Frequent discordance in PD-1 and PD-L1 expression between primary breast tumors and their matched distant metastases

The evolving landscape of genetic biomarkers for immunotherapy in primary and metastatic breast cancer

Background

Major advances have been achieved in the characterization of primary breast cancer genomic profiles. Limited information is available on the genomic profile of tumors originating from different metastatic locations in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) breast cancer, especially in Asian patients. This study aims to decipher the mutational profiles of primary and R/M breast cancer in Chinese patients using next-generation sequencing.

Methods

A total of 563 breast cancer patients were enrolled, and 590 tumor tissues and matched peripheral blood samples were collected and subjected to targeted sequencing with a panel of 1,021 cancer-related genes. The mutation spectrum, DNA damage response (DDR) genes, commonly altered signal pathways, and immunotherapy-related markers were compared between primary and R/M breast cancer. The molecular differences between our cohort and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) dataset were also explored.

Results

A total of 361 samples from primary and 229 samples from R/M breast cancer were analyzed. BRCA2, ATRX, and ATM were more frequently observed in R/M lesions among the 36 DDR genes. An ESR1 mutation and PD-L1 and PD-L2 amplification were enriched in R/M breast cancer (all p<0.05). Compared with the MSKCC dataset, we recruited more patients diagnosed at age 50 or younger and more patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes. The TNBC patients in our dataset had a higher percentage of PD-L1 amplification in metastasis tumors (p<0.05).

Conclusions

This study revealed the distinctive mutational features of primary and R/M tumors in Chinese breast cancer patients, which are different from those from Western countries. The enrichment of PD-L1 amplification in metastatic TNBC indicates the necessity to re-biopsy metastatic tumors for immunotherapy.

Evaluation of markers of immunity in different metastatic immune microenvironments suggests more suppression within breast to liver metastases in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Programmed death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are approved screening biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in advanced triple negative breast cancer. We examined these biomarkers along with characterization of the tumor microenvironment (TME) between breast tumors (BrTs), axillary metastases (AxMs), liver metastases (LvMs), non-axillary lymph node metastases, and non-liver metastases to determine differences related to site of metastatic disease.

METHODS

3076 unpaired biopsies from breast cancer patients were analyzed using whole transcriptome sequencing and NextGen DNA depicting TMB within tumor sites. The PD-L1 positivity was determined with VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay. The immune cell fraction within the TME was calculated by QuantiSeq and MCP-counter.

RESULTS

Compared to BrT, more LvM samples had a high TMB (≥ 10 mutations/Mb) and fewer LvM samples had PD-L1+ expression. Evaluation of the TME revealed that LvM sites harbored lower infiltration of adaptive immune cells, such as CD4+, CD8+, and regulatory T-cells compared with the BrT foci. We saw differences in innate immune cell infiltration in LvM compared to BrT, including neutrophils and NK cells.

CONCLUSIONS

LvMs are less likely to express PD-L1+ tumor cells but more likely to harbor high TMB as compared to BrTs. Unlike AxMs, LvMs represent a more immunosuppressed TME and demonstrate lower gene expression associated with adaptive immunity compared to BrTs. These findings suggest biopsy site be considered when interpreting results that influence ICI use for treatment and further investigation of immune composition and biomarkers expression by metastatic site.

PD-L1 (SP142) Expression in Primary and Recurrent/Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancers and Its Clinicopathological Significance

PURPOSE

The programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) SP142 assay identifies patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who are most likely to respond to the anti-PD-L1 agent atezolizumab. We aimed to compare PD-L1 (SP142) expression between primary and recurrent/metastatic TNBCs and elucidate the clinicopathological features associated with its expression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Primary and recurrent/metastatic TNBCs tested with PD-L1 (SP142) were collected, and clinicopathological information of these cases was obtained through a review of slides and medical records.

RESULTS

PD-L1 (SP142) positivity was observed in 50.9% (144/283) of primary tumors and 37.8% (31/82) of recurrent/metastatic TNBCs with a significant difference. Recurrent or metastatic sites were associated with PD-L1 positivity, with high PD-L1 positivity in the lung, breast, and soft tissues, and low positivity in the bone, skin, liver, and brain. When comparing PD-L1 expression between primary and matched recurrent/metastatic TNBCs using 55 paired samples, 20 cases (36.4%) showed discordance; 10 cases revealed positive conversion, and another 10 cases revealed negative conversion during metastatic progression. In primary TNBCs, PD-L1 expression was associated with a higher histologic grade, lower T category, pushing border, and higher tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte infiltration. In survival analyses, PD-L1 positivity, especially high positivity, was found to be associated with favorable prognosis of patients.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 (SP142) expression was lower in recurrent/metastatic TNBCs, and substantial cases showed discordance in its expression between primary and recurrent/metastatic sites, suggesting that multiple sites may need to be tested for PD-L1 (SP142) when considering atezolizumab therapy. PD-L1 (SP142)-positive TNBCs seems to be associated with favorable clinical outcomes.

PDL1-Based Nomogram May Be of Potential Clinical Utility for Predicting Survival Outcome in Stage III Breast Cancer

Purpose

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1) has the predictive and prognostic value in a great deal of cancers. This study aims to explore the expression of PDL1 in stage III breast cancer (BC) and its correlation with clinical outcome.

Methods

The protein expression of PDL1 in tumor tissues was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The correlations between PDL1 and clinicopathological variables were performed by χ²-tests or Fisher's exact tests. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis of the potential prognostic factors. Survival curves were estimated based on Kaplan-Meier analyses, and Log Rank test was used to contrast factors influencing the survival outcome.

Results

On the basis of the semiquantitative scoring method for PDL1 expression, the patients were divided into low PDL1 expression group (109 cases) and high PDL1 expression group (107 cases). PDL1 expression was correlated with positive lymph nodes, positive axillary lymph nodes, postoperative radiotherapy, and CK5/6 expression (P < 0.05). The PDL1 expression in tumor tissues was discovered to be a potential prognostic risk factor with the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for stage III BC. Moreover, patients with high PDL1 expression showed longer lifetime (DFS and OS) compared to those with low PDL1 expression in total patient population (P < 0.05). Moreover, the nomogram showed that the prediction line is in good agreement with the reference line for postoperative 1-, 3-, and 5-year lifetime. The DCA curve showed that the 3- and 5-year lifetime by nomogram had so much better divination of the clinical application than only by PDL1.

Conclusion

PDL1 is a latent prognostic factor in stage III BC and is closely related to some clinicopathological features. PDL1 expression in tumor tissues is significantly associated with better lifetime rate in stage III BC.

Advancing the PD-L1 CPS test in metastatic TNBC: Insights from pathologists and findings from a nationwide survey

Pembrolizumab has received approval as a first-line treatment for unresectable/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of ≥ 10. However, assessing CPS in mTNBC poses challenges. Firstly, it represents a novel analysis for breast pathologists. Secondly, the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in mTNBC further complicates the assessment. Lastly, the lack of standardized assays and staining platforms adds to the complexity. In KEYNOTE trials, PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit as a companion diagnostic test. However, both the 22C3 pharmDx and VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assays are validated for CPS assessment. Consequently, assay-platform choice, staining conditions, and scoring methods can significantly impact the testing outcomes. This consensus paper aims to discuss the intricacies of PD-L1 CPS testing in mTNBC and provide practical recommendations for pathologists. Additionally, we present findings from a nationwide Italian survey elucidating the state-of-the-art in PD-L1 CPS testing in mTNBC.

Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILS) and PD-L1 Expression in Breast Cancer: A Review of Current Evidence and Prognostic Implications from Pathologist's Perspective

With the rise of novel immunotherapies able to stimulate the antitumor immune response, increasing literature concerning the immunogenicity of breast cancer has been published in recent years. Numerous clinical studies have been conducted in order to identify novel biomarkers that could reflect the immunogenicity of BC and predict response to immunotherapy. In this regard, TILs have emerged as an important immunological biomarker related to the antitumor immune response in BC. TILs are more frequently observed in triple-negative breast cancer and HER2+ subtypes, where increased TIL levels have been linked to a better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and improved survival. PD-L1 is a type 1 transmembrane protein ligand expressed on T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and antigen-presenting cells and is considered a key inhibitory checkpoint involved in cancer immune regulation. PD-L1 immunohistochemical expression in breast cancer is observed in about 10-30% of cases and is extremely variable based on tumor stage and molecular subtypes. Briefly, TNBC shows the highest percentage of PD-L1 positivity, followed by HER2+ tumors. On the other hand, PD-L1 is rarely expressed (0-10% of cases) in hormone-receptor-positive BC. The prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in BC is still controversial since different immunohistochemistry (IHC) clones, cut-off points, and scoring systems have been utilized across published studies. In the present paper, an extensive review of the current knowledge of the immune landscape of BC is provided. TILS and PD-L1 expression across different BC subtypes are discussed, providing a guide for their pathological assessment and reporting.

Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression and CD8 lymphocyte infiltration in metastatic colorectal cancer and their prognostic significance

Purpose

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have become a major therapeutic method for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Growing evidence indicates that tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the tumour microenvironment are a prerequisite for the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy. In this study, we aimed to compare PD-L1 expression and cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) and CD8 TIL infiltration in primary tumours and paired metastases.

Patients and methods

Altogether, 111 patients with mCRC who underwent surgery at our hospital were included. PD-L1, CD4, and CD8 expression were detected by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray. PD-L1 expression was assessed using the combined positivity score (CPS), and a score ≥1 was judged as positive. The area proportion of TILs with positive staining ≥10% was classified as "high", while <10% was classified as "low".

Results

We observed the discordance of PD-L1 expression between primary tumours and paired metastases in 35/111 (31.5%) patients (κ = 0.137, P = 0.142). This heterogeneity was significantly correlated with discordance of CD8 TIL infiltration between primary tumours and paired metastases (P = 0.003). Compared with corresponding colorectal cancer tumours, lung metastases showed more CD8 TIL infiltration (P = 0.022, median: 8.5% vs. 5.0%), whereas liver metastases exhibited less CD8 TIL infiltration (P = 0.028, median: 3.0% vs. 5.0%). Area proportion of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ TIL infiltration in lung metastases were all higher than those in liver metastases (P = 0.005, median: 15.0% vs. 9.0%; P = 0.001, median: 8.5% vs. 3.0%). Compared with p MMR (MSI-L/MS-S) subgroup, area proportion of CD8 TIL infiltration in primary tumours and CD4, CD8 TIL infiltration in paired metastases were all higher in d MMR (MSI-H) group (P = 0.026, median: 15.0% vs 5.0%; P = 0.039, median: 15.0% vs 9.0%; P = 0.015, median: 15.0% vs 5.0%). Preoperative chemo/radiotherapy may increase CD8 TIL infiltration in primary tumours (P = 0.045, median: 10.0% vs. 5.0%). CD8 TIL infiltration in primary tumours was an independent predictive factor for overall survival (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.93, P = 0.038).

Conclusion

Heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression and CD8 TIL infiltration was found between primary tumours and paired metastases in mCRC. CD8 TIL infiltration in primary tumours could independently forecast the overall survival of patients with mCRC.

Correlation between Macrophage Polarization and PD-L1-Related Tumor Microenvironmental Alteration and Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis; nearly 80% patients have regional or distant metastasis when diagnosed. Tumor microenvironment (TME) alteration and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) have been reported to play a key role in cancer metastasis. However, the correlation between TME and EMT was poorly studied in PDAC. This study aims to explore the correlation between EMT markers and TME alteration, mainly including macrophage polarization and PD-L1 expression change, in primary and metastatic PDAC tissues by immunohistochemistry. The results indicated that macrophage polarization was found in metastases with the number of M1 macrophages (CD86⁺) decreased and M2 (CD163⁺) increased, though PD-L1 expression did not have a significant alteration. Compared to primary tumors, E-cadherin was significantly lower, while snail was higher, while no difference was found with N-cadherin and ZEB1. Correlation analysis indicated that snail, but not ZEB1, E-cadherin, or N-cadherin, was highly correlated with macrophage polarization. To conclude, the number of CD86⁺ M1 macrophages was increased while CD163⁺ M2 macrophages decreased in metastases, with no significant alteration of PD-L1 expression compared to primary tumors. EMT markers-Snail and E-cadherin-but not ZEB1 or N-cadherin, were found to be higher/lower in metastases, which mean that EMT played an important role in PDAC metastasis. Further analysis indicated that snail was highly correlated with M1 to M2 macrophage polarization, which prompted that EMT may be one reason for macrophage polarization induced TME alteration in PDAC metastasis.

Chemoradiation therapy alters the PD-L1 score in locoregional recurrent squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

PD-L1 testing guides therapeutic decision-making for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We sought to understand whether chemoradiation therapy (CRT) influences the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) and other biomarkers of response to immunotherapy. PD-L1 expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry, and bulk RNA sequencing was performed on 146 HNSCC patients (65 primary sites, 50 paired local recurrences, and 31 paired regional recurrences). PD-L1 was scored using the CPS of ≥1, ≥20, and ≥50. Overall, 98 %, 54 %, and 17 % of HNSCCs had a CPS ≥1, ≥20, and ≥50, respectively. When using a cut-off of ≥1, CRT did not significantly change CPS at the locoregional recurrent site. However, there were significant changes when using CPS ≥20 or ≥50. The CPS changed for 32 % of patients when using a CPS ≥20 (p < 0.001). When using a CPS ≥50, there was a 20-23 % (p = 0.0058-0.00067) discordance rate at the site of locoregional recurrence. Oral cavity cancers had a significantly higher discordant rate than other primary sites for CPS ≥50, 44 % (8/18, p = 0.0058) and 58 % (7/12, p = 0.00067) discordance at the site of local and regional recurrence, respectively. When evaluating the 18 gene IFN-ɣ signature predictive of response to anti-PD-1 blockade, there was a statistically significant increase in the IFN-ɣ signature in recurrent larynx cancer (p = 0.02). Our study demonstrates that when using a higher cut-off of CPS ≥20 and ≥50, a repeat biopsy may be warranted after CRT for local and regional recurrent HNSCCs.

PD-L1 Expression in Triple-negative Breast Cancer-a Comparative Study of 3 Different Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Assessment of programmed death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has entered daily practice to identify patients eligible for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, different antibodies and different cut-offs for PD-L1 positivity are used, and the interchangeability of these methods is not clear. The aim of our study was to analyze whether different PD-L1 antibodies can be used interchangeably to identify TNBC patients as PD-L1 positive.

METHODS

A tissue microarray encompassing 147 TNBC cases was immunohistochemically analyzed using 3 different antibodies against PD-L1: SP142, SP263, and E1L3N. PD-L1 positivity was determined as ≥1% of positive tumor-associated immune cells. The staining patterns of the 3 antibodies were compared and correlated with clinicopathological data.

RESULTS

A total of 84 cases were evaluable for PD-L1 analysis with all 3 antibodies. PD-L1 was positive in 50/84 patients (59.5%) with SP263, in 44/84 (52.4%) with E1L3N, and in 29/84 (34.5%) with SP142. There was no statistical difference between the performance of SP263 and E1L3N, but both antibodies stained significantly more cases than the SP142 antibody.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the 3 PD-L1 antibodies identify different TNBC patient subgroups as PD-L1 positive and, therefore cannot be used interchangeably. Additional studies are needed to further investigate the use and impact of different PD-L1 antibody clones for predictive selection of TNBC patients for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: real-world results from a single academic center in Austria

Purpose

IMpassion130 led to the approval of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative, PD-L1 immune-cell positive breast cancer (BC) by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The objective of the present study was to investigate the implementation, safety and efficacy of this combination in the initial phase after approval.

Methods

A retrospective data analysis including all BC patients who received atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel between 1.1.2019 and 31.10.2020 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Department of Medicine 1, respectively, at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Maier product-limit method. Owing to the retrospective nature of this study, all statistics must be considered exploratory.

