Linear array ultrasound in low-grade glioma surgery: histology-based assessment of accuracy in comparison to conventional intraoperative ultrasound and intraoperative MRI

Towards Optical Biopsy in Glioma Surgery

Currently, the focus of intraoperative imaging in brain tumor surgery is beginning to shift to optical methods such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), Raman spectroscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), and fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM). Optical imaging technologies provide in vivo and real-time high-resolution images of tissues. "Optical biopsy" can be considered as an alternative to traditional approaches for intraoperative histopathologic consultation. Intraoperative optical imaging can help to achieve precise intraoperative identification of tumor infiltrations within the surrounding brain parenchyma. Therefore, it can be considered as a complement to existing approaches based on wide-field imaging modalities such as MRI, US, or 5-ALA fluorescence. A promising future direction for intraoperative guidance during brain tumor surgery or stereotactic biopsy lies in the integration of optical imaging with machine learning techniques, enabling automated differentiation between tumor tissue and healthy brain parenchyma. We present this review to increase knowledge and form critical opinions in the field of using optical imaging in brain tumor surgery.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines for the role of surgery in the management of patients with diffuse low grade glioma: update

Target populationAdults with imaging suggestive of a WHO grade II diffuse gliomas (oligodendrogliomas or astrocytomas)QuestionIn adults with imaging suggestive of a WHO grade II diffuse gliomas (oligodendrogliomas or astrocytomas), does surgical resection improve overall survival compared to observation or biopsy?Updated Recommendation from the Prior Version of These Guidelines:Level III: In adults with imaging suggestive of a WHO grade II diffuse gliomas (oligodendrogliomas or astrocytomas), surgical resection is suggested over observation or biopsy to improve overall survival.Question Q2In adults with imaging suggestive of a WHO grade II diffuse gliomas (oligodendrogliomas or astrocytomas), does maximal surgical resection improve progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to subtotal resection/biopsy?Unchanged Recommendations from the Prior Version of These GuidelinesLevel II It is recommended that GTR or STR be accomplished instead of biopsy alone when safe and feasible so as to decrease the frequency of tumor progression recognizing that the rate of progression after GTR is fairly high.Level III Greater extent of resection can improve OS in WHO grade II diffuse gliomas patients. New RecommendationsLevel III: It is suggested that extent of resection be maximized as is safely possible for IDH mutant and IDHwt WHO grade II diffuse gliomas. to improve PFS and OS. Level III: There is insufficient evidence that greater extent of resection of 1p19q codeleted oligodendrogliomas (WHO grade II diffuse gliomas) improves OS Question Q3In adults with imaging suggestive of a WHO grade II diffuse gliomas (oligodendrogliomas or astrocytomas), does the addition of intraoperative MRI and/or intraoperative ultrasound during surgery improve extent of resection?Unchanged Recommendation from the Prior Version of These GuidelinesLevel III: The use of intraoperative MRI is suggested to increase the extent of resection for adults with WHO grade II diffuse glioma.New RecommendationLevel III: The use of intraoperative ultrasound is suggested to increase the extent of resection compared to conventional surgery for adults with WHO grade II diffuse glioma.Question 4In adults with imaging suggestive of a WHO grade II diffuse glioma (oligodendrogliomas or astrocytomas) with seizures, does maximal surgical resection improve seizure control compared to observation or subtotal resection/biopsy?Updated Recommendation from the Prior Version of These GuidelinesLevel III: In adults with imaging consistent with a WHO Grade II diffuse glioma who present with seizure activity, surgical resection of greater than 90% of the lesion, when it can be accomplished safely, is suggested over observation or lesser extent of resection/biopsy to improve seizure control.New Questions and RecommendationsQuestion 5In adults with imaging suggestive of a WHO grade II diffuse glioma (oligodendrogliomas or astrocytomas), does use of intraoperative fluorescent guided surgery improve extent of resection?RecommendationLevel III: Intraoperative fluorescent guided surgery with 5-ALA is not suggested to improve the extent of resection for WHO grade II gliomas.Question 6In adults with imaging suggestive of a WHO grade II diffuse glioma (oligodendrogliomas or astrocytomas) in eloquent brain cortex, does awake craniotomy or other methods of intraoperative mapping increase extent of resection compared to conventional surgery without these techniques?RecommendationLevel III: It is suggested that awake craniotomy and other methods of intraoperative mapping can be used to increase the extent of resection for adults with WHO grade II diffuse glioma.Question 7In adults with imaging suggestive of a WHO grade II diffuse glioma (oligodendrogliomas or astrocytomas) in eloquent brain cortex, does use of advanced preoperative imaging modalities in the form of fMRI and/or DTI decrease surgical morbidity?RecommendationLevel III: The use of functional MRI and DTI related modalities are suggested to decrease surgical morbidity in adults with WHO grade II diffuse glioma.

Observations from the first 100 cases of intraoperative MRI - experiences, trends and short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

We sought to analyze, in well-defined clinical setting, the first 100 patients treated at the intraoperative MRI (iMRI) hybrid surgical theatre at our facility in a population-based setting to evaluate which pathologies are best approached with iMRI assisted surgeries, as this is not yet clearly defined.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery in the 3T iMRI hybrid surgical theatre at our neurosurgical department between December 2017 to May 2021 were included after informed consent. Demographic, clinical, surgical, histological, radiological and outcome parameters, as well as variables related to iMRI, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Patients were subdivided into adult and pediatric cohorts.

