Trastuzumab uptake and its relation to efficacy in an animal model of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis

Investigation of Prevalence, Survival, and Molecular Type of Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases

Background

This study aims to investigate the factors associated with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) in individuals suffering from breast cancer (BC).

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study conducted on 200 patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) including 52 brain and 148 other organ metastases. The demographic, medical, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic approach characteristics were compared between the groups.

Results

Headache (61.5%), weakness and lethargy (26.9%), dizziness (15.4%), blurred vision/blindness (15.4%), and convulsions (15.4%) were the major initial symptoms of BCBM. Radiotherapy (71.2%), injectable (34.6%), and oral chemotherapy (26.9%) were the major applied therapeutic strategies to manage brain metastasis (BM). The overall survival of the patients from cancer diagnosis to death accounted for 33 months (95%CI: 27.52-38.47), while this period after BM diagnosis was limited to 6 months (95%CI: 5.15-6.84). The rate of hormone therapy was remarkably higher among the metastasis in other organs than the brain (P value = 0.005), while targeted therapy was performed in higher rates for BM (P value = 0.001). The evaluation of BC-related tumor markers revealed that human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) (P value < 0.001) positivity was remarkably higher among BCBM, while positive estrogen receptor (ER) (P value = 0.004) and progesterone receptor (PR) (P value = 0.013) were statistically more in the other group.

Conclusion

Based on the findings of this study, the BC patients with BM had a remarkable short survival, had a higher rate of perineural invasion, and were mostly positive for HER2. Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery were the most common approaches to these patients.

The multidisciplinary management of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases: from new biological insights to future therapeutic options

The advent and success of new drugs for treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer has led to a constant improvement in disease and progression-free survival as well as overall survival. Despite these advantages, the overall survival and quality of life of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases are significantly worse than the ones of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer metastases outside the brain. For this reason, prevention and treatment of brain metastasis remain a major clinical challenge and the keys to further improving the clinical and survival outcomes of HER2-positive breast cancer patients. This review discusses the etiopathogenesis of brain metastasis, the currently available treatments, and the future perspective on new treatment strategies and diagnostic tools.

A Phase II Study of Atezolizumab, Pertuzumab, and High-Dose Trastuzumab for Central Nervous System Metastases in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases have few effective systemic therapy options. In a prior study, pertuzumab with high-dose trastuzumab demonstrated a high clinical benefit rate (CBR) in the central nervous system (CNS) in patients with brain metastases. The current trial evaluated whether the addition of atezolizumab to this regimen would produce further improvements in CNS response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial of atezolizumab, pertuzumab, and high-dose trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. Participants received atezolizumab 1,200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks, pertuzumab (loading dosage 840 mg i.v., then 420 mg i.v. every 3 weeks), and high-dose trastuzumab (6 mg/kg i.v. weekly for 24 weeks, then 6 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was CNS overall response rate per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases criteria. Key secondary endpoints included CBR, overall survival, and safety and tolerability of the combination.

RESULTS

Among 19 enrolled participants, two had a confirmed intracranial partial response for a CNS overall response rate of 10.5% (90% confidence interval, 1.9%-29.6%). The study did not meet the prespecified efficacy threshold and was terminated early. The CBR was 42.1% at 18 weeks and 31.6% at 24 weeks. Seven patients (36.8%) required a dose delay or hold, and the most frequent any-grade adverse events were diarrhea (26.3%) and fatigue (26.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of atezolizumab to pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab does not result in improved CNS responses in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases.

Distinct uptake and elimination profiles for trastuzumab, human IgG, and biocytin-TMR in experimental HER2+ brain metastases of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is an improved understanding of drug distribution in brain metastases. Rather than single point snapshots, we analyzed the time course and route of drug/probe elimination (clearance), focusing on the intramural periarterial drainage (IPAD) pathway.

METHODS

Mice with JIMT1-BR HER2+ experimental brain metastases were injected with biocytin-TMR and either trastuzumab or human IgG. Drugs/probes circulated for 5 min to 48 h, followed by perfusion. Brain sections were stained for human IgG, vascular basement membrane proteins laminin or collagen IV, and periarterial α-SMA. A machine learning algorithm was developed to identify metastases, metastatic microenvironment, and uninvolved brain in confocally scanned brain sections. Drug/probe intensity over time and total imaged drug exposure (iAUC) were calculated for 27,249 lesions and co-immunofluorescence with IPAD-vascular matrix analyzed in 11,668 metastases.

RESULTS

In metastases, peak trastuzumab levels were 5-fold higher than human IgG but 4-fold less than biocytin-TMR. The elimination phase constituted 85-93% of total iAUC for all drugs/probes tested. For trastuzumab, total iAUC during uptake was similar to the small molecule drug probe biocytin-TMR, but slower trastuzumab elimination resulted in a 1.7-fold higher total iAUC. During elimination trastuzumab and IgG were preferentially enriched in the α-SMA+ periarterial vascular matrix, consistent with the IPAD clearance route; biocytin-TMR showed heterogeneous elimination pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug/probe elimination is an important component of drug development for brain metastases. We identified a prolonged elimination pathway for systemically administered antibodies through the periarterial vascular matrix that may contribute to the sustained presence and efficacy of large antibody therapeutics.

Early therapy evaluation of intra-arterial trastuzumab injection in a human breast cancer xenograft model using multiparametric MR imaging

PURPOSE

To investigate the treatment efficacy of intra-arterial (IA) trastuzumab treatment using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a human breast cancer xenograft model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human breast cancer cells (BT474) were stereotaxically injected into the brains of nude mice to obtain a xenograft model. The mice were divided into four groups and subjected to different treatments (IA treatment [IA-T], intravenous treatment [IV-T], IA saline injection [IA-S], and the sham control group). MRI was performed before and at 7 and 14 d after treatment to assess the efficacy of the treatment. The tumor volume, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters (Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and Vp) were measured.

RESULTS

Tumor volumes in the IA-T group at 14 d after treatment were significantly lower than those in the IV-T group (13.1 mm3 [interquartile range 8.48-16.05] vs. 25.69 mm3 [IQR 20.39-30.29], p = 0.005), control group (IA-S, 33.83 mm3 [IQR 32.00-36.30], p<0.01), and sham control (39.71 mm3 [IQR 26.60-48.26], p <0.001). The ADC value in the IA-T group was higher than that in the control groups (IA-T, 7.62 [IQR 7.23-8.20] vs. IA-S, 6.77 [IQR 6.48-6.87], p = 0.044 and vs. sham control, 6.89 [IQR 4.93-7.48], p = 0.004). Ktrans was significantly decreased following the treatment compared to that in the control groups (p = 0.002 and p<0.001 for vs. IA-S and sham control, respectively). Tumor growth was decreased in the IV-T group compared to that in the sham control group (25.69 mm3 [IQR 20.39-30.29] vs. 39.71 mm3 [IQR 26.60-48.26], p = 0.27); there was no significant change in the MRI parameters.