Results

In total 20 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 7.1 months (IQR 5.2–9.1). Median PFS was 3.0 months (SE = .24; 95% CI [2.5; 3.5]). Median OS was 8.94 months (SE = 2.34, 95%CI [4.35; 13.53]). No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusion

The present study showed a considerably shorter PFS (3.0 vs. 7.5 months) and OS (8.94 vs. 25.0 months) than IMpassion130 putatively owing to the use of atezolizumab in later treatment lines, more aggressive tumors and a study population with higher morbidity compared to the pivotal trial.

Immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: Insights into tumor immune landscape and therapeutic opportunities

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a clinically aggressive subtype of breast cancer that represents 15-20% of breast tumors and is more prevalent in young pre-menopausal women. It is the subtype of breast cancers with the highest metastatic potential and recurrence at the first 5 years after diagnosis. In addition, mortality increases when a complete pathological response is not achieved. As TNBC cells lack estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors, patients do not respond well to hormone and anti-HER2 therapies, and conventional chemotherapy remains the standard treatment. Despite efforts to develop targeted therapies, this disease continues to have a high unmet medical need, and there is an urgent demand for customized diagnosis and therapeutics. As immunotherapy is changing the paradigm of anticancer treatment, it arises as an alternative treatment for TNBC patients. TNBC is classified as an immunogenic subtype of breast cancer due to its high levels of tumor mutational burden and presence of immune cell infiltrates. This review addresses the implications of these characteristics for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of the disease. Herein, the role of immune gene signatures and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as biomarkers in TNBC is reviewed, identifying their application in patient diagnosis and stratification, as well as predictors of efficacy. The expression of PD-L1 expression is already considered to be predictive of response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy, but the challenges regarding its value as biomarker are described. Moreover, the rationales for different formats of immunotherapy against TNBC currently under clinical research are discussed, and major clinical trials are highlighted. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated clinical benefit, particularly in early-stage tumors and when administered in combination with chemotherapy, with several regimens approved by the regulatory authorities. The success of antibody-drug conjugates and research on other emerging approaches, such as vaccines and cell therapies, will also be addressed. These advances give hope on the development of personalized, more effective, and safe treatments, which will improve the survival and quality of life of patients with TNBC.

Circulating tumor cell assay to non-invasively evaluate PD-L1 and other therapeutic targets in multiple cancers

Biomarker directed selection of targeted anti-neoplastic agents such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, small molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies form an important aspect of cancer treatment. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of the tumor tissue is the method of choice to evaluate the presence of these biomarkers. However, a significant barrier to biomarker testing on tissue is the availability of an adequate amount of tissue and need for repetitive sampling due to tumor evolution. Also, tumor tissue testing is not immune to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. We describe the analytical and clinical validation of a Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) assay to accurately assess the presence of PD-L1 22C3 and PD-L1 28.8, ER, PR and HER2, from patients with solid tumors to guide the choice of suitable targeted therapies. Analytically, the test has high sensitivity, specificity, linearity and precision. Based on a blinded case control study, the clinical sensitivity and specificity for PD-L1 (22C3 and 28.8) was determined to be 90% and 100% respectively. The clinical sensitivity and specificity was 83% and 89% for ER; 80% and 94% for PR; 63% and 89% for HER2 (by ICC); and 100% and 92% for HER2 (by FISH), respectively. The performance characteristics of the test support its suitability and adaptability for routine clinical use.

The current state of molecular profiling in gastrointestinal malignancies

This is a review of the current state of molecular profiling in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and what to expect from this evolving field in the future. Individualized medicine is moving from broad panel testing of numerous genes or gene products in tumor biopsy samples, identifying biomarkers of prognosis and treatment response, to relatively noninvasive liquid biopsy assays, building on what we have learned in our tumor analysis and growing into its own evolving predictive and prognostic subspecialty. Hence, the field of GI precision oncology is exploding, and this review endeavors to summarize where we are now in preparation for the journey ahead.

Concordance, Correlation, and Clinical Impact of Standardized PD-L1 and TIL Scoring in SCCHN

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been thoroughly researched in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). To address the impact of intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity in these biomarkers, we explored the concordance of PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) and stromal TILs in different paired tissue sample types, while evaluating their internal relationship and prognostic impact.

METHODS

A total of 165 tissue blocks from 80 SCCHN patients were reviewed for TILs and PD-L1 CPS. Concordance between paired tissue samples was evaluated, and their association with several clinicopathological variables, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) was determined.

RESULTS

Biopsies and paired resection material were severely discordant in 39% and 34% of samples for CPS and TIL count, respectively, of which CPS was underscored in 27% of biopsies. In paired primary tumor-metastatic lesions, the disagreement was lower for CPS (19%) but not for TIL count (44%). PD-L1 CPS was correlated with prolonged OS when calculated from tissue acquirement, while extended OS and DFS were observed for high TIL density.

CONCLUSION

Intertumoral and, especially, intratumoral heterogeneity were confounding factors when determining PD-L1 CPS and TIL count on paired tissue samples, indicating the increasing necessity of assessing both biomarkers on representative tissue material. Although TILs hold valuable prognostic information in SCCHN, the robustness of PD-L1 as a biomarker in SCCHN remains ambiguous.

A Need for More Molecular Profiling in Brain Metastases

As local disease control improves, the public health impact of brain metastases (BrM) continues to grow. Molecular features are frequently different between primary and metastatic tumors as a result of clonal evolution during neoplasm migration, selective pressures imposed by systemic treatments, and differences in the local microenvironment. However, biomarker information in BrM is not routinely obtained despite emerging evidence of its clinical value. We review evidence of discordance in clinically actionable biomarkers between primary tumors, extracranial metastases, and BrM. Although BrM biopsy/resection imposes clinical risks, these risks must be weighed against the potential benefits of assessing biomarkers in BrM. First, new treatment targets unique to a patient's BrM may be identified. Second, as BrM may occur late in a patient's disease course, resistance to initial targeted therapies and/or loss of previously identified biomarkers can occur by the time of occult BrM, rendering initial and other targeted therapies ineffective. Thus, current biomarker data can inform real-time treatment options. Third, biomarker information in BrM may provide useful prognostic information for patients. Appreciating the importance of biomarker analyses in BrM tissue, including how it may identify specific drivers of BrM, is critical for the development of more effective treatment strategies to improve outcomes for this growing patient population.

Analysis of patients without and with an initial triple-negative breast cancer diagnosis in the phase 3 randomized ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38 via a proprietary hydrolyzable linker. In the ASCENT study, SG improved survival versus single-agent treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in pre-treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Hormone/HER2 receptor changes are common, particularly at relapse/metastasis. This subanalysis assessed outcomes in patients who did/did not have TNBC at initial diagnosis, before enrollment.

METHODS

TNBC diagnosis was only required at study entry. Patients with mTNBC refractory/relapsing after ≥ 2 prior chemotherapies were randomized 1:1 to receive SG or TPC. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in patients without brain metastases.

RESULTS

Overall, 70/235 (30%) and 76/233 (33%) patients who received SG and TPC, respectively, did not have TNBC at initial diagnosis. Clinical benefit with SG versus TPC was observed in this subset. Median PFS was 4.6 versus 2.3 months (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.32-0.72), median overall survival was 12.4 versus 6.7 months (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.30-0.64), and objective response rate (ORR) was 31% versus 4%; those who also received prior CDK4/6 inhibitors had ORRs of 21% versus 5%. Efficacy and safety for patients with TNBC at initial diagnosis were generally similar to those who did not present with TNBC at initial diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Patients without TNBC at initial diagnosis had improved clinical outcomes and a manageable safety profile with SG, supporting SG as a treatment option for mTNBC regardless of subtype at initial diagnosis. Subtype reassessment in advanced breast cancer allows for optimal treatment. Clinical trial registration number NCT02574455, registered October 12, 2015.