RESULTS

Various neurosurgical procedures were performed; resection of tumors and epileptic foci, endoscopic skull base procedures including pituitary lesions, deep brain stimulation (DBS) and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). In total, 41 patients were pediatric. An iMRI scan was carried out in 96% of cases and led to continuation of surgery in 50% of cases, mainly due to visualized remaining pathological tissue (95.2%). Median time to iMRI from intubation was 280 min and median total duration of surgery was 445 min. The majority of patients experienced no postoperative complications (70%), 13 patients suffered permanent postoperative deficits, predominantly visual.

CONCLUSION

Herein, we demonstrate the first 100 patients undergoing neurosurgery aided by iMRI at our facility since introduction. Indications for surgery differed between pediatric and adult patients. The iMRI was utilized for tumor surgeries, particularly adult low-grade gliomas and pediatric tumors, as well as for epilepsy surgery and DBS. In this heterogenous population, iMRI led to continuation of surgery in 50%. To establish the benefit in maximizing the extent of resection in these brain pathologies future studies are recommended.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative differentiation and delineation techniques in brain tumours

Brain tumour identification and delineation in a timeframe of seconds would significantly guide and support surgical decisions. Here, treatment is often complicated by the infiltration of gliomas in the surrounding brain parenchyma. Accurate delineation of the invasive margins is essential to increase the extent of resection and to avoid postoperative neurological deficits. Currently, histopathological annotation of brain biopsies and genetic phenotyping still define the first line treatment, where results become only available after surgery. Furthermore, adjuvant techniques to improve intraoperative visualisation of the tumour tissue have been developed and validated. In this review, we focused on the sensitivity and specificity of conventional techniques to characterise the tumour type and margin, specifically fluorescent-guided surgery, neuronavigation and intraoperative imaging as well as on more experimental techniques such as mass spectrometry-based diagnostics, Raman spectrometry and hyperspectral imaging. Based on our findings, all investigated methods had their advantages and limitations, guiding researchers towards the combined use of intraoperative imaging techniques. This can lead to an improved outcome in terms of extent of tumour resection and progression free survival while preserving neurological outcome of the patients.

Evaluation of a Navigated 3D Ultrasound Integration for Brain Tumor Surgery: First Results of an Ongoing Prospective Study

The aim of the study was to assess the quality, accuracy and benefit of navigated 2D and 3D ultrasound for intra-axial tumor surgery in a prospective study. Patients intended for gross total resection were consecutively enrolled. Intraoperatively, a 2D and 3D iUS-based resection was performed. During surgery, the image quality, clinical benefit and navigation accuracy were recorded based on a standardized protocol using Likert’s scales. A total of 16 consecutive patients were included. Mean ratings of image quality in 2D iUS were significantly higher than in 3D iUS (p < 0.001). There was no relevant decrease in rating during the surgery in 2D and 3D iUS (p > 0.46). The benefit was rated 2.2 in 2D iUS and 2.6 in 3D iUS (p = 0.08). The benefit remained stable in 2D, while there was a slight decrease in the benefit in 3D after complete tumor resection (p = 0.09). The accuracy was similar in both (mean 2.2 p = 0.88). Seven patients had a small tumor remnant in intraoperative MRT (mean 0.98 cm3) that was not appreciated with iUS. Crucially, 3D iUS allows for an accurate intraoperative update of imaging with slightly lower image quality than 2D iUS. Our preliminary data suggest that the benefit and accuracy of 2D and 3D iUS navigation do not undergo significant variations during tumor resection.

Full-course resection control strategy in glioma surgery using both intraoperative ultrasound and intraoperative MRI

Background

Intraoperative ultrasound(iUS) and intraoperative MRI (iMRI) are effective ways to perform resection control during glioma surgery. However, most published studies employed only one modality. Few studies have used both during surgery. How to combine these two techniques reasonably, and what advantages they could have for glioma surgery are still open questions.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a series of consecutive patients who underwent initial surgical treatment of supratentorial gliomas in our center. We utilized a full-course resection control strategy to combine iUS and iMRI: IUS for pre-resection assessment and intermediate resection control; iMRI for final resection control. The basic patient characteristics, surgical results, iMRI/iUS findings, and their impacts on surgical procedures were evaluated and reported.

Results

A total of 40 patients were included. The extent of resection was 95.43 ± 10.37%, and the gross total resection rate was 72.5%. The median residual tumor size was 6.39 cm3 (range 1.06–16.23 cm3). 5% (2/40) of patients had permanent neurological deficits after surgery. 17.5% (7/40) of patients received further resection after the first iMRI scan, resulting in four (10%) more patients achieving gross total resection. The number of iMRI scans per patient was 1.18 ± 0.38. The surgical time was 4.5 ± 3.6 hours. The pre-resection iUS scan revealed that an average of 3.8 borders of the tumor were beside sulci in 75% (30/40) patients. Intermediate resection control was utilized in 67.5% (27/40) of patients. In 37.5% (15/40) of patients, the surgical procedures were changed intraoperatively based on the iUS findings. Compared with iMRI, the sensitivity and specificity of iUS for residual tumors were 46% and 96%, respectively.

