1
|
Van Alsten SC, Zipple I, Calhoun BC, Troester MA. Misclassification of second primary and recurrent breast cancer in the surveillance epidemiology and end results registry. Cancer Causes Control 2025; 36:421-432. [PMID: 39702817 PMCID: PMC11981851 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01944-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 11/20/2024] [Indexed: 12/21/2024]
Abstract
The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry incorporates laterality, histology, latency, and topography to identify second primary breast cancers. Contralateral tumors are classified as second primaries, but ipsilaterals are subject to additional inclusion criteria that increase specificity but may induce biases. It is important to understand how classification methods affect accuracy of second tumor classification. We collected estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ER, PR, Her2) status for 11,838 contralateral and 5,371 ipsilateral metachronous secondary tumors and estimated concordance odds ratios (cORs) to evaluate receptor dependence (the tendency for tumors to share receptor status) by laterality. If only second primaries are included, receptor dependence should be similar for contralateral and ipsilateral tumors. Thus, we compared ratios of cORs as a measure of inaccuracy. Cases who met ipsilateral second primary criteria were younger and had less aggressive primary tumor characteristics compared to contralateral tumors. Time to secondary tumors was (by definition) longer for ipsilaterals than contralaterals, especially among ER + primaries. Overall and in multiple strata, ipsilateral tumors showed higher receptor dependence than contralateral tumors (ratios of cORs > 1), suggesting some SEER-included ipsilaterals are recurrences. SEER multiple primary criteria increase specificity, but remain inaccurate and may lack sensitivity. The dearth of early occurring ipsilateral tumors (by definition), coupled with high observed receptor dependence among ipsilaterals, suggests important inaccuracies. Datasets that allow comparison of pathologist- and SEER-classification to true multi-marker genomic dependence are needed to understand inaccuracies induced by SEER definitions.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Breast Neoplasms/classification
- Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Female
- SEER Program
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/classification
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/metabolism
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/classification
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Aged
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
- Registries
- Adult
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C Van Alsten
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7435, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Isaiah Zipple
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Benjamin C Calhoun
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melissa A Troester
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box 7435, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corrigan KL, Kouzy R, Jaoude JA, Patel RR, Layman RM, Giordano SH, Woodward WA, Smith BD, Shaitelman SF, Ludmir EB. Inclusion of premenopausal women in breast cancer clinical trials. Breast 2022; 66:204-207. [PMID: 36327626 PMCID: PMC9637813 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with premenopausal breast cancer (PMBC) have been historically excluded from some clinical trials because of the limitations of using endocrine therapy (ET) in this population. We analyzed breast cancer randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to determine the rates of and factors associated with inclusion of PMBC patients to provide a benchmark for PMBC inclusion in RCTs moving forward. METHODS Using ClinicalTrials.Gov, we identified breast cancer phase III RCTs and extracted inclusion criteria and patient enrollment information. Multiple binary logistic regression modeling was used to assess trial-related factors that were associated with PMBC patient inclusion. RESULTS Of 170 breast cancer RCTs identified, 131 (77.1%) included PMBC patients. Sixty-five (38.2%) trials analyzed patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, of which 31 (47.7%) allowed for enrollment of PMBC patients. Lower rates of PMBC inclusion were seen in trials that studied HR+/HER2-patients (47.7% PMBC inclusion in HR+/HER2-trials vs. 94.3% in non-HR+/HER2-trials, aOR 0.07 [95% CI: 0.02-0.19], p < 0.001) and in trials that randomized or mandated ET (44.4% in ET trials vs. 83.2% in non-ET trials, aOR 0.21 [95% CI: 0.10-0.83], p = 0.02). Trials studying chemotherapy (CT) were associated with inclusion of PMBC patients (100% in CT trials vs. 70.5% in non-CT trials, a OR 14.02 [95% CI: 1.54-127.91], p = 0.01). All surgical and radiation therapy clinical trials allowed for the inclusion of PMBC patients in their eligibility criteria. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer clinical trials should carefully select their enrollment criteria and consider inclusion of premenopausal patients when appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey L Corrigan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Ramez Kouzy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph Abi Jaoude
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roshal R Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rachel M Layman
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wendy A Woodward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
El-Yakub A. Biological characteristics of breast cancers in a teaching hospital in Northwestern Nigeria. SAHEL MEDICAL JOURNAL 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/smj.smj_23_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
4
|
Wernli KJ, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K, Buist DSM, Brandzel SD, Bush M, Johnson D, Henderson LM, Nekhlyudov L, Onega T, Sprague BL, Lee JM, Lehman CD, Miglioretti DL. Surveillance Breast MRI and Mammography: Comparison in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer. Radiology 2019; 292:311-318. [PMID: 31161975 PMCID: PMC6694722 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Background There is lack of consensus regarding the use of breast MRI for routine surveillance for second breast cancer events in women with a personal history of breast cancer. Purpose To compare performance of surveillance mammography with breast MRI. Materials and Methods This observational cohort study used prospectively collected data and included 13 266 women age 18 years and older (mean age, 60 years ± 13) with stage 0-III breast cancer who underwent 33 938 mammographic examinations and 2506 breast MRI examinations from 2005 to 2012 in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Women were categorized into two groups: mammography alone (n = 11 745) or breast MRI (n = 1521). Performance measures were calculated by using end-of-day assessment and occurrence of second breast cancer events within 1 year of imaging. Logistic regression was used to compare performance for breast MRI versus mammography alone, adjusting for women, examination, and primary breast cancer characteristics. Analysis was conducted on a per-examination basis. Results Breast MRI was associated with younger age at diagnosis, chemotherapy, and higher education and income. Raw performance measures for breast MRI versus mammography were as follows, respectively: cancer detection rates, 10.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7, 14.8) versus 8.2 (95% CI: 7.3, 9.2) per 1000 examinations; sensitivity, 61.4% (27 of 44; 95% CI: 46.5%, 76.2%) versus 70.3% (279 of 397; 95% CI: 65.8%, 74.8%); and biopsy rate, 10.1% (253 of 2506; 95% CI: 8.9%, 11.3%) versus 4.0% (1343 of 33 938; 95% CI: 3.7%, 4.2%). In multivariable models, breast MRI was associated with higher biopsy rate (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI: 1.9, 2.7; P < .001) and cancer detection rate (OR, 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.7; P = .03) than mammography alone. However, there were no differences in sensitivity (OR, 1.1; 95% CI: 0.4, 2.9; P = .84) or interval cancer rate (OR, 1.1; 95% CI: 0.6, 2.2; P = .70). Conclusion Comparison of the performance of surveillance breast MRI with mammography must account for patient characteristics. Whereas breast MRI leads to higher biopsy and cancer detection rates, there were no significant differences in sensitivity or interval cancers compared with mammography. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Newell in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen J. Wernli
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Laura Ichikawa
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Karla Kerlikowske
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Diana S. M. Buist
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Susan D. Brandzel
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Mary Bush
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Dianne Johnson
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Louise M. Henderson
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Larissa Nekhlyudov
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Tracy Onega
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Brian L. Sprague
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Janie M. Lee
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Constance D. Lehman
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| | - Diana L. Miglioretti
- From the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730
Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 (K.J.W., L.I., D.S.M.B., S.D.B., M.B.,
D.J., D.L.M.); Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (K.K.); Department of Radiology,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (L.M.H.); Department of Medicine,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.N.); Department of
Biomedical Data Science, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH (T.O.); Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Vermont,
Burlington, Vt (B.L.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.D.L.); Department of Public
Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, Calif (D.L.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loo LWM, Gao C, Shvetsov YB, Okoro DR, Hernandez BY, Bargonetti J. MDM2, MDM2-C, and mutant p53 expression influence breast cancer survival in a multiethnic population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 174:257-269. [PMID: 30470976 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5065-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to examine the association between expression of mutant p53 (mtp53), full-length MDM2 (MDM2), and MDM2 isoform C (MDM2-C) and survival in multiethnic breast cancer patients. METHODS A total of 787 invasive breast tumors included in a clinically annotated multiethnic population-based tissue microarray (TMA) were screened utilizing commercially available antibodies to p53 and MDM2, and a newly developed monoclonal antibody recognizing MDM2-C. RESULTS Mutant p53 (mtp53) was more common in younger (< 50 years) breast cancer patients. Among the 787 cases included in the study, mtp53, MDM2, and MDM2-C expression were not significantly associated with risk of overall or breast cancer-specific mortality. However when associations within individual racial/ethnic groups (White, Japanese, and Native Hawaiian) were examined, expression of MDM2-C was found to be associated with lower risk of breast cancer-specific mortality exclusively for White patients HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.69 and mtp53 expression was associated with higher overall mortality in Japanese patients (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.02-2.59). Also, Japanese patients positive for the joint expression of MDM2-C and mtp53 had a greater than twofold risk of overall mortality (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.04-4.48); and White patients with positive MDM2-C and wild-type p53 expression (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.96) were at lower risk of mortality when compared to patients with negative MDM2-C and wild-type p53 expression in their respective racial/ethnic group. CONCLUSION Racial/ethnic differences in expression profiles of mtp53, MDM2, and MDM2-C and associations with breast cancer-specific and overall mortality. MDM2-C may have a positive or negative role in breast tumorigenesis depending on mtp53 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lenora W M Loo
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
| | - Chong Gao
- Department of Biological Sciences Hunter College, The Graduate Center Departments of Biology and Biochemistry, City University of New York, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Yurii B Shvetsov
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Danielle R Okoro
- Department of Biological Sciences Hunter College, The Graduate Center Departments of Biology and Biochemistry, City University of New York, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Brenda Y Hernandez
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Jill Bargonetti
- Department of Biological Sciences Hunter College, The Graduate Center Departments of Biology and Biochemistry, City University of New York, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li Q, Li L, Jiang X, Du Q, Li Y, Li T, Gong H, Cao B. Characteristics and prognostic values of traditional pathological parameters and advanced molecular subtypes in women in Beijing with operable breast cancer: a retrospective analysis. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021819. [PMID: 30413499 PMCID: PMC6231570 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigated the characteristics and prognostic values of traditional pathological parameters and advanced molecular subtypes in women with operable breast cancer in Beijing. DESIGN A retrospective study through case information enquiry or telephonic follow-up. SETTING Beijing Friendship Hospital. PARTICIPANTS 1042 patients with primary operable breast cancer between 2008 and 2012 were enrolled in the study. MEASURES The characteristics and 5-year relapse rates according to the Nottingham Prognosis Index (NPI) and molecular subtypes were analysed. RESULTS In 1042 patients, the percentages of high histological grade, N1+N2, T2+T4 were 7.3%, 24.2%, 46.9%, respectively. In patients with invasive breast cancer, the percentages of auxiliary staging, positive margins, vascular invasion and nerve infiltration were 65.0%, 2.8%, 10.5% and 1.1%, respectively. The missing percentages of auxiliary staging, margins, vascular tumour invasion and nerve infiltration were 14.2%, 31.4%, 46.5% and 97.4%, respectively. The percentages of ER-positive, PR-positive, HER2-positive and Ki-67 high expression were 64.3%, 43.8%, 18.8% and 62.7%, respectively. The percentages of luminal A, luminal B, HER2-overexpression and basal-like breast cancers were 10.5%, 54.2%, 8.2% and 11.2%, respectively. Luminal A, luminal B and basal-like breast cancer subtypes were more common in the >60 years group, the 41-60 years group and the 20-40 years group, respectively. The 5-year relapse rates according to NPI were as follows: 6.2% in the low recurrence risk group, 10.4% in the moderate recurrence risk group and 12.9% in the high recurrence risk group. The 5-year relapse rates according to molecular subtypes were as follows: luminal A 4.0%, luminal B 7.0%, HER2-overexpression14.2%, basal-like 15.6%. CONCLUSIONS Reasonable analysis of traditional pathological parameters and advanced molecular subtypes in women with operable breast cancer in Beijing may be useful to guide precise treatment and predict prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin Li
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyue Jiang
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Du
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yingrui Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular biology, Basic Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Teng Li
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Gong
- Department of Surgery, Beijing Changping Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Bangwei Cao
- Department of Cancer center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alabdulkareem H, Pinchinat T, Khan S, Landers A, Christos P, Simmons R, Moo TA. The impact of molecular subtype on breast cancer recurrence in young women treated with contemporary adjuvant therapy. Breast J 2017; 24:148-153. [DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2016] [Revised: 11/02/2016] [Accepted: 11/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarah Khan
- New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center; New York NY USA
| | - Alyssa Landers
- New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center; New York NY USA
| | - Paul Christos
- New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center; New York NY USA
| | - Rache Simmons
- New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center; New York NY USA
| | - Tracy-Ann Moo
- New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center; New York NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grozescu T, Popa F. Immunotherapy and gene therapy in prostate cancer treatment. J Med Life 2017; 10:54-55. [PMID: 28255378 PMCID: PMC5304374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
There are few methods bringing several relatively recent advances in therapy of certain types of prostate cancer. Belonging to personalized therapies, they use cells (normal or pathologic) from the patient, modify and reintroduce them in the patient's body, leading to an increased efficiency against the neoplastic tissue, proving to increase the patient's lifespan and/ or tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Grozescu
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - F Popa
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grozescu T, Popa F. Prostate cancer between prognosis and adequate/proper therapy. J Med Life 2017; 10:5-12. [PMID: 28255369 PMCID: PMC5304372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowing the indolent, non-invasive nature of most types of prostate cancer, as well as the simple fact that the disease seems more likely to be associated with age rather than with other factors (50% of men at the age of 50 and 80% at the age of 80 have it [1], with or without presenting any symptom), the big challenge of this clinical entity was to determine severity indicators (so far insufficient) to guide the physician towards an adequate attitude in the clinical setting. The risk of over-diagnosing and over-treating many prostate cancer cases (indicated by all the major European and American studies) is real and poses many question marks. The present paper was meant to deliver new research data and to reset the clinical approach in prostate cancer cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Grozescu
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - F Popa
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tevaarwerk AJ, Wisinski KB, O'Regan RM. Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. J Oncol Pract 2016; 12:1148-1156. [PMID: 27858538 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2016.016865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Systemic therapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has evolved in the last 5 years, but critical questions remain. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for the addition of ovarian suppression to endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancers considered to be at high risk for recurrence, whereas those with lower-risk cancers seem to have a favorable outcome with tamoxifen alone. Two large randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for extending adjuvant tamoxifen beyond 5 years. Currently the choice of systemic therapy is selected empirically but molecular profiling may, in the near future, provide a more conclusive means of selecting an endocrine therapeutic approach for premenopausal patients. Given that a significant subset of hormone receptor-positive cancers are intrinsically resistant to endocrine agents, as well as the finding that inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 and mammalian target of rapamycin appears to potentially reverse this resistance in patients with metastatic disease, evaluation of these agents in the early-stage setting is ongoing.