Prognostic Role of PD-L1 Expression in Invasive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

The role of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological variables, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in invasive breast cancer. PD-L1 expression was associated with age ≥ 50 years, lymph node status-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, Ki67 ≥ 20%, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. PD-L1 positivity was associated with worse OS; however, there was no significant improvement in DFS. PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with the clinicopathological characteristics of favorable and unfavorable prognoses. However, the final clinical outcome was associated with lower OS and had no significant association with DFS.

Abstract

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been investigated in various types of cancer; however, the role of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological variables, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in invasive breast cancer. A total of 965 articles were included from CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Of these, 22 studies encompassing 6468 cases of invasive breast cancer were included in the systematic review, and 15 articles were included in the meta-analysis. PD-L1 expression was associated with age ≥ 50 years, lymph node status-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, Ki67 ≥ 20%, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. PD-L1 positivity was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, HR, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.26–3.52; p =< 0.000); however, there was no significant improvement in DFS (HR 0.17; 95% CI −0.12–0.46; p =< 0.252). PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with the clinicopathological characteristics of favorable and unfavorable prognoses. However, the final clinical outcome was associated with lower OS and had no significant association with DFS.

PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression status in relation to chemotherapy in primary and metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in various cancers. Although programmed death ligand 1/2 (PD‐L1/L2) expressions have been demonstrated as predictive biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and prognostic markers, whether PD‐L1/L2 expression is altered in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma during the therapeutic course is unclear. Whether PD‐L1/L2 expression in metastatic or recurrent lesions is consistent with that in primary tumors is also unknown. This study included 561 surgically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and PD‐L1/L2 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. We investigated the influence of chemotherapeutic drugs (cisplatin and fluorouracil) on PD‐L1/L2 expression and PD‐L1/L2‐related pathways in vitro. We also examined PD‐L1/L2 expression in 18 surgically resected lymph node metastases and 10 recurrent lesions compared with primary lesions. The positive rate of PD‐L1 was significantly higher in patients with preoperative chemotherapy than in those without preoperative therapy. The positive rate of PD‐L2 expression showed no significant difference between patient groups. Cisplatin increased PD‐L1 expression in cancer cell lines in vitro, but decreased PD‐L2 in some cell lines. The effects of cisplatin on phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 1/3 (pSTAT1/3) also differed depending on cell lines. Fluorouracil increased PD‐L1 and PD‐L2 expression. PD‐L1/L2 expression in lymph node metastases and recurrent lesions did not always match expression in primary lesions. PD‐L1/L2 expression may be altered by preoperative chemotherapy, and PD‐L1 /L2 expression in primary lesions does not always match that of metastatic/recurrent lesions. Thus, one‐time evaluation is not sufficient to evaluate PD‐L1/L2 expression as a biomarker in esophageal cancer.

Currently Used Laboratory Methodologies for Assays Detecting PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2 and Soluble PD-L1 in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

Several methods targeting the programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) axis have been developed and evaluated for the detection of immune checkpoint levels that are strongly involved in immunotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Variations in different assays used in diverse studies have affected their result interpretation and clinical utility. When applying these assays to the laboratory, a comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of them should be recognized. We reviewed applied laboratory techniques for detecting PD-1, PD-ligand (L)1, PD-L2, and soluble PD-L1, which are important for selecting metastatic cancer patients for immunotherapy. Advances in methodologies according to the epoch are also investigated to gain insight into immunologic techniques and to facilitate appropriate laboratory settings for evaluating the PD-1 axis status, which are useful for estimating outcomes and planning patient-tailored immunotherapy strategies.

Abstract

Approximately 20% of breast cancer (BC) patients suffer from distant metastasis. The incidence and prevalence rates of metastatic BC have increased annually. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are an emerging area of treatment, especially for metastatic patients with poor outcomes. Several antibody drugs have been developed and approved for companion testing of the programmed death protine-1 (PD-1) axis. We reviewed currently used laboratory methodologies for assays determining PD-1 axis to provide a comprehensive understanding of principles, advantages, and drawbacks involved in their implementation. The most commonly used method is immunohistochemistry (92.9%) for PD-L1 expression using tissue samples (96.4%). The commonly used anti-PD-L1 antibody clone were commercially available 22C3 (30.8%), SP142 (19.2%), SP263 (15.4%), and E1L3N (11.5%). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and electrochemiluminescent immunoassay that target soluble PD-ligand (L)1 were developed and popularized in 2019–2021, in contrast to 2016–2018. Easy accessibility and non-invasiveness due to the use of blood samples, quantitative outputs, and relatively rapid turnaround times make them more preferable. Regarding scoring methods, a combination of tumor and immune cells (45.5% in 2016–2018 to 57.1% in 2019–2021) rather than each cell alone became more popular. Information about antibody clones, platforms, scoring methods, and related companion drugs is recommended for reporting PD-L1 expression.

Discordance of PD-L1 Expression at the Protein and RNA Levels in Early Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

Despite the increasing use of checkpoint inhibitors for early and metastatic breast cancer, Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) remains the only validated albeit imperfect predictive biomarker. Significant discordance in PD-L1 protein expression depending on the antibody used has been demonstrated, while the weak correlation and discordant prognostic information between protein and gene expression underscore its biologic heterogeneity. In this study, we use material from two patient cohorts of early breast cancer and multiple methodologies (immunohistochemistry, RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization, immunofluorescence, bulk gene expression, and multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry) to demonstrate the significant discordance in PD-L1 expression among various methods and between different areas of the same tumor, which hints toward the presence of spatial, intratumoral and biological heterogeneity.

Abstract

We aimed to assess if the discrepant prognostic information between Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein versus mRNA expression in early breast cancer (BC) could be attributed to heterogeneity in its expression. PD-L1 protein and mRNA expression in BC tissue microarrays from two clinical patient cohorts were evaluated (105 patients; cohort 1: untreated; cohort 2: neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with SP142, SP263 was performed. PD-L1 mRNA was evaluated using bulk gene expression and RNA-FISH RNAscope^®, the latter scored in a semi-quantitative manner and combined with immunofluorescence (IF) staining for the simultaneous detection of PD-L1 protein expression. PD-L1 expression was assessed in cores as a whole and in two regions of interest (ROI) from the same core. The cell origin of PD-L1 expression was evaluated using multiplex fluorescent IHC. IHC PD-L1 expression between SP142 and SP263 was concordant in 86.7% of cores (p < 0.001). PD-L1 IF/IHC was weakly correlated with spatial mRNA expression (concordance 54.6–71.2%). PD-L1 was mostly expressed by lymphocytes intra-tumorally, while its stromal expression was mostly observed in macrophages. Our results demonstrate only moderate concordance between the various methods of assessing PD-L1 expression at the protein and mRNA levels, which may be attributed to both analytical performance and spatial heterogeneity.

Determining PD-L1 Status in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Lessons Learned from IMpassion130

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 12% to 17% of all breast cancers and has an aggressive clinical behavior. Increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte counts are prognostic for survival in TNBC, making this disease a potential target for cancer immunotherapy (CIT). Research on immunophenotyping of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is revealing molecular and structural organization in the tumor microenvironment that may predict patient prognosis. The anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel was the first CIT combination to demonstrate progression-free survival benefit and clinically meaningful overall survival benefit in the first-line treatment of metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) in patients with PD-L1-expressing tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) in ≥ 1% of the tumor area. This led to its US and EU approval for mTNBC and US approval of the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay as a companion diagnostic immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay. Subsequently, the anti- programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was approved by the FDA for mTNBC based on progression-free survival benefit in patients with a combined positive score ≥10 by its concurrently approved 22C3 companion diagnostic assay. Treatment guidelines now recommend PD-L1 testing for patients with mTNBC, and the testing landscape will likely become increasingly complex as new anti-PD-L1/PD-1 agents and diagnostics are approved for TNBC. Integrating PD-L1 testing into current diagnostic workflows for mTNBC may provide more treatment options for these patients. Therefore, it is critical for medical oncologists and pathologists to understand the available assays and their relevance to therapeutic options to develop an appropriate workflow for IHC testing.

