1
|
Mitchell JW, Sossi F, Miller I, Jaber PB, Das-Gupta Z, Fialho LS, Amos A, Austin JK, Badzik S, Baker G, Zeev BB, Bolton J, Chaplin JE, Cross JH, Chan D, Gericke CA, Husain AM, Lally L, Mbugua S, Megan C, Mesa T, Nuñez L, von Oertzen TJ, Perucca E, Pullen A, Ronen GM, Sajatovic M, Singh MB, Wilmshurst JM, Wollscheid L, Berg AT. Development of an International Standard Set of Outcomes and Measurement Methods for Routine Practice for Adults with Epilepsy: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Consensus Recommendations. Epilepsia 2024. [PMID: 38738754 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
At present, there is no internationally accepted set of core outcomes or measurement methods for epilepsy clinical practice. Therefore, the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) convened an international working group of experts in epilepsy, people with epilepsy and their representatives to develop minimum sets of standardized outcomes and outcomes measurement methods for clinical practice that support patient-clinician decision-making and quality improvement. Consensus methods identified 20 core outcomes. Measurement tools were recommended based on their evidence of strong clinical measurement properties, feasibility, and cross-cultural applicability. The essential outcomes included many non-seizure outcomes: anxiety, depression, suicidality, memory and attention, sleep quality, functional status, and the social impact of epilepsy. The proposed set will facilitate the implementation of the use of patient-centered outcomes in daily practice, ensuring holistic care. They also encourage harmonization of outcome measurement, and if widely implemented should reduce the heterogeneity of outcome measurement, accelerate comparative research, and facilitate quality improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W Mitchell
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology (ISMIB), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Frieda Sossi
- International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, London, UK
| | - Isabel Miller
- International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, London, UK
| | | | - Zofia Das-Gupta
- International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, London, UK
| | - Luz Sousa Fialho
- International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement, London, UK
| | - Action Amos
- International Bureau for Epilepsy, Africa Region, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Joan K Austin
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Scott Badzik
- Lived Experience Representative, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Gus Baker
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bruria Ben Zeev
- The Edmond and Lilly Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | | | | | - J Helen Cross
- Developmental Neurosciences Dept, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Derrick Chan
- KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Duke-NUS, Singapore
| | - Christian A Gericke
- The University of Queensland Medical School, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Aatif M Husain
- Duke University Medical Center and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lorraine Lally
- LLM (International Human Rights Law), LLM (Financial Services Law), Galway, Ireland
| | | | | | - Tomás Mesa
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Lilia Nuñez
- Centro Medico Nacional 20 de Noviembre, Médica Sur, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Tim J von Oertzen
- Department of Neurology 1, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Emilio Perucca
- Department of Medicine (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Gabriel M Ronen
- Department of Pediatrics, CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martha Sajatovic
- Departments of Psychiatry and of Neurology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Mamta B Singh
- All Indian Institute of Medicine Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Jo M Wilmshurst
- Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Anne T Berg
- Department of Neurology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grove BE, de Thurah A, Ivarsen P, Kvisgaard AK, Hjollund NH, Grytnes R, Schougaard LMV. Remote Symptom Monitoring Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e48173. [PMID: 38656781 PMCID: PMC11079764 DOI: 10.2196/48173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Denmark, outpatient follow-up for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is changing from in-hospital visits toward more remote health care delivery. The nonuse of remote patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is a well-known challenge, and it can be difficult to explain which mechanisms of interventions influence the outcome. Process evaluation may, therefore, be used to answer important questions on how and why interventions work, aiming to enhance the implications for clinical practice. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to provide insight into the intervention process by evaluating (1) the representativity of the study population, (2) patient and physician use patterns, (3) patient adherence to the intervention, and (4) clinical engagement. METHODS A process evaluation determining the reach, dose, fidelity, and clinical engagement was carried out, alongside a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). We developed and implemented an intervention using PRO measures to monitor outpatients remotely. Data were collected for the PRO intervention arms in the RCT from 4 sources: (1) PRO data from the participants to determine personal factors, (2) the web-based PRO system to identify key usage intervention patterns, (3) medical records to identify clinical factors relating to the use of the intervention, and (4) semistructured interviews conducted with involved physicians. RESULTS Of the 320 patients invited, 152 (47.5%) accepted to participate. The study population reflected the target population. The mean adherence rate to the PRO intervention arms was 82% (95% CI 76-87). The questionnaire response rate was 539/544 (99.1%). A minority of 13 (12.9%) of 101 patients needed assistance to complete study procedures. Physicians assessed 477/539 (88.5%) of the questionnaires. Contact was established in 417/539 (77.4%) of the cases, and 122/539 (22.6%) of the patients did not have contact. Physicians initiated 288/417 (69.1%) and patients requested 129/417 (30.9%) of all the contacts. The primary causes of contact were clinical data (242/417, 58%), PRO data (92/417, 22.1%), and medication concerns and precautionary reasons (83/417, 19.9%). Physicians found the use of PRO measures in remote follow-up beneficial for assessing the patient's health. The inclusion of self-reported clinical data in the questionnaire motivated physicians to assess patient responses. However, some barriers were emphasized, such as loss of a personal relationship with the patient and the risk of missing important symptoms in the absence of a face-to-face assessment. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the importance and practical use of remote monitoring among patients with CKD. Overall, the intervention was implemented as intended. We observed high patient adherence rates, and the physicians managed most questionnaires. Some physicians worried that distance from the patients made it unfeasible to use their "clinical glance," posing a potential risk of overlooking crucial patients' symptoms. These findings underscore key considerations for the implementation of remote follow-up. Introducing a hybrid approach combining remote and face-to-face consultations may address these concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03847766; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03847766.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgith Engelst Grove
- AmbuFlex, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Per Ivarsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Niels Henrik Hjollund
- AmbuFlex, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Regine Grytnes
- AmbuFlex, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Torbjørnsen A, Spildo I, Mollestad MA, Jensen AL, Singstad T, Weldingh NM, Joranger P, Ribu L, Holmen H. Investigating Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patient-Centered Diabetes Specialist Outpatient Care (DigiDiaS): Protocol for a Multimethod Prospective Observational Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e52766. [PMID: 38441955 PMCID: PMC10951827 DOI: 10.2196/52766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living with type 1 diabetes is challenging, and to support self-management, repeated consultations in specialist outpatient care are often required. The emergence of new digital solutions has revolutionized how health care services can be patient centered, providing unprecedented opportunities for flexible, high-quality care. However, there is a lack of studies exploring how the use of digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for flexible specialist care affects diabetes self-management. To provide new knowledge on the relevance of using PROMs in standard care, we have designed a multimethod prospective study. OBJECTIVE The overall aim of this protocol is to describe our prospective multimethod observational study designed to investigate digital PROMs in a routine specialist outpatient setting for flexible patient-centered diabetes care (DigiDiaS). METHODS This protocol outlines the design of a multimethod prospective observational cohort study that includes data from electronic health records, self-reported questionnaires, clinical consultation field observations, and individual in-depth interviews with patients and diabetes health care personnel. All patients with type 1 diabetes at a designated outpatient clinic were invited to participate and use the digital PROM implemented in clinical care. Both users and nonusers of the digital PROM were eligible for the prospective study, allowing for a comparison of the two groups. Data were collected at baseline and after 12 months, including self-management as the primary outcome assessed using the Patient Activation Measure, along with the secondary outcomes of digital health literacy, quality of life, health economy, and clinical variables such as glycated hemoglobin. RESULTS The digital solution was implemented for routine clinical care in the department in November 2021, and data collection for the prospective study started in October 2022. As of September 6, 2023, 84.6% (186/220) of patients among those in the digital PROM and 15.5% (34/220) of patients among the nonusers have consented to participate. We expect the study to have enough participants by the autumn of 2023. With 1 year of follow-up, the results are expected by spring 2025. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, a multimethod prospective observational cohort study can offer valuable insights into the relevance, effectiveness, and acceptability of digital tools using PROMs in diabetes specialist care. Such knowledge is crucial for achieving broad and successful implementation and use of these tools in a large diabetes outpatient clinic. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/52766.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Torbjørnsen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingeborg Spildo
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maria Aadland Mollestad
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Annesofie Lunde Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- SDCA-Steno Diabetes Centre, Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Tone Singstad
- Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Akershus, Norway
| | - Nina Mickelson Weldingh
- Division of Research and Innovation, Department of Research Support Service, Akershus University Hospital, Akershus, Norway
| | - Pål Joranger
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lis Ribu
- The Centre for Senior Citizen Staff, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Heidi Holmen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ravn S, Grønfeldt JM, Thaysen HV, Iversen LH. The impact of the extent of surgery on late adverse effects following cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:107105. [PMID: 38096698 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the impact of the surgical extent on late adverse effects (LAE) following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHOD A prospective cohort study including patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC due to peritoneal metastases from gastrointestinal tumour origin. From 2006 through 2019, consecutive patients treated with CRS + HIPEC were followed at 3, 6 and 12 months, and LAEs were assessed using the symptom scales and items from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Surgical extent was categorized into three groups (major, intermediate, minor) based on peritonectomy procedures and colorectal resections performed as part of CRS. EORTC data were analysed using a linear mixed effects regression model adjusted for age, gender, origin of tumour and comorbidity. RESULTS In total, 257 patients who responded to at least one questionnaire during the follow-ups were included. Only diarrhoea symptoms were positively associated with surgical extent (mean differences: major vs. minor: 8.4 (-0.5; 17.2) (p = 0.06) and major vs. intermediate: 10.9 (3.8; 18.0) (p = 0.00)). Additionally, diarrhoea symptoms persisted throughout the study period and did not change over time (mean difference 12-3 months: -3.6 (-9.1; 1.7) (p-value = 0.18)). Overall, the levels of different symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, and appetite loss) significantly decreased from 3 to 12 months. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing extensive CRS suffer from persistent impaired gastrointestinal function in terms of diarrhoea compared patients undergoing to less extensive surgery. Attention should be directed at detecting such LAE and to guide patients accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sissel Ravn