Conclusion

The full-course resection control strategy by combining iUS and iMRI could be successfully implemented with good surgical results in initial glioma surgeries. This strategy might stabilize resection control quality and provide the surgeon with more intraoperative information to tailor the surgical strategy. Compared with iMRI-assisted glioma surgery, this strategy might improve efficiency by reducing the number of iMRI scans and shortening surgery time.

Intraoperative ultrasound in brain tumor surgery: A review and implementation guide

Accurate and reliable intraoperative neuronavigation is crucial for achieving maximal safe resection of brain tumors. Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) has received significant attention as the next step in improving navigation. However, the immense cost and logistical challenge of iMRI precludes implementation in most centers worldwide. In comparison, intraoperative ultrasound (ioUS) is an affordable tool, easily incorporated into existing theatre infrastructure, and operative workflow. Historically, ultrasound has been perceived as difficult to learn and standardize, with poor, artifact-prone image quality. However, ioUS has dramatically evolved over the last decade, with vast improvements in image quality and well-integrated navigation tools. Advanced techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), have also matured and moved from the research field into actual clinical use. In this review, we provide a comprehensive and pragmatic guide to ioUS. A suggested protocol to facilitate learning ioUS and improve standardization is provided, and an outline of common artifacts and methods to minimize them given. The review also includes an update of advanced techniques and how they can be incorporated into clinical practice.

Safe Surgery for Glioblastoma: Recent Advances and Modern Challenges

One of the major challenges during glioblastoma surgery is balancing between maximizing extent of resection and preventing neurological deficits. Several surgical techniques and adjuncts have been developed to help identify eloquent areas both preoperatively (fMRI, nTMS, MEG, DTI) and intraoperatively (imaging (ultrasound, iMRI), electrostimulation (mapping), cerebral perfusion measurements (fUS)), and visualization (5-ALA, fluoresceine)). In this review, we give an update of the state-of-the-art management of both primary and recurrent glioblastomas. We will review the latest surgical advances, challenges, and approaches that define the onco-neurosurgical practice in a contemporary setting and give an overview of the current prospective scientific efforts.

Chemotherapeutic nanomaterials in tumor boundary delineation: Prospects for effective tumor treatment

Accurately delineating tumor boundaries is key to predicting survival rates of cancer patients and assessing response of tumor microenvironment to various therapeutic techniques such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This review discusses various strategies that have been deployed to accurately delineate tumor boundaries with particular emphasis on the potential of chemotherapeutic nanomaterials in tumor boundary delineation. It also compiles the types of tumors that have been successfully delineated by currently available strategies. Finally, the challenges that still abound in accurate tumor boundary delineation are presented alongside possible perspective strategies to either ameliorate or solve the problems. It is expected that the information communicated herein will form the first compendious baseline information on tumor boundary delineation with chemotherapeutic nanomaterials and provide useful insights into future possible paths to advancing current available tumor boundary delineation approaches to achieve efficacious tumor therapy.

Current Limitations of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Brain Tumor Surgery

While benefits of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) have been frequently described, data on IOUS limitations are relatively sparse. Suboptimal ultrasound imaging of some pathologies, various types of ultrasound artifacts, challenging patient positioning during some IOUS-guided surgeries, and absence of an optimal IOUS probe depicting the entire sellar region during transsphenoidal pituitary surgery are some of the most important pitfalls. This review aims to summarize prominent limitations of current IOUS systems, and to present possibilities to reduce them by using ultrasound technology suitable for a specific procedure and by proper scanning techniques. In addition, future trends of IOUS imaging optimization are described in this article.

Intraoperative MRI for Brain Tumors

INTRODUCTION

The use of intraoperative imaging has been a critical tool in the neurosurgeon's armamentarium and is of particular benefit during tumor surgery. This article summarizes the history of its development, implementation, clinical experience and future directions.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature focusing on the development and clinical experience with intraoperative MRI. Utilizing the authors' personal experience as well as evidence from the literature, we present an overview of the utility of MRI during neurosurgery.

RESULTS

In the 1990s, the first description of using a low field MRI in the operating room was published describing the additional benefit provided by improved resolution of MRI as compared to ultrasound. Since then, implementation has varied in magnetic field strength and in configuration from floor mounted to ceiling mounted units as well as those that are accessible to the operating room for use during surgery and via an outpatient entrance to use for diagnostic imaging. The experience shows utility of this technique for increasing extent of resection for low and high grade tumors as well as preventing injury to important structures while incorporating techniques such as intraoperative monitoring.

CONCLUSION

This article reviews the history of intraoperative MRI and presents a review of the literature revealing the successful implementation of this technology and benefits noted for the patient and the surgeon.

Using Histopathology to Assess the Reliability of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Guiding Additional Brain Tumor Resection: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) is a powerful tool for guiding brain tumor resections, provided that it accurately discerns residual tumor.

OBJECTIVE

To use histopathology to assess how reliably iMRI may discern additional tumor for a variety of tumor types, independent of the indications for iMRI.

METHODS

A multicenter database was used to calculate the odds of additional resection during the same surgical session for grade I to IV gliomas and pituitary adenomas. The reliability of iMRI for identifying residual tumor was assessed using histopathology of tissue resected after iMRI.