CONCLUSION

IA treatment with trastuzumab potentially affects the early response to treatment, including decreased tumor growth and decrease of Ktrans, in a preclinical brain tumor model.

Pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases: PATRICIA final efficacy data

The PATRICIA study (NCT02536339) examined the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with progressive central nervous system (CNS) metastases following radiotherapy. Primary analysis confirmed CNS objective response rate (ORR) was 11% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3-25); clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 68% (4 months) and 51% (6 months). We report final efficacy data after a further 21-months of follow-up, updated safety, survival, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patients received standard-dose pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab (6 mg/kg weekly) until CNS or systemic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint: confirmed ORR (CNS) per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases criteria. Secondary endpoints were response duration, CBR, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and PROs. By clinical cut-off, 39 patients had completed or discontinued treatment. Confirmed ORR (CNS) was 11% (95% CI: 3.0-25.4). Median CNS-PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI: 4.0-8.9), as was median CNS-PFS or systemic PFS (95% CI: 4.0-8.9); median OS was 27.2 months (95% CI: 16.1-not reached). CBR in the CNS was 51% (19 patients, 95% CI: 34.4-68.1) at 6 months. Two patients remained on treatment until study closure, achieving stable disease for 4.1 and 4.8 years. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 7.7% of patients. Patients with confirmed partial response or stable disease (≥4 months) in the CNS had stable PROs over time. Pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab represents a reasonable non-chemotherapeutic treatment option for selected patients with HER2-positive MBC with CNS metastases.

Available Systemic Treatments and Emerging Therapies for Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

OPINION STATEMENT

In 2023, breast cancer brain metastases (BCBrM) remain a major clinical challenge gaining well-deserved attention. Historically managed with local therapies alone, systemic therapies including small molecule inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have shown unprecedented activity in recent trials including patients with brain metastases. These advancements stem from efforts to include patients with stable and active BCBrM in early- and late-phase trial design. Tucatinib added to trastuzumab and capecitabine improves intracranial and extracranial progression-free survival and overall survival in stable and active human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+)-positive brain metastases. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has both shown impressive intracranial activity in stable and active HER2+ BCBrMs challenging historical thinking of ADCs' inability to penetrate the central nervous system (CNS). T-DXd has shown potent activity in HER2-low (immunohistochemistry scores of 1+ or 2+, non-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization) metastatic breast cancer and will be studied in HER2-low BCBrM as well. Novel endocrine therapies including oral selective estrogen downregulators (SERDs) and complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs) are being studied in hormone receptor-positive BCBrM clinical trials due to robust intracranial activity in preclinical models. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) brain metastases continue to portend the worst prognosis of all subtypes. Clinical trials leading to the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors have enrolled few BCBrM patients leading to a lack of understanding of immunotherapies contribution in this subgroup. Data surrounding the use of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in patients with germline BRCA mutation carriers with CNS disease is hopeful. ADCs including those targeting low-level HER2 expression and TROP2 are under active investigation in triple-negative BCBrMs.

Molecular landscape and emerging therapeutic strategies in breast cancer brain metastasis

Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Advanced BC with brain metastasis (BM) is a major cause of mortality with no specific or effective treatment. Therefore, better knowledge of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is crucial for developing novel therapeutic strategies and improving clinical outcomes. In this review, we focused on the latest advances and discuss the contribution of the molecular subtype of BC, the brain microenvironment, exosomes, miRNAs/lncRNAs, and genetic background in BCBM. The blood–brain barrier and blood–tumor barrier create challenges to brain drug delivery, and we specifically review novel approaches to bypass these barriers. Furthermore, we discuss the potential application of immunotherapies and genetic editing techniques based on CRISPR/Cas9 technology in treating BCBM. Emerging techniques and research findings continuously shape our views of BCBM and contribute to improvements in precision therapies and clinical outcomes.

Clinical outcome of patients with isolated central nervous system progression on first-line pertuzumab and trastuzumab treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in a real-life cohort

BACKGROUND

More than 10% of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) will develop Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases as first and isolated site of relapse on trastuzumab and pertuzumab first-line therapy. However, few clinical data are available to guide the best strategy in this setting.

METHODS

Patients experiencing isolated CNS progression on trastuzumab and pertuzumab first-line therapy were retrospectively identified from the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) real-life database between 2008 and 2016.

RESULTS

Among 995 patients treated with first-line trastuzumab and pertuzumab for HER2-positive mBC, 132 patients (13%) experienced isolated CNS progression with a median time of 12 months after mBC diagnosis. Twelves patients did not receive any treatment and were excluded from the analysis. Among the 120 patients considered, 76 (63%) received CNS-directed local therapy, 73 (60%) continued trastuzumab and pertuzumab, whereas 47 (39%) started another systemic treatment. After a median follow-up of 21 months, there was no difference in progression-free survival for patient who continued trastuzumab-pertuzumab or switched to another systemic treatment. In multivariate analysis, trastuzumab-pertuzumab continuation was associated with longer OS (HR 0,28 IC 95%: 0,14-0,54 p < 0,001). mOS was not reached (95% 37.6-NE) and was 23.2 months (95% CI 15.5-53.6) in patients who continued trastuzumab and pertuzumab therapy and in patients who switched for another systemic therapy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this real-life cohort, trastuzumab-pertuzumab continuation after local treatment for isolated CNS progression did not negatively impact PFS and OS. Prospective trials and assessment of new strategies are warranted in this specific situation.

Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer

The management of patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BMs) is exquisitely multidisciplinary. Patients presenting with a symptomatic BM may be offered neurosurgical resection, followed by radiation. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is preferred over whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in most patients presenting with a limited number of BMs, whereas WBRT with hippocampal-sparing and concomitant memantine is preferred for patients with multiple BMs. There is a growing role for systemic therapy, in some cases in lieu of local therapy, particularly in patients with HER2+ breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Achilles' Heel in Breast Cancer Patients' Care

Brain metastases (BM) significantly affect the prognosis as well as the quality of life of breast cancer (BC) patients. Although advancements in neurosurgical and radiotherapy techniques improve local control and symptom management, BM remains associated with a poor prognosis. In addition, the efficacy of currently approved systemic therapies in central nervous system (CNS) compartment is still limited, especially after progression on local therapy. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) has been recognized as a mechanism of primary resistance to many chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies due to low drug penetration. Other mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance are still unclear and may vary across the BC subtypes. New small molecules have demonstrated efficacy in BM, in particular for the HER2-positive subtype, with a benefit in survival. A new era has begun in the field of BM, and many trials specifically designed for this population are currently ongoing. The BC research community needs to address this call with the final aim of improving the efficacy of systemic therapy in CNS compartment and ultimately preventing the occurrence of BM.