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Salmani H, Nasiri S, Ahmadi M. The advantages, disadvantages, threats, and opportunities of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in cancer: A systematic review. Digit Health 2024; 10:20552076241257146. [PMID: 38812853 PMCID: PMC11135117 DOI: 10.1177/20552076241257146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems hold promise for revolutionizing communication between cancer patients and healthcare providers across various care settings. This systematic review explores the multifaceted landscape of ePROs in cancer care, encompassing their advantages, disadvantages, potential risks, and opportunities for improvement. Methods In our systematic review, we conducted a rigorous search in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, employing comprehensive medical subject heading terms for ePRO and cancer, with no date limitations up to 2024. Studies were critically appraised and thematically analyzed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, including considerations of advantages, disadvantages, opportunities, and threats. Findings Analyzing 85 articles revealed 69 themes categorized into four key areas. Advantages (n = 14) were dominated by themes like "improved quality of life and care." Disadvantages (n = 26) included "limited access and technical issues." Security concerns and lack of technical skills were prominent threats (n = 10). Opportunities (n = 19) highlighted advancements in symptom management and potential solutions for technical challenges. Conclusion This review emphasizes the crucial role of continuous exploration, integration, and innovation in ePRO systems for optimizing patient outcomes in cancer care. Beyond traditional clinical settings, ePROs hold promise for applications in survivorship, palliative care, and remote monitoring. By addressing existing limitations and capitalizing on opportunities, ePROs can empower patients, enhance communication, and ultimately improve care delivery across the entire cancer care spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hosna Salmani
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Somayeh Nasiri
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Ahmadi
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Taramasco C, Rimassa C, Noël R, Bravo Storm ML, Sánchez C. Co-design of a Mobile App for Engaging Breast Cancer Patients in Reporting Health Experiences: Qualitative Case Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e45968. [PMID: 38010791 PMCID: PMC10714266 DOI: 10.2196/45968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization recommends incorporating patient-reported experience measures and patient-reported outcome measures to ensure care processes. New technologies, such as mobile apps, could help report and monitor patients' adverse effects and doubts during treatment. However, engaging patients in the daily use of mobile apps is a challenge that must be addressed in accordance with the needs of people. OBJECTIVE We present a qualitative case study documenting the process of identifying the information needs of breast cancer patients and health care professionals during the treatment process in a Chilean cancer institution. The study aims to identify patients' information requirements for integration into a mobile app that accompanies patients throughout their treatment while also providing features for reporting adverse symptoms. METHODS We conducted focus groups with breast cancer patients who were undergoing chemotherapy (n=3) or who completed chemotherapy between 3 months and 1 year (n=1). We also surveyed health care professionals (n=9) who were involved in patient care and who belonged to the oncology committee of the cancer center where the study took place. Content analysis was applied to the responses to categorize the information needs and the means to satisfy them. A user interface was designed according to the findings of the focus groups and was assessed by 3 trained information system and user interaction design experts from 2 countries, using heuristic evaluation guidelines for mobile apps. RESULTS Patients' information needs were classified into 4 areas: an overview of the disease, information on treatment and day-to-day affairs, assistance on the normality and abnormality of symptoms during treatment, and symptoms relevant to report. Health care professionals required patients to be provided with information on the administrative and financial process. We noted that the active involvement of the following 4 main actors is required to satisfy the information needs: patients, caregivers, social network moderators, and health professionals. Seven usability guidelines were extracted from the heuristic evaluation recommendations. CONCLUSIONS A mobile app that seeks to accompany breast cancer patients to report symptoms requires the involvement of multiple participants to handle the reports and day-to-day information needs. User interfaces must be designed with consideration of the patient's social conventions and the emotional load of the disease information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Taramasco
- Instituto de Tecnologías para la Innovación en Salud y Bienestar, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Andrés Bello, Viña del Mar, Chile
- Centro para la Prevención y el Control del Cáncer, Santiago, Chile
| | - Carla Rimassa
- Instituto de Tecnologías para la Innovación en Salud y Bienestar, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Andrés Bello, Viña del Mar, Chile
- Facultad de Medicina, Escuela de Fonoaudiología, Campus San Felipe, Universidad de Valparaíso, San Felipe, Chile
| | - René Noël
- Escuela de Ingeniería Informática, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
| | - María Loreto Bravo Storm
- Departamento de Hematología y Oncología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - César Sánchez
- Departamento de Hematología y Oncología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Matini L, Chapman TP, Kantschuster R, Wilson J, Tarafdar A, Hussain M, Song K, Simadibrata DM, Seeva P, White L, Slater J, Kormilitzin A, Collins G, Travis SPL, Walsh A. Development of the Escalation of Therapy or Intervention (ETI) Calculator for Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Using ePROMs. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1744-1751. [PMID: 37306285 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Digital collection of patient-reported outcome measures [PROMs] is largely unexplored as a basis for follow-up for patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. Our aim was to develop a model to predict the likelihood of escalation of therapy or intervention at an outpatient appointment that may be used to rationalize follow-up. METHODS TrueColours-IBD is a web-based, real-time, remote monitoring software that allows longitudinal collection of ePROMs. Data for prediction modelling were derived from a Development Cohort, guided by the TRIPOD statement. Logistic regression modelling used ten candidate items to predict escalation of therapy or intervention. An Escalation of Therapy or Intervention [ETI] calculator was developed, and applied in a Validation Cohort at the same centre. RESULTS The Development Cohort [n = 66] was recruited in 2016 and followed for 6 months [208 appointments]. From ten items, four significant predictors of ETI were identified: SCCAI, IBD Control-8, faecal calprotectin, and platelets. For practicality, a model with only SCCAI and IBD Control-8, both entered remotely by the patient, without the need for faecal calprotectin or blood tests was selected. Between 2018 and 2020, a Validation Cohort of 538 patients [1188 appointments] was examined. A 5% threshold on the ETI calculator correctly identified 343/388 [88%] escalations and 274/484 [57%] non-escalations. CONCLUSIONS A calculator based on digital, patient-entered data on symptoms and quality of life can predict whether a patient with UC requires escalation of therapy or intervention at an outpatient appointment. This may be used to streamline outpatient appointments for patients with UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence Matini
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Thomas P Chapman
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Richard's and Worthing Hospitals, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, West Sussex, UK
| | - Ramona Kantschuster
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jean Wilson
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Adib Tarafdar
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Moheez Hussain
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kaiyang Song
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Pavetha Seeva
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lydia White
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jessica Slater
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Gary Collins
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Simon P L Travis
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alissa Walsh
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Torbjørnsen A, Jensen AL, Singstad T, Weldingh NM, Holmen H. Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2023; 11:e003628. [PMID: 37963648 PMCID: PMC10649597 DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are increasingly used in clinical diabetes care to increase patient involvement and improve healthcare services. The objectives were to identify instruments used to measure PROs in outpatient diabetes clinics and to investigate the use of these PRO measures alongside the experiences of patients and healthcare personnel in a clinical setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A scoping review was conducted according to the framework of Arksey and O'Malley with scoping searches of Cinahl, EMBASE, Medline and Health and Psychosocial Instruments. Studies reporting on adults with diabetes in a clinical setting where the PRO measure response directly affected patient care were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS In total, 35 197 citations were identified, of which 7 reports presenting 4 different PRO measures were included in the review. All four of the included items measured psychosocial aspects of diabetes, and three included elements of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale. All the patients were satisfied with the use of PRO measures in clinical care, whereas the level of satisfaction among healthcare personnel with PRO measures varied within and among studies. CONCLUSIONS The limited number of eligible studies in this review suggests that research on PRO measures for diabetes outpatient care is scarce. Patients welcome the opportunity to express their concerns through the systematic collection of PRO measures, and some healthcare personnel value the broader insight that PRO measures provide into the impact of diabetes on patients' lives. However, the heterogeneity among services and among patients challenges the implementation of PRO measures. Research is needed to explore how PRO measures in clinical outpatient care affect healthcare personnel workflow. REVIEW REGISTRATION https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/46AHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Torbjørnsen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Annesofie Lunde Jensen
- Health Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Centre Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Tone Singstad
- Department of Endocrinology Outpatient Service, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway
| | | | - Heidi Holmen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- Intervention Centre, Oslo Universitetssykehus, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rasmussen SP, Schougaard LMV, Hjøllund NH, Christiansen DH. Patient-reported outcome measures as determinants for the utilization of health care among outpatients with epilepsy: a prognostic cohort study. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:103. [PMID: 37861867 PMCID: PMC10589170 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00641-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures can inform clinical decision making and planning of treatment in the health care system. The aim of this study was to examine whether patient-reported health domains influence the use of health care services in outpatients with epilepsy. METHODS This was a prognostic cohort study of 2,426 epilepsy outpatients referred to PRO-based follow-up at the Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Patients filled out a questionnaire covering health literacy areas, self-efficacy, well-being and general health. The main outcome was a record of contact to the epilepsy outpatient clinic, inpatient ward and/or emergency room within 1 year, retrieved from health register data. Associations were analysed by multivariable binomial logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 2,017 patients responded to the questionnaire and 1,961 were included in the final analyses. An outpatient contact was more likely among patients with very low health literacy ('social support'): odds ratio (OR) 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1-2.1), very low and low self-efficacy: OR 1.7 (95% CI: 1.2-2.3) and OR 1.4 (95% CI: 1.0-1.8), low and medium well-being: OR 2.2 (95% CI: 1.6-3.0) and OR 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.9), and patients rating their general health as fair: OR 2.8 (95% CI: 1.7-4.6). Inpatient contact and emergency room contact were associated with the health domains of self-efficacy and general health. CONCLUSIONS PRO questionnaire data indicated that patients with low health literacy ("social support"), well-being, self-efficacy and self-rated general health had an increased use of health care services at 1 year.These results suggest that PRO measures may provide useful information in relation to the possibility of proactive efforts and prevention of disease-related issues and to help identify efficiency options regarding resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Primdahl Rasmussen
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Gødstrup Hospital, Hospitalsparken 15, Herning, 7400, Denmark
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Møllegade 16, Herning, 7400, Denmark
| | - Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Møllegade 16, Herning, 7400, Denmark
| | - Niels Henrik Hjøllund
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Møllegade 16, Herning, 7400, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
| | - David Høyrup Christiansen
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Gødstrup Hospital, Hospitalsparken 15, Herning, 7400, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, Aarhus, 8200, Denmark.
- Elective Surgery Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Falkevej 1A, Silkeborg, 8600, Denmark.