RESULTS

Gliomas (904/1517 cases, 59.6%) were more likely than pituitary adenomas (176/515, 34.2%) to receive additional resection after iMRI (P < .001), but these tumors were equally likely to have additional tissue sent for histopathology (398/904, 44.4% vs 66/176, 37.5%; P = .11). Tissue samples were available for resections after iMRI for 464 cases, with 415 (89.4%) positive for tumor. Additional resections after iMRI for gliomas (361/398, 90.7%) were more likely to yield additional tumor compared to pituitary adenomas (54/66, 81.8%) (P = .03). There were no significant differences in resection after iMRI yielding histopathologically positive tumor between grade I (58/65 cases, 89.2%; referent), grade II (82/92, 89.1%) (P = .98), grade III (72/81, 88.9%) (P = .95), or grade IV gliomas (149/160, 93.1%) (P = .33). Additional resection for previously resected tumors (122/135 cases, 90.4%) was equally likely to yield histopathologically confirmed tumor compared to newly-diagnosed tumors (293/329, 89.0%) (P = .83).

CONCLUSION

Histopathological analysis of tissue resected after use of iMRI for grade I to IV gliomas and pituitary adenomas demonstrates that iMRI is highly reliable for identifying residual tumor.

Surgery for Diffuse WHO Grade II Gliomas: Volumetric Analysis of a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort From the German Study Group for Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

In diffuse WHO grade II gliomas (LGG), the extent of resection (EOR) required to achieve significant survival benefits remains elusive.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of residual volume (RV) and EOR with progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in LGG in a retrospective, multicenter series by the German study group of intraoperative MRI (GeSGIM).

METHODS

Consecutive cases were retrospectively assessed from 5 centers. Tumors were volumetrically quantified before and after surgery, and clinical data were analyzed, including IDH mutations and neurologic deficits. Kaplan-Meier estimates, accelerated failure time models (AFT), and multivariate Cox regression models were calculated to identify determinants of survival.

RESULTS

A total of 140 cases were analyzed. Gross total resection (GTR) was associated with significantly longer PFS compared to any incomplete resection (P = .009). A significant survival disadvantage was evident even for small (>0-5 ml) residuals and increased for moderate (>5-20 ml) and large remnants (>20 ml) P = .001). Accordingly, PFS increased continuously for 20% incremental steps of EOR (P < .001). AFT models supported the notion of a continuous association of RV and EOR with PFS. Multivariate Cox regression models confirmed RV (P = .01) and EOR (P = .005) as continuous prognosticators of PFS. Univariate analysis showed significant associations of RV and EOR with OS.

CONCLUSION

Our data support the hypothesis of a continuous relationship of RV and EOR with survival for LGG with superiority seen for GTR. Hence, GTR should be achieved whenever safely feasible, and resections should be maximized whenever tumor has to be left behind to spare function.

Impact of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Other Factors on Surgical Outcomes for Newly Diagnosed Grade II Astrocytomas and Oligodendrogliomas: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Few studies use large, multi-institutional patient cohorts to examine the role of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in the resection of grade II gliomas.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of iMRI and other factors on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for newly diagnosed grade II astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of a multicenter database assessed the impact of patient-, treatment-, and tumor-related factors on OS and PFS.

RESULTS

A total of 232 resections (112 astrocytomas and 120 oligodendrogliomas) were analyzed. Oligodendrogliomas had longer OS (P &lt; .001) and PFS (P = .01) than astrocytomas. Multivariate analyses demonstrated improved OS for gross total resection (GTR) vs subtotal resection (STR; P = .006, hazard ratio [HR]: .23) and near total resection (NTR; P = .02, HR: .64). GTR vs STR (P = .02, HR: .54), GTR vs NTR (P = .04, HR: .49), and iMRI use (P = .02, HR: .54) were associated with longer PFS. Frontal (P = .048, HR: 2.11) and occipital/parietal (P = .003, HR: 3.59) locations were associated with shorter PFS (vs temporal). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed longer OS with increasing extent of surgical resection (EOR) (P = .03) and 1p/19q gene deletions (P = .02). PFS improved with increasing EOR (P = .01), GTR vs NTR (P = .02), and resections above STR (P = .04). Factors influencing adjuvant treatment (35.3% of patients) included age (P = .002, odds ratio [OR]: 1.04) and EOR (P = .003, OR: .39) but not glioma subtype or location. Additional tumor resection after iMRI was performed in 105/159 (66%) iMRI cases, yielding GTR in 54.5% of these instances.

CONCLUSION

EOR is a major determinant of OS and PFS for patients with grade II astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Intraoperative MRI may improve EOR and was associated with increased PFS.

Intraoperative imaging in the neurosurgery operating theatre: A review of the most commonly used techniques for brain tumour surgery

INTRODUCTION

New intraoperative imaging techniques, which aim to improve tumour resection, have been implemented in recent years in brain tumour surgery, although they lead to an increase in resources. In order to carry out an update on this topic, this manuscript has been drafted by a group from the Sociedad Española de Neurocirugía (Spanish Society of Neurosurgery).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Experts in the use of each one of the most-used intraoperative techniques in brain tumour surgery were presented with a description of the technique and a brief review of the literature. Indications for use, their advantages and disadvantages based on clinical experience and on what is published in the literature will be described.