Systemic Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIM

Patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) develop brain metastases (BM) in up to 30% of cases. Treatment of patients with BM can consist of local treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy) and/or systemic treatment. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of different systemic therapies in patients with HER2+ mBC and BM.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the databases PubMed, Embase.com, Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection and the Wiley/Cochrane Library. Eligible articles included prospective or retrospective studies reporting on the effect of systemic therapy on objective response rate (ORR) and/or median progression free survival (mPFS) in patients with HER2+ mBC and BM. The timeframe within the databases was from inception to 19 January 2022. Fixed-effects meta-analyses were used. Quality appraisal was performed using the ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies were included, involving 3118 patients. Most studies, which contained the largest patient numbers, but also often carried a moderate-serious risk of bias, investigated lapatinib and capecitabine (LC), trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) or pyrotinib. The best quality data and/or highest ORR were described with tucatinib (combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine, TTC) and trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd). TTC demonstrated an ORR of 47.3% in patients with asymptomatic and/or active BM. T-DXd achieved a pooled ORR of 64% (95% CI 43-85%, I² 0%) in a heavily pretreated population with asymptomatic BM (3 studies, n = 96).

CONCLUSIONS

Though our meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity of included studies and a related serious risk of bias, this review provides a comprehensive overview of all currently available systemic treatment options. T-Dxd and TTC that appear to constitute the most effective systemic therapy in patients with HER2+ mBC and BM, while pyrotinib might be an option in Asian patients.

Innovative Approaches for Breast Cancer Metastasis to the Brain

Breast cancer metastasis is a continued concern for patients with recent development in our understanding of disease progression. In this paper, we highlight the pathophysiology behind breast cancer metastasis. Blood brain barrier disruption plays a critical component in progression. We then investigate the current treatment strategies and recommended guidelines. This focuses on radiation and medical management. Finally, we address the role of surgical intervention. The data is organized into tables and figures to highlight key components. Finally, we address emerging treatments and pre-clinical data. The paper will serve as a user-friendly guide for clinicians and researchers to help formulate a strategy to manage breast cancer metastasis patients sufficiently. 

Application of C-Terminal Clostridium Perfringens Enterotoxin in Treatment of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer

Claudin-4 is part of the Claudin family of transmembrane tight junction (TJ) proteins found in almost all tissues and, together with adherens junctions and desmosomes, forms epithelial and endothelial junctional complexes. Although the distribution of Claudin-4 occurs in many cell types, the level of expression is cell-specific. Claudin proteins regulate cell proliferation and differentiation by binding cell-signaling ligands, and its expression is upregulated in several cancers. As a result, alterations in Claudin expression patterns or distribution are vital in the pathology of cancer. Profiling the genetic expression of Claudin-4 showed that Claudin-4 is also a receptor for the clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE) and that Claudin-4 has a high sequence similarity with CPE's high-affinity receptor. CPE is cytolytic due to its ability to form pores in cellular membranes, and CPE treatment in breast cancer cells have shown promising results due to the high expression of Claudin-4. The C-terminal fragment of CPE (c-CPE) provides a less toxic alternative for drug delivery into breast cancer cells, particularly metastatic tumors in the brain, especially as Claudin-4 expression in the central nervous system (CNS) is low. Therefore, c-CPE provides a unique avenue for the treatment of breast-brain metastatic tumors.

[89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 positron emission tomography correlates with response to glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma B-targeted therapy in triple negative breast cancer

There is a need for prognostic markers to select patients most likely to benefit from antibody drug conjugate (ADC) therapy. We quantified the relationship between pre-treatment positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma B (gpNMB) with 89Zr-labeled anti-gpNMB antibody ([89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011) and response to ADC therapy (CDX-011) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). First, we compared different PET imaging metrics and found that standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor-to-heart SUV ratios (SUVR) were sufficient to delineate differences in radiotracer uptake in the tumor of four different cell- and patient-derived tumor models and achieved high standardized effect sizes. These tumor models with varying levels of gpNMB expression were imaged with [89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 followed by treatment with a single bolus injection of CDX-011. The percent change in tumor volume relative to baseline (% CTV) was then correlated with SUVmean of [89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 uptake in the tumor. All gpNMB-positive tumor models responded to CDX-011 over 6 weeks of treatment, except one patient-derived tumor re-grew after 4 weeks of treatment. As expected, the gpNMB-negative tumor increased in volume by 130 {plus minus} 59 % at endpoint. The magnitude of pre-treatment SUV had the strongest inverse correlation with the % CTV at 2 - 4 weeks after treatment with CDX-011 (Spearman ρ = -0.8). However, pre-treatment PET imaging with [89Zr]ZrDFO-CR011 did not inform on which tumor types will re-grow over time. Other methods will be needed to predict resistance to treatment.

Targeting brain metastases in breast cancer

Brain metastases (BMs) are an important source of morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC). As survival of patients with advanced BC considerably improved thanks to research advancements and new therapeutic approaches, the apparent incidence of BMs is increasing. Local interventions, in the form of either surgical resection or radiation therapy, remain the mainstay in the management of BMs. Systemic treatments are typically used to complement local strategies to further improve and maintain control of central nervous system (CNS) disease. Although high-level evidence data about the impact of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), as well as the efficacy of anti-cancer agents on BMs and differentials between the systemic compartment and CNS are still scant, our understanding of the activity of systemic treatments with impact on BMs is rapidly evolving. Novel anti-HER2 agents, such as tucatinib, ado-trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab deruxtecan and neratinib, have shown intracranial efficacy. Current research efforts are ongoing not only to clarify the activity of existing treatments on the CNS, as well as to develop new drugs and innovative multi-modality approaches. This review will encompass the current treatment landscape of BMs arising from BC, with a focus on recent advancements in the field and investigational approaches.

Precision medicine biomarkers in brain metastases: applications, discordances, and obstacles

Brain metastases (BM) present a common cause of mortality and morbidity in several metastatic cancer entities. New therapeutic developments during the last decades, including targeted and immune-related therapies, have shown considerable extra- and intracranial response rates in specific subgroups of BM patients. However, differences in the molecular alteration in the BM tumor tissue compared to extracranial tumors leads to heterogeneous therapeutic responses. Therefore, an accurate molecular analyzation of BM tissue, if possible, has become an essential part in therapeutic decision making in BM patients. The concordance of predictive molecular biomarkers between multiple sites including extracranial and intracranial tumor tissue have been analyzed for some but not all biomarkers routinely applied in modern precision medicine approaches. In the present review, we summarize the current evidence of predictive biomarkers for personalized therapy approaches in the treatment of parenchymal BM.