PD-L1 expression in bladder cancer: Which scoring algorithm in what tissue?

INTRODUCTION

For cisplatin-ineligible patients, approval of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy relies on the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression assay employed, namely, the combined positive score (CPS) or immune cell (IC) score. This study compares PD-L1 diagnostic scores and positivity in primary and matched metastatic bladder cancer tissue.

METHODS

A total of 108 patients undergoing radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder cancer and lymphatic spread (pN+) were included. PD-L1 expression was compared by immunohistochemistry (IHC) between the primary bladder tumor and associated lymph node metastases using Ventana SP263 anti-PD-L1 antibody. In a subset of cases further IHC was performed with Ventana SP142 and Dako 22C3 antibodies. Second, the PD-L1 scoring algorithms for the CPS and IC score were compared. Correlation of PD-L1 positivity with clinical parameters and tumor stage was assessed. Intra- and intertissue analyses were performed with Pearson's chi square test, McNemar test and Spearman correlation employing IBM SPSS 25.

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression did not correlate with clinicopathological parameters. The CPS (43.5% vs. 35.6%; P=0.006) and the IC score (28.7% vs. 21.2%; P=0.002) yielded PD-L1 positivity significantly more often in primary BC than in matched lymph node metastasis. Both the CPS (r=0.775; P<0.001) and the IC score (r=0.711; P<0.001) correlated between primary and metastatic bladder cancer tissue. Employing CPS vs. IC led to significantly more PD-L1-positive classified cases in primary BC (CPS vs. IC; 43.5% vs. 28.7%; P<0.001) and lymph node metastasis (CPS vs. IC; 35.6% vs. 21.2%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to lymph node analysis, bladder tissue yields more PD-L1 positivity assessed with the CPS and IC scores. This is particularly evident when employing the CPS. The findings highlight that employing both PD-L1 assays may maximize eligibility for first-line checkpoint-inhibitors to treat bladder cancer patients unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Discordance of PD-L1 status between primary and metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is predictive for benefit from immunotherapy in several human malignancies including triple negative breast cancer. Lower positivity rates but a larger relative benefit from atezolizumab has been implied when PD-L1 status is assessed at metastatic sites. We aimed to study the discordance of PD-L1 expression between primary tumor and metastasis in breast cancer due to its potential clinical utility.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline and Web of science were searched for studies reporting on PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic breast cancer, followed by data extraction. Outcomes included pooled PD-L1 positivity rates in tumor cells, immune cells or both in primary tumor and metastasis, PD-L1 discordance between matched primary tumors and metastasis and direction of discordance.

RESULTS

Of 2552 identified entries following de-duplication, 20 studies fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. Pooled PD-L1 positivity rate was higher in primary tumors compared to metastasis when assessed in immune cells (51.2% vs 37.1% p < 0.001) and tumor/immune cells (30.1% vs 14.6% p < 0.001), but not in tumor cells (18.7% vs 17.8% p = 0.65). PD-L1 positivity was lowest when assessed in bone metastases (12%) and highest in lymph nodes (60%). Discordance between primary tumors and metastasis was bidirectional, with higher pooled discordance rates when PD-L1 expression was assessed in immune compared to tumor cells (39.5% vs 13.6%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The observed considerable discordance between PD-L1 status in primary and metastatic breast cancer emphasizes the importance of appropriate tissue sampling when selecting patients for immunotherapy.

The expression of programmed death-ligand 1 and its association with histopathological grade, stage of disease, and occurrence of metastasis in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) plays a role in tumor escape and progression by inactivating T lymphocytes. The aim of the study reported here was to determine the relationship between the expression of PD-L1 and histopathological grade, stage of disease, and the occurrence of metastasis in breast cancer.

METHODS

The observational cross-sectional study involved analyzing the expression of PD-L1 by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

PD-LI was expressed in 43 of 60 patients with breast cancer (71.6%), mostly with a moderate histopathological grade (58.3%) and at an advanced stage (50%). Associations between the expression of PD-L1 and histopathological grade (p = 0.011), stage of disease (p = 0.009), and the occurrence of metastasis (p = 0.01) were significant, with an odds ratio of 5.

CONCLUSION

The associations between the expression of PD-L1 and histopathological grade, disease stage, and occurrence of metastasis were all significant in cases of breast cancer in the sample. Those findings suggest that the expression of PD-L1 increases the progression of breast cancer.

Microenvironmental regulation of tumour immunity and response to immunotherapy

The confluence of immunology and oncology has led to a lot of uncertainty and questions about relevant biomarkers. Despite the complexity of the tumour microenvironment, most clinical studies have relied on a single‐parameter immunohistochemical assay to prospectively select patients for checkpoint inhibitor therapy; the results of this strategy have been highly variable and often less than optimal. While great efforts have been made to identify additional or alternative biomarkers, pathologists, drug developers, and clinicians alike have faced technical, logistical, and regulatory challenges on how to implement them successfully. In this review, we will discuss these challenges; we will also highlight recent advances in dissecting the functional diversity of immune cell populations within the tumour microenvironment and their potential for improved, biomarker‐driven therapeutic strategies. The dynamic nature and cellular diversity of the tumour microenvironment may challenge past models of a single biomarker predicting patient response and clinical outcome. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

The recent advances of PD-1 and PD-L1 checkpoint signaling inhibition for breast cancer immunotherapy

Over the past decade, there has been sustained research activity on programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors for breast cancer (BC) immunotherapy. Several clinical studies have demonstrated the anti-tumor efficacy of monotherapy drugs targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 checkpoint signaling in BC. Besides, the combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents with other inhibitors, including poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, vaccines, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors are being investigated to improve drug efficacy. These trials have performed well and have shown better and more sustainable therapeutic responses. As follows, the purpose of this review is to discuss the recent advances in BC immunotherapy targeting the inhibition of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint signaling, when recommended as a monotherapy or in conjunction with other treatments. We look forward to providing new insights into the current state of BC research and the future direction of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint signaling.

Delivery of miR-424-5p via Extracellular Vesicles Promotes the Apoptosis of MDA-MB-231 TNBC Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment

Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) overexpressed on cancer cells has emerged as a key inhibitor that maintains the immunosuppressive microenvironment through its interaction with the PD-1 receptor in cancer. Here, we demonstrated that miR-424-5p delivery via extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from adipose tissue-mesenchymal stromal cells (AT-MSCs) partly promotes proinflammation and enhances antitumor cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) exhibits increased expression of PD-L1, and PD-L1 is positively correlated with the overall survival of patients with TNBC. PD-L1 shows relatively higher expression in MDA-MB-231 (MM231) cells and can be downregulated by miR-424-5p. Furthermore, miR-424-5p transported by EVs can increase the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, decrease the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines and promote the apoptosis of tumor cells. The intratumoral administration of miR-424-5p-EVs significantly slowed tumor growth. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that EVs may serve as a delivery system for novel immunotherapies for TNBC through the miR-424-5p/PD-L1 pathway.

Discordance of immunotherapy response predictive biomarkers between primary lesions and paired metastases in tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several biomarkers predict the efficacy of immunotherapy, which is essential for selecting patients who would potentially benefit. Discordant status of these biomarkers between primary tumours and paired metastases has been increasingly revealed. We aimed to comprehensively summarize the incidence of this phenomenon.

METHODS

Databases were searched to identify studies reporting primary-to-metastatic conversion of biomarkers, including programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), PD-L2, tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL), tumour mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI).

FINDINGS

56 studies with 2739 patients were included. The pooled discordance rate of PD-L1 was 22%. The percentage of PD-L1 changed from positive to negative was 41%, whereas that from negative to positive was 16%. The discordance rate for PD-1 and PD-L2 was 26% and 22%, respectively. TIL level was found with a discordance rate of 39%, and changes from high to low (50%) occurred more than that from low to high (16%). No significant difference in TMB was observed between two sites in most studies. MSI status discordance was found in 6% patients, with a percentage of 9% from MSI-high to microsatellite instable (MSS) and 0% from MSS to MSI-high.