RESULTS

The most robust intraoperative imaging technique appears to be low- and high-field magnetic resonance imaging, but this is the technique which results in the greatest expenditure. Intraoperative ultrasound navigation is portable and less expensive, but it provides poorer differentiation of high-grade tumours and is observer-dependent. The most-used fluorescence techniques are 5-aminolevulinic acid for high-grade gliomas and fluorescein, useful in lesions which rupture the blood-brain barrier. Last of all, intraoperative CT is more versatile in the neurosurgery operating theatre, but it has fewer indications in neuro-oncology surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative imaging techniques are used with increasingly greater frequency in brain tumour surgery, and the neurosurgeon should assess their possible use depending on their resources and the needs of each patient.

New Hope in Brain Glioma Surgery: The Role of Intraoperative Ultrasound. A Review

Maximal safe resection represents the gold standard for surgery of malignant brain tumors. As regards gross-total resection, accurate localization and precise delineation of the tumor margins are required. Intraoperative diagnostic imaging (Intra-Operative Magnetic Resonance-IOMR, Intra-Operative Computed Tomography-IOCT, Intra-Operative Ultrasound-IOUS) and dyes (fluorescence) have become relevant in brain tumor surgery, allowing for a more radical and safer tumor resection. IOUS guidance for brain tumor surgery is accurate in distinguishing tumor from normal parenchyma, and it allows a real-time intraoperative visualization. We aim to evaluate the role of IOUS in gliomas surgery and to outline specific strategies to maximize its efficacy. We performed a literature research through the Pubmed database by selecting each article which was focused on the use of IOUS in brain tumor surgery, and in particular in glioma surgery, published in the last 15 years (from 2003 to 2018). We selected 39 papers concerning the use of IOUS in brain tumor surgery, including gliomas. IOUS exerts a notable attraction due to its low cost, minimal interruption of the operational flow, and lack of radiation exposure. Our literature review shows that increasing the use of ultrasound in brain tumors allows more radical resections, thus giving rise to increases in survival.

The real-time ultrasonography for fusion image in glioma neurosugery

OBJECTIVES

The aim of study is to evaluate the general performance and efficiency of the using real time intraoperative ultrasound system with Volume Navigation system technology in glioma. Compare glioma intraoperative ultrasound and contrast agent ultrasound images to obtained preoperative MRI with fusion image in a real-time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients had been performed fusion imaging involved intraoperative real-time ultrasound and contrast agent ultrasound with preoperative MR imaging including preoperative gadolinium-enhanced MRI from March 2017 to December 2017. The number of tumor was counted online fusion imaging in real time ultrasound with and without preoperative MR. We analyzed ultrasound coplanar MR modalities in real time including tumor location, margin (obscure or defined). In addition, intraoperative ultrasound enhancement pattern was analyzed compare it to preoperative reconstruction gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Two radiologists who made planning ultrasound assessment for the focus lesion based on a 4 scoring system according to the degree of confidence.

RESULTS

Thirteen of fifteen patients whose automatically registration successful intraoperative neurosurgery accepted preoperative MR examination. Seven of fifteen fine-tuning registration phase were performed and satisfactory with fusion image substantially. Intraoperatively, 73.3% (11/15) glioma nodules were definite on conventional B-mode US by a radiologist who doesn't know the MR result before fusion US with MRI. However, 100% tumors were detected on fusion B-mode ultrasound imaging with MRI. Two radiologists evaluated the score between fusion B-mode ultrasound and CEUS with coplanar MRI and had a result that score was upgraded in 69.2% (9/13) and 84.6% (11/13) patients. Inter-observer agreement was significant (kappa value = 1.0, p < 0.001) in B-mode ultrasound fusion image with MRI. Inter-observer agreement was moderate (kappa value = 0. 0.618, p < 0.001) in CEUS fusion image with MRI.

CONCLUSION

Fusion imaging is very useful to detect poor sonographic visibility tumor on fusion B-mode US imaging with MR images. Fusion image may demonstrate multiplane images including same standard and nonstandard MRI and US images to help localize tumor. The additional real time fusion CEUS mode image with MR is a safe method for neurosurgery and the use of CEUS should be considered when fusion B-mode ultrasound imaging alone is not satisfactory for margin.

Non-enhancing gliomas: does intraoperative ultrasonography improve resections?

PURPOSE

Non-enhancing diffuse gliomas are a challenging surgical proposition. Delineation of tumour extent on preoperative imaging and intraoperative visualization are often difficult.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all cases of non-enhancing gliomas that were operated on using navigated 3-dimensional ultrasonography (US). Tumour delineation (good, moderate, or poor) on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative US was compared. Post-resection US findings with respect to residual tumour status were compared to the postoperative imaging findings. The extent of resection was calculated and recorded.