The blood-tumour barrier in cancer biology and therapy

The protective blood-brain barrier has a major role in ensuring normal brain function by severely limiting and tightly controlling the ingress of substances into the brain from the circulation. In primary brain tumours, such as glioblastomas, as well as in brain metastases from cancers in other organs, including lung and breast cancers and melanoma, the blood-brain barrier is modified and is referred to as the blood-tumour barrier (BTB). Alterations in the BTB affect its permeability, and this structure participates in reciprocal regulatory pathways with tumour cells. Importantly, the BTB typically retains a heterogeneous capacity to restrict the penetration of many therapeutic agents into intracranial tumours, and overcoming this challenge is a key to improving the effectiveness of treatment and patient quality of life. Herein, current knowledge of BTB structure and function is reviewed from a cell and cancer biology standpoint, with a focus on findings derived from in vivo models and human tumour specimens. Additionally, how this knowledge can be translated into clinical advances for patients with cancer is discussed.

Central Nervous System Metastases

The proportion of patients developing central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is increasing. Most are identified once symptomatic. Surgical resection is indicated for solitary or symptomatic brain metastases, separation surgery for compressive radioresistant spinal metastases, and instrumentation for unstable spinal lesions. Surgical biopsies are performed when histological diagnoses are required. Stereotactic radiosurgery is an option for limited small brain metastases and radioresistant spinal metastases. Whole-brain radiotherapy is reserved for extensive brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease with approaches to reduce cognitive side effects. Radiosensitive and inoperable spinal metastases typically receive external beam radiotherapy. Systemic therapy is increasingly being utilized for CNS metastases.

Pertuzumab Plus High-Dose Trastuzumab in Patients With Progressive Brain Metastases and HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Primary Analysis of a Phase II Study

PURPOSE

Effective therapies are needed for the treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with brain metastases. A trastuzumab radioisotope has been shown to localize in brain metastases of patients with HER2-positive MBC, and intracranial xenograft models have demonstrated a dose-dependent response to trastuzumab.

METHODS

In the phase II PATRICIA study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02536339), patients with HER2-positive MBC with CNS metastases and CNS progression despite prior radiotherapy received pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab (6 mg/kg weekly) until CNS or systemic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in the CNS per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases criteria. Secondary end points included duration of response, clinical benefit rate (complete response plus partial response plus stable disease ≥ 4 or ≥ 6 months) in the CNS, and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were treated for a median (range) of 4.5 (0.3-37.3) months at clinical cutoff. Thirty-seven patients discontinued treatment, most commonly because of CNS progression (n = 27); two remained on treatment. CNS ORR was 11% (95% CI, 3 to 25), with four partial responses (median duration of response, 4.6 months). Clinical benefit rate at 4 months and 6 months was 68% and 51%, respectively. Two patients permanently discontinued study treatment because of adverse events (left ventricular dysfunction [treatment-related] and seizure, both grade 3). No grade 5 adverse events were reported. No new safety signals emerged with either agent.

CONCLUSION

Although the CNS ORR was modest, 68% of patients experienced clinical benefit, and two patients had ongoing stable intracranial and extracranial disease for > 2 years. High-dose trastuzumab for HER2-positive CNS metastases may warrant further study.

Is Molecular Tailored-Therapy Changing the Paradigm for CNS Metastases in Breast Cancer?

Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common tumour spreading to the central nervous system (CNS). The prognosis of patients with CNS metastases depends on several parameters including the molecular assessment of the disease. Although loco-regional treatment remains the best approach, systemic therapies are acquiring a role leading to remarkable long-lasting responses. The efficacy of these compounds diverges between tumours with different molecular assessments. Promising agents under investigation are drugs targeting the HER2 pathways such as tucatinib, neratinib, pyrotinib, trastuzumab deruxtecan. In addition, there are several promising agents under investigation for patients with triple-negative brain metastases (third-generation taxane, etirinotecan, sacituzumab, immune-checkpoint inhibitors) and hormone receptor-positive brain metastases (CDK 4/5, phosphoinositide-3-kinase-mammalian target of rapamycin [PI3K/mTOR] inhibitors). Also, the systemic treatment of leptomeningeal metastases, which represents a very negative prognostic site of metastases, is likely to change as several compounds are under investigation, some with interesting preliminary results. Here we performed a comprehensive review focusing on the current management of CNS metastases according to molecular subtypes, site of metastases (leptomeningeal vs brain), and systemic treatments under investigation.

Brain Metastases in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Current and Novel Treatment Strategies

Development of brain metastases can occur in up to 30-50% of patients with breast cancer, representing a significant impact on an individual patient in terms of survival and quality of life. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have an increased risk of developing brain metastases; however, screening for brain metastases is not currently recommended due to the lack of robust evidence to support survival benefit. In recent years, several novel anti-HER2 agents have led to significant improvements in the outcomes of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Despite these advances, brain and leptomeningeal metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, and their optimal management remains an unmet need. This review presents an update on the current and novel treatment strategies for patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer and discusses the open questions in the field.

Leptomeningeal Metastases from Solid Tumors: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Molecular Approaches

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid tumors represent an unmet need of increasing importance due to an early use of MRI for diagnosis and improvement of outcome of some molecular subgroups following targeted agents and immunotherapy. In this review, we first discussed factors limiting the efficacy of targeted agents in LM, such as the molecular divergence between primary tumors and CNS lesions and CNS barriers at the level of the normal brain, brain tumors and CSF. Further, we reviewed pathogenesis and experimental models and modalities, such as MRI (with RANO and ESO/ESMO criteria), CSF cytology and liquid biopsy, to improve diagnosis and monitoring following therapy. Efficacy and limitations of targeted therapies for LM from EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged NSCLC, HER2-positive breast cancer and BRAF-mutated melanomas are reported, including the use of intrathecal administration or modification of traditional cytotoxic compounds. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in LM from non-druggable tumors, in particular triple-negative breast cancer, is discussed. Last, we focused on some recent techniques to improve drug delivery.

Mechanical tibial loading remotely suppresses brain tumors by dopamine-mediated downregulation of CCN4

Mechanical loading to the bone is known to be beneficial for bone homeostasis and for suppressing tumor-induced osteolysis in the loaded bone. However, whether loading to a weight-bearing hind limb can inhibit distant tumor growth in the brain is unknown. We examined the possibility of bone-to-brain mechanotransduction using a mouse model of a brain tumor by focusing on the response to Lrp5-mediated Wnt signaling and dopamine in tumor cells. The results revealed that loading the tibia with elevated levels of tyrosine hydroxylase, a rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine synthesis, markedly reduced the progression of the brain tumors. The simultaneous application of fluphenazine (FP), an antipsychotic dopamine modulator, enhanced tumor suppression. Dopamine and FP exerted antitumor effects through the dopamine receptors DRD1 and DRD2, respectively. Notably, dopamine downregulated Lrp5 via DRD1 in tumor cells. A cytokine array analysis revealed that the reduction in CCN4 was critical for loading-driven, dopamine-mediated tumor suppression. The silencing of Lrp5 reduced CCN4, and the administration of CCN4 elevated oncogenic genes such as MMP9, Runx2, and Snail. In summary, this study demonstrates that mechanical loading regulates dopaminergic signaling and remotely suppresses brain tumors by inhibiting the Lrp5-CCN4 axis via DRD1, indicating the possibility of developing an adjuvant bone-mediated loading therapy.