Collapse
|
11
|
Yang SX, Polley E, Lipkowitz S. New insights on PI3K/AKT pathway alterations and clinical outcomes in breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 45:87-96. [PMID: 26995633 PMCID: PMC7436195 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2016] [Revised: 03/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/02/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PI3K/AKT signaling pathway plays an important role in tumorigenesis and regulates critical cellular functions including survival, proliferation and metabolism. PIK3CA mutations and AKT activation by phosphorylation (pAKT) are often detected in many cancers and especially at high frequencies in breast cancer. Mounting data suggest that PIK3CA mutations or pAKT are mostly associated with better or insignificant outcomes in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early stage breast cancer and tend to be with worse prognosis in ER- disease. pAKT expression has been identified to predict paclitaxel chemotherapy benefit in node-positive breast cancer. Preclinical and neoadjuvant trial data suggest that PIK3CA alterations confer resistance to HER2-targeted therapy and are associated with lower pathological complete response (pCR) rate in HER2-positive breast cancer. However, recent results from randomized clinical trials of adjuvant and metastatic settings show that patients with mutant and wildtype PIK3CA tumors derived similar benefit from anti-HER2 therapy. This article, with our new insights, aims to decipher the mixed data and discusses the influence of the potential confounding factors in the assessments. We also share our views for validation of PI3K/AKT alterations in relation to clinical outcome in the context of specific breast cancer subtypes and treatment modalities towards further advance of the precision medicine for breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry X Yang
- National Clinical Target Validation Laboratory, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Eric Polley
- Biometrics Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stanley Lipkowitz
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang M, Zhang S, Wen Y, Wang Y, Wei Y, Liu H, Zhang D, Su J, Wang F, Zhang Y. DNA Methylation Patterns Can Estimate Nonequivalent Outcomes of Breast Cancer with the Same Receptor Subtypes. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0142279. [PMID: 26550991 PMCID: PMC4638352 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 10/20/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer has various molecular subtypes and displays high heterogeneity. Aberrant DNA methylation is involved in tumor origin, development and progression. Moreover, distinct DNA methylation patterns are associated with specific breast cancer subtypes. We explored DNA methylation patterns in association with gene expression to assess their impact on the prognosis of breast cancer based on Infinium 450K arrays (training set) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The DNA methylation patterns of 12 featured genes that had a high correlation with gene expression were identified through univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and used to define the methylation risk score (MRS). An improved ability to distinguish the power of the DNA methylation pattern from the 12 featured genes (p = 0.00103) was observed compared with the average methylation levels (p = 0.956) or gene expression (p = 0.909). Furthermore, MRS provided a good prognostic value for breast cancers even when the patients had the same receptor status. We found that ER-, PR- or Her2- samples with high-MRS had the worst 5-year survival rate and overall survival time. An independent test set including 28 patients with death as an outcome was used to test the validity of the MRS of the 12 featured genes; this analysis obtained a prognostic value equivalent to the training set. The predict power was validated through two independent datasets from the GEO database. The DNA methylation pattern is a powerful predictor of breast cancer survival, and can predict outcomes of the same breast cancer molecular subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Zhang
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
| | - Shaojun Zhang
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
| | - Yanhua Wen
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
| | - Yihan Wang
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
| | - Yanjun Wei
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
| | - Hongbo Liu
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
| | - Dongwei Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Jianzhong Su
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
| | - Fang Wang
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Altekruse SF, Rosenfeld GE, Carrick DM, Pressman EJ, Schully SD, Mechanic LE, Cronin KA, Hernandez BY, Lynch CF, Cozen W, Khoury MJ, Penberthy LT. SEER cancer registry biospecimen research: yesterday and tomorrow. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015; 23:2681-7. [PMID: 25472677 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries have been a source of biospecimens for cancer research for decades. Recently, registry-based biospecimen studies have become more practical, with the expansion of electronic networks for pathology and medical record reporting. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens are now used for next-generation sequencing and other molecular techniques. These developments create new opportunities for SEER biospecimen research. We evaluated 31 research articles published during 2005 to 2013 based on authors' confirmation that these studies involved linkage of SEER data to biospecimens. Rather than providing an exhaustive review of all possible articles, our intent was to indicate the breadth of research made possible by such a resource. We also summarize responses to a 2012 questionnaire that was broadly distributed to the NCI intra- and extramural biospecimen research community. This included responses from 30 investigators who had used SEER biospecimens in their research. The survey was not intended to be a systematic sample, but instead to provide anecdotal insight on strengths, limitations, and the future of SEER biospecimen research. Identified strengths of this research resource include biospecimen availability, cost, and annotation of data, including demographic information, stage, and survival. Shortcomings include limited annotation of clinical attributes such as detailed chemotherapy history and recurrence, and timeliness of turnaround following biospecimen requests. A review of selected SEER biospecimen articles, investigator feedback, and technological advances reinforced our view that SEER biospecimen resources should be developed. This would advance cancer biology, etiology, and personalized therapy research. See all the articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Biomarkers, Biospecimens, and New Technologies in Molecular Epidemiology." Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(12); 2681-7. ©2014 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean F Altekruse
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland.