RESULTS

There were 55 gliomas (43 high-grade, 12 low-grade). Forty were close to eloquent areas. The pre-resection concordance of MRI with US was 56%, with US defining more tumours as well-delineated (n=26) than MRI (n=13). US was used for resection control in 50 cases. Gross tumour resection was achieved in 24 cases (51%). US correctly predicted the residual tumour status in 78% of cases. The use of US led to radical resections even in some tumours preoperatively deemed to be unresectable. However, eloquent location was the only independent predictor of the extent of resection.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative US is a useful tool for guiding resection of non-enhancing gliomas. It may be better than MRI for delineating these tumours, and may thereby facilitate improved resection of these otherwise poorly delineated tumours. However, functional boundaries remain the main limiting factor for achieving complete resection of non-enhancing gliomas.

Histopathological Insights on Imaging Results of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 5-Aminolevulinic Acid, and Intraoperative Ultrasound in Glioblastoma Surgery

BACKGROUND

For appropriate use of available intraoperative imaging techniques in glioblastoma (GB) surgery, it is crucial to know the potential of the respective techniques in tumor detection.

OBJECTIVE

To assess histopathological basis of imaging results of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI), 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), and linear array intraoperative ultrasound (lioUS).

METHODS

We prospectively compared the imaging findings of iMRI, 5-ALA, and lioUS at 99 intraoperative biopsy sites in 33 GB patients during resection control. Histological classification of specimens, tumor load, presence of necrosis, presence of vascular malformations, and O6-methylguanin-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter state was correlated with imaging findings.

RESULTS

Solid tumor was found in 57%, infiltration zone in 42%, and no tumor in 1% of specimens. However, imaging was negative in iMRI in 49%, using 5-ALA in 17%, and in lioUS in 21%. In positive imaging results, share of solid tumor was highest in 5-ALA (65%) followed by lioUS (60%) and lowest in iMRI (55%). In comparison to 5-ALA, iMRI had a high share of solid tumor in specimens when showing intermediate results. Sensitivity for invasive tumor was higher in 5-ALA (84%) and lioUS (80%) than in iMRI (50%). We found a significant correlation of 5-ALA with classification of specimen, presence of necrosis, and microproliferations. Methylated MGMT promoter correlated with positive findings in 5-ALA. lioUS and iMRI showed no correlations with histopathological findings.

CONCLUSION

All of the assessed established imaging techniques detect infiltrating tumor only to a certain extent. Only 5-ALA showed a significant correlation with histopathological findings. Interestingly, tumor remnants in an MGMT-methylated tumor are more likely to be visible using 5-ALA as in unmethylated tumors.

Dual-labeling with 5-aminolevulinic acid and fluorescein for fluorescence-guided resection of high-grade gliomas: technical note

OBJECTIVE Fluorescence guidance with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) helps improve resections of malignant gliomas. However, one limitation is the low intensity of blue light for background illumination. Fluorescein has recently been reintroduced into neurosurgery, and novel microscope systems are available for visualizing this fluorochrome, which highlights all perfused tissues but has limited selectivity for tumor detection. Here, the authors investigate a combination of both fluorochromes: 5-ALA for distinguishing tumor and fluorescein for providing tissue fluorescence of adjacent brain tissue. METHODS The authors evaluated 6 patients who harbored cerebral lesions suggestive of high-grade glioma. Patients received 5-ALA (20 mg/kg) orally 4 hours before induction of anesthesia. Low-dose fluorescein (3 mg/kg intravenous) was injected immediately after anesthesia induction. Pentero microscopes (equipped either with Yellow 560 or Blue 400 filters) were used to visualize fluorescence. To simultaneously visualize both fluorochromes, the Yellow 560 module was combined with external blue light illumination (D-light C System). RESULTS Fluorescein-induced fluorescence created a useful background for protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) fluorescence, which appeared orange to red, surrounded by greenly fluorescent normal brain and edematous tissue. Green brain-tissue fluorescence was helpful in augmenting background. Levels of blue illumination that were too strong obscured PPIX fluorescence. Unspecific extravasation of fluorescein was noted at resection margins, which did not interfere with PPIX fluorescence detection. CONCLUSIONS Dual labeling with both PPIX and fluorescein fluorescence is feasible and gives superior background information during fluorescence-guided resections. The authors believe that this technique carries potential as a next step in fluorescence-guided resections if it is completely integrated into the surgical microscope.

Experimental study of sector and linear array ultrasound accuracy and the influence of navigated 3D-reconstruction as compared to MRI in a brain tumor model

PURPOSE

Currently, intraoperative ultrasound in brain tumor surgery is a rapidly propagating option in imaging technology. We examined the accuracy and resolution limits of different ultrasound probes and the influence of 3D-reconstruction in a phantom and compared these results to MRI in an intraoperative setting (iMRI).

METHODS

An agarose gel phantom with predefined gel targets was examined with iMRI, a sector (SUS) and a linear (LUS) array probe with two-dimensional images. Additionally, 3D-reconstructed sweeps in perpendicular directions were made of every target with both probes, resulting in 392 measurements. Statistical calculations were performed, and comparative boxplots were generated.

RESULTS

Every measurement of iMRI and LUS was more precise than SUS, while there was no apparent difference in height of iMRI and 3D-reconstructed LUS. Measurements with 3D-reconstructed LUS were always more accurate than in 2D-LUS, while 3D-reconstruction of SUS showed nearly no differences to 2D-SUS in some measurements. We found correlations of 3D-reconstructed SUS and LUS length and width measurements with 2D results in the same image orientation.