Tumor mutational burden and immune infiltrates in renal cell carcinoma and matched brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) and density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) have been postulated as predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the concordance of TMB and TIL of primary/extracranial renal cell carcinoma (RCC) specimens and matched brain metastases (BM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty specimens from 10 patients were retrieved from the Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry (6/10 primary tumor, 4/10 lung metastasis, 10/10 matched BM). TMB was assessed using the TruSight Oncology 500 gene panel with libraries sequenced on a NextSeq instrument. TIL subsets (CD3+, CD8+, CD45RO+, FOXP3+, PD-L1+) were investigated using immunohistochemistry (Ventana Benchmark Ultra system) and automated tissue analysis (Definiens software).

RESULTS

No significant difference in TMB, CD3+, CD8+, CD45RO+, FOXP3+ or PD-L1+ expression was observed between extracranial and matched intracranial specimens (P > 0.05). Higher CD8+ TIL (P = 0.053) and CD45RO+ TIL (P = 0.030) densities in the primary tumor compared with the intracranial samples were observed in specimens collected after exposure to systemic treatment. Neither extracranial sample origin (lung metastasis versus primary RCC) nor extracranial disease status at BM diagnosis (progressive versus stable disease) were significantly associated with TMB or TIL densities in extracranial and intracranial samples (P > 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the median differences of TMB or TIL densities from extracranial to intracranial samples and BM-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The comparable immunological microenvironment of extra- and intracranial tumor samples in our study underscores the immunological activation also in BM from RCC, and therefore, supports the development of immune modulatory treatments also in patients with brain metastatic RCC.

Tumor uptake and associated greater efficacy of anti-Her2 immunoliposome does not rely on Her2 expression status: study of a docetaxel-trastuzumab immunoliposome on Her2+ breast cancer model (SKBR3)

Nanoparticles have been used for decades in breast cancer. More recently, anti-human epidermal receptor 2 (Her2) immunoliposomes are of rising interest. However, recent studies have questioned the actual relevance of using anti-Her2 antibodies to improve liposome distribution and efficacy. Using standard thin-film method and maleimide linker, we have synthesized a 140-nm docetaxel-trastuzumab immunoliposome. This nanoparticle was then tested on a canonical Her2-overexpressing breast cancer model (i.e., SKBR3), using 3D spheroids and xenografted mice. Its efficacy was compared with free docetaxel + trastuzumab, liposomal docetaxel + free trastuzumab and to reference antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). Immunoliposomes resulted in better efficacy as compared with all other treatments, both in vitro and in vivo. To explain such an improvement, immunoliposome biodistribution was investigated using live imaging in xenografted mice. Surprisingly, no difference in tumor uptake was found between anti-Her2 immunoliposomes and standard docetaxel liposomes (i.e., 1.9 ± 1.2 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5% at the end of treatment and 1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 1.6 ± 0.4% at the end of the study, respectively, P > 0.05). We hypothesized that passive targeting (i.e., enhanced permeation and retention effect) contributed more to tumor distribution than active targeting and that the observed differences in efficacy could come from a better internalization of immunoliposomes into Her2+ cells as compared with standard liposomes, and not from a higher specificity towards tumor tissue.

Inhibition of the Growth of Breast Cancer-Associated Brain Tumors by the Osteocyte-Derived Conditioned Medium

The brain is a common site of metastasis from advanced breast cancer but few effective treatments are available. We examined a therapeutic option with a conditioned medium (CM), focusing on the role of Lrp5 and β-catenin in Wnt signaling, and IL1ra in osteocytes. Osteocytes presented the innate anti-tumor effect and the overexpression of the above genes strengthened their action. In a mouse model, the injection of their CM inhibited mammary tumors and tumor-driven osteolysis. Importantly, Lrp5- and/or IL1ra-overexpressing osteocytes or the local administration of β-catenin-overexpressing CM markedly inhibited brain tumors. In the transport analysis, tumor-suppressing factors in CM were shown to diffuse through the skull. Mechanistically, the CM with overexpression of the above genes downregulated oncogenic genes such as MMP9, Runx2, TGFβ, and Snail in breast cancer cells. Also, the CM with β-catenin overexpression downregulated CXCL1 and CXCL5 and upregulated tumor suppressors such as LIMA1, DSP, p53, and TRAIL in breast cancer cells. Notably, whole-genome proteomics revealed that histone H4 was enriched in CM and acted as an atypical tumor suppressor. Lrp5-overexpressing MSCs were also shown to act as anti-tumor agents. Collectively, this study demonstrated the therapeutic role of engineered CM in brain tumors and the tumor-suppressing action of extracellular histone H4. The result sheds light on the potential CM-based therapy for breast cancer-associated brain metastases in a minimally invasive manner.

Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis-Overview of Disease State, Treatment Options and Future Perspectives

Simple Summary

In this review, we present the latest information on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and local and systemic treatment of brain metastases from breast cancer, with a focus on recent publications. Improving the local treatment and subtype-specific systemic therapies through advancements in basic and translational research will contribute to better clinical outcomes for patients with breast cancer brain metastasis.

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second most common origin of brain metastasis after lung cancer. Brain metastasis in breast cancer is commonly found in patients with advanced course disease and has a poor prognosis because the blood–brain barrier is thought to be a major obstacle to the delivery of many drugs in the central nervous system. Therefore, local treatments including surgery, stereotactic radiation therapy, and whole-brain radiation therapy are currently considered the gold standard treatments. Meanwhile, new targeted therapies based on subtype have recently been developed. Some drugs can exceed the blood–brain barrier and enter the central nervous system. New technology for early detection and personalized medicine for metastasis are warranted. In this review, we summarize the historical overview of treatment with a focus on local treatment, the latest drug treatment strategies, and future perspectives using novel therapeutic agents for breast cancer patients with brain metastasis, including ongoing clinical trials.

