Psychosocial Profiles of Parents of Children with Undiagnosed Diseases: Managing Well or Just Managing?

Family genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing in the BabySeq project

PURPOSE

Genomic sequencing of newborns can initiate disease surveillance and therapy for children and may identify at-risk relatives through reverse cascade testing. We explored genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing among families of newborns who underwent exome sequencing and were identified as having a risk for an autosomal dominant disease.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured interviews with parents of newborns enrolled in the BabySeq Project who had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant associated with an autosomal dominant childhood- and/or adult-onset disease returned. We used directed content analysis to derive themes.

RESULTS

From 11 families, all first-degree relatives (n = 32, 100%), 29 second-degree relatives (76%), and 26 third-degree relatives (43%) were informed of their risk. All parents (n = 22, 69% of first-degree relatives), 4 (11%) second-degree relatives, and 1 (2%) third-degree relatives underwent cascade testing. Most parents preferred to handle risk communication themselves. Parents with positive cascade testing but no associated symptoms were less inclined to share findings with relatives but highly motivated to share results if the variant's associated disease severity was high, as perceived with adult-onset conditions. One new subtheme, family member traits, was identified and defined as a relative's propensity to anxiety/concern after risk communications but did not diminish risk communication.

CONCLUSION

Findings can inform more effective notification and testing practices for families of newborns at risk for hereditary genetic conditions.

Feasibility of newborn screening for pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy (PDE-ALDH7A1) is a developmental epileptic encephalopathy historically characterized by seizures that are resistant to antiseizure medications. Treatment with pyridoxine and lysine reduction therapies are associated with seizure control and improved developmental outcomes. In rare circumstances, patients have died prior to diagnosis and treatment with pyridoxine, and many patients are diagnosed after six months of age when lysine reduction therapies have limited efficacy. Recently two new metabolites were identified (2S,6S-/2S,6R-oxopropylpiperidine-2-carboxylic acid, 2-OPP and 6-oxo-pipecolate, 6-oxo-pip), and we evaluated these metabolites as potential newborn screening biomarkers.

METHODS

We recruited participants with a confirmed diagnosis of PDE-ALDH7A1 and retrieved their residual dried blood spots from state-sponsored newborn screening programs. We evaluated the dried blood spots for 2-OPP using commercially available newborn screening kits and equipment, and developed a second-tier test for 6-oxo-pip using LC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

We received eight residual dried blood spots collected before the onset of seizures and the diagnosis of PDE-ALDH7A1. In our newborn screening experiments, 2-OPP was elevated in 7 of 8 samples from affected participants with a mean of 3.08 μmol/L (95 % CI 2.17-3.99) compared to a mean of 0.09 μmol/L (95 % CI 0.09-0.10) in controls (p < 0.001). Second tier testing demonstrated elevated 6-oxo-pip in all samples from affected participants with a mean of 5.66 μmol/L (95 % CI 1.51-9.81) and was undetectable in controls (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with PDE-ALDH7A1 can be identified using neonatal dried blood spots prior to the onset of symptoms. The use of commercially available newborn screening approaches demonstrates the feasibility of newborn screening for this treatable condition.

The disequilibrium of hope: A grounded theory analysis of parents' experiences of receiving a "no primary finding" result from genome sequencing

Genome sequencing (GS) has the potential to reduce the "diagnostic odyssey" that many parents of children with rare undiagnosed conditions experience. While much research has considered the impact of receiving a diagnostic result, research has rarely focused solely on the impact of receiving a "no primary finding" (NPF) result. This study aimed to investigate the experience of parents of children with rare and undiagnosed conditions following an NPF result from GS. Nine parents whose child had an NPF result from GS were recruited through the social media platform of the charity SWAN (Syndromes Without A Name) UK. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using grounded theory. Analysis led to the emergence of two main themes. The first theme "Striving to Solve the Unsolved Puzzle" concerned the experience of striving to end the "diagnostic odyssey." The second theme "Navigating Hope, Lost then Found" plots the trajectory of hope raised by the promise of a new technology, dashed by the NPF, and the eventual return of small and distant hope for the future. Taken together, these themes allowed for a proposed theory: "The Disequilibrium of Hope," which highlights the dynamic and modifiable experience of hope participants experience in their GS journey. These results suggest GS can be an emotional rollercoaster for parents. While hope plays an important role in coping with the day-to-day life of living with a rare disease, careful management of expectations from GS is important during pre-test counseling, and continued follow-up and support are needed beyond result disclosure. An understanding of the disappointment and distress caused by an NPF result is valuable for healthcare professionals in this field to ensure counseling can be tailored. Further research should consider how to support parents after an NPF result.

Accelerating rare disease detection: an experience of multidisciplinary team model in undiagnosed diseases program in a children's hospital

Background

A definite diagnosis goes undiscovered for a percentage of children with undiagnosed disorders, with significant medical, psychological, and social effects. Other than specialized clinical centers, exceptional molecular studies, common procedures, and devoted activities at the national and international levels, children with complex undiagnosed disorders require innovative approaches.

Methods

In March 2016, Children's hospital of Fudan university represented the Children's Undiagnosed Diseases Program (UDP). The purpose of this study is to describe the project findings and underline the critical significance of multidisciplinary teamwork in China's undiagnosed rare illnesses program. We investigated the 758 cases in our UDP system retrospectively. Demographic information, laboratory test results, and genetic information were gathered.

Results

Between January 2017 and December 2021, 758 cases were examined. Males made up 436 (57.5%) of the total. Over half of the patients were children under the age of five. The average patient course time preceding admission to UDP was 6.0 months (95% CI 10.512.6). These patients visited an average of 1.8 clinics during their diagnostic journey. Except for 69 individuals (90.9%), all had more than one presenting symptom in various organs: 460 (60.7%) had neurology difficulties, 151 (19.9%) had endocrine problems, and 141 (18.6%) had immunology problems. UDP has a diagnosis rate of 61.3%. Genetic testing was performed on 469 of the 758 patients, for a genetic diagnosis rate of 15.8%. The UDP method has a sensitivity of 94.5%, a specificity of 86.4%, a positive predictive value of 92.8%, and an negative predictive value of 89.5%.

Conclusion

Our UDP targets an unmet need, namely the diagnosis of patients with complicated, multisystem illnesses. Using a multidisciplinary team model approach, this UDP pilot study achieved a reasonable diagnosis success rate, increasing the possibility of more diagnoses and new scientific discoveries of difficult and rare diseases.

Genomic Testing in Patients with Kidney Failure of an Unknown Cause: A National Australian Study

Key Points

Twenty-five percent of those with unexplained kidney failure have a monogenic cause. Whole genome sequencing with broad gene panel analysis is a feasible diagnostic approach in nephrology.

Background

The cause of kidney failure is unknown in approximately 10% of patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD). For those who first present to nephrology care with kidney failure, standard investigations of serology, imaging, urinalysis, and kidney biopsy are limited differentiators of etiology. We aimed to determine the diagnostic utility of whole genome sequencing (WGS) with analysis of a broad kidney gene panel in patients with kidney failure of unknown cause.

Methods

We prospectively recruited 100 participants who reached CKD stage 5 at the age of ≤50 years and had an unknown cause of kidney failure after standard investigation. Clinically accredited WGS was performed in this national cohort after genetic counseling. The primary analysis was targeted to 388 kidney-related genes with second-tier, genome-wide, and mitochondrial analysis.

