Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent ependymoma in children

Radiosurgery for central nervous system ependymomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ependymomas, rare malignant central nervous system (CNS) lesions (2-6% of primary CNS tumors), are typically treated with maximal safe resection followed by fractionated radiation therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an alternative, particularly in recurrent or residual cases. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of SRS for CNS ependymomas, while also identifying key prognostic factors.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of SRS in WHO Grade 2/3 CNS ependymoma patients. Random-effect meta-analysis was employed.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 298 patients and 496 lesions were included. Our meta-analysis demonstrated an overall local tumor control (LTC) rate of 72% (95% CI: 65-79%). LTC rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 83% (95% CI: 76-88%), 72% (95% CI: 64-78%), and 69% (95% CI: 61-76%), respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were estimated at 67% (95% CI: 50-80%), 56% (95% CI: 48-64%), and 51% (95% CI: 39-63%), respectively. Additionally, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 58% (95% CI: 48-67%). The incidence of adverse radiation events (ARE) was 20% (95% CI: 12-31%). Meta-regression showed older age correlated with improved tumor control (P = 0.02) and lower ARE (P = 0.06) and radionecrosis rates (P < 0.01), while larger tumor volumes (P = 0.03) and anaplastic histology (P = 0.01) were associated with poorer PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS is a reasonably valuable therapeutic option in the multimodal management of WHO Grade 2/3 CNS ependymomas, especially for individuals with inoperable, recurrent, or residual lesions. Key patient and tumor characteristics have been analyzed to determine factors potentially impacting treatment outcomes.

Pediatric cranial stereotactic radiosurgery: Meta-analysis and international stereotactic radiosurgery society practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pediatric patients. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize indications and outcomes specific to pediatric cranial SRS to inform consensus guidelines on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society.

METHODS

A systematic review, using the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, analyzed English-language articles on SRS, published between 1989 and 2021, that included outcomes for at least 5 pediatric patients. MEDLINE database terms included tumor types and locations, and radiosurgical and age-specific terms. We excluded nonclinical reports, expert opinions, commentaries, and review articles. Meta-regressions for associations with local control were performed for medulloblastoma, craniopharyngioma, ependymoma, glioma, and arteriovenous malformation (AVM).

RESULTS

Of the 113 articles identified for review, 68 met the inclusion criteria. These articles described approximately 400 pediatric patients with benign and malignant brain tumors and 5119 with AVMs who underwent cranial SRS. The rates of local control for benign tumors, malignant tumors, and AVMs were 89% (95% CI, 82%-95%), 71% (95% CI, 59%-82%), and 65% (95% CI, 60%-69%), respectively. No significant associations were identified for local control with the patient-, tumor-, or treatment-related variables.

CONCLUSIONS

This review is the first to summarize outcomes specific to SRS for pediatric brain tumors and AVMs. Although data reporting is limited for pediatric patients, SRS appears to provide acceptable rates of local control. We present ISRS consensus guidelines to inform the judicious use of cranial SRS for pediatric patients.

Brain and Brain Stem Necrosis After Reirradiation for Recurrent Childhood Primary Central Nervous System Tumors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE

Reirradiation is increasingly used in children and adolescents/young adults (AYA) with recurrent primary central nervous system tumors. The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) reirradiation task force aimed to quantify risks of brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic literature search using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for peer-reviewed articles from 1975 to 2021 identified 92 studies on reirradiation for recurrent tumors in children/AYA. Seventeen studies representing 449 patients who reported brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation contained sufficient data for analysis. While all 17 studies described techniques and doses used for reirradiation, they lacked essential details on clinically significant dose-volume metrics necessary for dose-response modeling on late effects. We, therefore, estimated incidences of necrosis with an exact 95% CI and qualitatively described data. Results from multiple studies were pooled by taking the weighted average of the reported crude rates from individual studies.

RESULTS

Treated cancers included ependymoma (n = 279 patients; 7 studies), medulloblastoma (n = 98 patients; 6 studies), any CNS tumors (n = 62 patients; 3 studies), and supratentorial high-grade gliomas (n = 10 patients; 1 study). The median interval between initial and reirradiation was 2.3 years (range, 1.2-4.75 years). The median cumulative prescription dose in equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD22; assuming α/β value = 2 Gy) was 103.8 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy). Among 449 reirradiated children/AYA, 22 (4.9%; 95% CI, 3.1%-7.3%) developed brain necrosis and 14 (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.2%) developed brain stem necrosis with a weighted median follow-up of 1.6 years (range, 0.5-7.4 years). The median cumulative prescription EQD22 was 111.4 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for development of any necrosis, 107.7 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for brain necrosis, and 112.1 Gy (range, 100.2-117 Gy) for brain stem necrosis. The median latent period between reirradiation and the development of necrosis was 5.7 months (range, 4.3-24 months). Though there were more events among children/AYA undergoing hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated reirradiation, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .46).