Effects of systemic therapy and local therapy on outcomes of 873 breast cancer patients with metastatic breast cancer to brain: MD Anderson Cancer Center experience

Outcomes of treatments for patients with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) remain suboptimal, especially for systemic therapy. To evaluate the effectiveness of systemic and local therapy (surgery [S], stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] and whole brain radiotherapy [WBRT]) in BCBM patients, we analyzed the data of 873 BCBM patients from 1999 to 2012. The median overall survival (OS) and time to progression in the brain (TTP-b) after diagnosis of brain metastases (BM) were 9.1 and 7.1 months, respectively. WBRT prolonged OS in patients with multiple BM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.88; P = .004). SRS alone, and surgery or SRS followed by WBRT (S/SRS + WBRT), were equivalent in OS and TTP-b (median OS, 14.9 vs 17.2 months; median TTP-b, 8.2 vs 8.6 months). Continued chemotherapy prolonged OS (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.30-0.41; P < .001) and TTP-b (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33-0.70; P < .001), however, with no advantage of capecitabine over other chemotherapy agents used (median OS, 11.8 vs 12.4 months; median TTP-b, 7.2 vs 7.4 months). Patients receiving trastuzumab at diagnosis of BM, continuation of anti-HER2 therapy increased OS (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.83; P = .005) and TTP-b (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.74; P = .003); no additional benefit was seen with switching over between trastuzumab and lapatinib (median OS, 18.4 vs 22.7 months; median TTP-b: 7.4 vs 8.7 months). In conclusion, SRS or S/SRS + WBRT were equivalent for patients' OS and local control. Continuation systemic chemotherapy including anti-HER2 therapy improved OS and TTP-b with no demonstrable advantage of capecitabine and lapatinib over other agents of physicians' choice was observed.

Brain metastasis models: What should we aim to achieve better treatments?

Brain metastasis is emerging as a unique entity in oncology based on its particular biology and, consequently, the pharmacological approaches that should be considered. We discuss the current state of modelling this specific progression of cancer and how these experimental models have been used to test multiple pharmacologic strategies over the years. In spite of pre-clinical evidences demonstrating brain metastasis vulnerabilities, many clinical trials have excluded patients with brain metastasis. Fortunately, this trend is getting to an end given the increasing importance of secondary brain tumors in the clinic and a better knowledge of the underlying biology. We discuss emerging trends and unsolved issues that will shape how we will study experimental brain metastasis in the years to come.

Current landscape and future perspectives in preclinical MR and PET imaging of brain metastasis

Brain metastasis (BM) is a major cause of cancer patient morbidity. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) represent important resources to assess tumor progression and treatment responses. In preclinical research, anatomical MRI and to some extent functional MRI have frequently been used to assess tumor progression. In contrast, PET has only to a limited extent been used in animal BM research. A considerable culprit is that results from most preclinical studies have shown little impact on the implementation of new treatment strategies in the clinic. This emphasizes the need for the development of robust, high-quality preclinical imaging strategies with potential for clinical translation. This review focuses on advanced preclinical MRI and PET imaging methods for BM, describing their applications in the context of what has been done in the clinic. The strengths and shortcomings of each technology are presented, and recommendations for future directions in the development of the individual imaging modalities are suggested. Finally, we highlight recent developments in quantitative MRI and PET, the use of radiomics and multimodal imaging, and the need for a standardization of imaging technologies and protocols between preclinical centers.

Treatment strategies for breast cancer brain metastases

Brain metastases from breast cancer (BCBM) constitute the second most common cause of brain metastasis (BM), and the incidence of these frequently lethal lesions is currently increasing, following better systemic treatment. Patients with ER-negative and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) are the most likely to develop BM, but if this diagnosis remains associated with a worse prognosis, long survival is now common for patients with HER2-positive BC. BCBM represents a therapeutic challenge that needs a coordinated treatment strategy along international guidelines. Surgery has always to be considered when feasible. It is now well established that stereotaxic radiosurgery allows for equivalent control and less-cognitive toxicities than whole-brain radiation therapy, which should be delayed as much as possible. Medical treatment for BCBM is currently a rapidly evolving field. It has been shown that the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is often impaired in macroscopic BM, and several chemotherapy regimens, antibody-drug conjugates and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors have been shown to be active on BCBM and can be part of the global treatment strategy. This paper provides an overview of the therapeutic option for BCBM that is currently available and outlines potential new approaches for tackling these deadly secondary tumours.

Brain metastases in metastatic cancer: a review of recent advances in systemic therapies

Introduction: Brain metastases (BM) are a frequent complication of metastatic cancer. Due to the wider availability and application of screening procedures, an increasing fraction of patients are diagnosed at the asymptomatic stage. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies has revolutionized treatment in several frequently BM-causing entities like metastatic lung cancer, melanoma and breast cancer. However, registered trials of new targeted and immunotherapy mostly excluded patients with BM resulting in limited knowledge of the intracranial efficacy of new systemic agents.Areas covered: The present review highlights recent advances in systemic therapies for the treatment and prophylaxis of the three leading BM causing tumors: NSCLC, melanoma and breast cancer.Expert opinion: High intracranial efficacy was observed for several next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially in patients with asymptomatic disease. Ongoing discussions addressed the need for local therapies in patients with asymptomatic BM and the availability of systemic therapy with high intracranial efficacy. Further BM-specific studies as well as BM-specific endpoints in registered trials are needed to define the role of systemic monotherapies in patients with BM.

HER2 antibody-drug conjugate controls growth of breast cancer brain metastases in hematogenous xenograft models, with heterogeneous blood-tumor barrier penetration unlinked to a passive marker

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases of HER2+ breast cancer persist as a clinical challenge. Many therapeutics directed at human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are antibodies or antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and their permeability through the blood-tumor barrier (BTB) is poorly understood. We investigated the efficacy of a biparatopic anti-HER2 antibody-tubulysin conjugate (bHER2-ATC) in preclinical models of brain metastases.

METHODS

The compound was evaluated in 2 hematogenous HER2+ brain metastasis mouse models, SUM190-BR and JIMT-1-BR. Endpoints included metastasis count, compound brain penetration, cancer cell proliferation, and apoptosis.

RESULTS

Biparatopic HER2-ATC 3 mg/kg prevented metastasis outgrowth in the JIMT-1-BR model. At 1 mg/kg bHER2-ATC, a 70% and 92% reduction in large and micrometastases was observed. For the SUM190-BR model, an 85% and 53% reduction, respectively, in large and micrometastases was observed at 3 mg/kg, without statistical significance. Proliferation was reduced in both models at the highest dose. At the endpoint, bHER2-ATC uptake covered a median of 4-6% and 7-17% of metastasis area in the JIMT-1-BR and SUM190-BR models, respectively. Maximal compound uptake in the models was 19% and 86% in JIMT-1-BR and SUM190-BR, respectively. Multiple lesions in both models demonstrated ADC uptake in the absence or low diffusion of Texas Red Dextran, a marker of paracellular permeability. Using in vitro BTB assays, the ADC was endocytosed into brain endothelial cells, identifying a potentially new mechanism of antibody permeability.

CONCLUSIONS

Biparatopic HER2-ATC significantly prevented JIMT-1-BR brain metastasis outgrowth and showed activity in the SUM190-BR model. The bHER2-ATC penetration into metastases that are impermeable to fluorescent dye suggested an endocytic mechanism of brain penetration.