INTERPRETATION

Our study demonstrates that PD-L1, PD-1, PD-L2, and TIL level had high frequency of discordance, while TMB and MSI status were less likely to change between primary tumours and paired metastases. Therefore, evaluating those frequently altered biomarkers of both primary and metastatic tumours is strongly recommended for precise clinical decision of immune checkpoint treatment. FUND: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872152).

Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity of PD-L1 Expression and Tumor Mutational Burden in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma at Baseline Diagnosis and after Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Intrapatient heterogeneity of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) could influence their roles as predictive biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the spatiotemporal heterogeneity and prognostic relevance of PD-L1 expression and TMB in GEA.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A cohort of 211 patients with stage II-IV GEA was retrospectively reviewed for a total of 407 tumor samples with PD-L1 expression data and 319 tumor samples with TMB data. PD-L1 status was defined as positive if combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 using the 22C3 pharmDx assay. TMB levels were categorized as low, intermediate, or high (≤5, 5-15, or >15 mutations/Mb), or using a single threshold (<10 or ≥10 mutation/Mb), determined by next-generation sequencing using a targeted gene panel.

RESULTS

Of 407 tumors, 56% were PD-L1 negative and 44% PD-L1 positive. Of 319 tumors, 50% were TMB-low, 45% TMB-intermediate, and 5% TMB-high; 86% had <10 and 14% ≥10 mutations/Mb. TMB level was significantly associated with MSI-status. PD-L1 expression and TMB exhibited marked spatial heterogeneity between baseline primary and metastatic tumors (61% and 69% concordance), and temporal heterogeneity between tumors before and after chemotherapy (57%-63% and 73%-75% concordance). PD-L1 expression and TMB were not significantly associated with overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression and TMB exhibit marked spatial and temporal heterogeneity in GEA. This heterogeneity should be considered when obtaining tumor samples for molecular testing and when deciding whether ICI therapy is appropriate.See related commentary by Klempner et al., p. 6401.

Prognostic value of programmed cell death ligand-1 expression in breast cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The correlation between programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) which may affect T cell to form the immune tolerance and breast cancer (BC) still maintains to be uncovered. This meta-analysis was about to explore PD-L1 expression as well as its prognostic role in BC.

METHODS

First of all, we performed 3 databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to explore publications between January of 2015 and January of 2020. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were conducted: immunohistochemistry shall be used to detect target molecule expression and at least 1 survival indicator and related data we need should be included. The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval were pooled related with survival as well as clinicopathological parameters. The effects of PD-L1 in differed aspects like sample size and age of each cohort were demonstrated by subgroup analyses as well as sensitivity analyses which may complain the potential source of heterogeneity. P < .05 indicates factors were charge of the heterogeneity of prognosis. Begg and Egger tests were used to identify publication bias.

RESULTS

We identified 12 studies containing a blanket of 4336 patients with BC for whom PD-L1 positive tumor cells were related with higher tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, estrogen receptor negativity, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity, luminal B and triple negative BC molecular subtype and high nuclear-associated antigen Ki- 67 expression. Meanwhile, compared to patients with PD-L1 negative expression, PD-L1 positivity associated with worse overall survival (Hazard ratio [HR]:1.43; 95% CI:0.98-2.10; P < .001) and might have no obvious tight connection with disease free survival (HR:1.40; 95% CI:1.11-1.78; P = .101) and recurrence free survival (HR:2.36; 95% CI:1.04-5.34; P = .145). The outcome of the meta-analysis was confirmed to be credible by sensitivity analysis. Publication bias was not existed indicated (P = .640).

CONCLUSION

Positive PD-L1 expression has a worse clinical outcome in patients with BC demonstrated by our meta-analysis. Being urgent to catch attention to the role of PD-L1 in BC, it may be considered as prognostic marker of immune microenvironment for improving therapy efficacy.

The Abscopal Effect: Could a Phenomenon Described Decades Ago Become Key to Enhancing the Response to Immune Therapies in Breast Cancer?

Background

The term "abscopal effect" was defined in 1953. In oncology the term is used to describe systemic antitumor effects triggered by local irradiation (nontarget effect). Although the mechanism of the abscopal effect is not completely understood yet, it has been demonstrated that in situ tumor vaccination, and the resulting antitumor immune response, is one of the key factors.

Summary

The development of immune therapies has recently led to concepts combining local radiotherapy and immune therapy with the aim of enhancing the response to immune therapy by the immunological mechanisms summarized in the term abscopal effect. This concept has also been investigated in less immunogenic tumors such as breast cancer. Initial data are promising but the hypothesis that the combination of checkpoint inhibitors and local radiotherapy could be an effective combination in breast cancer has to be proven by ongoing trials. Substitution of local radiotherapy by local hyperthermia could be an option in selected cases.

Key Messages

Combination of checkpoint inhibitors with local radiation or hyperthermia in breast cancer is a promising approach and could enhance the response rates generated by immune therapy alone through the antitumor immune response initiated by the abscopal effect.

PD-L1 expression in the microenvironment and the response to checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), data from studies using checkpoint-inhibiting antibodies that target programmed death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) demonstrated outstanding clinical activity. Translational investigations also suggested some correlations between therapeutic response and PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue. We comprehensively summarize results that have evaluated PD-L1 expression in HNSCC. We discuss flaws and strength of current PD-1/PD-L1 detection, quantification methods and the evaluation of PD-L1 as a prognostic and theragnostic biomarker. Understanding tumor microenvironment may help understanding resistance to checkpoint inhibitors, designing clinical trials that can exploit drug combinations.

Divergent organ-specific isogenic metastatic cell lines identified using multi-omics exhibit differential drug sensitivity

Background

Monitoring and treating metastatic progression remains a formidable task due, in part, to an inability to monitor specific differential molecular adaptations that allow the cancer to thrive within different tissue types. Hence, to develop optimal treatment strategies for metastatic disease, an important consideration is the divergence of the metastatic cancer growing in visceral organs from the primary tumor. We had previously reported the establishment of isogenic human metastatic breast cancer cell lines that are representative of the common metastatic sites observed in breast cancer patients.

Methods

Here we have used proteomic, RNAseq, and metabolomic analyses of these isogenic cell lines to systematically identify differences and commonalities in pathway networks and examine the effect on the sensitivity to breast cancer therapeutic agents.

Results

Proteomic analyses indicated that dissemination of cells from the primary tumor sites to visceral organs resulted in cell lines that adapted to growth at each new site by, in part, acquiring protein pathways characteristic of the organ of growth. RNAseq and metabolomics analyses further confirmed the divergences, which resulted in differential efficacies to commonly used FDA approved chemotherapeutic drugs. This model system has provided data that indicates that organ-specific growth of malignant lesions is a selective adaptation and growth process.

Conclusions

The insights provided by these analyses indicate that the rationale of targeted treatment of metastatic disease may benefit from a consideration that the biology of metastases has diverged from the primary tumor biology and using primary tumor traits as the basis for treatment may not be ideal to design treatment strategies.

Clinical and pathologic features associated with PD-L1 (SP142) expression in stromal tumor-infiltrating immune cells of triple-negative breast carcinoma

The Ventana PD-L1 SP142 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay is the FDA-approved companion diagnostic assay for atezolizumab therapy selection for patients with PD-L1-positive locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC). We aimed to elucidate clinical, pathologic, and molecular features associated with PD-L1 expression in TNBCs. Clinical, pathologic, and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular data for TNBCs tested with PD-L1 (SP142) IHC at our institution between 11/2018 and 12/2019 were retrieved and reviewed. PD-L1 positivity was defined as ≥1% IC staining. Patients with metastatic TNBC treated at first line with atezolizumab regimens were evaluated for treatment response and for time to treatment failure (TTF). Among 156 TNBCs, PD-L1 was positive in 47.4% of cases. Primary TNBCs were significantly more frequently PD-L1 positive, compared with recurrent/metastatic samples (p = 0.002). PD-L1-positive TNBCs had increased stromal IC, compared with PD-L1-negative samples (p < 0.001). The repertoire of somatic genetic alterations of PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative TNBCs was similar. Matched primary and recurrent/metastatic TNBC samples were available for eight patients, in whom four had discordant results. Thirty patients with metastatic TNBC were treated with atezolizumab regimens, with treatment failure occurring in 16 patients and a median TTF of 5.1 months in this early evaluation. The findings of this study show stromal ICs in primary TNBCs are more likely to show PD-L1 positivity than in recurrent or metastatic samples. This information should guide selection of samples suitable for testing. Further studies are needed to identify other features associated with PD-L1-positive breast carcinomas and clinical benefit of treatment.