- Centre for Research in Health and Nursing, Research, Regional Hospital Central Jutland, Heibergs Allé 2K, Viborg, 8800, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schougaard LMV, Knudsen LR, Grove BE, Vestergaard JM, Hjollund NH, Hauge EM, de Thurah A. Socioeconomic, Disease-Related, and Personal Factors Associated With Participation in Remote Follow-Up in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:2044-2053. [PMID: 36785998 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify socioeconomic, disease-related, and personal factors associated with participation in remote follow-up in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Following the implementation of a patient-reported outcome-based remote follow-up intervention in RA patients in Denmark, a cross-sectional study was conducted among 775 prevalent patients. In 2019, an electronic questionnaire was sent to eligible RA patients, covering health literacy and patient experience regarding involvement and confidence with remote care. Questionnaire data were linked to nationwide registries regarding socioeconomic status, labor market affiliation, and comorbidity level. Associations between registry- and questionnaire-based factors and remote follow-up were analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS All 775 patients were included in the registry-based analyses, but only 394 of 646 (61%) completed the questionnaire. No attachment to the labor market or low household income was associated with lower odds of remote follow-up participation (odds ratio [OR] 0.53 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.34-0.83]) and (OR 0.69 [95% CI 0.48-1.00]). Further, a high level of comorbidity was associated with lower odds of remote follow-up participation compared to a low/medium level of comorbidity (OR 0.53 [95% CI 0.34-0.81]). No association was found between health literacy and remote follow-up, but remote follow-up attendees reported more confidence in remote care (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.21-1.47]). CONCLUSION Participation in remote follow-up was associated with attachement to the labor market, household income, degree of comorbidity, and confidence with remote care. Additional research is necessary to investigate whether a larger and more divergent group of RA patients should be considered for inclusion in remote follow-up programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Line R Knudsen
- Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Niels H Hjollund
- Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark, and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rodkjaer LØ, Storgaard M, Sørensen NT, Schougaard LMV. Levels of health literacy among people living with HIV in outpatient care: a cross-sectional study from Denmark. AIDS Res Ther 2023; 20:59. [PMID: 37633910 PMCID: PMC10463697 DOI: 10.1186/s12981-023-00562-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low health literacy (HL) among people living with HIV (PLWHIV) encounter more disease related complications, more difficulty understanding health-related information and low adherence. Considering that, the HL levels among PLWHIV needs to be further investigated. The objective of this study was to investigate the levels of HL and patient involvement among PLWHIV in an outpatient clinic in Denmark. A second objective was to examine differences in HL levels across socio-demographic characteristics. METHODS In 2019, a population of 682 PLWHIV from a Danish outpatient hospital clinic were enrolled in cross-sectional study. Patients who had a digital postbox received an electronic questionnaire including following domains; health literacy, patient involvement, and socio-demographic status. Health literacy was measured using the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) through scores on three subscales: social support for health (HLQ4), engaging with healthcare providers (HLQ6), and understanding health information (HLQ9). An unpaired t-test was used to investigate mean differences in the HLQ scores across socio-demographic variables. RESULTS A total of 338 (55%) patients responded to the questionnaire. The included participants demonstrated high levels of HLQ4 (mean = 4.2) and HLQ6 (mean = 4.2), but lower for HLQ9 (mean = 2.9). In total 70-80% reported being involved in decisions about their health. We found a positive association between high level of HL (HLQ9) and living with a partner and higher levels of HL (HLQ4, HLQ6, and HLQ9) and employment. CONCLUSION PLWHIV in a Danish out-patient care population were found to have high levels of HL despite differences in demographic characteristics. Further research is needed to examine the levels of HL among non-responders to develop HL approaches and strategies to meet the needs of individuals with different HL skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte Ørneborg Rodkjaer
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Merete Storgaard
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Center for Patient-reported Outcomes, AmbuFlex, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Anderson NE, Kyte D, McMullan C, Cockwell P, Aiyegbusi OL, Verdi R, Calvert M. Global use of electronic patient-reported outcome systems in nephrology: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070927. [PMID: 37438075 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems to support the management of patients with chronic kidney disease is increasing. This mixed-methods study aimed to comprehensively identify existing and developing ePRO systems, used in nephrology settings globally, ascertaining key characteristics and factors for successful implementation. STUDY DESIGN ePRO systems and developers were identified through a scoping review of the literature and contact with field experts. Developers were invited to participate in a structured survey, to summarise key system characteristics including: (1) system objectives, (2) population, (3) PRO measures used, (4) level of automation, (5) reporting, (6) integration into workflow and (7) links to electronic health records/national registries. Subsequent semistructured interviews were conducted to explore responses. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Eligible systems included those being developed or used in nephrology settings to assess ePROs and summarise results to care providers. System developers included those with a key responsibility for aspects of the design, development or implementation of an eligible system. ANALYTICAL APPROACH Structured survey data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Interview transcripts were analysed using Codebook Thematic Analysis using domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS Fifteen unique ePRO systems were identified across seven countries; 10 system developers completed the structured survey and 7 participated in semistructured interviews. Despite system heterogeneity, reported features required for effective implementation included early and sustained patient involvement, clinician champions and expanding existing electronic platforms to integrate ePROs. Systems demonstrated several common features, with the majority being implemented within research settings, thereby affecting system implementation readiness for real-world application. CONCLUSIONS There has been considerable research investment in ePRO systems. The findings of this study outline key system features and factors to support the successful implementation of ePROs in routine kidney care.Cite Now.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Elizabeth Anderson
- Institute of Applied Heath Research, Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Research, Development and Innovation, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Derek Kyte
- Institute of Applied Heath Research, Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Christel McMullan
- Institute of Applied Heath Research, Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR SRMRC, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paul Cockwell
- Institute of Applied Heath Research, Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Institute of Applied Heath Research, Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rav Verdi
- Patient Partner, Institute of Applied Health Research,Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Institute of Applied Heath Research, Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR SRMRC, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Skovsgaard CV, Kruse M, Hjollund N, Maribo T, de Thurah A. Cost-effectiveness of a telehealth intervention in rheumatoid arthritis: economic evaluation of the Telehealth in RA (TeRA) randomized controlled trial. Scand J Rheumatol 2023; 52:118-128. [PMID: 35048793 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2021.2008604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Telehealth is rapidly gaining ground from usual treatment, not least because of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) measures. Within rheumatology, telehealth has been used for, inter alia, follow-up for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with low disease activity or in remission. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of such a telehealth intervention. METHOD In a randomized controlled trial, 294 patients were randomized into patient-reported outcome-based telehealth follow-up by either a nurse (PRO-TN) or a rheumatologist (PRO-TR) or to conventional outpatient follow-up (control). Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Individual-level healthcare and productivity costs were retrieved from national Danish registers. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for the intervention groups compared to the control group. Bootstrapping with 10 000 replications was used to obtain confidence intervals. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were generated. RESULTS The cost comparison showed that PRO-TR was significantly less costly than the control group, whereas the relative reduction in costs for PRO-TN was not significant. The telehealth groups experienced minor, non-significant declines in QALYs, whereas the control group experienced a slight, non-significant increase. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed that for PRO-TR, the willingness to accept a QALY loss was 89 328 EUR. A similar but smaller and non-significant result was seen for PRO-TN. CONCLUSION PRO-TR and PRO-TN seem to cost less but provide broadly similar health outcomes compared with conventional follow-up. Between the intervention groups, PRO-TR was significantly less costly. More studies are needed to conclude whether rheumatologist- or nurse-led telehealth is more cost-effective than conventional follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C V Skovsgaard
- Department of Public Health, Danish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - M Kruse
- Department of Public Health, Danish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Nhi Hjollund
- AmbuFlex, Center for Patient-reported Outcomes, Hospital Unit West Jutland, Herning, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - T Maribo
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Public Health and Rehabilitation Research, DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - A de Thurah
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Remote follow-up based on patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: A qualitative study of patient perspectives. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0281393. [PMID: 36763600 PMCID: PMC9916608 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in outpatient follow-up. PRO-based remote follow-up offers a new healthcare delivery model, where PROs are used as the basis for outpatient follow-up in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, the patient's perspective of this novel remote care delivery remains unknown. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore the patients' experiences using PROs in remote care and how this mode of follow-up may enhance patient engagement. DESIGN A qualitative approach was employed, guided by Focused Ethnography and Interpretive Description. PARTICIPANTS Purposively, 15 patients with chronic kidney disease experienced with PRO-based remote follow-up in 3 renal outpatient clinics in the Central Denmark Region, were recruited. MEASURES Field studies comprising participant observation in remote PRO consultations and individual, semi-structured interviews with the patients constituted the empirical data. Thematic analysis was performed according to Braun and Clarke's six-phase process. RESULTS PRO-based remote follow-up may enhance patient engagement by a) improving communication, b) increasing disease knowledge, c) inducing flexibility, d) ensuring clinician feedback on PRO data, and e) prompting clinical action. Barriers to enhanced patient engagement were identified as a) lack of feedback on PRO data, b) lower disease knowledge, c) PRO in competition with biomedical data, and d) loss of personal relation. CONCLUSION PRO-based follow-up in remote care holds several advantages for the patients. However, some barriers need clinical awareness before PROs may enhance the patients' engagement in remote follow-up. Future studies should explore the impact of involving relatives in PRO-based follow-up.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bergholdt SH, Hansen DG, Johnsen AT, Boman BS, Jensen PT. A NEw MOdel of individualized and patient-centered follow-up for women with gynecological cancer (the NEMO study)-protocol and rationale of a randomized clinical trial. Trials 2023; 24:74. [PMID: 36726187 PMCID: PMC9890753 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-07022-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up programs for gynecological cancer patients are currently under revision. There is limited evidence that traditional follow-up and clinical examinations improve survival in an early-stage gynecological setting. Further, traditional follow-up programs fail to accommodate the patient's need for psychosocial and sexual supportive care and to actively involve patients and their relatives in the follow-up process. Individualized programs may replace traditional routine follow-up with fixed intervals and length. Focusing on alarm-symptoms and self-reporting may ensure detection of recurrence while allowing a continuous attention to the patient's well-being and return to daily life. In this study, a nurse-led, individualized, and need-based intervention with a specific focus on patient empowerment is tested against a standard physician-led model primarily focusing on the detection of recurrence. METHODS The study is designed as a clinical, randomized trial conducted in one of four national onco-gynecological centers in Denmark. Patients with early-stage cervical or endometrial cancer are eligible for inclusion. The intervention group undergoes individualized, nurse-led follow-up supporting patient empowerment including repeated use of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) before each contact as a dialogue support tool. The follow-up contacts are mainly conducted by telephone. All project nurses attended a special training program before project start and are all well-educated and dedicated onco-gynecological nurses. The control group receives standard, physician-led, follow-up without use of ePROMs or specific focus on empowerment. The effect of the intervention is evaluated by questionnaires completed by patients at baseline (3 months after surgery) and 12, 18, and 36 months after surgery. Outcomes include empowerment using the Skill and technique subscale of the HEI-Q questionnaire as the primary outcome while fear of cancer recurrence and health-related quality of life as well as the remaining subscales of the HEI-Q represent secondary outcomes. Data is collected by use of the REDCap technology, which also provides a customized visual support function for the dialogue tool. DISCUSSION This study will provide new information about follow-up in early-stage gynecological cancer settings and thereby contribute to improvement of future follow-up programs. Importantly, the study will provide knowledge about the impact of specific focus on patient empowerment in follow-up programs and, further, how to facilitate empowerment among patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: ID no. NCT03838861. Registered on 6 February 2019. Protocol version 2, issue date 21 November 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stinne Holm Bergholdt
- grid.10825.3e0000 0001 0728 0170Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark ,grid.7143.10000 0004 0512 5013Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Dorte Gilsaa Hansen
- grid.7143.10000 0004 0512 5013Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark ,grid.10825.3e0000 0001 0728 0170Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark ,grid.10825.3e0000 0001 0728 0170Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anna Thit Johnsen
- grid.10825.3e0000 0001 0728 0170Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark ,grid.476266.7Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | | | - Pernille Tine Jensen
- grid.10825.3e0000 0001 0728 0170Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark ,grid.154185.c0000 0004 0512 597XDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark ,grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aiyegbusi OL, Hughes SE, Peipert JD, Schougaard LMV, Wilson R, Calvert MJ. Reducing the pressures of outpatient care: the potential role of patient-reported outcomes. J R Soc Med 2023; 116:44-64. [PMID: 36758615 PMCID: PMC9944235 DOI: 10.1177/01410768231152222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The global demand for hospital treatment exceeds capacity.The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated this issue, leading to increased backlogs and longer wait times for patients. The amount of outpatient attendances undertaken in many settings is still below pre-pandemic levels and this, combined with delayed referrals, means that patients are facing delays in treatment and poorer health outcomes. Use of digital health technologies, notably the use of remote symptom monitoring systems based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), may offer a solution to reduce outpatient waiting lists and tailor care to those in greatest need. Drawing on international examples, the authors explore the use of electronic PRO systems to triage clinical care. We summarise the key benefits of the approach and also highlight the challenges for implementation, which need to be addressed to promote equitable healthcare delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,NIHR Oxford-Birmingham Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sarah E Hughes
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,NIHR Oxford-Birmingham Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - John Devin Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, 7400, Herning, Denmark
| | - Roger Wilson
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,NIHR Oxford-Birmingham Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Torenholt R, Langstrup H. Between a logic of disruption and a logic of continuation: Negotiating the legitimacy of algorithms used in automated clinical decision-making. Health (London) 2023; 27:41-59. [PMID: 33685260 DOI: 10.1177/1363459321996741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
In both popular and academic discussions of the use of algorithms in clinical practice, narratives often draw on the decisive potentialities of algorithms and come with the belief that algorithms will substantially transform healthcare. We suggest that this approach is associated with a logic of disruption. However, we argue that in clinical practice alongside this logic, another and less recognised logic exists, namely that of continuation: here the use of algorithms constitutes part of an established practice. Applying these logics as our analytical framing, we set out to explore how algorithms for clinical decision-making are enacted by political stakeholders, healthcare professionals, and patients, and in doing so, study how the legitimacy of delegating to an algorithm is negotiated and obtained. Empirically we draw on ethnographic fieldwork carried out in relation to attempts in Denmark to develop and implement Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) tools - involving algorithmic sorting - in clinical practice. We follow the work within two disease areas: heart rehabilitation and breast cancer follow-up care. We show how at the political level, algorithms constitute tools for disrupting inefficient work and unsystematic patient involvement, whereas closer to the clinical practice, algorithms constitute a continuation of standardised and evidence-based diagnostic procedures and a continuation of the physicians' expertise and authority. We argue that the co-existence of the two logics have implications as both provide a push towards the use of algorithms and how a logic of continuation may divert attention away from new issues introduced with automated digital decision-support systems.