HER2‐positive breast cancer brain metastasis: A new and exciting landscape

Background

Brain metastases (BrM) incidence is 25% to 50% in women with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive breast cancer. Radiation and surgery are currently the main local treatment approaches for central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Systemic anti‐HER2 therapy following a diagnosis of BrM improves outcomes. Previous preclinical data has helped elucidate HER2 brain trophism, the blood‐brain/blood‐tumor barrier(s), and the brain tumor microenvironment, all of which can lead to development of novel therapeutic options.

Recent findings

Several anti‐HER2 agents are currently available and reviewed here, some of which have recently shown promising effects in BrM patients, specifically. New strategies driven by and focusing on brain metastasis‐specific genomics, immunotherapy, and preventive strategies have shown promising results and are under development.

Conclusions

The field of HER2+ breast cancer, particularly for BrM, continues to evolve as new therapeutic strategies show promising results in recent clinical trials. Increasing inclusion of patients with BrM in clinical studies, and a focus on assessing their outcomes both intracranially and extracranially, is changing the landscape for patients with HER2+ CNS metastases by demonstrating the ability of newer agents to improve outcomes.

Management of brain metastases according to molecular subtypes

The incidence of brain metastases has markedly increased in the past 20 years owing to progress in the treatment of malignant solid tumours, earlier diagnosis by MRI and an ageing population. Although local therapies remain the mainstay of treatment for many patients with brain metastases, a growing number of systemic options are now available and/or are under active investigation. HER2-targeted therapies (lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib and trastuzumab emtansine), alone or in combination, yield a number of intracranial responses in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. New inhibitors are being investigated in brain metastases from ER-positive or triple-negative breast cancer. Several generations of EGFR and ALK inhibitors have shown activity on brain metastases from EGFR and ALK mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) hold promise in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer without druggable mutations and in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The survival of patients with brain metastases from melanoma has substantially improved after the advent of BRAF inhibitors and ICIs (ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab). The combination of targeted agents or ICIs with stereotactic radiosurgery could further improve the response rates and survival but the risk of radiation necrosis should be monitored. Advanced neuroimaging and liquid biopsy will hopefully improve response evaluation.

Heterogeneity and vascular permeability of breast cancer brain metastases

Improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of systemic breast cancer have led to a prolongation in patient survival. Unfortunately, these advances are also associated with an increased incidence of brain metastases (BM), with the result that many patients succumb due to BM treatment failure. Intracranial delivery of many chemotherapeutic agents and other therapeutics is hindered by the presence of an impermeable blood-brain barrier (BBB) designed to protect the brain from harmful substances. The formation of BM compromises the integrity of the BBB, resulting in a highly heterogeneous blood-tumor barrier (BTB) with varying degrees of vascular permeability. Here, we discuss how blood vessels play an important role in the formation of brain micrometastases as well as in the transformation from poorly permeable BM to highly permeable BM. We then review the role of BTB vascular permeability in the diagnostics and the choice of treatment regimens for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) and discuss whether the vasculature of primary breast cancers can serve as a biomarker for BM. Specifically, we examine the association between the vascular permeability of BCBM and their accumulation of large molecules such as antibodies, which remains largely unexplored.

Current approaches to the management of brain metastases

Brain metastases are a very common manifestation of cancer that have historically been approached as a single disease entity given the uniform association with poor clinical outcomes. Fortunately, our understanding of the biology and molecular underpinnings of brain metastases has greatly improved, resulting in more sophisticated prognostic models and multiple patient-related and disease-specific treatment paradigms. In addition, the therapeutic armamentarium has expanded from whole-brain radiotherapy and surgery to include stereotactic radiosurgery, targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which are often used sequentially or in combination. Advances in neuroimaging have provided additional opportunities to accurately screen for intracranial disease at initial cancer diagnosis, target intracranial lesions with precision during treatment and help differentiate the effects of treatment from disease progression by incorporating functional imaging. Given the numerous available treatment options for patients with brain metastases, a multidisciplinary approach is strongly recommended to personalize the treatment of each patient in an effort to improve the therapeutic ratio. Given the ongoing controversies regarding the optimal sequencing of the available and expanding treatment options for patients with brain metastases, enrolment in clinical trials is essential to advance our understanding of this complex and common disease. In this Review, we describe the key features of diagnosis, risk stratification and modern paradigms in the treatment and management of patients with brain metastases and provide speculation on future research directions.

The role of teratogens in neural crest development

The neural crest (NC), discovered by Wilhelm His 150 years ago, gives rise to a multipotent migratory embryonic cell population that generates a remarkably diverse and important array of cell types during the development of the vertebrate embryo. These cells originate in the neural plate border (NPB), which is the ectoderm between the neural plate and the epidermis. They give rise to the neurons and glia of the peripheral nervous system, melanocytes, chondrocytes, smooth muscle cells, odontoblasts and neuroendocrine cells, among others. Neurocristopathies are a class of congenital diseases resulting from the abnormal induction, specification, migration, differentiation or death of NC cells (NCCs) during embryonic development and have an important medical and societal impact. In general, congenital defects affect an appreciable percentage of newborns worldwide. Some of these defects are caused by teratogens, which are agents that negatively impact the formation of tissues and organs during development. In this review, we will discuss the teratogens linked to the development of many birth defects, with a strong focus on those that specifically affect the development of the NC, thereby producing neurocristopathies. Although increasing attention is being paid to the effect of teratogens on embryonic development in general, there is a strong need to critically evaluate the specific role of these agents in NC development. Therefore, increased understanding of the role of these factors in NC development will contribute to the planning of strategies aimed at the prevention and treatment of human neurocristopathies, whose etiology was previously not considered.

The blood-brain barrier and blood-tumour barrier in brain tumours and metastases

For a blood-borne cancer therapeutic agent to be effective, it must cross the blood vessel wall to reach cancer cells in adequate quantities, and it must overcome the resistance conferred by the local microenvironment around cancer cells. The brain microenvironment can thwart the effectiveness of drugs against primary brain tumours as well as brain metastases. In this Review, we highlight the cellular and molecular components of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), a specialized neurovascular unit evolved to maintain brain homeostasis. Tumours are known to compromise the integrity of the BBB, resulting in a vasculature known as the blood-tumour barrier (BTB), which is highly heterogeneous and characterized by numerous distinct features, including non-uniform permeability and active efflux of molecules. We discuss the challenges posed by the BBB and BTB for drug delivery, how multiple cell types dictate BBB function and the role of the BTB in disease progression and treatment. Finally, we highlight emerging molecular, cellular and physical strategies to improve drug delivery across the BBB and BTB and discuss their impact on improving conventional as well as emerging treatments, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and engineered T cells. A deeper understanding of the BBB and BTB through the application of single-cell sequencing and imaging techniques, and the development of biomarkers of BBB integrity along with systems biology approaches, should enable new personalized treatment strategies for primary brain malignancies and brain metastases.