CONCLUSIONS

Existing reports suggest that in children/AYA with recurrent brain tumors, reirradiation with a total EQD22 of about 112 Gy is associated with an approximate 5% to 7% incidence of brain/brain stem necrosis after a median follow-up of 1.6 years (with the initial course of radiation therapy being given with conventional prescription doses of ≤2 Gy per fraction and the second course with variable fractionations). We recommend a uniform approach for reporting dosimetric endpoints to derive robust predictive models of late toxicities following reirradiation.

Respective Roles of Surgery, Chemotherapy, and Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Pediatric and Adolescent Ependymoma: A National Multicentric Study

PURPOSE

Half of the children and adolescents treated for intracranial ependymoma experience recurrences that are not managed in a standardized manner. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate recurrence treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after a first relapse in a population of patients from the Pediatric Ependymoma Photons Protons and Imaging study (PEPPI study) who were treated with surgery and radiation therapy in French Society of Childhood Cancer reference centers between 2000 and 2013. Data were analyzed using the Cox model as well as a landmark analysis at 4 months that accounted for the guarantee-time bias.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of the whole population of 202 patients was 105.1 months, with a 10-year OS of 68.2% and PFS of 45.5%. Among the 100 relapse cases, 68.0% were local relapses, 20.0% were metastatic, and 12.0% were combined (local and metastatic). Relapses were treated by surgery (n = 79) and/or reirradiation (n = 52) and/or chemotherapy (n = 22). The median follow-up after relapse was 77.8 months. The OS and PFS at 5 years were 43.1% and 16.2%, respectively. After surgery or radiation therapy of the first relapse, OS and PFS were more favorable, whereas treatments that included chemotherapy with or without focal treatment were associated with worse OS and PFS. In the multivariate analysis, stereotactic hypofractionated reirradiation after surgery was associated with a significantly better outcome (OS, P = .030; PFS, P = .008) and chemotherapy with a worse outcome (OS, P = .028; PFS, P = .033).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of relapse treatments within the PEPPI study determined that irrespective of whether the relapse was localized or metastatic, treatments that included surgery and/or reirradiation had better outcomes.

The evolving role of reirradiation in the management of recurrent brain tumors

Despite aggressive management consisting of surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and systemic therapy given alone or in combination, a significant proportion of patients with brain tumors will experience tumor recurrence. For these patients, no standard of care exists and management of either primary or metastatic recurrent tumors remains challenging.Advances in imaging and RT technology have enabled more precise tumor localization and dose delivery, leading to a reduction in the volume of health brain tissue exposed to high radiation doses. Radiation techniques have evolved from three-dimensional (3-D) conformal RT to the development of sophisticated techniques, including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic techniques, either stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Several studies have suggested that a second course of RT is a feasible treatment option in patients with a recurrent tumor; however, survival benefit and treatment related toxicity of reirradiation, given alone or in combination with other focal or systemic therapies, remain a controversial issue.We provide a critical overview of the current clinical status and technical challenges of reirradiation in patients with both recurrent primary brain tumors, such as gliomas, ependymomas, medulloblastomas, and meningiomas, and brain metastases. Relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate radiation technique and patient selection, the optimal radiation dose and fractionation, tolerance of the brain to a second course of RT, and the risk of adverse radiation effects have been critically discussed.

Latest classification of ependymoma in the molecular era and advances in its treatment: a review

Ependymoma is a rare central nervous system (CNS) tumour occurring in all age groups and is one of the most common paediatric malignant brain tumours. Unlike other malignant brain tumours, ependymomas have few identified point mutations and genetic and epigenetic features. With advances in molecular understanding, the latest 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of CNS tumours divided ependymomas into 10 diagnostic categories based on the histology, molecular information and location; this accurately reflected the prognosis and biology of this tumour. Although maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy is considered the standard treatment method, and chemotherapy is considered ineffective, the validation of the role of these treatment modalities continues. Although the rarity and long-term clinical course of ependymoma make designing and conducting prospective clinical trials challenging, knowledge is steadily accumulating and progress is being made. Much of the clinical knowledge obtained from clinical trials to date was based on the previous histology-based WHO classifications, and the addition of new molecular information may lead to more complex treatment strategies. Therefore, this review presents the latest findings on the molecular classification of ependymomas and advances in its treatment.