| | - Gabriel E Rosenfeld
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Danielle M Carrick
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Emilee J Pressman
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Sheri D Schully
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Leah E Mechanic
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Kathleen A Cronin
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| | | | - Charles F Lynch
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Wendy Cozen
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California. Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Muin J Khoury
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland. Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lynne T Penberthy
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Park JH, Anderson WF, Gail MH. Improvements in US Breast Cancer Survival and Proportion Explained by Tumor Size and Estrogen-Receptor Status. J Clin Oncol 2015. [PMID: 26195709 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.59.9191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer mortality began declining in many Western countries during the late 1980s. We estimated the proportion of improvements in stage- and age-specific breast cancer survival in the United States explained by tumor size or estrogen receptor (ER) status. METHODS We estimated hazard ratios for breast cancer-specific death from time of invasive breast cancer diagnosis in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 9 Registries Database from 1973 to 2010, with and without stratification by tumor size and ER status. RESULTS Hazards from breast cancer-specific death declined from 1973 to 2010, not only in the first 5 years after diagnosis, but also thereafter. Stratification by tumor size explained less than 17% of the improvements comparing 2005 to 2010 versus 1973 to 1979, except for women age ≥ 70 years with local (49%) or regional (38%) disease. Tumor size usually accounted for more of the improvement in the first 5 years after diagnosis than later. Additional adjustment for ER status (positive, negative, or unknown) from 1990 to 2010 did not explain much more of the improvement, except for women age ≥ 70 years within 5 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSION Most stage-specific survival improvement in women younger than age 70 years old is unexplained by tumor size and ER status, suggesting a key role for treatment. In the first 5 years after diagnosis, tumor size contributed importantly for women ≥ 70 years old with local and regional stage, and stratification by tumor size and ER status explained even more of the survival improvement among women age ≥ 70 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju-Hyun Park
- Ju-Hyun Park, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea; and William F. Anderson and Mitchell H. Gail, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - William F Anderson
- Ju-Hyun Park, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea; and William F. Anderson and Mitchell H. Gail, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mitchell H Gail
- Ju-Hyun Park, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea; and William F. Anderson and Mitchell H. Gail, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kohler BA, Sherman RL, Howlader N, Jemal A, Ryerson AB, Henry KA, Boscoe FP, Cronin KA, Lake A, Noone AM, Henley SJ, Eheman CR, Anderson RN, Penberthy L. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, Featuring Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, and State. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:djv048. [PMID: 25825511 PMCID: PMC4603551 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 653] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2014] [Revised: 01/21/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Cancer Society (ACS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Cancer Institute (NCI), and North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) collaborate annually to produce updated, national cancer statistics. This Annual Report includes a focus on breast cancer incidence by subtype using new, national-level data. METHODS Population-based cancer trends and breast cancer incidence by molecular subtype were calculated. Breast cancer subtypes were classified using tumor biomarkers for hormone receptor (HR) and human growth factor-neu receptor (HER2) expression. RESULTS Overall cancer incidence decreased for men by 1.8% annually from 2007 to 2011 [corrected]. Rates for women were stable from 1998 to 2011. Within these trends there was racial/ethnic variation, and some sites have increasing rates. Among children, incidence rates continued to increase by 0.8% per year over the past decade while, like adults, mortality declined. HR+/HER2- breast cancers, the subtype with the best prognosis, were the most common for all races/ethnicities with highest rates among non-Hispanic white women, local stage cases, and low poverty areas (92.7, 63.51, and 98.69 per 100000 non-Hispanic white women, respectively). HR+/HER2- breast cancer incidence rates were strongly, positively correlated with mammography use, particularly for non-Hispanic white women (Pearson 0.57, two-sided P < .001). Triple-negative breast cancers, the subtype with the worst prognosis, were highest among non-Hispanic black women (27.2 per 100000 non-Hispanic black women), which is reflected in high rates in southeastern states. CONCLUSIONS Progress continues in reducing the burden of cancer in the United States. There are unique racial/ethnic-specific incidence patterns for breast cancer subtypes; likely because of both biologic and social risk factors, including variation in mammography use. Breast cancer subtype analysis confirms the capacity of cancer registries to adjust national collection standards to produce clinically relevant data based on evolving medical knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betsy A Kohler
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA).
| | - Recinda L Sherman
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Nadia Howlader
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - A Blythe Ryerson
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Kevin A Henry
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Francis P Boscoe
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Kathleen A Cronin
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Andrew Lake
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Anne-Michelle Noone
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - S Jane Henley
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Christie R Eheman
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Robert N Anderson
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| | - Lynne Penberthy
- North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL (BAK, RLS, KAH, FPB); National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (NH, KAC, AMN, LP); American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA (AJ); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (ABR, SJH, CRE); Temple University Department of Geography, Philadelphia, PA (KAH); New York State Cancer Registry, NY (FPB); Information Management Services, Inc., Rockville, MD (AL); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (RNA)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Reams RR, Jones-Triche J, Chan OTM, Hernandez BY, Soliman KFA, Yates C. Immunohistological analysis of ABCD3 expression in Caucasian and African American prostate tumors. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:132981. [PMID: 25802834 PMCID: PMC4329846 DOI: 10.1155/2015/132981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Accepted: 01/04/2015] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
In a previously published study, we showed that expression of the ABCD3 gene increased with increasing metastatic potential in a panel of prostate cancer cell lines derived from African American and Caucasian American men. Given importance of identifying biomarker(s) that can distinguish indolent versus aggressive prostate tumors, we conducted an immunohistochemical analysis of ABCD3 expression Caucasian and African American prostate tumors. ABCD3 expression in each patient population was compared with clinicopathologic characteristics, Gleason score, and age. ABCD3 expression increased with increasing Gleason score (P = 0.0094), age (P = 0.0014), and pathology grade (P = 0.0007) in Caucasian patients. Interestingly, in the AA patients, ABCD3 expression highly increased to the same degree in both low and high Gleason score tumors. Similarly, ABCD3 expression was elevated to the same degree in BPH derived from AA. Our findings demonstrate that increased ABCD3 expression correlates with Gleason Score in CA prostate tumors. However, in AA prostate tumors, ABCD3 expression was higher and was sustained in both low Gleason and high Gleason AA tumors. While the functional role of ABCD3 in prostate cancer is not completely elucidated, this gene warrants further study as a potential biomarker for aggressive prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Renee Reams
- College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA
| | | | - Owen T. M. Chan
- Cancer Epidemiology, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Brenda Y. Hernandez
- Cancer Epidemiology, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Karam F. A. Soliman
- College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA
| | - Clayton Yates
- Department of Biology and Center for Cancer Research, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hernandez BY, Wilkens LR, Le Marchand L, Horio D, Chong CD, Loo LWM. Differences in IGF-axis protein expression and survival among multiethnic breast cancer patients. Cancer Med 2015; 4:354-62. [PMID: 25619494 PMCID: PMC4380961 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2014] [Revised: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 10/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