Clinical Data on Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer has traditionally been considered to have a low immunogenic potential compared to other tumor entities.

SUMMARY

The most extensively studied immunotherapeutic agents for breast cancer to date are immune checkpoint inhibitors, with the results of the IMpassion130 trial leading to the approval of atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel for first-line treatment of programmed cell death ligand 1-positive, metastatic, triple-negative breast cancer, and studies in earlier stages have yielded promising results. Other immunotherapeutic options being assessed in phases 2 and 3 trials include vaccine-based therapies and treatment with anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (H-directed immune-linked antibodies) and substances evaluated in early clinical trials as cellular therapies (adoptive cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T cells).

KEY MESSAGES

Immunotherapy is an emerging modality for the treatment of breast cancer, as evidenced by the plethora of preclinical and clinical concepts and ongoing trials. Early studies established the role of immunotherapeutic agents in the metastatic setting. Ongoing studies will expand our knowledge about the timing of administration, best partners for combination therapy, and predictive biomarkers to guide immunotherapy for breast cancer.

News on immune checkpoint inhibitors as immunotherapy strategies in adult and pediatric solid tumors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown unprecedented benefits in various adult cancers, and this success has prompted the exploration of ICI therapy even in childhood malignances. Although the use of ICIs as individual agents has achieved disappointing response rates, combinational therapies are likely to promise better results. However, only a subset of patients experienced prolonged clinical effects, thus suggesting the need to identify robust bio-markers that predict individual clinical response or resistance to ICI therapy as the main challenge. In this review, we focus on how the use of ICIs in adult cancers can be translated into pediatric malignances. We discuss the physiological mechanism of action of each IC, including PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 and the new emerging ones, LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT, B7-H3, BTLA and IDO-1, and evaluate their prognostic value in both adult and childhood tumors. Furthermore, we offer an overview of preclinical models and clinical trials currently under investigation to improve the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapies in these patients. Finally, we outline the main predictive factors that influence the efficacy of ICIs, in order to lay the basis for the development of a pan-cancer immunogenomic model, able to direct young patients towards more specific immunotherapy.

[The first experience of PD-L1 testing of triple negative breast cancer with marker SP142 in Russia]

AIM OF STUDY

To evaluate the pecularities of PD-L1 expression in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the Russian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 7 months, within a scientific study of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), we determined the PD-L1 status of 58 patients with TNBC. In each case, an immunohistochemical study was performed in a closed Ventana Bench Mark Ultra automatic stainer using a closed protocol with rabbit monoclonal antibodies Ventana PD-L1 SP142 and Opti View DAB IHC Detection Kit with Opti View Amplification Kit.

RESULTS

Positive PD-L1 status in TNBC was detected in 37.93% of cases. Almost all tumors had an expression level of up to 10%. Only 5.17% of cases showed ligand expression on tumor cells.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of the first experience of testing PD-L1 in TNLM in Russia, it was possible to obtain data comparable to the same data of large international studies. RUSSCO's information and logistic support allows making this analysis available to all citizens of the country.

Frequency of discordance in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression between primary tumors and paired distant metastases in advanced cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: To determine the frequency of discordance in programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1) expression between primary tumors and paired distant metastases in advanced cancers.Methods: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for eligible studies and assessed their methodologic quality using QUADAS-2 tool. We estimated the discordant rates (positive to negative or vice versa) of PD-L1 expression in primary tumors and paired distant metastases using logistic-normal random effects model. We performed subgroup analyses based on the PD-L1 status of primary tumors (positive or negative), location of primary tumors (lung or others) and distant metastases (central nervous system or others), timing of distant metastases (synchronous or metachronous), positivity thresholds of PD-L1 expression (1% or 5%) and types of antibody clones used (E1L3N or SP142).Results: Thirteen eligible studies including 451 cases were identified. The included studies were judged to have low to unclear risk of bias. The pooled estimate of discordant rates in PD-L1 expression was 31% (95% CI= 19-47%), with high heterogeneity across the studies (I² = 75%). There was no significant effect modification in the discordant rates according to the predefined subgroups.Conclusion: Approximately one-third of advanced cancer cases have discordance in PD-L1 expression between primary tumors and paired distant metastases. A more liberal testing of PD-L1 expression in both primary and metastatic tumors is recommended in order to identify patients who may benefit from immune checkpoint blockade treatment. Further research exploring the mechanisms and its impact are warranted.

PD-L1 diagnostics in the neoadjuvant setting: implications of intratumoral heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in triple negative breast cancer for assessment in small biopsies

PURPOSE

PD-L1 expression is a predictive biomarker for anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the neoadjuvant setting, immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of PD-L1 expression can only be performed on small tissue biopsies. In our study we investigated heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in TNBC, and how reliably PD-L1 expression in small tissue samples reflects PD-L1 expression in larger tumor sections in TNBC.

METHODS

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed from surgical specimens of 110 patients with TNBC. TMAs contained 4 cores (1 mm in diameter) per patient. To evaluate PD-L1 expression, TMAs were stained with PD-L1 IHC 22C3 PharmDx. Single-core PD-L1 expression was compared to overall PD-L1 expression of each patient's tumor, to ascertain how often small samples of tumor tissue show the same PD-L1 expression as larger tumor samples.

RESULTS

Our study found substantial heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression between different TMA cores from the same patient. Heterogeneity was greater in immune cells (ICs) than in tumor cells, in large part due to the uneven distribution of ICs in the tumor. For IC PD-L1 expression, we found that sensitivity can be as low as 0.81 for detecting PD-L1 expression at the 1% threshold most commonly used in breast cancer. Negative predictive value for ICs was 0.7.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression between small tissue samples from the same TNBC tumor, especially for IC expression. This poses challenges for evaluation of PD-L1 expression in the neoadjuvant setting. Negative biopsies should prompt further investigation, and multiple biopsies might be necessary.

The Prognostic Impact of Hormonal Receptor and HER-2 Expression Discordance in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Background

Hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) discordance between primary and metastatic breast cancer lesions is common. However, its impact on long-term survival remains unclear. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of this discordance in patients with metastaticf breast cancer (MBC).

Methods

A total of 270 patients with MBC who were underwent re-biopsy of progressive metastases at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2015 with patients consent and then review their primary tumors pathological findings. The HR and HER2 status in both primary and progressive metastatic lesions was determined by immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization. The discordance rates were correlated with the clinicopathologic characteristics, metastatic lesions, salvage treatment, and survival analysis in this population.

Results

A total of 142 (52.6%) MBC patients were diagnosed with discordant HR and HER2 status. Alterations in estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status were observed in 20.70%, 37.78%, and 11.48% cases, respectively. Chemotherapy (P=0.0192) and endocrine therapy (P=0.048) significantly affected the conversion of HR status. Endocrine therapy was positively correlated with PR discordance (P=0.002), while ER discordance was associated with adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.031). Survival analysis showed that ER status alterations between primary and metastatic lesions were associated with overall survival (P=0.002). The clinical prognosis was significantly worse with HR losses than with persistent HR positivity (P=0.023). In Cox multivariate analysis, the loss of HR expression and conversion to triple negative were independent prognostic indicators.

Conclusion

Discordance in HR status between primary and metastatic lesions may impact the prognosis of MBC, and HR conversion has independent prognostic value.