Results

The cohort was 61% male and the average age of participants at stage 5 CKD was 32 years (9 months to 50 years). A genetic diagnosis was made in 25% of participants. Disease-causing variants were identified across autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (6), glomerular disorders (4), ciliopathies (3), tubular disorders (2), Alport syndrome (4), and mitochondrial disease (1). Most diagnoses (80%) were in autosomal dominant, X-linked, or mitochondrial conditions (UMOD ; COL4A5 ; INF2 ; CLCN5 ; TRPC6 ; COL4A4 ; EYA1 ; HNF1B ; WT1 ; NBEA ; m.3243A>G ). Participants with a family history of CKD were more likely to have a positive result (odds ratio, 3.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 11.29). Thirteen percent of participants without a CKD family history had a positive result. In those who first presented in stage 5 CKD, WGS with broad analysis of a curated kidney disease gene panel was diagnostically more informative than kidney biopsy, with biopsy being inconclusive in 24 of the 25 participants.

Conclusions

In this prospectively ascertained Australian cohort, we identified a genetic diagnosis in 25% of patients with kidney failure of unknown cause.

Searching for a sense of closure: parental experiences of recontacting after a terminated pregnancy for congenital malformations

Rapid advances in genetic testing have improved the probability of successful genetic diagnosis. For couples who undergo a termination of pregnancy (TOP) due to foetal congenital malformations, these techniques may reveal the underlying cause and satisfy parents' need to know. The aim of this qualitative descriptive research study was to explore couples' experience of being recontacted after a congenital malformation-related TOP, as well as their reasons for participation. A retrospective cohort of 31 eligible candidates was recontacted for additional genetic testing using a standardized letter followed by a telephone call. Fourteen participants (45%) were included. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews at a hospital genetics department (UZ Brussel). Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. We found that despite the sometimes considerable length of time that passed since TOP, participants were still interested in new genetic testing. They appreciated that the initiative originated from the medical team, describing it as a "sensitive" approach. Both intrinsic (providing answers for themselves and their children) and extrinsic motivators (contributing to science and helping other parents) were identified as important factors for participation. These results show that participants often remain interested in being recontacted for new genetic testing such as whole genome sequencing, even after several years. As such, the results of this study can offer guidance in the more general current debate on recontacting patients in the field of genetics.

A qualitative evaluation of patient and parent experiences with an undiagnosed diseases program

Previous studies have explored patient experiences before being seen or at the beginning of their evaluation by undiagnosed diseases programs. This study provides additional insight into experiences after participation through in-depth, qualitative evaluation, allowing for reflection of current practice and patient/parent needs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients and parents of patients seen at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)'s unique, clinically focused Undiagnosed Diseases Program (UDP). Analysis of the interviews was guided by a thematic approach. Participants had undergone a diagnostic odyssey before being evaluated by the UDP and remained hopeful for a diagnosis. They appreciated the opportunity to be seen by the UDP. However, perception of experiences differed based on whether evaluation by the UDP led to a diagnosis. Additionally, while participants were pleased with initial communication, they indicated that there were unmet needs regarding follow-up. Patients and parents of patients believe that participation in an undiagnosed diseases program is the best option for diagnosis. The findings of this study provide a general overview of patient experiences and highlight strengths of the UAB UDP while also emphasizing areas to focus the improvement to optimize the benefit to patients and families with undiagnosed and rare diseases, which could be used helpful in the development of similar clinics.

Stress, coping, and positive aspects of caregiving among caregivers of children with rare disease

OBJECTIVE

Caregivers of children with rare diseases often consider caregiving to be a rewarding experience, despite high levels of burden. The present study examined associations between caregiver stress and positive aspects of caregiving (PAC); investigated associations between interpersonal coping strategies and PAC; and determined whether coping strategies moderated associations between stressors and PAC.

DESIGN

Survey data came from a study on caregivers across different caregiving conditions, including caregivers of children diagnosed with inherited metabolic conditions (n = 167), undiagnosed diseases (n = 23), and caregivers of typically-developing children (n = 74).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Positive Aspects of Caregiving (PAC) scale.

RESULTS

Results from generalized linear models indicated that perceived burden was not associated with PAC. Venting was negatively associated with PAC (b= -0.09, p=.03), whereas emotional support was associated with increased PAC for caregivers of children with undiagnosed conditions (b = 0.15, p=.02). Care needs were associated with greater PAC among caregivers engaged in high levels of emotional support coping (b = 0.10, p=.01) and venting (b = 0.09, p=.03).

CONCLUSION

These findings illuminate important differences in PAC based on the caregiving condition, and aspects of the caregiver stress process model that might be universal to caregivers. Results inform stress process theory and highlight the potential of support-based interventions for promoting PAC.

Supplemental data for this article is available online at.

Becoming a Rare Disease Parent: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Parent-Caregivers' Postpartum Experiences

Rare diseases constitute a group of conditions that are individually rare, but in aggregate impact between 3 and 6% of the world population. Many of these conditions present during infancy and involve substantial caregiving responsibilities, often assessed via quantitative measurements. However, few qualitative analyses examine lived experiences of parent-caregivers during the early period of their child's life. The purpose of this study was to examine the meaning that rare disease parent-caregivers apply to the postpartum year using data collected from a semi-structured interview exploring significant experiences over the course of their affected child's life. We utilized an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach to analyze 22 interview transcripts from caregivers to children with several inherited metabolic and mitochondrial disorders, as well as an undiagnosed disease. Our analysis yielded three superordinate themes: Reckoning With the Parent-Caregiver Role, Familial Transition, and Adaptation and Adjustment. Subordinate themes expanded upon these concepts and included distinctions between the parent and caregiving identity, communal coping and shifting of family dynamics, as well as meaning applied to child milestones, anticipatory grief, and parental perception of a new normal. Exploration of these themes in relation to existing literature, as well as future research directions for qualitative research on rare disease caregivers, is discussed. Overall, this work contributes to a growing body of literature exploring the parental experience of rare disease across several condition contexts.

Genomics Research with Undiagnosed Children: Ethical Challenges at the Boundaries of Research and Clinical Care

OBJECTIVE

To explore the perspectives of parents of undiagnosed children enrolled in genomic diagnosis research regarding their motivations for enrolling their children, their understanding of the potential burdens and benefits, and the extent to which their experiences ultimately aligned with or diverged from their original expectations.

STUDY DESIGN

In-depth interviews were conducted with parents, audio-recorded and transcribed. A structured codebook was applied to each transcript, after which iterative memoing was used to identify themes.

RESULTS

Fifty-four parents participated, including 17 (31.5%) whose child received a diagnosis through research. Themes describing parents' expectations and experiences of genomic diagnosis research included (1) the extent to which parents' motivations for participation focused on their hope that it would directly benefit their child, (2) the ways in which parents' frustrations regarding the research process confused the dual clinical and research goals of their participation, and (3) the limited clinical benefits parents ultimately experienced for their children.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that parents of undiagnosed children seeking enrollment in genomic diagnosis research are at risk of a form of therapeutic misconception-in this case, diagnostic misconception. These findings indicate the need to examine the processes and procedures associated with this research to communicate appropriately and balance the potential burdens and benefits of study participation.