CONCLUSIONS

LUS provides an accuracy and resolution comparable to iMRI, while SUS is less exact than LUS and iMRI. 3D-reconstruction showed the potential to distinctly improve accuracy and resolution of ultrasound images, although there is a strong correlation with the sweep direction during data acquisition.

Intraoperative imaging techniques for glioma surgery

Gliomas are CNS neoplasms that infiltrate the surrounding brain parenchyma, complicating their treatment. Tools that increase extent of resection while preventing neurological deficit are essential to improve prognosis of patients diagnosed with gliomas. Tools such as intraoperative MRI, ultrasound and fluorescence-guided microsurgery have been used in the surgical resection of CNS gliomas with the goal of maximizing extent of resection to improve patient outcomes. In addition, emerging experimental techniques, for example, optical coherence tomography and Raman spectroscopy are promising techniques which could 1 day add to the increasing armamentarium used in the surgical resection of CNS gliomas. Here, we present the potential advantages and limitations of these imaging techniques for the purposes of identifying gliomas in the operating room.

Direct navigated 3D ultrasound for resection of brain tumors: a useful tool for intraoperative image guidance

OBJECTIVE

Navigated 3D ultrasound is a novel intraoperative imaging adjunct permitting quick real-time updates to facilitate tumor resection. Image quality continues to improve and is currently sufficient to allow use of navigated ultrasound (NUS) as a stand-alone modality for intraoperative guidance without the need for preoperative MRI.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed cases involving operations performed at their institution in which a 3D ultrasound navigation system was used for control of resection of brain tumors in a "direct" 3D ultrasound mode, without preoperative MRI guidance. The usefulness of the ultrasound and its correlation with postoperative imaging were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ultrasound was used for resection control in 81 cases. In 53 of these 81 cases, at least 1 intermediate scan (range 1-3 intermediate scans) was obtained during the course of the resection, and in 50 of these 53 cases, the result prompted further resection. In the remaining 28 cases, intermediate scans were not performed either because the first ultrasound scan performed after resection was interpreted as showing no residual tumor (n = 18) and resection was terminated or because the surgeon intentionally terminated the resection prematurely due to the infiltrative nature of the tumor and extension of disease into eloquent areas (n = 10) and the final ultrasound scan was interpreted as showing residual disease. In an additional 20 cases, ultrasound navigation was used primarily for localization and not for resection control, making the total number of NUS cases where radical resection was planned 101. Gross-total resection (GTR) was planned in 68 of these 101 cases and cytoreduction in 33. Ultrasound-defined GTR was achieved in 51 (75%) of the cases in which GTR was planned. In the remaining 17, further resection had to be terminated (despite evidence of residual tumor on ultrasound) because of diffuse infiltration or proximity to eloquent areas. Of the 33 cases planned for cytoreduction, NUS guidance facilitated ultrasound-defined GTR in 4 cases. Overall, ultrasound-defined GTR was achieved in 50% of cases (55 of 111). Based on the postoperative imaging (MRI in most cases), GTR was achieved in 58 cases (53%). Final (postresection) ultrasonography was documented in 78 cases. The findings were compared with the postoperative imaging to ascertain concordance in detecting residual tumor. Overall concordance was seen in 64 cases (82.5%), positive concordance was seen in 33 (42.5%), and negative in 31 (40%). Discordance was seen in 14 cases-with ultrasound yielding false-positive results in 7 cases and false-negative results in 7 cases. Postoperative neurological worsening occurred in 15 cases (13.5%), and in most of these cases, it was reversible by the time of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that 3D ultrasound can be effectively used as a stand-alone navigation modality during the resection of brain tumors. The ability to provide repeated, high-quality intraoperative updates is useful for guiding resection. Attention to image acquisition technique and experience can significantly increase the quality of images, thereby improving the overall utility of this modality.

Neurosurgical tools to extend tumor resection in hemispheric low-grade gliomas: conventional and contrast enhanced ultrasonography

PURPOSE

Pediatric low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are the most frequent solid tumor in childhood. Based on an increasing number of literature reports, maximal safe resection is recommended as the first line of treatment whenever possible. However, distinguishing tumor tissue from the surrounding normal brain is often challenging with infiltrating neoplasms, even with the assistance of intraoperative, microscopic and conventional neuronavigation systems. Therefore, any technique that enhances the detection and visualization of LGGs intraoperatively is certainly desirable.

METHODS

In this paper, we reviewed the role of intraoperative conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a tool for extending tumor resection in LGGs. Moreover, our experience with this technology is reported and discussed.

RESULTS

Both B-mode and CEUS are helpful in highlighting LGGs, detecting tumor margins and providing additional information such as vascularization, thus improving the safety of a more radical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the full potentialities of the method are yet to be explored, intraoperative ultrasound is a promising tool in oncologic surgery and LGG surgery.