Spatiotemporal Changes in Checkpoint Molecule Expression

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, have led to therapeutic breakthrough in patients with advanced malignancy, covering the lung, breast, gastrointestinal, head and neck, urinary system, lymphoma, and solid tumor harboring MSI/dMMR. In certain cancer types, the expression level of immune checkpoint molecule will be required if the immune-based approaches are considered, especially the PD-L1 expression. However, in other types, survival benefit has been proven regardless of PD-L1 expression. It raises a question of how to select patients for immune therapy and whether the expression of immune checkpoint molecules will be optimal biomarkers. Before answering this question, a comprehensive map for the expression of immune checkpoint molecules is needed. In this chapter, we describe our current knowledge on the spatiotemporal changes in the expression of checkpoint molecules. We discuss the different frequencies of expression depending on tumor types and stages, the different patterns between primary and metastatic tumors, as well as the change of expression before and after treatment. The expression of PD-L1 has been most studied, but the threshold that separate "positive" and "negative" PD-L1 expressions and the consistency of testing platform remain under debate. Better understanding on the tumor microenvironment and expression of checkpoint molecules will help to identify patients who will benefit from checkpoint blockade therapy.

Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Present and Future

Purpose of Review

Immunotherapy is emerging as an effective treatment option for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. In this review, we summarize clinical data of immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer and comment on future directions in the field.

Recent Findings

IMpassion130 was a phase III trial that demonstrated progression-free survival benefit, and potentially overall survival benefit, of first-line chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel) plus anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) atezolizumab, among PD-L1-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancers. Studies are ongoing to evaluate other combination therapies with immune checkpoint blockade in TNBC, and to evaluate efficacy in PD-L1-negative tumors and in later lines of therapy.

Summary

Immunotherapy is now a standard option in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Ongoing trials may expand the degree of clinical benefit. Further work is ongoing to identify novel predictive biomarkers, which in the future may enable a personalized approach of combination immunotherapy.

The Regulatory Role of MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNA molecules which function as critical post-transcriptional gene regulators of various biological functions. Generally, miRNAs negatively regulate gene expression by binding to their selective messenger RNAs (mRNAs), thereby leading to either mRNA degradation or translational repression, depending on the degree of complementarity with target mRNA sequences. Aberrant expression of these miRNAs has been linked etiologically with various human diseases including breast cancer. Different cellular pathways of breast cancer development such as cell proliferation, apoptotic response, metastasis, cancer recurrence and chemoresistance are regulated by either the oncogenic miRNA (oncomiR) or tumor suppressor miRNA (tsmiR). In this review, we highlight the current state of research into miRNA involved in breast cancer, with particular attention to articles published between the years 2000 to 2019, using detailed searches of the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The post-transcriptional gene regulatory roles of various dysregulated miRNAs in breast cancer and their potential as therapeutic targets are also discussed.

Gene expression signatures of site-specificity in cancer metastases

We have previously shown that metastases are generally characterized by a core program of gene expression that induces the oxidative energy metabolism, activates vascularization/tissue remodeling, silences extracellular matrix interactions, and alters ion homeostasis. This core program distinguishes metastases from their originating primary tumors as well as from their target host tissues. We hypothesized that organ preference is reflected in additional, site-selective components within the metastatic gene expression programs. Expanding our prior analysis of 653 human gene expression profiles plus data from a murine model, we find that the release from the primary tumor is associated with a suppression of functions that are important for the identity of the organ of origin, such as a down-regulation of steroid hormone responsiveness in the disseminated foci derived from prostate cancer. Metastases adjust to their target microenvironment by up-regulating-even overexpressing-genes and genetic programs that are characteristic of that organ. Finally, alterations in RNA and protein processing as well as immune deviation are common. In the clinic, metastases are mostly treated with the chemotherapy protocols devised for their primary tumors. Adjustments that account for the gene expression differences between primary and metastatic cancers have the potential to improve the currently dismal success rates.

Inflammatory Biomarkers as Predictors of Response to Immunotherapy in Urological Tumors

Immunotherapy represents the new era of cancer treatment because of its promising results in various cancer types. In urological tumors, the use of the immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is increasingly spreading. Although not all patients and not all diseases respond equally well to immunotherapy, there is an increasing need to find predictive markers of response to ICIs. Patient- and tumor-related factors may be involved in primary and secondary resistance to immunotherapy: tumor-derived protein and cytokines, tumor mutational burden, and patient performance status and comorbidities can condition tumor response to ICIs. Recently, some of these factors have been evaluated as potential biomarkers of response, with conflicting results. To date, the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and the presence of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in tumor tissue are the only biomarkers capable of guiding the clinician's decision in urothelial cancer and prostate cancer, respectively. In this review, we performed a comprehensive search of the main publications on biomarkers that are predictive of response to ICIs in urological cancers. Our aim was to understand whether existing data have the potential to drive clinical decision-making in the near future.

Inter- and intraobserver agreement of programmed death ligand 1 scoring in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma and breast carcinoma

AIMS

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression by tumour cells (TC) is a mechanism for tumour immune escape through down-regulation of antitumour T cell responses and is a target for immunotherapy. PD-L1 status as a predictor of treatment response has led to the development of multiple biomarkers with different reference cut-offs. We assessed pathologist consistency in evaluating PD-L1 immunopositivity by examining the inter- and intraobserver agreement using various antibody clones and different cancer types.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PD-L1 expression in TC and immune cells (IC) was manually scored in 27 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC), 30 urothelial carcinoma (UC) and breast carcinoma (BC) using three commercial clones (SP263, SP142, 22C3) and one platform-independent test (E1L3N). For interobserver agreement, PD-L1 status was evaluated blindly by three pathologists. For intraobserver agreement, PD-L1 expression was re-evaluated following a wash-out period. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), overall percentage agreement (OPA) and κ-values were calculated. Using clinical algorithms, the percentage of PD-L1-positive cases in HSCC, BC and UC were 15-81%, 47-67% and 7-43%, respectively. The percentage of PD-L1 positive cases relied heavily on the algorithm/cut-off values used. Almost perfect interobserver agreement was achieved using SP263 and E1L3N in HSCC, 22C3, SP142 and E1L3N in BC and 22C3 in UC. The SP142 clone in UC and HSCC showed moderate agreement and was associated with lower ICC and decreased intraobserver concordance.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent inter- and intraobserver agreement can be achieved using SP263, 22C3 and E1L3N, whereas PD-L1 scoring using SP142 clone is associated with a higher level of subjectivity.

Primary tumor resection for initially staged IV breast cancer: An emphasis on programmed death-ligand 1 expression, promoter methylation status, and survival

Conventional therapy modalities for advanced breast cancer are problematic, whereas checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has been considered as a promising approach. This study aims to determine programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and methylation status of PD-L1 promoter in primary tumor tissue and metastatic foci of patients with stage IV breast cancer.Clinicopathological data and survival rates of 57 breast cancer patients, who were initially staged IV, and operated for intact tumors, were retrospectively analyzed. Immunohistochemical analysis of PD-L1 using 57 primary tumors, 33 paired metastatic lymph nodes, and 14 paired distant metastases was performed. Additionally, the methylation rate of the PD-L1 gene promoter region was determined with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis in 38 samples.Overall PD-L1 expression in primary tumors was 23.1% (12/52). PD-L1 positivity was reduced in lymph nodes by 15.2% (5/33) and in distant metastases by 21.4% (3/14). PD-L1 expression diverged between primary and metastatic foci in a subset of cases (18.2% for lymph node and 33.3% for distant metastasis). In general, the PD-L1 promoter was not methylated, and mean methylation rates were low (min. 0%-max. 21%). We observed no correlation between PD-L1 expression, promoter methylation, and survival.Neither the expression nor the methylation status of PD-L1 in patients, who were presented with stage IV breast cancer and operated for an intact primary tumor, had a statistically significant relation with survival. Discordance in PD-L1 expression between primary tumor and metastasis should be considered during pathological and clinical management of patients who would undergo checkpoint blockade therapy.