Advancing Understanding of Inequities in Rare Disease Genomics

PURPOSE

Advances in genomic research have facilitated rare disease diagnosis for thousands of individuals. Unfortunately, the benefits of advanced genetic diagnostic technology are not distributed equitably among the population, as has been seen in many other health care contexts. Quantifying and describing inequities in genetic diagnostic yield is inherently challenging due to barriers to both clinical and research genetic testing. We therefore present an implementation protocol developed to expand access to our rare disease genomic research study and to further understand existing inequities.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

The Rare Genomes Project (RGP) at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard offers research genome sequencing to individuals with rare disease who remain genetically undiagnosed through direct interaction with the individual or family. This presents an opportunity for diagnosis beyond the clinical context, thus eliminating many barriers to access. An initial goal of RGP was to equalize access to genomic sequencing by decoupling testing access from proximity to a major medical center and physician referral. However, study participants over the initial 3 years of this project were predominantly white and well resourced. To further understand and address the lack of diversity within RGP, we developed a novel protocol embedded within the larger RGP study, in an approach informed by an implementation science framework. The aims of this protocol were: (1) to diversify recruitment and enrollment within RGP; (2) understand the process and context of implementing genomic medicine for rare disease diagnosis; and (3) investigate the value of a diagnosis for underserved populations.

IMPLICATIONS

Improved understanding of existing inequities and potential strategies to address them are needed to advance equity in rare disease genetic diagnosis and research. In addition to the moral imperative of equity in genomic medicine, this approach is critical in order to fully understand the genomic underpinnings of rare disease.

Shared Responsibility and Network Collaboration in Caregiving

Communal coping may benefit caregivers, but most communal coping research focuses on dyads. Using an egocentric network design, we examine caregivers' we-talk-a linguistic marker of shared responsibility-and caregiver reports of 1) network member involvement in collaborative care roles and 2) met/unmet expectations across typically developing and rare disease contexts. We-talk was linked to involvement in direct care and support, but links of we-talk to decision-making varied based on network member closeness; we-talk was linked to meeting expectations for decision-making only. There were no differences across context, suggesting shared responsibility is linked to collaborative roles across caregiving contexts.

Advancing Understanding of Inequities in Rare Disease Genomics

Purpose

Advances in genomic research have led to the diagnosis of rare, early-onset diseases for thousands of individuals. Unfortunately, the benefits of advanced genetic diagnostic technology are not distributed equitably among the population, as has been seen in many other healthcare contexts. Even quantifying and describing inequities in genetic diagnostic yield is challenging due to variation in referrals to clinical genetics practices and other barriers to clinical genetic testing.

Methods

The Rare Genomes Project (RGP) at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard offers research genome sequencing to individuals with rare disease who remain genetically undiagnosed through direct interaction with the individual or family. This presents an opportunity for diagnosis beyond the clinical context, thus eliminating many barriers to access.

Findings

An initial goal of RGP was to equalize access to genomic sequencing by decoupling testing access from proximity to a major medical center and physician referral. However, our study participants are overwhelmingly non-disadvantaged, as evidenced by their access to specialist care and genetic testing prior to RGP enrollment, and are also predominantly white.

Implications

We therefore describe our novel initiative to diversify RGP enrollment in order to advance equity in rare disease genetic diagnosis and research. In addition to the moral imperative of medical equity, this is also critical in order to fully understand the genomic underpinnings of rare disease. We utilize a mixed methods approach to understand the priorities and values of underrepresented communities, existing disparities, and the obstacles to addressing them: all of which is necessary to promote equity in future genomic medicine initiatives.

Factors influencing illness uncertainty in parents of children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia in a developing country: A cross-sectional study

Background

Illness uncertainty in parents of children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) refers to parents' inability to create meaning in events related to their children having CAH. This may influence their role in caring for children with CAH.

Objective

The study aimed to determine factors associated with illness uncertainty experienced by parents of children with CAH in a developing country.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 80 parents (43 mothers and 37 fathers) of children with CAH, selected using consecutive sampling methods. The Parent's Perception of Uncertainty Scale (PPUS) was used to measure the illness uncertainty levels. Data were collected from March 2020 to October 2020. Independent t-test and chi-square test were used to determine factors (parent's gender, age, educational level, monthly household income, number of children with CAH, history of child death due to CAH, child's age when first diagnosed with CAH, duration of therapy, gender change, type of CAH (salt wasting/SW or simple virilizing/SV), current gender, and genitoplasty) influencing illness uncertainty in parents.

Results

The mean scores of PPUS were 42.3 ± 12.91, and the majority of parents had a low PPUS score (49; 61%). Parents of children with SW-CAH showed higher uncertainty (44.2 ± 12.77) than those with SV-CAH (32.6 ± 8.86; p = 0.003). Parents who lost their children due to CAH were more likely to report a moderate illness uncertainty than parents who never experienced child mortality due to CAH (χ²(1, 80) = 4.893; p = 0.027).

Conclusion

The factors significantly affecting uncertainty in parents of children with CAH determined in this study might help healthcare professionals, including nurses, to play a pivotal role in giving pertinent information regarding their children's health, disease, and therapy to help manage parental uncertainty.

The parent-reported ADHD symptom infrequency scale (PRASIS): a parent report measure of ADHD symptom exaggeration

The present article outlines the development of the parent-reported ADHD symptom infrequency scale (PRASIS), a novel stand-alone questionnaire designed to discriminate between parents exaggerating ratings of ADHD symptoms of their child from parents more accurately reporting symptoms. The PRASIS includes an Infrequency scale (INF) to measure infrequently reported symptoms of ADHD and a clinical scale to measure Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5^th Edition (DSM-5) defined ADHD symptoms (ADHD Total). An initial list of infrequency and clinical items was revised over the course of three studies, each conducted on a different sample of participants (n₁ = 154, n₂ = 203, n₃ = 167) recruited via CloudResearch and consisting of mothers of children 4-12 years old. Analyses on the final version of the measure demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency (INF α = .87 , ADHD Total α = .94) and high convergent validity of the PRASIS ADHD Total scores with ADHD Rating Scale-5 Total scores (r = .87, p < .001). Omnibus ANOVA comparisons demonstrated excellent group discrimination of both the PRASIS Infrequency scale and the PRASIS ADHD scale (Cohen's f = 0.81-0-90). Specificity was above the minimum requirement set a priori (≥.80) and resulting sensitivity was similar or higher than other non-ADHD measures in the symptom validity literature. Specificity and sensitivity are reported for multiple cutoff scores, and positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) are presented for several base rates.

Exome/Genome Sequencing in Undiagnosed Syndromes

Exome sequencing (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) have radically transformed the diagnostic approach to undiagnosed rare/ultrarare Mendelian diseases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), the technology integral for ES, GS, and most large (100+) gene panels, has enabled previously unimaginable diagnoses, changes in medical management, new treatments, and accurate reproductive risk assessments for patients, as well as new disease gene discoveries. Yet, challenges remain, as most individuals remain undiagnosed with current NGS. Improved NGS technology has resulted in long-read sequencing, which may resolve diagnoses in some patients who do not obtain a diagnosis with current short-read ES and GS, but its effectiveness is unclear, and it is expensive. Other challenges that persist include the resolution of variants of uncertain significance, the urgent need for patients with ultrarare disorders to have access to therapeutics, the need for equity in patient access to NGS-based testing, and the study of ethical concerns. However, the outlook for undiagnosed disease resolution is bright, due to continual advancements in the field.