There is limited knowledge about the biological basis of racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer outcomes. Aberrations in IGF signaling induced by obesity and other factors may contribute to these disparities. This study examines the expression profiles of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-axis proteins and the association with breast cancer survival across a multiethnic population. We examined the expression profiles of the IGF1, IGF1R, IGFBP2 (IGF-binding proteins), and IGFBP3 proteins in breast tumor tissue and their relationships with all-cause and breast cancer-specific survival up to 17 years postdiagnosis in a multiethnic series of 358 patients in Hawaii, USA. Native Hawaiians, Caucasians, and Japanese were compared. Covariates included demographic and clinical factors and ER/PR/HER2 (estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2) status. In Native Hawaiian patients, IGFBP2 and IGFBP3 expression were each independently associated with overall and breast cancer mortality (IGFB2: HRmort = 10.96, 95% CI: 2.18–55.19 and HRmort = 35.75, 95% CI: 3.64–350.95, respectively; IGFBP3: HRmort = 5.16, 95% CI: 1.27–20.94 and HRmort = 8.60, 95% CI: 1.84–40.15, respectively). IGF1R expression was also positively associated with all-cause mortality in Native Hawaiians. No association of IGF-axis protein expression and survival was observed in Japanese or Caucasian patients. The interaction of race/ethnicity and IGFBP3 expression on mortality risk was significant. IGF-axis proteins may have variable influence on breast cancer progression across different racial/ethnic groups. Expression of binding proteins and receptors in breast tumors may influence survival in breast cancer patients by inducing aberrations in IGF signaling and/or through IGF-independent mechanisms. Additional studies to evaluate the role of the IGF-axis in breast cancer are critical to improve targeted breast cancer treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda Y Hernandez
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
McCormack VA, Joffe M, van den Berg E, Broeze N, Silva IDS, Romieu I, Jacobson JS, Neugut AI, Schüz J, Cubasch H. Breast cancer receptor status and stage at diagnosis in over 1,200 consecutive public hospital patients in Soweto, South Africa: a case series. Breast Cancer Res 2014; 15:R84. [PMID: 24041225 PMCID: PMC3978918 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2013] [Accepted: 07/31/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Estimates of the proportion of estrogen receptor negative (ERN) and triple-negative (TRN) breast cancer from sub-Saharan Africa are variable and include high values. Large studies of receptor status conducted on non-archival tissue are lacking from this region. Methods We identified 1218 consecutive women (91% black) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2006–2012 at a public hospital in Soweto, South Africa. Immunohistochemistry based ER, progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal factor 2 (HER2) receptors were assessed at diagnosis on pre-treatment biopsy specimens. Mutually adjusted associations of receptor status with stage, age, and race were examined using risk ratios (RRs). ER status was compared with age-stratified US Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program (SEER) data. Results 35% (95% confidence interval (CI): 32–38) of tumors were ERN, 47% (45–52) PRN, 26% (23–29) HER2P and 21% (18–23) TRN. Later stage tumors were more likely to be ERN and PRN (RRs 1.9 (1.1-2.9) and 2.0 (1.3-3.1) for stage III vs. I) but were not strongly associated with HER2 status. Age was not strongly associated with ER or PR status, but older women were less likely to have HER2P tumors (RR, 0.95 (0.92-0.99) per 5 years). During the study, stage III + IV tumors decreased from 66% to 46%. In black women the percentage of ERN (37% (34–40)) and PRN tumors (48% (45–52)) was higher than in non-black patients (22% (14–31) and 34% (25–44), respectively, P = 0.004 and P = 0.02), which remained after age and stage adjustment. Age-specific ERN proportions in black South African women were similar to those of US black women, especially for women diagnosed over age 50. Conclusion Although a greater proportion of black than non-black South African women had ER-negative or TRN breast cancer, in all racial groups in this study breast cancer was predominantly ER-positive and was being diagnosed at earlier stages over time. These observations provide initial indications that late-stage aggressive breast cancers may not be an inherent feature of the breast cancer burden across Africa.
Collapse
|
19
|
Anderson WF, Rosenberg PS, Prat A, Perou CM, Sherman ME. How many etiological subtypes of breast cancer: two, three, four, or more? J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106:dju165. [PMID: 25118203 PMCID: PMC4148600 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2013] [Revised: 05/01/2014] [Accepted: 05/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, divisible into a variable number of clinical subtypes. A fundamental question is how many etiological classes underlie the clinical spectrum of breast cancer? An etiological subtype reflects a grouping with a common set of causes, whereas a clinical subtype represents a grouping with similar prognosis and/or prediction. Herein, we review the evidence for breast cancer etiological heterogeneity. We then evaluate the etiological evidence with mRNA profiling data. A bimodal age distribution at diagnosis with peak frequencies near ages 50 and 70 years is a fundamental characteristic of breast cancer for important tumor features, clinical characteristics, risk factor profiles, and molecular subtypes. The bimodal peak frequencies at diagnosis divide breast cancer overall into a "mixture" of two main components in varying proportions in different cancer populations. The first breast cancer tends to arise early in life with modal age-at-diagnosis near 50 years and generally behaves aggressively. The second breast cancer occurs later in life with modal age near 70 years and usually portends a more indolent clinical course. These epidemiological and molecular data are consistent with a two-component mixture model and compatible with a hierarchal view of breast cancers arising from two main cell types of origin. Notwithstanding the potential added value of more detailed categorizations for personalized breast cancer treatment, we suggest that the development of better criteria to identify the two proposed etiologic classes would advance breast cancer research and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William F Anderson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics Biostatistics Branch (WFA, PSR), and Division of Cancer Prevention (MES), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Translational Genomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain (AP); Department of Genetics and Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (CMP).
| | - Philip S Rosenberg
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics Biostatistics Branch (WFA, PSR), and Division of Cancer Prevention (MES), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Translational Genomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain (AP); Department of Genetics and Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (CMP)
| | - Aleix Prat
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics Biostatistics Branch (WFA, PSR), and Division of Cancer Prevention (MES), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Translational Genomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain (AP); Department of Genetics and Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (CMP)
| | - Charles M Perou
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics Biostatistics Branch (WFA, PSR), and Division of Cancer Prevention (MES), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Translational Genomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain (AP); Department of Genetics and Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (CMP)
| | - Mark E Sherman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics Biostatistics Branch (WFA, PSR), and Division of Cancer Prevention (MES), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Translational Genomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain (AP); Department of Genetics and Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (CMP)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Association between oestrogens receptor expressions in breast cancer and comorbidities: a cross-sectional, population-based study. PLoS One 2014; 9:e98127. [PMID: 24848085 PMCID: PMC4029934 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2014] [Accepted: 04/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer with oestrogen receptor expression is common in older women. Several factors, such as age and reproductive hormone exposure, have been associated with oestrogen receptor expression in breast cancer. However, the association between comorbidities and the oestrogen receptor expression has been poorly studied. We hypothesized that there was an association between burden comorbidity and breast cancer with oestrogen receptor expression in older women. Objective To determine whether oestrogen receptor expression in breast cancer was associated with burden comorbidity in community-dwelling women. Methods A total of 1,707 women with breast cancer registered on the list of a breast cancer registry were included. The recorded data included: age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score≥1, breast cancer characteristics (coded according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology), and breast cancer pathological stage (the pathological-tumour-node-metastasis, Scarff Bloom Richardson, and hormonal status of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor). Results Breast cancer with oestrogen receptor expression was identified in 1,378 patients (80·7%). The fully-adjusted logistic regression showed that oestrogen receptor expression was associated with Charlson Comorbidity Index score≥1 (odds ratio [OR] = 1·91,95%confidence interval [CI] = [1.01–3.61], P = 0·048), progesterone receptor expression (OR = 16·64, 95%CI = [11.62–23.81], P<0·001), human epidermal growth factor receptor (OR = 0·54, 95%CI = [0.34–0.84], P = 0·007), age (OR = 1.02, 95%CI = [1.00–1.03], P = 0.008), Scarff Bloom Richardson grade II and grade III (OR = 0·21with 95%CI = [0.10–0.44] and OR = 0·06 with 95%CI = [0.03–0.12], P<0·001). Conclusion Our findings provide new data showing an independent positive association between burden comorbidity and breast cancer with oestrogen receptor expression. This result confirms that evaluation of oestrogen receptor expression in breast cancer should not be limited to hormonal factors stratified by age.