Precision based approach to tailoring radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary management of pediatric central nervous system tumors

Modern day survivorship from childhood malignancies is estimated to be over 80%. However, central nervous system tumors remain the leading cause of cancer mortality in children and is the most common solid tumor in this population. Improved survivorship is, in part, a result of improved multidisciplinary care, often with a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy. With improved survival, long term effects of treatment and quality of life impacts have been recognized and pose a challenge to maximize the therapeutic ratio of treatment. It has been increasingly more apparent that precise risk stratification, such as with the inclusion of molecular classification, is instrumental in efforts to tailor radiotherapy for appropriate treatment, generally towards de-intensification for this vulnerable patient population. In addition, advances in radiotherapy techniques have allowed greater conformality and accuracy of treatment for those who do require radiotherapy for tumor control. Ongoing efforts to tailor radiotherapy, including de-escalation, omission, or intensification of radiotherapy, continue to improve as increasing insight into tumor heterogeneity is recognized, coupled with advances in precision medicine employing novel molecularly-targeted therapeutics.

Apatinib and temozolomide in children with recurrent ependymoma: A case report

RATIONALE

Outcomes remain poor in children with recurrent ependyomams (rEPNs), despite advances in surgery and radiotherapy. Systemic therapeutic options are limited, given the low response to chemotherapy and targeted drugs. There is an urgent need for efective pharmacotherapy. Apatinib is a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which has been reported to exhibit broad antitumor profiles. However, its effects on rEPNs have not been reported thus far.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We present a 5-year-old recurrent ependyomam patient benefting from apatinib and temozolomide. The patient was diagnosed with ependyomam in January 2016 and treated with surgery and radiotherapy. After surgery, the patient walked with an mild unsteady gait. He was diagnosed with recurrence in November 2018 following which he was treated with reoperation, reirradiation and chemotherapy (etopside, cisplatin, and temozolomide [TMZ]). The patients increased gait instability in April 2019.

DIAGNOSES

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed progression of the disease. The lession at the left edge of the fourth ventricle and cerebellar peduncles was significantly increased.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was administer TMZ (200 mg/m2/d, d1-5, 28 days as a cycle) + apatinib (250 mg, every other day). Twelve cycle of TMZ and apatinib were given.

OUTCOMES

The tumor significantly shrank during the patient received TMZ and apatinib. After 9 months of medication, MRI revealed a nearly complete response However, the tumor progressed on May 5, 2020. From the beginning of the application of TMZ and apatinib, the progression-free survival was 1 year and the survival time was 19 months. Grade 1 leukocytopenia was observed without other adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Apatinib and temozolomide treatment with mild side effects may be a new option for children with recurrent ependyomams.

Ependymoma: Evaluation and Management Updates

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review state of art and relevant advances in the molecular genetics and management of ependymomas of children and adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ependymomas may occur either in the brain or in the spinal cord. Compared with intracranial ependymomas, spinal ependymomas are less frequent and exhibit a better prognosis. The new WHO classification of CNS tumors of 2021 has subdivided ependymomas into different histomolecular subgroups with different outcome. The majority of studies have shown a major impact of extent of resection; thus, a complete resection must be performed, whenever possible, at first surgery or at reoperation. Conformal radiotherapy is recommended for grade 3 or incompletely resected grade II tumors. Proton therapy is increasingly employed especially in children to reduce the risk of neurocognitive and endocrine sequelae. Craniospinal irradiation is reserved for metastatic disease. Chemotherapy is not useful as primary treatment and is commonly employed as salvage treatment for patients failing surgery and radiotherapy. Standard treatments are still the mainstay of treatment: the discovery of new druggable pathways will hopefully increase the therapeutic armamentarium in the near future.

Radiosurgery, reirradiation, and brachytherapy

Radiosurgery and brachytherapy are potentially useful treatment techniques that are sparingly applied in pediatric oncology. They are often used in the setting of reirradiation for recurrent or metastatic tumors. Reirradiation in children with recurrent tumors is complicated by the tolerance of critical organs and the potential risks for overall long-term dose-dependent complications. We review the current literature available in support of reirradiation and the use of radiosurgery and brachytherapy in pediatric patients.

Image-Guided Robotic Radiosurgery for the Management of Spinal Ependymomas

Background

Ependymomas are rare neoplasms of the central nervous system (CNS), usually localized intracranially and most commonly diagnosed in children. Spinal ependymomas are more frequent in young adults. They are either primary lesions or manifest as disseminated seeding of cranial tumors. Data on the management of spinal ependymoma lesions remain scarce, especially concerning stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The purpose of this study is to report the treatment outcomes of two institutions using robotic radiosurgery (RRS) for the treatment of spinal ependymomas.

Materials and Methods

All patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of an ependymoma WHO grade II or III who were treated with RRS for one or more spinal lesions were included in this analysis.