Continuing a search for a diagnosis: the impact of adolescence and family dynamics

The "diagnostic odyssey" describes the process those with undiagnosed conditions undergo to identify a diagnosis. Throughout this process, families of children with undiagnosed conditions have multiple opportunities to decide whether to continue or stop their search for a diagnosis and accept the lack of a diagnostic label. Previous studies identified factors motivating a family to begin searching, but there is limited information about the decision-making process in a prolonged search and how the affected child impacts a family's decision. This study aimed to understand how families of children with undiagnosed diseases decide whether to continue to pursue a diagnosis after standard clinical testing has failed. Parents who applied to the Undiagnosed Disease Network (UDN) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews. The 2015 Supportive Care Needs model by Pelenstov, which defines critical needs in families with rare/undiagnosed diseases, provided a framework for interview guide development and transcript analysis (Pelentsov et al in Disabil Health J 8(4):475-491, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DHJO.2015.03.009 ). A deductive, iterative coding approach was used to identify common unifying themes. Fourteen parents from 13 families were interviewed. The average child's age was 11 years (range 3-18) and an average 63% of their life had been spent searching for a diagnosis. Our analysis found that alignment or misalignment of parent and child needs impact the trajectory of the diagnostic search. When needs and desires align, reevaluation of a decision to pursue a diagnosis is limited. However, when there is conflict between parent and child desires, there is reevaluation, and often a pause, in the search. This tension is exacerbated when children are adolescents and attempting to balance their dependence on parents for medical care with a natural desire for independence. Our results provide novel insights into the roles of adolescents in the diagnostic odyssey. The tension between desired and realistic developmental outcomes for parents and adolescents impacts if, and how, the search for a diagnosis progresses.

Links of we-talk to caregiver social network systems and health

Caring for a child, particularly one with a rare disease, presents a challenging set of stressors that can impact entire family networks. Given this shared impact, caregivers can engage in communal coping to address the caregiving process, defined as the perception of caregiving as shared and collaborative behaviors to address it. In this study, we examined one common measure of communal coping-first person plural pronouns or "we-talk"-in caregivers of either (a) children with rare or undiagnosed diseases or (b) typically developing children. We sought to examine how we-talk is linked to (a) caregiver health and well-being and (b) social network involvement in caregiving. Caregivers (n = 311) participated in (a) survey questionnaires (b) a network enumeration interview and (c) a semistructured interview of caregiving. Results indicated we-talk was unrelated to stress or self-rated health, but was linked to more benefit-finding; greater individual-focused language (I-talk) was also linked to worse self-rated health. Additionally, we-talk was unrelated to malfeasant behavior (e.g., overly critical), but was linked to less nonfeasant behavior (e.g., underinvolvement), more uplift behavior (e.g., helping with caregiving), and more health-related communication with network members. Further, these findings did not differ across caregiving context. This work highlights the role of communal coping for caregivers managing general parenting stress as well as the stress associated with caring for a child with complex medical needs. Future research should continue to examine how interpersonal coping processes operate within social networks to impact health and well-being for all involved. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Parents' understanding of genome and exome sequencing for pediatric health conditions: a systematic review

Genome and exome sequencing (GS/ES) are increasingly being used in pediatric contexts. We summarize evidence regarding the actual and perceived understanding of GS/ES of parents of a child offered testing for diagnosis and/or management of a symptomatic health condition. We searched four databases (2008-2021) and identified 1264 unique articles, of which 16 met inclusion criteria. We synthesized data from qualitative and quantitative studies and organized results using Ayuso et al. (2013)'s framework of key elements of information for informed consent to GS/ES. Many of the parents represented had prior experience with genetic testing and accessed a form of genetic counseling. Parents' understanding was varied across the domains evaluated. Parents demonstrated understanding of the various potential direct clinical benefits to their child undergoing GS/ES, including in relation to other genetic tests. We found parents had mixed understanding of the nature of potential secondary findings, and of issues related to data privacy, confidentiality, and usage of sequencing results beyond their child's clinical care. Genetic counseling consultations improved understanding. Our synthesis indicates that ES/GS can be challenging for families to understand and underscores the importance of equipping healthcare professionals to explore parents' understanding of ES/GS and the implications of testing for their child.

ModelMatcher: A scientist-centric online platform to facilitate collaborations between stakeholders of rare and undiagnosed disease research

Next-generation sequencing is a prevalent diagnostic tool for undiagnosed diseases and has played a significant role in rare disease gene discovery. Although this technology resolves some cases, others are given a list of possibly damaging genetic variants necessitating functional studies. Productive collaborations between scientists, clinicians, and patients (affected individuals) can help resolve such medical mysteries and provide insights into in vivo function of human genes. Furthermore, facilitating interactions between scientists and research funders, including nonprofit organizations or commercial entities, can dramatically reduce the time to translate discoveries from bench to bedside. Several systems designed to connect clinicians and researchers with a shared gene of interest have been successful. However, these platforms exclude some stakeholders based on their role or geography. Here we describe ModelMatcher, a global online matchmaking tool designed to facilitate cross-disciplinary collaborations, especially between scientists and other stakeholders of rare and undiagnosed disease research. ModelMatcher is integrated into the Rare Diseases Models and Mechanisms Network and Matchmaker Exchange, allowing users to identify potential collaborators in other registries. This living database decreases the time from when a scientist or clinician is making discoveries regarding their genes of interest, to when they identify collaborators and sponsors to facilitate translational and therapeutic research.

Ethical Considerations for Equitable Access to Genomic Sequencing for Critically Ill Neonates in the United States

Rare diseases impact all socio-economic, geographic, and racial groups indiscriminately. Newborn screening (NBS) is an exemplary international public health initiative that identifies infants with rare conditions early in life to reduce morbidity and mortality. NBS theoretically promotes equity through universal access, regardless of financial ability. There is however heterogeneity in access to newborn screening and conditions that are screened throughout the world. In the United States and some other developed countries, NBS is provided to all babies, subsidized by the local or federal government. Although NBS is an equitable test, infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) may not receive similar benefits to healthier infants. Newborns in the NICU may receive delayed and/or multiple newborn screens due to known limitations in interpreting the results with prematurity, total parenteral nutrition, blood transfusions, infection, and life support. Thus, genomic technologies might be needed in addition to NBS for equitable care of this vulnerable population. Whole exome (WES) and genome sequencing (WGS) have been recently studied in critically ill newborns across the world and have shown promising results in shortening diagnostic odysseys and providing clinical utility. However, in certain circumstances several barriers might limit access to these tests. Here, we discuss some of the existing barriers to genomic sequencing in NICUs in the United States, explore the ethical implications related to low access, consider ways to increase access to genomic testing, and offer some suggestions for future research in these areas.

Clinical application of a scale to assess genomic healthcare empowerment (GEmS): Process and illustrative case examples

The Genome Empowerment Scale (GEmS), developed as a research tool, assesses perspectives of parents of children with undiagnosed disorders about to undergo exome or genome sequencing related to the process of empowerment. We defined genomic healthcare empowerment as follows: perceived ability to understand and seek new information related to the genomic sequencing, manage emotions related to the diagnostic process and outcomes, and utilize genomic sequencing information to the betterment of the individual/child and family. The GEmS consists of four scales, two are primarily emotion-focused (Meaning of a Diagnosis, and Emotional Management of the Process) and two are action-oriented (Seeking Information and Support, and Implications and Planning). The purpose of this research was to provide a strategy for interpreting results from the GEmS and present illustrative cases. These illustrations should serve to facilitate use of the GEmS in the clinical and research arena, particularly with respect to guiding genetic counseling processes for parents of children with undiagnosed conditions.