Collapse
|
18
|
Astradsson A, Sørensen NT, Graversen AS, Nemeiko I, Bilgin-Freiert A, Stephansen LV, Einarsson HB, Schougaard LMV, Juhler M, Hansen TS. Hydroflex: Use of Patient Reported Outcomes in a Clinical Setting Among Patients with Hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg 2023; 169:e67-e72. [PMID: 36270591 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND A patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure is defined as "any report of the status of a patient's health condition that comes directly from the patient without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else". PRO data are increasingly being used in health care to facilitate monitoring of symptoms, facilitate communication between patients and clinicians, facilitate early identification of problems, and reduce unnecessary outpatient appointments for stable patients. METHODS We have designed a PRO system specifically for hydrocephalus, a program named Hydroflex. The aim of Hydroflex is to use PRO measures to decide the need for clinical attention and let the patients report their need regarding a physical consultation. Patients receive questionnaires at home instead of having prescheduled appointments at the outpatient clinic. Based on an automated algorithm, the patients' PRO measures are ranked to help clinical decision-making. RESULTS In this paper, we describe the implementation and early experience of Hydroflex at our institution. CONCLUSIONS It is our belief that Hydroflex provides more continuity in the treatment of patients with hydrocephalus. Also, it provides for a more standardized follow-up scheme, and we postulate this will lead to improved patient satisfaction and involvement and fewer outpatient appointments. Also, Hydroflex is useful for quality control and prospective research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnar Astradsson
- Department of neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Nanna Toxvig Sørensen
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | | | - Ivona Nemeiko
- Department of neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
- AmbuFlex - Center for Patient-reported Outcomes, Central Denmark Region, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | - Marianne Juhler
- Department of neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Toft BS, Rodkjaer L, Andersen AB, de Thurah A, Nielsen B, Nielsen CP, Hørlück JT, Kallestrup L, Schougaard LMV, Ludvigsen MS, Hoybye MT, Ellegaard T, Bekker H. Measures used to assess interventions for increasing patient involvement in Danish healthcare setting: a rapid review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e064067. [PMID: 36572495 PMCID: PMC9806071 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify measures used within Denmark evaluating any type of intervention designed to facilitate patient involvement in healthcare. DESIGN Environmental scan employing rapid review methods. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PsycInfo and CINAHL were searched from 6-9 April 2021 from database inception up to the date of the search. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Quantitative, observational and mixed methods studies with empirical data on outcomes used to assess any type of intervention aiming to increase patient involvement with their healthcare. Language limitations were Danish and English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers extracted data from 10% of the included studies and, due to their agreement, the data from the rest were extracted by first author. Data were analysed with reference to existing categories of measuring person-centred care; findings were synthesised using narrative summaries. Adapted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines were used to guide reporting. RESULTS Among 3767 records, 43 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 74 different measures used to evaluate interventions aimed at increasing patient involvement within healthcare in Danish hospital and community settings. Generic measures assessed: patient engagement (n=3); supporting self-management (n=8); supporting shared decision-making (n=9); patient satisfaction and experiences of care (n=11); health-related patient-reported outcome (n=20). CONCLUSIONS Across Denmark, complex interventions designed to improve patient involvement with healthcare vary in their goals and content. Some targeting healthcare professionals, some patient health literacy and some service infrastructure. A plethora of measures assess the impact of these interventions on patient, professional and service delivery outcomes. Few measures assessed patient involvement directly, and it is unclear which proxy measures capture indicators of perceived involvement. Lack of conceptual clarity between intervention goals, the components of change and measures makes it difficult to see what types of intervention can best support change in services to ensure patients are more effectively involved in their healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Skovsby Toft
- Research Centre of Patient Involvement, Århus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lotte Rodkjaer
- Research Centre of Patient Involvement, Århus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne Bendix Andersen
- Research Centre of Health and Welfare Technology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Berit Nielsen
- Department of Public Health, DEFACTUM - Public Health and Quality Improvement, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen
- Department of Public Health, DEFACTUM - Public Health and Quality Improvement, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Jens Thusgård Hørlück
- Social and Health Services and Labour Market, Defactum, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark
| | - Lisbeth Kallestrup
- Department of Quality and Patient Involvement, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Mette Spliid Ludvigsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Midtjylland, Denmark
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodo, Nordland, Norway
| | - Mette Terp Hoybye
- Interdisciplinary Research Unit, Elective Surgery Center, Regionshospitalet Silkeborg, Silkeborg, Midtjylland, Denmark
| | | | - Hilary Bekker
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Holmen H, Singstad T, Ribu L, Jensen AL, Weldingh NM, Torbjørnsen A. Adapting a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Digital Outpatient Specialist Health Care Services for Type 1 Diabetes: User Involvement Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2022; 9:e38678. [DOI: 10.2196/38678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Diabetes self-management is crucial for patients with type 1 diabetes, and digital services can support their self-management and facilitate flexible follow-up. The potential of using digital patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in routine outpatient care is not fully used owing to a lack of adapted PRO measures.
Objective
This study presents the process of identifying and adapting a digital PRO measure for use in clinical diabetes practice and describes the preferred item topics of the adapted PRO measure, as reported by patients and diabetes specialist nurses.
Methods
With the involvement of patients, diabetes specialist nurses, management, and researchers, we hosted a series of workshops and 2 dialogue conferences. Scoping searches to identify relevant PRO measures formed the foundation for the process. An in-person dialogue conference was conducted with diabetes specialist nurses as participants, and a digital dialogue conference was conducted with patients with type 1 diabetes as participants. A diabetes-specific PRO measure was translated and adapted to our digital platform. Notes and summaries from the dialogue conferences were imported into NVivo (QSR International) and thematically analyzed as a single combined data set.
Results
The thematic analysis of the 2 dialogue conferences aimed to explore the views of patients with type 1 diabetes and diabetes specialist nurses on the outcomes necessary to measure. An overarching theme, Ensuring that the PRO measure captures the patients’ needs precisely and accurately, in a way that facilitates care and communication with health care personnel, was identified and supported with data from both the patients and diabetes specialist nurses. This theme contained four categories: The need for explanatory text after questions to ensure understanding and accurate response, Capturing individual needs in standardized questions, getting to the heart of the patient’s problem, and The questions increase patient reflection.
Conclusions
We successfully conducted an iterative process that identified a PRO measure aligned with the topics raised by the diabetes specialist nurses. Similarly, the patients found the PRO measure to be relevant and one that was addressing their needs. Only minor adjustments were necessary when programming the PRO measure in the digital platform. Our management, patients, and diabetes specialist nurses had a valuable impact on the results. User involvement facilitated a specific focus on the clinical requests to be met by PRO measures and how they must be adapted to local and digital platforms. Overall, this has facilitated the current implementation of the adapted digital PRO measure.
Collapse
|
21
|
Glintborg B, Jensen DV, Terslev L, Hendricks O, Østergaard M, Horskjær Rasmussen S, Jensen MP, Adelsten T, Colic A, Danebod K, Kildemand M, Loft AG, Munk HL, Pedersen JK, Østgård RD, Møller Sørensen C, Krogh NS, Agerbo J, Ziegler C, Hetland ML. Nationwide, large-scale implementation of an online system for remote entry of patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology: characteristics of users and non-users and time to first entry. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002549. [PMID: 36418086 PMCID: PMC9685239 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims In May 2020, a nationwide, web-based system for remote entry of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in inflammatory rheumatic diseases was launched and implemented in routine care (DANBIO-from-home). After 1.5 years of use, we explored clinical characteristics of patients who did versus did not use the system, and the time to first entry of PROs. Methods All patients followed in DANBIO were informed about DANBIO-from-home by electronic invitations or when attending their clinic. Characteristics of patients who did/did not use DANBIO-from-home in the period after implementation were explored by multivariable logistic regression analyses including demographic and clinical variables (gender, age group, diagnosis, disease duration, use of biological disease-modifying agent (bDMARD), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Patient Acceptable Symptom Scale (PASS)). Time from launch to first entry was presented as cumulative incidence curves by age group (<40/40–60/61–80/>80 years). Results Of 33 776 patients, 68% entered PROs using DANBIO-from-home at least once. Median (IQR) time to first entry was 27 (11–152) days. Factors associated with data entry in multivariate analyses (OR (95% CI)) were: female gender (1.19 (1.12 to 1.27)), bDMARD treatment (1.41 (1.33 to 1.50)), age 40–60 years (1.79 (1.63 to 1.97)), 61–80 years (1.87 (1.70 to 2.07), or age >80 years (0.57 (0.50 to 0.65)) (reference: age <40 years), lower HAQ (0.68 (0.65 to 0.71)) and PASS ‘no’ (1.09 (1.02 to 1.17). Diagnosis was not associated. Time to first entry of PROs was longest in patients <40 years of age (119 (24–184) days) and shortest in the 61–80 years age group (25 (8–139) days). Conclusion A nationwide online platform for PRO in rheumatology achieved widespread use. Higher age, male gender, conventional treatment and disability were associated with no use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Lene Terslev
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Oliver Hendricks
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Simon Horskjær Rasmussen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Mogens Pfeiffer Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Thomas Adelsten
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital Koge, Koge, Denmark
| | - Ada Colic
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital Koge, Koge, Denmark
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Malene Kildemand
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Heidi Lausten Munk
- Rheumatology Research Unit, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jens Kristian Pedersen
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Jette Agerbo
- Danish Rheumatism Association/Gigtforeningen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Connie Ziegler
- Danish Rheumatism Association/Gigtforeningen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Electronic patient-reported outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2022; 18:739-740. [PMID: 35995857 PMCID: PMC9395843 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00619-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
23
|
Karlsen IL, Svendsen PA, Abildgaard JS. A review of smartphone applications designed to improve occupational health, safety, and well-being at workplaces. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1520. [PMID: 35948904 PMCID: PMC9364491 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13821-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As smartphones become more widespread, software applications for occupational health, safety and well-being (OHS&W) at work are increasing. There is sparse knowledge about the available apps and the research evidence of their effects. This study aims to identify available smartphone applications designed to improve OHS&W at workplaces, and examine to what extent the apps are scientifically validated. Methods We searched the Danish App Store and Google Play for free OHS&W apps. Apps were included if they targeted OHS&W and were designed for workplace use. After categorizing the apps, we searched bibliographic databases to identify scientific studies on the ‘intervention apps’. Results Altogether, 57 apps were included in the study; 19 apps were categorized as digital sources of information, 37 apps contained an intervention designed for workplace changes, and one app had too sparse information to be classified. Based on the publicly available information about the 37 intervention apps, only 13 had references to research. The bibliographic database search returned 531 publications, resulting in four relevant studies referring to four apps aimed at ergonomic measures, noise exposure, and well-being, which showed either limited effect or methodological limitations. Conclusion There is no conceptual clarity about what can be categorized as an OHS&W app. Although some of the apps were developed based on scientific research, there is a need to evaluate the apps’ effects in promoting OHS&W. The sparse documentation of evidence should be kept in mind when applying apps to improve OHS&W. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13821-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iben Louise Karlsen
- The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Peter Aske Svendsen
- The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, A. C. Meyers Vænge 15, 2450, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Johan Simonsen Abildgaard
- The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Organization, Copenhagen Business School, Kilevej 14A, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Eriksen J, Bygholm A, Bertelsen P. The association between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient participation in chronic care: A scoping review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:1852-1864. [PMID: 35090802 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly applied in chronic care due to their many functionalities and synergies with current healthcare policies. The participatory potential of PROs is especially emphasised in the Danish context. This review scrutinises the association between PRO and patient participation in chronic care. METHODS This scoping review adheres to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and the synthesis is based on narrative and thematic analyses. RESULTS Eighty-four articles were deemed eligible. The association between PRO and patient participation regards seven themes: PRO development, response rates and patient burden, patient empowerment and self-management, display and quality of data, patient-clinician communication, shared decision-making, and organisational and attitudinal aspects. Lack of knowledge, actor attitudes, organisational setup, and technological infrastructure act as the main barriers. CONCLUSION The connection between PROs and patient participation is dialectic and unfolds in three phases-before, during, and after patient-clinician consultation. Knowledge regarding the last phase is particularly scarce. Henceforth, studies should address how to include a broader segment of patients, PROs participatory effects over time and PROs impact on patients' everyday lives. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The review provides knowledge concerning the association between PROs and patient participation to enhance future chronic care, research, and discussions in the area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe Eriksen