Results

Twelve patients underwent RRS for the treatment of 32 spinal ependymoma lesions between 2005 and 2020. Two patients were below the age of 18 when treated, whereas nine patients (75%) suffered from a primary spinal ependymoma. The median dose was 15 Gy prescribed to a median isodose of 70%, with 27 lesions (84%) receiving a single-session treatment. The local control (LC) after a median follow-up of 56.7 months was 84%. LC rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 92, 85, and 77%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimated overall survival after 1, 3, and 5 years were 75, 75, and 64%, respectively. Five patients died, all of them suffering from an anaplastic ependymoma, with widespread CNS tumor progression being the reason for death in four patients. The majority of patients (58%) showed a stable neurological status at the last available follow-up. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated.

Conclusion

RRS appears to be a safe and efficient treatment modality for managing primary and secondary spinal ependymal tumors in patients with multiple lesions and local recurrences.

Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for pilocytic astrocytoma: an international multiinstitutional study

OBJECTIVE

The current standard initial therapy for pilocytic astrocytoma is maximal safe resection. Radiation therapy is considered for residual, recurrent, or unresectable pilocytic astrocytomas. However, the optimal radiation strategy has not yet been established. Here, the authors describe the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pilocytic astrocytoma in a large multiinstitutional cohort.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved multiinstitutional database of patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) between 1990 and 2016 was queried. Data were gathered from 9 participating International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF) centers. Patients with a histological diagnosis of pilocytic astrocytoma treated using a single session of GKRS and with at least 6 months of follow-up were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were analyzed in the study. The median patient age was 14 years (range 2-84 years) at the time of GKRS. The median follow-up was 67.3 months. Thirty-nine percent of patients underwent SRS as the initial therapy, whereas 61% underwent SRS as salvage treatment. The median tumor volume was 3.45 cm3. The tumor location was the brainstem in 30% of cases, with a nonbrainstem location in the remainder. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates at the last follow-up were 95.7% and 92.5%, respectively. Five- and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 74.0% and 69.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, an age < 18 years, tumor volumes < 4.5 cm3, and no prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy were identified as positive prognostic factors for improved PFS. On multivariate analysis, only prior radiotherapy was significant for worse PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This represents the largest study of single-session GKRS for pilocytic astrocytoma to date. Favorable long-term PFS and overall survival were observed with GKRS. Further prospective studies should be performed to evaluate appropriate radiosurgery dosing, timing, and sequencing of treatment along with their impact on toxicity and the quality of life of patients with pilocytic astrocytoma.

Craniospinal irradiation as part of re-irradiation for children with recurrent intracranial ependymoma

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes in children with relapsed, molecularly characterized intracranial ependymoma treated with or without craniospinal irradiation (CSI) as part of a course of repeat radiation therapy (re-RT).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 31 children. Patients with distant relapse received CSI as part of re-RT. For patients with locally recurrent ependymoma, those treated before 2012 were re-irradiated with focal re-RT. In 2012, institutional practice changed to offer CSI, followed by boost re-RT to the site of resected or gross disease.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 5.5 years. Of 9 patients with distant relapse after initial RT, 2-year freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) were 12.5% and 62.5%, respectively. There were 22 patients with local failure after initial RT. In these patients, use of CSI during re-RT was associated with improvement in 5-year FFP (83.3% with CSI vs 15.2% with focal re-RT only, P = 0.030). In the subgroup of patients with infratentorial primary disease, CSI during re-RT also improved 5-year FFP (100% with CSI, 10.0% with focal re-RT only, P = 0.036). Twenty-three patients had known molecular status; all had posterior fossa group A tumors (n = 17) or tumors with a RELA (v-rel avian reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog A) fusion (n = 6). No patient developed radiation necrosis after fractionated re-RT, though almost all survivors required assistance throughout formal schooling. Five out of 10 long-term survivors have not developed neuroendocrine deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-irradiation with CSI is a safe and effective treatment for children with locally recurrent ependymoma and improves disease control compared with focal re-irradiation, with the benefit most apparent for those with infratentorial primary tumors.

Extent of re-excision, sequence/timing of salvage re-irradiation, and disease-free interval impact upon clinical outcomes in recurrent/progressive ependymoma

PURPOSE

To report clinical outcomes of salvage re-irradiation (re-RT) in recurrent/progressive ependymoma.