Applications of Ultrasound in the Resection of Brain Tumors

Neurosurgery makes use of preoperative imaging to visualize pathology, inform surgical planning, and evaluate the safety of selected approaches. The utility of preoperative imaging for neuronavigation, however, is diminished by the well-characterized phenomenon of brain shift, in which the brain deforms intraoperatively as a result of craniotomy, swelling, gravity, tumor resection, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, and many other factors. As such, there is a need for updated intraoperative information that accurately reflects intraoperative conditions. Since 1982, intraoperative ultrasound has allowed neurosurgeons to craft and update operative plans without ionizing radiation exposure or major workflow interruption. Continued evolution of ultrasound technology since its introduction has resulted in superior imaging quality, smaller probes, and more seamless integration with neuronavigation systems. Furthermore, the introduction of related imaging modalities, such as 3-dimensional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, high-frequency ultrasound, and ultrasound elastography, has dramatically expanded the options available to the neurosurgeon intraoperatively. In the context of these advances, we review the current state, potential, and challenges of intraoperative ultrasound for brain tumor resection. We begin by evaluating these ultrasound technologies and their relative advantages and disadvantages. We then review three specific applications of these ultrasound technologies to brain tumor resection: (1) intraoperative navigation, (2) assessment of extent of resection, and (3) brain shift monitoring and compensation. We conclude by identifying opportunities for future directions in the development of ultrasound technologies.

The use of ultrasound in intracranial tumor surgery

BACKGROUND

As an intraoperative imaging modality, ultrasound is a user-friendly and cost-effective real-time imaging technique. Despite this, it is still not routinely employed for brain tumor surgery. This may be due to the poor image quality in inexperienced hands, and the well-documented learning curve. However, with regular use, the operator issues are addressed, and intraoperative ultrasound can provide valuable real-time information. The aim of this review is to provide an understanding for neurosurgeons of the development and use of ultrasound in intracranial tumor surgery, and possible future advances.

METHODS

A systematic search of the electronic databases Embase, Medline OvidSP, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar regarding the use of ultrasound in intracranial tumor surgery was undertaken.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Intraoperative ultrasound has been shown to be able to accurately account for brain shift and has potential for regular use in brain tumor surgery. Further developments in probe size, resolution, and image reconstruction techniques will ensure that intraoperative ultrasound is more accessible and attractive to the neuro-oncological surgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

This review has summarized the development of ultrasound and its uses with particular reference to brain tumor surgery, detailing the ongoing challenges in this area.

Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Resection of Gliomas: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Image-guided surgery has become standard practice during surgical resection, using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Intraoperative ultrasound (IoUS) has attracted interest because of its perceived safety, portability, and real-time imaging. This report is a meta-analysis of intraoperative ultrasound in gliomas.

METHODS

Critical literature review and meta-analyses, using the MEDLINE/PubMed service. The list of references in each article was double-checked for any missing references. We included all studies that reported the use of ultrasound to guide glioma-surgery. The meta-analyses were conducted according to statistical heterogeneity between the studies using Open MetaAnalyst Software. If there was no heterogeneity, fixed effects model was used for meta-analysis; otherwise, a random effect model was used. Statistical heterogeneity was explored by χ(2) and inconsistency (I(2)) statistics; an I(2) value of 50% or more represented substantial heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A wide search yielded 19,109 studies that might be relevant, of which 4819 were ultrasound in neurosurgery; 756 studies used ultrasound in cranial surgery, of which 24 studies used intraoperative ultrasound to guide surgical resection and 74 studies used it to guide biopsy. Fifteen studies fulfilled our stringent inclusion criteria, giving a total of 739 patients. The estimated average gross total resection rate was 77%. Furthermore, the relationship between extent of surgical resection and study population was not linear. Gross total resection was more likely under IoUS when the lesion was solitary and subcortical, with no history of surgery or radiotherapy. IoUS image quality, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values deteriorated as surgical resection proceeded.

CONCLUSION

IoUS-guided surgical resection of gliomas is a useful tool for guiding the resection and for improving the extent of resection. IoUS can be used in conjunction with other complementary technologies that can improve anatomic orientation during surgery. Real-time imaging, improved image quality, small probe sizes, repeatability, portability, and relatively low cost make IoUS a realistic, cost-effective tool that complements any existing tools in any neurosurgical operating environment.

A simple, safe and effective surface marking and targeting method combined with intraoperative ultrasonography for small subcortical intracranial lesions

BACKGROUND

Accurately locating small subcortical brain lesions is very important for maximal surgical resection with minimal neurological damage. Intraoperative MRI has proved to be more precise than ultrasound, it is relatively expensive and is not available in all centers. Herein we describe a new, simple, safe and effective method for determining a small skin incision and craniotomy via skin staples combined with intraoperative ultrasonography to determine the margins, vascularity and residue of the lesion.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with small subcortical lesions were admitted into the study. The maximum diameter of the lesions ranged between 18 and 30 mm. The depth of the lesion was described as the distance between the cortical surface and most outer point of the lesion. The mean of the depth of the lesions was 10.56 mm ranging between 3.3 and 18.7 mm. Multiple skin staples were used as irremovable skin markers. Before and after dural incision, ultrasound was used to assess the lesion size and location, its relationship with the surrounding tissue and the Doppler function to reveal the blood supply to the lesion.

RESULTS

In this study mean craniotomy diameter was 44 mm ranging between 32-55 mm. The location, extent, characteristics and adjacent tissue of the lesion were observed by high frequency ultrasonography during the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a simple, safe and effective method for determining a small skin incision and craniotomy combined with intraoperative ultrasound for small subcortical intracranial lesions for health center that does not have intraoperative MRI and navigation systems.