- Department of Planning, Techno-Anthropology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Ann Bygholm
- Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Pernille Bertelsen
- Department of Planning, Techno-Anthropology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Appel CW, Pedersen SC, Nielsen AS, Larsen BF. Telemedicine based on patient-reported outcomes in management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in a real-life setting - a before and after cohort study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 57:825-831. [PMID: 35195491 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2041083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Avoidable appointments and increasing incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) call for alternative ways of organizing outpatient visits. In controlled studies, telemedicine including patient reported outcome (PRO) has shown to improve outcomes in IBD and reduce health care utilization. However, we lack studies of telemedicine implemented in everyday practice. We therefore described use of a PRO-based telemedicine follow-up (AmbuIBD) in a real-life setting and investigated the effect on outpatient visits and hospital admissions. METHODS We conducted a cohort study including patients with IBD in an outpatient clinic at a Danish regional hospital August 2018. Data included extracts from the Patient Administration System and the AmbuFlex system between 2017 and August 2018, plus questionnaire data from clinicians. Descriptive statistics were used to describe use of AmbuIBD and differences between before and after results were tested with Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. RESULTS Of 848 patients in outpatient care, 77% were included in AmbuIBD. Most patients were set to answer a PRO questionnaire once a year (n = 407, 62%), and 66% of 1913 answered questionnaires were handled with no further contact. AmbuIBD was well accepted by clinicians. Outpatient visits the year after AmbuIBD compared to the year before were reduced with 14% (p ≤ .001). The largest reduction was for patients with mild or no disease activity (45%, p ≤ .001). No difference was found for hospital admissions. CONCLUSIONS AmbuIBD is feasible and well accepted when implemented in an outpatient clinic. More than half of patients are only followed by questionnaire, and we found a reduction in outpatient visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte W Appel
- Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Sarah Christine Pedersen
- Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Amalie Søgaard Nielsen
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Birgit Furstrand Larsen
- Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Laurberg T, Schougaard LMV, Hjollund NHI, Lomborg KE, Hansen TK, Jensen AL. Randomized controlled study to evaluate the impact of flexible patient-controlled visits in people with type 1 diabetes: The DiabetesFlex Trial. Diabet Med 2022; 39:e14791. [PMID: 35028992 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM The objective of this study was to assess the impact of health care-initiated visits versus patient-controlled flexible visits on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in people with type 1 diabetes. METHODS The DiabetesFlex trial was a randomized controlled, pragmatic non-inferiority 15-month follow-up study comparing standard care (face-to-face visits every 4 months) with DiabetesFlex (patient-controlled flexible visits using patient-reported, outcome-based telehealth follow-up). Of 343 enrolled participants, 160 in each group completed the study. The primary outcome was mean change in HbA1c from baseline to 15-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were blood pressure, lipid levels, frequency of visits, the World Health Organization score-five well-being-index (WHO-5), the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) scale and experience of participation in own care (participation score). RESULTS The adjusted mean difference in HbA1c between standard care and DiabetesFlex was similar and below the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.4% (-0.03% [95%CI: 0.15, 0.11]/-0.27 mmol/mol [-1.71, 1.16]). No intergroup mean changes in lipid or blood pressure were observed. Conversely, DiabetesFlex participants presented an increased mean WHO-5 index of 4.5 (1.3, 7.3), participation score of 1.1 (0.5, 2.0), and decreased PAID score of -4.8 (-7.1, -2.6) compared with standard care. During follow-up, DiabetesFlex participants actively changed 23% of face-to-face visits to telephone consultations, cancelled more visits (17% vs. 9%), and stayed away without cancellation less often (2% vs. 8%). CONCLUSION Compared with standard care, flexible patient-controlled visits combined with patient-reported outcomes in participants with metabolic controlled type 1 diabetes and good psychological well-being further improved diabetes-related well-being and decreased face-to-face visits while maintaining safe diabetes management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tinne Laurberg
- Steno Diabetes Centre Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Liv Marit Valen Schougaard
- AmbuFlex, Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark
- ResCenPI - Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark
| | - Niels Henrik Ingvar Hjollund
- AmbuFlex, Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Elisabeth Lomborg
- ResCenPI - Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Troels Krarup Hansen
- Steno Diabetes Centre Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Annesofie Lunde Jensen
- Steno Diabetes Centre Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- ResCenPI - Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nielsen AS, Hanna L, Larsen BF, Appel CW, Osborne RH, Kayser L. Readiness, acceptance and use of digital patient reported outcome in an outpatient clinic. Health Informatics J 2022; 28:14604582221106000. [PMID: 35658693 DOI: 10.1177/14604582221106000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Use of digital patient-reported outcomes is being introduced in care of chronic conditions, including Inflammatory Bowel Disease. The aim is to supplement face-to-face follow-up sessions through symptom screening, and to inform follow-up through questions about mental health and quality of life. However, little is known about who is using this as intended. This study aimed to map differences between users and non-users among people with IBD and explore the mechanisms behind. We administered a questionnaire including the Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (ReadHy) and the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ) to all people with IBD registered at Silkeborg Regional Hospital. Comparison between users and non-users and cluster analysis was conducted. Effect size (Cohen's d) was used to estimate magnitude of difference between groups. The user and non-user groups differed most strongly by level of emotional distress (d = 0.45). Cluster analysis of the ReadHy scales showed profiles have different sets of difficulties and reservations towards digital solutions. These difficulties correlated moderately with SUTAQ dissatisfaction and low acceptability. The dimensions of ReadHy may help to better understand particular needs of people with IBD when accessing digital PROs, which may lead to higher acceptability and improved quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalie Søgaard Nielsen
- Department of Public Health, 4321University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; School of Health and Social Development, 2104Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lisa Hanna
- School of Health and Social Development, 95522Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Birgit Furstrand Larsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Charlotte W Appel
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Kayser
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Geriatric screening in older adults with cancer using electronic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) – A feasible approach in a resource-limited setting. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:880-884. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
29
|
Gu Y, Yang X, Tian L, Yang H, Lv J, Yang C, Wang J, Xi J, Kong G, Zhang W. Structure-Aware Siamese Graph Neural Networks for Encounter-Level Patient Similarity Learning. J Biomed Inform 2022; 127:104027. [PMID: 35181493 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Patient similarity learning has attracted great research interest in biomedical informatics. Correctly identifying the similarity between a given patient and patient records in the database could contribute to clinical references for diagnosis and medication. The sparsity of underlying relationships between patients poses difficulties for similarity learning, which becomes more challenging when considering real-world Electronic Health Records (EHRs) with a large number of missing values. In the paper, we organize EHRs as a graph and propose a novel deep learning framework, Structure-aware Siamese Graph neural Networks (SSGNet), to perform robust encounter-level patient similarity learning while capturing the intrinsic graph structure and mitigating the influence from missing values. The proposed SSGNet regards each patient encounter as a node, and learns the node embeddings and the similarity between nodes simultaneously via Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with siamese architecture. Further, SSGNet employs a low-rank and contrastive objective to optimize the structure of the patient graph and enhance model capacity. The extensive experiments were conducted on two publicly available datasets and a real-world dataset regarding IgA nephropathy from Peking University First Hospital, in comparison with multiple baseline and state-of-the-art methods. The significant improvement in Accuracy, Precision, Recall and F1 score on the patient encounter pairwise similarity classification task demonstrates the superiority of SSGNet. The mean average precision (mAP) of SSGNet on the similar encounter retrieval task is also better than other competitors. Furthermore, SSGNet's stable similarity classification accuracies at different missing rates of data validate the effectiveness and robustness of our proposal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Gu
- Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xuebing Yang
- Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Tian
- Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hongyu Yang
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jicheng Lv
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Yang
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jinwei Wang
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jianing Xi
- School of Artificial Intelligence, Optics and Electronics (iOPEN), Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Guilan Kong
- National Institute of Health Data Science, Peking University, Beijing, China; Advanced Institute of Information Technology, Peking University, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Wensheng Zhang
- Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
A PRO-cision medicine intervention to personalize cancer care using patient-reported outcomes: intervention development and feasibility-testing. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:2341-2355. [PMID: 35133567 PMCID: PMC9253074 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03093-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE PRO-cision medicine refers to personalizing care using patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We developed and feasibility-tested a PRO-cision Medicine remote PRO monitoring intervention designed to identify symptoms and reduce the frequency of routine in-person visits. METHODS We conducted focus groups and one-on-one interviews with metastatic breast (n = 15) and prostate (n = 15) cancer patients and clinicians (n = 10) to elicit their perspectives on a PRO-cision Medicine intervention's design, value, and concerns. We then feasibility-tested the intervention in 24 patients with metastatic breast cancer over 6-months. We obtained feedback via end-of-study surveys (patients) and interviews (clinicians). RESULTS Focus group and interview participants reported that remote PRO symptom reporting could alert clinicians to issues and avoid unneeded/unwanted visits. However, some patients did not perceive avoiding visits as beneficial. Clinicians were concerned about workflow. In the feasibility-test, 24/236 screened patients (10%) enrolled. Many patients were already being seen less frequently than monthly (n = 97) or clinicians did not feel comfortable seeing them less frequently than monthly (n = 31). Over the 6-month study, there were 75 total alerts from 392 PRO symptom assessments (average 0.19 alert/assessment). Patients had an average of 4 in-person visits (vs. expected 6.5 without the intervention). Patients (n = 19/24) reported high support on the end-of-study survey, with more than 80% agreeing with positive statements about the intervention. Clinician end-of-study interviews (n = 11/14) suggested that PRO symptom monitoring be added to clinic visits, rather than replacing them, and noted the increasing role of telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS Future research should explore combining remote PRO symptom monitoring with telemedicine and in-person visits.
Collapse
|
31
|
Tolstrup LK, Pappot H, Bastholt L, Möller S, Dieperink KB. Impact of patient-reported outcomes on symptom monitoring during treatment with checkpoint inhibitors: health-related quality of life among melanoma patients in a randomized controlled trial. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:8. [PMID: 35061112 PMCID: PMC8782960 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00414-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In a randomized controlled trial, we previously investigated if melanoma patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors had fewer severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) when they reported symptoms using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) with triggered alerts as an add-on to standard care, compared to standard care alone. The aim of this study is to examine between-group differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and associations between irAEs severity and HRQoL. Methods The study population of 138 patients completed the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L Index and FACT-M questionnaires at baseline and weeks 24 and 48. We analyzed HRQoL from all patients who completed at least one questionnaire. Missing FACT-M items were imputed following existing guidelines. Results There was no difference in HRQoL at baseline as measured EQ-5D-5L between the intervention and the control group. Between baseline and 48 weeks, mean EQ-5D-5L scores were unchanged among patients in the intervention group (p = 0.81) but decreased significantly among patients in the control group (p = 0.03). Consequently, patients in the intervention group had higher mean scores than those in the control group (p = 0.05) at 48 weeks. Mean FACT-M scores did not differ significantly between the two groups at any of the time points. There were observed no between-group differences in mean EQ-5D-5 and mean FACT-M scores between patients with severe irAEs and patients who had none. Conclusion Melanoma patients receiving CPIs who self-reported irAEs using ePRO with triggered alerts as a supplement to standard care maintained their HRQoL compared to patients who received standard care alone. Patients in the intervention group had a significantly better HRQoL measured by EQ-5D-5L than controls 48 weeks after baseline. The results suggest that including ePRO in standard care increases melanoma patients´ well-being. Further and larger studies are needed to confirm this finding and examine the impact of severe irAEs on cancer patients’ HRQoL. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03073031 Registered 8 March 2017, Retrospectively registeredhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00414-5.