Collapse
|
21
|
Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI, Chen VW, Clarke CA, Ries LAG, Cronin KA. US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106:dju055. [PMID: 24777111 PMCID: PMC4580552 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1017] [Impact Index Per Article: 92.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2013] [Revised: 11/22/2013] [Accepted: 02/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2010, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries began collecting human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptor status for breast cancer cases. METHODS Breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor (HR; estrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor [PR]) and HER2 status were assessed across the 28% of the US population that is covered by SEER registries. Age-specific incidence rates by subtype were calculated for non-Hispanic (NH) white, NH black, NH Asian Pacific Islander (API), and Hispanic women. Joint HR/HER2 status distributions by age, race/ethnicity, county-level poverty, registry, stage, Bloom-Richardson grade, tumor size, and nodal status were evaluated using multivariable adjusted polytomous logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Among case patients with known HR/HER2 status, 36810 (72.7%) were found to be HR(+)/HER2(-), 6193 (12.2%) were triple-negative (HR(-)/HER2(-)), 5240 (10.3%) were HR(+)/HER2(+), and 2328 (4.6%) were HR(-)/HER2(+); 6912 (12%) had unknown HR/HER2 status. NH white women had the highest incidence rate of the HR(+)/HER2(-) subtype, and NH black women had the highest rate of the triple-negative subtype. Compared with women with the HR(+)/HER2(-) subtype, triple-negative patients were more likely to be NH black and Hispanic; HR(+)/HER2(+) patients were more likely to be NH API; and HR(-)/HER2(+) patients were more likely to be NH black, NH API, and Hispanic. Patients with triple-negative, HR(+)/HER2(+), and HR(-)/HER2(+) breast cancer were 10% to 30% less likely to be diagnosed at older ages compared with HR(+)/HER2(-) patients and 6.4-fold to 20.0-fold more likely to present with high-grade disease. CONCLUSIONS In the future, SEER data can be used to monitor clinical outcomes in women diagnosed with different molecular subtypes of breast cancer for a large portion (approximately 28%) of the US population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Howlader
- Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR).
| | - Sean F Altekruse
- Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR)
| | - Christopher I Li
- Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR)
| | - Vivien W Chen
- Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR)
| | - Christina A Clarke
- Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR)
| | - Lynn A G Ries
- Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR)
| | - Kathleen A Cronin
- Affiliations of authors: Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD (NH, SFA, LAGR, KAC); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (CIL); Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (CIL); Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA (VWC); Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA (CAC); National Cancer Institute Contractor, RiesSearch, LLC, Rockville MD (LAGR)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Anderson WF, Rosenberg PS, Katki HA. Tracking and evaluating molecular tumor markers with cancer registry data: HER2 and breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106:dju093. [PMID: 24777110 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- William F Anderson
- Affiliation of authors: Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (WFA, PSR, HAK)
| | - Philip S Rosenberg
- Affiliation of authors: Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (WFA, PSR, HAK)
| | - Hormuzd A Katki
- Affiliation of authors: Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (WFA, PSR, HAK).
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cubasch H, Joffe M, Hanisch R, Schuz J, Neugut AI, Karstaedt A, Broeze N, van den Berg E, McCormack V, Jacobson JS. Breast cancer characteristics and HIV among 1,092 women in Soweto, South Africa. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 140:177-86. [PMID: 23801159 PMCID: PMC3706733 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2606-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2013] [Accepted: 06/08/2013] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
In the low-income HIV-endemic regions of sub-Saharan Africa, malignancies related to HIV have long been recognized as a major public health problem. However, epithelial malignancies associated with older age, such as breast cancer, are also rising dramatically in those regions. We compared consecutive HIV-positive and -negative black women diagnosed with breast cancer at a large public hospital in Soweto, South Africa, on age, year of diagnosis, stage, grade, and receptor status, and grouped HIV-positive patients by CD4 cell counts. We computed prevalence ratios of the associations of HIV status and CD4 category with stage, grade, receptor status, and among the HIV-positive patients, receipt of ART, controlling for age and year of diagnosis. Of 1,092 patients, 765 were tested for HIV; 151 (19.7 %) tested positive, a prevalence similar to that in the source population. Although, HIV-positive patients were younger than HIV-negative patients (p < 0.001), HIV status was not associated with the tumor characteristics. Thirty-seven women (25.9 %) had CD4 cell counts <200 cells/μl. Patients in that severely immunocompromised group were older than those in the other groups (p = 0.01). This study is the first to analyze the association of HIV with breast cancer in a large sample. Based on similar HIV prevalence in our sample and the population of the hospital's catchment area, clinicians serving HIV-endemic communities should promote routine HIV testing of younger breast cancer patients and immediate treatment of those who test positive, prior to the initiation of chemotherapy. Research is needed on treatment and outcomes given HIV and low CD4 cell count.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herbert Cubasch
- University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Maureen Joffe
- University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Wits Health Consortium, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Rachel Hanisch
- Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 69008 France
| | - Joachim Schuz
- Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 69008 France
| | - Alfred I. Neugut
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th Street, Room 732, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Alan Karstaedt
- University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Nadine Broeze
- University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Eunice van den Berg
- University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Valerie McCormack
- Section of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 69008 France
| | - Judith S. Jacobson
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th Street, Room 732, New York, NY 10032 USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kwee SA, Hernandez B, Chan O, Wong L. Choline kinase alpha and hexokinase-2 protein expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: association with survival. PLoS One 2012; 7:e46591. [PMID: 23071593 PMCID: PMC3465336 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2012] [Accepted: 09/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Hexokinase-2 (HK2) and more recently choline kinase alpha (CKA) expression has been correlated with clinical outcomes in several major cancers. This study examines the protein expression of HK2 and CKA in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in association with patient survival and other clinicopathologic parameters. Methods Immunohistochemical analysis for HK2 and CKA expression was performed on a tissue microarray of 157 HCC tumor samples. Results were analyzed in relation to clinicopathologic data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Program registries. Mortality rates were assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using log-rank tests. Predictors of overall survival were assessed using proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical expression of HK2 and CKA was detected in 71 (45%) and 55 (35%) tumor samples, respectively. Differences in tumor HK2 expression were associated with tumor grade (p = 0.008) and cancer stage (p = 0.001), while CKA expression differed significantly only across cancer stage (p = 0.048). Increased mortality was associated with tumor HK2 expression (p = 0.003) as well as CKA expression (p = 0.03) with hazard ratios of 1.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23–2.83) and 1.59 (95% CI 1.04–2.41), respectively. Similar effects on overall survival were noted in a subset analysis of early stage (I and II) HCC. Tumor HK2 expression, but not CKA expression, remained a significant predictor of survival in multivariable analyses. Conclusion HK2 and CKA expression may have biologic and prognostic significance in HCC, with tumor HK2 expression being a potential independent predictor of survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandi A Kwee