METHODS

Medical records of patients treated with curative-intent re-RT as multi-modality management for recurrent/progressive ependymoma were analyzed retrospectively. The linear-quadratic model was used to provide estimates of biologically effective dose (BED) of irradiation using an α/β value of 2 for late CNS toxicity for each course of irradiation and summated to derive cumulative BED without correcting for the assumed recovery.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients (median age 10 years at index diagnosis) treated with curative-intent re-RT between 2010 and 2018 were included. Median time to first recurrence was 29 months with an inter-quartile range (IQR) of 16-64 months. Majority (n = 46, 84%) of patients underwent surgical re-excision of recurrent disease. Median interval from first course of irradiation (RT1) to second course (RT2) was 35 months (IQR = 26-66 months) with a median re-RT dose of 54 Gy in 30 fractions (range 40-60 Gy), resulting in median cumulative equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction (EQD2) of 106.2 Gy (range 92.4-117.6 Gy). Volume of re-RT was based on location and pattern of relapse, comprising uni-focal (n = 49, 89%), multi-focal (n = 3, 5.5%), or craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in 3 (5.5%) patients respectively. Thirty-six (66%) patients received platinum-based salvage chemotherapy either before or after RT2. At a median follow up of 37 months (range 6-80 months), the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire study cohort were 40% and 51% respectively. Gross total resection at recurrence; early salvage re-RT (prior to chemotherapy, if any); and longer (> 2 years) disease-free interval (DFI) were associated with better survival outcomes. Salvage re-RT was generally well tolerated with only 3 (5.5%) patients developing symptomatic radiation necrosis necessitating corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

Extent of re-excision, sequence/timing of re-RT, and DFI impact upon outcomes in curative-intent, multi-modality salvage therapy for recurrent ependymoma.

Acute and chronic hemorrhage from radiation-induced cavernous malformation associated with late-delayed radiation necrosis in long surviving glioma patients: A case report

Although radiation therapy is a standard treatment strategy for patients with glioma, its delayed complications are not clearly understood. Radiation-induced cavernous malformation (RICM) is one of the complications in the delayed phase following radiation therapy, which usually occurs in children. Herein we present three cases of RICM with radiation necrosis in long surviving adult glioma patients, 2 with oligoastrocytoma and one with anaplastic ependymoma. Two of three patients had received an obvious overdose of radiation by additional stereotactic radiation therapy. Repeated episodes of either acute or chronic hemorrhages from RICM worsened the neurological symptoms in all cases. The interval between the last irradiation and the occurrence of symptoms was 45-173 months. The presence of hypointense rim on FLAIR or T2* on magnetic resonance imaging, which resembles the appearance of sporadic cavernous malformations, could be helpful in differentiating RICM from tumor recurrence. Surgical resection was effective in alleviating the symptoms. Microscopically, RICM is a vascular lesion with vulnerable vessels, which are observed in the center of the radiation necrosis. Repeated hemorrhages from these vessels cause either gradual or sudden worsening of neurological symptoms. Therefore, radiation overdose, which results in radiation injury, should be avoided in low grade glioma patients, who could potentially survive for a long period.

Current and Emerging Methods of Management of Ependymoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses the evidence base behind current and emerging strategies of management of intracranial and spinal ependymomas in children, with a particular focus on aspects of surgical techniques, challenges and complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The cornerstone of management remains maximal safe resective surgery, which has repeatedly been shown to correlate with improved survival. This is followed by focal conformal radiotherapy, although good results using proton beam therapy, with the potential for diminished side effects, are emerging. The role of chemotherapy remains largely unproven for paediatric ependymoma. Despite optimal management strategies, many children with ependymoma suffer from tumour recurrence. The standard of care for paediatric ependymoma comprises surgery and radiotherapy. Results of ongoing clinical trials will help shape its management in order to leverage our increasingly sophisticated understanding of the genetic drivers behind these tumours into survival benefit for this challenging group of patients.

Appraisal of re-irradiation for the recurrent glioblastoma in the era of MGMT promotor methylation

Despite recent innovation in treatment techniques and subsequently improved outcomes, the majority of glioblastoma (GBL) have relapses, especially in locoregional areas. Local re-irradiation (re-RT) has been established as a feasible option for recurrent GBL of all ages with safety, tolerability, and effectiveness both in survival and quality of life regardless of fractionation schedule. To keep adverse effects under acceptable range, cumulative dose limit in equivalent dose at 2 Gy fractions by the linear-quadratic model at α/β = 2 for normal brain tissue (EQD2) with narrow margin should be observed and single/hypofractionated re-RT should be undertaken very carefully to recurrent tumor with large volume or adjacent to the brainstem. Promising outcome of re-operation (re-Op) plus re-RT (re-Op/RT) need to be validated and result from re-RT with temozolomide/bevacizumab (TMZ/BV) or new strategy is expected. Development of new-concept prognostic scoring or risk group is required to select patients properly and make use of predictive biomarkers such as O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation that influence outcomes of re-RT, re-Op/RT, or re-RT with TMZ/BV.

