoring, the research group was given 10 μg/Kg alfentanil + RB 0.2 mg/kg intravenously, and the control group was given 10 μg/Kg alfentanil + propofol 1.5 mg/kg. If there is a clinical need, the research group was given 2.5 mg/additional RB, whereas the control group was treated with an additional 0.5 mg/kg propofol. Main outcome measures were as follows: The vital endpoints including diachronic changes in heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), respiratory rate (RR), blood oxygen saturation (SPO₂), end-expiratory carbon dioxide (etCO₂), IPI, modified observer's assessment of alert/sedation (MOAA/S), time-related endpoints, perioperative adverse events, endoscopy, and anesthesiologist satisfaction, and 24-hour follow-up of adverse reactions, IPI scores, and satisfaction were recorded.

Results

The HR and BP of the patients in the research group and the control group decreased, with a greater decrease in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The values of RR, PETCO₂, and IPI in the research group and the control group decreased to the lowest at 2-3 min but the decrease in the control group was more significant. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the time from the completion of administration to 4 minutes of IPI and the total examination time, but the awakening time in the research group was slightly longer than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The incidences of respiratory depression and hypotension during the operation were shown to be markedly smaller in the investigation relative to the control team, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05), whereas the occurrence of cough, movements, and singultus was more common in the investigations, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The results of the 24-hour follow-up showed that the adverse reactions such as nausea, dizziness, fatigue, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension were much less frequent in the study team, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05), and the patient satisfaction was higher than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The regression results showed that age, sedative, and total dose of analgesia had significant effects on the results, and the covariance coefficient of sedative was 1.57 of IPI score in the research group higher than that of the control group.

Conclusions

RB combined with alfentanil can provide safe and effective sedation for patients undergoing painless gastroscopy. Compared with propofol, RB and alfentanil for injection can avoid large hemodynamic fluctuations and deep sedation, and have fewer adverse reactions. However, the cases involved in this study are all from a single-center data, which requires further multicenter research and conformation.

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynaecological day surgery under remimazolam general anesthesia: a randomized double-blind controlled study

Purpose

To observe the effect of different antiemetic drugs for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after gynaecological day surgery under remimazolam general anesthesia.

Methods

One hundred ninety-two patients were selected for gynaecological day surgery and randomly divided into three groups: droperidol group (DD group), tropisetron group (DT group) and control group (DC group). Flurbiprofen axetil 50 mg and dexamethasone 5 mg were given intravenously before induction of anesthesia, and 2 min later droperidol 1 mg was given intravenously to the DD group, tropisetron 5 mg to the DT group and saline (5 ml) to the DC group. Induction of anesthesia: remimazolam 6 mg/kg/h was continuously infused until sleep, mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg and alfentanil 20ug/kg were slowly pushed, 3 min later intubation was performed to control breathing. Maintenance of anesthesia: 40ug/kg/h of alfentanil, 1 mg/kg/h of remimazolam continuous infusion. After awakening and extubation, the patient was transferred to the PACU. PONV were recorded in the PACU and an electronic questionnaire was pushed 24 h after surgery.

Results

The incidence of PONV within the PACU was significantly lower in the DD (14.5%)and DT(26.7%) groups than in the DC(50%) group (p < 0.01), there was no significantly difference between the DT and DD groups. There were no significant difference in the incidence of PONV in 24 h after surgery between the three groups(DD:DT:DC = 44.5%:45.1%:63.8%,p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Droperidol or tropisetron combined with dexamethasone is superior to dexamethasone alone for the prevention of PONV in the PACU after remimazolam combined with alfentanil anesthesia, with no significant difference in the incidence of PONV in 24 h after surgery.

Effective anesthetic management with remimazolam and ketamine without muscle relaxants for parotidectomy in a patient with myotonic dystrophy: A case report

RATIONALE

Patients with myotonic dystrophy (DM) are highly sensitive to anesthetics, muscle relaxants, and opioids, necessitating appropriate anesthetic management. Recently, remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has been approved for use as a general anesthetic in Japan, and patients with DM have reportedly been treated with remimazolam. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has reported on endotracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants under anesthetic management with remimazolam, nor on the combination of remimazolam and ketamine.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 23-year-old man was referred to our hospital for right parotidectomy and diagnosed with DM just before surgery. At the surgeon's discretion, he was scheduled to undergo nerve monitoring to preserve the facial nerve.

DIAGNOSIS

Myotonic dystrophy.

INTERVENTIONS

We planned total intravenous anesthesia without muscle relaxants and selected remimazolam for anesthesia. Our aim was to prevent the intraoperative or postoperative complications associated with propofol and inhalational anesthetics. Additionally, we selected multimodal analgesia, including ketamine, to avoid opioid use. General anesthesia was induced with ketamine 30 mg, remifentanil 0.72 μg/kg/min, and remimazolam 12 + 6 mg. Endotracheal intubation was performed under videolaryngoscopy without the use of muscle relaxants. For postoperative analgesia, we administered additional doses of ketamine 20 mg and acetaminophen 1000 mg, and the surgeons infiltrated 8 mL of xylocaine 0.5% with epinephrine into the skin incision before starting the surgery. Intraoperative anesthesia was maintained with remimazolam 0.9 to 1.0 mg/kg/h and remifentanil 0.26 to 0.50 μg/kg/min. Flumazenil was administered for rapid awakening and safe extubation. All vitals, including the bispectral index, were stable during surgery.

OUTCOMES

The patient did not develop facial nerve paralysis, sore throat, or hoarseness, nor did he have any memory of the surgery. Good postoperative analgesia was achieved.

LESSONS

We achieved effective anesthetic management using remimazolam without muscle relaxants in a patient with DM. Furthermore, the combination of remimazolam and ketamine provided good sedation and postoperative analgesia.