- The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lin NU, Vanderplas A, Hughes ME, Theriault RL, Edge SB, Wong YN, Blayney DW, Niland JC, Winer EP, Weeks JC. Clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival among women with triple-negative breast cancer in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cancer 2012; 118:5463-72. [PMID: 22544643 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 453] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2011] [Revised: 02/03/2012] [Accepted: 03/02/2012] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to describe clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival according to breast cancer subtype with a focus on triple-negative tumors. METHODS In total, 15,204 women were evaluated who presented to National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers with stage I through III breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2006. Tumors were classified as positive for estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) (hormone receptor [HR]-positive) and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2); positive for HER2 and any ER or PR status (HER2-positive); or negative for ER, PR, and HER2 (triple-negative). RESULTS Subtype distribution was triple-negative in 17% of women (n = 2569), HER2-positive in 17% of women (n = 2602), and HR-positive/HER2-negative in 66% of women (n = 10,033). The triple-negative subtype was more frequent in African Americans compared with Caucasians (adjusted odds ratio, 1.98; P < .0001). Premenopausal women, but not postmenopausal women, with high body mass index had an increased likelihood of having the triple-negative subtype (P = .02). Women with triple-negative cancers were less likely to present on the basis of an abnormal screening mammogram (29% vs 48%; P < .0001) and were more likely to present with higher tumor classification, but they were less likely to have lymph node involvement. Relative to HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors, triple-negative tumors were associated with a greater risk of brain or lung metastases; and women with triple-negative tumors had worse breast cancer-specific and overall survival, even after adjusting for age, disease stage, race, tumor grade, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (overall survival: adjusted hazard ratio, 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 2.39-3.10; P < .0001). The difference in the risk of death by subtype was most dramatic within the first 2 years after diagnosis (overall survival for 0-2 years: OR, 6.10; 95% confidence interval, 4.81-7.74). CONCLUSIONS Triple-negative tumors were associated with unique risk factors and worse outcomes compared with HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Triple negative (TN) breast cancers fail to express the three most common breast cancer receptors; i.e., estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2). Accumulating data demonstrate that epidemiological risk factor profiles also vary between TN (ER-PR-HER2-) and other breast cancers, especially the so-called Luminal A breast cancers (ER+PR ± HER2-) [1]. A more comprehensive understanding of the epidemiology of TN breast cancers has important public health implications for risk assessment [2], prevention and treatment. The epidemiology of TN breast cancers can be first understood in the age-related reproductive risk factor patterns for ER, PR, and HER2. For example, there is a clear and strong association between older age at diagnosis (and therefore postmenopausal status) and the development of ER positive, PR positive, and HER2 negative breast cancers. On the other hand, younger age at diagnosis (and premenopausal status) is related to the development of ER negative, PR negative, and HER2 positive breast cancers. This gives rise to the somewhat counterintuitive suggestion that menopause has a greater relative impact upon hormone receptor negative than positive breast cancers [3,4]. Throughout this review, we will primarily contrast ER-PR-HER2- (TN) with ER+PR ± HER2- (Luminal A) breast cancers. We will first summarize the population-based age-specific incidence rate patterns and clinical outcomes, and then will review the available analytical studies. Information sources for this review included the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 13 Registries Public-Use Database [5], CANCERLIT, Index Medicus, and PubMed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen L Gierach
- Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, DHHS/NIH/NCI/Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, MD 20892-7244, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Swede H, Gregorio DI, Tannenbaum SH, Brockmeyer JA, Ambrosone C, Wilson LL, Pensa MA, Gonsalves L, Stevens RG, Runowicz CD. Prevalence and prognostic role of triple-negative breast cancer by race: a surveillance study. Clin Breast Cancer 2011; 11:332-41. [PMID: 21729670 PMCID: PMC4459583 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2011.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2011] [Revised: 04/05/2011] [Accepted: 04/07/2011] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emerging research suggests a substantially greater prevalence of the adverse triple-negative (TN) subtype (human epidermal growth factor receptor [HER]2(-), estrogen receptor [ER](-), and progesterone receptor [PR])(-)) among black patients with breast cancer. No reports however have been generated from a statewide cancer registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study consisted of all black patients (N = 643) and a random sample of white patients (n = 719) diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer (2000-2003) listed in the National Cancer Institute-Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (NCI-SEER) Connecticut Tumor Registry (CTR). HER2 status was obtained from pathology reports submitted to the registry. Remaining data were obtained from the registry database. RESULTS TN tumors were more prevalent in black compared with white patients (30.8% vs. 11.2%, respectively; P < .001.) There was a 2-fold greater frequency of ER(-) and PR(-) phenotypes among black patients, but HER2 status did not differ by race. Patients with lobular cancer were less likely to have TN breast cancer compared with patients with ductal tumors (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58). Among patients with regional disease, black patients exhibited increased risk of death (relative risk [RR] = 2.71; 95% CI, 1.48-4.97) independent of TN status. No survival disparity was found among patients with local disease. DISCUSSION These registry-based data corroborate reports that TN breast cancer varies substantially by race and histologic subtype. A survival disparity among patients with advanced disease, but not local disease, casts some doubt on TN status as an explanation for differences. CONCLUSION More research is warranted to understand why black patients with advanced breast cancer may be at increased risk for death whether or not their tumors express the TN phenotype.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology
- Breast Neoplasms/ethnology
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/ethnology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/epidemiology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/ethnology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Carcinoma, Medullary/epidemiology
- Carcinoma, Medullary/ethnology
- Carcinoma, Medullary/pathology
- Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data
- Female
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prevalence
- Prognosis
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
- SEER Program
- Survival Analysis
- United States/epidemiology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Swede
- Department of Community Medicine & Health Care, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cronin KA, Harlan LC, Dodd KW, Abrams JS, Ballard-Barbash R. Population-based estimate of the prevalence of HER-2 positive breast cancer tumors for early stage patients in the US. Cancer Invest 2010; 28:963-8. [PMID: 20690807 PMCID: PMC5094051 DOI: 10.3109/07357907.2010.496759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
The goal of this study was to estimate prevalence of HER-2 positive tumors in a population-based sample of 1026 women diagnosed in 2005 with early stage breast cancer. We modeled the relationship between patient and tumor characteristics and HER-2. HER-2 positive estimates were 19% for women aged ≤ 49 years and 15% aged ≥ 50 years. HER-2 varied by tumor grade and size in women aged ≤ 49 years but was not significant in multivariate analysis. Tumor grade and race were associated with HER-2 for women aged ≥ 50 years after controlling for other variables. HER-2 varies by age and by race and tumor in older women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen A Cronin
- Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sherman ME, Howatt W, Blows FM, Pharoah P, Hewitt SM, Garcia-Closas M. Molecular pathology in epidemiologic studies: a primer on key considerations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19:966-72. [PMID: 20332257 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of molecular pathologic components in epidemiologic studies offers opportunities to relate etiologic factors to specific tumor types, which in turn may allow the development of better overall risk prediction and provide clues about mechanisms that mediate risk factors. In addition, this research may help identify or validate tissue biomarkers related to prognosis and prediction of treatment responses. In this mini review, we highlight specific considerations related to the incorporation of pathology in epidemiologic studies, using breast cancer research as a model. Issues related to ensuring the representativeness of cases for which research tissue is available and understanding limitations resulting from variable procedures for tissue collection, fixation, and processing are discussed. The growing importance of molecular pathology in clinical medicine has led to increased emphasis on optimized tissue preparation, which should enhance this type of research. In addition, the availability of new technologies including tissue microarrays, image scanning, and automated analysis to achieve high-throughput standardized assessment of immunohistochemical markers, and potentially other assays, is enabling consistent scoring of a growing list of markers in large studies. Concurrently, methodologic research to extend the range of assays that can be done on fixed tissues is expanding possibilities for molecular pathologic studies in epidemiologic research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Sherman