Short Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy in Palliation of Pediatric Malignancies: Outcomes and Toxicities

PURPOSE

Treatment strategies in palliation of pediatric cancer remain a significant challenge. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a short course of hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) for metastatic or recurrent childhood tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 104 lesions in 62 pediatric patients with metastatic or recurrent cancer were treated with a short hypofractionation schedule (>1 but ≤5 fractions; ≥3 Gy per fraction) between 2007 and 2017 in our institution. The primary endpoint was local control (LC). Other endpoints included treatment response, overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicity. Toxicities were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.0.

RESULTS

The most common histologies were neuroblastoma, comprising 50 of the 104 lesions (48.1%); osteosarcoma, 17 lesions (16.4%); and Ewing sarcoma, 13 lesions (12.5%). A median total dose of 24 Gy was delivered in a median of 5 fractions. Of 104 lesions, 26 (25.0%) were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy, 24 (23.1%) with intensity modulated RT, and 48 (46.2%) with 2-dimensional RT or 3-dimensional conformal RT. A complete or partial response was observed in 63 (60.6%) of lesions, and stable disease was observed in 34 (32.7%). At a median follow-up of 8.7 months, 21 local failures occurred (20.2%). The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 74% and 68%, respectively. LC was better for tumors without previous irradiation (83% vs 57% with previous RT; P = .004). LC rates did not differ between RT techniques or total biologically effective dose with α/β ratio of 10 (BED10) (≤30 vs >30 Gy). At the time of analysis, 38 deaths in the cohort of 62 patients (61.3%) were recorded. The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 31% and 44%, respectively. Incidence of any grade ≥3 toxicity was 6.7% (7 of 104). No grade 5 events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

A short hypofractionation scheme yields effective disease control and treatment response with a favorable side effect profile. Select pediatric patients with symptomatic metastases or recurrent disease can be considered for a short course of palliative RT.

Supratentorial Extraventricular Ependymoma: Retrospective Analysis of 15 Patients at a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Supratentorial extraventricular ependymoma (STEE) is an extremely rare central nervous system (CNS) neoplasm, the clinical characteristics and optimal treatment of which remain unclear. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of 15 patients with STEE.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with STEE were identified, and their clinical, radiologic, and surgical records were reviewed.

RESULTS

The 15 patients included 6 males (40%) and 9 females (60%), with a median age of 15 years. Nine patients (60%) underwent gross total resection, 5 patients (33.3%) underwent subtotal resection, and 1 patient (6.7%) underwent biopsy. Eight patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, and 3 received adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade II and grade III STEE were 100% and 30%, respectively, and the corresponding 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 77.8% and 20%. The differences in OS and PFS rates between WHO grades II and III STEE were statistically significant (P < 0.01 and 0.02, respectively). Anaplastic histology (WHO grade III) was a poor prognostic factor for PFS (P = 0.04). The recurrence pattern was local recurrence in all patients; all cases were treated primarily by redo surgery. Three patients with recurrent WHO grade II STEE were alive at more than 64, 52, and 44 months after redo surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

STEE is an extremely rare CNS neoplasm. The histological grade of STEE is an important prognostic factor. Microsurgical resection might play a major role in both initial treatment and treatment of recurrent tumors.

EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of ependymal tumors

Ependymal tumors are rare CNS tumors and may occur at any age, but their proportion among primary brain tumors is highest in children and young adults. Thus, the level of evidence of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions is higher in the pediatric compared with the adult patient population.The diagnosis and disease staging is performed by craniospinal MRI. Tumor classification is achieved by histological and molecular diagnostic assessment of tissue specimens according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification 2016. Surgery is the crucial initial treatment in both children and adults. In pediatric patients with intracranial ependymomas of WHO grades II or III, surgery is followed by local radiotherapy regardless of residual tumor volume. In adults, radiotherapy is employed in patients with anaplastic ependymoma WHO grade III, and in case of incomplete resection of WHO grade II ependymoma. Chemotherapy alone is reserved for young children <12 months and for adults with recurrent disease when further surgery and irradiation are no longer feasible. A gross total resection is the mainstay of treatment in spinal ependymomas, and radiotherapy is reserved for incompletely resected tumors. Nine subgroups of ependymal tumors across different anatomical compartments (supratentorial, posterior fossa, spinal) and patient ages have been identified with distinct genetic and epigenetic alterations, and with distinct outcomes. These findings may lead to more precise diagnostic and prognostic assessments, molecular subgroup-adapted therapies, and eventually new recommendations pending validation in prospective studies.