Compassionate Healthcare for Parents of Children with Life-limiting Illnesses: A Qualitative Study

Objectives:

Premature death of a child from a serious illness is probably one of the most painful experiences for a parent. This study examined the clinical experiences of bereaved parents of children with a life-limiting illness to provide recommendations for quality care.

Materials and Methods:

Data were collected using semi-structured in-depth interviews with bereaved parents whose children had died at least 3 months before the interview. Parents were purposively sampled from two institutions offering end-of-life care to children with life-limiting illnesses. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results:

Data analysis revealed three main themes: (1) Clinical communication, (2) Healthcare infrastructure and (3) Non-physical aspects of healthcare. The seven subthemes uncovered were as follows: (1) Honesty and clarity, (2) empathy, (3) interdisciplinary communication, (4) inconveniences in hospital, (5) home palliative care, (6) financial burden of illness and (7) psychosocial and spiritual support.

Conclusion:

Strategies to improve healthcare for children and their families are multifold. Underlying the provision of quality care is compassion; a child and family-friendly healthcare system with compassionate providers and compassionate institutional policies are vital components to achieving quality healthcare. Culturally sensitive psychosocial, emotional and spiritual support will need to be integrated as standard care.

"Doctors can read about it, they can know about it, but they've never lived with it": How parents use social media throughout the diagnostic odyssey

Parents of children with undiagnosed conditions struggle to obtain information about how to treat and support their children. It can be particularly challenging to find communities and other parents who share their experiences and can provide emotional and informational support. This study sought to characterize how parents use social media, both throughout the diagnostic odyssey and post-diagnosis, to meet their informational, social, and emotional support needs. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 14 parents from the Stanford site of the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN), including five whose children had received a diagnosis through study participation. Interview recordings were analyzed using inductive, team-based coding and thematic analysis based in grounded theory using Dedoose qualitative analysis software. Through this process, we identified four key themes related to social media use. First, parents struggled to find the "right" community, often seeking out groups of similar patients based on symptoms or similar conditions. Second, though they found much valuable information through social media about caring for their child, they also struggled to interpret the relevance of the information to their own child's condition. Third, the social support and access to other patients' and families' lived experiences were described as both highly valued and emotionally challenging, particularly in the case of poor outcomes for similar families. Finally, parents expressed the need to balance concerns about their child's privacy with the value of transparency and data sharing for diagnosis. Our results suggest that the needs and experiences of undiagnosed patients and families differ from those with diagnosed diseases and highlight the need for support in best utilizing social media resources at different stages of the diagnostic odyssey.

'We don't know what tomorrow will bring': Parents' experiences of caring for a child with an undiagnosed genetic condition

BACKGROUND

Families and healthcare professionals caring for a sick or disabled child without a definitive diagnosis face unique challenges, particularly in relation to managing uncertainty, access to healthcare and coordination of care. There has been little research exploring the impact this has on families, their support needs or their experience of health services.

METHODS

This qualitative interview study included interviews with 14 mothers of children with undiagnosed genetic conditions. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged, uncovering overlapping patterns in the data: (1) living with complexity amidst uncertainty-'We don't know what tomorrow will bring'; (2) parental role-'I do everything I can'; (3) parental role-'Not coping is not an option'; and (4) support needs-'There's lots of help that just isn't out there'.

CONCLUSIONS

The results clearly demonstrate the stresses faced when caring for a child with an undiagnosed genetic condition. Some themes are shared with the experience of other families caring for children with complex needs. However, parents were doing all they could for their child in the context of a life of uncertainty, with the absence of a clear diagnosis clearly causing additional stress that impacted on the whole family. Impact on their emotional and physical well-being was evident; they described times of feeling stressed, worried and anxious. They were confused due to being overloaded with information and frustrated by a lack of care coordination. Parents did not appear to prioritize their own well-being and held back their emotions to protect themselves and others. As a result, they had many unmet needs, particularly relating to emotional support.

Supporting families of children with an undiagnosed genetic condition: Using co-design to ensure the right person is in the right post doing the right job

BACKGROUND

Families and professionals caring for a child without a definitive diagnosis face unique challenges, particularly in relation to managing uncertainty; access to healthcare; obtaining relevant information and support; and trying to navigate a healthcare system that is often fragmented. We used co-design to inform the establishment of the first UK specialist nursing post dedicated to working with children with undiagnosed genetic conditions and their families.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To understand what families and hospital staff want from the service; (2) To understand how the post should be operationalized in practice; (3) To develop the job description and person specification for the postholder.

METHODS

A range of approaches were used to collect data: interviews (nine parents and 10 hospital staff); a focus group (three parents); a creative workshop (six patients and siblings); and an online forum (81 parents). Data were analyzed using framework and thematic analysis. The strands of data were brought together and reviewed as a whole to formulate the postholder's job description and person specification.

RESULTS

Stakeholders identified nine key elements to the role which were incorporated into the job description: practical support; point of contact; community liaison; signposting to other services; care coordination; supporting families; advocacy; raising awareness; and emotional support.

CONCLUSIONS

Highlighted in this paper are the practical aspects of engaging and involving all relevant stakeholders in the process of co-designing a new post and subsequent staff recruitment. The flexibility employed in the setting and methods of data collection were instrumental in ensuring that the views of a diverse range of participants were ascertained. A major consideration is the resources required to undertake co-design, in terms of time and finances. We believe that the resources required for the co-design are offset by the advantages of having the right person in the right post, doing the right job.

Genetic Testing in Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Neurodevelopmental disorders are the most prevalent chronic medical conditions encountered in pediatric primary care. In addition to identifying appropriate descriptive diagnoses and guiding families to evidence-based treatments and supports, comprehensive care for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders includes a search for an underlying etiologic diagnosis, primarily through a genetic evaluation. Identification of an underlying genetic etiology can inform prognosis, clarify recurrence risk, shape clinical management, and direct patients and families to condition-specific resources and supports. Here we review the utility of genetic testing in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders and describe the three major testing modalities and their yields - chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing (with/without copy number variant calling), and FMR1 CGG repeat analysis for fragile X syndrome. Given the diagnostic yield of genetic testing and the potential for clinical and personal utility, there is consensus that genetic testing should be offered to all patients with global developmental delay, intellectual disability, and/or autism spectrum disorder. Despite this recommendation, data suggest that a minority of children with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability have undergone genetic testing. To address this gap in care, we describe a structured but flexible approach to facilitate integration of genetic testing into clinical practice across pediatric specialties and discuss future considerations for genetic testing in neurodevelopmental disorders to prepare pediatric providers to care for patients with such diagnoses today and tomorrow.

Could Polygenic Risk Scores Be Useful in Psychiatry?: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are predictors of the genetic susceptibility to diseases, calculated for individuals as weighted counts of thousands of risk variants in which the risk variants and their weights have been identified in genome-wide association studies. Polygenic risk scores show promise in aiding clinical decision-making in many areas of medical practice. This review evaluates the potential use of PRS in psychiatry.