The evolving role of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases

Approximately 30-50% of advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer patients will develop brain metastases (BMs) during the disease course. Brain metastases may become a main limitation of life expectancy and a half of them will die from brain progression. Even in patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer managed with curative therapy, the risk of brain metastases is also increased. Central nervous system (CNS) may usually present as the first site of recurrence in HER2-positive breast cancer. Local treatments including radiotherapy and surgery are essential while new chemotherapy and biological agents appear to contribute a significant role in the future treatment field of CNS metastases. This article will review recent progresses in HER2-positive breast cancer with BM, with a focus on the efficacy of the HER2 targeted agents-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1).

Brain metastases

An estimated 20% of all patients with cancer will develop brain metastases, with the majority of brain metastases occurring in those with lung, breast and colorectal cancers, melanoma or renal cell carcinoma. Brain metastases are thought to occur via seeding of circulating tumour cells into the brain microvasculature; within this unique microenvironment, tumour growth is promoted and the penetration of systemic medical therapies is limited. Development of brain metastases remains a substantial contributor to overall cancer mortality in patients with advanced-stage cancer because prognosis remains poor despite multimodal treatments and advances in systemic therapies, which include a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Thus, interest abounds in understanding the mechanisms that drive brain metastases so that they can be targeted with preventive therapeutic strategies and in understanding the molecular characteristics of brain metastases relative to the primary tumour so that they can inform targeted therapy selection. Increased molecular understanding of the disease will also drive continued development of novel immunotherapies and targeted therapies that have higher bioavailability beyond the blood-tumour barrier and drive advances in radiotherapies and minimally invasive surgical techniques. As these discoveries and innovations move from the realm of basic science to preclinical and clinical applications, future outcomes for patients with brain metastases are almost certain to improve.

Central Nervous System Metastasis in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Patient Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival from SystHERs

PURPOSE

Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with central nervous system (CNS) metastasis have a poor prognosis. We report treatments and outcomes in patients with HER2-positive MBC and CNS metastasis from the Systemic Therapies for HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Study (SystHERs).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

SystHERs (NCT01615068) was a prospective, U.S.-based, observational registry of patients with newly diagnosed HER2-positive MBC. Study endpoints included treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO).

RESULTS

Among 977 eligible patients enrolled (2012-2016), CNS metastasis was observed in 87 (8.9%) at initial MBC diagnosis and 212 (21.7%) after diagnosis, and was not observed in 678 (69.4%) patients. White and younger patients, and those with recurrent MBC and hormone receptor-negative disease, had higher risk of CNS metastasis. Patients with CNS metastasis at diagnosis received first-line lapatinib more commonly (23.0% vs. 2.5%), and trastuzumab less commonly (70.1% vs. 92.8%), than patients without CNS metastasis at diagnosis. Risk of death was higher with CNS metastasis observed at or after diagnosis [median overall survival (OS) 30.2 and 38.3 months from MBC diagnosis, respectively] versus no CNS metastasis [median OS not estimable: HR 2.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.05-4.00 and HR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.52-2.49]. Patients with versus without CNS metastasis at diagnosis had lower quality of life at enrollment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite advances in HER2-targeted treatments, patients with CNS metastasis continue to have a poor prognosis and impaired quality of life. Observation of CNS metastasis appears to influence HER2-targeted treatment choice.

Heterogeneous distribution of trastuzumab in HER2-positive xenografts and metastases: role of the tumor microenvironment

Most HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients continue to relapse. Incomplete access to all target HER2-positive cells in metastases and tumor tissues is a potential mechanism of resistance to trastuzumab. The location of locally bound trastuzumab was evaluated in HER2-positive tissues in vivo and as in vivo xenografts or metastases models in mice. Microenvironmental elements of tumors were related to bound trastuzumab using immunohistochemical staining and include tight junctions, vasculature, vascular maturity, vessel patency, hypoxia and HER2 to look for correlations. Trastuzumab was evaluated alone and in combination with bevacizumab. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters of overall vascular function, perfusion and apparent permeability were compared with matched histological images of trastuzumab distribution and vascular patency. Trastuzumab distribution is highly heterogeneous in all models examined, including avascular micrometastases of the brain and lung. Trastuzumab distributes well through the extravascular compartment even in conditions of high HER2 expression and poor convective flow in vivo. Microregional patterns of trastuzumab distribution in vivo do not consistently correlate with vascular density, patency, function or maturity; areas of poor trastuzumab access are not necessarily those with poor vascular supply. The number of vessels with perivascular trastuzumab increases with time and higher doses and dramatically decreases when pre-treated with bevacizumab. Areas of HER2-positive tissue without bound trastuzumab persist in all conditions. These data directly demonstrate tissue- and vessel-level barriers to trastuzumab distribution in vivo that can effectively limit access of the drug to target cells in brain metastases and elsewhere.

Understanding patterns of brain metastasis in breast cancer and designing rational therapeutic strategies

One of the most feared sequelae after a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer is development of metastases to the brain as this diagnosis can affect physical function, independence, relationships, quality of life, personality, and ultimately one's sense of self. The propensity to develop breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) varies by subtype, occurring in up to one half of those with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), approximately a third of HER+ breast cancers and 14% in hormone positive disease. Median survival after BCBM diagnosis can be as short as 5 months in TNBC and 10-18 months in the other subtypes. Here, we review the biology of BCBMs and how it informs the rational design of new therapeutic approaches and agents. We discuss application of novel targeted and immunotherapies by breast cancer subtype. It is noteworthy that there are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments specifically for BCBMs currently. Nevertheless, there are legitimate grounds for hope as patients with BCBMs are now being included in clinical trials of systemic therapies and a better understanding of the biology and genetic underpinning of BCBMs is driving an increased range of options for patients.

Drug Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Blame the Barrier or the Brain?

The brain is the most common site of first metastasis for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with HER2-targeting drugs. However, the development of effective therapies for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) is limited by an incomplete understanding of the mechanisms governing drug sensitivity in the central nervous system. Pharmacodynamic data from patients and in vivo models suggest that inadequate drug penetration across the "blood-tumor" barrier is not the whole story. Using HER2-positive BCBMs as a case study, we highlight recent data from orthotopic brain metastasis models that implicate brain-specific drug resistance mechanisms in BCBMs and suggest a translational research paradigm to guide drug development for treatment of BCBMs. Clin Cancer Res; 24(8); 1795-804. ©2018 AACR.

Recent advances in the biology and treatment of brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer: summary of a multidisciplinary roundtable discussion

This article is the result of a round table discussion held at the European Lung Cancer Conference (ELCC) in Geneva in May 2017. Its purpose is to explore and discuss the advances in the knowledge about the biology and treatment of brain metastases originating from non-small cell lung cancer. The authors propose a series of recommendations for research and treatment within the discussed context.