Radiation and subsequent reirradiation outcomes in the treatment of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma and a systematic review of the reirradiation literature

PURPOSE

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a devastating pediatric disease, with a median survival of <1 year. Here, we review our institution's DIPG experience over an 8-year interval and perform a systematic review of the literature, specifically evaluating reports of reirradiation (reRT) for DIPG.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 26 patients who underwent definitive intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for DIPG at a single institution between 2007 and 2015. Three of these patients underwent reRT for progressive disease. Clinical endpoints, including progression-free survival and overall survival (OS), were assessed. We then performed a thorough PubMed search of the literature discussing reRT for patients with DIPG.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of the 26 patients (92%) completed the initial course of radiation (54 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions using IMRT). Median age at diagnosis was 6.0 years (range, 2.0-26.5). With respect to systemic therapy, 1 (4.2%) received no systemic therapy, 1 (4.2%) received concurrent systemic therapy alone, 4 (16.7%) received adjuvant therapy alone, and 18 (75%) received a combination of concurrent and adjuvant therapy. Median follow-up time was 11 months from the date of initial diagnosis. Median OS for the cohort was 12 months, with a 1-year OS of 51%. The 3 patients who underwent reRT received 20 Gy in 10 daily fractions using IMRT alone with no treatment toxicity noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation therapy is essential in the definitive management of DIPG. With advances in treatment techniques, it is feasible to reirradiate select patients with progressive disease; however, further research is warranted to optimize dose, delivery, and patient selection in the recurrent/progressive setting. In the future, it may be reasonable to propose more focal delivery of reRT (ie, hypofractionated radiation) in select patients with the goal of reducing treatment time and providing effective palliation.

Pediatric Ependymoma

Over the past 150 years since Virchow's initial characterization of ependymoma, incredible efforts have been made in the classification of these tumors and in the care of pediatric patients with this disease. While the advent of modern neurosurgery and the optimization of radiation have provided significant gains, a more complex but incomplete picture of pediatric ependymomas has begun to form through a combination of international collaborations and detailed genetic and histologic characterizations. This review includes and synthesizes the clinical understanding of pediatric ependymoma and their developing molecular insight into what is truly a family of malignancies in which distinct members require different surgical approaches, radiation plans, and targeted therapies.

Re-irradiation of recurrent pediatric ependymoma: modalities and outcomes: a twenty-year survey

Background

Standard treatment for recurrent ependymomas is not defined. Re- irradiation has been proposed but its modalities and results are still to be explored.

Patients and methods

From June 1994 to December 2013, 32 pediatric patients with ependymoma were re-irradiated for local (n = 15) or metastatic (n = 17) relapses. Files were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Local relapses were treated with hypofractionated focal radiotherapy (hypoFFRT) (n = 8) or focal fractionated radiotherapy (FFRT) (n = 7). Metastatic relapses were treated with hypoFFRT (n = 3), FFRT (n = 3), spinal radiotherapy (n = 4) and craniospinal irradiation (CSI) (n = 7). Median PFS and OS after re-irradiation were 1.2 and 3.5 years respectively with a median follow-up of 2.1 years (0.2–11.4). For local relapses, median PFS was 2.5 years for patients treated with hypoFFRT versus 1.2 years for patients treated with FFRT (p = 0.2). For metastatic relapses, median PFS was 0.7 years for patients treated with focal radiotherapy (hypoFFRT, FFRT, spinal radiotherapy) versus 6.8 years for patients treated with CSI (p = 0.073). 15 patients achieved greater PFS after second radiotherapy (RT2) than after first radiotherapy (RT1). 27 patients (84 %) had surgery before re-irradiation. PFS was better for patients with GTR before RT2 (14.7 vs 6.7 months) (p = 0.05). 5 patients developed radionecrosis; only one required corticosteroids.

Conclusion

Re-irradiation at relapse is a safe, feasible and potentially curative treatment. Metastatic relapse may require CSI even when isolated and re-operated. For local relapses, considering conflicting results in the literature, a randomized trial is warranted to explore fractionated focal radiotherapy versus hypofractionated focal irradiation.

Final results of the second prospective AIEOP protocol for pediatric intracranial ependymoma

BACKGROUND

This prospective study stratified patients by surgical resection (complete = NED vs incomplete = ED) and centrally reviewed histology (World Health Organization [WHO] grade II vs III).

METHODS

WHO grade II/NED patients received focal radiotherapy (RT) up to 59.4 Gy with 1.8 Gy/day. Grade III/NED received 4 courses of VEC (vincristine, etoposide, cyclophosphamide) after RT. ED patients received 1-4 VEC courses, second-look surgery, and 59.4 Gy followed by an 8-Gy boost in 2 fractions on still measurable residue. NED children aged 1-3 years with grade II tumors could receive 6 VEC courses alone.