OBSERVATIONS

On their own, PRS will never be able to establish or definitively predict a diagnosis of common complex conditions (eg, mental health disorders), because genetic factors only contribute part of the risk and PRS will only ever capture part of the genetic contribution. Combining PRS with other risk factors has potential to improve outcome prediction and aid clinical decision-making (eg, determining follow-up options for individuals seeking help who are at clinical risk of future illness). Prognostication of adverse physical health outcomes or response to treatment in clinical populations are of great interest for psychiatric practice, but data from larger samples are needed to develop and evaluate PRS.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Polygenic risk scores will contribute to risk assessment in clinical psychiatry as it evolves to combine information from molecular, clinical, and lifestyle metrics. The genome-wide genotype data needed to calculate PRS are inexpensive to generate and could become available to psychiatrists as a by-product of practices in other medical specialties. The utility of PRS in clinical psychiatry, as well as ethical issues associated with their use, should be evaluated in the context of realistic expectations of what PRS can and cannot deliver. Clinical psychiatry has lagged behind other fields of health care in its use of new technologies and routine clinical data for research. Now is the time to catch up.

Experiences of parents with children with congenital disorders of glycosylation: What can we learn from them?

BACKGROUND

Congenital disorders of glycosylation are a group of rare metabolic, genetic diseases that cause severe cognitive and physical impairments. Owing to the rarity of this condition, the experiences of these parents are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore parents' experiences of caring for a child or young adult with congenital disorders of glycosylation.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 parents from 11 countries by teleconference to assess their experience of parenting children with the stated condition. Through thematic analysis, combining deductive and inductive strategies, we identified common themes across the interviews regarding the initial stage of diagnosis and the current experience.

RESULTS

Parents reported many difficulties in managing the disease and its consequences, mainly related to the condition's management and the child's well-being, focusing less on their own burden and distress. Receiving and adapting to the diagnosis was described as a strenuous and highly emotional process, with parents facing a lack of medical knowledge and difficulty in accessing competent health providers. Regarding the experience of parenting a child with congenital disorders of glycosylation, participants' concerns focused on the child and were related to promoting the child's development and autonomy and finding adequate health and educational support. Participants identified several support strategies. Relevant patient associations provided critical informational, instrumental, and social support.

CONCLUSIONS

Results point to parents' need to receive support from informed healthcare and educational providers that recognize their unique challenges and multiple needs.

The influence of social determinants of health on the genetic diagnostic odyssey: who remains undiagnosed, why, and to what effect?

Although Mendelian genetic disorders are individually rare, they are collectively more common and contribute disproportionately to pediatric morbidity and mortality. Remarkable advances in the past decade have led to identification of the precise genetic variants responsible for many of these conditions. Confirming the molecular diagnosis through genetic testing allows for individualized treatment plans in addition to ending the diagnostic odyssey, which not only halts further unnecessary testing but may also result in immense psychological benefit, leading to improved quality of life. However, ensuring equitable application of these advances in genomic technology has been challenging. Though prior studies have revealed disparities in testing for genetic predisposition to cancer in adults, little is known about the prevalence and nature of disparities in diagnostic testing in the pediatric rare disease population. While it seems logical that those with impaired access to healthcare would be less likely to receive the genetic testing needed to end their odyssey, few studies have addressed this question directly and the potential impact on health outcomes. This review synthesizes the available evidence regarding disparities in pediatric genetic diagnosis, defining the need for further, prospective studies with the ultimate goal of delivering precision medicine to all who stand to benefit. IMPACT: Social determinants of health are known to contribute to inequality in outcomes, though the impact on pediatric rare disease patients is not fully understood. Diagnostic genetic testing is a powerful tool, though it may not be available to all in need. This article represents the first effort, to our knowledge, to evaluate the existing literature regarding disparities in genetic testing for pediatric rare disease diagnosis and identify gaps in care.

Utilizing telehealth to create a clinical model of care for patients with Batten disease and other rare diseases

The COVID-19 pandemic transformed the delivery of healthcare across the world. Telehealth has emerged as the primary method for providing healthcare early in the pandemic. Patient and healthcare provider views of the effectiveness of telehealth services are encouraging and support the long-term use of telehealth services in clinical practice. Telehealth may provide a strategy that has far-reaching benefits for diverse patient populations, such as patients with Batten disease and other rare diseases, who face additional barriers to accessing subspecialty healthcare services. The aims of this paper, through the experience of a single Batten Disease Center of Excellence, are to (1) review the benefits and barriers involved in the delivery of telehealth services to patients with rare diseases; (2) discuss components of a model for clinical care that utilizes telehealth services for patients with Batten disease; (3) discuss limitations and future directions of using telehealth in patients with rare diseases. Healthcare systems should consider building clinical models that utilize telehealth services to provide multidisciplinary services to patients with rare diseases. There are numerous benefits in using telehealth that can enhance and expand service delivery between the patient and clinician. Telehealth services can also improve provider-to-provider communication and collaboration when providing clinical care to individuals with rare diseases. Although there are many benefits to utilizing telehealth services in provision of care to patients with rare diseases, it is important to consider factors that may limit or add additional barriers prior to implementing telehealth services. There is a need for future collaborative research to examine and compare the effectiveness and outcomes of telehealth services with standard of care services that are provided in-person. Future research should also examine how to reduce the challenges and barriers associated with the implementation of telehealth services.

Plain language summary

What is telehealth? Telehealth is defined by the US Department of Health Resources and Services Administrations1 as the "use of electronic information and telecommunication technologies to support long-distance clinical healthcare, patient and professional health-related education, public health, and health administration. Technologies include video conference, the internet, store-and-forward imaging, streaming media, and terrestrial and wireless communication." What was the aim of this review? This review was conducted to guide a clinical model using telehealth services for patients with Batten disease and other rare diseases based on the experiences of a single Batten Disease Center of Excellence. Why is this important? Individuals with rare diseases may face multiple barriers to accessing clinical services. Local doctors and treatment providers, such as speech therapists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, and psychologists, may not have knowledge of rare diseases or how to manage symptoms and disease progression, or how to guide treatment services. Other barriers may also include:• Lack of local resources;• Increased caregiver stress;• Difficulty obtaining a correct diagnosis.There are numerous benefits to using telehealth services for both patients with rare diseases, such as:• Convenience;• Cost savings;• Improved access to care;• Ability to see multiple providers that can help with symptom monitoring, assessment, and treatment services. Where do we go from here? It is important to consider limitations when creating a model for clinical care for patients with rare diseases. Some limitations to think about are:• Clinician and organization familiarity with telehealth;• Reimbursement and coverage from insurance companies for telehealth;• Security and privacy of patient information;• Training of telehealth providers;• Logistical factors, including use of equipment, internet/connectivity, and technical troubleshooting.Future directions should involve collaborative research that studies the effectiveness, feasibility, and perceptions of families of rare diseases and providers that use telehealth for clinical healthcare services. Research should also further study and consider ways to improve barriers and challenges associated with implementing telehealth systems into existing healthcare systems.