Collapse
|
32
|
Cramon PK, Bjorner JB, Groenvold M, Boesen VB, Bonnema SJ, Hegedüs L, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Rasmussen ÅK, Watt T. Implementation of thyroid-related patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:1000682. [PMID: 36246917 PMCID: PMC9554589 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1000682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in clinical practice to improve clinical care. Multiple studies show that systematic use of PROs can enhance communication with patients and improve patient satisfaction, symptom management and quality of life. Further, such data can be aggregated to examine health levels for patient groups, improve quality of care, and compare patient outcomes at the institutional, regional or national level. However, there are barriers and challenges that should be handled appropriately to achieve successful implementation of PROs in routine clinical practice. This paper briefly overviews thyroid-related PROs, describes unsolved quality of life issues in benign thyroid diseases, provides examples of routine collection of PROs, and summarizes key points facilitating successful implementation of thyroid-related PROs in routine clinical practice. Finally, the paper touches upon future directions of PRO research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Karkov Cramon
- Department of Medical Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jakob Bue Bjorner
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- QualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, Johnston, RI, United States
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Palliative Care Research Unit, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Victor Brun Boesen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steen Joop Bonnema
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Laszlo Hegedüs
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen
- Department of Medical Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Åse Krogh Rasmussen
- Department of Medical Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Torquil Watt
- Department of Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- *Correspondence: Torquil Watt,
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Eriksen J, Bygholm A, Nielsen SH, Bertelsen P. The experiences of community-dwelling individuals with newly diagnosed type-2 diabetes in using patient-reported outcomes in a municipal setting. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221089792. [PMID: 35386954 PMCID: PMC8977707 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221089792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to examine the experiences of citizens with newly diagnosed type-2 diabetes when using a newly developed and implemented patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire as part of clinical practice in a municipal setting. Specifically, the citizens’ experiences in completing the PRO questionnaire and using the PRO data in consultations were examined. Methods The study was based on participant observations and semi-structured interviews and conducted at the Centre for Diabetes in Copenhagen and online. Participants were recruited deliberately to represent different cases of citizens with type-2 diabetes. Ten citizens were observed during consultation with an healthcare professional (HCP) and subsequently interviewed. The interviews were recorded as audio or video and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was performed on the basis of previously described guidelines. Results The PRO instigated reflections and enlightened citizens on disease-specific matters and motivated citizens to engage in self-management activities. During the citizen-HCP consultations, the PRO data prepared the actors before the meeting and enabled structured, effective and relevant conversations. However, the PRO questionnaire lacked response options, triggered citizen concerns about future health conditions and made them unsure if their answers were correct and aware that they lacked disease-specific knowledge. The experiences were linked to the citizens' situation as newly diagnosed with type-2 diabetes. Conclusion The informants found the PRO questionnaire and data meaningful and useful. However, adjustments are needed if the PRO instrument is to resemble the disease situation of citizens with newly diagnosed type-2 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe Eriksen
- Techno-anthropology, Department of Planning, Aalborg University (AAU), Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ann Bygholm
- Health Informatics, Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University (AAU), Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Pernille Bertelsen
- Techno-anthropology, Department of Planning, Aalborg University (AAU), Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Torenholt R, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T. 'Is this something I should be worried about?': A study of nurses' recontextualisation work when making clinical decisions based on patient reported outcome data. Soc Sci Med 2021; 294:114645. [PMID: 35051741 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
As clinical care practices are becoming more digitalised, information about patients is increasingly being encoded as quantified data, and the processes of sorting data are often supported by algorithmic computations. One such practice becoming more prevalent across Western countries is the clinical use of Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) data. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork carried out in a Danish setting among nurses managing PRO-based breast cancer follow-up, we examine how clinical decisions are made on the basis of PRO-data and what this requires from the nurses. By applying the concept of recontextualisation work as an analytical perspective, we shed light on the efforts of nurses when mobilising complementary information about patients in order to recontextualise the otherwise decontextualised data, thereby giving data practical value in clinical decision-making. Recontextualisation work, we show, is shaped by organisational structure, available resources, and nurses' professional capacity. Drawing analytical attention to the work of recontextualisation allows for a nuanced understanding of the efforts required to make data workable and hence what it takes to carry out clinical decisions in today's datafied healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikke Torenholt
- Department of Public Health, Section for Health Services Research, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014, København K, Denmark.
| | - Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen
- Department of Health and Social Context, National Institute of Public Health, Studiestræde 6, DK-1455, København K, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rodkjær L, Jeppesen M, Schougaard L. Management of Cystic Fibrosis during COVID-19: Patient Reported Outcomes based remote follow-up among CF patients in Denmark - A feasibility study. J Cyst Fibros 2021; 21:e106-e112. [PMID: 34785157 PMCID: PMC8590607 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2021.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are considered to be a COVID-19 risk group. In March 2020, a fast-track Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) solution was developed to ensure access to CF care without in-person hospital visits. This study investigated the feasibility of urgently replacing in-person appointments with remote monitoring using telephone consultations combined with PROs. We investigated patients and health care professionals' (HCPs) acceptance, recruitment rate, response rate, missing data, and attrition. Methods We included adult CF patients from the Department of Infectious Diseases at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark between April and June 2020. Patients filled in a disease-specific questionnaire including relevant clinical aspects, performed home spirometry, and sent in a sputum sample before a scheduled telephone consultation. Twelve participants who completed the questionnaire and had a telephone consultation were interviewed. Three physicians and three nurses from the CF clinical team participated in a focus group interview. Results Eighty patients were recruited for remote monitoring, and 41 patients filled in at least one questionnaire. Overall, both patients and HCPs found remote monitoring and use of PROs acceptable and useful. Patients experienced greater flexibility and found the questionnaire relevant and understandable but pointed out the need for items regarding mental health status and more adequate information about changes in follow-up and workflow. Conclusion Urgent reorganization of outpatient follow-up among CF patients due to COVID-19 was feasible in routine clinical practice. However, patient involvement should be a future point of attention to ensure a sustainable telehealth PRO solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte Rodkjær
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark; Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.
| | - Majbritt Jeppesen
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
| | - Liv Schougaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark; Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University, Central Denmark Region, Denmark; AmbuFlex, Center for Patient-reported Outcomes, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Brkic A, Kim JG, Haugeberg G, Diamantopoulos AP. Decentralizing healthcare in Norway to improve patient-centered outpatient clinic management of rheumatoid arthritis - a conceptual model. BMC Rheumatol 2021; 5:43. [PMID: 34743757 PMCID: PMC8572582 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-021-00215-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A growing population of older adults and improved effective treatments for inflammatory rheumatic diseases will increase the demand for more healthcare resources that already struggle with staggering outpatient clinic waiting times. Transformative delivery care models that provide sustainable healthcare services are urgently needed to meet these challenges. In this mini-review article, a proposed Lifelong Treatment Model for a decentralized follow-up of outpatient clinic patients living with rheumatoid arthritis is presented and discussed.Our conceptual model follows four steps for a transformative care delivery model supported by an Integrated Practice Unit; (1) Diagnosis, (2) Treatment, (3) Patient Empowered Disease Management, and (4) Telehealth. Through an Integrated Practice Unit, a multidisciplinary team could collaborate with patients with rheumatoid arthritis to facilitate high-value care that addresses most important outcomes of the patients; (1) Early Remission, (2) Decentralization, (3) Improved Quality of Life, and (4) Lifelong Sustain Remission.The article also addresses the growing challenges for the healthcare delivery system today for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and proposes how to reduce outpatient clinic visits without compromising quality and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alen Brkic
- Department of Research, Sorlandet Hospital, Service Box 416, Kristiansand, Norway.
| | - Jung G Kim
- Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Department of Health Systems Science, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Glenn Haugeberg
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of medicine, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Andreas P Diamantopoulos
- Department of Rheumatology, Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum (Oslo), Norway.,Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Kongsvinger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Grove BE, Schougaard LMV, Ivarsen PR, Kyte D, Hjollund NH, de Thurah A. Patient-reported outcome measures for clinical decision-making in outpatient follow-up: validity and reliability of a renal disease questionnaire. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5:107. [PMID: 34655365 PMCID: PMC8520563 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00384-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly used by clinicians to support communication in telephone- or face-to-face consultations with patients. A renal disease questionnaire has been developed, but not sufficiently evaluated through clinimetrics in clinical setting. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the content validity, construct validity and the test-retest reliability of a renal disease questionnaire to be used for clinical decision-making. METHODS A content, construct validity and test-retest reliability study was conducted in 3 nephrology outpatient clinics in Central Denmark Region, Denmark. Content validity (face validity, comprehensibility and relevance) was assessed among 8 patients and 6 clinicians. Reliability was assessed by asking outpatients with chronic kidney disease to complete the questionnaire twice. Reliability was assessed by kappa statistics and agreement by percentage. Construct validity was determined using 4 a priori defined hypotheses and comparing 2 known groups. RESULTS Five new domains emerged, 6 items were rephrased and 3 items were removed following the content validity test. A total of 160 patients completed the questionnaire with median 8 days (IQR 2 days) between assessments. The test-retest reliability parameters of the single items in the questionnaire were substantial to almost perfect as all the observed weighted kappa values ranged from 0.61 to 0.91, 95% CI (0.34 to 0.95). In total, 61% of the single items showed almost perfect agreement. In total, 3 of the 4 hypotheses were accepted and 44% of the items showed satisfying known-group discriminative validity. CONCLUSION A renal disease questionnaire used for clinical decision-making in outpatient follow-up showed acceptable content validity and substantial to almost perfect reliability. Sufficient construct validity was not established. Incorporating the questionnaire into routine clinical practice may improve the evaluation of disease burden in patients with chronic kidney disease. We ask patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Central Region Denmark to complete a questionnaire before each outpatient visit. The answers they provide are used to support communication with their health care provider. A questionnaire requires testing to ensure it can accurately capture important information about patient's symptoms and quality of life. When questionnaires are used to support communication between patients and health care professionals, they need to have good measurement properties. This means they need to be: (1) trustworthy, (2) relevant to a patient's health condition, (3) consistent and produce stable results every time. We explored the measurement properties of a questionnaire designed to be used in the face-to face outpatient visits for patients with CKD. We found that the questionnaire captured consistent and stable results. Using this questionnaire may help health care professionals to assess the patients´ burden of symptoms with a more patient-centered approach. Potentially, the use of the questionnaire will increase the patients´ ability to cope with their symptoms and strengthen patients´ involvement in the clinical decisions concerning their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgith Engelst Grove
- AmbuFlex, Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Per Ramløv Ivarsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Derek Kyte
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
- Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Niels Henrik Hjollund
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nielsen AS, Appel CW, Larsen BF, Kayser L, Hanna L. Patient perspectives on digital patient reported outcomes in routine care of inflammatory bowel disease. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5:92. [PMID: 34533682 PMCID: PMC8448812 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00366-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Digital patient reported outcomes are used increasingly in daily care and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Their purpose includes increased focus on patient wellbeing, reduction in avoidable follow-up consultations and increased patient self-management. However, implementation issues occur and studies indicate patients may have concerns, particularly regarding having fewer face-to-face consultations. This study aims to explore patients’ perspectives of use and non-use of digital patient reported outcomes and to understand the mechanisms underpinning patient reluctance to engage with this health technology. Results Sixteen patients with inflammatory bowel disease at a regional hospital in Denmark were interviewed about their experiences of, and perspectives on, digital patient reported outcomes. A certain level of eHealth literacy was found to be a fundamental condition for use, while other factors were barriers or facilitators for use of digital PROs. Patients’ main concerns were about potential consequences for their care and relationship with the clinic. Most patients in stable remission were satisfied with the hospital being a “life-line” if their symptoms worsened, and perceived digital patient reported outcomes to be an efficient tool to establish that “life-line”. Patients with severe symptoms and a high degree of emotional distress related to their disease valued the potential for digital patient reported outcomes to increase their clinicians’ focus on mental health and extra-intestinal symptoms. Conclusion This study found that if patients had sufficient digital literacy, they perceived digital patient reported outcomes to be a useful replacement for face-to-face consultations. However, they were concerned about digital patient reported outcomes’ effect on the patient–clinician relationship and its ability to detect worsening of symptoms. These concerns may be mitigated by good patient–clinician relationships, and the option for patients to maintain direct telephone contact with their gastroenterology specialist. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00366-2. ‘Digital patient reported outcomes’ refer to systems by which health professionals collect health information from patients between consultations, mostly via self-completed online questionnaires. This approach aims to support treatment and disease management, and reduce avoidable face-to-face consultations between doctor and patient. However, patients may have concerns about using digital systems to communicate with their clinicians, particularly regarding having fewer face-to-face consultations. To find out more, we interviewed sixteen patients at an Inflammatory Bowel Disease outpatient clinic in Denmark, where digital Patient Reported Outcomes have been used since 2017. We found out that patients needed to have enough familiarity with technology to be able to use these online systems. Patients were worried about how this new way of communicating with the clinic affected their care and their relationship with their doctors and nurses. People with Inflammatory Bowel Disease can have long periods of time with very little disease activity, and in these stable periods, a lot of patients found that a digital Patient Reported Outcomes system was a good way to stay in touch with the clinic and keep reporting their symptoms online– as long as they still had the possibility of contacting the clinic by telephone if needed. During disease flare-ups, patients believed that digital patient reported outcomes’ could be used to give broader insight into their health situation, and trusted their clinicians to use their self-reported data to improve their care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalie Søgaard Nielsen
- Section of Health Service Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
| | - Charlotte W Appel
- Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Birgit Furstrand Larsen
- Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars Kayser
- Section of Health Service Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisa Hanna
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kataria S, Ravindran V. Harnessing of real world data and real world evidence using digital tools: utility and potential models in rheumatology practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:502-513. [PMID: 34528081 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The diversity of diseases in rheumatology and variability in disease prevalence necessitates greater data parity in disease presentation, treatment responses including adverse events to drugs and various co-morbidities. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for drug development and performance evaluation. However, when the drug is applied outside the controlled environment the outcomes may differ in patient population. In this context, the need to understand the macro and micro changes involved in disease evolution and progression becomes important and so is the need for harvesting and harnessing the Real-World Data (RWD) from various resources to use them in generating Real World Evidence (RWE). Digital tools with potential relevance to rheumatology can be potentially leveraged to obtain greater patient insights, greater information on disease progression and disease micro processes and even in the early diagnosis of diseases. Since the patients spend only a minuscule proportion of their time in hospital or in a clinic, using the modern digital tools to generate realistic, bias proof RWD in non-invasive patient friendly manner becomes critical. In this review we have appraised different digital mediums and mechanisms for collecting RWD and proposed digital care models for generating RWE in rheumatology.