RESULTS

From January 2002 to December 2014, one hundred sixty consecutive children entered the protocol (median age, 4.9 y; males, 100). Follow-up was a median of 67 months. An infratentorial origin was identified in 110 cases. After surgery, 110 patients were NED, and 84 had grade III disease. Multiple resections were performed in 46/160 children (28.8%). A boost was given to 24/40 ED patients achieving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 58.1% and 68.7%, respectively, in this poor prognosis subgroup. For the whole series, 5-year PFS and OS rates were 65.4% and 81.1%, with no toxic deaths. On multivariable analysis, NED status and grade II were favorable for OS, and for PFS grade II remained favorable.

CONCLUSIONS

In a multicenter collaboration, this trial accrued the highest number of patients published so far, and results are comparable to the best single-institution series. The RT boost, when feasible, seemed effective in improving prognosis. Even after multiple procedures, complete resection confirmed its prognostic strength, along with tumor grade. Biological parameters emerging in this series will be the object of future correlatives and reports.

Pediatric Brain Tumors: Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Opportunities

Great progress has been made in many areas of pediatric oncology. However, tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) remain a significant challenge. A recent explosion of data has led to an opportunity to understand better the molecular basis of these diseases and is already providing a foundation for the pursuit of rationally chosen therapeutics targeting relevant molecular pathways. The molecular biology of pediatric brain tumors is shifting from a singular focus on basic scientific discovery to a platform upon which insights are being translated into therapies.

Radiosurgery for Pediatric Brain Tumors

The utility of radiosurgery for pediatric brain tumors is not well known. For children, radiosurgery may have an important role for treating unresectable tumors, residual disease, or tumors in the recurrent setting that have received prior radiotherapy. The available evidence demonstrates utility for some children with primary brain tumors resulting in good local control. Radiosurgery can be considered for limited residual disease or focal recurrences. However, the potential toxicities are unique and not insignificant. Therefore, prospective studies need to be performed to develop guidelines for indications and treatment for children and reduce toxicity in this population.

Re-irradiation of recurrent anaplastic ependymoma using radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Recurrent ependymomas were retreated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). The efficacy, toxicities, and differences between SRS and FSRT were analyzed.

METHODS

Eight patients with recurrent ependymomas fulfilling the criteria described below were evaluated. Inclusion criteria were: (1) the patient had previously undergone surgery and conventional radiotherapy as first-line treatment; (2) targets were located in or adjacent to the eloquent area or were deep-seated; and (3) the previously irradiated volume overlapped the target lesion.

RESULTS

FSRT was delivered to 18 lesions, SRS to 20 lesions. A median follow-up period was 23 months. The local control rate was 76 % at 3 years. No significant differences in local control were observed due to tumor size or fractionation schedule. Lesions receiving >25 Gy/5 fr or 21 Gy/3 fr did not recur within 1 year, whereas no dose-response relationship was observed in those treated with SRS. No grade ≥2 toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our treatment protocol provided an acceptable LC rate and minimal toxicities. Because local recurrence of tumors may result in patient death, a minimum dose of 21 Gy/3 fr or 25 Gy/5 fr or higher may be most suitable for treatment of these cases.

Molecular sub-group-specific immunophenotypic changes are associated with outcome in recurrent posterior fossa ependymoma

Better understanding of ependymoma (EPN) biology at relapse is needed to improve therapy at this critical event. Convincing data exist defining transcriptionally distinct posterior fossa (PF) sub-groups A and B at diagnosis. The clinical and biological consequence of these sub-groups at recurrence has not yet been defined. Genome and transcriptome microarray profiles and clinical variables of matched primary and first recurrent PF EPN pairs were used to identify biologically distinct patterns of progression between EPN sub-groups at recurrence. Key findings were validated by histology and immune function assays. Transcriptomic profiles were partially conserved at recurrence. However, 4 of 14 paired samples changed sub-groups at recurrence, and significant sub-group-specific transcriptomic changes between primary and recurrent tumors were identified, which were predominantly immune-related. Further examination revealed that Group A primary tumors harbor an immune gene signature and cellular functionality consistent with an immunosuppressive phenotype associated with tissue remodeling and wound healing. Conversely, Group B tumors develop an adaptive, antigen-specific immune response signature and increased T-cell infiltration at recurrence. Clinical distinctions between sub-groups become more apparent after first recurrence. Group A tumors were more often sub-totally resected and had a significantly shorter time to subsequent progression and worse overall survival. Minimal tumor-specific genomic changes were observed for either PF Groups A or B at recurrence. Molecular sub-groups of PF EPN convey distinct immunobiologic signatures at diagnosis and recurrence, providing potential biologic rationale to their disparate clinical outcomes. Immunotherapeutic approaches may be warranted, particularly in Group A PF EPN.