From Basic Science to Clinical Application of Polygenic Risk Scores: A Primer

IMPORTANCE

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are predictors of the genetic susceptibilities of individuals to diseases. All individuals have DNA risk variants for all common diseases, but genetic susceptibility differences between people reflect the cumulative burden of these. Polygenic risk scores for an individual are calculated as weighted counts of thousands of risk variants that they carry, where the risk variants and their weights have been identified in genome-wide association studies. Here, we review the underlying basic science of PRS, providing a foundation for understanding the potential clinical utility and limitations of PRS.

OBSERVATIONS

Polygenic risk scores can be calculated for a wide range of diseases from a saliva or blood sample using genotyping technologies that are inexpensive. While genotyping only needs to be done once for each individual in their lifetime, the PRS can be recalculated as identification of risk variants improves. On their own, PRS will never be able to establish or definitively predict future diagnoses of common complex conditions because genetic factors only contribute part of the risk, and PRS will only ever capture part of the genetic contributions. Nonetheless, just as clinical medicine uses a multitude of other predictive measures, PRS either on their own or as part of multivariable predictive algorithms could play a role.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Utility of PRS in clinical medicine and ethical issues related to their use should be evaluated in the context of realistic expectations of what PRS can and cannot deliver. For different diseases, PRS could have utility in community settings (stratification to better triage people into established screening programs) or could contribute to clinical decision-making for those presenting with symptoms but where formal diagnosis is unclear. In principle, PRS could contribute to treatment choices, but more data are needed to allow development of PRS in this context.

Family genetic result communication in rare and undiagnosed disease communities: Understanding the practice

Genetic results have implications not only for the individual, but also for their family members. Research on family communication of genetic results has primarily focused on families affected by adult-onset, dominant conditions as well as more common genetic conditions such as familial hypercholesterolemia, cardiomyopathies, and genetic hearing loss. This study therefore aimed to characterize genetic result communication in families with rare and undiagnosed conditions and identify factors that influence communication. One hundred and forty-two individuals who received a diagnosis from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN), a study focused on providing diagnoses to individuals with undiagnosed conditions, were eligible to complete a survey assessing genetic results communication. Survey items assessed if communication was discussed with healthcare providers, with whom participants communicated genetic testing, why they chose to communicate with these family members, and what information they communicated. All respondents (5 adult UDN participants, 38 parents/guardians of UDN participants, and 2 identifying as both) shared genetic results with at least one family member. Individuals who identified as both were considered exclusively adult participants for the purpose of these analyses. Adult participants and parents/guardians of participants reported high levels of understanding (96%), utility (96%), and comfort communicating genetic results (89%). Additionally, parents/guardians were more likely to disclose genetic results due to a general desire to share (60% of parents/guardians vs. 14% adult participants), while adult participants reported that they shared results to communicate risk to family members (86% of adult participants vs. 24% of parents/guardians). Many respondents did not recall discussing with a healthcare provider how (64%) or what (42%) to communicate about results. The results of this study provide insight into the practice of result communication by individuals with rare and previously undiagnosed conditions, which can ideally inform development of more effective counseling strategies and guidelines to aid family communication.

Waiting for a diagnosis in Rubinstein-Taybi: The journey from "ignorance is bliss" to the value of "a label"

The journey to receiving a diagnosis for rare genetic disease can be long and emotionally impactful. This study describes parental experiences of receiving their child's diagnosis of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RTS), a rare genetic condition characterized by growth and developmental delay together with dysmorphic features. Parents from the RTS Australia support group participated in qualitative, semi-structured phone interviews, which were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Questions focused on psychosocial challenges and benefits pre and post-diagnosis. Ten mothers and three fathers participated, with the mean age of diagnosis being 8 months. Parents reported positive psychological effects from a slight delay in diagnosis, and negative effects from an extended diagnostic delay, suggesting the ideal time for a parent to receive a diagnosis lies in the post attachment stage, prior to the development of significant parental concerns. This stage would vary depending on condition severity. Parents desired a diagnosis to reduce uncertainty; however, uncertainty remained post diagnosis, and shifted its focus from broadly encompassing etiology and prognosis, to specifically focusing on concerns regarding severity within the spectrum. Perceived benefits of a diagnosis mainly centered on the provision of a label. Parents articulated that a label increased social acceptance, enhanced coping, promoted communication, and improved access to medical, financial, and support services. This study provides insights into the experience of families prior to and following receipt of a diagnosis. It also highlights the possibility of an optimal time window to receive a diagnosis; in which bonding is maximized and parental distress is minimized.

Improving diagnosis for rare diseases: the experience of the Italian undiagnosed Rare diseases network

Background

For a number of persons with rare diseases (RDs) a definite diagnosis remains undiscovered with relevant physical, psychological and social consequences. Undiagnosed RDs (URDs) require other than specialised clinical centres, outstanding molecular investigations, common protocols and dedicated actions at national and international levels; thus, many “Undiagnosed RDs programs” have been gradually developed on the grounds of a well-structured multidisciplinary approach.

Methods

The Italian Undiagnosed Rare Diseases Network (IURDN) was established in 2016 to improve the level of diagnosis of persons with URD living in Italy. Six Italian Centres of Expertise represented the network. The National Centre for Rare Diseases at the Istituto Superiore di Sanità coordinates the whole project. The software PhenoTips was used to collect the information of the clinical cases.

Results

One hundred and ten cases were analysed between March 2016 and June 2019. The age of onset of the diseases ranged from prenatal age to 51 years. Conditions were predominantly sporadic; almost all patients had multiple organs involvements. A total of 13/71 family cases were characterized by WES; in some families more than one individual was affected, so leading to 20/71 individuals investigated. Disease causing variants were identified in two cases and were associated to previously undescribed phenotypes. In 5 cases, new candidate genes were identified, although confirmatory tests are pending. In three families, investigations were not completed due to the scarce compliance of members and molecular investigations were temporary suspended. Finally, three cases (one familial) remain still unsolved. Twelve undiagnosed clinical cases were then selected to be shared at International level through PhenomeCentral in accordance to the UDNI statement.

Conclusions

Our results showed a molecular diagnostic yield of 53,8%; this value is comparable to the diagnostic rates reported in other international studies. Cases collected were also pooled with those collected by UDNI International Network. This represents a unique example of global initiative aimed at sharing and validating knowledge and experience in this field. IURDN is a multidisciplinary and useful initiative linking National and International efforts aimed at making timely and appropriate diagnoses in RD patients who still do not have a confirmed diagnosis even after a long time.

Challenges Affecting Access to Health and Social Care Resources and Time Management among Parents of Children with Rett Syndrome: A Qualitative Case Study

Rare diseases face serious sustainability challenges regarding the distribution of resources geared at health and social needs. Our aim was to describe the barriers experienced by parents of children with Rett Syndrome for accessing care resources. A qualitative case study was conducted among 31 parents of children with Rett syndrome. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus groups, researchers’ field notes and parents’ personal documents. A thematic analysis was performed and the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines were followed. Three main themes emerged from the data: (a) essential health resources; (b) bureaucracy and social care; and (c) time management constraints. Parents have difficulties accessing appropriate health services for their children. Administrative obstacles exist for accessing public health services, forcing parents to bear the financial cost of specialized care. Time is an essential factor, which conditions the organization of activities for the entire family. Qualitative research offers insight into how parents of children with Rett syndrome experience access to resources and may help improve understanding of how Rett syndrome impacts the lives of both the children and their parents.