Collapse
|
40
|
Anderson NE, McMullan C, Calvert M, Dutton M, Cockwell P, Aiyegbusi OL, Kyte D. Using patient-reported outcome measures during the management of patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring treatment with haemodialysis (PROM-HD): a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e052629. [PMID: 34446501 PMCID: PMC8395280 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients undergoing haemodialysis report elevated symptoms and reduced health-related quality of life, and often prioritise improvements in psychosocial well-being over long-term survival. Systematic collection and use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may help support tailored healthcare and improve outcomes. This study investigates the methodological basis for routine PRO assessment, particularly using electronic formats (ePROs), to maximise the potential of PRO use, through exploration of the experiences, views and perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) on implementation and use of PROs in haemodialysis settings. STUDY DESIGN Qualitative study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Semistructured interviews with 22 patients undergoing haemodialysis, and 17 HCPs in the UK. ANALYTICAL APPROACH Transcripts were analysed deductively using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and inductively using thematic analysis. RESULTS For effective implementation, the potential value of PROs needs to be demonstrated empirically to stakeholders. Any intervention must remain flexible enough for individual and aggregate use, measuring outcomes that matter to patients and clinicians, while maintaining operational simplicity. Any implementation must sit within a wider framework of education and support for both patients and clinicians who demonstrate varying previous experience of using PROs and often confuse related concepts. Implementation plans must recognise the multidimensionality of end-stage kidney disease and treatment by haemodialysis, while acknowledging the associated challenges of delivering care in a highly specialised environment. To support implementation, careful consideration needs to be given to barriers and facilitators including effective leadership, the role of champions, effective launch and ongoing evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Using the CFIR to explore the experiences, views and perceptions of key stakeholders, this study identified key factors at organisational and individual levels which could assist effective implementation of ePROs in haemodialysis settings. Further research will be required to evaluate subsequent ePRO interventions to demonstrate the impact and benefit to the dialysis community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Elzabeth Anderson
- Research and Development, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christel McMullan
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR SMRC, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR SMRC, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mary Dutton
- Research and Development, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paul Cockwell
- Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Olalekan L Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Derek Kyte
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Herrmann S, Power B, Rashidi A, Cypher M, Mastaglia F, Grace A, McKinnon E, Sarrot P, Michau C, Skinner M, Desai R, Duracinsky M. Supporting Patient-Clinician Interaction in Chronic HIV Care: Design and Development of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Software Application. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e27861. [PMID: 34328442 PMCID: PMC8367117 DOI: 10.2196/27861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The consideration of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a hallmark of best practice in HIV care. Information technology offers an opportunity to more closely engage patients with chronic HIV infection in their long-term management and support a focus on HRQL. However, the implementation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, such as HRQL in routine care, is challenged by the need to synthesize data generated by questionnaires, the complexity of collecting data between patient visits, and the integration of results into clinical decision-making processes. OBJECTIVE Our aim is to design and pilot-test a multimedia software platform to overcome these challenges and provide a vehicle to increase focus on HRQL issues in HIV management. METHODS A multidisciplinary team in France and Australia conducted the study with 120 patients and 16 doctors contributing to the design and development of the software. We used agile development principles, user-centered design, and qualitative research methods to develop and pilot the software platform. We developed a prototype application to determine the acceptability of the software and piloted the final version with 41 Australian and 19 French residents using 2 validated electronic questionnaires, the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 Items, and the Patient Reported Outcomes Quality of Life-HIV. RESULTS Testing of the prototype demonstrated that patients wanted an application that was intuitive and without excessive instruction, so it felt effortless to use, as well as secure and discreet. Clinicians wanted the PRO data synthesized, presented clearly and succinctly, and clinically actionable. Safety concerns for patients and clinicians included confidentiality, and the potential for breakdown in communication if insufficient user training was not provided. The final product, piloted with patients from both countries, showed that most respondents found the application easy to use and comprehend. The usability testing survey administered found that older Australians had reduced scores for understanding the visual interface (P=.004) and finding the buttons organized (P=.02). Three-fourths of the respondents were concerned with confidentiality (P=.007), and this result was more prevalent in participants with higher anxiety and stress scores (P=.01), as measured by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 Items. These statistical associations were not observed in 15 French patients who completed the same questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS Digital applications in health care should be safe and fit for purpose. Our software was acceptable to patients and shows potential to overcome some barriers to the implementation of PROs in routine care. The design of the clinicians' interface presents a solution to the problem of voluminous data, both synthesizing and providing a snapshot of longitudinal data. The next stage is to conduct a randomized controlled trial to determine whether patients experience increased satisfaction with care and whether doctors perceive that they deliver better clinical care without compromising efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Herrmann
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
| | - Brad Power
- College of Arts, Business, Law & Social Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | - Amineh Rashidi
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | - Mark Cypher
- College of Arts, Business, Law & Social Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | - Frank Mastaglia
- College of Arts, Business, Law & Social Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | - Amy Grace
- School of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
| | | | - Pierre Sarrot
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Economics Clinical Trial Unit, Hospital Hotel-Dieu, AP-HP, University de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Renae Desai
- Perron Institute for Neurological & Translational Science, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Martin Duracinsky
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Economics Clinical Trial Unit, Hospital Hotel-Dieu, AP-HP, University de Paris, Paris, France.,Department of Internal Medicine & Immunology, Hospital Bicetre, AP-HP, Kremlin-Bicetre, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Aiyegbusi OL, Nair D, Peipert JD, Schick-Makaroff K, Mucsi I. A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2021; 12:20406223211015958. [PMID: 34104376 PMCID: PMC8150668 DOI: 10.1177/20406223211015958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
An application of telemedicine of growing interest and relevance is the use of personal computers and mobile devices to collect patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PROs are self-reports of patients' health status without interpretation by anyone else. The tools developed to assess PROs are known as patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). The technological innovations that have led to an increased ownership of electronic devices have also facilitated the development of electronic PROMs (ePROMs). ePROMs are a conduit for telemedicine in the care of patients with chronic diseases. Various studies have demonstrated that the use of ePROMs in routine clinical practice is both acceptable and feasible with patients increasingly expressing a preference for an electronic mode of administration. There is increasing evidence that the use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePROMs) could have significant impacts on outcomes valued by patients, healthcare providers and researchers. Whilst the development and implementation of these systems may be initially costly and resource-intensive, patient preferences and existing evidence to support their implementation suggests the need for continued research prioritisation in this area. This narrative review summarises and discusses evidence of the impact of ePROMs on clinical parameters and outcomes relevant to chronic diseases. We also explore recently published literature regarding issues that may influence the robust implementation of ePROMs for routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Centre, West Midlands, UK
| | - Devika Nair
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA Vanderbilt O’Brien Center for Kidney Disease, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - John Devin Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Istvan Mucsi
- Multiorgan Transplant Program, University Health Network and Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Taarnhøj GA, Lindberg H, Johansen C, Pappot H. Patient-Reported Outcomes, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Clinical Outcomes for Urothelial Cancer Patients Receiving Chemo- or Immunotherapy: A Real-Life Experience. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10091852. [PMID: 33923176 PMCID: PMC8123186 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) often have comorbidities, which cause trouble for the completion of oncological treatment, and little is known about their quality of life (QoL). The aim of the present study was to obtain and describe patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and QoL data from UCC patients in the treatment for locally advanced muscle-invasive or metastatic UCC. A total of 79 patients with UCC completed four questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BLM30, HADS, and select PRO-CTCAE™ questions) once weekly during their treatment. From those, 26 patients (33%) underwent neoadjuvant treatment for local disease while 53 patients (67%) were treated for metastatic disease. Of all patients, 54% did not complete the planned treatment due to progression, nephrotoxicity, death, or intolerable symptoms during treatment. The five most prevalent PRO-CTCAE grade ≥ 2 symptoms were frequent urination (37%), fatigue (35%), pain (31%), dry mouth (23%), and swelling of the arms or legs (23%). The baseline mean overall QoL was 61 (±SD 24) for all patients (neoadjuvant (73, ±SD 19) and metastatic (54, ±SD 24)) and remained stable over the course of treatment for both groups. A stable overall QoL was observed for the patients in this study. More than half of the patients did not, however, complete the planned treatment. Further supportive care is warranted for bladder cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gry Assam Taarnhøj
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (C.J.); (H.P.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +45-3545-0737
| | - Henriette Lindberg
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark;
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (C.J.); (H.P.)