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Rockville, MD, 6120 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852-7234, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Krenacs T, Ficsor L, Varga SV, Angeli V, Molnar B. Digital microscopy for boosting database integration and analysis in TMA studies. Methods Mol Biol 2010; 664:163-175. [PMID: 20690062 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-806-5_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The enormous amount of clinical, pathological, and staining data to be linked, analyzed, and correlated in a tissue microarray (TMA) project makes digital slides ideal to be integrated into TMA database systems. With the help of a computer and dedicated software tools, digital slides offer dynamic access to microscopic information at any magnification with easy navigation, annotation, measurement, and archiving features. Advanced slide scanners work both in transmitted light and fluorescent modes to support biomarker testing with immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Currently, computer-driven integrated systems are available for creating TMAs, digitalizing TMA slides, linking sample and staining data, and analyzing their results. Digital signals permit image segmentation along color, intensity, and size for automated object quantification where digital slides offer superior imaging features and batch processing. In this chapter, the workflow and the advantages of digital TMA projects are demonstrated through the project-based MIRAX system developed by 3DHISTECH and supported by Zeiss.The enhanced features of digital slides compared with those of still images can boost integration and intelligence in TMA database management systems, offering essential support for high-throughput biomarker testing, for example, in tumor progression/prognosis, drug discovery, and target therapy research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tibor Krenacs
- Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Budapest, Hungary.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Steude JS, Maskarinec G, Erber E, Verheus M, Hernandez BY, Killeen J, Cline JM. Mammographic density and matrix metalloproteinases in breast tissue. CANCER MICROENVIRONMENT 2009; 3:57-65. [PMID: 20012240 PMCID: PMC2970805 DOI: 10.1007/s12307-009-0031-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2009] [Accepted: 11/10/2009] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, yet the underlying histopathologic correlates are not clear. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors (TIMPs) play important roles in multiple stages of tumorigenesis. This study examined the association between mammographic density and expression of MMPs 1, 3, 9, and 12 and TIMP3 in benign and malignant breast tissue of 277 women with mainly Caucasian and Japanese ancestry. Tissue microarrays with up to 4 benign and 4 malignant cores per woman were stained immunohistochemically and evaluated. Digitized prediagnostic mammograms were assessed for densities using a computer-assisted method. General linear models adjusted for known confounders were applied to estimate mean densities by staining category. Strong expression of all MMPs was about twice as frequent in malignant as in benign tissue, while TIMP3 expression in stromal tissue was higher in benign than malignant cores. For MMP3 and 9, less than 10% of cores stained positive; thus, they were not further analyzed. None of the markers showed a statistically significant association with breast density in the entire study population and ethnic-specific results were conflicting and difficult to explain. Although not statistically significant, mean density was consistently lower with more extensive TIMP3 expression in stromal and epithelial tissue. These findings indicate that the higher breast cancer risk in women with dense breasts may be influenced by lower TIMP3 expression. However, future investigations into activities and ratios of additional proteases and their inhibitors as well as other pathways, such as inflammation, are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana S Steude
- Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, 1236 Lauhala Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Anderson WF, Jatoi I, Sherman ME. Qualitative age interactions in breast cancer studies: mind the gap. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:5308-11. [PMID: 19826117 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.22.9450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- William F Anderson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Verheus M, Maskarinec G, Erber E, Steude JS, Killeen J, Hernandez BY, Cline JM. Mammographic density and epithelial histopathologic markers. BMC Cancer 2009; 9:182. [PMID: 19523235 PMCID: PMC2709637 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2009] [Accepted: 06/13/2009] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We explored the association of mammographic density, a breast cancer risk factor, with hormonal and proliferation markers in benign tissue from tumor blocks of pre-and postmenopausal breast cancer cases. METHODS Breast cancer cases were recruited from a case-control study on breast density. Mammographic density was assessed on digitized prediagnostic mammograms using a computer-assisted method. For 279 participants of the original study, we obtained tumor blocks and prepared tissue microarrays (TMA), but benign tissue cores were only available for 159 women. The TMAs were immunostained for estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) and beta (ERbeta), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2/neu, Ki-67, and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA). We applied general linear models to compute breast density according to marker expression. RESULTS A substantial proportion of the samples were in the low or no staining categories. None of the results was statistically significant, but women with PR and ERbeta staining had 3.4% and 2.4% higher percent density. The respective values for Caucasians were 5.7% and 11.6% but less in Japanese women (3.5% and -1.1%). Percent density was 3.4% higher in women with any Ki-67 staining and 2.2% in those with positive PCNA staining. CONCLUSION This study detected little evidence for an association between mammographic density and expression of steroid receptors and proliferation markers in breast tissue, but it illustrated the problems of locating tumor blocks and benign breast tissue samples for epidemiologic research. Given the suggestive findings, future studies examining estrogen effects in tissue, cell proliferation, and density in the breast may be informative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn Verheus
- Cancer Research Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Maskarinec G, Erber E, Verheus M, Hernandez BY, Killeen J, Cashin S, Cline JM. Soy consumption and histopathologic markers in breast tissue using tissue microarrays. Nutr Cancer 2009; 61:708-16. [PMID: 19838945 PMCID: PMC2903450 DOI: 10.1080/01635580902913047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
This study examined the relation of soy intake with hormonal and proliferation markers in benign and malignant breast tissue using tissue microarrays (TMAs). TMAs with up to 4 malignant and 4 benign tissue samples for 268 breast cancer cases were constructed. Soy intake in early life and in adulthood was assessed by questionnaire. The TMAs were stained for estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, ERbeta, progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and Ki-67 using standard immunohistochemical methods. Logistic regression was applied for statistical analysis. A higher percentage of women showed positive marker expression in malignant than in benign tissue. With one exception, HER2/neu, no significant associations between soy intake and pathologic markers were observed. Early life soy intake was associated with lower HER2/neu and PCNA staining of malignant tissue. In benign tissue, early life soy intake showed higher ER and PR expression, but no difference in proliferation markers. The results of this investigation provide some assurance that soy intake does not adversely affect markers of proliferation. TMAs were shown to be a useful tool for epidemiologic research.
Collapse
|
35
|
Krenacs T, Zsakovics I, Diczhazi C, Ficsor L, Varga VS, Molnar B. The Potential of Digital Microscopy in Breast Pathology. Pathol Oncol Res 2008; 15:55-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s12253-008-9087-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2008] [Accepted: 07/07/2008] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|