Caring for a child with Bardet-Biedl syndrome: A qualitative study of the parental experiences of daily coping and support

This study aimed to explore the parental experiences of having a child with Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) and how parents managed to cope with this situation. Five parents of children with BBS (0-18 years old) participated in semistructured in-depth interviews. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes. The parents experienced distress due to a lack of knowledge on BBS in their support system (e.g., school staff, clinicians, and family members), and they found it stressful to coordinate with multiple support services. Socialization at work, support from family members, and communicating with other parents who are in a similar situation promoted better coping and adaptations to daily life. Results highlight the importance of parents receiving adequate support while they face daily challenges. An increased knowledge on how rare disorders impact family life is needed in the support system.

The genome empowerment scale: An assessment of parental empowerment in families with undiagnosed disease

While genomic sequencing (ES/GS) has the potential to diagnose children with difficult to diagnose phenotypes, the goal should be not only a diagnosis, but also to empower parents to seek next steps for their children and to emotionally manage the outcome, whether or not a diagnosis is secured. To help achieve this goal, objective measures are needed to assess the process of parental empowerment related to genome sequencing. We present the validity and reliability of the Genome Empowerment Scale (GEmS), developed using a healthcare empowerment theoretical model. To evaluate its psychometric properties, 158 parents of 117 children with an undiagnosed condition undergoing genomic sequencing completed the GEmS, measures for criterion validity and for depression and anxiety. Factor analysis resulted in a four factor solution: (a) meaning of a diagnosis; (b) emotional management of the process; (c) seeking information and support and (d) implications and planning. Reliability and validity analyses show that the GEmS has good psychometric properties. The inter-relationships among the factors revealed a profile that may identify parents at risk for a poorer outcome who may benefit from targeted genetic counseling. The GEmS, an objective measure of parental genomic empowerment, can be utilized for future research and translational applications.

Genomic medicine for undiagnosed diseases

One of the primary goals of genomic medicine is to improve diagnosis through identification of genomic conditions, which could improve clinical management, prevent complications, and promote health. We explore how genomic medicine is being used to obtain molecular diagnoses for patients with previously undiagnosed diseases in prenatal, paediatric, and adult clinical settings. We focus on the role of clinical genomic sequencing (exome and genome) in aiding patients with conditions that are undiagnosed even after extensive clinical evaluation and testing. In particular, we explore the impact of combining genomic and phenotypic data and integrating multiple data types to improve diagnoses for patients with undiagnosed diseases, and we discuss how these genomic sequencing diagnoses could change clinical management.

Cases from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network: The continued value of counseling skills in a new genomic era

The "diagnostic odyssey" is well known and described in genetic counseling literature. Studies addressing the psychological, emotional, and financial costs of not having a diagnosis have shown how it permeates the lives of patients and families. The Undiagnosed Diseases Network aims to end this odyssey by providing diagnoses to individuals with undiagnosed conditions through multidisciplinary evaluations, whole exome and genome sequencing, and basic science research. It also provides an opportunity to learn from patients and families and to better understand their journeys and the impact of receiving a diagnosis. Seven cases are presented that outline challenges that come from working with chronically undiagnosed and newly diagnosed patients in a time when sequencing for clinical diagnosis is rapidly increasing. They illuminate the emotional journey of patients and families searching for a diagnosis and the mental health problems, financial distress, and chaos that can accompany not having answers. They also illustrate the surprising reactions patients and families can have to receiving a diagnosis, including anger, grief, and disappointment. While the lessons learned from these families are not novel, new strategies are presented for handling these challenges in undiagnosed and ultra-rare populations, groups that will increase with the rise of clinical sequencing.

Recent developments in genetic/genomic medicine

Advances in genetic technology are having a major impact in the clinic, and mean that many perceptions of the role and scope of genetic testing are having to change. Genomic testing brings with it a greater opportunity for diagnosis, or predictions of future diagnoses, but also an increased chance of uncertain or unexpected findings, many of which may have impacts for multiple members of a person's family. In the past, genetic testing was rarely able to provide rapid results, but the increasing speed and availability of genomic testing is changing this, meaning that genomic information is increasingly influencing decisions around patient care in the acute inpatient setting. The landscape of treatment options for genetic conditions is shifting, which has evolving implications for clinical discussions around previously untreatable disorders. Furthermore, the point of access to testing is changing with increasing provision direct to the consumer outside the formal healthcare setting. This review outlines the ways in which genetic medicine is developing in light of technological advances.

Alone in a Crowd? Parents of Children with Rare Diseases' Experiences of Navigating the Healthcare System

A disorder is considered a rare disease if it affects 1 in 2000, hence, while independently unique, collectively, these conditions are quite common. Many rare diseases are diagnosed during childhood, and therefore parents become primary caregivers in addition to their parental role. Despite the prevalence of rare diseases among children, there has been little research focused on parents' experiences of navigating the healthcare system, a gap we begin to address in this study. Guided by an interpretive description methodology, participants were recruited through online listservs and posting flyers at a pediatric hospital in Western Canada. Sixteen parents (15 mothers and 1 father) participated in in-depth, semi-structured interviews between April 2013 and March 2014. Data were analyzed inductively, generating the main study themes. Findings illuminated the challenges parents' experienced on their child's diagnostic journey-from seeking, to receiving, to adjusting to the rare disease diagnosis. Following diagnosis, gaps, and barriers to services resulted in parents pursuing services that could support their child's unique care needs, which often resulted in out-of-pocket payments and changes to employment. Parents found peer support, both online and in person, to be an effective resource. This study illustrates the common challenges experienced by parents of children with rare diseases as they navigate the healthcare system. Parents' role as "expert caregiver" was rarely acknowledged by healthcare providers, pointing to the need to foster more egalitarian relationships. As well, parents were burdened with the additional role of care coordinator, a role that could be filled formally by a healthcare provider. Lastly, peer support was a key resource in terms of information and emotional support for parents who often begin their journey feeling isolated and alone. Policies and programs are needed that validate the invisible care work of parents and ensure adequate formal supports are in place to mitigate potential sources of inequity for these families. Furthermore, genetic counselors can play a key role in ensuring parents' informational needs are addressed at the time of diagnosis and in connecting families who share common experiences regardless of the rare disease diagnosis.

Understanding Adult Participant and Parent Empowerment Prior to Evaluation in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network

The burden of living with an undiagnosed condition is high and includes physical and emotional suffering, frustrations, and uncertainty. For patients and families experiencing these stressors, higher levels of empowerment may be associated with better outcomes. Thus, it is important to understand the experiences of patients with undiagnosed conditions and their families affected by undiagnosed conditions in order to identify strategies for fostering empowerment. In this study, we used the Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) to assess levels of empowerment and support group participation in 35 adult participants and 67 parents of child participants in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) prior to their UDN in-person evaluation. Our results revealed significantly lower empowerment scores on the GCOS-24 in adult participants compared to parents of child participants [t(100) = − 3.01, p = 0.003, average difference = − 11.12, 95% CI (− 3.78, − 18.46)] and no significant association between support group participation and empowerment scores. The majority of participants (84.3%, 86/102) are not currently participating in any support groups, and participation rates were not significantly different for adult participants and parents of child participants (11.4 vs. 19.7%, respectively, FE p = 0.40). Open-ended responses provided additional insight into support group participation, the challenges of living with undiagnosed conditions, and positive coping strategies. Future research will evaluate the extent to which empowerment scores change as participation in the UDN unfolds.