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (C.J.); (H.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kargo AS, Jensen PT, Lindemann K, Hjollund NHI, Lund B, Haee M, Möller S, Hansen DG, Dahl Steffensen K. The PROMova study comparing active and passive use of patient-reported outcome measures in ovarian cancer follow-up: effect on patient-perceived involvement, satisfaction with care, and usefulness. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:434-443. [PMID: 33651647 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1891281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with ovarian cancer often experience substantial health problems and side effects resulting in reduced quality of life (QoL). Different models of using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) during follow-up may improve the quality of care. This national, multicenter observational study investigated the effect of active use of PROMs on patient-perceived involvement, satisfaction with care, unmet needs, and QoL during follow-up of ovarian cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ovarian cancer patients were recruited at the end of primary treatment at eight centers in Denmark. During 18 months of follow-up patients repeatedly completed European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires covering health related QoL and symptoms. At the sites using PROMs actively (ACT), the clinician had access to an overview of the patient's scores during the clinical encounter. Clinicians using PROMs passively were alerted in case of severe development of symptoms. Following each encounter, patients evaluated their health service experience by completing the CollaboRATE scale of involvement in decision making, the Patient Experience Questionnaire, and ad hoc questions covering patient-perceived usefulness of the PROMs. RESULTS A total of 223 patients were enrolled, i.e., 168 (75.3%) at five sites using ACT and 53 (23.8%) at three sites using them passively. We found no statistically significant difference in involvement in the decision making, satisfaction with care, unmet needs, and QoL between the two groups. The majority of patients found it useful to complete the PROMs, although it did not seem to significantly support them in raising issues with the oncologist. CONCLUSION Active use of PROMs did not improve patients' experience of involvement in follow-up care as compared to passive use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anette Stolberg Kargo
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Pernille Tine Jensen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kristina Lindemann
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Niels Henrik Ingvar Hjollund
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bente Lund
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Mette Haee
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Sören Möller
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN – Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Dorte Gilså Hansen
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Karina Dahl Steffensen
- Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
van Biesen W, Van Der Straeten C, Sterckx S, Steen J, Diependaele L, Decruyenaere J. The concept of justifiable healthcare and how big data can help us to achieve it. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:87. [PMID: 33676513 PMCID: PMC7937275 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01444-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last decades, the face of health care has changed dramatically, with big improvements in what is technically feasible. However, there are indicators that the current approach to evaluating evidence in health care is not holistic and hence in the long run, health care will not be sustainable. New conceptual and normative frameworks for the evaluation of health care need to be developed and investigated. The current paper presents a novel framework of justifiable health care and explores how the use of artificial intelligence and big data can contribute to achieving the goals of this framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim van Biesen
- Renal Division, 0K12 IA, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Gent, Belgium. .,Consortium for Justifiable Healthcare, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | - Sigrid Sterckx
- Consortium for Justifiable Healthcare, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Johan Steen
- Renal Division, 0K12 IA, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Gent, Belgium.,Consortium for Justifiable Healthcare, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lisa Diependaele
- Consortium for Justifiable Healthcare, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Johan Decruyenaere
- Consortium for Justifiable Healthcare, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Intensive Care, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
ePRO-based individual follow-up care for women treated for early breast cancer: impact on service use and workflows. J Cancer Surviv 2021; 15:485-496. [PMID: 33415653 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00942-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The increasing population of breast cancer survivors highlights the need to (re)consider how we utilize available services for survivorship care in oncology clinics. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes (ePROs) can be used to identify patients' individual care needs and triage them to the right services. We examined the impact on service use, workflow and workload following the introduction of an ePRO-based individual follow-up (PIFU) for women treated for early breast cancer. METHODS A multi-method approach was used. In a pilot randomized controlled trial, the use of consultations, telephone calls, and specialist referrals were systematically recorded. Comparison was done between PIFU and standard follow-up care (SFU). Focus group interviews with nurse navigators evaluated the impact on workflow and workload qualitatively. RESULTS The 64 women randomized to attend SFU used a mean of 3.8 (95% CI: 3.5-4.1) planned consultations during the 2-year study period compared with a mean of 1.9 consultations (95% CI: 1.4-2.4) for the 60 women randomized to PIFU (P < 0.001). Urgent appointments were more frequent in SFU (mean of 0.47 vs 0.22 per patient, P = 0.03). No statistically significant differences were observed in the use of telephone calls and specialist referrals. The nurse navigators did not experience an increase in their workload, but implementation of PIFU may require a re-structured workflow. CONCLUSIONS The ePRO-based individual follow-up could change organization of care and re-allocate services for those in need of it. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS ePRO-based individual follow-up could potentially ensure more time for those most in need of face-to-face care.
Collapse
|
47
|
Gandrup J, Ali SM, McBeth J, van der Veer SN, Dixon WG. Remote symptom monitoring integrated into electronic health records: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27:1752-1763. [PMID: 32968785 PMCID: PMC7671621 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE People with long-term conditions require serial clinical assessments. Digital patient-reported symptoms collected between visits can inform these, especially if integrated into electronic health records (EHRs) and clinical workflows. This systematic review identified and summarized EHR-integrated systems to remotely collect patient-reported symptoms and examined their anticipated and realized benefits in long-term conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched Medline, Web of Science, and Embase. Inclusion criteria were symptom reporting systems in adults with long-term conditions; data integrated into the EHR; data collection outside of clinic; data used in clinical care. We synthesized data thematically. Benefits were assessed against a list of outcome indicators. We critically appraised studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS We included 12 studies representing 10 systems. Seven were in oncology. Systems were technically and functionally heterogeneous, with the majority being fully integrated (data viewable in the EHR). Half of the systems enabled regular symptom tracking between visits. We identified 3 symptom report-guided clinical workflows: Consultation-only (data used during consultation, n = 5), alert-based (real-time alerts for providers, n = 4) and patient-initiated visits (n = 1). Few author-described anticipated benefits, primarily to improve communication and resultant health outcomes, were realized based on the study results, and were only supported by evidence from early-stage qualitative studies. Studies were primarily feasibility and pilot studies of acceptable quality. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS EHR-integrated remote symptom monitoring is possible, but there are few published efforts to inform development of these systems. Currently there is limited evidence that this improves care and outcomes, warranting future robust, quantitative studies of efficacy and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Gandrup
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Syed Mustafa Ali
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - John McBeth
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sabine N van der Veer
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - William G Dixon
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Rheumatology Department, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tolstrup LK, Bastholt L, Dieperink KB, Möller S, Zwisler AD, Pappot H. The use of patient-reported outcomes to detect adverse events in metastatic melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020; 4:88. [PMID: 33125537 PMCID: PMC7599285 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00255-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A randomized controlled pilot trial was conducted to assess if melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy had the number of grade 3 or 4 adverse events during treatment reduced by 50% using a tailored electronic patient-reported outcomes tool in addition to standard toxicity monitoring compared to standard monitoring alone. Secondary endpoints were: if more AEs were reported in the intervention group, if there was a difference between the two groups in the number of telephone consultations, extra out-patient visits, number of days in the hospital, days in steroid treatment and the time patients experienced grade 2 or higher toxicity. Patients and methods Melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy at the Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark participated. Standard care included assessment of AEs by a clinician before each treatment cycle using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. In addition, patients randomized to the intervention reported their AEs weekly by an electronic PRO-tool based on the PRO-CTCAE platform. Results One hundred forty-six melanoma patients were randomized. In this study, we did not detect a difference between the two groups in the number of grade 3 or 4 AEs (P = 0.983), in the overall number of AEs (P = 0.560) or in the time the patients in the two groups experienced grade 2 or higher toxicity (0.516). The number of phone contacts was significantly higher in the intervention group (P = 0.009) and there was a tendency towards patients in the intervention group having more extra visits (P = 0.156). Conclusion It has been examined if the number of severe AEs for melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy could be reduced by involving the patients in the reporting of symptoms. The results do not justify the expansion of the pilot study into a regular phase III study with this particular set-up. However, a significant difference in the number of phone contacts was found as patients in the intervention group called more frequently, indicating that their attention to AEs was increased. Even though the use of an electronic PRO tool could not reduce the number of severe AEs in this melanoma population, a positive impact on other endpoints such as QoL, communication, or treatment-planning, cannot be excluded. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03073031 Registered 8 March 2017, Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lærke K Tolstrup
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Karin B Dieperink
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sören Möller
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,OPEN - Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ann-Dorthe Zwisler
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care (REHPA), Nyborg, Denmark
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Friis RB, Hjøllund NH, Pappot H, Taarnhøj GA, Vestergaard JM, Skuladottir H. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Routine Care Predict for Survival at Disease Progression in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 22:e169-e179. [PMID: 33160899 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have been increasingly implemented in routine care to aid in clinical decision-making. However, the prognostic value of PRO measures as a tool for decision making is not easily interpreted by clinicians. Our aims were to explore the prognostic value of PRO measures at disease progression and the changes in PRO measures between treatment start (baseline) and disease progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS Since 2014, patients with lung cancer have completed an electronic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and LC-13 before every outpatient visit at the Department of Oncology, Hospital Unit West, Jutland, Denmark. The patients' responses were used in routine care. Patients receiving palliative antineoplastic treatment were eligible for analysis if the questionnaire had been completed at the initiation of first-line treatment and at disease progression. The prognostic value of the scores was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazard model. A P value < .01 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 94 screened patients were included. At disease progression, survival could be predicted from the absolute score of the global health scale, 3 functional scales (physical, role, emotional), and 7 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, dyspnea, hemoptysis, lung cancer dyspnea, chest pain). In addition, changes in hemoptysis, dysphagia, dyspnea, and chest pain predicted for survival at progression. CONCLUSION PRO measures used in routine care can provide clinicians with relevant prognostic information about patients with lung cancer at disease progression. These results show the potential value of PRO measures when used in clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Niels Henrik Hjøllund
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Herning, Denmark; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gry Assam Taarnhøj
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jesper Medom Vestergaard
- Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, University Research Clinic, Herning, Denmark
| | - Halla Skuladottir
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Unit West Jutland, Herning, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Taarnhøj GA, Lindberg H, Dohn LH, Omland LH, Hjøllund NH, Johansen C, Pappot H. Electronic reporting of patient-reported outcomes in a fragile and comorbid population during cancer therapy - a feasibility study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:225. [PMID: 32653005 PMCID: PMC7353726 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01480-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Electronic collection of patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) is becoming widespread in health care, but the implementation into routine cancer care during therapy remains to be seen. Especially, little is known of the use and success of electronic reporting during active cancer treatment in fragile and comorbid patients. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of ePRO and its incorporation into routine cancer care, measured by physician compliance, for a fragile and comorbid bladder cancer (BC) population receiving chemo- or immunotherapy. Methods All BC patients initiating treatment for locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer at Rigshospitalet or Herlev Hospital, Denmark, were approached during an 8 month period. Exclusion criteria were patients not speaking Danish or not being signed up for electronic communication with health authorities. Enrolled patients were prompted to complete weekly ePROs from home. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer’s general quality of life questionnaire, QLQ-C30, and the module for muscle-invasive bladder cancer QLQ-BLM30, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS, and selected items from the Patient Reported-Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), in total 158 questions weekly. If failing to report when prompted, patients were sent two e-mail reminders. Patients were informed that the physician would have an overview of the reported ePROs at their following clinical visits. Physicians were at all clinical visits informed to look at the ePROs in a software solution separate from the medical records. Physicians were logged to check their compliance to the task. No continuous surveillance of ePROs was established. Results Of 91 patients screened for enrolment, 19 patients (21%) were not found eligible for standard treatment, eight patients (9%) were not signed up for electronic communication with the health authorities and nine patients (10%) declined participation. Another six patients did not meet other inclusion criteria. In total 49 BC patients were enrolled, 29 initiating chemotherapy and 20 initiating immunotherapy. A total of 466 electronic questionnaires were completed. The overall adherence of the patients to complete ePROs was at an expected level for an elderly cancer population (75%) and remained above 70% until the 6th cycle of treatment. The physician’ compliance was in contrast low (0–52%) throughout the course of treatment. Conclusions Electronic reporting of PROs is feasible in a fragile and comorbid population of patients during routine active cancer treatment. Despite clear implementation strategies the physician compliance remained low throughout the study proving the need for further implementation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gry Assam Taarnhøj
- Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - Henriette Lindberg
- Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Line Hammer Dohn
- Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Lise Høj Omland
- Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Niels Henrik Hjøllund
- AmbuFlex/WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Herning, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|